Filed
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on March 7 , 2017
Registration
No. 333-215650
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
Amendment
No. 2 to
FORM
S-1
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT UNDER THE
SECURITIES
ACT OF 1933
CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
(Exact
name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
|
27-2205650
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification Number)
|
18671
Lake Drive East
dellFive
Business Park G
Minneapolis,
MN 55317
Tel:
(952) 698-6980
Fax:
(952) 698-6999
(Address,
including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of Registrant’s principal executive offices)
Copies
to
:
Jeffrey
C. Mack
Chief
Executive Officer
18671
Lake Drive East
Minneapolis,
MN 55317
Tel:
(952) 698-6981
(Name,
address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)
Jonathan
B. Abram
Dorsey
& Whitney LLP
50
South Sixth Street, Suite 1500
Minneapolis,
MN 55402
Tel:
(612) 343-7962
|
Ryan
Brauer, Esq.
Fredrikson
& Byron, P.A.
200
South Sixth Street
Suite
4000
Minneapolis,
MN 55402
Tel:
(612) 492-7252
|
Approximate
date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this registration statement.
If
any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under
the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box. [ ]
If
this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the
following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the
same offering. [ ]
If
this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list
the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [ ]
If
this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list
the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller
reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
Large
accelerated filer [ ]
|
|
Accelerated
filer [ ]
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer [ ]
|
|
Smaller
reporting company [X]
|
CALCULATION
OF REGISTRATION FEE
Title
of each class of securities
to be registered
|
|
|
Proposed
maximum
aggregate
offering
price
(1)
|
|
|
Amount
of
registration
fee
(2)
(3)
|
|
Common
stock, $0.0001 par value
|
|
|
$
|
14,950,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,732.80
|
|
(1)
|
Estimated
solely for purposes of calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Includes offering price of shares of common stock subject to the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares,
solely to cover over allotments, if any.
|
(2)
|
Calculated
pursuant to Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended based on an estimate of the proposed maximum aggregate offering price.
|
(3)
|
In
accordance with Rule 457(p), the total filing fee due for this registration statement of $1,732.80 has been offset by the
filing fees associated with all of the unsold securities under the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-212610),
filed by Cachet Financial Solutions, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 20, 2016 and withdrawn from
registration on October 19, 2016 (the “Prior Registration Statement”). The total amount of filing fees paid by
Cachet Financial Solutions, Inc. in connection with the Prior Registration Statement was $2,316.10. Accordingly, no additional
filing fee is due in connection with this filing.
|
The
registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until
the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become
effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration statement shall become effective
on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
The
information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is declared effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities
and we are not soliciting offers to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.
Subject
to Completion, dated March 7 , 2017
PRELIMINARY
PROSPECTUS
Shares of Common Stock
Cachet
Financial Solutions, Inc.
We
are offering 2,166,667 shares of our common stock in this offering.
Our
common stock is currently traded on the OTCQB Marketplace under the symbol “CAFN.” On March 3 , 2017, the closing
price of our common stock on the OTCQB Marketplace was $6.00 per share , as adjusted on a proforma basis for a reverse
split of our common stock as described in this prospectus. The public offering price of our common stock offered by this prospectus
will be determined by negotiation between us and the underwriters based on many factors, including the price of our common stock
on the OTCQB Marketplace during recent periods, our history, our prospects, the industry in which we operate, our past and present
operating results, the previous experience of our executive officers and the general condition of the securities markets at the
time of this offering. Prior to this offering, there has been a very limited trading market for our common stock on the OTCQB
Marketplace. Therefore, the price of our common stock on the OTCQB Marketplace during recent periods will only be one of many
factors in determining the public offering price.
In
conjunction with this offering, we have applied to list our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “CAFN,”
which listing we expect to occur upon consummation of this offering. No assurance can be given that our application will be approved.
This offering will only occur if Nasdaq approves the listing of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market.
On
March 6, 2017, the Pricing Committee of our Board of Directors approved a reverse split of our outstanding shares of common
stock at a ratio at 1-for-1.5 (1:1.5), which will be effective immediately prior to the pricing of this offering. Unless otherwise
indicated, all share amounts and per-share amounts in this prospectus reflect the pro forma impact of the reverse split of
our outstanding shares of common stock at a ratio of 1-for-1.5 (1:1.5).
James
L. Davis, one of our directors, may invest up to $1 million in this offering at the public offering price.
You
should read this prospectus carefully before you invest. You should not assume that the information in this prospectus is accurate
as of any date other than the date on the front of this prospectus.
Investing
in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. Before making any investment in these securities, you should read and carefully
consider the risks described in this prospectus under “Risk Factors” beginning on page 8 of this prospectus.
We
are an “emerging growth company” and a “smaller reporting company” under applicable law and will be subject
to reduced public company reporting requirements.
Neither
the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or
determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
|
Price
to Public
|
|
|
Underwriting
Discounts
and Commissions
(1)
|
|
|
Proceeds
to Cachet
Financial Solutions,
Inc., Before Expenses
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The
underwriters will receive compensation in addition to the underwriters discount and commissions.
See “Underwriting.”
|
The
underwriters have the option to purchase up to additional shares from us at the price to the public, less
the underwriting discounts and commissions, within 45 days from the date of this prospectus, to cover over-allotments of shares,
if any. If the underwriters exercise the option in full, the total underwriting discounts and commissions payable will be $__________,
and the total proceeds to us, before expenses, will be $__________. The underwriters expect to deliver the shares against payment
therefor on or about __________, 2017.
Lake
Street Capital Markets National Securities Corporation
Joint
Book-Running Managers
The
date of this prospectus is ,
2017
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
You
should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not, and the underwriters have not, authorized
anyone to provide you with different information. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should
not rely on it. We are not, and the underwriters are not, making an offer to sell the securities offered hereby in any
jurisdiction where the offer is not permitted. The information contained in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date of
this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or the time of issuance or sale of any securities. Our
business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since those dates. You should read this prospectus
in its entirety before making an investment decision. You should also read and consider the information in the documents to which
we have referred you in the section of this prospectus entitled “Where You Can Find More Information.”
We
are offering to sell, and seeking offers to buy, the securities only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are permitted. The
distribution of this prospectus and the offering of the securities in certain jurisdictions may be restricted by law. Persons
outside the United States who come into possession of this prospectus must inform themselves about, and observe any restrictions
relating to, the offering of the securities and the distribution of this prospectus outside the United States. This prospectus
does not constitute, and may not be used in connection with, an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities
offered by this prospectus by any person in any jurisdiction in which it is unlawful for such person to make such an offer or
solicitation.
This
prospectus contains summaries of certain provisions contained in some of the documents described herein, but reference is made
to the actual documents for complete information. All of the summaries are qualified in their entirety by the actual documents.
Copies of some of the documents referred to herein have been filed, will be filed, or will be incorporated by reference as exhibits
to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, and you may obtain copies of those documents as described below
under the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information.”
This
prospectus contains market data and industry statistics and forecasts that are based on independent industry publications and
other publicly available information. Although we believe that these sources are reliable, we do not guarantee the accuracy or
completeness of this information, and we have not independently verified this information. Although we are not aware of any misstatements
regarding the market and industry data presented in this prospectus, these estimates involve risks and uncertainties and are subject
to change based on various factors, including those discussed under the heading “Risk Factors”. Accordingly, investors
should not place undue reliance on this information.
Our
logo and some of our trademarks are used in this prospectus, which remain our sole intellectual property. This prospectus also
includes trademarks, tradenames, and service marks that are the property of other organizations. Solely for convenience, our trademarks
and tradenames referred to in this prospectus appear without the TM symbol, but those references are not intended to indicate,
in any way, that we will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, our rights, or the right of the applicable licensor
to these trademarks and tradenames.
Note
Regarding Reverse Stock Split
On
January 17, 2017, our Board of Directors approved for submission to a vote of our stockholders the grant of authority to
the Board of Directors to amend our Certificate of Incorporation to effect a reverse split of our common stock, which we
refer to as the Reverse Stock Split. At a special meeting of our stockholders on February 9, 2017, our stockholders approved
the proposal, granting our Board of Directors the authority, but not the obligation, to implement the Reverse Stock Split, at
any time in a ratio of not less than 1-for-1.01 and not more than 1-for-4, with the final ratio to be determined at
the discretion of our Board of Directors.
On March 6, 2017, the Pricing Committee of our
Board of Directors fixed the Reverse Stock Split ratio at 1-for-1.5 (1:1.5), which will be effective immediately prior to the
pricing of this offering. Unless indicated otherwise, all share amounts and per-share amounts in this prospectus reflect the pro
forma impact of the Reverse Stock Split.
|
|
|
|
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
This
summary does not contain all of the information that should be considered before investing in the shares. Investors should
read the entire prospectus carefully, including the more detailed information regarding our business, the risks of purchasing
the shares discussed in this prospectus under “Risk Factors” beginning on page 8 of this prospectus and our
consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes beginning on page F-1 of this prospectus.
Unless
otherwise indicated or unless the context requires otherwise, all references in this prospectus to “we,” “us,”
“our,” the “Company,” or similar references mean Cachet Financial Solutions, Inc. and our subsidiary,
Cachet Financial Solutions Inc. (a Minnesota corporation), on a consolidated basis.
Our
Business
Overview
We
are a leading provider of software-as-a-service, or SaaS, financial technology, or fintech, solutions to the financial
services industry. We provide traditional financial institutions and alternative financial service, or AFS, providers
with innovative mobile and other solutions to enable them to offer a suite of leading-edge mobile financial services to
their customers through the Internet, or cloud-based, access. As a SaaS provider, we develop, host and maintain software
solutions that we license to our clients. We serve three primary markets in the United States: banks, credit unions and
AFS providers, which includes providers of non-traditional banking services such as reloadable prepaid cards and check
cashing services. In the future, we intend to expand outside of the United States, including Latin America and Europe,
as opportunities present themselves.
We
have been expanding our suite of available fintech solutions. One of our recent solutions, Select Mobile Money, is a prepaid
mobile money platform that seamlessly links various mobile banking features with a prepaid debit card issued by financial
institutions or AFS providers. This solution enables card users, i.e., customers of our client financial institutions
or AFS providers, to conveniently manage their card accounts through an easy-to-use integrated mobile application, or
app, with multiple features that is downloaded onto their smart phone or tablet and, by adding a suite of available mobile
financial services linked to their card accounts, enhances the card’s usefulness and the cardholder’s mobile
banking experience. For example, prepaid cardholders using our application may deposit paper checks and direct payroll
deposits into their prepaid card account, access cash from their prepaid card account at any automated teller machine,
or ATM, and check their prepaid card account balance and transaction history. We believe that our Select Mobile Money
solutions are setting the industry standard for reloadable prepaid mobile money solutions.
Our
Select Mobile Money solutions comprise two distinct mobile banking technology solutions: first, a white label mobile money
platform for larger financial institutions and AFS providers that already have a reloadable prepaid card program and wish
to enhance it by integrating a feature rich app; and second, an end-to-end reloadable prepaid card program, which we call
Select Mobile Money-Express, or SMM-X, offered to all banks, credit unions and AFS providers of all sizes that would like
to deploy a complete reloadable prepaid card program, comprising a prepaid debit card, an integrated mobile app and program
management.
According
to a study released by the Philadelphia Federal Reserve Bank in September 2014, titled “Millennials with Money:
A New Look at Who Uses GPR Prepaid Cards,” 45% of consumers ages 18 to 32, which we refer to as the millennial generation,
or millennials, said they owned a general purpose reloadable prepaid card. We believe millennials are the first truly
mobile generation accustomed to using a smart phone or tablet to perform routine interactions remotely, including purchasing
goods and services and managing their money. With the preceding baby boomer generation approaching retirement, we believe
that the millennial generation is the future customer base of financial institutions and AFS providers. As these financial
services providers adapt to the mobile environment we believe they require innovative solutions to enable them to offer
their millennial customers fast, reliable and convenient financial services remotely through mobile applications, including
prepaid mobile money solutions and reloadable prepaid cards.
Our
Select Mobile Money solutions are designed to specifically meet the needs of millennials, the “unbanked” (those
who have no formal relationship with a bank or credit union, prefer not to use a traditional checking account, or who
do not meet the minimum balance required to avoid high bank fees) and the “under-banked” (those who have only
a minimal relationship with a bank or credit union). These solutions provide end-users with convenient and secure anywhere
and anytime mobile access via the Internet to a variety of convenient self-service mobile banking services through an
easy-to-use integrated mobile application with multiple features downloaded onto their smart phone or tablet and linked
to a reloadable prepaid card. Both our white label and our SMM-X prepaid mobile money solutions support advanced analytics,
which we believe can help our clients by enhancing the prepaid cardholder experience and keeping their customers engaged.
Revenues for our SMM-X solutions are based principally on transaction and/or user fees which will increase as customers
utilize this application.
Our
business has historically focused on offering a full suite of consumer and business remote deposit check capture, or RDC,
products that enable financial institutions to provide their customers with the ability to conveniently deposit their
checks remotely anytime, anywhere. While we continue to offer these solutions, we recently expanded our focus to include
prepaid mobile money solutions. Our latest innovations are a mobile remote payment capture solution, which we call Select
Mobile NowPay, which enables enterprises to accept check payments submitted via their customers’ mobile devices,
and our mobile account opening solution, which we call Select Mobile Account Opening, which streamlines the account opening
process by utilizing photo imaging to capture customer data and auto-populate an account opening application form for
checking, savings, credit card and other types of accounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
of December 31, 2016, we had entered into contracts for the sale of approximately 881 products (including product enhancements),
of which approximately 600 were “active” as of December 31, 2016, meaning that the product or enhancement
has been deployed or implemented by our client for use by its customers or that we have completed our implementation and/or
customization work for the product or enhancement and have delivered it to our client for deployment. Of the approximately
881 products sold as of December 31, 2016, approximately 819 related to RDC products, 47 related to our white label Select
Mobile Money solution, nine related to our SMM-X solution, five related to Select Mobile Account Opening and one related
to Select Mobile NowPay. Of the approximately 600 products sold which were active as of December 31, 2016, approximately
575 related to RDC products, 22 related to our white label Select Mobile Money solutions, two related to our SMM-X solution
and one related to Select Mobile Account Opening. Our Select Mobile NowPay solution was not yet active as of December
31, 2016.
Our
Market Opportunity
Mobile
Financial Services
We
believe that the mobile channel will become the primary channel for customers to interact with financial institutions
and AFS providers in the United States, and that these financial services providers will seek to offer more services through
the mobile channel to strengthen customer loyalty. Mobile financial services resonate with financial services providers
because mobile technologies provide these service providers a means to level the competitive playing field and compete
with larger financial institutions. In addition, with mobile offerings, branch location is no longer a determining factor
of where to bank. According to a December 2015 report by Javelin Strategy & Research, or Javelin, titled “2015
Mobile Banking, Smartphone, and Tablet Forecast,” the proportion of weekly mobile bankers exceeded that of weekly
branch bankers for the first time in 2015.
Prepaid
Mobile Money
A
reloadable prepaid card provides the convenience of a debit card, including a secure way to shop online and make other
purchases. Reloadable prepaid cards are generally accepted everywhere MasterCard and Visa are accepted. Unlike a debit
card, a reloadable prepaid card account is prefunded by the cardholder and it cannot be over-drawn. Card usage is limited
to the balance available on the account. This limits the cardholder’s exposure to overdraft fees and other related
penalties, and removes the credit history requirements normally required to open a traditional bank account. A prepaid
card can be a valuable budgeting tool. It is sometimes used to help teens and young adults learn money management skills.
Reloadable
prepaid cards are a convenient and safer alternative that have less serious consequences than losing cash or high limit
credit cards should the card be lost or stolen. If a reloadable prepaid card is stolen, the loss is limited only to the
cash balance remaining on the card, and no valuable financial information is lost or compromised.
We
believe that the reloadable prepaid card will continue to grow in popularity across all income groups for budgeting, payroll,
student usage, travel and more. According to a November 2015 Business Insider Intelligence report, titled “The Prepaid
Cards Report: The rise of reloadable cards could affect the way millennials approach banking,” prepaid cards accounted
for 800 million transactions worth $20 billion in the United States in 2003, and jumped to 9.2 billion transactions worth
$220 billion in the United States in 2012. In that study, Business Insider also estimated that prepaid card volumes in
the U.S. market would top $317 billion in 2015.
RDC
Products
Federal
legislation commonly referred to as “Check 21” has made the RDC service possible. Implemented in October 2004,
this legislation allows financial institutions to clear checks based upon images of the original items instead of having
to transport the original check to the paying bank for clearing. The commonly viewed benefits of this service include
customer convenience, better deposit availability, reduced non-sufficient funds, reduced transportation costs and eliminating
the need to physically transfer the check during the clearing process.
We
believe that checks are the preferred form of payment for small to medium size businesses compared to other forms of payment
because we believe these businesses perceive checks to be less expensive. We also believe that RDC will become an increasingly
popular banking service for consumers as it becomes more widely available and consumers become more comfortable with the
technology. We believe that our remote and mobile RDC solutions enable banks and credit unions to increase customer satisfaction
among their business and consumer customers, grow deposits in a low-cost manner, reduce transaction costs and decrease
traffic at bricks-and-mortar branches.
Mobile
Check Payment
Our
mobile check payment solution, Select Mobile NowPay, enables the biller to offer its customers the ability to use their
mobile devices to take a photo of a check and submit the digital image of the check as payment on their loan or other
recurring bill. We believe that a self-service mobile check payment option that fits customers’ lifestyles, meets
demand for easier and more convenient payment options and supports more timely payments will gain acceptance in the consumer
lending market. We believe that the primary target markets for this solution include lenders, such as special purpose
consumer finance subsidiaries of large retailers, captive auto finance companies and loan servicing companies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile
Account Opening for Consumers
Traditional
mobile account opening, which requires mobile customers to fill out tedious on-screen forms, is cumbersome and time consuming
and can potentially lead to account abandonment, errors and incomplete application forms. With consumers’ emerging
preference for the mobile channel, we believe that fast and efficient mobile account opening will become increasingly
more important to the ongoing success of all financial services companies. By allowing consumers to take photos instead
of entering data, our Select Mobile Account Opening solution can streamline the account opening process, reduce the number
of human errors resulting from manually completing inaccurate data or failing to complete all relevant or required fields
in the application forms, and consequently can reduce new account abandonment rates and enhance the overall account opening
experience.
Our
Solutions
Prepaid
Mobile Money Solutions: Select Mobile Money
Our
prepaid mobile money solutions, Select Mobile Money, comprise two distinct mobile banking technology solutions: a white
label mobile money platform for larger financial institutions and AFS providers that already have a reloadable prepaid
card program and wish to enhance it by integrating a feature rich app; and an end-to-end reloadable prepaid card program,
which we call Select Mobile Money-Express, or SMM-X, offered to all banks, credit unions and AFS providers of all sizes.
Both our white label and our SMM-X prepaid mobile money solutions support advanced analytics, which we believe can help
our clients by enhancing the prepaid cardholder experience and keeping their customers engaged.
Our
acquisition of certain mobile money assets from DeviceFidelity, Inc. in March 2014 has enabled us to enter the prepaid
mobile money market. In March 2013, prior to the acquisition, DeviceFidelity’s mobile wallet platform (currently,
our Select Mobile Money solution) won the 2013 Paybefore Award for the Best-in-Category Outstanding Mobile Wallet and
Application. In February 2015, the Navy Federal Credit Union’s Visa Buxx app, which is powered by our white label
Select Mobile Money prepaid platform, was the 2015 Paybefore Awards Best-in-Category winner of the judges’ choice
award.
Our
White Label Mobile Money Platform
Our
white label mobile banking platform enables financial institutions and AFS providers to offer their prepaid cardholders
an integrated mobile application with multiple features, which currently include the ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
deposit
a paper check directly into the cardholder’s prepaid card account,
|
|
●
|
direct
payroll deposits into the cardholder’s prepaid card account,
|
|
●
|
access
cash from the cardholder’s prepaid card account at any automated teller machine, or ATM,
|
|
●
|
check
account balance and transaction history,
|
|
●
|
access
a national coupon network,
|
|
●
|
make
card to card money transfers,
|
|
●
|
make
international money transfers, and
|
|
●
|
locate
surcharge-free ATMs and cash loading locations.
|
|
|
|
|
As
of December 31, 2016, we entered into contracts for the sale of 47 white label mobile
money products, of which 22 products were active.
Our
Select Mobile Money Express Platform (SMM-X)
We
offer our SMM-X solution, an end-to-end reloadable prepaid card program, to all banks, credit unions and AFS providers
of all sizes that would like to deploy a complete reloadable prepaid card program, comprising a prepaid debit card, an
integrated mobile app and program management. This program is designed for financial institutions and AFS providers that
either do not have the capability or resources to launch or service their own independent reloadable prepaid card program
or do not wish to assume the risks and burdens associated with deploying their own independent reloadable prepaid card
program. Our SMM-X mobile application provides a full suite of mobile banking services that help our clients’ prepaid
cardholders to better manage their prepaid card and their money, with the same features currently available under our
white label mobile banking platform.
In
contrast to our white label mobile money solution, deploying our SMM-X solution typically does not require significant
upfront customization or integration efforts. We believe this is advantageous because it allows this solution to be more
easily and timely implemented by clients of all sizes. We also believe that the SMM-X solution is advantageous to us because
our financial model for this solution is based principally on future transaction and/or user fee components, which are
recurring in nature.
As
of December 31, 2016 we entered into contracts for the sale of a total of nine SMM-X products, of which two were active.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RDC
Solutions
Our
RDC solutions are composed of various software applications that permit a business or consumer to scan or take a picture
of a check by using a smart phone, tablet or other device (e.g., a desktop computer that is connected to a scanner) and
then transmit the resulting image to a bank for posting and clearing. These various software applications are developed
to be compatible with both Windows and Mac operating systems, and are marketed and sold with various features and levels
of functionality to banks and credit unions in the United States. Our main RDC solutions are marketed under the following
names:
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Select
Business Merchant Capture—
This product provides our clients’ business customers with the ability to scan and
deposit checks from their PC or Mac desktop computer or mobile device, eliminating trips to the bank to deposit checks.
|
|
|
●
|
Select
Mobile Deposit—
This product enables our clients to offer their consumer customers the ability to deposit their checks
anywhere, anytime by taking a picture of the front and back of the endorsed check using a mobile device. Additional fraud
protection is provided through integration with CheckReview, our cloud-based SaaS proprietary technology that helps identify
potential fraud, by viewing and validating the digital image of the check in real time and detecting checks submitted for
deposit more than once.
|
|
|
●
|
Select
Mobile Deposit-Express—
This product is an unbranded, standalone version of Select Mobile Deposit we developed for
iPhone and Android phones to minimize start-up costs and simplify deployment of mobile deposit for small financial institutions
that lack the resources to go to market with their own branded mobile deposit apps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
of December 31, 2016, we entered into contracts for the sale of 819 RDC products, of
which 575 RDC products were active.
Remote
Payment Capture Solution: Select Mobile NowPay
Select
Mobile NowPay is a remote payment capture solution that enables financing companies and other lenders to offer their customers
the convenience of making a payment on a loan or other recurring debt by using an app on a smartphone to take a photo
image of their check and transmit it to the payee. As of December 31, 2016, we sold one Select Mobile NowPay product,
which was not yet implemented by the client for use by its customers. We expect our client will begin to deploy or implement
this solution in 2017.
Mobile
Account Opening for Consumers
Select
Mobile Account Opening streamlines the account opening process by utilizing photo imaging to capture customer data and
auto-populate an account opening application form for checking, savings, credit card and other types of accounts. This
SaaS-based solution minimizes the cumbersome and error-prone manual data entry typical of mobile account application forms.
Users simply capture a picture of the front and back of their driver’s license, and validated data is used to pre-populate
account origination systems and identity verification providers. As of December 31, 2016, we entered into contracts for
the sale of a total of five Select Mobile Account Opening products, of which one had been deployed.
Our
Competitive Strengths
We
believe we have three key competitive strengths.
Premier
Technology—
Our mobile and other innovative solutions, including prepaid mobile money and RDC solutions, enable
financial institutions and AFS providers to deploy high-end cloud-based platforms that meet the expectations and needs
of their customers.
Innovation—
We
continually drive innovation to ensure that our solutions are best in class and at the forefront of other solutions available
in the market. We leverage our technology and take advantage of new opportunities in the mobile payment space.
Comprehensive
Training and Support Services—
We offer comprehensive product training, technical support and marketing support
services to our clients to prepare for product launch and beyond, including one-on-one and group training on product use,
web-based product training and educational webinars to inform our client’s staff of product features and benefits
and how to sell. Our marketing support services include customized marketing collateral, product videos and post-launch
contests and promotions to help our clients promote their products and increase customer adoption.
Our
Objective
Our
objective is to be the leading innovator and provider of mobile and other innovative technology solutions, including prepaid
mobile money solutions and RDC, designed to meet the specific requirements of financial institutions and AFS providers
in the market.
Our
Strategy
To
achieve our objective, we are developing new products and enhancements to existing products, focusing on our target markets,
marketing and branding our products and services effectively. In addition, we intend to build our sales force, channel
partners and resellers, grow revenue from our existing clients, offer our products internationally and opportunistically
pursue acquisitions.
New
Products and Product Enhancements—
We plan to develop new technologies and solutions to enhance our suite of
prepaid mobile money, RDC and related products we offer. We are currently focused on a number of product enhancements,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
expanding
security sign-on features for our applications, such as touch ID through finger print authentication, iris recognition and
retinal scanning;
|
|
|
|
●
|
developing
additional media to enable access to our applications through other devices, including, for example, Apple and Android watches;
|
|
|
|
●
|
expanding
the integration of our technologies, such as real time posting of checks, with providers of core banking systems, who we refer
to as core providers (for example, Fiserv, FIS, and Jack Henry); and
|
|
|
|
●
|
adding
new features to our prepaid mobile money solutions, such as bill payments, international money transfers and coupons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Focus
on Our Target Markets—
Using a direct sales force, we focus on banks and credit
unions of $500 million to $20 billion in assets and AFS providers that primarily
serve the unbanked, under-banked and millennial consumer markets. We believe these institutions
represent the best opportunity for acceptance and growth of our prepaid mobile money
and RDC solutions because they generally have multiple branches and a significant commercial
and/or consumer customer base, yet many of these institutions often do not have internal
marketing capabilities to effectively take advantage of the opportunity that our mobile
and other solutions present.
Market
and Brand our Solutions and Services Effectively—
Our marketing strategy has revolved around strengthening brand
awareness, building thought leadership and developing and executing targeted lead generation programs promoting our key
competitive strengths and innovative products and services.
Build
our Internal Sales Force—
We believe there is significant opportunity to increase our future revenues by increasing
the size of our internal sales force, which will increase the number of our clients.
Seek
Additional Channel Partners and Resellers—
We have a number of channel partners and resellers. A channel partner
is another company with whom we have integrated our Select Mobile Deposit product into its product offering platform,
and that channel partner then sells the integrated solution to a financial institution. A reseller is a sales agent that
resells our solutions, currently Select Mobile Deposit and Select Business Merchant Capture, to its clients. We intend
to seek new channel partners and resellers which should help us increase the number of our clients.
Grow
Revenue from Existing Clients—
We believe we can continue to grow our revenues from our existing clients by cross
selling new solutions and adding new features and functionality into existing solutions. In addition, as our clients add
new customers to our solutions, we have experienced revenue growth from increased transactions and user fees.
Offer
our Products Internationally—
To date, we have derived all of our revenues from the U.S. market. We believe that
there is an additional growth opportunity for our cloud-based SaaS solutions in international markets.
Pursue
Acquisitions—
While we intend to generate most of our growth organically, we believe there may be opportunities
for us in the future to opportunistically pursue acquisitions that will expand our product offerings or bring synergies
to our business.
Our
Corporate Information
Our
business operations are conducted entirely through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Cachet Financial Solutions Inc., a Minnesota
corporation. We were incorporated in Delaware in February 2010. In February 2014, we acquired the business of our subsidiary,
and changed our corporate name to “Cachet Financial Solutions, Inc.” Our corporate headquarters and principal
executive offices are located at 18671 Lake Drive East, dellFive Business Park G, Minneapolis, MN 55317. Our telephone
number is (952) 698-6980. Our website address is www.cachetfinancial.com. The information on or accessible through our
website is not part of this prospectus.
Listing
on the Nasdaq Capital Market
Our
common stock is currently traded on the OTCQB Marketplace under the symbol “CAFN.” We have applied to list
our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “CAFN,” which listing we expect to occur upon
consummation of this offering, at which time our common stock will cease to be traded on the OTCQB Marketplace. No assurance
can be given that our listing application will be approved. This offering will occur only if Nasdaq approves the listing
of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market.
Going
Concern Considerations
As
of December 31, 2016, our current liabilities exceeded current assets by $8.3 million. In their report dated February
24, 2017, except for “The Offering” in Note 14, as to which the date is March 7, 2017, our independent
registered public accounting firm, Lurie, LLP, stated that our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2016 were prepared under the assumption that we would be able to continue as a going concern and noted
that our limited revenues, recurring losses from operations and stockholders’ deficit raise substantial doubt about
our ability to continue as a going concern. For the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we had an operating cash flow
deficit of $9.5 million and $7.4 million, respectively. We currently anticipate that our cash and forecasted cash receipts
will be sufficient to fund our operations through March 31, 2017. If we are successful in completing this offering, we
believe we will have sufficient cash to fund our operations through February 24, 2018. There can be no assurance that
we will complete this offering or that we will not require additional financing or that such financing will be available
to us on reasonably acceptable terms. (See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Financial Position.”)
Reverse
Stock Split
On
January 17, 2017, our Board of Directors approved for submission to a vote of our stockholders the grant of authority to the
Board of Directors to amend our Certificate of Incorporation to effect a reverse split of our common stock, which we refer to
as the Reverse Stock Split. At a special meeting of our stockholders on February 9, 2017, our stockholders approved the
proposal, granting our Board of Directors the authority, but not the obligation, to implement the Reverse Stock Split at any
time in a ratio of not less than 1-for-1.01 and not more than 1-for-4, with the final ratio to be determined at the
discretion of our Board of Directors. On March 6, 2017, the Pricing Committee of our Board of Directors fixed the Reverse
Stock Split ratio at 1-for-1.5 (1:1.5), which will be effective immediately prior to the pricing of this offering. Unless
indicated otherwise, the information in this prospectus reflects the pro forma impact of the Reverse Stock
Split.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary
Risk Factors
We
are subject to a number of risks, including risks that may prevent us from achieving our business objectives or may adversely
affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and prospects. You should carefully consider
these risks, including the risks discussed in the section entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 8 of this
prospectus, before investing in the common stock . Risks relating to our business include, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
we
have a significant amount of debt, which may affect our ability to reach profitability;
|
|
|
●
|
we
received a going concern qualification from our independent registered public accounting firm, which indicates that there
is a substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern;
|
|
|
●
|
we
have a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting;
|
|
|
●
|
our
operations and business are subject to the risks of an early stage company with little revenue;
|
|
|
●
|
our
future revenue growth is dependent upon the success and popularity of our solutions, including our SMM-X solution, and if
we are not successful in selling our solutions to new clients, our business will be materially and adversely affected;
|
|
|
●
|
deploying
our SMM-X solution requires the services of a sponsor bank that issues the reloadable prepaid cards to our prospective clients’
customers, and any refusal by such bank to work with any of our clients will materially and adversely affect our ability to
sell this solution;
|
|
|
●
|
we
compete with other companies that are well established and have more resources, which puts us at a competitive disadvantage;
|
|
|
●
|
the
Federal Reserve System may adopt and implement its initiative for electronic alternatives to the paper check, which may cause
the use of paper checks to decline significantly and affect our business;
|
|
|
●
|
we
face risks related to the storage of our clients’ and their customers’ confidential and proprietary information,
including risks related to cyber-security risks and security breaches;
|
|
|
●
|
our
failure to offer high-quality support and services could have a material adverse effect on our business;
|
|
|
●
|
we
rely our reliance on third-parties to provide software integration, hardware, fulfillment and support and maintenance services
in connection with our solutions;
|
|
|
●
|
defects
in our solutions and our failure to provide agreed upon solutions to our clients could materially damage our reputation, sales
and profitability;
|
|
|
●
|
we
face prolonged sales cycles, substantial upfront sales costs and less predictability in completing some of our sales with
our large financial institution clients; and
|
|
|
●
|
our
future success depends on deployment of our solutions in a timely and successful manner and our clients’ active and
effective promotion of our solutions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE
OFFERING
The
summary below describes some of the terms of the offering. For a more complete description of the common stock, see “Description
of Securities.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer
|
|
Cachet
Financial Solutions, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock offered by us
|
|
2,166,667
shares
of common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public
offering price
|
|
$6.00
per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over-allotment
option
|
|
We
have granted the underwriters an option to purchase up to 325,000 additional shares of common stock. This option is
exercisable, in whole or in part, for a period of 45 days from the date of this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock outstanding prior to this offering
|
|
2,103,392
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock outstanding after this offering
|
|
4,270,059
(1)(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use
of proceeds
|
|
We
intend to use the net proceeds received from this offering, after the payment of all expenses incurred with this offering,
(i) to repay an aggregate of $2,147,500 of outstanding indebtedness owed to several entities and (ii) for working capital
and other general corporate purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
a more complete description of our anticipated use of proceeds from this offering, see “Use of Proceeds.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
and trading symbol
|
|
Our
common stock is currently traded on the OTCQB Marketplace under the symbol “CAFN.” We have applied to list our
common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “CAFN.” If our listing application is approved, we
expect to list our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market upon consummation of this offering and our common stock will
cease to be traded on the OTCQB Marketplace.
|
|
|
(1)
|
The
information in this prospectus reflects the 1-for-1.5 Reverse Stock Split, which will be effective immediately prior to the pricing of this offering.
The number of shares
of our common stock to be outstanding both before and after this offering is based on the number of shares outstanding as
of December 31, 2016 after applying the 1-for-1.5 Reverse Stock Split , and excludes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
225,231
shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding
stock options as of December 31, 2016
|
|
|
●
|
298,000
shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of stock
options approved for grant by our Board of Directors on September 13, 2016 to certain directors, officers and other associates
under our 2016 Stock Incentive Plan, which grant is contingent and effective upon the consummation of this offering;
|
|
|
●
|
58,324
shares of our common stock available for future grants
under our 2016 Stock Incentive Plan as of December 31, 2016;
|
|
|
●
|
10,981
shares of our common stock available for future grants
under our 2014 Stock Incentive Plan as of December 31, 2016;
|
|
|
●
|
2,895,686
shares of our common stock reserved for issuance under
outstanding warrants as of December 31, 2016, with a weighted average exercise price of $11.60 per share;
|
|
|
●
|
687,636
shares of our common stock issuable upon conversion of
our Series C Convertible Preferred Stock as of December 31, 2016, which will occur upon the consummation of this offering;
and
|
|
|
●
|
2,099,794
shares of our common stock
issuable upon conversion of certain convertible notes (calculated based on the assumed public price of $6.00
per share), which will occur upon the consummation of this offering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Except
as otherwise indicated, the number of shares of common stock presented in this prospectus excludes shares issuable if the
underwriters exercise their over-allotment option. See also note (1) above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RISK
FACTORS
An
investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. Before deciding whether to invest in our common stock, you should
consider carefully the risks described below, together with all of the other information set forth in this prospectus and the
documents incorporated by reference herein. If any of these risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition, results
of operations or cash flow could be materially and adversely affected. This could cause the trading price of our common stock
to decline, resulting in a loss of all or part of your investment. The risks described below and in the documents referenced above
are not the only ones that we face. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also affect
our business.
Risks
Related to Our Financial Position
We
have a significant amount of secured and unsecured debt, which may affect our ability to operate our business and secure additional
financing in the future, and could limit or eliminate recovery of your investment if we fail to reach profitability.
We
have a substantial amount of indebtedness. As of December 31, 2016, our total indebtedness aggregated $4.7 million (gross notes
payable of $13.2 million less debt discount of $8.5 million), of which $12.9 million is payable within one year. Of the $12.9
million payable within one year, $7.1 million is convertible, at our option, into shares of our common stock following the listing
of our common stock on an exchange owned by the Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC. (See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Principal Sources of Funds—Debt and Equity Pursuant to Private Placements.”)
We
may be unable to satisfy the entirety of our debt owed to our lenders. Any such failure could have a material and adverse effect
on our financial condition, business prospects and viability. If we are unable to pay or refinance our senior secured indebtedness
when due, or if we are declared bankrupt or insolvent, these junior creditors may not recover the value of their notes. As a matter
of state and creditor law, common stock ranks junior to all of our existing and future indebtedness, both secured and unsecured,
and to other non-equity claims against our assets available to satisfy claims against us, including claims in bankruptcy, liquidation
or similar proceedings. Due to the substantial indebtedness of our company, holders of our common stock face the risk that they
may not recover any portion of their investment unless all of the claims of our creditors are satisfied first or unless they are
able to sell their stock prior to any such claims are asserted.
We
received a going concern qualification from our independent registered public accounting firm, which indicates that there is a
substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. If we are unable to generate sufficient revenue, obtain financing
or adjust our operating expenses so as to achieve and maintain positive working capital, we likely will be forced to cease operations
and investors will likely lose their entire investment.
As
of December 31, 2016, our current liabilities exceeded current assets by $8.3 million. In their report dated February 24, 2017,
except for “The Offering” in Note 14, as to which the date is March 7, 2017 our independent registered public
accounting firm, Lurie, LLP, stated that our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016
were prepared under the assumption that we would be able to continue as a going concern and noted that our limited revenues, recurring
losses from operations and stockholders’ deficit raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we had an operating cash flow deficit of $9.5 million and $7.4 million,
respectively.
We
currently anticipate that our cash and forecasted cash receipts will be sufficient to fund our operations through March 31, 2017.
If we are successful in completing this offering, we believe we will have sufficient cash to fund our operations through February
24, 2018. There can be no assurance that we will complete this offering or that we will not require additional financing or that
such financing will be available to us on reasonably acceptable terms.
Because
we have received an opinion from our auditor that substantial doubt exists as to whether we can continue as a going concern, it
may be more difficult for us to attract investors, secure debt financing or bank loans, or a combination of the foregoing, on
favorable terms, if at all.
If
we are unable to generate sufficient revenue, obtain financing or adjust our operating expenses so as to achieve and maintain
positive working capital, we likely will be forced to cease operations and investors will likely lose their entire investment.
We can give no assurance as to our ability to generate adequate revenue, raise sufficient capital, sufficiently reduce operating
expenses, or continue as a going concern. In addition, concerns about our financial viability may have an adverse effect on current
and potential clients’ willingness to enter into long-term relationships with us.
There
is no assurance that we will complete this offering or raise proceeds that meet our expectations. If we do not complete this offering
or raise proceeds that meet our expectations, we may not be able to continue operations and as such our independent auditor’s
report will continue to contain an uncertainty paragraph related to our ability to continue as a going concern.
We
intend to use a portion of the net proceeds received from this offering to pay off certain outstanding debt, including debt which
matures in March 2017. It is our belief, based on our current cash flow forecast and after giving effect to this offering and
using a portion of the offering proceeds to pay off certain indebtedness, that we will have sufficient capital resources to continue
our business for a sustained period of time, and in any event through 2017. While we believe in the viability of our strategy
to generate sufficient revenues and in our ability to raise additional funds through the completion of this offering, there can
be no assurance that we will be able to generate sufficient revenues or complete this offering or raise anticipated proceeds.
If
we fail to complete this offering or raise anticipated proceeds, we may not be able to continue operations and as such our independent
auditor’s report will continue to contain an uncertainty paragraph related to our ability to continue as a going concern.
We
may need additional financing in the future and any such financing may dilute our existing stockholders. We may not be able to
secure financing on favorable terms, or at all, to meet our future capital needs.
We
intend to use the net proceeds received from this offering, after the payment of all expenses incurred in connection with this
offering, to repay the following indebtedness that is currently outstanding: (i) approximately $75,000 will be used to repay indebtedness
currently outstanding under a convertible term promissory note, due March 22, 2017, issued by us to Jon D and Linda W Gruber Trust
on December 22, 2016; (ii) approximately $1,440,000 will be used to repay indebtedness currently outstanding under a convertible
term promissory note, due March 15, 2017, issued by us to FLMM Ltd. on December 23, 2016; (iii) approximately $632,500
will be used to repay indebtedness currently outstanding under a convertible term promissory note, due June 12, 2017, issued by
us to FirstFire Global Opportunities Fund, LLC on December 22, 2016; and (iv) the balance will be used to fund marketing and sales
and working capital, and for general corporate purposes. (For a more complete description of our anticipated use of proceeds from
this offering, see “Use of Proceeds.”)
Even
after we complete this offering, in the future we may require additional capital to respond to business opportunities, refinancing
needs, challenges, acquisitions or unforeseen circumstances, and may decide to engage in equity or debt financings or enter into
credit facilities for other reasons. We may not be able to secure any such additional debt or equity financing or refinancing
on favorable terms, in a timely manner, or at all. Any debt financing obtained by us in the future could also include restrictive
covenants relating to our capital-raising activities and other financial and operational matters, which may make it more difficult
for us to obtain additional capital and to pursue business opportunities, including potential acquisitions.
If
we raise additional funds through further issuances of equity, convertible debt securities or other securities convertible into
equity, our existing stockholders could suffer significant dilution in their percentage ownership of our company. Any new equity
securities we issue could have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of holders of our common stock. If we are unable
to obtain adequate financing or financing on terms satisfactory to us when we require it, our ability to continue to grow or support
our business and to respond to business challenges could be significantly limited.
Risks
Related to Our Business and Our Industry
Our
operations and business are subject to the risks of an early stage company with little revenue at this time.
Our
business is subject to all the risks inherent in the establishment of a new enterprise and the uncertainties arising from the
absence of a significant operating history. We cannot project whether or when we will become profitable because of the significant
uncertainties regarding our ability to generate revenues. One of the principal challenges that we face is gaining client acceptance.
We face substantial competition from well-established companies with far greater resources, and our potential clients may be more
familiar with our competitors and their capabilities.
Our
future success will depend upon many factors and variables facing a new business, including factors which may be beyond our control
or which cannot be predicted at this time. We have formulated our business plans and strategies based on certain assumptions regarding
the acceptance of our business model and the marketing of our solutions. Nevertheless, our assessments regarding market size,
market share, or market acceptance of our solutions or a variety of other factors may prove incorrect. We are a new enterprise
and have not previously engaged in the market in which our solutions will be offered. In sum, we may be unable to successfully
implement our business plan and become a profitable business.
Our
future revenue growth is dependent upon the success and popularity of our solutions, including our SMM-X solution. If we do not
successfully market and sell our solutions to new clients, if our solutions are not widely used by their customers, or if the
popularity of our solutions declines, our business and results of operations will be materially and adversely affected.
To
date, our growth has resulted primarily from selling our solutions to new clients and enabling our clients to deploy these solutions
for use by their customers. We expect that our success will continue to depend to a large extent on the continuing broad market
acceptance of our solutions among financial institutions, AFS providers and their customers.
Our
future revenue also depends in part on our ability to attract new clients, including additional financial institutions and AFS
providers, for our solutions and assist our clients with their deployment efforts. For example, our financial model is based in
part on our ability to successfully sell and deploy our SMM-X solution to banks, credit unions and AFS providers, and upon this
solution becoming widely used by our clients’ customers. Specifically, our financial model for our SMM-X solution is based
principally on future transactions and/or user-fee components. Hence, the wide adoption of our SMM-X solution by our clients’
customers is critical to our future revenue growth. Our financial model is also based on our belief that there are significant
opportunities for sales of our other solutions to additional clients. If we are unable to sell our solutions, including our SMM-X
solution, and achieve broad adoption of our solutions by financial institutions and AFS providers, or if our solutions are not
widely used by their customers after they are deployed, then our business and results of operations will be materially and adversely
affected.
Our
clients’ customers may not currently use our solutions for a number of reasons, including unfamiliarity with the technology
or perceived lack of reliability. We believe that the acceptance of our solutions by our clients and their customers also depends
on the following factors:
|
●
|
our
clients’ and our clients’ customers’ beliefs on the importance of our solutions;
|
|
●
|
our
ability to demonstrate our solutions economic and other benefits;
|
|
●
|
our
clients’ acceptance of us as a service provider; and
|
|
●
|
the
reliability of the software and hardware comprising our solutions.
|
Even
if we are successful in refining, selling and servicing our solutions, the market may slow or not grow fast enough for us to attain
profitability in the near future, if ever. If our solutions fall out of favor, or if our solutions fail to win consumer acceptance,
our business and results of operations will be materially and adversely affected.
We
have only recently begun to market our SMM-X solution as a separate brand under our Select Mobile Money solutions. We are in the
process of developing a separate brand for this solution. If we fail to develop, maintain and protect a strong brand for our SMM-X
solution, we may not be successful in selling this solution to banks, credit unions and AFS providers and our business will suffer.
We
have only recently begun to market our SMM-X solution as a separate brand under our Select Mobile Money solutions. We are in the
process of developing a separate brand for this solution. We believe that the development of a strong and trusted brand for this
solution is important to our success in selling it to banks, credit unions and/or AFS providers and is critical to expanding our
client base. Any negative publicity about our industry, our company or the quality and reliability of our SMM-X solution could
adversely affect our ability to develop, maintain and protect our SMM-X brand. If we fail to successfully develop, maintain and
protect a strong and trusted separate brand for our SMM-X solution, we may not be successful in marketing and selling it and our
business and results of operations will suffer.
In
deploying our SMM-X solution, we will need to rely on the services of a sponsor bank that issues the reloadable prepaid cards
to our prospective clients’ customers. Any refusal by such reloadable prepaid card issuer to work with any of our clients,
the distributor of the reloadable prepaid card, will materially and adversely affect our ability to sell this solution and will
have a material adverse effect on our business.
Our
SMM-X solution will utilize the services of a bank, which we refer to as a “sponsor bank,” that issues the reloadable
prepaid cards to our prospective clients’ customers. Our client is the distributor of the reloadable prepaid card issued
by the sponsor bank. Our sponsor bank may refuse to work with any prospective financial institution or AFS provider for any reason,
including lack of sufficient financial controls and/or lack of adequate measures to protect customer privacy. Any refusal by a
sponsor bank to work with any of our clients will materially and adversely affect our ability to sell our SMM-X solution and could
potentially have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Our
business depends on a strong and trusted brand, and any failure to maintain, protect and enhance our brand would hurt our business.
We
have developed a strong and trusted brand that has contributed significantly to the success of our business. Our brand is predicated
on the idea that innovative solutions should enable our clients to offer their customers fast, reliable and convenient financial
services remotely through mobile platforms. Maintaining, protecting and enhancing our brand is critical to expanding our client
base and our third-party partners. This will depend largely on our ability to maintain trust, be a technology leader, and continue
to provide high-quality and secure solutions. Any negative publicity about our industry or our company, the quality and reliability
of our solutions, our risk management processes, changes to our solutions, our ability to effectively manage and resolve client
complaints, our privacy and security practices, litigation, regulatory activity, and the experience of clients with our solutions,
could adversely affect our reputation and the confidence in and use of our solutions. Harm to our brand can arise from many sources,
including failure by us to satisfy expectations; inadequate protection of sensitive information; compliance failures and claims;
litigation and other claims; employee misconduct; and misconduct by our partners, supplies or other counterparties. If we do not
successfully maintain a strong and trusted brand, our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
To date, our brand has been associated with the term “CACHET.” As a result of a judgment and permanent injunction
against us, we must cease the use of this term for all purposes in our business as of April 15, 2017 and we must engage in a re-branding
of our business under a new name. We have not yet announced our new brand name and we cannot predict how our customers will respond
to our new name or whether our re-branding will impact our business or results of operations. We will be required to spend significant
resources, both financial and management time, toward advertising and marketing related to our re-branding. We estimate the expenses
related to the re-branding will be between $200,000 and $300,000 over a six-month period during 2017. See the risk factor below
entitled “We must change our name and rebrand our company” concerning a judgment that requires us to change our character
mark “CACHET.”
We
cannot be certain that we will be successful in increasing our revenue by introducing new revenue streams.
Important
factors to our future growth include continued development and marketing of our solutions to existing clients and making our solutions
increasingly attractive with the need for applications or combinations of applications tailored to their specific needs. For example,
we have only recently begun offering our end-to-end reloadable prepaid card program for our SMM-X solutions to banks, credit unions
and AFS providers. This program has individual challenges and risks, and we cannot be certain that this program, or any of our
other development and marketing efforts and activities will contribute to substantial revenue or introduce substantial new revenue
streams. Our failure to introduce substantial new revenue streams, including as a result of our inability to generate revenues
from our new SMM-X program, will have a material adverse effect to our business and results of operations.
We
compete with other companies that are well established and have more resources, and we may also compete against technologies developed
in-house by some of our clients or potential clients, all of which puts us at a competitive disadvantage.
The
market for prepaid mobile money and RDC solutions is highly competitive and we expect competition to increase. Most of our competitors
or potential competitors (e.g., FIS, Fiserv, D+H, Jack Henry, Bluepoint Solutions and Goldleaf ProfitStars) have significantly
greater financial, technical and marketing resources than us. These competitors may be able to respond more rapidly than we can
to new or emerging technologies or changes in client requirements. They are also able to devote greater resources to the development,
promotion and sale of their products than we do. On occasion, we may also have potential clients who have developed their prepaid
mobile money or RDC solutions internally, and so our competition may come from within the clients themselves, sometimes making
it more difficult to consummate a transaction due to territoriality, bias toward in-house developed capabilities, or concerns
about our support availability in comparison to in-house support.
We
expect competitors to continue to improve the performance of their products and to introduce new solutions and technologies. Successful
new product introductions or enhancements by our competitors could affect our sales and the market acceptance of our solutions,
cause intense price competition or make our solutions obsolete. To be competitive, we must continue to invest significant resources
in research and development, sales and marketing and customer support. If we do not have sufficient resources to make these investments,
or are unable to make the technological advances necessary to be competitive, our competitive position will suffer. Our failure
to compete successfully against current or future competitors could seriously harm our business.
Our
industry is characterized by rapid technological change. If we are unable to adapt our solutions and develop or acquire new technology
to keep with these rapid changes, we will not be able to obtain or maintain market share.
The
market for our solutions is characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards, changes in our clients’
needs and the needs of our clients’ customers. Furthermore, many of our competitors have greater capabilities and resources
to develop and test new technology more rapidly than we do. We must respond to changing technology and industry standards in a
timely and cost-effective manner. We may not be successful in acquiring new technologies, developing or acquiring new solutions
or enhancing existing solutions in a timely and cost-effective manner. These new technologies or enhancements may not achieve
market acceptance. Our pursuit of necessary technology may require substantial time and expense. We may need to license new technologies
to respond to technological change. These licenses may not be available to us on financially favorable terms. Finally, we may
not succeed in adapting our solutions to new technologies as they emerge.
In
addition, under various agreements with our clients that purchase our prepaid mobile money solutions, we are required to comply
with certain industry security standards called the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard, or PCI DSS, in order to meet
these clients’ requirements, and also industry demands and best practices (for a more complete description of the PCI DSS,
see “Our Business—Payment Card Industry Association Compliance”). Compliance with the PCI DSS and implementing
related procedures, technology and information security measures requires significant resources and ongoing attention. Costs and
potential problems and interruptions associated with the implementation of new or upgraded systems and technology such as those
necessary to achieve compliance with the PCI DSS or with maintenance or adequate support of existing systems could also disrupt
or reduce the efficiency of our operations. Any material interruptions or failures in our systems could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If
our information technology systems are damaged or cease to function properly, we may have to make a significant investment to
fix or replace them. In addition, we may have to upgrade our existing information technology systems from time to time, in order
for such systems to withstand the increasing needs of our expanding business. Any material interruption experienced by our information
technology systems could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Costs
and potential interruptions associated with the implementation of new or upgraded systems and technology or with maintenance or
adequate support of our existing systems could disrupt or reduce the efficiency of our business.
If
the Federal Reserve System adopts and implements its initiative for electronic alternatives to the paper check, government agencies
may no longer issue paper checks and the use of paper checks will decline significantly, which will materially and adversely affect
our business.
The
Federal Reserve System is currently advocating for facilitating and implementing electronic alternatives to the paper check. This
initiative is still underway and no final conclusions have been made. However, if this initiative is adopted and implemented,
whether fully or partially, government agencies may no longer issue paper checks. For example, the U.S. Social Security Administration
may no longer issue paper checks for the payment of social security benefits. As a result, the use of paper checks may decline
significantly, revenues from our RDC solutions may decline significantly and our business may be materially and adversely affected.
We
face risks related to the storage of our clients’ and their customers’ confidential and proprietary information, including
risks related to cyber-security and security breaches. Our systems and processes may not provide absolute security. We may incur
increasing costs in an effort to minimize those risks and to respond to cyber incidents.
Our
solutions are designed to maintain the confidentiality and security of our clients’ and their customers’ confidential
and proprietary information that is stored on our systems, which may include sensitive financial data. We are entirely dependent
on the secure operation of our websites and systems as well as the operation of the Internet generally. As a result, we face risks
related to accidental or willful security breaches (including unauthorized access to this data), which could expose us to liability
for the loss or misuse of such information, time-consuming and expensive litigation and other possible liabilities as well as
negative publicity. Attacks may be targeted at us, our clients or both. Our security measures may be breached due to the actions
of outside parties, employee error, malfeasance, or otherwise, and, as a result, an unauthorized party may obtain access to our
data or our users’ or clients’ data. Additionally, outside parties may attempt to fraudulently induce employees, users,
or clients to disclose sensitive information in order to gain access to our data or our users’ or clients’ data. Our
servers are also vulnerable to computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins, and similar disruptions, including “denial-of-service”
type attacks.
Our
maintenance and regular upgrade of our systems and processes, which are designed to protect the security of our computer systems,
software, networks and other technology assets and the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information belonging to
us and our clients, may not provide absolute security. It is possible that we may not be able to anticipate or to implement effective
preventive measures against all security breaches of these types, especially because the techniques used change frequently or
are not recognized until launched, and because cyber-attacks can originate from a wide variety of sources, including third parties
outside the company such as persons who are involved with organized crime or associated with external service providers or who
may be linked to terrorist organizations or hostile foreign governments. These risks may increase in the future as we continue
to increase our mobile and other Internet-based solution offerings and expand our internal usage of web-based solutions and applications
or expand into new countries. Techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage systems change frequently and generally
are difficult to recognize and react to. As a result, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate preventative
or reactionary measures.
A
successful penetration or circumvention of the security of our systems could cause serious negative consequences, including significant
disruption of our operations, misappropriation of our confidential information or that of our clients, or damage to our computers
or systems or those of our clients and counterparties, and could result in violations of applicable privacy and other laws, financial
loss to us or to our clients, loss of confidence in our security measures, client dissatisfaction, significant litigation exposure,
and harm to our reputation, all of which could have a material adverse effect on us.
If
an actual or perceived breach of security occurs, client perception of the effectiveness of our security measures could be harmed
and could result in the loss of clients. Actual or anticipated attacks and risks may cause us to incur increasing costs, including
costs to deploy additional personnel and protection technologies, train employees, and engage third party experts and consultants.
Our
ability to sell our solutions is highly dependent on the quality of our support and services offerings, and our failure to offer
high-quality support and services could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.
Once
our solution is deployed within our clients’ networks, our clients depend on our support organization to resolve any issues
relating to our software and solutions. As a result, high-quality support is critical for the successful marketing and sale of
our software and solutions, including the renewal of term-based license agreements and service agreements. If we do not assist
our clients in deploying our software solutions effectively, succeed in helping our clients resolve post-deployment issues quickly,
or provide ongoing support, our existing clients may not renew their license or maintenance and support agreements with us or
buy additional software and solutions from us. Furthermore, our failure to provide our existing clients with high-quality support
could harm our reputation with potential clients. If we fail to manage these resources correctly, our business will suffer. In
addition, if we expand our operations internationally our support organization will face additional challenges, including those
associated with delivering support, training and documentation in languages other than English. Our failure to maintain high-quality
support and solutions could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.
We
rely on third-parties to provide software integration, hardware, fulfillment and support and maintenance services in connection
with our solutions, and these third-parties’ failure to perform these services adequately could materially and adversely
affect our business.
While
we believe we possess all proprietary rights necessary to conduct our business, we do not own outright all of the technologies,
including software, that are used in our solutions. We may develop proprietary software for our solutions by using imaging, mobile
solutions or other technologies from various partners. For example, our RDC solutions utilize software and hardware from multiple
third-party vendors such as Mitek Systems Inc., Parascript, LLC and AQ2 Technologies, LLC. We expect that we will continue to
rely on multiple third-party vendors to create competitive software offerings for our clients and to provide them with state-of-the-art
solutions. In the event these third-parties fail to provide these services adequately, including as a result of errors in their
systems or events beyond their control, or refuse to provide these services on terms acceptable to us or at all, and we are not
able to find suitable alternatives, our business may be materially and adversely affected.
We
also rely on cooperation among our third-party vendors, and if they are unwilling to work with us or one another to perform needed
integration services, our ability to provide competitive software offerings may be adversely impacted. The performance of our
solutions depends upon the performance and quality of third-party solutions, including hardware fulfillment, support and maintenance.
If the systems provided by third-parties develop technical or operations problems, or cannot be scaled to meet the needs of our
clients, or the third-parties do not perform required services in a timely manner, our business may be materially and adversely
affected.
If
our solutions have defects or if we fail to provide agreed upon solutions to our clients and our clients’ customers, it
could materially damage our reputation, sales and profitability and result in other costs.
The
solutions we provide to our clients and industry partners, including those licensed from third-parties and those we develop, are
extremely complex and are constantly being modified and improved, and as such, they may contain material undetected defects or
errors, particularly when first introduced or as new versions are released. As a result of such software errors or defects, we
could face loss or delay in recognition of revenues, delay in market acceptance of our solutions, sales credits or refunds to
our clients, loss of existing clients and difficulty in attracting new clients, diversion of development resources, harm to our
reputation, and increased service and maintenance costs, any of which would have a material adverse effect upon our business,
operating results and financial condition. In addition, our contracts with users and partners contain provisions that may require
us to remedy malfunctions in our solutions and to pay damages if we breach our contractual obligations. Although we attempt to
limit our contractual liability for consequential damages in delivering our solutions, these limitations on liability may be unenforceable
in some cases, or may be insufficient to protect us from liability for damages. We maintain general liability insurance coverage,
including coverage for errors or omissions; however, this coverage may not continue to be available on reasonable terms or may
be insufficient to cover one or more large claims. An insurer might disclaim coverage as to any future claim. A successful assertion
of one or more large claims against us that exceeds our available insurance coverage or changes in our insurance policies, including
premium increases or the imposition of a large deductible or co-insurance requirement, could harm our operating results and financial
condition.
If
we are unable to renew client contracts at favorable terms, we could lose clients and our results of operations and financial
condition could be adversely affected.
Failure
to achieve favorable renewals of client contracts could negatively impact our business. Our contracts with clients generally run
for a period of 12 to 36 months. At the end of the contract term, clients have the opportunity to renegotiate their contracts
with us or to consider whether to engage one or more of our competitors to provide solutions. If we are not successful in achieving
high renewal rates and favorable contract terms, our results of operations and financial condition may be materially and adversely
affected.
Because
some of our sales efforts are targeted at large financial institutions, we face prolonged sales cycles, substantial upfront sales
costs and less predictability in completing some of our sales. If our sales cycle lengthens, or if our upfront sales investments
do not result in sufficient revenue, our operating results may be harmed.
We
target a portion of our sales efforts at large financial institutions, which presents challenges that are different from those
we encounter with smaller clients. Because our large clients are often making an enterprise-wide decision to deploy our solutions,
we face longer sales cycles, substantial upfront sales costs, significant contract negotiations and less predictability in completing
sales with these clients. Our sales cycle can often last one year or more with our largest clients, who often undertake an extended
evaluation process, but is variable and difficult to predict and can be longer or shorter. If we begin to expand internationally,
we anticipate that we may experience even longer sales cycles, more complex client needs, higher upfront sales costs and less
predictability in completing sales with our larger clients and clients located outside of the United States. If our sales cycle
lengthens or our upfront sales investments do not generate sufficient revenue to justify our investments in our sales efforts,
our operating results may be harmed.
Our
future success depends upon our clients’ active and effective promotion of our solutions.
Our
success depends upon our clients, their willingness to effectively promote our solutions to their customers, and their customers’
adoption and use of our solutions. In general, our contracts with our clients allow them to exercise significant discretion over
the promotion of our solutions, and they could give higher priority to other solutions that they offer. Accordingly, losing the
support of our clients would likely limit or reduce the use of our solutions and the related revenue. Our revenue may also be
negatively affected by our clients’ operational decisions. For example, if a client implements changes in its systems that
disrupt the integration between its systems and ours, we could experience a decline in the use of our solutions. Even if our clients
actively and effectively promote our solutions, there can be no assurance that their efforts will result in increased usage of
our solutions by their customers or the growth of our revenue. Failure of our clients to effectively promote our solutions, and
of their customers to increasingly adopt and use our solutions, could have a material adverse effect upon our future revenue and
operating results.
Our
reputation is critical to our business, and if our reputation is harmed our business and operating results could be adversely
affected.
Our
reputation, which depends on earning and maintaining the trust and confidence of our current and potential clients and our clients’
customers, is critical to our business. Our reputation is vulnerable to many threats that can be difficult or impossible to control,
and costly or impossible to remediate. Regulatory inquiries or investigations, data security breaches, lawsuits, employee misconduct,
perceptions of conflicts of interest and rumors, among other developments, could substantially damage our reputation, even if
they are baseless or satisfactorily addressed. In addition, any perception that the quality of our solutions may not be the same
or better than that of other providers could also damage our reputation. Any damage to our reputation could harm our ability to
attract and retain clients and key associates and adversely affect our operating results. Attempts to repair our reputation, if
damaged, may be costly and time consuming, and such efforts may not ultimately be successful.
As
a result of our clients’ increased usage of our platform, we will need to continually improve our hosting infrastructure
to meet our clients’ needs and avoid service interruptions or slower system performance.
