VANCOUVER, BC, March 15,
2022 /CNW/ - Stuhini Exploration Ltd. (the
"Company" or "Stuhini") (TSX-V: STU) is pleased to
announce a pit-constrained Mineral Resource Estimate ("MRE"), for
the Ruby Creek molybdenum deposit ("Ruby Creek Molybdenum
Deposit"), located 35 kilometres (km) by road east of Atlin, BC. The MRE was undertaken by Mine
Development Associates ("MDA"), a division of RESPEC. The effective
date of this MRE is March 10, 2022
and an NI 43-101 Technical Report (the "Technical Report") will be
filed on SEDAR within 45 days of this news release and posted on
the Company's website.
Open Pit Resource Estimate
The pit constrained Measured and Indicated resources contain
432,991,000 pounds ("lbs") of molybdenum ("Mo") hosted within
369,398,000 tonnes at an average Mo grade of 0.053 % at 0.020 % Mo
cutoff (Table 1). Resources within the Inferred category include
43,650,000 lbs of Mo hosted within 41,946,000 tonnes at an
average Mo grade of 0.047 % (Table 1).
"MDA, has developed a very robust resource model that will form
the basis for future economic studies" notes Ehsan Salmabadi,
P.Geo, Stuhini's Vice President of Exploration. "Our efforts in the
coming months will focus on internal scoping studies to give us
guidance on our next steps in assessing the economics of the Ruby
Creek Molybdenum Deposit."
Mr. David O'Brien President &
CEO of Stuhini goes on to add, "We are very excited about being
able to update the Ruby Creek Molybdenum Resource and look forward
to what the future holds, especially in light of the dramatic
increase in molybdenum prices in the last 20 months. I wish
to thank our consultants and our in-house technical team for their
efforts and professionalism in bringing this MRE to
fruition."
Table 1: Ruby Creek Measured plus Indicated and Inferred
open-pit resources reported at various Mo cut-off grades.
Measured +
Indicated
|
Inferred
|
Cutoff
(Mo%)
|
Tonnes
|
Mo%
|
lbs Mo
(x1,000)
|
Cutoff
(Mo%)
|
Tonnes
|
Mo%
|
lbs Mo
(x1,000)
|
0.015
|
392,179,000
|
0.051
|
441,726
|
0.015
|
52,578,000
|
0.041
|
47,640
|
0.020
|
369,398,000
|
0.053
|
432,991
|
0.020
|
41,946,000
|
0.047
|
43,650
|
0.025
|
339,466,000
|
0.056
|
417,930
|
0.025
|
36,404,000
|
0.051
|
40,850
|
0.030
|
303,203,000
|
0.059
|
395,929
|
0.030
|
31,666,000
|
0.055
|
38,050
|
0.035
|
264,499,000
|
0.063
|
368,629
|
0.035
|
26,998,000
|
0.058
|
34,700
|
0.040
|
225,911,000
|
0.068
|
336,773
|
0.040
|
23,062,000
|
0.062
|
31,420
|
0.045
|
191,616,000
|
0.072
|
304,656
|
0.045
|
19,666,000
|
0.065
|
28,270
|
0.050
|
160,991,000
|
0.077
|
272,762
|
0.050
|
15,739,000
|
0.070
|
24,180
|
0.060
|
111,516,000
|
0.087
|
212,848
|
0.060
|
10,521,000
|
0.077
|
17,880
|
0.070
|
76,167,000
|
0.097
|
162,549
|
0.070
|
6,175,000
|
0.086
|
11,710
|
0.080
|
51,026,000
|
0.108
|
121,118
|
0.080
|
2,891,000
|
0.099
|
6,280
|
0.090
|
33,852,000
|
0.119
|
89,150
|
0.090
|
1,773,000
|
0.108
|
4,210
|
0.100
|
23,209,000
|
0.131
|
66,966
|
0.100
|
926,000
|
0.119
|
2,430
|
Table 2: Ruby Creek Measured and Indicated open pit resources
reported at various Mo cut-off grades.
