UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
|
For the quarterly period ended: September 30, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
Commission file number: 0
-22945
HELIOS AND MATHESON NORTH AMERICA INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
13-3169913
|
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
200 Park Avenue South
|
|
(212) 979-8228
|
|
|
|
New York, New York 10003
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Registrants Telephone Number,
Including Area Code)
|
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
o
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
|
Smaller reporting company
þ
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act) Yes
o
No
þ
As of November 12, 2010, there were 5,826,088 shares of common stock, with $.01 par value per
share, outstanding.
HELIOS AND MATHESON NORTH AMERICA INC.
INDEX
2
Part I. Financial Information
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
|
Financial Statements
|
HELIOS AND MATHESON NORTH AMERICA INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,809,779
|
|
|
$
|
1,354,989
|
|
Accounts receivable- less allowance for doubtful accounts of $266,395 at September 30, 2010, and $220,879 at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
2,238,968
|
|
|
|
2,471,705
|
|
Unbilled receivables
|
|
|
110,525
|
|
|
|
184,229
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
1,152,635
|
|
|
|
178,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
5,311,907
|
|
|
|
4,189,802
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
53,632
|
|
|
|
79,952
|
|
Deposits and other assets
|
|
|
143,453
|
|
|
|
154,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
5,508,992
|
|
|
$
|
4,424,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
1,647,688
|
|
|
$
|
1,630,054
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
26,732
|
|
|
|
184,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,674,420
|
|
|
|
1,814,958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized; 5,826,088 issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2010 and 3,086,362 issued
and outstanding as of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
58,261
|
|
|
|
30,864
|
|
Paid-in capital
|
|
|
37,820,783
|
|
|
|
35,840,669
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)/income foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(1,860
|
)
|
|
|
2,084
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(34,042,612
|
)
|
|
|
(33,264,118
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
3,834,572
|
|
|
|
2,609,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
5,508,992
|
|
|
$
|
4,424,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
HELIOS AND MATHESON NORTH AMERICA INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
9,858,635
|
|
|
$
|
10,927,285
|
|
|
$
|
3,453,250
|
|
|
$
|
3,562,010
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
7,732,414
|
|
|
|
8,266,965
|
|
|
|
2,781,230
|
|
|
|
2,766,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,126,221
|
|
|
|
2,660,320
|
|
|
|
672,020
|
|
|
|
795,215
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general & administrative
|
|
|
2,870,203
|
|
|
|
4,288,184
|
|
|
|
662,184
|
|
|
|
1,303,797
|
|
Depreciation & amortization
|
|
|
39,299
|
|
|
|
96,769
|
|
|
|
8,252
|
|
|
|
26,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,909,502
|
|
|
|
4,384,953
|
|
|
|
670,436
|
|
|
|
1,330,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)/income from operations
|
|
|
(783,281
|
)
|
|
|
(1,724,633
|
)
|
|
|
1,584
|
|
|
|
(535,561
|
)
|
Other income(expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income-net
|
|
|
4,759
|
|
|
|
4,101
|
|
|
|
689
|
|
|
|
1,498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,759
|
|
|
|
4,101
|
|
|
|
689
|
|
|
|
1,498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)/income before income taxes
|
|
|
(778,522
|
)
|
|
|
(1,720,532
|
)
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
|
|
(534,063
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
17,431
|
|
|
|
(9,028
|
)
|
|
|
6,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)/income
|
|
|
(778,494
|
)
|
|
|
(1,737,963
|
)
|
|
|
11,301
|
|
|
|
(540,160
|
)
|
Other comprehensive loss foreign
currency adjustment
|
|
|
(3,944
|
)
|
|
|
(5,106
|
)
|
|
|
(1,971
|
)
|
|
|
(529
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive (loss)/income
|
|
$
|
(782,438
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,743,069
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,330
|
|
|
$
|
(540,689
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)/income per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.73
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.73
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
HELIOS AND MATHESON NORTH AMERICA, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(778,494
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,737,963
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
used in operating activities, net of acquired assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
39,299
|
|
|
|
96,769
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
4,821
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
7,511
|
|
|
|
18,574
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing cost
|
|
|
11,250
|
|
|
|
6,383
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
165,163
|
|
|
|
1,056,007
|
|
Unbilled receivables
|
|
|
73,704
|
|
|
|
(100,075
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(973,756
|
)
|
|
|
78,947
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
80,386
|
|
|
|
(244,935
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(158,172
|
)
|
|
|
187,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(1,528,288
|
)
|
|
|
(591,828