We
have experienced significant growth in the number of transactions and data that our hosting infrastructure supports. We seek to
maintain sufficient excess capacity in our infrastructure to meet the needs of all of our existing and new clients. If our business
continues to grow, we may also need to increase bandwidth, storage or other elements of our infrastructure.
The
amount of infrastructure needed to support our clients is based on our estimates of anticipated usage. If we do not accurately
predict our infrastructure capacity requirements, our clients could experience service outages or slower system performance that
may subject us to financial penalties and result in client losses, which could harm our reputation and adversely affect our revenue
growth. In addition, increasing our infrastructure as a result of experiencing unforeseen increases in usage or in anticipation
of increased usage from new or existing clients would cause us to have increased cost of revenue, which could adversely affect
our gross margins until we sufficiently increase revenue to offset the increased costs.
Our
solutions may not function as intended due to human error, power or Internet connectivity issues, which could materially and adversely
affect our business and results of operations.
We
have from time to time found defects in our software and hardware, internal systems and technical integrations with third-party
systems, and new errors may be introduced in the future. In addition, we provide frequent incremental releases of solution updates
and functional enhancements, which increases the possibility of errors. Since clients use our solutions for important aspects
of their businesses, any errors, defects, disruptions in services, or other performance problems with our solutions could hurt
our reputation and damage our clients’ businesses.
It
is important that our solutions are available for processing to our clients on a 24/7/365 basis. We rely on our internet service
provider, or ISP , to provide consistent service and administration, keep up with technical requirements and innovations,
and maintain industry standards of redundancy and recovery. If our ISP does not meet these requirements, our image may suffer
in the marketplace and we could lose clients.
Our
solutions must integrate with a variety of mobile devices and desktop hardware, including to enable merchants and consumers to
capture information. If we are unable to ensure that our solutions integrate with such mobile devices and desktop hardware, our
business and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
We
are dependent on the ability of our solutions to integrate with a variety of mobile devices and desktop hardware. Any changes
in these devices that degrade the functionality of our solutions, impose additional costs or requirements on us, or give preferential
treatment to competitive solutions, including their own solutions, could materially and adversely affect usage of our solutions.
In
addition, we rely on scanners supplied by vendors for our commercial RDC solutions and on such vendors to provide technical support
in connection with such scanners. Changes in the design of these scanners may limit the interoperability of our hardware with
such scanners and require modifications to our hardware. If we are unable to ensure that our hardware continues to interoperate
effectively with such scanners, or if doing so is costly, our business and results of operations may be materially and adversely
affected.
We
rely on third-party app marketplaces to drive downloads of our mobile apps, such as our RDC mobile apps. If third-parties block
or limit our access to any app marketplaces, our business and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
We
rely on app marketplaces, such as the Apple App Store and Google Play, to drive downloads of our mobile app. Apple, Google and
other operators of app marketplaces regularly make changes to their marketplaces, and those changes may make access to our solutions
more difficult. In the event that it is difficult for consumers to access and use our apps, our business and results of operations
may be materially and adversely affected.
Privacy
concerns could have an adverse impact on our revenue and harm our reputation and may require us to modify our operations.
The
financial services industry, and in particular banks, credit unions and companies involved in the check-cashing business, are
concerned about the maintenance of client privacy and compliance with consumer privacy requirements under laws such as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley
Act. While we strive to comply with all applicable data protection laws and regulations, as well as our own privacy policies,
any failure or perceived failure on our part to comply, and even the failure of a competitor of ours in our industry, may result
in proceedings or actions against us by government entities or others, or could cause us to lose users and clients, which could
potentially have a material and adverse effect on our business.
In
addition, as nearly all of our solutions are Internet based, the amount of data we store for users on our servers (including personal
information) has been increasing. Any systems failure or compromise of our security, or lapses by competitors in our industry,
that results in the release of users’ data could seriously limit the adoption of our solutions, as well as harm our reputation
and brand and, therefore, our business. We may also need to expend significant resources to protect against security breaches.
The risk that these types of events could seriously harm our business is likely to increase as we expand the number of Internet-based
solutions we offer.
Regulatory
authorities around the world are considering a number of legislative and regulatory proposals concerning data protection. In addition,
the interpretation and application of consumer and data protection laws in the United States, Europe and elsewhere are often uncertain
and in flux. It is possible that these laws may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our data practices.
If so, in addition to the possibility of fines, this could result in an order requiring that we change our data practices, which
could have an adverse effect on our business. Complying with these various laws could cause us to incur substantial costs or require
us to change our business practices in a manner adverse to our business.
Failure
by our clients to obtain proper permissions and waivers might result in claims against us or may limit or prevent our use of data,
which could harm our business.
We
require our clients to provide necessary notices and to obtain necessary permissions and waivers for use and disclosure of information
through our solutions. Our contracts with our clients include assurances from them that they have done so and will do so, but
we do not audit our clients to ensure that they have acted, and continue to act, consistent with such assurances. If, despite
these requirements and contractual obligations, our clients do not obtain necessary permissions and waivers, then our use and
disclosure of information that we receive from them or on their behalf might be limited or prohibited by federal, state or foreign
privacy laws or other laws. Such a failure to obtain proper permissions and waivers could impair our functions, processes and
databases that reflect, contain, or are based upon such data and might prevent use of such data. In addition, such a failure could
interfere with, or prevent creation or use of, rules, analyses, or other data-driven activities that benefit us and our business.
Moreover, we might be subject to claims or liability for use or disclosure of information by reason of lack of valid notices,
agreements, permissions or waivers. These claims or liabilities could subject us to unexpected costs and adversely affect our
operating results.
If
we are unable to manage our growth, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Any
new and significant sustained growth will likely place a strain on our management systems and operational resources. Our ability
to compete effectively and to manage our future growth, if any, will depend on our ability to maintain and improve operational,
financial and management information systems on a timely basis and to expand, train, motivate and manage our work force. If we
begin to grow significantly, we cannot be certain that our personnel, systems, procedures and controls will be adequate to support
our operations.
We
face risks in expanding into new geographic regions.
We
plan to continue expanding into new geographic regions, and we currently face and will continue to face risks entering markets
in which we have limited or no experience and in which we may not be well-known. Offering our solutions in new geographic regions
often requires substantial expenditures and takes considerable time, and we may not be successful enough in these new geographies
to recoup our investments in a timely manner or at all. We may be unable to attract a sufficient number of sellers, fail to anticipate
competitive conditions, or face difficulties in operating effectively in these new markets.
The
expansion of our solutions globally exposes us to risks relating to staffing and managing cross-border operations; increased costs
and difficulty protecting intellectual property and sensitive data; tariffs and other trade barriers; differing and potentially
adverse tax consequences; increased and conflicting regulatory compliance requirements, including with respect to data privacy
and security; lack of acceptance of our solutions; challenges caused by distance, language, and cultural differences; exchange
rate risk; and political instability. Accordingly, our efforts to expand our global operations may not be successful, which could
limit our ability to grow our business.
Financial
institutions are subject to industry consolidation, and we may lose clients with little notice, which could adversely affect our
revenues.
The
financial institution industry is prone to consolidations that result from mergers and acquisitions. Other financial institutions
that do not use our solutions may acquire our existing clients and then convert them to competing solutions. It is also possible
that the larger financial institutions that result from consolidations could have greater leverage in negotiating terms with us
or could decide to perform in-house some or all of the solutions which we currently provide or could provide. Most of our contracts
provide for a charge to the client for early termination of the contract without cause, but these charges are insufficient to
replace the recurring revenues that we would have received if the financial institution had continued as a client.
If
our clients or their customers are unwilling to use our cloud-based solutions, our client base may not grow or may decrease and
our business and results of operations could be materially harmed.
Many
enterprises have invested substantial personnel and financial resources to integrate legacy enterprise software into their businesses
and are more familiar and comfortable with this type of infrastructure. Because our solutions involve the aggregation, storage
and use of confidential information and related data, some clients may be reluctant or unwilling to migrate to our cloud-based
solutions due to a lack of perceived cost and performance benefits associated with cloud-based solutions, and concerns regarding
the ability of cloud computing companies to adequately address security and privacy concerns. If other cloud-based solutions experience
security incidents, loss of client data, disruptions in delivery or other problems, these concerns and perceptions regarding the
market for cloud computing as a whole may be further negatively affected. If clients are unwilling to accept our cloud-based solutions
as a result of these perceptions and concerns, we may be required to develop other alternative solutions for these clients, which
would be time-consuming and costly and could negatively affect our gross margins. In addition, negative perceptions and concerns
regarding cloud computing could cause the growth of our client base to slow, which could result in decreased revenue and harm
to our business and results of operations.
We
are a party to a pending legal proceeding brought against us by one of our note holders that alleges that we breached the terms
of the note issued to such note holder. If this note holder prevails in this legal proceeding, we may be subject to claims of
default or cross default by our other note holders, which may cause us to incur substantial costs and may have a material adverse
effect on our business.
A
holder of our series subordinated note commenced an action against us in Hennepin County Court in the State of Minnesota alleging
that we breached the terms of the note and seeking to collect alleged amounts due and owing under the note. The dispute centers
on the note holder’s interpretation of the agreement. Based on the note holder’s interpretation of the agreement,
the note holder seeks an extraordinary amount in alleged liquidated damages (approximately $300,000 on an outstanding debt of
approximately $415,000), and we contend the note holder’s interpretation is unenforceable under Minnesota law. We dispute
the allegations of the note holder and intend to vigorously defend the claim. The note holder moved for summary judgment and a
hearing on that motion was held on August 9, 2016 before the Fourth Judicial District in Hennepin County in Minnesota where the
Court heard both arguments and took the motion under advisement. On October 19, 2016, the Court entered an order granting in part
and denying in part the motion for summary judgment. The alleged default could subject us to claims of default or cross default
by our other lenders. At this time no other lender has asserted such a claim.
Our
business is subject to the risks of earthquakes, fire, floods, other natural catastrophic events and man-made problems such as
power disruptions or terrorism.
A
significant natural disaster, such as an earthquake, fire or a flood, or a significant power outage could have a material adverse
impact on our business, operating results and financial condition. Our corporate headquarters and cloud network operations centers
are located in Minneapolis, Minnesota. This region is known for tornado risk. Further, if a natural disaster occurs in a region
from which we derive a significant portion of our revenues, clients in that region may delay or forego purchases of our solutions,
which may materially and adversely impact our operating results for a particular period. In addition, acts of terrorism could
cause disruptions in our business or the business of our partners, clients or the economy as a whole. To the extent that any of
the above results in delays or cancellations of client orders, our business, financial condition and operating results would be
adversely affected.
We
face risks arising from acquisitions.
In
March 2014, we acquired certain assets related to our Select Mobile Money solutions from DeviceFidelity. We may pursue similar
strategic transactions in the future. Risks in acquisition transactions include difficulties in the integration of acquired businesses
into our operations and control environment, difficulties in assimilating and retaining employees and intermediaries, difficulties
in retaining the existing clients of the acquired entities, assumed or unforeseen liabilities that arise in connection with the
acquired businesses, the failure of counterparties to satisfy any obligations to indemnify us against liabilities arising from
the acquired businesses, and unfavorable market conditions that could negatively impact our growth expectations for the acquired
businesses. Fully integrating an acquired company or business into our operations may take a significant amount of time. We cannot
assure you that we will be successful in overcoming these risks or any other problems encountered with acquisitions and other
strategic transactions. These risks may prevent us from realizing the expected benefits from acquisitions and could result in
the failure to realize the full economic value of a strategic transaction or the impairment of goodwill and/or intangible assets
recognized at the time of an acquisition. These risks could be heightened if we complete a large acquisition or multiple acquisitions
within a short period of time.
We
have a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting.
As
part
of our evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, our management
concluded that we do not have adequate controls in place to ensure complex financial instruments are properly accounted for and
reported in our financial statements. The ineffectiveness of the design, implementation and operation of the controls surrounding
these instruments create a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement to the consolidated financial statements would
not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Accordingly, our management concluded that this deficiency represents a material
weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016.
Internal
controls over financial reporting are processes designed to provide reasonable assurances regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Failure to maintain effective internal controls
over financial reporting in the future could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations, cause our consolidated financial
statements to contain material misstatements, and harm our business and operating results. Our internal controls may not prevent
all potential errors, because any control system, regardless of its design, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance
that the objectives of the control system will be achieved.
So
long as we are either an emerging growth company or a smaller reporting company, we are exempt from Section 404(b) of Sarbanes-Oxley,
which requires an independent registered public accounting firm to attest to our management’s assessment of internal control
over the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. If we are neither an emerging growth company nor a smaller
reporting company, our independent registered public accounting firm will be required to attest on our management’s assessment
of internal control over the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. This may cause us to incur additional
costs related to auditing and also the examination, investigation and report on internal controls.
Our
risk management efforts may not be effective.
We
could incur substantial losses and our business operations could be disrupted if we are unable to effectively identify, manage,
monitor, and mitigate financial risks, such as credit risk, interest rate risk, prepayment risk, liquidity risk and other market-related
risks, as well as operational risks related to our business, assets and liabilities. Our risk management policies, procedures
and techniques, including our scoring methodology, may not be sufficient to identify all of the risks we are exposed to, mitigate
the risks we have identified or identify additional risks to which we may become subject in the future.
Our
business may be materially and adversely affected by U.S. and global market and economic conditions.
For
the foreseeable future, we expect to continue to derive most of our revenue from solutions we provide to the financial services
industry. Given this concentration, we are exposed to the global economic conditions in the financial services industry. A prolonged
poor economic environment could result in significant decreases in demand by current and potential clients for our solutions and
in the number and dollar amount of transactions we process, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results
of operations and financial condition.
Risks
Related to Our Workforce and Personnel
We
are a small company with limited staff, particularly in our accounting department. Our limited staff and resources have in the
past adversely affected our internal controls over financial reporting. Our failure to implement measures that will ensure adequate
controls over our financial and other reporting processes could cause us to fail to meet our financial and other reporting obligations.
While
we continue to evaluate and improve our internal controls, we are a small company with limited staff, particularly in our accounting
department which consists of primarily two full-time employees: our Chief Financial Officer and our Corporate Controller.
We also have a part-time accounting clerk. Our key accounting and finance personnel have only recently begun to serve in such
capacities. Our Chief Financial Officer joined our company in March 2016 and our Corporate Controller has served in such
capacity from July 2015.
Our
limited accounting staff may not allow for effective internal controls over financial reporting due to the lack of adequate segregation
of duties and insufficient secondary review of GAAP. For example, our company has issued, and may in the future issue, warrants,
convertible notes and convertible redeemable preferred stock, and we may lack experience in accounting for complex transactions.
We have recently implemented an automated third party software solution for tracking and reporting of stock options and related
compensation expenses, instead doing so manually.
Due
to our current staffing limitations, we cannot be certain that the measures we implement in the future will ensure that we design,
undertake and maintain adequate controls over our financial processes and reporting. Any failure by us to hire and retain experienced
accounting and financial reporting personnel, implement required new or improved controls, or any difficulties we encounter in
their implementation, could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. See the risk factor above entitled “We have
a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting.”
Because
we are a small company with limited staff and we do not employ an in-house general counsel or have a legal compliance department,
we might not always be able to timely file every periodic and current report with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC.
Our failure to file certain reports with SEC in a timely manner could adversely affect our business and our stockholders, and
may also result in the suspension of trading of our common and/or the revocation of our registration by the SEC.
We
are a small company with limited staff. We do not employ an in-house general counsel or have a legal compliance department. This
may adversely affect our disclosure controls and procedures, including our ability to timely file periodic or current reports
with the SEC from time to time. For example, there have been instances in the past where we have not filed a current report on
a timely basis or at all. In addition, on March 30, 2016 we filed with the SEC a notification of late filing informing the SEC
that due to staffing limitations we could not timely file our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2015. Our failure to file periodic and certain current reports with the SEC in a timely manner, among other things, could in the
future preclude or delay us from being eligible to use a short form registration statement on Form S-3 to register certain sales
of our common stock by us or our stockholders and could even result in the suspension of trading of our common stock and/or the
revocation of our registration by the SEC. Any of these consequences may have a material adverse effect on our business and results
of operations, and can also adversely affect our stockholders.
Our
success may depend on our ability to attract, recruit and retain qualified and skilled personnel, including qualified and skilled
programmers and sales, marketing and support personnel.
Our
key personnel currently include:
|
●
|
Jeffrey C. Mack, Chief
Executive Officer and President
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Bruce
Whitmore, Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Lawrence
C. Blaney, Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Bryan
Meier, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Our
future success depends significantly on the continued service of our key technical, sales and senior management personnel and
their ability to execute our growth strategy, as well as on our ability to attract, recruit and retain additional qualified and
skilled technical, sales and senior management associates. If we fail to retain our key associates (including due to death or
disability) or to attract, recruit and retain additional qualified and skilled associates, our ability to maintain and develop
our business and solutions may be materially and adversely affected and the price of our common stock may decline.
In
this regard, we do not have any key-person insurance on any of our key associates. We have written employment agreements with
all but one of our key associates, and all of those agreements contain customary non-competition and other restrictive covenants
benefitting our company, but these agreements do not guarantee the services of these individuals for the terms of their agreements
or beyond.
In
order for us to continue to develop and market our new solutions and for our business to continue to grow, we need to attract,
recruit and retain additional qualified and skilled personnel. Our failure to do so will materially and adversely affect our ability
to develop and market our new solutions, which will have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial position and
operating results.
We
will need to attract, recruit and retain additional qualified and skilled personnel in order for us to be able to develop and
market our new solutions, including our SMM-X solutions. If we fail to attract, recruit and retain additional qualified and skilled
personnel, we will not be successful in developing and marketing our new solutions or enhancing our existing solutions, which
will have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial position and operating results.
Risks
Related to Legal and Regulatory Compliance
Our
clients operate in a highly regulated environment, and failure by financial institutions and AFS providers through which our solutions
are made available to comply with applicable laws and regulations could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial
position and operating results.
Our
clients operate in a highly-regulated environment at the federal and state levels, and failure by financial institutions and AFS
providers through which our solutions are made available to comply with the laws and regulations to which we and they are subject
could negatively impact our business. In addition, our clients have and may in the future require us to adhere to standards relating
to high levels of security, the maintenance of client privacy and other regulatory areas that they are obligated meet in their
compliance with such laws. There can be no assurance that we will be able to meet such requirements. Any such failure could materially
and adversely affect our business and its viability, as well as the price of our common stock.
Changes
in banking regulations could negatively affect our business.
Our
financial institution clients are subject to the supervision of several federal, state and local government regulatory agencies,
and we must continually ensure that our solutions work within the extensive and evolving regulatory requirements applicable to
our financial institution clients. Regulation of financial institutions such as banks can indirectly affect our business. While
the use of our solutions by financial institutions is either not subject to, or is currently in compliance with, banking regulations,
a change in regulations or the creation of new regulations on financial institutions, including modifying a financial institution’s
ability to offer solutions similar to ours, could prevent or lessen the use of our solutions by financial institutions, which
would have a substantial negative effect on our business and operations.
Risks
Related to Our Intellectual Property
Our
ability to execute our business strategy will depend on our ability to protect our intellectual property, and if any third-parties
make unauthorized use of our intellectual property, or if our intellectual property rights are successfully challenged, our competitive
position and business could suffer.
Our
success and ability to compete will depend substantially on our ability to develop proprietary technologies. We currently own
no patents, but have filed several applications with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. These include an application filed
in October 2010, relating to our Apple OS X Internet deposit application. We cannot be certain that our intellectual property
rights will not be infringed upon, that others will not develop products in violation of our intellectual property rights, or
that others may assert, rightly or wrongly, that our intellectual property rights are invalid or unenforceable. In instances where
we may rely on trade secrets for the protection of our confidential and proprietary business information, we cannot be certain
that we would have adequate remedies for any such breach or that our trade secrets will not otherwise become discovered or, for
that matter, independently developed by our competitors. In general, defending intellectual property rights is expensive and consumes
considerable time and attention of management. Our involvement in intellectual property litigation would likely have a materially
and adverse effect on our business and may threaten our viability. Even if we were ultimately successful in defending our intellectual
property rights, the cost of such defense may be crippling to our business and materially and adversely affect our prospects and
viability.
In
addition, competitors may design around our technology or develop competing technologies. There can be no assurance that we will
obtain patents on the inventions disclosed in our provisional application or on any future patent applications, nor can there
be any assurance that the scope of any future patent will be sufficiently broad to offer us meaningful protection.
Our
intellectual property rights are currently not protected outside the United States. If we begin to expand internationally, we
will need to obtain legal protection for our intellectual property rights, which will cause us to incur substantial costs and
may have a material adverse effect on our business. There can be no assurance that legal protection can be afforded to our intellectual
property rights in foreign jurisdictions.
We
have not filed any patent applications outside the United States. If we begin to expand internationally, we will need to obtain
legal protection for our intellectual property rights, including by filing patent applications in various jurisdictions, which
will cause us to incur substantial costs and may have a material adverse effect on our business. There can be no assurance that
such legal protection can be afforded and our intellectual property rights may be limited or unavailable altogether in some foreign
jurisdictions, which could make it easier for competitors to capture market share in such jurisdictions and have a material adverse
effect on our business.
Third-parties
may claim that we infringe their intellectual property or proprietary rights, which could cause us to incur significant expenses
or prevent us from selling our solutions.
Third-parties
may bring claims against us alleging that we have infringed on their intellectual property rights or claims that our intellectual
property rights are not valid. Any claims against us, with or without merit, could be time consuming and costly to defend or litigate,
divert our attention and resources, result in the loss of goodwill associated with our business or require us to make changes
to our solutions. In addition, we may need to bring legal claims to enforce or protect such intellectual property rights. Any
litigation, whether successful or unsuccessful, may result in substantial costs and a diversion of our resources.
We
must change our name and re-brand our company.
An
entity named Cachet Banq contacted us in December 2010 relative to their U.S. Trademark Registration No. 2,857,465 (registered
on June 29, 2004) for the standard character mark “CACHET” covering “financial services, namely automated clearing
house processing services for the payroll service industry.” Cachet Banq has alleged that our use of “CACHET”
infringes on their federal trademark registration. On or about March 4, 2013, Cachet Banq filed a trademark infringement lawsuit
against us in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The parties filed cross motions for summary
judgment. The initial brief was filed on May 30, 2014, replies were filed on June 26, 2014 and the court took these motions under
advisement on July 8, 2014. We have denied that our use of the character mark “CACHET” infringes on Cachet Banq’s
purported rights in their mark. On September 21, 2015, the court issued an order (1) granting Cachet Banq’s motion for summary
judgment, (2) denying our motion for summary judgment, and (3) ordering the parties to submit memoranda regarding remedies. The
last of those memoranda were submitted on October 12, 2015. On November 30, 2015, the Court entered an additional order providing
for an additional period of discovery and additional briefing regarding remedies. Pursuant to the Court’s order, the parties
engaged in a renewed period of discovery focused on remedies and submitted additional briefing. The discovery was completed and
all additional briefing was submitted to the Court by April 19, 2016. According to their briefing on the remedies, Cachet Banq
is not presently seeking any monetary damages as a result of the alleged infringement, but rather an injunction.
On
October 27, 2016, the Court entered a judgment and permanent injunction against us which, effective from April 15, 2017, enjoins
us and our officers, directors, agents, servants, employees and attorneys and all persons in active concert or participation with
any of the foregoing from (i) using any mark, name, symbol, logo or other indicia that incorporates or is confusingly similar
to the term “CACHET” in any way that relates to financial services, and (ii) offering for sale, soliciting sales,
promoting, distributing, importing, advertising, or selling any products or services, in any medium, under any mark, name, symbol,
logo or other indicia that incorporates or is confusingly similar to the term “CACHET” which in any way relate to
financial services. We are also ordered to destroy or discard all signs, products, advertisements, packaging, literature, business
cards, and any other promotional material, which feature the term “CACHET” or a term confusingly similar thereto,
both physical and electronic, which are in any way related to financial services, in each case except for the permitted use described
below. Under the injunction, we must complete our transition to a yet-to-be determined new company name by no later than April
15, 2017. We are permitted to reference our current name in an explanatory fashion on signs, products, advertisements, packaging,
literature, business cards, and any other promotional material to introduce our new name in a font size no greater than one-third
the font-size of the yet-to-be determined new company name. This permitted use provision terminates on June 30, 2017, by which
date we must cease from using the explanatory statement in any manner and destroy or discard all materials featuring the explanatory
statement. By no later than July 12, 2017, we must file a declaration, under penalty of perjury, setting forth in detail the manner
and form in which we have complied with the injunction.
We
intend to comply with the injunction and will pursue a re-branding of our company. We expect that the re-branding will require
us to devote significant resources to advertising and marketing new brands and will cause us to incur substantial costs. We estimate
the expenses related to the re-branding will be between $200,000 and $300,000 over a six-month period during 2017. The Court denied
Cachet Banq’s request for attorney’s fees and costs.
The
intellectual property behind our technology includes pending patent protection, as well as unpublished know-how. All patent protection
eventually expires, and unpublished know-how is dependent on key individuals.
The
commercialization of our technology is partially dependent upon know-how and trade secrets held by certain individuals working
with and for us. Because the expertise runs deep in these few individuals, if something were to happen to any or all of them,
the ability to properly operate our technologies without compromising quality and performance could be diminished greatly.
Even
if our pending patent applications are approved and our patents are registered, knowledge published in the form of patents has
finite protection, as all patents have a limited life and an expiration date. While continuous efforts will made to apply for
additional patents if appropriate, there is no guarantee that additional patents will be granted. The expiration of patents relating
to our technology may hinder our ability to sub-license or sell the technology for a long period of time without the development
of a more complex licensing strategy.
Our
use of ”open source” software could negatively affect our ability to sell our solutions and subject us to possible
litigation.
Portions
of our prepaid mobile money solutions, Select Mobile Money and other solutions incorporate so-called “open source”
software. In addition, we may incorporate additional open source software in the future. Open source software is generally licensed
by its authors or other third parties under open source licenses. If we fail to comply with these licenses, we may be subject
to specified conditions, including requirements that we offer our solutions that incorporate the open source software for no cost,
that we make available source code for modifications or derivative works we create based upon, incorporating or using the open
source software and that we license such modifications or derivative works under the terms of the particular open source license.
If an author or other third party that distributes open source software that we use were to allege that we had not complied with
the conditions of one or more of these licenses, we could be required to incur significant legal expenses defending against such
allegations and could be subject to significant damages, including being enjoined from the sale of our solutions that contained
the open source software and could be required to comply with the foregoing conditions, which could disrupt the sale of the affected
solution. In addition, there have been claims challenging the ownership of open source software against companies that incorporate
open source software into their products. As a result, we could be subject to suits by third-parties claiming ownership of software
that what we believe is open source software. Any such litigation could be costly for us to defend, have a negative effect on
our operating results and financial condition and require us to devote additional research and development resources to change
our solutions.
If
our trademarks and trade names are not adequately protected, then we may not be able to build name recognition in our markets
of interest and our business may be adversely affected.
If
our trademarks and trade names are not adequately protected, then we may not be able to build name recognition in our markets
of interest, and our business may be adversely affected. We currently have registered and unregistered trademarks in the United
States. Our trademarks or trade names may be challenged, infringed, circumvented or declared generic or determined to be infringing
on other marks. We may not be able to protect our rights to these trademarks and trade names, which we need to build name recognition
among potential collaborators or customers in our markets of interest. At times, competitors may adopt trade names or trademarks
similar to ours, thereby impeding our ability to build brand identity and possibly leading to market confusion. Further, there
could be potential trade name or trademark infringement claims brought by owners of other trademarks or trade names that incorporate
variations of our trademarks or trade names. In addition, we have not registered our trademarks internationally, and the laws
of certain foreign countries may not protect proprietary rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. Over the
long term, if we are unable to successfully register our trademarks and trade names and/or establish name recognition based on
our trademarks and trade names, then we may not be able to compete effectively and our business may be adversely affected. Our
efforts to enforce or protect our proprietary rights related to trademarks, trade secrets, domain names, copyrights or other intellectual
property may be ineffective and could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and could adversely impact our financial
condition or results of operations.
Risks
Related to Our Corporate Organization
Provisions
in our organizational documents and under Delaware law could delay or prevent a change in control of our company, which could
adversely affect the price of our common stock.
Our
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, our Bylaws, and Delaware law contain provisions that could make it more difficult
for a third-party to obtain control of us. For example, Delaware law contains a business combination statute. The anti-takeover
effect of the business combination statue could discourage, delay, or prevent a change in control by prohibiting us from engaging
in a business combination with an interested stockholder for a period of three years after the person becomes an interested stockholder,
even if a change of control would be beneficial to our existing stockholders. In addition, our Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation and bylaws make the acquisition of our company more difficult, including the following:
|
●
|
only
a majority of our directors are authorized to call a special meeting of our stockholders;
|
|
●
|
advance
notice procedures apply for stockholders to nominate candidates for election as directors and stockholder proposals for business
at a meeting; and
|
|
●
|
our
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation authorizes undesignated preferred stock, the terms of which may be established,
and shares of which may be issued, by our Board of Directors without any stockholder approval.
|
Because
these provisions and laws could discourage takeover attempts, even when a change of control would be beneficial to a stockholder,
these provisions and laws could adversely affect the price of our common stock.
Being
a public company whose securities are traded on a national stock exchange results in additional expenses and diverts management’s
attention, and could also adversely affect our ability to attract and retain qualified directors.
As
a public reporting company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or
the Exchange Act. Even though we are currently a “smaller reporting company” (as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange
Act) and therefore subject to reduced disclosure requirements, these requirements generate significant accounting, legal and financial
compliance costs and make some activities more difficult, time consuming or costly, and may place significant strain on our personnel
and resources. In addition, after the listing of our common stock for trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market, we will subject to
certain corporate governance requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market. For example, under the rules of the Nasdaq Capital Market,
a majority of our Board of Directors must be comprised of independent directors; we must establish board committees (such as a
compensation committee and an audit committee) whose members must be independent, subject to certain exceptions; our board committees
must be able to engage with independent consultants and advisors; and we must make periodic reports to the Nasdaq Capital Market.
We will incur additional expenses that we have not incurred prior to this offering in order to satisfy these requirements. In
addition, management’s attention may be diverted from other business concerns, which could have an adverse and even material
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation grants our Board of Directors the power to issue additional shares of common
and preferred stock and to designate other classes of preferred stock, all without stockholder approval.
Our
authorized capital consists of 520,000,000 shares of capital stock of which 20,000,000 shares are designated as preferred stock.
Our Board of Directors, without any action by our stockholders, may designate and issue shares of preferred stock in such series
as it deems appropriate and establish the rights, preferences and privileges of such shares, including dividends, liquidation
and voting rights, provided it is consistent with Delaware law.
The
rights of holders of our preferred stock that may be issued could be superior to the rights of holders of our common shares. The
designation and issuance of shares of capital stock having preferential rights could adversely affect other rights appurtenant
to shares of our common stock. Furthermore, any issuances of additional stock (common or preferred) will dilute the percentage
of ownership interest of then-current holders of our capital stock and may dilute our book value per share.
Because
we became public by means of a reverse merger, we may not be able to attract the attention of major brokerage firms.
Additional
risks to our investors may exist since we became public through a “reverse merger.” Security analysts of major brokerage
firms may not provide coverage of our company since, because we became public through a reverse merger, there is no incentive
to brokerage firms to recommend the purchase of our common stock. In addition, because of past abuses and fraud concerns stemming
primarily from a lack of public information about newly public businesses, there are many people in the securities industry and
business in general who view reverse merger transactions with suspicion. Without brokerage firm and analyst coverage, there may
be fewer people aware of us and our business, resulting in fewer potential buyers of our common stock, less liquidity, and lower
stock prices for our investors than would be the case if we had become a public reporting company in a more traditional manner.
We
are an “emerging growth company” and our election to delay adoption of new or revised accounting standards applicable
to public companies may result in our consolidated financial statements not being comparable to those of some other public companies.
As a result of this and other reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies, our securities may be less
attractive to investors.
We
are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, and we intend to take advantage of exemptions from certain
reporting requirements available to “emerging growth companies” under that Act, including but not limited to not being
required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of Sarbanes-Oxley (relating to the effectiveness
of our internal control over financial reporting), reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic
reports and any proxy statements we may be required to file, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a non-binding advisory
vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. In addition,
Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an “emerging growth company” can delay the adoption of certain accounting
standards until those standards would apply to private companies.
We
have elected to delay such adoption of new or revised accounting standards and, as a result, we may not comply with new or revised
accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for other public companies that are
not “emerging growth companies.” Consequently, our consolidated financial statements may not be comparable to the
financial statements of other public companies. We may take advantage of these reporting exemptions until we are no longer an
“emerging growth company.” In this regard, we will remain an “emerging growth company” for up to five
years after the first sale of our common equity securities under an effective registration statement. However, we may cease to
be an “emerging growth company” earlier under certain circumstances, including (i) if the market value of our common
stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700,000,000 as of any June 30 in which case we would cease to be an “emerging
growth company” as of December 31 of such year, (ii) if our total annual gross revenues exceed $1.0 billion in any fiscal
year or (iii) if we issue more than $1.0 billion of non-convertible debt over a three-year period.
We
cannot predict if investors will find our securities less attractive due to our reliance on these exemptions. If investors were
to find our securities less attractive as a result of our election, our stock price may be adversely affected.
Risks
Related to Tax Matters
Our
ability to use our net operating losses to offset future taxable income may be subject to certain limitations and our ability
to generate future taxable income.
On
December 31, 2016, we had net operating loss, or NOL, carry forwards for federal income tax purposes of $30.1 million,
which will begin to expire in 2032, and net operating loss carry forwards for state income tax purposes of $15.7 million,
the expiration period of such net operating loss carry forwards varies by state. Due to the possibility that we will not be able
to realize some portion of our NOLs, we carry a full valuation allowance against our gross deferred tax asset.
In
general, under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or the Code, a corporation that undergoes an “ownership
change” is subject to limitations on its ability to utilize its pre-change NOLs to offset future taxable income. If our
existing NOLs are subject to limitations arising from previous ownership changes or future ownerships changes, including but not
limited to this offering, our ability to utilize NOLs could be limited by Code Section 382 and thereby result in the expiration
of our NOLs or otherwise cause our NOLs to be unavailable to offset future taxable income.
In
addition, the realization of these net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards are dependent on our ability to generate sufficient
taxable income before their expiration.
Taxing
authorities may successfully assert that we should have collected or in the future should collect sales and use, value added or
similar taxes, and we could be subject to liability with respect to past or future sales, which could adversely affect our financial
results.
We
do not collect sales, use, value added and similar taxes in all jurisdictions in which we have sales, based on our belief that
such taxes are not applicable. Sales and use, value added and similar tax laws and rates vary greatly by jurisdiction. Certain
jurisdictions in which we do not collect such taxes may assert that such taxes are applicable, which could result in tax assessments,
penalties and interest, and we may be required to collect such taxes in the future. Such tax assessments, penalties and interest
or future requirements to collect may adversely affect our financial results. State, local and foreign jurisdictions have differing
rules and regulations governing sales, use, value added and other taxes, and these rules and regulations are subject to varying
interpretations that may change over time. In particular, the applicability of such taxes to our solutions in various jurisdictions
may differ from our current position. Further, these jurisdictions’ rules regarding tax nexus and the applicability of these
taxes to our solutions are complex and vary significantly. As a result, we could face the possibility of tax audits and assessments,
and our liability for these taxes and associated interest and penalties could exceed our original estimates. A successful assertion
that we should be collecting or accruing sales, use, value-added or other taxes in those jurisdictions where we are not currently
doing so, could result in substantial tax liabilities and associated interest and penalties, which could materially impact our
financial position and results of operations.
Tax
provision changes, the adoption of new tax legislation or exposure to additional tax liabilities could materially impact our financial
position and results of operations.
We
are subject to income and other taxes in the United States of America. Our tax liabilities are affected by the amounts we charge
for services, licenses and funding. We are subject to ongoing tax audits in various jurisdictions. Tax authorities may disagree
with our tax policies and practices and assess additional taxes. In addition, tax authorities could review our transactions or
tax returns and assert, in addition to the above, various withholding requirements apply to us or that benefits of tax treaties
are not available to us. We regularly assess the likely outcomes of these tax positions in order to determine the appropriateness
of our tax provision. However, there can be no assurance that we will accurately predict the outcomes of these audits, and the
amounts ultimately paid upon resolution of audits could be materially different from the amounts previously included in our income
tax expense and therefore could have a material impact on our tax provision, net income and cash flows. In addition, our effective
tax rate in the future could be adversely affected by changes to our operating structure, changes in the mix of earnings in countries
with differing statutory tax rates, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, changes in tax laws and the
discovery of new information in the course of our tax return preparation process. In particular, the carrying value of deferred
tax assets is dependent on our ability to generate future taxable income. In addition, proposals for tax legislation including
increased tax rates, new tax laws or revised interpretations in the jurisdictions in which we operate, if adopted, could adversely
impact our financial position and results of operations.
We
could be subject to additional tax liabilities.
We
are subject to federal, state, local and sales taxes in the United States. Significant judgment is required in evaluating our
tax positions and our worldwide provision for taxes. During the ordinary course of business, there are many activities and transactions
for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. In addition, our tax obligations and effective tax rates could be adversely
affected by changes in the relevant tax, accounting and other laws, regulations, principles and interpretations, including those
relating to income tax nexus, by our earnings being lower than anticipated in jurisdictions where we have lower statutory rates
and higher than anticipated in jurisdictions where we have higher statutory rates, by changes in foreign currency exchange rates,
or by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities. We may be audited in various jurisdictions, and such
jurisdictions may assess additional taxes, sales taxes and value-added taxes against us. Although we believe our tax estimates
are reasonable, the final determination of any tax audits or litigation could be materially different from our historical tax
provisions and accruals, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results or cash flows in the period or periods
for which a determination is made.
Risks
Related to this Offering and Our Securities
An
investment in our common stock is extremely speculative and there can be no assurance of any return on any such investment.
An
investment in our common stock is extremely speculative and there is no assurance that investors will obtain any return on their
investment. Investors will be subject to substantial risks involved in an investment in our company, including the risk of losing
their entire investment.
The
price of our common stock may be volatile and subject to wide fluctuations.
Even
though we have our common stock quoted on the OTCQB Marketplace and have applied to list our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital
Market, a consistently active trading market for our common stock may not develop. You may not be able to sell your shares quickly
or at the current market price if trading in our stock is not active. You may lose all or a part of your investment. The market
price of our common stock may be highly volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in response to a variety of factors and risks,
many of which are beyond our control. In addition to the risks noted elsewhere in this prospectus, some of the other factors affecting
our stock price may include:
|
●
|
variations
in our operating results;
|
|
●
|
the
level and quality of securities analysts’ coverage of our common stock;
|
|
●
|
announcements
by us or our competitors of significant contracts, acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;
|
|
●
|
announcements
by third-parties of significant claims or proceedings against us; and
|
|
●
|
future
sales of our common stock.
|
For
these reasons, comparing our operating results on a period-to-period basis may not be meaningful, and you should not rely on past
results as an indication of future performance. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a public company’s
securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against the public company. Regardless of its outcome,
this type of litigation could result in substantial costs to us and a likely diversion of our management’s attention. You
may not receive a positive return on your investment when you sell your shares and you may lose the entire amount of your investment.
We
have a significant number of shares of our common stock issuable upon conversion of certain outstanding debt obligations and convertible
preferred stock, and the issuance of such shares upon conversion will have a dilutive impact on our stockholders.
As
of December 31, 2016, there were 687,636 shares of our common stock issuable upon conversion of our Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock. In addition, as of December 31, 2016, we had outstanding stock options and warrants to purchase a total of 3,120,916
shares of our common stock. As of December 31, 2016, we also had convertible notes outstanding, which at that point were convertible
into 962,340 shares of common stock. Upon consummation of a public offering of securities in excess of $10.0 million, which
we expect will be this offering, the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock and certain of the convertible notes outstanding will
automatically convert into common stock, immediately diluting our stockholders investment in us. Upon consummation of a listing
on an exchange owned by the Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC, which we expect will occur in connection with this offering, certain of
the convertible notes outstanding will be convertible, at our option, into shares of our common stock at either the lower of $8.33
per share and 80% of the per share price in our next underwritten public offering or the lower of $10.50 per share
and 80% of the per share price in our next underwritten public offering, as outlined in each individual agreement. We expect that
our next underwritten public offering will be this offering. We also have convertible notes that are convertible at the option
of the holder at the lower of $8.33 per share and 80% of the per share price in our next underwritten public offering or
the lower of $10.50 per share and 80% of the per share price in our next underwritten public offering, as outlined in each
individual agreement. If the offering price in our next underwritten public offering is less than $8.33 per share, convertible
notes will be converted into shares of our common stock at a discount, which could further dilute our existing stockholders’
interests. (For a more complete description concerning the dilution you will incur if you purchase common stock in this offering,
see “Dilution.”)
We
are required to register under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, the resale of shares of our
common stock by a number of our securityholders. Our failure to comply with our contractual obligations and timely register the
resale of any shares of our common stock will result in, among other things, the payment of liquidated damages, including in the
form of issuances of securities, which will have a dilutive effect on our stockholders including purchasers in this offering and
could have a material adverse effect on our ability to raise additional funds through private placements in the future and have
a material adverse effect on our business.
We
have entered into various agreements with purchasers of our securities from time to time which require us to register under the
Securities Act the resale of shares of our common stock that we have issued or will be required to issue to such purchasers. For
a description of registration rights, see “Shares Eligible for Future Sale—Registration Rights.” Our failure
to comply with our contractual obligations and timely register the resale of any shares of our common stock for any reason, including
as a result of any unexpected delay in the completion of this offering, will result in a breach of the agreements with certain
securityholders and in the payment of liquidated damages, including issuances of securities, as required under the terms of our
agreements with certain securityholders. Any issuance of securities to these purchasers will have a dilutive effect on our stockholders,
including purchasers in this offering. In addition, our failure to timely register the resale of any shares of our common stock
will result in reputational harm for our company and could have a material adverse effect on our ability to raise additional funds
through private placements in the future, which may have a material adverse effect on our business.
Shortly
after the completion of this offering, we intend to file a registration statement with the SEC to register the resale of shares
of our common stock in order to comply with our contractual obligations with certain securityholders. Our intention to register
the resale of these shares and the presence of these additional shares trading in the market after the completion of this offering
may have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.
We
have entered into various agreements with purchasers of our securities from time to time which require us to register under the
Securities Act the resale of shares of our common stock that we have issued or will be required to issue to such purchasers. Shortly
after the completion of this offering, we intend to file a registration statement with the SEC to register the resale of shares
of our common stock issued or issuable to certain securityholders. See “Shares Eligible for Future Sale—Registration
Rights.” Our intention to register the resale of these shares and the presence of these additional shares trading in the
market after the completion of this offering may have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.
In
addition, the existence of these registration rights may make it more difficult for us to conduct any future offering of our common
stock or to use our common stock as consideration for acquiring any business or company in the future, or may increase the cost
of acquiring any business or company, as the sellers of the target business may be discouraged from entering into a transaction
with us or will demand a higher price due to the potential adverse effect that the exercise of such registration rights may have
on the trading price of our common stock.
Our
common stock is currently categorized as, and may again in the future constitute, a “penny stock,” which may make
it difficult to sell shares of our common stock.
Our
common stock is currently categorized as a “penny stock,” which is generally defined in Rule 15g-9 under the Exchange
Act as an equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share,
subject to certain exceptions.
Being
a “penny stock,” our common stock is subject to certain SEC rules and requirements. For example, the penny stock rules
require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized
risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the SEC, which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level
of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for
the penny stock. The penny-stock rules severely limit the liquidity of securities in the secondary market, and many brokers choose
not to participate in penny-stock transactions. As a result, there is generally less trading in penny stocks.
On
January 17, 2017, our Board of Directors approved for submission to a vote of our stockholders the grant of authority to the Board
of Directors to amend our Certificate of Incorporation to effect a reverse split of our common stock, which we refer to as the
Reverse Stock Split. At a special meeting of our stockholders on February 9, 2017, our stockholders approved the proposal, granting
our Board of Directors the authority, but not the obligation, to implement the Reverse Stock Split, at any time in a ratio of
not less than 1-for-1.01 and not more than 1-for-4, with the final ratio to be determined at the discretion of our Board of Directors.
On March 6, 2017, the Pricing Committee of our Board of Directors approved a reverse split of our outstanding shares
of common stock at a ratio at 1-for-1.5 (1:1.5), which will be effective immediately prior to the pricing of this offering.
However,
even if we implement the Reverse Stock Split and our common stock is no longer categorized as a “penny stock,” our
common stock may in the future become a “penny stock,” and if this occurs the statutory safe harbor protection will
not be applicable to us in the event of certain legal actions based upon forward-looking statements. The lack of this protection
in a contested proceeding could harm our financial condition and, ultimately, the value of our common stock.
If
you become a holder of our common stock and our common stock becomes or remains a “penny stock”, you may not always
be able to resell shares of our common stock in a public broker’s transaction, if at all, at the times and prices that you
feel are fair or appropriate. In addition, because of our status as a penny stock issuer and our former status as a shell company,
we are an “ineligible issuer” under the Securities Act. This means that we will not be able to use certain streamlined
registration procedures, including those that permit the use of free writing prospectuses and permit incorporation by reference.
If
there are substantial sales of shares of our common stock, the price of our common stock could decline.
The
price of our common stock could decline if there are substantial sales of our common stock, particularly sales by our directors,
executive officers, employees or significant stockholders, or when there is a large number of shares of our common stock available
for sale. As of December 31, 2016, there were 2,103,392 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding. The market price
of the shares of our common stock could decline as a result of the sale of a substantial number of our shares of common stock
in the public market or the perception in the market that the holders of a large number of shares intend to sell their shares.
Our
management has broad discretion to determine how to use the proceeds received from this offering, and may use them in ways that
may not enhance our business, operating results or the price of our common stock.
Our
management will have broad discretion over the use and investment of the net proceeds of this offering (including for the payment
of our existing debt, as described under “Use of Proceeds” below). Investors in this offering will need to rely upon
the judgment of our management with respect to the use of proceeds from this offering with only limited information concerning
management’s specific intentions. It is possible that we may decide in the future not to use the proceeds of this offering
in the manner in which we currently expect. Until the net proceeds are used, they may be placed in investments that do not produce
significant income or that may lose value.
Because
the public offering price of our common stock will be substantially higher than the net tangible book value per share of our outstanding
common stock following this offering, new investors will experience immediate and substantial dilution.
The
public offering price of our common stock is substantially higher than the net tangible book value per share of our common stock
immediately following this offering based on the total value of our tangible assets less our total liabilities. Therefore, if
you purchase shares of our common stock in this offering, you will experience immediate and substantial dilution. (For a more
complete description concerning the dilution you will incur if you purchase common stock in this offering, see “Dilution.”)
If
securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research
reports about our business, our share price and trading volume could decline.
The
trading market for our common stock will, to some extent, depend on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts
publish about us or our business. We do not have any control over these analysts. If one or more of the analysts who cover us
from time to time should downgrade our shares or change their opinion of our business prospects, our share price would likely
decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of our company or fails to regularly publish reports on us, we could
lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause our share price or trading volume to decline.
Stockholders
should not anticipate receiving cash dividends on our common stock.
We
have never declared or paid any cash dividends or distributions on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain future earnings
to support operations and to finance expansion and therefore do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in
the foreseeable future.
Substantial
future sales of shares of our common stock in the public market could cause our stock price to fall.
Shares
of our common stock that we have issued directly or that have been or may be acquired upon exercise of warrants or the conversion
of convertible securities are or may be covered by registration statements which permit the public sale of stock. Other holders
of shares of common stock that we have issued, including shares issuable upon exchange or conversion of our common stock, may
be entitled to dispose of their shares pursuant to (i) the applicable holding period, volume and other restrictions of Rule 144
or (ii) another exemption from registration under the Securities Act. Additional sales of a substantial number of our shares of
our common stock in the public market, or the perception that sales could occur, could have a material adverse effect on the price
of our common stock.
Our
executive officers and directors possess controlling voting power with respect to our common stock, which will limit your influence
on corporate matters.
Our
directors and executive officers collectively beneficially own approximately 50.83% of our voting stock as of February 13, 2017.
As a result, our insiders have the ability to effectively control our management and affairs through the election and removal
of our Board of Directors and all other matters requiring stockholder approval, including any future merger, consolidation or
sale of all or substantially all of our assets. This concentrated control could discourage others from initiating any potential
merger, takeover or other change-of-control transaction that may otherwise be beneficial to our stockholders. Furthermore, this
concentrated control will limit the practical effect of your influence over our business and affairs, through any stockholder
vote or otherwise. Any of these effects could depress the price of our common stock.
Risks
Related to the Reverse Stock Split and the Listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market
The
Reverse Stock Split, which will be effective immediately prior to the pricing of this offering, immediately provides additional authorized shares
for issuance by our Board of Directors, which could be used to frustrate any change in control or takeover transaction.
On
March 6, 2017, the Pricing Committee of our Board of Directors fixed the Reverse Stock Split ratio at 1-for-1.5 (1:1.5),
effective immediately prior to the pricing of this offering. As a result of the Reverse Stock Split, we will immediately have
additional authorized shares of common stock that the Board of Directors could issue in the future without stockholder
approval. Such additional shares could be issued, among other purposes, in financing transactions or to resist or frustrate a
third-party transaction that is favored by a majority of the independent stockholders. This could have an anti-takeover
effect, in that additional shares could be issued, within the limits imposed by applicable law, in one or more transactions
that could make a change in control or takeover of us more difficult.
Even
though the Reverse Stock Split immediately increases the price of our common stock, there can be no assurance that the price of
our common stock will satisfy the applicable minimum bid price requirement of the Nasdaq Capital Market. If we fail to meet the
minimum bid price requirement of the Nasdaq Capital Market, we will not be able to list our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital
Market, in which case this offering will not be completed.
On
March 6, 2017, the Pricing Committee of our Board of Directors fixed the Reverse Stock Split ratio at 1-for-1.5 (1:1.5),
effective immediately prior to the pricing of this offering, in order for the price of our common stock to be above the $4.00
minimum bid price required by the Nasdaq Capital Market. However, it is possible that the market price of our common stock
may fall below the minimum bid price required by the Nasdaq Capital Market in the future. If we are unable to meet the
minimum bid price requirement of the Nasdaq Capital Market, we will be unable to list our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital
Market, in which case this offering will not be completed. In addition to specific listing and maintenance standards, the
Nasdaq Capital Market has broad discretionary authority over the initial and continued listing of securities, which it could
exercise with respect to the listing of our common stock.
Even
if our common stock achieves the minimum bid price requirement of the Nasdaq Capital Market, there can be no assurance that our
Nasdaq listing application will be approved, in which case this offering will not be completed.
Our
common stock is currently quoted on the OTCQB Marketplace under the symbol “CAFN.” Our common stock is currently not
listed on any stock exchange and there is currently a very limited trading market for our common stock on the OTCQB Marketplace.
We have applied to list our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “CAFN,” which listing we expect
to occur upon consummation of this offering. In order for our common stock to be approved for listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market,
we will need to satisfy certain qualitative and quantitative requirements, including having at least $5,000,000 of stockholders’
equity. No assurance can be given that we will be able to satisfy all the applicable listing requirements of the Nasdaq Capital
Market and that our listing application will be approved. If our Nasdaq listing application is approved, our common stock will
then cease to be traded on the OTCQB Marketplace. If our Nasdaq listing application is not approved, this offering will not be
completed.
Even
if our Nasdaq listing application is approved and our common stock is initially listed for trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market,
there can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with the continued listing standards of the Nasdaq Capital Market.
Even
if our Nasdaq initial listing application is approved and our common stock is initially listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market, there
can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with the qualitative and quantitative continued listing requirements of the
Nasdaq Capital Market. For example, the market price of our common stock may not remain at the level required for continuing compliance
with Nasdaq requirement in the future. Further, it is not uncommon for the market price of a company’s common stock to decline
in the period following a reverse stock split. If the Board of Directors effects the Reverse Stock Split, and the market price
of our common stock declines in the period after the Reverse Stock Split, the percentage decline may be greater than would occur
in the absence of the Reverse Stock Split. Our failure to meet these requirements may result in our common stock being delisted
from the Nasdaq Capital Market.
The
Reverse Stock Split could decrease the liquidity of our stock.
The
Reverse Stock Split could adversely affect the liquidity of
our common stock given the reduced number of shares that will be outstanding after the Reverse Stock Split. In addition, the Reverse
Stock Split could increase the number of stockholders who own odd lots (less than 100 shares) of our common stock, creating the
potential for such stockholders to experience an increase in the cost of selling their shares and greater difficulty effecting
such sales.
Even
after the Reverse Stock Split, the trading price of our common stock may not be high enough to attract new investors, including
institutional investors, and may not satisfy the investing requirements of those investors. Consequently, the trading liquidity
of our common stock may not improve.
Even
after the Reverse Stock Split, there can be no assurance that the Reverse Stock Split would result in a share price that
will attract new investors, including institutional investors, or that the share price will satisfy the investing requirements
of those investors. As a result, the trading liquidity of our common stock may not necessarily improve, our share price may decline
and you may lose all or part of your investment.
CAUTIONARY
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Information
contained in this prospectus may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. federal securities laws. Forward-looking
statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. Except for the historical information contained in this
discussion of the business and the discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, the matters discussed
herein are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include but are not limited to our plans for sales growth
and expectations of gross margin, expenses, new product introduction, our liquidity and capital needs, and our plans to list our
common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market. This information may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors
which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements, which involve assumptions and
describe our future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “may,” “will,”
“should,” “potential,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,”
“intend,” “plan” or “project” or the negative of these words or other variations on these
words or comparable terminology.
In
addition to the risks and uncertainties described in “Risk Factors” above and elsewhere in this prospectus, these
risks and uncertainties may include consumer trends, business cycles, scientific developments, changes in governmental policy
and regulation, currency fluctuations, economic trends in the United States and inflation. Forward-looking statements are based
on assumptions that may be incorrect, and there can be no assurance that any projections or other expectations included in any
forward-looking statements will come to pass. Our actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied by the
forward-looking statements as a result of various factors.
This
prospectus also contains market data related to our business and industry. These market data include projections that are based
on a number of assumptions. If these assumptions turn out to be incorrect, actual results may differ from the projections based
on these assumptions. As a result, our markets may not grow at the rates projected by these data, or at all. The failure of these
markets to grow at these projected rates may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial
condition and the market price of our securities.
Except
as required by U.S. securities laws, we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements for any reason,
even if new information becomes available or other events occur in the future.
USE
OF PROCEEDS
We
estimate that the net proceeds from this offering will be approximately $11,581,234, calculated based on gross proceeds of
$13,000,000 received by us, assuming the sale by us of $2,166,667 shares of our common stock, and after deducting the underwriting
discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us of approximately $1,418,766. If the underwriters exercise
their option to purchase additional shares in full, we estimate that our net proceeds will be approximately $13,394,734, after
deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.
We
intend to use the net proceeds received from this offering, after the payment of all expenses incurred in connection with this
offering, to repay the following indebtedness that is currently outstanding:
|
●
|
approximately
$75,000 will be used to repay indebtedness currently outstanding under a convertible term promissory note, due March 22, 2017,
issued by us to Jon D and Linda W Gruber Trust on December 22, 2016 with interest payable at a rate of 8% per annum;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
approximately
$1,440,000 will be used to repay indebtedness currently outstanding under a convertible term promissory note, due March 15,
2017, issued by us to FLMM Ltd. on December 23, 2016 with interest payable at a rate of 8% per annum; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
approximately
$632,500 will be used to repay indebtedness currently outstanding under a convertible term promissory note, due June 12, 2017,
issued by us to FirstFire Global Opportunities Fund, LLC on December 22, 2016 with interest payable at a rate of 5% per annum.
|
The
balance will be used to fund marketing and sales and working capital, and for general corporate purposes.
The
allocation of the net proceeds of this offering set forth above represents our current estimates and intentions based upon our
present plans and assumptions regarding industry and general economic conditions and our future revenues and expenditures. As
of the date of this prospectus, we cannot predict with complete certainty all of the particular uses for the net proceeds to be
received upon the completion of this offering. Our management will have broad discretion in the application of the net proceeds
in the category of other working capital and general corporate purposes. For example, if we identify opportunities that we believe
are in the best interests of our stockholders, we may use a portion of the net proceeds from this offering to acquire, invest
in or license complementary products, technologies or businesses, although we have no current understandings, agreements or commitments
to do so. In addition, the amounts and timing of our actual expenditures will depend upon numerous factors, including the results
of our research and development efforts. Investors will be relying on the judgment of our management regarding application of
the net proceeds of this offering.
Pending
use of the proceeds from this offering as described above, we intend to invest the net proceeds of this offering in short-term,
interest-bearing, investment-grade securities or certificates of deposit.
MARKET
FOR OUR COMMON STOCK
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Market
for Our Common Stock
On
March 3, 2017, the closing bid price for our common stock as reported on the OTC Market’s OTCQB Marketplace was $6.00
per share , as adjusted on a proforma basis for the Reverse Stock Split . There was no trading of our common stock on
the OTCQB Marketplace or any other market, exchange or quotation system before July 2014. Although our common stock is quoted
on the OTCQB Marketplace, there is a limited trading market for our common stock. Because our common stock is thinly traded, any
reported sale prices may not be a true market-based valuation of our common stock. We have applied to list our common stock on
the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “CAFN.” If our listing application is approved, we expect to list our common
stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market upon consummation of this offering and our common stock will cease to be traded on the OTCQB
Marketplace.
The
table below sets forth reported high and low closing bid quotations for our common stock for the fiscal quarters indicated as
reported on the OTCQB Marketplace. The quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission
and may not represent actual transactions. The quotations shown in the table below reflect the 1:15 reverse split of our outstanding
shares of common stock that we implemented on July 27, 2016, as well as the Reverse Stock Split, which will be effective immediately prior to the pricing of this offering .
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31,
2015
|
|
$
|
31.28
|
|
|
$
|
14.63
|
|
Quarter ended June 30, 2015
|
|
$
|
17.99
|
|
|
$
|
8.10
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, 2015
|
|
$
|
22.28
|
|
|
$
|
7.88
|
|
Quarter ended December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
19.35
|
|
|
$
|
7.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
11.93
|
|
|
$
|
7.38
|
|
Quarter ended June 30, 2016
|
|
$
|
16.88
|
|
|
$
|
5.63
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, 2016
|
|
$
|
13.50
|
|
|
$
|
8.63
|
|
Quarter ended December 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
10.50
|
|
|
$
|
8.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2017 (through
March 6 , 2017)
|
|
$
|
6.75
|
|
|
$
|
4.88
|
|
Record
Holders
As
of March 6 , 2017,
we had 2,129,059 shares of common
stock held by approximately 124 holders of record.
Securities
Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The
table below sets forth certain information, as of the close of business on December 31, 2016, regarding equity compensation plans
(including individual compensation arrangements) under which our securities were then authorized for issuance.
|
|
Number
of Securities to be
Issued Upon Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(a)
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(b)
|
|
|
Number
of Securities Remaining
Available for Issuance Under Equity
Compensation Plans (excluding
securities reflected
in column a)
(c)
|
|
Equity
compensation plans approved by securityholders
|
|
|
41,820
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
19.74
|
|
|
|
157,887
|
(2)
|
Equity
compensation plans not approved by securityholders
|
|
|
183,412
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
22.50
|
|
|
|
10,981
|
(4)
|
(1)
|
Represents
5,016 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options under the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan
and 36,804 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options under the 2016 Stock Incentive
Plan.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Represents
58,324 shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2016 Stock Incentive Plan and 99,564 shares of
common stock available for issuance
under the 2014 Associate
Stock Purchase Plan.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Represents
39,108 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options under the 2014 Stock Incentive Plan
and 144,304 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options issued outside the plans.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Represents
10,981 shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2014 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
On
February 12, 2014, our Board of Directors approved the assumption of the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan as part of a reverse triangular
merger that we completed in February 2014. As of December 31, 2016, 5,015 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance
under the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan. However, our Board of Directors agreed that no new grants would be made under the 2010 Equity
Incentive Plan.
2016
Stock Incentive Plan
On
June 2, 2016, our Board of Directors adopted our 2016 Stock Incentive Plan. The plan is administered by the Board of Directors
or an authorized committee. The plan was approved by a majority of our stockholders in June 2016. Our Chief Executive Officer
may, on a discretionary basis and without committee review or approval, grant non-qualified (non-statutory) options for up to
4,445 common shares to new employees of our company who are not officers of our company during each fiscal year. Incentives
under the plan may be granted in one or a combination of the following forms: (a) incentive stock options and non-statutory stock
options; (b) stock appreciation rights (SARs); (c) stock awards; (d) restricted stock; (e) restricted stock units; and (f) performance
shares. Eligible participants include officers and employees of the company, members of the Board of Directors, and consultants
or other independent contractors. As of December 31, 2016, an aggregate of 356,324 shares of common stock were issuable
under the plan (excluding 298,000 shares of our common stock to certain directors, officers and other associates). To the
extent necessary for an award to satisfy the performance-based exception to the deductibility limitations of Code Section 162(m),
the maximum number of shares of common stock that may be granted to a participant as performance awards cannot exceed 17,778 ,
subject to adjustment as provided in the 2016 Stock Incentive Plan, and the maximum amount that may be paid under such performance-based
exception to any one person during any period of three calendar years is $3,000,000. The term of each stock option shall be determined
by the board or committee, but shall not exceed ten years. Vested stock options may be exercised in whole or part by the holder
giving notice to our company. Options under the plan may provide for the holder of the option to make payment of the exercise
price by the surrender of shares equal in value to the exercise price.
On
September 13, 2016, our Board of Directors approved a grant of options to purchase an aggregate amount of 298,000 shares
of our common stock to certain directors, officers and other associates under our 2016 Stock Incentive Plan. This grant is contingent
and effective upon the consummation of this offering and the exercise price will be the public offering price per share in this
offering. The options vest as to one-third on the date on which this offering is consummated and one-third on each of the first
and second anniversary of such date, so long as the individual is employed by us or is serving as a director on such anniversary
dates. As a result, upon the consummation of this offering, options to purchase 341,677 shares of our common stock will
be outstanding under our 2016 Stock Incentive Plan, assuming no options outstanding under our 2016 Stock Incentive Plan as of
December 31, 2016 are exercised prior to the consummation of this offering.