Measured
|
Indicated
|
Cutoff
(Mo%)
|
Tonnes
|
Mo%
|
lbs Mo
(x1,000)
|
Cutoff
(Mo%)
|
Tonnes
|
Mo%
|
lbs Mo
(x1,000)
|
0.015
|
52,381,000
|
0.063
|
72,406
|
0.015
|
339,798,000
|
0.049
|
369,320
|
0.020
|
49,638,000
|
0.065
|
71,351
|
0.020
|
319,760,000
|
0.051
|
361,640
|
0.025
|
46,478,000
|
0.068
|
69,780
|
0.025
|
292,988,000
|
0.054
|
348,150
|
0.030
|
42,768,000
|
0.072
|
67,509
|
0.030
|
260,435,000
|
0.057
|
328,420
|
0.035
|
38,876,000
|
0.076
|
64,709
|
0.035
|
225,623,000
|
0.061
|
303,920
|
0.040
|
35,037,000
|
0.080
|
61,563
|
0.040
|
190,874,000
|
0.065
|
275,210
|
0.045
|
31,495,000
|
0.084
|
58,256
|
0.045
|
160,121,000
|
0.070
|
246,400
|
0.050
|
28,462,000
|
0.088
|
55,092
|
0.050
|
132,529,000
|
0.075
|
217,670
|
0.060
|
22,272,000
|
0.097
|
47,578
|
0.060
|
89,244,000
|
0.084
|
165,270
|
0.070
|
16,997,000
|
0.107
|
40,059
|
0.070
|
59,170,000
|
0.094
|
122,490
|
0.080
|
12,838,000
|
0.117
|
33,228
|
0.080
|
38,188,000
|
0.104
|
87,890
|
0.090
|
9,416,000
|
0.129
|
26,820
|
0.090
|
24,436,000
|
0.116
|
62,330
|
0.100
|
7,025,000
|
0.141
|
21,836
|
0.100
|
16,184,000
|
0.127
|
45,130
|
Ruby Creek Mineral Resource Estimate Notes:
- The mineral resources disclosed in this press release were
estimated following the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy
and Petroleum ("CIM") Definition Standards - For Mineral Resources
and Mineral Reserves prepared by the CIM Standing Committee on
Reserve Definitions adopted May 10,
2014.
- Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have
demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that all or
any part of the mineral resources estimated will be converted into
mineral reserves.
- The number of metric tonnes and pounds were rounded to the
nearest thousand. Any discrepancies in the totals are due to
rounding effects.
- As defined by NI 43‑101, the Independent and Qualified Persons
for the Technical Report are Steven
Ristorcelli, C. P. G., Peter
Ronning, P. Eng., Finley
Bakker, P. Geo., and John
Eggert, P. Eng.
- Reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction were
determined by applying open-pit mining and operating parameters in
pit optimization to build a resource-constraining pit.
- This MRE was derived from a database containing 305 diamond
drill holes, four rotary holes, plus underground bulk samples
entered as 17 "drill holes".
- The Effective Date of the Ruby Creek database used in the MRE
is January 27, 2020.
- Mo price used for the resource pit was US$15/lb Mo.
- Estimated operating costs used in the MRE (in US$) were
$2.00/tonne for mining, $1.00/tonne for G&A, $5.00/tonne for processing and a roasting charge
of $1.77/kilogram ("kg") of Mo.
Metallurgical recoveries of 92% were utilized in the determination
of cut-off grades for the open-pit resource.
- The resource is reported at a cutoff of 0.02% Mo. Cut-off
calculations were based on metallurgical recoveries, operating
costs for mining and processing, and metal prices described
above.
- Tonnage was estimated from volumes using specific gravities
ranging from 2.57 to 2.60 for different igneous lithologies.
- The geologic models and 3D block model were created in HxGN
MinePlan by Steven Ristorcelli, C.
P. G., an associate of MDA, and Finley J.
Bakker, P. Geo., of Finley Bakker Consulting.
- The database auditing and quality assurance/quality control
("QA/QC") was conducted by Peter
Ronning, P. Eng.
- The review of the historic metallurgical work was conducted by
John Eggert, P. Eng.
- A rotated block model with block sizes of 10 m by 10 m by
10 m was used. The block dimensions
were chosen to best reflect potential block sizes for open-pit
mining
- Inverse distance cubed ("ID3") was used for
estimation.
