Quarterly Report (10-q)

Table of Contents

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

x            QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014

or

 

o               TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from              to             

 

Commission file number: 001-36308

 

TALMER BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Michigan

 

61-1511150

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

 

 

2301 West Big Beaver Rd, Suite 525

Troy, Michigan

 

48084

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

(248) 498-2802

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x    No  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes x    No  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer  o

 

Accelerated filer  o

Non-accelerated filer  x
 (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

Smaller reporting company  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o    No  x

 

The number of shares outstanding of the issuer’s Class A common stock, as of August 13, 2014 was 70,451,057.

 

 

 



Table of Contents

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

Page

 

 

 

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

1

 

 

 

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

2

 

 

 

ITEM 1.

Financial Statements

2

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013

2

 

Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013

3

 

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013

4

 

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013

5

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013

6

 

Notes to Consolidated Statements

7

 

 

 

ITEM 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

71

ITEM 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

113

ITEM 4.

Controls and Procedures

116

 

 

 

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

117

 

 

 

ITEM 1.

Legal Proceedings

117

ITEM 1A.

Risk Factors

117

ITEM 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

117

ITEM 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

117

ITEM 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

117

ITEM 5.

Other Information

117

ITEM 6.

Exhibits

117

 



Table of Contents

 

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

Statements included in this report that are not historical in nature are intended to be, and are hereby identified as, forward-looking statements for purposes of the safe harbor provided by Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  The words “may,” “will,” “anticipate,” “should,” “would,” “believe,” “contemplate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “continue,” “may” and “intend,” as well as other similar words and expressions of the future, are intended to identify forward-looking statements.  These forward-looking statements include statements related to our projected growth, proposed branch sales, branch consolidations, including the anticipated costs associated with such consolidations, anticipated future financial performance, and management’s long-term performance goals, as well as statements relating to the anticipated effects on results of operations and financial condition from expected developments or events, or business and growth strategies, including anticipated internal growth and plans to establish or acquire banks (including the pending acquisition of First of Huron Corporation) or the assets of failed banks.

 

These forward-looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in such statements.  Potential risks and uncertainties include the following:

 

·                   the reaction to the anticipated acquisition of the banks’ customers, employees and counterparties or difficulties related to the transition of services;

·                   the inability to obtain the requisite regulatory approvals for our anticipated acquisition and meet other closing terms and conditions;

·                   general economic conditions (both generally and in our markets) may be less favorable than expected, which could result in, among other things, a continued deterioration in credit quality, a further reduction in demand for credit and a further decline in real estate values;

·                   the general decline in the real estate and lending markets, particularly in our market areas, may continue to negatively affect our financial results;

·                   our ability to raise additional capital may be impaired if current levels of market disruption and volatility continue or worsen;

·                   we may be unable to collect reimbursements on losses that we incur on our assets covered under loss share agreements with the FDIC as we anticipate;

·                   costs or difficulties related to the integration of the banks we acquired or may acquire, including Talmer West Bank, may be greater than expected;

·                   restrictions or conditions imposed by our regulators on our operations or the operations of banks we acquire, including the terms of the Talmer West Bank Consent Order with the FDIC and the Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services, may make it more difficult for us to achieve our goals;

·                   legislative or regulatory changes, including changes in accounting standards and compliance requirements, may adversely affect us;

·                   competitive pressures among depository and other financial institutions may increase significantly;

·                   changes in the interest rate environment may reduce margins or the volumes or values of the loans we make or have acquired;

·                   other financial institutions have greater financial resources and may be able to develop or acquire products that enable them to compete more successfully than we can;

·                   our ability to attract and retain key personnel can be affected by the increased competition for experienced employees in the banking industry;

·                   adverse changes may occur in the bond and equity markets;

·                   war or terrorist activities may cause further deterioration in the economy or cause instability in credit markets; and

·                   economic, governmental or other factors may prevent the projected population, residential and commercial growth in the markets in which we operate.

 

You should not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report.  All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section.  We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.  See Item 1A, Risk Factors, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, for a description of some of the important factors that may affect actual outcomes.

 

1



Table of Contents

 

PART I

 

Item 1.  Financial Statements.

 

Talmer Bancorp, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and due from banks

 

$

107,292

 

$

97,167

 

Interest-bearing deposits with other banks

 

218,309

 

206,160

 

Federal funds sold and other short-term investments

 

77,000

 

72,029

 

Total cash and cash equivalents

 

402,601

 

375,356

 

Securities available-for-sale

 

731,700

 

620,083

 

Federal Home Loan Bank stock

 

16,541

 

16,303

 

Loans held for sale, (includes $113.8 million and $85.3 million respectively, measured at fair value)

 

136,089

 

85,252

 

Loans:

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate (includes $18.5 million and $16.3 million respectively, measured at fair value) (1)

 

1,362,869

 

1,085,453

 

Commercial real estate

 

1,131,348

 

755,839

 

Commercial and industrial

 

647,090

 

446,644

 

Real estate construction (includes $1.4 million measured at fair value at December 31, 2013) (1)

 

112,866

 

176,226

 

Consumer

 

42,034

 

9,754

 

Total loans, excluding covered loans

 

3,296,207

 

2,473,916

 

Less: Allowance for loan losses - uncovered

 

(24,360

)

(17,746

)

Net loans - excluding covered loans

 

3,271,847

 

2,456,170

 

Covered loans

 

459,280

 

530,068

 

Less: Allowance for loan losses - covered

 

(32,743

)

(40,381

)

Net loans - covered

 

426,537

 

489,687

 

Net total loans

 

3,698,384

 

2,945,857

 

Premises and equipment

 

56,642

 

51,001

 

FDIC indemnification asset

 

102,694

 

131,861

 

Other real estate owned

 

52,273

 

29,955

 

Loan servicing rights

 

74,104

 

78,603

 

Core deposit intangible

 

15,378

 

13,205

 

FDIC receivable

 

7,198

 

7,783

 

Company-owned life insurance

 

95,580

 

39,500

 

Income tax benefit

 

187,847

 

126,200

 

Other assets

 

30,642

 

26,402

 

Total assets

 

$

5,607,673

 

$

4,547,361

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits:

 

 

 

 

 

Noninterest-bearing demand deposits

 

$

958,278

 

$

779,379

 

Interest-bearing demand deposits

 

697,031

 

598,281

 

Money market and savings deposits

 

1,330,036

 

1,215,864

 

Time deposits

 

1,187,661

 

927,313

 

Other brokered funds

 

123,528

 

80,000

 

Total deposits

 

4,296,534

 

3,600,837

 

FDIC clawback liability

 

26,309

 

24,887

 

FDIC warrants payable

 

4,493

 

4,118

 

Short-term borrowings

 

238,826

 

71,876

 

Long-term debt

 

266,407

 

199,037

 

Other liabilities

 

48,979

 

29,591

 

Total liabilities

 

4,881,548

 

3,930,346

 

Shareholders’ equity

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock - $1.00 par value

 

 

 

 

 

Authorized - 20,000,000 shares at 6/30/2014 and 12/31/2013

 

 

 

 

 

Issued and outstanding - 0 shares at 6/30/2014 and 12/31/2013

 

 

 

Common stock:

 

 

 

 

 

Class A Voting Common Stock - $1.00 par value

 

 

 

 

 

Authorized - 198,000,000 shares at 6/30/2014 and 12/31/2013

 

 

 

 

 

Issued and outstanding - 70,451,057 shares at 6/30/2014 and 66,234,397 shares at 12/31/2013

 

70,451

 

66,234

 

Class B Non-Voting Common Stock - $1.00 par value

 

 

 

 

 

Authorized - 2,000,000 shares at 6/30/2014 and 12/31/2013

 

 

 

 

 

Issued and outstanding - 0 shares at 6/30/2014 and 12/31/2013

 

 

 

Additional paid-in-capital

 

404,079

 

366,428

 

Retained earnings

 

249,362

 

192,349

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

 

2,233

 

(7,996

)

Total shareholders’ equity

 

726,125

 

617,015

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

 

$

5,607,673

 

$

4,547,361

 

 


(1)  Amounts represent loans for which the Company has elected the fair value option.  See Note 3.

 

See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

2



Table of Contents

 

Talmer Bancorp, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Income

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Three months ended June 30,

 

Six months ended June 30,

 

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest and fees on loans

 

$

56,925

 

$

51,290

 

$

110,338

 

$

100,028

 

Interest on investments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Taxable

 

2,198

 

1,102

 

4,076

 

2,466

 

Tax-exempt

 

1,139

 

1,006

 

3,091

 

2,000

 

Total interest on securities

 

3,337

 

2,108

 

7,167

 

4,466

 

Interest on interest earning cash balances

 

172

 

201

 

388

 

491

 

Interest on federal funds and other short term investments

 

278

 

247

 

455

 

447

 

Dividends on FHLB stock

 

160

 

138

 

345

 

545

 

FDIC indemnification asset

 

(5,506

)

(6,908

)

(12,224

)

(15,056

)

Total interest income

 

55,366

 

47,076

 

106,469

 

90,921

 

Interest Expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-bearing demand deposits

 

216

 

159

 

440

 

326

 

Money market and savings deposits

 

492

 

494

 

986

 

1,012

 

Time deposits

 

1,432

 

1,545

 

2,923

 

3,206

 

Other brokered funds

 

35

 

48

 

64

 

72

 

Interest on short-term borrowings

 

33

 

33

 

208

 

55

 

Interest on long-term debt

 

627

 

742

 

1,201

 

1,538

 

Total interest expense

 

2,835

 

3,021

 

5,822

 

6,209

 

Net interest income

 

52,531

 

44,055

 

100,647

 

84,712

 

Provision for loan losses - uncovered

 

3,219

 

4,923

 

9,643

 

6,099

 

Benefit for loan losses - covered

 

(7,321

)

(7,460

)

(9,819

)

(6,376

)

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

 

56,633

 

46,592

 

100,823

 

84,989

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noninterest income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deposit fee income

 

3,163

 

4,648

 

6,437

 

9,160

 

Mortgage banking and other loan fees

 

(1,025

)

10,770

 

239

 

15,955

 

Net gain on sales of loans

 

5,681

 

16,139

 

8,713

 

32,954

 

Bargain purchase gain

 

 

 

40,157

 

71,702

 

FDIC loss sharing income

 

(3,434

)

(2,343

)

(3,547

)

(2,213

)

Accelerated discount on acquired loans

 

4,326

 

3,920

 

10,792

 

6,213

 

Net gain (loss) on sales of securities

 

 

69

 

(2,310

)

100

 

Other income

 

5,185

 

2,858

 

9,590

 

5,790

 

Total noninterest income

 

13,896

 

36,061

 

70,071

 

139,661

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noninterest expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Salary and employee benefits

 

30,391

 

34,110

 

66,120

 

87,005

 

Occupancy and equipment expense

 

7,937

 

6,824

 

17,085

 

13,827

 

Data processing fees

 

2,260

 

1,913

 

4,000

 

3,560

 

Professional service fees

 

2,814

 

4,425

 

7,104

 

8,312

 

FDIC loss sharing expense

 

983

 

722

 

1,507

 

1,418

 

Bank acquisition and due diligence fees

 

268

 

474

 

1,979

 

7,703

 

Marketing expense

 

1,607

 

654

 

2,698

 

2,191

 

Other employee expense

 

804

 

958

 

1,500

 

1,705

 

Insurance expense

 

803

 

3,280

 

2,652

 

6,212

 

Other expense

 

6,302

 

6,544

 

15,138

 

12,563

 

Total noninterest expenses

 

54,169

 

59,904

 

119,783

 

144,496

 

Income before income taxes

 

16,360

 

22,749

 

51,111

 

80,154

 

Income tax provision (benefit)

 

(4,246

)

7,743

 

(5,902

)

4,693

 

Net income

 

$

20,606

 

$

15,006

 

$

57,013

 

$

75,461

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.29

 

$

0.23

 

$

0.82

 

$

1.14

 

Diluted

 

$

0.27

 

$

0.21

 

$

0.76

 

$

1.08

 

Average common shares outstanding - basic

 

70,021

 

66,229

 

69,071

 

66,229

 

Average common shares outstanding - diluted

 

75,659

 

69,852

 

74,531

 

69,764

 

 

See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

3



Table of Contents

 

Talmer Bancorp, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Three months ended June 30,

 

Six months ended June 30,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

20,606

 

$

15,006

 

$

57,013

 

$

75,461

 

Other comprehensive income (loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized holding gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale arising during the period

 

7,151

 

(13,719

)

13,427

 

(14,478

)

Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses on realized income (1)

 

 

(69

)

2,310

 

(100

)

Net unrealized gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale

 

7,151

 

(13,788

)

15,737

 

(14,578

)

Tax effect

 

(2,503

)

4,818

 

(5,508

)

5,102

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

 

4,648

 

(8,970

)

10,229

 

(9,476

)

Total comprehensive income, net of tax

 

$

25,254

 

$

6,036

 

$

67,242

 

$

65,985

 

 


(1) Amounts are included in “Net gain (loss) on on sales of securities” in the Consolidated Statements of Income within total noninterest income. For the three months ended June 30, 2014, there was no income tax expense (benefit) associated with the reclassification adjustments.  Income tax expense (benefit) associated with the reclassification adjustments for the three months ended June 30, 2013 was $24 thousand, and for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was ($809) thousand and $35 thousand, respectively, and are included in “Income tax provision (benefit)” in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

 

See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

4



Table of Contents

 

Talmer Bancorp, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

Accumulated Other

 

Total

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

Paid in

 

Retained

 

Comprehensive

 

Shareholders’

 

(In thousands)

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Capital

 

Earnings

 

Income (Loss)

 

Equity

 

Balance at December 31, 2012

 

66,229

 

$

66,229

 

$

356,836

 

$

93,760

 

$

3,918

 

$

520,743

 

Cumulative effect adjustment of change in accounting policy to beginning retained earnings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31

 

 

 

31

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

75,461

 

 

 

75,461

 

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(9,476

)

(9,476

)

Stock based compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

9,090

 

 

 

 

 

9,090

 

Balance at June 30, 2013

 

66,229

 

$

66,229

 

$

365,926

 

$

169,252

 

$

(5,558

)

$

595,849

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

 

66,234

 

$

66,234

 

$

366,428

 

$

192,349

 

$

(7,996

)

$

617,015

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

57,013

 

 

 

57,013

 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,229

 

10,229

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

454

 

 

 

 

 

454

 

Issuance of common shares

 

3,839

 

3,839

 

37,575

 

 

 

 

 

41,414

 

Restricted stock awards

 

378

 

378

 

(378

)

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at June 30, 2014

 

70,451

 

$

70,451

 

$

404,079

 

$

249,362

 

$

2,233

 

$

726,125

 

 

See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

5



Table of Contents

 

Talmer Bancorp, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

Cash flows from operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

57,013

 

$

75,461

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

3,386

 

4,348

 

Amortization of core deposit intangibles

 

1,460

 

1,356

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

454

 

9,090

 

Benefit for loan losses

 

(176

)

(277

)

Originations of loans held for sale

 

(510,154

)

(1,575,966

)

Proceeds from sales of loans

 

489,389

 

1,479,430

 

Net gain from sales of loans

 

(8,713

)

(32,954

)

Net (gain)/loss on sales of securities

 

2,310

 

(100

)

Gain on acquisition

 

(40,157

)

(71,702

)

Valuation writedowns on other real estate

 

2,404

 

3,559

 

Valuation change in Company-owned life insurance

 

(1,080

)

(665

)

Valuation change in loan servicing rights

 

9,014

 

(2,480

)

Net additions to loan servicing rights

 

(3,748

)

(15,083

)

Net decrease in FDIC indemnification asset and receivable

 

29,752

 

54,826

 

Net gain on sales of other real estate owned

 

(4,233

)

(2,544

)

Net increase in accrued interest receivable and other assets

 

(21,211

)

(9,274

)

Net increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities

 

17,168

 

39,058

 

Net securities premium amortization

 

2,286

 

3,930

 

Deferred income tax expense

 

20,665

 

6,588

 

Change in valuation allowance of deferred income tax asset

 

(10,127

)

 

Other, net

 

183

 

(57

)

Net cash from (used in) operating activities

 

35,886

 

(33,456

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

Net increase in uncovered loans

 

(288,289

)

(81,209

)

Net decrease in covered loans

 

68,023

 

107,113

 

Purchases of FHLB stock

 

(5,300

)

(490

)

Purchases of securities available-for-sale

 

(185,687

)

(406,000

)

Purchases of Company-owned life insurance

 

(55,000

)

 

Purchases of premises and equipment

 

(6,995

)

(2,059

)

Proceeds from:

 

 

 

 

 

Maturities and redemptions of securities available-for-sale

 

44,619

 

202,385

 

Sale of FHLB stock

 

10,995

 

 

Sale of securities available-for-sale

 

54,211

 

7,500

 

Sale of uncovered loans

 

5,526

 

 

Sale of other real estate owned

 

24,161

 

18,869

 

Sale of premises and equipment

 

1,621

 

46

 

Net cash provided from acquisition

 

209,831

 

394,805

 

Net cash from (used in) investing activities

 

(122,284

)

240,960

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

Net decrease in deposits

 

(162,072

)

(143,151

)

Net increase in other short-term borrowings

 

201,932

 

134,817

 

Issuances of long-term FHLB advances

 

90,000

 

30,000

 

Repayments of long-term FHLB advances

 

(21,880

)

(112,948

)

Repayments on long-term sweep repurchase agreements

 

(816

)

(813

)

Repayments of senior unsecured line of credit

 

(35,000

)

 

Other changes in long-term debt

 

66

 

527

 

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

 

41,414

 

 

Net cash from (used in) financing activities

 

113,644

 

(91,568

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

 

27,245

 

115,936

 

Beginning cash and cash equivalents

 

375,356

 

362,771

 

Ending cash and cash equivalents

 

$

402,601

 

$

478,707

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

 

 

 

 

 

Interest paid

 

$

6,125

 

$

5,690

 

Income taxes paid

 

4,344

 

15,775

 

Transfer from loans to other real estate owned

 

13,097

 

11,689

 

Net transfer of loans held for investment to loans held for sale

 

21,456

 

 

Transfer from premises and equipment to other bank owned property

 

675

 

2,324

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-cash transactions:

 

 

 

 

 

Increase in assets and liabilities in acquisitions:

 

 

 

 

 

Securities

 

13,619

 

139,764

 

FHLB stock

 

5,933

 

12,993

 

Loans held-for-sale

 

 

213,946

 

Uncovered loans

 

571,666

 

1,530,376

 

Premises and equipment

 

4,912

 

22,168

 

Loan servicing rights

 

767

 

41,967

 

Company-owned life insurance

 

 

38,172

 

Other real estate owned

 

30,878

 

18,448

 

Core deposit intangible

 

3,633

 

9,816

 

Other assets

 

60,722

 

128,278

 

Deposits

 

857,769

 

2,121,258

 

Short-term borrowings

 

18

 

21,892

 

Long-term debt

 

 

312,956

 

Other liabilities

 

4,017

 

22,925

 

 

See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

6



Table of Contents

 

TALMER BANCORP, INC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2014

 

1 . BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND RECENTLY ADOPTED AND ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

 

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Talmer Bancorp, Inc. (“the Company”), and its wholly-owned subsidiaries have been prepared in accordance with United States (U.S.) generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, the statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the Consolidated Financial Statements, primarily consisting of normal recurring adjustments, have been included. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year or for any other interim period. Certain items in prior periods were reclassified to conform to the current presentation.  For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in the Annual Report of Talmer Bancorp, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

 

On February 11, 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission declared effective the Company’s registration statement on Form S-1 registering the shares of the Company’s common stock as “TLMR” on the Nasdaq Capital Market.  On February 14, 2014, the Company completed the initial public offering of 15,555,555 shares of Class A common stock for $13 per share.  Of the 15,555,555 shares sold, 3,703,703 shares were sold by the Company and 11,851,852 shares were sold by certain selling shareholders.  In addition, on February 21, 2014, the selling shareholders sold an additional 2,333,333 shares of Class A common stock to cover the exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option.  The Company received net proceeds of approximately $42.0 million from the offering, after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses.  The Company did not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling shareholders.

 

Subsequent Events

 

In July 2014, Talmer West Bank sold its single branch office in Albuquerque, New Mexico along with its $34.1 million of deposits and $23.7 million of loans to Grants State Bank, a unit of First Bancorp of Durango, Inc. The net impact to pre-tax income related to this transaction recorded in the third quarter of 2014 is a $1.6 million benefit, as gains on sales of loans and deposits of $1.5 million and $400 thousand, respectively, were partially offset by the write-off of the related core deposit intangible, loss on the sale of fixed assets and other costs associated with the transaction.

 

In August 2014, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire First of Huron Corporation, the holding company for Signature Bank headquartered in Bad Axe, Michigan, for aggregate cash consideration of $13.4 million.  Signature Bank had total assets of $228.0 million as of June 30, 2014, including $172.3 million of net total loans.  The Company will acquire and simultaneously retire certain outstanding subordinated debentures of First of Huron Corporation and assume its trust preferred securities.  The closing of the transaction is pending regulatory approval and customary closing conditions, including the approval by the shareholders of First of Huron Corporation.  The transaction is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2014 or the first quarter of 2015.

 

On August 8, 2014, we sold our branch offices located in Wisconsin to Town Bank, a wholly owned bank subsidiary of Wintrust Financial Corporation.  Under the terms of the agreement we sold our 10 branch offices to Town Bank, for approximately $13.5 million more than the net book value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction.  Town Bank assumed all of our deposits in Wisconsin totaling $354.8 million as of August 8, 2014. Concurrent with the closing of this transaction, Town Bank will sell two of the branch locations and related deposits in Kenosha and Genoa City, Wisconsin to its affiliate, State Bank of the Lakes, a Wintrust community bank. As of June 30, 2014, $9.0 million of premises and equipment is accounted for at lower of cost or fair value and considered held for sale related to this transaction.  The

 

7



Table of Contents

 

net impact to pre-tax income related to this transaction recorded in the third quarter of 2014 was a $12.1 million benefit, related to gains on the sale of net assets and liabilities, offset by the write-off of the related core deposit intangible of $911 thousand and other costs associated with the transaction of approximately $1.0 million.

 

Customer Initiated Derivatives

 

In the first quarter of 2014, the Company began entering into interest rate derivatives to provide a service to certain qualifying customers to help facilitate their respective risk management strategies (“customer-initiated derivatives”).  Therefore, these derivatives are not used to manage interest rate risk in the Company’s assets or liabilities. The Company generally takes offsetting positions with dealer counterparties to mitigate the valuation risk of the customer-initiated derivatives.  Income primarily results from the spread between the customer derivatives and the offsetting dealer positions. The accounting for changes in the fair value (i.e. gains or losses) of a derivative instrument is determined by whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and, further by the type of hedging relationship.  The Company presents derivative instruments at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets on a net basis when a right of offset exists, based on transactions with a single counterparty and any cash collateral paid to and/or received from that counterparty for derivative contracts that are subject to legally enforceable master netting arrangements.  The Company has no derivatives designated as qualifying accounting hedging instruments.  For derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments, the gain or loss derived from changes in fair value are recognized in current earnings during the period of change.

 

Earnings Per Share

 

On June 10, 2014, the Company awarded restricted stock to certain employees and directors of the Company which qualify as participating securities. As such, beginning in June of 2014, the Company applies the two-class method of computing earnings per share.  Under this calculation, all outstanding unvested share-based payment awards that contain right to nonforfeitable dividends are considered participating securities and earnings per share is determined according to dividends declared, when applicable, and participating rights in undistributed earnings.

 

Basic earnings per common share is net income divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.  Distributed and undistributed earnings are allocated between common and participating security shareholders based on their respective rights and then are divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period.  Diluted earnings per common share includes the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares issuable under stock options and warrants.

 

Deferred Compensation Plan

 

As of June 26, 2014, the Company maintains a deferred compensation plan to certain key employees and members of the Board of Directors which allows participants to defer a portion of their compensation.  Participants have the ability to begin deferrals into the Deferred Compensation Plan beginning July 1, 2014.  While the Company maintains ownership of the deferred compensation asset, the participants are able to direct the investment of the assets into a pre-determined selection of investment options.  Company stock is not an investment option for the participants.  The assets are recorded at fair value in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.  A liability is established, in other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, for the fair value of the obligation to the participants.  Any increase or decrease in the fair value of the deferred compensation plan assets is recorded in other noninterest income on the Consolidated Statements of Income.  Any increase or decrease in the fair value of the deferred compensation obligation to participants is recorded as additional compensation expense or a reduction of compensation expense on the Consoldiated Statements of Income.

 

8



Table of Contents

 

Recently Adopted and Issued Accounting Standards

 

In January 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-04, “ Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure ” (“ASU 2014-04”), which clarifies the time at which a creditor is considered to have physical possession of residential real estate that is collateral for a residential mortgage loan.  The creditor is considered to have physical possession when legal title to the collateral or a deed in lieu of foreclosure or similar legal agreement is completed.  Consequently it should reclassify the loan to other real estate owned at that time.  ASU 2014-04 is effective for public companies for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014, as such, the Company will adopt ASU 2014-04 as of January 1, 2015.  Under the provisions, the Company will have the option to adopt the amendments in the ASU using either a modified retrospective transition method or a prospective transition method.  The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of ASU 2014-04.

 

In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08 , “Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity” (“ASU 2014-08”), which raises the threshold for a disposal to qualify as a discontinued operation and requires new disclosures of both discontinued operations and certain other disposals that do not meet the definition of a discontinued operation.  The ASU is intended to reduce the frequency of disposals reported as discontinued operations by focusing on strategic shifts that have or will have a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results and will permit companies to have continuing cash flows and significant continuing involvement with the disposed component.  ASU 2014-08 is effective for disposals (or classifications as held for sale) and acquired businesses or nonprofit activities that are classified as held for sale upon acquisition that occur within annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those years.  As such, the Company will evaluate the provisions of ASU 2014-08 as it relates to any potential disposals or acquisitions beginning on or after January 1, 2015.

 

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “ Revenue from Contracts with Customers ” (“ASU 2014-09”), which outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including revenue recognition guidance.  The core principle of the revenue model is that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The ASU is intended to clarify and converge the revenue recognition principles under U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards and to streamline revenue recognition requirements in addition to expanding required revenue recognition disclosures.  ASU 2014-09 is effective for public companies for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginnining on or after December 15, 2016.  As such, the Company will adopt ASU 2014-09 as of January 1, 2017.  Under the provision, the Company will have the option to adopt the guidance using either a full retrospective method or a modified transition approach.  The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of ASU 2014-09.

 

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-11, “ Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings, and Disclosures ” (“ASU 2014-11”), which amends Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 860 to require entities to account for repurchase-to-maturity transactions as secured borrowings, elimate accounting guidance on linked repurchase financing transactions and expand disclosure requirements related to certain transfers of financial assets that are accounted for as sales and certain transfers accounted for as secured borrowings.  The disclosure requirements related to transactions accounted for as a sale and all of the accounting guidance within ASU 2014-11are effective for public companies for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and require the new guidance to be applied by making a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption.  The disclosure requirements related to repurchase agreements, securities lending transactions and repurchase-to-maturity transactions accounted for as secured borrowings within ASU 2014-11 are effective for public companies for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014 and for interim periods

 

9



Table of Contents

 

beginning after March 15, 2015.  As such, the Company will adopt the accounting guidance under ASU 2014-11 as of January 1, 2015.  The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of ASU 2014-11.

 

2.  BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

 

The Company has determined that the acquisitions of Talmer West Bank (formerly known as Michigan Commerce Bank) and First Place Bank constitute business combinations as defined by the FASB ASC Topic 805, “ Business Combinations. ”  Accordingly, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their fair values on the date of acquisition, as required. Fair values were determined based on the requirements of FASB ASC Topic 820, “ Fair Value Measurement ”. In many cases the determination of these fair values required management to make estimates about discount rates, future expected cash flows, market conditions and other future events that are highly subjective in nature and subject to change.

 

On January 1, 2014, the Company purchased 100% of the capital stock of Financial Commerce Corporation’s wholly-owned subsidiary banks, Michigan Commerce Bank, a Michigan state-chartered bank, Indiana Community Bank, an Indiana state-chartered bank, Bank of Las Vegas, a Nevada state-chartered bank and Sunrise Bank of Albuquerque, a New Mexico state-chartered bank, and certain other bank-related assets from Financial Commerce Corporation and its parent holding company, Capitol Bancorp Ltd., in a transaction facilitated under Section 363 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, for cash consideration of $4.0 million and a separate $2.5 million payment to fund an escrow account to pay the post-petition administrative fees and expenses of the professionals in the bankruptcy cases of Financial Commerce Corporation and Capital Bancorp, Ltd., each of which filed voluntary bankruptcy petitions under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code on August 9, 2012, with any unused escrowed funds to be refunded to the Company.

 

Immediately prior to consummation of the acquisition, Capitol Bancorp Ltd. merged Indiana Community Bank, Bank of Las Vegas and Sunrise Bank of Albuquerque with and into Michigan Commerce Bank, with Michigan Commerce Bank as the surviving bank in the merger.  Simultaneously with the merger, Michigan Commerce Bank changed its name to Talmer West Bank.  The Company contributed $99.5 million of additional capital during the three months ended March 31, 2014 to Talmer West Bank in order to recapitalize the bank.  In order to support the acquisition and recapitalization of Talmer West Bank, the Company borrowed $35.0 million under a senior unsecured line of credit. The Company used a portion of the net proceeds from the initial public offering that closed on February 14, 2014 to repay the $ 35.0 million during the first quarter of 2014.  The Company incurred $191 thousand and $1.8  million of acquisition related expenses during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively, related to the acquisition of Talmer West Bank, included within “Bank acquisition and due diligence fees” in the Consolidated Statements of Income.  Although the acquisition included five branches in Nevada and New Mexico that are outside of the Company’s target markets, 12 of the branches acquired, or 70% of the total number of branches acquired in the acquisition, fit squarely within the Company’s target market areas.

 

10



Table of Contents

 

The assets and liabilities associated with the acquisition of Talmer West Bank were recorded in the consolidated balance sheets at estimated fair value as of the acquisition date.  The following allocation is based on the information that was available to make preliminary estimates of the fair value and may change as additional information becomes available and additional analyses are completed.  While the Company believes that information provided a reasonable basis for estimating the fair values, it expects that it could obtain additional information and evidence during the measurement period that may result in changes to the estimated fair value amounts. This measurement period ends on the earlier of one year after the acquisition date or the date we receive the information about the facts and circumstances that existed at acquisition date. Subsequent adjustments are, and if necessary, will be retrospectively reflected in future filings. These refinements include: (1) changes in the estimated fair value of loans acquired and changes in the determination on whether such loans are considered purchased credit impaired; (2) changes in the estimated fair value of certain premises and equipment acquired; (3) changes in deferred tax assets related to fair value estimates and a change in the expected realization of items considered to be built in losses and (4) a change in the bargain purchase gain caused by the net effect of these adjustments.

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consideration paid:

 

 

 

Cash

 

$

6,500

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of identifiable assets acquired:

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

216,331

 

Investment securities

 

13,619

 

Federal Home Loan Bank stock

 

5,933

 

Loans

 

571,666

 

Premises and equipment

 

4,912

 

Loan servicing rights

 

767

 

Other real estate owned

 

30,878

 

Core deposit intangible

 

3,633

 

Other assets

 

60,722

 

Total identifiable assets acquired

 

908,461

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of liabilities assumed:

 

 

 

Deposits

 

857,769

 

Other liabilities

 

4,035

 

Total liabilities assumed

 

861,804

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of net identifiable assets acquired

 

46,657

 

Bargain purchase gain resulting from acquisition

 

$

40,157

 

 

The estimated fair values presented in the above table reflect additional information that the Company obtained following the acquisition, which resulted in changes to certain fair value estimates made as of the acquisition date within the measurement period.  Material adjustments to the acquisition date estimated fair values are recorded in the period in which the acquisition occurred and, as a result, previously recorded results have changed.  After considering this additional information, the estimated fair value of the deferred tax assets included within “other assets”  increased $4.2 million, the estimated fair value of loans decreased $507 thousand and the estimated fair value of other liabilities increased $500 thousand.  These revised fair value estimates resulted in a net increase to the bargain purchase gain resulting from acquisition of $3.2 million to $40.2 million, which is recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the six months ended June 30, 2014.  The increase in the acquisition date deferred tax asset resulted from changes in the amounts of temporary differences related to nonaccrual interest and federal loss carryforwards that were deemed necessary based on information obtained subsequent to the acquisition that affected the value of deferred tax assets on January 1, 2014.  In addition to the increase in the acquisition date deferred tax asset value, the amount of the valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets was reduced to zero from $961 thousand.  The decrease in the valuation allowance at acquisition was driven by the change in federal loss carryforwards.

 

The Talmer West Bank acquisition resulted in a pre-tax bargain purchase gain of $40.2 million as the estimated fair value of assets acquired exceeded the estimated fair value of liabilities assumed and consideration paid.  The gain was included within “Bargain purchase gain” in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

 

Loans acquired in the Talmer West Bank acquisition were initially recorded at fair value with no separate allowance for loan losses.  The Company reviewed the loans at acquisition to determine which should be considered purchased credit impaired loans (i.e. loans accounted for under FASB ASC Subtopic 310-30 , “Loans and Debt

 

11



Table of Contents

 

Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality” (“ASC 310-30”)) defining impaired loans as those that were either not accruing interest or exhibited credit risk factors consistent with nonperforming loans at the acquisition date.

 

Fair values for purchased loans are based on a discounted cash flow methodology that considers various factors including the type of loan and related collateral, classification status, fixed or variable interest rate, term of the loan and whether or not the loan was amortizing, and a discount rate reflecting the Company’s assessment of risk inherent in the cash flow estimates.  Larger purchased loans are individually evaluated while smaller purchased loans are grouped together according to similar characteristics and were treated in the aggregate when applying various valuation techniques.

 

The Company accounts for purchased credit impaired loans in accordance with the provisions of ASC 310-30.  The cash flows expected to be collected on purchased loans are estimated based upon the expected remaining life of the underlying loans, which includes the effects of estimated prepayments.  Purchased loans are considered credit impaired if there is evidence of credit deterioration at the date of purchase and if it is probable that not all contractually required payments will be collected.  Interest income, through accretion of the difference between the carrying value of the loans and the expected cash flows is recognized on the acquired loans accounted for under ASC 310-30.

 

Purchased loans outside the scope of ASC 310-30 are accounted for under FASB ASC Subtopic 310-20, “Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs” (“ASC 310-20”).  Premiums and discounts created when the loans were recorded at their fair values at acquisition are amortized over the remaining terms of the loans as an adjustment to the related loan’s yield.

 

Information regarding acquired loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 as well as those excluded from ASC 310-30 accounting at acquisition date is as follows:

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounted for under ASC 310-30:

 

 

 

Contractual cash flows

 

$

331,523

 

Contractual cash flows not expected to be collected (nonaccretable difference)

 

86,410

 

Expected cash flows

 

245,113

 

Interest component of expected cash flows (accretable yield)

 

32,764

 

Fair value at acquisition

 

$

212,349

 

 

 

 

 

Excluded from ASC 310-30 accounting:

 

 

 

Unpaid principal balance

 

$

362,782

 

Fair value discount

 

(3,465

)

Fair value at acquisition

 

359,317

 

Total Fair value at acquisition

 

$

571,666

 

 

Talmer West Bank’s results of operations have been included in the Company’s financial results since the January 1, 2014 acquisition date.

 

12



Table of Contents

 

The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents the consolidated results of operations of the Company and Talmer West Bank as if the acquisition had occurred as of January 1, 2013 with pro forma adjustments to give effect of any change in interest income due to the accretion of the discount (premium) associated with the fair value adjustments to acquired loans, any change in interest expense due to estimated premium amortization/discount accretion associated with the fair value adjustments to acquired time deposits and borrowings and other debt and the amortization of the core deposit intangible that would have resulted had the deposits been acquired as of January 1, 2013.

 

 

 

For the three months ended June 30,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2014 (1)

 

2013

 

Net Interest and other income

 

$

66,427

 

$

91,626

 

Net Income

 

20,606

 

23,470

 

Earnings per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.29

 

$

0.35

 

Diluted

 

0.27

 

0.34

 

 


(1) As the business combination was effective January 1, 2014, there were no proforma adjustments for the three months ended June 30, 2014.

 

 

 

For the six months ended June 30,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2014 (1)

 

2013

 

Net Interest and other income

 

$

170,718

 

$

248,380

 

Net Income

 

57,013

 

84,532

 

Earnings per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.82

 

$

1.28

 

Diluted

 

0.76

 

1.21

 

 


(1) As the business combination was effective January 1, 2014, there were no proforma adjustments for the six months ended June 30, 2014.

 

On January 1, 2013, the Company purchased substantially all of the assets of First Place Financial Corp. (FPFC) including all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of First Place Bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of FPFC, headquartered in Warren, Ohio, in a transaction facilitated under Section 363 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, for cash consideration of $45.0 million.  Under the provisions of the asset purchase agreement, the Company assumed $60.0 million in subordinated notes issued to First Place Capital Trust, First Place Capital Trust II, and First Place Capital III, of which $45.0 million was immediately retired.  Following the acquisition, the Company contributed $179.0 million of additional capital in order to recapitalize First Place Bank with commitments to contribute additional capital if needed.  The Company incurred $474 thousand and $7.7 million of acquisition related expenses during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 primarily related to the acquisition of First Place Bank included within “Bank acquisition and due diligence fees” in the Consolidated Statements of Income.  First Place Bank was consolidated with and into Talmer Bank and Trust on February 10, 2014.

 

13



Table of Contents

 

The following table presents a summary of the assets and liabilities purchased in the First Place Bank acquisition recorded at fair value.

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consideration paid:

 

 

 

Cash

 

$

45,000

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value of identifiable assets acquired:

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

439,805

 

Investment securities

 

139,764

 

Federal Home Loan Bank stock

 

12,993

 

Loans held-for-sale

 

213,946

 

Loans

 

1,530,376

 

Premises and equipment

 

22,168

 

Loan servicing rights

 

41,967

 

Company-owned life insurance

 

38,172

 

Other real estate owned

 

18,448

 

Core deposit intangible

 

9,816

 

Other assets

 

128,278

 

Total identifiable assets acquired

 

2,595,733

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of liabilities assumed:

 

 

 

Deposits

 

2,121,258

 

Short-term borrowings

 

21,892

 

Long-term debt

 

312,956

 

Other liabilities

 

22,925

 

Total liabilities assumed

 

2,479,031

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value of net identifiable assets acquired

 

116,702

 

Bargain purchase gain resulting from acquisition

 

$

71,702

 

 

The First Place Bank acquisition resulted in a pre-tax bargain purchase gain of $71.7 million as the estimated fair value of assets acquired exceeded the estimated fair value of liabilities assumed and consideration paid. The gain was included within “Bargain purchase gain” in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

 

The core deposit intangible is being amortized on an accelerated basis over the estimated life, currently expected to be 10 years.

 

Loans acquired in the First Place Bank acquisition were initially recorded at fair value with no separate allowance for loan losses.

