Barrick Gold Corporation (NYSE:GOLD)(TSX:ABX) — The completion of
major processing plant maintenance at Nevada Gold Mines, the
conversion of the Goldstrike autoclave to a carbon-in-leach
process, a much-improved performance from Turquoise Ridge and the
steady ramp-up of throughput at Pueblo Viejo’s expanded plant will
boost production in the second half of the year and keep Barrick on
track to achieve its 2023 guidance, the company said today.
Reporting on the results for the first quarter, president and
chief executive Mark Bristow said production, while lower than Q4
2022, was on plan, and free cash flow1 had still increased,
demonstrating the value of Barrick’s Tier One2 asset portfolio. Net
earnings per share for the quarter were $0.07, while adjusted net
earnings per share3 were $0.14, and the quarterly dividend was
maintained at $0.10 per share.
“At NGM, we have introduced a flatter and more responsive
organizational structure and instilled the Barrick style of
leadership in what is still a relatively new management team.
Through this process, we have passed a major milestone in our
journey to unlock Nevada’s full potential and strengthen its
15-year business plan,” he said.
“In the Dominican Republic, construction of Pueblo Viejo’s
expanded process plant was 93% complete at the end of Q1 and we’re
ramping up to full capacity by July. Currently our biggest growth
project, it has been designed to extend the mine’s Tier One life to
beyond 2040 at an expected average annual production rate of
800,000 ounces4 of gold.”
The development of another major project, Reko Diq in Pakistan,
is also advancing steadily with continued progress on the updating
of the feasibility study and the establishment of a Community
Development Committee as well as a school. Scheduled to go into
production in 2028, Reko Diq hosts one of the world’s largest
undeveloped copper-gold deposits.
The Africa and Middle East region finished Q1 with gold
production ahead of plan, setting the foundation for another year
of delivery. At the Loulo-Gounkoto complex in Mali, the first
high-grade stope at the new Gounkoto underground mine was
successfully mined ahead of schedule. At North Mara in Tanzania,
mining has started at the new Gena open pit. During the quarter,
Barrick committed $30 million to a new education initiative in
partnership with the Tanzanian government.
“While we continue to build our peerless asset base, we are also
casting our net wider and stepping up the hunt for fresh
opportunities. During the past quarter, we have opened up new
frontiers and secured multiple interesting prospects in Canada, the
USA, Peru, the Dominican Republic, Saudi Arabia and Tanzania,”
Bristow said.
“We’re also maintaining our carefully planned transition to
cleaner energy. In Nevada, work has started on the TS Power Plant’s
natural gas co-fire project as well as the TS Solar project. At
Loulo, work is under way on the expansion of its solar plant and
the addition of a battery storage system and at Kibali in the
Democratic Republic of Congo (“DRC”), a battery back-up system for
the three hydropower stations that supply the bulk of its energy is
being planned.”
Bristow said Barrick’s consistent reserve replacement and
resource growth has allowed it to underpin each operation and
project with a fully planned 10+ year production profile. This
secures the generation of a robust free cash flow that consistently
delivers strong returns to shareholders and enables Barrick to
drive organic growth by investing in the development of its
world-class assets.
Financial and Operating
Highlights
Financial Results |
Q1 2023 |
Q4 2022 |
|
Q1 2022 |
Realized gold price5,6($ per ounce) |
1,902 |
1,728 |
|
1,876 |
Net earnings($ millions) |
120 |
(735 |
) |
438 |
Adjusted net earnings3($
millions) |
247 |
220 |
|
463 |
Net cash provided by operating
activities($ millions) |
776 |
795 |
|
1,004 |
Free cash flow1($
millions) |
88 |
(96 |
) |
393 |
Net earnings per share($) |
0.07 |
(0.42 |
) |
0.25 |
Adjusted net earnings per
share3($) |
0.14 |
0.13 |
|
0.26 |
Attributable capital expenditures7,8($ millions) |
526 |
743 |
|
478 |
Operating Results |
Q1 2023 |
Q4 2022 |
|
Q1 2022 |
Gold |
|
|
|
Production5(000s of
ounces) |
952 |
1,120 |
|
990 |
Cost of sales5,9($ per
ounce) |
1,378 |
1,324 |
|
1,190 |
Total cash costs5,10($ per
ounce) |
986 |
868 |
|
832 |
All-in
sustaining costs5,10($ per ounce) |
1,370 |
1,242 |
|
1,164 |
Copper |
|
|
|
Production5(millions of
pounds) |
88 |
96 |
|
101 |
Cost of sales5,9($ per
pound) |
3.22 |
3.19 |
|
2.21 |
C1 cash costs5,11($ per
pound) |
2.71 |
2.25 |
|
1.81 |
All-in
sustaining costs5,11($ per pound) |
3.40 |
3.98 |
|
2.85 |
Key Performance Indicators
Best Assets
- Q1 production in line with plan
after planned maintenance at Nevada Gold Mines and start of plant
commissioning at Pueblo Viejo
- Pueblo Viejo and Nevada Gold Mines
ramp up to drive a stronger second half in line with guidance
- Robust performance from Turquoise
Ridge driving year-on-year production increase
- Pueblo Viejo’s expansion project
continues to advance: SAG mill turning and first ore through the
crusher as ramp-up starts
- Gounkoto underground delivers first
production stopes ahead of schedule
- Resin-in-leach to carbon-in-leach
conversion at the Goldstrike autoclave completed on time and on
budget improving operational flexibility
- Exploration team secures new
projects in Canada, USA, Peru, Dominican Republic, Saudi Arabia,
Tanzania
Leader in Sustainability
- New global safety program ‘Journey
to Zero’ launched
- 2022 Sustainability
Report highlights Barrick’s contribution to achievement of
United Nations Sustainable Development Goals
- Reko Diq constitutes first Community
Development Committee and opens Humai school
- Barrick leads nationwide education
initiative in Tanzania with $30 million commitment
- Pueblo Viejo receives highest gender
equality certification in Dominican Republic
Delivering Value
- Free cash flow1 increased despite a
lower production quarter
- Net earnings per share of $0.07 and
adjusted net earnings per share3 of $0.14 for the quarter
- $0.10 per share dividend declared
Q1 2023 Results
PresentationWebinar and Conference
Call
Mark Bristow will host a live presentation of
the results today at 11:00 AM ET, with an interactive webinar
linked to a conference call. Participants will be able to ask
questions.
Go to the webinarUS
and Canada (toll-free), 1 800 319 4610UK (toll-free), 0808 101
2791International (toll), +1 416 915 3239
The Q1 2023 presentation materials will be
available on Barrick’s website at www.barrick.com and the webinar
will remain on the website for later viewing.
Barrick Declares Q1 Dividend
Barrick today announced the declaration of a dividend of $0.10
per share for the first quarter of 2023.
The dividend is consistent with the Company’s Performance
Dividend Policy announced at the start of 2022 and will be paid on
June 15, 2023 to shareholders of record at the close of business on
May 31, 2023.
“Through the maintenance of a robust balance sheet, we are able
to continue to provide a strong base dividend to our shareholders,
with our Performance Dividend Policy providing shareholders with
the potential for additional upside going forward,” said senior
executive vice-president and chief financial officer Graham
Shuttleworth.
Unlocking the Full Potential of the NGM
District
Successful near-mine exploration at Nevada Gold Mines’ (“NGM”)
Tier One operations is adding significant growth potential to its
15-year plan while NGM’s new management team is driving innovation
and optimization of the company’s asset suite.
The Goldrush, Robertson and Cortez Hills mining projects will
all bolster the Cortez complex, with further growth to come from
Barrick’s wholly owned Fourmile project, which includes the new
Dorothy target, and from Hanson, below the Cortez Hills underground
mine.
Carlin is also well-endowed with opportunities, notably around
the Leeville mine with expansion from Fallon, Miramar, Horsham and
Upper Rita K. Other opportunities around the northern Carlin trend
include upside from Ren and Corona. Turquoise Ridge is exploring
the BBT corridor and Getchell, while at Phoenix, NGM is
investigating the expansion of copper production at Copper
Canyon.
The NGM team has identified three key innovation and
optimization action areas: developing a pipeline of future leaders;
focusing on further mining efficiencies; and increasing process
throughput.
The NGM complex is a long-life business which needs to attract
the best new-generation people for its future operations and
leadership by providing opportunities that align with their career
ambitions and their core values. Once recruited, they are developed
through tailored leadership programs as well as NGM’s training
mine.
NGM is investing $320 million12 in a fleet of 62 new trucks, to
be delivered over the next three years, which is expected to
de-risk and accelerate open pit mining. New portals at Pete Bajo
and Rita K as well as at Ren will boost productivity and
mineralization development, and a new paste plant at Goldstrike
underground will increase paste capacity. At Turquoise Ridge, the
ramp-up of the recently commissioned Third Shaft continues to
improve hoist capacity, mine production and ventilation.
The conversion from resin-in-leach to carbon-in-leach at the
Goldstrike autoclave was completed during the first quarter,
enabling the operation to process open pit material sooner from
Carlin South. The first phase of the Gold Quarry roaster expansion
project was recently completed with the second and final phase
scheduled for 2024. The overall project is expected to deliver
around a 20% increase in throughput.
Massive Expansion Project Will Extend Pueblo Viejo’s
Tier One Life Beyond 2040
Barrick’s $2.1 billion investment12 in the expansion of the
Pueblo Viejo gold mine in the Dominican Republic — of which the
process plant portion is now largely complete — is designed to
deliver a totally transformed asset capable of ramping up
production to an annual 1 million ounces and averaging 800,000
ounces per year over a life that is expected to extend to the
2040s.4
The reinvention of Pueblo Viejo is all the more remarkable says
Mark Bristow, because at the time of the merger with Randgold in
January 2019, the mine was facing closure: its vast resources could
not be converted to reserves because it did not have the necessary
tailings storage capacity.
“We tackled the mine’s challenges head-on. Chief among these was
securing a site for a new tailings storage facility, which required
lengthy consultation and negotiation with the regulatory
authorities as well as the affected communities. Once the site was
selected, we completed an Environmental and Social Impact
Assessment in line with the government’s terms of reference, and we
expect a decision towards the middle of this year,” Bristow
said.
“Equally remarkable has been Pueblo Viejo’s steady upward
trajectory, in the midst of the expansion project, in all other
areas of its business. Despite having to manage multiple tie-ins,
the team has achieved record throughput levels from 2019 to 2022.
At the same time, it has also been transitioning to a local and
more diverse workforce, in line with Barrick’s global policy. It
now has a 98% Dominican workforce with a female representation of
23%, up from 11% in 2019.”
Pueblo Viejo is the first Dominican mining company to be awarded
the highest level of gender equality certification by the country’s
Ministry of Women and the United Nations Development Programme, for
three consecutive years.
Nor has its commitment to its host communities faltered, says
Bristow. Eight community development committees have been formed in
line with Barrick’s sustainability strategy. Notable projects
include the construction of the Zambrana medical clinic and the
Sabana del Rey potable water treatment plant, the electrification
of 21 rural villages and the establishment of an educational fund
for scholars and students from the communities.
Pueblo Viejo is also continuing to reduce its greenhouse gas
emissions through the conversion of its power plant and lime kiln
to use liquid natural gas.
Building Barrick’s Next Leadership
Generation
Barrick continues to invest in the development of a
multicultural and multigenerational workforce aligned to a changing
world.
The Group sources and trains a vast majority of its employees
from its host countries in Africa, the Middle East, South and
Central America, as well as in Canada and the United States.
Our diverse workforce is the product of Barrick’s strategy of
local employment and stakeholder recognition in the countries in
which we operate, says Mark Bristow: 96% of its workforce are host
country or community hires, as are 78% of its management. The age
profile is also trending younger, with 54% of employees now under
the age of 40 and 17% younger than 30.
“Within each region, we have launched a comprehensive frontline
development program that focuses on building appropriate business
and leadership skills, ensuring consistency of competencies and
aligning values with the Barrick DNA. We are also building
relationships with partner universities to provide us with a
pipeline of talent well into the future,” says human resources
executive Darian Rich.
Sustainable Delivery Centered on Achievement of UN
Sustainable Development Goals
Barrick’s sustainability strategy is based on integrated and
holistic management and aligned with the objectives of the United
Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), that seeks to
deliver outcomes that are achievable, demonstrable and align with
global priorities, says Mark Bristow in the company’s 2022
Sustainability Report.
Bristow says by using the SDGs as the central framework of its
sustainability reporting, Barrick is better able to link an
integrated approach to sustainability management, and to avoid the
siloed thinking and mere box-ticking approach that can be a
consequence of taking an ESG compliance-driven approach. Barrick’s
latest Sustainability Report, its fifth since the merger with
Randgold in 2019, still complies with important key reporting
frameworks, but its primary lens for understanding and measuring
its progress in sustainability aligns with a focus on the SDGs — an
often-forgotten global commitment.