2014
Stock Incentive Plan
On
February 12, 2014, our Board of Directors adopted our 2014 Stock Incentive Plan. The plan is administered by the Board of Directors
or an authorized committee. Our Chief Executive Officer may, on a discretionary basis and without committee review or approval,
grant non-qualified (non-statutory) options for up to 4,445 common shares to new employees of our company who are not officers
of our company during each fiscal year. Incentives under the plan may be granted in one or a combination of the following forms:
(a) non-statutory stock options; (b) SARs; (c) stock awards; (d) restricted stock; (e) restricted stock units; and (f) performance
shares. Eligible participants include officers and employees of the company, members of the Board of Directors, and consultants
or other independent contractors. As of December 31, 2016, an aggregate of 67,628 shares of common stock were issuable
under the plan, including 10,981 shares of common stock available for future grants under the plan. No person is eligible
to receive grants of stock options and SARs under the plan that exceed, in the aggregate, 17,778 shares of common stock
in any one year. The term of each stock option shall be determined by the board or committee, but shall not exceed ten years.
Vested stock options may be exercised in whole or part by the holder giving notice to our company. Options under the plan may
provide for the holder of the option to make payment of the exercise price by the surrender of shares equal in value to the exercise
price.
2014
Associate Stock Purchase Plan
On
September 8, 2014, our Board of Directors adopted our 2014 Associate Stock Purchase Plan and authorized us to issue up to 22,223
shares of our common stock under the plan. On December 29, 2016, our Board of Directors authorized an additional 100,000
shares of common stock under the plan. The plan is designed to be a stock purchase plan qualifying under Code Section 423.
The Board of Directors elected to cause the plan to be effective as of September 1, 2014, and was approved by our stockholders
in August 2015 in order to fully comply with the requirements of Code Section 423.
The
2014 Associate Stock Purchase Plan permits eligible employees to purchase shares of our common stock at the end of pre-established
offering periods at a maximum 15% discount from the common stock’s fair market value on the date of purchase or the offering
date, whichever is lower. Purchases will be funded through employee payroll deductions (or, if payroll deductions are not permitted
by local law, by other permitted methods). Eligible employees include any person, including an officer, employed by our company
or a subsidiary and whose customary employment is at least 20 hours per week. The plan is administered by our Board of Directors
or by a committee of our Board of Directors designated for such purpose.
Rule
144
In
general, pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act, any person (or persons whose shares are aggregated) including persons
deemed to be affiliates, whose restricted securities have been fully paid for and held for at least six months from the later
of the date of issuance by a public reporting issuer or acquisition from an affiliate of that issuer, may sell such securities
in broker’s transactions or directly to market makers, provided that the number of shares sold in any three-month period
may not exceed the greater of one percent of the then-outstanding shares of common stock or the average weekly trading volume
of shares of common stock in the over-the-counter market during the four calendar weeks preceding the sale. Sales under Rule 144
are also subject to certain notice requirements and the availability of current public information about the public reporting
issuer. After one year has elapsed from the later of the issuance of restricted securities by the public reporting issuer or their
acquisition from an affiliate of that issuer, persons who are not affiliates under the rule may sell such securities without any
limitation.
Pursuant
to Rule 144(i), securities issued by a current or former shell company that otherwise meets the holding period and other requirements
of Rule 144 nevertheless cannot be sold in reliance on Rule 144 until one year after the date on which the issuer filed current
“Form 10 information” (as defined in Rule 144(i)) with the SEC reflecting that it ceased being a shell company, and
provided that at the time of a proposed sale pursuant to Rule 144 the issuer has satisfied certain reporting requirements under
the Exchange Act. On March 31, 2014, we filed with the SEC an annual report on Form 10-K reflecting that we ceased to be a shell
company, which means that the one-year period has elapsed and the restrictions set forth in Rule 144(i) no longer apply to us,
except that at the time of a proposed sale pursuant to Rule 144 we must have satisfied certain reporting requirements under the
Exchange Act.
DIVIDEND
POLICY
We
have never paid any cash dividends on our common stock and we do not intend to declare or pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable
future. Any future determination to pay dividends on our common stock will be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors,
subject to applicable laws, and will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, general business
conditions, and other factors that our Board of Directors considers relevant.
CAPITALIZATION
The
following table sets forth our capitalization as of December 31, 2016:
|
●
|
on
an actual basis;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
on
a pro forma basis giving effect to (i) the issuance of convertible notes in an aggregate principal amount of $3,210,526 and
warrants to purchase 378,695 shares of our common stock in exchange for an aggregate purchase price of $3,050,000
paid in cash (ii) the refinancing of certain notes payable, due in 2018 , to Mr. Davis and Mr. Hanson in the amount
of $2,869,978, including accrued but unpaid interest thereon, (iii) the repayment of notes payable, due October 2016, with
interest between 8.25% and 12%, including accrued but unpaid interest thereon , and (iv) the Reverse Stock Split, which
will be effective immediately prior to the pricing of this offering ; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
on
a pro forma basis, as adjusted for: (i) the sale by us of $13.0 million in shares of our common stock in this offering at
an assumed offering price of $6.00 , and the receipt by us of the net offering proceeds of approximately $11.6
million, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses, (ii) the application of the
proceeds of this offering as described in “Use of Proceeds,” (iii) the conversion of all the issued and outstanding
shares of our Series C Convertible Preferred Stock into 687,636 shares of our common stock upon consummation of this
offering, (iv) the conversion of indebtedness into an aggregate of $10.08 million in shares of our common stock, (v)
the issuance to Michael J. Hanson of warrants to purchase 90,526 shares of our common stock, and (vi) the termination
of price-protection features arising from certain anti-dilution adjustment provisions in certain warrants and the related
reclassification of mark-to-market charges into stockholders’ equity. (See “Use of Proceeds”)
|
The
table below should be read together with “Selected Financial Data,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto appearing
elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
As
of December 31, 2016
(unaudited)
|
|
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Pro
Forma
|
|
|
Pro
Forma As
Adjusted
(1)
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
2,977
|
|
|
$
|
12,408
|
|
Current
Portion of Long-Term Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of capital lease
obligations
|
|
$
|
379
|
|
|
$
|
379
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
(4)
|
|
|
4,229
|
|
|
|
2,503
|
|
|
|
642
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
Current portion
of warrant and conversion feature liability
(4)
|
|
|
2,870
|
|
|
|
3,832
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
current portion of long-term obligations
|
|
$
|
8,153
|
|
|
$
|
6,946
|
|
|
|
1,249
|
|
Long-Term
Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease, net of current maturities
|
|
$
|
238
|
|
|
$
|
238
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current maturities
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
3,186
|
|
|
|
3,186
|
|
Warrant and conversion
feature liability
(2)(4)
|
|
|
7,352
|
|
|
|
9,079
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
Total
long-term obligations
|
|
$
|
7,906
|
|
|
$
|
12,503
|
|
|
|
3,758
|
|
Shareholders’
Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series C Convertible Preferred shares,
$0.0001 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized, 43,530 shares issued and outstanding on an actual and pro forma basis; no
shares issued and outstanding on a pro forma, as adjusted basis
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Common shares, $0.0001 par value; 500,000,000
shares authorized, 2,103,392 issued and outstanding, actual; issued
and outstanding on a pro forma basis; issued and outstanding on a pro
forma, as adjusted basis
(3)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Additional-paid-in-capital
|
|
|
69,119
|
|
|
|
69,183
|
|
|
|
105,369
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(84,451
|
)
|
|
|
(84,936
|
)
|
|
|
(97,251
|
)
|
Total
shareholders’ equity (deficit)
|
|
$
|
(15,332
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,753
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,119
|
|
Total
capitalization
|
|
$
|
734
|
|
|
$
|
6,673
|
|
|
$
|
25,534
|
|
(1)
|
A
$1.00 increase in the assumed public offering price of $6.00 per share would decrease the as adjusted number
of shares of common stock issued and outstanding by approximately (309,524) and a $1.00 decrease in the assumed public
offering price of $6.00 per common share would increase the adjusted number of shares issued and outstanding
by approximately 433,333 . A 100,000 share increase (decrease) in the number of shares offered by us at the assumed
public offering price of $6.00 per common share would increase (decrease) the as adjusted amount of each of cash and
cash equivalents, additional paid-in-capital, total shareholders’ equity and total capitalization by approximately $534,518 ,
after deducting estimated underwriters’ fees and estimated offering expenses payable by us. The as adjusted information
discussed above is illustrative only and will adjust based on the actual public offering price and other terms of this offering
determined at pricing.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Warrant
and conversion feature liability on an actual basis represents (i) the aggregate amount of fair value adjustments made with
respect to warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,936,799 shares of our common stock that as of December 31, 2016 include
price-protection features arising from certain anti-dilution adjustment provisions included in the warrants, which warrants
are carried at fair value as of December 31, 2016 and (ii) the aggregate amount of fair value adjustments made with respect
to the conversion feature in the convertible notes, due June, 2017 through January, 2018, in an aggregate principal amount
of $10,078,947 , issued to various investors between June, 2016 and January, 2017. Warrant and conversion feature
liability on a pro forma, as adjusted basis, gives effect to (i) the termination of such price protection features in warrants
to purchase an aggregate of 858,492 shares of our common stock and (ii) the conversion of the convertible notes,
due June, 2017 through January, 2018, in an aggregate principal amount of $10,078,947 , issued to various investors
between June, 2016 and January, 2017.
|
|
|
(3)
|
The
number of shares of our common stock to be outstanding both before and after this offering is based on the number of shares
outstanding as of December 31, 2016 , as adjusted for the Reverse Stock Split, and excludes:
|
|
●
|
225,231
shares of our common
stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options as of December 31, 2016;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
298,000
shares of our common
stock issuable upon exercise of stock options approved for grant by our Board of Directors on September 13, 2016 to certain
directors, officers and other associates under our 2016 Stock Incentive Plan, which grant is contingent and effective upon
the consummation of this offering;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
58,324
shares of our common
stock available for future grants under our 2016 Stock Incentive Plan as of December 31, 2016;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
10,981
shares of our common
stock available for future grants under our 2014 Stock Incentive Plan as of December 31, 2016;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
2,895,686
shares of our common stock reserved for issuance under outstanding
warrants as of December 31, 2016, with a weighted average exercise price of $11.60 per share;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
687,636
shares of our common
stock issuable upon conversion of our Series C Convertible Preferred Stock as of December 31, 2016, which will occur upon
the consummation of this offering; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
2,099,794
shares of our common stock issuable upon conversion of certain
convertible notes (calculated based on the assumed public price of $6.00 per share), which will occur upon the
consummation of this offering.
|
(4)
|
The
fair values of convertible notes issued in January 2017 were recorded in this table pursuant to an allocation process and
estimated based on a third-party valuation report received for a similar instrument.
|
DILUTION
If
you invest in our common stock, your investment will be diluted immediately to the extent of the difference between the public
offering price per share of common stock you pay in this offering, and the pro forma, as adjusted net tangible book value per
share of common stock immediately after this offering.
Net
tangible book value represents the amount of our total tangible assets reduced by our total liabilities. Tangible assets equal
our total assets less goodwill and intangible assets. Pro forma, as adjusted net tangible book value per share set forth in the
table below represents our net tangible book value as of December 31, 2016 divided by the number of shares of common stock outstanding,
after giving effect to (i) the conversion of our issued and outstanding Series C Convertible Preferred Stock into 687,636
shares of our common stock, (ii) the conversion of convertible notes in the aggregate principal amount of 2,099,794
shares of our common stock issued to various investors between June 2016 and January 2017, (iii) the conversion of the principal
amount of $678,947 of indebtedness outstanding under our line of credit with Michael J. Hanson at a conversion price per
share equal to the assumed public offering price of $6.00 , into an aggregate of shares of our common stock and
in consideration for such conversion the issuance to Mr. Hanson of warrants to purchase 90,526 shares of our common stock
at an exercise price equal to the public offering price in this offering, (iv) the sale by us of shares of our common stock in
this offering at an assumed offering price of $6.00 per share and (v) the use of net proceeds of approximately
$11,581,234 from this offering, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses, as contemplated
herein.
Our
actual net tangible book value (deficit) as of December 31, 2016 was approximately $(15,611,492) , or $7.43
per share.
|
|
Pro
Forma,
As Adjusted
as of
December 31, 2016
|
|
Assumed public offering price per share
|
|
$
|
|
|
Net tangible book value per share as of December 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
( 7.43
|
)
|
Increase in net tangible book value
attributable to net proceeds received from this offering
|
|
$
|
8.49
|
|
Pro forma, as adjusted net tangible book value per share as of
December 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
Pro forma, as adjusted net tangible book value per share as of
December 31, 2016, assuming full exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option
|
|
$
|
1.01
|
|
Dilution in net tangible book value
per share to new investors
|
|
$
|
4.94
|
|
Dilution in net tangible book value
per share to new investors, assuming full exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option
|
|
$
|
4.99
|
|
Unless
otherwise indicated, the foregoing illustration does not reflect potential dilution as of December 31, 2016 from the exercise
of outstanding stock options or warrants to purchase an aggregate of 3,120,916 shares of our common stock.
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
The
selected financial data included in this section is extracted from the previously filed financial statements included in this
prospectus as adjusted to reflect the Reverse Stock Split , which will be effective immediately prior to the pricing
of this offering . We have prepared the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements on the same basis as the audited
consolidated financial statements and have included, in our opinion, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments
that we consider necessary for a fair statement of financial statements set forth in those statements. Our historical results
are not indicative of the results to be expected in the future and our interim results are not necessarily indicative of results
to be expected for the full year ended December 31, 2016, or any other period. The following financial data should be read in
conjunction with, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to, “Use of Proceeds,” “Capitalization,”
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our financial statements
and the related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. Selected audited financial information for fiscal 2016 and 2015 is
as follows:
|
|
Year
Ended
December 31,
|
|
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
7,975
|
|
|
$
|
4,301
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
5,396
|
|
|
|
4,119
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,579
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
4,049
|
|
|
|
3,440
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
1,901
|
|
|
|
2,643
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
4,074
|
|
|
|
3,909
|
|
Total operating
expenses
|
|
|
10,024
|
|
|
|
9,992
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(7,445
|
)
|
|
|
(9,810
|
)
|
Interest expense and other non-cash
financing expense
|
|
|
11,548
|
|
|
|
2,446
|
|
Mark-to-market warrant and debt
(income) expense
|
|
|
(5,244
|
)
|
|
|
2,319
|
|
Share price/conversion adjustment
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,705
|
|
Other (income)
expense
|
|
|
1,418
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(15,167
|
)
|
|
|
(18,252
|
)
|
Less: cumulative
unpaid preferred dividends
|
|
|
(480
|
)
|
|
|
(260
|
)
|
Net loss attributable
to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(15,647
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18,512
|
)
|
Weighted average common
shares outstanding—basic and fully diluted
(1)
|
|
|
1,863,087
|
|
|
|
1,181,157
|
|
Net loss per common share—basic
and fully diluted(1)
|
|
$
|
(8.40
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15.67
|
)
|
(1)
|
Weighted
average common shares outstanding for the year s ended December 31, 2015 and 2016 are adjusted from the previously
filed consolidated financial statements to reflect the impact of the Reverse Stock Split , as described in this prospectus.
|
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You
should read the following discussion in conjunction with the information contained in other sections of this prospectus, particularly
under the headings “Risk Factors” and “Business.” This discussion and analysis is based on the beliefs
of our management, as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, our management. The statements in this
discussion and analysis concerning expectations regarding our future performance, liquidity and capital resources, as well as
other non-historical statements in this discussion and analysis, are forward-looking statements. (See “Cautionary Note Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements.”) These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including
those described under “Risk Factors.” Our actual results could differ materially from those suggested or implied by
any forward-looking statements.
Overview
We
are a leading provider of software-as-a-service, or SaaS, financial technology, or fintech, solutions to the financial services
industry. We provide traditional financial institutions and alternative financial service, or AFS, providers with innovative mobile
and other solutions to enable them to offer a suite of leading-edge mobile financial services to their customers through the Internet,
or cloud-based, access. As a SaaS provider, we develop, host and maintain software solutions that we license to our clients. We
serve three primary markets in the United States: banks, credit unions and AFS providers, which includes providers of non-traditional
banking services such as reloadable prepaid cards and check cashing services. In the future, we intend to expand outside of the
United States, including Latin America and Europe, as opportunities present themselves.
We
have been expanding our suite of available fintech solutions. One of our recent solutions, Select Mobile Money, is an award-winning
prepaid mobile money platform that seamlessly links various mobile banking features with a prepaid debit card issued by financial
institutions or AFS providers. Our Select Mobile Money solutions comprise two distinct mobile banking technology solutions: first,
a white label mobile money platform for larger financial institutions and AFS providers that already have a reloadable prepaid
card program and wish to enhance it by integrating a feature rich app; and second, an end-to-end reloadable prepaid card program,
which we call Select Mobile Money-Express, or SMM-X, offered to all banks, credit unions and AFS providers of all sizes that would
like to deploy a complete reloadable prepaid card program, comprising a prepaid debit card, an integrated mobile app and program
management.
Our
business has historically focused on offering a full suite of consumer and business remote deposit check capture, or RDC, products
that enable financial institutions to provide their customers with the ability to conveniently deposit their checks remotely anytime,
anywhere. While we continue to offer these solutions, we recently expanded our focus to include prepaid mobile money solutions.
Our latest innovations are a mobile remote payment capture solution, which we call Select Mobile NowPay, which enables enterprises
to accept check payments submitted via their customers’ mobile devices, and our mobile account opening solution, which we
call Select Mobile Account Opening, which streamlines the account opening process by utilizing photo imaging to capture customer
data and auto-populate an account opening application form for checking, savings, credit card and other types of accounts.
Revenues
Our
Revenue Sources
As
of December 31 , 2016, we have sold primarily RDC solutions, which have been the primary source of our revenue, and the
balance of our revenues were from sales of our Select Mobile Money and Select Mobile Account Opening solutions.
As
of December 31, 2016, we had entered into contracts for the sale of approximately 881 products (including product enhancements),
of which approximately 600 were “active” as of December 31, 2016, meaning that the product or enhancement has been
deployed or implemented by our client for use by its customers or that we have completed our implementation and/or customization
work for the product or enhancement and have delivered it to our client for deployment. Of the approximately 881 products sold
as of December 31, 2016, approximately 819 related to RDC products, 47 related to our white label Select Mobile Money solution,
nine related to our SMM-X solution, five related to Select Mobile Account Opening and one related to Select Mobile NowPay. Of
the approximately 600 products sold which were active as of December 31, 2016, approximately 575 related to RDC products, 22 related
to our white label Select Mobile Money solutions, two related to our SMM-X solution and one related to Select Mobile Account Opening.
Our Select Mobile NowPay solution was not yet active as of December 31, 2016.
Our
Revenue Components
Our
revenues are comprised of non-recurring revenue and recurring revenue.
Non-recurring
revenue consists of up-front implementation fees and fees from professional services. Up-front implementation fees are due upon
entering into a new contract for the initial setup of our solution. Fees from professional services may include fees charged for
any client customization services, development of interfaces requested by our clients, assistance with integration of our solutions
with our clients’ applications, dedicated client support services, advisory services to clients who choose to develop their
own interfaces and applications, and additional marketing support services requested by our clients. For our RDC solutions, we
also include in this category revenues from the sale of scanning and related equipment.
We
earn recurring revenue on a monthly basis from our clients’ customer transactions, monthly user fees charged per customer,
and/or hosting/maintenance fees charged to our clients. Recurring revenue arises only after the client has implemented one of
our solutions, whether prepaid mobile money, RDC, or mobile account opening. Recurring revenue varies depending on the specific
solution deployed, the fee arrangement negotiated with the client, the number of client customers that use the application, the
type of user transaction and the volume of user transactions.
Recurring
revenue from our white label solution and our prepaid mobile money solution varies by client and typically includes a monthly
hosting fee and a monthly active user fee charged based on the number of customers that open the application. Although we do not
currently charge user transaction fees for this solution, in the future we may introduce new features into this solution which
may have a transaction fee revenue component. (For a description the potential recurring revenue components of our SMM-X prepaid
mobile money solution, see “Our Business—Our Solutions—Prepaid Mobile Money Solutions: Select Mobile Money—Our
Select Mobile Money Express Platform (SMM-X).”)
Recurring
revenue from our RDC solutions varies by client and typically includes a monthly hosting/maintenance fee, a monthly user fee we
charge our client for each customer that has signed up for this service, and transaction fees which vary based on the type of
service and the number of checks deposited using this service.
Recurring
revenue from our Select Mobile NowPay solutions is expected to include a monthly hosting fee and transaction fees based on the
number of payments received using this service. Recurring revenue from our Select Mobile Account Opening solutions is expected
to include a monthly hosting fee and transaction fees based on the number of new accounts applications made using this service.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Set
forth below is a summary of the critical accounting policies applied in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Basis
of Presentation
Our
consolidated financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of our wholly owned subsidiary, Cachet Financial Solutions
Inc. Our wholly-owned subsidiary is the only entity with operational activity, and therefore no intercompany transactions exist
with the parent entity which would need to be eliminated. We have prepared our consolidated financial statements in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Our
consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis that we will continue as a going concern. (See Note 1 of our
consolidated financial statements.)
Revenue
Recognition
As
mentioned above, we generate revenue from the following sources:
|
●
|
up-front
implementation fee;
|
|
●
|
professional
service fees; and
|
|
●
|
recurring
revenue, comprising of monthly hosting/maintenance fee, monthly user fees and transaction fees.
|
We
commence revenue recognition for fees earned on our SaaS fintech solutions and services when all of the following criteria are
met:
|
●
|
there
is persuasive evidence of an arrangement;
|
|
●
|
the
service has been or is being provided to the client;
|
|
●
|
collection
of the fees is reasonably assured; and
|
|
●
|
the
amount of fees to be paid by the client is fixed or determinable.
|
Up-Front
Implementation Fees
The
up-front implementation fees are recognized over the term of the contract or expected life of the contract where no contractual
term exists. Generally, client agreements are entered into for 12 to 36 months. A majority of the implementation service component
of the arrangement with clients is performed within 120 days of entering into a contract with the customer.
Professional
Services Fee
Fees
from professional services may include fees charged for any client customization services, development of interfaces requested
by our clients, assistance with integration of our solutions with our client’s applications, dedicated client support services,
advisory services to clients who choose to develop their own interfaces and applications, and additional marketing support services
requested by our clients. Professional services are typically performed within three to six months of entering into an arrangement
with the customer. Professional services are typically sold on a fixed-fee basis, but are also offered on a time-and-material
basis. Revenue for time-and-material arrangements is recognized as the services are performed. Revenue for professional services
is recognized under a percent of completion method matching the revenue with the costs of the computer programmer’s time.
We use internal milestones to estimate the costs and related percent of completion. Professional services are not considered essential
to the functionality of our SaaS solutions. For our RDC solutions, we also include in this category revenues from the sale of
scanning and related equipment.
In
determining whether professional services can be accounted for separately from other services, we consider the availability of
the professional services from other vendors, the nature of our professional services and whether we sells our solutions to new
clients without professional services.
Recurring
Revenue
Recurring
revenue is billed on a monthly basis, and includes hosting/maintenance fees charged to our clients, user fees charged per customer,
and transaction fees based on our client’s customer transactions. Recurring revenue arises only after the client has implemented
one of our solutions, whether RDC, Select Mobile Money, Select Mobile NowPay or Select Mobile Account Opening. Recurring revenue
varies depending on the specific solution deployed, the fee arrangement negotiated with the client, the number of client customers
that use the application (and, in the case of our prepaid mobile money application, the type of service used), and the volume
of monthly user transactions.
Recurring
revenue is recognized monthly based on the terms of the specific client agreement, commencing on the date the service is provisioned
to the client, provided the four revenue recognition criteria have been satisfied. Hosting/maintenance fees and user fees are
recognized on a monthly basis as earned under the terms of the client agreement provided the four revenue recognition criteria
have been satisfied. Transaction volume fees are recognized as transactions are processed provided the four revenue recognition
criteria have been satisfied.
Multiple
Element Arrangement
We
enter into multiple element arrangements in which a client may purchase a solution and professional services. For arrangements
with multiple deliverables, we evaluate whether the individual deliverables qualify as separate units of accounting. In order
to treat deliverables in a multiple element arrangement as separate units of accounting, the deliverables must have standalone
value upon delivery. If the deliverables have standalone value upon delivery, we account for each deliverable separately and revenue
is recognized for the respective deliverables as they are delivered. If one or more of the deliverables does not have standalone
value upon delivery, the deliverables that do not have standalone value are combined with the final deliverable within the arrangement
and treated as a single unit of accounting.
We
determine the selling price for each element based on the selling price hierarchy of: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence of
fair value, or VSOE, (ii) third-party evidence, or TPE, and (iii) estimated selling price, or ESP. We are unable to establish
VSOE for any of our services, as we have not historically priced our solutions or services with sufficient consistency. We are
unable to establish TPE, as we do not have sufficient information regarding pricing of third-party solutions and professional
services similar to our offerings. As a result, we have developed estimates of selling prices based on margins established by
our senior management as the targets in our selling and pricing strategies after considering the nature of the services, the economic
and competitive environment, and the nature and magnitude of the costs incurred. The amount of arrangement fee allocated to a
single unit of accounting is limited by any contingent revenue, if applicable.
Deferred
Revenue
Deferred
revenue consists of billings and payments received in advance of revenue recognition from any of the solutions and services we
offer as described above and is recognized as the revenue recognition criteria are met. We typically invoice our clients on a
monthly basis and, in certain limited cases, on an annual basis. Accordingly, the deferred revenue balance does not represent
the total contract value of our multi-year client agreements. Deferred revenue also includes certain deferred professional services
fees, which are recognized in accordance with our revenue recognition policy. The portion of deferred revenue we expect to recognize
during the succeeding 12-month period is recorded as current deferred revenue, and the remaining portion is recorded as non-current.
Cost
of Revenue
Cost
of revenue primarily consists of costs related to developing, implementing, hosting and supporting our cloud-based solutions and
services, including our RDC solutions and our prepaid mobile money solutions, providing client support, data communications expense,
salaries and benefits and non-cash stock compensation expense of operations and support personnel, software development fees,
software license fees, amortization expense associated with acquired developed technology assets, and property and equipment depreciation
of fixed assets used in the generation of revenue. Cost of revenue also includes the cost of professional services we procure
externally, including for the services we procure from our external programming consultants in Toronto, Canada. These external
programming consultants are dedicated primarily to our prepaid mobile money solutions and other select development projects. We
do not track or allocate cost of revenues to the different solutions or services we sell or to our specific revenue sources, except
for the cost of professional services we incur externally including for the services we procure from our external programming
consultants in Toronto, Canada.
Goodwill
Goodwill
represents the excess purchase price over the fair value of the portion of identifiable assets acquired in a previous acquisition.
Goodwill is not amortized but is reviewed at least annually for impairment, or between annual dates if a change in circumstances
indicates that an impairment could exist. Our management performs its annual impairment test at the close of each fiscal year,
and considers several factors in evaluating goodwill for impairment, including our current financial position and results, general
economic and industry conditions and legal and regulatory conditions. No impairment of goodwill was identified for the years ended
December 31, 2016. See Note 9 to our audited consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets, Including License Agreements
We
review our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount
of an asset to future undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired,
the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of
the assets. In December 2016, we determined that an impairment of approximately $87,000 had occurred on our finite-lived
intangible assets related to certain customer contracts acquired in the acquisition of the Select Mobile Money business on March
4, 2014. In determining any impairment losses, we review all circumstances, including the undiscounted cash flows expected to
be derived from those contracts going forward.
Results
of Operations: Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015
Revenues
The
following table details the composition of our revenues for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:
|
|
Year
Ended
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
%
Total
Revenue
|
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
|
%
Total
Revenue
|
|
|
$
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
%
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
Recurring revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RDC
solutions
|
|
$
|
4,725
|
|
|
|
59.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,800
|
|
|
|
65.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,925
|
|
|
|
68.8
|
%
|
Select
Mobile Money solutions
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
44.9
|
%
|
Select
Mobile Account opening
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Total recurring revenue
|
|
|
5,269
|
|
|
|
66.1
|
%
|
|
|
3,139
|
|
|
|
73.0
|
%
|
|
|
2,130
|
|
|
|
67.9
|
%
|
Professional services
|
|
|
2,172
|
|
|
|
27.2
|
%
|
|
|
574
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
%
|
|
|
1,598
|
|
|
|
278.4
|
%
|
Up-front
implementation fees
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
|
588
|
|
|
|
13.7
|
%
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(9.2
|
)%
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
7,975
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,301
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,674
|
|
|
|
85.4
|
%
|
The
increase in revenue was primarily due to an increase in recurring revenue from our RDC solutions, which resulted from an increase
in the number of our RDC products (including product enhancements) that were deployed by our clients for use by their customers
from 133 during the year ended December 31, 2015 to 187 during the year ended December 31, 2016, an increase of approximately
41%. The increase in recurring revenue from our RDC solutions was also partially related to an increase in RDC transactions processed,
which increased by approximately 68% during the year ended December 31, 2016 from the same period of the prior year. The
increases in recurring revenue from our Select Mobile Money and Select Mobile Account Opening solutions during the year ended
December 31, 2016 are primarily a result of increased deployments of these solutions. We deployed 12 of our Select Mobile Money
solutions and two SMM-X solutions during the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared with eight Select Mobile Money solutions
during the year ended December 31, 2015. SMM-X was first deployed in the fourth quarter of 2016.
The
increase in revenue from professional services is primarily attributable to our new customers requesting more customization. The
decrease in up-front implementation fees is primarily due to the completion of the amortization into revenue of historical implementation
fees received in respect of products sold in prior periods, partially offset by the amortization into revenue of implementation
fees sold in the current period.
Cost
of Revenue
The
following table details the composition of our cost of revenue for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:
|
|
Year
Ended
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
%
Total
Revenue
|
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
|
%
Total
Revenue
|
|
|
$
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
%
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
Data center support costs
|
|
$
|
2,802
|
|
|
|
35.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,483
|
|
|
|
57.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
319
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
|
805
|
|
|
|
18.7
|
%
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
|
|
(30.9
|
)%
|
Third-party licensing costs
|
|
|
1,351
|
|
|
|
16.9
|
%
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
|
|
865
|
|
|
|
178.0
|
%
|
Cost of professional
services
|
|
|
552
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
90.3
|
%
|
Sub-total
|
|
|
5,261
|
|
|
|
66.0
|
%
|
|
|
4,064
|
|
|
|
94.5
|
%
|
|
|
1,197
|
|
|
|
29.5
|
%
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
145.5
|
%
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
5,396
|
|
|
|
67.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,119
|
|
|
|
95.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,277
|
|
|
|
31.0
|
%
|
Cost
of revenue during the year ended December 31, 2016 consisted primarily of our costs of deploying and supporting our RDC solutions,
and to a more limited extent the cost of deploying and supporting our white label Select Mobile Money solutions.
Data
center support costs primarily include labor costs for employees and non-employee consultants in our account and project management,
technology infrastructure and technology integration departments, excluding stock-based compensation. Data center support costs
also include equipment and software expenses associated with revenue producing activities. As our revenues increase, we are experiencing
economies of scale related to our data center support costs. The decrease in amortization expense was due to an impairment identified
during the year ended December 31, 2015 related to assets acquired in a previous acquisition, on which we also recognized additional
impairment charges in 2016. The increase in our third-party licensing costs was a direct result of processing more transactions
within our RDC and Select Mobile Money solutions during the year ended December 31, 2016. The cost of professional services is
primarily for the cost of services we procure from our external programming consultants in Toronto, Canada, who are dedicated
primarily to our prepaid mobile money solutions and other select development projects. We utilized these consultants more often
during the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015.
As
a result of our investment in fixed costs to support current and expected future operations, and the relatively early stage of
recurring revenue generation across all product lines, the reported gross profit may not be representative of our operating model
as the volume of transactions increases in the future. The variable component of our cost of revenue is expected to increase as
transaction volume increases. We also expect to continue to gain leverage on the fixed portion of our cost of operations as more
clients are brought online and generating revenue.
Sales
and Marketing
Total
sales and marketing expenses increased approximately 18%, or $609,000, to $4.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, from
$3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. Non-cash stock compensation expense included in sales and marketing expenses
was approximately $163,000 and $91,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Excluding non-cash stock
compensation expense, total sales and marketing expenses increased approximately $537,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016
as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015.
The
overall increase in sales and marketing expenses (excluding non-cash compensation expense) was primarily due to hiring pursuant
to our efforts to build a robust national sales force, including placement fees incurred from recruiters. We currently anticipate
our sales and marketing expenses will continue to increase in 2017 as we plan to hire additional sales personnel in an effort
to increase our sales for all of our solutions and services. We may also experience increased sales and marketing expenses as
a result of higher levels of commission expense resulting from increased sales.
Research
and Development
The
following table details the composition of our research and development expenses for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:
|
|
Year
Ended
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
%
Total
Revenue
|
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
|
%Total
Revenue
|
|
|
$
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
%
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
Employees and contractors
|
|
$
|
1,603
|
|
|
|
20.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,976
|
|
|
|
45.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
(373
|
)
|
|
|
(18.9
|
)%
|
Recruiting expenses
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
(237
|
)
|
|
|
(94.0
|
)%
|
Travel, facilities,
software and other
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
(43.5
|
)%
|
Sub-total
|
|
|
1,793
|
|
|
|
22.5
|
%
|
|
|
2,538
|
|
|
|
59.0
|
%
|
|
|
(745
|
)
|
|
|
(29.4
|
)%
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
Research and
development
|
|
$
|
1,901
|
|
|
|
23.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,643
|
|
|
|
61.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
(742
|
)
|
|
|
(28.1
|
)%
|
The
decrease in research and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily due to both a decrease in the
number of our associates involved in research and development following the completion of development and release of our Select
Business Merchant Capture platform, an RDC solution designed specifically for businesses, and a switch from external programming
consultants to employee software developers. We believe our research and development expenses will continue to decrease in 2017
as compared to 2016 because we have completed most of our research and development work on our prepaid mobile money solutions,
and we anticipate that our other projects under development, Select Mobile Account Opening and Select Mobile NowPay, will require
less research and development over time.
General
and Administrative
The
following table details the composition of our general and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:
|
|
Year
Ended
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
%
Total
Revenue
|
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
|
%
Total
Revenue
|
|
|
$
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
%
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
Employees and contractors
|
|
$
|
2,649
|
|
|
|
33.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,593
|
|
|
|
60.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
Recruiting expenses
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
370.3
|
%
|
Travel, facilities,
software and other
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,087
|
|
|
|
25.3
|
%
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(4.9
|
)%
|
Sub-total
|
|
|
3,857
|
|
|
|
48.4
|
%
|
|
|
3,717
|
|
|
|
86.4
|
%
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
|
$
|
4,074
|
|
|
|
51.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,909
|
|
|
|
90.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
The
increase in expenses related to employees and contractors, including recruiting expenses, for the year ended December 31, 2016
as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 was due to increased hiring of employees and contract labor within the finance
department and other administrative positions, including our Chief Financial Officer, who was hired in March 2016 and our Manager
of SEC Financial Reporting, who was hired in July 2016. We believe that the level of our general and administrative costs will
be comparable in 2017 with those incurred in 2016.
Interest
Expense and Non-Cash Financing Charges
Interest
expense and other non-cash financing expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $11.5 million compared to $2.4 million for
the year ended December 31, 2015, an increase of $9.1 million. These expenses, for the year ended December 31, 2016, include approximately
$917,000 of cash interest expense related to the outstanding debt and capital lease obligations, $1.5 million of amortization
of deferred financing fees and original issue discount, and $9.1 million primarily related to issuing additional warrants for
short term debt and convertible note obligations. The expenses for the year ended December 31, 2015 included approximately $525,000
of cash interest expense, approximately $210,000 of amortization of deferred financing fees and $1.7 million of expenses related
to the issuance of warrants as part of a private investment in public equity offering and inducements for warrant holders to exercise
their warrants.
Share
Price Conversion Adjustment
There
was no share price conversion adjustment related to convertible securities during the year ended December 31, 2016. However, there
was a share price conversion adjustment of $3.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 arising from the adjustment of adjusting
conversion prices on our series A, B and C Preferred Stock.
Mark-to-Market
Warrant and Debt (Income) Expense
Mark-to-market
warrant and debt (income) expense was $5.2 million of income for the year ended December 31, 2016 and $2.3 million of expense
for the year ended December 31, 2015. The liability associated with the outstanding warrants and convertible notes issued was
adjusted to fair value as of December 31, 2016 using the closing price of our common stock as of that date, which is a significant
input to the determination of fair value. The number of outstanding warrants with anti-dilutive protection was 1,936,799
(of which 86,648 have been adjusted down to a floor, as indicated in the relevant agreements) as of December 31, 2016 compared
to 668,193 as of December 31, 2015.
Other
(Income) Expense
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, we recognized net other expense of $1.4 million, which consisted of $1.7 million of costs incurred
in connection with a discontinued offering in October 2016, partially offset by approximately $325,000 arising from insurance
proceeds received as reimbursement for litigation expenses incurred in connection with the Cachet Banq litigation. During the
year ended December 31, 2015, we recognized net other income of approximately $28,000, which resulted from a gain on disposition
of property and equipment of approximately $42,000, partially offset by approximately $14,000 for finance costs related to an
advisory fee from a financial advisory services company.
Provision
for Income Taxes
We
have recorded and continue to carry a full valuation allowance against our gross deferred tax assets that are not likely to be
recovered. We have not recorded a current or deferred tax provision for the years ended December 31, 2016 or 2015.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Financial
Condition
Since
our inception in February 2010, we have raised capital to support operating losses incurred in development of our solutions, products
and services, our capability infrastructure, the marketing expenses to increase our client base and the general and administrative
functions to support our planned growth. Our accumulated deficit from inception through December 31, 2016, of $84.5 million, has
been funded primarily through the issuance of equity, debt, and warrants.
As
of December 31, 2016, we had a book overdraft of approximately $199,000 in cash and cash equivalents presented on the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets as checks issued in excess of deposits. As of December 31, 2015, we had approximately $45,000 in cash
and cash equivalents. In the normal course of business, our principal demands for funds are to pay or fund operating expenses
as well as principal and interest payments on our outstanding indebtedness, including capital leases. Many of our notes payable
are due within one year. As of December 31, 2016, we had gross notes payable of $13.2 million, of which $12.9 million is due in
2017. Of the $12.9 million of notes payable outstanding as of December 31, 2016 that are due in 2017, $7.1 million is convertible
into shares of our common stock, at our option, upon consummation of an underwritten public offering. If we are unsuccessful in
consummating an underwritten public offering, we will be required to raise additional funds through other sources to repay this
debt and continue our operations. If we are unable to complete this offering or otherwise raise the required funds, we will be
unable to continue operations after March 31, 2017.
Going
Concern
As
of December 31, 2016, our current liabilities exceeded current assets by $8.3 million. In their report dated February 24, 2017,
except for “The Offering” in Note 14, as to which the date is March 7, 2017, our independent registered public
accounting firm, Lurie, LLP, stated that our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016
were prepared under the assumption that we would be able to continue as a going concern and noted that our limited revenues, recurring
losses from operations and stockholders’ deficit raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we had an operating cash flow deficit of $9.5 million and $7.4 million,
respectively. We currently anticipate that our cash and forecasted cash receipts will be sufficient to fund our operations through
March 31, 2017. If we are successful in completing this offering, we believe we will have sufficient cash to fund our operations
through February 24, 2018.
Principal
Sources of Funds
Debt
and Equity Pursuant to Private Placements
Throughout
2016, we completed several private placements through which we raised funds to service our debt and continue growing our operations.
Refer to Note 5 “Financing Arrangements,” Note 10 “Shareholders’ Deficit” and Note 12 “Related
Party Transactions” to our consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding private placements.
In
March and April of 2016, we completed a private placement whereby we sold 163,484 shares of our common stock for net proceeds
of $1.2 million. In December 2016, we issued to these shareholders an additional 26,250 shares of common stock in settlement
of the anti-dilution provision provided for in the relevant agreements.
In
June 2016, we completed private placements in the form of convertible notes for gross proceeds of $2.0 million. We used cash of
$1.4 million to repay one of these convertible notes in December 2016.
On
July 13, 2016, we issued to James L. Davis, one of our directors, a convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $360,000
and a warrant to purchase up to 13,334 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustments, in exchange for an aggregate
purchase price of $300,000, paid by Mr. Davis in cash. On January 24, 2017, we and Mr. Davis agreed to consolidate the outstanding
principal under the convertible promissory note into a new note described below.
On
July 14, 2016, we issued to Michael J. Hanson, one of our directors, a convertible promissory note in the principal amount of
$240,000 and a warrant to purchase up to 8,890 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustments, in exchange for an aggregate
purchase price of $200,000, paid by Mr. Hanson in cash. On January 24, 2017, we and Mr. Hanson agreed to consolidate the outstanding
principal under the convertible promissory note into a new note described below.
On
August 11, 2016, we entered a securities purchase agreement with Columbus Capital pursuant to which we issued to Columbus Capital
convertible notes, due August 2017, in an aggregate principal amount of $526,315 and warrants to purchase 56,899 shares
of the Company’s common stock, subject to adjustments, in exchange for an aggregate purchase price of $500,000 paid in cash.
On
August 12, 2016, we entered a securities purchase agreement Messrs. Hanson and Davis, pursuant to which we issued to each of Messrs.
Hanson and Davis a convertible note, due August 2017, in a principal amount of $263,158 and a warrant to purchase 28,450
shares of our common stock, subject to adjustments, in exchange for a purchase price of $250,000 paid in cash by each such director.
On January 24, 2017, we and Mr. Davis agreed to consolidate the outstanding principal and interest under his convertible note
into a new note described below.
On
September 15, 2016, we issued to each of Alice Ann Corporation and Robert G. Allison convertible notes, due September 15, 2017,
in an aggregate principal amount of $50,000 and warrants to purchase 5,406 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustments,
in exchange for an aggregate purchase price of $47,500 paid in cash by each of Alice Ann Corporation and Robert G. Allison.
From
October 2016 through January 2017, we issued convertible notes for an aggregate principal balance of $8.1 million and aggregate
gross proceeds to the Company of $7.7 million. We also issued to these investors warrants to purchase an aggregate 977,407
shares of our common stock, exercisable at the lower of $8.33 per share and 80% of the per share price in our next
underwritten public offering, subject to adjustment, and exercisable for a five-year period.
Between
November and December 2016, we entered into an agreement with an investment bank to assist us in raising capital in a private
placement offering, pursuant to which we paid a finder’s fee of 10% of cash proceeds, paid 7% in cash and 3% in warrants
to purchase shares of our common stock.
In
December 2016, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with FirstFire Global Opportunities Fund, LLC (“FirstFire”),
pursuant to which we issued to FirstFire a convertible promissory note with an aggregate principal balance of $550,000 (the “FirstFire
Note”). FirstFire funded $550,000 of principal due under the FirstFire Note and after giving effect to original issue discount
we received gross proceeds of $500,000. The FirstFire Note bears interest at a rate of 5% per annum and is due June 12, 2017.
Prior to an event of default, amounts funded under the FirstFire Note are convertible into shares of our common stock at a price
equal to the lower of $8.33 per share or a price per share equal to 80% of the price in our next underwritten public
offering. Upon prepayment, we must pay FirstFire an amount equal to: (A) within 30 days of the date of issuance, 105%, (B) between
31 and 60 days of issuance, 110%, (C) between 61 and 120 days of the date of issuance, 115%, (D) between 121 and 150 days of the
date of issuance, 125% and (E) thereafter, 135% multiplied by the principal amount plus any accrued but unpaid interest on the
principal amount, plus default interest, if any. We also issued to FirstFire warrants to purchase up to 59,407 shares of
our common stock at an exercise price equal to the lower of $8.33 per share and 80% of the price in our next underwritten
public offering, exercisable for a five-year period. We also granted FirstFire piggy-back registration rights, which FirstFire
has waived in connection with this offering.
On
December 23, 2016, we issued a Convertible Term Promissory Note to FLMM Ltd. in the amount of $1,440,000, payable in cash
(the “FLMM Note”). The FLMM Note is secured by substantially all of the assets of our operating subsidiary, bears
interest at a rate of 8% per annum and is payable in full on March 15, 2017. We may not prepay the note without the consent of
FLMM. FLMM has the right, at its sole option and discretion, to convert the principal and interest under the FLMM Note into shares
of our common stock at a price equal to $10.50 per share. FLMM will also have the right, at its sole option and discretion,
to convert the principal and interest under the FLMM Note into shares of our common stock following an offering that results in
our common stock being listed on any exchange operated by the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (an “Uplist Transaction”) at
a rate equal to the lower of $10.50 per share and 80% of the per share price in the Uplist Transaction. As consideration
for entering into the FLMM Note, we also issued to FLMM a warrant to purchase 43,244 shares of our common stock, exercisable
for a five-year period from the date of issuance, at the lower of $8.33 per share and 80% of the per share price in our
next underwritten public offering.
On
December 22, 2016, we issued a Convertible Term Promissory Note to Jon D and Linda W Gruber Trust (“Gruber”) in the
amount of $75,000, payable in cash (the “Gruber Note”). The Gruber Note is unsecured, bears interest at a rate of
8% per annum and is payable in full on March 22, 2017, which may, under certain circumstances, be extended to May 31, 2017. We
may not prepay the note without the consent of Gruber.
Gruber
has the right, at its sole option and discretion, to convert the principal and interest under the Gruber note into shares of the
Company’s common stock at $10.50 per share.
Gruber will also have the right, at its
sole option and discretion, to convert the principal and interest under the Gruber Note into shares of our common stock following
an offering that results in an Uplist Transaction at a rate equal to the lower of $10.50 per share and 80% of the per share
price in the Uplist Transaction. As consideration for entering into the Gruber Note, we also issued to Gruber a warrant to purchase
2,253 shares of common stock, exercisable for a five-year period from the date of issuance, at the lower of $8.33
per share and 80% of the per share price in our next underwritten public offering.
On
December 22, 2016, we issued a Convertible Term Promissory Note to Mr. Davis in the amount of $50,000, payable in cash and bearing
interest at a rate of 8% per annum (the “Davis Note”). The Davis Note is payable in full on March 22, 2017, which
may, under certain circumstances, be extended to May 31, 2017. As consideration for entering into the Davis Note, we also issued
to Mr. Davis a warrant to purchase 1,502 shares of common stock, exercisable for a five-year period from the date of issuance,
at the lower of $8.33 per share and 80% of the per share price in our next underwritten public offering.
On
December 22, 2016, we issued a Convertible Term Promissory Note to Mr. Hanson in the amount of $85,000, payable in cash and bearing
interest at a rate of 8% per annum (the “Hanson Note”). The Hanson Note is payable in full on March 22, 2017, which
may, under certain circumstances, be extended to May 31, 2017. As consideration for entering into the Hanson Note, we also issued
to Mr. Hanson a warrant to purchase 2,553 shares of common stock, exercisable for a five-year period from the date of issuance,
at the lower of $8.33 per share and 80% of the per share price in our next underwritten public offering.
On
December 29, 2016, we entered into a Demand Promissory Note agreement for $250,000 with Davis & Associates, Inc., a company
owned by Mr. Davis, a director of the Company. We repaid the Demand Promissory Note on the same day.
On
January 5, 2017, we issued to Vista Partners, LLC a convertible note with a principal balance of $120,000 under the same terms
as the convertible notes that we issued from October 2016 through January 2017, described above. We also issued to Vista Partners,
LLC a warrant to purchase 12,974 shares of our common stock, exercisable for a five-year period from the date of issuance
at the lover of $8.33 per share and 80% of the per share price in our next underwritten public offering.
On
January 24, 2017, we entered into an Amended and Restated Term Promissory Note with Mr. Davis, pursuant to which we and Mr. Davis
agreed to consolidate certain debt due to Mr. Davis, including the Davis Note and certain other notes as indicated above, into
a single note due April 30, 2018 in the principal amount of $896,243. The note is unsecured and bears interest at a rate of 7%
per annum with all principal and accrued interest due and payable at the close of business on April 30, 2018.
On
January 24, 2017, we entered into an Amended and Restated Term Promissory Note with Mr. Hanson, pursuant to which we and Mr. Hanson
agreed to consolidate certain debt due to Mr. Hanson, including the Hanson Note and certain other notes as indicated above, into
a single note due April 30, 2018 in the principal amount of $1,973,735. The note is unsecured and bears interest at a rate of
8% per annum with all principal and accrued interest due and payable at the close of business on April 30, 2018.
Other
Debt
We
have relied upon Messrs. Davis and Hanson to provide short-term funding through the issuance of debt to such directors. See Note
12 “Related Party Transactions” to our consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding debt
issuances to Messrs. Davis and Hanson. There can be no assurance that Messrs. Hanson and Davis will continue to provide such funding
in the future.
Warrant
Exercises
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, warrants to purchase 341,796 shares of common stock were exercised by the holders for
aggregate proceeds to the Company of $1.6 million. We issued 256,337 shares of common stock pursuant to these warrant exercises.
Refer to Note 10 “Shareholders’ Deficit” to our consolidated financial statements for more information related
to our warrant activity for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Cash
Flow
Operating
Activities
Net
cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $9.5 million, compared to $7.4 million for 2015. Our
net loss for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $15.2 million, which is $3.1 million less than our net loss of $18.3 million
for 2015, although when adjusted for non-cash charges in our statement of operations, our cash used in operating activities before
changes in operating assets and liabilities decreased by approximately $285,000 comparing the two periods.
Our
accounts receivable increased by $2.4 million and approximately $389,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
The significant increase in accounts receivable during the year ended December 31, 2016 was due to an overall increase in our
revenues and billings. Changes in working capital also included an increase in deferred commissions during the year ended December
31, 2016 and 2015 of approximately $15,000 and $35,000, respectively, related to the commissions we paid to our sales staff. Prepaid
expenses increased approximately $28,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 primarily due to maintenance and support contracts
and decreased approximately $370,000 during the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily a result of an increase in capitalized
leases for prepaid items such as software maintenance and technology licensed from third parties. Our deferred revenue balance
decreased by approximately $346,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared with an increase of approximately $190,000 for
the year ended December 31, 2015. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the decrease primarily related to the amortization into
revenue amounts due under long-term contracts while the increase for the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily related to billings
received in advance of revenue recognition criteria being met.
Our
accounts payable balance increased during the year ended December 31, 2016 by $1.3 million, compared to an increase of approximately
$444,000 during the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in accounts payable during the year ended December 31, 2016 was
primarily due to purchases of software licenses and amounts incurred for offering costs which had not been paid as of December
31, 2016. The increase in accounts payable during the year ended December 31, 2015 was primarily due to having incurred significant
fees related to completing our equity offerings and other professional fees associated with completing our year-end audit. Accrued
expenses increased during the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 by approximately $74,000 and $20,000, respectively, primarily
as a result of an increase in accruals for various related operating costs incurred but unpaid at the end of both periods presented.
Accrued interest expense increased during the year ended December 31, 2016 by approximately $43,000 compared to $289,000 for the
year ended December 31, 2015. The increases in accrued interest for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were primarily due
to an increase in our outstanding indebtedness, partially offset by amounts repaid during the year.
Investing
Activities
Cash
used in investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 totaled approximately $44,000 and $135,000,
respectively. These purchases were primarily part of hardware and software upgrades to our data centers where we host our SaaS
cloud based platforms for our clients and computers for our employees. Based on future growth, we may be required to make additional
investments in our data centers.
Financing
Activities
Net
cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $9.5 million compared to $7.5 million for the year
ended December 31, 2015.
Excluding
approximately $300,000 of debt issuance costs paid during the year ended December 31, 2016, our borrowings during the years
ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 totaled $12.5 million and $1.2 million, respectively. The funds received during the year
ended December 31, 2016 came from Messrs. Hanson and Davis as well as several other investors pursuant to convertible note offerings,
while funds received during the year ended December 31, 2015 came from Messrs. Hanson and Davis. The funds were primarily used
for working capital and debt service purposes for the year ended December 31, 2016 and working capital purposes during the year
ended December 31, 2015. We repaid $5.3 million on notes payable during the year ended December 31, 2016 and approximately $198,000
in principal payments related to installments payments on an outstanding note payable during the year ended December 31, 2015.
During the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we made principal payments on capital leases totaling approximately $402,000
and $204,000, respectively. We also borrowed approximately $69,000 and $113,000 on a bank loan during the year ended December
31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, while making principal payments against bank loans totaling approximately $96,000 and $105,000
during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
During
the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we issued shares of our common stock and issued five-year warrants to purchase
shares of our common stock in a private placement as well as shares for professional services and other purposes. Net proceeds
to us related to the issuance of shares of our common stock, after offering costs, were $1.4 million for the year ended December
31, 2016 and approximately $256,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we
also received $1.6 million and $1.3 million, respectively, pursuant to the exercise of warrants. We received $5.2 million pursuant
to sales of Series C Preferred Stock during the year ended December 31, 2015 .
CONTINGENCIES
We
are involved in claims, lawsuits and other legal proceedings. We record a provision for a liability when we believe that it is
both probable that a liability has been incurred, and that the amount can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required
to determine both probability and the estimated amount. Such legal proceedings are inherently unpredictable and subject to significant
uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control. Should any of these estimates and assumptions change or prove to be incorrect,
it could have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position, and cash flows.
Refer
to the information contained under the heading “Litigation” in Note 7 “Commitments and Contingencies”
to our consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding these contingencies.
INFLATION
Many
of our contracts with our clients are for periods of 12 to 36 months, with no provisions designed to mitigate the adverse impact
of inflation. We may be adversely impacted by inflation as a result of the lack of these provisions.
OFF
BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We
had no material off balance sheet arrangements, as defined by the SEC, as of December 31, 2016 or 2015.
Reclassification
of Warrant and Conversion Feature Liability into Stockholders’ Equity
As
of December 31, 2016, holders of warrants to purchase an aggregate of 500,461 shares of our common stock have agreed to
terminate the anti-dilution protection in those warrants effective upon the consummation of this offering and the listing of our
common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market, which will occur upon completion of this offering. The fair value of these warrants
($1.5 million at December 31, 2016) at the termination date will be reclassified from warrant liability into stockholders’
equity. Additionally, warrants to purchase 335,809 shares of our common stock are exercisable at the lower of $8.33
per share or 80% of the per share price in this offering. After the completion of this offering, the price of these warrants
will be fixed and the fair value ($1.0 million as of December 31, 2016) at the date on which this offering is completed will be
reclassified from warrant liability into stockholders’ equity.
On
June 1, 2016, we issued to Columbus Capital convertible notes, due June 1, 2017, in an aggregate principal amount of $1,052,632.
We have the right to require Columbus Capital to convert the notes into shares of our common stock at that conversion price if
our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market, the Nasdaq Global Market or the Nasdaq Global Select Market. We intend
to exercise our conversion right upon the completion of this offering and the listing of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital
Market. The fair value of the conversion feature (approximately $326,000 at December 31, 2016) will be reclassified from a conversion
feature liability into stockholders’ equity.
In
August 2016, we issued to Columbus Capital convertible notes, due August 11, 2017, in an aggregate principal amount of $526,315,
and we issued to Michael J. Hanson and James L. Davis convertible notes, due August 12, 2017, in an aggregate principal amount
of $526,316. We have the right to require Columbus Capital and Messrs. Hanson and Davis to convert these notes into shares
of our common stock at that conversion price if our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market, the Nasdaq Global Market
or the Nasdaq Global Select Market. We intend to exercise this conversion right upon the completion of this offering and the listing
of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market. As a result of such conversion, the fair value of the conversion feature (approximately
$336,000 at December 31, 2016) at the conversion date will be reclassified from a conversion feature liability into stockholders’
equity.
On
September 15, 2016, we issued to Alice Ann Corporation and Robert G. Allison convertible notes, due September 15, 2017, in an
aggregate principal amount of $100,000. We have the right to require Alice Ann Corporation and Robert G. Allison to convert these
notes into shares of our common stock at that conversion price if our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market, the
Nasdaq Global Market or the Nasdaq Global Select Market. We intend to exercise this conversion right upon the completion of this
offering and the listing of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market. As a result of such conversion, the fair value of the
conversion feature (approximately $32,000 at December 31, 2016) at the conversion date will be reclassified from a conversion
feature liability into stockholders’ equity.
Between
October and December 2016, we issued to several investors convertible notes, which are unsecured and do not bear any interest.
Each of the investors may elect to convert the principal amount of the notes into shares of our common stock at any time before
the maturity date of the notes at a conversion price equal to the lower of $10.50 and 80% of the per share price in this
offering. We have the right to require each of the investors to convert these notes into shares of our common stock at that conversion
price if our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market, the Nasdaq Global Market or the Nasdaq Global Select Market.
We intend to exercise this conversion right upon the completion of this offering and the listing of our common stock on the Nasdaq
Capital Market. As a result of such conversion, the fair value of the conversion feature (approximately $1.5 million at December
31, 2016) at the conversion date will be reclassified from a conversion feature liability into stockholders’ equity.
OUR
BUSINESS
Overview
We
are a leading provider of software-as-a-service, or SaaS, financial technology, or fintech, solutions to the financial services
industry. We provide traditional financial institutions and alternative financial service, or AFS, providers with innovative mobile
and other solutions to enable them to offer a suite of leading-edge mobile financial services to their customers through the Internet,
or cloud-based, access. As a SaaS provider, we develop, host and maintain software solutions that we license to our clients. We
serve three primary markets in the United States: banks, credit unions and AFS providers, which includes providers of non-traditional
banking services such as reloadable prepaid cards and check cashing services. In the future, we intend to expand outside of the
United States, including Latin America and Europe, as opportunities present themselves.
We
have been expanding our suite of available fintech solutions. One of our recent solutions, Select Mobile Money, is an award-winning
prepaid mobile money platform that seamlessly links various mobile banking features with a prepaid debit card issued by financial
institutions or AFS providers. This solution enables card users to conveniently manage their card accounts through an easy-to-use
integrated mobile application, or app, with multiple features downloaded onto their smart phone or tablet and, by adding a suite
of available mobile financial services linked to their card accounts, enhances the card’s usefulness and the cardholder’s
mobile banking experience. For example, prepaid cardholders using our application may deposit paper checks and direct payroll
deposits into their prepaid card account, access cash from their prepaid card account at any automated teller machine, or ATM,
and check their prepaid card account balance and transaction history. We believe that our Select Mobile Money solutions are setting
the industry standard for reloadable prepaid mobile money solutions.
Our
Select Mobile Money solutions include two distinct mobile banking technology solutions: first, a white label mobile money platform
for larger financial institutions and AFS providers that already have a reloadable prepaid card program and wish to enhance it
by integrating a feature rich app; and second, an end-to-end reloadable prepaid card program, which we call Select Mobile Money-Express,
or SMM-X, offered to all banks, credit unions and AFS providers of all sizes that would like to deploy a complete reloadable prepaid
card program, comprising a prepaid debit card, an integrated mobile app and program management.
Our
Select Mobile Money solutions are designed to specifically meet the needs of millennials, the “unbanked” (those who
have no formal relationship with a bank or credit union, prefer not to use a traditional checking account, or who do not meet
the minimum balance required to avoid high bank fees) and the “under-banked” (those who have only a minimal relationship
with a bank or credit union). These solutions provide end-users with convenient and secure anywhere and anytime mobile access
via the Internet to a variety of convenient self-service mobile banking services through an easy-to-use integrated mobile application
with multiple features downloaded onto their smart phone or tablet and linked to a reloadable prepaid card. Both our white label
and our SMM-X prepaid mobile money solutions support advanced analytics, which we believe can help our clients by enhancing the
prepaid cardholder experience and keeping their customers engaged. As a result, we are experiencing a growing demand for these
solutions by financial institutions and AFS providers.
If
we are successful in selling and deploying our SMM-X solution and in turn it becomes widely used by our clients’ customers,
we believe this has the potential to significantly increase our future revenues as our financial model for this solution is based
principally on future transaction and/or user fee components described below. As we begin to deploy these solutions for our clients,
and as their customers in turn utilize this application, we believe that the potential recurring revenue from these transaction
and/or user fee components will become a significant source of revenue for us, and our Select Mobile Money solutions could potentially
become the primary source of our future revenue.
As
of December 31, 2016, our business has historically focused on offering a full suite of consumer and business remote deposit check
capture, or RDC, products that enable financial institutions to provide their customers with the ability to conveniently deposit
their checks remotely anytime, anywhere. While we continue to offer these solutions, we recently expanded our focus to include
prepaid mobile money solutions. Our latest innovations are a mobile remote payment capture solution, which we call Select Mobile
NowPay, which enables enterprises to accept check payments submitted via their customers’ mobile devices, and our mobile
account opening solution, which we call Select Mobile Account Opening, which streamlines the account opening process by utilizing
photo imaging to capture customer data and auto-populate an account opening application form for checking, savings, credit card
and other types of accounts.
As
of December 31, 2016, we had entered into contracts for the sale of approximately 881 products (including product enhancements),
of which approximately 600 were “active” as of December 31, 2016, meaning that the product or enhancement has been
deployed or implemented by our client for use by its customers or that we have completed our implementation and/or customization
work for the product or enhancement and have delivered it to our client for deployment. Of the approximately 881 products sold
as of December 31, 2016, approximately 819 related to RDC products, 47 related to our white label Select Mobile Money solution,
nine related to our SMM-X solution, five related to Select Mobile Account Opening and one related to Select Mobile NowPay. Of
the approximately 600 products sold which were active as of December 31, 2016, approximately 575 related to RDC products, 22 related
to our white label Select Mobile Money solutions and one related to Select Mobile Account Opening. Our Select Mobile NowPay solutions
was not yet active as of December 31, 2016.
Our
business operations are conducted entirely through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Cachet Financial Solutions Inc., a Minnesota corporation.