 

14



Table of Contents

 

Information regarding acquired loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 as well as those excluded from ASC 310-30 accounting at acquisition date is as follows:

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounted for under ASC 310-30:

 

 

 

Contractual cash flows

 

$

738,639

 

Contractual cash flows not expected to be collected (nonaccretable difference)

 

150,008

 

Expected cash flows

 

588,631

 

Interest component of expected cash flows (accretable yield)

 

158,221

 

Fair value at acquisition

 

$

430,410

 

 

 

 

 

Excluded from ASC 310-30 accounting:

 

 

 

Unpaid principal balance

 

$

1,094,223

 

Fair value premium

 

5,743

 

Fair value at acquisition

 

1,099,966

 

Total Fair value at acquisition

 

$

1,530,376

 

 

First Place Bank’s results of operations have been included in the Company’s financial results since the January 1, 2013 acquisition date.

 

3.  FAIR VALUE

 

The fair value framework as detailed by FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurement” requires the categorization of assets and liabilities into a three-level hierarchy based on the markets in which the financial instruments are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. A brief description of each level follows.

 

Level 1 — Valuation is based upon quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical instruments in active markets.

 

Level 2 — Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; or model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

 

Level 3 — Valuation is measured through utilization of model-based techniques that rely on at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. Any necessary unobservable assumptions used reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include use of discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.

 

Fair value estimates are based on existing financial instruments and, in accordance with GAAP, do not attempt to estimate the value of anticipated future business or the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. In addition, tax ramifications related to the recognition of unrealized gains and losses, such as those within the investment securities portfolio, can have a significant effect on estimated fair values and, in accordance with GAAP, have not been considered in the estimates. For these reasons, the aggregate fair value should not be considered an indication of the value of the Company.

 

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies and key inputs used to measure financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value, as well as a description of the methods and any significant assumptions used to estimate fair value disclosures for financial assets and liabilities not recorded at fair value in their entirety on a recurring basis. For financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value, the description includes the level of the fair value hierarchy in which the assets for liabilities are classified. Transfers of asset or liabilities between levels of the fair value hierarchy are recognized at the beginning of the reporting period, when applicable.

 

15



Table of Contents

 

Cash and cash equivalents: Due to the short-term nature, the carrying amount of these assets approximates the estimated fair value.  The Company classifies cash and due from banks as Level 1 and interest-bearing deposits with other banks and federal funds and other short-term investments as Level 2.

 

Securities available-for-sale:   Investment securities classified as available-for-sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available or the market is deemed to be inactive at the measurement date, fair values are measured utilizing independent valuation techniques of identical or similar investment securities. Third-party vendors compile prices from various sources and may apply such techniques as matrix pricing to determine the value of identical or similar investment securities. Management reviews the methodologies and assumptions used by the third-party pricing services and evaluates the values provided, principally by comparison with other available market quotes for similar instruments and/or analysis based on internal models using available third-party market data.  Level 1 securities include equity securities traded on an active exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange and U.S Treasury securities traded in active over-the-counter markets.  Level 2 securities include obligations issued by U.S. government-sponsored enterprises, state and municipal obligations, mortgage-backed securities issued by both U.S. government-sponsored enterprises and non-agency enterprises securities, corporate debt securities, Small Business Administration Pools and privately issued commercial mortgage-backed securities that have active markets at the measurement date. The fair value of Level 2 securities was determined using quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or pricing models based on observable market data inputs, primarily interest rates, spreads and prepayment information.

 

Securities classified as Level 3, including an obligation of a political subdivision and a trust preferred security (included within “Corporate debt securities”) as of June 30, 2014, represent securities in less liquid markets requiring significant management assumptions when determining fair value. The fair values of these investment securities represent less than one percent of the total available-for-sale securities.  The Troubled Asset Relief Program preferred securities and the trust preferred security fair values are compiled by a third-party vendor through consideration of recent trades and/or auctions of comparable securities, where applicable and are presented without adjustment.  Comparable securities consider credit, structure, tenor, trade flows and cash flow characteristics.  Due to the limited sales of these types of securities, significant unobservable assumptions are included to determine comparable securities to be included in the analysis.  The fair value of the political subdivision obligation is determined using a discounted cash flow model prepared internally which includes a significant unobservable input related to the credit assumption of the security.  Since the purchase of this security, no credit related concerns have come to the Company’s attention, therefore no adjustment for credit loss assumptions were made.

 

Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) Stock: Restricted equity securities are not readily marketable and are recorded at cost and evaluated for impairment based on the ultimate recoverability of initial cost. No significant observable market data is available for these instruments. The Company considers the profitability and asset quality of the issuer, dividend payment history and recent redemption experience, when determining the ultimate recoverability of cost.  The Company believes its investments in FHLB stock are ultimately recoverable at cost.

 

Loans held for sale:   Loans held for sale are carried at fair value based on the Company’s election of the fair value option. These loans currently consist of one-to-four family residential real estate loans originated for sale to qualified third parties. The fair value is determined based on quoted market rates and other market conditions considered relevant. The Company classifies loans held for sale as recurring Level 2.  At June 30, 2014, $22.3 million of loans were included in loans held for sale and carried at lower of cost or fair value due to the pending sale of the Company’s Albuquerque branch.  The estimated fair value of loans held for sale carried at lower of cost or market is based on quoted prices.  As of June 30, 2014 none of these loans were impaired.  As such, the Company classifies the estimated fair value of loans held for sale measured at lower of cost or market as Level 2.

 

16



Table of Contents

 

Loans measured at fair value :  During the normal course of business, loans originated with the initial intention to sell but are not ultimately sold, are transferred from held for sale to our portfolio of loans held for investment at fair value as the Company adopted the fair value option at origination.  The fair value of these loans is estimated using discounted cash flows, taking into consideration current market interest rates, loan repricing characteristics and expected loan prepayment speeds, while also taking into consideration other significant unobservable inputs such as the payment history and credit quality characteristic of each individual loan and an illiquidity discount reflecting the relative illiquidity of the market. Due to the adjustments made relating to unobservable inputs, the Company classifies the loans transferred from loans held for sale as recurring Level 3.

 

Loans:   The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis other than those discussed in “Loans measured at fair value” above. However, periodically, the Company records nonrecurring adjustments to the carrying value of loans based on fair value measurements. Loans, outside the scope of ASC 310-30, are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance with the original contractual terms of the loan agreements. Impaired loans, which include all nonaccrual loans and troubled debt restructurings, are disclosed as nonrecurring fair value measurements when an allowance is established based on the fair value of the underlying collateral.  Appraisals for collateral-dependent impaired loans are prepared by certified general appraisers (for commercial properties) or certified residential appraisers (for residential properties). These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. The comparable sales approach evaluates the sales price of similar properties in the same market area.  This approach is inherently subjective due to the wide range of comparable sale dates. The income approach considers net operating income generated by the property and the investor’s required return.  This approach utilizes various inputs including lease rates and cap rates which are subject to judgment. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to account for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. These adjustments generally range from 0% to 40% depending on the property type, as well as various sales and property characteristics including but not limited to: date of sale, size and condition of facility, quality of construction and proximity to the subject property. Once received, management reviews the assumptions and approaches utilized in the appraisal as well as the overall resulting fair value in comparison with independent data sources such as recent market data or industry-wide statistics to determine if additional downward adjustments should be made.  Property values are typically adjusted when management is aware of circumstances, economic changes or other conditions, since the date of the appraisal that would impact the expected selling price. Such adjustments are usually significant and result in a nonrecurring Level 3 classification.

 

Estimated fair values for loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 are based on a discounted cash flow methodology that considers factors including the type of loan and related collateral, classification status, fixed or variable interest rate, term of loan and whether or not the loan was amortizing, and a discount rate reflecting the Company’s assessment of risk inherent in the cash flow estimates. Cash flows expected to be collected on these loans are estimated based upon the expected remaining life of the underlying loans, which includes the effects of estimated prepayments. The Company classifies the estimated fair value of loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 as Level 3.

 

For loans excluded from ASC 310-30 accounting that are not individually evaluated for impairment, fair value is estimated using a discounted cash flow model. The cash flows take into consideration current portfolio interest rates and repricing characteristics as well as assumptions relating to prepayment speeds. The discount rates take into consideration the current market interest rate environment, a credit risk component based on the credit characteristics of each loan portfolio, and a liquidity premium reflecting the liquidity or illiquidity of the market. The Company classifies the estimated fair value of non-collateral dependent loans excluded from ASC 310-30 accounting as Level 3.

 

17



Table of Contents

 

Premises and equipment:   Premises and equipment are reviewed for impairment when events indicate their carrying amount may not be recoverable from future undiscounted cash flows.  As of June 30, 2014 there were no impaired premises and equipment.  Impaired premises and equipment at December 31, 2013 was recorded at fair value based on a recent appraisal through a valuation allowance.  The Company classifies impaired premises and equipment as nonrecurring Level 2.

 

FDIC indemnification asset: The fair value of the FDIC indemnification asset is estimated using projected cash flows related to the loss sharing agreements based on the expected reimbursements for losses and the applicable loss sharing percentages. The Company re-estimates the expected indemnification asset cash flows in conjunction with the quarterly re-estimation of cash flows on covered loans accounted for under ASC 310-30. The expected cash flows are discounted to reflect the uncertainty of the timing and receipt of the loss sharing reimbursement from the FDIC.  These cash flow evaluations are inherently subjective as they require material estimates, all of which may be subject to significant change.  The estimates used in calculating the value of the FDIC indemnification asset are reflective of the estimates utilized to determine the estimated fair value of loans accounted for under ASC 310-30. The Company classifies the estimated fair value of the FDIC indemnification asset as Level 3.

 

Other real estate owned : Other real estate owned represents property acquired by the Company as part of an acquisition, through the loan foreclosure or repossession process, or any other resolution activity that results in partial or total satisfaction of problem covered loans, or by closing of branches or operating facilities. Properties are initially recorded at fair value, less estimated costs to sell, establishing a new cost basis. Subsequently, the assets are valued at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell based on periodic valuations performed. Fair value is based upon independent market prices, appraised value or management’s estimate of the value, using a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. The comparable sales approach evaluates the sales price of similar properties in the same market area.  This approach is inherently subjective due to the wide range of comparable sale dates. The income approach considers net operating income generated by the property and the investor’s required return.  This approach utilizes various inputs including lease rates and cap rates which are subject to judgment. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to account for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. These adjustments generally range from 0% to 40% depending on the property type, as well as various sales and property characteristics including but not limited to: date of sale, size and condition of facility, quality of construction and proximity to the subject property.  Adjustments are typically significant and result in a Level 3 classification.

 

Loan servicing rights: Loan servicing rights are accounted for under the fair value measurement method.  A third party valuation model is used to determine the fair value at the end of each reporting period utilizing a discounted cash flow analysis using interest rates and prepayment speed assumptions currently quoted for comparable instruments and a discount rate determined by management.  Changes in fair value of loan servicing rights are recorded in “Mortgage banking and other loan fees”.  Because of the nature of the valuation inputs, the company classifies loan servicing rights as Level 3.

 

18



Table of Contents

 

At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, loan servicing rights included the following assumptions:

 

 

 

Commercial Real
Estate

 

Agricultural

 

Mortgage

 

As of June 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prepayment speed

 

7.07-50.00

%

5.26-53.43

%

3.79-41.62

%

Weighted average (“WA”) discount rate

 

19.45

%

15.00

%

9.65

%

WA cost to service/per year

 

$

471

 

$

200

 

$

57

 

WA Ancillary income/per year

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

36

 

WA float range

 

0.56

%

0.56

%

0.98-1.74

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prepayment speed

 

8.50-50.00

%

4.98-53.16

%

3.55-44.49

%

WA discount rate

 

20.00

%

15.00

%

10.17

%

WA cost to service/per year

 

$

467

 

$

200

 

$

57

 

WA Ancillary income/per year

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

45

 

WA float range

 

0.56

%

0.56

%

0.73-1.54

%

 

FDIC receivable: The FDIC receivable represents claims submitted to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) for reimbursement for which the Company expects to receive payment within 90 days. Due to their short term nature, the carrying amount of these instruments approximates the estimated fair value. The Company classifies the estimated fair value of FDIC receivable as Level 2.

 

Company-owned life insurance: The Company holds life insurance policies on certain officers. The carrying value of these policies approximates fair value as it is based on the cash surrender value adjusted for other charges or amounts due that are probable at settlement. As such, the Company classifies the estimated fair value of Company-owned life insurance as Level 2.

 

Derivative instruments: The Company enters into interest rate lock commitments with prospective borrowers to be sold into the secondary market and forward commitments for the future delivery of mortgage loans to third party investors, which are carried at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair value of these commitments is based on the fair value of related mortgage loans determined using observable market data.  Interest rate lock commitments are adjusted for expectations of exercise and funding.  This adjustment is not considered to be a material input.  The Company classifies derivatives as recurring Level 2.

 

Derivative instruments held or issued for customer-initiated activities are traded in over-the counter markets where quoted market prices are not readily available.  Fair value for over-the-counter derivative instruments is measured on a recurring basis using third party models that use primarily market observable inputs, such as yield curves and option volatilities.  The fair value for these derivatives may include a credit valuation adjustment that is determined by applying a credit spread for the counterparty or the Company, as appropriate, to the total expected exposure of the derivative after considering collateral and other master netting arrangements.  These adjustments, which are considered Level 3 inputs, are based on estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default.  The Company assesses the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and at June 30, 2014 it was determined that the credit valuation adjustments were not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives.  As a result, the company classifies its over-the-counter derivative valuations in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

Accrued interest receivable and payable: Due to their short term nature, the carrying amount of these instruments approximates the estimated fair value; therefore, the Company classifies the estimated fair value of accrued interest receivable and payable as Level 2.

 

Deposits: The estimated fair value of demand deposits (e.g., noninterest and interest-bearing demand, savings, other brokered funds and certain types of money market accounts) is, by definition, equal to the amount

 

19



Table of Contents

 

payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values for certificates of deposit are based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows at current interest rates. The estimated fair value of deposits does not take into account the value of the Company’s long-term relationships with depositors, commonly known as core deposit intangibles, which are not considered financial instruments.  The Company classifies the estimated fair value of deposits as Level 2.

 

Clawback Liability: The CF Bancorp, First Banking Center and Peoples State Bank loss sharing agreements contain a provision where if losses do not exceed a calculated threshold, the Company is obligated to compensate the FDIC.  The carrying amount of these instruments approximates the estimated fair value.  The estimated fair value requires management’s assumption of what estimated losses will be, which is a significant component.  As such, the Company classifies the estimated fair value of the FDIC clawback liability as Level 3.

 

Short-term borrowings: Short-term borrowings represent federal funds purchased, a senior unsecured line of credit and certain short-term FHLB advances. Due to their short term nature, the carrying amount of these instruments approximates the estimated fair value. The Company classifies the estimated fair value of short-term borrowings as Level 2.

 

Long-term debt: Long-term debt includes securities sold under agreements to repurchase, FHLB advances and subordinated notes related to trust preferred securities.  The estimated fair value is based on current rates for similar financing or market quotes to settle those liabilities.  The Company classifies the estimated fair value of long-term debt as Level 2.

 

FDIC warrants payable: FDIC warrants payable represent stock warrants that were issued to the FDIC in connection with the 2010 FDIC-assisted acquisition of CF Bancorp. These warrants are recorded at net present value based on management estimates used in a discounted pricing model. The inputs into the pricing model include management’s assumption of an annualized growth rate.  The carrying amount of these instruments approximates the estimated fair value.  The Company classifies the estimated fair value of FDIC warrants payable as Level 3.

 

20



Table of Contents

 

The following tables present the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value, including financial assets and liabilities for which the Company has elected the fair value option, on a recurring basis:

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Total

 

Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)

 

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

 

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

 

June 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Securities available-for-sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Treasury securities

 

$

750

 

$

750

 

$

 

$

 

U.S. government sponsored agency obligations

 

117,370

 

 

117,370

 

 

Obligations of state and political subdivisions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Taxable

 

397

 

 

 

397

 

Tax-exempt

 

200,575

 

 

200,575

 

 

Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Pools

 

36,548

 

 

36,548

 

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issued and/or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies or U.S. government-sponsored enterprises

 

280,775

 

 

280,775

 

 

Privately issued

 

10,807

 

 

10,807

 

 

Privately issued commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

5,173

 

 

5,173

 

 

Corporate debt securities

 

78,807

 

 

78,374

 

433

 

Equity securities

 

498

 

498

 

 

 

Total securities available-for-sale

 

731,700

 

1,248

 

729,622

 

830

 

Loans measured at fair value:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

18,521

 

 

 

18,521

 

Loans held for sale

 

113,765

 

 

113,765

 

 

Loan servicing rights

 

74,104

 

 

 

74,104

 

Derivative assets

 

523

 

 

523

 

 

Total assets at fair value

 

$

938,613

 

$

1,248

 

$

843,910

 

$

93,455

 

Derivative liabilities

 

81

 

 

81

 

 

Total liabilties at fair value

 

$

81

 

$

 

$

81

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Securities available-for-sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government sponsored agency obligations

 

$

98,237

 

$

 

$

98,237

 

$

 

Obligations of state and political subdivisions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Taxable

 

396

 

 

 

396

 

Tax-exempt

 

182,000

 

 

182,000

 

 

Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Pools

 

42,426

 

 

42,426

 

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issued and/or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies or U.S. government-sponsored enterprises

 

218,922

 

 

218,922

 

 

Privately issued

 

4,446

 

 

4,446

 

 

Privately issued commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

5,147

 

 

5,147

 

 

Corporate debt securities

 

68,020

 

 

67,615

 

405

 

Equity securities

 

489

 

489

 

 

 

Total securities available-for-sale

 

620,083

 

489

 

618,793

 

801

 

Loans measured at fair value:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

16,334

 

 

 

16,334

 

Real estate construction

 

1,374

 

 

 

1,374

 

Loans held for sale

 

85,252

 

 

85,252

 

 

Loans servicing rights

 

78,603

 

 

 

78,603

 

Derivative assets

 

2,630

 

 

2,630

 

 

Total assets at fair value

 

$

804,276

 

$

489

 

$

706,675

 

$

97,112

 

 

21



Table of Contents

 

There were no transfers between levels within the fair value hierarchy during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 or 2013.

 

The following table summarizes the changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

 

 

 

Three months ended June 30, 2014

 

 

 

Securities available-for-sale

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Taxable obligations
of state and political
subdivisions

 

Corporate
Debt
Securities

 

Loans held for
investment

 

Loan
servicing
rights

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

$

397

 

$

420

 

$

17,914

 

$

77,892

 

Additions due to acquisition

 

 

 

 

 

Transfers from loans held for sale

 

 

 

542

 

 

Gains (losses):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recorded in earnings (realized):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recorded in “Interest on investments”

 

 

1

 

 

 

Recorded in “Mortgage banking and other loan fees”

 

 

 

401

 

(5,947

)

Recorded in OCI (pre-tax)

 

 

12

 

 

 

New originations

 

 

 

 

2,159

 

Repayments

 

 

 

(336

)

 

Draws on previously issued lines of credits

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, end of period

 

$

397

 

$

433

 

$

18,521

 

$

74,104

 

 

 

 

Six months ended June 30, 2014

 

 

 

Securities available-for-sale

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Taxable obligations
of state and political
subdivisions

 

Corporate
Debt
Securities

 

Loans held for
investment

 

Loan
servicing
rights

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

$

396

 

$

405

 

$

17,708

 

$

78,603

 

Additions due to acquisition

 

 

 

 

767

 

Transfers from loans held for sale

 

 

 

778

 

 

Gains (losses):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recorded in earnings (realized):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recorded in “Interest on investments”

 

1

 

2

 

 

 

Recorded in “Mortgage banking and other loan fees”

 

 

 

413

 

(9,014

)

Recorded in OCI (pre-tax)

 

 

26

 

 

 

New originations

 

 

 

 

3,748

 

Repayments

 

 

 

(506

)

 

Draws on previously issued lines of credits

 

 

 

128

 

 

Balance, end of period

 

$

397

 

$

433

 

$

18,521

 

$

74,104

 

 

 

 

Three months ended June 30, 2013

 

 

 

Securities available-for-sale

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Taxable obligations of
state and political
subdivisions

 

Corporate Debt
Securities

 

Loans held for
investment

 

Loan servicing
rights

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

$

396

 

$

15,744

 

$

 

$

53,761

 

Gains (losses):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recorded in earnings (realized):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recorded in “Net gain (loss) on sale of securities”

 

 

69

 

 

 

Recorded in “Mortgage banking and other loan fees”

 

 

 

 

3,799

 

Recorded in OCI (pre-tax)

 

 

179

 

 

 

Purchases

 

 

 

 

 

New originations

 

 

 

 

7,627

 

Sales/calls

 

 

(1,986

)

 

 

Balance, end of period

 

$

396

 

$

14,006

 

$

 

$

65,187

 

 

22



Table of Contents

 

 

 

Six months ended June 30, 2013

 

 

 

Securities available-for-sale

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Taxable obligations
of state and political
subdivisions

 

Corporate
debt
securities

 

Loans held for
investment

 

Loan
servicing
rights

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

$

396

 

$

15,250

 

$

 

$

 

Transfers based on new accounting policy election

 

 

 

 

5,657

(1)

Additions due to acquisition

 

 

 

 

41,967

 

Gains (losses):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recorded in earnings (realized):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recorded in “Net gain (loss) on sale of securities”

 

 

69

 

 

 

Recorded in “Mortgage banking and other loan fees”

 

 

 

 

2,480

 

Recorded in OCI (pre-tax)

 

 

233

 

 

 

Purchases

 

 

440

 

 

 

New originations

 

 

 

 

15,083

 

Sales/calls

 

 

(1,986

)

 

 

Balance, end of period

 

$

396

 

$

14,006

 

$

 

$

65,187

 

 


(1) The balance transferred includes $31 thousand of cumulative adjustment related to the change in accounting policy referenced in Note 1 to our audited financial statements included in our 2013 Annual Report.

 

The aggregate fair value, contractual balance (including accrued interest), and gain or loss position for loans held for investment measured and recorded at fair value was as follows:

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

June 30, 2014

 

December 31, 2013

 

Aggregate fair value

 

$

18,521

 

$

17,708

 

Contractual balance

 

18,363

 

18,022

 

Fair market value gain (loss)

 

158

 

(314

)

 

There were no gains (losses) included in the fair value above that were associated with instrument specific credit risk. The aggregate fair value and contractual principal balance of loans held for investment measured and recorded at fair value that were 90 days or more past due as of June 30, 2014 was $213 thousand and $211 thousand, respectively.  Of the aggregate fair value of loans that were 90 days or more past due as of June 30, 2014, $153 thousand were on nonaccrual status.  The aggregate fair value and contractual principal balance of loans held for investment measured and recorded at fair value that were 90 days or more past due as of December 31, 2013 was $293 thousand and $301 thousand, respectively. Of the aggregate fair value of loans that were 90 days or more past due as of December 31, 2013, $252 thousand were on nonaccrual status.

 

Interest income is recorded based on the contractual terms of the loans in accordance with the Company’s policy on loans held for investment and is recorded in “Interest and fees on loans” in the Consolidated Statements of Income. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, there was $168 thousand and $259 thousand, respectively, of interest income earned on loans transferred from loans held for sale to loans held for investment.

 

The Company has elected the fair value option for loans held for sale (other than the $22.3 million of loans included in loans held for sale due to the pending sale of our Albuquerque branch). These loans are intended for sale and the Company believes that the fair value is the best indicator of the resolution of these loans. Interest income is recorded based on the contractual terms of the loans in accordance with the Company policy on loans held for investment in “Interest and fees on loans” in the Consolidated Statements of Income. None of these loans are 90 days past due or on nonaccrual status as of June 30, 2014 or December 31, 2013.

 

23



Table of Contents

 

The aggregate fair value, contractual balance (including accrued interest), and gain or loss for loans held for sale carried at fair value was as follows:

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

June 30, 2014

 

December 31, 2013

 

Aggregate fair value

 

$

113,765

 

$

85,252

 

Contractual balance

 

106,246

 

82,567

 

Unrealized gain

 

7,519

 

2,685

 

 

The total amount of gains (losses) from changes in fair value included in “Net gain on sales of loans” in the Consolidated Statements of Income were as follows:

 

 

 

For the three months ended
June 30,

 

For the six months ended
June 30,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

Change in fair value

 

$

3,458

 

$

(14,115

)

$

4,834

 

$

(11,709

)

 

Certain financial assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These include assets that are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period.

 

24



Table of Contents

 

The following table presents the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Total

 

Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)

 

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

 

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

 

June 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impaired loans:(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uncovered

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

2,192

 

$

 

$

 

$

2,192

 

Commercial real estate

 

930

 

 

 

930

 

Commercial and industrial

 

311

 

 

 

311

 

Total uncovered impaired loans

 

3,433

 

 

 

3,433

 

Covered

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

46

 

 

 

46

 

Commercial and industrial

 

1,112

 

 

 

1,112

 

Total covered impaired loans

 

1,158

 

 

 

1,158

 

Total impaired loans

 

4,591

 

 

 

4,591

 

Other real estate owned (uncovered)(2)

 

4,157

 

 

 

4,157

 

Other real estate owned (covered)(3)

 

464

 

 

 

464

 

Total

 

$

9,212

 

$

 

$

 

$

9,212

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impaired loans:(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uncovered

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

1,569

 

$

 

$

 

$

1,569

 

Commercial and industrial

 

762

 

 

 

762

 

Total uncovered impaired loans

 

2,331

 

 

 

2,331

 

Covered

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial real estate

 

644

 

 

 

644

 

Total covered impaired loans

 

644

 

 

 

644

 

Total impaired loans

 

2,975

 

 

 

2,975

 

Other real estate owned (uncovered) (2)

 

2,216

 

 

 

2,216

 

Other real estate owned (covered) (3)

 

4,596

 

 

 

4,596

 

Premises and equipment

 

105

 

 

105

 

 

Total

 

$

9,892

 

$

 

$

105

 

$

9,787

 

 


(1) Specific reserves of $1.3 million and $1.4 million were provided to reduce the fair value of these loans at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, based on the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral.  In addition, charge-offs of $1.9 million and $12 thousand reduced the fair value of these loans in for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $2.0 million and $729 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

(2) The Company charged $821 thousand and $892 thousand through other non-interest expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $1.5 million and $1.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, to reduce the fair value of these properties.

(3) The Company charged $537 thousand and $1.2 million through other noninterest expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $904 thousand and $2.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, to reduce the fair value of these properties.  These expenses were partially offset by FDIC loss sharing income recorded due to the associated loss share coverage.

 

The Company typically holds the majority of its financial instruments until maturity and thus does not expect to realize many of the estimated fair value amounts disclosed.  The disclosures also do not include estimated fair value amounts for items that are not defined as financial instruments, but which have significant value.  These

 

25



Table of Contents

 

include such items as core deposit intangibles, the future earnings potential of significant customer relationships and the value of fee generating businesses.  The Company believes the imprecision of an estimate could be significant.

 

The following tables present the carrying amount and estimated fair values of financial instruments not recorded at fair value in their entirety on a recurring basis on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated Fair Value

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Carrying Value

 

Total

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

June 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

402,601

 

$

402,601

 

$

107,292

 

$

295,309

 

$

 

Federal Home Loan Bank stock

 

16,541

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loans, excluding covered loans(1)

 

3,271,847

 

3,357,268

 

 

 

3,357,268

 

Net covered loans(2)

 

426,537

 

517,752

 

 

 

517,752

 

Loans held for sale (3)

 

136,089

 

137,577

 

 

 

137,577

 

 

 

Accrued interest receivable

 

10,700

 

10,700

 

 

10,700

 

 

FDIC indemnification asset

 

102,694

 

67,635

 

 

 

67,635

 

FDIC receivable

 

7,198

 

7,198

 

 

7,198

 

 

Company-owned life insurance

 

95,580

 

95,580

 

 

95,580

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Savings and demand deposits

 

$

3,108,873

 

$

3,108,873

 

$

 

$

3,108,873

 

$

 

Time deposits

 

1,187,661

 

1,189,344

 

 

1,189,344

 

 

Total deposits

 

4,296,534

 

4,298,217

 

 

4,298,217

 

 

 

FDIC clawback liability

 

26,309

 

26,309

 

 

 

26,309

 

Short term borrowings

 

238,826

 

238,826

 

 

238,826

 

 

Long-term debt

 

266,407

 

260,392

 

 

260,392

 

 

FDIC warrants payable

 

4,493

 

4,493

 

 

 

4,493

 

Accrued interest payable

 

620

 

620

 

 

620

 

 

 


(1) Included $3.4 million of impaired loans recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and $18.5 million of loans recorded at fair value on a recurring basis.

(2) Included $1.2 million of impaired loans recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.

(3) Included $113.8 million of loans held for sale recorded at fair value on a recurring basis.

 

26



Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated Fair Value

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Carrying Value

 

Total

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

375,356

 

$

375,356

 

$

97,167

 

$

278,189

 

$

 

Federal Home Loan Bank stock

 

16,303

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loans, excluding covered loans(1)

 

2,456,170

 

2,574,109

 

 

 

2,574,109

 

Net covered loans(2)

 

489,687

 

534,857

 

 

 

534,857

 

Accrued interest receivable

 

7,968

 

7,968

 

 

7,968

 

 

FDIC indemnification asset

 

131,861

 

84,010

 

 

 

84,010

 

FDIC receivable

 

7,783

 

7,783

 

 

7,783

 

 

Company-owned life insurance

 

39,500

 

39,500

 

 

39,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Savings and demand deposits

 

$

2,673,524

 

$

2,673,524

 

$

 

$

2,673,524

 

$

 

Time deposits

 

927,313

 

928,128

 

 

928,128

 

 

Total deposits

 

3,600,837

 

3,601,652

 

 

3,601,652

 

 

FDIC clawback liability

 

24,887

 

24,887

 

 

 

24,887

 

Short term borrowings

 

71,876

 

71,876

 

 

71,876

 

 

Long-term debt

 

199,037

 

190,420

 

 

190,420

 

 

FDIC warrants payable

 

4,118

 

4,118

 

 

 

4,118

 

Accrued interest payable

 

626

 

626

 

 

626

 

 

 


(1) Included $2.3 million of impaired loans recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and $17.7 million of loans recorded at fair value on a recurring basis.

(2) Included $644 thousand of impaired loans recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.

 

27



Table of Contents

 

4.   SECURITIES

 

A summary of the Company’s securities available-for-sale is as follows:

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Gross
Unrealized
Gains

 

Gross
Unrealized
Losses

 

Fair Value

 

June 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Treasury securities

 

$

750

 

$

 

$

 

$

750

 

U.S. government sponsored agency obligations

 

117,690

 

489

 

(809

)

117,370

 

Obligations of state and political subdivisions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Taxable

 

397

 

 

 

397

 

Tax-exempt

 

198,457

 

3,187

 

(1,069

)

200,575

 

SBA Pools

 

36,699

 

87

 

(238

)

36,548

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issued and/or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies or U.S. government-sponsored enterprises

 

279,782

 

2,154

 

(1,161

)

280,775

 

Privately issued

 

10,798

 

9

 

 

10,807

 

Privately issued commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

5,154

 

19

 

 

5,173

 

Corporate debt securities

 

78,038

 

818

 

(49

)

78,807

 

Equity securities

 

500

 

 

(2

)

498

 

Total securities available-for-sale

 

$

728,265

 

$

6,763

 

$

(3,328

)

$

731,700

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government sponsored agency obligations

 

$

102,597

 

$

 

$

(4,360

)

$

98,237

 

Obligations of state and political subdivisions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Taxable

 

396

 

 

 

396

 

Tax-exempt

 

184,351

 

2,102

 

(4,453

)

182,000

 

SBA Pools

 

42,956

 

162

 

(692

)

42,426

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issued and/or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies or U.S. government-sponsored enterprises

 

223,518

 

729

 

(5,325

)

218,922

 

Privately issued

 

4,453

 

22

 

(29

)

4,446

 

Privately issued commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

5,181

 

 

(34

)

5,147

 

Corporate debt securities

 

68,433

 

237

 

(650

)

68,020

 

Equity securities

 

500

 

 

(11

)

489

 

Total securities available-for-sale

 

$

632,385

 

$

3,252

 

$

(15,554

)

$

620,083

 

 

28



Table of Contents

 

Proceeds from sales of securities and the associated gains and losses recorded in earnings are listed below:

 

 

 

For the three months ended
June 30,

 

For the six months ended
June 30,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

Proceeds

 

$

 

$

1,986

 

$

54,211

 

$

7,500

 

Gross gains

 

 

69

 

 

124

 

Gross losses

 

 

 

(2,310

)

(24

)

 

The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities by contractual maturity at June 30, 2014 are shown below. Contractual maturity is utilized for U.S treasury securities, U.S. Government sponsored agency obligations, obligations of state and political subdivisions and corporate debt securities. Securities with multiple maturity dates are classified in the period of final maturity. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities if borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

 

 

 

June 30, 2014

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Amortized Cost

 

Fair Value

 

Securities with contractual maturities:

 

 

 

 

 

Within one year

 

$

3,808

 

$

3,808

 

After one year through five years

 

93,350

 

94,957

 

After five years through ten years

 

202,443

 

203,379

 

After ten years

 

428,164

 

429,058

 

Equity securities

 

500

 

498

 

Total securities available-for-sale

 

$

728,265

 

$

731,700

 

 

Securities with amortized cost of $356.9 million and $271.3 million were pledged at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, to secure borrowings and deposits.

 

29



Table of Contents

 

A summary of the Company’s investment securities available-for-sale in an unrealized loss position is as follows:

 

 

 

Less than 12 Months

 

More than 12 Months

 

Total

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Fair Value

 

Unrealized
losses

 

Fair Value

 

Unrealized
losses

 

Fair
Value

 

Unrealized
losses

 

June 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government sponsored agency obligations

 

$

9,959

 

$

(11

)

$

84,194

 

$

(798

)

$

94,153

 

$

(809

)

Obligations of state and political subdivisions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax-exempt

 

26,923

 

(214

)

49,412

 

(855

)

76,335

 

(1,069

)

SBA Pools

 

6,927

 

(76

)

13,339

 

(162

)

20,266

 

(238

)

Residential mortgage-backed securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issued and/or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies or U.S. government-sponsored agencies

 

50,487

 

(88

)

65,401

 

(1,073

)

115,888

 

(1,161

)

Privately issued

 

 

 

114

 

 

114

 

 

Corporate debt securities

 

5,027

 

(2

)

12,073

 

(47

)

17,100

 

(49

)

Equity securities

 

 

 

498

 

(2

)

498

 

(2

)

Total securities available-for-sale

 

$

99,323

 

$

(391

)

$

225,031

 

$

(2,937

)

$

324,354

 

$

(3,328

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government sponsored agency obligations

 

$

98,237

 

$

(4,360

)

$

 

$

 

$

98,237

 

$

(4,360

)

Obligations of state and political subdivisions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax-exempt

 

102,585

 

(4,159

)

5,794

 

(294

)

108,379

 

(4,453

)

SBA Pools

 

26,498

 

(692

)

 

 

26,498

 

(692

)

Residential mortgage-backed securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issued and/or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies or U.S. government-sponsored agencies

 

155,028

 

(4,952

)

18,846

 

(373

)

173,874

 

(5,325

)

Privately issued

 

557

 

(1

)

1,746

 

(28

)

2,303

 

(29

)

Privately issued commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

5,147

 

(34

)

 

 

5,147

 

(34

)

Corporate debt securities

 

34,487

 

(650

)

 

 

34,487

 

(650

)

Equity securities

 

489

 

(11

)

 

 

489

 

(11

)

Total securities available-for-sale

 

$

423,028

 

$

(14,859

)

$

26,386

 

$

(695

)

$

449,414

 

$

(15,554

)

 

As of June 30, 2014, the Company’s security portfolio consisted of 333 securities, 115 of which were in an unrealized loss position. The unrealized losses for these securities resulted primarily from changes in interest rates. The Company expects full collection of the carrying amount of these securities and does not intend to sell the securities in an unrealized loss position nor does it believe it will be required to sell securities in an unrealized loss position before the value is recovered.  The Company does not consider these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2014.

 

The unrealized losses are spread across asset classes, primarily in those securities carrying fixed interest rates. At June 30, 2014, the combination of these security asset class holdings in an unrealized loss position had an estimated fair value of $324.4 million with gross unrealized losses of $3.3 million. Unrealized losses in these security holdings were mainly impacted by increases in benchmark U.S. Treasury rates and, to a lesser extent, widened liquidity spreads since their respective acquisition dates.

 

5.                     LOANS

 

Residential real estate loans represent loans to consumers for the purchase or refinance of a residence. These loans are generally financed over a 15- to 30-year term, and in most cases, are extended to borrowers to finance their primary residence with both fixed-rate and adjustable-rate terms. The majority of these loans originated by the Company conform to secondary market underwriting standards and are sold within a short timeframe to unaffiliated third parties. As such, the credit underwriting standards adhere to the underwriting standards and

 

30



Table of Contents

 

documentation requirements established by the respective investor or correspondent bank.  Residential real estate loans also include home equity loans and lines of credit that are secured by a first or second lien on the borrower’s residence.  Home equity lines of credit consist mainly of revolving lines of credit secured by residential real estate.  Home equity lines of credit are generally governed by the same lending policies and subject to the same credit risk as described previously for residential real estate loans.

 

Commercial real estate loans consist of term loans secured by a mortgage lien on the real property such as apartment buildings, office and industrial buildings, retail shopping centers, and farmland. The credit underwriting for both owner-occupied and non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans includes detailed market analysis, historical and projected cash flow analysis, appropriate equity margins, assessment of lessees and lessors, type of real estate and other analysis. Risk of loss is managed by adherence to standard loan policies that establish certain levels of performance prior to the extension of a loan to the borrower. Geographic diversification, as well as diversification across industries, are other means by which the risk of loss is managed by the Company.

 

Commercial and industrial loans include financing for commercial purposes in various lines of business, including manufacturing, agricultural, service industry and professional service areas.  The Company works with businesses to meet their short-term working capital needs while also providing long-term financing for their business plans. Credit risk is managed through standardized loan policies, established and authorized credit limits, centralized portfolio management and the diversification of market area and industries. The overall strength of the borrower is evaluated through the credit underwriting process and includes a variety of analytical activities including the review of historical and projected cash flows, historical financial performance, financial strength of the principals and guarantors, and collateral values, where applicable. Commercial and industrial loans are generally secured with the assets of the company and/or the personal guarantee of the business owners.

 

Real estate construction loans are term loans to individuals, companies or developers used for the construction of a commercial or residential property for which repayment will be generated by the sale or permanent financing of the property.  Generally, these loans are for construction projects that have been either presold, preleased, or have secured permanent financing, as well as loans to real estate companies with significant equity invested in the project.

 

Consumer loans include loans made to individuals not secured by real estate, including loans secured by automobiles or watercraft, and personal unsecured loans. Risk elements in the consumer loan portfolio are primarily focused on the borrower’s cash flow and credit history, key indicators of the ability to repay and borrower credit scores. A certain level of security is provided through liens on automobile or watercraft titles, where applicable. Economic conditions that affect consumers in the Company’s markets have a direct impact on the credit quality of these loans. Higher levels of unemployment, lower levels of income growth and weaker economic growth are factors that may adversely impact consumer loan credit quality.