- The deposit was divided into three estimation domains with
unique orientations: (1) a main mineralized horizontal domain; (2)
a steeply northwest dipping domain along the Adera fault zone and
(3) shallow dipping in the footwall of the Adera fault zone.
- The drill samples were coded by domain and were capped to
different grades depending on the domain.
- The main mineralized horizontal domain samples were capped to
0.90% Mo. The steeply northwest dipping domain along the Adera
fault zone and the shallow dipping footwall zone was capped to 1.5%
Mo. Along the southwest end of the deposit where drilling is spaced
widely, grades were capped to 0.4% Mo in four holes.
- The mineral resources estimate was done in two passes. A
quadrant search with a maximum of two composites per quadrant was
used in the domains because of significantly clustered data.
Volumes outside the domains were estimated in a single pass.
The quantity and grade of reported Inferred mineral
resources in this estimation are uncertain in nature and there has
been insufficient exploration to re-define these Inferred mineral
resources as Indicated mineral resources. It is uncertain if
further exploration will result in upgrading them to the Indicated
mineral resources category.
Qualified Persons
The Independent and Qualified Persons for the Ruby Creek
Technical Report are Steven
Ristorcelli, C. P. G., Peter
Ronning, P. Eng., Finley
Bakker, P. Geo., and John
Eggert, P. Eng., who have reviewed the technical disclosure
in this release. In accordance with National Instrument 43-101
Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, Ehsan Salmabadi, P.
Geo. Vice President Exploration, is the Qualified Person for the
Company and has also validated and approved the technical and
scientific content of this news release. The Company adheres to CIM
Best Practices Guidelines in conducting, documenting, and reporting
its activities on its various exploration projects.
Proactive Investor Interview
A brief video highlighting this release can be found on the
Company website or by clicking the link below:
Proactive Investor interview with Dave
O'Brien, President & CEO of Stuhini Exploration.
About Stuhini Exploration Ltd.
Stuhini is a mineral exploration company focused on the
exploration and development of it's base and precious metal
properties in western Canada. The
Company's portfolio of exploration properties includes its flagship
the Ruby Creek Property located approximately 20 km east of
Atlin, BC, the Que Project located
approximately 70 km north of Johnson's Crossing in the Yukon, the South Thompson Project located
approximately 35 km northwest of Grand
Rapids, Manitoba and the Big Ledge Property located
approximately 57 km south of Revelstoke,
BC.
Forward Looking Statements
This news release contains "forward-looking statements" within
the meaning of Canadian securities legislation. Such
forward‑looking statements concern the Company's strategic plans,
future price estimates for Molybdenum ("Mo"), and updating the
historic Mo resource to a current resource estimate. Such
forward‑looking statements or information are based on a number of
assumptions, which may prove to be incorrect. Assumptions have been
made regarding, among other things: conditions in general economic
and financial markets; accuracy of assay results; geological
interpretations from sampling results, price estimates for Mo; the
effect of Covid-19 on the Company's ability to conduct exploration;
performance of available laboratory and other related services;
effects on general economic conditions and commodity prices,
including Mo,; and future exploration costs. The actual results
could differ materially from those anticipated in these
forward‑looking statements as a result of the risk factors
including: downturn in future price estimates for Mo, the timing
and content of work programs; results of exploration activities and
development of mineral properties; the interpretation and
uncertainties of sampling results and other geological data;
receipt, maintenance and security of permits and mineral property
titles; environmental and other regulatory risks; project costs
overruns or unanticipated costs and expenses; availability of funds
and general market and industry conditions. Forward-looking
statements are based on the expectations and opinions of the
Company's management on the date the statements are made. The
assumptions used in the preparation of such statements, although
considered reasonable at the time of preparation, may prove to be
imprecise and, as such, readers are cautioned not to place undue
reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as
of the date the statements were made. The Company undertakes no
obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements
included in this news release if these beliefs, estimates and
opinions or other circumstances should change, except as otherwise
required by applicable law.
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services
Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX
Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or
accuracy of this release.
SOURCE Stuhini Exploration Ltd.