“Our sustainability approach allows us to tackle the challenges
of alleviating poverty, managing changes to the climate and
preserving biodiversity holistically and concurrently — because
they are inextricably connected,” Bristow says.
For example, Barrick generated more than $10.7 billion12 in
economic value and created 21,000 jobs in 2022 (SDG 8: Decent Work
and Economic Growth). Additionally, 96% of its employees and 78% of
its senior site managers are host country nationals, and $1.4
billion12 worth of goods and services were procured from suppliers
in the communities closest to its mines. In total, Barrick spent
over $6.1 billion12 on host country suppliers in 2022.
Barrick also invested more than $36 million12 in community
development projects from education facilities in Nevada (SDG 4:
Quality Education), to business incubators in the Dominican
Republic (SDG 9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure) and
gender-based violence awareness in Tanzania (SDG 5: Gender
Equality). Barrick’s employees at Pueblo Viejo are now 23% women,
with a target of 50% female representation for all new hires (SDG
5: Gender Equality and SDG 10: Reduced Inequality). Pueblo Viejo is
the first Dominican mining company to have been awarded the highest
level of gender equality certification by the country’s Ministry of
Women and the UN Development Programme.
On the environmental front, Barrick has set itself a greenhouse
gas emissions reduction target that is both demonstrable and
achievable (SDG 13: Climate Action). The company’s total emissions
in 2022 were 6,705kt CO2e (Scope 1 and 2: market-based), which is
6% lower compared to the year before and an 11% reduction against
its 2018 baseline.
“For us, sustainability is instrumental in our continued drive
to operate mines that are welcomed and respected as development
partners throughout the world,” Bristow says.
Protecting Biodiversity: Barrick Leads the
Way
Conserving biodiversity is fundamental to the survival of our
world, essential to tackling climate change and has an important
part to play in the war on poverty, says Barrick group
sustainability executive Grant Beringer.
“We strive not only to protect and restore biodiversity within
our permits, but also to partner with NGOs such as African Parks to
make a positive contribution to nature in the countries in which we
operate, some of which host unique but vulnerable ecosystems,” he
says.
“To achieve this, we have committed Barrick, through our
Biodiversity Policy and Standard, to have a net neutral impact on
any key biodiversity features at our sites, as well as to take
measurable conservation actions to help conserve high-value
biodiversity sites in our host countries.”
Beringer cites Barrick’s partnership with the Garamba National
Park and African Parks in the DRC as a prime example of its
commitment to protecting nature as well as its holistic approach to
sustainability.
Since 2015, Barrick has provided financial and in-kind support
for a comprehensive conservation program designed to restore the
park’s former megaherbivore abundance. The latest Barrick-sponsored
initiative will see the return of white rhinos, last spotted there
in 2006, to the park.
“Our engagement with Garamba also includes livelihood support
for the communities that depend on it. In addition to its 500
employees, we have helped the park to provide economic
opportunities for some 10,000 people through agricultural projects,
while the four hospitals it supports treat more than 12,000
patients annually.”
In Nevada, Barrick has partnered with state and federal
agencies, NGOs and local stakeholders to identify and implement
projects to improve the ecosystem of the Great Basin. Among these
is the rehabilitation of some 10,000 hectares of critically
important habitat for sage grouse on the ranches owned by NGM.
In the Dominican Republic, Pueblo Viejo, in conjunction with the
government, has identified the nearby Aniana Vargas National Park
as a biodiversity offset site. The park shares most of its fauna
and flora, as well as unique animals such as the Hutia rodent and
the Samana least gecko, with the mine’s site.
At the Lumwana copper mine in Zambia, Barrick’s commitment to
the implementation of the UN’s REDD+ project has advanced with the
completion of an eligibility and feasibility study, and the
project’s broad acceptance by the affected communities. The project
aims to conserve 530,000 hectares of woodland around the mine,
which will benefit these communities through the creation of
tourism, horticulture and beekeeping opportunities. It will also
have the capacity to generate carbon credits aligned with Barrick’s
hard-to-abate emissions strategy that can be used to offset
hard-to-abate emissions, in line with Barrick’s Roadmap to Net
Zero.
Continued Reserve Replacement and Disciplined Strategy
Support 10-Year Growth Plan
Barrick last year again more than replaced the gold reserves it
mined and its proven ability to sustain this achievement through
exploration will support the execution of its 10-year rolling
business plan, says executive chairman John Thornton.
“Attuned to the cyclicality of markets, Barrick’s strategy of
building its future by continuing to invest in sustainably
profitable growth, organic as well as external, has equipped us
well to deal with challenging circumstances. In the current climate
of uncertainty, we are proving again that our people are truly
world class and are more than capable of making Barrick the world’s
most valued gold and copper company,” he added.
“Our focus in 2023 will be on expanding Barrick’s value
foundation, already one of the industry’s best, within and beyond
our current borders. The Reko Diq project in Pakistan will almost
double our current copper production and will add to our gold
production when it is fully operational. We are also extending our
presence in North and South America and we are particularly excited
by new opportunities in North Africa and the Middle East.”
Thornton says that at a time when environmental management and
human rights are coming under increasingly critical scrutiny,
Barrick’s sustainability strategy has long been embedded in its
business plans.
“The creation of long-term value for all stakeholders
contributes meaningfully to the social and economic development of
our host countries and communities, protects the safety and health
of our people, respects human rights and manages the impact of our
operations on the environment. Sustainability performance accounts
for 25% of the long-term incentive awards for our senior leaders,
demonstrating the importance Barrick attaches to our sustainability
commitments,” he says.
Barrick lead director Brett Harvey says that at a time when the
mining industry’s recruitment pool is shrinking, Barrick actively
seeks to attract talented young people by offering them
exceptionally rewarding career opportunities in a modern,
world-class business. By prioritizing local recruitment — 96% of
Barrick’s global employees are host country nationals — the company
has also built a workforce that is naturally multicultural and
ethnically diverse. Similarly, the Board represents a mosaic of
skills, nationalities, racial and ethnic backgrounds and
experiences and perspectives that is not only capable of directing
Barrick effectively in a rapidly changing world, but also
represents the composition of our stakeholder universe.
Barrick Steers Porgera Back Towards World-Class
Production
The government of Papua New Guinea, Barrick Niugini Limited and
New Porgera Limited have signed an agreement to progress with the
resumption of operations at the Porgera gold mine, which have been
suspended since 2020.12
Porgera hosts an orebody with measured and indicated resources
of 10 million ounces14 and inferred resources of 3.4 million
ounces.14 After the initial ramp up and optimization of the Wangima
pit, the mine is forecast to produce an average of 700,000 ounces
per year, achieving a milestone towards its potential Tier One
status.
The New Porgera Progress Agreement, signed on March 31, confirms
that all parties are committed to reopening the mine at the
earliest opportunity, in line with the terms of the Porgera Project
Commencement Agreement and the New Porgera Limited Shareholders
Agreement, both concluded in 2022. The New Porgera project team
will now move ahead with the filings for a special mining lease and
progressing the other conditions set out in the Commencement
Agreement for the reopening of the mine.
The equity in New Porgera is shared 51% by Papua New Guinea
(“PNG”) stakeholders, including local landowners and the Enga
provincial government. Economic benefits will be shared 53% by the
PNG stakeholders and 47% by Barrick Niugini Limited, which will
operate the mine.
After the signing ceremony, Mark Bristow said there was strong
support from all stakeholders to get Porgera reopened as soon as
possible.
“It’s been a long journey but in the process we have secured the
buy-in of all the stakeholders. For Barrick, the reopening of the
mine would represent another victory for our host-country
partnership model which has been so successful in Tanzania and has
now also been adopted for the new Reko Diq copper-gold project in
Pakistan,” Bristow said.
“Localization is an essential part of our partnership philosophy
so New Porgera will, whenever possible, source the goods and
services it requires from businesses genuinely based and owned in
Porgera, the Enga province and PNG. Similarly, it will give
preference to locals in recruiting employees for the reopening
mine.”
Pioneering Kibali Plans Further Partner-Based
Development
Since Kibali went into production 10 years ago, it has not only
grown into Africa’s largest gold mine, it has also opened a new
mining frontier in the DRC and stimulated the development of a
thriving regional economy in the country’s north-east province.
Mark Bristow says the mutually beneficial partnership between
the company and its local stakeholders, notably the government,
contractors, service providers, employees and the community, has
demonstrated that it is possible to build and operate a successful
world-class mine, run by host country nationals, in one of Africa’s
remotest corners.
In the 13 years since the acquisition of the property which
became Kibali, it has invested more than $4.6 billion12 in the DRC,
with payments to local contractors and suppliers alone amounting to
almost $2.4 billion, $1.4 billion going to the government in the
form of royalties, taxes and permits, salaries amounting to $621
million, and the investment of $196 million in infrastructure
development and community support.
“Kibali has multiple partnerships with local businesses, many of
which we have actively mentored, such as the all-Congolese team
that built the mine’s Azambi hydropower station,” Bristow said.
“Kibali’s three continuously upgraded hydropower stations and
their battery back-up system have put it in the lead of the Barrick
group’s green energy drive. At present, approximately 80% of the
mine’s power requirement is provided by renewable energy sources
and this will rise when the planned new solar plant is commissioned
in 2025, further reducing Kibali’s carbon footprint as well as its
energy costs.”
The mine also continues to invest in the recruitment and
training of Congolese nationals, who already account for 95% of its
workforce and 76% of its leadership, with special emphasis on the
skills development of potential managers and technicians.
Barrick Pledges $30 Million Towards School Development
in Partnership With Tanzania
In a meeting between Mark Bristow and Tanzania president Samia
Suluhu Hassan, the company affirmed its pledge of $30 million in
partnership with the Tanzanian government, towards the expansion of
education infrastructure in Tanzania.
Called ‘The Barrick-Twiga Future Forward Education Program’, the
objective is to build 1,090 classrooms, 1,640 ablution blocks and
270 dormitories across 161 schools nationwide, helping to
accommodate approximately 49,000 of the estimated 190,000 students
who are expected to start their A-levels in July this year. The
first $10 million was committed in April and the balance will be
rolled out with the program.
“We believe that education is key to the development of the
country. Both the Bulyanhulu and North Mara gold mines continue to
support the education sector through the building of classrooms and
the improvement of education infrastructure around the mines, which
has seen some of them consistently feature among the top schools in
these regions,” Bristow said.
North Mara has already spent $1.9 million on 87 primary and
secondary schools in the Tarime District, 14 of which are the best
performing schools in the district. Bulyanhulu has spent $1.8
million on 80 educational projects around the mine and is currently
building a Vocational Education Training College Centre in Bunango
Village. Barrick’s investment around the mine has given 7,557
Tanzanian girls access to education in 2022.
“In addition to the company’s support of education, last year
North Mara was officially recognized as Tanzania’s largest taxpayer
and Bulyanhulu was awarded the Best Compliant Employer prize by the
National Social Security Fund. North Mara and Bulyanhulu also
received the first and runner-up recognition awards, respectively,
for the export of minerals and the generation of foreign currency.
They’ve both come a very long way and we look forward to continuing
that journey through our Twiga partnership with the
government.”
Bristow said since Barrick took over control of the mines in
2019, it had pumped $2.4 billion into the Tanzanian economy.
Through their community development committees, the mines had
invested more than $10 million in projects to improve healthcare,
education, access to potable water and the road infrastructure.
Peerless Asset Quality and High-Potential Prospects
Position Barrick for Profitable Growth
The past year marked a major milestone in Barrick’s journey to
becoming the world’s most valued gold and copper mining company,
with the foundational targets of the new business created by the
merger with Randgold in January 2019 having largely been met, and
its greater goals now within reach, says Mark Bristow with the
recent publication of the company’s 2022 Annual Report.
“North America is Barrick’s value foundation and the true
benefits of our creation of the NGM complex are now becoming
evident in the form of mineral resource growth and new discoveries.
The quality and prospectivity of its portfolio cannot be
overstated,” he said.
“In Central America, the plant expansion project we initiated at
the Pueblo Viejo gold mine in the Dominican Republic is rapidly
taking shape. With its unlocked reserve base now standing at 20
million ounces15, the life of the mine — one of the six Tier One
assets in our gold portfolio — has been extended beyond 2040 and it
will maintain an average annual production rate above 800,000
ounces over that time.4
“Another of our Tier One assets, the Loulo-Gounkoto complex in
Mali, which has produced more than 9 million ounces of gold since
2005, is set to maintain its current rate of production for the
next 10 years, with its life extending to 203716.”
Bristow said Barrick was also achieving its strategic objective
of significantly expanding its copper holdings. Work on the
reconstituted Reko Diq project in Pakistan — one of the largest and
highest quality undeveloped copper-gold deposits in the world — has
started, and the revitalized Lumwana mine in Zambia has commenced a
prefeasibility study on the Super Pit expansion. When both of these
projects are completed in 2028, they will elevate Barrick into the
front rank of copper producers.