 

31



Table of Contents

 

Loans at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were as follows:

 

 

 

Covered loans

 

Uncovered loans

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Accounted
for under
ASC 310-30

 

Excluded from
ASC 310-30
accounting

 

Total
covered
loans

 

Accounted
for under
ASC 310-30

 

Excluded from
ASC 310-30
accounting

 

Total
uncovered
loans

 

Total

 

June 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

94,750

 

$

22,757

 

$

117,507

 

$

260,627

 

$

1,102,242

 

$

1,362,869

 

$

1,480,376

 

Commercial real estate

 

225,690

 

30,526

 

256,216

 

212,874

 

918,474

 

1,131,348

 

1,387,564

 

Commercial and industrial

 

39,386

 

21,111

 

60,497

 

17,809

 

629,281

 

647,090

 

707,587

 

Real estate construction

 

13,121

 

1,270

 

14,391

 

10,381

 

102,485

 

112,866

 

127,257

 

Consumer

 

10,558

 

111

 

10,669

 

3,004

 

39,030

 

42,034

 

52,703

 

Total

 

$

383,505

 

$

75,775

 

$

459,280

 

$

504,695

 

$

2,791,512

 

$

3,296,207

 

$

3,755,487

(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

100,034

 

$

23,300

 

$

123,334

 

$

253,528

 

$

831,925

 

$

1,085,453

 

$

1,208,787

 

Commercial real estate

 

262,769

 

36,632

 

299,401

 

98,299

 

657,540

 

755,839

 

1,055,240

 

Commercial and industrial

 

51,407

 

27,030

 

78,437

 

5,985

 

440,659

 

446,644

 

525,081

 

Real estate construction

 

15,268

 

1,950

 

17,218

 

1,970

 

174,256

 

176,226

 

193,444

 

Consumer

 

11,508

 

170

 

11,678

 

2,907

 

6,847

 

9,754

 

21,432

 

Total

 

$

440,986

 

$

89,082

 

$

530,068

 

$

362,689

 

$

2,111,227

 

$

2,473,916

 

$

3,003,984

(1)

 


(1) Reported net of deferred fees and costs totaling $7.0 million and $9.8 million at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

 

Nonperforming Assets and Past Due Loans

 

Nonperforming assets consist of loans for which the accrual of interest has been discontinued, other real estate owned acquired through acquisitions and other real estate owned obtained through foreclosure or closing of branch or operating facilities.

 

Loans are considered past due or delinquent when the contractual principal or interest due in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement or any portion thereof remains unpaid after the due date of the scheduled payment. Loans outside of those accounted for under ASC 310-30 are classified as nonaccrual when, in the opinion of management, collection of principal or interest is doubtful. The accrual of interest income is discontinued when a loan is placed in nonaccrual status and any payments received reduce the carrying value of the loan. A loan may be placed back on accrual status if all contractual payments have been received and collection of future principal and interest payments are no longer doubtful. Loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 are classified as performing, even though they may be contractually past due, as any nonpayment of contractual principal or interest is considered in the quarterly re-estimation of expected cash flows and is included in the resulting recognition of current period provision for loan losses or future yield adjustments.

 

32



Table of Contents

 

Information as to nonperforming assets was as follows:

 

 

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

Uncovered nonperforming assets

 

 

 

 

 

Nonaccrual loans

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

13,628

 

$

15,415

 

Commercial real estate

 

9,432

 

5,591

 

Commercial and industrial

 

2,615

 

2,681

 

Real estate construction

 

158

 

510

 

Consumer

 

166

 

100

 

Total nonaccrual loans

 

25,999

 

24,297

 

Other real estate owned (1)

 

39,806

 

17,046

 

Total uncovered nonperforming assets

 

65,805

 

41,343

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Covered nonperforming assets

 

 

 

 

 

Nonaccrual loans

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

1,834

 

988

 

Commercial real estate

 

6,350

 

8,124

 

Commercial and industrial

 

3,840

 

7,201

 

Real estate construction

 

1,034

 

1,372

 

Consumer

 

16

 

31

 

Total nonaccrual loans

 

13,074

 

17,716

 

Other real estate owned

 

10,926

 

11,571

 

Total covered nonperforming assets

 

24,000

 

29,287

 

Total nonperforming assets

 

$

89,805

 

$

70,630

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uncovered loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing, excluding loans accounted for under ASC 310-30

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

59

 

539

 

Commercial real estate

 

244

 

 

Consumer

 

2

 

 

Total loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing, excluding loans accounted for under ASC 310-30

 

$

305

 

$

539

 

Covered loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing, excluding loans accounted for under ASC 310-30

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial and industrial

 

49

 

 

Total loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing, excluding loans accounted for under ASC 310-30

 

$

49

 

$

 

 


(1) Excludes closed branches and operating facilities.

 

33



Table of Contents

 

Loan delinquency, excluding loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 was as follows:

 

 

 

June 30, 2014

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

30-59 days
past due

 

60-89 days
past due

 

90 days or more
past due

 

Total past due

 

Current

 

Total loans

 

90 days or more
past due and still
accruing

 

Uncovered loans, excluding loans accounted for under ASC 310-30

 

Residential real estate

 

$

4,937

 

$

2,332

 

$

6,596

 

$

13,865

 

$

1,088,377

 

$

1,102,242

 

$

59

 

Commercial real estate

 

4,156

 

404

 

6,102

 

10,662

 

907,812

 

918,474

 

244

 

Commercial and industrial

 

3,670

 

88

 

1,886

 

5,644

 

623,637

 

629,281

 

 

Real estate construction

 

372

 

 

76

 

448

 

102,037

 

102,485

 

 

Consumer

 

174

 

107

 

5

 

286

 

38,744

 

39,030

 

2

 

Total

 

$

13,309

 

$

2,931

 

$

14,665

 

$

30,905

 

$

2,760,607

 

$

2,791,512

 

$

305

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Covered loans, excluding loans accounted for under ASC 310-30

 

Residential real estate

 

$

1,031

 

$

166

 

$

606

 

$

1,803

 

$

20,954

 

$

22,757

 

$

 

Commercial real estate

 

1,192

 

1,605

 

5,275

 

8,072

 

22,454

 

30,526

 

 

Commercial and industrial

 

500

 

8

 

3,346

 

3,854

 

17,257

 

21,111

 

49

 

Real estate construction

 

 

 

981

 

981

 

289

 

1,270

 

 

Consumer

 

 

5

 

10

 

15

 

96

 

111

 

 

Total

 

$

2,723

 

$

1,784

 

$

10,218

 

$

14,725

 

$

61,050

 

$

75,775

 

$

49

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

30-59 days
past due

 

60-89 days
past due

 

90 days or more
past due

 

Total past due

 

Current

 

Total loans

 

90 days or more
past due and still
accruing

 

Uncovered loans, excluding loans accounted for under ASC 310-30

 

Residential real estate

 

$

11,244

 

$

1,849

 

$

6,641

 

$

19,734

 

$

812,191

 

$

831,925

 

$

539

 

Commercial real estate

 

1,400

 

4,992

 

1,122

 

7,514

 

650,026

 

657,540

 

 

Commercial and industrial

 

136

 

25

 

560

 

721

 

439,938

 

440,659

 

 

Real estate construction

 

5,038

 

356

 

359

 

5,753

 

168,503

 

174,256

 

 

Consumer

 

207

 

38

 

4

 

249

 

6,598

 

6,847

 

 

Total

 

$

18,025

 

$

7,260

 

$

8,686

 

$

33,971

 

$

2,077,256

 

$

2,111,227

 

$

539

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Covered loans, excluding loans accounted for under ASC 310-30

 

Residential real estate

 

$

827

 

$

260

 

$

224

 

$

1,311

 

$

21,989

 

$

23,300

 

$

 

Commercial real estate

 

324

 

558

 

5,681

 

6,563

 

30,069

 

36,632

 

 

Commercial and industrial

 

1,619

 

119

 

4,476

 

6,214

 

20,816

 

27,030

 

 

Real estate construction

 

 

 

1,365

 

1,365

 

585

 

1,950

 

 

Consumer

 

1

 

17

 

7

 

25

 

145

 

170

 

 

Total

 

$

2,771

 

$

954

 

$

11,753

 

$

15,478

 

$

73,604

 

$

89,082

 

$

 

 

34



Table of Contents

 

Impaired Loans

 

Information as to total impaired loans (both individually and collectively evaluated for impairment) is as follows:

 

 

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

Uncovered

 

 

 

 

 

Nonaccrual loans

 

$

25,999

 

$

24,297

 

Performing troubled debt restructurings:

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

1,628

 

328

 

Commercial real estate

 

2,588

 

1,637

 

Commercial and industrial

 

995

 

1,367

 

Real estate construction

 

94

 

90

 

Consumer

 

29

 

30

 

Total uncovered performing troubled debt restructurings

 

5,334

 

3,452

 

Total uncovered impaired loans

 

$

31,333

 

$

27,749

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Covered

 

 

 

 

 

Nonaccrual loans

 

$

13,074

 

$

17,716

 

Performing troubled debt restructurings:

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

2,821

 

2,691

 

Commercial real estate

 

16,102

 

14,391

 

Commercial and industrial

 

2,962

 

3,802

 

Real estate construction

 

109

 

163

 

Total covered performing troubled debt restructurings

 

21,994

 

21,047

 

Total covered impaired loans

 

$

35,068

 

$

38,763

 

 

Troubled Debt Restructurings

 

The Company assesses all loan modifications to determine whether a modification constitutes a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”). For loans excluded from ASC 310-30 accounting, a modification is considered a TDR when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulties and the Company grants a concession to the borrower.  For loans accounted for individually under ASC 310-30, a modification is considered a TDR when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulties and the effective yield after the modification is less than the effective yield at the time the loan was acquired in association with consideration of qualitative factors included within ASC 310-40.  All TDRs are considered impaired loans.  The nature and extent of impairment of TDRs, including those which have experienced a subsequent default, is considered in the determination of an appropriate level of charge off and/or allowance for loan losses.

 

As of June 30, 2014, there were $14.4 million of nonperforming TDRs and $27.3 million of performing TDRs included in impaired loans.  As of December 31, 2013, there were $17.9 million of nonperforming TDRs and $24.5 million of performing TDRs included in impaired loans.  All TDRs are considered impaired loans in the calendar year of their restructuring.  In subsequent years, a restructured obligation modified at a market rate and compliant with its modified terms for a minimum period of six months is no longer reported as a TDR. A loan that has been modified at a rate other than market will return to performing status if it satisfies the six month performance requirement; however, it will continue to be reported as a TDR and considered impaired.

 

35



Table of Contents

 

The following tables present the recorded investment of loans modified in TDRs during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 by type of concession granted.  In cases where more than one type of concession was granted, the loans were categorized based on the most significant concession.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial effects of modification

 

 

 

Concession type

 

 

 

Total recorded

 

Net

 

Provision

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Principal
deferral

 

Principal
reduction (1)

 

Interest rate

 

Forbearance
agreement

 

Total number
of loans

 

investment at
June 30, 2014

 

charge-offs
(recoveries)

 

(benefit) for
loan losses (2)

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uncovered

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

144

 

$

159

 

$

 

$

147

 

9

 

$

450

 

$

 

$

22

 

Commercial real estate

 

 

 

180

 

99

 

3

 

279

 

 

 

Commercial and industrial

 

7

 

 

61

 

 

6

 

68

 

 

(3

)

Consumer

 

 

88

 

 

 

2

 

88

 

 

 

Total uncovered

 

151

 

247

 

241

 

246

 

20

 

885

 

 

19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Covered

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

 

$

14

 

$

345

 

$

 

9

 

$

359

 

$

 

$

22

 

Commercial real estate

 

 

 

652

 

 

2

 

652

 

 

6

 

Commercial and industrial

 

 

 

177

 

100

 

5

 

277

 

 

11

 

Total covered

 

 

14

 

1,174

 

100

 

16

 

1,288

 

 

39

 

Total loans

 

$

151

 

$

261

 

$

1,415

 

$

346

 

36

 

$

2,173

 

$

 

$

58

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uncovered

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

144

 

$

227

 

$

230

 

$

147

 

15

 

$

748

 

$

 

$

127

 

Commercial real estate

 

 

 

894

 

1,026

 

8

 

1,920

 

(9

)

197

 

Commercial and industrial

 

50

 

 

61

 

117

 

11

 

228

 

 

31

 

Consumer

 

 

88

 

 

 

2

 

88

 

 

26

 

Total uncovered

 

194

 

315

 

1,185

 

1,290

 

36

 

2,984

 

(9

)

381

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Covered

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

113

 

$

14

 

$

345

 

$

 

14

 

$

472

 

$

6

 

$

29

 

Commercial real estate

 

 

 

652

 

446

 

3

 

1,098

 

 

66

 

Commercial and industrial

 

 

 

203

 

100

 

8

 

303

 

 

14

 

Total covered

 

113

 

14

 

1,200

 

546

 

25

 

1,873

 

6

 

109

 

Total loans

 

$

307

 

$

329

 

$

2,385

 

$

1,836

 

61

 

$

4,857

 

$

(3

)

$

490

 

 


(1) Loan forgiveness related to loans modified in TDRs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 totaled $51 thousand and $178 thousand, respectively.

(2) The provision for loan losses for covered loans is partially offset by the build of an associated FDIC indemnification asset on covered loans.

 

36



Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial effects of
modification

 

 

 

Concession type

 

 

 

Total recorded

 

 

 

Provision

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Principal
deferral

 

Interest
rate

 

Forbearance
agreement

 

Total number
of loans

 

investment at
June 30, 2013

 

Net
charge-offs (1)

 

(benefit) for
loan losses (2)

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uncovered

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

 

$

449

 

$

 

7

 

$

449

 

$

 

$

 

Commercial real estate

 

1,730

 

1,082

 

 

5

 

2,812

 

 

 

Commercial and industrial

 

 

24

 

 

2

 

24

 

 

 

Total uncovered

 

1,730

 

1,555

 

 

14

 

3,285

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Covered

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

158

 

$

14

 

$

 

7

 

$

172

 

$

 

$

 

Commercial real estate

 

104

 

1,688

 

675

 

10

 

2,467

 

1,256

 

1,239

 

Commercial and industrial

 

563

 

625

 

 

15

 

1,188

 

 

5

 

Real estate construction

 

53

 

 

 

1

 

53

 

 

 

Total covered

 

878

 

2,327

 

675

 

33

 

3,880

 

1,256

 

1,244

 

Total loans

 

$

2,608

 

$

3,882

 

$

675

 

47

 

$

7,165

 

$

1,256

 

$

1,244

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uncovered

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

4

 

$

459

 

$

 

9

 

$

463

 

$

 

$

 

Commercial real estate

 

1,979

 

1,371

 

19

 

9

 

3,369

 

 

5

 

Commercial and industrial

 

 

122

 

 

5

 

122

 

 

 

Consumer

 

16

 

 

 

1

 

16

 

 

 

Total uncovered

 

1,999

 

1,952

 

19

 

24

 

3,970

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Covered

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

777

 

$

14

 

$

 

15

 

$

791

 

$

 

$

32

 

Commercial real estate

 

104

 

1,921

 

675

 

14

 

2,700

 

1,243

 

1,304

 

Commercial and industrial

 

623

 

985

 

67

 

33

 

1,675

 

 

(15

)

Real estate construction

 

681

 

7

 

 

3

 

688

 

 

 

Total covered

 

2,185

 

2,927

 

742

 

65

 

5,854

 

1,243

 

1,321

 

Total loans

 

$

4,184

 

$

4,879

 

$

761

 

89

 

$

9,824

 

$

1,243

 

$

1,326

 

 


(1) No amounts were forgiven in the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 as a result of modification.

(2) The provision for loan losses for covered loans is partially offset by the build of an associated FDIC indemnification asset on covered loans.

 

When a modification qualifies as a TDR and was initially individually accounted for under ASC 310-30, the loan is required to be moved from ASC 310-30 accounting and accounted for under ASC 310-40.  In order to accomplish the transfer of the accounting for the TDR from ASC 310-30 to ASC 310-40, the loan is essentially retained in the ASC 310-30 accounting model and subject to the quarterly cash flow re-estimation process. Similar to loans accounted for under ASC 310-30, deterioration in expected cash flows result in the recognition of allowance for loan losses. However, unlike loans accounted for under ASC 310-30, improvements in estimated cash flows on these loans result only in recapturing previously recognized allowance for loan losses and the yield remains at the last yield recognized under ASC 310-30.

 

37



Table of Contents

 

On an ongoing basis, the Company monitors the performance of TDRs to their modified terms. The following table presents the number of loans modified in TDRs during the previous 12 months for which there was payment default during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, including the recorded investment as of June 30, 2014 and 2013.  A payment on a TDR is considered to be in default once it is greater than 30 days past due.

 

 

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2014

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2014

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Total number
of loans

 

Total recorded
investment

 

Charged off following
a subsequent default

 

Total number
of loans

 

Total recorded
investment

 

Charged off following
a subsequent default

 

Uncovered

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

14

 

$

951

 

$

13

 

20

 

$

1,245

 

$

95

 

Commercial real estate

 

1

 

546

 

 

3

 

1,797

 

176

 

Commercial and industrial

 

2

 

135

 

 

2

 

135

 

 

Consumer

 

1

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

Total uncovered

 

18

 

1,632

 

13

 

28

 

3,177

 

271

 

Covered

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

5

 

175

 

 

7

 

219

 

12

 

Commercial real estate

 

2

 

546

 

 

6

 

669

 

 

Commercial and industrial

 

2

 

53

 

 

9

 

188

 

2

 

Real estate construction

 

 

 

 

1

 

346

 

483

 

Consumer

 

1

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

Total covered

 

10

 

774

 

 

25

 

1,422

 

497

 

Total loans

 

28

 

$

2,406

 

$

13

 

53

 

$

4,599

 

$

768

 

 

 

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2013

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2013

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Total number
of loans

 

Total recorded
investment

 

Charged off following
a subsequent default

 

Total number
of loans

 

Total recorded
investment

 

Charged off following
a subsequent default

 

Uncovered

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

2

 

$

202

 

$

25

 

5

 

$

335

 

$

25

 

Commercial real estate

 

1

 

249

 

 

1

 

249

 

 

Commercial and industrial

 

1

 

437

 

 

1

 

437

 

 

Consumer

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

3

 

Total uncovered

 

4

 

888

 

25

 

10

 

1,021

 

28

 

Covered

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

14

 

466

 

46

 

15

 

641

 

46

 

Commercial real estate

 

19

 

2,167

 

89

 

26

 

3,282

 

89

 

Commercial and industrial

 

24

 

1,486

 

 

26

 

1,743

 

 

Real estate construction

 

1

 

628

 

 

1

 

628

 

 

Total covered

 

58

 

4,747

 

135

 

68

 

6,294

 

135

 

Total loans

 

62

 

$

5,635

 

$

160

 

78

 

$

7,315

 

$

163

 

 

At June 30, 2014, commitments to lend additional funds to borrowers whose terms have been modified in TDRs totaled $1.6 million.

 

The terms of certain other loans that were modified during the three and six months ending June 30, 2014 and 2013 that did not meet the definition of a TDR generally involved a modification of the terms of a loan to borrowers who were not deemed to be experiencing financial difficulties or a loan accounted for under ASC 310-30 that did not result in a lower effective yield than at the date of acquisition after the modification in association with consideration of qualitative factors included within ASC 310-40. The evaluation of whether or not a borrower is deemed to be experiencing financial difficulty is completed during loan committee meetings at the time of the loan approval.

 

Credit Quality Indicators

 

Credit risk monitoring and management is a continuous process to manage the quality of the loan portfolio.

 

The Company categorizes commercial and industrial, commercial real estate and real estate construction loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt including, current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation and current economic trends,

 

38



Table of Contents

 

among other factors.  The risk rating system is used as a tool to analyze and monitor loan portfolio quality.  Risk ratings meeting an internally specified exposure threshold are updated annually, or more frequently upon the occurrence of a circumstance that affects the credit risk of the loan.  The following describes each risk category:

 

Pass:   Includes all loans without weaknesses or potential weaknesses identified in the categories of special mention, substandard or doubtful.

 

Special Mention:   Loans with potential credit weakness or credit deficiency, which, if not corrected, pose an unwarranted financial risk that could weaken the loan by adversely impacting the future repayment ability of the borrower.

 

Substandard:   Loans with a well-defined weakness, or weaknesses, such as loans to borrowers who may be experiencing losses from operations or inadequate liquidity of a degree and duration that jeopardizes the orderly repayment of the loan.  Substandard loans also are distinguished by the distinct possibility of loss in the future if these weaknesses are not corrected.

 

Doubtful:   Loans with all the characteristics of a loan classified as Substandard, with the added characteristic that credit weaknesses make collection in full highly questionable and improbable.

 

Commercial and industrial, commercial real estate and real estate construction loans by credit risk category were as follows:

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Pass

 

Special
Mention

 

Substandard

 

Doubtful

 

Total

 

June 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uncovered loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial real estate

 

$

956,062

 

$

80,942

 

$

84,912

 

$

9,432

 

$

1,131,348

 

Commercial and industrial

 

606,618

 

25,845

 

12,012

 

2,615

 

647,090

 

Real estate construction

 

104,046

 

2,117

 

6,545

 

158

 

112,866

 

Total

 

$

1,666,726

 

$

108,904

 

$

103,469

 

$

12,205

 

$

1,891,304

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Covered loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial real estate

 

$

142,841

 

$

17,396

 

$

89,629

 

$

6,350

 

$

256,216

 

Commercial and industrial

 

35,159

 

5,762

 

15,736

 

3,840

 

60,497

 

Real estate construction

 

7,905

 

479

 

4,973

 

1,034

 

14,391

 

Total

 

$

185,905

 

$

23,637

 

$

110,338

 

$

11,224

 

$

331,104

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uncovered loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial real estate

 

$

645,276

 

$

43,597

 

$

61,375

 

$

5,591

 

$

755,839

 

Commercial and industrial

 

423,295

 

10,237

 

10,431

 

2,681

 

446,644

 

Real estate construction

 

164,466

 

19

 

11,231

 

510

 

176,226

 

Total

 

$

1,233,037

 

$

53,853

 

$

83,037

 

$

8,782

 

$

1,378,709

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Covered loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial real estate

 

$

163,167

 

$

17,058

 

$

111,052

 

$

8,124

 

$

299,401

 

Commercial and industrial

 

43,917

 

6,951

 

20,368

 

7,201

 

78,437

 

Real estate construction

 

6,193

 

2,803

 

6,850

 

1,372

 

17,218

 

Total

 

$

213,277

 

$

26,812

 

$

138,270

 

$

16,697

 

$

395,056

 

 

For residential real estate loans and consumer loans, the Company evaluates credit quality based on the aging status of the loan and by payment activity. Residential real estate loans and consumer loans secured by a

 

39



Table of Contents

 

residence where the debt has been discharged but the borrower continues to make payments are considered nonperforming. The following table presents residential real estate and consumer loans by credit quality:

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Performing

 

Nonperforming

 

Total

 

June 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uncovered loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

1,349,241

 

$

13,628

 

$

1,362,869

 

Consumer

 

41,868

 

166

 

42,034

 

Total

 

$

1,391,109

 

$

13,794

 

$

1,404,903

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Covered loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

115,673

 

$

1,834

 

$

117,507

 

Consumer

 

10,653

 

16

 

10,669

 

Total

 

$

126,326

 

$

1,850

 

$

128,176

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uncovered

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

1,070,038

 

$

15,415

 

$

1,085,453

 

Consumer

 

9,654

 

100

 

9,754

 

Total

 

$

1,079,692

 

$

15,515

 

$

1,095,207

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Covered loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

122,346

 

$

988

 

$

123,334

 

Consumer

 

11,647

 

31

 

11,678

 

Total

 

$

133,993

 

$

1,019

 

$

135,012

 

 

6.  ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

 

The allowance for loan losses represents management’s assessment of probable, incurred credit losses in the loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses consists of specific allowances, based on individual evaluation of certain loans, and allowances for homogeneous pools of loans with similar risk characteristics. Management’s evaluation in establishing the adequacy of the allowance includes evaluation of actual past loan loss experience, probable incurred losses in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect a specific borrower’s ability to repay (including the timing of future payments), the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, economic conditions, and other pertinent factors, such as periodic internal and external evaluations of delinquent, nonaccrual, and classified loans. The evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires utilizing material estimates. The evaluation of these factors is the responsibility of certain senior officers from the credit administration, finance, and lending areas.

 

The Company established an allowance for loan losses associated with purchased credit impaired loans (accounted for under ASC 310-30) based on credit deterioration subsequent to the acquisition date. The Company re-estimates cash flows expected to be collected for purchased credit impaired loans on a quarterly basis, with any decline in expected cash flows recorded as provision for loan losses on a discounted basis during the period. For any increases in cash flows expected to be collected, the Company first reverses any previously recorded allowance for loan loss, then adjusts the amount of accretable yield recognized on a prospective basis over the loan’s remaining life.

 

For loans not accounted for under ASC 310-30, the Company individually assesses for impairment all commercial real estate, commercial and industrial and real estate construction nonaccrual loans and TDRs greater than $250,000.  For residential real estate loans and consumer loans, the Company assesses all loans for impairment if on nonaccrual status or if the loan is a TDR.

 

40



Table of Contents

 

Information as to impaired loans individually evaluated for impairment is as follows:

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Recorded
investment with
no related
allowance

 

Recorded
investment
with related
allowance

 

Total recorded
investment

 

Contractual
principal
balance

 

Related
allowance

 

June 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uncovered individually evaluated impaired loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

11,459

 

$

3,089

 

$

14,548

 

$

18,148

 

$

808

 

Commercial real estate

 

4,240

 

787

 

5,027

 

7,264

 

23

 

Commercial and industrial

 

1,291

 

368

 

1,659

 

2,074

 

122

 

Consumer

 

2

 

31

 

33

 

34

 

5

 

Total uncovered individually evaluated impaired loans

 

$

16,992

 

$

4,275

 

$

21,267

 

$

27,520

 

$

958

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Covered individually evaluated impaired loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

2,174

 

$

2,170

 

$

4,344

 

$

5,455

 

$

479

 

Commercial real estate

 

17,541

 

 

17,541

 

21,459

 

 

Commercial and industrial

 

574

 

1,622

 

2,196

 

2,350

 

674

 

Real estate construction

 

412

 

 

412

 

713

 

 

Consumer

 

14

 

2

 

16

 

44

 

2

 

Total covered individually evaluated impaired loans

 

$

20,715

 

$

3,794

 

$

24,509

 

$

30,021

 

$

1,155

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uncovered individually evaluated impaired loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

8,143

 

$

5,871

 

$

14,014

 

$

17,005

 

$

1,923

 

Commercial real estate

 

4,588

 

 

4,588

 

4,423

 

 

Commercial and industrial

 

1,817

 

1,065

 

2,882

 

3,548

 

284

 

Real estate construction

 

359

 

 

359

 

359

 

 

Consumer

 

3

 

30

 

33

 

33

 

1

 

Total uncovered individually evaluated impaired loans

 

$

14,910

 

$

6,966

 

$

21,876

 

$

25,368

 

$

2,208

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Covered individually evaluated impaired loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

1,141

 

$

1,537

 

$

2,678

 

$

3,389

 

$

360

 

Commercial real estate

 

17,138

 

924

 

18,062

 

21,814

 

230

 

Commercial and industrial

 

3,704

 

1,417

 

5,121

 

5,503

 

937

 

Real estate construction

 

1,138

 

 

1,138

 

2,672

 

 

Consumer

 

6

 

19

 

25

 

45

 

2

 

Total covered individually evaluated impaired loans

 

$

23,127

 

$

3,897

 

$

27,024

 

$

33,423

 

$

1,529

 

 

41



Table of Contents

 

 

 

For the three months ended
 June 30, 2014

 

For the six months ended
June 30, 2014

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Average recorded
investment

 

Interest income
recognized

 

Average recorded
investment

 

Interest income
recognized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uncovered individually evaluated impaired loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

14,870

 

$

134

 

$

15,038

 

$

279

 

Commercial real estate

 

5,686

 

38

 

6,280

 

84

 

Commercial and industrial

 

1,668

 

15

 

1,676

 

39

 

Consumer

 

34

 

1

 

35

 

2

 

Total uncovered individually evaluated impaired loans

 

$

22,258

 

$

188

 

$

23,029

 

$

404

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Covered individually evaluated impaired loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

4,364

 

$

63

 

$

4,378

 

$

127

 

Commercial real estate

 

17,615

 

266

 

17,689

 

533

 

Commercial and industrial

 

2,299

 

21

 

2,399

 

44

 

Real estate construction

 

412

 

 

413

 

9

 

Consumer

 

21

 

1

 

22

 

2

 

Total covered individually evaluated impaired loans

 

$

24,711

 

$

351

 

$

24,901

 

$

715

 

 

 

 

For the three months ended
 June 30, 2013

 

For the six months ended
June 30, 2013

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Average recorded
investment

 

Interest income
recognized

 

Average recorded
investment

 

Interest income
recognized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uncovered individually evaluated impaired loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

6,346

 

$

25

 

$

3,191

 

$

25

 

Commercial real estate

 

3,199

 

43

 

1,935

 

44

 

Commercial and industrial

 

1,461

 

16

 

1,478

 

48

 

Total uncovered individually evaluated impaired loans

 

$

11,006

 

$

84

 

$

6,604

 

$

117

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Covered individually evaluated impaired loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

270

 

$

3

 

$

270

 

$

6

 

Commercial real estate

 

19,853

 

311

 

20,311

 

602

 

Commercial and industrial

 

7,056

 

57

 

7,160

 

124

 

Real estate construction

 

1,043

 

16

 

1,025

 

32

 

Total covered individually evaluated impaired loans

 

$

28,222

 

$

387

 

$

28,766

 

$

764

 

 

42



Table of Contents

 

Uncovered Loans

 

Changes in the allowance for loan losses and the allocation of the allowance for uncovered loans were as follows:

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Residential real
estate

 

Commercial
real estate

 

Commercial
and industrial

 

Real estate
construction

 

Consumer

 

Total

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses - uncovered:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

9,896

 

$

6,776

 

$

4,757

 

$

1,083

 

$

259

 

$

22,771

 

Provision (benefit) for loan losses

 

695

 

2,786

 

425

 

(618

)

(69

)

3,219

 

Gross charge-offs

 

(1,381

)

(3,586

)

(481

)

(28

)

(57

)

(5,533

)

Recoveries

 

540

 

1,870

 

439

 

961

 

93

 

3,903

 

Net (charge-offs) recoveries

 

(841

)

(1,716

)

(42

)

933

 

36

 

(1,630

)

Ending allowance for loan losses

 

$

9,750

 

$

7,846

 

5,140

 

$

1,398

 

$

226

 

$

24,360

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses - uncovered:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

7,708

 

$

4,267

 

$

3,404

 

$

2,027

 

$

340

 

$

17,746

 

Provision (benefit) for loan losses

 

3,559

 

5,924

 

1,761

 

(1,483

)

(118

)

9,643

 

Gross charge-offs

 

(2,817

)

(4,831

)

(626

)

(109

)

(123

)

(8,506

)

Recoveries

 

1,300

 

2,486

 

601

 

963

 

127

 

5,477

 

Net (charge-offs) recoveries

 

(1,517

)

(2,345

)

(25

)

854

 

4

 

(3,029

)

Ending allowance for loan losses

 

$

9,750

 

$

7,846

 

$

5,140

 

$

1,398

 

$

226

 

$

24,360

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of June 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses - uncovered:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Individually evaluated for impairment

 

$

808

 

$

23

 

$

122

 

$

 

$

5

 

$

958

 

Collectively evaluated for impairment

 

4,327

 

3,355

 

4,653

 

781

 

66

 

13,182

 

Accounted for under ASC 310-30

 

4,615

 

4,468

 

365

 

617

 

155

 

10,220

 

Allowance for loan losses - uncovered:

 

$

9,750

 

$

7,846

 

$

5,140

 

$

1,398

 

$

226

 

$

24,360

 

Balance of loans - uncovered:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Individually evaluated for impairment

 

$

14,548

 

$

5,027

 

$

1,659

 

$

 

$

33

 

$

21,267

 

Collectively evaluated for impairment

 

1,087,694

 

913,447

 

627,622

 

102,485

 

38,997

 

2,770,245

 

Accounted for under ASC 310-30

 

260,627

 

212,874

 

17,809

 

10,381

 

3,004

 

504,695

 

Total uncovered loans

 

$

1,362,869

 

$

1,131,348

 

$

647,090

 

$

112,866

 

$

42,034

 

$

3,296,207

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses - uncovered:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of peiod

 

$

2,185

 

$

3,976

 

$

3,778

 

$

415

 

$

244

 

$

10,598

 

Provision (benefit) for loan losses

 

2,257

 

938

 

(5

)

1,490

 

243

 

4,923

 

Gross charge-offs

 

(1,641

)

(357

)

(178

)

(68

)

(91

)

(2,335

)

Recoveries

 

457

 

214

 

13

 

25

 

79

 

788

 

Net charge-offs

 

(1,184

)

(143

)

(165

)

(43

)

(12

)

(1,547

)

Ending allowance for loan losses

 

$

3,258

 

$

4,771

 

$

3,608

 

$

1,862

 

$

475

 

$

13,974

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses - uncovered:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

2,059

 

$

4,265

 

$

4,162

 

$

268

 

$

191

 

$

10,945

 

Provision (benefit) for loan losses

 

3,476

 

910

 

(306

)

1,637

 

382

 

6,099

 

Gross charge-offs

 

(2,771

)

(789

)

(303

)

(68

)

(239

)

(4,170

)

Recoveries

 

494

 

385

 

55

 

25

 

141

 

1,100

 

Net charge-offs

 

(2,277

)

(404

)

(248

)

(43

)

(98

)

(3,070

)

Ending allowance for loan losses

 

$

3,258

 

$

4,771

 

$

3,608

 

$

1,862

 

$

475

 

$

13,974

 

 

43



Table of Contents

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Residential
real estate

 

Commercial
real estate

 

Commercial
and industrial

 

Real estate
construction

 

Consumer

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses - uncovered:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Individually evaluated for impairment

 

$

1,923

 

$

 

$

284

 

$

 

$

1

 

$

2,208

 

Collectively evaluated for impairment

 

2,697

 

2,862

 

2,959

 

2,025

 

224

 

10,767

 

Accounted for under ASC 310-30

 

3,088

 

1,405

 

161

 

2

 

115

 

4,771

 

Allowance for loan losses - uncovered:

 

$

7,708

 

$

4,267

 

$

3,404

 

$

2,027

 

$

340

 

$

17,746

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance of loans - uncovered:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Individually evaluated for impairment

 

$

14,014

 

$

4,588

 

$

2,882

 

$

359

 

$

33

 

$

21,876

 

Collectively evaluated for impairment

 

817,911

 

652,952

 

437,777

 

173,897

 

6,814

 

2,089,351

 

Accounted for under ASC 310-30

 

253,528

 

98,299

 

5,985

 

1,970

 

2,907

 

362,689

 

Total uncovered loans

 

$

1,085,453

 

$

755,839

 

$

446,644

 

$

176,226

 

$

9,754

 

$

2,473,916

 

 

44



Table of Contents

 

Covered Loans

 

Changes in the allowance and the allocation of the allowance for covered loans were as follows:

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Residential
real estate

 

Commercial
real estate

 

Commercial
and industrial

 

Real estate
construction

 

Consumer

 

Total

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses - covered:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

5,077

 

$

24,062

 

$

6,759

 

$

2,003

 

$

99

 

$

38,000

 

Provision (benefit) for loan losses

 

91

 

(5,848

)

(1,411

)

(95

)

(58

)

(7,321

)

Gross charge-offs

 

(412

)

(1,209

)

(1,500

)

(979

)

(30

)

(4,130

)

Recoveries

 

556

 

4,270

 

692

 

590

 

86

 

6,194

 

Net (charge-offs) recoveries

 

144

 

3,061

 

(808

)

(389

)

56

 

2,064

 

Ending allowance for loan losses

 

$

5,312

 

$

21,275

 

$

4,540

 

$

1,519

 

$

97

 

$

32,743

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses - covered:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

4,696

 

$

26,394

 

$

7,227

 

$

1,984

 

$

80

 

$

40,381

 

Provision (benefit) for loan losses

 

783

 

(7,839

)

(2,501

)

(178

)

(84

)

(9,819

)

Gross charge-offs

 

(1,275

)

(3,195

)

(2,527

)

(1,004

)

(77

)

(8,078

)

Recoveries

 

1,108

 

5,915

 

2,341

 

717

 

178

 

10,259

 

Net (charge-offs) recoveries

 

(167

)

2,720

 

(186

)

(287

)

101

 

2,181

 

Ending allowance for loan losses

 

$

5,312

 

$

21,275

 

$

4,540

 

$

1,519

 

$

97

 

$

32,743

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of June 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses- covered:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Individually evaluated for impairment

 

$

479

 

$

 

$

674

 

$

 

$

2

 

$

1,155

 

Collectively evaluated for impairment

 

165

 

431

 

534

 

13

 

 

1,143

 

Accounted for under ASC 310-30

 

4,668

 

20,844

 

3,332

 

1,506

 

95

 

30,445

 

Allowance for loan losses

 

$

5,312

 

$

21,275

 

$

4,540

 

$

1,519

 

$

97

 

$

32,743

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance of covered loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Individually evaluated for impairment

 

$

4,344

 

$

17,541

 

$

2,196

 

$

412

 

$

16

 

$

24,509

 

Collectively evaluated for impairment

 

18,413

 

12,985

 

18,915

 

858

 

95

 

51,266

 

Accounted for under ASC 310-30

 

94,750

 

225,690

 

39,386

 

13,121

 

10,558

 

383,505

 

Total covered loans

 

$

117,507

 

$

256,216

 

$

60,497

 

$

14,391

 

$

10,669

 

$

459,280

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses - covered:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

5,084

 

$

29,018

 

$

12,150

 

$

3,577

 

$

85

 

$

49,914

 

Provision (benefit) for loan losses

 

(130

)

(4,770

)

(2,433

)

(89

)

(38

)

(7,460

)

Gross charge-offs

 

(471

)

(1,230

)

(871

)

(446

)

(75

)

(3,093

)

Recoveries

 

468

 

4,369

 

1,666

 

317

 

131

 

6,951

 

Net (charge-offs) recoveries

 

(3

)

3,139

 

795

 

(129

)

56

 

3,858

 

Ending allowance for loan losses

 

$

4,951

 

$

27,387

 

$

10,512

 

$

3,359

 

$

103

 

$

46,312

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses - covered:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

5,716

 

$

30,150

 

$

10,915

 

$

4,509

 

$

183

 

$

51,473

 

Provision (benefit) for loan losses

 

(274

)

(4,001

)

(910

)

(1,024

)

(167

)

(6,376

)

Gross charge-offs

 

(1,220

)

(5,840

)

(1,706

)

(810

)

(94

)

(9,670

)

Recoveries

 

729

 

7,078

 

2,213

 

684

 

181

 

10,885

 

Net (charge-offs) recoveries

 

(491

)

1,238

 

507

 

(126

)

87

 

1,215

 

Ending allowance for loan losses

 

$

4,951

 

$

27,387

 

$

10,512

 

$

3,359

 

$

103

 

$

46,312

 

 

45



Table of Contents

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Residential
real estate

 

Commercial
real estate

 

Commercial
and industrial

 

Real estate
construction

 

Consumer

 

Total

 

As of December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses- covered:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Individually evaluated for impairment

 

$

360

 

$

230

 

$

937

 

$

 

$

2

 

$

1,529

 

Collectively evaluated for impairment

 

192

 

3,010

 

471

 

108

 

1

 

3,782

 

Accounted for under ASC 310-30

 

4,144

 

23,154

 

5,819

 

1,876

 

77

 

35,070

 

Allowance for loan losses

 

$

4,696

 

$

26,394

 

$

7,227

 

$

1,984

 

$

80

 

$

40,381

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance of covered loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Individually evaluated for impairment

 

$

2,678

 

$

18,062

 

$

5,121

 

$

1,138

 

$

25

 

$

27,024

 

Collectively evaluated for impairment

 

20,622

 

18,570

 

21,909

 

812

 

145

 

62,058

 

Accounted for under ASC 310-30

 

100,034

 

262,769

 

51,407

 

15,268

 

11,508

 

440,986

 

Total covered loans

 

$

123,334

 

$

299,401

 

$

78,437

 

$

17,218

 

$

11,678

 

$

530,068

 

 

7. ACQUIRED LOANS AND LOSS SHARE ACCOUNTING

 

A significant amount of loans acquired in the CF Bancorp and First Banking Center acquisitions during the year 2010 and the Peoples State Bank and Community Central Bank acquisitions during the year 2011 are covered by loss sharing agreements with the FDIC, whereby the FDIC generally reimburses the Bank for the 80% of losses incurred. The CF Bancorp, First Banking Center and Peoples State Bank loss share agreements also include provisions where a clawback payment, calculated using formulas included within the contracts, is to be made to the FDIC 10 years and 45 days following the acquisition in the event actual losses fail to reach stated levels. The estimated FDIC clawback liability totaled $26.3 million ($22.2 million related to the CF Bancorp acquisition and $4.1 million related to the First Banking Center acquisition) at June 30, 2014 compared to $24.9 million ($21.0 million related to the CF Bancorp acquisition and $3.9 million related to the First Banking Center acquisition) at December 31, 2013. No clawback liability was recorded in relation to Peoples State Bank as of both June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

 

Acquired loans were recorded at fair value as of the acquisition date, which includes loans acquired in each FDIC-assisted acquisition and in the First Place Bank and Talmer West Bank acquisitions. At the acquisition date, where a loan exhibits evidence of credit deterioration since origination and it is probable at the date of acquisition that the Company will not collect all principal and interest payments in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement, the Company accounts for the loan under ASC 310-30 and recognizes the expected shortfall of expected future cash flows, as compared to the contractual amount due, as a nonaccretable discount. Any excess of the net present value of expected future cash flows over the acquisition date fair value is recognized as the accretable discount, or accretable yield. We recognize accretion of the accretable discount as interest income over the expected remaining life of the purchased loan. Fair value discounts/premiums created on acquired loans accounted for outside the scope of ASC 310-30 are accounted for under ASC 310-20 and are accreted/amortized into interest income over the remaining term of the loan as an adjustment to the related loans yield.

