Overview
We are a blank check
company incorporated as a Delaware corporation in October 2020 and formed for the purpose of effecting a merger, capital stock
exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or similar business combination, with one or more businesses or assets.
We have generated no operating revenues to date, and we do not expect that we will generate operating revenues until we consummate
our initial business combination.
We have concentrated
our efforts on identifying businesses which provide insurance or insurance related services, with particular emphasis on insurance
distribution businesses, regulated insurance or reinsurance businesses, and insurance related technology businesses. We are not,
however, required to complete our initial business combination with an insurance business. While we may pursue a business combination
outside of that industry, we believe a focus on the insurance sector best combines the expertise and experience of our management
team with a sector that offers attractive investment opportunities.
We seek to identify
and acquire businesses which may leverage Cohen & Company’s knowledge of and experience with insurance investment strategies,
which may allow us to participate in the management and development of the company beyond the consummation of the business combination.
We do not intend to acquire start-up companies, companies with speculative business plans or companies that are excessively leveraged.
We broadly define the
insurance sector (or insurance related services and companies) to include, but not be limited to:
|
●
|
Insurance
distribution companies, including retail agents, insurance brokers or managing general agencies;
|
|
●
|
Insurance
and/or reinsurance carriers, in any sector including property-casualty, life and health;
|
|
●
|
Insurance
run-off managers;
|
|
●
|
Service
providers, including claims or cost management, business processing, premium payment facilitation, data and technology providers,
and asset managers; and
|
|
●
|
InsureTech
(defined below) companies, including those focused on using technology to maximize savings and efficiency, launch growth opportunities
and innovate new risk selection processes.
|
Insurance is a significant
sector within the global financial economy. The insurance sector has experienced significant changes in recent years, most notably
in North America, which has led to improvements in capital efficiency, access to business and quality of risk analytics. We focus
on identifying target companies which, among other things, are well positioned to benefit from these developments, in part through
growth opportunities or by capitalizing on Cohen & Company’s insurance investment strategies. In addition, the development
of the insurance Linked Securities (“ILS”) market, challenging the dominance of traditional reinsurance companies,
has improved access to a consistent supply of risk capital at lower cost. In addition, after the catastrophe events of 2017, 2018
and 2019, the available supply of ILS capital was observed to alleviate the expected increase in cost of reinsurance capital usually
applied by traditional reinsurers, flattening the peaks of the previously observed market pricing cycle and thereby providing an
opportunity to cut long-term operating costs of those insurance and reinsurance companies who utilize reinsurance as a significant
form of contingent capital. In addition, the transfer of risk to ILS funds has provided an opportunity to generate income unrelated
to underwriting risk for both insurance and reinsurance companies. The influence of ILS is now spreading beyond property catastrophe
insurance to a broader range of underlying classes of insurance. Technology (“InsureTech”) is improving access to consumer
and agency networks thereby improving access to business development possibilities and the retention of existing policyholders.
In addition, InsureTech is significantly improving access to underwriting, risk and claims data, which has positive benefits for
risk selection, pricing, claims cost control and portfolio management for those companies who can adequately adapt. Also, the technical
and economic situation resulting from the Covid-19 epidemic is leading to further transformation in the insurance industry. Whilst
the claim burden on some insurance and reinsurance companies will be substantial, his burden is concentrated in specific classes
of insurance and therefore many sectors of the industry are not significantly negatively affected but will benefit from an expected
general increase in insurance premiums in the upcoming period whilst the industry recoups the cost of recent claims and recalibrates
the cost of risk capital. We will seek companies whose business plans are resilient, and which may benefit from the improved economics
and possible M&A activity which is currently being observed. Companies in the insurance sector are also highly regulated and
subject to overview from rating agencies, leading to transparency and detailed availability of data to analyze, review and monitor
potential acquisition targets. We believe that those companies who have, or can be provided with, the skill and knowledge required
to capitalize on the current changes occurring in the insurance market will benefit from improved operational efficiencies and
underwriting performance, facilitating future growth. We believe our management team has the skills and experience to identify,
evaluate and consummate a business combination and is well positioned to assist any insurance businesses we acquire to take advantage
of the opportunities described above. However, our management team’s network and investing and operating experience do not
guarantee a successful initial business combination. The members of our management team are not required to devote any significant
amount of time to our business and are concurrently involved with other businesses. There is no guarantee that our current officers
and directors will continue in their respective roles, or in any other role, after our initial business combination, and their
expertise may only be of benefit to us until our initial business combination is completed. Past performance by our management
team is not a guarantee of success with respect to any business combination we may consummate.