“Brownfields exploration continues to unlock potential around
our existing assets while greenfields work has started delivering
real value. We’re continuing to expand our global exploration
footprint with active programs elsewhere in North America as well
as in Latin America, Saudi Arabia and Egypt,” he said.
“One of the highlights of last year was the continued growth in
our gold reserves and resources, driven by our strategy of
investing in organic growth through exploration and mineral
resource management. Barrick’s ability over time to more than
replace the ounces we mine reinforces our sustainability and our
sector-leading production profile.”
Demonstrating its commitment to strong shareholder returns,
Barrick returned a record $1.6 billion17 to shareholders last year,
but this was not at the expense of its growth strategy, Bristow
said.
“We continue to invest in and roll out our 10-year gold and
copper plans, projecting real growth on a steady base-case
production profile. This investment is made possible by the
unmatched quality of our assets and the abundant free cash flow
they generate. Also embedded in our portfolio is a long pipeline of
quality projects from which we are steadily unlocking value. The
ability to grow without having to buy is a very significant
advantage that differentiates Barrick from its peers,” he said.
In line with Barrick’s commitment to a ‘best people’ workforce,
Bristow said Barrick is aggressively recruiting promising young
professionals across all of the relevant disciplines. The next
generation of leaders is already taking shape in the company’s
succession plans and last year already saw seamless transitions in
a number of key positions.
It is also rapidly progressing the greening of its power grid
across the group. Major solar projects in the Dominican Republic
and Nevada, the expansion of solar power and the addition of a
battery energy storage system at Loulo-Gounkoto, and the planned
solar power dry season back-up for Kibali’s three hydropower
plants, will not only significantly advance Barrick towards its
2050 net zero target, but will improve the mines’ margins by
pruning energy costs.
Also in the annual report, executive chairman John Thornton
noted the significant contribution Barrick’s operations make in the
developing countries in which it operates.
“Mining can and should be a key catalyst for economic growth and
social upliftment. Barrick’s substantial contribution to our host
countries’ coffers and our equally significant investment in the
welfare of the communities that border on our mines is making a
real difference, highlighting the important part the mining
industry can play in narrowing the gap between the richer and
poorer nations to make the world a better place,” he said.
Mali Operations Honored by Government for Tax
Citizenship
Barrick’s Loulo-Gounkoto gold mining complex, as one of the
largest taxpayers in Mali, has been formally thanked by the
government for its role in enabling the tax department to achieve
its revenue targets for 2022.
In a ceremony at Barrick’s Bamako office, the country’s director
of large enterprises presented both Loulo and Gounkoto with
certificates of recognition honoring what was described as their
high level of tax citizenship and expressing the hope that this
productive partnership between the mines and the government would
continue.
Barrick, through its legacy company Randgold, has been operating
in Mali for more than a quarter of a century and during that time,
we have contributed to the development of the country’s economy and
its mining industry.
A First for Water Treatment in San Juan
The community of Iglesia near the Veladero mine in San Juan,
Argentina, has become the first municipality in the province to use
alternative energy to power its drinking water treatment
plants.
Solar energy will power the plants' pumps and operate the
filtering equipment, sending water from wells to reserve tanks.
"This system will reduce our electricity expense by 50% to 60%,
which is a huge savings," says Oscar Varela, president of the Rodeo
Neighborhood Association.
Two photovoltaic kits of 12 horsepower with 32 panels generating
9.9 kilowatts, and one 17 horsepower kit comprising 60 panels of
18.6 kilowatts, were built in the Rodeo and Bella Vista water
treatment plants. In case of any power failure in the panels, the
plants are automatically reconnected to the power grid.
"The idea of powering the water treatment plants with solar
energy is an innovation that emerged as we have been working to
refurbish a total of ten plants in the region over the last three
years," said Veladero's sustainable development manager, Alberto
Abecasis.
The effort was a collaboration between Veladero, neighborhood
associations, the Municipality of Iglesia and the Ministry of
Mining.
The mine and its neighbors have also collaborated in
environmental participatory monitoring. Over the past few months,
five monitoring sessions that had 21 community members collect
water samples at Veladero's compliance points and submit them to a
certified lab for testing, has confirmed water quality meets all
baseline parameters.
Barrick organizes participatory monitoring sessions like these
at several operations worldwide to ensure that our host communities
understand what we are doing to make sure we are responsible
stewards of the environment.
2023 Operating and Capital Expenditure
Guidance
GOLD PRODUCTION AND COSTS |
|
2023 forecastattributable production(000s oz) |
2023 forecast costof sales9 ($/oz) |
2023 forecast totalcash costs10 ($/oz) |
2023 forecast all-insustaining costs10($/oz) |
Carlin (61.5%) |
910 - 1,000 |
1,030 - 1,110 |
820 - 880 |
1,250 - 1,330 |
Cortez (61.5%)18 |
580 - 650 |
1,080 - 1,160 |
680 - 740 |
930 - 1,010 |
Turquoise Ridge (61.5%) |
300 - 340 |
1,290 - 1,370 |
900 - 960 |
1,170 - 1,250 |
Phoenix (61.5%) |
100 - 120 |
1,860 - 1,940 |
880 - 940 |
1,110 - 1,190 |
Long Canyon (61.5%) |
0 - 10 |
2,120 - 2,200 |
730 - 790 |
1,080 - 1,160 |
Nevada Gold Mines (61.5%) |
1,900 - 2,100 |
1,140 - 1,220 |
790 - 850 |
1,140 - 1,220 |
Hemlo |
150 - 170 |
1,400 - 1,480 |
1,210 - 1,270 |
1,590 - 1,670 |
North America |
2,100 - 2,300 |
1,160 - 1,240 |
820 - 880 |
1,170 - 1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pueblo Viejo (60%) |
470 - 520 |
1,130 - 1,210 |
710 - 770 |
960 - 1,040 |
Veladero (50%) |
160 - 180 |
1,630 - 1,710 |
1,060 - 1,120 |
1,550 - 1,630 |
Porgera (47.5%)13 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
Latin America & Asia Pacific |
630 - 700 |
1,260 - 1,340 |
800 - 860 |
1,110 - 1,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loulo-Gounkoto (80%) |
510 - 560 |
1,100 - 1,180 |
750 - 810 |
1,070 - 1,150 |
Kibali (45%) |
320 - 360 |
1,080 - 1,160 |
710 - 770 |
880 - 960 |
North Mara (84%) |
230 - 260 |
1,120 - 1,200 |
900 - 960 |
1,240 - 1,320 |
Bulyanhulu (84%) |
160 - 190 |
1,230 - 1,310 |
880 - 940 |
1,160 - 1,240 |
Tongon (89.7%) |
180 - 210 |
1,260 - 1,340 |
1,070 - 1,130 |
1,240 - 1,320 |
Africa & Middle East |
1,450 - 1,600 |
1,130 - 1,210 |
820 - 880 |
1,080 - 1,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Attributable to
Barrick19,20,21 |
4,200 - 4,600 |
1,170 - 1,250 |
820 - 880 |
1,170 - 1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
COPPER PRODUCTION AND COSTS |
|
2023 forecastattributable production(Mlbs) |
2023 forecast costof sales9($/lb) |
2023 forecast C1cash costs11($/lb) |
2023 forecast all-insustaining costs11($/lb) |
Lumwana |
260 - 290 |
2.45 - 2.75 |
2.00 - 2.20 |
3.20 - 3.50 |
Zaldívar (50%) |
100 - 110 |
3.40 - 3.70 |
2.60 - 2.80 |
2.90 - 3.20 |
Jabal Sayid (50%) |
65 - 75 |
1.80 - 2.10 |
1.50 - 1.70 |
1.60 - 1.90 |
Total Attributable to
Barrick21 |
420 - 470 |
2.60 - 2.90 |
2.05 - 2.25 |
2.95 - 3.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
ATTRIBUTABLE CAPITAL EXPENDITURES |
|
|
|
|
($ millions) |
|
|
|
Attributable minesite sustaining7 |
1,450 - 1,700 |
|
|
|
Attributable project7 |
750 - 900 |
|
|
|
Total attributable capital expenditures |
2,200 - 2,600 |
|
|
|
2023 OUTLOOK ASSUMPTIONS AND ECONOMIC
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
|
2023 Guidance Assumption |
Hypothetical Change |
Impact on EBITDA22 (millions) |
Impact on TCC and AISC10,11 |
Gold price sensitivity |
$1,650/oz |
+/- $100/oz |
+/- $590 |
+/- $5/oz |
Copper
price sensitivity |
$3.50/lb |
+/- $0.25/lb |
+/- $110 |
+/- $0.01/lb |
Production and Cost Summary - Gold
|
For the three months ended |
|
3/31/23 |
12/31/22 |
% Change |
3/31/22 |
% Change |
Nevada Gold Mines LLC
(61.5%)a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis) |
416 |
516 |
(19 |
)% |
459 |
(9 |
)% |
|
Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis) |
676 |
838 |
(19 |
)% |
747 |
(9 |
)% |
|
Cost of sales ($/oz) |
1,461 |
1,257 |
16 |
% |
1,169 |
25 |
% |
|
Total cash costs ($/oz)b |
1,074 |
906 |
19 |
% |
820 |
31 |
% |
|
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b |
1,436 |
1,179 |
22 |
% |
1,118 |
28 |
% |
|
Carlin (61.5%)c |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis) |
166 |
265 |
(37 |
)% |
229 |
(28 |
)% |
|
|
Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis) |
270 |
432 |
(37 |
)% |
373 |
(28 |
)% |
|
|
Cost of sales ($/oz) |
1,449 |
1,081 |
34 |
% |
1,015 |
43 |
% |
|
Total cash costs ($/oz)b |
1,215 |
878 |
38 |
% |
829 |
47 |
% |
|
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b |
1,689 |
1,217 |
39 |
% |
1,139 |
48 |
% |
|
Cortez (61.5%)c |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis) |
140 |
140 |
0 |
% |
115 |
22 |
% |
|
Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis) |
226 |
226 |
0 |
% |
187 |
22 |
% |
|
Cost of sales ($/oz) |
1,324 |
1,284 |
3 |
% |
1,113 |
19 |
% |
|
Total cash costs ($/oz)b |
913 |
848 |
8 |
% |
784 |
16 |
% |
|
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b |
1,233 |
1,037 |
19 |
% |
1,150 |
7 |
% |
|
Turquoise Ridge (61.5%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis) |
81 |
78 |
4 |
% |
67 |
21 |
% |
|
Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis) |
131 |
127 |
4 |
% |
109 |
21 |
% |
|
Cost of sales ($/oz) |
1,412 |
1,518 |
(7 |
)% |
1,436 |
(2 |
)% |
|
|
Total cash costs ($/oz)b |
1,034 |
1,089 |
(5 |
)% |
1,030 |
0 |
% |
|
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b |
1,271 |
1,304 |
(3 |
)% |
1,281 |
(1 |
)% |
|
|
Phoenix (61.5%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis) |
27 |
30 |
(10 |
)% |
23 |
17 |
% |
|
Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis) |
45 |
48 |
(10 |
)% |
37 |
17 |
% |
|
Cost of sales ($/oz) |
2,380 |
1,901 |
25 |
% |
2,253 |
6 |
% |
|
Total cash costs ($/oz)b |
1,198 |
946 |
27 |
% |
835 |
43 |
% |
|
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b |
1,365 |
1,037 |
32 |
% |
1,027 |
33 |
% |
|
Long Canyon (61.5%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis) |
2 |
3 |
(33 |
)% |
25 |
(92 |