 

46



Table of Contents

 

Changes in the carrying amount of accretable discount for purchased loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 were as follows:

 

 

 

For the three months ended
June 30,

 

For the six months ended
June 30,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

317,384

 

$

351,403

 

$

302,287

 

$

216,970

 

Additions due to acquisitions

 

 

 

32,764

 

158,221

 

Discount accretion

 

(23,873

)

(25,149

)

(45,832

)

(51,559

)

Reclassifications from nonaccretable discount and other additions to accretable discount due to results of cash flow re-estimations

 

24,543

 

22,460

 

40,907

 

40,449

 

Other activity, net (1)

 

(12,462

)

(22,990

)

(24,534

)

(38,357

)

Balance at end of period

 

$

305,592

 

$

325,724

 

$

305,592

 

$

325,724

 

 


(1) Primarily includes changes in the accretable discount due to loan payoffs, foreclosures and charge-offs.

 

For loans accounted for under ASC 310-30, the Company remeasures expected cash flows on a quarterly basis. For loans where the remeasurement process results in a decline in expected cash flows, impairment is recorded. As a result of this impairment, the indemnification asset is increased to reflect anticipated future cash to be received from the FDIC. Alternatively, when a loan’s remeasurement results in an increase in expected cash flows, the effective yield of the related loan is increased through an addition to the accretable discount. As a result of the improved cash flows, the indemnification asset is first reduced by the writing off of any indemnification asset related to impairment previously recorded with any remaining indemnification asset accreting off over the shorter of the expected term of the loan or the remaining life of the related loss-sharing agreement.

 

The total identified improvement in the cash flow expectations during the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 for both covered and uncovered purchase credit impaired loans was $24.5 million and $22.5 million, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the total identified improvement in the cash flow expectations was $40.9 million and $40.4 million, respectively. These reclassifications resulted in yield adjustments on these loans on a prospective basis. The Company also identified declines in the cash flow expectations of certain loans. A decline in the present value of current expected cash flows compared to the previously estimated expected cash flows, due in any part to change in credit, is referred to as credit impairment and recorded as provision for loan losses during the period. Declines in the present value of expected cash flows only from the expected timing of such cash flows is referred to as timing impairment and recognized prospectively as a decrease in yield on the loan.

 

Below is the composition of the recorded investment for loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

 

 

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

Contractual cash flows

 

$

1,492,546

 

$

1,357,070

 

Non-accretable difference

 

(298,754

)

(251,108

)

Accretable yield

 

(305,592

)

(302,287

)

Loans accounted for under ASC 310-30

 

$

888,200

 

$

803,675

 

 

47



Table of Contents

 

The following table details the components and impact of the provision for loan losses on covered loans and the related FDIC loss sharing income.

 

 

 

For the three months ended
June 30,

 

For the six months ended
June 30,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

Provision (benefit) for loan losses - covered:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impairment recorded as a result of re-estimation of cash flows on loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 (1)

 

$

1,066

 

$

2,554

 

$

2,365

 

$

8,398

 

Additional benefit recorded, net of charge-offs, for covered loans including those accounted for under ASC 310-20 and ASC 310-40

 

(8,387

)

(10,014

)

(12,184

)

(14,774

)

Total benefit for loan losses-covered

 

$

(7,321

)

$

(7,460

)

$

(9,819

)

$

(6,376

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less: FDIC loss share income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income recorded as a result of re-estimation of cash flows on loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 (1)

 

1,923

 

1,591

 

3,504

 

3,606

 

Expense recorded, to offset provision (benefit), for covered loans including those accounted for under ASC 310-20 and ASC 310-40

 

(5,950

)

(8,011

)

(7,467

)

(11,819

)

Total loss sharing expense due to provision for loan losses-covered

 

(4,027

)

(6,420

)

(3,963

)

(8,213

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (increase) decrease to income before taxes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (income) expense recorded as a result of re-estimation of cash flows on loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 (1) 

 

(857

)

963

 

(1,139

)

4,792

 

Net income recorded, for covered loans including those accounted for under ASC 310-20 and ASC 310-40

 

(2,437

)

(2,003

)

(4,717

)

(2,955

)

Net (increase) decrease to income before taxes

 

$

(3,294

)

$

(1,040

)

$

(5,856

)

$

1,837

 

 


(1)  The results of re-estimations also included cash flow improvements related to covered loans of $8.0 million and $13.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $16.4 million and $32.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, and 2013, respectively.  Improvements in cash flows from the re-estimation process are recognized prospectively as an adjustment to the accretable yield on the loan.

 

48



Table of Contents

 

The following table summarizes the activity related to the FDIC indemnification asset and the FDIC receivable for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.  For further detail on impairment and provision expense related to loans accounted for under ASC Topic 310-30, refer to Note 6 “Allowance for Loan Losses.”

 

 

 

For the three months ended
June 30, 2014

 

For the six months ended
June 30, 2014

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

FDIC
Indemnification
Asset

 

FDIC
Receivable

 

FDIC
Indemnification
Asset

 

FDIC
Receivable

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

119,045

 

$

8,130

 

$

131,861

 

$

7,783

 

Accretion

 

(5,506

)

 

(12,224

)

 

Sales and write-downs of other real estate owned (covered)

 

(281

)

(55

)

(753

)

(247

)

Net effect of change in allowance on covered assets (1)

 

(6,130

)

 

(8,155

)

 

Reimbursements requested from FDIC (reclassification to FDIC receivable)

 

(4,434

)

4,434

 

(8,035

)

8,035

 

Decrease due to recoveries net of additional claimable expenses incurred (2)

 

 

(3,433

)

 

(4,319

)

Claim payments received from the FDIC

 

 

(1,878

)

 

(4,054

)

Balance at end of period

 

$

102,694

 

$

7,198

 

$

102,694

 

$

7,198

 

 


(1) Primarily includes adjustments for fully claimed and exited loans and the results of remeasurement of expected cash flows under ASC 310-30 accounting.

(2) Includes expenses associated with maintaining the underlying properties and legal fees.

 

 

 

For the three months ended
June 30, 2013

 

For the six months ended
June 30, 2013

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

FDIC
Indemnification
Asset

 

FDIC
Receivable

 

FDIC
Indemnification
Asset

 

FDIC
Receivable

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

202,202

 

$

15,090

 

$

226,356

 

$

17,999

 

Accretion

 

(6,908

)

 

(15,056

)

 

Sales and write-downs of other real estate owned (covered)

 

(1,455

)

809

 

(2,318

)

1,427

 

Net effect of change in allowance on covered assets (1)

 

(14,202

)

 

(20,873

)

 

Reimbursements requested from FDIC (reclassification to FDIC receivable)

 

(7,681

)

7,681

 

(16,153

)

16,153

 

Increase (decrease) due to additional claimable expenses incurred net of recoveries (2)

 

 

(1,415

)

 

387

 

Claim payments received from the FDIC

 

 

(4,592

)

 

(18,393

)

Balance at end of period

 

$

171,956

 

$

17,573

 

$

171,956

 

$

17,573

 

 


(1) Primarily includes adjustments for fully claimed and exited loans and the results of remeasurement of expected cash flows under ASC 310-30 accounting.

(2) Includes expenses associated with maintaining the underlying properties and legal fees.

 

49



Table of Contents

 

8. OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED

 

Changes in other real estate owned were as follows:

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Uncovered

 

Covered

 

Total

 

Balance at January 1, 2014

 

$

18,384

 

$

11,571

 

$

29,955

 

Additions due to acquisitions

 

30,878

 

 

30,878

 

Transferred to other real estate owned (1)

 

8,826

 

4,946

 

13,772

 

Disposals

 

(15,241

)

(4,687

)

(19,928

)

Write-downs

 

(1,500

)

(904

)

(2,404

)

Balance at June 30, 2014

 

$

41,347

 

$

10,926

 

$

52,273

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at January 1, 2013

 

$

869

 

$

23,834

 

$

24,703

 

Additions due to acquisitions

 

18,448

 

 

18,448

 

Transferred to other real estate owned (1)

 

5,333

 

8,680

 

14,013

 

Disposals

 

(7,491

)

(8,834

)

(16,325

)

Write-downs

 

(1,253

)

(2,306

)

(3,559

)

Balance at June 30, 2013

 

$

15,906

 

$

21,374

 

$

37,280

 

 


(1) Includes loans transferred to other real estate owned and transfers to other real estate owned due to branch or building operation closings/consolidations.

 

Income and expenses related to other real estate owned were as follows:

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Uncovered

 

Covered

 

Total

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net gain on sale

 

$

2,998

 

$

91

 

$

3,089

 

Write-downs

 

(821

)

(537

)

(1,358

)

Net operating expenses

 

(919

)

(30

)

(949

)

Total

 

$

1,258

 

$

(476

)

$

782

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net gain on sale

 

$

4,002

 

$

231

 

$

4,233

 

Write-downs

 

(1,500

)

(904

)

(2,404

)

Net operating expenses

 

(1,545

)

(73

)

(1,618

)

Total

 

$

957

 

$

(746

)

$

211

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net gain on sale

 

$

1,048

 

$

44

 

$

1,092

 

Write-downs

 

(892

)

(1,154

)

(2,046

)

Net operating (expenses) income

 

(416

)

44

 

(372

)

Total

 

$

(260

)

$

(1,066

)

$

(1,326

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net gain on sale

 

$

2,418

 

$

126

 

$

2,544

 

Write-downs

 

(1,253

)

(2,306

)

(3,559

)

Net operating (expenses) income

 

(737

)

90

 

(647

)

Total

 

$

428

 

$

(2,090

)

$

(1,662

)

 

Note that covered other real estate expenses and income are partially offset by the corresponding recording of FDIC loss share income or expense.

 

9.  CORE DEPOSIT INTANGIBLES

 

The Company recorded core deposit intangibles (CDIs) associated with the acquisitions of CF Bancorp, First Banking Center, Peoples State Bank, Community Central Bank, First Place Bank and Talmer West Bank. CDIs are amortized on an accelerated basis over their estimated useful lives and have an estimated remaining weighted-average useful life of 7.59 years as of June 30, 2014. The Company had no other intangible assets as of June 30, 2014 or December 31, 2013.

 

50



Table of Contents

 

The table below presents the Company’s net carrying amount of CDIs.

 

 

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

Gross carrying amount

 

$

22,964

 

$

19,331

 

Accumulated amortization

 

(7,586

)

(6,126

)

Net carrying amount

 

$

15,378

 

$

13,205

 

 

Amortization expense recognized on CDIs was $724 thousand and $668 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $1.5 million and $1.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, included as a component of “other expense” on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

 

10.  LOAN SERVICING RIGHTS

 

Loan servicing rights are created as a result of the Company’s mortgage banking origination activities, the purchase of mortgage servicing rights, the origination and purchase of agricultural servicing rights and the origination and purchase of commercial real estate servicing rights.  Loans serviced for others are not reported as assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

The Company elected as of January 1, 2013 to account for all loan servicing rights under the fair value method.  This change in accounting policy resulted in a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings as of January 1, 2013 in the amount of $31 thousand.  For further information on this election, refer to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s 2013 Annual Report.  The following table represents the activity for loan servicing rights and the related fair value changes.

 

51



Table of Contents

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Commercial
Real Estate

 

Agricultural

 

Mortgage

 

Total

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value, beginning of period

 

$

1,079

 

$

894

 

$

75,919

 

$

77,892

 

Additions from loans sold with servicing retained

 

 

57

 

2,102

 

2,159

 

Changes in fair value due to:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reductions from loans paid off during the period

 

(11

)

(68

)

(1,668

)

(1,747

)

Changes due to valuation inputs or assumptions (1)

 

(231

)

(7

)

(3,962

)

(4,200

)

Fair value, end of period

 

$

837

 

$

876

 

$

72,391

 

$

74,104

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value, beginning of period

 

$

368

 

$

962

 

$

77,273

 

$

78,603

 

Additions due to acquisition

 

767

 

 

 

767

 

Additions from loans sold with servicing retained

 

 

123

 

3,625

 

3,748

 

Changes in fair value due to:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reductions from loans paid off during the period

 

(68

)

(137

)

(2,404

)

(2,609

)

Changes due to valuation inputs or assumptions (1)

 

(230

)

(72

)

(6,103

)

(6,405

)

Fair value, end of period

 

$

837

 

$

876

 

$

72,391

 

$

74,104

 

Principal balance of loans serviced

 

$

234,921

 

$

41,518

 

$

7,109,497

 

$

7,385,936

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value, beginning of period

 

$

461

 

$

1,253

 

$

52,047

 

$

53,761

 

Additions from loans sold with servicing retained

 

 

34

 

7,593

 

7,627

 

Changes in fair value due to:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reductions from loans paid off during the period

 

 

(167

)

(2,511

)

(2,678

)

Changes due to valuation inputs or assumptions (1)

 

(23

)

(21

)

6,521

 

6,477

 

Fair value, end of period

 

$

438

 

$

1,099

 

$

63,650

 

$

65,187

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value, beginning of period

 

$

518

 

$

1,456

 

$

3,683

 

$

5,657

 

Additions due to acquisition

 

 

 

41,967

 

41,967

 

Additions from loans sold with servicing retained

 

 

65

 

15,018

 

15,083

 

Changes in fair value due to:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reductions from loans paid off during the period

 

(4

)

(323

)

(4,177

)

(4,504

)

Changes due to valuation inputs or assumptions (1)

 

(76

)

(99

)

7,159

 

6,984

 

Fair value, end of period

 

$

438

 

$

1,099

 

$

63,650

 

$

65,187

 

Principal balance of loans serviced

 

$

294,141

 

$

52,371

 

$

6,693,048

 

$

7,039,560

 

 


(1)  Represents estimated fair value changes primarily due to prepayment speeds and market-driven changes in interest rates.

 

52



Table of Contents

 

Expected and actual loan prepayment speeds are the most significant factors driving the fair value of loan servicing rights. The following table presents assumptions utilized in determining the fair value of loan servicing rights as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

 

 

 

Commercial 
Real Estate

 

Agricultural

 

Mortgage

 

As of June 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prepayment speed

 

7.07-50.00%

 

5.26-53.43%

 

3.79-41.62%

 

Weighted average (“WA”) discount rate

 

19.45

%

15.00

%

9.65

%

WA cost to service/per year

 

$

471

 

$

200

 

$

57

 

WA Ancillary income/per year

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

36

 

WA float range

 

0.56

%

0.56

%

0.98-1.74%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prepayment speed

 

8.50-50.00%

 

4.98-53.16%

 

3.55-44.49%

 

WA discount rate

 

20.00

%

15.00

%

10.17

%

WA cost to service/per year

 

$

467

 

$

200

 

$

57

 

WA Ancillary income/per year

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

45

 

WA float range

 

0.56

%

0.56

%

0.73-1.54%

 

 

The Company realized total loan servicing fee income of $3.7 million and $4.5 million, for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $7.3 million and $8.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, recorded as a component of “Mortgage banking and other loan fees” in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

 

11.  DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

 

In the normal course of business, the Company enters into various transactions involving derivative instruments to manage exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and to meet the financing needs of customers (customer initiated derivatives).  These financial instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of market and credit risk.  Market and credit risk are included in in the determination of fair value.

 

Commitments to fund mortgage loans (interest rate locks) to be sold into the secondary market and forward commitments for the future delivery of mortgage loans to third party investors are considered derivatives. It is the Company’s practice to enter into forward commitments for the future delivery of mortgage loans when interest rate lock commitments are entered into in order to economically hedge the effect of changes in interest rates resulting from its commitments to fund the loans.

 

The Company additionally enters into interest rate derivatives to provide a service to certain qualifying customers to help facilitate their respective risk management strategies (“customer-initiated derivatives”) and, therefore, are not used to manage interest rate risk in the Company’s assets or liabilities. The Company generally takes offsetting positions with dealer counterparts to mitigate the inherent risk.  Income primarily results from the spread between the customer derivative and the offsetting dealer positions.

 

The Company has no derivatives designated as qualifying accounting hedging instruments.

 

53



Table of Contents

 

The following table reflects the amount and fair value of mortgage banking and customer initiated derivatives.  Fair values of customer-initiated derivative instruments represent the net unrealized gains or losses on such contracts and are recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.  Changes in fair value are recorded as a component of “Other noninterest income” in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Notional 
Amount

 

Gross 
Derivative 
Assets (1)

 

Gross 
Derivative 
Liabilities (1)

 

June 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forward contracts related to mortgage loans to be delivered for sale

 

$

247,441

 

$

(2,035

)

$

 

Interest rate lock commitments

 

97,657

 

2,282

 

 

Customer-initiated derivatives

 

11,834

 

276

 

81

 

Total derivative instruments

 

$

356,932

 

$

523

 

$

81

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forward contracts related to mortgage loans to be delivered for sale

 

$

168,746

 

$

1,484

 

$

 

Interest rate lock commitments

 

67,685

 

1,146

 

 

Total derivative instruments

 

$

236,431

 

$

2,630

 

$

 

 


(1) Net derivative assets are included in “Other assets” and net derivative liabilities are included in “Other liabilities” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

In the normal course of business, the Company may decide to settle a forward contract rather than fulfill the contract.  Cash received or paid in this settlement manner is included in “Net gain on sales of loans” in the Consolidated Statements of Income and is considered a cost of executing a forward contract.

 

The following table reflects the net gains (losses) relating to derivative instruments related to the changes in fair value.

 

 

 

 

 

For the three months ended 
June 30,

 

For the six months ended 
June 30,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Location of Gain (Loss)

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

Forward contracts related to mortgage loans to be delivered for sale

 

Net gain on sale of loans

 

$

(6,915

)

$

24,477

 

$

(9,909

)

$

26,126

 

Interest rate lock commitments

 

Net gain on sale of loans

 

1,274

 

(7,343

)

1,136

 

(8,834

)

Customer-inititated derivatives

 

Other noninterest income

 

6

 

 

19

 

 

Total gain (loss) recognized in income

 

 

 

$

(5,635

)

$

17,134

 

$

(8,754

)

$

17,292

 

 

Methods and assumptions used by the Company in estimating the fair value of its forward contracts, interest rate lock commitments and customer-initiated derivatives are discussed in Note 3, “Fair Value”.

 

12.  COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND GUARANTEES

 

Commitments

 

In the normal course of business, the Company offers a variety of financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include outstanding commitments to extend credit, credit lines, commercial letters of credit and standby letters of credit.

 

The Company’s exposure to credit loss, in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty to the financial instrument, is represented by the contractual amounts of those instruments. The credit policies used in making commitments and conditional obligations are the same as those used for on-balance sheet instruments.

 

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer provided there is no violation of any condition established in the commitment. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination

 

54



Table of Contents

 

clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many commitments expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on an individual basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty. The collateral held varies, but may include securities, real estate, inventory, plant, or equipment. Unfunded commitments under commercial lines of credit, revolving credit lines and overdraft protection agreements are included in commitments to extend credit. These lines of credit are generally uncollateralized, usually do not contain a specified maturity date and may be drawn upon only to the total extent to which the Company is committed.

 

Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The Company’s portfolio of standby letters of credit consists primarily of performance assurances made on behalf of customers who have a contractual commitment to produce or deliver goods or services. The risk to the Company arises from its obligation to make payment in the event of the customers’ contractual default to produce the contracted good or service to a third party.

 

The allowance for credit losses on lending-related commitments included $567 thousand and $1.0 million at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, for probable credit losses inherent in the Company’s unused commitments and was recorded in “Other liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

A summary of the contractual amounts of the Company’s exposure to off-balance sheet risk is as follows:

 

 

 

June 30, 2014

 

December 31, 2013

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Fixed Rate

 

Variable 
Rate

 

Total

 

Fixed Rate

 

Variable 
Rate

 

Total

 

Commitments to extend credit

 

$

583,064

 

$

453,492

 

$

1,036,556

 

$

523,666

 

$

216,473

 

$

740,139

 

Standby letters of credit

 

70,758

 

2,938

 

73,696

 

68,452

 

561

 

69,013

 

Total commitments

 

$

653,822

 

$

456,430

 

$

1,110,252

 

$

592,118

 

$

217,034

 

$

809,152

 

 

Contingencies and Guarantees

 

The Company has originated and sold certain loans for which the buyer has limited recourse to us in the event the loans do not perform as specified in the agreements.  These loans had an outstanding balance of $70.1 million and $79.5 million at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The maximum potential amount of undiscounted future payments that we could be required to make in the event of nonperformance by the borrower totaled $38.2 million and $42.9 million, at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.  In the event of nonperformance, we have rights to the underlying collateral securing the loans.  As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we had recorded a liability of $325 thousand and $567 thousand, respectively, in connection with the recourse agreements, recorded in “Other liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

We issue standby letters of credit for commercial customers to third parties to guarantee the performance of those customers to the third parties.  If the customer fails to perform, we perform in their place and record the funds advanced as an interest-bearing loan.  These letters of credit are underwritten using the same policies and criteria applied to commercial loans.  Therefore, they represent the same risk to us as a loan to that commercial loan customer.  At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, our standby letters of credit totaled $73.7 million and $69.0 million, respectively.

 

Representations and Warranties

 

In connection with our mortgage banking loan sales, we make certain representations and warranties that the loans meet certain criteria, such as collateral type and underwriting standards.  We may be required to repurchase individual loans and/or indemnify the purchaser against losses if the loan fails to meet established

 

55



Table of Contents

 

criteria.  At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, our liability recorded in connection with these representations and warranties totaled $4.0 million and $4.8 million, respectively.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

The Company and certain of its subsidiaries are subject to various pending or threatened legal proceedings arising out of the normal course of business. Some of these claims are against entities or assets of which the Company has acquired in business acquisitions, and certain of these claims, or future claims, will be covered by loss sharing agreements with the FDIC.

 

The Company assesses its liabilities and contingencies in connection with outstanding legal proceedings utilizing the latest information available. Where it is probable that the Company will incur a loss and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated, the Company records a liability in its consolidated financial statements. While the ultimate liability with respect to these litigation matters and claims cannot be determined at this time, in the opinion of management, any liabilities arising from pending legal proceedings would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial statements.

 

56



Table of Contents

 

13.  SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS AND LONG-TERM DEBT

 

The following table presents the components of the Company’s short-term borrowings and long-term debt.

 

 

 

June 30, 2014

 

December 31, 2013

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Amount

 

Weighted 
Average Rate (1)

 

Amount

 

Weighted 
Average Rate (1)

 

Short-term borrowings:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase: 0.05% - 0.35% floating-rate notes

 

$

148,826

 

0.21

%

$

36,876

 

0.20

%

FHLB advances: 0.26% fixed-rate notes

 

50,000

 

0.26

%

 

 

FHLB advances: 0.07% floating-rate

 

40,000

 

0.07

%

 

 

Holding company line of credit: floating-rate based on one-month LIBOR plus 3.00%

 

 

 

35,000

 

3.17

%

Total short-term borrowings

 

238,826

 

0.20

%

71,876

 

1.64

%

Long-term debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FHLB advances: 0.19% - 7.44% fixed-rate notes due August 2014 to 2027 (2)

 

198,488

 

2.17

%

130,368

 

3.28

%

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase: 4.11%-4.30% fixed-rate notes due 2016 to 2037 (3)

 

57,263

 

4.19

%

58,079

 

4.19

%

Subordinated notes related to trust preferred securities: floating-rate based on three-month LIBOR plus 1.45% due 2034 to 2035 (4)

 

10,656

 

2.47

%

10,590

 

2.49

%

Total long-term debt

 

266,407

 

2.62

%

199,037

 

3.50

%

Total short-term borrowings and long-term debt:

 

$

505,233

 

1.47

%

$

270,913

 

3.01

%

 


(1) Weighted average rate presented is the contractual rate which excludes premiums and discounts related to purchase accounting.

(2) The June 30, 2014 balance includes advances payable of $190.6 million and purchase accounting premiums of $7.9 million. The December 31, 2013 balance includes advances payable of $121.2 million and purchase accounting premiums of $9.2 million.

(3) The June 30, 2014 balance includes securities sold under agreements to repurchase of $50.0 million and purchase accounting premiums of $7.3 million. The December 31, 2013 balance includes securities sold under agreements to repurchase of $50.0 million and purchase accounting premiums of $8.1 million.

(4) The June 30, 2014 balance includes subordinated notes related to trust preferred securities of $15.0 million and purchase accounting discounts of $4.3 million.  The December 31, 2013 balance includes subordinated notes related to trust preferred securities of $15.0 million and purchase accounting discounts of $4.4 million.

 

57



Table of Contents

 

Selected financial information pertaining to the components of our short-term borrowings is as follows:

 

 

 

For the three months ended

 

For the six months ended

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

June 30, 2014

 

June 30, 2014

 

Securities sold under agreement to repurchase:

 

 

 

 

 

Average daily balance

 

$

86,444

 

$

77,054

 

Average interest rate during the period

 

0.13

%

0.11

%

Weighted-average interest rate at period end

 

0.21

%

0.18

%

Maximum month-end balance

 

$

148,826

 

$

148,826

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FHLB advances:

 

 

 

 

 

Average daily balance

 

$

38,806

 

$

19,634

 

Average interest rate during the period

 

0.13

%

0.18

%

Weighted-average interest rate at period end

 

0.18

%

1.04

%

Maximum month-end balance

 

$

90,000

 

$

90,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal funds purchased:

 

 

 

 

 

Average daily balance

 

$

1,132

 

$

2,254

 

Average interest rate during the period

 

0.28

%

0.25

%

Interest rate at period end

 

N/A

(1)

N/A

(1)

Maximum month-end balance

 

$

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FHLB overnight repurchase agreements:

 

 

 

 

 

Average daily balance

 

$

 

$

4,420

 

Average interest rate during the period

 

0.00

%

0.10

%

Interest rate at period end

 

N/A

(1)

N/A

(1)

Maximum month-end balance

 

$

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Holding company line of credit:

 

 

 

 

 

Average daily balance

 

$

 

$

11,215

 

Average interest rate during the period

 

0.00

%

3.17

%

Interest rate at period end

 

N/A

(1)

N/A

(1)

Maximum month-end balance

 

$

 

$

35,000

 

 


(1) The holding company line of credit, Federal funds purchased and FHLB overnight repurchase agreements did not have oustanding balances at June 30, 2014.

 

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are typically held by an independent third party when they are for retail customers (short-term borrowings) and are delivered to the counterparty when they are wholesale borrowings with brokerage firms (long-term debt).  At maturity, the securities underlying the agreements are returned to the banks.  Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are secured by mortgage-backed securities and bonds with an amortized cost of $356.9 million at June 30, 2014.

 

Our subsidiary banks are members of the FHLB, which provides short- and long-term funding collateralized by mortgage-related assets to its members.  Each advance is payable at its maturity date, with a prepayment penalty for fixed rate advances.  At June 30, 2014, FHLB advances were collateralized by $1.6 billion of commercial and mortgage loans, with $1.0 billion in the form of a blanket lien arrangement and $527.2 million under specific lien arrangements.  Based on this collateral, the Company is eligible to borrow up to an additional $842.9 million at June 30, 2014.

 

58



Table of Contents

 

14.  INCOME TAXES

 

The current and deferred components of the provision for income taxes were as follows:

 

 

 

For the three months ended June 30,

 

For the six months ended June 30,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

Current income tax expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

$

(13,079

)

$

6,793

 

$

(16,024

)

$

(1,241

)

State

 

(338

)

(2,030

)

(416

)

(654

)

Total current income tax expense

 

(13,417

)

4,763

 

(16,440

)

(1,895

)

Deferred income tax expense (benefit)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

18,274

 

449

 

19,528

 

5,543

 

State

 

646

 

2,531

 

1,137

 

1,045

 

Total deferred income tax expense (benefit)

 

18,920

 

2,980

 

20,665

 

6,588

 

Change in valuation allowance

 

(9,749

)

 

(10,127

)

 

Income tax provision (benefit)

 

$

(4,246

)

$

7,743

 

$

(5,902

)

$

4,693

 

 

Provision for income taxes is computed by applying an estimated annual effective tax rate, based on our forecast of annual income from continuing operations, to year-to-date pre-tax income from continuing operations, and then adjusting for any additional tax effects required to be recorded discretely in the quarter to which they relate.

 

A reconciliation of expected income tax expense (benefit) at the federal statutory rate to the Company’s provision for income taxes and effective tax rate follows

 

 

 

For the three months ended June 30,

 

For the six months ended June 30,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Amount

 

Rate

 

Amount

 

Rate

 

Amount

 

Rate

 

Amount

 

Rate

 

Tax based on federal statutory rate

 

$

5,726

 

35.0

%

$

7,963

 

35.0

%

$

17,889

 

35.0

%

$

28,054

 

35.0

%

Effect of:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax exempt income

 

(475

)

(2.9

)

(451

)

(2.0

)

(1,202

)

(2.4

)

(879

)

(1.1

)

State taxes, net of federal benefit

 

201

 

1.2

 

325

 

1.4

 

469

 

0.9

 

254

 

0.3

 

Change in valuation allowance

 

(9,749

)

(59.6

)

 

 

(10,127

)

(19.8

)

 

 

Bargain purchase gain

 

 

 

 

 

(14,055

)

(27.5

)

(25,096

)

(31.3

)

Transaction costs

 

426

 

2.6

 

 

 

454

 

0.9

 

2,581

 

3.2

 

Other, net

 

(375

)

(2.3

)

(94

)

(0.4

)

670

 

1.3

 

(221

)

(0.3

)

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

$

(4,246

)

(26.0

) %

$

7,743

 

34.0

%

$

(5,902

)

(11.5

) %

$

4,693

 

5.9

%

 

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company recognized an income tax benefit of $4.2 million and $5.9 million on $16.4 million and $51.1 million of pre-tax income, an effective tax rate of negative 26.0% and 11.5%, respectively, compared to an income tax expense of $7.7 million and $4.7 million on $22.7 million and $80.2 million of pre-tax income, an effective tax rate of 34.0% and 5.9%, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013.  The income tax benefit for the three months ended June 30, 2014 resulted primarily from the relief of $9.7 million of remaining valuation allowance related to the deferred tax assets acquired in the First Place Bank acquisition. See below for a discussion on the relief of the valuation allowance. The income tax benefit for the six months ended June 30, 2014 resulted primarily from the relief of the valuation allowance and treating the $40.2 million bargain purchase gain resulting from the acquisition of Talmer West Bank on January 1, 2014 as non-taxable, based on the tax structure of the acquisition. The income tax expense of $4.7 million with an effective tax rate of only 5.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2013 is primarily the result of treating the $71.7 million bargain purchase gain resulting from the acquisition of First Place Bank on January 1, 2013 as non-taxable, based on the tax structure of the acquisition.

 

59



Table of Contents

 

The significant components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were as follows:

 

 

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses

 

$

49,334

 

$

51,527

 

Other real estate losses

 

8,107

 

3,702

 

Organizational costs

 

290

 

311

 

Accrued stock-based compensation

 

5,991

 

5,926

 

Loss and tax credit carry forwards

 

30,657

 

19,298

 

Other reserves

 

1,921

 

1,988

 

Goodwill and other intangibles

 

1,389

 

1,494

 

Nonaccrual interest

 

10,428

 

10,150

 

Business combination adjustments

 

74,522

 

53,890

 

Net unrealized loss on available for sale securities

 

 

4,306

 

Other

 

25

 

 

Total deferred tax assets

 

182,664

 

152,592

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

4,345

 

3,996

 

FHLB stock dividends

 

248

 

1,541

 

Deferred loan fees

 

974

 

1,229

 

Prepaid expenses

 

151

 

799

 

Net unrealized gain on available for sale securities

 

1,202

 

 

Loan servicing rights

 

25,906

 

27,334

 

Other

 

 

247

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

 

32,826

 

35,146

 

Net deferred tax asset before valuation allowance

 

149,838

 

117,446

 

Valuation allowance

 

 

(10,127

)

Net deferred tax asset

 

$

149,838

 

$

107,319

 

 

On January 1, 2014, the Company acquired Talmer West Bank and recorded $58.6 million in deferred tax assets at acquisition.  Upon acquisition, Talmer West Bank incurred a Section 382 ownership change.  As such, the Company’s ability to benefit from the use of Talmer West Bank’s pre-ownership change net operating loss carry forwards, as well as the deductibility of certain of its built-in losses if realized during a five-year recognition period (one year with respect to bad debt deductions), will be limited to approximately $3.0 million per year, putting at risk the utilization of associated deferred tax assets before they expire.  No valuation allowance was established against the deferred tax assets associated with Talmer West Bank’s pre-change losses based on management’s estimate of the amount and timing of built-in losses more likely than not to be realized over the Section 382 recognition period, and the impact on our utilization of pre-ownership change net operating loss carry forwards.  In determining its estimate of built-in losses more likely than not to be realized within the Section 382 recognition period, management focused primarily on tax losses embedded in Talmer West Bank’s loan portfolio and other real estate owned and, to a lesser extent, on tax losses embedded in fixed assets, investments in partnerships and certain accrued expenses, and anticipated when these losses might create actual tax deductions, either through bad debt deductions, depreciation, amortization, payment, or disposition of the assets in question.

 

At January 1, 2014, Talmer West Bank had an estimated $23.5 million in gross federal loss carry forwards expiring in 2032 and 2033.  The exact amount of pre-ownership change carry forwards cannot be determined until the finalization of Capitol Bancorp, Ltd.’s consolidated tax return (parent of Talmer West Bank’s former parent) for

 

60



Table of Contents

 

the year ended December 31, 2014, at which time final allocations will be made from that return to the entity acquired by the Company.

 

The valuation allowance of $10.1 million against the Company’s deferred tax asset at December 31, 2013 related to Section 382 ownership changes incurred by First Place Bank, upon its acquisition by the Company on January 1, 2013. The valuation allowance established at December 31, 2013 was based on management’s calculation of the annual 382 limitation and its estimate of the amount and timing of built-in losses more likely than not to be realized over the Section 382 recognition period, and the impact on our utilization of pre-ownership change operating loss and tax credit carry forwards.

 

At December 31, 2013, the Company, including First Place Bank and its related acquired affiliates, had the following estimated loss and tax credit carry forwards:  $26.9 million in gross federal loss carry forwards, $856 thousand in tax credits expiring between 2027 and 2032, and $1.9 million in federal alternative minimum tax credits with an indefinite life. At December 31, 2013, the Company estimated the use of $24.8 million in estimated gross federal loss carry forwards and $856 thousand in tax credits related to First Place Bank and its acquired affiliates, expiring between 2027 and 2032 would be limited to $1.7 million annually due to an ownership change, within the meaning of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, incurred at January 1, 2013.  In the second quarter of 2014, the Company, with the assistance of a legal and tax accounting external experts, reached a conclusion regarding the calculation of the annual 382 limitation related to the ownership change of First Place Bank which resulted in an increase of the annual 382 limitation from $1.7 million to $6.6 million.  This increase eliminated the need for a valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets acquired in the First Place Bank acquisition.

 

The use of $3.7 million of gross federal loss carry forwards, expiring between 2027 and 2029, is limited to $145 thousand annually due to an ownership change within the meaning of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code incurred in November 2009. The carrying value was previously reduced to reflect that $1.4 million will expire unused.

 

Outside of the Section 382-limited deferred tax assets acquired in both the Talmer West Bank and First Place Bank acquisitions, management concluded that no valuation allowance was necessary on the remainder of the Company’s net deferred tax assets at either December 31, 2013 or June 30, 2014.  This determination was based on the Company’s history of pre-tax and taxable income over the prior three years, as well as management’s expectations for sustainable profitability in the future.  Management monitors deferred tax assets quarterly for changes affecting realizability and the valuation allowance could be adjusted in future periods.

 

Actual outcomes could vary from the Company’s current estimates, resulting in future increases or decreases in the valuation allowance and corresponding future tax expense or benefit.

 

At June 30, 2014, Talmer Bank and Trust had approximately $36.0 million of bad debt reserve in equity for which no provision for federal income taxes was recorded. This amount represents First Place Bank’s qualifying thrift bad debt reserve at December 31, 1987, which is only required to be recaptured into taxable income if certain events occur. At June 30, 2014, the potential tax on the above amount was approximately $13.0 million. The Company does not intend to take any action that would result in a recapture of any portion of its bad debt reserve.

 

In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into certain transactions that have tax consequences.  From time to time, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and state taxing authorities may review and/or challenge specific interpretive tax positions taken by the Company with respect to those transactions.  The Company believes that its tax returns, as well as First Place Bank and Talmer West Bank’s tax returns for periods prior to the acquisitions, were filed based upon applicable statutes, regulations and case law in effect at the time of the transactions.  The IRS, various state and other jurisdictions, if presented with the transactions, could disagree with the Company’s interpretation of the tax law.