At December 31, 2020,
we had not yet commenced operations. All activity through December 31, 2020 relates to the Company’s formation, its initial
public offering, and identifying a target company for our initial business combination.
The registration statement
for our initial public offering was declared effective on December 17, 2020. On December 22, 2020, we consummated the initial public
offering of 25,000,000 units generating gross proceeds of $250,000,000.
Simultaneously with
the closing of the initial public offering, we consummated the sale of 575,000 placement units at a price of $10.00 per unit in
a private placement to our sponsor, generating gross proceeds of $5,750,000.
Following the closing
of the initial public offering on December 22, 2020, an amount of $250,000,000 ($10.00 per unit) from the net proceeds of the sale
of the units in the initial public offering and the placement units was placed in a trust account and invested in U.S. government
securities, within the meaning set forth in Section 2(a)(16) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment
Company Act”), with a maturity of 185 days or less or in money market funds meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 of
the Investment Company Act, which invest only in direct U.S. government treasury obligations, until the earlier of: (i) the consummation
of a business combination, (ii) the redemption of any public shares in connection with a stockholder vote to amend our amended
and restated certificate of incorporation to modify the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our public shares
if we do not complete a business combination by December 22, 2022; or (iii) the distribution of the trust account, if we are unable
to complete a business combination within the combination period or upon any earlier liquidation of us.
Nasdaq rules require
that we must complete one or more business combinations having an aggregate fair market value of at least 80% of the value of the
assets held in the trust account (excluding the deferred underwriting commissions and taxes payable on the interest earned on the
trust account) at the time of our signing a definitive agreement in connection with our initial business combination. Our board
of directors will make the determination as to the fair market value of our initial business combination. If our board of directors
is not able to independently determine the fair market value of our initial business combination, we will obtain an opinion from
an independent investment banking firm or another independent entity that commonly renders valuation opinions with respect to the
satisfaction of such criteria. While we consider it unlikely that our board of directors will not be able to make an independent
determination of the fair market value of our initial business combination, it may be unable to do so if it is less familiar or
experienced with the business of a particular target or if there is a significant amount of uncertainty as to the value of a target’s
assets or prospects.
We anticipate structuring
our initial business combination to acquire 100% of the equity interest or assets of the target business or businesses.
Business Strategy
We have sought to capitalize
on the significant insurance experience and contacts of John M. Butler, our President and Chief Executive Officer, Daniel G. Cohen,
the Chairman of our Board of Directors, and the other members of our Board of Directors, to identify, evaluate, acquire and operate
a target business. If we elect to pursue an investment outside of the insurance industry, as INSU I has elected to do in connection
with its initial business combination, our management’s expertise related to that industry may not be directly applicable
to its evaluation or operation. Our management and Board of Directors have extensive experience in the financial services industry
generally, and the insurance industry in particular, as well as extensive experience in operating financial services companies
and/or insurance businesses in a public company environment as managers, operators, principals, investors, advisors or directors,
with extensive experience in sourcing, evaluating, negotiating, structuring and executing transactions in the insurance sector.
Cohen & Company
Inc., the parent of Cohen & Company, LLC, the manager of our sponsor, managed approximately $2.65 billion as of September 30,
2020 in fixed income assets in a variety of assets classes including U.S. and European trust preferred securities, subordinated
debt and corporate loans. It has experience funding small and medium-sized insurance companies in the U.S., Bermuda and Europe,
with over $4.3 billion invested across 210 insurance companies from 2002 through February 19, 2021. Cohen & Company’s
extensive diligence process has led to historically low rates of default on the insurance components of its managed portfolios,
resulting in average annual default rates of approximately 0.33%, expected recovery rates of 22% and average annual loss rates
of approximately 0.26% from 2002 through February 19, 2021.
