Troilus Gold Corp. (“Troilus” or the “Company”, TSX: TLG; OTCQX:
CHXMF) reports initial assay results from its Phase II Gap Zone
drill program at its Troilus Project, located in northcentral
Quebec, Canada. The Gap Zone spans an ~2-kilometre area between the
larger of the two formerly mined pits, Z87, and the Southwest Zone,
which was discovered in late 2019. In 2021, Troilus completed a
5-drill hole Phase I drill program in the Gap Zone to test for
mineralization and continuation of lithological sequence. The
results from Phase I, including 4.2 g/t AuEq over 7 m and 0.95 g/t
AuEq over 16 m (see press release from April 21, 2022), provided
confirmation that the mineralized units found in Z87 and the
Southwest Zone continue into the Gap Zone. The ~11,000 metre Phase
II Gap Zone drilling program was initiated earlier this year and is
expected to conclude in July. Details of the Gap Zone drill results
are presented in Table 1, while drill hole locations are shown in
figures 1 and 2.
Gap Zone Drill Results
Highlights:
Mineral Extensions Southward beyond Z87 into the
Gap Zone
- 1.04 g/t AuEq over
13 metres, including 1.85 g/t AuEq over 5 metres and 4.17 g/t AuEq
over 1 metre in hole GZ-006, identified down-dip mineral continuity
from Z87 South
- 1.73 g/t AuEq over
6 metres, including 7.54 g/t AuEq over 1 metre in hole GZ-012,
identified up-dip mineral continuity of Z87 South
- 1.22 g/t AuEq over
6 metres, including 4.24 g/t AuEq over 1 metre, as well as 6.20 g/t
AuEq over 2 metres and 1.06 g/t AuEq over 8 metres in hole GZ-030,
identified down-dip mineral continuity of Z87 South
Mineral Extensions Northward Beyond the
Southwest Zone into the Gap Zone
- 1.07 g/t AuEq over
5 metres, including 2.58 g/t AuEq over 1 metre, as well as 4.66 g/t
AuEq over 1 metre and 5.41 g/t AuEq over 1 metre in hole
GZ-010
Justin Reid, CEO of Troilus Gold, commented, “We
have always believed in the mineralization potential of the Gap
Zone - seeing the potential become reality through our multi-phased
drill programs has been extremely encouraging. Our geology team has
been successfully keying in on similarities between the Gap Zone
and the rest of the Troilus deposit, and the effectiveness of such
observations is continually proven through the drill bit. We
believe that stratigraphically, the mineralization in the Gap Zone
can be traced to the surface, as we have witnessed in the Southwest
Zone. As we continue to drill the Gap Zone and the rest of the
Troilus deposit, new trends will reveal themselves and will help
inform future drill programs.”
The initial results from the Phase II Gap Zone
drill program continues to prove the northward continuation of
mineralization from the Southwest Zone, and the southward extension
from Z87, into the Gap Zone. Feldspar-porphyry dykes, shearing and
veining within the diorite intrusion, and the northward extension
of the magnetite breccia unit from the Southwest Zone host the bulk
of the mineralization found thus far in the Gap Zone.