Our
Market Opportunity
Mobile
Financial Services
We
believe the proliferation of camera-enabled mobile devices has accelerated the adoption of mobile-centric banking products. According
to a December 2014 study by Bain & Company, titled “Customer Loyalty in Retail Banking: Global Edition 2014,”
banking customers completed more interactions with their banks via the mobile channel, i.e., smartphones and tablets, than through
any other channel in 13 of 22 countries surveyed in the study during the last quarter of 2014. We believe that the mobile channel
will become the primary channel for customers to interact with the financial institutions and AFS providers in the United States,
and that these financial services providers will seek to offer more services through the mobile channel to strengthen customer
loyalty. According to the Javelin 2015 report titled “2015 Mobile Banking, Smartphone, and Tablet Forecast,” the proportion
of weekly mobile bankers exceeded that of weekly branch bankers for the first time in 2015.
Mobile
financial services resonate with financial services providers because mobile technologies provide these service providers a means
to level the competitive playing field and compete with larger financial institutions. In addition, with mobile offerings, branch
location is no longer a determining factor of where to bank.
We
also believe that financial institutions and AFS providers that proactively work to build and maintain robust mobile channels
serving the needs of the highly valuable mobile consumer will experience increased mobile adoption and usage by their customers.
Over time we believe this will increase operating efficiencies, reduce customer attrition and create new revenue opportunities
for our clients. We believe this is especially important as baby boomers retire and millennials enter their prime earning and
investing years.
Prepaid
Mobile Money
A
reloadable prepaid card provides the convenience of a debit card, including a secure way to shop online and make other purchases.
Reloadable prepaid cards are generally accepted everywhere MasterCard and Visa are accepted. Unlike a debit card, a reloadable
prepaid card account is prefunded by the cardholder and it cannot be over-drawn. Card usage is limited to the balance available
on the account. This limits the cardholder’s exposure to overdraft fees and other related penalties, and removes the credit
history requirements normally required to open a traditional bank account. A reloadable prepaid card can be a valuable budgeting
tool. It is sometimes used to help teens and young adults learn money management skills.
Reloadable
prepaid cards are a convenient and safer alternative that have less serious consequences than losing cash or high limit credit
cards should the card be lost or stolen. If a reloadable prepaid card is stolen, the loss is limited only to the cash balance
remaining on the card, and no valuable financial information is lost or compromised.
According
to a study released by the Philadelphia Federal Reserve Bank in September 2014, titled “Millennials with Money: A New Look
at Who Uses GPR Prepaid Cards,” 45% of consumers ages 18–32, the millennial generation, said they owned a general
purpose reloadable prepaid card. We believe millennials are the first truly mobile generation accustomed to using a smart phone
or tablet to perform routine interactions remotely, including purchasing goods and services, and managing their money. With the
preceding baby boomer generation approaching retirement, we believe the millennial generation is the future customer base of financial
institutions and AFS providers. As these financial services providers adapt to the mobile environment, we believe they require
innovative solutions to enable them to offer their customers fast, reliable and convenient financial services remotely through
mobile applications, including prepaid mobile money solutions and reloadable prepaid cards that are popular with the millennial
generation.
Reloadable
prepaid cards are also used by the unbanked and the under-banked. In our experience, AFS providers and more recently financial
institutions also wish to attract these consumers, who generally do not qualify for a traditional checking account or prefer not
to grow a traditional banking relationship for reasons such as the desire to avoid banking fees and/or minimum-balance requirements.
We
believe that easy and immediate access to money is especially important to the unbanked and under-banked consumer because this
demographic often lives “paycheck to paycheck” and requires quicker access to their funds to pay for everyday living
essentials, such as food, rent and basic utilities. We believe that the inconvenience and cost of accessing multiple service providers,
which are common barriers among the unbanked and the under-banked consumers, serves as a strong incentive for these consumers
to use an aggregated service like Select Mobile Money. Our Select Mobile Money product also addresses the needs of most unbanked
or under-banked consumers.
We
believe that the reloadable prepaid card will continue to grow in popularity across all income groups for budgeting, payroll,
student usage, travel and more. According to a November 2015 Business Insider Intelligence report, titled “The Prepaid Cards
Report: The rise of reloadable cards could affect the way millennials approach banking,” prepaid cards accounted for 800
million transactions worth $20 billion in the United States in 2003, and jumped to 9.2 billion transactions worth $220 billion
in the United States in 2012. In that study, Business Insider also estimated that prepaid card volumes in the U.S. market would
top $317 billion in 2015.
Our
Select Mobile Money solutions provide end-users with convenient and secure anywhere and anytime mobile access via the Internet
to a variety of self-service mobile banking services through an easy-to-use mobile application downloaded onto their smart phone
or tablet and linked to their reloadable prepaid card.
RDC
Products
Federal
legislation commonly referred to as “Check 21” has made the RDC service possible. Implemented in October 2004, this
legislation allows financial institutions to clear checks based upon images of the original items instead of having to transport
the original check to the paying bank for clearing. The commonly viewed benefits of this service include customer convenience,
better deposit availability, reduced non-sufficient funds, reduced transportation costs and eliminating the need to physically
transfer the check during the clearing process.
According
to the 2013 Federal Reserve Payments Study, released the U.S. Federal Reserve in December 2013:
|
●
|
the
number of checks paid continued to decline, falling to 18.3 billion in 2012—less than half the number of checks that
were paid in 2003;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
despite
the continued decline in the use of checks, the check clearing process continued to gain efficiencies and has become virtually
100 percent electronic;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
most
checks continued to be deposited in paper form, but the number of checks deposited as electronic images increased since the
U.S. Federal Reserve’s last survey;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
in
2012, among all checks deposited at the bank of first deposit, 3.4 billion (17 percent) were deposited as electronic images
compared with 3.0 billion (13 percent) in 2009; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
in
2012, 93 percent of checks deposited as images were by business depositors compared with 7 percent by consumer depositors.
|
An
April 2015 report by Celent, updated in November 2015, titled “Seizing the Small Business RDC Opportunity: New Products
are Changing Everything,” confirms that checks not only remain widely accepted, but are the preferred form of payment for
small to medium size businesses compared to other forms of payment because we believe these businesses perceive checks to be less
expensive. In light of the prevalent use of checks by these businesses and the benefits of the mobile deposit service, we believe
that most major financial institutions in the United States today have either launched an RDC service for businesses, or are considering
doing so.
According
to the American Bankers Association, a survey of 1,000 U.S. adults conducted in August 2014 for that association by an independent
market research firm:
|
●
|
more
than one in seven Americans deposited a check using a mobile device within the year prior to the survey; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
of
those who have used mobile deposit, 80 percent reported using it regularly—at least once per month.
|
While
only 13 percent of the 1,000 survey respondents said that during the preceding 12 months they deposited a check into their bank
account by taking a picture of the check with their mobile device, we believe that RDC will become an increasingly popular banking
service for consumers as it becomes more widely available and consumers become more comfortable with the technology.
According
to a 2016 report by Javelin titled “Mobile Banking Financial Institution Scorecard: Mobile Becomes the Remote Control for
Banking,” mobile deposit has very quickly moved from being innovative to being just table stakes, with 97% of top financial
institutions supporting the feature as of May 2016.
We
believe that our remote and mobile RDC solutions enable banks and credit unions to increase customer satisfaction among their
business and consumer customers, grow deposits in a low-cost manner, reduce transaction costs, and decrease traffic at bricks-and-mortar
branches.
Mobile
Check Payment
According
to a 2014 report by Crone Consulting titled “Bill Pay’s New Manifesto: Omni-Channel Strategy Driving Interactive Customer
Engagement,” the average U.S. household is obligated to pay between 10 to 15 recurring bills per month, including, but not
limited to, credit card statements, loans, insurance premiums and utility bills such as cable TV and phone. Historically, recurring
billing has been the domain of paper, which contributed to the growth and primary use of paper checks. According to the Crone
Consulting report, these paper-based interactions are lose/lose scenarios, as they are expensive and time-consuming to both biller
and customer, including because a customer who receives a paper bill in the mail needs to drive to the branch office to make a
payment. The Crone Consulting report refers to these paper-based interactions as high-cost and low-touch interactions because
they cause paper clutter and do not allow for any interaction between the biller and the customer. According to the Crone Consulting
report, migrating from high-cost, low-touch interactions to low-cost, high-touch interactions (with mobile) will create a win/win
scenario for both biller and customer. The Crone Consulting report also states that the mobile bill payment usage is growing,
and for some financial institutions, more than 33% of all the service interactions through their mobile banking apps are for bill
payment functions.
Our
mobile check payment solution, Select Mobile NowPay, enables the biller to offer its customers the ability to use their mobile
devices to take a photo of a check and submit the digital image of the check as payment on their loan or other recurring bill.
We believe that a self-service mobile check payment option that fits customers’ lifestyles, meets demand for easier and
more convenient payment options and supports more timely payments will gain acceptance in the consumer lending market. We believe
that the primary target markets for this solution include lenders, such as special purpose consumer finance subsidiaries of large
retailers and captive auto finance companies and loan servicing companies.
Our
Select Mobile NowPay solution can also reduce delinquencies in bill payments by customers and collection-related costs for billers.
According to a 2015 survey prepared for the National Foundation for Credit Counseling (NFCC) titled “The 2015 Consumer Financial
Literacy Survey,” 24% of U.S. adults participating in the survey admitted do not pay all of their bills on time. With our
Select Mobile NowPay solution, customers can make their payments faster and easier, even at the last minute, alleviating the need
to mail a check days in advance to arrive by the due date.
Mobile
Account Opening for Consumers
According
to the Javelin 2016 report titled “Mobile Banking Financial Institution Scorecard: Mobile Becomes the Remote Control for
Banking,” half of the U.S. adult population now banks through smartphones and tablets. Javelin states in its report that
this dramatic shift in consumers’ channel preferences from in-branch and online to mobile banking puts pressure on financial
institutions to innovate in the mobile space to meet growing and changing expectations. According to Javelin, top financial institutions
are moving quickly to enable consumers to open accounts on their mobile devices, with 33% of the financial institutions supporting
mobile account opening in 2015 (as opposed to 17% in 2014).
With
consumers’ emerging preference for the mobile channel, we believe that fast and efficient mobile account opening will become
increasingly more important to the ongoing success of all financial services companies. In their 2013 report, “
How to
Upgrade Online and Select Mobile Account Opening for an Omnichannel
,” Javelin reported that 88.5 million Americans attempted
to open an account online or with a mobile device in the 12 months prior to the report. In their 2015 report, “
Digital
Account Opening Reaches the Tipping Point
,” Javelin reported 60% growth in the number of accounts opened by consumers
via mobile across a variety of deposit, loan and investment products between 2013 and 2014.
Traditional
mobile account opening, which requires mobile customers to fill out tedious on-screen forms is cumbersome and time consuming and
can potentially lead to account abandonment, errors and incomplete application forms. By allowing consumers to take photos instead
of entering data, our Select Mobile Account Opening solution can streamline the account opening process, reduce the number of
human errors resulting from manually completing inaccurate data or failing to complete all relevant or required fields in the
application forms, and consequently can reduce new account abandonment rates and enhance the overall account opening experience.
We
believe there is a significant and growing opportunity for us to enable financial institutions and AFS providers to offer their
customers an easier and faster mobile account opening solution. We estimate the market opportunity to include:
|
●
|
more
than 5,000 banks in the U.S. at the end of 2015 as reported by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation;
|
|
●
|
more
than 6,000 credit unions in the U.S. at the end of 2015 as reported by the National Credit Union Administration; and
|
|
●
|
more
than 13,000 AFS providers in the U.S. at the end of 2009 as estimated by the Financial Service Centers of America, or FISCA.
|
Our
Solutions
Prepaid
Mobile Money Solutions: Select Mobile Money
Our
prepaid mobile money solutions, Select Mobile Money, include two distinct mobile banking technology solutions: a white label mobile
money platform for larger financial institutions and AFS providers that already have a reloadable prepaid card program and wish
to enhance it by integrating a feature rich app; and an end-to-end reloadable prepaid card program, which we call Select Mobile
Money-Express, or SMM-X, offered to all banks, credit unions and AFS providers of all sizes. Both deployment options help our
clients retain and attract new customers, including millennials, the unbanked, and under-banked. In February 2015, the Navy Federal
Credit Union’s Visa Buxx app, which is powered by our white label Select Mobile Money prepaid platform, was the 2015 Paybefore
Awards Best-in-Category winner of the judges’ choice award.
Our
acquisition of certain mobile money assets from DeviceFidelity in March 2014 has enabled us to enter the prepaid mobile money
market. In March 2013, prior to the acquisition, DeviceFidelity’s mobile wallet platform (currently, our Select Mobile Money
solution) won the 2013 Paybefore Award for the Best-in-Category Outstanding Mobile Wallet and Application.
Both
our white label and our SMM-X prepaid mobile money solutions support advanced analytics, which we believe can help our clients
gain a competitive advantage by enhancing the prepaid cardholder experience and keeping their customers engaged. Prepaid cardholders
tend to be anonymous to the program manager by purchasing a debit card at a retail location, loading money onto the card and then
using it wherever Visa or MasterCard is accepted. The program manager is not able to communicate with the cardholder or increase
program value. To address this problem, we have embedded advanced analytics into our prepaid mobile money platform which capture
the customer’s device type, allow the program manager to see the length of time that the customer is using the app, the
customer’s activities and where the customer is located when the customer logs into the app. Our prepaid mobile money solutions
support push notifications, in-app notifications and banner advertisements which are driven by the analytics platform.
Our
back-end analytics capabilities which are embedded in our prepaid mobile money platforms enable our client to log into our analytics
portal, view data elements on their own, analyze customers who use a particular feature of the app, monitor a specific customer’s
use of the app, send relevant marketing messages to keep the customer engaged, and communicate an offer to a customer who has
not used a particular feature or service of the app. Our clients can also promote customer-wide specials and set marketing campaigns
via the portal to promote certain customer behavior. We believe these features of our prepaid mobile money solutions can help
our clients increase customer retention and revenue opportunities.
Our
White Label Mobile Money Platform
Our
white label mobile money platform for reloadable prepaid cards is our initial prepaid mobile money solution which we began offering
in 2014. We offer this solution to larger banks, credit unions and AFS providers, including reloadable prepaid card issuers and
check cashing service providers that currently have a reloadable prepaid card program that they wish to enhance by integrating
a feature rich app. Our white label mobile banking platform enables financial institutions and AFS providers to offer their prepaid
cardholders an integrated mobile application with multiple features, which currently include the ability to:
|
●
|
deposit
a paper check directly into the cardholder’s prepaid card account,
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
direct
payroll deposits into the cardholder’s prepaid card account,
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
access
cash from the cardholder’s prepaid card account at any automated teller machine, or “ATM,”
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
check
account balance and transaction history,
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
access
a national coupon network,
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
make
card to card money transfers,
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
make
international money transfers, and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
locate
surcharge free ATMs and cash loading locations.
|
Implementing
our white label mobile money solution requires significant up-front customization and integration efforts. We utilize the services
of internal and external software developers to deploy this solution, and we charge our clients an up-front implementation fee
and professional services fees for this work. In addition, as and when the program is periodically updated by our clients to include
new features, we perform additional professional services for a fee. Recurring revenue from our white label mobile money solution
varies by client and typically includes a monthly hosting fee and a monthly active user fee charged based on the number of customers
that open the application. Although we do not currently charge user transaction fees for this solution, in the future we may introduce
new features into this solution which may have a transaction fee revenue component. As of December 31, 2016, we entered into contracts
for the sale of 47 white label mobile money products (including product enhancements) to 13 clients, of which 22 products (including
11 product enhancements) were active, meaning that product or enhancement has been deployed or implemented by our client for use
by its customers or we have completed our implementation and/or customization work for the product or enhancement and have delivered
it to our client for deployment.
Our
Select Mobile Money Express Platform (SMM-X)
We
offer our SMM-X solution, an end-to-end reloadable prepaid card program, to all banks, credit unions and AFS providers of all
sizes that would like to deploy a complete reloadable prepaid card program, comprising a prepaid debit card, an integrated mobile
app and program management. This program is designed for financial institutions and AFS providers that either do not have the
capability or resources to launch or service their own independent reloadable prepaid card program or do not wish to assume the
risks and burdens associated with deploying their own independent reloadable prepaid card program. Our SMM-X mobile application
provides a full suite of mobile banking services that help our clients’ prepaid cardholders to better manage their prepaid
card and their money, with the same features currently available under our white label mobile banking platform.
We
will deploy this program using a sponsor bank, which is the reloadable prepaid card issuer, with whom we have a contractual relationship.
As the prepaid card issuer, the sponsor bank assumes the regulatory and financial risks associated with issuing reloadable prepaid
cards to consumers. Our client is the distributor of reloadable prepaid cards issued by the sponsor bank. This program effectively
relieves our client, the distributor , from the two largest barriers to entry for entering the reloadable prepaid card market:
card issuance, including the associated regulatory and financial risks and burdens; and program management, including card fulfillment
and servicing of the accounts. Under this program, we provide a complete turn-key solution to our client, including card issuance
provided by the sponsor bank and program management provided by us. SMM-X incorporates our client’s logo, colors and imagery
to keep the client’s brand in front of their customers.
In
contrast to our white label mobile money solution, deploying our SMM-X solution typically does not require significant upfront
customization or integration efforts. Therefore, any up-front implementation fee and professional services fees earned by us for
deploying the SMM-X solution tends to be minimal, which we believe is advantageous because it allows this solution to be more
easily and timely implemented by clients of all sizes. Contracts for the sale our SMM-X solutions tend to be less negotiable than
contracts for the sale our white label mobile money solutions, in part, because this program is deployed using a sponsor bank
as the reloadable prepaid card issuer and the underlying fee structure for this solution is less flexible. Unlike our white label
mobile money solutions, to earn revenues from our SMM-X solutions we will rely heavily on the following recurring revenue components
(or variants thereof) associated with the SMM-X solution:
|
●
|
a
minor monthly hosting fee charged to our client, the card distributor;
|
|
●
|
a
portion of each transaction or interchange fee that the card distributer charges merchants that accept the reloadable prepaid
card as payment for goods and services sold by the merchant (similar to any credit or debit card);
|
|
●
|
a
portion of each transaction fee that the card distributer charges cardholders for any transfer of funds from the reloadable
prepaid card to another person, domestic or international;
|
|
●
|
for
the general purpose reloadable prepaid card program, a portion of the per card issuance fee charged by the card distributor
to the cardholder upon acquiring the card;
|
|
●
|
for
the general purpose reloadable prepaid card program, a portion of a per card monthly user fee charged by the card issuer to
the cardholder (which monthly card fee is shared by us and the card issuer);
|
|
●
|
for
the general purpose reloadable prepaid card program, a portion of the cash load fee charged to the cardholder by the merchant
performing the cash load service at an approved location (the merchant keeps some of the cash load fee and the remainder is
shared by us and the card issuer); and
|
|
●
|
for
the general purpose reloadable prepaid card program, a portion of an “instant good funds” fee charged to the cardholder
by Ingo Money, Inc. with regard to the instant availability of funds service provided by Ingo Money with respect to any check
deposited onto the reloadable prepaid card (the portion of the fee not retained by Ingo Money, which provides the instant
availability of funds service to the cardholder, is shared equally by us and the card issuer).
|
As
of December 31, 2016 we entered into contracts for the sale of a total of nine SMM-X products, of which two were active. If we
are successful in selling and deploying our SMM-X solution and in turn it becomes widely used by our clients’ customers,
we believe this has the potential to significantly increase our future revenues as our financial model for this solution is based
principally on future transaction and/or user fee components described above. As we begin to deploy these solutions for our clients,
and as their customers in turn utilize this application, we believe that the potential recurring revenue from these transaction
and/or user fee components will become a significant source of revenue for us, and our Select Mobile Money solutions could potentially
become the primary source of our future revenue.
On
July 11, 2016, we entered into a prepaid card marketing and technology development agreement with Central Bank of Kansas City,
or CBKC. The marketing agreement will enable us to deploy our SMM-X program. Under the Marketing Agreement, we and CBKC will establish,
operate and market prepaid card programs which will be made available to our clients, third party distributors, who desire to
offer these programs to their customers. Under the terms of the marketing agreement, we are required to use CBKC as our exclusive
provider and issuer of all stored value cards and demand deposit accounts marketed or offered by us, except that we are permitted
to use other third parties for such services in certain circumstances for certain programs that do not meet our or CBKC’s
requirements or expectations, for example, (i) where we have offered CBKC to establish a program and CBKC has declined to do so
or (ii) if a program proves to be unprofitable for either party under the marketing agreement in the future and the parties are
unable to agree in good faith on modifications that would make the program profitable. The marketing agreement has an 18-month
term, but the parties may agree to extend the marketing agreement on terms and conditions to be mutually agreed upon. Not earlier
than 18 months after July 11, 2016, any party may terminate the marketing agreement, in whole or in part, with respect to one
or more programs upon providing the other party with advance written notice, provided that the party seeking termination is able
to demonstrate in good faith that the applicable program cannot be operated profitably.
RDC
Solutions
Our
RDC solutions are composed of various software applications that permit a business or consumer to scan or take a picture of a
check by using a smart phone, tablet or other device (e.g., a desktop computer that is connected to a scanner) and then transmit
the resulting image to a bank for posting and clearing. These various software applications are developed to be compatible with
both Windows and Mac operating systems, and are marketed and sold with various features and levels of functionality to banks and
credit unions in the United States. We do not offer, sell or license our RDC solutions to retail consumers.
As
of December 31, 2016, we entered into contracts for the sale of 819 RDC products, of which 575 RDC products were active,
meaning that product or enhancement has been deployed or implemented by our client for use by its customers or we have completed
our implementation and/or customization work for the product or enhancement and have delivered it to our client for deployment.
Our main RDC solutions are marketed under the following names: Select Business Merchant Capture, Select Mobile Deposit and Select
Mobile Deposit-Express.
Our
Select Business Merchant Capture product provides a financial institution’s business customers with the ability to scan
and deposit checks from their PC or Mac desktop computer or mobile device, eliminating trips to the bank to deposit checks. This
was our core product when we were founded in 2010. It has since been enhanced significantly in response to market needs. Today,
Select Business Merchant Capture is an omni-channel solution offering seamless integration across multiple desktop and mobile
operating systems. Businesses with field personnel collecting checks throughout the day, such as contractors, freight and in-person
services, can use their smart phone or tablet to deposit checks immediately while on the road, instead of waiting until they get
back to the office or have time to go the bank.
Our
Select Mobile Deposit product enables a financial institution to offer their consumer customers the ability to deposit their checks
anywhere, anytime by taking a picture of the front and back of the endorsed check using a mobile device. Consumers can save time
and money by eliminating trips to the bank. Financial institutions can expand their geographic reach and reduce overhead and operational
costs. All transactions are transmitted with multiple layers of security and can even be traced to user devices to combat fraud.
Additional fraud protection is provided through integration with CheckReview, our cloud-based SaaS proprietary technology that
helps identify potential fraud, by viewing and validating the digital image of the check in real time and detecting checks submitted
for deposit more than once.
Our
Select Mobile Deposit-Express product is an unbranded, standalone version of Select Mobile Deposit we developed for iPhone and
Android phones to minimize start-up costs and simplify deployment of mobile deposit for small financial institutions that lack
the resources to go to market with their own branded mobile deposit apps. Small banks and credit unions get the same leading technology
and support of our Select Mobile Deposit product at a fraction of the cost of a branded solution.
Remote
Payment Capture Solution: Select Mobile NowPay
We
recently introduced Select Mobile NowPay, which is a remote payment capture solution. This solution enables financing companies
and other lenders to offer their customers the convenience of making a payment on a loan or other recurring debt by using an app
on a smartphone to take a photo image of their check and transmit it to the payee. NowPay enhances the payment experience and
reduces the worry of late payments because customers no longer need to physically mail or deliver that check to the payee to make
a payment. NowPay helps keep lenders’ accounts receivable current with more timely payments and creates a new revenue opportunity
for the lenders.
We
offer our Select Mobile NowPay solution to any company that accepts recurring bill payments. Our market focus is on the following
primary markets:
|
●
|
lenders,
including special purpose consumer finance subsidiaries of large retailers and captive auto finance companies;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
loan
servicing companies, such as mortgage and student loan servicing companies; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
collection
agencies.
|
As
of December 31, 2016, we sold one Select Mobile NowPay product, which was not yet implemented by the client for use by its customers.
We expect our client will begin to deploy or implement this solution in 2017.
Mobile
Account Opening for Consumers
We
also recently introduced our Select Mobile Account Opening solution. This solution streamlines the account opening process by
utilizing photo imaging to capture customer data and auto-populate an account opening application form for checking, savings,
credit card and other types of accounts. This SaaS-based solution can be integrated with our prepaid mobile money platform, Select
Mobile Money, or with our client’s mobile banking application. It minimizes the cumbersome and error-prone manual data entry
typical of mobile account application forms. Users simply capture a picture of the front and back of their driver’s license,
and validated data is used to pre-populate account origination systems and identity verification providers. Once approved, a user
can fund his or her prepaid account immediately by writing a check and transmitting the digital image of the check, remote deposit
capture of a payroll or other check, authorizing an automated clearing house, or ACH, transfer, or using a credit card or bank
debit card to transfer funds. By using mobile imaging to generate faster and easier account opening and funding, clients enhance
customer satisfaction and experience increased application completion rates. As of December 31, 2016, we entered into contracts
for the sale of a total of five Select Mobile Account Opening products, of which one had been deployed.
Our
Revenue Sources
Our
revenues are comprised of non-recurring revenue and recurring revenue.
Non-Recurring
Revenue
We
have the following two categories of non-recurring revenue:
Up-Front
Implementation Fees.
We usually charge our clients an up-front implementation fee due upon entering into a new contract for
the initial set up of a product or product enhancement. This fee is earned by us over the term of the contract for completing
our implementation work for the product or enhancement and delivering it to our client for deployment. Usually, the term of these
contracts range anywhere from 12 to 36 months. This fee is amortized on a monthly basis over the term of the contract.
Professional
Services Fees.
If requested by our client, we provide professional services to the client for our solutions. Fees from professional
services may include fees charged for any client customization services, development of interfaces requested by our clients, assistance
with integration of our solutions with our client’s applications, dedicated client support services, advisory services to
clients who choose to develop their own interfaces and applications, and additional marketing support services requested by our
clients. For our RDC solutions, we also include in this category revenues from the sale of scanning and related equipment.
Recurring
Revenue
We
earn recurring revenue on a monthly basis from our client’s customer transactions, monthly user fees charged per customer,
and/or hosting/maintenance fees charged to our clients. Recurring revenue arises only after the client has deployed or implemented
one of our solutions, whether prepaid mobile money, RDC, or mobile account opening. Recurring revenue varies depending on the
specific solution deployed, the fee arrangement negotiated with the client, the number of client customers that use the application,
the type of user transaction and the volume of user transactions.
Recurring
revenue from our white label solution prepaid mobile money solution varies by client and typically includes a monthly hosting
fee and a monthly active user fee charged based on the number of customers that open the application. Although we do not currently
charge user transaction fees for this solution, in the future we may introduce new features into this solution which may have
a transaction fee revenue component. For a description of the potential recurring revenue components of our SMM-X prepaid mobile
money solution, see “Our Solutions—Prepaid Mobile Money Solutions: Select Mobile Money— Our Select Mobile Money
Express Platform (SMM-X).”)
Recurring
revenue from our RDC solutions varies by client and typically includes a monthly hosting/maintenance fee, a monthly user fee we
charge our client for each customer that has signed up for this service, and transaction fees which vary based on the type of
service and the number of checks deposited using this service.
Recurring
revenue from our Select Mobile NowPay solutions are expected to include a monthly hosting fee and transaction fees based on the
number of payments received using this service. Recurring revenue from our Select Mobile Account Opening solutions is expected
to include a monthly hosting fee and transaction fees based on the number of new accounts applications made using this service.
Our
Competitive Strengths
We
believe that the following represent our competitive strengths.
Premier
Technology
Our
mobile and other innovative solutions, including prepaid mobile money and RDC solutions, enable financial institutions and AFS
providers to deploy high-end cloud-based platforms that in turn meet the expectations and needs of their business and consumer
customer base.
Innovation
We
continually drive innovation to ensure that our solutions are best in class and at the forefront of other solutions available
in the market. We leverage our technology and take advantage of new opportunities in the mobile payment space. Examples of our
innovation and development leadership include introducing:
|
●
|
the
first Apple compatible, patent-pending RDC business technology platform,
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
our
CheckReview product, which is a patent-pending fraud-prevention solution allowing financial institutions to review a high
quality image of a personal check prior to processing that check,
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
an
interface that enables a check casher client, or check guarantor retained by the check casher or prepaid card issuer, to review
a high quality image of a captured check and, following approval of the check, authorize loading of funds from the captured
check onto their customer’s reloadable prepaid card,
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
a
patent-pending method for applying fees and business rules to RDC transactions, and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
a
patent-pending method for accepting payments by check through mobile RDC and applying the funds as payment on a loan or other
recurring debt.
|
Comprehensive
Training and Support Services
We
offer comprehensive product training, technical support and marketing support services to our clients to prepare for product launch
and beyond, including one-on-one and group training on product use, web-based product training, and educational webinars to inform
our client’s staff of product features and benefits and how to sell. As part of our marketing support services, we provide
customized marketing collateral, product videos, and post launch contests and promotions to help our clients promote their products
and increase customer adoption. Additionally, we provide clients with ongoing risk mitigation consulting and access to reports
that analyze customer use and transactions.
Our
typical client implementation process includes integrating our software into the infrastructure of the financial institution or
AFS provider, initiating client staff training and providing sales and marketing development to help our client’s succeed
when their prepaid mobile money solutions or RDC product is launched. We also intend to offer technical support for our Select
Mobile Account Opening product as well.
We
believe that comprehensive product training, technical support and marketing support services is a key differentiator of our company.
We also believe that financial institutions and AFS providers appreciate the advantages of this support and, even more importantly,
the benefits for their customers. Informal feedback from our clients confirms that our marketing support services help ensure
a successful launch and implementation of our prepaid mobile money and RDC solutions.
Our
Objective
Our
objective is to be the leading innovator and provider of mobile and other innovative technology solutions, including prepaid mobile
money solutions and RDC, designed to meet the specific requirements of financial institutions and AFS providers in the market.
Our
Strategy
To
achieve our objective, we are developing new products and enhancements to existing products, focusing on our target markets, marketing
and branding our products and services effectively. In addition, we intend to build our sales force, channel partners and resellers,
grow revenue from our existing clients, offer our products internationally, and opportunistically pursue acquisitions.
New
Products and Product Enhancements
It
is our plan to develop new technologies and solutions to enhance our suite of prepaid mobile money, RDC and related products we
offer. We intend to continue to listen to our clients and their customers, analyze the competitive landscape, and improve our
product offering. We are currently focused on the following product enhancements:
|
●
|
the
ability for a customer to sign-in once to access all of our applications;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
expanding
security sign-on features for our applications, such as touch ID through finger print authentication, iris recognition and
retinal scanning;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
developing
additional media to enable access to our applications through other devices, including, for example, Apple and Android watches;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
expanding
the integration of our technologies with providers of core banking systems, who we refer to as core providers (for example,
Fiserv, FIS, and Jack Henry), such as real time posting of checks;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
adding
new features to our prepaid mobile money solutions, such as bill payments, international money transfers, and coupons;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
enhancing
our mobile image capture technology; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
expanding
the integration of our Select Business Merchant Capture product with other commercial business management applications that
customers use, such as a commercial accounting package.
|
Focus
on Our Target Markets
Using
a direct sales force, we focus on banks and credit unions with $500 million to $20 billion in assets and AFS providers
that primarily serve the unbanked, under-banked and millennial consumer markets. We believe these institutions represent the best
opportunity for acceptance and growth of our prepaid mobile money and RDC solutions because they generally have multiple branches
and a significant commercial and/or consumer customer base. Also, many of these institutions often do not have internal marketing
capabilities to effectively take advantage of the opportunity that our mobile and other solutions present.
Market
and Brand our Solutions and Services Effectively
Our
branding and positioning strategy is based on our understanding of our target market needs and the desire to create value for
our clients while differentiating us in the marketplace. Our marketing strategy has revolved around strengthening brand awareness,
building thought leadership, and developing and executing targeted lead generation programs promoting our key competitive strengths
and innovative products and services.
Brand
Awareness.
Since our inception, we have focused on building and maintaining a strong presence at national banking, credit
union and AFS trade shows where we believe there is opportunity for significant exposure through exhibitions, conference sponsorships,
speaking opportunities and pre-show, onsite and post-show communications.
Thought
Leadership.
We have established and nurtured relationships with major industry media and associations, which has led to important
industry speaking opportunities, interviews and mentions in key print and online publications. We further distinguish our company
as a trusted partner and industry leader by leveraging our blog posts, social media, press releases, white papers and webinars.
Sales
Leads.
We employ a targeted, integrated and content-driven approach to generating sales leads. We segment our markets based
on specific criteria that represent the best opportunity and fit with our capabilities for specific product offerings, and then
target these groups with strategic campaigns that include content offers designed to nurture relationships, generate interest
and produce sales leads.
Build
our Internal Sales Force
We
believe there is significant opportunity to increase our future revenues by increasing the size of our internal sales force, which
will increase the number of our clients.
Seek
Additional Channel Partners and Resellers
We
have built an ecosystem of channel partners and resellers. A channel partner is another company with whom we have integrated our
Select Mobile Deposit product into its product offering platform, and that channel partner then sells the integrated solution
to a financial institution. A reseller is a sales agent that resells our solutions, currently Select Mobile Deposit and Select
Business Merchant Capture, to its clients. These important relationships are built by us supplying to the reseller, its clients
and their customers our premier technology and excellent client and customer support. We intend to seek new channel partners and
resellers which should help us increase the number of our clients.
Grow
Revenue from Existing Clients
We
have grown our revenues from our existing clients by cross selling new solutions and adding new features and functionality into
existing solutions. In addition, as our clients add new customers to our solutions, we have experienced revenue growth from increased
and transactions and user fees. We intend to continue growing our revenues from our existing client base in a similar fashion.
Offer
our Products Internationally
To
date, we have derived all of our revenues from the U.S. market. We believe that there is an additional growth opportunity for
our cloud-based SaaS solutions in international markets.
Pursue
Acquisitions
We
intend to opportunistically pursue acquisitions to accelerate the growth in our business through additional product offerings
or acquisition of customers. While we intend to generate most of our growth organically, we believe there may be opportunities
for us in the future to acquire companies that will bring synergies to our business.
Intellectual
Property
We
generally rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, internal security practices and employee
and third-party confidentiality agreements to protect our intellectual property rights. We believe that we possess all proprietary
rights necessary to conduct our business.
Patent
Applications
We
have applied for patents in the United States with regard to how our software is used on the Apple operating system platform and
various tablet devices (Android, Microsoft and Apple). We have also applied for patents in the United States with regard to certain
aspects of the functionality of our software, including check deposit review, approval and fraud-prevention processes, fees and
billing processes used by financial institutions and AFS providers, as well as other capabilities. While these functions are important
features of our prepaid mobile money and RDC solutions, we believe that none of them are critical to our overall ability to provide
our solutions. Nevertheless, our management does believe that these patents, if ultimately obtained, provide us with a competitive
advantage in the marketplace for our prepaid mobile money and RDC services. We have not filed any patent applications outside
the United States. The patents applications referred to above are still pending and have not been awarded to date.
Non-Patented
Proprietary Technology
We
develop custom and proprietary software for all of our solutions and products. Our key proprietary software components that we
developed for our prepaid mobile money solutions include:
|
●
|
financial
management tools, including real-time transaction posting, transaction history and fund transfers;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
a
data access gateway that integrates with a processor’s system to connect our prepaid mobile money solutions to the global
debit card networks; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
integration
of our applications with third party service providers, such as coupon providers, ATM locator service providers and retail
service providers.
|
Our
key proprietary software components that we developed for our RDC solutions include:
|
●
|
decision
workflow and business rules, including setting different deposit limits for each customer account and separate financial institution
controls;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
risk
management controls, including duplicate check detection and fraud detection;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
a
broad integration framework which integrates the financial settlement process for financial institutions, AFS providers, core
providers and other financial technology providers; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
returned
check management, which is a data feature designed to store information on prior returned checks which our check cashing service
provider clients often purchase.
|
Trademarks
We
have registered certain trademarks with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on the Principal Register. We also rely
on the United States on common law rights to certain trademarks. We have not registered any of our trademarks in jurisdictions
outside of the United States. Solely for convenience, our trademarks and trade names referred to in this prospectus appear without
the ® and ™ symbols, but those references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that we will not assert, to the
fullest extent under applicable law, our rights, or the right of the applicable licensor to these trademarks and trade names.
Additionally, we do not intend for our use or display of other companies’ trade names, trademarks or service marks to imply
a relationship with, or endorsement or sponsorship of us, by these other companies.
Outsourced
Software Development
We
outsource software development tasks for our prepaid mobile money solutions and other select development projects to six software
developers based in Toronto, Canada, who are our consultants. The work product produced by these consultants is our proprietary
software.
Licensed
Software for our RDC Solutions
We
also license from third-parties material software products that support our RDC solutions. For example, we license from Mitek
Systems Inc. and Parascript, LLC the rights to use their image capture and processing technologies. We license from AQ2 Technologies,
LLC its technology for generating check financial settlement files, which includes the pertinent information about the check,
for transmission to a financial institution’s core processing platform. We also license from All My Papers software tools
to assist with processing returned check files. Server software for these licensed technologies reside in our own offsite data
centers, as opposed to being hosted with third party service providers.
Indemnification
Obligations
We
are required under our client agreements to indemnify our clients and hold them harmless for any third party infringement claims
relating to our solutions. To the extent we use any licensed software in providing solutions to our clients, we are generally
entitled to be indemnified by the software provider for any third party infringement claims relating to their licensed software.
Government
Regulation
We
are not a financial institution or an AFS provider, and therefore we are generally not regulated by the regulatory authorities
that regulate financial institutions or AFS providers. However, federal law provides the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
(“CPFB”) with supervisory and enforcement authority over service providers to certain “covered persons”
engaged in offering or providing consumer financial products or services; and we would be subject to such regulatory authority
by the CFPB. Additionally, as a provider of fintech solutions to the financial services industry, our clients expect us to be
aware of the regulatory requirements and developments applicable to them and maintain the internal controls necessary for their
regulatory compliance. We continue to invest the resources required of us to maintain internal controls necessary for our client’s
regulatory compliance.
For
example, our financial institution clients are required to comply with certain regulations under Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, as well
as certain state regulations relating to financial institutions. Those regulations are designed to establish, implement and maintain
such physical, electronic and procedural safeguards to maintain the security and confidentiality of customer data and to protect
consumer data privacy.
To
satisfy our clients’ regulatory requirements and their need to be assured of the suitability of the design and operating
effectiveness of controls related to security and availability around their information, we obtain a report on controls at a service
organization relevant to security and availability (Service Organization Controls Report (SOC) 2 Type 2) from our independent
auditors annually, which we refer to as the SOC 2 Type 2 Report. The SOC 2 Type 2 Report provides a description of the controls
necessary to meet the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ Trust Services Principles and Criteria, referred
to as the TSP Section 100, along with our independent auditor’s tests of our controls to meet the TSP Section 100 and the
results of those tests. Upon request, we make this report available to our clients and potential clients.
Payment
Card Industry Association Compliance
Payment
Card Industry, or PCI, is a self-regulatory organization founded by its founding members, American Express, Discover Financial
Services, JCB International, MasterCard and Visa Inc. Participating organizations in PCI may include merchants, banks, processors,
hardware and software developers and point-of-sale vendors.
PCI
has defined a set of twelve industry security standards outlined below, called the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard,
or PCI DSS, which is designed to ensure that all companies that accept, process, store or transmit credit card information maintain
a secure environment.
|
(1)
|
Install
and maintain a firewall configuration to protect cardholder data.
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Do
not use vendor-supplied defaults for system passwords and other security parameters.
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Protect
stored cardholder data.
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Encrypt
transmission of cardholder data across open, public networks.
|
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
Use
and regularly update antivirus software.
|
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
Develop
and maintain secure systems and applications.
|
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
Restrict
access to cardholder data by business need-to-know.
|
|
|
|
|
(8)
|
Assign
a unique ID to each person with computer access.
|
|
|
|
|
(9)
|
Restrict
physical access to cardholder data.
|
|
|
|
|
(10)
|
Track
and monitor all access to network resources and cardholder data.
|
|
|
|
|
(11)
|
Regularly
test security systems and processes.
|
|
|
|
|
(12)
|
Maintain
a policy that addresses information security.
|
The
PCI founding members have all agreed to incorporate the PCI DSS as part of the technical requirements for each of their data security
compliance programs, which effectively means that all merchants, banks, processors, hardware and software developers and point-of-sale
vendors must also comply with the PCI DSS.
As
part of our prepaid mobile money solutions, we have access to and transmit reloadable prepaid card numbers and we also integrate
with the reloadable prepaid card issuers’ core system. Therefore, under various agreements with our clients that purchase
our prepaid mobile money solutions, we are required to comply with PCI DSS in order to meet these clients’ requirements,
and also industry demands and best practices. If we fail to comply, these clients may terminate their agreements with us without
any cancelation penalty due from the client. In addition, the PCI governing council may impose a significant monetary penalty
on us, depending on the significance of the breach and the number of account holders impacted.
Compliance
levels are set by the PCI governing body. Our compliance level is PCI level three, which requires an annual attestation of compliance
for service providers against the PCI standards. This annual attestation of compliance is prepared by us and submitted to our
clients during the fourth quarter of each year.
If
the number of reloadable prepaid cards we have access and transmit in any calendar year exceeds one million, then our PCI compliance
requirements will increase to level two, which entails a full external audit by a PCI-registered qualified security assessor,
QSA, a quarterly network scan by an approved scan vender and a report on compliance issued by the QSA. We expect this may occur
as early as October 2017. Therefore, we expect to incur additional expenses to satisfy PCI compliance requirements in the future.
Competition
Prepaid
Mobile Money Solutions
We
are not aware of any direct competitors for our Select Mobile Money solutions. Other mobile platforms in the industry are either
not focused on prepaid mobile money solutions or they are offered as ancillary services by core providers such as FIS, Fiserv,
Jack Henry and D+H, and are thereby not as current, comprehensive or robust.
Monetise
is a digital technology company that offers a mobile platform, but we believe it is focused on direct deposit accounts and checking
accounts, not prepaid accounts. Our expertise and focus is on developing features and functionality tailored for the prepaid mobile
money market.
Our
prepaid mobile money solutions have a data access gateway that integrates with core banking systems, which are back-end systems
that process daily banking transactions and post updates to accounts and other financial records. Core banking systems typically
include deposit, loan and credit-processing capabilities, with interfaces to general ledger systems and reporting tools. Having
our prepaid mobile money solutions integrate with a core provider’s system enables us to connect to the global debit card
networks. As a result, we offer financial institutions and AFS providers a more robust solution than a core provider can offer
on its own.
FIS,
Fiserv, D+H and Jack Henry are the major providers of core banking systems, or core providers. Their technology provides the behind-the-scenes
engine that processes all deposits, payments, loans, most transactions and customer data at financial institutions. Many core
providers offer mobile banking platforms, but their products are very simple and basic compared to our prepaid mobile money solutions.
Everything outside of the core providers ’ primary services is considered ancillary. The core providers ’
ancillary services tend not to get the same focus for development and updates, and also tend to be inflexible and more expensive.
If
a client has a need for broader functionality, a core provider will often bring in a partner like us. A core provider can be a
competitor, while simultaneously offering us opportunities on which we may partner to provide a more robust prepaid mobile money
solution to the client. We have integrated with all the major core providers and expect more opportunities to partner with the
major core providers in the future.
RDC
Solution
Since
RDC incorporates both software and hardware solutions, companies involved with these platforms may be considered competitors if
they offer a complete solution to their customers. Non-hardware or software companies also offer RDC solutions. These companies
typically sell directly to their commercial customers. Pitney Bowes and NCR are two companies we are aware of which offer an RDC
solution directly to their customers. Software companies offering RDC solutions include, but are not limited to, Bluepoint Solutions,
Fiserv, Goldleaf ProfitStars, Net Deposit, VSoft, Deluxe Corporation (acquired Wausau), and Fidelity Information Services (FIS).
Nearly
all of these competitors are larger, have more resources, including marketing and sales resources, and have proven viability in
RDC and many other related businesses. Competing against these firms presents us with significant challenges and highlights our
need to provide excellent products and service that remain innovative.
Research
and Development
During
the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we incurred research and development costs of $1.9 million and $2.6 million, respectively,
to expand the functionality of our products and solutions.
Employees
and Consultants
We
believe our employees have a significant role in the future success of our business. To reflect this, we refer to our employees
as associates. Our associates are involved in administration, sales, marketing, technology development, engineering and support.
As
of December 31, 2016, we had approximately 63 full-time and two part-time associates, all based in the U.S., of which approximately
34 associates are directly associated with research and product development and client support. The rest of our associates are
involved with sales, marketing, finance and administrative functions.
As
of December 31, 2016, we also have six full-time non-employee consultants based in Toronto, Canada who are software developers
that work on software development tasks primarily for our prepaid mobile money solutions and other select development projects.
Legal
Proceedings
Cachet
Banq
An
entity named Cachet Banq contacted us in December 2010 relative to their U.S. Trademark Registration No. 2,857,465 (registered
on June 29, 2004) for the standard character mark “CACHET” covering “financial services, namely automated clearing
house processing services for the payroll service industry.” Cachet Banq has alleged that our use of “CACHET”
infringes on their federal trademark registration. On or about March 4, 2013, Cachet Banq filed a trademark infringement lawsuit
against us in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The parties filed cross motions for summary
judgment. The initial brief was filed on May 30, 2014, replies were filed on June 26, 2014 and the court took these motions under
advisement on July 8, 2014. We have denied that our use of the character mark “CACHET” infringes on Cachet Banq’s
purported rights in their mark. On September 21, 2015, the court issued an order (1) granting Cachet Banq’s motion for summary
judgment, (2) denying our motion for summary judgment, and (3) ordering the parties to submit memoranda regarding remedies. The
last of those memoranda were submitted on October 12, 2015. On November 30, 2015, the Court entered an additional order providing
for an additional period of discovery and additional briefing regarding remedies. Pursuant to the Court’s order, the parties
engaged in a renewed period of discovery focused on remedies and submitted additional briefing. The discovery was completed and
all additional briefing was submitted to the Court by April 19, 2016. According to their briefing on the remedies, Cachet Banq
is not presently seeking any monetary damages as a result of the alleged infringement, but rather an injunction.
On
October 27, 2016, the Court entered a judgment and permanent injunction against us which, effective from April 15, 2017, enjoins
us and our officers, directors, agents, servants, employees and attorneys and all persons in active concert or participation with
any of the foregoing from (i) using any mark, name, symbol, logo or other indicia that incorporates or is confusingly similar
to the term “CACHET” in any way that relates to financial services, and (ii) offering for sale, soliciting sales,
promoting, distributing, importing, advertising, or selling any products or services, in any medium, under any mark, name, symbol,
logo or other indicia that incorporates or is confusingly similar to the term “CACHET” which in any way relate to
financial services. We are also ordered to destroy or discard all signs, products, advertisements, packaging, literature, business
cards, and any other promotional material, which feature the term “CACHET” or a term confusingly similar thereto,
both physical and electronic, which are in any way related to financial services, in each case except for the permitted use described
below. Under the injunction, we must complete our transition to a yet-to-be determined new company name by no later than April
15, 2017. We are permitted to reference our current name in an explanatory fashion on signs, products, advertisements, packaging,
literature, business cards, and any other promotional material to introduce our new name in a font size no greater than one-third
the font-size of the yet-to-be determined new company name. This permitted use provision terminates on June 30, 2017, by which
date we must cease from using the explanatory statement in any manner and destroy or discard all materials featuring the explanatory
statement. By no later than July 12, 2017, we must file a declaration, under penalty of perjury, setting forth in detail the manner
and form in which we have complied with the injunction.
We
intend to comply with the injunction and will pursue a re-branding. We expect that the re-branding will require us to devote significant
resources to advertising and marketing new brands and will cause us to incur substantial costs. We estimate the expenses related
to the re-branding will be between $200,000 and $300,000 over a six-month period during 2017. The Court denied Cachet Banq’s
request for attorney’s fees and costs.
Series
Subordinated Note
On
March 31, 2016, the holder of the series subordinated note referred to in Note 5 “Financing Arrangements” to our consolidated
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 commenced an action against us in Hennepin County Court in the State
of Minnesota, alleging that we breached the terms of the note and seeking to collect alleged amounts due and owing under the note.
The holder of the note alleges that we are in default and owe the note holder approximately $695,000 plus interest and assessments
accruing after April 1, 2016. The dispute centers on the note holder’s interpretation of the agreement. Based on the note
holder’s interpretation of the agreement, the note holder seeks an extraordinary amount in alleged liquidated damages (approximately
$300,000 on an outstanding debt of approximately $415,000). We dispute the allegations of the note holder and intend to vigorously
defend the claim. Among other things, we contend the note holder’s interpretation of the agreement is unenforceable under
Minnesota law. The note holder moved for summary judgment and a hearing on that motion was held on August 9, 2016 before the Fourth
Judicial District in Hennepin County in Minnesota where the Court heard both arguments and took the motion under advisement. On
October 19, 2016, the Court entered an order granting in part and denying in part the motion for summary judgment. The alleged
default could subject us to claims of default or cross default by our other lenders. At this time no other lender has asserted
such a claim. If the noteholder is successful in its lawsuit, we would be subject to a penalty of $500 per day for each day that
we are in default of the note. As of December 31, 2016, we had accrued $176,000 related to this $500 per day penalty.
Trooien
Capital
On
or about May 24, 2016, we received notice from Trooien Capital alleging that we have not made interest payments in accordance
with the terms of convertible notes issued to Trooien Capital in December 2013, and as a result of such alleged breach, all outstanding
amounts under such notes are accelerated. Pursuant to the convertible notes, our subsidiary granted to Trooien Capital a security
interest in all of our subsidiary’s property and assets, including all property that our subsidiary will acquire in the
future, as collateral security for the payment and performance of our subsidiary’s obligations under the convertible notes.
On or about May 27, 2016, our subsidiary filed a verified complaint with the Fourth District Court of Hennepin County in Minnesota
naming Trooien Capital as a defendant and seeking a declaratory judgment against Trooien Capital with respect to this claim. On
June 10, 2016, Trooien Capital answered our subsidiary’s complaint and asserted counterclaims. On June 20, 2016, Trooien
Capital moved to appoint a receiver for our subsidiary. On June 30, 2016, the Company filed a notice of motion and motion to dismiss
a portion of the counterclaims. On July 19, 2016, the Company filed with the Fourth District Court of Hennepin County in Minnesota
a memorandum of law and supporting documents requesting that the Court deny Trooien Capital’s motion to appoint a receiver
for our subsidiary. On October 18, 2016, a hearing on the motions was held and the Court took both motions under advisement. On
October 21, 2016, the Court entered an order denying Trooien Capital’s motion to appoint a receiver and denying the Company’s
motion to dismiss a portion of Trooien Capital’s counterclaims.
On
December 20, 2016, we entered into a settlement agreement and full release with Trooien Capital, pursuant to which we agreed to
pay to Trooien Capital a total of $3.1 million and to issue a warrant to purchase 333,334 shares of the Company’s
common stock at the lower of $8.33 per share and 80% of the Company’s per share price in the next underwritten public
offering, in settlement of the convertible notes in the amount of $2.3 million, plus interest accrued but unpaid thereon. In exchange
for the settlement payment and warrants, Trooien Capital, within one business day after receipt of the settlement payment and
warrants, will take all necessary steps to remove, terminate or otherwise release any and all interest in any tangible or intangible
assets of the Company. The Company fully repaid the $3.1 million due to Trooien Capital as of December 23, 2016.
Our
Corporate Information
All
of our business is conducted entirely by our wholly-owned subsidiary, Cachet Financial Solutions Inc., a Minnesota corporation.
Our current corporate organization is depicted below:
We
were incorporated in Delaware in February 2010. In February 2014, we acquired the business of our subsidiary, and changed our
corporate name to “Cachet Financial Solutions, Inc.” Prior to the merger, our corporate name was “DE Acquisition
2, Inc.” We were formed as a “blank check” company with the sole purpose of acquiring a business seeking to
become a public reporting company through a merger transaction.
Our
corporate headquarters and principal executive offices are located at 18671 Lake Drive East, dellFive Business Park G, Minneapolis,
MN 55317. Our telephone number is (952) 698-6980. Our website address is www.cachetfinancial.com. The information on or accessible
through our website is not part of this prospectus.
MANAGEMENT
Directors
and Executive Officers
The
name, age and positions of our current executive officers and directors are as follows:
Name
|
|
|
Age
|
|
|
Positions
|
Jeffrey
C. Mack
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer, President and Director (Chairman)
|
Bruce
Whitmore
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
Executive
Vice President and Chief Information Officer
|
Lawrence
C. Blaney
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Executive
Vice President of Sales
|
Bryan
D. Meier
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Darin
P. McAreavey
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Director
|
Michael
J. Hanson
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Director
|
James
L. Davis
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
Director
|
Rod
Jardine
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Director
|
Ruth
Owades
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
Director
|
Liyuan
Woo
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
Director
|
James
J. Spencer
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Director
|
Robin
S. O’Connell
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Director
|
The
biographies of the above-identified individuals are set forth below.
Jeffrey
C. Mack
is our Chief Executive Officer, President and Director (Chairman), and has served in such capacities since our inception.
He has also served in identical capacities at our subsidiary since our subsidiary’s inception. Mr. Mack has significant
experience building and managing companies of all sizes and across a variety of industries. Prior to joining our company, Mr.
Mack served as a consultant to multiple small businesses, including a business engaged in the sale of banking technology and related
services. From January 2003 to September 2008, Mr. Mack served as Chairman, CEO and President of Wireless Ronin Technologies,
Inc., a leader in dynamic digital signage. In January 1990, Mr. Mack founded and became Chairman, CEO and President of Arcadia
Financial Ltd. (formerly known as Olympic Financial Ltd.), one of the largest independent providers of automobile financing in
the United States. Prior to founding Arcadia Financial, Mr. Mack served as an executive in the commercial banking industry for
17 years.
Bruce
Whitmore
is our Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer, and has served in such capacities since January 2015.
Mr. Whitmore served as CTO at SkyBridge Americas from June 2013 to January 2015. Prior to working for SkyBridge Americas, Mr.
Whitmore served as Head of Information Technology and Executive Consultant for KDV Ltd from January 2011 to June 2013. From January
2008 to January 2011, Mr. Whitmore held various IT roles at Carlson Companies. From 1992 to 1997, Mr. Whitmore also held various
IT roles within United Health Care Group Corporation. Mr. Whitmore earned a Bachelor of Science, Strategic Management of Information
Technology Cardinal Stritch University.
Lawrence
C. Blaney
is our Executive Vice President of Sales, and has served in such capacity since June 2010. He has also served in
identical capacity at our subsidiary since June 2010. He has a successful track record of building high-performance global sales
and marketing organizations. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Blaney served as Senior Vice President of Development at Wireless
Ronin Technologies, Inc. From 1998 to 2008, Mr. Blaney was the Vice President of Sales and Marketing at Richardson Electronics,
a global custom solutions company. During his tenure at Richardson, he helped realign the sales force by creating a vertical market
strategy focusing on financial institutions. Richardson Electronics saw a growth in sales from $35 million to $95 million under
his management. In 1990, Mr. Blaney formed a startup systems integration company focusing on selling hardware and software to
large financial institutions, which included major U.S. exchanges and international banks. Mr. Blaney sold his company to Richardson
Electronics in 1998.
Bryan
D. Meier
is our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and has served in such capacities since March 2016.
He oversees our corporate finance, accounting, investor relations, contract management and reporting. He also works with our executive
team to identify opportunities to drive corporate value and long-term financial success. Mr. Meier has more than 25 years of experience
in numerous CFO positions from startups to $4 billion corporations. From June 2014 to November 2015, Mr. Meier served as CFO for
Recovery Technology Solutions, Inc. From 2013 to 2014 Mr. Meier was CFO at TT Electronics PLC. Mr. Meier was Vice President and
CFO of Phoenix Solar, Inc. from 2010 to 2012 in San Francisco.
Darin
P. McAreavey
is a director of our company and has served in such capacity since February 2016. From April 2014 to February
2016, Mr. McAreavey served as our Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President. Prior to that, Mr. McAreavey served as
the Senior Vice President and CFO at Wireless Ronin Technologies, Inc. since March 2009. Prior to working for Wireless Ronin,
Mr. McAreavey served as CFO for Xiotech Corporation from September 2007 to March 2009. From February 2007 to September 2007, Mr.
McAreavey worked for Global Capacity Group as its CFO. In addition, Mr. McAreavey worked for Stellent, Inc. as CFO, Executive
Vice President and Treasurer from May 2006 to February 2007 and as the Corporate Controller from September 2004 to May 2006. Mr.
McAreavey held several management level finance positions, including director of Finance, at Computer Network Technology from
August 1995 to September 2004. From November 1993 to August 1995, Mr. McAreavey was a Supervising Senior for KPMG LLP. Mr. McAreavey
began his professional career as a Senior Accountant at Eide Helmeke & Co. from July 1991 to November 1993 and earned a Master
of Business Administration degree in 1998 from the University of Saint Thomas.
Michael
J. Hanson
is a director of our company, and has served in such capacity since March 2014. In addition, he has served as a
director of our subsidiary since its inception. Mr. Hanson has served as President and CEO of Hunt Electric Corporation since
1996. He began his career at Hunt in 1985 as an Assistant Project Manager and worked his way up through various senior and executive
roles until he was promoted to his current position. He became Hunt’s majority stockholder in 2001. Mr. Hanson serves as
the Governor of the St. Paul Chapter of the National Electrical Contractors Association. He is also a Representative and President
of the Federated Electrical Contractors. He currently serves as a Trustee for Dunwoody College of Technology.
James
L. Davis
is a director of our company, and has served in such capacity since March 2014. In addition, he has served as a director
of our subsidiary since its inception. Mr. Davis is the President of Davis & Associates, Inc., which he founded more than
30 years ago. Davis & Associates represents the leading edge lighting and controls manufacturer, providing lighting and controls
solutions for customers in the upper Midwest. Mr. Davis is also a private investor and has served as a director on both private
and public company boards for more than 20 years. He is currently a director of ProUroCare Medical Inc., a publicly held medical
device manufacturer.
Rod
Jardine
is a director of our company, and has served in such capacity since February 2015. He is currently President of Agile
CxO, Inc., an IT management company that helps companies align their IT roadmaps and architecture to business strategy. Mr. Jardine
has worked with large payors to change the way they identify risk, manage revenue, maintain compliance, and enhance performance
for commercial risk adjustment. Prior to Agile CxO, Mr. Jardine was CIO at TMG Health, where he successfully led the production
rollout and implementation of their Medicare platform, TMG Core. Previously, he held executive leadership roles at UnitedHealth
Group (UHG), where he led the development of myCustomHealth, their private retiree health exchange. Mr. Jardine was also responsible
for UHG’s health services web/consumer engagement strategy and was the chief architect for its $10 billion health services
division, OptumHeath, where he guided the development and implementation of the division’s IT enterprise systems.
Ruth
Owades
is a director of our company, and has served in such capacity since June 2016. In 1988, Ms. Owades founded Calyx &
Corolla, a fresh flower catalog and website, and had served as its Chief Executive Officer and Chairman from inception through
2000, at which time that company was sold to an investor group. From 1979 to 1987, Ms. Owades served as the Chief Executive Officer
of Gardener’s Eden, a gardening tools, furniture and accessories company that was founded by Ms. Owades. In 1983, Gardener’s
Eden was purchased by Williams-Sonoma. Ms. Owades currently serves on the board of directors of Northern Trust Western Region,
Ultra Capital, diaTribe Foundation and Technion—the Israel Institute of Technology, and previously served as a director
of Armstrong World Industries, Deckers Outdoor Corporation, J. Jill Group, Newsy, and Providian Financial. Ms. Owades is a graduate
of Scripps College and earned an MBA degree from Harvard Business School, and was recognized by her alma maters with the Distinguished
Alumna Award from Scripps and the Alumni Achievement Award from Harvard Business School. Ms. Owades has served on the Board of
Dean’s Advisors for Harvard Business School and is a Life Trustee of Scripps College. In 2009, Ms. Owades was presented
with the Fulbright Lifetime Achievement Medal in Washington D.C. Ms. Owades provides advisory and mentoring services to early
stage companies, including helping management establish progress milestones, finalize funding strategies, analyze consumer behavior
trends, and explore joint ventures and alternate revenue streams.
Liyuan
Woo
is a director of our company and has served in such capacity since August 2016. From April 2013 through February 2016,
Ms. Woo served as the Chief Financial Officer of Bebe Stores, Inc., a publicly traded fashion retail company, and was responsible
for all aspects of operations including finance, investor relations, strategic corporate development, supply chain, real estate
and construction, legal and loss preventions. From August 2010 to June 2014, Ms. Woo served as Bebe Stores’ Principal Accounting
Officer and Vice President Corporate Controller and advised the board of directors of Bebe Stores on various strategic matters,
including alternative financings, repurchasing and structuring solutions. From September 2004 to July 2010, Ms. Woo held a Senior
Manager position with Deloitte & Touche LLP in its M&A Transaction Services Group and advised private equity firms as
well as public and private companies during M&A transactions, initial public offerings and growth initiatives for the technology,
consumer, life science, and financial services industries. From September 1997 to September 2004, Ms. Woo served as an Audit Manager
at Deloitte. Ms. Woo had served on the board of directors of Dress For Success San Francisco, an organization with mission to
assist underprivileged women.
James
J. Spencer
is a director of our company and has served in such capacity since August 2016. In 2008, Mr. Spencer founded Newsy
(Newsy.com), an early mobile, OTTV and online video news service that was acquired by the E.W. Scripps Company in 2014. Mr. Spencer
served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Newsy from 2008 to 2016, and as its Chairman of the Board of Directors
from 2008 until the sale of the company in 2014. From 1999 to 2001, Mr. Spencer served as a Vice President of Content at Ask.com
(formerly known as Ask Jeeves), where he was responsible for all search queries and helped guide the company to be the 15th most
trafficked website and through a successful initial public offering. From 1997 to 1998, Mr. Spencer served as the General Manager
of News and Information Programming at AOL Inc., a mass media content provider, where he advanced the content, business and partnership
operations for one of AOL’s major business units. From 1995 to 1997, Mr. Spencer served as an executive director of partnerships
for NBC. From 1990 to 1995, Mr. Spencer served as the General Manager of New Media at Multimedia, Inc. prior to its sale to Gannett
Company, Inc. Mr. Spencer currently serves as a board member on the Reynolds Journalism Institute’s Investment Committee
and The Missouri Innovation Center’s Accelerator Investment Committee.