)% |
|
|
Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis) |
4 |
5 |
(33 |
)% |
41 |
(92 |
)% |
|
|
Cost of sales ($/oz) |
1,621 |
1,812 |
(11 |
)% |
1,093 |
48 |
% |
|
Total cash costs ($/oz)b |
579 |
616 |
(6 |
)% |
342 |
69 |
% |
|
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b |
629 |
664 |
(5 |
)% |
366 |
72 |
% |
|
Pueblo Viejo (60%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis) |
89 |
98 |
(9 |
)% |
104 |
(14 |
)% |
|
|
Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis) |
149 |
163 |
(9 |
)% |
174 |
(14 |
)% |
|
|
Cost of sales ($/oz) |
1,241 |
1,215 |
2 |
% |
1,077 |
15 |
% |
|
Total cash costs ($/oz)b |
714 |
764 |
(7 |
)% |
682 |
5 |
% |
|
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b |
1,073 |
1,065 |
1 |
% |
948 |
13 |
% |
|
Loulo-Gounkoto (80%) |
|
|
|
|
|
Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis) |
137 |
139 |
(1 |
)% |
138 |
(1 |
)% |
|
Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis) |
172 |
174 |
(1 |
)% |
172 |
(1 |
)% |
|
Cost of sales ($/oz) |
1,275 |
1,216 |
5 |
% |
1,088 |
17 |
% |
|
Total cash costs ($/oz)b |
855 |
822 |
4 |
% |
721 |
19 |
% |
|
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b |
1,190 |
1,102 |
8 |
% |
982 |
21 |
% |
|
Kibali (45%) |
|
|
|
|
|
Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis) |
64 |
97 |
(34 |
)% |
76 |
(16 |
)% |
|
Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis) |
141 |
216 |
(34 |
)% |
168 |
(16 |
)% |
|
Cost of sales ($/oz) |
1,367 |
1,570 |
(13 |
)% |
1,137 |
20 |
% |
|
Total cash costs ($/oz)b |
987 |
617 |
60 |
% |
744 |
33 |
% |
|
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b |
1,177 |
981 |
20 |
% |
996 |
18 |
% |
|
Veladero (50%) |
|
|
|
|
|
Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis) |
43 |
50 |
(14 |
)% |
46 |
(7 |
)% |
|
Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis) |
86 |
99 |
(14 |
)% |
92 |
(7 |
)% |
|
Cost of sales ($/oz) |
1,587 |
2,309 |
(31 |
)% |
1,348 |
18 |
% |
|
Total cash costs ($/oz)b |
1,035 |
954 |
8 |
% |
847 |
22 |
% |
|
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b |
1,761 |
1,526 |
15 |
% |
1,588 |
11 |
% |
|
Porgera (47.5%)d |
|
|
|
|
|
Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis) |
— |
— |
— |
% |
— |
— |
% |
|
Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis) |
— |
— |
— |
% |
— |
— |
% |
|
Cost of sales ($/oz) |
— |
— |
— |
% |
— |
— |
% |
|
Total cash costs ($/oz)b |
— |
— |
— |
% |
— |
— |
% |
|
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b |
— |
— |
— |
% |
— |
— |
% |
|
Tongon (89.7%) |
|
|
|
|
|
Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis) |
50 |
63 |
(21 |
)% |
35 |
43 |
% |
|
Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis) |
55 |
70 |
(21 |
)% |
39 |
43 |
% |
|
Cost of sales ($/oz) |
1,453 |
1,381 |
5 |
% |
2,036 |
(29 |
)% |
|
Total cash costs ($/oz)b |
1,182 |
1,070 |
10 |
% |
1,667 |
(29 |
)% |
|
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b |
1,284 |
1,404 |
(9 |
)% |
1,803 |
(29 |
)% |
|
Hemlo |
|
|
|
|
|
Gold produced (000s oz) |
41 |
38 |
8 |
% |
31 |
32 |
% |
|
Cost of sales ($/oz) |
1,486 |
1,451 |
2 |
% |
1,727 |
(14 |
)% |
|
Total cash costs ($/oz)b |
1,291 |
1,227 |
5 |
% |
1,503 |
(14 |
)% |
|
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b |
1,609 |
1,557 |
3 |
% |
1,982 |
(19 |
)% |
|
North Mara (84%) |
|
|
|
|
|
Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis) |
68 |
70 |
(3 |
)% |
56 |
21 |
% |
|
Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis) |
81 |
84 |
(3 |
)% |
66 |
21 |
% |
|
Cost of sales ($/oz) |
987 |
1,030 |
(4 |
)% |
852 |
16 |
% |
|
Total cash costs ($/oz)b |
759 |
758 |
0 |
% |
709 |
7 |
% |
|
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b |
1,137 |
1,301 |
(13 |
)% |
874 |
30 |
% |
|
Bulyanhulu (84%) |
|
|
|
|
|
Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis) |
44 |
49 |
(10 |
)% |
45 |
(2 |
)% |
|
Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis) |
53 |
58 |
(10 |
)% |
53 |
(2 |
)% |
|
Cost of sales ($/oz) |
1,358 |
1,237 |
10 |
% |
1,216 |
12 |
% |
|
Total cash costs ($/oz)b |
982 |
896 |
10 |
% |
847 |
16 |
% |
|
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b |
1,332 |
1,401 |
(5 |
)% |
984 |
35 |
% |
|
Total Attributable to
Barricke |
|
|
|
|
|
Gold produced (000s oz) |
952 |
1,120 |
(15 |
)% |
990 |
(4 |
)% |
|
Cost of sales ($/oz)f |
1,378 |
1,324 |
4 |
% |
1,190 |
16 |
% |
|
Total cash costs ($/oz)b |
986 |
868 |
14 |
% |
832 |
19 |
% |
|
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b |
1,370 |
1,242 |
10 |
% |
1,164 |
18 |
% |
|
- These results
represent our 61.5% interest in Carlin, Cortez, Turquoise Ridge,
Phoenix and Long Canyon.
- Further
information on these non-GAAP financial performance measures,
including detailed reconciliations, is included in the endnotes to
this press release.
- Includes
Goldrush.
- As Porgera was placed on care and
maintenance on April 25, 2020, no operating data or per ounce data
is provided.
- Excludes
Pierina, which is producing incidental ounces while in
closure.
- Gold cost of sales per ounce is calculated as cost of sales
across our gold operations (excluding sites in closure or care and
maintenance) divided by ounces sold (both on an attributable basis
using Barrick's ownership share).
Production and Cost Summary -
Copper
|
For the three months ended |
|
3/31/23 |
12/31/22 |
% Change |
3/31/22 |
% Change |
Lumwana |
|
|
|
|
|
Copper production (Mlbs) |
48 |
53 |
(9 |
)% |
57 |
(16 |
)% |
Cost of sales ($/lb) |
3.56 |
3.56 |
0 |
% |
2.20 |
62 |
% |
C1 cash costs ($/lb)a |
3.09 |
2.34 |
32 |
% |
1.86 |
66 |
% |
All-in sustaining costs ($/lb)a |
3.98 |
4.86 |
(18 |
)% |
3.16 |
26 |
% |
Zaldívar
(50%) |
|
|
|
|
|
Copper production (Mlbs attributable basis) |
22 |
25 |
(12 |
)% |
25 |
(12 |
)% |
Copper production (Mlbs 100% basis) |
44 |
50 |
(12 |
)% |
51 |
(12 |
)% |
Cost of sales ($/lb) |
3.73 |
3.55 |
5 |
% |
2.85 |
31 |
% |
C1 cash costs ($/lb)a |
2.86 |
2.69 |
6 |
% |
2.15 |
33 |
% |
All-in sustaining costs ($/lb)a |
3.22 |
3.60 |
(11 |
)% |
2.64 |
22 |
% |
Jabal Sayid (50%) |
|
|
|
|
|
Copper production (Mlbs attributable basis) |
18 |
18 |
0 |
% |
19 |
(5 |
)% |
Copper production (Mlbs 100% basis) |
37 |
36 |
0 |
% |
38 |
(5 |
)% |
Cost of sales ($/lb) |
1.53 |
1.72 |
(11 |
)% |
1.30 |
18 |
% |
C1 cash costs ($/lb)a |
1.39 |
1.42 |
(2 |
)% |
1.10 |
26 |
% |
All-in sustaining costs ($/lb)a |
1.61 |
1.54 |
5 |
% |
1.17 |
38 |
% |
Total Attributable to Barrick |
|
|
|
|
|
Copper production (Mlbs) |
88 |
96 |
(8 |
)% |
101 |
(13 |
)% |
Cost of sales ($/lb)b |
3.22 |
3.19 |
1 |
% |
2.21 |
46 |
% |
C1 cash costs ($/lb)a |
2.71 |
2.25 |
20 |
% |
1.81 |
50 |
% |
All-in sustaining costs ($/lb)a |
3.40 |
3.98 |
(15 |
)% |
2.85 |
19 |
% |
- Further
information on these non-GAAP financial performance measures,
including detailed reconciliations, is included in the endnotes to
this press release.
- Copper cost of sales per pound is calculated as cost of sales
across our copper operations divided by pounds sold (both on an
attributable basis using Barrick's ownership share).
Financial and Operating Highlights
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
3/31/23 |
|
12/31/22 |
|
% Change |
|
|
3/31/22 |
|
% Change |
|
Financial Results ($ millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
2,643 |
|
2,774 |
|
(5 |
)% |
|
2,853 |
|
(7 |
)% |
Cost of sales |
1,941 |
|
2,093 |
|
(7 |
)% |
|
1,739 |
|
12 |
% |
Net earningsa |
120 |
|
(735 |
) |
116 |
% |
|
438 |
|
(73 |
)% |
Adjusted net earningsb |
247 |
|
220 |
|
12 |
% |
|
463 |
|
(47 |
)% |
Adjusted EBITDAb |
1,183 |
|
1,286 |
|
(8 |
)% |
|
1,645 |
|
(28 |
)% |
Adjusted EBITDA marginc |
45 |
% |
46 |
% |
(2 |
)% |
|
58 |
% |
(22 |
)% |
Minesite sustaining capital
expendituresb,d |
454 |
|
557 |
|
(18 |
)% |
|
420 |
|
8 |
% |
Project capital
expendituresb,d |
226 |
|
324 |
|
(30 |
)% |
|
186 |
|
22 |
% |
Total consolidated capital
expendituresd,e |
688 |
|
891 |
|
(23 |
)% |
|
611 |
|
13 |
% |
Net cash provided by operating
activities |
776 |
|
795 |
|
(2 |
)% |
|
1,004 |
|
(23 |
)% |
Net cash provided by operating
activities marginf |
29 |
% |
29 |
% |
0 |
% |
|
35 |
% |
(17 |
)% |
Free cash flowb |
88 |
|
(96 |
) |
192 |
% |
|
393 |
|
(78 |
)% |
Net earnings per share (basic
and diluted) |
0.07 |
|
(0.42 |
) |
117 |
% |
|
0.25 |
|
(72 |
)% |
Adjusted net earnings (basic)b
per share |
0.14 |
|
0.13 |
|
8 |
% |
|
0.26 |
|
(46 |
)% |
Weighted average diluted common shares (millions of shares) |
1,755 |
|
1,759 |
|
0 |
% |
|
1,779 |
|
(1 |
)% |
Operating Results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold production (thousands of
ounces)g |
952 |
|
1,120 |
|
(15 |
)% |
|
990 |
|
(4 |
)% |
Gold sold (thousands of
ounces)g |
954 |
|
1,111 |
|
(14 |
)% |
|
993 |
|
(4 |
)% |
Market gold price ($/oz) |
1,890 |
|
1,726 |
|
10 |
% |
|
1,877 |
|
1 |
% |
Realized gold priceb,g
($/oz) |
1,902 |
|
1,728 |
|
10 |
% |
|
1,876 |
|
1 |
% |
Gold cost of sales (Barrick’s
share)g,h ($/oz) |
1,378 |
|
1,324 |
|
4 |
% |
|
1,190 |
|
16 |
% |
Gold total cash costsb,g
($/oz) |
986 |
|
868 |
|
14 |
% |
|
832 |
|
19 |
% |
Gold all-in sustaining
costsb,g ($/oz) |
1,370 |
|
1,242 |
|
10 |
% |
|
1,164 |
|
18 |
% |
Copper production (millions of
pounds)g |
88 |
|
96 |
|
(8 |
)% |
|
101 |
|
(13 |
)% |
Copper sold (millions of
pounds)g |
89 |
|
99 |
|
(10 |
)% |
|
113 |
|
(21 |
)% |
Market copper price
($/lb) |
4.05 |
|
3.63 |
|
12 |
% |
|
4.53 |
|
(11 |
)% |
Realized copper priceb,g
($/lb) |
4.20 |
|
3.81 |
|
10 |
% |
|
4.68 |
|
(10 |
)% |
Copper cost of sales
(Barrick’s share)g,i ($/lb) |
3.22 |
|
3.19 |
|
1 |
% |
|
2.21 |
|
46 |
% |
Copper C1 cash costsb,g
($/lb) |
2.71 |
|
2.25 |
|
20 |
% |
|
1.81 |
|
50 |
% |
Copper all-in sustaining
costsb,g ($/lb) |
3.40 |
|
3.98 |
|
(15 |
)% |
|
2.85 |
|
19 |
% |
|
As at 3/31/23 |
As at 12/31/22 |
% Change |
|
As at 3/31/22 |
% Change |
Financial Position ($ millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt (current and
long-term) |
4,777 |
|
4,782 |
|
0 |
% |
|
5,144 |
|
(7 |
)% |
Cash and equivalents |
4,377 |
|
4,440 |
|
(1 |
)% |
|
5,887 |
|
(26 |
)% |
Debt,
net of cash |
400 |
|
342 |
|
17 |
% |
|
(743 |
) |
154 |
% |
- Net earnings represents net earnings attributable to the equity
holders of the Company.
- Further information on these non-GAAP financial performance
measures, including detailed reconciliations, is included in the
endnotes to this press release.
- Represents adjusted EBITDA divided by revenue.
- Amounts presented on a consolidated
cash basis. Project capital expenditures are included in our
calculation of all-in costs, but not included in our calculation of
all-in sustaining costs.
- Total consolidated capital
expenditures also includes capitalized interest of $8 million for
the three month period ended March 31, 2023 (December 31,
2022: $10 million and March 31, 2022: $5 million).