Figure 1: Plan View Map of the Gap Zone
Drill Program, Showing Current and Previously Reported Drill Hole
Collar and Traces
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/789c52fd-d2a4-4855-9cfd-fafd4ebf0301
Figure 2: Longitudinal Section Facing
North-West Showing Intercepts above 0.3 g/t AuEq on Currently
Reported Drill Holes
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/6d2918b6-b424-4354-86cf-cfd32990986e
Table 1: Initial Gap Zone Phase II Assay
Results
Hole |
From (m) |
To (m) |
Length (m) |
Au (g/t) |
Cu ( %) |
Ag (g/t) |
AuEq (g/t) |
GZ-006 |
|
222 |
223 |
1 |
0.89 |
0.08 |
1.50 |
1.00 |
|
381 |
382 |
1 |
0.90 |
0.02 |
0.25 |
0.93 |
|
417 |
430 |
13 |
0.97 |
0.05 |
0.95 |
1.04 |
incl |
423 |
428 |
5 |
1.75 |
0.06 |
1.22 |
1.84 |
incl |
427 |
428 |
1 |
4.04 |
0.10 |
1.20 |
4.17 |
|
436 |
439 |
3 |
0.81 |
0.16 |
2.20 |
1.04 |
|
456 |
457 |
1 |
1.52 |
0.03 |
0.25 |
1.56 |
GZ-010 |
|
13.4 |
16 |
2.6 |
1.31 |
0.00 |
0.25 |
1.31 |
|
175 |
176 |
1 |
0.95 |
0.17 |
0.80 |
1.17 |
|
310 |
311 |
1 |
2.83 |
1.20 |
31.70 |
4.66 |
|
352 |
353 |
1 |
1.13 |
0.03 |
1.10 |
1.17 |
|
374 |
379 |
5 |
0.93 |
0.10 |
1.85 |
1.07 |
incl |
378 |
379 |
1 |
2.42 |
0.11 |
1.90 |
2.58 |
|
397 |
402 |
5 |
0.63 |
0.19 |
1.86 |
0.88 |
|
408 |
410 |
2 |
0.92 |
0.47 |
5.15 |
1.56 |
|
433 |
434 |
1 |
1.18 |
0.14 |
2.00 |
1.38 |
|
467 |
468 |
1 |
5.24 |
0.11 |
3.40 |
5.41 |
|
487 |
489 |
2 |
1.30 |
0.02 |
0.43 |
1.32 |
GZ-012 |
|
35 |
36 |
1 |
0.99 |
0.15 |
5.30 |
1.23 |
|
94 |
100 |
6 |
1.59 |
0.09 |
2.45 |
1.73 |
incl |
96 |
97 |
1 |
7.08 |
0.30 |
8.50 |
7.54 |
|
162.3 |
163 |
0.7 |
1.18 |
0.02 |
0.70 |
1.21 |
GZ-015 |
|
42 |
43 |
1 |
0.94 |
0.01 |
1.00 |
0.97 |
|
138 |
139 |
1 |
1.33 |
0.01 |
1.30 |
1.35 |
|
174 |
175 |
1 |
1.24 |
0.46 |
30.40 |
2.12 |
|
193 |
196 |
3 |
0.75 |
0.01 |
0.47 |
0.77 |
GZ-030 |
|
61 |
67 |
6 |
1.14 |
0.05 |
1.40 |
1.22 |
incl |
64 |
65 |
1 |
4.19 |
0.03 |
1.30 |
4.24 |
|
85 |
86 |
1 |
2.01 |
0.00 |
0.25 |
2.01 |
|
89 |
90 |
1 |
1.17 |
0.00 |
0.25 |
1.18 |
|
154 |
155 |
1 |
1.40 |
0.01 |
0.25 |
1.42 |
|
169 |
174 |
5 |
1.01 |
0.03 |
0.32 |
1.05 |
|
189 |
194 |
5 |
0.82 |
0.02 |
0.45 |
0.85 |
incl |
190 |
191.2 |
1.2 |
2.47 |
0.02 |
0.80 |
2.51 |
|
231 |
233 |
2 |
5.74 |
0.34 |
3.35 |
6.20 |
|
250 |
251 |
1 |
1.38 |
0.02 |
0.70 |
1.42 |
|
258 |
266 |
8 |
0.33 |
0.48 |
11.99 |
1.06 |
incl |
258 |
259 |
1 |
1.02 |
0.08 |
2.00 |
1.15 |
|
287 |
289 |
2 |
1.16 |
0.11 |
5.60 |
1.35 |
|
295 |
298 |
3 |
0.97 |
0.09 |
2.71 |
1.11 |
*Note drill intervals
reported in this news release are down-hole core lengths as true
thicknesses cannot be determined with available information.
Quality Assurance and
Control
During the Gap Zone Phase II drill program, one
meter assay samples were taken from NQ core and sawed in half.
One-half was sent for assaying at ALS Laboratory, a certified
commercial laboratory, and the other half was retained for results,
cross checks, and future reference. A strict QA/QC program was
applied to all samples, which included insertion of one certified
mineralized standard and one blank sample in each batch of 25
samples. Every sample was processed with standard crushing to 85 %
passing 75 microns on 500 g splits. Samples were assayed by one-AT
(30 g) fire assay with an AA finish and if results were higher than
3.5 g/t Au, assays were redone with a gravimetric finish. For QA/QC
samples, a 50 g fire assay was done. In addition to gold, ALS
laboratory carried out multi-element analysis for ME-ICP61 analysis
of 33 elements four acid ICP-AES.
Qualified PersonThe technical
and scientific information in this press release has been reviewed
and approved by Kyle Frank, P.Geo., Exploration Manager, who is a
Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101. Mr. Frank is an employee
of Troilus and is not independent of the Company under NI
43-101.