Robin
S. O’Connell
is a director of our company and has served in such capacity since August 2016. Since September 2015, Mr.
O’Connell has been serving as the Executive Vice President Head of Growth & Partnerships of Uphold, Inc., a cloud-based
financial service provider, where he is responsible for revenue generation through B2B partnerships with large multinational corporations
and international trading organizations. From January 2014 to August 2015, Mr. O’Connell served as Vice President Business
Development of Worldpay, Inc., a payment processing company publicly traded on the London Stock Exchange, where he led all new
e-commerce business development activity in North America for large international businesses. From July 2010 to December 2013,
Mr. O’Connell served as Vice President Business Development of BetterFinance, Inc. (formerly Billfloat, Inc.) and led business
development and account management for venture-backed alternative lending start-up. From October 2006 to June 2010, Mr. O’Connell
served as Vice President Business Development of Billeo, Inc., where he was responsible for sales & business development for
venture-backed bill payment and e-commerce start-up. From 2000 to 2006, Mr. O’Connell served in various capacities at Visa,
including as a Director, Product Development and Management, where he managed the Visa Bill Payment Initiative, led Visa’s
Bill Payment Steering Committee and managed a cross-functional team responsible for all marketing, merchant sales and product
development activities.
Under
our Bylaws, all of our directors serve until their successors are elected and qualified for terms expiring upon the next annual
meeting of our stockholders.
When
considering whether directors and nominees have the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills to enable the Board of Directors
to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively in light of our business and structure, the Board of Directors focuses primarily
on the industry and transactional experience, and other background, in addition to any unique skills or attributes associated
with a director. With regard to Mr. Mack, the Board of Directors considered his significant experience, expertise and background
with regard to our business and his prior experience as a chief executive for other business enterprises. With respect to Mr.
McAreavey the Board of Directors considered his extensive experience with the business of our company. With regard to Mr. Hanson,
the Board of Directors considered his extensive experience with the business of our company since its inception. With regard to
Mr. Davis, the Board of Directors considered his background and experience as an investor in many different businesses, together
with his prior experience serving on the boards of public companies. With regard to Mr. Jardine, the Board of Directors considered
his extensive knowledge and experience in helping very large enterprises leverage technology in order to drive organic growth.
Letter
Agreement with Aracle SPF IV, LLC
On
March 31, 2016, we entered into a letter agreement with Aracle SPF IV, LLC in connection with a securities purchase agreement
that we entered into with them on the same date. Pursuant to the letter agreement, we are required to appoint a new independent
director to our Board of Directors and/or an advisory board member to be referred to us by Aracle and subject to our management’s
express prior approval. Aracle’s right to appoint a director to our Board of Directors and/or an advisory board member survives
for two years through March 31, 2018. As of the date of this prospectus, we have not appointed any director referred to us by
Aracle.
Other
Management Employee
Set
forth below is a description of our other management employee.
Walt
Granville
is our Senior Vice President Mobile Innovation, and has served in such capacity since November 2015. He is responsible
for driving new innovations that optimize the user experience and help our clients to realize the full value of the Select Mobile
Money platform. Mr. Granville has a successful 20-year track record of delivering global innovations within the highly competitive
payments, loyalty, offers, and mobile markets. Prior to joining our company, he was Vice President, Global Partnerships for the
Monitise Group. At Monitise, Mr. Granville focused on development and deployment of services enabled across a distributed customer
base that included Visa, MasterCard, Santander and IBM, for global markets that included the U.S., UK, Germany, Spain, France,
Turkey and Brazil. These services included alternative payments, domestic and cross-border P2P payments, and a content platform
that allowed clients to cross sell goods and services in their mobile banking and mobile wallet applications, such as gift cards,
identity theft services, credit reports, event tickets, and deep-linked merchant offers. Previously, Mr. Granville served in key
leadership roles in the mobile, emerging payments, loyalty and card markets, including leading the Visa Global Information Products
team dedicated to the development, sales and implementation of new data and technology innovations that leveraged the core Visa
payments network. At Visa, he successfully led the execution of more than 25 innovation programs in the card-linked offers, emerging
payments, data insights, loyalty and daily deals spaces, with high profile clients such as Microsoft, Chase, Sears, Nordstrom’s
and United Airlines.
Director
Independence
Our
board of directors will periodically review relationships that directors have with our company to determine whether the directors
are independent. For purposes of determining director independence, we have applied the definition of “independent
director” set forth in Nasdaq Rule 5605(a)(2), which provides that an “independent director” is a person, other
than an executive officer or employee of the company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the
company’s board of directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities
of a director. The OTCQB Marketplace, on which shares of our common stock are quoted, does not have any director independence
requirements.
Under
Nasdaq Rule 5605(b)(1), which will apply to us from the date on which our common stock is listed for trading on the Nasdaq Capital
Market, a majority of the board of directors of a company must be comprised of independent directors within the meaning of Nasdaq
Rule 5605(a)(2). As of the date of this prospectus, our board of directors has determined that five of our nine directors—Rod
Jardine, Ruth Owades, Liyuan Woo, James J. Spencer and Robin S. O’Connell—are “independent” within the
meaning of Nasdaq Rule 5605(a)(2). We expect to continue to be in compliance with the independence requirement under Nasdaq Rule
5605(b)(1) on the date on which our common stock is listed for trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market.
Board
Committees
On
August 19, 2016, our Board of Directors approved the reconstitution of our audit committee, corporate governance committee and
executive committee and the establishment of a compensation committee. Each committee consists of the following members:
Name
|
|
|
Audit
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
Corporate
Governance
|
|
|
|
Executive
|
|
|
|
Independent
Directors
|
|
Jeffrey C. Mack
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
Darin P. McAreavey
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Hanson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
James L. Davis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rod Jardine
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Ruth Owades
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Liyuan Woo
|
|
|
X
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
James J. Spencer
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Robin S. O’Connell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
*
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
*committee
chairperson
Audit
Committee
Our
audit committee currently consists of the following independent directors: Rod Jardine, Liyuan Woo and James J. Spencer. Liyuan
Woo is the chairperson of our audit committee and is considered to be a “financial expert” as that term is defined
in Nasdaq Rule 5605(c)(2).
The
duties and responsibilities of our audit committee include (i) selecting, evaluating and, if appropriate, replacing our independent
registered accounting firm, (ii) reviewing the plan and scope of audits, (iii) reviewing our significant accounting policies,
any significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls or material weakness therein and any significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of their
evaluation, (iv) overseeing related auditing matters and (v) approving, as the case may be, any transactions or courses of dealing
with related parties that are required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K, which is the SEC’s disclosure
rules for certain related-person transactions.
Corporate
Governance Committee
Our
corporate governance committee currently consists of the following independent directors: Ruth Owades, Liyuan Woo, James J. Spencer
and Robin S. O’Connell. Ruth Owades is the chairperson of our corporate governance committee.
The
duties and responsibilities of our corporate governance committee include making decisions relating to board composition, director
qualifications standards, selection of the Chairman of the Board of Directors and the Chief Executive Officer, director responsibilities
and the committees of the Board of Directors.
Executive
Committee
Our
executive committee currently consists of the following directors: Jeffrey C. Mack, Darin P. McAreavey, Michael J. Hanson and
James L. Davis. Jeffrey C. Mack is the chairperson of our executive committee.
Compensation
Committee
The
duties and responsibilities of our compensation committee include reviewing and approving our compensation strategy, philosophy,
policies and programs; reviewing and discussing management’s assessment of the material risks associated with our employee
compensation structure, policies and programs; determination of the compensation of our directors; reviewing and making recommendations
to our Board of Directors with respect to our incentive compensation, equity-based and pension plans; and reviewing and making
recommendations to our Board of Directors with respect to executive officer and director indemnification and insurance matters.
Our
compensation committee consists of the following directors: James L. Davis, Ruth Owades and Robin S. O’Connell. Robin S.
O’Connell is the chairperson of our compensation committee. Our Board of Directors determined that, even though Mr. Davis
is not considered “independent” within the meaning of Nasdaq Rule 5605(a)(2), it is imperative and in the best interests
of our company and our stockholders that Mr. Davis be appointed as a member of the compensation committee for a period of not
more than two years from the date on which our common stock is listed for trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market, in light of the
fact that Ruth Owades and Robin S. O’Connell have only recently joined our Board of Directors and that Mr. Davis has been
our director since 2014 and is therefore very familiar with our historical executive compensation decisions, policies and practices
and is also an experienced local investor and businessman that is familiar with the local market in Minneapolis where our company
maintains its principal place of business. For these reasons, our Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Davis can provide
our compensation committee with a unique perspective for compensation-related decisions during a period not exceeding two years
or until such time as our Board of Directors determines that t
he
appointment of Mr. Davis to our compensation committee is no longer necessary. Mr. Davis is not an executive officer or employee
or a family member of an executive officer. Mr. Davis is our director and a security holder. As of February 13, 2017, Mr. Davis
beneficially owned 33.97% of our common stock.
Code
of Ethics
On
February 12, 2014, we adopted a code of ethics that governs the conduct of our officers, directors and employees in order to promote
honesty, integrity, loyalty and the accuracy of our consolidated financial statements. A copy of our code of ethics may be found
on our website at
www.cachetfinancial.com
.
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Summary
Compensation Table
Our
employment arrangements with our named executives are described under “Executive Compensation—Employment and Change-In-Control
Agreements.” In addition, during 2016, our Board of Directors approved the extension of certain options for our executive
officers as set forth under “Executive Compensation—Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End.”
The
following table sets forth the cash and non-cash compensation awarded to or earned by our principal executive officer and our
three executive officers serving at the end of the last completed fiscal year. For purposes of this prospectus, these individuals
are collectively the “named executives” of our company.
Name/Title
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
$
|
|
|
Bonus
$
|
|
|
Option
Awards
$
(1)
|
|
|
Other
Annual
Compensation
$
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Jeffrey C. Mack
|
|
2016
|
|
|
314,792
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
59,115
|
(2)
|
|
|
16,408
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
390,315
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors and
|
|
2015
|
|
|
290,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
125,376
|
(4)
|
|
|
17,836
|
(5)
|
|
$
|
453,212
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
2014
|
|
|
262,917
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
75,634
|
(6)
|
|
|
13,200
|
(7)
|
|
$
|
359,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce Whitmore
|
|
2016
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
25,335
|
(8)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
245,335
|
|
Chief Information Officer and Executive
|
|
2015
|
|
|
196,108
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
46,803
|
(9)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
242,911
|
|
Vice President
|
|
2014
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lawrence C. Blaney
|
|
2016
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
7,800
|
(7)
|
|
$
|
227,800
|
|
Executive Vice President of Sales &
Marketing
|
|
2015
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
35,589
|
(10)
|
|
|
7,800
|
(7)
|
|
$
|
263,389
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
188,750
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
28,146
|
(11)
|
|
|
7,800
|
(7)
|
|
$
|
224,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bryan D. Meier
|
|
2016
|
|
|
191,667
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
40,850
|
(12)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
232,517
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
|
|
2015
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Darin P. McAreavey
|
|
2016
|
|
|
27,870
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
54,048
|
(13)
|
|
|
750
|
(7)
|
|
$
|
82,668
|
|
Former Chief Financial Officer and Executive
Vice President
|
|
2015
|
|
|
230,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
39,180
|
(14)
|
|
|
5,250
|
(7)
|
|
$
|
274,430
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
163,449
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
124,954
|
(15)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
288,403
|
|
(1)
|
The
amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value with respect to stock options granted in the years indicated,
including the incremental grant date fair value of any stock options repriced during the years indicated. The fair value was
calculated in accordance with stock-based accounting rules (ASC 718).
|
|
|
(2)
|
Includes
the aggregate grant date fair value of $59,115 with respect to stock options granted to Mr. Mack.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Amount
represents vehicle lease of $12,844 and life insurance of $3,564.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Includes
the aggregate grant date fair value of $125,376 with respect to stock options granted to Mr. Mack.
|
|
|
(5)
|
Amount
represents car allowance $6,600, vehicle lease $8,563 and life insurance $2,673.
|
(6)
|
Includes
the aggregate grant date fair value of $60,402 with respect to stock options granted to Mr. Mack, and the incremental
grant date fair value of $15,232 with respect to stock options that were repriced.
|
|
|
(7)
|
Amount
represents car allowance.
|
|
|
(8)
|
Includes
the aggregate grant date fair value of $25,335 with respect to stock options granted to Mr. Whitmore.
|
|
|
(9)
|
Includes
the aggregate grant date fair value of $46,803 with respect to stock options granted to Mr. Whitmore.
|
|
|
(10)
|
Includes
the aggregate grant date fair value of $35,589 with respect to stock options granted to Mr. Blaney.
|
|
|
(11)
|
Includes
the aggregate grant date fair value of $23,475 with respect to stock options granted to Mr. Blaney, and the incremental
grant date fair value of $4,671 with respect to stock options that were repriced.
|
|
|
(12)
|
Mr.
Meier became our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer effective March 1, 2016. Includes the aggregate grant
date fair value of $40,850 with respect to stock options granted to Mr. Meier.
|
|
|
(13)
|
Includes
the aggregate grant date fair value of $54,048 with respect to stock options granted to Mr. McAreavey. Mr. McAreavey
became our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer effective April 3, 2014. He resigned his positions as Chief
Financial Officer and Executive Vice President effective as of February 7, 2016.
|
|
|
(14)
|
Includes
the aggregate grant date fair value of $39,180 with respect to stock options granted to Mr. McAreavey.
|
|
|
(15)
|
Includes
the aggregate grant date fair value of $111,025 with respect to stock options granted to Mr. McAreavey, and the incremental
grant date fair value of $13,929 with respect to stock options that were repriced.
|
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
As
of December 31, 2016, and after applying the Reverse Stock Split, we had outstanding equity awards as follows:
|
|
|
Option
Awards
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Number
of securities underlying unexercised options (# exercisable)
|
|
|
|
Number
of securities underlying unexercised options (# unexercisable)
|
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive Plan Awards: Number of securities underlying unearned options
|
|
|
|
Option
exercise price ($)
|
|
|
|
Option
expiration date
|
|
|
|
|
1,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90.00
|
|
|
|
2/10/2020
|
|
|
|
|
5,185
|
|
|
|
10,372
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.23
|
|
|
|
1/12/2021
|
|
Jeffrey C. Mack
|
|
|
25,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.75
|
|
|
|
12/15/2019
|
|
|
|
|
14,222
|
|
|
|
7,112
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.68
|
|
|
|
9/24/2020
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.75
|
|
|
|
2/20/2018
|
|
|
|
|
3,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.75
|
|
|
|
5/16/2020
|
|
|
|
|
2,223
|
|
|
|
1,111
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.68
|
|
|
|
9/24/2020
|
|
Bruce
Whitmore
(3)
|
|
|
5,186
|
|
|
|
2,593
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.75
|
|
|
|
1/5/2020
|
|
|
|
|
2,222
|
|
|
|
4,445
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.23
|
|
|
|
1/12/2021
|
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90.00
|
|
|
|
11/10/2020
|
|
|
|
|
834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90.00
|
|
|
|
1/6/2020
|
|
Lawrence C. Blaney
|
|
|
9,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.75
|
|
|
|
12/15/2019
|
|
|
|
|
2,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.75
|
|
|
|
2/20/2018
|
|
|
|
|
4,038
|
|
|
|
2,019
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.68
|
|
|
|
9/24/2020
|
|
Bryan
Meier
(8)
|
|
|
3,704
|
|
|
|
7,408
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.66
|
|
|
|
3/4/2021
|
|
(1)
|
Options
vest to the extent of 5,186 shares as of January 12, 2017 and the remaining 5,186 shares on January 12, 2018.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Options
vest to the extent of 7,112 shares on September 24, 2017.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Mr.
Whitmore became our Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer effective January 5, 2015.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Options
vest to the extent of 1,111 shares on September 24, 2017.
|
|
|
(5)
|
Options
vest to the extent of 2,593 shares on January 5, 2017.
|
|
|
(6)
|
Options
vest to the extent of 2,222 shares on January 12, 2017 and the remaining 2,223 shares on January 12, 2018.
|
|
|
(7)
|
Options
vest to the extent of 2,019 shares on September 24, 2017.
|
|
|
(8)
|
Mr.
Meier became our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer effective March 1, 2016.
|
|
|
(9)
|
Options
vest to the extent of 3,704 shares on March 4, 2017 and the remaining 3,704 shares on March 4, 2018.
|
Employment
and Change-In-Control Agreements
We
employ Jeffrey C. Mack, our President and Chief Executive Officer, at an annual base salary of $335,000 effective June 1, 2016.
We employ Bruce Whitmore, our Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer, Lawrence C. Blaney, our Executive Vice President
of Sales, and Bryan D. Meier, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, at annual base salaries of $220,000,
$220,000 and $230,000, respectively, effective January 1, 2016 or for Bryan D. Meier, the effective hire date of March 1, 2016.
We have employment agreements with all of the above-named executives.
Employment
Agreements with Jeffrey C. Mack, Lawrence C. Blaney, Bruce Whitmore and Bryan D. Meier
The
employment agreement with each of Mr. Mack and Mr. Blaney was entered into on April 1, 2014. The employment agreement with Mr.
Whitmore was entered into on January 5, 2015 and has a one-year term that renews automatically unless either party provides the
other with at least 60 days’ prior written notice. The employment agreement with Mr. Meier was entered into on February
21, 2017, although his employment with us had previously commenced according to the terms of an employment offer letter on March
1, 2016. At the discretion of our Board of Directors, the base salary of each executive may be increased, but not decreased.
Each employment agreement provides the executive with the right to participate in our benefit plans, policies and programs as
those plans, policies and programs are made available to our similarly situated executives. In addition, each employment agreement
provides the executive with 22 business days of vacation/paid time off per year as specified in each agreement.
The
employment agreements will terminate upon the death or disability, as defined in the agreement, of the executive. In addition,
we can terminate the employment agreement with an executive for cause, as defined in the agreement, and the executive can terminate
the employment agreement for good reason, as defined in the agreement.
The
employment agreements obligate us to pay severance to the executives in the event that we terminate their agreement without cause
or if an executive terminates their agreement with good reason. We will also be obligated to make severance payments if each of
the following conditions are met: (i) there is a change in control of our company, as defined in the agreement, (ii) the executive
is employed on a full-time basis at the time of the change in control, and (iii) the executive’s employment is terminated
(including the executive’s own termination of employment with good reason) other than as a result of death, disability or
cause. The severance payment will be equal to 12 months of base salary at the time of termination. In addition, if the event giving
rise to the severance payment is a change in control, then the executive will be entitled to receive a “severance bonus”
in an amount equal to twice the bonus earned by that executive for the prior fiscal year. In the case of a termination without
cause other than in connection with a change in control, then the executive will be entitled to receive a “severance bonus”
in an amount equal to the bonus earned by that executive for the prior fiscal year. No such severance bonus is permitted to exceed
two times or one time, as applicable, the maximum bonus target for that executive for the prior fiscal year. As a condition to
receiving any severance payments or severance bonus, an executive must execute and deliver a full separation agreement and release
in form acceptable to us. All severance payments will be made in monthly installments, beginning on the date that is 30 days after
the event resulting in the obligation to make severance payments, over the life of non-competition period specified in the executive’s
employment agreement. The employment agreements require that severance bonus payments be made in a lump sum within 30 days after
the event resulting in the obligation to make severance payments.
The
employment agreements contain customary inventions-assignment provisions, non-competition provisions that survive for a one-year
period after the termination of employment, and non-solicitation provisions applicable to the customers and vendors of the business,
and the employees of the business, that survive for a one-year period after the termination of employment. All of the employment
agreements contain mandatory and binding arbitration provisions for the resolution of disputes arising under the agreements.
In
addition, in connection with the commencement of Mr. Meier’s employment, we granted to Mr. Meier a stock option for the
purchase of up to 11,112 shares at a price of $8.66 per share under our current stock incentive plan. A total
of 3,704 shares purchasable under the option vested immediately on March 4, 2016, 3,704 shares vested on
March 4, 2017 and the remaining 3,704 shares will vest on March 4, 2018, so long as Mr. Meier remains our employee.
Compensation
of Directors
We
have not in the past paid cash compensation to our directors for their service on our Board of Directors. Currently, we
have no current plans to pay cash compensation to members of our Board of Directors for their services on our board. As we seek
to expand our Board of Directors and add independent directors, we do, however, expect to change this policy. In the past, we
have issued stock options for the purchase of the equivalent of 30,000 shares of common stock to our non-employee directors. Accordingly,
we may issue stock options to other non-employee directors in the future, on terms to be determined by our Board of Directors.
Compensation
of our directors during 2016 appears in the following table.
Name
|
|
Fees
Earned or
Paid in Cash ($)
|
|
|
Option
Awards ($)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
Jeffrey C. Mack
(1)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Darin P. McAreavey
(2)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Michael J. Hanson
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
James L. Davis
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Rod Jardine
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Ruth Owades
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
20,640
|
(3)
|
|
|
20,640
|
|
Liyuan Woo
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
33,359
|
(4)
|
|
|
33,359
|
|
James J. Spencer
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
33,359
|
(5)
|
|
|
33,359
|
|
Robin S. O’Connell
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
33,359
|
(6)
|
|
|
33,359
|
|
(1)
|
For
information relative to Mr. Mack, please refer to the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End” table above.
|
|
|
(2)
|
For
information relative to Mr. McAreavey, please refer to the “Summary Compensation” table above.
|
|
|
(3)
|
On
July 18, 2016, we issued options to Ms. Owades for the purchase of 5,334 shares at a purchase price of $7.65
per share. Of these options, 1,778 vested immediately and the remaining 3,556 vest equally on July 18, 2017
and July 18, 2018, such options expire five years from the date of grant.
|
|
|
(4)
|
On
August 17, 2016, we issued options to Ms. Woo for the purchase of 5,334 shares at a purchase price of $11.78
per share. Of these options, 1,778 vested immediately and the remaining 3,556 vest equally on August 17,
2017 and August 17, 2018, such options expire five years from the date of grant.
|
|
|
(5)
|
On
August 17, 2016, we issued options to Mr. Spencer for the purchase of 5,334 shares at a purchase price of $11.78
per share. Of these options, 1,778 vested immediately and the remaining 3,556 vest equally on August 17,
2017 and August 17, 2018, such options expire five years from the date of grant.
|
|
|
(6)
|
On
August 17, 2016, we issued options to Mr. O’Connell for the purchase of 5,334 shares at a purchase price of $11.78
per share. Of these options, 1,778 vested immediately and the remaining 3,556 vest equally on August 17,
2017 and August 17, 2018, such options expire five years from the date of grant.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
As
of February 13, 2017, after applying the Reverse Stock Split, we had outstanding 2,112,392 shares of common stock.
Each share of common stock is currently entitled to one vote on all matters put to a vote of our stockholders. The following table
sets forth the number of common shares, and percentage of outstanding common shares, beneficially owned as of February 13, 2017,
by:
|
●
|
each
person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of our outstanding common stock;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
each
of our current directors;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
each
of our current executive officers and any other persons identified as a “named executive” in the Summary Compensation
Table above; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
all
our current executive officers and directors as a group.
|
Shares
beneficially owned and percentage ownership before this offering is based on 2,112,392 shares of common stock outstanding
as of February 13, 2017 after applying the Reverse Stock Split .
Beneficial
ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC, and includes general voting power and/or investment power with
respect to securities. The following shares of common stock are deemed outstanding for computing the beneficial ownership percentage
of the person holding such securities but are not deemed outstanding for computing the beneficial ownership percentage of any
other person: (i) shares of common stock owned by or for, among others, the spouse, children or certain other relatives of such
person, (ii) shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options or warrants that are currently exercisable or exercisable
within 60 days of February 13, 2017, and (iii) shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of other securities currently convertible
or convertible within 60 days of February 13, 2017.
Under
the applicable SEC rules, each person’s beneficial ownership is calculated by dividing the total number of shares with respect
to which they possess beneficial ownership by the total number of outstanding shares. In any case where an individual has beneficial
ownership over securities that are not outstanding, but are issuable upon the exercise of options or warrants or similar rights
within the next 60 days, that same number of shares is added to the denominator in the calculation described above. Because the
calculation of each person’s beneficial ownership set forth in the “Percentage Beneficially Owned” column of
the table may include shares that are not presently outstanding, the sum total of the percentages set forth in such column may
exceed 100%. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each of the following persons is c/o Cachet Financial Solutions, Inc.,
18671 Lake Drive East, dellFive Business Park G, Minneapolis, MN 55317, and, based upon information available or furnished to
us, each such person has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares set forth opposite his, her or its name.
Name
|
|
Shares
of
Common
Stock
|
|
|
Shares
of
Series C
Convertible
Preferred
Stock
|
|
|
Shares
of
Common
Stock
Issuable
Upon
Conversion
of Series C
Convertible
Preferred
Stock
(1)
|
|
|
Aggregate
Shares of
Common
Stock
(Including
Series C
Shares, As
Converted)
|
|
|
Aggregate
Percentage
of Shares of
Common
Stock
(Including
Series C
Shares, As
Converted)
|
|
Directors
and Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey
C. Mack
(2)
|
|
|
4,132
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
58,706
|
|
|
|
2.71
|
%
|
Bruce
Whitmore
(3)
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
9,985
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Lawrence
C. Blaney
(4)
|
|
|
2,017
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
4,796
|
|
|
|
27,697
|
|
|
|
1.30
|
%
|
Bryan
D. Meier
(5)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,703
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Darin
P. McAreavey
(6)
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Michael
J. Hanson
(7)
|
|
|
149,696
|
|
|
|
8,500
|
|
|
|
135,894
|
|
|
|
701,633
|
|
|
|
26.33
|
%
|
James
L. Davis
(8)
|
|
|
218,159
|
|
|
|
11,100
|
|
|
|
177,460
|
|
|
|
974,669
|
|
|
|
33.97
|
%
|
Rod
Jardine
(9)
|
|
|
4,530
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
8,087
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Ruth
Owades
(10)
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,955
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Liyuan
Woo
(11)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,778
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
James
J. Spencer
(12)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,778
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Robin
S. O’Connell
(13)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,778
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
All
current directors and executive officers as a group
|
|
|
379,111
|
|
|
|
19,900
|
|
|
|
318,150
|
|
|
|
1,791,813
|
|
|
|
50.83
|
%
|
Other
Beneficial Owners of More Than Five Percent of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trooien
Capital, LLC
(14)
|
|
|
54,921
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
47,962
|
|
|
|
514,127
|
|
|
|
19.99
|
%
|
Scarsdale
Equities LLC
(15)
|
|
|
15,490
|
|
|
|
5,330
|
|
|
|
85,208
|
|
|
|
218,360
|
|
|
|
9.43
|
%
|
Tiburon
Opportunity Fund, L.P.
(16)
|
|
|
222,819
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
39,969
|
|
|
|
485,246
|
|
|
|
20.43
|
%
|
Jon
D & Linda W Gruber Trust
(17)
|
|
|
206,732
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
79,938
|
|
|
|
509,089
|
|
|
|
21.08
|
%
|
FLMM
Limited
(18)
|
|
|
217,161
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
79,938
|
|
|
|
979,053
|
|
|
|
34.06
|
%
|
JMR
Capital Limited
(19)
|
|
|
98,766
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
126,915
|
|
|
|
5.93
|
%
|
Columbus
Capital
(20)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
519,048
|
|
|
|
19.72
|
%
|
Cross
River Partners LP
(21)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
453,387
|
|
|
|
17.67
|
%
|
*
|
Represents
beneficial ownership of less than 1% of our outstanding shares of common stock (including
Series C shares, as converted).
|
(1)
|
Shares
beneficially owned and percentage ownership is based on 2,112,392 shares of common
stock outstanding as of February 13, 2017 , after applying Reverse Stock Split .
|
|
|
(2)
|
The
aggregate shares of common stock held by Mr. Mack includes 54,574 shares of common
stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options. On September 13, 2016, our Board
of Directors approved a grant to Mr. Mack of an option to purchase 116,667 shares
of our common stock, which grant is contingent and effective upon the consummation of
our next underwritten public offering and has an exercise
price equal to the public offering price per share in our next underwritten public offering.
The option vests as to one-third of such grant on the date on which our next underwritten
public offering is consummated and one-third on each of the first and second anniversary
of such date, so long as Mr. Mack is employed by us on such anniversary dates.
|
|
|
(3)
|
The
aggregate shares of common stock held by Mr. Whitmore includes 9,630 shares of
common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options. On September 13, 2016, our
Board of Directors approved a grant to Mr. Whitmore of an option to purchase 33,334
shares of our common stock, which grant is contingent and effective upon the consummation
of
our next underwritten public offering and has an exercise
price equal to the public offering price per share in our next underwritten public offering.
The option vests as to one-third of such grant on the date on which our next underwritten
public offering is consummated and one-third on each of the first and second anniversary
of such date, so long as Mr. Whitmore is employed by us on such anniversary dates.
|
|
|
(4)
|
The
aggregate shares of common stock held by Mr. Blaney includes (i) 4,796 shares
of common stock issuable upon conversion of shares of Series C Convertible Preferred
Stock, (ii) 17,706 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding
options and (iii) 3,180 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding
warrants. On September 13, 2016, our Board of Directors approved a grant to Mr. Blaney
of an option to purchase 50,000 shares of our common stock, which grant is contingent
and effective upon the consummation of
our next underwritten
public offering and has an exercise price equal to the public offering price per share
in our next underwritten public offering. The option vests as to one-third of such grant
on the date on which our next underwritten public offering is consummated and one-third
on each of the first and second anniversary of such date, so long as Mr. Blaney is employed
by us on such anniversary dates.
|
|
|
(5)
|
The
aggregate shares of common stock held by Mr. Meier includes 3,704 shares of common
stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options. On September 13, 2016, our Board
of Directors approved a grant to Mr. Meier of an option to purchase 50,000 shares
of our common stock, which grant is contingent and effective upon the consummation of
our next underwritten public offering and has an exercise
price equal to the public offering price per share in our next underwritten public offering.
The option vests as to one-third of such grant on the date on which our next underwritten
public offering is consummated and one-third on each of the first and second anniversary
of such date, so long as Mr. Meier is employed by us on such anniversary dates.
|
|
|
(6)
|
Mr.
McAreavey resigned his position as Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President
effective as of February 7, 2016. His vested options expired unexercised on May 7, 2016.
On September 13, 2016, our Board of Directors approved a grant to Mr. McAreavey of an
option to purchase 5,334 shares of our common stock, which grant is contingent
and effective upon the consummation of
our next underwritten
public offering and has an exercise price equal to the public offering price per share
in our next underwritten public offering. The option vests as to one-third of such grant
on the date on which our next underwritten public offering is consummated and one-third
on each of the first and second anniversary of such date, so long as Mr. McAreavey is
serving as a director on such anniversary dates.
|
|
|
(7)
|
The
aggregate shares of common stock held by Mr. Hanson includes (i) 135,894 shares
of common stock issuable upon conversion of shares of Series C Convertible Preferred
Stock, (ii) 1,778 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding
options, (iii) 62,188 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of outstanding
convertible notes and (iv) 352,078 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise
of outstanding warrants. On September 13, 2016, our Board of Directors approved a grant
to Mr. Hanson of an option to purchase 5,334 shares of our common stock, which
grant is contingent and effective upon the consummation of
our
next underwritten public offering and has an exercise price equal to the public offering
price per share in our next underwritten public offering. The option vests as to one-third
of such grant on the date on which our next underwritten public offering is consummated
and one-third on each of the first and second anniversary of such date, so long as Mr.
Hanson is serving as a director on such anniversary dates.
|
|
|
(8)
|
The
aggregate shares of common stock held by Mr. Davis includes (i) 177,460 shares
of common stock issuable upon conversion of shares of Series C Convertible Preferred
Stock, of which 15,988 shares are owned by Mr. Davis’ self-directed retirement
account plan, (ii) 1,204 shares of common stock that are held by Mr. Davis’
spouse (either personally or through her individual retirement account), beneficial ownership
of which Mr. Davis disclaims, (iii) 1,778 shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of outstanding options, (iv) 571,758 shares of common stock issuable
upon exercise of outstanding warrants and (v) 5,514 shares of common stock issuable
upon conversion of outstanding convertible notes. On September 13, 2016, our Board of
Directors approved a grant to Mr. Davis of an option to purchase 5,334 shares
of our common stock, which grant is contingent and effective upon the consummation of
our next underwritten public offering and has an exercise
price equal to the public offering price per share in our next underwritten public offering.
The option vests as to one-third of such grant on the date on which our next underwritten
public offering is consummated and one-third on each of the first and second anniversary
of such date, so long as Mr. Davis is serving as a director on such anniversary dates.
|
(9)
|
The
aggregate shares of common stock held by Mr. Jardine includes 3,556 shares of
common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options. On September 13, 2016, our
Board of Directors approved a grant to Mr. Jardine of an option to purchase 5,334
shares of our common stock, which grant is contingent and effective upon the consummation
of
our next underwritten public offering and has an exercise
price equal to the public offering price per share in our next underwritten public offering.
The option vests as to one-third of such grant on the date on which our next underwritten
public offering is consummated and one-third on each of the first and second anniversary
of such date, so long as Mr. Jardine is serving as a director on such anniversary dates.
|
|
|
(10)
|
The
aggregate shares of common stock held by Ms. Owades includes 1,778 shares of common
stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options.
|
|
|
(11)
|
The
aggregate shares of common stock held by Ms. Woo includes 1,778 shares of common
stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options.
|
|
|
(12)
|
The
aggregate shares of common stock held by Mr. Spencer includes 1,778 shares of
common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options.
|
|
|
(13)
|
The
aggregate shares of common stock held by Mr. O’Connell includes 1,778 shares
of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options.
|
|
|
(14)
|
The
aggregate shares of common stock held by Trooien Capital includes (i) 47,962 shares
of common stock issuable upon conversion of shares of Series C Convertible Preferred
Stock issued to Mr. Gerald Trooien and (ii) 411,244 shares of common stock issuable
upon exercise of outstanding warrants. The address of this shareholder is 965 Summit
Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55105.
|
|
|
(15)
|
The
aggregate shares of common stock held by Scarsdale Equities LLC includes (i) 85,208
shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of shares of Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock and (ii) 117,662 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise
of outstanding warrants. The address of this shareholder is 10 Rockefeller Plaza, Suite
720, New York, NY 10020.
|
|
|
(16)
|
The
ownership percentage set forth herein does not give effect to certain provisions of (i)
warrants to purchase 75,101 shares of common stock and (ii) our convertible preferred
stock ( 1,667 shares of which are owned by the named person), that limit the exercise
of the warrants and conversion of the stock if the holder would beneficially own more
than 4.99% (and in certain circumstances more than 9.99%) following such exercise or
conversion. The address of this shareholder is 13313 Point Richmond Beach Road NW, Gig
Harbor, WA 98332.
|
|
|
(17)
|
The
aggregate shares of common stock held by Jon D. & Linda W. Gruber Trust includes
(i) 79,938 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of shares of Series
C Convertible Preferred Stock, (ii) 165,150 shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of outstanding warrants and (iii) 57,269 shares of common stock issuable
upon conversion of outstanding convertible notes. The address of this shareholder is
234 Van Ness, Ste 5, San Francisco, CA 94133.
|
|
|
(18)
|
The
aggregate shares of common stock held by FLMM Ltd. includes (i) 79,938 shares
of common stock issuable upon conversion of shares of Series C Convertible Preferred
Stock, (ii) 379,396 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding
warrants and (iii) 302,558 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of
outstanding convertible notes. The address of this shareholder is 2711 North Haskell,
Suite 1650, Dallas , TX 75204.
|
|
|
(19)
|
The
aggregate shares of common stock held by JMR Capital Limited includes 28,149 shares
of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants. The address of this shareholder
is 2711 North Haskell, Suite 1650, Dallas , TX 75204.
|
|
|
(20)
|
The
aggregate shares of common stock held by Columbus Capital includes (i) 259,208
shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants and (ii) 259,840
shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of outstanding convertible notes.
The address of this shareholder is 350 California Street., 22nd Floor, San Francisco,
CA 94104.
|
|
|
(21)
|
The
aggregate shares of common stock held by Cross River Partners LP includes (i) 252,885 shares of common stock issuable
upon exercise of outstanding warrants and (ii) 200,502 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of outstanding
convertible notes. The address of this shareholder is 31 Bailey Ave. Suite D, Ridgefield, CT 06877.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Related-Person
Transactions
Loan
and Security Agreement with Mr. Michael J. Hanson
On
March 4, 2014, we entered into a loan and security agreement with Michael J. Hanson, our director and a beneficial owner of 26.33%
of our common stock as of February 13, 2017, pursuant to which we borrowed $1,500,000 from Mr. Hanson to fund our acquisition
of Select Mobile Money from DeviceFidelity. The promissory note under the loan agreement had an interest rate equal to 24%, payable
monthly commencing April 2014. Because we failed to pay the accrued interest on the promissory note on or before April 4, 2014,
the interest rate was increased to 48% on April 4, 2014 and continued to accrue at that rate until we repaid the promissory note
in full. We paid the promissory note in full, an aggregate amount of $1,731,781, on July 14, 2014.
Under
the loan agreement, we also issued to Mr. Hanson shares of our common stock equal to 12.5% of the principal amount under the note,
or $187,500, which equaled 3,473 shares based on a share price of $54.00 . Because we failed to pay the outstanding
amounts under the promissory note on or before April 4, 2014, we issued to Mr. Hanson additional shares of our common stock equal
to 3.125% of the outstanding principal amount, or $46,875, which equaled 869 shares, on each successive fifth business
day for as long as any portion of the principal amount of the promissory note was outstanding. In total, we issued to Mr. Hanson
17,014 shares of our common stock in connection with the loan agreement.
Revolving
Line of Credit Note with Mr. Michael J. Hanson
On
May 7, 2014, we entered into a revolving line of credit note with Michael J. Hanson for advances aggregating $1,500,000. The borrowing
terms include a stated interest rate of 10% per annum on the principal amount outstanding, and payment of the principal amount
and unpaid accrued interest upon the earlier of September 30, 2014 or completion of a public offering of securities. Through the
second quarter of 2014, we had drawn down the entire $1,500,000 under the line of credit. The entire principal amount and unpaid
accrued interest under the line of credit was convertible into shares of our common stock, at Mr. Hanson’s option, upon
the completion of an initial public offering, or IPO , of our common stock, at a 20% discount to the price at which
the shares of our stock were sold in the IPO.
On
June 24, 2014, we entered into a letter agreement with Mr. Hanson and the other party to that agreement under which Mr. Hanson
agreed to convert an amount of $500,000 of the then outstanding principal amount under the line of credit into shares of
our common stock upon the consummation of our IPO. We completed our IPO in July 2014. The letter agreement also extended the maturity
date under the line of credit until such time as we conclude a subsequent financing in which we raise gross proceeds aggregating
to at least $10,000,000 or July 31, 2015, whichever is earlier. On July 31, 2015, we entered into another letter agreement with
Mr. Hanson that extended the maturity date for the repayment of the principal and accrued interest balance under the line of credit
to January 31, 2016.
On
February 24, 2016, we entered into another letter agreement with Mr. Hanson that extended the maturity date for the repayment
of the principal and accrued interest balance under the line of credit to January 31, 2017. Under the letter agreement, we agreed
to make interest only payments on June 30, September 30 and December 31, 2016. The interest only payments are for interest accrued
on the principal balance from February 1, 2016 to the date of payment.
On
July 7, 2016, we entered into another letter agreement with Mr. Hanson, effective as of June 30, 2016, pursuant to which we agreed
to make interest only payments on January 31, 2017. The interest only payments are for interest accrued on the principal balance
from February 1, 2016 to the date of payment.
On
October 6, 2016, we entered into an agreement with Mr. Hanson to convert, upon consummation of an underwritten public offering,
the principal amount outstanding of $1.0 million as of that date into shares of our common stock at a price per share equal to
the public offering price per share in our next underwritten public offering. We subsequently agreed to reduce the conversion
amount by $321,053 as consideration for Mr. Hanson entering into securities purchase agreements with us in the same amount in
December 2016. As consideration for Mr. Hanson’s agreement to convert certain of his debt into shares of our c
ommon
stock, we also agreed to issue to Mr. Hanson warrants to purchase 90,526 shares of our common stock at a price per share
equal to the public offering price per share in our next underwritten public offering.
On
January 24, 2017, we entered into an Amended and Restated Term Promissory Note with Mr. Hanson (the “2017 Consolidated Hanson
Note”), pursuant to which we and Mr. Hanson agreed to amend the line of credit by reducing the principal debt thereunder
by $617,957 and incorporating that amount, together with certain other consolidated debt due to Mr. Hanson, including accrued
but unpaid interest thereon, into a single note due April 30, 2018 in the principal amount of $1,973,735. The 2017 Consolidated
Hanson Note is unsecured and bears interest at a rate of 8% per annum with all principal and
accrued
interest due and payable at the close of business on April 30, 2018.
Conversion
Agreement with Trooien Capital, Mr. Michael J. Hanson and James L. Davis
On
June 18, 2014, we entered into a conversion agreement with Trooien Capital, Michael J. Hanson and James L. Davis. Mr. Davis is
our director and a beneficial owner of 33.97% of our common stock as of February 13, 2017. Pursuant to the conversion agreement,
the three debt holders agreed to convert a principal amount of debt and related interest owed by us aggregating to $2,135,193
into shares of our common stock, upon the consummation of our IPO. The conversion price per share under the conversion agreement
is 80% of the per-share price at which our common stock is sold in the IPO. Under the conversion agreement, we also amended the
conversion terms of certain convertible promissory notes previously issued to Messrs. Hanson and Davis (in an aggregate amount
to $1,533,685 as of June 24, 2014), to match them to the conversion terms described above. We completed our IPO in July 2014.
On
December 15, 2014, we amended the conversion agreement to clarify the number of warrants to be received by Messrs. Hanson and
Davis as part of the conversion of the debt as set forth in the conversion agreement upon the completion of our IPO. Specifically,
(i) Mr. Hanson received warrants to purchase 19,474 shares of our common stock and (ii) Mr. Davis received warrants to
purchase 26,286 shares of our common stock, which in each case equals 100% of the number of shares of common stock received
by Hanson and Davis under the conversion agreement. The amendment to the conversion agreement also amended the warrants to reflect
an exercise price of $45.00 per share and a five-year term.
Commitment
Letter with Mr. Michael J. Hanson and James L. Davis
On
July 30, 2014, we entered into a commitment letter with Michael J. Hanson and James L. Davis pursuant to which Messrs. Hanson
and Davis agreed to lend us up to $2,500,000 in the aggregate, bearing interest at 10% per annum and due January 31, 2015. The
commitment letter provided that if any portion of the notes issuable under the commitment letter were outstanding after January
31, 2015, the default interest rate under the notes would increase to 18% per annum.
On
February 3, 2015, we entered into an agreement with Mr. Hanson pursuant to which Mr. Hanson agreed to convert $250,000 of the
amount outstanding under the commitment letter into shares of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock.
On
February 16, 2015, we entered into an addendum #1 to the commitment letter, which extended the maturity date for the repayment
of the outstanding principal balance owed under the commitment letter to January 31, 2016. On October 23, 2015, we entered into
an addendum #2 to the commitment letter, which provided for an additional advancement of $250,000 by Mr. Hanson.
On
February 24, 2016, we entered into an addendum #3 to the commitment letter, which extended the maturity date to January 31, 2017
and provided that we make interest only payments on June 30, September 30 and December 31, 2016. The interest only payments are
for interest accrued on the principal balance from February 1, 2016 to the date of payment. The outstanding principal and accrued
interest balance were scheduled to be due in full on January 31, 2017.
On
July 7, 2016, we entered into an addendum #4 to the commitment letter, effective as of June 30, 2016, which extended the payment
date of the interest only payments that were or will be due and payable on June 30, September 30 and December 31, 2016 to January
31, 2017.
On
January 24, 2017, we and Mr. Hanson agreed to consolidate the outstanding principal and interest under the commitment letter into
the 2017 Consolidated Hanson Note described above.
Agreements
with James L. Davis Related to Equipment Leases With KLC Financial, Inc.
On
February 3, 2015, we entered into a guaranty in favor of James L. Davis in connection with a master equipment lease agreement
entered into by Mr. Davis and KLC Financial, Inc. on February 11, 2015. Under the guaranty, we unconditionally guaranteed all
of the amounts due, and the satisfaction of all the terms and obligations of Mr. Davis under the master equipment lease. The master
equipment lease provides financing for up to $500,000 of computer equipment that our company procured for its data centers to
accommodate the overall increase in transactions and ensure it is able to meet customer uptime requirements. In addition, on February
11, 2015 we entered into a lease agreement with Mr. Davis pursuant to which we leased the equipment that Mr. Davis leased under
the master equipment lease with KLC Financial, Inc. on the same terms as provided in the master equipment lease. As consideration
for Mr. Davis entering into the master equipment lease with KLC Financial, Inc., on February 3, 2015 we issued to Mr. Davis a
five-year warrant to purchase up to 18,117 shares of our common stock at $25.88 per share. On June 3, 2015, we amended
the warrant to adjust the exercise price from $25.88 to $10.83 (since adjusted to $7.41) .
On
June 29, 2015, Mr. Davis provided a personal guarantee as part of a lease we entered into with KLC Financial, Inc. totaling approximately
$242,000. As consideration for Mr. Davis providing a personal guarantee, we issued to Mr. Davis a five-year warrant to purchase
up to 10,751 shares of our common stock at $9.90 per share.
Private
Placements and Issuances of Warrants
On
January 14, 2014, we issued to Michael J. Hanson and James L. Davis warrants to purchase shares of our common stock in aggregate
amounts of 10,278 and 21,667 , respectively. The original exercise price under these warrants was $81.00 per
share. On April 13, 2015, the exercise price under the warrants was adjusted from $81.00 to $31.50 .
On
July 14, 2014, we issued to Mr. Hanson, Mr. Davis and Lisa E. Zitter (Mr. Davis’ daughter) five-year warrants to purchase
up to 45,926 , 65,926 and 2,964 shares of our common stock, respectively, at an exercise price of
$42.19 per share.
From
September 19, 2014 through February 3, 2015, we entered into a series of securities purchase agreements pursuant to which: (i)
JMR Capital Limited, a beneficial owner of 5.93 % of our common stock as of February 13, 2017, purchased shares of our Series
A Convertible Preferred Stock in an aggregate amount of $950,000, which shares were subsequently converted into 37,600
shares of our common stock, and five-year warrants to purchase 28,149 shares of our common stock; (ii) FLMM Ltd., a beneficial
owner of 34.06% of our common stock as of February 13, 2017, purchased shares of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and
our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock in an aggregate amount of $1,450,000, which shares were subsequently converted
into 56,966 shares of our common stock, and five-year warrants to purchase 47,472 shares of our common stock; (iii) Jon D. &
Linda W. Gruber Trust, a beneficial owner of 21.08 % of our common stock as of February 13, 2017, purchased shares of our Series
B Convertible Preferred Stock in an aggregate amount of $500,250, which shares were subsequently converted into 19,376
shares of our common stock at a price of $25.88 per share, including 64 shares of our common stock issued as payment-in-kind
for dividends on the preferred stock prior to conversion and five-year warrants to purchase 19,334 shares of our common stock;
(iv) Tiburon Opportunity Fund, L.P., a beneficial owner of 20.43 % of our common stock as of February 13, 2017, purchased shares
of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock in an aggregate amount of $900,004,
which shares were subsequently converted into 35,564 shares of our common stock at a price of $25.88 per share, including
781shares of our common stock issued as payment-in-kind for dividends on the preferred stock and five-year warrants to purchase
27,569 shares of our common stock; and (v) Mr. Hanson purchased shares of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock in an aggregate
amount of $250,000, which shares were subsequently converted into 9,683 shares of our common stock at a price of
$25.88 per share, together with a five-year warrant to purchase an aggregate of 9,662 shares of our common stock. All of these
warrants have an exercise price of $45.00 per share. We subsequently adjusted the exercise price of the foregoing warrants
from $45.00 to $7.41.
On
June 3, 2015:
|
●
|
We
entered into a securities purchase agreement pursuant to which: (i) Mr. Hanson purchased 1,980 shares of our Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock at a price of $100.00 per share, together with five-year warrants to purchase 20,101 shares of our
common stock; (ii) Mr. Davis purchased 2,100 shares of our Series C Convertible Preferred Stock at a price of $100.00
per share, together with five-year warrants to purchase 21,319 shares of our common stock; (iii) Mr. Blaney (one of our executive
officers) purchased 300 shares of our Series C Convertible Preferred Stock at a price of $100.00 per share, together with
five-year warrants to purchase 3,046 shares of our common stock; (iv) Davis & Associates, Inc.’s 401(k) Profit Sharing
Plan purchased 1,000 shares of our Series C Convertible Preferred Stock at $100.00 per share, together with five-year warrants
to purchase 10,152 shares of our common stock; (v) FLMM Ltd. purchased 5,000 shares of our Series C Convertible Preferred
Stock at a price of $100.00 per share, together with five-year warrants to purchase 50,760 shares of our common stock;
(vi) the Jon D. & Linda W. Gruber Trust purchased 5,000 shares of our Series C Convertible Preferred Stock at a price
of $100.00 per share, together with five-year warrants to purchase 50,760 shares of our common stock; (vii) Gerald
Trooien purchased 3,000 shares of our Series C Convertible Preferred Stock at a price of $100.00 per share, together
with five-year warrants to purchase 30,456 shares of our common stock; and (viii) Tiburon Opportunity Fund, L.P. purchased
2,500 shares of our Series C Convertible Preferred Stock at a price of $100.00 per share, together with five-year
warrants to purchase 25,380 shares of our common stock. All of these warrants have an exercise price of $10.83 per
share.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
We
received promissory notes in an aggregate amount of $950,000 from Mr. Hanson, Mr. Davis and Davis & Associates,
Inc., and issued to such persons shares of our Series C Convertible Preferred Stock at a price of $100.00 per share
in the amounts of 3,500, 3,500 and 2,500 shares, respectively, together with five-year warrants to purchase 35,532, 35,532
and 25,380 shares of our common stock, respectively. All of these warrants have an exercise price of $10.83 per
share. The promissory notes were paid in full during the third fiscal quarter of 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
We
issued to Mr. Davis and Mr. Hanson shares of our Series C Convertible Preferred Stock in the amounts of 2,000 and 3,020, respectively,
together with five-year warrants to purchase 20,304 and 30,659 shares of our common stock, respectively, in exchange for the
cancellation of our debt in the amounts of $200,000 and $302,000 held by them, respectively. All of these warrants
have an exercise price of $10.83 per share.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
We
issued additional shares of our common stock to former holders of our Series A and B Convertible Preferred Stock (all of which
has been converted to shares of our common stock), such that following the issuance of such shares, such holders received
the same number of shares of our common stock in total as they would have received upon conversion of the Series A and B Convertible
Preferred Stock if the conversion price for the Series A and B Convertible Preferred Stock had been the same as the initial
conversion price under the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock. We granted the recipients of these shares the same registration
rights as are provided in Series C Convertible Preferred Stock holders. FLMM Ltd. received 92,670 shares of common stock,
JMR Capital Limited received 61,166 shares of common stock, the Jon D. & Linda W. Gruber Trust received 31,520 shares
of common stock and Tiburon Opportunity Fund, L.P. received 57,855 shares of common stock.
|
From
October 2015 through December 2015, we completed a sale of shares of our common stock, pursuant to warrant exercises by certain
investors, including certain of our affiliates. FLMM Ltd. exercised warrants for 42,667 shares of common stock for aggregate proceeds
of $379,169. The Jon D. & Linda W. Gruber Trust exercised warrants for 37,112 shares of common stock for proceeds of
approximately $402,000. Tiburon Opportunity Fund, L.P. exercised warrants for 15,556 shares of common stock for proceeds of approximately
$169,000. Mr. Blaney exercised warrants for 1,334 shares of common stock for proceeds of approximately $14,000. As consideration
for the warrants being exercised on a cash basis, we issued to the foregoing persons five-year replacement warrants covering 110%
of the number of shares purchased upon exercise of the existing warrants.
On
October 6, 2015, we entered into an equity exchange agreement with Michael J. Hanson to exchange 17,014 shares of common stock
previously issued to Hanson for a five-year, fully vested, warrant to purchase 33,628 shares of common stock at an exercise price
of $30.38 per share.
On
November 24, 2015, we issued to Tiburon Opportunity Fund, L.P. a five-year warrant to purchase 7,472 shares of our common stock
at $10.83 per share, with a fair value of approximately $30,000, in consideration for providing our sales referrals to various
banks and credit unions.
From
January 2016 through May 24, 2016, we completed a sale of shares of our common stock, pursuant to warrant exercises by certain
investors, including certain of our affiliates. FLMM Ltd. exercised warrants for 19,778 shares of common stock for proceeds of
approximately $146,000. The Jon D. & Linda W. Gruber Trust exercised warrants for 32,982 shares of common stock for proceeds
of approximately $244,000. Tiburon Opportunity Fund, L.P. exercised warrants for 20,139 shares of common stock for proceeds of
approximately $149,000. James L. Davis exercised warrants for 6,755 shares of common stock for proceeds of $50,000. Mr.
Hanson exercised warrants for 16,887 shares of common stock for proceeds of $125,000. As consideration for the foregoing warrants
being exercised on a cash basis, we issued to the foregoing persons five-year replacement warrants covering 110% of the number
of shares purchased upon exercise of the existing warrants. Warrants for the purchase of 24,584 shares of common stock issued
to Tiburon Opportunity Fund, L.P. were repriced from $10.83 per share to $7.41 per share on January 5, 2016.
From
February 25, 2016 through April 8, 2016, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain accredited investors, including
certain of our affiliates, pursuant to which: (i) FLMM Ltd. purchased 42,043 shares of our common stock and five-year warrants
to purchase 21,022 shares of our common stock at a price of $10.35 per share for $350,000 and (ii) the Jon D. & Linda
W. Gruber Trust purchased 30,031 shares of our common stock and five-year warrants to purchase 15,016 shares of our common stock
at a price of $10.35 per share for $250,000.
On
September 19, 2016, we issued to Scarsdale Equities LLC, a beneficial owner of 9.43% of our common stock as of February 13, 2017,
five-year warrants to purchase 12,797 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $7.41 per share. The warrants
were issued to Scarsdale Equities LLC in consideration for Scarsdale Equities LLC’s advisory services to us in connection
with obtaining certain modifications to our securities.
Between
October 21, 2016 and January 17, 2017 we entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain accredited investors,
including certain of our affiliates, pursuant to which (i) FLMM Ltd. purchased a convertible note for the principal amount of
$1,736,842 and warrants to purchase 187,767 shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $1,650,000, (ii)
Tiburon Opportunity Fund, L.P. purchased a convertible note for the principal amount of $526,316 and warrants to purchase
56,900 shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $500,000, (iii) Jon D. & Linda W. Gruber Trust
purchased a convertible note for the principal amount of $526,316 and warrants to purchase 56,900 shares of our common stock
for an aggregate purchase price of $500,000, (iv) Michael J. Hanson purchased convertible notes for the aggregate principal
amount $321,053 and warrants to purchase 34,708 shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $305,000, and
(v) James L. Davis purchased a convertible note for the principal amount $57,895 and warrants to purchase 6,259 shares of our
common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $55,000. The notes are unsecured, do not bear any interest and are payable in
full one year from each issuance date.
On
January 26, 2017, in order to provide each of these investors 100% warrant coverage on their investments, we issued to each of
these investors additional warrants as follows: (i) we issued to FLMM Ltd. a warrant to purchase 20,864 shares of our common stock,
(ii) we issued to Tiburon Opportunity Fund, L.P. a warrant to purchase 6,323 shares of our common stock, (iii) we issued to Jon
D. & Linda W. Gruber a warrant to purchase 10,253 shares of our common stock, (iv) we issued to Mr. Hanson warrants to purchase
3,858 shares of our common stock, and (v) we issued to Mr. Davis a warrant to purchase 696 shares of our common stock. These warrants
have an exercise price per share equal to the lower of $8.33 per share and 80% of the per share price of our common stock in our
next underwritten public offering, subject to adjustments, and are exercisable for a five-year period.
Issuances
of Promissory Notes
From
January 10, 2014 through February 11, 2014, we issued demand promissory notes to Michael J. Hanson and James L. Davis in the amounts
of $275,000 and $275,000, respectively. The notes accrued simple interest at the rate of 10% per annum. On July 7, 2014,
the notes were converted into shares of our common stock.
On
March 19 and 20, 2014, we issued convertible promissory notes to Mr. Hanson, Mr. Davis and Mr. Peterson (a former member of our
Board of Directors) in the amounts of $150,000, $100,000 and $15,000, respectively. The convertible promissory notes were
due and payable on or prior to June 30, 2015, and accrued simple interest at the rate of 8% per annum. On July 7, 2014, the convertible
promissory notes were converted into shares of our common stock.
From
April 2, 2014 through April 28, 2014, we issued demand promissory notes to Mr. Hanson and Mr. Davis in the aggregate amount of $250,000
for each director. The notes had accrued simple interest at the rate of 10% per annum. In July 2014, a total of $150,000
was repaid to Mr. Hanson and the balance under the notes to Mr. Hanson was converted into shares of our common stock. The notes
issued to Mr. Davis were converted into shares of our common stock.
On
June 11, 2014, we issued demand promissory notes to Mr. Hanson and Mr. Davis in the amounts of $150,000 and $125,000, respectively.
The notes accrued simple interest at the rate of 10% per annum. In July 2014, the note to Mr. Hanson was repaid in full and the
note to Mr. Davis was converted into shares of our common stock
.
On
June 24, 2014, we entered into a letter agreement with Mr. Davis and the other party thereto pursuant to which Mr. Davis agreed
to convert $933,484 in principal amount of debt and accrued interest owed to him into shares of our common stock upon the consummation
of our IPO. Conversions were to be effected on the same terms as those provided in the conversion agreement we entered into with
Mr. Davis on June 18, 2014. We completed our IPO in July 2014.
On
June 25 and 26, 2014, we issued demand promissory notes to Mr. Hanson and Mr. Davis in the amounts of $225,000 and $25,000,
respectively. The notes accrued simple interest at the rate of 10% per annum. In July 2014, the notes were repaid in full.
On
March 18 and 23, 2015, we borrowed an aggregate amount of $400,000 from Mr. Hanson and Mr. Davis ($200,000 from each) pursuant
to demand promissory notes that we issued to them. The notes bore interest at the rate of 10% per annum and were due and payable
on June 30, 2015. The notes were subsequently converted into shares of our Series C Convertible Preferred Stock.
On
December 22, 2015, we borrowed $150,000 for working capital purposes from Mr. Hanson pursuant to a demand promissory note issued
to Mr. Hanson bearing interest at the rate of 10% per annum. The note initially had a maturity date of June 30, 2016. On July
13, 2016, we amended the note, effective as of June 30, 2016, to extend the maturity date of the note from June 30, 2016 to January
31, 2017. On January 24, 2017, we and Mr. Hanson agreed to consolidate the outstanding principal and interest under the note into
the 2017 Consolidated Hanson Note described above.
On
January 29, 2016, we issued to Tiburon Opportunity Fund, L.P. a demand promissory note for a principal amount of $150,000.
The note was due and payable on February 29, 2016. In lieu of interest, we issued to Tiburon Opportunity Fund, L.P. a five-year
cashless warrant to purchase 11,112 shares of our common stock at $7.41 per share. The note provided that if we failed to repay
the note on the due date, and for every thirty days beyond the due date the note is outstanding, we would be required to issue
to Tiburon Opportunity Fund, L.P. additional five-year cashless warrants to purchase 11,112 shares of our common stock at $7.41
per share at the end of each 30-day period. Because we failed to repay the note within the required 30-day period, we issued to
Tiburon Opportunity Fund, L.P., on February 28, 2016, an additional warrant to purchase 11,112 shares of our common stock at $7.41
per share. On March 7, 2016, Tiburon Opportunity Fund, L.P. exercised the warrants for 22,223 shares of our common stock for proceeds
of $164,500. We repaid the note in full on March 7, 2016. As consideration for the warrant being exercised on a cash basis, we
issued to Tiburon Opportunity Fund, L.P. a five-year replacement warrant for the purchase of 11,112 shares of our common stock.
On
February 1, 2016, we entered into a demand promissory note with Mr. Davis for a principal amount of $150,000. In lieu of
interest under the promissory note, we issued to Mr. Davis a five-year cashless warrant to purchase 11,112 shares of our common
stock at $7.41 per share. Under the promissory note, we were required to issue to Mr. Davis, for each 30 days that the principal
amount is outstanding, an additional warrant to purchase 11,112 shares of our common stock at $7.41 per share. The promissory
note was originally due and payable on March 1, 2016. On March 29, 2016, we extended the maturity date under the promissory note
to January 31, 2017. As of December 31, 2016, we issued to Mr. Davis warrants to purchase a total of 133,336 shares of our common
stock in connection with this promissory note. On January 24, 2017, we entered into an Amended and Restated Term Promissory Note
with Mr. Davis (the “2017 Consolidated Davis Note”), pursuant to which we and Mr. Davis agreed to consolidate the
outstanding principal under this demand promissory note, together with certain other debt due to Mr. Davis, including accrued
but unpaid interest thereon, into a single note due April 30, 2018 in the principal amount of $896,243. The 2017 Consolidated
Davis Note is unsecured and bears interest at a rate of 7% per annum with all principal and accrued interest due and payable at
the close of business on April 30, 2018.