- Represents net cash provided by
operating activities divided by revenue.
- On an attributable basis.
- Gold cost of sales per ounce is
calculated as cost of sales across our gold operations (excluding
sites in closure or care and maintenance) divided by ounces sold
(both on an attributable basis using Barrick's ownership
share).
- Copper cost of sales per pound is
calculated as cost of sales across our copper operations divided by
pounds sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick's
ownership share).
Consolidated Statements of Income
Barrick
Gold Corporation(in millions of United States dollars, except per
share data) (Unaudited) |
Three months endedMarch 31, |
|
|
|
2023 |
|
|
2022 |
|
Revenue (notes 4 and 5) |
$2,643 |
|
$2,853 |
|
Costs and expenses (income) |
|
|
Cost of sales (notes 4 and
6) |
|
1,941 |
|
|
1,739 |
|
General and administrative
expenses |
|
39 |
|
|
54 |
|
Exploration, evaluation and
project expenses |
|
71 |
|
|
67 |
|
Impairment charges (notes 8b
and 12) |
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
Loss on currency
translation |
|
38 |
|
|
3 |
|
Closed mine
rehabilitation |
|
22 |
|
|
3 |
|
Income from equity investees
(note 11) |
|
(53 |
) |
|
(99 |
) |
Other
expense (income) (note 8a) |
|
52 |
|
|
(11 |
) |
Income before finance costs and income taxes |
$532 |
|
$1,095 |
|
Finance
costs, net |
|
(58 |
) |
|
(88 |
) |
Income before income taxes |
$474 |
|
$1,007 |
|
Income
tax expense (note 9) |
|
(205 |
) |
|
(301 |
) |
Net income |
$269 |
|
$706 |
|
Attributable to: |
|
|
Equity holders of Barrick Gold
Corporation |
$120 |
|
$438 |
|
Non-controlling interests (note 15) |
$149 |
|
$268 |
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share
data attributable to the equity holders of Barrick Gold Corporation
(note 7) |
|
|
Net income |
|
|
Basic |
$0.07 |
|
$0.25 |
|
Diluted |
$0.07 |
|
$0.25 |
|
The notes to these unaudited condensed interim financial
statements, which are contained in the First Quarter Report 2023
available on our website, are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive
Income
Barrick
Gold Corporation(in millions of United States dollars)
(Unaudited) |
Three months endedMarch 31, |
|
|
|
2023 |
|
|
2022 |
|
Net income |
$269 |
|
$706 |
|
Other comprehensive
income (loss), net of taxes |
|
|
Items that may be
reclassified subsequently to profit or loss: |
|
|
Currency translation
adjustments, net of tax $nil and $nil |
|
(3 |
) |
|
— |
|
Items that will not be
reclassified to profit or loss: |
|
|
Net change on equity
investments, net of tax $nil and ($8) |
|
— |
|
|
58 |
|
Total other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
(3 |
) |
|
58 |
|
Total comprehensive income |
$266 |
|
$764 |
|
Attributable to: |
|
|
Equity holders of Barrick Gold
Corporation |
$117 |
|
$496 |
|
Non-controlling interests |
$149 |
|
$268 |
|
The notes to these unaudited condensed interim financial
statements, which are contained in the First Quarter Report 2023
available on our website, are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow
Barrick
Gold Corporation (in millions of United States dollars)
(Unaudited) |
Three months endedMarch 31, |
|
|
|
2023 |
|
|
2022 |
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
Net income |
$269 |
|
$706 |
|
Adjustments for the following
items: |
|
|
Depreciation |
|
495 |
|
|
460 |
|
Finance costs, net1 |
|
58 |
|
|
88 |
|
Impairment charges (notes 8b and 12) |
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
Income tax expense (note 9) |
|
205 |
|
|
301 |
|
Income from equity investees (note 11) |
|
(53 |
) |
|
(99 |
) |
Gain on sale of non-current assets |
|
(3 |
) |
|
(2 |
) |
Loss on currency translation |
|
38 |
|
|
3 |
|
Change in working capital
(note 10) |
|
(206 |
) |
|
(131 |
) |
Other
operating activities (note 10) |
|
52 |
|
|
(77 |
) |
Operating cash flows before interest and income taxes |
|
856 |
|
|
1,251 |
|
Interest paid |
|
(23 |
) |
|
(23 |
) |
Interest received1 |
|
49 |
|
|
10 |
|
Income
taxes paid2 |
|
(106 |
) |
|
(234 |
) |
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
776 |
|
|
1,004 |
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
Property, plant and
equipment |
|
|
Capital expenditures (note 4) |
|
(688 |
) |
|
(611 |
) |
Sales proceeds |
|
3 |
|
|
1 |
|
Investment sales |
|
— |
|
|
260 |
|
Dividends received from equity
method investments (note 11) |
|
67 |
|
|
359 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities |
|
(618 |
) |
|
9 |
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
Lease repayments |
|
(4 |
) |
|
(6 |
) |
Dividends |
|
(175 |
) |
|
(178 |
) |
Disbursements to
non-controlling interests (note 15) |
|
(62 |
) |
|
(267 |
) |
Pueblo
Viejo JV partner shareholder loan |
|
20 |
|
|
45 |
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
(221 |
) |
|
(406 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and
equivalents |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents |
|
(63 |
) |
|
607 |
|
Cash and equivalents at the beginning of
period |
|
4,440 |
|
|
5,280 |
|
Cash and equivalents at the end of period |
$4,377 |
|
$5,887 |
|
- 2022 figures have been restated to reflect the change in
presentation to present interest received ($10 million) separately
from finance costs.
- Income taxes paid excludes $28 million (2022:
$26 million) for the three months ended March 31, 2023 of
income taxes payable that were settled against offsetting VAT
receivables.
The notes to these unaudited condensed interim financial
statements, which are contained in the First Quarter Report 2023
available on our website, are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Barrick Gold Corporation |
As at March 31, |
|
As at December 31, |
|
(in millions of United States dollars) (Unaudited) |
|
2023 |
|
|
2022 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
$4,377 |
|
$4,440 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
557 |
|
|
554 |
|
Inventories |
|
1,913 |
|
|
1,781 |
|
Other current assets |
|
1,691 |
|
|
1690 |
|
Total current assets |
$8,538 |
|
$8,465 |
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
Equity in investees (note 11) |
|
3,969 |
|
|
3,983 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
26,084 |
|
|
25,821 |
|
Goodwill |
|
3,581 |
|
|
3,581 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
149 |
|
|
149 |
|
Deferred income tax assets |
|
19 |
|
|
19 |
|
Non-current portion of inventory |
|
2,705 |
|
|
2,819 |
|
Other assets |
|
1,107 |
|
|
1,128 |
|
Total assets |
$46,152 |
|
$45,965 |
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
Accounts payable |
$1,504 |
|
$1,556 |
|
Debt |
|
12 |
|
|
13 |
|
Current income tax liabilities |
|
310 |
|
|
163 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
1,380 |
|
|
1,388 |
|
Total current liabilities |
$3,206 |
|
$3,120 |
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
Debt |
|
4,765 |
|
|
4,769 |
|
Provisions |
|
2,244 |
|
|
2,211 |
|
Deferred income tax liabilities |
|
3,270 |
|
|
3,247 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
1,349 |
|
|
1,329 |
|
Total liabilities |
$14,834 |
|
$14,676 |
|
Equity |
|
|
Capital stock (note 14) |
$28,115 |
|
$28,114 |
|
Deficit |
|
(7,338 |
) |
|
(7,282 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
23 |
|
|
26 |
|
Other |
|
1,913 |
|
|
1,913 |
|
Total equity attributable to Barrick Gold Corporation
shareholders |
$22,713 |
|
$22,771 |
|
Non-controlling interests (note 15) |
|
8,605 |
|
|
8,518 |
|
Total equity |
$31,318 |
|
$31,289 |
|
Contingencies and commitments (notes 4 and 16) |
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
$46,152 |
|
$45,965 |
|
The notes to these unaudited condensed interim financial
statements, which are contained in the First Quarter Report 2023
available on our website, are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in
Equity
Barrick
Gold Corporation |
|
|
|
Attributable to equity holders of the company |
|
|
(in millions of United States dollars) (Unaudited) |
|
CommonShares (inthousands) |
|
Capitalstock |
|
Retainedearnings(deficit) |
Accumulatedothercomprehensiveincome (loss)1 |
Other2 |
|
Total equityattributable toshareholders |
Non-controllinginterests |
Totalequity |
At January 1, 2023 |
|
1,755,350 |
|
$28,114 |
|
($7,282 |
) |
$26 |
|
$1,913 |
|
$22,771 |
|
$8,518 |
|
$31,289 |
|
Net income |
|
— |
|
— |
|
120 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
120 |
|
149 |
|
|
269 |
|
Total other comprehensive loss |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(3 |
) |
— |
|
(3 |
) |
— |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
— |
|
— |
|
120 |
|
(3 |
) |
— |
|
117 |
|
149 |
|
|
266 |
|
Transactions with owners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(175 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
(175 |
) |
— |
|
|
(175 |
) |
Disbursements to non-controlling interests (note 15) |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(62 |
) |
|
(62 |
) |
Dividend reinvestment plan (note 14) |
|
58 |
|
1 |
|
(1 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Total transactions with owners |
|
58 |
|
1 |
|
(176 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
(175 |
) |
(62 |
) |
|
(237 |
) |
At March 31, 2023 |
|
1,755,408 |
|
$28,115 |
|
($7,338 |
) |
$23 |
|
$1,913 |
|
$22,713 |
|
$8,605 |
|
$31,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1, 2022 |
|
1,779,331 |
|
$28,497 |
|
($6,566 |
) |
($23 |
) |
$1,949 |
|
$23,857 |
|
$8,450 |
|
$32,307 |
|
Net income |
|
— |
|
— |
|
438 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
438 |
|
268 |
|
|
706 |
|
Total other comprehensive income |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
58 |
|
— |
|
58 |
|
— |
|
|
58 |
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
— |
|
— |
|
438 |
|
58 |
|
— |
|
496 |
|
268 |
|
|
764 |
|
Transactions with owners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(178 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
(178 |
) |
— |
|
|
(178 |
) |
Disbursements to non-controlling interests |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(267 |
) |
|
(267 |
) |
Dividend reinvestment plan |
|
25 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Total transactions with owners |
|
25 |
|
— |
|
(178 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
(178 |
) |
(267 |
) |
|
(445 |
) |
At March 31, 2022 |
|
1,779,356 |
|
$28,497 |
|
($6,306 |
) |
$35 |
|
$1,949 |
|
$24,175 |
|
$8,451 |
|
$32,626 |
|
- Includes cumulative translation losses at March 31, 2023:
$95 million (December 31, 2022: $93 million;
March 31, 2022: $94 million).
- Includes additional paid-in capital as at March 31, 2023:
$1,875 million (December 31, 2022: $1,875 million;
March 31, 2022: $1,911 million).
The notes to these unaudited condensed interim financial
statements, which are contained in the First Quarter Report 2023
available on our website, are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
Technical Information
The scientific and technical information
contained in this press release has been reviewed and approved by
Craig Fiddes, SME-RM, Lead, Resource Modeling, Nevada Gold Mines;
Chad Yuhasz, P.Geo, Mineral Resource Manager, Latin America &
Asia Pacific; Richard Peattie, MPhil, FAusIMM, Mineral Resources
Manager: Africa and Middle East; Simon Bottoms, CGeol, MGeol, FGS,
FAusIMM, Mineral Resource Management and Evaluation Executive; John
Steele, CIM, Metallurgy, Engineering and Capital Projects
Executive; and Rob Krcmarov, FAusIMM, Technical Advisor to Barrick
— each a “Qualified Person” as defined in National Instrument
43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.
All mineral reserve and mineral resource
estimates are estimated in accordance with National Instrument
43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. Unless
otherwise noted, such mineral reserve and mineral resource
estimates are as of December 31, 2022.
Endnotes
Endnote 1
“Free cash flow” is a non-GAAP financial measure
that deducts capital expenditures from net cash provided by
operating activities. Management believes this to be a useful
indicator of our ability to operate without reliance on additional
borrowing or usage of existing cash. Free cash flow is intended to
provide additional information only and does not have any
standardized definition under IFRS, and should not be considered in
isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared
in accordance with IFRS. The measure is not necessarily indicative
of operating profit or cash flow from operations as determined
under IFRS. Other companies may calculate this measure differently.
Further details on this non-GAAP financial performance measure are
provided in the MD&A accompanying Barrick’s financial
statements filed from time to time on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on
EDGAR at www.sec.gov. The following table reconciles this non-GAAP
financial measure to the most directly comparable IFRS measure.