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale/(Purchase) of property and equipment
|
|
|
(12,978
|
)
|
|
|
2,856
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in)/provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(12,978
|
)
|
|
|
2,856
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of stock
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of deferred financing cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(3,944
|
)
|
|
|
(5,106
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
454,790
|
|
|
|
(599,078
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
1,354,989
|
|
|
|
912,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
1,809,779
|
|
|
$
|
313,194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for interest
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for income taxes net of refunds
|
|
$
|
10,592
|
|
|
$
|
(64,018
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
5
HELIOS AND MATHESON NORTH AMERICA INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1) GENERAL:
These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
contained in Helios and Matheson North America Inc.s (the Company) Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the accompanying
financial statements and related notes thereto. The accounting policies used in preparing these
financial statements are the same as those described in the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
2) CONTROLLED COMPANY:
The Board of Directors had determined that Helios and Matheson is a Controlled Company for
purposes of The NASDAQ Stock Market (NASDAQ) listing requirements. A Controlled Company is a
company of which more than 50% of the voting power for the election of directors is held by an
individual, group or another company. Certain NASDAQ requirements do not apply to a Controlled
Company, including requirements that: (i) a majority of its Board of Directors must be comprised
of independent directors as defined in NASDAQs rules; and (ii) the compensation of officers and
the nomination of directors be determined in accordance with specific rules, generally requiring
determinations by committees comprised solely of independent directors or in meetings at which only
the independent directors are present. The Board of Directors has determined that Helios and
Matheson is a Controlled Company based on the fact that Helios and Matheson Information
Technology, Ltd. (Helios and Matheson Parent) holds approximately 84% of the voting power of the
Company.
3) INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements
contain all the adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) necessary to present
fairly the consolidated financial position as of September 30, 2010, the consolidated results of
operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 and cash flows
for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2009 has been derived from the audited
financial statements at that date but does not include all the information and footnotes required
by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial
statements. For further information, refer to the audited consolidated financial statements and
footnotes thereto included in the Form 10-K filed by the Company for the year ended December 31,
2009.
For the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010, the Company reported net income
of approximately $11,000 and a net loss of ($778,000), respectively and for the three and nine
month periods ended September 30, 2009, the Company reported a net loss of approximately ($540,000)
and ($1.7) million, respectively. The Company continues to focus on revenue growth and cost
reductions, including but not limited to outsourcing and off-shoring solutions, in an attempt to
improve its financial condition.
In managements opinion, cash flows from operations and borrowing capacity combined with cash
on hand will provide adequate flexibility for funding the Companys working capital obligations for
the next twelve months.
4) STOCK BASED COMPENSATION:
The Company has a stock based compensation plan, which is described as follows:
The Companys Stock Option Plan (the Plan) provides for the grant of stock options that are
either incentive or non-qualified for federal income tax purposes. The Plan provides for the
issuance of a maximum of 460,000 shares of common stock (subject to adjustment pursuant to
customary anti-dilution provisions). Stock options vest over a period of between one to four
years.
The exercise price per share of a stock option is established by the Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors in its discretion but may not be less than the fair market value of a share
of common stock as of the date of grant. The aggregate fair market value of the shares of common
stock with respect to which incentive stock options first become exercisable by an individual to
whom an incentive stock option is granted during any calendar year may not exceed $100,000.
Stock options, subject to certain restrictions, may be exercisable any time after full vesting
for a period not to exceed ten years from the date of grant. Such period is established by the
Company in its discretion on the date of grant. Stock options terminate in connection with the
termination of employment.
6
The Company uses the modified prospective application method as specified by the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB), whereby compensation cost is recognized over the remaining
service period based on the grant-date fair value of those awards as calculated for pro forma
disclosures as originally issued. For the three and nine month period ended September 30, 2010,
the Company recorded stock based compensation expense of $0 and $7,511. For the three and nine
month period ended September 30, 2009, the Company recorded stock based compensation expense of
$6,259 and $18,574.