On
February 11, 2016, we entered into a demand promissory note with Mr. Hanson for a principal amount of $75,000. In lieu
of interest under the promissory note, we issued to Mr. Hanson a five-year cashless warrant to purchase 5,556 shares of our common
stock at $7.41 per share. Under the promissory note, we are required to issue to Mr. Hanson, for each 30 days that the principal
amount is outstanding, an additional warrant to purchase 5,556 shares of our common stock at $7.41 per share. The promissory note
was originally due and payable on March 11, 2016. On March 29, 2016 we extended the maturity date under the promissory note to
January 11, 2017. As of December 31, 2016, we issued to Mr. Hanson warrants to purchase a total of 61,116 shares of our common
stock in connection with this promissory note. On January 24, 2017, we and Mr. Hanson agreed to consolidate the outstanding principal
under this demand promissory note into the 2017 Consolidated Hanson Note described above.
On
May 9 and 10, 2016, we entered into two demand promissory notes in the principal amount of $250,000 each with Mr. Davis.
Each promissory note accrues interest at the per annum rate of 10% and is payable upon the written demand of Mr. Davis. As an
additional inducement to Mr. Davis to advance the amounts under each promissory note, we issued to Mr. Davis, under each
promissory note, a warrant to acquire 3,334 shares of our common stock for each week the applicable note is outstanding. The
warrants under the May 9th promissory note have an exercise price of $6.08 per share and the warrants under the May
10th promissory note have an exercise price of $5.63 per share. If a promissory note is outstanding for more than 30
days, the amount of warrants is increased to from 3,334 to 4,445 shares per week. On May 24, 2016, we amended each warrant to
increase the exercise price of the warrant to $7.41 per share.
On
May 9, 2016, we entered into a promissory note for the principal amount of $226,650 with Mr. Davis. The promissory note
accrues interest at the per annum rate of 10% and is payable in six monthly installments of $38,650 each, which includes
interest. As an additional inducement to Mr. Davis to advance the amounts under the promissory note, we issued to Mr. Davis a
warrant to acquire 15,110 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $6.08 per share. On May 24, 2016, we amended
the warrant to increase the exercise price of the warrant to $7.41 per share.
On
May 25, 2016, we borrowed $200,000 from Mr. Davis and issued to Mr. Davis a demand promissory note in the principal amount of $200,000.
The note did not bear interest and was payable on demand of Mr. Davis. We repaid this note in full on June 6, 2016.
On
January 24, 2017, we entered into an Amended and Restated Term Promissory Note with Mr. Davis, pursuant to which we and Mr. Davis
agreed to consolidate certain notes due to Mr. Davis totaling $896,243, including accrued but unpaid interest thereon, into a
single note due April 30, 2018. The note is unsecured and bears interest at a rate of 7% per annum, with all principal and accrued
interest due and payable at the close of business on April 30, 2018.
On
January 24, 2017, we entered into an Amended and Restated Term Promissory Note with Mr. Hanson, pursuant to which we and Mr. Hanson
agreed to consolidate certain notes due to Mr. Hanson totaling $1,973,735, including accrued but unpaid interest thereon, into
a single note, due April 30, 2018. The note is unsecured and bears interest at a rate of 8% per annum with all principal and accrued
interest due and payable at the close of business on April 30, 2018.
Outstanding
Amounts Owed to Our Directors as of December 31, 2016
As
of December 31, 2016, we owed our director, Mr. Hanson, an aggregate amount of $3.2 million (comprised of $2.8 million of principal
and approximately $407,000 of accrued interest).
As
of December 31, 2016, we owed our director, Mr. Davis, an aggregate amount of $1.2 million (comprised of $1.2 million of
principal and $4,260 of accrued interest).
Convertible
Promissory Note and Warrant Issued to James L. Davis in July 2016
On
July 13, 2016, we issued to James L. Davis a convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $360,000 and a warrant to
purchase up to 13,334 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustments, in exchange for an aggregate purchase price of $300,000,
paid by Mr. Davis in cash. On January 24, 2017, we and Mr. Davis agreed to consolidate the outstanding principal under this convertible
promissory into the 2017 Consolidated Davis Note described above.
Convertible
Promissory Note and Warrant Issued to Michael J. Hanson in July 2016
On
July 14, 2016, we issued to Michael J. Hanson a convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $240,000 and a warrant
to purchase up to 8,890 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustments, in exchange for an aggregate purchase price of $200,000,
paid by Mr. Hanson in cash. On January 24, 2017, we and Mr. Hanson agreed to consolidate the outstanding principal under this
convertible promissory into the 2017 Consolidated Hanson Note described above.
Convertible
Promissory Notes and Warrants Issued to Michael J. Hanson and James L. Davis in August 2016
On
August 12, 2016, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with Michael J. Hanson and James L. Davis pursuant to which we
issued to each of Messrs. Hanson and Davis a convertible note, due August 2017, in a principal amount of $263,158 and warrants
to purchase 28,450 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustments, in exchange for a purchase price of $250,000 paid
in cash by each such person. On January 24, 2017, we and Mr. Davis agreed to consolidate the outstanding principal and interest
under his convertible note into the 2017 Consolidated Davis Note described above. The outstanding Hanson note is unsecured, does
not bear any interest and is payable in full on August 12, 2017. Mr. Hanson may elect to convert the principal amount of the note
issued to him into shares of our common stock at any time before August 12, 2017 at a conversion price per share equal to the
lower of $8.33 and 80% of the per share sale price of our common stock in our next underwritten public offering. We have
the right to require Mr. Hanson to convert the note into shares of our common stock at that conversion price if our common stock
is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market, the Nasdaq Global Market or the Nasdaq Global Select Market. We intend to exercise our
conversion right upon the completion of this offering and the listing of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market. The warrants
issued to Messrs. Hanson and Davis have an exercise price of $8.33 per share, subject to adjustments, and are exercisable
for a five year period.
Issuance
of Promissory Notes and Warrants to James L. Davis Related to Lease with KLC Financial, Inc. in August 2016 and January 2017
On
August 1, 2016 and January 25, 2017, James L. Davis entered into financial leases with KLC Financial, Inc. to fund the purchase
of certain licenses for our exclusive use and benefit. Pursuant to each of the financial leases, Mr. Davis is obligated to pay
to KLC Financial, Inc. the sum of $238,950, together with all accrued interest thereon, in six monthly installments of $40,983
each, which includes interest and equates to an imputed interest rate of 13.875% per annum for the August 1, 2016 note and 9.9%
for the January 25, 2017 note. The August 1, 2016 note required a prepayment of one monthly installment.
To
ensure that Mr. Davis is kept whole from these arrangements, both on August 22, 2016 and January 25, 2017 we issued to Mr. Davis
an unsecured promissory note. Pursuant to each note, we are obligated to pay to Mr. Davis the sum of $238,950, together
with all accrued interest thereon, in six monthly installments of $40,983 each, which includes interest and equates to
an imputed interest rate of 13.875% per annum for the August 1, 2016 note and 9.9% for the January 25, 2017 note. The August 1,
2016 note required a prepayment of one monthly installment. Unless Mr. Davis directs us to do otherwise in writing, we are required
under the terms of each note to make the payments required under each note directly to KLC Financial, Inc. in satisfaction of
our obligations to Mr. Davis under each note and Mr. Davis’ obligations to KLC Financial, Inc.
As
an additional inducement to Mr. Davis to advance amounts under the notes, on August 22, 2016 we also issued to Mr. Davis a warrant
to purchase 16,000 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustments. The warrants issued to Mr. Davis have an exercise price
of $10.13 per share, subject to adjustments, and are exercisable for a five-year period. On January 25, 2017, we issued
to Mr. Davis a warrant to purchase 28,704 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustments. The warrants issued to Mr. Davis
have an exercise price equal to the lower of $8.33 per share and 80% of the per share price of our common stock in our next underwritten
public offering, subject to adjustments, and are exercisable for a five-year period.
Exercise
of Warrants and Issuance of Replacement Warrants in September 2016
On
September 15, 2016, we issued to:
|
●
|
James
L. Davis, (i) 33,739 shares of our common stock upon the exercise of outstanding warrants, in consideration for $250,000 in
aggregate exercise proceeds, and (ii) replacement warrants to purchase 37,113 shares of our common stock at an exercise price
of $7.41 per share;
|
|
●
|
FLMM
Ltd., (i) 20,244 shares of our common stock upon the exercise of outstanding warrants, in consideration for $150,003 in aggregate
exercise proceeds, and (ii) replacement warrants to purchase 22,268 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of
$7.41 per share; and
|
|
●
|
Jon
D. & Linda W. Gruber Trust, (i) 36,280 shares of our common stock upon the exercise of outstanding warrants, in consideration
for $268,578 in aggregate exercise proceeds, and (ii) replacement warrants to purchase 39,908 shares of our common stock at
an exercise price of $7.41 per share.
|
Agreement
to Convert Revolving Line of Credit Note with Michael J. Hanson into Common Stock
On
October 6, 2016, Mr. Hanson agreed to convert, upon the consummation of this offering, the principal amount of $1,000,000
of indebtedness outstanding under our line of credit into shares of our common stock at a conversion price-per-share equal to
the public offering price-per-share in this offering. In consideration for this conversion, we agreed to issue to Mr. Hanson,
upon the consummation of this offering, five-year warrants to purchase 90,526 shares of our common stock, exercisable at an exercise
price-per-share equal to the public offering price-per-share in this offering. We and Mr. Hanson subsequently agreed to reduce
the conversion amount by $321,053 as consideration for Mr. Hanson entering into securities purchase agreements with us in the
same amount in December 2016. We also reduced the number of warrants to purchase our common stock issuable to Mr. Hanson to 90,526
shares.
Promissory
Note with James L. Davis
On
November 16, 2016, we entered into an unsecured promissory note with James L. Davis, one of our directors, pursuant to which we
are obligated to pay to Mr. Davis the sum of $250,000, together with all accrued interest thereon, in six monthly installments
of $42,101 each, which includes interest and equates to an imputed interest rate of 5% per annum.
As
an additional inducement to Mr. Davis to advance amounts under the note, we also issued to Mr. Davis a warrant to purchase 30,365
shares of our common stock, subject to adjustments. The warrants issued to Mr. Davis have an exercise price of $7.41 per share,
subject to adjustments, and are exercisable for a five-year period.
Securities
Purchase Agreements with James L. Davis and Michael J. Hanson
In
December 2016, we entered into securities purchase agreements with Messrs. Davis and Hanson pursuant to which we agreed to issue
to Messrs. Davis and Hanson convertible notes, due December 2017, in an aggregate principal amount of $378,947 and warrants to
purchase 40,968 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustments, in exchange for an aggregate purchase price of $360,000, payable
in cash.
The
notes do not bear any interest and are payable in full in December 2017. Messrs. Davis and Hanson may elect to convert the principal
amount of the notes into shares of our common stock at any time before the maturity date at a conversion price per share equal
to the lower of $10.50 and 80% of the per share price of our common stock in our next underwritten public offering. We will have
the right to require Messrs. Davis and Hanson to convert the notes into shares of our common stock at that conversion price if
our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market, the Nasdaq Global Market or the Nasdaq Global Select Market. The warrants
will have an exercise price per share equal to the lower of $8.33 and 80% of the per share price of our common stock in our next
underwritten public offering, subject to adjustments, and are exercisable for a five-year period.
Settlement
Agreement with Trooien Capital, LLC
On
December 20, 2016, we entered into a settlement agreement and full release with Trooien Capital, LLC relating to convertible notes
issued to Trooien Capital in 2013. Pursuant to the settlement, we agreed to pay to Trooien Capital a total of $3.1 million and
to issue a warrant to purchase 333,334 shares of the Company’s common stock at the lower of $8.33 per share and 80% of the
Company’s per share price in the next underwritten public offering, in settlement of the convertible notes in the amount
of $2.3 million, plus interest accrued but unpaid thereon. In exchange for the settlement payment and warrants, Trooien Capital,
within one business day after receipt of the settlement payment and warrants, will take all necessary steps to remove, terminate
or otherwise release any and all interest in any tangible or intangible assets of the Company. The Company fully repaid the $3.1
million due to Trooien Capital as of December 23, 2016 and issued the warrants as of that same date.
Convertible
Promissory Notes
On
December 22, 2016, we issued to:
|
●
|
James L. Davis a convertible term promissory note in the amount of $50,000 bearing
interest at the rate of 8% per annum and with a maturity of March 22, 2017, which may be extended
to May 31, 2017;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Michael J. Hanson
a convertible term promissory note in the amount of $85,000 bearing interest at the rate of
8% per annum and with a maturity of March 22, 2017, which may be extended to May 31, 2017;
and,
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Jon D. &
Linda W. Gruber Trust a convertible term promissory note in the amount of $75,000 bearing
interest at the rate of 8% per annum and with a maturity of March 22, 2017, which may be extended
to May 31, 2017.
|
On
December 23, 2016, we issued to FLMM Ltd. a convertible term promissory note in the amount of $1,440,000 bearing interest
at the rate of 8% per annum and with a maturity of March 15, 2017.
On
January 24, 2017, we and (i) Mr. Davis agreed to consolidate the outstanding principal and interest under his convertible term
promissory note into the 2017 Consolidated Davis Note described above (ii) Mr. Hanson agreed to consolidate the outstanding principal
and interest under his convertible term promissory note into the 2017 Consolidated Hanson Note described above.
Issuance
of $250,000 Demand Promissory Note to Davis & Associates in December 2016
On
December 29, 2016, we entered into a Demand Promissory Note agreement for $250,000 with Davis & Associates, Inc., a company
owned by James L. Davis, a director of the Company. The Demand Promissory Note accrues interest at a rate of 4% per annum. All
principal and accrued but unpaid interest on the Demand Promissory Note will become payable upon the written demand of Davis &
Associates. We repaid this Demand Promissory Note as of the same date, December 29, 2016.
Related-Person
Transaction Policy
Our
related-person transaction policy sets forth the policies and procedures for the review, approval and ratification of related-person
transactions, and covers, with certain exceptions set forth in Item 404 of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act, any transaction,
arrangement or relationship, or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships in which we were or are to be
a participant, where the amount involved exceeds the lesser of $120,000 and one percent of the average of our total assets
at year end for the last two completed fiscal years and a related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest,
including purchases of goods or services by or from the related person or entities in which the related person has a material
interest, indebtedness, guarantees of indebtedness and employment by us of a related person.
DESCRIPTION
OF SECURITIES
The
following is a description of our capital stock and the material provisions of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation,
Bylaws and other agreements to which we and our stockholders are parties, in each case upon the closing of this offering. The
following is only a summary and is qualified by applicable law and by the text of the actual documents, copies of which are available
as set forth under “Where You Can Find More Information.”
General
Immediately
following the closing of this offering, our authorized capital stock will consist of 520,000,000 shares of capital stock, par
value $0.0001 per share, of which 500,000,000 shares are authorized for issuance as common stock and 20,000,000 shares are authorized
for issuance as undesignated preferred stock. As of December 31, 2016, there were issued and outstanding (i) 2,103,392
shares of common stock and (ii) 1,031,454 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock.
Common
Stock
Voting
Rights.
The holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote for each outstanding share of common stock owned by that
stockholder on every matter properly submitted to the stockholders for their vote. Stockholders are not entitled to vote cumulatively
for the election of directors.
Dividend
Rights.
Subject to the dividend rights of the holders of any outstanding series of preferred stock, holders of our common
stock are entitled to receive ratably such dividends and other distributions of cash or any other right or property as may be
declared by our Board of Directors out of our assets or funds legally available for such dividends or distributions.
Liquidation
Rights.
In the event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our affairs, holders of our
common stock would be entitled to share ratably in our assets that are legally available for distribution to stockholders after
payment of liabilities. If we have any preferred stock outstanding at such time, holders of the preferred stock may be entitled
to distribution and/or liquidation preferences. In either such case, we must pay the applicable distribution to the holders of
our preferred stock before we may pay distributions to the holders of our common stock.
Conversion,
Redemption and Preemptive Rights.
Holders of our common stock have no conversion, redemption, preemptive, subscription or
similar rights.
Preferred
Stock
Under
our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, our Board of Directors is authorized, subject to limitations prescribed
by law, to issue shares of preferred stock in one or more series without further stockholder approval. Our Board of Directors
has discretion to determine the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of, including without limitation voting rights,
dividend rights, conversion rights, redemption privileges and liquidation preferences of, and to fix the number of shares of,
each series of our preferred stock. Accordingly, our Board of Directors could authorize the issuance of shares of preferred stock
with terms and conditions that could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a transaction or a change in control
that might involve a premium price for holders of our common stock or otherwise be in their best interest.
The
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock entitles its holders to a 10% per annum dividend, payable quarterly in cash or in additional
shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (or a combination of both) as determined by us, and subject to the provisions of
the Delaware General Corporation Law. The Series C Convertible Preferred Stock will automatically convert into common stock upon
the closing of this offering.
Warrants
As
of December 31, 2016, there were warrants outstanding to purchase a total of 2,895,686 shares of our common stock, all
of which expire between July 20, 2017 and December 28, 2021. Each of these warrants entitles the holder to purchase one share
of common stock at prices ranging from $7.41 to $90.00 per share, with a weighted average exercise price of $11.60
per share. Certain of these warrants have a net or non-cash exercise provision under which its holder may, in lieu of payment
of the exercise price in cash, surrender the warrant and receive a net amount of shares based on the fair market value of our
common stock at the time of exercise of the warrant after deduction of the aggregate exercise price. Each of these warrants also
contains provisions for the adjustment of the exercise price and the aggregate number of shares issuable upon the exercise of
the warrant in the event of dividends, share splits, reorganizations and reclassifications and consolidations. Of the warrants
outstanding as of December 31, 2016, warrants to purchase approximately 1,936,799 shares of our common stock contain full-ratchet
anti-dilution provisions which require a reduction to the exercise price of these warrants in the event that we issue common stock,
or securities convertible into or exercisable for common stock, at a price per share that is lower than the warrant exercise price.
Options
As
of December 31, 2016, (i) stock options to purchase an aggregate of 225,231 shares of common stock were outstanding under
our stock incentive plans and grants, (ii) 10,981 shares of our common stock reserved for future grants under our 2014
Stock Incentive Plan, and (iii) 356,324 shares of our common stock reserved for future grants under our 2016 Stock Incentive
Plan (excluding 298,000 shares of our common stock to certain directors, officers and other associates). (See “Market
for Our Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters.”)
Certain
Anti-Takeover Effects
Charter
and Bylaw Provisions
Certain
provisions set forth in our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and our Bylaws, which are summarized below, may
be deemed to have an anti-takeover effect and may delay, deter or prevent a tender offer or takeover attempt that a stockholder
might consider to be in its best interests, including attempts that might result in a premium being paid over the market price
for the shares held by stockholders.
|
●
|
Special
Meetings of Stockholders.
Our Bylaws provide that special meetings of stockholders may be called only by a majority of
the directors of our board. Stockholders are not permitted to call a special meeting of stockholders, to require that the
Chairman call such a special meeting, or to require that our board request the calling of a special meeting of stockholders.
|
|
●
|
Advance
Nominations for Directors and Meeting Proposals.
Our Bylaws provide advance notice procedures for stockholders seeking
to nominate candidates for election as directors at any meeting of stockholders or proposing other business to be conducted
at a meeting. Our Bylaws also specify certain requirements regarding the form and content of any such advance notice from
a stockholder. These provisions may preclude our stockholders from making nominations for directors at our stockholder meetings.
|
|
●
|
Blank
Check Preferred Stock.
Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation contains provisions that permit us to issue,
without any further vote or action by the stockholders, up to 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series and,
with respect to each such series, to fix the number of shares constituting the series and the designation of the series, the
voting powers (if any) of the shares of the series, and the preferences and relative, participating, optional and other special
rights, if any, and any qualifications, limitations or restrictions, of the shares of such series.
|
Delaware
Takeover Statute
We
are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. In general, Section 203 prohibits a Delaware
corporation that is a public company from engaging in any “business combination” with any “interested stockholder”
for a period of three years following the date that such stockholder becomes an interested stockholder, unless: (1) prior to such
date, the board of directors of the corporation approved either the business combination or the transaction that resulted
in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder; (2) on consummation of the transaction that resulted in the stockholder
becoming an interested stockholder, the interested stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of the corporation outstanding
at the time the transaction commenced, excluding for purposes of determining the number of shares outstanding those shares owned
(x) by persons who are directors and also officers and (y) by employee stock plans in which employee participants do not have
the right to determine confidentially whether shares held subject to the plan will be tendered in a tender or exchange offer;
or (3) on or subsequent to such date, the business combination is approved by the board of directors and authorized at
an annual or special meeting of stockholders, and not by written consent, by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the
outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the interested stockholder.
Section
203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law generally defines “business combination” to include: (1) any merger or
consolidation involving the corporation and the interested stockholder; (2) any sale, transfer, pledge or other disposition of
10% or more of the assets of the corporation involving the interested stockholder; (3) subject to certain exceptions, any transaction
that results in the issuance or transfer by the corporation of any stock of the corporation to the interested stockholder; (4)
any transaction involving the corporation that has the effect of increasing the proportionate share of the stock of any class
or series of the corporation beneficially owned by the interested stockholder; or (5) the receipt by the interested stockholder
of the benefit of any loans, advances, guarantees, pledges or other financial benefits provided by or through the corporation.
Section
203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law generally defines “interested stockholder” to include, with respect to
any company, any person (other than the company and any direct or indirect majority-owned subsidiary of the company) that (1)
is the owner of 15% or more of the outstanding voting stock of the company, or (2) is an affiliate or associate of the company
and was the owner of 15% or more of the outstanding voting stock of the company at any time within the three-year period immediately
prior to the date on which it is sought to be determined whether such person is an interested stockholder, and the affiliates
and associates of such person.
While
the foregoing provisions of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, our Bylaws and Delaware law may have an anti-takeover
effect, these provisions are intended to enhance the likelihood of continuity and stability in the composition of our Board of
Directors and in the policies formulated by the board, and to discourage certain types of transactions that may involve an actual
or threatened change of control. In that regard, these provisions are designed to reduce our vulnerability to an unsolicited acquisition
proposal. The provisions also are intended to discourage certain tactics that may be used in proxy fights. Nevertheless, such
provisions could have the effect of discouraging others from making tender offers for our shares and, as a consequence, they also
may inhibit fluctuations in the market price of our common stock that could result from actual or rumored takeover attempts. Such
provisions also may have the effect of preventing changes in our management.
Transfer
Agent and Registrar
Our
transfer agent is Corporate Stock Transfer, Inc., located at 3200 Cherry Creek Drive S., Denver, Colorado 80209. The transfer
agent’s telephone number is (303) 282-4800. The transfer agent is registered under the Exchange Act.
UNDERWRITING
The
underwriters named below have agreed to buy, subject to the terms and conditions of the underwriting agreement, the number of
shares of common stock listed opposite their respective names below. The underwriters are committed to purchase and pay
for all of the shares, if any are purchased, other than those shares covered by the over-allotment option we describe below. The
underwriting agreement also provides that if the underwriters default, this offering of our shares of common stock may be terminated.
Underwriters
|
|
Number
of shares
|
|
Lake Street Capital Markets,
LLC
|
|
|
|
|
National Securities
Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
A
copy of the underwriting agreement has been filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is part.
We
have been advised by the underwriters that they propose to offer the common stock directly to the public at the public offering
price set forth on the cover page of this prospectus. Any common stock sold by the underwriters to securities dealers will
be sold at the public offering price less a selling concession not in excess of
per share. The underwriters may allow, and these selected dealers may re-allow, a concession of not more than
per share to other brokers and dealers. The underwriters are offering the shares, subject to prior sale, when, as and if issued
to and accepted by them, subject to approval of legal matters by their counsel, including the validity of the shares, and other
conditions contained in the underwriting agreement, such as the receipt by the underwriters of officer’s certificates and
legal opinions. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the underwriting agreement, the underwriters have agreed, severally
and not jointly, to purchase all of the shares sold under the underwriting agreement if any of these shares are purchased.
No
action has been taken by us or the underwriters that would permit a public offering of the shares in any jurisdiction where action
for that purpose is required. None of the shares of common stock included in this offering may be offered or sold, directly or
indirectly, nor may this prospectus or any other offering material or advertisements in connection with the offer and sales of
any of the shares of common stock being offered hereby be distributed or published in any jurisdiction, except under circumstances
that will result in compliance with the applicable rules and regulations of that jurisdiction. Persons who receive this prospectus
are advised to inform themselves about and to observe any restrictions relating to this offering of securities and the distribution
of this prospectus. This prospectus is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation of any offer to buy the shares in any jurisdiction
where that would not be permitted or legal.
Underwriting
Discounts and Commissions
The
following table shows the public offering price, underwriting discounts and commissions, and proceeds before expenses to us. The
information assumes either no exercise or full exercise of the option we granted to the underwriters to purchase additional shares.
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Per
share
|
|
|
|
Without
Over-Allotment
|
|
|
|
With
Over-Allotment
|
|
Public offering price
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Underwriting
discounts and commissions
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Proceeds, before
expenses, to us
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
We
estimate the total expenses payable by us for this offering to be approximately $550,572 , which amount includes (i) up
to $125,000 for the underwriters’ out-of-pocket expenses ($30,000 of which has been paid in advance, subject to FINRA Rule
5110(f)(2)(C)), including but not limited to travel, databases, fees and disbursements of counsel, and of other consultants and
advisors retained by the Representative and (ii) other estimated expenses of approximately $425,572 which includes legal,
accounting, printing costs and various fees associated with the registration and listing of our shares.
The
securities we are offering are being offered by the underwriters subject to certain conditions specified in the underwriting agreement.
Representative’s
Warrants
In
addition to the underwriting discount to be paid by us, we have agreed to issue to the Representative or its designees warrants
to purchase the number of shares of our common stock that is equivalent to 3.0% of the number of shares of common stock sold in
this offering, at an exercise price equal to 110% of the per share equivalent paid by the investors in this offering. The Representative’s
warrants will have a term of exercise expiring five years from the effective date of the registration statement of which this
prospectus is a part. Pursuant to FINRA Rule 5110(g), the Representative’s warrants and any shares issued upon exercise
of the compensation warrants shall not be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged, or hypothecated, or be the subject of any hedging,
short sale, derivative, put, or call transaction that would result in the effective economic disposition of the securities by
any person for a period of 180 days immediately following the date of effectiveness or commencement of sales of this offering,
except the transfer of any security:
|
●
|
by
operation of law or by reason of reorganization of our company;
|
|
●
|
to
any FINRA member firm participating in the offering and the officers or partners thereof, if all securities so transferred
remain subject to the lock-up restriction set forth above for the remainder of the time period;
|
|
●
|
by
operation of law or by reason of reorganization of our company;
|
|
●
|
if
the aggregate amount of securities of our company held by the holder of the compensation warrants or related persons do not
exceed 1% of the securities being offered;
|
|
●
|
that
is beneficially owned on a pro-rata basis by all equity owners of an investment fund, provided that no participating member
manages or otherwise directs investments by the fund, and participating members in the aggregate do not own more than 10%
of the equity in the fund; or
|
|
●
|
the
exercise or conversion of any security, if all securities received remain subject to the lock-up restriction set forth above
for the remainder of the time period.
|
The
Representative’s warrants are exercisable for cash or on a cashless basis. The exercise price and number of shares issuable
upon exercise of the warrants may be adjusted in certain circumstances including in the event of a stock dividend or our recapitalization,
reorganization, merger or consolidation. The warrant exercise price or underlying shares will also be adjusted for issuances of
common stock at a price below the warrant exercise price. The warrants will also be entitled to certain registration rights for
the life of the warrants.
Over-allotment
Option
We
have granted to the Representative an option, exercisable not later than 45 days after the date of this prospectus, to purchase
up to a number of additional shares of common stock equal to 15% of the number of shares of common stock sold in the primary offering.
Any shares so purchased shall be sold at a price per share equal to the public offering price, less the underwriting discount.
The underwriters may exercise the option solely to cover over-allotments, if any, made in connection with this offering. If any
additional shares of common stock are purchased pursuant to the over-allotment option, the underwriters will offer these shares
of common stock on the same terms as those on which the other securities are being offered hereby.
Listing
on the Nasdaq Capital Market
Our
common stock is currently traded on the OTCQB Marketplace under the symbol “CAFN.” We have applied to list our common
stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “CAFN,” which listing we expect to occur upon consummation of
this offering, at which time our common stock will cease to be traded on the OTCQB Marketplace. No assurance can be given that
our application will be approved. This offering will only occur if Nasdaq approves the listing of our common stock on the Nasdaq
Capital Market. If Nasdaq does not approve the listing of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market, we do not intend to proceed
with this offering.
Determination
of Offering Price
The
public offering price of our common stock offered by this prospectus has been determined by us and the underwriters and may bear
no relation to our assets, book value, historical earnings or net worth, or any other accepted valuation criteria. No valuation
or appraisal has been obtained in connection with this offering.
The
public offering price of our common stock offered by this prospectus has been determined by negotiation between us and the underwriters
based on many factors, including the price of our common stock on the OTCQB Marketplace during recent periods, our history, our
prospects, the industry in which we operate, our past and present operating results, the previous experience of our executive
officers and the general condition of the securities markets at the time of this offering. It should be noted, however, that historically
there has been a limited volume of trading in our common stock on the OTCQB Marketplace. Therefore, the price of our common stock
on the OTCQB Marketplace during recent periods was only one of many factors in determining the public offering price.
Accordingly,
the public offering price stated on the cover page of this prospectus should not be considered as an indication of the actual
value of our common stock, which is subject to change as a result of market conditions and other factors. Neither we nor any of
the underwriters can assure investors that, after this offering, an active trading market will develop for our common stock or
that our common stock can be resold at or above the public offering price.
Lock-up
Agreements
Our
officers, directors and certain of our stockholders, and each of their respective affiliates, have agreed with the underwriters
to be subject to a lock-up period of 180 days following the date of this prospectus. This means that, during the applicable lock-up
period, such persons may not offer, sell, contract to sell, pledge, hypothecate or otherwise dispose of, (or enter into any transaction
which is designed to, or might reasonably be expected to, result in the disposition (whether by actual disposition or effective
economic disposition due to cash settlement or otherwise) by such persons), directly or indirectly, including the filing (or participation
in the filing) of a registration statement with the SEC in respect of, or establish or increase a put equivalent position or liquidate
or decrease a call equivalent position within the meaning of Section 16 of the Exchange Act, and the rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder with respect to, any shares of common stock of the company or any securities convertible into, or exercisable or exchangeable
for shares of common stock, or publicly announce an intention to effect any such transaction. Certain limited transfers are permitted
during the lock-up period. We have also agreed, in the underwriting agreement, to similar lock-up restrictions on the issuance
and sale of our securities for 180 days following the closing of this offering, although we will be permitted to issue stock options
or stock awards to directors, officers and employees under our existing plans and other customary carve outs to be set forth in
the underwriting agreement. The underwriters may, in their sole discretion and without notice, waive the terms of any of these
lock-up agreements.
Other
Relationships
We
have granted the Representative a right of first refusal to act as financial advisor to us and/or our affiliates with respect
to any other form of investment banking services, including, but not limited to, mergers and acquisitions and acting as placement
agent or co-lead bookrunner of any privately or publicly placed offering of our equity or debt securities. This right of first
refusal will be effective only for the six-month period following the termination of the engagement period between us and the
Representative. The terms of any such engagement of the Representative will be determined by separate agreement.
We
previously paid compensation to the Representative for services as a financial advisor in connection with its offerings of convertible
notes and warrants, which closed on January 4, 2017, January 13, 2017, and January 17, 2017. This compensation included five-year
warrants to purchase 10,727 shares. The warrants have an exercise price equal to the lower of $8.33 per share or
80% of the per share sale price of our common stock in our next underwritten public offering, which we expect will be this offering.
These warrants are subject to the restrictions of FINRA Rule 5110(g), which are set forth above under “Representative’s
Warrants.” These warrants are considered underwriting compensation in connection with this offering.
Some
of the underwriters and their affiliates have engaged in, and may in the future engage in, investment banking and other commercial
dealings in the ordinary course of business with us or our affiliates. They have received, or may in the future receive, customary
fees and commissions for these transactions.
Transfer
Agent and Registrar
The
transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is Corporate Stock Transfer, Inc.
Stabilization,
Short Positions and Penalty Bids
The
underwriters may engage in syndicate covering transactions, stabilizing transactions and penalty bids or purchases for the purpose
of pegging, fixing or maintaining the price of our common stock:
|
●
|
Over-allotment
transactions involve sales by the underwriters of securities in excess of the number of shares the underwriters are obligated
to purchase. This creates a syndicate short position which may be either a covered short position or a naked short position.
In a covered short position, the number of shares over-allotted by the underwriters is not greater than the number of shares
that they may purchase in the over-allotment option. In a naked short position, the number of shares involved is greater than
the number of shares in the over-allotment option. The underwriters may close out any short position by exercising their over-allotment
option and/or purchasing securities in the open market.
|
|
●
|
Syndicate
covering transactions involve purchases of securities in the open market after the distribution has been completed in order
to cover syndicate short positions. In determining the source of securities to close out the short position, the underwriters
will consider, among other things, the price of securities available for purchase in the open market as compared with the
price at which they may purchase securities through exercise of the over-allotment option. If the underwriters sell more shares
than could be covered by exercise of the over-allotment option and, therefore, has a naked short position, the position can
be closed out by buying securities in the open market. A naked short position is more likely to be created if the underwriters
are concerned that there could be downward pressure on the price of the securities in the open market after pricing that could
adversely affect investors who purchase in the offering.
|
|
●
|
Stabilizing
transactions permit bids to purchase the underlying security so long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a specific maximum.
|
|
●
|
Penalty
bids permit the underwriters to reclaim a selling concession from a syndicate member when the securities originally sold by
the syndicate member are purchased in a stabilizing or syndicate covering transaction to cover syndicate short positions.
|
These
syndicate covering transactions, stabilizing transactions and penalty bids may have the effect of raising or maintaining the market
prices of our securities or preventing or retarding a decline in the market prices of our securities. As a result, the price of
our common stock may be higher than the price that might otherwise exist in the open market. Neither we nor the underwriters make
any representation or prediction as to the effect that the transactions described above may have on the price of our common stock.
These transactions may be effected on the Nasdaq Capital Market, in the over-the-counter market or on any other trading market
and, if commenced, may be discontinued at any time.
In
connection with this offering, the underwriters also may engage in passive market making transactions in our common stock in accordance
with Regulation M during a period before the commencement of offers or sales of shares of our common stock in this offering and
extending through the completion of the distribution. In general, a passive market maker must display its bid at a price not in
excess of the highest independent bid for that security. However, if all independent bids are lowered below the passive market
maker’s bid, that bid must then be lowered when specific purchase limits are exceeded. Passive market making may stabilize
the market price of the securities at a level above that which might otherwise prevail in the open market and, if commenced, may
be discontinued at any time.
Neither
we nor the underwriters make any representation or prediction as to the direction or magnitude of any effect that the transactions
described above may have on the prices of our securities. In addition, neither we nor the underwriters make any representation
that the underwriters will engage in these transactions or that any transactions, once commenced, will not be discontinued without
notice.
Indemnification
We
have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain liabilities, including certain liabilities arising under the Securities
Act, or to contribute to payments that the underwriters may be required to make for these liabilities.
Electronic
Distribution
In
connection with the offering, certain of the underwriters or securities dealers may distribute prospectuses by electronic means,
such as e-mail.
SHARES
ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
There
is not currently an established U.S. trading market for our common stock. Upon completion of this offering (at an assumed public
offering price of $6.00 per share), there will be approximately
shares of common stock issued and outstanding, assuming no warrants or options outstanding are exercised. Of these shares, we
believe that approximately would be freely transferable
immediately. As of December 31, 2016, our executive officers and directors beneficially own 1,779,766 shares, which would
be eligible for resale subject to the volume and manner of sale limitations of Rule 144 of the Securities Act and subject to the
lock-up restrictions described below. In addition, as of December 31, 2016, 1,334,156 shares are “restricted securities,”
as that term is defined in Rule 144, and are eligible for sale under the provisions of Rule 144.
The
number of shares of our common stock outstanding after this offering is based on the number of shares outstanding as of December
31, 2016 after applying the Reverse Stock Split and excludes:
|
●
|
225,231
shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding
stock options as of December 31, 2016 ;
|
|
●
|
298,000
shares of our common
stock issuable upon exercise of stock options approved for grant by our Board of Directors on December 31, 2016 to certain
directors, officers and other associates under our 2016 Stock Incentive Plan, which grant is contingent and effective upon
the consummation of this offering;
|
|
●
|
58,324
shares of our common
stock available for future grants under our 2016 Stock Incentive Plan as of December 31, 2016 (excluding 298,000 shares
of our common stock to certain directors, officers and other associates);
|
|
●
|
10,981
shares of our common
stock available for future grants under our 2014 Stock Incentive Plan as of December 31, 2016;
|
|
●
|
2
,895,686
shares of our common
stock reserved for issuance under outstanding warrants as of December 31, 2016, with a weighted average exercise price of $11.60
per share;
|
|
●
|
687,636
shares of our common
stock issuable upon conversion of our Series C Convertible Preferred Stock as of December 31, 2016, which will occur upon
the consummation of this offering; and
|
|
●
|
2,099,794
shares of our common stock issuable upon conversion of
certain convertible notes (calculated based on the assumed public price of $6.00 per share), which will occur
upon the consummation of this offering.
|
In
general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, a person (or persons whose shares are required to be aggregated), including a
person who may be deemed an “affiliate” of us, who has beneficially owned restricted securities for at least six months
may sell, within any three-month period, a number of shares that does not exceed the greater of: (1) 1% of the then outstanding
shares of common stock or (2) the average weekly trading volume of the common stock during the four calendar weeks preceding
the date on which notice of such sale was filed under Rule 144. Sales of shares held by our affiliates that are not “restricted”
are subject to such volume limitations, but are not subject to the holding period requirement. Sales under Rule 144 are also subject
to certain requirements as to the manner of sale, notice and availability of current public information about our company. A person
who is not deemed to have been an affiliate of our company at any time during the 90 days preceding a sale by such person, and
who has beneficially owned the restricted shares for at least one year, is entitled to sell such shares under Rule 144 without
regard to any of the restrictions described above.
Notwithstanding
the foregoing, the SEC by rule has prohibited the use of Rule 144 for resale of securities issued by a shell company (other than
business combination related shell companies) or any issuer that has been at any time previously a shell company. The SEC has
provided an important exception to this prohibition, however, if the following conditions are met:
|
●
|
the
issuer of the securities that was formerly a shell company has ceased to be a shell company;
|
|
●
|
the
issuer of the securities is subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act;
|
|
●
|
the
issuer of the securities has filed all Exchange Act reports and material required to be filed, as applicable, during the preceding
12 months (or such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports and materials), other than Form 8-K reports;
and
|
|
●
|
at
least one year has elapsed from the time that the issuer filed current Form 10 type information with the SEC reflecting its
status as an entity that is not a shell company.
|
While
we currently meet the foregoing conditions, as a result of this prohibition, holders of restricted securities of ours will be
able to sell such securities pursuant to Rule 144 only as long as the foregoing conditions are met.
Following
this offering, we cannot predict the effect, if any, that the availability for sale of shares held by our current stockholders
will have on the market price from time to time. Nevertheless, sales by our current stockholders of a substantial number of shares
of common stock in the public market could materially and adversely affect the market price for our common stock. In addition,
the availability for sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock acquired through the exercise of outstanding stock
options or warrants or conversion of convertible notes could materially adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Lock-up
Agreements
In
connection with this offering, each of our directors and officers has entered into a lock-up agreement with the underwriters of
this offering that restricts the sale of shares of our common stock by such person for a period of 180 days after the date of
this prospectus without the prior written consent of the underwriters. Upon the expiration of the lock-up period, substantially
all of the shares subject to such lock-up restrictions will become eligible for sale, subject to the limitations discussed above
(see “Underwriting—Lock-up Agreements”). Our directors and executive officers collectively beneficially own
approximately 50.83% of our voting stock as of February 13, 2017, which includes (i) an aggregate of 379,111 issued and
outstanding shares of our common stock, (ii) stock options to purchase an aggregate of 99,837 shares of our common stock,
and (iii) warrants to purchase an aggregate of 927,015 shares of our common stock (see “Security Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners and Management”).
Registration
Rights
From
March 31, 2016 through April 8, 2016, we entered into various agreements with purchasers of shares of our common stock which require
us to register under the Securities Act the resale of such shares by such persons. These registration rights are generally subject
to certain conditions and limitations, including our right to limit the number of shares included in any registration statement
under certain circumstances. If we fail to file a registration statement in a timely manner, we will be required to issue to the
applicable purchaser, upon our failure to timely file the registration statement and on each monthly anniversary thereof until
the registration statement is filed, shares of our common stock in an amount equal to 1% of the aggregate subscription amounts
paid by such purchaser under the agreement, up to a maximum aggregate amount equal to 6% of the aggregate subscription amounts
paid by such purchaser under the agreement. These agreements generally provide that we are not required to take any action to
effect any such registration if we furnish to the applicable stockholder a certificate, signed by the Chairman of our Board of
Directors, stating that in the good faith judgment of our Board of Directors it would be detrimental to us or our stockholders
for a registration statement to be filed at such time, in which case our obligation to file a registration statement will be deferred
for a period not to exceed 90 days from the date of such certificate. We are permitted to utilize this right of deferral only
once. Due to this offering, our Board of Directors recently deferred our obligation to register the resale of shares of our common
stock issued under these agreements for a period of 90 days from July 8, 2016. Shortly after the completion of this offering,
we intend to file a registration statement with the SEC to register the resale of shares of our common stock currently held by,
or issuable to, many of our securityholders.
From
June 2016 through January 17, 2017, we entered into securities purchase agreements with various investors pursuant to which we
issued convertible notes in an aggregate principal amount of $10,078,947 and warrants to purchase 1,258,637
shares of our common stock, subject to adjustments. Each investor may elect to convert the principal amount of the notes into
shares of our common stock at any time within 1 year from the date the notes were issued at a conversion price per share equal
to either the lower of $10.50 and 80% of the per share sale price of our common stock in our next underwritten public offering,
or the lower of $8.33 and 80% of the per share sale price of our common stock in our next underwritten public
offering, which we expect will be this offering. We have the right to require each investor to convert the notes into shares of
our common stock at that conversion price if our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market, the Nasdaq Global Market
or the Nasdaq Global Select Market. We intend to exercise our conversion right upon the completion of this offering and the listing
of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market. The warrants issued to each investor have an exercise price of either
the lower of $8.33 and 80% of the per share sale price of our common stock in our next underwritten public offering, or $8.33
per share, subject to adjustments, and are exercisable for a five year period. Under each of these securities purchase agreements,
we are required to file with the SEC a registration statement covering the resale of the shares of our common stock issuable upon
conversion of the notes and the exercise of warrants within 21 days after the completion of this offering, or 90 days following
the date on which our current financing plan is terminated. We intend to file a registration statement with the SEC to register
the resale of these shares under the Securities Act shortly after the completion of this offering. If we fail to file a registration
statement in a timely manner, then upon such failure we are required to issue to each investor additional five-year warrants to
purchase an aggregate of 54,639 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $8.33 per share, and
for each subsequent 30-day period for which a registration statement was not filed we are required to issue to each investor additional
five-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 57,607 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $8.33
per share.
In
addition, pursuant to a securities purchase agreement entered into with an investor in December 2016, such investor has a piggy-back
registration right that requires us to request the underwriters in this offering to permit such investor’s registrable securities
be included in this offering on the same terms and conditions as we are offering shares of common stock. We have obtained a waiver
from the investor with respect to its piggy-back registration rights in connection with this offering.
We
are generally required to pay all expenses incurred by us in connection with any registration described above, including all registration
and filing fees, prospectus printing expenses (if required), fees and disbursements of our counsel and independent public accountants,
fees and expenses (including reasonable counsel fees) incurred in connection with complying with state securities or “blue
sky” laws, fees of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., transfer taxes and fees of transfer agents and registrars.
The terms of these agreements generally also provide that, once a registration statement is declared effective by the SEC, we
must use our best efforts to keep such registration statement continuously effective during the period beginning on its effective
date until the earliest of (i) such time as all of the applicable shares have been sold, (ii) at least two years have
passed since the date we sold the applicable shares to the applicable purchaser, and (iii) such time as all the applicable shares
may be sold under Rule 144 under the Securities Act.
LEGAL
MATTERS
Certain
legal matters in connection with this offering will be passed upon for us by Dorsey & Whitney LLP of Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Certain legal matters in connection with this offering will be passed upon on behalf of the underwriters by Fredrikson & Byron,
P.A. of Minneapolis, Minnesota.
EXPERTS
Our
consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016 included in this prospectus and in
the related registration statement have been audited by Lurie, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm. As indicated
in their report with respect thereto, these financial statements are included in this prospectus in reliance upon the authority
of such firm as experts in auditing and accounting, with respect to such report.
WHERE
YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We
are subject to the reporting and information requirements of the Exchange Act, and, as a result, we file annual, quarterly and
current reports, and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy this information at the Public Reference Room of the
SEC located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the
operation of the Public Reference Room. Copies of all or any part of the registration statement may be obtained from the SEC’s
offices upon payment of fees prescribed by the SEC. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains periodic and current reports,
information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The address of the SEC’s
website is www.sec.gov.
CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Shareholders
and Board of Directors
Cachet
Financial Solutions, Inc.
Minneapolis,
Minnesota
We
have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Cachet Financial Solutions, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31,
2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ deficit and cash flows for each of the
years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2016. Cachet Financial Solutions, Inc.’s management is responsible for these
consolidated financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based
on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements
are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for
designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit
also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements,
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In
our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of Cachet Financial Solutions, Inc. as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for
each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America.
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed
in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has limited revenues, suffered recurring losses from operations
and has a shareholders’ deficit. These conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.
Management’s plans regarding those matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include
any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/
Lurie, LLP
|
|
Minneapolis,
MN
|
|
|
|
February
24, 2017
, except for “The Offering” in Note 14,
as to which the date is March 7, 2017.
|
CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
As
of
|
|
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
Accounts receivable,
net
|
|
|
2,885
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
Deferred commissions
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
Prepaid
expenses and deferred costs
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
3,241
|
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net
|
|
|
696
|
|
|
|
664
|
|
GOODWILL
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
632
|
|
DEFERRED COMMISSIONS
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
OTHER NON-CURRENT
ASSETS
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
|
$
|
4,496
|
|
|
$
|
2,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
2,205
|
|
|
$
|
1,110
|
|
Checks issued in
excess of deposits
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
|
632
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
697
|
|
|
|
890
|
|
Warrant and conversion
feature liability, current
|
|
|
2,870
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Current maturities
of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
Short-term
debt and current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
4,229
|
|
|
|
4,768
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
11,495
|
|
|
|
7,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL LEASE, net of current maturities
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
LONG TERM DEBT, net of current portion
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
WARRANT LIABILITY, net of current portion
|
|
|
7,352
|
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
DEFERRED REVENUE
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
ACCRUED RENT
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
TOTAL
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
19,828
|
|
|
|
11,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS’
DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible preferred stock, $.0001
Par Value, 20,000,000 shares authorized, 43,530 and 44,030 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Common shares, $.0001 Par Value, 500,000,000
shares authorized, 2,103,392 and 1,545,426 issued and outstanding
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
69,119
|
|
|
|
60,226
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(84,451
|
)
|
|
|
(69,280
|
)
|
TOTAL
SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
|
|
|
(15,332
|
)
|
|
|
(9,054
|
)
|
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
|
|
$
|
4,496
|
|
|
$
|
2,636
|
|
See
accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
Year
Ended
|
|
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUE
|
|
$
|
7,975
|
|
|
$
|
4,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COST OF REVENUE
|
|
|
5,396
|
|
|
|
4,119
|
|
GROSS PROFIT
|
|
|
2,579
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and Marketing
|
|
|
4,049
|
|
|
|
3,440
|
|
Research and Development
|
|
|
1,901
|
|
|
|
2,643
|
|
General
and Administrative
|
|
|
4,074
|
|
|
|
3,909
|
|
TOTAL OPERATING
EXPENSES
|
|
|
10,024
|
|
|
|
9,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING LOSS
|
|
|
(7,445
|
)
|
|
|
(9,810
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE AND OTHER NON-CASH
FINANCING CHARGES
|
|
|
11,548
|
|
|
|
2,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARE PRICE CONVERSION ADJUSTMENT
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MARK-TO-MARKET WARRANT AND DEBT (INCOME)
EXPENSE
|
|
|
(5,244
|
)
|
|
|
2,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER EXPENSE
(INCOME)
|
|
|
1,418
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
NET LOSS
|
|
|
(15,167
|
)
|
|
|
(18,252
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LESS: CUMULATIVE
UNPAID PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
|
|
|
(480
|
)
|
|
|
(260
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE
TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS
|
|
$
|
(15,647
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18,512
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and fully
diluted
|
|
|
1,863,087
|
|
|
|
1,181,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per
common share - basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(8.40
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15.67
|
)
|
See
accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
|
|
Convertible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Preferred
Stock
|
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Shareholders’
|
|
(In
thousands, except share data)
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2014
|
|
|
2,229,702
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
752,701
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
47,309
|
|
|
$
|
(51,721
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,412
|
)
|
Issuance
of convertible preferred stock and warrants, net of costs
|
|
|
1,896,510
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,220
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,220
|
|
Conversion
of debt into preferred stock
|
|
|
222,411
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
752
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
752
|
|
Series
A & B preferred stock conversion to common stock
|
|
|
(4,304,593
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
221,597
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Warrant
exercises
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
126,605
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
Warrant
price adjustment
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Issuance
of replacement warrants
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
Lincoln
Park Capital Fund - commitment fee
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
18,519
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Issuance
of stock under Lincoln Park Capital Fund agreement, net of costs
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
33,930
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
Issuance
of shares under Associate Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
7,378
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
Issuance
of restricted common stock to Associates, net of forfeitures
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,733
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Share
price conversion adjustment
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
365,895
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,705
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,705
|
|
Conversion
of warrant liability to Additional Paid-in Capital
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
931
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
931
|
|
Payment
of preferred dividend paid with common stock
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,323
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Issuance
of warrants for capital lease arrangements
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,203
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
Issuance
of common stock and warrants for professional services
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
25,556
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
Stock
compensation expense, including issuance of performance stock awards to Associates
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
Director
equity exchange agreement
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(17,014
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(779
|
)
|
|
|
779
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(18,252
|
)
|
|
|
(18,252
|
)
|
Balance, December
31, 2015
|
|
|
44,030
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,545,426
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
60,226
|
|
|
$
|
(69,280
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,054
|
)
|
Conversion
of preferred stock to common stock
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6,755
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Preferred
dividend paid with common stock
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
March
2016 equity offering, net of costs
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
189,733
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,332
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,332
|
|
Warrant
exercises
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
256,337
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,605
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,605
|
|
Issuance
of warrants and price adjustments
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,998
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,998
|
|
Conversion
of warrant liability to additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,738
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,738
|
|
Issuance
of common stock for professional services and fees
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
69,256
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
Share-based
compensation
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
21,898
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
Issuance
of common stock under Associate Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
13,452
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(15,167
|
)
|
|
|
(15,167
|
)
|
Balance, December
31, 2016
|
|
|
43,530
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,103,392
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
69,119
|
|
|
$
|
(84,451
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,332
|
)
|
See
accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
Year
Ended
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(15,167
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18,252
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to
net cash used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of discount/amortization of
financing costs
|
|
|
1,482
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
Change in fair value of warrant liability
|
|
|
(5,244
|
)
|
|
|
3,422
|
|
Depreciation, amortization and impairment
of intangibles
|
|
|
896
|
|
|
|
1,127
|
|
Stock compensation
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
Warrants and common stock issued for
professional and other services
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
Amortization of deferred commissions
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
Debt/warrant
inducement and share price adjustment
|
|
|
8,774
|
|
|
|
4,314
|
|
|
|
|
(8,020
|
)
|
|
|
(8,305
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(2,448
|
)
|
|
|
(389
|
)
|
Deferred commissions
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and deferred costs
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
370
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
1,294
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(346
|
)
|
|
|
190
|
|
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(9,446
|
)
|
|
|
(7,416
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of fixed
assets
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of notes and
warrants
|
|
|
12,471
|
|
|
|
1,150
|
|
Repayment of notes
|
|
|
(5,314
|
)
|
|
|
(198
|
)
|
Issuance of shares of common stock, net of costs
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
Warrants exercised
|
|
|
1,605
|
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
Issuance of shares of convertible preferred
stock, net of costs
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,220
|
|
Payment of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Repayment of capital lease
|
|
|
(402
|
)
|
|
|
(204
|
)
|
Proceeds from bank borrowing
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
Repayment of
bank borrowing
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
9,452
|
|
|
|
7,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET DECREASE IN CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
End of period
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES
OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
875
|
|
|
$
|
219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CASH INVESTING
AND FINANCING TRANSACTIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of debt and interest to equity
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
752
|
|
Debt issuance costs in exchange for
warrants
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
Notes issued for capital lease obligation
assumed by a director
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Prepaid additions financed through capital
lease
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
Fixed asset additions financed through
capital lease
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
636
|
|
Common stock issued for preferred stock
dividends
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
Conversion of warrant liability to additional
paid-in-capital
|
|
|
1,738
|
|
|
|
932
|
|
See
accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.
Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature
of Business and Operations Overview
Cachet
Financial Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) is a leading provider of software-as-a-service, or SaaS, financial technology,
or fintech, solutions to the financial services industry. The Company provides traditional financial institutions and alternative
financial service, or AFS, providers with innovative mobile and other solutions to enable them to offer a suite of leading-edge
mobile financial services to their customers through the Internet, or cloud-based, access. As a SaaS provider, the Company develops,
hosts and maintains software solutions that it licenses to its clients. The Company serves three primary markets in the United
States: banks, credit unions and AFS providers, which includes providers of non-traditional banking services such as reloadable
prepaid cards and check cashing services. In the future, the Company intends to expand outside of the United States, including
Latin America and Europe, as opportunities present themselves.
The
Company has been expanding its suite of available fintech solutions. One of the Company’s recent solutions, Select Mobile
Money, is a prepaid mobile money platform that seamlessly links various mobile banking features with a prepaid debit card issued
by financial institutions or AFS providers. This solution enables card users to conveniently manage their card accounts through
an easy-to-use integrated mobile application, or app, with multiple features downloaded onto their smart phone or tablet and,
by adding a suite of available mobile financial services linked to their card accounts, enhances the card’s usefulness and
the cardholder’s mobile banking experience. For example, prepaid cardholders using the Company’s application may deposit
paper checks and direct payroll deposits into their prepaid card account, access cash from their prepaid card account at any automated
teller machine, or ATM, and check their prepaid card account balance and transaction history. The Company believes that its Select
Mobile Money solutions are setting the industry standard for reloadable prepaid mobile money solutions.
The
Company’s Select Mobile Money solutions comprise two distinct mobile banking technology solutions: first, a white label
mobile money platform for larger financial institutions and AFS providers that already have a reloadable prepaid card program
and wish to enhance it by integrating a feature rich app; and second, an end-to-end reloadable prepaid card program, called Select
Mobile Money-Express, or SMM-X, offered to all banks, credit unions and AFS providers of all sizes that would like to deploy a
complete reloadable prepaid card program, comprising a prepaid debit card, an integrated mobile app and program management.
The
Company’s business has historically focused on offering a full suite of consumer and business remote deposit check capture,
or RDC, products that enable financial institutions to provide their customers with the ability to conveniently deposit their
checks remotely anytime, anywhere. While the Company continues to offer these solutions, the Company recently expanded its focus
to include prepaid mobile money solutions. The Company’s latest innovations are a mobile remote payment capture solution,
which the Company calls Select Mobile NowPay, which enables enterprises to accept check payments submitted via their customers’
mobile devices, and the Company’s mobile account opening solution, which the Company calls Select Mobile Account Opening,
which streamlines the account opening process by utilizing photo imaging to capture customer data and auto-populate an account
opening application form for checking, savings, credit card and other types of accounts.
The
Company’s business operations are conducted through its wholly owned subsidiary, Cachet Financial Solutions Inc., a Minnesota
corporation (the “Subsidiary”). The Company was incorporated in Delaware in February 2010. In February 2014, the Company
acquired the business of the Subsidiary, and changed its corporate name to “Cachet Financial Solutions, Inc.”
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis
of Presentation
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company are prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The Company’s consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of the Company and the Subsidiary. The Subsidiary is the only entity with operational
activity, and therefore no intercompany transactions exist with the Company which would require elimination.
Capital
Structure Change
On
June 2, 2016, the board of directors of the Company (the “Board of Directors”) adopted resolutions approving and recommending
to the Company’s shareholders to approve a proposal to amend the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
to effect a reverse split of outstanding shares of common stock of the Company, which was subsequently approved by the Company’s
shareholders, and the ratio was set by the Board of Directors at 1:15 (the “July Reverse Stock Split”). The July Reverse
Stock Split became effective on July 27, 2016. As a result of the July Reverse Stock Split, the Company’s historical financial
statements have been revised to reflect share counts and per share data as if the July Reverse Stock Split had been in effect
for all periods presented.
CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Going
Concern
In
August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, “
Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as
a Going Concern.
” The amendments provide guidance about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there
is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures.
The standard is effective for the Company’s year ended December 31, 2016 and interim periods thereafter. The Company has
adopted this new accounting standard as of December 31, 2016, which requires the Company to evaluate whether there is substantial
doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for one year from the date that these financial statements
were available to be issued.
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis that the Company will continue as a going concern.
From inception to December 31, 2016, the Company has accumulated a deficit of $84.5 million, and, as of December 31, 2016, current
liabilities exceeded current assets by $8.3 million. The Company believes, based on its current cash flow forecast, it will have
enough cash to continue operations through March 31, 2017. If the Company is able to complete an underwritten public offering,
the Company believes that it will have sufficient cash to continue operations through February 24, 2018.
Revenue
Recognition
The
Company generates revenue from the following sources:
|
●
|
up-front
implementation fees;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
professional
service fees; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
recurring
revenue, comprising of monthly hosting/maintenance fee, monthly user fees and transaction fees.
|
The
Company commences revenue recognition for fees earned on its solutions and services when all of the following criteria are met:
|
●
|
there
is persuasive evidence of an arrangement;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
service has been or is being provided to the client;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
collection
of the fees is reasonably assured; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
amount of fees to be paid by the client is fixed or determinable.
|
Up-Front
Implementation Fees
The
up-front implementation fees are recognized over the term of the contract or expected life of the contract where no contractual
term exists. Generally, client agreements are entered into for 12 to 36 months. A majority of the implementation service component
of the arrangement with clients is performed within 120 days of entering into a contract with the customer.
Professional
Services Fee
Fees
from professional services may include fees charged for consulting, implementation services, client customization services, development
of interfaces requested by the Company’s clients, assistance with software design and development and third-party application
integration of the Company’s solutions with its client’s applications, dedicated client support services, advisory
services to clients who choose to develop their own interfaces and applications, and additional marketing support services requested
by the Company’s clients. Professional services are typically performed within three to six months of entering into an arrangement
with the customer. Professional services are typically sold on a fixed-fee basis, but are also offered on a time-and-material
basis. Revenue for time-and-material arrangements is recognized as the services are performed. Revenue for professional services
is recognized under a percent of completion method matching the revenue with the costs of the computer programmer’s time.
The Company uses internal milestones to estimate the costs and related percent of completion. Professional services are not considered
essential to the functionality of the Company’s SaaS solutions. For the Company’s RDC solutions, the Company also
includes in this category revenues from the sale of scanning and related equipment.
In
determining whether professional services can be accounted for separately from other services, the Company considers the availability
of the professional services from other vendors, the nature of professional services and whether the Company sells its solutions
to new clients without professional services.
Recurring
Revenue
Recurring
revenue is billed on a monthly basis, and includes hosting/maintenance fees charged to the Company’s clients, user fees
charged per customer, and transaction fees based on client’s customer transactions. Recurring revenue arises only after
the client has implemented one of the Company’s solutions, whether RDC, Select Mobile Money, Select Mobile NowPay or Select
Mobile Account Opening. Recurring revenue varies depending on the specific solution deployed, the fee arrangement negotiated with
the client, the number of client customers that use the application (and, in the case of the Company’s prepaid mobile money
application, the type of service used), and the volume of monthly user transactions.
CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Recurring
revenue is recognized monthly based on the terms of the specific client agreement, commencing on the date the service is provisioned
to the client, provided the four revenue recognition criteria have been satisfied. Hosting/maintenance fees and user fees are
recognized on a monthly basis as earned under the terms of the client agreement provided the four revenue recognition criteria
have been satisfied. Transaction volume fees are recognized as transactions are processed provided the four revenue recognition
criteria have been satisfied.
Multiple
Element Arrangement
The
Company enters into multiple element arrangements in which a client may purchase a solution and professional services. For arrangements
with multiple deliverables, the Company evaluates whether the individual deliverables qualify as separate units of accounting.
In order to treat deliverables in a multiple element arrangement as separate units of accounting, the deliverables must have standalone
value upon delivery. If the deliverables have standalone value upon delivery, the Company accounts for each deliverable separately
and revenue is recognized for the respective deliverables as they are delivered. If one or more of the deliverables does not have
standalone value upon delivery, the deliverables that do not have standalone value are combined with the final deliverable within
the arrangement and treated as a single unit of accounting.
The
Company determines the selling price for each element based on the selling price hierarchy of: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence
of fair value, or VSOE, (ii) third-party evidence, or TPE, and (iii) estimated selling price, or ESP. The Company is unable to
establish VSOE for any of its services, as the Company has not historically priced its solutions or services with sufficient consistency.
The Company is unable to establish TPE, as the Company does not have sufficient information regarding pricing of third-party solutions
and professional services similar to its offerings. As a result, the Company has developed estimates of selling prices based on
margins established by the Company’s senior management as the targets in its selling and pricing strategies after considering
the nature of the services, the economic and competitive environment, and the nature and magnitude of the costs incurred. The
amount of arrangement fee allocated to a single unit of accounting is limited by any contingent revenue, if applicable.
Deferred
Revenue
Deferred
revenue consists of billings and payments received in advance of revenue recognition from any of the solutions and services the
Company offers as described above and is recognized as the revenue recognition criteria are met. The Company typically invoices
its clients on a monthly basis and, in certain limited cases, on an annual basis. Accordingly, the deferred revenue balance does
not represent the total contract value of the Company’s multi-year client agreements. Deferred revenue also includes certain
deferred professional services fees, which are recognized in accordance with the Company’s revenue recognition policy. The
portion of deferred revenue the Company expects to recognize during the succeeding 12-month period is recorded as current deferred
revenue, and the remaining portion is recorded as non-current.
