Lightwave Logic Inc (LWLG) News

Absolutely true, Vein. When you compare LWLG to Lm, you see that Lm has all the things LWLG does not: strategic partnerships, market buzz, third party investments, massive capital raises. LWLG has been dicking around for over twenty years, moving from one incompetent leadership team to the next, with only a handful of patents and zero revenue and customers to show for it. I wrote many years ago on this board that my biggest concern was that, unless we had better management, we would get beaten to the market by a nimbler and better managed and funded company, probably with inferior technology. That reality is playing out now. 

The fantasists on this board will claim that if only LWLG weren't bound by dozens of super top secret dome of silence NDAs, we'd all know the truth. Well, as Reanimator pointed out, quite correctly, Lm as well as other tech companies seem to have no such restrictions on publicizing customers, strategic partnerships etc. So, given the invisibility of LWLG to the market (except for shorts, of course) and the complete absence of news, deals, customers, strategic partnerships, analysts, revenue protections, third party investments, I think we have to take the occam's razor view of LWLG: that it is a struggling irrelevancy in the investment and technology worlds. 

Do you want to know what is Brutal, your constant crying and whining.

Hello whining copymachine with no news, i'm shocked, brutal, we have been misled, simply painful, when does the pain stop, etc etc, day in day out.

@vein get lost you ridiculous whining copymachine, sell leave this board it is better for you and everyone on this board. If you do not want to shut up with your whining buy a Diary and write it in there so yee what kind of idiot you are.

Vein's comments are all over lwlg Ihub. His constant negative criticism has no end, and will solve nothing but will make any readers of his posts insane. Ignore at your benefit, otherwise it will be a cost. 😅🤪

All I know is they raised 4 billion in last round of financing. Someone believes 

Lightmatter, a company focused on developing photonic chips for artificial intelligence, claims several advantages over traditional electronic processors:  

1. Speed: Lightmatter claims its photonic chips are 10 times faster than Nvidia's AI processors. This is due to the speed of light, which is significantly faster than the speed of electrons in traditional electronic circuits.  

2. Energy Efficiency: Lightmatter's chips are said to be significantly more energy-efficient than traditional AI processors. This is due to the fact that photons do not lose energy as they travel through a photonic circuit, whereas electrons do lose energy as they travel through an electronic circuit.  

3. Scalability:Photonic chips can be scaled to much higher densities than electronic chips, which means that they can be used to build much more powerful and efficient AI systems.

4. Smaller Size: Photonic chips are smaller and lighter than electronic chips, which makes them ideal for use in mobile devices and other space-constrained applications.

5. Lower Cost: Lightmatter claims that its chips will be less expensive to manufacture than traditional AI processors. This is due to the fact that photonic chips can be manufactured using existing semiconductor manufacturing processes.  

However, it's important to note that Lightmatter is still a relatively young company, and its technology is still in the early stages of development. While the potential benefits of photonic chips are significant, it remains to be seen whether Lightmatter will be able to overcome the technical challenges and bring its technology to market on a large scale.  

Here are some additional points to consider:

Maturity of the Technology: Photonic computing is still a relatively new technology, while traditional electronic computing has been around for decades. This means that there are still many challenges to be overcome before photonic chips can be widely adopted.

Cost of Manufacturing: While Lightmatter claims that its chips will be less expensive to manufacture than traditional AI processors, it is still unclear whether this will be the case in practice.

Power Consumption: While photonic chips are more energy-efficient than traditional electronic chips, they still require a significant amount of power to operate. This could limit their use in some applications.

Compatibility with Existing Hardware and Software: Photonic chips are not compatible with existing electronic hardware and software. This means that new hardware and software will need to be developed in order to take advantage of the benefits of photonic computing.
Overall, Lightmatter's photonic chips have the potential to revolutionize the field of artificial intelligence. However, it is important to be realistic about the challenges that lie ahead.

So bottom line is there nothing too amazing about Lightmatter vein you clown Short! but if you look at their implied market cap and then look at LWLG, and trust me LWLG's technology is going to be FAR MORE VALUABLE then you will begin to understand just how UNDERVALUED LWLG is today!!!

LightMatter is all over cnbc. Their solution seems to solve everything!! 

The shorts covered at the day of the kerrisdale* report or doubled down?

What a dumb point of view you have.

That's what happens when you keep talking about high interest and signing deals for over a year and nothing gets done. Just road shows and podcasts. 🥱🥱🤡🤡

Save it for your conspiracy support group

That close reeked of manipulation to keep it sub $3.

Grifter Shorts Must Return 22 MILLION Borrowed Shares!!!! Then tell me about the PPS, it will be higher than the $20 high set back in 2021!!! Tier 1 deals in progress with Tier 1's on 3 continents!! Shorts hourglass sands of time are waning rapidly!!!

If Shorts think that 109 million Retail Longs are going to capitulate their shares NOW just because they are manipulating the price lower with their low volume high frequency manipulation games, they have an even more serious mental issue than their knuckleheaded continuous stream of bullshit posts here would indicate!! No, instead the 108 million Retail Longs that have been PERFECTLY STEADY here for the LAST 3 YEARS will only GROW in numbers as the manipulation games continue up until the day Lebby drops the first Tier 1 bomb on them, then like all good little cockroaches they will all be scrambling for the EXIT at the same time trying to escape their own annihilation!!

If the Institutions & Shorts are supposed the smart money then you better be buying LWLG hand over fist because these are EXACTLY who has been funding the LWLG Operating Budget these past 3 years, Lewrock put the data together showing that in the last 3 years Retail Investors have remained perfectly steady at 109 million shares ownership, LWLG has been 100% financed on the backs of Institutions & Shorts!!

WAKE ME WHEN 22 MILLION SHORTS HAVE COVERED BEFORE LEBBY INKS THE FIRST OF MANY TIER 1 DEALS!!!!

Never thought I would see the day when the naz would be 19000 and we can't break 3 bucks !! Brutal 

You think Lightwave is involved since their material seems to be able to operate in cryogenic environments eg quantum computing. Like your White House briefing papers.

Nrdc92’s probably been fielding CA calls from Lurker3, and Dice today. Forwarding them to his boss TP.

Shorts tried SUPER-HARD in 3rd Quarter BUT FAILED!!!!!

2,129,159 shares Shorted 3rd_Quarter BUT FAILED TO DROP THE PPS AT ALL!!!!

an additional 2,129,159 shares Shorted in the 3rd quarter with NO NEGATIVE IMPACT TO PPS tells the story that Shorts are OUT OF GAS!!!!! Retail Longs & Institutions are sopping up all the Shorts can muster!!!!! There will NEVER be a volume capitulation!!! Shorts are trapped like the little rats they are!!!!

https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/lwlg/short-interest

The 6/30/24 close was 2.99
The 9/30/24 close was 2.76
The 3 month VWAP was 2.89

Grifter Shorts Must Return 22 MILLION Borrowed Shares!!!! Then tell me about the PPS, it will be higher than the $20 high set back in 2021!!! Tier 1 deals IN PROGRESS ON 3 CONTINENTS WITH BIGGEST TRANSCEIVER COMPANIES IN THE WORL!! Shorts hourglass sands of time are waning rapidly!!!

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175156647&txt2find=timeline

WAKE ME WHEN 22 MILLION SHORTS HAVE COVERED BEFORE LEBBY INKS THE FIRST OF MANY TIER 1 DEALS!!!!

Shorts hourglass sands of time waning before Lebby inks first of many Tier 1 deals!!

If the Institutions & Shorts are supposed the smart money then you better be buying LWLG hand over fist because these are EXACTLY who has been funding the LWLG Operating Budget these past 3 years, Lewrock put the data together showing that in the last 3 years Retail Investors have remained perfectly steady at 109 million shares ownership, LWLG has been 100% financed on the backs of Institutions & Shorts!!

3rd Quarter----> Retail & Institutions INCREASED BUYING!!!! Meanwhile Shorts INCREASED over 10% in the 3rd Quarter alone an Additional 2,129,159 shares!!! The HUGE Increase in 3rd Quarter Shorting had ZERO NEGATIVE EFFECT ON THE PPS!!!!!

LWLG 3rd Quarter Ownership Analysis

Share Ownership (Shares)

Retail_________109.4 Million an INCR of 1.5 Million
Institutions______33.8 Million an INCR of 1.4 Million
Shorts_________(21.7) Million as INCR (2.1) Million

Total___________121.5 Million an INCR 0.7 Million

Share Ownership (Percentages)

Retail_________90%
Institutions_____27%
Shorts________(17%)

Total__________100%

The 3rd Quarter saw the PPS remain FLAT in the 2.80's while Retail and Institutions INCREASED their holdings on the backs of the Shorts who DESPITE Shorting an Additional 2,129,159 shares (an INCREASE to Total Shares Shorted of over 10%) were UNABLE TO LOWER THE PPS!!!

This is 100% proof positive of what I have been posting here,

Grifter Shorts Must Return 22 MILLION Borrowed Shares!!!! Then tell me about the PPS, it will be higher than the $20 high set back in 2021!!! Tier 1 deals in progress with Tier 1's on 3 continents!! Shorts hourglass sands of time are waning rapidly!!!

If Shorts think that 109 million Retail Longs are going to capitulate their shares NOW just because they are manipulating the price lower with their low volume high frequency manipulation games, they have an even more serious mental issue than their knuckleheaded continuous stream of bullshit posts here would indicate!! No, instead the 109 million Retail Longs that have been PERFECTLY STEADY here for the LAST 3 YEARS will only GROW in numbers as the manipulation games continue up until the day Lebby drops the first Tier 1 bomb on them, then like all good little cockroaches they will all be scrambling for the EXIT at the same time trying to escape their own annihilation!!

If the Institutions & Shorts are supposed the smart money then you better be buying LWLG hand over fist because these are EXACTLY who has been funding the LWLG Operating Budget these past 3 years, Lewrock put the data together showing that in the last 3 years Retail Investors have remained perfectly steady at 108 million shares ownership, LWLG has been 100% financed on the backs of Institutions & Shorts!!

WAKE ME WHEN 22 MILLION SHORTS HAVE COVERED BEFORE LEBBY INKS THE FIRST OF MANY TIER 1 DEALS!!!!

Here is link to the website, just scroll along the top and look at the dropdown menus, FAQ's, oh, oh I just looked he has 100 companies under the news tabs as under investigation. Looks like he has been in business for 10 months. That is 10 companies investigated every month for free.

That is right they did it at no cost, nothing could have settled in a year. From the web site, "We understand that the term "litigation" can appear complex, intimidating, and costly. However, the primary concern is the expense involved. We will represent you at NO COST and assist you in regaining control of your valuable investment."

https://www.kuehn.law/

Snow is coming up there this weekend he will no doubt be shoveling snow while doing investigations.

53 Hill Street, Suite 605
Southampton NY

Look at their info
His expertise has been recognized through various speaking engagements, including presenting at the UALR Bowen School of Law’s 2022 Symposium on “SPACs: The New Frontier?”, where he shared insights on emerging issues in securities law and "Stacking the Debt: Consumer Rights in the Financial Market Place" held at the Russell Senate Office Building – U.S. Senate, Washington, DC. Mr. Kuehn is also the author of the article SPAC ATTACK, 45 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 217, discussing developing trends in SPAC litigation.

X Oh Lightwave Logics CEO Lebby's Legal Witness Experience
Over his life look at Lebby's EXPERT WITNESS EXPERIENCE

Understand that Lebby needed to understand the technology and businesses that he spoke for. A mind once stretched does not return to its original dimension.