Reconciliation of Net Cash Provided by
Operating Activities to Free Cash Flow
($
millions) |
For the three months ended |
|
|
3/31/23 |
|
12/31/22 |
|
3/31/22 |
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities |
776 |
|
795 |
|
1,004 |
|
Capital expenditures |
(688 |
) |
(891 |
) |
(611 |
) |
Free cash flow |
88 |
|
(96 |
) |
393 |
|
Endnote 2
A Tier One Gold Asset is an asset with a reserve
potential to deliver a minimum 10-year life, annual production of
at least 500,000 ounces of gold and total cash costs per ounce over
the mine life that are in the lower half of the industry cost
curve. A Tier One Copper Asset is an asset with a reserve potential
of greater than five million tonnes of contained copper and C1 cash
costs per pound over the mine life that are in the lower half of
the industry cost curve.
Endnote 3
“Adjusted net earnings” and “adjusted net
earnings per share” are non-GAAP financial performance measures.
Adjusted net earnings excludes the following from net earnings:
impairment charges (reversals) related to intangibles, goodwill,
property, plant and equipment, and investments;
acquisition/disposition gains/losses; foreign currency translation
gains/losses; significant tax adjustments; other items that are not
indicative of the underlying operating performance of our core
mining business; and tax effect and non-controlling interest of the
above items. Management uses this measure internally to evaluate
our underlying operating performance for the reporting periods
presented and to assist with the planning and forecasting of future
operating results. Management believes that adjusted net earnings
is a useful measure of our performance because impairment charges,
acquisition/disposition gains/losses and significant tax
adjustments do not reflect the underlying operating performance of
our core mining business and are not necessarily indicative of
future operating results. Adjusted net earnings and adjusted net
earnings per share are intended to provide additional information
only and does not have any standardized definition under IFRS and
should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for
measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. The
measures are not necessarily indicative of operating profit or cash
flow from operations as determined under IFRS. Other companies may
calculate these measures differently. The following table
reconciles these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly
comparable IFRS measure. Further details on these non-GAAP
financial performance measures are provided in the MD&A
accompanying Barrick’s financial statements filed from time to time
on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.
Reconciliation of Net Earnings to Net
Earnings per Share, Adjusted Net Earnings and Adjusted Net Earnings
per Share
($
millions, except per share amounts in dollars) |
For the three months ended |
|
|
3/31/23 |
|
12/31/22 |
|
3/31/22 |
|
Net
earnings attributable to equity holders of the Company |
120 |
|
(735 |
) |
438 |
|
Impairment charges (reversals)
related to intangibles, goodwill, property, plant and equipment,
and investmentsa |
1 |
|
1,642 |
|
2 |
|
Acquisition/disposition
gainsb |
(3 |
) |
(319 |
) |
(2 |
) |
Loss on currency translation |
38 |
|
4 |
|
3 |
|
Significant tax adjustmentsc |
48 |
|
(4 |
) |
17 |
|
Other expense (income)
adjustmentsd |
63 |
|
126 |
|
13 |
|
Non-controlling intereste |
(6 |
) |
(271 |
) |
0 |
|
Tax
effecte |
(14 |
) |
(223 |
) |
(8 |
) |
Adjusted net earnings |
247 |
|
220 |
|
463 |
|
Net earnings per sharef |
0.07 |
|
(0.42 |
) |
0.25 |
|
Adjusted net earnings per sharef |
0.14 |
|
0.13 |
|
0.26 |
|
- For the three month period ended
December 31, 2022, net impairment charges mainly relate to a
goodwill impairment at Loulo-Gounkoto, and non-current asset
impairments at Veladero and Long Canyon, partially offset by an
impairment reversal at Reko Diq.
- For the three month period ended
December 31, 2022, acquisition/disposition gains primarily relate
to a gain as Barrick’s interest in the Reko Diq project increased
from 37.5% to 50%.
- For the three month period ended
March 31, 2023, significant tax adjustments mainly relate to
foreign currency translation gains and losses on tax balances,
changes in the discount rate assumptions on our closed mine
rehabilitation provision, foreign exchange losses and the
remeasurement of deferred tax balances.
- For the three month period ended
March 31, 2023, other expense (income) adjustments mainly relate to
the $30 million commitment we made towards the expansion of
education infrastructure in Tanzania, per our community investment
obligations under the Twiga partnership. For the three month period
ended December 31, 2022, other expense (income) adjustments mainly
relate to a net realizable value impairment of leach pad inventory
at Veladero and supplies obsolescence write-off at Bulyanhulu and
North Mara. Other expense (income) adjustments for all periods were
also impacted by changes in the discount rate assumptions on our
closed mine rehabilitation provision and care and maintenance
expenses at Porgera.
- Non-controlling interest and tax
effect for the three month period ended December 31, 2022 primarily
relates to impairment charges (reversals) related to non-current
assets.
- Calculated using weighted average
number of shares outstanding under the basic method of earnings per
share.
Endnote 4
On a 100% basis. Refer to the Technical Report
on the Pueblo Viejo Mine, Dominican Republic, dated March 17, 2023
and filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov on
March 17, 2023.
Endnote 5
On an attributable basis.
Endnote 6
“Realized price” is a non-GAAP financial
performance measure which excludes from sales: treatment and
refining charges; and cumulative catch-up adjustment to revenue
relating to our streaming arrangements. We believe this provides
investors and analysts with a more accurate measure with which to
compare to market gold prices and to assess our gold sales
performance. For those reasons, management believes that this
measure provides a more accurate reflection of our Company’s past
performance and is a better indicator of its expected performance
in future periods. The realized price measure is intended to
provide additional information, and does not have any standardized
definition under IFRS and should not be considered in isolation or
as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance
with IFRS. The measure is not necessarily indicative of sales as
determined under IFRS. Other companies may calculate this measure
differently. The following table reconciles realized prices to the
most directly comparable IFRS measure. Further details on these
non-GAAP financial performance measures are provided in the
MD&A accompanying Barrick’s financial statements filed from
time to time on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at
www.sec.gov.
Reconciliation of Sales to Realized
Price per ounce/pound
($
millions, except per ounce/pound information in dollars) |
Gold |
Copper |
For the three months ended |
|
3/31/23 |
|
12/31/22 |
|
3/31/22 |
|
3/31/23 |
12/31/22 |
3/31/22 |
Sales |
2,411 |
|
2,535 |
|
2,511 |
|
171 |
170 |
287 |
Sales applicable to
non-controlling interests |
(723 |
) |
(785 |
) |
(787 |
) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Sales applicable to equity
method investmentsa,b |
126 |
|
164 |
|
136 |
|
160 |
160 |
188 |
Sales applicable to sites in
closure or care and maintenancec |
(7 |
) |
(11 |
) |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
Treatment and refinement
charges |
7 |
|
15 |
|
3 |
|
43 |
47 |
51 |
Revenues – as adjusted |
1,814 |
|
1,918 |
|
1,863 |
|
374 |
377 |
526 |
Ounces/pounds sold (000s ounces/millions pounds)c |
954 |
|
1,111 |
|
993 |
|
89 |
99 |
113 |
Realized gold/copper price per ounce/poundd |
1,902 |
|
1,728 |
|
1,876 |
|
4.20 |
3.81 |
4.68 |
- Represents sales of $126 million
for the three month period ended March 31, 2023
(December 31, 2022: $164 million and March 31, 2022: $137
million) applicable to our 45% equity method investment in Kibali
for gold. Represents sales of $98 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2023 (December 31, 2022: $91 million and
March 31, 2022: $118 million) applicable to our 50% equity
method investment in Zaldívar and $69 million (December 31,
2022: $74 million and March 31, 2022: $75 million) applicable
to our 50% equity method investment in Jabal Sayid for copper.
- Sales applicable to equity method
investments are net of treatment and refinement charges.
- Excludes Pierina, which is
producing incidental ounces while in closure.
- Realized price per ounce/pound may
not calculate based on amounts presented in this table due to
rounding.
Endnote 7
Capital expenditures are classified into
minesite sustaining capital expenditures or project capital
expenditures depending on the nature of the expenditure. Minesite
sustaining capital expenditures is the capital spending required to
support current production levels. Project capital expenditures
represent the capital spending at new projects and major, discrete
projects at existing operations intended to increase net present
value through higher production or longer mine life. Management
believes this to be a useful indicator of the purpose of capital
expenditures and this distinction is an input into the calculation
of all-in sustaining costs per ounce and all-in costs per ounce.
Classifying capital expenditures is intended to provide additional
information only and does not have any standardized definition
under IFRS, and should not be considered in isolation or as a
substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with
IFRS. Other companies may calculate these measures differently. The
following table reconciles these non-GAAP financial performance
measures to the most directly comparable IFRS measure.
Reconciliation of the Classification of
Capital Expenditures
($
millions) |
For the three months ended |
|
3/31/23 |
12/31/22 |
3/31/22 |
Minesite sustaining capital expenditures |
454 |
557 |
420 |
Project capital expenditures |
226 |
324 |
186 |
Capitalized interest |
8 |
10 |
5 |
Total consolidated capital expenditures |
688 |
891 |
611 |
Endnote 8
These amounts are presented on the same basis as
our guidance.
Endnote 9
Gold cost of sales per ounce is calculated as
cost of sales across our gold operations (excluding sites in
closure or care and maintenance) divided by ounces sold (both on an
attributable basis using Barrick's ownership share). Copper cost of
sales per pound is calculated as cost of sales across our copper
operations divided by pounds sold (both on an attributable basis
using Barrick's ownership share). References to attributable basis
means our 100% share of Hemlo and Lumwana, our 61.5% share of NGM,
our 60% share of Pueblo Viejo, our 80% share of Loulo-Gounkoto, our
89.7% share of Tongon, our 84% share of North Mara, and Bulyanhulu,
our 50% share of Veladero, Zaldívar and Jabal Sayid, our 47.5%
share of Porgera and our 45% share of Kibali.
Endnote 10
“Total cash costs” per ounce, “All-in sustaining
costs” per ounce and “All-in costs” per ounce are non-GAAP
financial performance measures which are calculated based on the
definition published by the World Gold Council (a market
development organization for the gold industry comprised of and
funded by gold mining companies from around the world, including
Barrick, the “WGC”). The WGC is not a regulatory organization.
Management uses these measures to monitor the performance of our
gold mining operations and its ability to generate positive cash
flow, both on an individual site basis and an overall company
basis. “Total cash costs” per ounce start with our cost of sales
related to gold production and removes depreciation, the
noncontrolling interest of cost of sales and includes by-product
credits. “All-in sustaining costs” per ounce start with “Total cash
costs” per ounce and includes sustaining capital expenditures,
sustaining leases, general and administrative costs, minesite
exploration and evaluation costs and reclamation cost accretion and
amortization. These additional costs reflect the expenditures made
to maintain current production levels. “All-in costs” per ounce
start with “All-in sustaining costs” and adds additional costs that
reflect the varying costs of producing gold over the life-cycle of
a mine, including: project capital expenditures (capital spending
at new projects and major, discrete projects at existing operations
intended to increase net present value through higher production or
longer mine life) and other non-sustaining costs (primarily
non-sustaining leases, exploration and evaluation costs, community
relations costs and general and administrative costs that are not
associated with current operations). These definitions recognize
that there are different costs associated with the life-cycle of a
mine, and that it is therefore appropriate to distinguish between
sustaining and non-sustaining costs. Barrick believes that the use
of “Total cash costs” per ounce, “All-in sustaining costs” per
ounce and "All-in costs" per ounce will assist analysts, investors
and other stakeholders of Barrick in understanding the costs
associated with producing gold, understanding the economics of gold
mining, assessing our operating performance and also our ability to
generate free cash flow from current operations and to generate
free cash flow on an overall company basis. “Total cash costs” per
ounce, “All-in sustaining costs” per ounce and "All-in costs" per
ounce are intended to provide additional information only and do
not have standardized definitions under IFRS and should not be
considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of
performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. These measures are
not equivalent to net income or cash flow from operations as
determined under IFRS. Although the WGC has published a
standardized definition, other companies may calculate these
measures differently. Further details on these non-GAAP financial
performance measures are provided in the MD&A accompanying
Barrick’s financial statements filed from time to time on SEDAR at
www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.