 

61



Table of Contents

 

First Place Bank had received notice that the IRS had denied refund claims in amended tax returns filed by First Place Bank on a consolidated basis with its former parent company, First Place Financial Corp., for fiscal years ended June 30, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005.  The Company disagrees with the IRS position and is working with First Place Financial Corp. to appeal the examination-level decision.  Though not anticipated, an adverse result on appeal could impact the $11.7 million refund receivable recorded by the Company upon acquisition of First Place Bank.  In the second quarter of 2014, the IRS commenced an examination of the consolidated Federal tax returns of First Place Bank’s former parent for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2013, 2012, 2011, which returns included First Place Bank through January 1, 2013.  The results of this examination are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial statements.  First Place Bank’s Federal tax return for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 is currently subject to potential examination as well.  There are several years of returns that are still open to examination by various taxing authorities for Talmer West Bank.

 

During the first quarter 2014, the Company closed an examination by the IRS of Talmer Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries’ federal returns for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, with no significant tax changes. The Company’s federal tax return for the years ended December 31, 2012 to present are open to potential examination.  The Company’s most significant states of operation, Michigan and Ohio, do not impose income-based taxes on financial institutions. The Company and/or its subsidiaries are subject to minor amounts of income tax in various other states, with varying years open to potential examination.  The Company is not aware of any pending income tax examinations by any state jurisdiction.

 

The Company had no unrecognized tax benefits at June 30, 2014 or 2013 and does not expect to record unrecognized tax benefits of any significance during the next twelve months.  The Company recognizes interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense, when applicable.  There are no liabilities accrued for interest or penalties at June 30, 2014 or 2013.

 

15.  STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

 

The Company’s 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), along with amendments made to the Plan, limits the number of shares issued or issuable to employees, directors and certain consultants at 9.8 million shares of common stock.

 

Stock Options

 

Options are granted with an exercise price equal to or greater than the fair market price of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant.  The vesting and terms of option awards are determined by the Company’s Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.  During the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company granted 35 thousand and 3.6 million stock options, respectively, that were fully vested upon issuance and will remain outstanding for 10 years after the grant date.  As of June 30, 2014, 1.5 million option shares were available to be granted.

 

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the table below.  Given the relatively short history of Company stock being publicly traded during the six months ended June 30, 2014, post our public offering in February of 2014, and minimal trading in the Company’s stock during the six months ended June 30, 2013, it was not practicable for the Company to estimate volatility of its share price.  For the six months ended June 30, 2014 the Company used the average volatility of comparable public Bank holding companies as an input to the valuation model.  For the six months ended June 30, 2013 the Company used the volatility of an appropriate industry index (the ABA NASDAQ Community Bank Index) as an input in the valuation model. Since limited historical data is available, the expected term of options granted was estimated to be six years for both the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 based on expected lives used by a sample of other Midwest banks.  The risk-free interest rate was based on the U.S.

 

62



Table of Contents

 

Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant corresponding with the expected life of the options. All shares granted are expected to vest and the Company intends to issue already authorized shares to satisfy options upon exercise.

 

The fair value of options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were determined using the following weighted-average assumptions as of the grant date.

 

 

 

For the six months ended June 30,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

Fair value of options granted

 

$

4.77

 

$

2.13

 

Expected volatility

 

30.02

%

24.37

%

Risk-free interest rate

 

1.98

%

0.97

%

Expected life (in years)

 

6.00

 

6.00

 

 

Activity in the Plan during the six months ended June 30, 2014 is summarized below:

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

Number
of Shares
(in thousands)

 

Exercise 
Price per 
Share

 

Remaining 
Contractual Life
(in years)

 

Aggregate 
Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)

 

Outstanding at January 1, 2014

 

8,441

 

$

6.88

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

35

 

14.44

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised (1)

 

(340

)

6.25

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited or expired

 

(2

)

7.25

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at June 30, 2014

 

8,134

 

6.94

 

7.19

 

55,721

 

Options fully vested and expected to vest

 

8,134

 

6.94

 

7.19

 

55,721

 

Exercisable at June 30, 2014

 

8,063

 

6.93

 

7.19

 

55,315

 

 


(1) Options exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2014 had a weighted average fair value of $13.57, at respective exercise dates.  In the six months ended June 30, 2014, there were 118 thousand shares issued under the net-settlement option.  Total cash received from option exercises during the six months ended June 30, 2014 was $108 thousand resulting in the issuance of 17 thousand shares.

 

The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $2.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014.  There were no option exercises during the six months ended June 30, 2013.

 

Total compensation expense for stock options, included in “Salary and employee benefits” in the Consolidated Statements of Income, was $207 thousand and $819 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $387 thousand and $9.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

 

A summary of changes in the Company’s nonvested shares for the six months ended June 30, 2014 follows:

 

Nonvested Shares

 

Shares
 (in thousands)

 

Weighted-Average 
Grant-Date Fair Value

 

Nonvested at January 1, 2014

 

348

 

$

2.24

 

Granted

 

35

 

 

 

Vested

 

310

 

 

 

Forfeited

 

2

 

 

 

Nonvested at June 30, 2014

 

71

 

$

2.21

 

 

63



Table of Contents

 

As of June 30, 2014, there was $73 thousand of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options granted under the Plan.  The cost is expected to be recognized during the year ended December 31, 2014.

 

Restricted Stock Awards

 

Under the Plan, the Company can grant restricted stock awards that vest upon completion of future service requirements or specified performance criteria.  The fair value of these awards is equal to the market price of the common stock at the date of grant.  The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense for these awards over the vesting period, using the straight-line method, based upon the number of shares of restricted stock ultimately expected to vest.  Restricted stock awards granted in June of 2014 vest in their entirety following a five year service period for employees and over a one year service period for directors.  Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.  If an individual awarded restricted stock awards terminates employment prior to the end of the vesting period, the unvested portion of the stock award is forfeited.

 

The following table provides information regarding nonvested restricted stock awards:

 

Nonvested Restricted Stock Awards

 

Shares
 (in thousands)

 

Weighted-Average 
Grant-Date Fair Value

 

Nonvested at January 1, 2014

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

377,800

 

14.44

 

Nonvested at June 30, 2014

 

377,800

 

$

14.44

 

 

Total expense for restricted stock awards totaled $67 thousand for both the three and six month periods of June 30, 2014, of which $50 thousand was included in “Salary and employee benefits” related to employees and $17 thousand was included in “Professional fees” related to directors in the Consolidated Statements of Income.  There were no restricted stock awards outstanding prior to June of 2014.  As of June 30, 2014, the total compensation costs related to nonvested restricted stock that has not yet been recognized totaled $5.4 million and the weighted-average period over which these costs are expected to be recognized is 4.7 years.

 

16. REGULATORY CAPITAL MATTERS

 

Banks and bank holding companies are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Capital adequacy guidelines and, additionally for banks, prompt corrective action regulations, involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators. Failure to meet capital requirements can initiate regulatory action. Management believes as of June 30, 2014, the Company and its subsidiary banks met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.

 

Prompt corrective action regulations provide five classifications:  well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized, although these terms are not used to represent overall financial condition. If adequately capitalized, regulatory approval is required to accept brokered deposits. If undercapitalized, capital distributions are limited, as is asset growth and expansion, and capital restoration plans are required.

 

Talmer Bank and Trust was required to maintain Tier 1 common equity to total assets ratio of at least 10% under the FDIC’s Statement of Policy on Qualifications for Failed Bank Acquisitions for a period of three years following the Company’s most recent failed bank acquisition, and thereafter must maintain a capital level sufficient to be well capitalized under regulatory standards during the remaining period of ownership of the investors covered by the FDIC’s Statement of Policy. Talmer Bank and Trust’s last failed bank acquisition closed on April 29, 2011

 

64



Table of Contents

 

and, therefore, remained subject to the heightened capital requirement through April 29, 2014.  At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the most recent regulatory notifications categorized Talmer Bank and Trust as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the institution’s category.

 

The capital ratios of Talmer West Bank at June 30, 2014 exceed the total capital (to risk-weighted assets) ratio of at least 12.0% and a Tier 1 capital (to adjusted total assets) ratio of at least 9.0% as prescribed in the Consent Order by the FDIC and the Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services on April 5, 2010.  Notwithstanding its capital levels, Talmer West Bank will not be categorized as well capitalized while it is subject to the Consent Order.

 

Consent Order

 

On April 5, 2010, Michigan Commerce Bank consented to the issuance of the Consent Order by the FDIC and the Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services, which remains in effect following our acquisition of Talmer West Bank, as the surviving bank in the merger, on January 1, 2014.  The Consent Order represents an agreement to take certain actions, including, among other things: assessing and retaining qualified management; achieving and maintaining specified capital ratios; reducing certain classified assets, including the charge-off of loans classified ‘‘loss;’’ reviewing the allowance for loan and lease losses policy; implementing a comprehensive profit plan and budget; implementing a plan to manage concentrations of credit; and revising the bank’s policies governing interest rate risk.

 

The Consent Order also prohibits Talmer West Bank, without prior regulatory approval, from paying dividends, retaining new directors or senior executive officers, or entering into any material transaction.

 

Cease and Desist Order

 

On July 13, 2011, First Place Bank consented to a Cease and Desist Order which replaced the separate supervisory agreement entered into with the OTS on March 1, 2011. The Cease and Desist Order represents an agreement to take certain actions, including the submission of capital and business plans to, among other things, preserve and enhance the capital of First Place Bank and strengthen and improve its earnings and profitability.  On January 28, 2014, the FDIC approved the consolidation of First Place Bank with and into Talmer Bank and Trust.  Effective February 10, 2014, First Place Bank was merged with Talmer Bank and Trust and the Cease and Desist Order has no further force or effect.

 

65



Table of Contents

 

The following is a summary of actual and required capital amounts and ratios:

 

 

 

Actual

 

For Capital
Adequacy
Purposes

 

To Be Well
Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Amount

 

Ratio

 

Amount

 

Ratio

 

Amount

 

Ratio

 

June 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total capital to risk-weighted assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Talmer Bancorp, Inc. (Consolidated)

 

$

668,547

 

17.3

%

$

309,036

 

8.0

%

N/A

 

N/A

 

Talmer Bank and Trust

 

577,506

 

17.4

 

265,394

 

8.0

 

$

331,743

 

10.0

%

Talmer West Bank (1)

 

90,579

 

16.3

 

44,535

 

8.0

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Talmer Bancorp, Inc. (Consolidated)

 

624,432

 

16.2

 

154,518

 

4.0

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

Talmer Bank and Trust

 

535,815

 

16.2

 

132,697

 

4.0

 

199,046

 

6.0

 

Talmer West Bank (1)

 

88,067

 

15.8

 

22,267

 

4.0

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tier 1 leverage ratio

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Talmer Bancorp, Inc. (Consolidated)

 

624,432

 

11.7

 

213,377

 

4.0

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

Talmer Bank and Trust

 

535,815

 

12.1

 

177,321

 

4.0

 

221,651

 

5.0

 

Talmer West Bank (1)

 

88,067

 

9.9

 

35,453

 

4.0

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total capital to risk-weighted assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Talmer Bancorp, Inc. (Consolidated)

 

$

583,370

 

19.2

%

$

242,885

 

8.0

%

N/A

 

N/A

 

Talmer Bank and Trust

 

253,044

 

18.4

 

110,123

 

8.0

 

$

137,654

 

10.0

%

First Place Bank (2)

 

263,297

 

15.9

 

132,207

 

8.0

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Talmer Bancorp, Inc. (Consolidated)

 

555,350

 

18.3

 

121,443

 

4.0

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

Talmer Bank and Trust

 

235,448

 

17.1

 

55,062

 

4.0

 

82,593

 

6.0

 

First Place Bank (2)

 

252,873

 

15.3

 

66,104

 

4.0

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tier 1 leverage ratio

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Talmer Bancorp, Inc. (Consolidated)

 

555,350

 

12.2

 

182,221

 

4.0

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

Talmer Bank and Trust

 

235,448

 

10.3

 

91,363

 

4.0

 

114,204

 

5.0

 

First Place Bank (2)

 

252,873

 

11.7

 

86,521

 

4.0

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

 


(1) Notwithstanding its capital levels, Talmer West Bank will not be categorized as well capitalized while it is subject to the Consent Order.

(2) Notwithstanding its capital levels, First Place Bank was not categorized as well capitalized while it was subject to the Cease and Desist Order.  On February 10, 2014, First Place Bank was merged with and into Talmer Bank and Trust and the Cease and Desist Order had no further force or effect.

 

The Company’s principal source of funds for dividend payments is dividends received from its subsidiary banks. Banking regulations limit the amount of dividends that may be paid without prior approval of regulatory agencies. Talmer Bank and Trust cannot declare or pay a cash dividend or dividend in kind unless Talmer Bank and Trust will have a surplus amounting to not less than 20% of its capital after payment of the dividend.  In addition, Talmer Bank and Trust may pay dividends only out of net income then on hand, after deducting its losses and bad debts.  Further, Talmer Bank and Trust may not declare or pay a dividend until cumulative dividends on preferred stock, if any, are paid in full.  These limitations can affect Talmer Bank and Trust’s ability to pay dividends.

 

66



Table of Contents

 

Under FDIC regulations, limitations are imposed on all of Talmer West Bank’s capital distributions, including cash dividends.  As of June 30, 2014, Talmer West Bank was not able to pay any dividends without prior regulatory approval.

 

On August 6, 2014, a cash dividend on the Company’s Class A common stock of $0.01 per share was declared.  The dividend will be paid on August 29, 2014, to the Company’s Class A common shareholders of record as of August 18, 2014.

 

17.  PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Balance Sheets - Parent Co.

 

 

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

17,497

 

$

98,411

 

Investment in banking subsidiaries

 

718,491

 

562,381

 

Income tax benefit

 

5,265

 

5,404

 

Other assets

 

1,154

 

1,783

 

Total assets

 

$

742,407

 

$

667,979

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term borrowings

 

$

 

$

35,000

 

Long-term debt

 

10,656

 

10,590

 

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

 

5,626

 

5,374

 

Total liabilities

 

16,282

 

50,964

 

Shareholders’ equity

 

726,125

 

617,015

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

 

$

742,407

 

$

667,979

 

 

67



Table of Contents

 

Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income - Parent Co.

 

 

 

For the three months ended June 30,

 

For the six months ended June 30,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividend income from subsidiary

 

$

 

$

 

$

25,000

 

$

55,000

 

Bargain purchase gain

 

 

 

40,157

 

71,702

 

Other noninterest income

 

3

 

 

5

 

 

Total income

 

3

 

 

65,162

 

126,702

 

Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries and employee benefits

 

2,042

 

1,435

 

5,955

 

18,359

 

Bank acquisition and due diligence fees

 

266

 

358

 

1,974

 

7,590

 

Professional services

 

492

 

100

 

1,086

 

934

 

Marketing expense

 

26

 

12

 

191

 

1,025

 

Interest on long-term debt

 

125

 

125

 

252

 

296

 

Other

 

293

 

129

 

514

 

231

 

Total expenses

 

3,244

 

2,159

 

10,123

 

28,435

 

Income before income taxes and equity in

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

undistributed net earnings of subsidiaries

 

(3,241

)

(2,159

)

55,039

 

98,267

 

Income tax benefit

 

420

 

753

 

2,457

 

7,367

 

Equity in (over)/under distributed earnings of subsidiaries

 

23,427

 

16,412

 

(483

)

(30,173

)

Net income

 

$

20,606

 

$

15,006

 

$

57,013

 

$

75,461

 

Total comprehensive income, net of tax

 

$

20,606

 

$

15,006

 

$

57,013

 

$

75,461

 

 

68



Table of Contents

 

Statements of Cash Flows - Parent Co.

 

 

 

For the six months ended June 30,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

Cash flows from operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

57,013

 

$

75,461

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Equity in (over)/under distributed earnings of subsidiaries

 

(24,517

)

30,173

 

Gain on acquisition

 

(40,157

)

(71,702

)

Stock-based compensation expense

 

248

 

8,245

 

Decrease in income tax benefit

 

139

 

2,533

 

Decrease in other assets, net

 

629

 

9,723

 

Increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities, net

 

318

 

3,841

 

Net cash from (used in) operating activities

 

(6,327

)

58,274

 

Cash flows from investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

Cash (used in) proceeds from acquisitions

 

(6,500

)

(45,000

)

Capital contributions to subsidiaries

 

(99,500

)

(179,000

)

Dividends received from subsidiaries

 

25,000

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(81,000

)

(224,000

)

Cash flows from financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock

 

41,413

 

 

Repayment of senior unsecured line of credit

 

(35,000

)

 

Net cash from financing activities

 

6,413

 

 

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

 

(80,914

)

(165,726

)

Beginning cash and cash equivalents

 

98,411

 

211,849

 

Ending cash and cash equivalents

 

$

17,497

 

$

46,123

 

 

18.  EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

 

The two-class method is used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share.  Under the two-class method, earnings available to common shareholders for the period are allocated between common shareholders and participating securities according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and participating rights in undistributed earnings.  Common shares outstanding include common stock and vested restricted stock awards, when applicable.  On June 10, 2014 the Company awarded restricted stock to certain employees and directors of the Company which qualify as participating securities.  The factors used in the earnings per share computation follow:

 

69



Table of Contents

 

 

 

For the three months ended
June 30,

 

For the six months ended
June 30,

 

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

Net income

 

$

20,606

 

$

15,006

 

$

57,013

 

$

75,461

 

Net income allocated to participating securities

 

26

 

 

36

 

 

Net income allocated to common shareholders (1)

 

$

20,580

 

$

15,006

 

$

56,977

 

$

75,461

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares - issued

 

70,107

 

66,229

 

69,115

 

66,229

 

Average unvested restricted share awards

 

(86

)

 

(44

)

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic

 

70,021

 

66,229

 

69,071

 

66,229

 

Effect of dilutive securities -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employee and director stock options

 

4,112

 

2,636

 

3,991

 

2,548

 

Warrants

 

1,526

 

987

 

1,469

 

987

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted

 

75,659

 

69,852

 

74,531

 

69,764

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EPS available to common shareholders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.29

 

$

0.23

 

$

0.82

 

$

1.14

 

Diluted

 

$

0.27

 

$

0.21

 

$

0.76

 

$

1.08

 

 


(1) Net income allocated to common shareholders for basic and diluted earnings per share may differ under the two-class method as a result of adding common share equivalents for options and warrants to dilutive shares outstanding, which alters the ratio used to allocate net income to common shareholders and participating securities for the purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share.

 

For the effect of dilutive securities, the average stock valuation is $13.77 per share and assumed to be $10.00 per share for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and the assumed average stock valuation is $13.24 per share and $10.00 per share for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 respectively.

 

The following average shares related to outstanding options and warrants to purchase shares of common stock were not included in the computation of diluted net income available to common shareholders for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 respectively, because they were antidilutive.  There were no outstanding antidilutive warrants during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.

 

 

 

For the three months ended
June 30,

 

For the six months ended
June 30,

 

(Shares in thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

Average outstanding options

 

8

 

11

 

4

 

5

 

Outstanding exercise prices:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Low end

 

$

14.44

 

$

10.00

 

$

14.44

 

$

10.00

 

High end

 

$

14.44

 

$

10.00

 

$

14.44

 

$

10.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average outstanding warrants

 

 

39

 

 

39

 

Outstanding exercise prices:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Low end

 

 

 

$

10.00

 

 

 

$

10.00

 

High end

 

 

 

$

10.00

 

 

 

$

10.00

 

 

70



Table of Contents

 

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

 

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

The following discussion describes our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 and also analyzes our financial condition as of June 30, 2014 as compared to December 31, 2013. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes appearing in this report and in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes and disclosures in our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

In this report, unless the context suggests otherwise, references to “Talmer Bancorp, Inc.,” “the Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” mean the combined business of Talmer Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiary banks, Talmer Bank and Trust (“Talmer Bank”) , First Place Bank and Talmer West Bank.  However, if the discussion relates to a period before our acquisition of First Place Bank on January 1, 2013, the terms refer to Talmer Bancorp, Inc. and Talmer Bank; if the discussion relates to a period before our acquisition of Talmer West Bank on January 1, 2014, the terms refer to Talmer Bancorp, Inc., Talmer Bank and First Place Bank; and if the discussion relates to a period following the merger of First Place Bank with and into Talmer Bank on February 10, 2014, the terms refer to Talmer Bancorp, Inc., Talmer Bank and Talmer West Bank.

 

We have made, and will continue to make, various forward-looking statements with respect to financial and business matters.  Comments regarding our business that are not historical facts are considered forward-looking statements that involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those contained in these forward-looking statements. For additional information regarding our cautionary disclosures, see the “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements ” beginning on page 1 of this report.

 

Business Overview

 

Talmer Bancorp, Inc. is a bank holding company headquartered in Troy, Michigan.  Between April 30, 2010 and June 30, 2014, we successfully completed six bank acquisitions totaling $5.9 billion in assets and $5.8 billion in liabilities.  Through our wholly-owned subsidiary banks, Talmer Bank and Trust (“Talmer Bank”) and Talmer West Bank, we are a full service community bank offering a full suite of commercial and retail banking, mortgage banking, wealth management and trust services to small and medium-sized businesses and individuals primarily within Southeastern Michigan, Western Michigan and in smaller communities in Northeastern Michigan, as well as Northeastern and Eastern Ohio, Northern Indiana, South Central and Southeastern Wisconsin, Chicago, Illinois and Las Vegas, Nevada.

 

Given our strong capital position, local market knowledge and experienced leadership team, management believes we have a competitive advantage in the markets that we serve.  We have retained a seasoned community bank management team with executive management experience in community banks located in our Midwest markets. With a well-managed, financially sound and well-capitalized bank, management believes it has significant opportunities to expand in the current market environment through organic growth and strategic acquisitions of banking franchises in our concentrated markets of Michigan, Ohio and Indiana, as well as the Chicago Metropolitan area of Illinois.

 

Our product line includes loans to small and medium-sized businesses, residential mortgage loans, commercial real estate loans, residential and commercial construction and development loans, farmland and agricultural production loans, home equity loans, consumer loans and a variety of commercial and consumer demand, savings and time deposit products.  We also offer online banking and bill payment services, online cash management, safe deposit box rentals, debit card and ATM card services and the availability of a network of ATMs for our customers.

 

We have grown substantially since our operations began in August of 2007, with much of the growth occurring through acquisitions.  Since April 30, 2010, Talmer Bank has acquired the following four banks from the FDIC, as receiver, all of which have been fully integrated into our operations:

 

·                   CF Bancorp, Port Huron, Michigan on April 30, 2010;

·                   First Banking Center, Burlington, Wisconsin on November 19, 2010;

 

71



Table of Contents

 

·                   Peoples State Bank, Hamtramck, Michigan on February 11, 2011; and

·                   Community Central Bank, Mount Clemens, Michigan on April 29, 2011.

 

In addition, on January 1, 2013, we closed on the acquisition of First Place Bank, and on January 1, 2014, we closed on the acquisition of Talmer West Bank, formerly Michigan Commerce Bank.  First Place Bank had operated under a Cease and Desist Order with its regulator since July 13, 2011.  The Cease and Desist Order remained in effect following our acquisition of First Place Bank on January 1, 2013.  Following our acquisition, we devoted significant internal management resources as well as engaged third party professionals to assist us in evaluating and improving internal and risk management controls of First Place Bank, including hiring a nationally recognized third party to evaluate the internal and risk management controls over the bank’s mortgage banking operations.  Additionally, substantial resources were deployed to enhance the core operating technology, build and implement a disaster recovery plan and improve consumer compliance processes.  First Place Bank achieved compliance with the Cease and Desist Order, and on January 28, 2014, the FDIC approved the consolidation of First Place Bank with and into Talmer Bank, which occurred on February 10, 2014.  At the effective time of the consolidation, the Cease and Desist Order had no further force or effect.  Additionally, at the time of our acquisition of Talmer West Bank on January 1, 2014, Talmer West Bank was subject to a Consent Order with its regulators, which remains in effect.  For a further discussion of the Consent Order, see “ Talmer West Bank Consent Order with the FDIC and Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services ” in “ Supervision and Regulation ” of our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

As of June 30, 2014, we had $3.8 billion in total loans, compared to $3.0 billion at December 31, 2013.  Of this amount $2.2 billion, or 58.6%, consisted of loans we acquired (all of which were adjusted to their estimated fair values at the time of acquisition), and $1.6 billion consisted of loans we originated.

 

We had net income of $57.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to $75.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013. Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2014, included a bargain purchase gain of $40.2 million resulting from our acquisition of Talmer West Bank. We also incurred $11.7 million of transaction and integration related expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2014, including severance expense, bank acquisition and due diligence fees, bonus payments related to our successful acquisition of Talmer West Bank, the merger of First Place Bank and Talmer Bank and the completion of our initial public offering, as well as expenses incurred related to termination of certain software contracts.  These transaction and integration related expenses are detailed in the table below.

 

 

 

Six months ended June 30, 2014

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Actual

 

Transaction and
integration related
expenses

 

Excluding transaction and
integration related
expenses

 

Noninterest expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Salary and employee benefits

 

$

66,120

 

$

5,816

 

$

60,304

 

Occupancy and equipment expense

 

17,085

 

2,800

 

14,285

 

Data processing fees

 

4,000

 

 

4,000

 

Professional service fees

 

7,104

 

400

 

6,704

 

FDIC loss sharing expense

 

1,507

 

 

1,507

 

Bank acquisition and due diligence fees

 

1,979

 

1,979

 

 

Marketing expense

 

2,698

 

449

 

2,249

 

Other employee expense

 

1,500

 

 

1,500

 

Insurance expense

 

2,652

 

 

2,652

 

Other expense

 

15,138

 

240

 

14,898

 

Total noninterest expenses

 

$

119,783

 

$

11,684

 

$

108,099

 

 

While we continue to explore additional acquisition opportunities, there is no certainty that bargain purchase gains of any amount will be recognized as a result of any future closed transactions.  In addition, we seek to realize operating efficiencies from our recently completed acquisitions by utilizing technology to streamline our

 

72



Table of Contents

 

operations.  We continue to centralize the back-office functions of our acquired banks, as well as realize cost savings through the use of third party vendors and technology, in order to take advantage of economies of scale as we continue to grow.  We place our focus on initiatives that we believe will provide opportunities to enhance earnings, including the continued rationalization of our retail banking footprint through the evaluation of possible branch consolidations or opportunities to sell branches.

 

As of June 30, 2014, our total assets were $5.6 billion, our net total loans were $3.7 billion, our total deposits were $4.3 billion and our total shareholders’ equity was $726.1 million.

 

In this report, we refer to our six completed acquisitions collectively as the “acquisitions.” In addition, we refer to loans subject to loss share agreements with the FDIC as “covered loans” and loans that are not subject to loss share agreements with the FDIC as “uncovered loans.” All of the loans and other real estate covered under the loss share agreements with the FDIC are referred to as “covered assets.” We refer to our loans acquired in our acquisitions as “acquired loans,” regardless of whether they are covered under loss share agreements with the FDIC.

 

Recent Developments

 

Acquisition of Talmer West Bank (formerly Michigan Commerce Bank)

 

On January 1, 2014, we purchased Financial Commerce Corporation’s wholly-owned subsidiary banks, Michigan Commerce Bank, a Michigan state-chartered bank, Indiana Community Bank, an Indiana state-chartered bank, Bank of Las Vegas, a Nevada state-chartered bank and Sunrise Bank of Albuquerque, a New Mexico state-chartered bank, and certain other bank-related assets from Financial Commerce Corporation and its parent holding company, Capitol Bancorp Ltd., in a transaction facilitated under Section 363 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.  The purchase price consisted of cash consideration of $4.0 million and a separate $2.5 million payment to fund an escrow account to pay the post-petition administrative fees and expenses of the professionals in the bankruptcy cases of Financial Commerce Corporation and Capitol Bancorp Ltd., each of which filed voluntary bankruptcy petitions under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code on August 9, 2012, with any unused escrowed funds to be refunded to us.

 

Immediately prior to our consummation of the acquisition, Capitol Bancorp Ltd. merged Indiana Community Bank, Bank of Las Vegas and Sunrise Bank of Albuquerque with and into Michigan Commerce Bank, with Michigan Commerce Bank as the surviving bank in the merger.  Simultaneously with the merger, Michigan Commerce Bank changed its name to Talmer West Bank.  In connection with the acquisition, we contributed approximately $79.5 million of additional capital to Talmer West Bank in order to recapitalize the bank.  In order to support the acquisition and recapitalization of Talmer West Bank, Talmer Bancorp, Inc. borrowed $35.0 million under a senior unsecured line of credit and received $25.0 million in dividend capital from Talmer Bank.  Following the acquisition, an additional $20.0 million of capital was infused into Talmer West Bank to ensure capital requirements were met at June 30, 2014.   References to Talmer West Bank refer to Talmer West Bank as the surviving bank in the merger of Indiana Community Bank, Bank of Las Vegas and Sunrise Bank of Albuquerque with and into Michigan Commerce Bank.

 

We accounted for the acquisition under the acquisition method of accounting and have recorded the purchased assets and assumed liabilities at their respective acquisition date fair values.  Because the fair value of assets acquired and core deposit intangible asset created exceeded the fair value of liabilities assumed and consideration paid in the acquisition, on January 1, 2014, we recorded a bargain purchase gain of $40.2 million in our consolidated statements of income.

 

We acquired $908.5 million in assets at fair value, including $571.7 million in loans, net of unearned income, $13.6 million in investment securities, $30.9 million in other real estate owned and $767 thousand in loan servicing rights.  We also acquired $861.8 million of liabilities at fair value, including $857.8 million of retail deposits with a core deposit intangible of $3.6 million.

 

Approximately 40% of the fair value of loans acquired in the acquisition was accounted for as purchased credit impaired loans. On the January 1, 2014 acquisition date, the contractual cash flows for the purchased credit impaired loans acquired in the acquisition of Talmer West Bank were $331.5 million and the estimated fair value of

 

73



Table of Contents

 

the loans was $212.3 million. The estimated total cash flow from these loans was $245.1 million. The difference between the total estimated cash flows and the fair market value created an accretable discount in the amount of $32.8 million, which represents the undiscounted cash flows expected to be collected in excess of the estimated fair value of the purchased credit impaired loans.  This accretable discount is accreted into interest income on a method that approximates level yield over the estimated life of the related loans. Adjustments created when the loans were recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition are amortized or accreted over the remaining term of the loan as an adjustment to the related loan’s yield.

 

The acquired non-purchase credit impaired loans were recorded at their fair value of $359.3 million on the acquisition date, which included the recording of a $3.5 million discount primarily reflecting estimated credit marks over the life of the non-purchase credit impaired loans.

 

Pending Acquisition of First of Huron Corporation

 

On August 6, 2014, we entered into an agreement to acquire First of Huron Corporation, the holding company for Signature Bank headquartered in Bad Axe, Michigan, for aggregate cash consideration of $13.4 million.  Signature Bank had total assets of $228.0 million as of June 30, 2014, including $172.3 million of net total loans.  We will acquire and simultaneously retire certain outstanding subordinated debentures of First of Huron Corporation and assume its trust preferred securities.  The closing of the transaction is subject to regulatory approval and customary closing conditions, including the approval by the shareholders of First of Huron Corporation and is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2014 or the first quarter of 2015.

 

Branch Sales

 

On July 18, 2014, we sold our single branch office located in Albuquerque, New Mexico along with its $34.1 million of deposits and $23.7 million of loans to Grants State Bank, a unit of First Bancorp of Durango, Inc.  The net impact to pre-tax income related to this transaction recorded in the third quarter of 2014 is a $1.6 million benefit, as gains on sales of loans and deposits of $1.5 million and $400 thousand, respectively, were partially offset by the write-off of the related core deposit intangible, loss on the sale of fixed assets and other costs associated with the transaction.

 

Additionally, on August 8, 2014, we sold our 10 branch offices located in Wisconsin to Town Bank, a wholly owned bank subsidiary of Wintrust Financial Corporation for approximately $13.5 million more than the net book value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.  Town Bank assumed all of our deposits in Wisconsin totaling $354.8 million as of August 8, 2014.  Concurrent with the closing of this transaction, Town Bank will sell two of the branch locations and related deposits in Kenosha and Genoa City, Wisconsin to its affiliate, State Bank of the Lakes, a Wintrust community bank.  The net impact to pre-tax income related to this transaction recorded in the third quarter of 2014 was a $12.1 million benefit, related to gains on the sale of net assets and liabilities, partially offset by the write-off of the related core deposit intangible of $911 thousand and other costs associated with the transaction of approximately $1.0 million.

 

Finally, in the second quarter of 2014, we made the decision to consolidate our four branches located in Las Vegas, Nevada into one branch.  We recognized $490 thousand in severance related expenses related to consolidation in the second quarter of 2014. We anticipate the consolidation will occur in the third quarter of 2014 and will result in additional costs of approximately $860 thousand in occupancy and other miscellaneous operating expenses associated with the consolidation.

 

Economic Overview

 

After eleven consecutive quarters of expansion, the U.S. economy fell at a significant pace for the first quarter of 2014.  Real gross domestic product (“GDP”) for the first quarter of 2014 fell at an annualized rate of 2.9%, compared to growth of 2.6% for the fourth quarter of 2013, as indicated by the Bureau of Economic Analysis report published by the U.S. Department of Commerce .  This drastic decline is partially blamed on harsh winter weather as net exports, business investments, and housing investments all declined. Government spending and non-farm inventories also declined.  According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the unemployment rate (seasonally adjusted) fell significantly to 6.1% as of June 30, 2014, down from 6.7% as of December 31, 2013.  Total home

 

74



Table of Contents

 

sales in the U.S., as indicated by the National Association of Realtors, showed signs of weakening with existing home sales at a seasonally adjusted 4.3 million units for the rolling twelve months ended May 31, 2014, down 5.7% from the rolling twelve month total of 4.6 million units as of May 31, 2013.  Inventory levels are up at a 5.7 months’ supply, or 2.0 million units, as of May 31, 2014, up 14.0% from a 5.0 months’ supply of 1.9 million units as of one year prior.  New home sales were up with a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 504 thousand units as of May 31, 2014, up 16.9% compared to 431 thousand as of May 31, 2013.  Inventory for new homes remained at a 4.5 months’ supply as of May 31, 2014, while the median sales price of new homes increased 6.9% to $282 thousand.  Home values of existing homes, as indicated by the Case-Shiller 20 city index (seasonally adjusted), showed an increase of 10.8% from April 2013 to April 2014.  Bankruptcy filings, per the U.S. Court Statistics, also improved with total filings down 12.2% for the 12 months ending December 31, 2013, compared to the same period in 2012, with business filings down 17.1% and personal filings down 12.0% for the period.  Bankruptcy filings fell across all regions where we have branches in the 12 months ending December 31, 2013, compared to the prior year.  Bankruptcy filings continued to decrease in the first quarter of 2014, down 3.1% from the previous quarter, made up of a 4.6% decrease in business filings and a 3.1% decrease in personal filings.

 

Significant regulatory changes effective in early 2014 have had a profound impact on the overall mortgage industry.  We have taken appropriate steps to implement and comply with these new regulatory requirements, including those related to mortgage servicing practices (brought about by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau) and those related to mortgage lending practices (brought about by the Dodd-Frank Act).  While these requirements have certainly and significantly impacted the overall competitive landscape of the mortgage industry, we have been able to maintain if not increase our competitive posture thus far in 2014, and anticipate continuing to be able to expand our market presence in future periods should we so choose, as the industry absorbs the impact of these recently implemented lending and servicing regulations.

 

According to the Beige Book published by the Federal Reserve Board in May 2014, overall economic activity was improved with all of the 12 districts reporting modest or moderate growth. The Fourth (Cleveland) Federal Reserve District reported modest growth and the Seventh (Chicago) Federal Reserve District reported moderate growth.  The Cleveland District reported improvements in new construction, slow increases in manufacturing primarily in steel production, and continued strength in the auto industry.  Employment increased in both manufacturing and construction.  Energy continued to contribute to growth with coal exports increasing and wet gas from shale drilling continuing to increase. Retailers reported improving sales as warmer weather replaced the harsh winter.  Businesses have been requesting financing at a higher level with the greatest strength in equipment financing followed by CRE and mergers and acquisitions.  Freight companies are seeing a return to a more normal volume after a very difficult winter.  The Chicago District reports modest growth below earlier year expectations. Both consumer and business spending increased.  Growth in manufacturing, primarily in the auto, energy and aerospace industries, remained modest.  New construction was also characterized as modest with growth noted in retail, particularly grocery stores.  Demand for existing space improved with increased leasing of both industrial and office space.  Business financing requests increased, primarily C&I requests for small businesses.  Bankers report continued margin pressure and structure concessions primarily from non-bank competitors.  Agriculture contacts noted late plantings due to the delay of warmer weather but that corn crops appeared to be healthy except in Iowa where drought conditions were noted.  Soybean crops were behind average at this point.  Strong corn and weak soybeans have led to a reduction in future prices for corn and an increase for soybeans.  Livestock prices remained above last year prices although hog prices have fallen recently.

 

The economy in the state of Michigan noted improvements during the period.  The unemployment rate, as indicated by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, improved to 7.5% as of May 31, 2014, down from 8.3% as of December 31, 2013 and 8.9% as of December 31, 2012.  Wage growth was up 2.5% for the twelve months ending December 31, 2013.  Other improvements included a 15.4% decline in total bankruptcies, per the U.S. Court Statistics, during the year ended December 31, 2013 from the same period in 2012, followed by an additional decrease of 4.5% in the first quarter of 2014.   As of June 30, 2014, $1.3 billion, or 34.9% of our total loans are to businesses and consumers in the Detroit-Warren-Livonia metropolitan statistical area (“MSA”), which includes Wayne, Oakland, Macomb, Livingston, St. Clair and Lapeer counties in the state of Michigan.  Unemployment in the Detroit-Warren-Livonia MSA, as indicated by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, was 8.0% as of May 31, 2014, unchanged from 8.0% at December 31, 2013, but better than the 9.0% in May 2013.  The Detroit-Warren-Livonia MSA has been experiencing a recovery in the housing market and showed an increase in home prices as reported in the Case-Shiller index (seasonally adjusted) of 15.0% for the rolling twelve months ending April 30,

 

75



Table of Contents

 

2014.  O n July 18, 2013, the city of Detroit filed for Chapter 9 bankruptcy protection in federal court. We do not expect the bankruptcy to have a material impact on our loan portfolio or future business as much of the city’s debt consists of underfunded pension liabilities and other post-retirement benefits. We do not have direct exposure to bonds, debt or any other financial instrument issued by the city of Detroit and we do not have a concentration of loans to borrowers located in the city of Detroit. As of June 30, 2014, approximately $54.8 million, or 1.5% of our loan portfolio were loans to borrowers located in the city of Detroit, and of this amount, $9.3 million , or 17.0% of the total loans to borrowers located in the city of Detroit were covered by loss share agreements with the FDIC.

 

The Ohio economy also showed signs of a strengthening recovery.  Unemployment was down to 5.5% as of May 31, 2014, compared to 7.1% as of December 31, 2013 and 7.3% as of December 31, 2012.  Wage growth for the twelve months ending December 31, 2013 was up 2.3% from the same period in 2012.  Bankruptcies in Ohio, per the U.S. Court Statistics, were down 5.3% during the year ended December 31, 2013 from the same period in 2012, followed by an additional decrease of 2.7% in the first quarter of 2014.  The Case-Shiller index for the Cleveland market indicates housing prices were up 2.7% for the twelve month period ending April 30, 2014.