Look at these players, he knows them all.

Summary:
Depositions (total-to-date) >50
Trial/Hearing/Court appearances >20 (with IPR/PTAB ‘paper trial’, this total increases to >25)
Cited patent litigation case history: In essence, the following case history means that the expert doesn’t
have to disclose every minute detail in his expert report. He is allowed to disclose theories in the report
and expand on them in his witness statement.
See also In The Matter Of Certain Light-Emitting Diode Products, Systems, And Components Thereof,
Inv. No. 337-TA-1168, Order No. 34, 2020 WL 1026335 (Feb. 14, 2020) (denying motion in limine to
preclude testimony where: “[t]he invalidity theories at issue were previously disclosed at least in Dr.
Lebby’s expert report, and LSG had the opportunity to test these theories at Dr. Lebby’s deposition.”)
See case # 81 below

Patent litigation cases engaged:

1. Active case work: 1Q2009 (March 24th 2009); Testimony: US-China Economic and security review commission
on the optoelectronics industry. US Congress, Capitol Hill; Written statement on the status of the USA
optoelectronics industry with aural cross-examination by the commission. Trial experience.
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 0)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 1 (Cumulative total: 1)
c. Technology: Optoelectronics (optical storage, fiber optic communications, sensors, high power lasers,
LED lighting, LED luminaires etc.).

2. Active case work: 3Q2010-1Q2011; Finisar Corp. v. Optical Communication Products Inc., No. 10-CV-05617
and No. 11-cv-00104 (retained by plaintiff - Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP).
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 0)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 1)
c. Technology: semiconductor lasers/VCSELs, fiber optic transceiver modules

3. Active case work: 1Q2011; Ziptronix, Inc. v. OmniVision Technologies, Inc., Taiwan Semiconductor
Manufacturing Company Ltd., and TSMC North America Corp., No. 11-CV-5235 (retained by plaintiff – Alston
Bird LLP).
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 0)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 1)
c. Technology: CMOS image sensors; design and fabrication

4. Active case work: 3Q2011 to 3Q2012; Certain Light-Emitting Diodes and Products Containing Same, Inv. No.
337-TA-798 (USITC filed July 15, 2011) (retained by respondent Samsung – Covington & Burling LLP).
Deposition (x2) and trial experience.
a. Deposition: 3 (Cumulative total: 3)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 1 (Cumulative total: 2)
c. Technology: LEDs, device design, color gamut, packaging, optical lensing, lead frames, surface
mount packaging.

5. Active case work: 3Q2011 to 2Q2015; Cheetah Omni, LLC v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., No. 11-CV-390 (E.D.
Tex. filed July 29, 2011) (retained by plaintiff – Brooks Kushman). Deposition experience (x2).
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 4)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 2)
c. Technology: Fiber optic networks, optical switches, ROADMs and optical filters (dielectric based).

6. Active case work: 4Q2012 to 3Q2014; Finisar Corp. v. Cheetah Omni, LLC, No. 11-CV-15625 (E.D. Mich.
filed Dec. 23, 2011) (retained by defendant – Brooks Kushman). Deposition experience (x1).
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 5)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 2)
c. Technology: Wavelength optical switches, optical filters, and optical components, liquid crystal
technology.

7. Active case work: 4Q2012 to 3Q2013; Certain Optoelectronic Devices for Fiber Optic Communications,
Components Thereof, and Prods. Containing the Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-860 (USITC filed Sept. 24, 2012)
(retained by respondent – Mellanox, IPtronics and FCI Inc and counsel Alston & Bird LLP). Deposition (x2)
and trial experience.
a. Deposition: 2 (Cumulative total: 7)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 1 (Cumulative total: 3)
IPR2023-00475
HKC v. 138 East
Ex. 2001 - Page 086
Page 7
c. Technology: IC design, layout, and operation; especially laser driver chips for VCSELs. High speed
laboratory testing.

8. Active case work: 3Q2014 to 2Q2015; Microscan Sys., Inc. v. Cognex Corp., No. 14-CV-6952 (S.D.N.Y. filed
Aug. 27, 2014) (retained by plaintiff – Morrison & Foerster LLP). Deposition (x1) and trail experience.
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 8)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 1 (Cumulative total: 4)
c. Technology: Bar code scanners and associated optics such as imagers, lasers, LEDs, molded optics.
Laboratory testing.

9. Active case work: 2Q2014 to 1Q2016; Avago Techs. Fiber IP (Singapore) PTE Ltd. v. IPtronics Inc., No. 10-
CV-2863 (N.D. Cal. filed June 29, 2010) (retained by respondent – Alston & Bird LLP).
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 8)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
c. Technology: IC design, layout, and operation; especially laser driver chips for VCSELs. High speed
laboratory testing.

10. Active case work: 1Q2015 to 3Q2015; Regarding certain optical disc drives, Inv. No. 337-TA-897 (USITC filed
Oct. 21, 2013) (retained by respondent – O’Melveny & Myers LLP).
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 8)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
c. Technology: CD, CVD, BluRay optical disk drives, optical components, laser diodes, and optical
beam patterns. Laboratory testing of visible optics.

11. Active case work: 1Q2015 to 2Q2015; BMW of N. Am., LLC v. Innovative Display Techs., LLC, No. IPR2015-
00933, IPR2015-00934 (P.T.A.B. filed Mar. 24, 2015) (retained by plaintiff – Crowell Moring LLP).
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 8)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
c. Technology: LED backlights for vehicles; LED package and optical module/LED luminaire design.

12. Active case work: 1Q2015 to 2Q2015; BMW of N. Am., LLC v. Innovative Display Techs., LLC, No. IPR2015-
00934 (P.T.A.B. filed Mar. 24, 2015) (retained by plaintiff – Crowell Moring LLP).
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 8)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
c. Technology: LED backlights for vehicles; LED package and optical module/luminaire design.

13. Active case work: 1Q2015 to 3Q2016; OneChip Photonics Inc., Pre-litigation IP Case No. TBD; (retained by
plaintiff – Patent Monetization Inc. (PMI)).
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 8)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
c. Technology: Photonic Integrated Circuits using InP (Indium Phosphide); lasers, detectors,
waveguides, mux/demux, spot size converters.

14. Active case work: 2Q2016; IDT v. Hyundai Motor Co., No. 14-CV-201 (E.D. Tex. filed May 4, 2015) (retained
by defendant – DLA Piper LLP).
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 8)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
c. Technology: LED devices, packages and modules/luminaires for vehicles.

15. Active case work: 1Q2015 to 3Q2015; Cree Inc., v. Honeywell Int’l Inc., No. 3:14-CV-737 (W.D. Wisc. filed
Oct. 28, 2014) (retained by defendant - Arnold & Porter LLP). Deposition experience (x1).
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 9)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
c. Technology: LEDs for mobile phones; LED epitaxial layers, device designs, optical lensing,
packaging. Laboratory reverse engineering using TEM/SEM/EDAX etc.

16. Active case work: 2Q2015 to 4Q2015; Trs. of Boston Univ. v. Everlight Elecs. Co., Nos. 12-CV-11935, 12-CV12326, 12-CV-12330 (D. Mass. filed Oct. 17, 2012) (retained by plaintiff - Shore Chan DePumpo LLP).
Deposition (x1) and trial experience.
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 10)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 1 (Cumulative total: 5)
c. Technology: GaN buffer layers for LEDs, and associated technical marketing, sales and import
process into USA.

17. Active case work: 3Q2015 to 3Q2016; LG Elecs. Inc. v. Toshiba Samsung Storage Tech. Corp., No. 12-CV1063 (D. Del. filed Aug. 22, 2012) and IPR2015-01659 (PTAB filed Jul. 31st 2015 (retained by plaintiff – DLA
Piper & Nixon Law). IPR deposition (i.e. trial) experience (x1).
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 11)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 5)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 1)
d. Technology: Optical storage using laser diodes, photodetectors and optical materials

18. Active case work: 3Q2015 to 3Q2016; LG Elecs. Inc. v. Toshiba Samsung Storage Tech. Corp., No. 12-CV1063 (D. Del. filed Aug. 22, 2012) and IPR2015-01642 (PTAB filed Jul. 30th 2015) (retained by plaintiff –
DLA Piper & Nixon Law).
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 11)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 5)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 1)
IPR2023-00475
HKC v. 138 East
Ex. 2001 - Page 087
Page 8
d. Technology: Optical storage using laser diodes, photodetectors and optical materials

19. Active case work: 3Q2015 to 3Q2016; LG Elecs. Inc. v. Toshiba Samsung Storage Tech Corp., IPR2016-01677
(PTAB filed Aug. 24th 2016 (retained by plaintiff – DLA Piper & Nixon Law).
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 11)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 5)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 1)
d. Technology: Optical storage using laser diodes, photodetectors and optical materials

20. Active case work: 3Q2015 to 3Q2016; LG Elecs. Inc. v. Toshiba Samsung Storage Tech. Corp., IPR2015-01678
(PTAB filed Aug. 24th 2016) (retained by plaintiff – DLA Piper & Nixon Law).
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 11)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 5)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 1)
d. Technology: Optical storage using laser diodes, photodetectors and optical materials

21. Active case work: 3Q2015 to 3Q2016; LG Elecs. Inc. v. Toshiba Samsung Storage Tech. Corp., IPR2015-01644
(PTAB filed Jul. 30th 2015) (retained by plaintiff – DLA Piper & Nixon Law).
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 11)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 5)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 1)
d. Technology: Optical storage using laser diodes, photodetectors and optical materials

22. Active case work: 3Q2015 to 3Q2016; LG Elecs. Inc. v. Toshiba Samsung Storage Tech. Corp., IPR2015-01653
(PTAB filed Jul. 31st 2015) (retained by plaintiff – DLA Piper & Nixon Law).
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 11)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 5)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 1)
d. Technology: Optical storage using laser diodes, photodetectors and optical materials

23. Active case work: 3Q2015; Heptagon Pre-litigation IPR petition; (retained by plaintiff – Proskaurer Rose LLP).
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 11)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 5)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 1)
d. Technology: Proximity sensors using LEDs, photodetectors and innovative semiconductor packaging.

24. Active case work: 1Q2016 to 2Q2017; Dentsply v. Am. Orthodontics Inc., No. 15-CV-1706 (D. Pa. filed Sept.
1, 2015) and IPR2016-01652 (PTAB filed Aug. 19th 2016) (retained by defendant – Godfrey Kahn LLP). IPR
deposition (x1) experience.
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 12)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 5)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 2)
d. Technology: High power lasers (YAG, CO2) to engrave and scribe dental orthodontic brackets.

25. Active case work: 2Q2016 to 2Q2017; Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. Elect-tech Int’l (H.K.), No. 14-CV-2737 (N.D.
Cal. filed Aug. 12, 2015) (retained by plaintiff – Reed Smith LLP).
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 12)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 5)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 2)
d. Technology: Trade secret MOCVD epitaxial growth techniques for high power GaN/InGaN LED
technology, luminaires, modules and packaging.

26. Active case work: 2Q2016 to 4Q2016; Bluestone Innovations llc. v. E. Mishan & Co. Inc., Pre-litigation IP Case
No. TBD; (retained by defendant - Notaro, Michalos, & Zaccaria P.C.).
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 12)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 5)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 2)
d. Technology: GaN/InGaN LEDs on structured substrates with reverse engineering laboratory analysis.