Cost
of Revenue
Cost
of revenue primarily consists of costs related to developing, implementing, hosting and supporting the Company’s cloud-based
solutions and services, including the Company’s RDC solutions and prepaid mobile money solutions, providing client support,
data communications expense, salaries and benefits and non-cash stock compensation expense of operations and support personnel,
software development fees, software license fees, amortization expense associated with acquired developed technology assets, and
property and equipment depreciation of fixed assets used in the generation of revenue. Cost of revenue also includes the cost
of professional services the Company procures externally, including for the services the Company procures from its external programming
consultants in Toronto, Canada. These external programming consultants are dedicated primarily to the Company’s prepaid
mobile money solutions and other select development projects. The Company does not track or allocate cost of revenues to the different
solutions or services the Company sells to specific revenue sources, except for the cost of professional services the Company
incurs externally including for the services the Company procures from the external programming consultants in Toronto, Canada.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The
Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Cash and cash equivalents are maintained at more than one financial institution and, at times, balances may exceed federally insured
limits. The Company has never experienced any losses related to these balances and does not believe it is exposed to any significant
credit risk on cash and cash equivalents.
CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Accounts
Receivable
Accounts
receivable represent amounts due from customers. Management determines the allowance for doubtful accounts by regularly evaluating
individual customer receivables and considering a customer’s financial condition, credit history and current economic conditions.
Accounts receivable are written off when deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of accounts receivable previously written off are recorded
when received. The allowance for doubtful accounts was approximately $11,000 and $10,000 as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Accounts receivable collectible within one year from the balance sheet date are recognized as current assets within the consolidated
balance sheets while accounts receivable that are collectible after one year from the balance sheet date are recognized as other
assets within the consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2016, one customer represented approximately 42.8% of the Company’s
total receivables, for which the Company has not recorded a reserve due to the Company’s historical experience with this
customer. If amounts due from this customer become uncollectible in the future, the Company’s operations would be materially
impacted.
Property
and Equipment
Depreciation
and amortization is computed using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:
Computer
and Data Center Equipment
|
|
3
years
|
Purchased
and Acquired software
|
|
3
years
|
Leasehold
Improvements
|
|
3-5
years, or lease term if less
|
Furniture
and fixtures
|
|
7
years
|
Major
additions and improvements are capitalized, while replacements, maintenance and repairs, which do not improve or extend the life
of the respective assets, are expensed as incurred. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, related costs and accumulated
depreciation and amortization are removed and any gain or loss is reported.
Goodwill
Goodwill
represents the excess purchase price over the appraised value of the portion of identifiable assets that were acquired from DeviceFidelity,
completed in March 2014. Goodwill is not amortized but is reviewed at least annually for impairment, or between annual dates if
circumstances change that would more likely than not cause impairment. The Company’s management performs its annual impairment
test at the close of each fiscal year, and considers several factors in evaluating goodwill for impairment, including the Company’s
current financial position and results of operations, general economic and industry conditions and legal and regulatory conditions.
See Note 9 “Goodwill and Finite Lived Intangible Assets.”
Impairment
of Long-lived Assets, Including License Agreements
The
Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount
of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount
of an asset to future undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired,
the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of
the assets. See Note 9 “Goodwill and Finite Lived Intangible Assets.”
Deferred
Financing Costs
Deferred
financing costs are capitalized and amortized into interest expense over the lives of the related debt agreements. In the event
debt is converted or paid prior to maturity, any unamortized issuance costs related to such debt are charged to expense at the
time of conversion or payment prior to maturity.
In
April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs,
which changed the presentation of debt issuance costs in financial statements to present such costs as a direct deduction from
the related debt liability rather than as an asset. This ASU became effective for public companies during interim and annual reporting
periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company adopted this ASU in 2016 on a retrospective basis.
Advertising
Costs
Advertising
costs are expensed as incurred and are included in sales and marketing expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, advertising costs totaled approximately $60,000 and $65,000, respectively.
Deferred
Commissions
The
Company capitalizes commission costs paid to internal sales associates that are incremental and directly related to the acquisition
of client contracts. Commission costs are capitalized and amortized over the term of the related client contract.
CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Net
Loss Per Common Share
Basic
and diluted net loss per common share for all periods presented is computed by dividing the net loss attributable to common shareholders
by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding and common share equivalents outstanding, when dilutive. Potentially
dilutive common share equivalents include common shares which would potentially be issued pursuant to stock warrants, stock options,
convertible preferred stock and convertible note agreements. Common share equivalents are not included in determining the fully
diluted loss per share if their effect is antidilutive.
The
following table reflects the amounts used in determining loss per share:
|
|
Year
Ended
|
|
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(15,167
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18,252
|
)
|
Less: Cumulative
unpaid preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
(480
|
)
|
|
|
(260
|
)
|
Net loss attributable
to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(15,647
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18,512
|
)
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,863,087
|
|
|
|
1,181,157
|
|
Net loss per common share – basic
and diluted
|
|
$
|
(8.40
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15.67
|
)
|
The
following potential common shares were excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share from continuing operations and
diluted net loss per share attributable to common shareholders because their effect would have been anti-dilutive for the periods
presented:
|
|
As
of
|
|
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Preferred Stock
|
|
|
687,636
|
|
|
|
629,955
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
225,231
|
|
|
|
166,634
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
2,895,685
|
|
|
|
1,149,116
|
|
|
|
|
3,808,552
|
|
|
|
1,945,705
|
|
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The
Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments for certain financial instruments and to determine fair
value disclosures. Instruments issued with price protection features are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company
considers the carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable to approximate fair value
due to the short maturity of these instruments. With respect to the determination of fair values of financial instruments, there
are the following three levels of inputs:
Level
1 Inputs – Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.
Level
2 Inputs – Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in
markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.
Level
3 Inputs – Instruments with primarily unobservable value drivers.
The
instruments that are carried at fair value are valued using level 3 inputs utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model or
a Monte Carlo simulation, depending on the instrument. The conversion features that are carried at fair value are valued by a
third-party valuation specialist. There were no transfers into or out of level 3 of the fair value hierarchy during the year ended
December 31, 2016.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of these consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that may affect certain reported amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ
from those estimates. Significant estimates include the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, the allowance
for doubtful accounts, assumptions used to value stock options and warrants, conversion feature liabilities, conversion incentive
and share purchase price adjustments.
Research
and Development Costs
The
Company considers those costs incurred in developing new processes and solutions to be research and development costs and they
are expensed as incurred.
CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Income
Taxes
The
Company utilizes the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. The Company recognizes deferred tax liabilities
or assets for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities.
The Company regularly assesses the likelihood that its deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income. The Company
considers projected future taxable income and ongoing tax planning strategies in assessing the amount of the valuation allowance
necessary to offset the Company’s deferred tax assets that will not be recoverable. The Company has recorded and continues
to carry a full valuation allowance against its gross deferred tax assets that will not reverse against deferred tax liabilities
within the scheduled reversal period. If the Company determines in the future that it is more likely than not that the Company
will realize all or a portion of its deferred tax assets, the Company will adjust its valuation allowance in the period in which
the Company makes that determination. The Company expects to provide a full valuation allowance on its future tax benefits until
the Company can sustain a level of profitability that demonstrates its ability to realize these assets.
Reclassifications
Certain
prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation. These reclassifications did
not have an impact on reported net loss for any of the periods presented.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
On
May 28, 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)
No. 2014-09, “
Revenue from Contracts with Customers.
” The core principle of the ASU is for companies to recognize
revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in amounts that reflect the consideration, or payment, to which
the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The ASU may also result in enhanced disclosures about
revenue. For public entities, the ASU was to be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. On July
9, 2015, the FASB voted to allow a one year deferral of the effective date to annual reporting periods beginning after December
15, 2017. The deferral permits early adoption, but does not allow adoption any earlier than the original effective date of the
standard. The Company has not yet selected a transition method and is currently evaluating the impact this standard will have
on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In
January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “
Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,
”
which requires that most equity instruments be measured at fair value, with subsequent changes in fair value recognized in net
income. The pronouncement also impacts the financial liabilities under the fair value option and the presentation and disclosure
requirements for financial instruments. The ASU does not apply to equity method investments or investments in consolidated subsidiaries.
The revised guidance is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December
15, 2017, with early adoption permitted and amendments to be applied as a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet in
the year of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the ASU on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In
February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 “
Leases,
” which sets out the principles for the recognition, measurement,
presentation and disclosure of leases for both lessees and lessors. The new guidance requires lessees to apply a dual approach,
classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed
purchase by the lessee. This classification will determine whether lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest
method or on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, respectively. A lessee is also required to record a right-of-use
asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term greater than 12 months, regardless of their classification. Leases with
a term of 12 months or less will be accounted for similar to existing guidance for operating leases. The new standard supersedes
the previous leasing standard. The standard is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years,
beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the ASU on its
consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In
March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “
Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.
” This ASU
affects entities that issue share-based payment awards to their employees. The ASU is designed to simplify several aspects of
accounting for share-based payment award transactions, which include the income tax consequences, classification of awards as
either equity or liabilities, classification on the statement of cash flows and forfeiture rate calculations. The revised guidance
is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period.
The Company does not believe that this ASU will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In
June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “
Financial Instruments – Credit Losses,
” which introduces new
guidance for the accounting for credit losses on instruments within its scope. The new guidance introduces an approach based on
current expected credit losses (“CECL”) on certain types of financial instruments and expands disclosure requirements
regarding an entities assumptions, models and methods for estimating CECL. Generally, the CECL and subsequent changes to the estimate
will be reported in current earnings through an allowance on the consolidated balance sheets. The revised guidance is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted
for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the ASU on its consolidated
financial statements and disclosures.
CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In
August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “
Statement of Cash Flows,
” which is intended to reduce diversity
in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the consolidated statements of cash
flows by providing guidance on eight specific cash flow issues. The revised guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2017, including for interim periods within those fiscal years, and is to be applied retrospectively. Early adoption
is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the ASU on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In
January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “
Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350),
” which simplifies the
test for goodwill impairment by eliminating step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. Instead, an entity should perform its annual
or interim impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying amount, and should recognize an impairment
charge in the amount by which the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value. The revised guidance is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including for interim periods within those fiscal years, and is to be applied
prospectively. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January
1, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the ASU on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
2.
Prepaid Expenses and Deferred Costs
Prepaid
expenses and deferred costs primarily consist of prepayment of licenses and maintenance fees, or deposits with, the providers
of RDC software capabilities to the Company.
3.
Property and Equipment
Property
and equipment consists of the following:
|
|
As of
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
$
|
255
|
|
|
$
|
227
|
|
Data center equipment
|
|
|
1,230
|
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
Purchased software
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
692
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Total property and equipment
|
|
|
2,467
|
|
|
|
2,095
|
|
Less: accumulated
depreciation
|
|
|
(1,771
|
)
|
|
|
(1,431
|
)
|
Net property
and equipment
|
|
$
|
696
|
|
|
$
|
664
|
|
Depreciation
expense consisted of the following:
|
|
Year
Ended
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
$
|
340
|
|
|
$
|
322
|
|
4.
Accrued Expenses
Accrued
expenses consist of the following:
|
|
As of
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
$
|
226
|
|
|
$
|
120
|
|
Accrued rent
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Accrued sales
tax
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Total accrued
expenses
|
|
$
|
241
|
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
5.
Financing Arrangements
The
Company has obtained debt financing through bank loans, loans from directors and other affiliated parties and unaffiliated third
party investors. Certain of the Company’s debt agreements contain various covenants. As of December 31, 2016, the Company
believes that it is in compliance with all covenants. Certain of the debt was issued with warrants that permit the investor to
acquire shares of the Company’s common stock at prices as specified in the individual agreements. See Note 10 “Shareholders’
Deficit.”
The
Company’s debt and accrued interest outstanding as of the periods presented consisted of the following:
|
|
Principal
Balance
|
|
|
Accrued
Interest
|
|
(Dollar
amounts in thousands)
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes Payable
to Directors and Affiliates
|
|
$
|
3,078
|
|
|
$
|
1,748
|
|
|
$
|
411
|
|
|
$
|
232
|
|
Convertible Term Loan,
due December 2016, interest at 10%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
Convertible Notes,
due 2016 and 2017, interest between 0% and 8%
(1)
|
|
|
9,211
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Series Subordinated
Note, due January 2016, interest at 12%
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Notes Payable, due
October 2016, interest between 8.25% and 12%
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Note Payable, due August
2021, interest at 0%
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Installment
Note Payable – Bank
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
debt
|
|
|
13,197
|
|
|
|
4,991
|
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
|
632
|
|
Discount on notes payable
|
|
|
(8,519
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized
deferred financing costs
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt, net
|
|
|
4,545
|
|
|
|
4,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
4,229
|
|
|
|
4,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
debt, net of current portion
|
|
$
|
316
|
|
|
$
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes
notes payable to Messrs. Hanson and Davis totaling approximately $906,000.
|
Future
maturities of notes payable, gross, as of December 31, 2016 are as follows (in thousands):
2017
|
|
$
|
12,881
|
|
2018
|
|
|
115
|
|
2019
|
|
|
9
|
|
2020
|
|
|
—
|
|
2021
|
|
|
192
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,197
|
|
Less:
unamortized discount and deferred financing fees
|
|
|
(8,652
|
)
|
Total
debt
|
|
$
|
4,545
|
|
Notes
Payable to Directors and Affiliates
The
Company has historically relied on Messrs. Hanson and Davis to provide financing to fund the Company’s operations. See Note
12 “Related Party Transactions.”
Convertible
Term Loan, due December 2016, interest at 10%
In
December 2013, the Company entered into a loan and security agreement with Trooien Capital, LLC (“Trooien Capital,”
and the Company refers to this note as the “Trooien Capital Note”) for a principal amount of up to $4 million. Borrowings
under the Trooien Capital Note bore interest at 10% and matured in December 2016. Under the agreement, Trooien Capital had the
right, but not the obligation, to advance additional amounts up to the $4 million. Trooien Capital had the right to request shares
of common stock, rather than cash, as payment for interest. The Company repaid the Trooien Capital Note, including interest accrued
but unpaid thereon in December 2016 for an aggregate amount of $3.1 million in cash. See Note 7 “Commitments and Contingencies.”
Convertible
Notes, due 2016 and 2017, interest at 0%
For
accounting purposes, the Company accounts for the debt, warrants and conversion features of the following convertible notes using
an allocation process. As a result, the reported amount of the debt has been reduced and will be accreted to face value through
each of the maturity dates.
CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Convertible
notes that will convert upon uplisting
Between
June and September 2016, the Company issued to several investors convertible notes, which are unsecured and do not bear any interest,
and warrants to purchase common stock. Each of the investors may elect to convert the principal amount of the notes into shares
of the Company’s common stock at any time before the maturity date of the notes at a conversion price equal to the lower
of $8.33 and 80% of the per share sale price of the Company’s common stock in its next underwritten public offering.
The Company has the right to require each of the investors to convert the notes into shares of its common stock at that conversion
price if the Company’s common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market, the Nasdaq Global Market or the Nasdaq Global
Select Market. In addition, under the Company’s agreement with each of the investors, it is required to file with the SEC
a registration statement covering the resale of the shares of its common stock issuable under the notes and the warrants within
21 days after the Company’s next underwritten public offering, or 90 days following the date on which the Company’s
current financing plan is terminated. If the Company fails to file a registration statement in a timely manner, the Company will
be required to issue to each of the investors additional warrants to purchase shares of its common stock.
Between
October 2016 and January 2017, the Company issued to several investors convertible notes, which are unsecured and do not bear
any interest, and warrants to purchase common stock. Each of the investors may elect to convert the principal amount of the notes
into shares of the Company’s common stock at any time before the maturity date of the notes at a conversion price equal
to the lower of $10.50 and 80% of the per share sale price of the Company’s common stock in its next underwritten
public offering. The Company has the right to require each of the investors to convert the notes into shares of its common stock
at that conversion price if the Company’s common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market, the Nasdaq Global Market
or the Nasdaq Global Select Market. In addition, under the Company’s agreement with each of the investors, it is required
to file with the SEC a registration statement covering the resale of the shares of its common stock issuable under the notes and
the warrants within 21 days after the Company’s next underwritten public offering, or 90 days following the date on which
the Company’s current financing plan is terminated. If the Company fails to file a registration statement in a timely manner,
the Company will be required to issue to each of the investors additional warrants to purchase shares of its common stock.
The
Company has expressed its intent to grant a security interest in the assets and properties of the Company to the investors which,
when granted, shall (i) secure the full and timely payment and performance by the Company of the obligations of the Company under
the convertible notes on a pari passu basis among the investors, and (ii) be subordinate and junior in right of payment and security
to the prior payment in full of all senior obligations and the liens securing all senior obligations (as outlined in the securities
purchase agreement). As of the date that these financial statements were available to be issued, the Company has not yet granted
this security interest. After an event of default (as outlined in the securities purchase agreement), these notes will be convertible
at a conversion price equal to 60% of the lowest daily volume weighted average price in the 20 trading days immediately prior
to conversion (“VWAP”) if such VWAP is lower than the lower of $10.50 per share or 80% of the per share price
in the Company’s next underwritten public offering.
The
following table provides additional information about each financing as of December 31, 2016.
Note
Date
|
|
Maturity
Date
|
|
Proceeds
(1)
|
|
|
Principal
(1)
|
|
|
Fair
Value
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
June 2016
|
|
June 2017
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,053
|
|
|
$
|
1,955
|
|
August 2016
|
|
August 2017
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,053
|
|
|
|
1,969
|
|
September 2016
|
|
September 2017
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
October - December 2016
|
|
October - December 2017
|
|
|
6,695
|
|
|
|
7,005
|
|
|
|
12,408
|
|
(1)
|
As
provided for in the relevant agreements
|
|
|
(2)
|
As
of December 31, 2016, includes the principal amount of the notes plus the fair value of the conversion feature derivative
and warrants associated with the instrument.
|
Convertible
notes to June 9, 2016 Investors
On
June 9, 2016, the Company agreed to issue to each of Old Main Capital, LLC
,
River North Equity, LLC, Kodiak Capital
Group, LLC, and DiamondRock, LLC (collectively, the “June 9, 2016 Investors”) a convertible note in the principal
amount of up to $450,000 and a warrant to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, subject to adjustments, in exchange
for an aggregate purchase price of $375,000, payable by each of the June 9, 2016 Investors in two tranches. On June 9, 2016, each
of the June 9, 2016 Investors funded the first tranche of this investment, for aggregate gross proceeds to the Company of $1.0
million.
The
notes did not bear any interest but were issued with a 20% original issue discount and an additional 20% repayment premium. Each
tranche funded under a note was due and payable in full six months after the date of funding. The first tranche was due and repaid
on December 9, 2016 in the amount of $1.4 million. The June 9, 2016 Investors did not fund the second tranche.
In
December 2016, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with FirstFire Global Opportunities Fund, LLC (“FirstFire”) ,
pursuant to which the Company issued to FirstFire the FirstFire Note. FirstFire funded $550,000 of principal due under the FirstFire
Note and after giving effect to original issue discount the Company received gross proceeds of $500,000. The FirstFire Note bears
interest at a rate of 5% per annum and is due June 12, 2017. Prior to an event of default, amounts funded under the FirstFire
Note are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to the lowest of $ 8.33 per share
or a price per share equal to 80% of the price in the Company’s next underwritten public offering. Upon prepayment, the
Company must pay FirstFire an amount equal to: (A) within 30 days of the date of issuance, 105%, (B) between 31 and 60 days of
issuance, 110%, (C) between 61 and 120 days of the date of issuance, 115%, (D) between 121 and 150 days of the date of issuance,
125% and (E) thereafter, 135% multiplied by the principal amount, plus any accrued but unpaid interest on the principal amount,
plus default interest, if any.
The
Company also issued to FirstFire warrants to purchase up to 59,407 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise
price equal to the lower of $ 8.33 per share and 80% of the price in the Company’s next underwritten public offering,
exercisable for a five-year period. The Company also granted FirstFire piggy-back registration rights.
On
December 23, 2016, the Company issued a Convertible Term Promissory Note to FLMM Ltd. (“FLMM”) in
the amount of $1,440,000, payable in cash (the “FLMM Note”) . The FLMM Note is secured by substantially all
of the assets of the Subsidiary, bears interest at a rate of 8% per annum and is payable in full on March 15, 2017. The
Company may not prepay the note without the consent of FLMM. FLMM has the right, at its sole option and discretion, to
convert the principal and interest under the FLMM Note into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to
$ 10.50 per share. FLMM will also have the right, at its sole option and discretion, to convert the principal and
interest under the FLMM Note into shares of the Company’s common stock following an offering that results in the
Company’s common stock being listed on any exchange operated by the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Uplist
Transaction”) at a rate equal to the lower of $ 10.50 per share and 80% of the per share price in the Uplist
Transaction. As consideration for entering into the FLMM Note, the Company also issued to FLMM a warrant to purchase 43,243
shares of the Company’s common stock, exercisable for a five-year period from the date of issuance, at the lower of
$ 8.33 per share and 80% of the per share price in the Company’s next underwritten public offering.
On
December 22, 2016, the Company issued a Convertible Term Promissory Note to Jon D and Linda W Gruber Trust (“Gruber”)
in the amount of $75,000, payable in cash (the “Gruber Note”) . The Gruber Note is unsecured, bears interest
at a rate of 8% per annum and is payable in full on March 22, 2017, which may, under certain circumstances, be extended to May
31, 2017. The Company may not prepay the note without the consent of Gruber. Gruber has the right at its sole option and discretion
to convert the principal and interest under the Gruber Note into shares of the Company’s common stock at $ 10.50 per
share. Gruber will also have the right, at its sole option and discretion, to convert the principal and interest under the Gruber
Note into shares of the Company’s common stock following an offering that results in an Uplist Transaction at a rate equal
to the lower of $ 10.50 per share and 80% of the per share price in the Uplist Transaction. As consideration for entering
into the Gruber Note, the Company also issued to Gruber a warrant to purchase 2,253 shares of common stock, exercisable
for a five-year period from the date of issuance, at the lower of $ 8.33 per share and 80% of the per share price in the
Company’s next underwritten public offering.
CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Series
Subordinated Note, due January 2016, interest at 12%
The
series subordinated note was due in January 2016. As of December 31, 2016, the Company has not repaid the note. On March 31, 2016,
the holder of the note commenced legal action against the Company. See Note 7 “Commitments and Contingencies.”
Notes
Payable, due October 2016, interest between 8.25% and 12%
In
January 2014, the Company assumed notes payable in connection with the reverse merger transaction pursuant to which the Company
acquired the Subsidiary. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company repaid three of the notes for approximately $11,000,
including principal and accrued interest. During 2016, the Company also extended the maturity date of the remaining notes to August
2016 and then to October 2016. The Company agreed to a settlement with the holder of these notes and, on January 24, 2017, the
Company settled the principal and accrued but unpaid interest due under the remaining notes for a cash payment of $80,000 and
the issuance of 6,667 shares of the Company’s common stock to the holder.
Note
Payable, due August 2021, interest at 0%
In
August 2014, the Company entered into a 0% interest, $192,000 note payable to the State of Minnesota as part of an angel loan
program fund. There are no financial loan covenants associated with the loan, which has a maturity date of August 2021. The loan
contains a provision whereby if the Company transfers more than a majority of its ownership, the loan becomes immediately due,
along with a 30% premium amount of the principal balance. In addition, if the Company is more than 30 days past due on any payments
owed under the loan, the interest rate increases to 20% per annum.
Installment
Note Payable – Bank
In
January 2016, the Company entered into an installment note payable with a bank, replacing a previous note, for a principal amount
of approximately $330,000. The company received the net amount between the two notes, or approximately $69,000, which was primarily
used for working capital purposes. The note bears interest at the prime rate plus 1%, but not less than 5%. The note is due in
January 2019. The prime rate of interest was 3.75% as of December 31, 2016 and 3.50% as of December 31, 2015.
6.
Employee Benefit Plan
The
Company has a defined contribution 401(k) saving plan covering all employees satisfying certain eligibility requirements. The
plan permits, but does not require, contributions by the Company. The Company did not make any contributions pursuant to the plan
during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.
7. Commitments
and Contingencies
Operating
Leases
The
Company leases approximately 22,000 square feet of office space in Chanhassen, Minnesota. The lease commenced on May 1, 2012 and
extends through January 2022. In addition to the office space, the Company leases certain office furniture and equipment under
operating leases through November 2018. The Company has two vehicles on 36-month leases which commenced in January 2015 and June
2015, respectively. The Company also entered into a lease agreement, in April 2014, for a total of 1,812 square feet of office
space in Dallas, Texas related to the employees retained as part of its acquisition of Select Mobile Money. The lease commenced
on May 1, 2014 and extends through June 30, 2017. The Company has sub-leased the Dallas, Texas office space, commencing on November
19, 2015 and expiring on June 30, 2017. The Company also has various computer leases with three year terms. The Company is recording
rental expense monthly.
Rent
expense pursuant to operating leases for the periods presented is as follows:
|
|
Year
Ended
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense
|
|
$
|
464
|
|
|
$
|
476
|
|
CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The
Company’s headquarters office space lease calls for rent increases over the term of the lease. The Company records rent
expense on a straight-line basis using the average rent for the term of the lease. The excess of the expense over cash rent paid
is shown as accrued rent.
Future
minimum lease payments pursuant to operating leases as of December 31, 2016 are as follows (in thousands):
2017
|
|
$
|
292
|
|
2018
|
|
|
242
|
|
2019
|
|
|
241
|
|
2020
|
|
|
248
|
|
2021
|
|
|
255
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,300
|
|
The
Company is due approximately $17,000 in future minimum lease receivables through the expiration of its sublease on the Dallas,
TX office space in 2017.
Capital
Leases
The
total cost of capital leased assets, net of accumulated depreciation, included in property and equipment as of December 31, 2016
and December 31, 2015 totaled approximately $575,000 and $501,000, respectively.
Future
minimum lease payments pursuant to capital leases as of December 31, 2016 are as follows (in thousands):
2017
|
|
$
|
441
|
|
2018
|
|
|
154
|
|
2019
|
|
|
89
|
|
2020
|
|
|
5
|
|
2021
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total payments remaining
|
|
|
689
|
|
Less: portion
representing interest
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
Principal portion
|
|
|
663
|
|
Less: unamortized
deferred financing costs
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
Capital lease balance
|
|
|
617
|
|
Less: current
maturities of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(379
|
)
|
Capital lease,
net of current maturities
|
|
$
|
238
|
|
Litigation
Cachet
Banq
An
entity named Cachet Banq contacted the Company in December 2010 relative to their U.S. Trademark Registration No. 2,857,465 (registered
on June 29, 2004) for the standard character mark “CACHET” covering “financial services, namely automated clearing
house processing services for the payroll service industry.” Cachet Banq has alleged that the Company’s use of “CACHET”
infringes on their federal trademark registration. On or about March 4, 2013, Cachet Banq filed a trademark infringement lawsuit
against the Company in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The parties filed cross motions
for summary judgment. The initial brief was filed on May 30, 2014, replies were filed on June 26, 2014 and the court took these
motions under advisement on July 8, 2014. The Company has denied that its use of the character mark “CACHET” infringes
on Cachet Banq’s purported rights in their mark. On September 21, 2015, the court issued an order (1) granting Cachet Banq’s
motion for summary judgment, (2) denying the Company’s motion for summary judgment, and (3) ordering the parties to submit
memoranda regarding remedies. The last of those memoranda were submitted on October 12, 2015. On November 30, 2015, the Court
entered an additional order providing for an additional period of discovery and additional briefing regarding remedies. Pursuant
to the Court’s order, the parties engaged in a renewed period of discovery focused on remedies and submitted additional
briefing. The discovery was completed and all additional briefing was submitted to the Court by April 19, 2016. According to their
briefing on the remedies, Cachet Banq is not presently seeking any monetary damages as a result of the alleged infringement, but
rather an injunction.
CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On
October 27, 2016, the Court entered a judgment and permanent injunction against the Company which, effective from April 15, 2017,
enjoins the Company and its officers, directors, agents, servants, employees and attorneys and all persons in active concert or
participation with any of the foregoing from (i) using any mark, name, symbol, logo or other indicia that incorporates or is confusingly
similar to the term “CACHET” in any way that relates to financial services, and (ii) offering for sale, soliciting
sales, promoting, distributing, importing, advertising, or selling any products or services, in any medium, under any mark, name,
symbol, logo or other indicia that incorporates or is confusingly similar to the term “CACHET” which in any way relate
to financial services. The Company is also ordered to destroy or discard all signs, products, advertisements, packaging, literature,
business cards, and any other promotional material, which feature the term “CACHET” or a term confusingly similar
thereto, both physical and electronic, which are in any way related to financial services, in each case except for the permitted
use described below. Under the injunction, the Company must complete its transition to a yet-to-be determined new company name
by no later than April 15, 2017. The Company is permitted to reference its current name in an explanatory fashion on signs, products,
advertisements, packaging, literature, business cards, and any other promotional material to introduce the new name of the Company
in a font size no greater than one-third the font-size of the yet-to-be determined new company name. This permitted use provision
terminates on June 30, 2017, by which date the Company must cease from using the explanatory statement in any manner and destroy
or discard all materials featuring the explanatory statement. By no later than July 12, 2017, the Company must file a declaration,
under penalty of perjury, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which the Company has complied with the injunction.
The
Company intends to comply with the injunction and will pursue a re-branding of the Company. The Company expects that the re-branding
of the Company will require it to devote significant resources to advertising and marketing new brands and will cause the Company
to incur substantial costs. The Company estimates the expenses related to the re-branding will be between $200,000 and $300,000
over a six-month period during 2017. The Court denied Cachet Banq’s request for attorney’s fees and costs.
Series
Subordinated Note
On
March 31, 2016, the holder of the series subordinated note referred to in Note 5 “Financing Arrangements” commenced
an action against the Company in Hennepin County Court in the State of Minnesota, alleging that the Company breached the terms
of the note and seeking to collect alleged amounts due and owing under the note. The holder of the note alleges that the Company
is in default and owes the note holder approximately $695,000 plus interest and assessments accruing after April 1, 2016. The
dispute centers on the note holder’s interpretation of the agreement. Based on the note holder’s interpretation of
the agreement, the note holder seeks an extraordinary amount in alleged liquidated damages (approximately $300,000 on an outstanding
debt of approximately $415,000). The Company disputes the allegations of the note holder and intends to vigorously defend the
claim. Among other things, the Company contends the note holder’s interpretation of the agreement is unenforceable under
Minnesota law. The note holder moved for summary judgment and a hearing on that motion was held on August 9, 2016 before the Fourth
Judicial District in Hennepin County in Minnesota where the Court heard both arguments and took the motion under advisement. On
October 19, 2016, the Court entered an order granting in part and denying in part the motion for summary judgment. The alleged
default could subject the Company to claims of default or cross default by our other lenders. At this time no other lender has
asserted such a claim. If the plaintiff in this matter is successful in their lawsuit, the Company would be subject to a penalty
of $500 per day for each day that the Company was in default of the note. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had accrued $176,000
related to this $500 per day penalty and is reflected in accrued interest on the consolidated balance sheets.
Trooien
Capital
On
or about May 24, 2016, the Company received notice from Trooien Capital alleging that the Company did not make interest payments
in accordance with the terms of the Trooien Capital Note, and as a result of such alleged breach, all outstanding amounts under
such notes were accelerated. Pursuant to the Trooien Capital Note, the Subsidiary granted to Trooien Capital a security interest
in all of the Subsidiary’s property and assets, including all property that the Subsidiary will acquire in the future, as
collateral security for the payment and performance of the Subsidiary’s obligations under the Trooien Capital Note. On or
about May 27, 2016, the Subsidiary filed a verified complaint with the Fourth District Court of Hennepin County in Minnesota naming
Trooien Capital as a defendant and seeking a declaratory judgment against Trooien Capital with respect to this claim. On June
10, 2016, Trooien Capital answered the Subsidiary’s complaint and asserted counterclaims. On June 20, 2016, Trooien Capital
moved to appoint a receiver for the Subsidiary. On June 30, 2016, the Company filed a notice of motion and motion to dismiss a
portion of the counterclaims. On July 19, 2016, the Company filed with the Fourth District Court of Hennepin County in Minnesota
a memorandum of law and supporting documents requesting that the Court deny Trooien Capital’s motion to appoint a receiver
for the Subsidiary. On October 18, 2016, a hearing on the motions was held and the Court took both motions under advisement. On
October 21, 2016, the Court entered an order denying Trooien Capital’s motion to appoint a receiver and denying the Company’s
motion to dismiss a portion of Trooien Capital’s counterclaims.
CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On
December 20, 2016, the Company entered into a settlement agreement and full release with Trooien Capital, pursuant to which the
Company agreed to pay to Trooien Capital a total of $3.1 million and to issue a warrant to purchase 333,334 shares of the
Company’s common stock at the lower of $ 8.33 per share and 80% of the Company’s per share price in the next
underwritten public offering, in settlement of the Trooien Capital Note, plus interest accrued but unpaid thereon. In exchange
for the settlement payment and warrants, Trooien Capital, within one business day after receipt of the settlement payment and
warrants, agreed to take all necessary steps to remove, terminate or otherwise release any and all interest in any tangible or
intangible assets of the Subsidiary. The Company fully repaid the $3.1 million due to Trooien Capital as of December 23, 2016.
Financial
Service Agreements
In
August 2015, the Company entered into an agreement with a firm to provide investor relations and financial advisory services.
The initial six-month term of the agreement required the issuance of 17,778 shares of the Company’s common stock
and payments totaling $30,000. After the initial six-month term, the Company had the option to extend for an additional six months
which required issuing the firm additional shares of common stock and payment totaling $30,000. In February 2016, the Company
renewed the services agreement and issued the firm an additional 20,667 shares of common stock for another six months of
investor relations and financial advisory services. The Company renewed the services agreement further in August 2016 and issued
to the firm an additional 8,000 shares of common stock.
In
January 2016, the Company entered into an agreement with an independent contractor to provide investor relations, capital raising
services and other consulting duties. The agreement requires annual compensation for services of $100,000 as well as discretionary
bonuses paid in cash or stock based on the consultant’s ability to complete particular projects for the Company. The term
of this agreement is for 12 months commencing on January 1, 2016. The agreement is cancelable by either party with a 30-day notice.
8.
Income Taxes
The
Company has not recorded a current or deferred tax provision for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 due to the Company’s
net tax losses incurred and the uncertainty of realization of any related tax benefit in the future. Due to the full valuation
allowance on the Company’s net deferred tax assets, there was no deferred tax benefit or provision recorded.
A
reconciliation of the Company’s statutory tax expense (benefit) to our actual tax expense (benefit) is as follows:
|
|
Year
Ended
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal statutory rate at
34 percent
|
|
$
|
(5,157
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,206
|
)
|
State taxes, net of federal tax expense
(benefit)
|
|
|
(422
|
)
|
|
|
(499
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nondeductible interest
|
|
|
1,374
|
|
|
|
2,002
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Nondeductible meals & entertainment
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Other
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
Change in valuation
allowance
|
|
$
|
3,454
|
|
|
$
|
4,539
|
|
CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The
components of the Company’s net deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
|
|
Year
Ended
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
operating loss carry forward
|
|
$
|
11,080
|
|
|
$
|
7,662
|
|
Finite-lived intangibles
|
|
|
552
|
|
|
|
394
|
|
Non-qualified stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
Property, plant
and equipment
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
allowance
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Accrued
expenses
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
998
|
|
Gross deferred tax
assets
|
|
|
12,881
|
|
|
|
9,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of
indefinite-lived intangible
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Property,
plant and equipment
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gross
deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Net deferred tax assets before valuation
allowance
|
|
|
12,868
|
|
|
|
9,419
|
|
Less: valuation
allowance
|
|
|
(12,868
|
)
|
|
|
(9,419
|
)
|
Total net deferred
tax asset (liability)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
In
assessing the need for a valuation allowance, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all
of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation
of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management has assessed the
potential realization of its deferred tax assets and determined that sufficient uncertainty exists regarding the realization of
its deferred tax assets and therefore continues to record a valuation allowance on all of its deferred tax assets.
As
of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had approximate Federal NOL carryforwards of $30.1 million and $20.9 million, respectively,
and various state NOL carryforwards of $15.7 million and $10.2 million, respectively. The loss carryforwards for federal tax purposes
will begin expiring in 2032. The expiration of the statute of limitations related to the state NOL carryforwards varies by state.
The Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S. federal and various state jurisdictions. The Company is generally subject to
U.S. federal and state tax examinations for all years after 2012.
Section
382 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code generally imposes an annual limitation on the amount of net operating loss carryforwards
that might be used to offset taxable income when a corporation has undergone significant changes in stock ownership. The Company
has not completed a Section 382 analysis of the NOL carryforwards. Consequently, the Company’s NOL carryforwards may be
subject to annual limitations under Section 382.
The
Company recognizes tax liabilities for uncertain income tax positions based on management’s estimate of whether it is more
likely than not that additional taxes will be required. The Company had no uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2016 or
2015. It is the Company’s practice to recognize interest and penalties accrued on any unrecognized tax benefits as a component
of income tax expense. The Company does not expect any material changes in unrecognized tax positions over the next twelve months.
CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
9. Goodwill
and Finite Lived Intangible Assets
The
Company assesses the carrying amount of its goodwill for potential impairment annually or more frequently if events or a change
in circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred. The Company performs an impairment test for finite-lived assets,
such as intangible assets, and other long-lived assets, such as fixed assets, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable.
The
Company has only one operating and reporting unit that earns revenues, incurs expenses and makes available discrete financial
information for review by the Company’s chief operating decision maker. Accordingly, the Company completes its goodwill
impairment testing on this single reporting unit.
In
conducting the annual impairment test of the Company’s goodwill, qualitative factors are first examined to determine whether
the existence of events or circumstances indicates that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is
less than its carrying amount. If it is determined that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is
less than its carrying amount, a two-step impairment test is applied. In the first step, the Company calculates the fair value
of the reporting unit and compares that amount with the reporting unit’s carrying amount, including goodwill. If the carrying
amount exceeds the fair value, the Company performs the second step of measuring the amount of the goodwill impairment loss, if
any, by comparing the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill to the carrying amount of goodwill. This requires
performing a hypothetical application of the acquisition method to determine the implied fair value of goodwill after measuring
the reporting unit’s identifiable assets and liabilities.
The
Company had recorded Goodwill of $204,000 as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015. The Company conducted its annual goodwill
impairment test as of December 31, 2016 and determined there to be no impairment related to the Company’s goodwill.
For
the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized impairment charges of approximately $87,000 and $216,000,
respectively related to certain customer contracts acquired in the acquisition of the Select Mobile Money business in March 2014.
In determining the impairment loss, the Company reviewed all circumstances, including the undiscounted cash flows it expects to
derive from those contracts going forward.
Identified
intangible assets are summarized as follows:
|
|
Amortizable
|
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net
|
|
(Dollar
amounts in thousands)
|
|
(years)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Contracts
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
549
|
|
|
$
|
(526
|
)
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
Proprietary Software
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
(864
|
)
|
|
|
53
|
|
Total identified
intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,466
|
|
|
$
|
(1,390
|
)
|
|
$
|
76
|
|
|
|
Amortizable
|
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net
|
|
(Dollar
amounts in thousands)
|
|
(years)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer
Contracts
|
|
|
3
- 5
|
|
|
$
|
784
|
|
|
$
|
(510
|
)
|
|
$
|
274
|
|
Proprietary
Software
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
(559
|
)
|
|
|
358
|
|
Total
identified intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,701
|
|
|
$
|
(1,069
|
)
|
|
$
|
632
|
|
Amortization
and impairment expense for identified intangible assets is summarized below:
|
|
Year
Ended
|
|
|
Statement of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
|
Classification
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Contracts
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
Cost
of Revenue
|
|
Proprietary Software
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
Cost
of Revenue
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
556
|
|
|
|
805
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based
on the identified intangible assets recorded at December 31, 2016, future amortization expense is expected to be as follows (in
thousands):
CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
10.
Shareholders’ Deficit
Convertible
Preferred Stock
In
June 2015, the Company issued 44,030 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock at $100.00 per share and issued five-year
warrants to purchase 446,983 shares of its common stock at $ 7.41 per share, as adjusted, in a private placement.
The
Series C Preferred Stock entitles its holders to a 10% per annum dividend, payable quarterly in cash or in additional shares of
Series C Preferred Stock (or a combination of both) as determined by the Company, and may be converted to the Company’s
common stock at the option of a holder at a conversion price of $ 7.41 per share. The Series C Preferred Stock contains
anti-dilution conversion price protection allowing the stock’s conversion price to adjust, prior to conversion, should the
Company sell common stock at a price below the then current conversion price. The Series C Preferred Stock will automatically
convert into common stock upon the occurrence of any of the following: (a) an underwritten public offering of shares of the Company’s
common stock providing at least $10 million in gross proceeds, (b) the Company’s common stock closing price being greater
than 100% above the conversion price then in effect for at least 40 of 60 consecutive trading days, (c) four years after the closing
of the offering of the Series C Preferred Stock, or (d) the written consent of holders representing 50% of the issued and outstanding
Series C Preferred Stock. The holders of the Series C Preferred Stock are entitled to vote their shares on an as-converted basis
and are entitled to a liquidation preference equal to the stated value (i.e., purchase price) of their shares plus any accrued
but unpaid dividends thereon.
In
March 2016, an investor converted 500 shares of Series C Convertible Stock at the conversion price of $ 7.41 per share,
as well as received credit for all unpaid cumulative dividends earned through the date of conversion. The investor received a
total of 7,289 shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had outstanding 43,530 and 44,030,
respectively of its Series C Preferred Stock.
Common
Stock
The
Company’s common stock issuances for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:
|
|
Common
Stock
|
Balance,
December 31, 2014
|
|
|
752,701
|
|
Share price
conversion adjustment
|
|
|
365,895
|
|
Conversion
of preferred stock to common stock and payment of preferred dividend with common stock
|
|
|
224,920
|
|
Issuance
of common stock for professional services
|
|
|
25,556
|
|
Share-based
compensation
|
|
|
3,203
|
|
Issuance
of common stock under Associate Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
|
7,378
|
|
Warrant
exercises
|
|
|
126,605
|
|
Shares
issued to Lincoln Park Capital Fund under Equity Line Agreement
|
|
|
52,449
|
|
Issuance
of restricted common stock to Associates, net of forfeitures
|
|
|
3,733
|
|
Director
equity exchange agreement
|
|
|
( 17,014
|
)
|
Balance, December
31, 2015
|
|
|
1,545,426
|
|
Conversion
of preferred stock to common stock and payment of preferred dividend with common stock
|
|
|
7,290
|
|
Issuance
of common stock for professional services and fees
|
|
|
69,256
|
|
March 2016 equity
offering
|
|
|
189,733
|
|
Share-based
compensation
|
|
|
21,898
|
|
Issuance
of common stock under Associate Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
|
13,452
|
|
Warrant
exercises
|
|
|
256,337
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
2,103,392
|
|
Net
cash and non-cash increases to total shareholders’ deficit pursuant to common stock issuances for the year ended December
31, 2016 and 2015 totaled $3.8 million and $5.5 million, respectively.
CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Warrants
The
Company’s warrant activity for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 consisted of the following:
|
|
Number
of Shares Issuable Under Warrants
|
|
Weighted
Avg. Exercise Price
|
|
Weighted
Remaining
Life (Years)
|
Balance,
December 31, 2014
|
|
|
395,720
|
|
|
$
|
46.32
|
|
|
|
4.57
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
880,006
|
|
|
|
8.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(
126,610
|
)
|
|
|
9.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
1,149,116
|
|
|
|
16.47
|
|
|
|
3.98
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
2,088,365
|
|
|
|
8.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(
341,796
|
)
|
|
|
6.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
2,895,685
|
|
|
|
11.60
|
|
|
|
4.23
|
|
Certain
of the Company’s warrants have a cashless exercise provision, whereby the Company issues shares of common stock based on
the difference between the weighted-average trading price of the Company’s common stock for the five consecutive trading
days ending on the date immediately preceding the date of the warrant exercise and the stated exercise price of the warrants.
As a result of these cashless exercise provisions, the number of common shares issued pursuant to warrant exercises may be different
than the total number of warrants exercised during a given period.
As
of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company’s warrant and conversion feature liabilities consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
as of
|
|
Counterparty
|
|
Shares
Issuable
|
|
|
Current
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
Former senior lender
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
537
|
|
Mr. Davis
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Series A, B and C preferred shareholders
|
|
|
398,527
|
|
|
|
7.41
|
|
|
|
1,164
|
|
|
|
2,175
|
|
Lincoln Park Capital Fund
|
|
|
76,933
|
|
|
|
7.41
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Lender of October 2016 notes payable
|
|
|
3,333
|
|
|
|
7.41
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
June 9, 2016 Investors
|
|
|
133,333
|
|
|
|
7.41
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Convertible noteholders
(1)
|
|
|
879,993
|
|
|
|
8.33
|
|
|
|
7,369
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Messrs. Hanson and Davis
|
|
|
22,223
|
|
|
|
7.41
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Sutter Securities Incorporated
|
|
|
1,875
|
|
|
|
8.33
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Trooien Capital, LLC
|
|
|
333,333
|
|
|
|
8.33
|
|
|
|
968
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Craft Capital
Management LLC
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
|
8.33
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Warrant and conversion feature liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,222
|
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
Less: current
portion of warrant and conversion feature liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,870
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
WARRANT LIABILITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,352
|
|
|
$
|
2,800
|
|
(1) Shares
issuable includes only warrants issued in connection with convertible notes.
Warrants
that contain anti-dilution price protection are carried as liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets until they are either
exercised or no longer subject to anti-dilution protection, after which the value of the warrants is reclassified to additional
paid-in capital. The fair value of warrants is determined at the issuance date, and each quarter for warrants recognized as liabilities
and carried at fair value, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following significant assumptions, or a Monte
Carlo simulation, depending on the instrument.
CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Stock
price:
|
|
Published
trading market values of the Company’s common stock as of the grant date of the warrants or at the valuation date.
|
|
|
|
Exercise
price:
|
|
The
stated exercise price of the warrant.
|
|
|
|
Expected
term:
|
|
Generally,
the Company utilizes the contractual term of the warrant.
|
|
|
|
Expected
dividend:
|
|
The
rate of dividends that the Company expects to pay over the term of the warrant.
|
|
|
|
Volatility:
|
|
For
periods prior to the Company’s public offering, volatility is estimated based on the volatility of comparable peer companies
that are publicly traded, and for later periods the Company includes its actual common stock trading history.
|
|
|
|
Risk-free
interest rate:
|
|
The
daily United States Treasury yield curve rate.
|
The
conversion features on the Company’s convertible notes are accounted for as derivative financial instruments. The Company
records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the value of the conversion features are reflected in mark-to-market
warrant and debt (income) expense on the consolidated statements of operations. The Company obtains a valuation report prepared
by a third-party valuation specialist to assist in determining the fair value of the conversion features associated with certain
of its convertible notes. If converted by the holders, as of December 31, 2016, the Company would be required to issue 332,614
shares to settle convertible notes convertible at $ 8.33 per share and 629,725 shares to settle convertible notes
convertible at $ 10.50 per share.
The
fair value of the warrants issued was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation or the Black-Scholes option pricing model. For
the warrants valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, the following assumptions were used for the periods presented:
|
|
Year
Ended
|
|
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock price
|
|
$
|
6.08
to $ 16.88
|
|
|
$
|
9.00
to $ 25.20
|
|
Exercise price
|
|
$
|
7.41
to $ 10.35
|
|
|
$
|
7.41
to $ 30.38
|
|
Expected term
|
|
|
2.5
to 5.0 years
|
|
|
|
1.0
to 5.0 years
|
|
Expected dividend
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Volatility
|
|
|
51%
to 91
|
%
|
|
|
27%
to 96
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
0.71%
to 2.07
|
%
|
|
|
0.25%
to 1.37
|
%
|
11.
Stock-Based Compensation and Benefit Plans
Stock
Options and Performance Awards
On
February 9, 2010, the Board of Directors adopted the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2010 EIP”), which was approved
by the shareholders of the Company. Participants in the plan include the Company’s employees, officers, directors, consultants,
or independent contractors. On February 12, 2014, the Board of Directors approved the assumption of the 2010 EIP as part of the
Merger; however, it was agreed that no new grants would be made under the 2010 EIP. On February 12, 2014, the Board of Directors
also adopted the 2014 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2014 SIP”). On June 2, 2016, the Board of Directors adopted the 2016
Stock Incentive Plan (the “2016 SIP”), which was approved by the shareholders of the Company.
Pursuant
to the 2016 SIP, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer may, on a discretionary basis and without committee review or approval,
grant non-qualified (non-statutory) stock options for up to 4,445 common shares to new employees of the Company who are
not officers of the Company during each fiscal year. Incentives under the plan may be granted in one or a combination of the following
forms: (a) incentive stock options and non-statutory stock options; (b) stock appreciation rights (“SARs”); (c) stock
awards; (d) restricted stock; (e) restricted stock units; and (f) performance shares. Eligible participants include officers and
employees of the company, members of the Board of Directors, and consultants or other independent contractors. No person is eligible
to receive grants of stock options and SARs under the 2014 SIP that exceed, in the aggregate, 17,778 shares of common stock
in any one year. The term of each stock option shall be determined by the board or committee, but shall not exceed ten years.
Vested stock options may be exercised in whole or part by the holder giving notice to the Company. Options under the plan may
provide for the holder of the option to make payment of the exercise price by surrender of shares equal in value to the exercise
price. Options granted to employees generally vest over two to three years. Stock awards granted to non-employee directors generally
vest 50% on the grant date and 50% on the first anniversary of the date of the grant. Options expire five years from the date
of grant.
CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The
following is a summary of shares issuable pursuant to options granted as of December 31, 2016:
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Exercisable
|
2010
EIP
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
5,015
|
|
|
|
5,015
|
|
2014 SIP
|
|
|
67,628
|
|
|
|
39,108
|
|
|
|
24,889
|
|
2016 SIP
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
36,804
|
|
|
|
12,272
|
|
Issued
outside of plans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
144,304
|
|
|
|
105,641
|
|
Shares
issuable pursuant to options granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225,231
|
|
|
|
147,817
|
|
The
following is a summary of stock option activity for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:
|
|
Number
of Shares Issuable
|
|
Weighted
Avg.
|
|
Weighted
Remaining Contractual
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
Under
Options
|
|
Exercise
Price
|
|
Life
(Years)
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Balance,
December 31, 2014
|
|
|
120,231
|
|
|
$
|
45.23
|
|
|
|
4.05
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
76,767
|
|
|
|
20.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
or Expired
|
|
|
( 30,364
|
)
|
|
|
39.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December
31, 2015
|
|
|
166,634
|
|
|
|
29.70
|
|
|
|
3.95
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
109,209
|
|
|
|
9.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
or Expired
|
|
|
(50,612
|
)
|
|
|
20.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
225,231
|
|
|
|
21.99
|
|
|
|
3.52
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Exercisable
at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
147,817
|
|
|
|
27.05
|
|
|
|
3.21
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
Information
with respect to stock options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2016 is as follows:
|
|
Options
Outstanding
|
|
|
Options
Exercisable
|
|
Range
of
Exercise Price
|
|
Number
Outstanding
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
|
Number
Exercisable
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
$6.15
- $9.92
|
|
|
60,389
|
|
|
|
4.14
|
|
|
$
|
8.64
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
|
20,772
|
|
|
$
|
8.66
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
$9.93
- $15.74
|
|
|
31,915
|
|
|
|
4.45
|
|
|
|
11.79
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
12,319
|
|
|
|
12.18
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
$15.75
- $30.38
|
|
|
49,105
|
|
|
|
3.54
|
|
|
|
19.23
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
33,496
|
|
|
|
19.25
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
$33.75
to $90.00
|
|
|
83,822
|
|
|
|
2.71
|
|
|
|
37.11
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
81,230
|
|
|
|
37.22
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
225,231
|
|
|
|
3.52
|
|
|
$
|
21.99
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
|
147,817
|
|
|
$
|
27.05
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
The
Company has also adopted a performance bonus plan (the “Performance Bonus Plan”), which is intended to provide incentive
for associates to establish quarterly goals and objectives as defined by management and achieve those goals and objectives above
the established criteria. Shares issued pursuant to the Performance Bonus Plan to date have been issued under the 2014 SIP and
2016 SIP. The Company issued 21,898 and 3,202 shares to associates pursuant to the Performance Bonus Plan during
the years ended December 31, 2016 and
2015, respectively.
CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The
Company utilizes the Black-Scholes option pricing model when determining the compensation cost associated with stock options issued
using the following significant assumptions:
Stock
price:
|
|
Published
trading market values of the Company’s common stock as of the grant date of the stock options.
|
|
|
|
Exercise
price:
|
|
The
stated exercise price of the stock option.
|
|
|
|
Expected
term:
|
|
The
Company’s assumption of the term of the stock options based on historical exercise data.
|
|
|
|
Expected
dividend:
|
|
The
rate of dividends that the Company expects to pay over the term of the stock options.
|
|
|
|
Volatility:
|
|
For
periods prior to the Company’s public offering, volatility is estimated based on the volatility of comparable peer companies
that are publicly traded, and for later periods the Company includes its actual common stock trading history.
|
|
|
|
Risk-free
interest rate:
|
|
The
daily United States Treasury yield curve rate.
|
The
fair value of the stock options issued was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following assumptions
for the periods presented:
|
|
Year
Ended
|
|
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock price
|
|
$
|
6.15
to $ 11.78
|
|
|
$
|
12.38
to $ 30.38
|
|
Exercise price
|
|
$
|
6.15
to $ 11.78
|
|
|
$
|
12.38
to
$ 30.38
|
|
Expected term
|
|
|
3
Years
|
|
|
|
2
to 3 Years
|
|
Expected dividend
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Volatility
|
|
|
61%
to 91
|
%
|
|
|
26%
to 48
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
0.71%
to 1.54
|
%
|
|
|
0.22%
to 1.08
|
%
|
The
Company estimates forfeitures when recognizing compensation expense and this estimate of forfeitures is adjusted over the requisite
service period based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from such estimates. Changes
in estimated forfeitures are recognized through a cumulative catch-up adjustment, which is recognized in the period of change,
and impacts the amount of unamortized compensation expense to be recognized in future periods.
Compensation
expense recognized for the issuance of warrants, stock options, restricted stock grants and stock bonuses for the periods presented
was as follows:
|
|
Year
Ended
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
Stock-based compensation costs included
in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
Sales and marketing expenses
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
General and administrative
expenses
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
Total stock-based
compensation expense
|
|
$
|
623
|
|
|
$
|
443
|
|
As
of December 31, 2016, the total compensation cost related to unvested options awards not yet recognized was approximately $231,000,
which will be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.24 years.
2014
Associate Stock Purchase Plan
In
September 2014 and August 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors and stockholders, respectively, approved the 2014 Associate
Stock Purchase Plan, under which 22,223 shares were reserved for purchase by the Company’s associates (employees).
In December 2016, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the reservation of an additional 100,000 shares. The purchase
price of the shares under the plan is the lesser of 85% of the fair market value on the first or last day of the offering period.
Offering periods are every six months ending on June 30 and December 31. Associates may designate up to ten percent of their compensation
for the purchase of shares under the plan. As of December 31, 2016, there are 99,564 shares available for purchase remaining
in the plan.
CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
12. Related
Party Transactions
In
order to finance its operations, the Company has historically relied upon Messrs. Hanson and Davis for financing through the issuance
of debt, equity and warrants. Balances with related parties consisting of members of the Board of Directors for borrowings and
warrants were as follows. No debt is held by executive officers of the Company.
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes Payable
to Directors and Affiliates
(in thousands)
(1)
|
|
$
|
3,078
|
|
|
$
|
1,748
|
|
Convertible Notes, due 2016 and 2017,
interest between 0% and 8%, held by related parties
(in thousands)
|
|
$
|
906
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Accrued interest to
related parties
(in thousands)
|
|
$
|
411
|
|
|
$
|
232
|
|
Warrants held by related parties
|
|
|
888,802
|
|
|
|
460,695
|
|
(1)
|
Included
within this line item are two convertible notes, issued December 22, 2016, for proceeds of $135,000, a principal amount of
$135,000 and a fair value, as of December 31, 2016, of approximately $194,000.
|
|
|
Year
Ended
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related party interest expense
|
|
$
|
196
|
|
|
$
|
154
|
|
On
May 7, 2014, the Company entered into a $1.5 million line-of-credit agreement with Mr. Hanson, as subsequently amended (the “Line
of Credit”). The stated interest rate on the Line of Credit is 10% on the principal amount outstanding and the maturity
date is January 31, 2017, with all outstanding principal and accrued interest due in full on that date. There are no financial
covenants associated with the Line of Credit. On July 7, 2016, the Company entered into an amendment #3 to the borrowing agreement
with Mr. Hanson in connection with the Line of Credit. Pursuant to that amendment, which is effective as of June 30, 2016, the
parties agreed that the Company will make an interest-only payment on January 31, 2017. The interest-only payment is for interest
accrued on the principal balance from February 1, 2016 to date of payment. On October 6, 2016, Mr. Hanson agreed to convert the
$1.0 million owed under the Line of Credit to equity upon consummation of an underwritten public offering.
The
Company and Mr. Hanson subsequently agreed to reduce the conversion amount and number of warrants issuable pursuant to this conversion.
See Note 14 “Subsequent Events.”
On
July 30, 2014, the Company entered into a financing commitment letter with Messrs. Hanson and Davis to lend the Company up to
$2.5 million through December 31, 2014, bearing interest at 10% (which increases to 18% under certain circumstances in the event
of default). The maturity date of the financing commitment letter is January 31, 2017, on which date the total principal balance
and accrued interest thereon will be due in full. On July 7, 2016, the Company entered into an addendum #4 to this commitment
letter with Mr. Hanson. Pursuant to that addendum, which is effective as of June 30, 2016, the parties extended the payment date
of the interest-only payments that were or will be due and payable to January 31, 2017. The interest-only payments are for interest
accrued on the principal balance from February 1, 2016 to date of payment.
On
December 22, 2015, the Company issued a $150,000 demand promissory note to Mr. Hanson. The note bears an interest rate of 10%
and was due on June 30, 2016. On July 13, 2016, the Company entered into an addendum #1 to this demand promissory note. Pursuant
to that addendum, which is effective as of June 30, 2016, the parties extended the maturity date under the demand promissory note
from June 30, 2016 to January 31, 2017.
In
February 2016, the Company entered into a thirty-day note payable with Mr. Davis for $150,000 and Mr. Hanson for $75,000. Under
the note agreements, in lieu of interest, the Company agreed to issue five-year cashless warrants to purchase 11,111 and
5,556 shares of common stock at $ 7.41 per share to Messrs. Davis and Hanson, respectively. Additionally, for each
30 days the principal amount is outstanding, the Company issued to Messrs. Davis and Hanson an additional 11,111 and 5,556
warrants, respectively, with the same terms as described above. On March 29, 2016, both notes were amended to change the due
dates of the principal amounts owed to January 11, 2017 and January 31, 2017, under Messrs. Hanson’s and Davis’ notes,
respectively. Messrs. Davis and Hanson will continue to earn warrants on a 30-day basis until the principal is repaid. As of December
31, 2016, Messrs. Davis and Hanson have received a total of 133,336 and 61,116 warrants, respectively.
On
May 9, 2016, the Company entered into a promissory note agreement for approximately $227,000 with Mr. Davis. The note accrues
interest at the per annum rate of 10%. As an additional inducement to Mr. Davis to advance amounts under the note, the Company
agreed to issue to Mr. Davis a warrant to acquire 15,110 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price
of $ 7.41 per share as an inducement to enter into a promissory note agreement.
On
May 9 and 10, 2016, the Company entered into two demand promissory notes in the principal amount of $250,000 each with Mr. Davis.
Each promissory note accrues interest at the per annum rate of 10% and is payable upon the written demand of Mr. Davis. As an
additional inducement to Mr. Davis to advance the amounts under each promissory note, the Company issued to Mr. Davis, under each
promissory note, a warrant to acquire 3,333 shares of the Company’s common stock for each week the applicable note
is outstanding. The warrants under the May 9th promissory note have an exercise price of $ 6.08 per share and the warrants
under the May 10th promissory note have an exercise price of $ 5.63 per share. If a promissory note is outstanding for more
than 30 days, the amount of warrants is increased to from 3,333 to 4,445 shares per week. On May 24, 2016, the Company
amended each warrant to increase the exercise price of the warrant to $ 7.41 per share. The Company repaid these notes in
June 2016.
On
May 25, 2016, the Company borrowed $200,000 from Mr. Davis and issued to Mr. Davis a demand promissory note in the principal amount
of $200,000. The note did not bear interest and was payable on demand of Mr. Davis. The Company repaid this note in full on June
6, 2016.
CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On
July 13, 2016, the Company issued to Mr. Davis a convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $360,000 and a warrant
to purchase up to 13,333 shares of the Company’s common stock, subject to adjustments, in exchange for an aggregate
purchase price of $300,000. On July 14, 2016, the Company issued to Mr. Hanson a convertible promissory note in the principal
amount of $240,000 and a warrant to purchase up to 8,889 shares of the Company’s common stock, subject to adjustments,
in exchange for an aggregate purchase price of $200,000. The warrants have an exercise price of $ 9.00 per share, subject
to adjustments, and are exercisable for a five year period. The notes do not bear any interest, other than during an event of
default (in which case default interest at a rate of 24% per annum is applicable). The notes are due and payable six months after
the respective issuance dates. In addition to the Company providing three days advance written notice prior to repayment, under
the terms of the note upon repayment of the note (including on the maturity date) the Company is obligated to pay a 20% premium
on the principal amount and any accrued default interest then due on the note, which in the aggregate is equal to 120% of the
principal amount and any accrued default interest then due on the note. For accounting purposes, the Company accounts for the
debt and warrants using an allocation process. As a result, the reported amount of the debt has been reduced and will be accreted
to face value through each of the maturity dates.