Information with respect to options under the Companys Plan is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Balance December 31, 2009
|
|
|
35,500
|
|
|
$
|
4.62
|
|
Granted during 1st Qtr 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised during 1st Qtr 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeitures during 1st Qtr
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2010
|
|
|
35,500
|
|
|
$
|
4.62
|
|
Granted during 2nd Qtr 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised during 2nd Qtr 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeitures during 2nd Qtr
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2010
|
|
|
35,500
|
|
|
$
|
4.62
|
|
Granted during 3rd Qtr 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised during 3rd Qtr 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeitures during 3rd Qtr
2010
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance September 30, 2010
|
|
|
34,250
|
|
|
$
|
4.74
|
|
The following table summarizes the status of the stock options outstanding and exercisable at
September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
Stock
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Options
|
|
Range
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
$0.00 - $4.80
|
|
$
|
3.23
|
|
|
|
14,250
|
|
|
0.7 years
|
|
|
14,250
|
|
$4.80 - $9.60
|
|
$
|
5.82
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
5.6 years
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2010, 34,250 stock options were exercisable with a weighted average exercise
price of $4.74.
7
5) NET (LOSS)/INCOME PER SHARE
:
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net (loss)/income per
share for the nine months and the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Numerator for basic net (loss)/income per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)/income
|
|
$
|
(778,494
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,737,963
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,301
|
|
|
$
|
(540,160
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)/income available to
common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(778,494
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,737,963
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,301
|
|
|
$
|
(540,160
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for diluted net (loss)/income per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)/income available to common
stockholders & assumed conversion
|
|
$
|
(778,494
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,737,963
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,301
|
|
|
$
|
(540,160
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic and diluted
(loss)/income
per share weighted-average shares
|
|
|
3,668,428
|
|
|
|
2,396,707
|
|
|
|
4,813,581
|
|
|
|
2,396,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted (loss)/income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)/income per share
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.73
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the nine and three month periods ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009,
all options and warrants outstanding were excluded from the computation of net (loss)/income per
share because the effect would have been anti-dilutive.
6) CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK:
The revenues of three customers represented approximately 23%, 22% and 15% of the revenues for
the nine month period ended September 30, 2010. The revenue of one customer represented
approximately 25% of revenues for the same period in 2009. No other customer represented greater
than 10% of the Companys revenues for such periods. The Company continues its effort to broaden
its customer base in order to mitigate this risk.
7) CREDIT ARRANGEMENT:
The Company has entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the Loan Agreement) with Keltic
Financial Partners, LP II (Keltic). The Company has maintained a line of credit with Keltic for
more than five years but has rarely been required to draw on it. The Loan Agreement, which was set
to expire December 31, 2009, has been extended through December 31, 2010 with no material changes
in terms and conditions. Under the Loan Agreement, the Company has a line of credit up to $1.0
million based on the Companys eligible accounts receivable balances at an interest rate based on
the higher of prime rate plus 2.75%, 90 day LIBOR rate plus 5.25% or 7%. Net availability at
September 30, 2010 was approximately $800,000. The Loan Agreement has certain financial covenants
that shall apply only if the Company has any outstanding obligations to Keltic including borrowing
under the facility. The Company had no outstanding balance at September 30, 2010, or at December
31, 2009, under the Loan Agreement.
8
8) CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS:
The Companys commitments at September 30, 2010, are comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than 5
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
1 3 Years
|
|
|
3 5 Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
Long Term Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment Contracts
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Lease Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent
(2)
|
|
|
521,096
|
|
|
|
284,234
|
|
|
|
236,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
521,096
|
|
|
$
|
284,234
|
|
|
$
|
236,862
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
No named executive officers of the Company have employment contracts.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The Company has a New York facility with a lease term expiring July 31, 2012.
|
As of September 30, 2010, the Company does not have any Off Balance Sheet Arrangements.
9) PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes as reflected in the consolidated statements of operations
varies from the expected statutory rate primarily due to a provision for minimum state taxes and
the recording of additional valuation allowance against deferred tax assets. Internal Revenue Code
Section 382 (the Code) places a limitation on the utilization of Federal net operating loss and
other credit carry-forwards when an ownership change, as defined by the tax law, occurs.
Generally, this occurs when a greater than 50 percent change in ownership occurs. On September 5,
2006, Helios and Matheson Parent acquired a greater than 50 percent ownership of the Company.