27. Active case work: 3Q2016-1Q2017; 511 Innovations Inc. v. HTC Am., Inc., No. 15-CV-1524 (E.D. Tex. Filed
June 30, 2016) (retained by plaintiff – The Davis Firm). Deposition (x2)
a. Deposition: 2 (Cumulative total: 14)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 5)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 2)
d. Technology: Proximity sensors for mobile phones.

28. Active case work: 3Q2016-4Q2016; Mellanox Techs. Ltd. v. Methode Elecs. Inc., No. 15-CV-3730 (N.D. Cal.
filed Aug. 16, 2015) (retained by plaintiff – Alston & Bird).
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 14)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 5)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 2)
d. Technology: Fiber optic transceiver modules.

29. Active case work: 4Q2016-1Q2017; Novanta Inc., v Iradion Inc., No. 15-CV-01033 (D. Del. filed Nov. 9, 2015)
(retained by defendant – Barnes and Thornburg LLP).
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 14)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 5)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 2)
IPR2023-00475
HKC v. 138 East
Ex. 2001 - Page 088
Page 9
d. Technology: High power gas laser design and operation.

30. Active case work: 1Q2017-1Q2017; Optolum Inc., v Cree Inc., No. 16-CV-03828; (D. Az. filed Nov. 3, 2016)
(retained by defendant – Jones Day).
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 14)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 5)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 2)
d. Technology: LED packaging for illumination. LED luminaires.

31. Active case work: 1Q2017-4Q2017; Polygroup Macau Ltd (BVI)., v Willlis Electric Co., Ltd., 15-CV-00552
(W.D. NC. Filed: Apr 21st 2016), (retained by plaintiff - Troutman Sanders LLP). Deposition experience (x2)
a. Deposition: 2 (Cumulative total: 16)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 5)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 3)
d. Technology: Electrical connector, IC, and LED light product design including luminaires.

32. Active case work: 1Q2017-4Q2017; Polygroup Macau Ltd (BVI)., v Willlis Electric Co., Ltd., IPR2017-00309
(PTAB filed Nov. 21st 2017), (retained by plaintiff - Troutman Sanders LLP).
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 16)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 5)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 3)
d. Technology: Electrical connector, IC, and LED light product design including luminaires.

33. Active case work: 1Q2017-4Q2017; Polygroup Macau Ltd (BVI)., v Willlis Electric Co., Ltd., IPR2017-00330
(PTAB filed Nov. 24th 2017), (retained by plaintiff - Troutman Sanders LLP).
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 16)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 5)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 3)
d. Technology: Electrical connector, IC, and LED light product design including luminaires.

34. Active case work: 1Q2017-4Q2017; Polygroup Macau Ltd (BVI)., v Willlis Electric Co., Ltd., IPR2017-00331
(PTAB filed Nov. 24th 2017), (retained by plaintiff - Troutman Sanders LLP).
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 16)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 5)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 3)
d. Technology: Electrical connector, IC, and LED light product design including luminaires.

35. Active case work: 1Q2017-4Q2017; Polygroup Macau Ltd (BVI)., v Willlis Electric Co., Ltd., IPR2017-00332
(PTAB filed Nov. 25th 2017), (retained by plaintiff - Troutman Sanders LLP).
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 16)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 5)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 3)
d. Technology: Electrical connector, IC, and LED light product design including luminaires.

36. Active case work: 1Q2017-4Q2017; Polygroup Macau Ltd (BVI)., v Willlis Electric Co., Ltd., IPR2017-00334
(PTAB filed Nov. 25th 2017), (retained by plaintiff - Troutman Sanders LLP).
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 16)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 5)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 3)
d. Technology: Electrical connector, IC, and LED light product design including luminaires.

37. Active case work: 1Q2017-4Q2017; Polygroup Macau Ltd (BVI)., v Willlis Electric Co., Ltd., IPR2017-00335
(PTAB filed Nov. 25th 2017), (retained by plaintiff - Troutman Sanders LLP).
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 16)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 5)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 3)
d. Technology: Electrical connector, IC, and LED light product design including luminaires.

38. Active case work: 1Q2017-4Q2017; Macom Technology Solutions Holdings Inc., and Nitronex, LLC., v. Infineon
Technologies AG and Infineon Technologies North American Corp., 16-CV-02859 (C.D. Ca. filed Apr 26, 2016)
(retained by plaintiff – Baker Botts LLP).
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 16)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 5)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 3)
d. Technology: High performance GaN based RF FET device design and operation.

39. Active case work: 1Q2017-1Q2017; Quanergy Systems, Inc. v. Velodyne LiDAR, Inc. (16-cv-05251; N.D. Ca.
filed: Sep 13th 2016 (retained by plaintiff Velodyne) - Latham & Watkins LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 16)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 5)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 3)
d. Technology: Laser/photodetector based LIDAR design and operation for self-driving vehicles.

40. Active case work: 1Q2017-2Q2017; The Chamberlain Group Inc., v. Techtronic Industries Co., Ltd, Techtronic
Industries North America et al., Challenge to U.S Patent No. 7,862,209 (retained by plaintiff – The Chamberlain
Group) – Morgan, Lewis & Brockius, LLP.
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 16)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 5)
IPR2023-00475
HKC v. 138 East
Ex. 2001 - Page 089
Page 10
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 3)
d. Technology: LED based luminaire design for lighting.

41. Active case work: 1Q2017-1Q2018; Uber Technologies Inc., Ottomottto LLC., Otto Trucking LLC., v. Waymo
LLC (Google), 17-CV-00939 (N.D. Ca filed: Mar 10th, 2017), (retained by defendant Uber Technologies Inc.) –
Morrison and Foerster LLP. Deposition experience (x3) and trial experience (case settled at trial).
a. Deposition: 3 (Cumulative total: 19)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 1 (Cumulative total: 6)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 3)
d. Technology: Optical and electrical device, optics, and package designs for LIDAR based self-driving
vehicles.

42. Active case work: 2Q2017-2Q2017; Heptagon v. ST Mircoelectronics IPR petition; (retained by plaintiff
Heptagon) – Proskaurer Rose LLP).
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 19)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 3)
d. Technology: Optoelectronic based proximity sensors using LEDs and photodetectors.

43. Active case work: 2Q2017-2Q2018; AT&T Inc., v. Sycamore Holdings LLC., 16-CV-00588 (E. D. Tx filed: Jun
6
th 2016); (retained by defendant AT&T Inc.) - Kirkland and Ellis LLP. Deposition experience (x1)
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 20)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 3)
d. Technology: Coding designs of optical digital signals for high performance optical networks.

44. Active case work: 2Q2017 – 4Q2017; Clearfield Inc., v. CommScope, ADC, Tyco, and TE Connectivity, 17-CV00307 (D.C. Minn. filed Jan 31st 2017); (retained by defendant Clearfield, Inc.) – Pepper Hamilton LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 20)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 3)
d. Technology: Fiber optic connectors, panels, and distribution switches using optoelectronic
components.

45. Active case work: 2Q2017 – 4Q2017; Clearfield Inc., v. CommScope, ADC, Tyco, and TE Connectivity, IPR2017-
02122 (PTAB filed Sep. 15th 2017); (retained by defendant Clearfield, Inc.) – Pepper Hamilton LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 20)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 3)
d. Technology: Fiber optic connectors, panels, and distribution switches using optoelectronic
components.

46. Active case work: 2Q2017 – 4Q2017; Clearfield Inc., v. CommScope, ADC, Tyco, and TE Connectivity, IPR2018-
00003 (PTAB filed Oct. 6th 2017); (retained by defendant Clearfield, Inc.) – Pepper Hamilton LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 20)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 3)
d. Technology: Fiber optic connectors, panels, and distribution switches using optoelectronic
components.

47. Active case work: 2Q2017 – 4Q2017; Clearfield Inc., v. CommScope, ADC, Tyco, and TE Connectivity, IPR2018-
00154 (PTAB filed Nov. 7th 2017); (retained by defendant Clearfield, Inc.) – Pepper Hamilton LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 20)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 3)
d. Technology: Fiber optic connectors, panels, and distribution switches using optoelectronic
components.

48. Active case work: 4Q2016-2Q2017; Antunes Inc., Pre-litigation IP patent review; Case No. TBD; (retained by
plaintiff – Antunes Inc. and Chapman Spingola LLP).
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 20)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 3)
d. Technology: High power grating surface emitter laser diodes, and associated packaging and device
design for laser-based cooking ovens.

49. Active case work: 1Q2017-2Q2017; Core Optical Technologies LLC. v. Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.,
16-CV-00437 (C. D. Ca filed: Mar 7th 2016); (retained by defendant Fujitsu Network Communications) –
Morrison & Foerster LLP.
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 20)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 3)
d. Technology: Fiber optic based optical communications for coherent technologies

50. Active case work: 3Q2017-4Q2018; Oyster Optics LLC v. Coriant America, et al, 16-CV-01302 (E. D. Tx filed:
Nov 24th 2016); (retained by plaintiff Oyster Optics LLC) – Russ August & Kabat LLP.
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 21)
IPR2023-00475
HKC v. 138 East
Ex. 2001 - Page 090
Page 11
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 3)
d. Technology: Fiber optic based optoelectronic semiconductor component design and operation.

51. Active case work: 3Q2017-4Q2018; Oyster Optics LLC v. Infinera, Alcatel-Lucent, Fujitsu, Cisco Systems,
Huawei, 16-CV-01295, 16-CV-01297, 16-CV-01299, 16-CV-01301, 16-CV-01303 (E. D. Tx filed: Nov 24th
2016); (retained by plaintiff Oyster Optics LLC) – Russ August & Kabat LLP. Deposition experience (x1).
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 22)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 3)
d. Technology: Fiber optic based optoelectronic semiconductor component design and operation.
Including both direct detect and coherent communications, and encoding techniques such as PSK,
QPSK, AM, FM etc.

52. Active case work: 3Q2017-4Q2017; Olympus, Pre-litigation IP and Due Diligence; Case No. TBD; (retained by
plaintiff – Olympus and Fish & Richardson P.C.)
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 22)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 3)
d. Technology: High volume, low cost optical lens and optics technology.

53. Active case work: 3Q2017-1Q2018; Honeywell International, Inc et al v. Code Corporation et al., ITC No 337-
TA-1061 (filed Jun 28th 2017), “Certain barcode readers, scan engines, products containing the same, and
components thereof,” (retained by respondent – Honeywell and Alston and Bird LLP
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 23)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 3)
d. Technology: Bar-code scanners and associated optical/optoelectronic component performance and
operation.

54. Active case work: 4Q2017-1Q2019; Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 v. Intel Corp., 17-CV-00676 (filed Sep 29th 2017),
(retained by plaintiff – Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1) - Ropes and Gray, LLP.
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 23)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 3)
d. Technology: Fabrication, design, and reverse engineering of silicon-based FET ICs.

55. Active case work: 4Q2017-3Q2018; Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. and Volterra Semiconductor LLC., v.
Silicon Mitus Inc., and Silicon Mitus Technology Inc., 17-CV-03507 (N. D. Ca: filed Jun 16th 2017), (retained by
defendant Silicon Mitus) – Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP. (Deposition and trial experience X1)
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 24)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 1 (Cumulative total: 7)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 3)
d. Technology: Fabrication, design, characterization, and packaging of silicon-based FET ICs for power
applications

56. Active case work: 2Q2018-3Q2018; Cree, Inc., v. Document Security Systems Inc., 17-CV-4263 (C.D. Ca filed:
Apr 17th 2017), (retained by defendant Cree Inc.) - Jones Day, LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 24)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 7)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 3)
d. Technology: Design and packaging of high brightness GaN based LEDs for luminaires.