Our Chairman served
as Chairman of Insurance Acquisition Corp., or INSU I, a former blank check company which raised $150.7 million in its initial
public offering in March 2019 and completed its initial business combination when it merged with affiliates of Shift Technologies,
Inc. in October 2020, which we refer to as the INSU I Acquisition. Our Chairman also served as Chairman of INSU Acquisition
Corp. II, or INSU II, a former blank check company which raised $230 million in its initial public offering in September 2020
and completed its initial business combination when it merged with Metromile, Inc. in February 2021, which we refer to as
the INSU II Acquisition.
Also, our Chairman
served as an executive officer and/or director of FinTech Acquisition Corp., or FinTech I, a former blank check company which raised
$100.0 million in its initial public offering in February 2015 and completed its initial business combination when it acquired
FTS Holding Corporation in July 2016, which we refer to as the FinTech I Acquisition. Our Chairman also served as an executive
officer and/or director of FinTech Acquisition Corp. II, or FinTech II, a blank check company which raised $175.0 million in its
initial public offering in January 2017 and completed its initial business combination when it acquired Intermex Holdings II in
July 2018, which we refer to as the FinTech II Acquisition. In addition, our Chairman served as Chief Executive Officer of FinTech
Acquisition Corp. III, or FinTech III, a former blank check company which raised $345.0 million in its initial public offering
in November 2018 and completed its initial business combination with Paya, Inc. in October 2020, which we refer to as
the FinTech III Acquisition. Our Chairman currently serves as: Chief Executive Officer of FinTech Acquisition Corp. IV (NASDAQ:
FTIV), or FinTech IV, a blank check company which raised $230.0 million in its initial public offering in September 2020;
and Chief Executive Officer of FinTech Acquisition Corp. V (NASDAQ: FTCV), or FinTech V, a blank check company which raised $250.0 million
in its initial public offering in December 2020. We believe that potential sellers of target businesses will view the fact
that our Chairman has successfully closed multiple business combinations with vehicles similar to our company as a positive factor
in considering whether or not to enter into a business combination with us. However, past performance by our Chairman is not a
guarantee of success with respect to any business combination we may consummate.
Mr. Cohen, with over 22 years of experience
in financial services and financial technology, is the Chairman of the Board of Directors and of the Board of Managers of Cohen & Company, LLC, and serves as the President and Chief Executive of the European Business of Cohen & Company Inc. (NYSE
American: COHN), a financial services company with approximately $2.65 billion in assets under management as of September 30, 2020,
and as President, a director and the Chief Investment Officer of Cohen & Company Inc.’s indirect majority owned subsidiary,
Cohen & Company Financial Limited (formerly known as EuroDekania Management Limited), a Financial Conduct Authority regulated
investment advisor and broker dealer focusing on the European capital markets (“CCFL”). Mr. Cohen previously served
as Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors and of the Board of Managers of Cohen & Company, LLC. Mr. Cohen served as the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer of Cohen & Company Inc. from December 16, 2009 to September 16, 2013 and as
the Chairman of the Board of Directors from October 6, 2006 to September 16, 2013. Mr. Cohen served as the executive Chairman of
Cohen & Company Inc. from October 18, 2006 to December 16, 2009. In addition, Mr. Cohen served as the Chairman of the Board
of Managers of Cohen & Company, LLC from 2001 to September 16, 2013, as the Chief Investment Officer of Cohen & Company,
LLC from October 2008 to September 16, 2013, and as Chief Executive Officer of Cohen & Company, LLC from December 16, 2009
to September 16, 2013. Mr. Cohen served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of J.V.B. Financial Group, LLC (formerly C&Co/PrinceRidge
Partners LLC), the Company’s indirect broker dealer subsidiary (“JVB”), from July 19, 2012 to September 16, 2013.
