JNJ Johnson and Johnson

 

 

 

 

 

NOTICE OF EXEMPT SOLICITATION (VOLUNTARY SUBMISSION)

 

NAME OF REGISTRANT: Johnson & Johnson   

NAME OF PERSON RELYING ON EXEMPTION: Shareholder Association for Research & Education (SHARE)

ADDRESS OF PERSON RELYING ON EXEMPTION: Suite 510, 1155 Robson St., Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6E 1B5

Written materials are submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-6(g)(1) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:

 

RE: Support FOR: Item #12 – “Shareholder Proposal - Third Party Review and Report on Lobbying Activities Alignment with Position on Universal Health Coverage”

 

Annual Meeting: April 28, 2022

 

Contact: Anthony Schein, Director of Shareholder Advocacy, SHARE, aschein@share.ca

 

 March 31, 2022

 

To Johnson & Johnson Stockholders:

 

SHARE is urging stockholders to vote FOR Item #12 at the Johnson & Johnson stockholder meeting on April 28, 2022.

 

The proposal calls for Johnson & Johnson’s board to publish a report to shareholders disclosing whether the company’s lobbying activities and that of its trade associations align with the company’s Position on Universal Health Coverage, and in particular its provision supporting “broad and timely access to our medicines at sustainable prices that aim to be locally affordable.” It asks the Board of Directors to report on how it addresses the risks presented by any misaligned lobbying and the company’s plans, if any, to mitigate these risks. As you review the proposal, we would like to draw your attention to the following:

 

Rationale for a YES Vote

 

·

By asking the Company’s board of directors to report on how it addresses the risks presented by any misaligned lobbying and the company’s plans, if any, to mitigate these risks, the Proposal specifically addresses the key roles and responsibilities attributed to the Board and recognized best practices of good governance.

·

The public policy issues of drug pricing reform, broad and timely access to medicines at sustainable prices, intellectual property rights as they relate to COVID-19 vaccine access globally, and advocating for the privatization of Medicare and Medicaid – all raised in the supporting statement of this Proposal – all represent significant regulatory and reputational risks for the company if not properly overseen and managed.

 

share.ca

 

 

 

·

The proposal raises instances where it appears that the advocacy by a trade association to which the company belongs is contrary to the Company’s own stated and disclosed objectives. For shareholders, the positive statements about universal health access and pricing which the Company has disclosed publicly are an important element in addressing a mounting material risk of regulatory and legislative action on these very policy issues, but they are of little value if the Company’s lobbying activity and that of its trade associations undermine and contradict those same statements.

·

The proposal leaves the Board with full discretion to commission the study, assess the risks, determine its own mitigation strategy, none of which inserts shareholders into the ordinary business of the corporation.

 

The company’s response

 

Johnson & Johnson, in its proxy circular, says that its “global political engagement strategic imperatives are detailed on our website and align with our vision”, that it “engages in responsible lobbying and is deliberate in how it engages with trade associations, including through dissent, to advance [Universal Health Coverage].”

 

It notes that it provides disclosure of payments to some third-party associations and political contributions.

·

This proposal, however, is not asking for disclosure of payments but rather a review of whether lobbying activity carried out on the company’s behalf is consistent with the company’s own disclosures to investors.

 

It notes that the company “rank[ed] as one of the top three companies advancing access to medicines in low- and middle-income countries around the world” in the 2021 Access to Medicines Index.

·

The company spends a considerable amount of time enumerating activities in low-income countries, none of which is being questioned in this proposal. This proposal is not asking shareholders to vote on the company’s general activities to support universal health coverage, but rather asking the company’s board to evaluate whether policy activity by entities it supports is consistent with the company’s own disclosed policies, and to mitigate risks, if any, of misalignment, as it sees fit.