57. Active case work: 2Q2018-2Q2018; Weisen v., Ram Telecom International (RTI)., CGC-16-554331 (Sup Ca:
filed 3rd May 2017) (retained by plaintiff Weisen, J) - Yetter Coleman, LLP. Deposition experience (x1) and trial
experience (x1).
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 25)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 1 (Cumulative total: 8)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 3)
d. Technology: Submarine and subsea fiber optic cables: technology, markets, economic impact, and
history.

58. Active case work: 2Q2018-3Q2018; Seoul Semiconductor., v. Document Security Systems Inc., 17-CV-00981
(C.D. Ca filed: Apr 17th 2017), (retained by defendant Seoul Semiconductor) - Latham and Watkins LLP
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 26)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 8)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 3)
d. Technology: Design and packaging of high brightness GaN based LEDs for luminaires.

59. Active case work: 3Q2018-4Q2018; NEC Display Solutions Inc., and NEC Display Solutions of America, Inc.,
v. Ultravision., ITC Case# 337-TA-1114 (filed 24th May 2018), “Certain Modular LED Display Panels and
Components Thereof,” (retained by respondent Jones Day, LLP)
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 26)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 8)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 3)
IPR2023-00475
HKC v. 138 East
Ex. 2001 - Page 091
Page 12
d. Technology: Large LED Panels, LED displays, LED modular panel design, LED thermal engineering
and color displays for outdoor environments.

60. Active case work: 3Q2018-3Q2018; IFT (Innovative Foundry Technologies) (pre-lit), retained by plaintiff Mintz
Levin, Cohen, Ferris, Glovsky, and Popeo PC.)
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 26)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 8)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 3)
d. Technology: CMOS device (inc FinFETs) and IC fabrication techniques at 40, 28, 20, 16nm nodes.

61. Active case work: 4Q2018-2Q2019; Eidolon Optical LLC., v. Haag-Streit AG., IPR2018-01311, (retained by
patent owner Eidolon Optical LLC) - McInnes & McLane LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 26)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 8)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 4)
d. Technology: High brightness InGaAlP, GaP, AlGaAs, and GaN/InGaN based LEDs for use in medical
instruments

62. Active case work: 3Q2018-3Q2018; Voxtel Inc., v. Joseph Lachapelle & Luminar Technologies Inc., 18-CV27356 (D. Or. filed: Dec 18th 2017), (retained by plaintiff Voxtel Inc.) - Ater Wynne LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 26)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 8)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
d. Technology: LIDAR optical and electronic component and system technology

63. Active case work: 3Q2018-1Q2019; Alta Devices, v. LG Electronics Inc., 18-CV-00404 (N.D. Ca. filed: May 7th
2018), (retained by defendant LG Electronics Inc.) - Hogan Lovells LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 26)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 8)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
d. Technology: Trade Secret GaAs based solar cell design, fabrication, manufacturing, and device
performance

64. Active case work: 3Q2018-3Q18; Opterna AM Inc., v. Commscope Technologies Inc., Pre-litigation preparation,
(retained by defendant Opterna AM Inc.) - Sterne Kessler LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 26)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 8)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
d. Technology: Fiber optic connectors, panels, and distribution switches using optoelectronic
components.

65. Active case work: 4Q2018 – 1Q2019; U.D. Electronic Corp., v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., Preparation for IPR filing:
IPR2019-00508 (PTAB filed Dec 26th 2018); and support for 18-CV-00373 (S.D. Ca. filed: Feb 16th 2018)
(retained by petitioner U. D. Electronic Corp.) – Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves and Savitch LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 26)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 8)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
d. Technology: Electrical and fiber optic connectors, panels, and distribution switches using both
electronic and optoelectronic components.

66. Active case work: 4Q2018 – 1Q2019; U.D. Electronic Corp., v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., Preparation for IPR filing:
IPR2019-00515 (PTAB filed Dec 31st 2018); and support for 18-CV-00373 (S.D. Ca. filed: Feb 16th 2018)
(retained by petitioner U. D. Electronic Corp.) – Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves and Savitch LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 26)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 8)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
d. Technology: Electrical and fiber optic connectors, panels, and distribution switches using both
electronic and optoelectronic components.

67. Active case work: 4Q2018 – 1Q2019; U.D. Electronic Corp., v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., Preparation for IPR filing:
IPR2019-00262 (PTAB filed Nov 9th 2018); and support for 18-CV-00373 (S.D. Ca. filed: Feb 16th 2018)
(retained by petitioner U. D. Electronic Corp.) – Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves and Savitch LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 26)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 8)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
d. Technology: Electrical and fiber optic connectors, panels, and distribution switches using both
electronic and optoelectronic components.

68. Active case work: 4Q2018 – 1Q2019; U.D. Electronic Corp., v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., Preparation for IPR filing:
IPR2019-00511 (PTAB filed Dec 28th 2018); and support for 18-CV-00373 (S.D. Ca. filed: Feb 16th 2018)
(retained by petitioner U. D. Electronic Corp.) – Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves and Savitch LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 26)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 8)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
d. Technology: Electrical and fiber optic connectors, panels, and distribution switches using both
electronic and optoelectronic components.
IPR2023-00475
HKC v. 138 East
Ex. 2001 - Page 092
Page 13

69. Active case work: 4Q2018 – 1Q2019; Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co. Ltd., v. Bluehouse Global Ltd.,
Preparation for IPR filing: IPR2018-01405 (PTAB filed Jul 18th 2018); (retained by patent owner SEL Co Ltd.)
– Robinson Intellectual Law Office, P.C. (Counsel represented by Fish and Richardson LLP).
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 26)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 8)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
d. Technology: Semiconductor displays using active matrix LCD and thin film transistor technology.
Design, fabrication, and circuit layout.

70. Active case work: 4Q2018 – 1Q2019; Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co. Ltd., v. Bluehouse Global Ltd.,
Preparation for IPR filing: IPR2018-01393 (PTAB filed Jul 13th 2018); (retained by patent owner SEL Co Ltd.)
– Robinson Intellectual Law Office, P.C. (Counsel represented by Fish and Richardson LLP)
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 26)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 8)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
d. Technology: Semiconductor displays using active matrix LCD and thin film transistor technology.
Design and fabrication technology.

71. Active case work: 4Q2018 - 1Q2019; The Sloan Company dba SloanLED, v. Principle Lighting Group, LLC.,
18-CV-06449 (C.D. Ca. filed: Jul 26th 2018), (retained by defendant Sloan LED.) - Ferguson Case Orr Paterson
LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 26)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 1 (Cumulative total: 9)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
d. Technology: LED lighting, LED luminaires, LED performance, electrical and mechanical design and
construction.

72. Active case work: 1Q2019 - 1Q2019; HTC Corporation, v. Lemire Illumination Technologies., 18-CV-00021
(E.D. Tx. filed: Jan 21st 2018), (retained by defendant HTC Corporation) - Perkins Coie LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 26)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 9)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
d. Technology: LEDs for mobile phones

73. Active case work: 1Q2019 - 2Q2019; Frys Electronics, v. Seoul Semiconductor Co, and Seoul Viosys Co.,, 2:18-
CV-00386-JRG (E. D. Tx. filed: Nov 20th 2018), (retained by defendant Frys Electronics) - Lamkin IP Defense
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 26),
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 9)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
d. Technology: LED chips, LED packaging, LED lenses, LED luminaires, backlights, displays, and
televisions/monitors

74. Active case work: 2Q2019 – 4Q2019; Hanwha Q CELLS & Advance Materials Corporation, v. JinkoSolar,
LONGi Solar, REC Solar, ITC 337-TA-1151 (filed: Apr 4th 2019), (“Certain Photovoltaic Cells and Products
Containing Same,”), retained by patent owner and plaintiff Hanwha Q CELLS) - Covington and Burling LLP
a. Deposition: 2 (Cumulative total: 28)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 9)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)

75. Active case work: 2Q2019-3Q2019; Hanwha Q CELLS & Advance Materials Corporation, v. JinkoSolar and
affiliates, 19-CV-00450 (D. Del. filed: Jan 21st 2018), (retained by patent owner and plaintiff Hanwha Q CELLS)
- Covington and Burling LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 28)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 9)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
d. Technology: Silicon solar cells and materials analysis of passivation layers

76. Active case work: 2Q2019-2Q2019; Oyster Optics LLC v. Infinera Inc, 2:18-CV-00206 (E. D. Tx filed: May 15th
2018); (retained by plaintiff Oyster Optics LLC) – Russ August & Kabat LLP.
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 28)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 9)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
d. Technology: Fiber optic based optoelectronic semiconductor component and transceiver design/
operation.

77. Active case work: 2Q2019 – 2Q2019; Nichia Corporation & Osram Opto Semiconductors Inc., v. Lighting
Science Group Corp., IPR filing: IPR2019-01259 (PTAB filed Jun 28th 2019); (retained by petitioner Nichia and
Osram Opto.) – Shearman and Sterling, LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 28)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 9)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
d. Technology: LED chips, LED packaging and ceramic thermal heat sinking technology.

78. Active case work: 2Q2019 – 3Q2019; Nichia Corporation v. Lighting Science Group Corp., 2:17-CV-08849 (C.
D. Ca filed Jul 12th 2017); (retained by defendant Nichia) – Shearman and Sterling, LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 28)
IPR2023-00475
HKC v. 138 East
Ex. 2001 - Page 093
Page 14
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 9)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
d. Technology: LED chips, LED packaging and ceramic thermal heat sinking technology

79. Active case work: 3Q2019-3Q2019; Applied Optoelectronics Inc v. Class Action Lawsuit, 4:17-CV-02399 (S. D.
Tx filed: Mar 6th 2018); (retained by plaintiff Class Action Lawsuit) – Levi and Korsinsky, LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 28)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 9)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
d. Technology: Fiber optic based optoelectronic semiconductor components, transceivers, and subsystems.

80. Active case work: 3Q2019-3Q2019; DNA Motor v. Kuen Hwa Traffic Industrial Co., 18-CV-05664 (C. D. Ca
filed: Jan 15th 2019); (defendant DNA Motor) – Elizabeth Yang, Law and Mediation Office
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 28)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 9)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
d. Technology: LED design patent, and the design of an aftermarket LED based headlight assembly for
an automobile.

81. Active case work: 3Q2019 – 1Q2020; Nichia Corporation, Osram Opto Semiconductors Inc., Philips Lumileds,
GE Consumer Lighting, Cree, and Signify v. Lighting Science Group Corp., ITC 337-TA-1168 (filed: Apr 30th
2019), (“Certain Light-Emitting-Diode products, systems, and components thereof (III)”) (retained by
respondents Nichia, Osram Optoelectronics, Philips Lumileds, GE Consumer Lighting, Cree Hong Kong., Signify
Corp.) – Shearman and Sterling, LLP
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 29)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 1 (Cumulative total: 10)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
d. Technology: LED chips, LED packaging and ceramic thermal heat sinking technology (LTCC).

82. Active case work: 4Q2019 – 1Q2020; Amazon.com Inc, Bed, Bath and Beyond, IKEA, Target, and Walmart Inc.,
v. Regents of the University of California, ITC 337-TA-1172 (filed: July 30th 2019), (“Certain Filament LightEmitting-Diodes and products containing same”) (retained by respondents Amazon.com Inc, Bed, Bath and
Beyond, IKEA, Target, and Walmart Inc.) – Morrison and Foerster, LLP
a. Deposition: 2 (Cumulative total: 31)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 10)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
d. Technology: LED chips, LED packaging and light bulb filaments with transparent sub-mounts.