Reconciliation of Gold Cost of Sales to
Total cash costs, All-in sustaining costs and All-in costs,
including on a per ounce basis
($
millions, except per ounce information in dollars) |
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
Footnote |
3/31/23 |
|
12/31/22 |
|
3/31/22 |
|
Cost of sales applicable to gold production |
|
1,761 |
|
1,890 |
|
1,582 |
|
Depreciation |
|
(445 |
) |
(506 |
) |
(419 |
) |
Cash cost of sales applicable to equity method investments |
|
63 |
|
56 |
|
51 |
|
By-product credits |
|
(61 |
) |
(69 |
) |
(55 |
) |
Non-recurring items |
a |
0 |
|
(23 |
) |
0 |
|
Other |
b |
0 |
|
7 |
|
(1 |
) |
Non-controlling interests |
c |
(378 |
) |
(393 |
) |
(331 |
) |
Total cash costs |
|
940 |
|
962 |
|
827 |
|
General & administrative costs |
|
39 |
|
49 |
|
54 |
|
Minesite exploration and evaluation costs |
d |
11 |
|
23 |
|
10 |
|
Minesite sustaining capital expenditures |
e |
454 |
|
557 |
|
420 |
|
Sustaining leases |
|
7 |
|
11 |
|
9 |
|
Rehabilitation - accretion and amortization (operating sites) |
f |
14 |
|
14 |
|
11 |
|
Non-controlling interest, copper operations and other |
g |
(159 |
) |
(239 |
) |
(176 |
) |
All-in sustaining costs |
|
1,306 |
|
1,377 |
|
1,155 |
|
Global exploration and evaluation and project expense |
d |
60 |
|
83 |
|
57 |
|
Community relations costs not related to current operations |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
Project capital expenditures |
e |
226 |
|
324 |
|
186 |
|
Non-sustaining leases |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
Rehabilitation - accretion and amortization (non-operating
sites) |
f |
6 |
|
6 |
|
3 |
|
Non-controlling interest and copper operations and other |
g |
(88 |
) |
(130 |
) |
(58 |
) |
All-in costs |
|
1,510 |
|
1,660 |
|
1,343 |
|
Ounces sold - equity basis (000s ounces) |
h |
954 |
|
1,111 |
|
993 |
|
Cost of sales per ounce |
i,j |
1,378 |
|
1,324 |
|
1,190 |
|
Total cash costs per ounce |
j |
986 |
|
868 |
|
832 |
|
Total
cash costs per ounce (on a co-product basis) |
j,k |
1,030 |
|
908 |
|
869 |
|
All-in sustaining costs per ounce |
j |
1,370 |
|
1,242 |
|
1,164 |
|
All-in
sustaining costs per ounce (on a co-product basis) |
j,k |
1,414 |
|
1,282 |
|
1,201 |
|
All-in costs per ounce |
j |
1,583 |
|
1,496 |
|
1,353 |
|
All-in
costs per ounce (on a co-product basis) |
j,k |
1,627 |
|
1,536 |
|
1,390 |
|
a. |
Non-recurring itemsThese costs are not indicative
of our cost of production and have been excluded from the
calculation of total cash costs. Non-recurring items for the three
months ended December 31, 2022 relate to a net realizable value
impairment of leach pad inventory at Veladero. |
b. |
OtherOther adjustments for the three month period
ended March 31, 2023 include the removal of total cash costs
and by-product credits associated with Pierina, Golden Sunlight,
and Buzwagi, which all are producing incidental ounces, of
$3 million (December 31, 2022: $7 million; March 31,
2022: $3 million). |
c. |
Non-controlling interestsNon-controlling interests
include non-controlling interests related to gold production of
$529 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2023
(December 31, 2022: $560 million and March 31, 2022: $476
million). Non-controlling interests include NGM, Pueblo Viejo,
Loulo-Gounkoto, Tongon, North Mara and Bulyanhulu. Refer to Note 5
to the Financial Statements for further information. |
d. |
Exploration and evaluation
costs Exploration, evaluation and project
expenses are presented as minesite sustaining if it supports
current mine operations and project if it relates to future
projects. Refer to page 48 of Barrick’s Q1 2023 MD&A. |
e. |
Capital expenditures Capital expenditures are
related to our gold sites only and are split between minesite
sustaining and project capital expenditures. Project capital
expenditures are capital spending at new projects and major,
discrete projects at existing operations intended to increase net
present value through higher production or longer mine life.
Significant projects in the current year are the plant expansion
project at Pueblo Viejo, the solar projects at NGM and
Loulo-Gounkoto, and the Veladero Phase 7 leach pad expansion. Refer
to page 47 of Barrick’s Q1 2023 MD&A. |
f. |
Rehabilitation—accretion and amortizationIncludes
depreciation on the assets related to rehabilitation provisions of
our gold operations and accretion on the rehabilitation provision
of our gold operations, split between operating and non-operating
sites. |
g. |
Non-controlling interest and copper
operations Removes general &
administrative costs related to non-controlling interests and
copper based on a percentage allocation of revenue. Also removes
exploration, evaluation and project expenses, rehabilitation costs
and capital expenditures incurred by our copper sites and the
non-controlling interest of NGM, Pueblo Viejo, Loulo-Gounkoto,
Tongon, North Mara and Bulyanhulu operating segments. It also
includes capital expenditures applicable to our equity method
investment in Kibali. Figures remove the impact of Pierina, Golden
Sunlight, and Buzwagi. The impact is summarized as the
following: |
($
millions) |
For the three months ended |
|
Non-controlling interest, copper operations and other |
3/31/23 |
|
12/31/22 |
|
3/31/22 |
|
General & administrative costs |
(6 |
) |
(8 |
) |
(13 |
) |
Minesite exploration and
evaluation expenses |
(4 |
) |
(8 |
) |
(3 |
) |
Rehabilitation - accretion and
amortization (operating sites) |
(5 |
) |
(6 |
) |
(3 |
) |
Minesite sustaining capital expenditures |
(144 |
) |
(217 |
) |
(157 |
) |
All-in sustaining costs total |
(159 |
) |
(239 |
) |
(176 |
) |
Global exploration and evaluation and project expense |
(12 |
) |
(8 |
) |
(4 |
) |
Project capital expenditures |
(76 |
) |
(122 |
) |
(54 |
) |
All-in costs total |
(88 |
) |
(130 |
) |
(58 |
) |
h. |
Ounces sold - equity basisFigures remove the
impact of: Pierina and Buzwagi. Some of these assets are producing
incidental ounces while in closure or care and maintenance. |
i. |
Cost of sales per ounceFigures remove the cost of
sales impact of: Pierina of $3 million for the three month period
ended March 31, 2023 (December 31, 2022: $7 million and
March 31, 2022: $3 million); Golden Sunlight of $nil and $nil,
respectively, for the three month period ended March 31, 2023
(December 31, 2022: $nil and March 31, 2022: $nil);
Buzwagi of $nil for the three month period ended March 31,
2023 (December 31, 2022: $nil and March 31, 2022: $nil),
which are producing incidental ounces. Gold cost of sales per ounce
is calculated as cost of sales across our gold operations
(excluding sites in closure or care and maintenance) divided by
ounces sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick's
ownership share). |
j. |
Per ounce figures Cost of sales per ounce,
total cash costs per ounce, all-in sustaining costs per ounce and
all-in costs per ounce may not calculate based on amounts presented
in this table due to rounding. |
k. |
Co-product costs per ounce Total cash costs
per ounce, all-in sustaining costs per ounce and all-in costs per
ounce presented on a co-product basis removes the impact of
by-product credits of our gold production (net of non-controlling
interest) calculated as: |
($
millions) |
For the three months ended |
|
|
3/31/23 |
|
12/31/22 |
|
3/31/22 |
|
By-product credits |
61 |
|
69 |
|
55 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
(19 |
) |
(25 |
) |
(19 |
) |
By-product credits (net of non-controlling interest) |
42 |
|
44 |
|
36 |
|
Endnote 11
“C1 cash costs” per pound and “All-in sustaining
costs” per pound are non-GAAP financial performance measures
related to our copper mine operations. We believe that “C1 cash
costs” per pound enables investors to better understand the
performance of our copper operations in comparison to other copper
producers who present results on a similar basis. “C1 cash costs”
per pound excludes royalties and production taxes and non-routine
charges as they are not direct production costs. “All-in sustaining
costs” per pound is similar to the gold all-in sustaining costs
metric and management uses this to better evaluate the costs of
copper production. We believe this measure enables investors to
better understand the operating performance of our copper mines as
this measure reflects all of the sustaining expenditures incurred
in order to produce copper. “All-in sustaining costs” per pound
includes C1 cash costs, sustaining capital expenditures, sustaining
leases, general and administrative costs, minesite exploration and
evaluation costs, royalties and production taxes, reclamation cost
accretion and amortization and writedowns taken on inventory to net
realizable value. Further details on these non-GAAP financial
performance measures are provided in the MD&A accompanying
Barrick’s financial statements filed from time to time on SEDAR at
www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.
Reconciliation of Copper Cost of Sales
to C1 cash costs and All-in sustaining costs, including on a per
pound basis
($
millions, except per pound information in dollars) |
For the three months ended |
|
|
3/31/23 |
|
12/31/22 |
|
3/31/22 |
|
Cost of sales |
174 |
|
197 |
|
154 |
|
Depreciation/amortization |
(44 |
) |
(92 |
) |
(38 |
) |
Treatment and refinement charges |
43 |
|
47 |
|
51 |
|
Cash cost of sales applicable to equity method investments |
87 |
|
90 |
|
72 |
|
Less: royalties |
(15 |
) |
(16 |
) |
(32 |
) |
By-product credits |
(4 |
) |
(3 |
) |
(3 |
) |
Other |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
C1 cash costs |
241 |
|
223 |
|
204 |
|
General & administrative costs |
6 |
|
8 |
|
12 |
|
Rehabilitation - accretion and amortization |
2 |
|
2 |
|
1 |
|
Royalties |
15 |
|
16 |
|
32 |
|
Minesite exploration and evaluation costs |
2 |
|
6 |
|
3 |
|
Minesite sustaining capital expenditures |
33 |
|
139 |
|
67 |
|
Sustaining leases |
3 |
|
2 |
|
1 |
|
All-in sustaining costs |
302 |
|
396 |
|
320 |
|
Pounds sold - consolidated basis (millions pounds) |
89 |
|
99 |
|
113 |
|
Cost of sales per pounda,b |
3.22 |
|
3.19 |
|
2.21 |
|
C1 cash costs per pounda |
2.71 |
|
2.25 |
|
1.81 |
|
All-in sustaining costs per pounda |
3.40 |
|
3.98 |
|
2.85 |
|
- Cost of sales per pound, C1 cash
costs per pound and all-in sustaining costs per pound may not
calculate based on amounts presented in this table due to
rounding.
- Copper cost of sales per pound is calculated as cost of sales
across our copper operations divided by pounds sold (both on an
attributable basis using Barrick's ownership share).
Endnote 12
On a 100% basis.
Endnote 13
Porgera was placed on temporary care and
maintenance on April 25, 2020 and remains excluded from our 2023
guidance. We expect to update our guidance to include Porgera
following both the execution of definitive agreements to implement
the Commencement Agreement and the finalization of a timeline for
the resumption of full mine operations.
Endnote 14
On a 100% basis. Estimated in accordance with
National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral
Projects as required by Canadian securities regulatory authorities
as of December 31, 2022. Measured resources of 5.6 million tonnes
grading 5.55 g/t, representing 1.0 million ounces of gold.
Indicated resources of 79.0 million tonnes grading 3.62 g/t,
representing 9.2 million ounces of gold. Inferred resources of 33.0
million tonnes grading 3.2 g/t, representing 3.4 million ounces of
gold. Complete attributable mineral reserve and mineral resource
data for all of Barrick’s mines and projects, including tonnes,
grades, and ounces, can be found in the Mineral Reserves and
Mineral Resources Tables provided on pages 37 to 46 of Barrick’s
2022 Annual Information Form and Form 40-F filed on SEDAR at
www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.
Endnote 15
On a 100% basis. Estimated in accordance with
National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral
Projects as required by Canadian securities regulatory authorities.
Estimates are as of December 31, 2022, unless otherwise noted.
Proven mineral reserves of 59 million tonnes grading 2.29g/t,
representing 4.3 million ounces of gold. Probable mineral reserves
of 230 million tonnes grading 2.16g/t, representing 16 million
ounces of gold. Refer to the Technical Report on the Pueblo Viejo
Mine, Dominican Republic, dated March 17, 2023 and filed on SEDAR
at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov on March 17, 2023.
Complete attributable mineral reserve and mineral resource data for
all mines and projects referenced in this press release, including
tonnes, grades, and ounces, can be found in the Mineral Reserves
and Mineral Resources Tables provided on pages 37 to 46 of
Barrick’s 2022 Annual Information Form and Form 40-F filed on SEDAR
at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.
Endnote 16
On a 100% basis. Refer to the Technical Report
on the Loulo-Gounkoto Gold Mine Complex, Mali, dated March 17, 2023
and filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov on
March 17, 2023.
Endnote 17
Through dividends and share buybacks.
Endnote 18
Includes Goldrush.
Endnote 19
Total cash costs and all-in sustaining costs per
ounce include costs allocated to non-operating sites.
Endnote 20
Operating division guidance ranges reflect
expectations at each individual operating division and may not add
up to the company-wide guidance range total. Guidance ranges
exclude Pierina which is producing incidental ounces while in
closure.
Endnote 21
Includes corporate administration costs.
Endnote 22
EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial performance
measure, which excludes the following from net earnings: income tax
expense; finance costs; finance income; and depreciation.