Accordingly, the actual utilization of the net operating loss carry-forwards for tax purposes are
limited annually under the Code to a percentage (currently about four and a half percent) of the
fair market value of the Company at the date of this ownership change. The Company did not
generate taxable income during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The Company maintains a
valuation allowance against additional deferred tax assets arising from net operating loss
carry-forwards since, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or
all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
10) TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS
On August 1, 2010, the Company entered into a Statement of Work with IonIdea, Inc. to provide
certain professional services, workstation facilities and communication equipment to the Company
and its wholly-owned subsidiary Helios and Matheson Global Services (HMGS). The Statement of Work commenced on August 1, 2010 and shall
continue through July 31, 2011. Kishan Grama Ananthram, a member of the Companys Board of
Directors, is the Chief Executive Officer of IonIdea and Mr. Ananthram and his spouse own all of
the outstanding capital stock of Ion Idea. The total amount paid to IonIdea is based upon the
number of Company employees using workstation facilities and communication equipment.
On August 4, 2010, the Company entered into and consummated a private placement Securities
Purchase Agreement with Helios Matheson Inc (HM, Inc.), a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned
subsidiary of Helios and Matheson Parent, pursuant to which HM Inc. purchased 2,739,726 shares of
the Companys common stock at a price of $0.73 per share, equal to the closing bid price of the
Companys common stock on August 3, 2010, for a total investment of $2,000,000. The investment by
HM Inc. was part
of a plan submitted by the Company and accepted by NASDAQ to regain compliance with NASDAQs
minimum stockholders equity requirement. As a result of the private placement, which closed on
August 5, 2010, the Company believes that it has regained compliance with NASDAQ Listing Rule
5550(b)(1).
9
On July 20, 2010, the Company received a letter from NASDAQ regarding compliance with NASDAQ
Listing Rule 5550(a)(5) which requires a minimum market value of publicly held shares of
$1,000,000. The Company received communication from NASDAQ that its market value of publicly held
shares fell short of $1,000,000 for the last 30 consecutive business days. Pursuant to the Listing
Rules, NASDAQ has communicated to the Company that it has 180 calendar days from July 20, 2010 to
regain compliance. In order to regain compliance, the market value of publicly held shares must
close at $1,000,000 or more for a minimum of 10 consecutive business days during the 180 day grace
period.
On July 23, 2010, the Company received a second letter from NASDAQ regarding compliance with
NASDAQ Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) which requires a minimum bid price of $1.00 per share. The Company
received communication from NASDAQ that the bid price of its listed securities closed below $1.00
for the last 30 consecutive business days. Pursuant to the Listing Rules, NASDAQ has communicated
to the Company that it has a grace period of 180 calendar days from July 23, 2010, to regain
compliance with the $1.00 minimum bid price requirement. In order to regain compliance, the bid
price must close at $1.00 or more for a minimum of 10 consecutive business days during the 180 day
grace period.
On September 22, 2010, the Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with Helios and
Matheson Parent (the HMIT MOU) pursuant to which Helios and Matheson Parent has agreed to make
available to the Company facilities of dedicated Off-shore Development Centers (ODCs) and also
render services by way of support in technology, client engagement, management and running the ODCs
for the Company. The Company has furnished Helios and Matheson Parent a security deposit of $1
million to cover any expenses, claims or damages that Helios and Matheson Parent may incur while
discharging its obligations under the HMIT MOU and also to cover the Companys payables to Helios
and Matheson Parent. Such security deposit may be increased as business operations are scaled up.
Upon termination of the HMIT MOU, such security deposit will be refunded to the Company without
interest and after adjusting such amounts towards any expenses, claims or damages and dues payable
to Helios and Matheson Parent.
11) COGITO LITIGATION
Cogito Ltd. (Cogito), a software company whose products the Company had marketed since 1991
under an exclusive perpetual distribution agreement, terminated the agreement effective April 14,
2010. The Company disputes that there are any valid grounds for termination of the Cogito
agreement and communicated its position to Cogito.
On or about July 23, 2010 Cogito initiated an action against the Company in the Supreme Court
of the State of New York (New York County) initiating claims for $282,000 for royalties allegedly
owed to Cogito by the Company and for alleged damages amounts of over $2.0 million which was later
amended to over $4.7 million. On July 27, 2010 the Company was restrained from any solicitations
of contract renewals.