Mr. Cohen is also a founder, the former Chief Executive Officer and the current Chairman of The Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ: TBBK), which
we refer to as Bancorp, a financial holding company with over $6.3 billion of total assets as of December 31, 2020, whose principal
subsidiary is The Bancorp Bank, that provides a wide range of commercial and retail banking products and services to both regional
and national markets. Mr. Cohen currently serves as the Chief Executive Officer of FinTech IV and FinTech V. Mr. Cohen
served as Chairman of INSU I until the INSU I Acquisition, as Chairman of INSU II until the INSU II Acquisition, as Chief
Executive Officer, President and a director of FinTech I until the FinTech I Acquisition, as Chief Executive Officer and a director
of FinTech II until the FinTech II Acquisition and as Chief Executive Officer of FinTech III until the FinTech III Acquisition.
Mr. Cohen also recently joined FTAC Parnassus Acquisition Corp., or FTAC Parnassus, as its Chairman, FTAC Hera Acquisition
Corp., or FTAC Hera, as its President and Chief Executive Officer, FTAC Zeus Acquisition Corp., or FTAC Zeus, as its Chairman,
FinTech Acquisition Corp. VI, or FinTech VI, as its Chief Executive Officer, and INSU Acquisition Corp. IV, or INSU IV, as its
Chairman, each a blank check company formed for the purpose of effecting its own initial business combination. . He is also
a past Chief Executive Officer of RAIT Financial Trust, which we refer to as RAIT, formerly a publicly traded real estate finance
company focused on the commercial real estate industry, from December 2006 when it merged with Taberna Realty Finance Trust, to
February 2009, and served as a trustee from the date RAIT acquired Taberna in February 2009 until his resignation from that position
in February 2010. From 1998 to 2000, Mr. Cohen served as the Chief Operation Officer of Resource America, Inc., formerly a publicly
traded asset management company with interests in energy, real estate and financial services. Mr. Cohen was also a past director
of Jefferson Bank of Pennsylvania, a commercial bank and subsidiary of JeffBanks, Inc., a publicly traded bank holding company,
which we refer to as JeffBanks, acquired by Hudson United Bancorp in 1999.
John M. Butler, with
over 23 years of insurance experience, is our President and CEO. Mr. Butler joined Cohen & Company effective November 1, 2017,
as Portfolio Manager and Head of Cohen & Company’s U.S. Insurance Asset Management Platform and Global ILS Program. Mr. Butler
was President and Chief Executive officer of INSU I until the INSU I Acquisition, President and Chief Executive officer of INSU
II until the INSU II Acquisition, and he currently serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of INSU IV.
Previously Mr. Butler
worked for Twelve Capital, a European asset manager specializing in investment in the insurance sector where he served in various
senior roles including Managing Partner & Head of Investment Management. In this role, Mr. Butler oversaw the investment of
principally fixed income and insurance linked securities. Prior to this, Mr. Butler worked as Senior Underwriter managing the International
Catastrophe and Terrorism reinsurance portfolios of Hannover Re Bermuda Ltd., where he was responsible for managing the company’s
position as a lead reinsurer particularly in European and Asia-Pacific markets. Prior to this, Mr. Butler spent seven years with
the White Mountains Insurance Group, both in Dublin and Bermuda, managing the underwriting of the international non-marine treaty
portfolio. Earlier in his career, Mr. Butler worked for entities in the London reinsurance market, underwriting a broad range of
business lines. Since June 2020, Mr. Butler has served as Vice Chair of the Board of TCI Re, a reinsurance company headquartered
in Puerto Rico, and since February 2020, he has held an advisory board position with Kovrr Inc., an Israel based insurance cyber
risk analytics technology company.Mr. Butler holds an honors degree in Law from the University of London, is an Associate of the
Chartered Insurance Institute of the UK, a member of the Insurance Institute of Ireland and is qualified as a Chartered Insurer.
Our board of directors
has collectively over 85 years of insurance industry experience, having served in a variety of roles including as managers, operators,
principals, investors, advisors, bankers or directors. Their extensive experience includes sourcing, evaluating, negotiating, structuring
and executing capital transactions with private and public insurance businesses, and members of our board of directors have worked
as senior insurance practitioners carrying out technical underwriting, brokerage and general management functions at a senior level
within large international companies. In addition, our board of directors also has substantial experience in the management of
public financial sector companies.