 

With regard to third parties like trade associations or “think tanks whose purpose is to develop policy position papers or model legislation”, the company says it “may not align with or support every public position each of these broad-based groups takes.” The company says that “the Board of Directors and the Company have robust governance and oversight practices for Johnson & Johnson’s political engagement programs” and that the Board reviews “the annual dues to trade associations of $50,000 or more, where a percentage of the annual dues may be directed toward federal lobbying”

·

No one would expect a company to agree with every position or activity of every group it supports. This proposal does not ask it to do so. Instead, it asks the board to know and evaluate what positions or lobbying activities it is being exposed to when it provides financial support for those third parties, and to determine how best to mitigate any risks to which it is exposed. Knowing which associations it supports with more than $50,000 annually is not the same as knowing the full range of activities that association is undertaking – a fundamental requirement of risk mitigation. For example, as the Proposal notes, the trade association PhRMA raised nearly $527 million in 2020 and spent roughly $506 million, including making multi-million-dollar donations to numerous other organizations like the American Action Network for use in opposing congressional efforts to address drug pricing. The American Action Network also sponsored facebook advertising in 2020 supporting claims of electoral fraud.1 PhRMA also sits on the board of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) which has been involved in highly controversial lobbying activity including advocating for the privatization of Medicare and Medicaid and opposition to drug pricing reforms and prescription drug importation.

 

_____________________________

¹ https://www.fastcompany.com/90567642/facebook-is-still-failing-to-take-down-ads-that-question-the-elections-integrity

 

This is not a solicitation of authority to vote your proxy. Please DO NOT send us your proxy card as it will not be accepted

share.ca  |  2

 

 

 

Regulatory risk in this area is growing

 

The proposal’s subject is the Board’s oversight of regulatory and reputational risks in the company’s industry and disclosure to inform shareholders on the effectiveness of this oversight.

 

The subject of drug pricing reform has been the subject of at least nine congressional reports since 2019, including a 269-page Congressional Majority Staff report issued earlier this year, which concluded a nearly three-year, sweeping public investigation of the issue that included five public hearings.

 

The question of global policy on intellectual property in the context of the COVID pandemic – raised in this shareholder proposal – is of serious interest to shareholders because of the severe economic impacts of new variants of COVID which arise when vaccines are in short supply in developing countries – which were clearly evident when the Omicron variant spread globally late last year.

 

The Proposal clearly asks the company’s board to review whether its lobbying activity, and that of its trade associations, is consistent with its own disclosed position on exactly these policy issues.

 

The Proposal does not ask shareholders to vote on any membership or position taken on an issue, but rather asks the board to report on its oversight of activity related to positions already defined by the Company itself, positions earlier disclosed to shareholders and upon which shareholders may rely when considering the company’s exposure to regulatory and reputational risk.

 

SHARE urges you to support the proposal. If you have any questions please contact Anthony Schein at aschein@share.ca

 

 Vote “FOR” on Item #12, “Shareholder Proposal - Third Party Review and Report on Lobbying Activities Alignment with Position on Universal Health Coverage”

at the annual general meeting on April 28, 2022.

 

THE FOREGOING INFORMATON MAY BE DISSEMINATED TO SHAREHOLDERS VIA TELEPHONE, U.S. MAIL, EMAIL, CERTAIN WEBSITES AND CERTAIN SOCIAL MEDIA VENUES, AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUED AS INVESTMENT ADVICE OR AS A SOLICITATION OF AUTHORITY TO VOTE YOUR PROXY. THE COST OF DISSEMINATING THE FOREGOING INFORMATION TO SHAREHOLDERS IS BEING BORNE ENTIRELY BY THE FILERS. PROXY CARDS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED BY ANY FILER. PLEASE DO NOT SEND YOUR PROXY TO ANY FILER. TO VOTE YOUR PROXY, PLEASE FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS ON YOUR PROXY CARD.

 

The filer of this document is Shareholder Association for Research & Education (SHARE), Suite 510 – 1155 Robson Street Vancouver, BC V6E 1B5

 

 

This is not a solicitation of authority to vote your proxy. Please DO NOT send us your proxy card as it will not be accepted

share.ca  |  3