The Order to Show Cause for a preliminary injunction was resolved by way of a stipulation
between the parties dated October 18, 2010. The Company has been ordered by the Court to place an
agreed amount of $155,823.28 in escrow. Said monies will be held in the Companys attorneys trust
account until further Order of the Court. The Court provided the Company with 30 days to file its
answer and Counterclaim. The Company strongly disputes the claims and intends to vigorously defend
the action and assert appropriate counter claims for loss of business and goodwill due to Cogitos
termination of agreement without valid grounds. The Company has also been ordered to provide, by
November 1, 2010, limited accounting of royalties for Cogito products and services from January 1,
2010 through April 14, 2010 if the agreement were not to be terminated. Limited discovery with
regard to Cogitos Order to Show Cause for a preliminary injunction was permitted but discovery has
not commenced. No trial date is set.
In the meanwhile, on August 25, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with Cogito to
continue to provide service and support of software products owned by the Company.
12) SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Management completed an analysis of all subsequent events occurring after September 30, 2010,
the balance sheet date, through November 15, 2010, the date upon which the quarter-end consolidated
financial statements were issued, and determined there were no disclosures necessary which have not
been already disclosed elsewhere in these financial statements.
10
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
The following discussion and analysis of significant factors affecting the Companys operating
results, liquidity and capital resources should be read in conjunction with the accompanying
financial statements and related notes.
Statements included in this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and elsewhere in this document that do not relate to present or historical
conditions are forward-looking statements within the meaning of that term under Section 27A of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and under Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended. Additional oral or written forward-looking statements may be made by the Company
from time to time, and such statements may be included in documents that are filed with the SEC.
Such forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainties that could cause results or outcomes
to differ materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements may include, without limitation, statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provision
of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as believes, forecasts,
intends, possible, expects, estimates, anticipates, or plans and similar expressions
are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The Company cautions readers that results
predicted by forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, those relating to the
Companys future business prospects, revenues, working capital, liquidity, capital needs, interest
costs, and income are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements. The important factors on
which such statements are based, include but are not limited to, assumptions concerning the
magnitude of the ongoing economic crisis, including its impact on the Companys customers, demand
trends in the information technology industry and the continuing needs of current and prospective
customers for the Companys services.
Overview
Since 1983, Helios and Matheson has provided high quality IT services and solutions to Fortune
1000 companies and other large organizations. The Company is headquartered in New York City and
has a second office in Bangalore, India.
The Companys services include planning, designing and implementing enterprise-wide
information systems, database management services, performance optimization, migrations and
conversions, strategic sourcing, outsourcing and systems integration.
The Company is dedicated to providing cost efficient competitive services to its clients
through its Flexible Delivery Model. This capability is made possible either through HMGS, the Companys subsidiary operating in Bangalore,
India or Helios and Matheson Parent.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, approximately 91% of the Companys consulting
services revenues were generated from clients under time and materials engagements, as compared to
approximately 80% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, with the remainder generated under
fixed-price engagements. The Company has established standard-billing guidelines for consulting
services based on the types of services offered. Actual billing rates are established on a
project-by-project basis and may vary from the standard guidelines. The Company typically bills its
clients for time and materials services on a semi-monthly basis. Arrangements for fixed-price
engagements are made on a case-by-case basis. Consulting services revenues generated under time and
materials engagements are recognized as those services are provided. Revenues from fixed fee
contracts are recorded when work is performed on the basis of the proportionate performance method,
which is based on costs incurred to date relative to total estimated costs.
The Companys most significant operating cost is its personnel cost, which is included in cost
of revenues. As a result, the Companys operating performance is primarily based upon billing
margins (billable hourly rate less the consultants hourly cost) and consultant utilization rates
(number of days worked by a consultant during a semi-monthly billing cycle divided by the number of
billing days in that cycle). For the nine month period ended September 30, 2010, gross margin was
21.6% as compared to 24.3% for the nine month period ended September 30, 2009. The decrease in
gross margin is primarily a result of a decrease in higher margin project revenue. Large portions
of the Companys engagements are on a time and materials basis. While most of the Companys
engagements allow for periodic price adjustments to address, among other things, increases in
consultant costs, to date clients have been averse to accepting cost increases.
The Company actively manages its personnel utilization rates by monitoring project
requirements and timetables. The Companys utilization rate for the nine month period ended
September 30, 2010 was approximately 88% as compared to approximately 84% for the nine month period
ended September 30, 2009. As projects are completed, consultants either are re-deployed to new
projects at the current client site or to new projects at another client site or are encouraged to
participate in Helios and Mathesons training programs in order to expand their technical skill
sets. The Company carefully monitors the utilization levels.