83. Active case work: 4Q2019 – 4Q2019; U.D. Electronic Corp., v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., IPR2019-00511 (PTAB
filed Dec 28th 2018), (retained by petitioner U. D. Electronic Corp.) – Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves and Savitch
LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 31)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 10)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
d. Technology: Electrical and fiber optic connectors, panels, and distribution switches using both
electronic and optoelectronic components.

84. Active case work: 1Q2020 – 2Q2020; IKEA, v. Regents of the University of California, ITC 337-TA-1172 (filed:
July 30th 2019), (“Certain Filament Light-Emitting-Diodes and products containing same”) (retained by
respondents IKEA) – Flaster and Greenberg, LLP
a. Deposition: 2 (Cumulative total: 31)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 10)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
d. Technology: LED chips, LED packaging and light bulb filaments with transparent sub-mounts.

85. Active case work: 1Q2020-1Q2020; Hanwha Solutions Corporation, v. Longi Green Energy, Longi Solar
Technology, Longi Trading et al., IPR2019-01072 (PTAB filed 13th May 2019), (retained by patent owner
Hanwha Solutions Corporation) - Covington and Burling LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 31)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 10)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
d. Technology: Silicon solar cells and materials analysis of passivation layers

86. Active case work: 1Q2020-1Q2020; Hanwha Solutions Corporation, v. REC Solar Pte. Ltd. and JinkSolar (U.S.)
Inc. IPR2019-01145 (PTAB filed 6th March 2019), (retained by patent owner Hanwha Solutions Corporation) -
Covington and Burling LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 31)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 10)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
d. Technology: Silicon solar cells and materials analysis of passivation layers

87. Active case work: 4Q2019 – 2Q2020; Viavi Solutions Inc., v Optrontec Inc., ITC 337-TA-1187 (filed: 18th
November 2019), (“Certain Electronic devices with Optical Filters and Optical Sensor Systems and Components
Thereof”) (retained by complainant Viavi Solutions Inc.,) – Venable, LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 31)
IPR2023-00475
HKC v. 138 East
Ex. 2001 - Page 094
Page 15
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 10)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
d. Technology: Optical filters and optical sensor systems, design and fabrication of dielectric materials
for passband filters in applications such as optical communications, imaging, sensing, medical,
automotive.

88. Active case work: 2Q2020 – 4Q2020; Leviton Manufacturing Co., v. Corning Optical Communications LLC.,
ITC 337-TA-1194 (filed: 19th March 2020), (“Certain High-Density Fiber Optic Equipment and Components
Thereof”) (retained by respondent Leviton Manufacturing Co.,) – Morrison & Foerster, LLP
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 32)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 1 (Cumulative total: 11)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
d. Technology: Fiber optic adapters, fiber optic connectors (simplex, duplex, quad, multi-fiber), fiber
trays, racks, and fiber cabinet equipment.
e. Technology: LED chips, LED packaging and light bulb filaments with transparent sub-mounts.

89. Active case work: 2Q2020 – 2Q2020; subject to PO/NDA and engagement letter xxx v. yyy, Post Grant Review
petition for proceedings (US Patent # zzz), retained by Morrison and Foerster, LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 31)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 10)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
d. Optoelectronics, LEDs, lead frame packaging, optics, optical lenses, GaN (Gallium Nitride), optical
transparency

90. Active case work: 1Q2020-3Q2020; Cellect LLC, v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD and Samsung Electronics
America, Inc., IPR2020-00560 (PTAB filed 16th Feb 2020), (retained by patent owner Cellect LLC) – retained by
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 32)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 11)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
d. Technology: Silicon CMOS image sensors, drive electronics, smart pixels and CCD technology

91. Active case work: 2Q2020-2Q2020; Panasonic, v. 3M Innovative Properties Company., Preparation for IPR
filing, (retained by defendant Panasonic) – retained by Westerman Hattori Daniels & Adrian LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 32)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 11)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 4)
d. Technology: Touch sensor (resistive, optical, and capacitive) technology for mobile displays.
Analysis of display, electronic, and optical technologies.

92. Active case work: 2Q2020-3Q2020; Longi Green Energy Technology Co, Longi Solar Technology Co, Long
Solar Technology (H.K., Kuching, Taizhou, Zhejiang, Hefei, US) v. Hanwha Solutions Corporation., IPR 2019-
01072, (retained by patent owner Hanwha Solutions Corporation) – Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 33)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 11)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 5)
d. Optoelectronics; solar cell design, fabrication, device performance, packaging, and interface issues
relating to passivation (both chemical and electric field enhanced).

93. Active case work: 3Q2020-3Q2020; Oyster Optics LLC v. Ciena Corp, 4:17-CV-05920 (N. D. CA filed: April
22nd 2020); (retained by plaintiff Oyster Optics LLC) – Russ August & Kabat LLP.
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 33)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 1 (Cumulative total: 12)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 5)
d. Technology: Fiber optic based optoelectronic semiconductor component design and operation,
especially phase shift keying (PSK, QPSK) and phase based coherent communications.

94. Active case work: 3Q2020-2Q2021; Capella Photonics Inc., v. Infinera Corporation, Tellabs, Tellabs Operations
Inc., Coriant American Inc., and Coriant USA Inc., 2:20-CV-00077 (E. D. TX filed: March 16th 2020); (retained
by defendant Infinera Inc.) – Baker Botts LLP.
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 34)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 12)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 5)
d. Technology: Fiber optic wavelength selective switches (WSS), reconfigurable add-drop multiplexors
(ROADMs), and their design. Technical issues include polarization, wavelength selection, coupling,
mux/demux and operation in optical networks.

95. Active case work: 3Q2020-3Q2020; Longi Green Energy Technology Co, Longi Solar Technology Co, Long
Solar Technology (H.K., Kuching, Taizhou, Zhejiang, Hefei, US) v. Hanwha Solutions Corporation., IPR 2020-
00353, (retained by patent owner Hanwha Solutions Corporation) – Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 34)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 12)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 6)
d. Optoelectronics: solar cell design, fabrication, device performance, packaging, and interface issues
relating to passivation (both chemical and electric field enhanced).
IPR2023-00475
HKC v. 138 East
Ex. 2001 - Page 095
Page 16

96. Active case work: 3Q2020-2Q2021; Appotronics Corporation Ltd. v. Delta Electronics Inc., 2:19-CV-00466 (E.
D. Va filed: July 22nd 2020); (retained by defendant Delta Corporation Inc) – Pillsbury Winthorp Shaw Pitman
LLP.
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 35)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 12)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
d. Technology: Light projectors for display and the color wheel, phosphor technology, high power visible
lasers for projection, and the associated packaging of the modules/projectors for efficient cost design.

97. Active case work: 3Q2020 – 2Q2021; Ideal Industries Lighting LLC (dba Cree Lighting) v. RAB Lighting Inc.,
ITC 337-TA-1213 (filed: 15th July 2020), (“Certain Light-emitting Diode Products, Fixtures, and Components
thereof”), (retained by plaintiff Ideal Industries Lighting LLC (dba Cree Lighting) – Quinn Emanuel Urquhart an
Sullivan, LLP
a. Deposition: 1(Cumulative total: 36)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 2(twice at the stand); (Cumulative total: 14)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
d. Technology: Visible GaN based LEDs and various packaging optical lens designs for directing and
re-directing LED light output with applications in street lighting.

98. Active case work: 3Q2020-3Q2020; Cellect LLC, v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD and Samsung Electronics
America, Inc., ex parte declaration entitled, ‘Hand-held computers incorporating reduced area imaging devices’,
for U.S. Patent 6,982,742 (control number 90/014,453), (retained by patent owner Cellect LLC) – retained by
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 36)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 14)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
d. Technology: Hand-held silicon CMOS image sensors, drive electronics, smart pixels and CCD
technology. Technical history of CCD v. CMOS image sensors in the 1990s and associated
performance criteria.

99. Active case work: 3Q2020-3Q2020; Cellect LLC, v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD and Samsung Electronics
America, Inc., ex parte declaration entitled, ‘Communication devices incorporating reduced area imaging
devices’, for U.S. Patent 6,452,626 (control number 90/014,455), (retained by patent owner Cellect LLC) –
retained by Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 36)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 14)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
d. Technology: Hand-held silicon CMOS image sensors, drive electronics, smart pixels and CCD
technology. Technical history of CCD v. CMOS image sensors in the 1990s and associated
performance criteria.

100. Active case work: 4Q2020-4Q2020; Cellect LLC, v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD and Samsung Electronics
America, Inc., IPR declaration for U.S. Patent 9,198,565 (IPR2020-00476), (retained by patent owner Cellect
LLC) – retained by Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 36)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 14)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
d. Technology: Hand-held silicon CMOS image sensors, drive electronics, smart pixels and CCD
technology. Technical history of CCD v. CMOS image sensors in the 1990s and associated
performance criteria.

101. Active case work: 4Q2020-4Q2020; Cellect LLC, v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD and Samsung Electronics
America, Inc., IPR declaration for U.S. Patent 9,667,896 (IPR2020-00477), (retained by patent owner Cellect
LLC) – retained by Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 36)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 14)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
d. Technology: Hand-held silicon CMOS image sensors, drive electronics, smart pixels and CCD
technology. Technical history of CCD v. CMOS image sensors in the 1990s and associated
performance criteria.

102. Active case work: 4Q2020 – 1Q2021; U.D. Electronic Corp., v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., 3:18-CV-00373 (Filed
Fed 16th 2018), (retained by petitioner U. D. Electronic Corp.) – retained by defendant Perkins Coie LLP.
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 37)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 14)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
d. Technology: Electrical and fiber optic connectors, panels, and distribution switches using both
electronic and optoelectronic components. Noise suppression using EMI between electrical
components and connectors.

103. Active case work: 4Q2020-4Q2020; Cellect LLC, v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD and Samsung Electronics
America, Inc., IPR declaration for U.S. Patent 9,186,052 (IPR2020-00512), (retained by patent owner Cellect
LLC) – retained by Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 38)
IPR2023-00475
HKC v. 138 East
Ex. 2001 - Page 096
Page 17
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 14)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
d. Technology: Hand-held silicon CMOS image sensors, drive electronics, smart pixels and CCD
technology. Technical history of CCD v. CMOS image sensors in the 1990s and associated
performance criteria.

104. Active case work: 4Q2020-4Q2020; Cellect LLC, v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD and Samsung Electronics
America, Inc., IPR declaration for U.S. Patent 9,186,052 (IPR2020-00475), (retained by patent owner Cellect
LLC) – retained by Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 39)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 14)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
d. Technology: Hand-held silicon CMOS image sensors, drive electronics, smart pixels and CCD
technology. Technical history of CCD v. CMOS image sensors in the 1990s and associated
performance criteria.

105. Active case work: 3Q2020 – 1Q2021; Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. v. Verizon Communications, Inc., et al., 20-
CV-030-JRG (TX E. D. Filed 21st April 2020), (retained by plaintiff Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.) – retained by
plaintiff Caldwell Cassady Curry P.C.
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 39)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 14)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
d. Technology: Analysis of coding for fiber optic communications, specifically in relation to the
standardization process for the Telecommunication Standardization Sector of the International
Telecommunications Union (“ITU-T”), including the ITU-T’s G.709: Interfaces for the optical
transport network standard (“G.709” or “the G.709 Standard”). In particular, the technical issues that
relate to OTN hierarchy; functionality of the overhead in support of multi-wavelength optical
networks; frame structures, bit rates, and formats for mapping client signals.