On
August 12, 2016, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with Messrs. Hanson and Davis, pursuant to which the
Company issued to each of Messrs. Hanson and Davis a convertible note, due August 2017, in a principal amount of $263,158 and
a warrant to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for a purchase price of $250,000 paid in cash by
each such director. The notes are unsecured, do not bear any interest and are payable in full on August 12, 2017. Each of Messrs.
Hanson and Davis may elect to convert the principal amount of the note issued to him into shares of the Company’s common
stock at any time before August 12, 2017 at a conversion price per share equal to the lower of $ 8.33 and 80% of the per
share sale price of the Company’s common stock in the Company’s next underwritten public offering. The Company has
the right to require each of Messrs. Hanson and Davis to convert the notes into shares of the Company’s common stock at
that conversion price if the Company’s common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market, the Nasdaq Global Market or
the Nasdaq Global Select Market. For accounting purposes, the Company accounts for the debt, warrants and conversion features
using an allocation process. As a result, the reported amount of the debt has been reduced and will be accreted to face value
through each of the maturity dates.
On
August 1, 2016, Mr. Davis entered into a financial lease agreement to fund the purchase of certain licenses for the exclusive
use and benefit of the Company, in an aggregate amount of approximately $239,000, together with accrued interest thereon. On August
22, 2016, the Company entered into an unsecured promissory note with Mr. Davis, pursuant to which the Company is obligated to
pay to Mr. Davis the sum of approximately $239,000, together with all accrued interest thereon, in six monthly installments. The
Company is required to make the payments under the note directly to the lessor in satisfaction of the Company’s obligations
to Mr. Davis under the note and Mr. Davis’ obligations to the lessor. As consideration for entering into a financial lease
to fund the purchase of certain licenses for the exclusive use and benefit of the, the Company issued to Mr. Davis a warrant to
purchase 16,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $ 10.13 per share. The warrants
are exercisable for a five-year period.
On
November 16, 2016, the Company entered into an unsecured promissory note with Mr. Davis, pursuant to which the Company is obligated
to pay to Mr. Davis the sum of $250,000, together with all accrued interest thereon, in six monthly installments of $42,101 each,
which includes interest and equates to an imputed interest rate of 5% per annum. As an additional inducement to Mr. Davis to advance
amounts under the note, on November 16, 2016, the Company also issued to Mr. Davis a warrant to purchase 30,365 shares
of the Company’s common stock, subject to adjustments. The warrants issued to Mr. Davis have an exercise price of $ 7.41
per share, subject to adjustments, and are exercisable for a five-year period.
In
December 2016, the Company entered into securities purchase agreements with Messrs. Davis and Hanson pursuant to which the Company
agreed to issue to Messrs. Davis and Hanson convertible notes, due December 2017, in an aggregate principal amount of $378,947
and warrants to purchase 40,967 shares of common stock, subject to adjustments, in exchange for an aggregate purchase price
of $360,000, payable in cash. The notes do not bear any interest and are payable in full in December 2017. Messrs. Davis and Hanson
may elect to convert the principal amount of the notes into shares of common stock at any time before the maturity date at a conversion
price per share equal to the lower of $ 10.50 and 80% of the per share price of common stock in the Company’s next
underwritten public offering. The Company will have the right to require Messrs. Davis and Hanson to convert the notes into shares
of common stock at that conversion price if the Company’s common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market, the Nasdaq
Global Market or the Nasdaq Global Select Market. The warrants will have an exercise price per share equal to the lower of $ 8.33
and 80% of the per share price of the Company’s common stock in the Company’s next underwritten public offering,
subject to adjustments, and are exercisable for a five-year period.
CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On
December 22, 2016, the Company issued a Convertible Term Promissory Note to Mr. Davis in the amount of $50,000, payable in cash
(the “Davis Note”). The Davis Note is unsecured, bears interest at a rate of 8% per annum and is payable in full on
March 22, 2017, which may, under certain circumstances, be extended to May 31, 2017. The Company may not prepay the note without
the consent of Mr. Davis. Mr. Davis will have the right, at his sole option and discretion, to convert the principal and interest
under the Davis Note into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of (i) $ 10.50 per share or (ii)
following an Uplist Transaction at a rate equal to the lower of $ 10.50 per share and 80% of the Company’s per share
price in the Uplist Transaction. As consideration for entering into the Davis Note, the Company also issued to Mr. Davis a warrant
to purchase 1,502 shares of common stock, exercisable for a five-year period from the date of issuance, at the lower of
$ 8.33 per share and 80% of the Company’s per share price in the Company’s next underwritten public offering.
On
December 22, 2016, the Company issued a Convertible Term Promissory Note to Mr. Hanson in the amount of $85,000, payable in cash
(the “Hanson Note”). The Hanson Note is unsecured, bears interest at a rate of 8% per annum and is payable in full
on March 22, 2017, which may, under certain circumstances, be extended to May 31, 2017. The Company may not prepay the note without
the consent of Mr. Hanson. Mr. Hanson will have the right, at his sole option and discretion, to convert the principal and interest
under the Hanson Note into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of (i) $ 10.50 per share or
(ii) following an Uplist Transaction at a rate equal to the lower of $ 10.50 per share and 80% of the Company’s per
share price in the Uplist Transaction. As consideration for entering into the Hanson Note, the Company also issued to Mr. Hanson
a warrant to purchase 2,553 shares of common stock, exercisable for a five-year period from the date of issuance, at the
lower of $ 8.33 per share and 80% of the Company’s per share price in the Company’s next underwritten public
offering.
On
December 29, 2016, the Company entered into a Demand Promissory Note agreement for $250,000 with Davis & Associates, Inc.,
a company owned by Mr. Davis (“Davis & Associates”). The Demand Promissory Note accrues interest at a rate of
4% per annum. All principal and accrued but unpaid interest on the Demand Promissory Note will become payable upon the written
demand of Davis & Associates. The Company repaid this Demand Promissory Note as of the same date, December 29, 2016.
Subsequent
to December 31, 2016, the Company entered into several transactions with Messrs. Davis and Hanson including promissory notes which
consolidated certain of the outstanding debt described above. See Note 14 “Subsequent Events.”
13. Concentrations
The
Company’s revenues consist of recurring revenue, professional services and implementation fees. For the years ended December
31, 2016 and 2015, recurring revenues represented 66.1% and 73.0% of consolidated revenues, respectively, professional services
represented 27.2% and 13.3% of consolidated revenues, respectively, and implementation fees represented 6.7% and 13.7% of consolidated
revenues, respectively.
The
Company continues to rely on vendors to provide technology and licensing components that are critical to its solutions. In addition,
the Company engaged development contractors located in Toronto, Canada beginning in March 2014 to augment its software development
efforts. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company incurred billings of approximately $837,000, or 12.5% of total billings,
to this vendor. Billings incurred to this vendor for the year ended December 31, 2016 were less than 10% of the Company’s
total billings.
As
of December 31, 2016, the Company had net payables of approximately $317,000 owed to a law firm for legal services rendered in
connection with our previous failed offering, representing 14.4% of its accounts payable balance, and approximately $558,000 owed
to a technology partner for software licenses, representing 25.3% of its accounts payable balance. As of December 31, 2015, the
Company had net payables of approximately $342,000 owed to a law firm for legal services, representing 30.8% of its accounts payable
balance.
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, one customer represented $1.4 million, or 17.2% of the Company’s consolidated revenues.
There was no single customer whose revenue exceeded 10% of the Company’s consolidated revenues for the year ended December
31, 2015. Within accounts receivable is a receivable from the same customer totaling $1.3 million, representing 42.8% of the Company’s
total receivables as of December 31, 2016. This receivable is due to the Company in various installments, pursuant to each agreement,
beginning in January 2017 and ending in December 2019. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had receivables due from three customers
of approximately $121,000, $113,000 and $95,000 representing 17.0%, 15.8% and 13.3%, respectively, of its gross accounts receivable
balance.
14. Subsequent
Events
The
Offering
On
January 20, 2017, the Company filed with the SEC a Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No: 333-215650), pursuant
to which the Company intends to raise up to $13.8 million in cash proceeds and list its common stock on the Nasdaq
Capital Market (the “Offering”). The Board of Directors approved for submission to a vote of the stockholders of
the Company the grant of authority to the Board of Directors to amend the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to
effect a reverse split of the Company’s common stock. At a special meeting of stockholders on February 9, 2017,
the stockholders of the Company approved this proposal. On March 6, 2017, the Pricing Committee of the Board of
Directors fixed the Reverse Stock Split ratio at 1-for-1.5 (1:1.5), and the Company will file a Certificate of Amendment to
the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware to effect the
Reverse Stock Split immediately prior to the pricing of the Offering. As a result of the Reverse Stock Split, the Company’s
historical financial statements have been revised to reflect share counts and per share data as if the Reverse Stock Split
had been in effect for all periods presented.
CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Agreement
with Vista Partners
On
January 5, 2017, the Company entered into an addendum to an agreement entered into by and between the Company and Vista Partners,
LLC (“Vista”), dated August 1, 2015 pursuant to which Vista will provide the Company with investor relations and financial
advisory services (as amended, the “Vista Agreement”). The Vista Agreement shall be effective as of January 1, 2017
and continue for a term of six months. The Vista Agreement may be renewed for an additional six months under the same terms and
conditions upon mutual agreement of Vista and the Company. Pursuant to the Vista Agreement, Vista shall be provided the following
consideration by the Company:
|
●
|
A
non-refundable grant by the Company to Vista of $120,000 convertible bridge note and warrants under the same terms as the
Company’s October Private Placement; and,
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
A
non-refundable expense deposit totaling $12,500, due within 15 days of the signing of the Vista Agreement;
|
Pursuant
to the Vista Agreement, the Company also issued to Vista a warrant to purchase 12,973 shares of the Company’s common
stock. The note will not bear any interest and is payable in full in January 2018. Vista may elect to convert the principal amount
of the note into shares of the Company’s common stock at any time before the maturity date at a conversion price per share
equal to the lower of $ 10.50 and 80% of the per share price of the Company’s common stock in the Company’s
next underwritten public offering. The Company will have the right to require Vista to convert the note into shares of the Company’s
common stock at that conversion price if the Company’s common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market, the Nasdaq Global
Market or the Nasdaq Global Select Market. The warrant will have an exercise price per share equal to the lower of $ 8.33
and 80% of the per share price of the Company’s common stock in the Company’s next underwritten public offering, subject
to adjustments, and is exercisable for a five-year period. The Company is required to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission
a registration statement covering the resale of the shares of the Company’s common stock issuable under the notes and the
warrants within 21 days following the consummation of the Company’s next underwritten public offering or 90 days following
the date on which the Company’s current financing plan is terminated. If the Company fails to file a registration statement
in a timely manner, it will be required to issue to Vista additional warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common
stock.
Private
Placements
On
January 4, 2017, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with David Boehnen. On January 13, 2017, the Company
entered into a securities purchase agreement with Brett Nesland and Cross River Partners LP. On January 17, 2017, the Company
entered into a securities purchase agreement with Anglian Holdings, Inc., David Boehnen and Vikki Lansing Copley (collectively,
the “Investors”) pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue to the Investors convertible notes, due January 2018,
in an aggregate principal amount of $3.2 million and warrants to purchase 378,685 shares of the Company’s common
stock, subject to adjustments, in exchange for an aggregate purchase price of $3.1 million, payable in cash. Subsequent to the
issuance of these warrants, additional warrants to purchase 6,957 shares of the Company’s common stock were issued
to certain of the Investors that did not receive 100% warrant coverage pursuant to their original agreements. See paragraph related
to True Up Warrants under the heading “
Other Events
” below.
The
notes will not bear any interest and are payable in full in January 2018. The Investors may elect to convert the principal amount
of the notes into shares of the Company’s common stock at any time before the maturity date at a conversion price per share
equal to the lower of $ 10.50 and 80% of the per share price of the Company’s common stock in the Company’s
next underwritten public offering. The Company will have the right to require the Investors to convert the notes into shares of
the Company’s common stock at that conversion price if the Company’s common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Capital
Market, the Nasdaq Global Market or the Nasdaq Global Select Market. The warrants will have an exercise price per share equal
to the lower of $ 8.33 and 80% of the per share price of the Company’s common stock in the Company’s next underwritten
public offering, subject to adjustments, and are exercisable for a five-year period. The Company is required to file with the
Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement covering the resale of the shares of the Company’s common stock
issuable under the notes and the warrants within 21 days following the consummation of the Company’s next underwritten public
offering or 90 days following the date on which the Company’s current financing plan is terminated. If the Company fails
to file a registration statement in a timely manner, it will be required to issue to the Investors additional warrants to purchase
shares of the Company’s common stock.
Agreements
with Messrs. Hanson and Davis
On
January 24, 2017, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Term Promissory Note with Mr. Davis, pursuant to which the
Company and Mr. Davis agreed to consolidate the following debt due to Mr. Davis totaling $896,243, including accrued but unpaid
interest thereon, into a single note due April 30, 2018: (i) the note dated February 1, 2016, in the principal amount of $150,000,
(ii) the note dated July 13, 2016, in the principal amount of $432,000 (including a 20% repayment premium as outlined in the agreement),
(iii) the note dated August 12, 2016, in the principal amount of $263,158 and (iv) the note dated December 22, 2016, in the principal
amount of $50,000. The consolidated note is unsecured and bears interest at a rate of 7% per annum, with all principal and accrued
interest due and payable at the close of business on April 30, 2018.
CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On
January 24, 2017, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Term Promissory Note with Mr. Hanson, pursuant to which the
Company and Mr. Hanson agreed to consolidate the following debt due to Mr. Hanson totaling $1,973,735, including accrued but unpaid
interest thereon, into a single note, due April 30, 2018: (i) the note dated July 30, 2014, in the principal amount of $598,000,
(ii) the note dated December 22, 2015, in the principal amount of $150,000, (iii) the note dated February 11, 2016, in the principal
amount of $75,000, (iv) the note dated July 14, 2016, in the principal amount of $288,888 (including a 20% repayment premium as
outlined in the agreement) and (v) that note dated December 22, 2016, in the principal amount of $85,000. In addition, the consolidated
note amends the line-of-credit dated May 7, 2014 by reducing the principal debt thereunder by $617,957 and incorporating that
amount into the principal amount of the consolidated note. The consolidated note is unsecured and bears interest at a rate of
8% per annum with all principal and accrued interest due and payable at the close of business on April 30, 2018.
On
January 25, 2017, the Company entered into an unsecured promissory note with Mr. Davis, pursuant to which the Company is obligated
to pay to Mr. Davis the sum of $238,950, together with all accrued interest thereon, in six monthly installments of $40,983 each,
which includes interest and equates to an imputed interest rate of 9.9% per annum. As an additional inducement to Mr. Davis to
advance amounts under the note, on January 25, 2017, the Company also issued to Mr. Davis a warrant to purchase 28,704
shares of the Company’s common stock, subject to adjustments. The warrants issued to Mr. Davis have an exercise price per
share equal to the lower of $8.33 and 80% of the per share price of the Company’s common stock in the Company’s
next underwritten public offering, subject to adjustments, and are exercisable for a five-year period.
On
February 22, 2017, the Company entered into an agreement with Mr. Hanson in connection with the Line of Credit. Pursuant to the
agreement, Mr. Hanson agreed to convert, upon consummation of the Offering, the principal amount of $678,947 of indebtedness outstanding
under the Line of Credit into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price-per-share equal to the public offering
price-per-share in the Offering. As consideration for this conversion, the Company agreed to issue to Mr. Hanson, upon consummation
of the Offering, five-year warrants to purchase 90,526 shares of the Company’s common stock, at an exercise price
equal to the public offering price-per-share in the Offering.
Other
Events
On
January 24, 2017, the Company and the holder of its notes payable, due October 2016, interest between 8.25% and 12%, agreed to
a settlement to repay the principal and accrued but unpaid interest due under the note. Pursuant to the settlement, the Company
agreed to pay $80,000 cash and issue to the holder of the note 6,667 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock,
which terms the Company satisfied on January 25, 2017.
On
January 26, 2017, the Company issued to certain investors in its recent private placement offering, which was ongoing from October
21, 2016 to January 17, 2017, additional warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock to those investors that
did not receive 100% warrant coverage on their investments. Pursuant to these additional warrant issuances, the Company issued
a total of 71,017 warrants to these investors (“True Up Warrants”). These True Up Warrants have an exercise
price per share equal to the lower of $ 8.33 and 80% of the per share price of the Company’s common stock in the Company’s
next underwritten public offering, subject to adjustments, and are exercisable for a five-year period.
Shares of Common Stock
PROSPECTUS
Lake
Street Capital Markets National Securities Corporation
Joint
Book-Running Managers
, 2017
PART
II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
ITEM
13. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION
The
registrant estimates that expenses payable by the registrant is connection with the offering described in this Registration Statement
will be as follows:
Securities
and Exchange Commission registration fee
|
|
$
|
1,733
|
|
Nasdaq
Listing Application Fee
|
|
$
|
95,833
|
|
FINRA
Fee
|
|
$
|
500
|
|
Accounting
fees and expenses
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
Legal
fees and expenses
|
|
$
|
275,000
|
|
Transfer
agent and registrar fees
|
|
$
|
2,500
|
|
Printing
expenses
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
$
|
75,006
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
550,572
|
|
ITEM
14. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
Section
145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law provides for, under certain circumstances, the indemnification of officers, directors,
employees and agents against liabilities that they may incur in such capacities. A summary of the circumstances in which such
indemnification provided for is contained herein, but that description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the relevant
Section of the Delaware General Corporation Law.
In
general, the statute provides that any director, officer, employee or agent of a corporation may be indemnified against expenses
(including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement, actually and reasonably incurred in a proceeding
(including any civil, criminal, administrative or investigative proceeding) to which the individual was a party by reason of such
status. Such indemnity may be provided if the indemnified person’s actions resulting in the liabilities: (i) were taken
in good faith; (ii) were reasonably believed to have been in or not opposed to the company’s best interest; and (iii) with
respect to any criminal action, such person had no reasonable cause to believe the actions were unlawful. Unless ordered by a
court, indemnification generally may be awarded only after a determination of independent members of the Board of Directors or
a committee thereof, by independent legal counsel or by vote of the stockholders that the applicable standard of conduct was met
by the individual to be indemnified.
The
statutory provisions further provide that to the extent a director, officer, employee or agent is wholly successful on the merits
or otherwise in defense of any proceeding to which he was a party, he is entitled to receive indemnification against expenses,
including attorneys’ fees, actually and reasonably incurred in connection with the proceeding.
Indemnification
in connection with a proceeding by or in the right of Cachet Financial Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) in which the
director, officer, employee or agent is successful is permitted only with respect to expenses, including attorneys’ fees
actually and reasonably incurred in connection with the defense. In such actions, the person to be indemnified must have acted
in good faith, in a manner believed to have been in our best interest and must not have been adjudged liable to us unless and
only to the extent that the Court of Chancery or the court in which such action or suit was brought shall determine upon application
that, despite the adjudication of liability, in view of all the circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably
entitled to indemnity for such expense which the Court of Chancery or such other court shall deem proper. Indemnification is otherwise
prohibited in connection with a proceeding brought on behalf of the Company in which a director is adjudged liable to us, or in
connection with any proceeding charging improper personal benefit to the director in which the director is adjudged liable for
receipt of an improper personal benefit.
Delaware
law authorizes us to reimburse or pay reasonable expenses incurred by a director, officer, employee or agent in connection with
a proceeding in advance of a final disposition of the matter. Such advances of expenses are permitted if the person furnishes
to us a written agreement to repay such advances if it is determined that he is not entitled to be indemnified by us.
The
statutory section cited above further specifies that any provisions for indemnification of or advances for expenses does not exclude
other rights under our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, Bylaws, resolutions of our stockholders or disinterested
directors, or otherwise. These indemnification provisions continue for a person who has ceased to be a director, officer, employee
or agent of the corporation and inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors and administrators of such persons.
The
statutory provision cited above also grants the power to the Company to purchase and maintain insurance policies that protect
any director, officer, employee or agent against any liability asserted against or incurred by him in such capacity arising out
of his status as such. Such policies may provide for indemnification whether or not the corporation would otherwise have the power
to provide for it.
Article
10 of our Bylaws and Article 8 of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation provide that we will indemnify our directors,
officers, employees and agents to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law. Insofar as indemnification
for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling the Company pursuant
to the foregoing provisions, we understand that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed
in that Act and is therefore unenforceable.
We
have purchased directors’ and officers’ liability insurance in order to limit the exposure to liability for indemnification
of directors and officers, including liabilities under the Securities Act.
ITEM
15. RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
During
the three years prior to the filing date of this registration statement, we issued securities in unregistered offerings as follows:
|
●
|
From November
2013 through January 2014, we exchanged warrants for the purchase of an aggregate of 87,495 common shares for the issuance
of 17,499 common shares to accredited investors.
|
|
●
|
From November
2013 through January 2014, investors converted a grand total of approximately $5,306,000 of short-term debt principal and
accrued interest into 58,961 shares of common stock.
|
|
●
|
On December 31,
2013, a former director exercised a stock option for 1,333 shares of common stock. Proceeds totaled $24,000.
|
|
●
|
From February
through December 2014, we issued 21,732 shares of common stock to the former owners of DE Acquisition 2, Inc. in connection
to the reverse merger agreement.
|
|
●
|
From April through
July 2014, we issued 17,014 shares of common stock to a director as interest in connection with a loan arrangement entered
into in March 2014.
|
|
●
|
From January
through March 31, 2014, we issued an aggregate of $2,865,000 in principal amount of debt evidenced by promissory notes to
accredited investors. Included in that amount was $2,315,000 from three directors. We also issued warrants to these and other
investors for the purchase of 36,500 shares of common stock at a per-share exercise price of $81.00.
|
|
●
|
In August 2014
we issued a Promissory Note in the principal amount of $192,000 in favor of the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic
Development. The principal amount under the Promissory Note does not accrue any interest, other than default interest that
begins to accrue upon the failure to pay any amount due under the Promissory Note. The Promissory Note is due and payable
in one lump sum 84 months after the execution thereof.
|
|
●
|
In October 2012,
we issued a warrant to a former senior lender for 3,388 shares of common stock exercisable at $202.50 per share. The warrant
is exercisable though October 2017.
|
|
●
|
From April through
May 2014, we issued to accredited investors an aggregate of $330,000 in principal amount of debt evidenced by promissory
notes bearing interest at the per annum rate of 8%. In that same month, we also issued to accredited investors (directors)
an aggregate of $500,000 in principal amount of debt evidenced by promissory notes bearing interest at the per annum
rate of 10%.
|
|
●
|
During 2014,
we issued to accredited investors 2,229,702 shares of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock at $1.50 per share and also
issued to such to accredited investors five-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 99,098 shares of our common stock at
a per-share price of $45.00 (since adjusted to $7.41 per share). Our net proceeds after offering costs were approximately
$3,000,000. From December 31, 2014 through February 3, 2015, we issued to accredited investors (i) 9,000 shares of our Series
A Convertible Preferred Stock at $1.50 per share and five-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 400 shares of our common
stock at a per-share price of $45.00 (since adjusted to $7.41 per share) and (ii) 2,065,891 shares of our Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock at $1.15 per share and five-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 91,818 shares of our common
stock at a per-share price of $25.88 (since adjusted to $7.41 per share). Our net proceeds after offering costs were
approximately $2,200,000, including the cancellation of $250,000 in debt held by Michael J. Hanson, one of our directors.
|
|
●
|
In February 2015,
all 2,238,702 issued and outstanding shares of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock were converted into 129,780 shares
of our common stock, while all 2,065,891 outstanding Series B preferred shares converted into 91,818 shares of our common
stock. In addition, we issued 3,323 shares of common stock to the Series A and B Convertible Preferred Stock holders related
to the 8% dividend accrued through the conversion date.
|
|
●
|
On June 3,
2015, we sold an aggregate of 44,030 shares of our Series C Convertible Preferred Stock at $100.00 per share and issued
five-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 446,983 shares of our common stock at a per-share price of $10.83
(since adjusted to $7.41) in a private placement. Total (cash and non-cash) gross proceeds were $4,403,000. Gross
proceeds in the form of cash were $2,951,000. Gross proceeds in the form of promissory notes payable within 150 days
were $950,000. These promissory notes were provided by James L. Davis and Michael J. Hanson, both of whom are our
directors. We also issued 2,000 and 3,020 shares of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock to Mr. Davis and Mr.
Hanson, respectively, in exchange for the cancellation of Company debt in the amount of $200,000 and $302,000
held by them.
|
|
●
|
In connection
with the offer and sale of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, we issued additional shares of our common stock totaling
365,895 to former holders of our Series A and B Preferred Stock (all of which has been converted to common stock), such that
following the issuance of such shares, such holders would have received the same number of shares of our common stock in total
as they would have received upon conversion of the series A and B preferred stock if the conversion price for the series A
and B preferred stock had been the same as the initial conversion price under the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock.
|
|
●
|
Also in
connection with the sale of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock as set forth above, we paid commissions to placement
agents aggregating approximately $752,986 and sold to the placement agents five-year warrants for the purchase of up to
(i) 4,467 shares of common stock at $45.00 per share, (ii) 4,886 shares of common stock at $25.88 per share (3,287 shares
since adjusted to $10.83 per share), (iii) 31,289 shares of common stock at $10.83 per share (10,828 since adjusted to
$7.41 prior to exercise) and (iv) 10,745 shares of common stock at $11.82 per share.
|
|
●
|
In August 2015,
we issued to a vendor 17,776 shares of common stock as part of compensation for six months of investor relations and financial
advisory services. In February 2016, we issued the vendor an additional 20,667 shares of common stock as part of compensation
for another six months of investor relations and financial advisory services.
|
|
●
|
On October 6,
2015, we entered into an Equity Exchange Agreement with Michael J. Hanson, one of our directors, to exchange 17,014 shares
of common stock previously issued to Mr. Hanson for a five-year, fully vested warrant to purchase 33,628 shares of common
stock at an exercise price of $30.38 per share.
|
|
●
|
On October 12,
2015, we entered into a Purchase Agreement with Lincoln Park. As consideration for entering into the Purchase Agreement, we
issued to Lincoln Park 18,519 shares of common stock. Under the Purchase Agreement, we had the right to sell to Lincoln Park,
and Lincoln Park was obligated to purchase, up to $10,000,000 of our common stock, subject to certain limitations, from time
to time, over a 36-month period commencing November 6, 2015, the date the registration statement related to the shares to
be purchase under the Purchase Agreement was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission. During the year
ended December 31, 2015, Lincoln Park purchased 33,930 common shares under the agreement for gross proceeds of $273,000.
On July 2, 2016, we terminated the Purchase Agreement with Lincoln Park.
|
|
●
|
During 2015,
we completed the sale of 115,778 shares of our common stock, pursuant to warrant exercises for total proceeds of approximately
$1,171,000. As consideration for the warrants being exercised on a cash basis, we agreed to issue five-year replacement warrants,
covering 110% of the number of shares purchased upon exercise of the existing warrants. Accordingly, replacement warrants
covering a total of 127,356 shares of our common stock were issued through 2015.
|
|
●
|
On November 25,
2015, we issued an investor a five-year warrant to purchase 7,472 shares of our common stock at $10.83 per share, in consideration
for the investor providing us sales referrals to various banks and credit unions.
|
|
●
|
From January
2016 through June 2016, we received approximately $932,000 related to the exercise of warrants for 128,340 shares of our common
stock. During this same time period, we also issued replacement warrants for 125,175 shares of our common stock upon exercise
of certain of the foregoing warrants with an exercise price of $7.41 per share.
|
|
●
|
On January 29,
2016, we entered into a thirty-day note payable with a private investor for $150,000. In lieu of interest, we agreed to issue
a five-year cashless warrant to purchase 11,111 shares of common stock at $7.41 per share. Additionally, for each 30 days
the principal amount was outstanding, we agreed to issue the note holder an additional warrant for 11,111 shares with the
same terms as described above. On February 28, 2016, a warrant for an additional 11,111 shares was issued. On March 7, 2016,
we repaid the note. On the same day, the note holder exercised the warrants for the 22,223 shares associated with the note
for total proceeds of $164,500. As consideration for the warrants being exercised on a cash basis, we agreed to issue
a five-year replacement warrant, covering 50% of the number of shares purchased upon exercise of the existing warrants, or
11,111 shares at an exercise price of $7.41 per share.
|
|
●
|
In February 2016,
we entered into a thirty-day note payable with James L. Davis for $150,000 and Michael J. Hanson for $75,000. Under the note
agreements, in lieu of interest, we agreed to issue five-year cashless warrants to purchase 11,111 and 5,556 shares of common
stock at $7.41 per share to Messrs. Davis and Hanson, respectively. Additionally, for each 30 days the principal amount was
outstanding, we issued the note holders an additional 11,111 and 5,556 warrants respectively, with the same terms as described
above. On March 29, 2016, both notes were amended to change the due dates of the principal amounts owed to January 11 and
January 31, 2017. As of December 31, 2016, Messrs. Davis and Hanson had received warrants for a total of 133,336 and 61,116
shares, respectively. On January 24, 2017, we and Messrs. Davis and Hanson agreed to consolidate the outstanding principal
under these notes into new notes described below.
|
|
●
|
In March 2016,
we issued a lender a warrant for 3,333 shares of our common stock exercisable at $7.83 per share in connection with an extension
of the loan. The warrant is exercisable for five years. In May 2016, we issued the lender an additional warrant for 3,333
shares of our common stock exercisable at $8.33 per share for an additional extension of the loan.
|
|
●
|
In March 2016,
an investor converted 500 shares of our Series C Convertible Preferred Stock at the then-conversion price of $7.41 per share,
as well as received credit for all unpaid cumulative dividends earned through the date of conversion. The investor received
a total of 7,289 shares of common stock.
|
|
●
|
On April 8, 2016,
we completed a sale of an aggregate of 163,484 shares of our common stock at $8.33 per share and issued five-year warrants
to purchase an aggregate of 81,742 shares of our common stock at a per-share price of $10.35. In connection with the offering,
we paid our placement agent, Scarsdale Equities LLC a commission equal to up to 6% of the gross proceeds from the sale of
the securities, and issued to the placement agent five-year warrants for the purchase of up to 4,905 shares of common stock
at $10.35.
|
|
●
|
On May 9, 2016,
we entered into a Promissory Note for the principal amount of $226,650 with Mr. Davis. The promissory note accrues
interest at the per annum rate of 10% and is payable in six monthly installments of $38,650 each, which includes interest.
As an additional inducement to Mr. Davis to advance the amounts under the promissory note, we issued to Mr. Davis a warrant
to acquire 15,110 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $6.08 per share. On May 24, 2016, we amended the warrant
to increase the exercise price of the warrant to $7.41 per share.
|
|
●
|
On May 9 and
10, 2016, we entered into two Demand Promissory Notes in the principal amount of $250,000 each with Mr. Davis. Each promissory
note accrues interest at the per annum rate of 10% and is payable upon the written demand of Mr. Davis. As an additional inducement
to Mr. Davis to advance the amounts under each promissory note, we issued to Mr. Davis, under each promissory note, a warrant
to acquire 3,333 shares of our common stock for each week the applicable note is outstanding. The warrants under the May 9th
promissory note has an exercise price of $6.08 per share and the warrants under the May 10th promissory note has an
exercise price of $5.63 per share. If a promissory note is outstanding for more than 30 days, the amount of warrants
is increased from 3,333 to 4,445 shares per week. On May 24, 2016, we amended each warrant to increase the exercise price
of the warrant to $7.41 per share.
|
|
●
|
On May 25, 2016,
the Company borrowed $200,000 from Mr. Davis and issued to Mr. Davis a demand promissory note in the principal amount of $200,000.
The note did not bear interest and was payable on demand of Mr. Davis. The Company repaid this note in full on June 6, 2016.
|
|
●
|
On June 1, 2016,
we issued to Columbus Capital convertible notes, due June 1, 2017, in an aggregate principal amount of $1,052,632 and
warrants to purchase 113,799 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustments, in exchange for an aggregate purchase price
of $1,000,000 paid in cash. The Columbus Capital notes are unsecured, do not bear any interest and are payable in full
on June 1, 2017.
|
|
●
|
On June 9, 2016,
we agreed to issue to each of Old Main Capital, LLC, River North Equity, LLC, Kodiak Capital Group, LLC, and DiamondRock,
LLC a convertible note in the principal amount of up to $450,000 and a warrant to purchase up to 33,333 shares of our common
stock, subject to adjustments, in exchange for an aggregate purchase price of $375,000, payable by each investor in
two tranches. On June 9, 2016 each investor funded the first tranche of this investment, an amount equal to $250,000 of the
purchase price in cash, except Old Main Capital funded $225,000 in cash since Old Main Capital was entitled to deduct $25,000
of the proceeds for legal expenses of the investors (which we funded). The first tranche represents two-thirds of the entire
investment. We repaid the first tranche in full on December 9, 2016.
|
|
●
|
On July 1, 2016,
in connection with a mutual termination and release agreement that we entered into with Lincoln Park on the same date, we
issued to Lincoln Park warrants to purchase up to 66,667 shares of our common stock, which warrants are immediately exercisable
at an exercise price of $9.00 per share for five years from July 1, 2016.
|
|
●
|
On July 13, 2016,
we issued to James L. Davis, our director, a convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $360,000 and a
warrant to purchase up to 13,333 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustments, in exchange for an aggregate purchase
price of $300,000, paid by Mr. Davis in cash. On January 24, 2017, we and Mr. Davis agreed to consolidate the outstanding
principal under the convertible promissory note into a new note described below.
|
|
●
|
On July 14, 2016,
we issued to Michael J. Hanson, our director, a convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $240,000 and
a warrant to purchase up to 8,889 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustments, in exchange for an aggregate purchase
price of $200,000, paid by Mr. Hanson in cash. On January 24, 2017, we and Mr. Hanson agreed to consolidate the outstanding
principal under the convertible promissory note into a new note described below.
|
|
●
|
On July 16, 2016,
we granted to Ruth Owades, our director, an option to purchase 5,333 shares of our common stock. The option grant was made
under our 2016 Stock Incentive Plan. The option is exercisable at a per-share exercise price equal to $7.65 per share. One-third
of the option grant was deemed to have vested on June 28, 2016 (being the date on which Ms. Owades joined our Board of Directors)
and one-third of the option grant will vest on each of the first and second anniversary of such date, so long as Ms. Owades
is serving as a director on such anniversary dates.
|
|
●
|
On August 11,
2016, we issued to Columbus Capital convertible notes in an aggregate principal amount of $526,315 and warrants to
purchase 56,899 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustments, in exchange for an aggregate purchase price of $500,000
paid in cash by Columbus Capital. The notes are unsecured, do not bear any interest and are payable in full on August 11,
2017.
|
|
●
|
On August 12,
2016, we issued to each of Michael J. Hanson and James L. Davis, our directors, a convertible note in a principal amount of $263,158
and warrants to purchase 28,449 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustments, in exchange for a purchase price of $250,000
paid in cash by each such director. Mr. Hanson’s convertible note is unsecured, does not bear any interest and is payable
in full on August 12, 2017. On January 24, 2017, we and Mr. Davis agreed to consolidate the outstanding principal and interest
under his convertible note into a new note described below.
|
|
●
|
On August 17,
2016, we granted to each of Liyuan Woo, James J. Spencer and Robin S. O’Connell, our directors, an option to purchase
5,333 shares of our common stock. The option grants were made under our 2016 Stock Incentive Plan. The options are exercisable
at a per-share exercise price equal to $11.78 per share. One-third of the option grants vested on August 17, 2016 (being the
date on which such individuals joined our Board of Directors) and one-third of the option grants will vest on each of the
first and second anniversary of such date, so long as the individual is serving as a director on such anniversary dates.
|
|
●
|
On both
August 22, 2016 and January 25, 2017, we issued to James L. Davis, our director, a warrant to purchase 16,000 shares of our
common stock, subject to adjustments, with an exercise price of $10.13 per share, subject to adjustments and a warrant to
purchase 28,703 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustments, with an exercise price of the lower of $8.33 or 80% of
the per share price of our common stock in our next underwritten public offering, which we expect will be this offering,
respectively. The warrants are exercisable for a five year period. The warrants were issued to Mr. Davis in consideration for
Mr. Davis having entered into a financial lease with KLC Financial, Inc. in August 2016 and February 2017 to fund the
purchase of certain licenses for our exclusive use and benefit. Pursuant to the financial lease, Mr. Davis is obligated to
pay to KLC Financial, Inc. the sum of $238,950, together with all accrued interest thereon, in six monthly installments
of $40,983 each, which includes interest and equates to an imputed interest rate of 13.875% per annum. To ensure that
Mr. Davis is kept whole from this arrangement, on both August 22, 2016 and January 25, 2017 we entered into an unsecured
promissory note with Mr. Davis, pursuant to which we are obligated to pay to Mr. Davis the same amounts payable by Mr. Davis
under the financial lease with KLC Financial, Inc. on substantially the same terms.
|
|
●
|
On September
15, 2016, we issued to James L. Davis (i) 33,739 shares of our common stock upon the exercise of outstanding warrants, in
consideration for $250,000 in aggregate exercise proceeds, and (ii) replacement warrants to purchase 37,113 shares of our
common stock at an exercise price of $7.41 per share.
|
|
●
|
On September
15, 2016, we issued to FLMM Ltd. (i) 20,243 shares of our common stock upon the exercise of outstanding warrants, in consideration
for $150,003 in aggregate exercise proceeds, and (ii) replacement warrants to purchase 22,268 shares of our common stock at
an exercise price of $7.41 per share.
|
|
●
|
On September
15, 2016, we issued to Jon D. & Linda W. Gruber Trust (i) 36,279 shares of our common stock upon the exercise of outstanding
warrants, in consideration for $268,578 in aggregate exercise proceeds, and (ii) replacement warrants to purchase 39,907 shares
of our common stock at an exercise price of $7.41 per share.
|
|
●
|
On September
15, 2016, we issued to Alice Ann Corporation and Robert G. Allison convertible notes in an aggregate principal amount of $100,000
and warrants to purchase 10,812 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustments, in exchange for an aggregate purchase
price of $95,000 paid in cash by Alice Ann Corporation and Robert G. Allison. The notes are unsecured, do not bear
any interest and are payable in full on September 15, 2017.
|
|
●
|
On September
19, 2016, we issued to Scarsdale Equities LLC five-year warrants to purchase 12,797 shares of our common stock at an exercise
price of $7.41 per share. The warrants were issued to Scarsdale Equities LLC in consideration for Scarsdale Equities LLC’s
advisory services to us in connection with obtaining certain modifications to our securities.
|
|
●
|
On September
28, 2016, we issued to an investor 538 shares of our common stock in connection with the exercise by such investor of a warrant
to purchase common stock that we previously issued to such investor. In connection with such exercise, we received from the
investor exercise proceeds of $3,983 in the aggregate.
|
|
●
|
Between October
21, 2016 and January 26, 2017, we issued to certain investors convertible notes in an aggregate principal amount of $8,136,842
and warrants to purchase 977,407 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustments, in exchange for a purchase price of
$7,730,000 paid in cash by each such investor. The notes are unsecured, do not bear any interest and are payable in full one
year from each issuance date.
|
|
●
|
In connection
with our offerings of convertible notes and warrants, which closed on January 4, 2017, January 13, 2017, and January 17, 2017,
we issued to Lake Street Capital Markets, LLC five-year warrants to purchase 10,727 shares. The warrants have an exercise
price equal to the lower of $8.33 per share or 80% of the per share sale price of our common stock in our next underwritten
public offering, which we expect will be this offering.
|
|
●
|
On November 16,
2016, we entered into an unsecured promissory note with James L. Davis, one of our directors, pursuant to which we are obligated
to pay to Mr. Davis the sum of $250,000, together with all accrued interest thereon, in six monthly installments of $42,101
each, which includes interest and equates to an imputed interest rate of 5% per annum. As an additional inducement to Mr.
Davis to advance amounts under the note, we also issued to Mr. Davis a warrant to purchase 30,365 shares of our common stock,
subject to adjustments. The warrants issued to Mr. Davis have an exercise price of $7.41 per share, subject to adjustments,
and are exercisable for a five-year period.
|
|
●
|
In December 2016,
we issued to shareholders who had invested in our March and April of 2016 private placement an additional 26,249 shares of
common stock in settlement of the anti-dilution provision provided for in the relevant agreements.
|
|
●
|
On December 12,
2016, we issued to FirstFire Global Opportunities Fund, LLC a convertible promissory note with an aggregate principal balance
of $550,000 and a warrant to purchase up to 59,407 shares of our common stock at an exercise price equal to the conversion
price of the convertible promissory note, subject to adjustment. The convertible promissory note is unsecured, bears an interest
rate of 5% per annum and is due June 12, 2017. Prior to an event of default, amounts funded under the note are convertible
into shares of our common stock, at a price equal to the lowest of $8.33 per share or a price per share equal to 80% of the
price in our next underwritten public offering.
|
|
●
|
On December 20,
2016, we entered into a settlement agreement with Trooien Capital, LLC related to convertible promissory notes issued to Trooien
Capital, LLC in 2013. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, we issued a warrant to Trooien Capital, LLC to purchase 333,333
shares of our common stock at the lower of $8.33 per share and 80% of our per share price in the next underwritten public
offering.
|
|
●
|
On December 22,
2016, we issued to Jon D and Linda W Gruber Trust a convertible term promissory note in the amount of $75,000 which bears
an interest rate of 8% per annum and is due March 22, 2017.
|
|
●
|
On December 23,
2016, we issued to FLMM Ltd. a convertible term promissory note in the amount of $1,440,000 which bears an interest rate of
8% per annum and is due March 15, 2017.
|
|
●
|
On December 22,
2016, we issued to James L. Davis, one of our directors, a convertible term promissory note in the amount of $50,000 which
bore an interest rate of 8% per annum and was due March 22, 2017. On January 24, 2017, we and Mr. Davis agreed to consolidate
the outstanding principal and interest under the convertible promissory note into a new note described below.
|
|
●
|
On December 22,
2016, we issued to Michael J. Hanson, one of our directors, a convertible term promissory note in the amount of $85,000 which
bore an interest rate of 8% per annum and was due March 22, 2017. On January 24, 2017, we and Mr. Hanson agreed to consolidate
the outstanding principal and interest under the convertible promissory note into a new note described below.
|
|
●
|
On January 5,
2017, we issued to Vista Partners $120,000 convertible bridge note and warrants to purchase 12,973 shares of our common under
the same terms as the October Private Placement. The note and warrants were issued to Vista Partners in consideration for
Vista Partners’ investor relations and financial advisory services.
|
|
●
|
On January 24,
2017, we entered into an amended and restated promissory note with James L. Davis, one of our directors, pursuant to which
we and Mr. Davis agreed to consolidate certain debt due to Mr. Davis totaling $896,243, including accrued but unpaid interest
thereon, into a single note due April 30, 2018. The note is unsecured and bears interest at a rate of 7% per annum, with all
principal and accrued interest due and payable at the close of business on April 30, 2018.
|
|
●
|
On January 24,
2017, we entered into an amended and restated promissory note with Michael J. Hanson, one of our directors, pursuant to which
we and Mr. Hanson agreed to consolidate certain debt due to Mr. Hanson totaling $1,973,735, including accrued but unpaid interest
thereon, into a single note, due April 30, 2018. The note is unsecured and bears interest at a rate of 8% per annum with all
principal and accrued interest due and payable at the close of business on April 30, 2018.
|
|
●
|
On January 24,
2017, we and a holder of notes payable, due October 2016, agreed to a settlement to repay the principal and accrued but unpaid
interest due under the notes. Pursuant to the settlement, we agreed to pay $80,000 cash and issue to the holder of the notes
6,667 restricted shares of our common stock, and we satisfied these terms on January 25, 2017.
|
These
offerings were made in reliance on the exemptions from registration provided by Sections 4(a)(2) or 4(a)(5) of the Securities
Act and/or Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act, primarily due to the fact that the sales were made to investors
who represented to the Company that they were, or whom the Company determined qualified as, “accredited investors,”
as defined under Rule 501(a) of Regulation D under the Securities Act. In addition, each investor to whom a certificated instrument
was issued received such instrument with
a prominent restrictive
legend thereon.
ITEM
16. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)
Exhibits. The exhibits listed below are filed as a part of this registration statement.
Exhibit
No.
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
Form
of Underwriting Agreement
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
Agreement
and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated January 14, 2014, by and among the Company, Cachet Acquisition Co. and Cachet
Financial Solutions Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
on January 21, 2014)
|
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
Amendment
No. 1 to Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated February 11, 2014, by and among the Company, Cachet Acquisition
Co. and Cachet Financial Solutions Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on February 12, 2014)
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
Asset
Purchase Agreement, dated March 4, 2014, by and between the Company and DeviceFidelity, Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 5, 2014)
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on March 18, 2014 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on February 14, 2014)
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
Certificate
of Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware
on July 25, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July
26, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
Series
C Convertible Preferred Stock Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations, dated June 3, 2015 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on July 27, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
Bylaws,
adopted February 11, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed
on February 14, 2014)
|
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
Form of Certificate
of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
Form
of Underwriter Warrant
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Opinion
of Dorsey & Whitney LLP
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
2010
Equity Incentive Plan, effective February 9, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on February 12, 2014)
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
Warrant
to Purchase Common Stock, dated October 26, 2012, issued by Cachet Financial Solutions Inc. to Michaelson Partners, LLC (f/k/a
Imperium Special Finance Fund, L.P.) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on February 12, 2014)
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
Term
Note, effective December 14, 2012, made by The Margaret De Jong Trust in favor of the Company (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 19, 2014)
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
Loan
and Security Agreement, dated December 12, 2013, by and between the Company and Trooien Capital (together with form of promissory
note) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 12, 2014)
|
10.5
|
|
|
Form
of Assignment and Assumption of Employment Agreement, dated February 11, 2014, by and among Cachet Financial Solutions Inc.,
the Company and the executive officer party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on February 12, 2014)
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
2014
Stock Incentive Plan, effective February 11, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on February 12, 2014)
|
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
Loan
and Security Agreement, dated March 4, 2014, by and among the Company, Cachet Financial Solutions Inc. and Michael J. Hanson
(together with form of promissory note) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on March 5, 2014)
|
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
Executive
Employment Agreement, dated April 1, 2014, by and between Cachet Financial Solutions Inc. and Jeffrey C. Mack (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 20, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
Executive
Employment Agreement, dated April 1, 2014, by and between Cachet Financial Solutions Inc. and Lawrence C. Blaney (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 20, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
|
Amendment
No. 1 to Loan and Security Agreement, dated May 1, 2014, by and between the Company and Trooien Capital (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 7, 2014)
|
|
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
|
Revolving
Line of Credit Note, dated May 7, 2014, issued by the Company and Cachet Financial Solutions Inc. in favor of Michael J. Hanson
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 7, 2014)
|
|
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
|
Letter
Amendment to Promissory Notes, dated May 12, 2014, by and among Cachet Financial Solutions Inc., the Company and Trooien Capital
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Company’s Amended Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed on June
2, 2014)
|
|
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
|
Demand
Promissory Note, dated June 11, 2014, issued by Cachet Financial Solutions Inc. in favor of Michael J. Hanson (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 20, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
|
Demand
Promissory Note, dated June 11, 2014, issued by Cachet Financial Solutions Inc. in favor of James L. Davis (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 20, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
|
Conversion
Agreement, dated June 18, 2014, by and among the Company, Cachet Financial Solutions Inc., Trooien Capital, LLC, Michael J.
Hanson and James L. Davis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Amended Registration Statement
on Form S-1/A filed on June 23, 2014)
|
|
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
|
Letter
Agreement, dated June 24, 2014, by and among the Company, Cachet Financial Solutions Inc., James L. Davis and Michael J. Hanson
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on June 25, 2014)
|
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
|
Demand
Promissory Note, dated June 25, 2014, issued by Cachet Financial Solutions Inc. in favor of Michael J. Hanson (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 20, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
|
Demand
Promissory Note, dated June 26, 2014, issued by Cachet Financial Solutions Inc. in favor of James L. Davis (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 20, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
|
Commitment
Letter, dated July 30, 2014, by and among the Company, Michael J. Hanson and James L. Davis (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 6, 2014)
|
|
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
|
2014
Associate Stock Purchase Plan, effective September 1, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s
Periodic Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 2014)
|
|
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement, dated September 19, 2014, by and among the Company and certain purchasers (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 22, 2014)
|
10.22
|
|
|
Form
of Warrant to Purchase Common Stock, to be issued by the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 22, 2014)
|
|
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
|
Amendment
to Conversion Agreement, dated December 15, 2014, by and among the Company, Cachet Financial Solutions Inc., Michael J. Hanson
and James L. Davis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December
19, 2014)
|
|
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
|
Amendment
to Term Note effective December 16, 2014 by and among The Margaret De Jonge Trust and the Company (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 19, 2014)
|
|
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
|
Form
of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Directors Outside the 2014 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 19, 2014)
|
|
|
|
|
10.26
|
|
|
Form
of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement For Employees Outside the 2014 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 19, 2014)
|
|
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
|
Executive
Employment Agreement, dated January 5, 2015, by and between Cachet Financial Solutions Inc. and Bruce Whitmore (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 7, 2015)
|
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
|
Guaranty,
dated February 3, 2015, by and between the Company and James L. Davis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 20, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.29
|
|
|
Warrant
to Purchase Common Stock, dated February 11, 2015, issued by the Company to James L. Davis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.8 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 20, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.30
|
|
|
Agreement,
dated February 3, 2015, by and between the Company and Michael J. Hanson (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 9, 2015)
|
|
|
|
|
10.31
|
|
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement, dated February 3, 2015, by and among the Company and certain purchasers (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 4, 2015)
|
|
|
|
|
10.32
|
|
|
Lease
Agreement, dated February 11, 2015, by and between the Company and James L. Davis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 20, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
|
Addendum
#1 to Commitment Letter, dated February 16, 2015, by and among the Company, Michael J. Hanson and James L. Davis (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 18, 2015)
|
|
|
|
|
10.34
|
|
|
Demand
Promissory Note, dated March 18, 2015, issued by Cachet Financial Solutions Inc. in favor of Michael J. Hanson (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 20, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.35
|
|
|
Demand
Promissory Note, dated March 23, 2015, issued by Cachet Financial Solutions Inc. in favor of James L. Davis (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 20, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.36
|
|
|
Amendment
#2 to Term Note effective May 4, 2015 by and among The Margaret De Jonge Trust and the Company (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 15, 2015)
|
|
|
|
|
10.37
|
|
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement, dated June 3, 2015, by and among the Company and certain purchasers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 5, 2015)
|
|
|
|
|
10.38
|
|
|
Warrant
to Purchase Common Stock, dated June 29, 2015, issued by the Company in favor of James L. Davis (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 20, 2016)
|
10.39
|
|
|
Letter
Agreement #1 Amending Revolving Line of Credit Note, dated July 31, 2015, by and between the Company and Michael J. Hanson
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 12, 2015)
|
|
|
|
|
10.40
|
|
|
Equity
Exchange Agreement, dated October 6, 2015, by and among the Company, Cachet Financial Solutions Inc. and Michael J. Hanson
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 8, 2015)
|
|
|
|
|
10.41
|
|
|
Purchase
Agreement, dated October 12, 2015, by and between the Company and Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 14, 2015)
|
|
|
|
|
10.42
|
|
|
Registration
Rights Agreement, dated October 12, 2015, by and between the Company and Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 14, 2015)
|
|
|
|
|
10.43
|
|
|
Addendum
#2 to Commitment Letter, dated October 23, 2015, by and among the Company, Michael J. Hanson and James L. Davis (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 30, 2015)
|
|
|
|
|
10.44
|
|
|
Amendment
#3 to Term Note effective November 2, 2015 by and among The Margaret De Jonge Trust and the Company (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 2, 2015)
|
|
|
|
|
10.45
|
|
|
Demand
Promissory Note, dated December 22, 2015, issued by Cachet Financial Solutions Inc. in favor of Michael J. Hanson (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 20, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.46
|
|
|
Demand
Promissory Note, dated February 1, 2016, issued by Cachet Financial Solutions Inc. in favor of James L. Davis (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 14, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.47
|
|
|
Demand
Promissory Note, dated February 11, 2016, by and between the Company and Michael J. Hanson (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.18 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 14, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.48
|
|
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement, dated February 24, 2016, by and among the Company and certain purchasers (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 14, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.49
|
|
|
Addendum
#3 to Commitment Letter, dated February 24, 2016, by and between the Company and Michael J. Hanson (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 14, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.50
|
|
|
Letter
Agreement #2 Amending Revolving Line of Credit Note, dated February 24, 2016, by and between the Company and Michael J. Hanson
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 14, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.51
|
|
|
Letter
Agreement Re: Amendment #1 to Demand Promissory Note, dated March 29, 2016, by and between the Company and James L. Davis
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 14, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.52
|
|
|
Letter
Agreement Re: Amendment #1 to Demand Promissory Note, dated March 29, 2016, by and between the Company and Michael J. Hanson
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 14, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.53
|
|
|
Demand
Promissory Note, dated May 9, 2016, issued by the Company to James L. Davis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 12, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.54
|
|
|
Demand
Promissory Note, dated May 10, 2016, issued by the Company to James L. Davis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 12, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.55
|
|
|
Demand
Promissory Note, dated May 25, 2016, issued by the Company in favor of James L. Davis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 20, 2016)
|
10.56
|
|
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement, dated June 1, 2016, by and among the Company, Columbus Capital Partners L.P. and Columbus Capital QP Partners,
L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 7, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.57
|
|
|
2016
Stock Incentive Plan, effective June 2, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Annex C to the Company’s Preliminary Proxy
Statement on Schedule 14A filed on June 3, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.58
|
|
|
Form
of Securities Purchase Agreement, dated June 9, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on June 15, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.59
|
|
|
Letter
Agreement #3 Amending Revolving Line of Credit Note, dated June 30, 2016, by and between the Company and Michael J. Hanson
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 15, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.60
|
|
|
Addendum
#4 to Commitment Letter, dated June 30, 2016, by and between the Company and Michael J. Hanson (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 15, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.61
|
|
|
Addendum
#1 to Demand Promissory Note, dated June 30, 2016, by and between Cachet Financial Solutions Inc. and Michael J. Hanson (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 15, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.62
|
|
|
Mutual
Termination and Release Agreement, dated July 1, 2016, by and between the Company and Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 1, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.63
|
|
|
Prepaid
Card Marketing and Technology Development Agreement, dated July 11, 2016, by and between Cachet Financial Solutions Inc. and
Central Bank of Kansas City (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 10-Q
filed on August 15, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.64
|
|
|
Convertible
Promissory Note, dated July 13, 2016, issued by the Company to James L. Davis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to
the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 15, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.65
|
|
|
Convertible
Promissory Note, dated July 14, 2016, issued by the Company to Michael J. Hanson (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 15, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.66
|
|
|
Warrant,
dated July 13, 2016, issued by the Company to James L. Davis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 15, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.67
|
|
|
Warrant,
dated July 14, 2016, issued by the Company to Michael J. Hanson (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 15, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.68
|
|
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement, dated August 11, 2016, by and among the Company, Columbus Capital Partners L.P. and Columbus Capital QP
Partners, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August
16, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.69
|
|
|
Convertible
Term Promissory Note, dated August 11, 2016, issued by the Company to Columbus Capital Partners L.P. (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 16, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.70
|
|
|
Convertible
Term Promissory Note, dated August 11, 2016, issued by the Company to Columbus Capital QP Partners L.P. (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 16, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.71
|
|
|
Warrant
to Purchase Common Stock, dated August 11, 2016, issued by the Company to Columbus Capital Partners L.P. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 16, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.72
|
|
|
Warrant
to Purchase Common Stock, dated August 11, 2016, issued by the Company to Columbus Capital QP Partners L.P. (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 16, 2016)
|
10.73
|
|
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement, dated August 12, 2016, by and among the Company, Michael J. Hanson and James L. Davis (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 16, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.74
|
|
|
Convertible
Term Promissory Note, dated August 12, 2016, issued by the Company to Michael J. Hanson (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.7 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 16, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.75
|
|
|
Convertible
Term Promissory Note, dated August 12, 2016, issued by the Company to James L. Davis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.8 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 16, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.76
|
|
|
Warrant
to Purchase Common Stock, dated August 12, 2016, issued by the Company to Michael J. Hanson (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 16, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.77
|
|
|
Warrant
to Purchase Common Stock, dated August 12, 2016, issued by the Company to James L. Davis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.10 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 16, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.78
|
|
|
Promissory
Note, dated August 22, 2016, issued by the Company to James L. Davis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 26, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.79
|
|
|
Warrant
to Purchase Common Stock, dated August 22, 2016, issued by the Company to James L. Davis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 26, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.80
|
|
|
Warrant
to Purchase Common Stock, dated September 15, 2016, issued by the Company to James L. Davis (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 16, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.81
|
|
|
Warrant
to Purchase Common Stock, dated September 15, 2016, issued by the Company to FLMM Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 16, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.82
|
|
|
Warrant
to Purchase Common Stock, dated September 15, 2016, issued by the Company to Jon D. & Linda W. Gruber Trust (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 16, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.83
|
|
|
Warrant
to Purchase Common Stock, dated September 19, 2016, issued by the Company to Scarsdale Equities LLC (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 19, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.84
|
|
|
Promissory
Note, dated November 16, 2016, issued by the Company to James L. Davis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 22, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.85
|
|
|
Warrant
to Purchase Common Stock, dated November 16, 2016, issued by the Company to James L. Davis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 22, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.86
|
|
|
Form
of Securities Purchase Agreement dated December 12, 2016 (together with form of registration rights agreement, promissory
note and warrant) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December
27, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.87
|
|
|
Settlement
Agreement and Full Release, dated as of December 20, 2016, by and between Cachet Financial Solutions, Inc. and Trooien Capital,
LLC (together with warrant agreement) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on December 27, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.88
|
|
|
Loan
Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2016, by and among the Company and Jon D and Linda W Gruber Trust (together with warrant
agreement) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December
27, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.89
|
|
|
Loan
Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2016, by and among the Company and FLMM Ltd (together with warrant agreement) (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 27, 2016)
|
10.90
|
|
|
Loan
Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2016, by and among the Company and James L. Davis (together with warrant agreement) (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 20, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.91
|
|
|
Loan
Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2016, by and among the Company and Michael J. Hanson (together with warrant agreement)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 27, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.92
|
|
|
Demand
Promissory Note, dated December 29, 2016, by and among Cachet Financial Solutions, Inc. and Davis & Associates, Inc. (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 5, 2017)
|
|
|
|
|
10.93
|
|
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement, dated October 21, 2016, November 3, 2016, November 16, 2016, December 5, 2016, December 12, 2016, December
16, 2016, December 22, 2016 and January 4, 2017, by and among the Company and the investors party thereto (includes a form
of convertible promissory note and a form of warrant to purchase common stock) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 5, 2017)
|
|
|
|
|
10.94
|
|
|
Addendum
to Agreement, dated as of January 5, 2017 by and among Cachet Financial Solutions, Inc. and Vista Partners, LLC (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 11, 2017)
|
|
|
|
|
10.95
|
|
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement, dated October 21, 2016, by and among the Company and the investors
party thereto (as updated to reflect the sale of additional securities) (includes a form
of convertible promissory note and a form of warrant to purchase common stock) (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
on January 19, 2017)
|
|
|
|
|
10.96
|
|
|
Amended
and Restated Promissory Note, dated as of January 24, 2017, by and between the Company
and James L. Davis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 30, 2017)
|
|
|
|
|
10.97
|
|
|
Amended
and Restated Promissory Note, dated as of January 24, 2017, by and between the Company
and Michael J. Hanson (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 30, 2017)
|
|
|
|
|
10.98
|
|
|
Promissory
Note, dated January 25, 2017, issued by the Company to James L. Davis (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
January 30, 2017)
|
|
|
|
|
10.99
|
|
|
Warrant
to Purchase Common Stock, dated January 25, 2017, issued by the Company to James L. Davis
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form
8-K filed on January 30, 2017)
|
|
|
|
|
10.100
|
|
|
Employment
Agreement with Bryan D. Meier, dated February 21, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.75 to the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 24, 2017)
|
|
|
|
|
10.101
|
|
|
Letter
Agreement, by and between the Company and Michael J. Hanson, dated as of February 22, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.76 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 24, 2017)
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
List
of Subsidiaries (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April
14, 2015)
|
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
|
Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm of Lurie, LLP
|
|
|
|
|
23.2
|
|
|
Consent
of Dorsey & Whitney LLP (included with Exhibit 5)
|
|
|
|
|
24
**
|
|
|
Power
of Attorney
|
|
|
|
|
101.0
|
|
|
Financials
in XBRL Format
|
**
Previously filed
ITEM
17. UNDERTAKINGS
The
undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:
|
(1)
|
That
for purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed
as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the registrant
pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement
as of the time it was declared effective.
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
That,
for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each post-effective amendment that contains a form
of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering
of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Act, the registrant has duly caused this Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Minneapolis, State of Minnesota, on March 7 , 2017.
|
CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
|
/s/
Jeffrey C. Mack
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey
C. Mack
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Act, this Registration Statement has been signed by the following persons in their respective
capacities indicated below.
Name
|
|
|
Title
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Jeffrey C. Mack
|
|
|
Director
(Chairman), Chief Executive Officer and President
|
|
|
March
7
, 2017
|
Jeffrey
C. Mack
|
|
|
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer and Executive Vice President
|
|
|
March
7
, 2017
|
Bryan
D. Meier
|
|
|
(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
March
7
, 2017
|
James
L. Davis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
March
7
, 2017
|
Michael
J. Hanson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
March
7
, 2017
|
Rod
Jardine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
March
7
, 2017
|
Darin
P. McAreavey
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
March
7
, 2017
|
Ruth
Owades
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
March
7
, 2017
|
Liyuan
Woo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
March
7
, 2017
|
James
J. Spencer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
March
7
, 2017
|
Robin
S. O’Connell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*By:
|
/s/
Jeffrey C. Mack
|
|
Name:
|
Jeffrey
C. Mack
|
|
Title:
|
Attorney-in-fact
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
March 7
,
2017
|
|
Cachet Financial Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ:CAFND)
Historical Stock Chart
From Aug 2024 to Sep 2024
Cachet Financial Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ:CAFND)
Historical Stock Chart
From Sep 2023 to Sep 2024