11
Critical Accounting Policies
The methods, estimates and judgments the Company uses in applying its most critical accounting
polices have a significant impact on the results the Company reports in its consolidated financial
statements. The Company evaluates its estimates and judgments on an on-going basis. Estimates are
based on historical experience and on assumptions that the Company believes to be reasonable under
the circumstances. The Companys experience and assumptions form the basis for its judgments about
the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Actual results may vary from what is anticipated and different assumptions or estimates about the
future could change reported results. The Company believes the following accounting policies are
the most critical to it, in that they are important to the portrayal of its financial statements
and they require the most difficult, subjective or complex judgments in the preparation of the
consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
Consulting revenues are recognized as services are provided. The Company primarily provides
consulting services under time and material contracts, whereby revenue is recognized as hours and
costs are incurred. Customers for consulting revenues are billed on a weekly, semi-monthly or
monthly basis. Revenues from fixed fee contracts are recorded when work is performed on the basis
of the proportionate performance method, which is based on costs incurred to date relative to total
estimated costs. Any anticipated contract losses are estimated and accrued at the time they become
known and estimable. Unbilled accounts receivables represent amounts recognized as revenue based
on services performed in advance of customer billings. Revenue from sales of software licenses is
recognized upon delivery of the software to a customer because future obligations associated with
such revenue are insignificant.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The Company monitors its accounts receivable balances on a monthly basis to ensure that they
are collectible. On a quarterly basis, the Company uses its historical experience to accurately
determine its accounts receivable reserve. The Companys allowance for doubtful accounts is an
estimate based on specifically identified accounts as well as general reserves. The Company
evaluates specific accounts where it has information that the customer may have an inability to
meet its financial obligations. In these cases, management uses its judgment, based on the best
available facts and circumstances, and records a specific reserve for that customer, against
amounts due, to reduce the receivable to the amount that is expected to be collected. These
specific reserves are reevaluated and adjusted as additional information is received that impacts
the amount reserved. The Company also establishes a general reserve for all customers based on a
range of percentages applied to aging categories. These percentages are based on historical
collection and write-off experience. If circumstances change, the Companys estimate of the
recoverability of amounts due the Company could be reduced or increased by a material amount. Such
a change in estimated recoverability would be accounted for in the period in which the facts that
give rise to the change become known.
Valuation of Deferred Tax Assets
Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of the Company,
it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized. The Company assesses the recoverability of deferred tax assets at least annually based
upon the Companys ability to generate sufficient future taxable income and the availability of
effective tax planning strategies.
Stock Based Compensation
The Company uses the modified prospective application method as specified by the FASB whereby
compensation cost is recognized over the remaining service period based on the grant-date fair
value of those awards as calculated for pro forma disclosures as originally issued.
12
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth the percentage of revenues of certain items included in the
Companys Statements of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
78.4
|
%
|
|
|
75.7
|
%
|
|
|
80.5
|
%
|
|
|
77.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
21.6
|
%
|
|
|
24.3
|
%
|
|
|
19.5
|
%
|
|
|
22.3
|
%
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
29.5
|
%
|
|
|
40.1
|
%
|
|
|
19.4
|
%
|
|
|
37.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)/income from
operations
|
|
|
( 7.9
|
)%
|
|
|
( 15.8
|
)%
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
( 15.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)/income
|
|
|
( 7.9
|
)%
|
|
|
( 15.9
|
)%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
( 15.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparison of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 to the Three Months Ended September
30, 2009
During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the Company turned the corner by posting a net
income of $11,000 for the first time after a span of nearly three years. This significant
turnaround has been possible due to new initiatives on the business development front as well as
the results from various cost reduction measures implemented over the past months.
Revenues.
Revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2010 were $3.5 million
compared to $3.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The decrease is primarily
attributable to a decline in consulting revenue due to difficulty in replacing completed projects
and a pushback of new assignments from existing clients primarily as a result of the current
economic condition in the financial markets and the economy more broadly.
Gross Profit
. The resulting gross profit for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was
$672,000 as compared to $795,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009. As a percentage of
total revenues, gross margin for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was 19.5% compared to
22.3% for the three months ended September 30, 2009. Gross margin has decreased primarily as a
result of reductions in higher margin project revenue and software revenue.
Operating Expenses.