Management believes that EBITDA is a valuable indicator of our
ability to generate liquidity by producing operating cash flow to
fund working capital needs, service debt obligations, and fund
capital expenditures. Management uses EBITDA for this purpose.
Adjusted EBITDA removes the effect of impairment charges;
acquisition/disposition gains/losses; foreign currency translation
gains/losses; and other expense adjustments. We also remove the
impact of the income tax expense, finance costs, finance income and
depreciation incurred in our equity method accounted investments.
We believe these items provide a greater level of consistency with
the adjusting items included in our adjusted net earnings
reconciliation, with the exception that these amounts are adjusted
to remove any impact on finance costs/income, income tax expense
and/or depreciation as they do not affect EBITDA. We believe this
additional information will assist analysts, investors and other
stakeholders of Barrick in better understanding our ability to
generate liquidity from our full business, including equity method
investments, by excluding these amounts from the calculation as
they are not indicative of the performance of our core mining
business and not necessarily reflective of the underlying operating
results for the periods presented. EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are
intended to provide additional information only and do not have any
standardized definition under IFRS and should not be considered in
isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared
in accordance with IFRS. Other companies may calculate EBITDA and
adjusted EBITDA differently. Further details on these non-GAAP
financial performance measures are provided in the MD&A
accompanying Barrick’s financial statements filed from time to time
on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.
Reconciliation of Net Earnings to EBITDA
and Adjusted EBITDA
($
millions) |
For the three months ended |
|
|
3/31/23 |
|
12/31/22 |
|
3/31/22 |
|
Net earnings (loss) |
269 |
|
(816 |
) |
706 |
|
Income tax expense |
205 |
|
(131 |
) |
301 |
|
Finance costs, neta |
37 |
|
31 |
|
76 |
|
Depreciation |
495 |
|
604 |
|
460 |
|
EBITDA |
1,006 |
|
(312 |
) |
1,543 |
|
Impairment charges (reversals)
of non-current assetsb |
1 |
|
1,642 |
|
2 |
|
Acquisition/disposition
gainsc |
(3 |
) |
(319 |
) |
(2 |
) |
Loss on currency
translation |
38 |
|
4 |
|
3 |
|
Other expense (income)
adjustmentsd |
63 |
|
126 |
|
13 |
|
Income
tax expense, net finance costsa, and depreciation from equity
investees |
78 |
|
145 |
|
86 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
1,183 |
|
1,286 |
|
1,645 |
|
- Finance costs exclude
accretion.
- For the three month period ended
December 31, 2022, net impairment charges mainly relate to a
goodwill impairment at Loulo-Gounkoto, and non-current asset
impairments at Veladero and Long Canyon, partially offset by an
impairment reversal at Reko Diq.
- For the three month period ended
December 31, 2022, acquisition/disposition gains primarily relate
to a gain as Barrick’s interest in the Reko Diq project increased
from 37.5% to 50%.
- For the three month period ended
March 31, 2023, other expense (income) adjustments mainly relate to
the $30 million commitment we made towards the expansion of
education infrastructure in Tanzania, per our community investment
obligations under the Twiga partnership. For the three month period
ended December 31, 2022, other expense (income) adjustments mainly
relate to a net realizable value impairment of leach pad inventory
at Veladero and supplies obsolescence write-off at Bulyanhulu and
North Mara. Other expense (income) adjustments for all periods were
also impacted by changes in the discount rate assumptions on our
closed mine rehabilitation provision and care and maintenance
expenses at Porgera.
Corporate Office
Barrick Gold Corporation161 Bay
Street, Suite 3700Toronto, Ontario M5J 2S1Canada
Telephone: +1 416 861-9911Email:
investor@barrick.comWebsite: www.barrick.com
Shares Listed
GOLD
The New York Stock
Exchange
ABX The
Toronto Stock Exchange
Transfer Agents and Registrars
TSX Trust Company301 – 100
Adelaide Street West Toronto, Ontario M5H 4H1or American
Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC6201 – 15
AvenueBrooklyn, New York 11219
Telephone: 1-800-387-0825Fax:
1-888-249-6189Email: shareholderinquiries@tmx.comWebsite:
www.tsxtrust.com
Enquiries
President and Chief Executive OfficerMark
Bristow+1 647 205 7694+44 788 071 1386
Senior Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial
OfficerGraham Shuttleworth+1 647 262 2095+44 779
771 1338
Investor and Media RelationsKathy du Plessis+44
20 7557 7738Email: barrick@dpapr.com
Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking
Information
Certain information contained or incorporated by
reference in this press release, including any information as to
our strategy, projects, plans or future financial or operating
performance, constitutes “forward-looking statements”. All
statements, other than statements of historical fact, are
forward-looking statements. The words “believe”, “expect”,
“strategy”, “target”, “plan”, “scheduled”, “commitment”
“opportunities”, “guidance”, “project”, “continue”, “on track”,
“estimate”, “growth”, “potential”, “future”, “extend”, “planned”,
“will”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “may” and similar expressions
identify forward-looking statements. In particular, this press
release contains forward-looking statements including, without
limitation, with respect to: Barrick’s forward-looking production
guidance, including our ten-year production profile for gold and
copper and expected production in the second half of 2023;
estimates of future cost of sales per ounce for gold and per pound
for copper, total cash costs per ounce and C1 cash costs per pound,
and all-in-sustaining costs per ounce/pound; projected capital,
operating and exploration expenditures; our ability to convert
resources into reserves and replace reserves net of depletion from
production; mine life and production rates; projects at Carlin
expected to deliver increased throughput; Barrick’s global
exploration strategy and planned exploration activities, including
growth potential in North America, South America, Africa and the
Middle East; Barrick’s copper strategy; our plans and expected
completion and benefits of our growth projects, including the
Pueblo Viejo process plant expansion and mine life extension
project and new Naranjo tailings storage facility and solar and
battery energy storage projects at Nevada Gold Mines,
Loulo-Gounkoto and Kibali; potential mineralization and metal or
mineral recoveries; targeted first production for the Reko Diq
project; the timeline for execution and effectiveness of definitive
agreements to implement the Commencement Agreement between Papua
New Guinea and Barrick Niugini Limited; the duration of the
temporary suspension of operations at Porgera, the conditions for
the reopening of the mine, the timeline to recommence operations
and expected production; our pipeline of high confidence projects
at or near existing operations; Barrick’s partnership with the
Government of Tanzania under the framework agreement; Lumwana’s
potential for future growth and ability to further extend the life
of mine, including through the development of a Super Pit;
Barrick’s strategy, plans, targets and goals in respect of
environmental and social governance issues, including local
community relations, economic contributions and education and
employment initiatives, climate change and greenhouse gas emissions
reduction targets and biodiversity initiatives; Barrick’s talent
management strategy; Barrick’s performance dividend policy and
share buyback program; and expectations regarding future price
assumptions, financial performance and other outlook or
guidance.
Forward-looking statements are necessarily based
upon a number of estimates and assumptions including material
estimates and assumptions related to the factors set forth below
that, while considered reasonable by the Company as at the date of
this press release in light of management’s experience and
perception of current conditions and expected developments, are
inherently subject to significant business, economic and
competitive uncertainties and contingencies. Known and unknown
factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those
projected in the forward-looking statements and undue reliance
should not be placed on such statements and information. Such
factors include, but are not limited to: fluctuations in the spot
and forward price of gold, copper or certain other commodities
(such as silver, diesel fuel, natural gas and electricity); risks
associated with projects in the early stages of evaluation and for
which additional engineering and other analysis is required; risks
related to the possibility that future exploration results will not
be consistent with the Company’s expectations, that quantities or
grades of reserves will be diminished, and that resources may not
be converted to reserves; risks associated with the fact that
certain of the initiatives described in this press release are
still in the early stages and may not materialize; changes in
mineral production performance, exploitation and exploration
successes; risks that exploration data may be incomplete and
considerable additional work may be required to complete further
evaluation, including but not limited to drilling, engineering and
socioeconomic studies and investment; the speculative nature of
mineral exploration and development; lack of certainty with respect
to foreign legal systems, corruption and other factors that are
inconsistent with the rule of law; changes in national and local
government legislation, taxation, controls or regulations and/or
changes in the administration of laws, policies and practices; the
potential impact of proposed changes to Chilean law on the status
of value added tax refunds received in Chile in connection with the
development of the Pascua-Lama project; expropriation or
nationalization of property and political or economic developments
in Canada, the United States or other countries in which Barrick
does or may carry on business in the future; risks relating to
political instability in certain of the jurisdictions in which
Barrick operates; timing of receipt of, or failure to comply with,
necessary permits and approvals, including the issuance of a Record
of Decision for the Goldrush Project and/or whether the Goldrush
Project will be permitted to advance as currently designed under
its Feasibility Study, approval of the final location of the
additional tailings storage facility for Pueblo Viejo following
submission of the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment in the
Dominican Republic, and permitting activities required to optimize
Long Canyon’s life of mine; non-renewal of key licenses by
governmental authorities, including the new Special Mining Lease
for Porgera; failure to comply with environmental and health and
safety laws and regulations; increased costs and physical and
transition risks related to climate change, including extreme
weather events, resource shortages, emerging policies and increased
regulations relating to greenhouse gas emission levels, energy
efficiency and reporting of risks; contests over title to
properties, particularly title to undeveloped properties, or over
access to water, power and other required infrastructure; the
liability associated with risks and hazards in the mining industry,
and the ability to maintain insurance to cover such losses; damage
to the Company’s reputation due to the actual or perceived
occurrence of any number of events, including negative publicity
with respect to the Company’s handling of environmental matters or
dealings with community groups, whether true or not; risks related
to operations near communities that may regard Barrick’s operations
as being detrimental to them; litigation and legal and
administrative proceedings; operating or technical difficulties in
connection with mining or development activities, including
geotechnical challenges, tailings dam and storage facilities
failures, and disruptions in the maintenance or provision of
required infrastructure and information technology systems;
increased costs, delays, suspensions and technical challenges
associated with the construction of capital projects; risks
associated with working with partners in jointly controlled assets;
risks related to disruption of supply routes which may cause delays
in construction and mining activities, including disruptions in the
supply of key mining inputs due to the invasion of Ukraine by
Russia; risk of loss due to acts of war, terrorism, sabotage and
civil disturbances; risks associated with artisanal and illegal
mining; risks associated with Barrick’s infrastructure, information
technology systems and the implementation of Barrick’s
technological initiatives; the impact of global liquidity and
credit availability on the timing of cash flows and the values of
assets and liabilities based on projected future cash flows; the
impact of inflation, including global inflationary pressures driven
by supply chain disruptions caused by the ongoing Covid-19
pandemic, global energy cost increases following the invasion of
Ukraine by Russia and country-specific political and economic
factors in Argentina; adverse changes in our credit ratings;
fluctuations in the currency markets; changes in U.S. dollar
interest rates; risks arising from holding derivative instruments
(such as credit risk, market liquidity risk and mark-to-market
risk); risks related to the demands placed on the Company’s
management, the ability of management to implement its business
strategy and enhanced political risk in certain jurisdictions;
uncertainty whether some or all of Barrick's targeted investments
and projects will meet the Company’s capital allocation objectives
and internal hurdle rate; whether benefits expected from recent
transactions are realized; business opportunities that may be
presented to, or pursued by, the Company; our ability to
successfully integrate acquisitions or complete divestitures; risks
related to competition in the mining industry; employee relations
including loss of key employees; availability and increased costs
associated with mining inputs and labor; risks associated with
diseases, epidemics and pandemics, including the effects and
potential effects of the global Covid-19 pandemic; risks related to
the failure of internal controls; and risks related to the
impairment of the Company’s goodwill and assets. Barrick also
cautions that its 2023 guidance, as well as its ten-year production
profile for gold and copper, may be impacted by the ongoing
business and social disruption caused by the spread of
Covid-19.
In addition, there are risks and hazards
associated with the business of mineral exploration, development
and mining, including environmental hazards, industrial accidents,
unusual or unexpected formations, pressures, cave-ins, flooding and
gold bullion, copper cathode or gold or copper concentrate losses
(and the risk of inadequate insurance, or inability to obtain
insurance, to cover these risks).
Many of these uncertainties and contingencies
can affect our actual results and could cause actual results to
differ materially from those expressed or implied in any
forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, us. Readers
are cautioned that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of
future performance. All of the forward-looking statements made in
this press release are qualified by these cautionary statements.
Specific reference is made to the most recent Form 40-F/Annual
Information Form on file with the SEC and Canadian provincial
securities regulatory authorities for a more detailed discussion of
some of the factors underlying forward-looking statements and the
risks that may affect Barrick’s ability to achieve the expectations
set forth in the forward-looking statements contained in this press
release. We disclaim any intention or obligation to update or
revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise, except as required by
applicable law.
Barrick Gold (TSX:ABX)
Historical Stock Chart
From Aug 2023 to Sep 2023
Barrick Gold (TSX:ABX)
Historical Stock Chart
From Sep 2022 to Sep 2023