106. Active case work: 1Q2021 – 3Q2021; IKEA et al., v. Regents of the University of California, ITC 337-TA-1220
(filed: 29th September 2020), (“Certain filament light-emitting diodes and products containing same (II)”),
(retained by respondent JDG: IKEA, Global Value Lighting, Signify, Home Depot, GE, Satco) – retained by
Flaster Greenberg PC, Kirkland and Ellis, GT Law, Alston and Bird, Jones Day and Goodwin Law as JDG
counsel.
a. Deposition: 2 (Cumulative total: 41)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 1 (Cumulative total: 15)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
d. Technology: LED chips, LED packaging and light bulb filaments with transparent sub-mounts.

107. Active case work 4Q2020 – 1Q2021; Uber Technologies Inc., v. Anthony Scott Levandowski; Case No. 20-30242
(HLB) and 20-03050 (filed 16th September 2020), retained by defendant Uber Technologies Inc., retained by
Jenner and Block LLP.
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 41)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 15)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
d. Technology: LIDAR technology for motor vehicles that includes fiber amplifiers, LIDAR hardware,
laser diodes, photodetectors, fiber links, and free space communications.

108. Active case work: 1Q2021 – 3Q2021; CoSemi Technologies, v. Everpro Technologies, Fibbr Technologies,
Logitech, and Facebook Technologies, ITC 337-TA-1233 (filed: 29th October 2020), “Certain active optical
cables and products containing same”, (retained by claimant Cosemi Technologies) – retained by Rutan & Tucker
LLP.
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 42)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 15)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
d. Technology: Active optical cables with embedded silicon modulator ICs, copper cable, fiber optic
cable, VCSEL laser diodes, photodetectors and cable sheathing for consumer applications such as
gaming, HDMI, USB, etc.

109. Active case work: 2Q2021 – 3Q2021; Acuity Brands Lighting ,Inc. v. Heavy Duty Lighting (HDL), LLC., 20-
CV-03648-SCJ (GA N. D. Filed 2nd September 2020), (retained by defendant Acuity Brands Lighting) – retained
by defendant Duane Morris LLP.
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 43)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 15)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
d. Technology: LED lighting, LED chips, LED packages and LED packaging technologies such as
molding, glob-top, substrates, die mounting, optical reflectors, and electrical interconnect layouts.

110. Active case work: 2Q2021 – 4Q2021; Jiaxing Super Lighting Electric Appliance Co., LTD and Obert Inc. v. CH
Lighting Technology co., LTD., Elliott Electric Supply Inc., and Shaoxing Ruising Lighting co., Ltd., 20-CV00018-ADA (TX W D. Filed 16th March 2020), (retained by defendant CH Lighting et al) – retained by defendant
Holland and Knight LLP.
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 44)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 1 (Cumulative total: 16)
IPR2023-00475
HKC v. 138 East
Ex. 2001 - Page 097
Page 18
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
d. Technology: LED lighting and LED packaging technologies for T8 and T12 form factor tube lighting.
Technologies such as LED luminaire/tube packaging, mechanical structure, thermal heat dissipation,
electronic circuitry, printed circuit boards, and LED chips.

111. Active case work: 3Q2021 – 1Q2022; ASUSTEK Computer Inc, v. KT Imaging USA LLC, 20-CV-00300-ADA
(TX W D. Filed 20th April 2020, (retained by defendant ASUSTEK Computer Inc) – retained by defendant Turner
Boyd LLP.
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 44)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 16)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
d. Technology: Image sensor modules, cameras in PCs/laptops, consumer products, tear downs, optical
lenses, optical packaging, optical alignment.

112. Active case work: 3Q2021 – 3Q2021; Jiaxing Super Lighting Electric Appliance Co., LTD and Obert Inc. v.
Maxlite Inc., 19-CV-04047 (CA C.D. Filed 8th May 2019), (retained by defendant Maxlite Inc) – retained by
defendant Holland and Knight LLP.
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 44)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 16)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
d. Technology: LED lighting and LED packaging technologies for T8 and T12 form factor tube lighting.
Technologies such as LED luminaire/tube packaging, mechanical structure, thermal heat dissipation,
electronic circuitry, printed circuit boards, and LED chips.

113. Active case work: 3Q2021 – 1Q2023; Feit Electric Company Inc., v. Nichia Corporation, 20-CV-00359-GW,
(CA C. D. Filed 13th January 2020), (retained by defendant Feit Electric Company) – retained by Benesch
Friedlander Coplan &Aronoff LLP
a. Deposition: 2 (Cumulative total: 46)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 2 (Cumulative total: 18)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
d. Technology: LED lighting, LED chips, LED packages and LED packaging technologies such as leadframes, molding, glob-top, substrates, die mounting, optical reflectors, and electrical interconnect
layouts.

114. Active case work: 2Q2021 – 2Q2022; Samsung Corporation vs TBD, Pre-patent litigation, (retained by plaintiff
Samsung Corporation), - retained by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP).
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 46)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 18)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
d. Technology: TV displays, OLEDs, LCDs, color gamut, and quality of RGB/white color as per CIE
charts and colorimetry (NTSC, sRGB, AdobeRGB etc,.). Analysis of CHL (constant hue locus),
quantum dots, nano-crystals, nano-devices, nano-structures to improve light quality output.

115. Active case work 2Q2021 – 2Q2021, Holochip Corporation v, Edmund Optics, Optotune AG and others TBD,
Pre-patent litigation for ITC, (retained by plaintiff Holochip Corporation), - retained by King and Spalding LLP).
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 46)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 18)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 6)
d. Technology: Fluid lenses, and optical lenses with controlled focus facilities. Packaging of fluid lenses
using piezoelectric actuators, and hermetic chambers. Deformable surfaces using micro-fluidics.

116. Active case work: 2Q2021-3Q2021; Home Depot USA Inc., v. Lynk Labs, Inc., IPR declaration for U.S. Patent
10,757,783 (IPR2021-01368), (retained by petitioner Home Depot USA, Inc) – retained by DLA Piper LLP
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 47)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 18)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 7)
d. Technology: LED products, LED circuits, including both DC and AC circuit design. LED color
emission, white light, color mixing, CIE charts, and black body radiators for color temperature.

117. Active case work: 2Q2021-3Q2021; Home Depot USA Inc., v. Lynk Labs, Inc., IPR declaration for U.S. Patent
10,492,251 (IPR2021-01369), (retained by petitioner Home Depot USA, Inc) – retained by DLA Piper LLP
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 48)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 18)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 8)
d. Technology: LED products, LED circuits, including both DC and AC circuit design. LED color
emission, white light, color mixing, CIE charts, and black body radiators for color temperature.

118. Active case work: 3Q2021-3Q2021; Home Depot USA Inc., v. Lynk Labs, Inc., IPR declaration for U.S. Patent
10,091,842 (IPR2021-01540), (retained by petitioner Home Depot USA, Inc) – retained by DLA Piper LLP
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 49)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 18)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 9)
d. Technology: LED products, LED circuits, including both DC and AC circuit design. LED color
emission, white light, color mixing, CIE charts, and black body radiators for color temperature.
IPR2023-00475
HKC v. 138 East
Ex. 2001 - Page 098
Page 19

119. Active case work: 4Q2021-4Q2021; Home Depot USA Inc., v. Lynk Labs, Inc., IPR declaration for U.S. Patent
10,517,149 (IPR2022-000023), (retained by petitioner Home Depot USA, Inc) – retained by DLA Piper LLP
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 50)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 18)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 10)
d. Technology: LED products, LED circuits, including both DC and AC circuit design. LED color
emission, white light, color mixing, CIE charts, and black body radiators for color temperature.

120. Active case work: 4Q2021-Present; Everlight Elecs. Co. Ltd. v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al., 6:21-CV-00906 (W. D.
TX filed: August 31st 2021); (retained by defendant Amazon.com) – Morrison and Foerster LLP.
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 50)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 18)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 10)
d. Technology: LED chips, LED packaging with metallic electrodes, flip-chip solder bumping, and
doping of semiconductors for electrical conduction.

121. Active case work: 4Q2021-2Q2021; Hanwha Solutions Corporation and affiliated companies including Q-Cells,
Boviet Renewable Power, Boviet Solar, Canadian Solar International v. Advanced Silicon Group Technologies,
ITC 337-TA-1271 (filed: 14th October 2020) “Certain silicon photovoltaic cells and modules with nanostructures,
and products containing the same.” (retained by joint defense group consisting of Quinn Emanual Urquhart &
Sullivan, LLP., Morgan Lewis and Bockius, LLP., and Sidley Austin LLP.).
a. Deposition: 2 (Cumulative total: 52)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 1 (Cumulative total: 19)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 10)
d. Technology: Silicon based solar/photovoltaic cells and modules that include fabrication techniques
such as deposition, diffusion, wet/dry etching of nanostructures, nanowires, and nano-structures, nanofeatures, black silicon, monocrystalline wafers, and polysilicon fabrication.

122. Active case work: 4Q2021-2Q2022; Dell Computer Inc, v. KT Imaging USA LLC, Declaration for IPR with patent
number 6,876,544 as petitioner, (to be filed), (retained by defendant Dell Computer Inc) – retained by petitioner
Farella, Braun, and Martel.
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 52)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 19)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 10)
d. Technology: Image sensor modules, cameras in PCs/laptops, consumer products, tear downs, optical
lenses, optical packaging, optical alignment.

123. Active case work: 1Q2022-2Q2022; Cree Lighting, Wolfspeed, Ideal Industries Lighting, v. CAO Lighting,
Declaration for IPR with patent number 6,465,961 as petitioner, (filed 8th April 2022), (retained by defendant
Cree Lighting) – retained by Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP.
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 53)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 19)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 11)
d. Technology: LED based light bulbs, LED chips, LED arrays, LED packaging, chip-on-board, heat
sinks, GaN, InGaN, AlGaN (Gallium Nitride, Indium Gallium Nitride, Aluminum Gallium Nitride)
epitaxial layers, active regions, cladding layers, optical mirrors, DBRs

124. Active case work: 1Q2022-2Q2022; Cree Lighting, Wolfspeed, Ideal Industries Lighting, v. CAO Lighting,
Declaration for IPR with patent numbers 6,634,770 as petitioner, (filed 8th April 2022), (retained by defendant
Cree Lighting) – retained by Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP.
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 54)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 19)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 12)
d. Technology: LED based light bulbs, LED chips, LED arrays, LED packaging, chip-on-board, heat
sinks, GaN, InGaN, AlGaN (Gallium Nitride, Indium Gallium Nitride, Aluminum Gallium Nitride)
epitaxial layers, active regions, cladding layers, optical mirrors, DBRs

125. Active case work: 1Q2022-2Q2022; Cree Lighting dba Ideal Industries Lighting, v. CAO Lighting, 1:21-cv-00634
(MD NC filed 12th Aug 2021,), (retained by defendant Cree Lighting) – retained by Kilpatrick Townsend &
Stockton LLP.
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 54)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 19)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 12)
d. Technology: LED based light bulbs, LED chips, LED arrays, LED packaging, chip-on-board, heat
sinks, GaN, InGaN, AlGaN (Gallium Nitride, Indium Gallium Nitride, Aluminum Gallium Nitride)
epitaxial layers, active regions, cladding layers, optical mirrors, DBRs