Operating expenses are comprised of Selling, General and Administrative
(SG&A) expenses and depreciation and amortization. SG&A expenses for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 were $662,000 compared to the 2009 comparable period level of $1.3 million. The
decrease in SG&A expenses is associated with various cost reduction initiatives. Depreciation and
amortization expenses decreased $19,000 from $27,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009
to $8,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010.
Taxes.
Taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2010 were ($9,000) compared to $6,000
for the three months ended September 30, 2009. For the three months ended September 30, 2010, the
Company recorded a tax provision of $5,000 for minimum state taxes which was offset by ($14,000)
related to provision to return adjustments from the filing of state and federal tax returns. For
the three months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recorded a tax provision of $5,000 for
minimum state taxes and a provision to return adjustment of $1,000 from the filing of state and
federal tax returns.
Net Income/(loss).
As a result of the above, the Company had net income of $11,000 or $0.00
per basic and diluted share for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to a net loss of
($540,000) or ($0.23) per basic and diluted share for the three months ended September 30, 2009.
13
Comparison of the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
Revenues.
Revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were $9.9 million
compared to $10.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The decrease is primarily
attributable to a decline in consulting revenue due to difficulty in replacing completed projects
and a pushback of new assignments from existing clients primarily as a result of the unprecedented
crisis in the financial markets and the economy more broadly.
Gross Profit.
The resulting gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $2.1
million compared to $2.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. As a percentage of
total revenues, gross margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was 21.6% compared to
24.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Gross margin has decreased primarily as a
result of reductions in higher margin project revenue and software revenue.
Operating Expenses.
Operating expenses are comprised of Selling, General and Administrative
(SG&A) expenses and depreciation and amortization. SG&A expenses for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 were $2.9 million compared to the 2009 comparable period level of $4.3 million.
The decrease in SG&A expenses is associated with various cost reduction initiatives. Depreciation
and amortization expenses decreased $58,000 from $97,000 for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 to $39,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Taxes.
Taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were $0 compared to $17,000 for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company
recorded a tax provision of $14,000 for minimum state taxes which was increased by $3,000 related
to provision to return adjustments from the filing of state and federal tax returns compared to a
tax provision of $14,000 solely for minimum state taxes for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 which was offset by ($14,000) of provision to return adjustments from the filing of state and
federal tax returns.
Net Loss.
As a result of the above, the Company had a net loss of ($778,000) or ($0.21) per
basic and diluted share for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to a net loss of
($1.7) million or ($0.73) per basic and diluted share for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company had an operating loss of ($783,000) and a net loss of ($778,000) for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company had
an operating and net loss of ($1.7) million. The Company believes that its business, operating
results and financial condition have been harmed by the recent economic crisis and ongoing economic
uncertainty which continue to adversely affect the IT spending of its clients. A significant
portion of the Companys major customers are in the financial services industry and have come under
considerable pressure as a result of the unprecedented economic conditions in the financial
markets. While the Company has not lost any major clients, it has experienced a pushback of
assignments from existing clients and difficulty replacing high-margin completed projects, both of
which have impacted revenue growth through the third quarter of 2010. While the Company continues
to focus on revenue growth and cost reductions, including but not limited to eliminating
non-billing resources, outsourcing and off-shoring solutions, in an attempt to improve its
financial condition, there can be no assurance that the Company will be profitable in future
periods.
The Companys cash balances were approximately $1.8 million at September 30, 2010 and $1.4
million at December 31, 2009. Net cash used in operating activities for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 was approximately ($1.5) million compared to net cash used in operating
activities of approximately ($592,000) for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The decrease
in net cash provided is primarily a result of a decrease in working capital incurred for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010.
The Companys accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts, at September 30, 2010
and at December 31, 2009 were approximately $2.3 million and $2.7 million, respectively,
representing 57 and 69 days of sales outstanding (DSO), respectively. The decrease in DSO is
consistent with the collection of certain dated receivables. The accounts receivable at September
30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 included $111,000 and $184,000 of unbilled revenue, respectively.
The Company has provided an allowance for doubtful accounts at the end of each of the periods
presented. After giving effect to this allowance, the Company does not anticipate any difficulty
in collecting amounts due.
For the nine month period ended September 30, 2010, cash used in investing activities was
$13,000 which consisted of additions to property and equipment of $25,000 offset by disposals of
property and equipment of $12,000. For the nine month period ended September 30, 2009, cash
provided by investing activities was $3,000, comprised of $13,000 relating to the sale of a Company
automobile offset by additions to property and equipment of $10,000.