 

The Wisconsin economy continued to recover slowly.  The unemployment rate decreased to 5.7% as of May 31, 2014, down from 6.3% as of December 31, 2013 and 6.9% as of December 31, 2012.  Wage growth for the twelve months ending December 31, 2013 was up 2.7% from the same period in 2012.  In addition, personal and business bankruptcy filings, per the U.S. Court Statistics, for the year ended December 31, 2013 decreased 9.5% from the same period in 2012, followed by an additional decrease of 2.2% in the first quarter of 2014.  Real estate values have improved according to statistics from Zillow with prices increasing 2.3% for the twelve months ending June 30, 2014.

 

The Indiana economy also continued to show signs of recovery.  The unemployment rate decreased to 5.7% as of May 31, 2014, down from 6.8% as of December 31, 2013 and 8.0% as of December 31, 2012.  Wage growth for the twelve months ending December 31, 2013 was up 2.3% from the same period in 2012.  In addition, personal and business bankruptcy filings in Northern Indiana, per the U.S. Court Statistics, for the year ended December 31, 2013 decreased 5.6% from the same period in 2012, followed by an additional decrease of 2.8% in the first quarter 2014.  Real estate values have improved according to statistics from Zillow with prices increasing 1.6% in the twelve months ending June 30, 2014.

 

Summary of Acquisition and Loss Share Accounting

 

We determined the fair value of our acquired assets and liabilities in accordance with accounting requirements for fair value measurement and acquisition transactions as promulgated in FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Subtopic 310-30, “ Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality ” (“ASC 310-30”), ASC Topic 805, “ Business Combinations” (“ASC 805”), and ASC Topic 820, “ Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. ” The determination of the initial fair values on loans and other real estate purchased in an acquisition and the related FDIC indemnification asset require significant judgment and complexity.

 

At the time of each respective acquisition, we determine the fair value of our acquired loans on a loan by loan basis by dividing the loans into two categories:  (1) specifically reviewed loans — loans where the future cash flows are estimated based on a specific review of the loan, and (2) non-specifically reviewed loans — loans where the future cash flows for each loan is estimated using an automated cash flow calculation model.  For specifically reviewed loans, a designated group of credit officers, specialized in loan workouts and credit quality assessment, work with personnel from the acquired institution to review borrower cash payment activity, current appraisals, loan write ups, and watch list reports (including the current past due status and risk ratings assigned) to estimate future cash flows on the acquired loans. The estimated future cash flows are then discounted to determine initial fair value.  For our acquisition of CF Bancorp, the specifically reviewed loan population included all loans with credit quality indicators of special mention or worse, all loans that had an outstanding balance of $2.0 million or more, and all loans with a matured status as of the April 30, 2010 acquisition date, resulting in approximately 50% of the acquired loan portfolio being specifically reviewed loans.  For our acquisitions of First Banking Center and Peoples State Bank, the specifically reviewed loan population included all loans with a principal balance of $350 thousand or more, and for our acquisition of Community Central Bank, the specifically reviewed loan population included all loans with a principal balance of $475 thousand or more, resulting in approximately 60% of the acquired loan portfolios being specifically reviewed loans for each of these acquisitions. For our acquisition of First Place Bank, the specifically reviewed loan population included all commercial loans with an outstanding balance of $750

 

76



Table of Contents

 

thousand or more, all residential mortgage loans with an outstanding balance of $1.0 million or more, and all impaired loans with a balance of $250 thousand or more as of the January 1, 2013 acquisition date, resulting in approximately 30% of the acquired loan portfolio being specifically reviewed.  For our acquisition of Talmer West Bank, the specifically reviewed loan population included all loans with an outstanding balance of $500 thousand or more and a substantial portion of impaired loans with a balance of $250 thousand or more as of the January 1, 2014 acquisition date, resulting in approximately 50% of the acquired loan portfolio being specifically reviewed.

 

Non-specifically reviewed loans are categorized by risk profile and processed through an automated cash flow calculation model to generate expected cash flows on a loan by loan basis using contractual loan payment information such as coupon, payment type and amounts, and remaining maturity, along with assumptions that are assigned to each individual loan based on risk cohorts. Risk profiles are determined based on loan type, risk rating, delinquency history, current delinquency status, vintage, and collateral type. For our non-specifically reviewed loans, we apply life of loan default and loss assumptions, defined at a cohort level, to estimate future cash-flows. The assumptions are based on credit migration (migration of risk rating and past due status) combined with default, severity and prepayment data indicative of the market based upon market experience and benchmarking analysis of similar loans and/or portfolio sales and valuation. This information is captured through observation of comparable market transactions. Estimated future cash flows are discounted for each loan to determine initial fair value.

 

Where a loan exhibits evidence of credit deterioration since origination and it is probable at the acquisition date that we will not collect all principal and interest payments in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement, we account for the loan under ASC 310-30, as a purchased credit impaired loan.  At the date of acquisition, the majority of loans acquired in the CF Bancorp, First Banking Center, People State Bank and Community Central Bank acquisitions, as well as approximately 30% of the loans acquired in our acquisition of First Place Bank and 40% of the loans acquired in our acquisition of Talmer West Bank were accounted for under ASC 310-30 as purchased credit impaired loans. We account for all purchased credit impaired loans on a loan by loan basis.   We recognize the expected shortfall of expected future cash flows on these loans, as compared to the contractual amount due, as a nonaccretable discount. Any excess of the net present value of expected future cash flows over the acquisition date fair value is recognized as accretable yield. The accretable yield includes both the expected coupon of the loan and the discount accretion. We recognize accretable discount as interest income over the expected remaining life of the purchased credit impaired loan using a method that approximates the level yield method.

 

Fair value premiums and discounts established on acquired loans accounted for outside the scope of ASC 310-30 fall under FASB ASC Subtopic 310-20, “ Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs ” (“ASC 310-20”) and are accreted or amortized into interest income over the remaining term of the loan as an adjustment to the related loan’s yield.

 

Because we record all acquired loans at fair value, we do not record an allowance for loan losses related to acquired loans on the acquisition date. We re-estimate expected cash flows on our purchased credit impaired loans on a quarterly basis. This re-estimation process is performed on a loan by loan basis and replicates the methods used in determining the initial fair value at the acquisition date. We aim to segment the purchased credit impaired loan portfolio between those that are specifically reviewed and those that are non-specifically reviewed loans to maintain similar or greater coverage as at the acquisition date in the specifically reviewed loan population.

 

Any decline in expected cash flows identified during the quarterly re-estimation process results in impairment which is measured based on the present value of the new expected cash flows, discounted using the pre-impairment accounting yield of the loan, compared to the recorded investment in the loan. An impairment that is due to a decline in expected cash flows is known as credit impairment, while an impairment that is due to a change in the expected timing of such cash flows is known as timing impairment. If any portion of the impairment is due to credit impairment, we record all of the impairment as provision for loan losses during the period.  However, if the impairment is only related to a change in the expected timing of the cash flows, the impairment is recognized prospectively as a decrease in yield on the loan.  Declines in cash flow expectations on covered loans which are due to credit impairment also result in an increase to the FDIC indemnification asset which is recorded as noninterest income in “FDIC loss sharing income” in our consolidated statements of income in the period. Any improvements in expected cash flows and the effect of changes in expected timing in the receipt of the expected cash flows, once any previously recorded impairment is recaptured, is recognized prospectively as an adjustment to the accretable yield on the loan. Improvements in cash flows on loans covered by a loss share agreement result in a

 

77



Table of Contents

 

decline in the expected indemnification cash flows which is reflected as a downward yield adjustment on the FDIC indemnification assets.

 

We modify loans in the normal course of business and assess all loan modifications to determine whether a modification constitutes a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) in accordance with ASC 310-40 , “ Receivables — Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors ” (“ASC 310-40”).  For non-purchased credit impaired loans excluded from ASC 310-30 accounting, a modification is considered a TDR when a borrower is experiencing difficulties and we have granted a concession to the borrower that we would not normally consider and we conclude the concession results in an inability to collect all amounts due, including interest accrued at the original contractual terms. The concessions granted may include: principal deferral, interest rate concession, forbearance, principal reduction or A/B note restructure (where the original loan is restructured into two notes where, one reflects the portion of the modified loan which is expected to be collected, and one that is fully charged off). None of the modifications to date were due to partial satisfaction of the loan.

 

For purchased credit impaired loans accounted for individually under ASC 310-30 (which is all of our purchased credit impaired loans), a modification is considered a TDR when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulties and the effective yield after the modification is less than the effective yield at the time of the purchase in association with consideration of qualitative factors included within ASC 310-40.  When a modification qualifies as a TDR and was initially individually accounted for under ASC 310-30, the loan is required to be moved from ASC 310-30 accounting and accounted for under ASC 310-40. In order to accomplish the transfer of the accounting for the TDR from ASC 310-30 to ASC 310-40, the loan is essentially retained in the ASC 310-30 accounting model and subject to the periodic cash flow re-estimation process.  Similar to loans accounted for under ASC 310-30, deterioration in expected cash flows results in the recognition of impairment and an allowance for loan loss.  However, unlike loans accounted for under ASC 310-30, improvements in estimated cash flows on these loans result only in recapturing previously recognized allowance for loan losses and the yield remains at the last yield recognized under ASC 310-30.

 

Acquired loans that are paid in full or are otherwise settled results in accelerated recognition of any remaining loan discount through “Accelerated discount on acquired loans” in our consolidated statements of income in the period. If such loans are covered loans, any remaining FDIC indemnification asset no longer expected to be received is also written off through “Accelerated discount on acquired loans” in our consolidated statements of income in the corresponding period.

 

The loss share agreements from our FDIC-assisted acquisitions and the purchase accounting impact from our acquisitions create volatility in our cash flows and operating results. The effects of the loss share agreements and purchase accounting, primarily on purchased credit impaired loans, on cash flows and operating results following an acquisition can create volatility as we work with borrowers to determine appropriate repayment terms or alternate resolutions. The effects will depend primarily on the ability of borrowers to make required payments over an extended period of time.  At acquisition, management believes sufficient inherent discounts representing the expected losses compared to their acquired contractual payment amounts, were established.  As a result, our operating results would only be adversely affected by losses to the extent that those losses exceed the expected losses reflected in the fair value at the acquisition date.  In addition, as the loss share agreements cover up to a 10-year period (five years for loans other than single family residential mortgage loans), changing economic conditions will likely affect the timing of future charge-offs and the resulting reimbursements from the FDIC.  Management believes that any recapture of interest income and recognition of cash flows from borrowers or amounts received from the FDIC as part of the FDIC indemnification asset may be incurred unevenly over this period, as we exhaust our collection efforts under our normal practices.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared based on the application of accounting policies generally accepted in the United States, the most significant of which are described in Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K. These policies require the reliance on estimates and assumptions, which may prove inaccurate or are subject to variations. Changes in underlying factors, assumptions, or estimates could have a material impact on our future financial condition and results of operations. At December 31, 2013, the most critical of these significant accounting policies are the policies related to the allowance for loan losses, fair valuation methodologies, purchased loans, the FDIC indemnification asset and

 

78



Table of Contents

 

income taxes. These policies were reviewed with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and are discussed more fully on pages 87 through 91 in our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K. As of the date of this report, we did not believe there were any material changes in the nature or categories of the critical accounting policies or estimates and assumptions from those discussed in our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Financial Results

 

The three months ended June 30, 2014 includes the operations of Talmer West Bank, which we acquired on January 1, 2014.  We had net income for the three months ended June 30, 2014 of $20.6 million, or $0.27 per average diluted common share, compared to $15.0 million, or $0.21 per average diluted common share, for the three months ended June 30, 2013.  These results reflect the increased revenues and expenses related to the acquisition of Talmer West Bank which are discussed below, in addition to decreases outside of the inclusion of Talmer West Bank in total noninterest expenses of $15.3 million and income tax expense of $12.7 million, partially offset by decreases in mortgage banking and other loan fees of $11.8 million and net gain on sales of loans of $10.5 million. The decline in noninterest expenses was primarily due to a decrease in salary and employee benefits expense which relates significantly to the reduction in employee headcount as we have eliminated duplicative positions and streamlined operations with the merger of First Place Bank into Talmer Bank. The decrease in income tax expense to a benefit in the second quarter of 2014 was primarily driven by the elimination of a $9.7 million valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets acquired in our acquisition of First Place Bank on January 1, 2013 resulting from a conclusion reached with the assistance of legal and tax accounting experts, regarding the calculation of the annual Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code limitation related to the ownership change of First Place Bank.  The decline in mortgage banking and other loans fees primarily reflects the change in the fair value of loan servicing rights due to adjustments to fair value assumptions driven by interest rate fluctuations which impact assumed prepayment speeds, which was a detriment to earnings of $4.2 million during the second quarter of 2014, compared to a benefit of $6.5 million in the second quarter of 2013.   The decrease in net gain on sales of loans in the second quarter of 2014 compared to the second quarter of 2013 was primarily due to reduced levels of residential mortgage loans originated for sale.

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2014 we had net income of $57.0 million, or $0.76 per average diluted common share, compared to $75.5 million, or $1.08 per average diluted share, for the comparative period ended June 30, 2013.  These results reflect the increased revenues and expenses related to the acquisition of Talmer West Bank which are discussed below, including a $40.2 million bargain purchase gain.  The results for the six months ended June 30, 2013 included a $71.7 million bargain purchase gain as a result of our acquisition of First Place Bank on January 1, 2013.  Excluding the operating results of Talmer West Bank and the bargain purchase gains recognized in each period net income for the six months ended June 30, 2014 increased $12.0 million, compared to the same period in 2013, primarily reflecting decreases in noninterest expenses of $47.3 million and income tax expense of $11.2 million, partially offset by decreases in net gain on sales of loans of $24.2 million and mortgage banking and other loan fees of $15.7 million.  The decline in noninterest expenses was primarily due to a decrease in salary and employee benefits expense which relates significantly to the reduction in employee headcount as we have eliminated duplicative positions and streamline operations with the merger of First Place Bank into Talmer Bank .  The decrease in income tax expense to a benefit in the second quarter of 2014 was primarily driven by the same reason described in the quarterly discussion above .  The decline in mortgage banking and other loans fees primarily reflects the change in the fair value of loan servicing rights due to adjustments to fair value assumptions driven by interest rate fluctuations which impact assumed prepayment speeds, which was a detriment to earnings of $6.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, compared to a benefit of $7.0 million for the same period in 2013.   The decrease in net gain on sales of loans in the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the same period in 2013 was primarily due to reduced levels of residential mortgage loans originated for sale.

 

Net Interest Income

 

Net interest income is the difference between interest income and yield-related fees earned on assets and interest expense paid on liabilities. Adjustments are made to the yields on tax-exempt assets in order to present tax-exempt income and fully taxable income on a comparable basis. The “Analysis of Net Interest Income-Fully Taxable Equivalent” tables within this financial review provide an analysis of net interest income for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.  The “Rate/Volume Analysis” tables describe the extent to which changes in interest rates and changes in volume of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities have affected our net

 

79



Table of Contents

 

interest income on a fully taxable equivalent (“FTE”) basis for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

 

We had net interest income of $52.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014, an increase of $8.4 million, from $44.1 million for the same period in 2013.  The increase in net interest income in the second quarter of 2014 was primarily the result of the addition of $9.8 million of net interest income related to our acquisition of Talmer West Bank and its inclusion into our operations beginning January 1, 2014.

 

We had net interest income of $100.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, an increase of $15.9 million, from $84.7 million for the same period in 2013.  The increase in net interest income in the first half of 2014 was primarily the result of the addition of $18.9 million of net interest income related to our acquisition of Talmer West Bank and its inclusion into our operations beginning January 1, 2014.

 

Our net interest margin was 4.35% for the three months ended June 30, 2014, compared to 4.03% for the same period in 2013.  The increase of 32 basis points was due to a combination of several factors, the largest being an increase in the benefit received from discount accretion on our purchased credit impaired loan portfolio resulting from an increase in expected cash flows and payment speeds noted in our quarterly re-estimation of cash flows and the acquisition of Talmer West Bank, which had a significantly higher composition of its loan portfolio in commercial real estate loans that, on average, have a higher yield than Talmer Bank’s loan portfolio which has a larger percentage of residential real estate loans.

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2014, our net interest margin was 4.14% compared to 3.89% for the six months ended June 30, 2013.  The increase of 25 basis points was primarily due to the acquisition of Talmer West Bank, which had a significantly higher composition of its loan portfolio in commercial real estate loans that, on average, have a higher yield than Talmer Bank’s loan portfolio which has a larger percentage of residential real estate loans.

 

Our net interest margin benefits from discount accretion on our purchased credit impaired loan portfolio, a component of our accretable yield. The accretable yield represents the excess of the net present value of expected future cash flows over the acquisition date fair value and includes both the expected coupon of the loan and the discount accretion.  The accretable yield is recognized as interest income over the expected remaining life of the purchased credit impaired loan.  For the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the yield on total loans was 6.12% and 6.54%, respectively, while the yield generated using only the expected coupon would have been 4.69% and 5.16%, respectively.  For the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the yield on total loans was 5.96% and 6.50% respectively, while the yield generated using only the expected coupon would have been 4.85% and 5.02%, respectively.  The difference between the actual yield earned on total loans and the yield generated based on the expected coupon represents excess accretable yield. The expected coupon of the loan considers the actual coupon rate of the loan and does not include any interest income for loans in nonaccrual status.  The decline in the yield generated using only the expected coupon in both the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the same periods in 2013 was primarily due to our continued run-off of acquired covered loans that generally have higher coupon rates which are being replaced with higher quality residential mortgage and commercial real estate loans in a low interest rate environment.

 

Our net interest margin is also adversely impacted by the negative yield on the FDIC indemnification asset.   Because our quarterly cash flow re-estimations have continuously resulted in improvements in overall expected cash flows on covered loans, our expected payment from the FDIC under our loss share agreements have declined, resulting in a negative yield on the FDIC indemnification asset which partially offsets the benefits provided by the excess accretable yield discussed above.  The negative yield on the FDIC indemnification asset was 19.11% and 20.25% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively, compared to 14.09% and 14.60% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively.  The combination of the excess accretable yield and the negative yield on the FDIC indemnification asset benefited net interest margin by 63 basis points and 33 basis points for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, compared to 35 basis points for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2013.

 

The following tables set forth information related to our average balance sheet, average yields on assets, and average costs of liabilities. We derived these yields by dividing income or expense by the average balance of the

 

80



Table of Contents

 

corresponding assets or liabilities. We derived average balances from the daily balances throughout the periods indicated.

 

81



Table of Contents

 

Analysis of Net Interest Income — Fully Taxable Equivalent

 

 

 

For the three months ended June 30,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Average
Balance

 

Interest (1)

 

Average
Rate (2)

 

Average
Balance

 

Interest (1)

 

Average
Rate (2)

 

Earning assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest earning balances

 

$

249,780

 

$

172

 

0.28

%

$

302,516

 

$

201

 

0.27

%

Federal funds sold and other short-term investments

 

76,474

 

278

 

1.46

 

115,903

 

247

 

0.86

 

Investment securities (3):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Taxable

 

525,158

 

2,198

 

1.68

 

465,407

 

1,102

 

0.95

 

Tax-exempt

 

163,636

 

1,139

 

3.77

 

176,094

 

1,006

 

3.09

 

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

 

12,980

 

160

 

4.95

 

16,224

 

138

 

3.42

 

Gross uncovered loans (4)

 

3,254,119

 

41,350

 

5.10

 

2,493,787

 

29,849

 

4.80

 

Gross covered loans (4)

 

477,238

 

15,575

 

13.09

 

650,284

 

21,441

 

13.22

 

FDIC indemnification asset

 

115,566

 

(5,506

)

(19.11

)

196,676

 

(6,908

)

(14.09

)

Total earning assets

 

4,874,951

 

55,366

 

4.59

 

4,416,891

 

47,076

 

4.31

 

Non-earning assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and due from banks

 

111,834

 

 

 

 

 

100,466

 

 

 

 

 

Premises and equipment

 

57,084

 

 

 

 

 

57,558

 

 

 

 

 

Core deposit intangible

 

15,740

 

 

 

 

 

14,863

 

 

 

 

 

Other real estate owned

 

56,095

 

 

 

 

 

40,407

 

 

 

 

 

Loan servicing rights

 

76,431

 

 

 

 

 

54,685

 

 

 

 

 

FDIC receivable

 

6,380

 

 

 

 

 

15,222

 

 

 

 

 

Company-owned life insurance

 

90,228

 

 

 

 

 

38,674

 

 

 

 

 

Other non-earning assets

 

213,884

 

 

 

 

 

105,192

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses

 

(58,562

)

 

 

 

 

(62,691

)

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

5,444,065

 

 

 

 

 

$

4,781,267

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest bearing liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-bearing demand deposits

 

$

714,231

 

$

216

 

0.12

%

$

552,027

 

$

159

 

0.12

%

Money market and savings deposits

 

1,352,163

 

492

 

0.15

 

1,246,472

 

494

 

0.16

 

Time deposits

 

1,215,585

 

1,432

 

0.47

 

1,162,123

 

1,545

 

0.53

 

Other brokered funds

 

80,478

 

35

 

0.17

 

90,960

 

48

 

0.21

 

Short-term borrowings

 

126,382

 

33

 

0.11

 

57,086

 

33

 

0.23

 

Long-term debt

 

209,721

 

627

 

1.20

 

266,578

 

742

 

1.12

 

Total interest bearing liabilities

 

3,698,560

 

2,835

 

0.31

 

3,375,246

 

3,021

 

0.36

 

Noninterest bearing liabilities and shareholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-interest bearing demand deposits

 

965,979

 

 

 

 

 

703,013

 

 

 

 

 

FDIC clawback liability

 

25,787

 

 

 

 

 

22,434

 

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities

 

45,573

 

 

 

 

 

87,546

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholders’ equity

 

708,166

 

 

 

 

 

593,028

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

 

$

5,444,065

 

 

 

 

 

$

4,781,267

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest income

 

 

 

$

52,531

 

 

 

 

 

$

44,055

 

 

 

Interest spread

 

 

 

 

 

4.28

%

 

 

 

 

3.95

%

Net interest margin as a percentage of interest earning assets

 

 

 

 

 

4.32

%

 

 

 

 

4.00

%

Tax equivalent effect

 

 

 

 

 

0.03

%

 

 

 

 

0.03

%

Net interest margin on a fully tax equivalent basis

 

 

 

 

 

4.35

%

 

 

 

 

4.03

%

 


(1) Interest income is shown on actual basis and does not include taxable equivalent adjustments.

(2) Average rates are presented on an annual basis and include a taxable equivalent adjustment to interest income of $399 thousand and $352 thousand on tax-exempt securities for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, using the statutory tax rate of 35%.

(3) For presentation in this table, average balances and the corresponding average rates for investment securities are based upon historical cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts.

(4) Includes nonaccrual loans.

 

82



Table of Contents

 

 

 

For the six months ended June 30,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Average
Balance

 

Interest (1)

 

Average
Rate (2)

 

Average
Balance

 

Interest (1)

 

Average
Rate (2)

 

Earning assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest earning balances

 

$

324,900

 

$

388

 

0.24

%

$

385,460

 

$

491

 

0.26

%

Federal funds sold and other short-term investments

 

73,597

 

455

 

1.25

 

107,143

 

447

 

0.84

 

Investment securities (3):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Taxable

 

501,083

 

4,076

 

1.64

 

437,870

 

2,466

 

1.14

 

Tax-exempt

 

173,664

 

3,091

 

4.85

 

168,607

 

2,000

 

3.23

 

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

 

17,677

 

345

 

3.94

 

16,020

 

545

 

6.86

 

Gross uncovered loans (4)

 

3,236,360

 

80,953

 

5.04

 

2,425,608

 

58,061

 

4.83

 

Gross covered loans (4)

 

495,323

 

29,385

 

11.96

 

677,586

 

41,967

 

12.49

 

FDIC indemnification asset

 

121,740

 

(12,224

)

(20.25

)

207,936

 

(15,056

)

(14.60

)

Total earning assets

 

4,944,344

 

106,469

 

4.39

 

4,426,230

 

90,921

 

4.17

 

Non-earning assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and due from banks

 

100,634

 

 

 

 

 

100,743

 

 

 

 

 

Premises and equipment

 

56,222

 

 

 

 

 

59,093

 

 

 

 

 

Core deposit intangible

 

16,264

 

 

 

 

 

15,198

 

 

 

 

 

Other real estate owned

 

57,809

 

 

 

 

 

41,971

 

 

 

 

 

Loan servicing rights

 

78,238

 

 

 

 

 

52,302

 

 

 

 

 

FDIC receivable

 

6,722

 

 

 

 

 

15,049

 

 

 

 

 

Company-owned life insurance

 

65,731

 

 

 

 

 

38,510

 

 

 

 

 

Other non-earning assets

 

215,171

 

 

 

 

 

96,825

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses

 

(58,027

)

 

 

 

 

(60,774

)

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

5,483,108

 

 

 

 

 

$

4,785,147

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest bearing liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-bearing demand deposits

 

$

711,766

 

$

440

 

0.12

%

$

552,138

 

$

326

 

0.12

%

Money market and savings deposits

 

1,374,101

 

986

 

0.14

 

1,229,504

 

1,012

 

0.17

 

Time deposits

 

1,268,122

 

2,923

 

0.46

 

1,206,362

 

3,206

 

0.54

 

Other brokered funds

 

80,240

 

64

 

0.16

 

65,574

 

72

 

0.22

 

Short-term borrowings

 

114,577

 

208

 

0.37

 

49,191

 

55

 

0.23

 

Long-term debt

 

210,722

 

1,201

 

1.15

 

265,422

 

1,538

 

1.17

 

Total interest bearing liabilities

 

3,759,528

 

5,822

 

0.31

 

3,368,191

 

6,209

 

0.37

 

Noninterest bearing liabilities and shareholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-interest bearing demand deposits

 

951,432

 

 

 

 

 

717,623

 

 

 

 

 

FDIC clawback liability

 

25,433

 

 

 

 

 

22,387

 

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities

 

42,605

 

 

 

 

 

86,303

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholders’ equity

 

704,110

 

 

 

 

 

590,643

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

 

$

5,483,108

 

 

 

 

 

$

4,785,147

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest income

 

 

 

$

100,647

 

 

 

 

 

$

84,712

 

 

 

Interest spread

 

 

 

 

 

4.08

%

 

 

 

 

3.80

%

Net interest margin as a percentage of interest earning assets

 

 

 

 

 

4.10

%

 

 

 

 

3.86

%

Tax equivalent effect

 

 

 

 

 

0.04

%

 

 

 

 

0.03

%

Net interest margin on a fully tax equivalent basis

 

 

 

 

 

4.14

%

 

 

 

 

3.89

%

 


(1) Interest income is shown on actual basis and does not include taxable equivalent adjustments.

(2) Average rates are presented on an annual basis and include a taxable equivalent adjustment to interest income of $1.1 million and $700 thousand on tax-exempt securities for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, using the statutory tax rate of 35%.

(3) For presentation in this table, average balances and the corresponding average rates for investment securities are based upon historical cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts.

(4) Includes nonaccrual loans.

 

83



Table of Contents

 

Rate-Volume Analysis

 

 

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2014 vs. 2013

 

 

 

Increase (Decrease) Due to:

 

Net Increase

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Rate

 

Volume

 

(Decrease)

 

Interest earning assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest earning balances

 

$

7

 

$

(36

)

$

(29

)

Federal funds sold and other short-term investments

 

134

 

(103

)

31

 

Investment securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Taxable

 

939

 

157

 

1,096

 

Tax-exempt

 

208

 

(75

)

133

 

FHLB stock

 

53

 

(31

)

22

 

Gross uncovered loans

 

1,934

 

9,567

 

11,501

 

Gross covered loans

 

(216

)

(5,650

)

(5,866

)

FDIC indemnification asset

 

(1,992

)

3,394

 

1,402

 

Total interest income

 

1,067

 

7,223

 

8,290

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-bearing liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-bearing demand deposits

 

8

 

49

 

57

 

Money market and savings deposits

 

(42

)

40

 

(2

)

Time deposits

 

(182

)

69

 

(113

)

Other brokered funds

 

(8

)

(5

)

(13

)

Short-term borrowings

 

(25

)

25

 

 

Long-term debt

 

52

 

(167

)

(115

)

Total interest expense

 

(197

)

11

 

(186

)

Change in net interest income

 

$

1,264

 

$

7,212

 

$

8,476

 

 

84



Table of Contents

 

 

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2014 vs. 2013

 

 

 

Increase (Decrease) Due to:

 

Net Increase

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Rate

 

Volume

 

(Decrease)

 

Interest earning assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest earning balances

 

$

(29

)

$

(74

)

$

(103

)

Federal funds sold and other short-term investments

 

175

 

(167

)

8

 

Investment securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Taxable

 

1,215

 

395

 

1,610

 

Tax-exempt

 

1,029

 

62

 

1,091

 

FHLB stock

 

(252

)

52

 

(200

)

Gross uncovered loans

 

2,716

 

20,176

 

22,892

 

Gross covered loans

 

(1,705

)

(10,877

)

(12,582

)

FDIC indemnification asset

 

(4,658

)

7,490

 

2,832

 

Total interest income

 

(1,509

)

17,057

 

15,548

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-bearing liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-bearing demand deposits

 

16

 

98

 

114

 

Money market and savings deposits

 

(138

)

112

 

(26

)

Time deposits

 

(441

)

158

 

(283

)

Other brokered funds

 

(22

)

14

 

(8

)

Short-term borrowings

 

49

 

104

 

153

 

Long-term debt

 

(25

)

(312

)

(337

)

Total interest expense

 

(561

)

174

 

(387

)

Change in net interest income

 

$

(948

)

$

16,883

 

$

15,935

 

 

Provision for Loan Losses

 

We established an allowance for loan losses on both covered and uncovered loans through a provision for loan losses charged as an expense in our consolidated statements of income.  Management reviews our loan portfolio, consisting of originated loans and purchased loans that are not covered by loss sharing agreements with the FDIC, on a quarterly basis to evaluate our outstanding loans and to measure both the performance of the portfolio and the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.

 

We did not record an allowance for loan losses at acquisition for purchased uncovered or covered loans as these loans were recorded at fair value, based on a discounted cash flow methodology, at the date of each respective acquisition.  We re-estimate expected cash flows on a quarterly basis for all loans purchased with credit impairment.  We record a provision for loan losses during the period for any decline in expected cash flows. Conversely, any improvement in expected cash flows is recognized prospectively as an adjustment to the yield on the loan once any previously recorded impairment is recaptured.

 

The provision for credit losses on off balance sheet items, a component of “other expense” in our consolidated statements of income, reflects management’s assessment of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses on lending-related commitments.

 

For a further discussion of the allowance for loan losses, refer to the “ Allowance for Loan Losses ” section of this financial review.

 

Uncovered loans

 

The provision for loan losses on uncovered loans was $3.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014, compared to $4.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013.  The provision for loan losses on uncovered loans was $9.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, compared to $6.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013.  Our allowance for loan losses was $24.4 million, or 0.74% of uncovered loans at June

 

85



Table of Contents

 

30, 2014, compared to $17.7 million, or 0.72% of uncovered loans, at December 31, 2013. The provision for loan losses on uncovered loans for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 reflects impairment recorded in our re-estimation of cash flows for uncovered purchased credit impaired loans along with additional provision for organic loan growth, partially offset by the impact of improvements in historical loss factors.  We recorded impairment related to re-estimations of cash flows for uncovered purchased credit impaired loans of $4.3 million and $8.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively, and $1.5 million and $1.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively.  The provision for loan losses on uncovered loans at June 30, 2013 reflects provision for uncovered loans originated or acquired subsequent to our acquisition of First Place Bank on January 1, 2013. The re-estimation completed in the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 also resulted in $16.5 million and $24.5 million and in the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 also resulted in $8.8 million and $8.8 million, of improvements in gross cash flow expectations on uncovered purchased credit impaired loans, respectively, which will be recognized prospectively as an increase in the accretable yield and accreted into interest income over the expected remaining life of the related uncovered purchased credit impaired loan.

 

Covered loans

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2014, we had a provision benefit for covered loan losses of $7.3 million, compared to $7.5 million of provision benefit for covered loan losses for the three months ended June 30, 2013.  The provision benefit for covered loan losses for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 primarily includes the benefit from covered loan run-off due to pay downs and recoveries, partially offset by impairment of $1.1 million and $2.6 million in the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, resulting from our re-estimation of cash flows for covered purchased credit impaired loans. The impairment recorded in the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was partially offset by increases of $1.9 million and $1.6 million, respectively, in the FDIC indemnification asset recorded in FDIC loss sharing income on our consolidated statements of income.  The re-estimations completed in the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 also resulted in $8.0 million and $13.6 million, respectively, of improvements in gross cash flow expectations on covered purchased credit impaired loans, which will be recognized prospectively as an increase in the accretable yield and accreted into interest income over the expected remaining life of the related covered purchased credit impaired loan.

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2014, we had a provision benefit for covered loan losses of $9.8 million, compared to $6.4 million of provision benefit for covered loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2013.  The provision benefit for covered loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 primarily includes the benefit from covered loan run-off due to pay downs and recoveries, partially offset by impairment of $2.4 million and $8.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, resulting from our re-estimation of cash flows for covered purchased credit impaired loans. The impairment recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was partially offset by increases of $3.5 million and $3.6 million, respectively, in the FDIC indemnification asset recorded in FDIC loss sharing income on our consolidated statements of income.  The re-estimations completed in the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 also resulted in $16.4 million and $31.7 million, respectively, of improvements in gross cash flow expectations on covered purchased credit impaired loans, which will be recognized prospectively as an increase in the accretable yield and accreted into interest income over the expected remaining life of the related covered purchased credit impaired loan.

 

Many of our covered loans were originated prior to or during the recession and these loans typically have weak credit metrics such as high loan to value ratios and low debt service coverage ratios. Therefore, the ultimate credit outcome for the covered loans can be volatile. As the economy has begun to stabilize, we have started to see many of these covered loans perform better than expected, while some are performing worse than expected.

 

A substantial portion of the provision or benefit for loan loss on covered loans is offset by FDIC loss sharing income. An analysis of the changes in the allowance for loan losses, including charge-offs and recoveries by loan category, is provided in the “ Analysis of the Allowance for Loan Losses — Uncovered ” and the “ Analysis of the Allowance for Loan Losses — Covered ” tables in this financial review.

 

86



Table of Contents

 

The following tables detail the components of the provision for loan losses on covered loans and the impact to net income.

 

 

 

For the three months ended
June 30,

 

For the six months ended
June 30,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

Provision (benefit) for loan losses - covered:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impairment recorded as a result of re-estimation of cash flows on loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 (1)

 

$

1,066

 

$

2,554

 

$

2,365

 

$

8,398

 

Additional benefit recorded, net of charge-offs, for covered loans including those accounted for under ASC 310-20 and ASC 310-40

 

(8,387

)

(10,014

)

(12,184

)

(14,774

)

Total benefit for loan losses-covered

 

$

(7,321

)

$

(7,460

)

$

(9,819

)

$

(6,376

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less: FDIC loss share income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income recorded as a result of re-estimation of cash flows on loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 (1)

 

1,923

 

1,591

 

3,504

 

3,606

 

Expense recorded, to offset provision (benefit), for covered loans including those accounted for under ASC 310-20 and ASC 310-40

 

(5,950

)

(8,011

)

(7,467

)

(11,819

)

Total loss sharing expense due to provision for loan losses-covered

 

(4,027

)

(6,420

)

(3,963

)

(8,213

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (increase) decrease to income before taxes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (income) expense recorded as a result of re-estimation of cash flows on loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 (1) 

 

(857

)

963

 

(1,139

)

4,792

 

Net income recorded, for covered loans including those accounted for under ASC 310-20 and ASC 310-40

 

(2,437

)

(2,003

)

(4,717

)

(2,955

)

Net (increase) decrease to income before taxes

 

$

(3,294

)

$

(1,040

)

$

(5,856

)

$

1,837

 

 


(1)  The results of re-estimations also included cash flow improvements related to covered loans of $8.0 million and $13.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $16.4 million and $32.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, and 2013, respectively.  Improvements in cash flows from the re-estimation process are recognized prospectively as an adjustment to the accretable yield on the loan.

 

87



Table of Contents

 

Noninterest Income

 

The following table presents noninterest income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

 

 

 

For the three months ended
June 30,

 

For the six months ended
June 30,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

Noninterest income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deposit fee income

 

$

3,163

 

$

4,648

 

$

6,437

 

$

9,160

 

Mortgage banking and other loan fees

 

(1,025

)

10,770

 

239

 

15,955

 

Net gain on sales of loans

 

5,681

 

16,139

 

8,713

 

32,954

 

Bargain purchase gain

 

 

 

40,157

 

71,702

 

FDIC loss sharing income

 

(3,434

)

(2,343

)

(3,547

)

(2,213

)

Accelerated discount on acquired loans

 

4,326

 

3,920

 

10,792

 

6,213

 

Net gain (loss) on sales of securities

 

 

69

 

(2,310

)

100

 

Other income

 

5,185

 

2,858

 

9,590

 

5,790

 

Total noninterest income

 

$

13,896

 

$

36,061

 

$

70,071

 

$

139,661

 

 

Noninterest income decreased $22.2 million to $13.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014, compared to $36.1 million for the same period of 2013.  The decrease in noninterest income for the three months ended June 30, 2014, compared to 2013, was primarily due to decreases in mortgage banking and other loan fees of $11.8 million and net gain on sales of loans of $10.5 million.  The decline in mortgage banking and other loans fees primarily reflects the change in the fair value of loan servicing rights, which was a detriment to earnings of $4.2 million during the second quarter of 2014, compared to a benefit of $6.5 million in the second quarter of 2013.  The decrease in net gain on sales of loans in the second quarter of 2014 compared to the second quarter of 2013 was primarily due to reduced levels of residential mortgage loans originated for sale.

 

Noninterest income decreased $69.6 million to $70.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, from $139.7 million for the same period of 2013.  The decrease in noninterest income for the six months ended June 30, 2014, compared to 2013, was primarily due to the recognition of $40.2 million of bargain purchase gain in the six months ended June 30, 2014, compared to $71.7 million of bargain purchase gain recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and decreases in net gain on sales of loans of $24.2 million and mortgage banking and other loan fees of $15.7 million.  The bargain purchase gain recognized in the first quarter of 2014 increased $3.7 million from the previously recorded level due to adjustments to the acquisition date fair value of certain assets and liabilities related to our acquisition of Talmer West Bank within the measurement period.  The decline in mortgage banking and other loans fees primarily reflects the change in the fair value of loan servicing rights, which was a detriment to earnings of $6.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, compared to a benefit of $7.0 million for the same period in 2013.  The decrease in net gain on sales of loans in the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the same period in 2013 was primarily due to reduced levels of residential mortgage loans originated for sale.