126. Active case work: 1Q2022-2Q2022; Lite-On Technology Corporation and Genesis Photonics Inc., v. Sensor
Electronic Technology Inc., (SETi), 6:21-cv-00322 (WD Tex filed 12th Aug 2021,), (retained by plaintiff LiteOn
and Genesis) – retained by Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP.
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 54)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 19)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 12)
IPR2023-00475
HKC v. 138 East
Ex. 2001 - Page 099
Page 20
d. Technology: LED based light bulbs, LED chips, LED arrays, LED packaging, flip-chip packaging,
chip-on-board, heat sinks, GaN, InGaN, AlGaN (Gallium Nitride, Indium Gallium Nitride, Aluminum
Gallium Nitride) epitaxial layers, GaN fabrication, LED quantum well active regions, LEDcladding
layers, optical mirrors, DBRs

127. Active case work: 1Q2022-2Q2022; Lite-On Technology Corporation and Genesis Photonics Inc., v. Sensor
Electronic Technology Inc., (SETi), Declaration for IPR (IPR2022-00395) as patent owner, (retained by plaintiff
LiteOn and Genesis) – retained by Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP.
a. Deposition: 2 (Cumulative total: 56)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 19)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 2 (Cumulative total: 14)
d. Technology: LED based light bulbs, LED chips, LED arrays, LED packaging, flip-chip packaging,
chip-on-board, heat sinks, GaN, InGaN, AlGaN (Gallium Nitride, Indium Gallium Nitride, Aluminum
Gallium Nitride) epitaxial layers, GaN fabrication, LED quantum well active regions, LED cladding
layers, optical mirrors, DBRs

128. Active case work: 1Q2022-2Q2022; Lite-On Technology Corporation and Genesis Photonics Inc., v. Sensor
Electronic Technology Inc., (SETi), Declaration for IPR (IPR2022-00396) as patent owner, (retained by plaintiff
LiteOn and Genesis) – retained by Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP.
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 56)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 19)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 14)
d. Technology: LED based light bulbs, LED chips, LED arrays, LED packaging, flip-chip packaging,
chip-on-board, heat sinks, GaN, InGaN, AlGaN (Gallium Nitride, Indium Gallium Nitride, Aluminum
Gallium Nitride) epitaxial layers, GaN fabrication, LED quantum well active regions, LED cladding
layers, optical mirrors, DBRs

129. Active case work: 1Q2022-2Q2022; Lite-On Technology Corporation and Genesis Photonics Inc., v. Sensor
Electronic Technology Inc., (SETi), Declaration for IPR (IPR2022-00397) as patent owner, (retained by plaintiff
LiteOn and Genesis) – retained by Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP.
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 56)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 19)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 14)
d. Technology: LED based light bulbs, LED chips, LED arrays, LED packaging, flip-chip packaging,
chip-on-board, heat sinks, GaN, InGaN, AlGaN (Gallium Nitride, Indium Gallium Nitride, Aluminum
Gallium Nitride) epitaxial layers, GaN fabrication, LED quantum well active regions, LED cladding
layers, optical mirrors, DBRs

130. Active case work: 1Q2022-2Q2022; Lite-On Technology Corporation and Genesis Photonics Inc., v. Sensor
Electronic Technology Inc., (SETi), Declaration for IPR (IPR2022-00406) as patent owner, (retained by plaintiff
LiteOn and Genesis) – retained by Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP.
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 56)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 19)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 14)
d. Technology: LED based light bulbs, LED chips, LED arrays, LED packaging, flip-chip packaging,
chip-on-board, heat sinks, GaN, InGaN, AlGaN (Gallium Nitride, Indium Gallium Nitride, Aluminum
Gallium Nitride) epitaxial layers, GaN fabrication, LED quantum well active regions, LED cladding
layers, optical mirrors, DBRs

131. Active case work: 1Q2022-2Q2022; Lite-On Technology Corporation and Genesis Photonics Inc., v. Sensor
Electronic Technology Inc., (SETi), Declaration for IPR (IPR2022-00419) as patent owner, (retained by plaintiff
LiteOn and Genesis) – retained by Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP.
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 57)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 19)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 15)
d. Technology: LED based light bulbs, LED chips, LED arrays, LED packaging, flip-chip packaging,
chip-on-board, heat sinks, GaN, InGaN, AlGaN (Gallium Nitride, Indium Gallium Nitride, Aluminum
Gallium Nitride) epitaxial layers, GaN fabrication, LED quantum well active regions, LED cladding
layers, optical mirrors, DBRs

132. Active case work: 1Q2022-3Q2022; Panasonic Corporation, v. Magna International Inc., 21-cv-00319 (WD Tex
filed 31st Mar 2021,), (retained by plaintiff Panasonic) – retained by Sidley Austin LLP.
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 57)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 19)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 15)
d. Technology: Automotive sensors, cameras, electronic circuitry, controls, packaging, surround view
camera systems.

133. Active case work: 2Q2022 – Present; Jiaxing Super Lighting Electric Appliance Co., LTD and Obert Inc. v.
Maxlite Inc., 19-CV-04047 (CA C.D. Filed 8th May 2019), (retained by defendant Maxlite Inc) – retained by
defendant Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves and Savitch LLP.
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 57)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 19)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 15)
IPR2023-00475
HKC v. 138 East
Ex. 2001 - Page 100
Page 21
d. Technology: LED lighting and LED packaging technologies for T8 and T12 form factor tube lighting.
Technologies such as LED luminaire/tube packaging, mechanical structure, thermal heat dissipation,
electronic circuitry, printed circuit boards, and LED chips.

134. Active case work: 1Q2022 – 4Q2022; Advanced Engineering Services LLC., v. Lumasense Technologies Inc.,
and DOES 1-50, 21-CV-03279-WHO combined with 20-CV-07905-WHO (CA N.D. Filed 23rd Feb 2022),
(retained by plaintiff Advanced Engineering Services LLC) – retained by plaintiff SAC Attorneys LLP
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 58)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 19)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 15)
d. Technology: Thermal, gas, and flow sensing for use in designing and manufacturing equipment used
in semiconductor chip manufacturing. In particular, review of data relating to the simulation of finite
element analysis (“FEA”) and computational fluid dynamics (“CFD”) data for gases, temperature, and
stress with actual sensor data that could be intelligently integrated, customized, installed, tested,
verified, and validated.

135. Active case work: 2Q2022-3Q2022; Frontier Communications v. Charter Communications, Pre-litigation IP and
Due Diligence; Case No. TBD; Retained by Frontier Communications, (retained by Mayer Brown LLP)
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 58)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 19)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 15)
d. Technology: Optical PON for high-speed data FTTH evaluation, testing, and analysis.

136. Active case work: 2Q2022-3Q2022; Russ, August & Kabat, Pre-litigation IP and Due Diligence; Case No. TBD;
(retained by plaintiff – Russ, August & Kabat LLP)
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 58)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 19)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 15)
d. Technology: High volume fiber optic transceivers for EPON/GPON with: CDR circuits, ‘Intelligencein-the-Module’ and ‘M-ary’ families.

137. Active case work: 2Q2022-3Q2022; Signify Holding B.V. v. GE Lighting Solutions LLC., Declaration for IPR
(IPR2022-XXX – in draft form for US patent #7,497,973) as petitioner, (retained by petitioner Signify Holding
B.V.) – retained by Alston and Bird LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 58)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 19)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 15)
d. Technology: LED based light bulbs, LED chips that emit in the UV and visible, LED arrays, LED
packaging including phosphors and encapsulants, and the type of phosphors utilized for different
emission. In particular, phosphors that are activated by dopants such as Europium (Eu), Manganese
(Mn) and the associated ions for these materials e.g. Mn2+, Mn3+, Mn4+, Mn6+, etc. Included
analysis of InGaN and AlGaN based epitaxial material systems, and the use of phosphors in high
pressure mercury vapor lamps.

138. Active case work: 3Q22 – Present; Canon, Inc., and Canon USA Inc v. WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos
Licensing and Development., Declaration for IPR ((IPR2022-XXX) for US patent #7,493,030 as petitioner,
(retained by Canon Inc) – retained by Orrick LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 58)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 19)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 15)
d. Technology: Digital camera operation including optical focus, image sensing, optical train, depth of
field, exposure time, different focus and focal areas of a portion of the image, general photography
and optical principles.

139. Active case work: 3Q22 – Present; Canon, Inc., and Canon USA Inc v. WSOU Investments, LLC d/b/a Brazos
Licensing and Development., 21-CV- 00166-ADA-DTG (W.D. TX.) Filed 29th Sept 2022. (retained by defendant
Canon Inc) – retained by Orrick LLP
a. Deposition: 1 (Cumulative total: 59)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 19)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 15)
d. Technology: Digital camera operation including optical focus, image sensing, optical train, depth of
field, exposure time, different focus and focal areas of a portion of the image, general photography
and optical principles.
e.

140. Active case work: 3Q22 – Present; Fujifilm Sonosite., v. Butterfly Network, Inc., 1-22-CV-00309 (D.Del) Filed
29th Mar 2022), (retained by defendant Butterfly Network, Inc.,) – retained by defendant Akin Gump LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 59)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 19)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 15)
d. Technology: Ultra-sonic equipment that includes displays, especially OLED displays. The electronic
circuits and how displays are electronically controlled.
IPR2023-00475
HKC v. 138 East
Ex. 2001 - Page 101
Page 22

141. Active case work: 3Q22 – Present; LedComm LLC., v. IKEA US Retail LLC et al, 6-22-CV-00302-ADA (W.D.
Tx.) Filed 21st Mar 2022), (retained by defendant IKEA US Retail LLC et al.) – retained by defendant Flaster
Greenberg LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 59)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 19)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 15)
d. Technology: LED surface mount packaging, LED GaN/InGaN chips, and associated LED lighting
performance specifications.

142. Active case work: 2Q22 – 3Q2022; NXP Semiconductors N.V. and NXP USA Inc., v. MediaTek Inc,, Amazon.com
Inc., Belkin International Inc, Linksys USA Inc., et al, ITC Investigation 337-TA-1287 entitled “Certain integrated
circuits, and electronic devices and products containing the same” (Filed 1st Dec 2021), (retained by respondents
Amazon.com Inc.,) – retained by respondent Morrison Foerster LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 59)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 19)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 15)
d. Technology: LED surface mount packaging, LED GaN/InGaN chips, and associated LED lighting
performance specifications. LED Luminaires.

143. Active case work: 3Q22 – 4Q22; Amazon.com Inc., v. Epistar Corp., 6-22-CV-00526-ADA (W.D. Tx.) Filed 24th
May 2022), (retained by defendant Amazon.com Inc..) – retained by defendant Morrison Foerster LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 59)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 19)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 15)
d. Technology: LED surface mount packaging, LED GaN/InGaN chips, GaN/InGaN epitaxial growth,
fabrication, device design and packaging. LED luminaires.

144. Active case work: 4Q22 – Present; Amazon.com Inc., v. Epistar Corp., 6-22-CV-00526-ADA (W.D. Tx.) Filed
24th May 2022), (retained by defendant Amazon.com Inc..) – retained by defendant Perkins Coie LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 59)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 19)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 15)
d. Technology: LED surface mount packaging, LED GaN/InGaN chips, GaN/InGaN epitaxial growth,
fabrication, device design and packaging. LED Luminaires.

145. Active case work: 4Q22 – Present; Qorvo., v. Akoustis Technologies Inc., 1-21-CV-1417-JPM (C.A.) Filed 4th
Oct 2021), (retained by defendant Akoustis.) – retained by defendant Pillsbury LLP
a. Deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 59)
b. Trial/Hearing/Court appearance: 0 (Cumulative total: 19)
c. IPR/PTAB trial/deposition: 0 (Cumulative total: 15)
d. Technology: acoustic wave filters, BAW filters (bulk-acoustic-wave) filters for RF applications,
devices, fabrication, and character.