14
For the nine month period ended September 30, 2010, cash provided by financing activities was
$2,000,000 and related solely to a securities purchase agreement which closed on August 5, 2010
between the Company and Helios and Matheson Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Helios and Matheson
Parent. For the nine month period ended September 30, 2009, net cash used in financing activities
was $5,000 and related solely to the extension of the Companys line of credit with Keltic
Financial Partners, LP.
The Company has entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the Loan Agreement) with Keltic
Financial Partners, LP II (Keltic). The Company has maintained a line of credit with Keltic for
more than five years but has rarely been required to draw on it. The Loan Agreement, which was set
to expire December 31, 2009, has been extended through December 31, 2010 with no material changes
in terms and conditions. Under the Loan Agreement, the Company has a line of credit up to $1.0
million based on the Companys eligible accounts receivable balances at an interest rate based on
the higher of prime rate plus 2.75%, 90 day LIBOR rate plus 5.25% or 7%. Net availability at
September 30, 2010 was approximately $800,000. The Loan Agreement has certain financial covenants
that shall apply only if the Company has any outstanding obligations to Keltic including borrowing
under the facility. The Company had no outstanding balance at September 30, 2010, or at December
31, 2009, under the Loan Agreement.
In managements opinion, cash flows from operations and borrowing capacity combined with cash
on hand (including the recent cash infusion of $2 million on August 5, 2010) will provide adequate
flexibility for funding the Companys working capital obligations for the next twelve months.
For the nine months ended September 30 2010, there were no shares of common stock issued
pursuant to the exercise of options issued under the Companys stock option plan.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of September 30, 2010, the Company does not have any Off Balance Sheet Arrangements.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The Companys commitments at September 30, 2010 are reflected and further detailed in the
Contractual Obligation table located in Part I, Item 1, Note 8 of this Form 10-Q.
Inflation
The Company has not suffered material adverse affects from inflation in the past. However, a
substantial increase in the inflation rate in the future may adversely affect customers purchasing
decisions, may increase the costs of borrowing or may have an adverse impact on the Companys
margins and overall cost structure.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
None.
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
As a smaller reporting company we are not required to provide this information.
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
|
Controls and Procedures
|
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
As of September 30, 2010, we
carried out an evaluation, under the supervision of and with the participation of our Chief
Executive Officer and our Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)). Disclosure controls and
procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file
or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosures. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer have concluded that, as of September 30, 2010, our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective.
15
Changes in internal control.
During the quarter covered by this report, there was no
change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the
Exchange Act) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect our
internal control over financial reporting.
Part II. Other Information
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
|
Legal Proceedings
|
The Companys legal proceedings at September 30, 2010 have been disclosed in Part I, Item 1,
Note 11 of this Form 10-Q.
As a smaller reporting company we are not required to provide this information.
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
On August 4, 2010, the Company issued 2,739,726 shares of common stock to Helios and Matheson,
Inc., a subsidiary of Helios and Matheson Parent. The Company sold the common stock at a price of
$0.73 per share, for total proceeds of $2 million. The Company relied on Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act of 1933 to make the offer inasmuch the investor occupied a status relative to the
Company that afforded it effective access to the information that registration would otherwise
provide and the securities were sold without any form of general solicitation or general
advertising.
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
|
None.
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
|
[Removed and Reserved]
|
None.
|
|
|
Item 5.
|
|
Other Information
|
None.
16
Item 6
.
Exhibits
(a)
Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1
to the Form 10-K, as previously filed with the SEC on March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
Bylaws of Helios and Matheson North America Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit
3.2 to the Form 10-K, as previously filed with the SEC on March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
Statement of Work, dated as of August 1, 2010, between the Registrant and IonIdea, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
Memorandum of Understanding, dated as of September 22, 2010, between the Registrant and
Helios and Matheson Information Technology Limited.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement dated April 4, 2010 between the Registrant and Helios and
Matheson, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K, as previously
filed with the SEC on August 6, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
17
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HELIOS AND MATHESON NORTH AMERICA INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 15, 2010
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Divya Ramachandran
Divya Ramachandran
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 15, 2010
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Umesh Ahuja
Umesh Ahuja
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|
|
|
18
Helios & Matheson North America Inc. (MM) (NASDAQ:HMNA)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2024 to Jun 2024
Helios & Matheson North America Inc. (MM) (NASDAQ:HMNA)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2023 to Jun 2024