 

88



Table of Contents

 

Noninterest Expenses

 

The following table presents noninterest expenses for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

 

 

 

For the three months ended
June 30,

 

For the six months ended
June 30,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

Noninterest expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Salary and employee benefits

 

$

30,391

 

$

34,110

 

$

66,120

 

$

87,005

 

Occupancy and equipment expense

 

7,937

 

6,824

 

17,085

 

13,827

 

Data processing fees

 

2,260

 

1,913

 

4,000

 

3,560

 

Professional service fees

 

2,814

 

4,425

 

7,104

 

8,312

 

FDIC loss sharing expense

 

983

 

722

 

1,507

 

1,418

 

Bank acquisition and due diligence fees

 

268

 

474

 

1,979

 

7,703

 

Marketing expense

 

1,607

 

654

 

2,698

 

2,191

 

Other employee expense

 

804

 

958

 

1,500

 

1,705

 

Insurance expense

 

803

 

3,280

 

2,652

 

6,212

 

Other expense

 

6,302

 

6,544

 

15,138

 

12,563

 

Total noninterest expenses

 

$

54,169

 

$

59,904

 

$

119,783

 

$

144,496

 

 

Noninterest expenses decreased $5.7 million to $54.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014, from $59.9 million for the same period in 2013.  Total noninterest expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2014 reflect the inclusion of Talmer West Bank into our operations beginning January 1, 2014, which added approximately $9.5 million of operating costs.  The decrease in noninterest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2014, compared to 2013, was primarily due to decreases of $3.7 million in salary and employee benefits and $2.5 million in insurance expense.  The decline in salary and employee benefits for the three months ended June 30, 2014, compared to the same period in 2013, relates significantly to the reduction in employee headcount as we have eliminated duplicative positions and streamlined operations with the merger of First Place Bank into Talmer Bank.  The decrease in insurance expense is due to a combination of the benefit of new corporate insurance contracts combining First Place Bank into Talmer Bank and lower FDIC insurance expense primarily as a result of the merger of First Place Bank with and into Talmer Bank, which occurred on February 10, 2014 following First Place Bank achieving compliance with the Cease and Desist Order.

 

Noninterest expenses decreased $24.7 million to $119.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, from $144.5 million for the same period of 2013.  Total noninterest expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2014 reflect the inclusion of Talmer West Bank into our operations beginning January 1, 2014, which added approximately $22.5 million of operating costs.  The decrease in noninterest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2014, compared to 2013, was primarily due to decreases of $20.9 million in salary and employee benefits, $5.7 million in bank acquisition and due diligence fees and $3.6 million in insurance expense.  Salary and employee benefits in the six months ended June 30, 2014 included $5.8 million of transaction related expenses including severance expense and bonus payments related to our successful acquisition of Talmer West Bank, the merger of First Place Bank with and into Talmer Bank and the completion of our initial public offering, while the six months ended June 30, 2013, included $11.3 million of transaction and integration related expenses, including First Place Bank acquisition related bonuses, stock options issued and the accrual of anticipated severance payments for planned reductions in the work force.  The remaining decline in salary and employee benefits for the six months ended June 30, 2014, compared to the same period in 2013, relates significantly to the reduction in employee headcount as we have eliminated duplicative positions and streamlined operations with the merger of First Place Bank into Talmer Bank.

 

Income Taxes and Tax-Related Items

 

During the three months ended June 30, 2014, we recognized an income tax benefit of $4.2 million on $16.4 million of pre-tax income.  The benefit in the second quarter of 2014 was primarily driven by the elimination

 

89



Table of Contents

 

of a $9.7 million valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets acquired in our acquisition of First Place Bank on January 1, 2013 resulting from a conclusion reached with the assistance of legal and tax accounting experts, regarding the calculation of the annual Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code limitation related to the ownership change of First Place Bank.  Without the benefit from the reversal of the $9.7 million valuation allowance, our tax expense would have been $5.5 million, or an effective tax rate of 33.6%, compared to an income tax expense of $7.7 million on $22.7 million of pre-tax income, an effective tax rate of 34.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2013.

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we recognized an income tax benefit of $5.9 million on $51.1 million of pre-tax income, an effective tax rate of negative 11.5%, compared to an income tax expense of $4.7 million on $80.2 million of pre-tax income, an effective tax rate of 5.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2013.  The income tax benefit for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and the low effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2013, resulted primarily from treating the $40.2 million bargain purchase gain resulting from our acquisition of Talmer West Bank on January 1, 2014 and the $71.7 million bargain purchase gain resulting from our acquisition of First Place Bank on January 1, 2013 as non-taxable, based on the tax structure of the acquisitions. The income tax benefit for the six months ended June 30, 2014 was also impacted by the reversal of the valuation allowance discussed previously.

 

Further information on income taxes is presented in Note 14, “Income Taxes,” of our consolidated financial statements.

 

Financial Condition

 

Balance Sheet

 

Total assets were $5.6 billion at June 30, 2014, compared to $4.5 billion at December 31, 2013.  Of the $1.1 billion increase, $908.5 million was related to the fair value of assets acquired in our acquisition of Talmer West Bank.  The increase in total assets of $151.9 million, setting aside the fair value of assets acquired in our acquisition of Talmer West Bank, was primarily due to an increase in net uncovered loans of $244.0 million, securities available-for-sale of $98.0 million, company-owned life insurance of $56.1 million and loans held for sale of $50.8 million, partially offset by decreases in cash and cash equivalents of $189.1 million, net covered loans of $63.2 million and the FDIC indemnification asset of $29.2 million.  The increase in uncovered loans reflects $315.9 million of net uncovered loan growth in Talmer Bank’s portfolio, partially offset by $71.9 million of net loan run-off in Talmer West Bank’s loan portfolio, of which $22.3 million was due to transferring portfolio loans to loans held for sale as a result of the planned sale of the Albuquerque branch. The increases in securities available-for-sale and company-owned life insurance reflect management’s plan to more fully deploy excess liquidity.  The increase in loans held for sale is primarily the result of an increase in new residential mortgage loan originations and our transfer of $22.3 million of portfolio loans to loans held for sale as a result of the Albuquerque branch sale.  The decrease in net covered loans reflects the run-off of $70.8 million in covered loans partially offset by a reduction in the allowance for covered loan losses of $7.6 million. The decrease in the FDIC indemnification asset is primarily the result of the negative accretion on the indemnification asset resulting from improvements in expected cash flows on covered loans and new claims filed with the FDIC for losses incurred on covered loans.

 

Total liabilities were $4.9 billion at June 30, 2014, compared to $3.9 billion at December 31, 2013.  The acquisition date fair value of liabilities assumed in our acquisition of Talmer West Bank increased liabilities by $861.8 million.  The $951.2 million increase in liabilities in the six months ended June 30, 2014 was primarily due to increases in total deposits of $695.7 million, short-term borrowings of $167.0 million and long-term debt of $67.4 million.  The $695.7 million increase in total deposits primarily reflects the acquisition date fair value of deposits assumed of $857.8 million related to our acquisition of Talmer West Bank, partially offset by Talmer West Bank deposit run-off during the first half of 2014.  The increases in short-term borrowings and long-term debt primarily reflect Federal Home Loan Bank advances and additional securities sold under agreements to repurchase added in the first half of 2014.

 

Total shareholders’ equity at June 30, 2014 was $726.1 million, an increase of $109.1 million from $617.0 million at December 31, 2013.  The increase primarily reflects our initial public offering completed in February 2014 that raised $42.0 million of capital, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses and net income of $57.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014.

 

90



Table of Contents

 

Loans

 

Our loan portfolio represents a broad range of borrowers primarily in the Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin Illinois, Indiana and Nevada markets comprised of residential real estate, commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, real estate construction and consumer financing loans.  All loans acquired in the CF Bancorp acquisition and all loans (except consumer loans) acquired in the First Banking Center, Peoples State Bank and Community Central Bank acquisitions were acquired under loss share agreements with the FDIC that call for the FDIC to reimburse us for a portion of our losses incurred on such loans, and we present covered loans separately from uncovered loans due to these loss share agreements.

 

Residential real estate loans represent loans to consumers for the purchase or refinance of a residence.  These loans are generally financed over a 15 to 30 year term, and in most cases, are extended to borrowers to finance their primary residence with both fixed-rate and adjustable-rate terms.  Residential real estate loans also include home equity loans and lines of credit that are secured by a first- or second-lien on the borrower’s residence.  Home equity lines of credit consist mainly of revolving lines of credit secured by residential real estate.

 

Commercial real estate loans consist of term loans secured by a mortgage lien on the real estate properties, such as apartment buildings, office and industrial buildings, retail shopping centers and farmland.

 

Commercial and industrial loans include financing for commercial purposes in various lines of businesses, including the manufacturing industry, agricultural, service industry and professional service areas.  Commercial and industrial loans are generally secured with the assets of the company and/or the personal guarantee of the business owners.

 

Real estate construction loans are term loans to individuals, companies or developers used for the construction of a commercial or residential property for which repayment will be generated by the sale or permanent financing of the property.  Generally, these loans are for construction projects that have been either presold, preleased, or have secured permanent financing, as well as loans to real estate companies with significant equity invested in the project.

 

Consumer loans include loans made to individuals not secured by real estate, including loans secured by automobiles or watercraft, and personal unsecured loans.

 

Concentrations of credit risk can exist in relation to individual borrowers or groups of borrowers, certain types of collateral, certain types of industries or certain geographic regions. Credit risk associated with these concentrations could arise when a significant amount of loans or other financial instruments, related by similar characteristics, are simultaneously impacted by changes in economic or other conditions that cause their probability of repayment or other type of settlement to be adversely affected. Our uncovered loan portfolio is managed to a risk-appropriate level as to not create a collateral, industry or geographic concentration. As of June 30, 2014, we do not have any significant concentrations to any one industry or borrower. Our largest geographic concentration of loans is in the Detroit-Warren-Livonia metropolitan statistical area (“MSA”), which includes borrowers located in Wayne, Oakland, Macomb, Livingston, St. Clair and Lapeer counties in the state of Michigan.  Loans to borrowers in the Detroit-Warren-Livonia MSA totaled $1.3 billion, or approximately 34.9% of total loans, at June 30, 2014, of which approximately $308.3 million, or 23.5% of the total Detroit-Warren-Livonia MSA loans, were covered by loss share agreements with the FDIC.

 

91



Table of Contents

 

The following tables detail our loan portfolio by loan type and geographic location as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. Geographic location is primarily determined by the domicile of the borrower and in some instances, the location of the collateral.

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Michigan

 

Ohio

 

Wisconsin

 

Illinois

 

Indiana

 

Nevada

 

Other

 

Total

 

June 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uncovered loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate (1)(2)

 

$

543,032

 

$

565,220

 

$

13,149

 

$

38,758

 

$

108,929

 

$

9,659

 

$

84,122

 

$

1,362,869

 

Commercial real estate (3)(4)

 

572,312

 

242,449

 

69,502

 

87,404

 

38,519

 

100,607

 

20,555

 

1,131,348

 

Commercial and industrial (5)

 

352,257

 

81,278

 

21,864

 

120,349

 

11,269

 

9,770

 

50,303

 

647,090

 

Real estate construction

 

52,430

 

26,556

 

8,638

 

6,498

 

12,315

 

4,564

 

1,865

 

112,866

 

Consumer

 

36,787

 

2,328

 

650

 

107

 

346

 

1,727

 

89

 

42,034

 

Total uncovered loans

 

1,556,818

 

917,831

 

113,803

 

253,116

 

171,378

 

126,327

 

156,934

 

3,296,207

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Covered loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate (1)

 

89,643

 

299

 

24,803

 

1,144

 

1,447

 

171

 

 

117,507

 

Commercial real estate (3)

 

194,943

 

 

54,569

 

5,845

 

73

 

 

786

 

256,216

 

Commercial and industrial (5)

 

28,463

 

93

 

29,044

 

1,858

 

 

 

1,039

 

60,497

 

Real estate construction

 

7,627

 

 

5,274

 

946

 

31

 

 

513

 

14,391

 

Consumer

 

10,584

 

56

 

13

 

5

 

11

 

 

 

10,669

 

Total covered loans

 

331,260

 

448

 

113,703

 

9,798

 

1,562

 

171

 

2,338

 

459,280

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total loans

 

$

1,888,078

 

$

918,279

 

$

227,506

 

$

262,914

 

$

172,940

 

$

126,498

 

$

159,272

 

$

3,755,487

 

 


(1) Residential real estate loans to borrowers in the Detroit-Warren-Livonia MSA totaled $371.1 million of uncovered loans and $82.6 million of covered loans.  The Detroit-Warren-Livonia MSA includes borrowers located in Wayne, Oakland, Macomb, Livingston, St. Clair and Lapeer counties in the State of Michigan.

(2) Residential real estate loans to borrowers in the Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor metropolitan statistical area (Cleveland MSA) totaled $137.6 million of uncovered loans.  The Cleveland MSA includes borrowers located in Cuyahoga, Geauga, Lake, Lorain, and Medina counties in the State of Ohio.

(3) Commercial real estate loans to borrowers in the Detroit-Warren-Livonia MSA totaled $342.8 million of uncovered loans and $184.2 million of covered loans.

(4) Commercial real estate loans to borrowers in the Cleveland MSA totaled $146.3 million of uncovered loans.

(5) Commercial and industrial loans to borrowers in the Detroit-Warren-Livonia MSA totaled $217.2 million of uncovered loans and $26.2 million of covered loans.

 

92



Table of Contents

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Michigan

 

Ohio

 

Wisconsin

 

Illinois

 

Indiana

 

Other

 

Total

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uncovered loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate (1)(2)

 

$

411,176

 

$

500,407

 

$

11,825

 

$

33,670

 

$

59,808

 

$

68,567

 

$

1,085,453

 

Commercial real estate (3)(4)

 

348,950

 

244,788

 

62,330

 

71,267

 

5,338

 

23,166

 

755,839

 

Commercial and industrial (5)

 

295,456

 

53,268

 

20,263

 

75,802

 

731

 

1,124

 

446,644

 

Real estate construction

 

49,950

 

82,774

 

2,425

 

1,086

 

35,098

 

4,893

 

176,226

 

Consumer

 

5,693

 

3,175

 

703

 

94

 

 

89

 

9,754

 

Total uncovered loans

 

1,111,225

 

884,412

 

97,546

 

181,919

 

100,975

 

97,839

 

2,473,916

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Covered loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate (1)

 

95,658

 

344

 

24,472

 

1,263

 

1,597

 

 

123,334

 

Commercial real estate (3)

 

221,020

 

 

71,412

 

6,896

 

73

 

 

299,401

 

Commercial and industrial (5)

 

41,579

 

106

 

34,575

 

2,177

 

 

 

78,437

 

Real estate construction

 

8,866

 

 

7,237

 

990

 

125

 

 

17,218

 

Consumer

 

11,582

 

57

 

23

 

5

 

11

 

 

11,678

 

Total covered loans

 

378,705

 

507

 

137,719

 

11,331

 

1,806

 

 

530,068

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total loans

 

$

1,489,930

 

$

884,919

 

$

235,265

 

$

193,250

 

$

102,781

 

$

97,839

 

$

3,003,984

 

 


(1) Residential real estate loans to borrowers in the Detroit-Warren-Livonia MSA totaled $290.1 million of uncovered loans and $88.2 million of covered loans.  The Detroit-Warren-Livonia MSA includes borrowers located in Wayne, Oakland, Macomb, Livingston, St. Clair and Lapeer counties in the State of Michigan.

(2) Residential real estate loans to borrowers in the Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor metropolitan statistical area (Cleveland MSA) totaled $137.7 million of uncovered loans.  The Cleveland MSA includes borrowers located in Cuyahoga, Geauga, Lake, Lorain, and Medina counties in the State of Ohio.

(3) Commercial real estate loans to borrowers in the Detroit-Warren-Livonia MSA totaled $257.1 million of uncovered loans and $208.4 million of covered loans.

(4) Commercial real estate loans to borrowers in the Cleveland MSA totaled $148.7 million of uncovered loans.

(5) Commercial and industrial loans to borrowers in the Detroit-Warren-Livonia MSA totaled $266.7 million of uncovered loans and $38.9 million of covered loans.

 

93



Table of Contents

 

The following table details our loan portfolio by loan type for the periods presented.

 

 

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

Uncovered loans

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

1,362,869

 

$

1,085,453

 

Commercial real estate

 

 

 

 

 

Non-owner occupied

 

731,743

 

581,651

 

Owner-occupied

 

371,406

 

148,545

 

Farmland

 

28,199

 

25,643

 

Total commercial real estate

 

1,131,348

 

755,839

 

Commercial and industrial

 

647,090

 

446,644

 

Real estate construction

 

112,866

 

176,226

 

Consumer

 

42,034

 

9,754

 

Total uncovered loans

 

3,296,207

 

2,473,916

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Covered loans

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

117,507

 

123,334

 

Commercial real estate

 

 

 

 

 

Non-owner occupied

 

142,846

 

154,951

 

Owner-occupied

 

91,829

 

115,435

 

Farmland

 

21,541

 

29,015

 

Total commercial real estate

 

256,216

 

299,401

 

Commercial and industrial

 

60,497

 

78,437

 

Real estate construction

 

14,391

 

17,218

 

Consumer

 

10,669

 

11,678

 

Total covered loans

 

459,280

 

530,068

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total loans

 

$

3,755,487

 

$

3,003,984

 

 

Total loans were $3.8 billion at June 30, 2014, an increase of $751.5 million from December 31, 2013, resulting from the acquisition of $571.7 million of loans at fair value in our acquisition of Talmer West Bank on January 1, 2014 and $250.6 million of uncovered loan growth outside of the acquisition, partially offset by $70.8 million in covered loan run-off.  The $250.6 million of uncovered loan growth is the result of $320.0 million of uncovered loan growth in Talmer Bank’s loan portfolio, partially offset by $69.4 million of loan run-off in Talmer West Bank’s loan portfolio. The loan run-off in Talmer West Bank’s loan portfolio includes $22.3 million of portfolio loans transferred to loans held for sale as a result of the planned sale of the Albuquerque branch. The total increase in uncovered loans of $822.3 million at June 30, 2014, compared to December 31, 2013, includes loans acquired in our acquisition of Talmer West Bank, represented by increases in commercial real estate loans of $375.5 million, residential real estate loans of $277.4 million, commercial and industrial loans of $200.5 million and consumer loans of $32.3 million, partially offset by a decline in real estate construction loans of $63.4 million.  The covered loan run-off for the six months ended June 30, 2014 resulted from decreases in commercial real estate loans of $43.2 million, or 14.42%, commercial and industrial loans of $18.0 million, or 22.87%, residential real estate loans of $5.8 million, or 4.72%, real estate construction loans of $2.8 million, or 16.42% and consumer loans of $1.0 million, or 8.64%.  Long term, we intend to decrease the concentration of our residential real estate and commercial real estate portfolios, as we run off acquired loans, with a goal of our overall loan portfolio to be approximately one-third commercial and industrial loans, less than one-third commercial real estate loans, and the remaining to be a mix of residential real estate and consumer loans.

 

We originate both fixed and adjustable rate residential real estate loans conforming to the underwriting guidelines of the Federal National Mortgage Association or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, home equity loans and lines of credit that are secured by first or junior liens, and a limited amount of other secured high credit quality jumbo loans.  We have not originated or purchased a material amount of high-risk products, such as

 

94



Table of Contents

 

Subprime, option adjustable rate or Alternative A-paper mortgage loans as of June 30, 2014.

 

Residential real estate loans totaled $1.5 billion at June 30, 2014, of which $1.4 billion were uncovered and $117.5 million were covered.  Of the $1.5 billion of residential real estate loans outstanding at June 30, 2014, $15.5 million (consisting of $13.7 million of uncovered loans and $1.8 million of covered loans) were on nonaccrual status.  Included in residential real estate loans are $258.2 million of home equity loans and lines of credit (consisting of $199.2 million of uncovered loans and $59.0 million of covered loans) of which $70.8 million have interest only payment terms.  These loans are generally secured by junior liens and represent the only interest only residential real estate loans that we held as of June 30, 2014.  Also included in residential real estate loans are $62.6 million of uncovered jumbo adjustable rate mortgages and $55.6 million of residential real estate loans with balloon payment terms (consisting of $47.6 million of uncovered loans and $8.0 million of covered loans) of which only $782 thousand were on nonaccrual status as of June 30, 2014.

 

Real estate construction loans totaled $127.3 million at June 30, 2014, of which $112.9 million were uncovered loans and $14.4 million were covered loans.  Of the $127.3 million of real estate construction loans outstanding at June 30, 2014, $1.2 million (consisting of $158 thousand of uncovered loans and $1.0 million of covered loans) were on nonaccrual status. Included in real estate construction loans are $19.4 million of loans with balloon payment terms (consisting of $17.4 million of uncovered loans and $2.0 million of covered loans), all of which were current on payments as of June 30, 2014.

 

Loan Maturity/Rate Sensitivity

 

The following tables show the contractual maturities of our uncovered and covered loans for the periods presented.

 

 

 

Loans Maturing

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

One year or
less

 

After one
but within
five years

 

After five
years

 

Total

 

June 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uncovered loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

80,101

 

$

98,312

 

$

1,184,456

 

$

1,362,869

 

Commercial real estate

 

207,497

 

719,564

 

204,287

 

1,131,348

 

Commercial and industrial

 

185,312

 

324,430

 

137,348

 

647,090

 

Real estate construction

 

23,787

 

21,921

 

67,158

 

112,866

 

Consumer

 

3,178

 

6,493

 

32,363

 

42,034

 

Total uncovered loans

 

$

499,875

 

$

1,170,720

 

$

1,625,612

 

$

3,296,207

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sensitivity of loans to changes in interest rates:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Predetermined (fixed) interest rates

 

 

 

835,478

 

931,853

 

 

 

Floating interest rates

 

 

 

335,242

 

693,759

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

$

1,170,720

 

$

1,625,612

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Covered loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

11,033

 

$

47,458

 

$

59,016

 

$

117,507

 

Commercial real estate

 

156,916

 

86,293

 

13,007

 

256,216

 

Commercial and industrial

 

41,759

 

16,129

 

2,609

 

60,497

 

Real estate construction

 

11,695

 

2,072

 

624

 

14,391

 

Consumer

 

344

 

787

 

9,538

 

10,669

 

Total covered loans

 

$

221,747

 

$

152,739

 

$

84,794

 

$

459,280

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sensitivity of loans to changes in interest rates:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Predetermined (fixed) interest rates

 

 

 

144,359

 

39,654

 

 

 

Floating interest rates

 

 

 

8,380

 

45,140

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

$

152,739

 

$

84,794

 

 

 

 

95



Table of Contents

 

 

 

Loans Maturing

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

One year or
less

 

After one but
within five
years

 

After five
years

 

Total

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uncovered loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

23,500

 

$

48,930

 

$

1,013,023

 

$

1,085,453

 

Commercial real estate

 

100,614

 

490,468

 

164,757

 

755,839

 

Commercial and industrial

 

155,673

 

201,290

 

89,681

 

446,644

 

Real estate construction

 

6,657

 

11,799

 

157,770

 

176,226

 

Consumer

 

2,663

 

4,495

 

2,596

 

9,754

 

Total uncovered loans

 

$

289,107

 

$

756,982

 

$

1,427,827

 

$

2,473,916

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sensitivity of loans to changes in interest rates:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Predetermined (fixed) interest rates

 

 

 

556,077

 

807,531

 

 

 

Floating interest rates

 

 

 

200,905

 

620,296

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

$

756,982

 

$

1,427,827

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Covered loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

11,053

 

$

46,271

 

$

66,010

 

$

123,334

 

Commercial real estate

 

158,912

 

122,596

 

17,893

 

299,401

 

Commercial and industrial

 

48,970

 

25,211

 

4,256

 

78,437

 

Real estate construction

 

12,944

 

3,651

 

623

 

17,218

 

Consumer

 

331

 

906

 

10,441

 

11,678

 

Total covered loans

 

$

232,210

 

$

198,635

 

$

99,223

 

$

530,068

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sensitivity of loans to changes in interest rates:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Predetermined (fixed) interest rates

 

 

 

186,643

 

47,250

 

 

 

Floating interest rates

 

 

 

11,992

 

51,973

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

$

198,635

 

$

99,223

 

 

 

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

 

We maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level we believe is sufficient to absorb probable incurred losses in our loan portfolio given the conditions at the time. Management determines the adequacy of the allowance based on periodic evaluations of the loan portfolio and other factors. These evaluations are inherently subjective as they require management to make material estimates, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. The allowance is increased by provisions charged to expense and decreased by actual charge-offs, net of recoveries or previous amounts charged-off.

 

Purchased Loans

 

We maintain an allowance for loan losses on purchased loans based on credit deterioration subsequent to the acquisition date.  In accordance with the accounting guidance for business combinations, there was no allowance brought forward on any of the acquired loans as any credit deterioration evident in the loans was included in the determination of the fair value of the loans at the acquisition date.  For purchased credit impaired loans, accounted for under FASB Topic ASC 310-30 “Receivables — Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality” (“ASC 310-30”) and troubled debt restructurings previously individually accounted for under ASC 310-30, management establishes an allowance for credit deterioration subsequent to the date of acquisition by re-estimating expected cash flows on a quarterly basis with any decline in expected cash flows recorded as provision for loan losses. Impairment is measured as the excess of the recorded investment in a loan over the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the pre-impairment accounting yield of the loan.  For any increases in cash flows expected to be collected, we first reverse only previously recorded allowance for loan loss, then adjust the amount of accretable yield recognized on a prospective basis over the loan’s remaining life.  These cash flow evaluations are inherently subjective as they require material estimates, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. For non-purchased credit impaired loans acquired in our acquisitions of First Place Bank and Talmer West Bank that are

 

96



Table of Contents

 

accounted for under ASC 310-20, the historical loss estimates are based on the historical losses experienced by First Place Bank or by Talmer West Bank, as applicable, for loans with similar characteristics as those acquired other than purchased credit impaired loans.  We record an allowance for loan losses only when the calculated amount exceeds the estimated credit mark at acquisition that was established for the similar period covered in the allowance for loan loss calculation. For all other purchased loans accounted for under ASC 310-20 or under ASC 310-40, the allowance is calculated in accordance with the methods used to calculate the allowance for loan losses for originated loans.

 

Originated loans

 

The allowance for loan losses represents management’s assessment of probable, incurred credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses consists of specific allowances, based on individual evaluation of certain loans, and allowances for homogeneous pools of loans with similar risk characteristics.

 

Impaired loans include loans placed on nonaccrual status and troubled debt restructurings. Loans are considered impaired when based on current information and events it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance with the original contractual terms of the loan agreements. When determining if we will be unable to collect all principal and interest payments due in accordance with the original contractual terms of the loan agreement, we consider the borrower’s overall financial condition, resources and payment record, support from guarantors, and the realized value of any collateral.  Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired.  Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.

 

Impaired loans are identified to be individually evaluated for impairment based on a defined dollar threshold for commercial real estate, commercial and industrial and real estate construction loans, while all residential real estate and consumer impaired loans are individually evaluated for impairment.  If a loan is impaired, a portion of the allowance is allocated so that the loan is reported, net, at the discounted expected future cash flows or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is collateral dependent. Impaired loans which do not meet the criteria to be evaluated individually are evaluated in homogeneous pools of loans with similar risk characteristics.

 

The allowance for our business loans, which includes commercial and industrial, commercial real estate and real estate construction loans, that are not individually evaluated for impairment begins with a process of estimating the probable incurred losses in the portfolio. These estimates are established based on our internal credit risk ratings and historical loss data. Internal credit risk ratings are assigned to each business loan at the time of approval and are subjected to subsequent periodic reviews by senior management, at least annually or more frequently upon the occurrence of a circumstance that affects the credit risk of the loan. As our operating history is limited and we are growing rapidly, the historical loss estimates for loans are based primarily on the actual historical loss experienced by all banks in our markets of Michigan, Ohio, Indiana and Wisconsin combined with a small factor representing our own loss history from the same time period.  These estimates are established by loan type including commercial and industrial, commercial real estate and real estate construction, and further segregated by region, including Michigan, Ohio, Indiana and Wisconsin, where applicable. In addition, consideration is given to borrower rating migration experience and trends, industry concentrations and conditions, changes in collateral values of properties securing loans and trends with respect to past due and nonaccrual amounts. Given our limited operating history, the estimate of losses for single family residential and consumer loans which are not individually evaluated is also based primarily on historical loss rates experienced in the respective loan classes by all banks in Michigan, Ohio, Indiana and Wisconsin. This estimate is also adjusted to give consideration to borrower rating migration experience and trends, changes in collateral values of properties securing loans and trends with respect to past due and nonaccrual amounts.

 

97



Table of Contents

 

The following tables present, by loan type, the changes in the allowance for loan losses on both uncovered and covered loans for the periods presented.

 

Analysis of the Allowance for Loan Losses — Uncovered

 

 

 

For the three months ended
June 30,

 

For the six months ended
June 30,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

22,771

 

$

10,598

 

$

17,746

 

$

10,945

 

Loan charge-offs:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

(1,381

)

(1,641

)

(2,817

)

(2,771

)

Commercial real estate

 

(3,586

)

(357

)

(4,831

)

(789

)

Commercial and industrial

 

(481

)

(178

)

(626

)

(303

)

Real estate construction

 

(28

)

(68

)

(109

)

(68

)

Consumer

 

(57

)

(91

)

(123

)

(239

)

Total loan charge-offs

 

(5,533

)

(2,335

)

(8,506

)

(4,170

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recoveries of loans previously charged-off:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

540

 

457

 

1,300

 

494

 

Commercial real estate

 

1,870

 

214

 

2,486

 

385

 

Commercial and industrial

 

439

 

13

 

601

 

55

 

Real estate construction

 

961

 

25

 

963

 

25

 

Consumer

 

93

 

79

 

127

 

141

 

Total loan recoveries

 

3,903

 

788

 

5,477

 

1,100

 

Net charge-offs

 

(1,630

)

(1,547

)

(3,029

)

(3,070

)

Provision for loan losses

 

3,219

 

4,923

 

9,643

 

6,099

 

Balance at end of period

 

$

24,360

 

$

13,974

 

$

24,360

 

$

13,974

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total uncovered loans at year end

 

0.74

%

0.62

%

0.74

%

0.62

%

Net loan charge-offs on noncovered loans as a percentage of average uncovered loans

 

0.20

%

0.25

%

0.19

%

0.25

%

 

98



Table of Contents

 

Analysis of the Allowance for Loan Losses — Covered

 

 

 

For the three months ended
June 30,

 

For the six months ended
June 30,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

38,000

 

$

49,914

 

$

40,381

 

$

51,473

 

Loan charge-offs:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

(412

)

(471

)

(1,275

)

(1,220

)

Commercial real estate

 

(1,209

)

(1,230

)

(3,195

)

(5,840

)

Commercial and industrial

 

(1,500

)

(871

)

(2,527

)

(1,706

)

Real estate construction

 

(979

)

(446

)

(1,004

)

(810

)

Consumer

 

(30

)

(75

)

(77

)

(94

)

Total loan charge-offs

 

(4,130

)

(3,093

)

(8,078

)

(9,670

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recoveries of loans previously charged-off:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

556

 

468

 

1,108

 

729

 

Commercial real estate

 

4,270

 

4,369

 

5,915

 

7,078

 

Commercial and industrial

 

692

 

1,666

 

2,341

 

2,213

 

Real estate construction

 

590

 

317

 

717

 

684

 

Consumer

 

86

 

131

 

178

 

181

 

Total loan recoveries

 

6,194

 

6,951

 

10,259

 

10,885

 

Net (charge-offs) recoveries

 

2,064

 

3,858

 

2,181

 

1,215

 

Provision (benefit) for loan losses

 

(7,321

)

(7,460

)

(9,819

)

(6,376

)

Balance at end of period

 

$

32,743

 

$

46,312

 

$

32,743

 

$

46,312

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total covered loans at year end

 

7.13

%

7.68

%

7.13

%

7.68

%

Net loan charge-offs (recoveries) on covered loans as a percentage of average covered loans

 

-1.73

%

-2.37

%

-0.88

%

-0.36

%

 

Our uncovered allowance for loan losses was $24.4 million, or 0.74% of uncovered loans, at June 30, 2014, compared to $17.7 million, or 0.72% of uncovered loans, at December 31, 2013.  The $6.7 million increase in the uncovered allowance for loan losses during the six months ended June 30, 2014 was primarily due to allowance resulting from our quarterly re-estimation of expected cash flows for our uncovered purchased credit impaired loans along with additional provision for organic loan growth, partially offset by an improvement in historical loss factors.

 

The covered allowance for loan losses was $32.7 million, or 7.13% of covered loans, at June 30, 2014, compared to $ 40.4 million , or 7.62% of total covered loans, at December 31, 2013.  The $7.7 million decrease from December 31, 2013 to June 30, 2014 was primarily driven by payments received on covered loans previously carrying an allowance for loan loss, partially offset by the additional allowance resulting from our quarterly re-estimation of expected cash flows for our covered purchased credit impaired loans.

 

99



Table of Contents

 

The following tables present, by loan type, the allocation of the allowance for loan losses on both uncovered and covered loans for the periods presented.

 

Allocation of the Allowance for Loan Losses — Uncovered

 

 

 

June 30, 2014

 

 

 

Accounted for under ASC 310-30

 

Excluded from ASC 310-30 accounting

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Allocated
Allowance

 

Allowance
Ratio (1)

 

Percent of
loans in each
category to
total loans

 

Allocated
Allowance

 

Allowance
Ratio (1)

 

Percent of
loans in each
category to
total loans

 

Balance at end of period applicable to:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

4,615

 

1.77

%

51.6

%

$

5,135

 

0.47

%

39.5

%

Commercial real estate

 

4,468

 

2.10

 

42.2

 

3,378

 

0.37

 

32.9

 

Commercial and industrial

 

365

 

2.05

 

3.5

 

4,775

 

0.76

 

22.5

 

Real estate construction

 

617

 

5.94

 

2.1

 

781

 

0.76

 

3.7

 

Consumer

 

155

 

5.16

 

0.6

 

71

 

0.18

 

1.4

 

Total uncovered loans

 

$

10,220

 

2.02

%

100.0

%

$

14,140

 

0.51

%

100.0

%

 


(1) Allocated allowance as a percentage of related loans outstanding.

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

 

Accounted for under ASC 310-30

 

Excluded from ASC 310-30 accounting

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Allocated
Allowance

 

Allowance
Ratio (1)

 

Percent of
loans in each
category to
total loans

 

Allocated
Allowance

 

Allowance
Ratio (1)

 

Percent of
loans in each
category to
total loans

 

Balance at end of period applicable to:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

3,088

 

1.22

%

69.9

%

$

4,620

 

0.56

%

39.4

%

Residential real estate

 

1,405

 

1.43

 

27.1

 

2,862

 

0.44

 

31.1

 

Commercial and industrial

 

161

 

2.69

 

1.7

 

3,243

 

0.74

 

20.9

 

Commercial and industrial

 

2

 

0.10

 

0.5

 

2,025

 

1.16

 

8.3

 

Real estate construction

 

115

 

3.96

 

0.8

 

225

 

3.29

 

0.3

 

Total uncovered loans

 

$

4,771

 

1.32

%

100.0

%

$

12,975

 

0.61

%

100.0

%

 


(1) Allocated allowance as a percentage of related loans outstanding.

 

Allocation of the Allowance for Loan Losses — Covered

 

 

 

June 30, 2014

 

December 31, 2013

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Allocated
Allowance

 

Allowance
Ratio (1)

 

Percent of
loans in each
category to
total loans

 

Allocated
Allowance

 

Allowance
Ratio (1)

 

Percent of
loans in each
category to
total loans

 

Balance at end of period applicable to:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

5,312

 

4.52

%

25.6

%

$

4,696

 

3.81

%

23.3

%

Commercial real estate

 

21,275

 

8.30

 

55.8

 

26,394

 

8.82

 

56.5

 

Commercial and industrial

 

4,540

 

7.50

 

13.2

 

7,227

 

9.21

 

14.8

 

Real estate construction

 

1,519

 

10.56

 

3.1

 

1,984

 

11.52

 

3.2

 

Consumer

 

97

 

0.91

 

2.3

 

80

 

0.69

 

2.2

 

Total uncovered loans

 

$

32,743

 

7.13

%

100.0

%

$

40,381

 

7.62

%

100.0

%

 


(1) Allocated allowance as a percentage of related loans outstanding.

 

100



Table of Contents

 

Summary of Impaired Assets and Past Due Loans

 

 

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

Uncovered

 

 

 

 

 

Nonperforming troubled debt restructurings

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

1,920

 

$

2,469

 

Commercial real estate

 

2,842

 

3,581

 

Commercial and industrial

 

541

 

415

 

Consumer

 

90

 

3

 

Total nonperforming troubled debt restructurings

 

5,393

 

6,468

 

Nonaccrual loans other than nonperforming troubled debt restructurings

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

11,708

 

$

12,946

 

Commercial real estate

 

6,590

 

2,010

 

Commercial and industrial

 

2,074

 

2,266

 

Real estate construction

 

158

 

510

 

Consumer

 

76

 

97

 

Total nonaccrual loans other than nonperforming troubled debt restructurings

 

20,606

 

17,829

 

Total nonaccrual loans

 

25,999

 

24,297

 

Other real estate (1)

 

39,806

 

17,046

 

Total nonperforming assets

 

65,805

 

41,343

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performing troubled debt restructurings

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

1,628

 

328

 

Commercial real estate

 

2,588

 

1,637

 

Commercial and industrial

 

995

 

1,367

 

Real estate construction

 

94

 

90

 

Consumer

 

29

 

30

 

Total performing troubled debt restructurings

 

5,334

 

3,452

 

Total uncovered impaired assets

 

$

71,139

 

$

44,795

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing, excluding loans accounted for under ASC 310-30

 

$

305

 

$

539

 

 

101



Table of Contents

 

 

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

Covered

 

 

 

 

 

Nonperforming troubled debt restructurings

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

1,408

 

$

900

 

Commercial real estate

 

4,861

 

6,561

 

Commercial and industrial

 

2,089

 

3,052

 

Real estate construction

 

595

 

926

 

Consumer

 

15

 

25

 

Total nonperforming troubled debt restructurings

 

8,968

 

11,464

 

Nonaccrual loans other than nonperforming troubled debt restructurings

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

$

426

 

$

88

 

Commercial real estate

 

1,489

 

1,563

 

Commercial and industrial

 

1,751

 

4,149

 

Real estate construction

 

439

 

446

 

Consumer

 

1

 

6

 

Total nonaccrual loans other than nonperforming troubled debt restructurings

 

4,106

 

6,252

 

Total nonaccrual loans

 

13,074

 

17,716

 

Other real estate

 

10,926

 

11,571

 

Total nonperforming assets

 

24,000

 

29,287

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performing troubled debt restructurings

 

 

 

 

 

Residential real estate

 

2,821

 

2,691

 

Commercial real estate

 

16,102

 

14,391

 

Commercial and industrial

 

2,962

 

3,802

 

Real estate construction

 

109

 

163

 

Total performing troubled debt restructurings

 

21,994

 

21,047

 

Total covered impaired assets

 

$

45,994

 

$

50,334

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing, excluding loans accounted for under ASC 310-30

 

$

49

 

$

 

 


(1) Excludes closed branches and operating facilities.

 

Nonperforming assets consist of nonaccrual loans and other real estate owned. We do not consider performing TDRs to be nonperforming assets. The level of nonaccrual loans is an important element in assessing asset quality. Loans are classified as nonaccrual when, in the opinion of management, collection of principal or interest is doubtful. Generally, loans are placed on nonaccrual status due to the continued failure by the borrower to adhere to contractual payment terms coupled with other pertinent factors, such as insufficient collateral value.

 

Purchased credit impaired loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 are classified as performing, even though they may be contractually past due, as any nonpayment of contractual principal or interest is considered in the quarterly re-estimation of expected cash flows and is included in the resulting recognition of current period covered loan loss provision or future period yield adjustments.

 

Total nonperforming assets were $89.8 million as of June 30, 2014, compared to $ 70.6 million as of December 31, 2013.  The $ 19.2 million increase was primarily the result of $30.9 million of uncovered other real estate owned related to our acquisition of Talmer West Bank on January 1, 2014, partially offset by disposals of other real estate owned during the six months ended June 30, 2014.