X

It is at 30 days or after, "within" would get you in trouble.

Newbies, ECOC Slide 20 is the ONLY information you need to understand to know LWLG is a incredible buying opportunity!!

https://api.mziq.com/mzfilemanager/v2/d/307dbc8b-e212-48ba-9968-8cef3f6b5188/0d5d1e3e-2052-00d8-bb2f-2b7a2adf0310?origin=1

On the LEFT is a comparison of LWLG's technology to the touted #1 competitive threat TFLN

On the RIGHT is a comparison the ONLY other commercial Polymer materials development company NLM

To make it EASY PEASY for you, BOTH of these supposed BEST competitors pale by comparison!!!!!

Couple this with this recent Paper with authors from Cisco, Intel, and Arista (Andy B) which points out just how crappy TFLN's position is today in being ready to commercialize!! TFLN is a joke really!!! Even the #1 TFLN Development company recently said it may take 3 or more years from now to be able to scale volume of TFLN modulators!!! here from the Paper

“For monolithic TFLN modulators and PICs, 150 mm wafer is the largest size for product presently. Limited wafer size, large device footprint, relatively high material cost, and thin-film uniformity contribute a large portion of the chip cost. Although the chip fabrication is not overly complex, uniform waveguide formation for ultra-low loss operation is not trivial, which necessitates optimized photolithography, etching technology, and post-fabrication processes. Additionally, long-term DC drift remains a challenge for TFLN. To make these modulators commercially viable and reliable, thermally or electrically phase control is a must.

TFLN modulators heterogeneously integrated with silicon or Si3N4 are still in the R&D stage. Similar to III-V-on-silicon heterogeneous integration, TFLN integration occurs towards the back-end-of-line (BEOL) process and requires specialized processing tools along with stringent cross-contamination controls, especially if large-wafer scale processing is involved. The TFLN transfer step is critical for achieving high yield and optimal device performance.”

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10666944/references#references

On a daily base I work with a company based all over the US, Europe and Asia...
I forwarded this link ... and you know what ...
We all had a good laugh !!!!
Has anyone vistited this selfmade one-man show website ... 😂😂😂😂😂
And I must say ... quit impressive the amount of attorneys 😂😂
And they work 24hrs a day 🙄
Non problem anyway, Matthew will help you today 🤪🤪 

As long as they were in a tax-free account that sounds like a good move, if they were in a taxable account and a takeover happens that could hurt big time, changing a long-term cap gain tax rate into a rate that is essentially the ordinary income rate which could be 37% (and when it is big money that check is difficult to write). Also keep in mind the wash sale rule. A wash sale happens when you sell a security at a loss and buy a “substantially identical” security within 30 days before or after the sale. (The wash-sale rule prevents taxpayers from deducting paper losses without significantly changing their market position.)

X Good Luck

The claim they like to substantiate is truly a bogus claim, It means there is no legitimate or for that matter real concern. It leaves only one option, this is somehow a last ditch effort to scare people out of their shares by the more astute and larger shorts, It’s a clear sign to the ‘ rookie’ shorts “ get the hell out of here”! I don’t wish anybody bad things, but I would advice shorts to listen to your rich peers and to cover your position. This could become a serious issue. .

Well some were definitely shook loose at the last Q update. Personally, I sold a portion at around 3.30 but then increased that holding by 20% by buying back with that capital at around the 2.70 range. At this point, whenever the company offers information that reveals weakness or further slipped timelines I would expect more shares to shake loose. The danger is when longs start selling on bad news and seeking greener pastures. People only have so much patience and well...lifespan

BS. Nuffin' muffin.

some of my friends sent a request for info to the lawyers. What are the motives for the lawsuit.

I saw the replies.

Ican´t stop laughing
nrdc92. can you help them a bit

It should be explicitly stated here for the foreigners and everybody else that the law firm is just INVESTIGATING A POSSIBLE LAWSUIT, not FILING AN ACTUAL LAWSUIT. Investigating happens a lot. Some are legit. Many are not, and are attempts to manipulate the stock price. TBD.

Haha, first of more, likely...x out

They are scared!!! Storm coming. ....shorts are in panic mode. Cant shake any shares loose
Getting desperate

Thanks for the info

What with this lawsuit?

Interesting thought. What additional actions should we expect to try and shake loose shares? Seems like retail is dug in. I know i am.

Paid basher !

The institutions know the games played by the shorts and honestly only rookie retailers would worry. I like the "self-dealing" comment, in the cut and paste "insert name of firm here" PR.

As info, self-dealing is when a person with a fiduciary duty to a company takes action to gain personal benefit, instead of for the benefit of the company.

X Yawn

These are evil posts from by shorts payed horrible people. Brrrrr

Could be, maybe these lawsuit PR's are a signal to the shorts to cover. Try to scare the last holders to sell and give them a chance to cover. who knows, we will find out. Not scared

Then don’t reply

fact is Lebby joined LWLG in 2015, and took reigns of the company in 2017, he set out on a mission to get Polymers on the Industry Roadmap (IPSR) and was very successful in doing so, Lebby also set out a TimeLine that dates back at least as far as the 2019 ASM presentation, that TimeLine has stood until this day calling for the Tier 1 Customer Acceptance to come in 2024, only recently has Lebby told investors it may take "a little longer than expected" and run into 2025, but Lebby also told investors he is working on deals with the largest Transceiver makers in the world, and on 3 continents no less!!!

we've had a lot of interest from Tier 1 companies since then, I've given a few talks and a few updates, but what I can say today is that we have deepening relationships with these folks, and they are not just in the U.S., they are in Europe, as well as in Asia, and so this is interest level, these companies include some of the world's biggest Transceiver component manufacturers

we've been in deep discussions with this, and I'm working very very hard to put together Commercial Agreements on that, and this is something that I've indicated to our shareholders that is taking a little longer than it was expected, but it's also really exciting because now you can start thinking about the scale of our technology, so this is happening and I'm working really hard on it

Here's a few VERY IMPORTANT facts to keep in mind,

1) Lebby has told investors that these Tier 1 Transceiver makers no longer question the Reliability & Stability which has been the Achilles heel of Polymers that has caused the Industry at large to fail time and again to successfully develop Polymers for the last 40 years!!

2) Lebby has successfully implemented PDK's that allow LWLG to produce 200gbs modulators with WORLD CLASS PERFORMANCE on large 200 mm Wafer which are imperative to Tier 1's for mass productions of Millions of units!!

3) There is NO COMPETITION even close to the performance metrics of LWLG Polymers, the closest Next-Gen competitor has been touted as TFLN but TFLN cannot be produced in volume on 200mm Wafers and the leading TFLN company is saying it will take at least 3 more years, maybe longer to achieve this goal, here's why

“For monolithic TFLN modulators and PICs, 150 mm wafer is the largest size for product presently. Limited wafer size, large device footprint, relatively high material cost, and thin-film uniformity contribute a large portion of the chip cost. Although the chip fabrication is not overly complex, uniform waveguide formation for ultra-low loss operation is not trivial, which necessitates optimized photolithography, etching technology, and post-fabrication processes. Additionally, long-term DC drift remains a challenge for TFLN. To make these modulators commercially viable and reliable, thermally or electrically phase control is a must.

TFLN modulators heterogeneously integrated with silicon or Si3N4 are still in the R&D stage. Similar to III-V-on-silicon heterogeneous integration, TFLN integration occurs towards the back-end-of-line (BEOL) process and requires specialized processing tools along with stringent cross-contamination controls, especially if large-wafer scale processing is involved. The TFLN transfer step is critical for achieving high yield and optimal device performance.”

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10666944/references#references

I would call this a buy signal

And no one cares ! About the lawsout ?

Maybe for you !

When thirdrail shows up, the gettin’s usually good.

3rd Quarter----> Retail & Institutions INCREASED BUYING!!!! Meanwhile Shorts INCREASED over 10% in the 3rd Quarter alone an Additional 2,129,159 shares!!! The HUGE Increase in 3rd Quarter Shorting had ZERO NEGATIVE EFFECT ON THE PPS!!!!!

LWLG 3rd Quarter Ownership Analysis

Share Ownership (Shares)

Retail_________109.4 Million an INCR of 1.5 Million
Institutions______33.8 Million an INCR of 1.4 Million
Shorts_________(21.7) Million as INCR (2.1) Million

Total___________121.5 Million an INCR 0.7 Million

Share Ownership (Percentages)

Retail_________90%
Institutions_____27%
Shorts________(17%)

Total__________100%

The 3rd Quarter saw the PPS remain FLAT in the 2.80's while Retail and Institutions INCREASED their holdings on the backs of the Shorts who DESPITE Shorting an Additional 2,129,159 shares (an INCREASE to Total Shares Shorted of over 10%) were UNABLE TO LOWER THE PPS!!!

This is 100% proof positive of what I have been posting here,

Grifter Shorts Must Return 22 MILLION Borrowed Shares!!!! Then tell me about the PPS, it will be higher than the $20 high set back in 2021!!! Tier 1 deals in progress with Tier 1's on 3 continents!! Shorts hourglass sands of time are waning rapidly!!!

If Shorts think that 109 million Retail Longs are going to capitulate their shares NOW just because they are manipulating the price lower with their low volume high frequency manipulation games, they have an even more serious mental issue than their knuckleheaded continuous stream of bullshit posts here would indicate!! No, instead the 109 million Retail Longs that have been PERFECTLY STEADY here for the LAST 3 YEARS will only GROW in numbers as the manipulation games continue up until the day Lebby drops the first Tier 1 bomb on them, then like all good little cockroaches they will all be scrambling for the EXIT at the same time trying to escape their own annihilation!!

If the Institutions & Shorts are supposed the smart money then you better be buying LWLG hand over fist because these are EXACTLY who has been funding the LWLG Operating Budget these past 3 years, Lewrock put the data together showing that in the last 3 years Retail Investors have remained perfectly steady at 108 million shares ownership, LWLG has been 100% financed on the backs of Institutions & Shorts!!

WAKE ME WHEN 22 MILLION SHORTS HAVE COVERED BEFORE LEBBY INKS THE FIRST OF MANY TIER 1 DEALS!!!!

Strong Sell LWLG Stock

Given the investment horizon of 90 days and your above-average risk tolerance, the recommendation regarding Lightwave Logic is 'Sell'.
That's what happens when you promote a widget as a PLATFORM. lol
I pulled the plug on my position when your senior management started dumping in the high teens.
You are still at least a couple of years away from sales and revenue, if ever.
Technology moves quickly and there may never be a market for the technology ten years after the fact.
Sorry for your loss.

Put the chart out from then till now while your at it! And if you don't want to cry .. turn it upside down and look at it! After a few minutes you and your deluded mates will probably try convincing the board that's the new chart ! Lmao.

Some one put up a chart of June of 2022 and then look at what the price was 30 days later.

Bullshit ... It dropped from $13 to $7. Nice try though

Do you think Nrdc92’s involved with the CA from the “legal” side?

Riveting information.

Just hope that Pepe and the old guy from Dupont decide this does not look good on the resume and split. It happened over at Niocorp and you saw the result. It is one thing if you cannot accomplish what you set out to do but here insiders profited heavily while management kept throwing out timelines they knew had zero chance of happening. Lebby reaffirming timelines in June was a disgrace. Shareholders have no idea how many companies we are working with at present. Pinocchio and proto say over 40, it could be 2. Zero credibility going forward.

No repercussion to the law firm when it proves to be a nuffin' muffin'...

I smell a rat.