About Troilus Gold Corp.
Troilus Gold Corp. is a Canadian-based junior
mining company focused on the systematic advancement and de-risking
of the former gold and copper Troilus Mine towards production. From
1996 to 2010, the Troilus Mine produced +2 million ounces of gold
and nearly 70,000 tonnes of copper. Troilus is located in the
top-rated mining jurisdiction of Quebec, Canada, where is holds a
strategic land position of 1,420 km² in the Frotêt-Evans Greenstone
Belt. Since acquiring the project in 2017, ongoing exploration
success has demonstrated the tremendous scale potential of the gold
system on the property with significant mineral resource growth.
The Company is advancing engineering studies following the
completion of a robust PEA in 2020, which demonstrated the
potential for the Troilus project to become a top-ranked gold and
copper producing asset in Canada. Led by an experienced team with a
track-record of successful mine development, Troilus is positioned
to become a cornerstone project in North America.
For more information:
Caroline ArsenaultVP Corporate
Communications+1 (647) 407-7123info@troilusgold.com
Cautionary Note Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements and Information
Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves
do not have demonstrated economic viability; the estimate of
Mineral Resources in the updated Mineral Resource statement may be
materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title,
taxation, socio-political, marketing, or other relevant issues.
There is no certainty that the Indicated Mineral Resources will be
converted to the Probable Mineral Reserve category, and there is no
certainty that the updated Mineral Resource statement will be
realized.
The PEA is preliminary in nature, includes
inferred mineral resources that are considered too speculative
geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them
that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and
there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized. Mineral
resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated
economic viability. The PEA is subject to a number of risks and
uncertainties. See below and the Company’s latest technical report
available on SEDAR for more information with respect to the key
assumptions, parameters, methods and risks of determination
associated with the foregoing.
This press release contains “forward-looking
statements” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities
legislation. Forward-looking statements include, but are not
limited to, statements regarding the impact of the ongoing drill
program and results on the Company, the possible economics of the
project and the Company’s understanding of the project; the
development potential and timetable of the project; the estimation
of mineral resources; realization of mineral resource estimates;
the timing and amount of estimated future exploration; the
anticipated results of the Company’s ongoing 2022 drill program and
their possible impact on the potential size of the mineral resource
estimate; costs of future activities; capital and operating
expenditures; success of exploration activities; the anticipated
ability of investors to continue benefiting from the Company’s low
discovery costs, technical expertise and support from local
communities. Generally, forward-looking statements can be
identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as
“plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”,
“scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “continue”,
“anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, or “believes”, or
variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain
actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “will”, “might”
or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved”. Forward-looking
statements are made based upon certain assumptions and other
important facts that, if untrue, could cause the actual results,
performances or achievements of Troilus to be materially different
from future results, performances or achievements expressed or
implied by such statements. Such statements and information are
based on numerous assumptions regarding present and future business
strategies and the environment in which Troilus will operate in the
future. Certain important factors that could cause actual results,
performances or achievements to differ materially from those in the
forward-looking statements include, amongst others, currency
fluctuations, the global economic climate, dilution, share price
volatility and competition. Forward-looking statements are subject
to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important
factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity,
performance or achievements of Troilus to be materially different
from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements,
including but not limited to: there being no assurance that the
exploration program will result in expanded mineral resources;
risks and uncertainties inherent to mineral resource estimates; the
impact the COVID 19 pandemic may have on the Company’s activities
(including without limitation on its employees and suppliers) and
the economy in general; the impact of the recovery post COVID 19
pandemic and its impact on gold and other metals; the receipt of
necessary approvals; general business, economic, competitive,
political and social uncertainties; future prices of mineral
prices; accidents, labour disputes and shortages; environmental and
other risks of the mining industry, including without limitation,
risks and uncertainties discussed in the most recent Technical
Report and in other continuous disclosure documents of the Company
available under the Company’s profile at www.sedar.com. Although
Troilus has attempted to identify important factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in
forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause
results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can
be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as
actual results and future events could differ materially from those
anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not
place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Troilus does
not undertake to update any forward-looking statements, except in
accordance with applicable securities laws.
Troilus Gold (TSX:TLG)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2023 to Dec 2023
Troilus Gold (TSX:TLG)
Historical Stock Chart
From Dec 2022 to Dec 2023