 

FDIC Indemnification Asset and Receivable

 

In connection with our FDIC-assisted acquisitions, we entered into loss share agreements with the FDIC.  At each acquisition date, we account for amounts receivable from the FDIC under the loss share agreements as an

 

102



Table of Contents

 

indemnification asset. Subsequent to initial recognition, the FDIC indemnification asset is reviewed quarterly and adjusted for any changes in expected cash flows. These adjustments are measured on the same basis as the related covered assets.  A decline in expected cash flows on covered loans is referred to as impairment and recorded as provision for loan losses, resulting in an increase to the allowance for loan losses on covered loans. Estimated reimbursements due from the FDIC under loss share agreements related to any declines in expected cash flows are recorded as noninterest income in “FDIC loss sharing income” in our consolidated statements of income and result in an increase to the FDIC indemnification asset in the same period.  An improvement in expected cash flows on covered loans, once any previously recorded impairment is recaptured, is recognized prospectively as an upward adjustment to the yield on the related loan and a downward adjustment to the yield on the FDIC indemnification asset. As such, overall improvements in expected cash flows on covered loans can result in a negative yield on the FDIC indemnification asset, which is recorded in “interest income” in our consolidated statements of income, while increases to the FDIC indemnification asset are recorded as adjustments to noninterest income in “FDIC loss sharing income” in our consolidated statements of income.  When covered loans payoff sooner than expected, any remaining FDIC indemnification asset is reviewed and may result in a direct write off as an adjustment to noninterest income in “Accelerated discount on acquired loans” in our consolidated statements of income. The FDIC indemnification asset is also reduced for claims submitted to the FDIC for reimbursement.  We have established a FDIC receivable which represents claims submitted to the FDIC for reimbursement for which we expect to receive payment within 90 days.

 

Our loss share agreements for CF Bancorp, First Banking Center and Peoples State Bank include provisions where a clawback payment, calculated using formulas included within the agreements, is to be made to the FDIC ten years and 45 days following the acquisition in the event actual losses fail to reach stated levels.  As of June 30, 2014, the estimated FDIC clawback liability totaled $26.3 million, including $ 22.2 million and $ 4.1 million related to the CF Bancorp and First Banking Center acquisitions, respectively.

 

The following table summarizes the activity related to the FDIC indemnification asset and the FDIC receivable for the periods indicated.

 

 

 

For the three months ended
June 30, 2014

 

For the six months ended
June 30, 2014

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

FDIC
Indemnification
Asset

 

FDIC
Receivable

 

FDIC
Indemnification
Asset

 

FDIC
Receivable

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

119,045

 

$

8,130

 

$

131,861

 

$

7,783

 

Accretion

 

(5,506

)

 

(12,224

)

 

Sales and write-downs of other real estate owned (covered)

 

(281

)

(55

)

(753

)

(247

)

Net effect of change in allowance on covered assets (1)

 

(6,130

)

 

(8,155

)

 

Reimbursements requested from FDIC (reclassification to FDIC receivable)

 

(4,434

)

4,434

 

(8,035

)

8,035

 

Decrease due to recoveries net of additional claimable expenses incurred (2)

 

 

(3,433

)

 

(4,319

)

Claim payments received from the FDIC

 

 

(1,878

)

 

(4,054

)

Balance at end of period

 

$

102,694

 

$

7,198

 

$

102,694

 

$

7,198

 

 


(1) Primarily includes adjustments for fully claimed and exited loans and the results of remeasurement of expected cash flows under ASC 310-30 accounting.

(2) Includes expenses associated with maintaining the underlying properties and legal fees.

 

103



Table of Contents

 

 

 

For the three months ended
June 30, 2013

 

For the six months ended
June 30, 2013

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

FDIC
Indemnification
Asset

 

FDIC
Receivable

 

FDIC
Indemnification
Asset

 

FDIC
Receivable

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

202,202

 

$

15,090

 

$

226,356

 

$

17,999

 

Additions due to acquisitions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accretion

 

(6,908

)

 

(15,056

)

 

Sales and write-downs of other real estate owned (covered)

 

(1,455

)

809

 

(2,318

)

1,427

 

Net effect of change in allowance on covered assets (1)

 

(14,202

)

 

(20,873

)

 

Reimbursements requested from FDIC (reclassification to FDIC receivable)

 

(7,681

)

7,681

 

(16,153

)

16,153

 

Increase (decrease) due to additional claimable expenses incurred net of recoveries (2)

 

 

(1,415

)

 

387

 

Claim payments received from the FDIC

 

 

(4,592

)

 

(18,393

)

Balance at end of period

 

$

171,956

 

$

17,573

 

$

171,956

 

$

17,573

 

 


(1) Primarily includes adjustments for fully claimed and exited loans and the results of remeasurement of expected cash flows under ASC 310-30 accounting.

(2) Primarily includes expenses associated with maintaining the underlying properties and legal fees.

 

Securities Available-for-Sale

 

 

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

Securities available-for-sale:

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Treasury securities

 

$

750

 

$

 

U.S. government sponsored agency obligations

 

117,370

 

98,237

 

Obligations of state and political subdivisions:

 

 

 

 

 

Taxable

 

397

 

396

 

Tax exempt

 

200,575

 

182,000

 

Small Business Administration (SBA) Pools

 

36,548

 

42,426

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities:

 

 

 

 

 

Issued and/or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies or U.S. government-sponsored enterprises

 

280,775

 

218,922

 

Privately issued

 

10,807

 

4,446

 

Privately issued commercial mortgage backed securities

 

5,173

 

5,147

 

Corporate debt securities:

 

 

 

 

 

Senior debt

 

53,953

 

43,845

 

Subordinated debt

 

24,854

 

24,175

 

Equity securities

 

498

 

489

 

Total securities available-for-sale

 

$

731,700

 

$

620,083

 

 

The composition of our investment securities portfolio reflects our investment strategy of maintaining an appropriate level of liquidity for both normal operations and potential acquisitions while providing an additional source of revenue.  The investment portfolio also provides a balance to interest rate risk and credit risk in other categories of the balance sheet, while providing a vehicle for the investment of available funds, furnishing liquidity, and supplying securities to pledge as collateral. At June 30, 2014, total securities available-for-sale were $731.7 million, or 13.05% of total assets, compared to $620.1 million, or 13.64% of total assets, at December 31, 2013.  Of the $111.6 million increase from December 31, 2013 to June 30, 2014, $13.6 million was related to the fair value of

 

104



Table of Contents

 

the investment securities portfolio acquired in our acquisition of Talmer West Bank.  The remaining increase primarily reflected increases in a diverse mix of investments including residential mortgage-backed securities, U.S. government sponsored agency obligations, obligations of state and political subdivisions and corporate debt securities which reflect management’s plan to more fully deploy excess liquidity.  Securities with amortized cost of $356.9 million and $271.3 million were pledged at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, to secure borrowings and deposits.

 

The following tables show contractual maturities and yields for the securities available-for-sale portfolio at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

 

 

 

Maturity as of June 30, 2014

 

 

 

One Year or Less

 

One to Five Years

 

Five to Ten Years

 

After Ten Years

 

 

 

Amortized

 

Average

 

Amortized

 

Average

 

Amortized

 

Average

 

Amortized

 

Average

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Cost

 

Yield (1)

 

Cost

 

Yield (1)

 

Cost

 

Yield (1)

 

Cost

 

Yield (1)

 

Securities available-for-sale (2):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Treasury securities

 

$

750

 

0.08

%

$

 

%

$

 

%

$

 

%

U.S. government sponsored agency obligations (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

70,959

 

1.72

 

46,731

 

1.17

 

Obligations of state and political subdivisions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Taxable (1)

 

 

 

397

 

6.19

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax exempt (1) (3)

 

1,300

 

6.00

 

36,259

 

3.95

 

119,222

 

4.32

 

41,676

 

4.99

 

SBA Pools (4) (5)

 

 

 

1,810

 

0.67

 

34,889

 

0.85

 

 

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities (4):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issued and/or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies or sponsored enterprises

 

9,144

 

2.82

 

204,207

 

2.41

 

66,431

 

2.34

 

 

 

Privately issued (1)

 

1,202

 

4.00

 

9,596

 

2.95

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities (4)

 

 

 

5,154

 

2.19

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate debt securities (6)

 

1,758

 

1.55

 

56,576

 

1.70

 

7,991

 

2.26

 

11,713

 

2.22

 

Total securities available-for-sale

 

$

14,154

 

2.91

%

$

313,999

 

2.38

%

$

299,492

 

2.80

%

$

100,120

 

2.89

%

 


(1) Average yields assume a yield to call approach where embedded call options exist, such as in certain callable U.S. government sponsored agency obligations and non-agency CMO’s. $78.7 million of U.S. government sponsored agency obligations maturing beyond 5 years contain step-up coupon structures which, if were not to be called prior to stated maturities, would positively impact average yields for balances maturing in the five-to-ten years bucket and after ten years bucket by 94 basis points and 205 basis points, respectively, or resulting in average yields of 2.66% and 3.22%, respectively.

(2) This table excludes a mutual fund holding in the CRA Fund.

(3) Average yields on tax-exempt obligations have been computed on a tax equivalent basis, based on a 35% federal tax rate.

(4) Maturity distributions for SBA pools, residential mortgage-backed securities and commercial mortgage backed securities are based on estimated average lives.

(5) All indicated balances in the one-to-five years bucket and five-to-ten years bucket encompass floating rate holdings indexed to Prime, which are contractually adjustable on a quarterly basis, in which the current June 30, 2014 indexed coupon rates are assumed to remain constant until maturity.

(6) Average yields on corporate debt securities in the one-to-five year maturity bucket and after ten year maturity bucket includes yields on $20.7 million and $11.7 million, respectively, of floating rate holdings indexed to 3-month LIBOR, in which the current June 30, 2014 indexed coupon rates are assumed to remain constant until maturity.

 

105



Table of Contents

 

 

 

Maturity as of December 31, 2013

 

 

 

One Year or Less

 

One to Five Years

 

Five to Ten Years

 

After Ten Years

 

 

 

Amortized

 

Average

 

Amortized

 

Average

 

Amortized

 

Average

 

Amortized

 

Average

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Cost

 

Yield (1)

 

Cost

 

Yield (1)

 

Cost

 

Yield (1)

 

Cost

 

Yield (1)

 

Securities available-for-sale (2):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government sponsored agency obligations (1)

 

$

 

%

$

 

%

$

62,606

 

1.40

%

$

39,991

 

1.09

%

Obligations of state and political subdivisions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Taxable (1)

 

 

 

 

 

397

 

6.19

 

 

 

Tax-exempt (1) (3)

 

2,823

 

2.78

 

20,500

 

3.54

 

116,682

 

3.63

 

44,345

 

3.59

 

SBA Pools (4)(5)

 

 

 

 

 

42,956

 

1.09

 

 

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities (5):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issued and/or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies or sponsored enterprises

 

7,356

 

3.10

 

134,132

 

2.23

 

82,030

 

2.18

 

 

 

Privately issued (1)

 

2,905

 

3.25

 

1,548

 

3.93

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities (4)

 

 

 

5,181

 

2.19

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate debt securities (6)

 

 

 

42,635

 

1.52

 

14,158

 

2.29

 

11,640

 

2.24

 

Total securities available-for-sale

 

$

13,084

 

3.06

%

$

203,996

 

2.20

%

$

318,829

 

2.42

%

$

95,976

 

2.39

%

 


(1)  Average yields assume a yield to worst call approach where embedded call options exist, such as in certain callable U.S. government sponsored agency obligations, obligations of state and political subdivisions and non-agency CMO’s.  $77.8 million of U.S. government sponsored agency obligations maturing beyond 5 years contain step-up coupon structures which, if were not to be called prior to stated maturities, would positively impact average yields for balances maturing in the five-to-ten years bucket and after ten years bucket by 126 basis points and 201 basis points, respectively, or resulting in average yields of 2.66% and 3.10%, respectively.

(2) This table excludes a mutual fund holding in the CRA Fund.

(3) Average yields on tax-exempt obligations have been computed on a tax equivalent basis, based on a 35% federal tax rate.

(4) Maturity distributions for SBA pools, residential mortgage-backed securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities are based on estimated average lives.

(5) $35.0 million of the balances in the five-to-ten years bucket encompass floating rate holdings indexed to Prime, which are contractually adjustable on a quarterly basis, in which the current December 31, 2013 indexed coupon rates are assumed to remain constant until maturity.

(6) Average yields on corporate debt securities in the one-to-five year maturity bucket and after ten year maturity bucket includes yields on $20.7 million and $11.6 million, respectively, of floating rate holdings indexed to 3-month LIBOR, in which the current December 31, 2013 indexed coupon rates are assumed to remain constant until maturity.

 

Loan servicing rights

 

Loan servicing rights are created as a result of our mortgage banking origination activities, the purchase and origination of agricultural servicing rights and the origination and purchase of commercial real estate servicing rights. Loans serviced for others are not reported as assets in our consolidated balance sheets.  As of June 30, 2014, we serviced loans with an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $7.4 billion.

 

Total loan servicing rights were $74.1 million as of June 30, 2014, compared to $ 78.6 million as of December 31, 2013.  The decrease was due to a $6.4 million change in the fair value of loan servicing rights from December 31, 2013 to June 30, 2014 and $2.6 million of reduced fair value due to loans paid off during the period, partially offset by $4.5 million of loan servicing rights added to the portfolio during the six months ended June 30, 2014.

 

106



Table of Contents

 

Deposits

 

 

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

Noninterest-bearing demand deposits

 

$

958,278

 

$

779,379

 

Interest-bearing demand deposits

 

697,031

 

598,281

 

Money market and savings deposits

 

1,330,036

 

1,215,864

 

Time deposits

 

1,187,661

 

927,313

 

Other brokered funds

 

123,528

 

80,000

 

Total deposits

 

$

4,296,534

 

$

3,600,837

 

 

Total deposits were $4.3 billion at June 30, 2014 and $3.6 billion at December 31, 2013, representing 88.02% and 91.62% of total liabilities at each period end, respectively.  The fair value of deposits acquired in our acquisition of Talmer West Bank totaled $857.8 million consisting of time deposits of $407.2 million, noninterest-bearing deposits of $175.1 million, money market and savings deposits of $166.0 million, and interest-bearing deposits of $109.5 million.  Since the acquisition of Talmer West Bank, there has been $162.1 million of net run-off in total deposits.  This decline in deposits is primarily due to $146.8 million of net time deposit run-off.  The net time deposit run-off reflects management’s efforts to reduce the level of higher cost deposits acquired in our acquisition of Talmer West Bank.  Our interest-bearing deposit costs were 27 basis points and 30 basis points for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

 

On August 8, 2014, we sold our branch offices located in Wisconsin to Town Bank.  This transaction included Town Bank assuming all of our deposits in Wisconsin which totaled $354.8 million as of August 8, 2014.  We expect to replace this funding source through deposits assumed in our pending acquisition of First of Huron Corporation, the holding company for Signature Bank and through additional brokered funds.

 

The following table shows the contractual maturity of time deposits, including CDARs and IRA deposits and other brokered funds, of $100 thousand and over that were outstanding at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

 

 

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

Maturing in

 

 

 

 

 

3 months or less

 

$

220,885

 

$

103,297

 

3 months to 6 months

 

126,568

 

88,492

 

6 months to 1 year

 

164,710

 

82,517

 

1 year or greater

 

214,182

 

115,508

 

Total

 

$

726,345

 

$

389,814

 

 

107



Table of Contents

 

Borrowings

 

 

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

Short-term borrowings:

 

 

 

 

 

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

 

$

148,826

 

$

36,876

 

FHLB advances

 

90,000

 

 

Holding company line of credit

 

 

35,000

 

Total short-term borrowings

 

238,826

 

71,876

 

Long-term debt:

 

 

 

 

 

FHLB advances (1)

 

198,488

 

130,368

 

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (2)

 

57,263

 

58,079

 

Subordinated notes related to trust preferred securities (3)

 

10,656

 

10,590

 

Total long-term debt

 

266,407

 

199,037

 

Total short-term borrowings and long-term debt:

 

$

505,233

 

$

270,913

 

 


(1) The June 30, 2014 balance includes advances payable of $190.6 million and purchase accounting premiums of $7.9 million. The December 31, 2013 balance includes advances payable of $121.2 million and purchase accounting premiums of $9.2 million.

(2) The June 30, 2014 balance includes securities sold under agreements to repurchase of $50.0 million and purchase accounting premiums of $7.3 million. The December 31, 2013 balance includes securities sold under agreements to repurchase of $50.0 million and purchase accounting premiums of $8.1 million.

(3) The June 30, 2014 balance includes subordinated notes related to trust preferred securities of $15.0 million and purchase accounting discounts of $4.3 million, respectively.  The December 31, 2013 balance includes subordinated notes related to trust preferred securities of $15.0 million and purchase accounting discounts of $4.4 million, respectively.

 

Total short-term borrowings and long-term debt outstanding at June 30, 2014 was $505.2 million, an increase of $234.3 million from $270.9 million at December 31, 2013.  The increase in total borrowings during the first half of 2014 was primarily due to the net additions of $158.1 million in FHLB advances and $111.1 million in securities sold under agreements to repurchase, partially offset by the repayment of our $35.0 million Holding company line of credit.

 

Total debt was collateralized by $1.9 billion of commercial and mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities and bonds at June 30, 2014, compared to $949.6 million of commercial and mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities and bonds at December 31, 2013.  See the “Contractual Obligations” section of this financial review for maturity information.

 

108



Table of Contents

 

Capital Resources

 

The following table summarizes the changes in our shareholders’ equity for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

For the three months ended
June 30,

 

For the six months ended
June 30,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

701,208

 

$

588,993

 

$

617,015

 

$

520,743

 

Cumulative effect adjustment of change in accounting policy to beginning retained earnings

 

 

 

 

31

 

Net income

 

20,606

 

15,006

 

57,013

 

75,461

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

4,648

 

(8,970

)

10,229

 

(9,476

)

Stock based compensation expense

 

274

 

820

 

454

 

9,090

 

Issuance of common shares

 

(611

)

 

41,414

 

 

Balance at end of period

 

$

726,125

 

$

595,849

 

$

726,125

 

$

595,849

 

 

On January 1, 2014, we purchased Financial Commerce Corporation’s wholly-owned subsidiary banks, Michigan Commerce Bank, a Michigan state-chartered bank, Indiana Community Bank, an Indiana state-chartered bank, Bank of Las Vegas, a Nevada state-chartered bank and Sunrise Bank of Albuquerque, a New Mexico state-chartered bank, and certain other bank-related assets from Financial Commerce Corporation and its parent holding company, Capitol Bancorp Ltd., in a transaction facilitated under Section 363 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.  The purchase price consisted of cash consideration of $4.0 million and a separate $2.5 million payment to fund an escrow account to pay the post-petition administrative fees and expenses of the professionals in the bankruptcy cases of Financial Commerce Corporation and Capitol Bancorp Ltd., each of which filed voluntary bankruptcy petitions under Chapter 11 of the U.S Bankruptcy Code on August 9, 2012, with any unused escrowed funds to be refunded to us.

 

Immediately prior to our consummation of the acquisition, Capitol Bancorp Ltd. merged Indiana Community Bank, Bank of Las Vegas and Sunrise Bank of Albuquerque with and into Michigan Commerce Bank, with Michigan Commerce Bank as the surviving bank in the merger.  Simultaneously with the merger, Michigan Commerce Bank changed its name to Talmer West Bank.  In connection with the acquisition, we contributed approximately $79.5 million of additional capital to Talmer West Bank in order to recapitalize the bank.  Following the acquisition, an additional $20.0 million of capital was infused into Talmer West Bank to ensure capital requirements were met at both March 31, 2014 and June 30, 2014.  In order to support the acquisition and recapitalization of Talmer West Bank, Talmer Bancorp, Inc. borrowed $35.0 million under a senior unsecured line of credit. We used a portion of the net proceeds from our initial public offering that closed on February 14, 2014, to repay the $35.0 million senior unsecured line of credit, including accrued and unpaid interest.

 

On February 14, 2014, we completed the initial public offering of 15,555,555 shares of Class A common stock for $13 per share.  Of the 15,555,555 shares sold, 3,703,703 shares were sold by the Company and 11,851,852 shares were sold by certain selling shareholders.  In addition, on February 21, 2014, the selling shareholders sold an additional 2,333,333 shares of Class A common stock to cover the exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option.  We received net proceeds of $42.0 million from the offering, after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses.  The Company did not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling shareholders.

 

We strive to maintain an adequate capital base to support our activities in a safe and sound manner while at the same time attempting to maximize shareholder value. We assess capital adequacy against the risk inherent in our

 

109



Table of Contents

 

balance sheet, recognizing that unexpected loss is the common denominator of risk and that common equity has the greatest capacity to absorb unexpected loss.

 

The capital ratios of Talmer West Bank at June 30, 2014 exceed the total capital (to risk-weighted assets) ratio of at least 12.0% and a Tier 1 capital (to adjusted total assets) ratio of at least 9.0% as prescribed in the Consent Order issued by the FDIC and the Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services on April 5, 2010.  Notwithstanding its capital levels, Talmer West Bank will not be categorized as well capitalized while it is subject to the Consent Order.

 

Our capital ratios exceeded the well capitalized regulatory requirements as follows:

 

 

 

Well
Capitalized
Regulatory
Requirement

 

Capital
Ratio

 

June 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

N/A

 

17.3

%

Talmer Bank and Trust

 

10.0

 

17.4

 

Talmer West Bank (1)

 

N/A

 

16.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tier 1 risk-based capital

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

N/A

 

16.2

 

Talmer Bank and Trust

 

6.0

 

16.2

 

Talmer West Bank (1)

 

N/A

 

15.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tier 1 leverage ratio

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

N/A

 

11.7

 

Talmer Bank and Trust

 

5.0

 

12.1

 

Talmer West Bank (1)

 

N/A

 

9.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

Total risk-based capital

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

N/A

 

19.2

 

Talmer Bank and Trust

 

10.0

 

18.4

 

First Place Bank (2)

 

N/A

 

15.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tier 1 risk-based capital

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

N/A

 

18.3

 

Talmer Bank and Trust

 

6.0

 

17.1

 

First Place Bank (2)

 

N/A

 

15.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tier 1 leverage ratio

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

N/A

 

12.2

 

Talmer Bank and Trust

 

5.0

 

10.3

 

First Place Bank (2)

 

N/A

 

11.7

 

 


(1) Notwithstanding its capital levels, Talmer West Bank will not be categorized as well capitalized while it is subject to the Consent Order.

(2) Notwithstanding its capital levels, First Place Bank was not categorized as well capitalized while it was subject to the Cease and Desist Order.  On February 10, 2014, First Place Bank was merged with and into Talmer Bank and Trust and the Cease and Desist Order had no further force or effect.

 

A cash dividend on our Class A common stock of $0.01 per share was declared on August 6, 2014.  The dividend will be paid on August 29, 2014, to our Class A common shareholders of record as of August 18, 2014.

 

110



Table of Contents

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

In the normal course of business, we offer a variety of financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk to meet the financing needs of our customers. These financial instruments include outstanding commitments to extend credit, credit lines, commercial letters of credit and standby letters of credit.

 

Our exposure to credit loss, in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty to the financial instrument, is represented by the contractual amounts of those instruments. The same credit policies are used in making commitments and conditional obligations as are used for on-balance sheet instruments.

 

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer provided there is no violation of any condition established in the commitment. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many commitments expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. We evaluate each customer’s creditworthiness on an individual basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by us upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty. The collateral held varies, but may include securities, real estate, inventory, plant, or equipment. Unfunded commitments under commercial lines of credit, revolving credit lines and overdraft protection agreements are included in commitments to extend credit. These lines of credit are generally uncollateralized, usually do not contain a specified maturity date and may be drawn upon only to the total extent to which we are committed.

 

Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by us to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Our portfolio of standby letters of credit consists primarily of performance assurances made on behalf of customers who have a contractual commitment to produce or deliver goods or services. The risk to us arises from our obligation to make payment in the event of the customers’ contractual default to produce the contracted good or service to a third party. Management conducts regular reviews of these instruments on an individual customer basis and does not anticipate any material losses as a result of these letters of credit.

 

We maintain an allowance to cover probable losses inherent in our financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk.  At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the allowance for off-balance sheet risk was $567 thousand and $1.0 million, respectively, and included in “Other liabilities” on our consolidated balance sheets.

 

A summary of the contractual amounts of our exposure to off-balance sheet risk is as follows.

 

 

 

June 30, 2014

 

December 31, 2013

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Fixed
Rate

 

Variable
Rate

 

Total

 

Fixed
Rate

 

Variable
Rate

 

Total

 

Commitments to extend credit

 

$

583,064

 

$

453,492

 

$

1,036,556

 

$

523,666

 

$

216,473

 

$

740,139

 

Standby letters of credit

 

70,758

 

2,938

 

73,696

 

68,452

 

561

 

69,013

 

Total commitments

 

$

653,822

 

$

456,430

 

$

1,110,252

 

$

592,118

 

$

217,034

 

$

809,152

 

 

We enter into forward commitments for the future delivery of mortgage loans when interest rate lock commitments are entered into in order to economically hedge the effect of changes in interest rates resulting from our commitments to fund the loans.  These commitments to fund mortgage loans (interest rate lock commitments) to be sold into the secondary market and forward commitments for the future delivery of mortgage loans to third party investors are considered derivatives.

 

We additionally enter into interest rate derivatives to provide a service to certain qualifying customers to help facilitate their respective risk management strategies (“customer-initiated derivatives”) and, therefore, are not used to manage interest rate risk in the Company’s assets or liabilities.  We generally take offsetting positions with dealer counterparts to mitigate the inherent risk.  The agreements with our derivative counterparties contain a provision where if we default on any of our indebtedness, then we could also be declared in default on our derivative obligations.  In addition, these agreements contain a provision where if we fail to maintain our status as a well-capitalized institution, then the counterparty could terminate the derivative positions and we would be required to settle our obligations under the agreements.  As of June 30, 2014 the fair value of derivatives in a net liability

 

111



Table of Contents

 

position, which includes accrued interest, but excludes any adjustment for nonperformance risk, related to these agreements was $85 thousand.

 

The following table reflects the amount and fair value of our derivatives.

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Notional
Amount

 

Gross
Derivative
Assets (1)

 

Gross
Derivative
Liabilities (1)

 

June 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivative instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forward contracts related to mortgage loans to be delivered for sale

 

$

247,441

 

$

(2,035

)

$

 

Interest rate lock commitments

 

97,657

 

2,282

 

 

Customer-initiated derivatives

 

11,834

 

276

 

81

 

Total derivative instruments

 

$

356,932

 

$

523

 

$

81

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivative instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forward contracts related to mortgage loans to be delivered for sale

 

$

168,746

 

$

1,484

 

$

 

Interest rate lock commitments

 

67,685

 

1,146

 

 

Total derivative instruments

 

$

236,431

 

$

2,630

 

$

 

 


(1) Net derivative assets are included in “Other assets” and net derivative liabilities are included in “Other liabilities” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

Note 11, “Derivative Instruments,” to our consolidated financial statements includes additional information about these derivative contracts.

 

In connection with our mortgage banking loan sales, we make certain representations and warranties that the loans meet certain criteria, such as collateral type and underwriting standards.  We may be required to repurchase individual loans and/or indemnify the purchaser against losses if the loan fails to meet established criteria.  Our estimated liability recorded in connection with these representations and warranties was $4.0 million and $4.8 million at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.  The reserve at June 30, 2014 included $2.1 million for general allowances and $1.9 million for specific claims.  The liability for specific claims includes liability for the estimated likelihood of payment of the claims while the general allowance is developed using a model to estimate the unknown liability including inputs such as the loans sold by year, the number and dollar amount of claims to-date by year, the rate of claims being rescinded and the estimate of the amount of the loss as a percent of the loan balance.  During the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2103, we paid $190 thousand and $1.8 million, respectively, in claims and expensed $190 thousand and $549 thousand, respectively, to provide for a sufficient reserve in connection with these mortgage banking loan sales representations and warranties. During the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, we paid $1.7 million and $2.8 million, respectively, in claims and expensed $960 thousand and $1.9 million, respectively, to provide for a sufficient reserve in connection with these mortgage banking loan sales representations and warranties .

 

112



Table of Contents

 

Contractual Obligations

 

In the normal course of business, we have various outstanding contractual obligations that will require future cash outflows.  The following table represents the largest contractual obligations as of June 30, 2014.

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Total

 

Less than 1
year

 

1 to 3 years

 

3 to 5 years

 

More than
5 years

 

Future minimum lease payments

 

$

35,628

 

$

6,954

 

$

10,671

 

$

8,244

 

$

9,759

 

FHLB borrowings

 

280,540

 

90,000

 

166,690

 

12,850

 

11,000

 

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

 

198,826

 

148,826

 

40,000

 

 

10,000

 

Subordinated notes related to trust preferred securities

 

15,000

 

 

 

 

15,000

 

Total

 

$

529,994

 

$

245,780

 

$

217,361

 

$

21,094

 

$

45,759

 

 

Liquidity

 

Liquidity management is the process by which we manage the flow of funds necessary to meet our financial commitments on a timely basis and at a reasonable cost and to take advantage of earnings enhancement opportunities. These financial commitments include withdrawals by depositors, credit commitments to borrowers, expenses of our operations, and capital expenditures.  Liquidity is monitored and closely managed by our Asset and Liability Committee (“ALCO”), a group of senior officers from the finance, risk management, treasury, and lending areas.  It is ALCO’s responsibility to ensure we have the necessary level of funds available for normal operations as well as maintain a contingency funding policy to ensure that potential liquidity stress events are planned for, quickly identified, and management has plans in place to respond. ALCO has created policies which establish limits and require measurements to monitor liquidity trends, including modeling and management reporting that identifies the amounts and costs of all available funding sources.  In addition, we have implemented modeling software that projects cash flows from the balance sheet under a broad range of potential scenarios, including severe changes in the interest rate environment.

 

At June 30, 2014, we had liquidity on hand of $776.7 million, compared to $694.5 million at December 31, 2013.  Liquid assets include cash and due from banks, federal funds sold, interest-bearing deposits with banks and unencumbered securities available-for-sale.

 

Each of our subsidiary banks are members of the FHLB, which provide short- and long-term funding to its members through advances collateralized by real estate-related assets and other select collateral, most typically in the form of U.S. government issued debt securities. The actual borrowing capacity is contingent on the amount of collateral available to be pledged to the FHLB.  As of June 30, 2014, we had $288.5 million of outstanding borrowings from the FHLB with remaining maturities ranging from the years 2014 to 2027.  We also maintain relationships with correspondent banks which could provide funds on short notice, if needed.  In addition, because Talmer Bank is “well capitalized,” it can accept wholesale deposits up to approximately $1.4 billion based on current policy limits. Management believes that we had adequate resources to fund all of our commitments as of June 30, 2014.

 

Item 3.  Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

 

Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in the fair value of financial instruments due to changes in interest rates.  Interest-rate risk is the risk to earnings and equity value arising from changes in market interest rates and arises in the normal course of business to the extent that there is a divergence between the amount of our interest-earning assets and the amount of interest-bearing liabilities that are prepaid/withdrawn, re-price, or mature in specified periods. We seek to achieve consistent growth in net interest income and equity while managing volatility arising from shifts in market interest rates.  ALCO oversees market risk management, monitoring risk measures, limits, and policy guidelines for managing the amount of interest-rate risk and its effect on net interest income and capital. Our Board of Directors approves policy limits with respect to interest rate risk.

 

113



Table of Contents

 

Interest Rate Risk

 

Interest rate risk management is an active process that encompasses monitoring loan and deposit flows complemented by investment and funding activities. Effective interest rate risk management begins with understanding the dynamic characteristics of assets and liabilities and determining the appropriate interest rate risk position given business activities, management objectives, market expectations and ALCO policy limits and guidelines.

 

Interest rate risk can come in a variety of forms, including repricing risk, basis risk, yield curve risk and option risk.  Repricing risk is the risk of adverse consequences from a change in interest rates that arises because of differences in the timing of when those interest rate changes impact our assets and liabilities.  Basis risk is the risk of adverse consequence resulting from unequal change in the spread between two or more rates for different instruments with the same maturity. Yield curve risk is the risk of adverse consequence resulting from unequal changes in the spread between two or more rates for different maturities for the same or different instruments. Option risk in financial instruments arises from embedded options such as options provided to borrowers to make unscheduled loan prepayments, options provided to debt issuers to exercise call options prior to maturity, and depositor options to make withdrawals and early redemptions.

 

We regularly review our exposure to changes in interest rates.  Among the factors we consider are changes in the mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, interest rate spreads and repricing periods.  ALCO reviews, on at least a quarterly basis, our interest rate risk position.

 

The interest-rate risk position is measured and monitored at each bank subsidiary using net interest income simulation models and economic value of equity sensitivity analysis that capture both short-term and long-term interest-rate risk exposure. In addition, periodic Earnings at Risk analyses incorporate the expected change in the value of loan servicing rights, the net interest income simulation results, and the gain on sale from mortgage originations over various interest rate scenarios.

 

Net interest income simulation involves forecasting net interest income under a variety of interest rate scenarios including instantaneous shocks.

 

The estimated impact on our net interest income as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, assuming immediate parallel moves in interest rates is presented in the table below. Simulation results for June 30, 2014 reflect the addition of Talmer West Bank.

 

 

 

June 30, 2014

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

 

Following 12
months

 

Following 24
months

 

Following 12
months

 

Following 24
months

 

+400 basis points

 

0.2

%

3.1

%

4.7

%

24.4

%

+300 basis points

 

0.3

 

3.0

 

3.3

 

18.3

 

+200 basis points

 

0.1

 

2.1

 

2.1

 

12.3

 

+100 basis points

 

(0.0

)

1.1

 

0.8

 

6.2

 

-100 basis points

 

(3.9

)

(5.2

)

(3.3

)

(5.5

)

-200 basis points

 

(8.3

)

(10.9

)

(7.2

)

(10.5

)

-300 basis points

 

(10.3

)

(13.1

)

(8.6

)

(12.2

)

-400 basis points

 

(11.0

)

(13.9

)

(9.2

)

(12.8

)

 

Modeling the sensitivity of net interest income and the economic value of equity to changes in market interest rates is highly dependent on numerous assumptions incorporated into the modeling process. The models used for these measurements rely on estimates of the potential impact that changes in interest rates may have on the value and prepayment speeds on all components of our loan portfolio, investment portfolio, loan servicing rights, any hedge or derivative instruments, as well as embedded options and cash flows of other assets and liabilities. Balance sheet growth assumptions are also included in the simulation modeling process. The model includes the effects of off-balance sheet instruments such as interest rate swap derivatives. Due to the current low interest rate environment, we assumed that market interest rates would not fall below 0% for the scenarios that used the down 100, 200, 300 and 400 basis point parallel shifts in market interest rates. The analysis provides a framework as to

 

114



Table of Contents

 

what our overall sensitivity position is as of our most recent reported position and the impact that potential changes in interest rates may have on net interest income and the economic value of our equity.

 

Management strategies may impact future reporting periods, as our actual results may differ from simulated results due to the timing, magnitude, and frequency of interest rate changes, the difference between actual experience, and the characteristics assumed, as well as changes in market conditions. Market based prepayment speeds are factored into the analysis for loan and securities portfolios. Rate sensitivity for transactional deposit accounts is modeled based on both historical experience and external industry studies.

 

We use economic value of equity sensitivity analysis to understand the impact of interest rate changes on long-term cash flows, income, and capital. Economic value of equity is based on discounting the cash flows for all balance sheet instruments under different interest rate scenarios. Deposit premiums are based on external industry studies and utilizing historical experience.

 

The table below presents the change in our economic value of equity as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 assuming immediate parallel shifts in interest rates. The table below presents the change in our economic value of equity as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 assuming immediate parallel shifts in interest rates.  Simulation results for June 30, 2014 reflect the addition of Talmer West Bank in addition to a model adjustment based upon our own historical model which resulted in longer lives of our non-core deposits.

 

 

 

June 30, 2014

 

December 31, 2013

 

+400 basis points

 

(19.6

)%

(33.8

)%

+300 basis points

 

(10.9

)

(24.2

)

+200 basis points

 

(5.5

)

(14.7

)

+100 basis points

 

(2.1

)

(6.4

)

-100 basis points

 

(1.2

)

2.6

 

-200 basis points

 

(1.4

)

7.1

 

-300 basis points

 

0.0

 

9.3

 

-400 basis points

 

0.4

 

9.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operational Risk

 

Operational risk is the risk of loss due to human behavior, inadequate or failed internal systems and controls, and external influences such as market conditions, fraudulent activities, disasters, and security risks. We continuously strive to strengthen our system of internal controls, operating processes and employee awareness to assess the impact on earnings and capital and to improve the oversight of our operational risk.

 

Compliance Risk

 

Compliance risk represents the risk of regulatory sanctions, reputational impact or financial loss resulting from our failure to comply with rules and regulations issued by the various banking agencies and standards of good banking practice. Activities which may expose us to compliance risk include, but are not limited to, those dealing with the prevention of money laundering, privacy and data protection, community reinvestment initiatives, fair lending challenges resulting from the expansion of our banking center network and employment and tax matters.

 

Strategic and/or Reputation Risk

 

Strategic and/or reputation risk represents the risk of loss due to impairment of reputation, failure to fully develop and execute business plans, failure to assess current and new opportunities in business, markets and products, and any other event not identified in the defined risk types mentioned previously. Mitigation of the various risk elements that represent strategic and/or reputation risk is achieved through initiatives to help us better understand and report on various risks, including those related to the development of new products and business initiatives.

 

115



Table of Contents

 

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures.

 

Based on our management’s evaluation (with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer), as of June 30, 2014, the end of the period covered by this report, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”)) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

Changes in Internal Controls

 

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period to which this report relates that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

The design of any system of controls and procedures is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. There can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.

 

116



Table of Contents

 

PART II

 

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings.

 

From time to time we are a party to various litigation matters incidental to the conduct of our business. We are not presently party to any legal proceedings the resolution of which we believe would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, liquidity, results of operation, cash flows or capital levels.

 

Item 1A.  Risk Factors.

 

There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in Item 1A. of Part I in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

 

Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

 

None.

 

Item 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

 

None.

 

Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures.

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 5.  Other Information.

 

None.

 

Item 6.  Exhibits.

 

Exhibit No.

 

Description of Exhibit

 

 

 

10.1

 

Talmer Bancorp, Inc. Annual Incentive Plan (filed as Appendix A and incorporated by reference to Talmer Bancorp, Inc.’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed on Schedule 14A with the SEC on April 28, 2014)

 

 

 

10.2

 

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 11, 2014)

 

 

 

10.3

 

Form of Director Restricted Stock Agreement

 

 

 

10.4

 

Talmer Bancorp, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 27, 2014)

 

 

 

31.1

 

Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

31.2

 

Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

32.1

 

Section 1350 Certifications

 

 

 

101

 

The following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL); (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and six

 

117



Table of Contents

 

 

 

months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, (iv) Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, and (vi) Notes to Consolidate Financial Statements.(1)

 


(1)         Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

 

118



Table of Contents

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

TALMER BANCORP, INC.

 

 

 

August 14, 2014

By:

 /s/ David T. Provost

 

 

David T. Provost

 

 

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

( Principal Executive Officer )

 

 

 

August 14, 2014

By:

 /s/ Dennis Klaeser

 

 

Dennis Klaeser

 

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

( Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer )

 

119