We have identified
the following criteria that we intend to use in evaluating business transaction opportunities. This list is not intended to be
all-inclusive, and we expect that no individual criterion will entirely determine a decision to pursue a particular opportunity.
Further, any particular business transaction opportunity which we ultimately determine to pursue may not meet one or more of these
criteria:
|
●
|
Potential to Leverage our Operational Expertise. We seek platforms where we can leverage our operational expertise in enhancing and optimizing returns for the business. Such efficiencies include more effective access to reinsurance and ILS markets and structures resulting in lower cost and more readily available capital, together with access to other forms of capital, technical expertise, investment capabilities and the development of fee generating service provision to third parties.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Significant growth opportunities. We seek to acquire one or more businesses which have currently underutilized opportunities for profitable growth which can be leveraged through one or more of the following: improved access to capital, development or restructuring of the balance sheet, improved asset management processes, enhanced technology and operating processes; which in turn will assist in the development of greater risk adjusted returns. We believe that our management team can leverage their expertise to create significant improvements in these areas to improve performance and strengthen competitive position.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Ability to generate risk-free fee income. We seek to acquire one or more businesses or assets that have a history of, or potential for, strong, stable technical insurance returns and risk-free fee income.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Strong management team. We seek to acquire one or more businesses or assets that have strong, experienced management teams or those that provide a platform for us to assemble an effective and experienced management team. We will focus on management teams with a proven track record of technical insurance expertise.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Significant Ownership Transition Benefits. We seek to acquire one or more businesses whose growth or performance could benefit significantly from the transition from private to public company ownership. Examples of such situations include businesses that are currently impeded by lack of financial resources resulting from current private ownership, transactions that can resolve current dissident shareholder issues or provide a reliable transition for management currently constrained by a lack of clarity over next generation ownership, and subsidiaries within larger international organizations which would benefit from a transition to separate ownership.
|
Competitive Strengths
We believe we have
the following competitive strengths:
|
●
|
Management Operating, Investing and Transaction Sourcing Experience. Our directors and executive officers have significant insurance sector, and M&A and public company operating experience. John M. Butler has over 20 years’ experience in the insurance industry, as an executive of international reinsurance companies and within the insurance focused asset management arena. Daniel G. Cohen, with over 20 years’ experience in the financial services industry, is a founder of Bancorp, the Chairman and Chief Investment Officer of an investment bank and is an affiliate of a broker-dealer subsidiary of the investment bank. Our board of directors has over 85 years’ of collective experience in the insurance industry, including in senior operational roles in underwriting, banking, advisory roles, and merchant banking specializing in structuring capital transactions for small and mid-market insurers. We believe that this breadth of experience provides us with in-depth industry, investing, financing and M&A knowledge, sources of propriety deal flow, and a network of third party relationships that all provide a competitive advantage in sourcing and evaluating businesses and acquisition opportunities in our target industry.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Strong Financial Position and Flexibility. With a trust account initially in the amount of $250,000,000 and a public market for our common stock, we offer a target business a variety of options to facilitate a future business transaction and fund the growth and expansion of business operations. Because we are able to consummate an initial business transaction using our capital stock, debt, cash or a combination of the foregoing, we have the flexibility to design an acquisition structure to address the needs of the parties. We have not, however, taken any steps to secure third party financing and would only do so simultaneously with the consummation of our initial business transaction. Accordingly, our flexibility in structuring an initial business transaction may be constrained by our ability to arrange third-party financing, if required.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Status as a Public Company. We believe our structure makes us an attractive business transaction partner to prospective target businesses. As an existing public company, we offer a target business an alternative to the traditional initial public offering through a merger or other business transaction with us. In this situation, the owners of the target business would exchange their shares of stock in the target business for shares of our capital stock. Once public, we believe the target business would have greater access to capital and additional means of creating management incentives that are better aligned with stockholders’ interests than it could as a private company. We believe that being a public company can also augment a company’s profile among potential new customers and vendors and aid it in attracting and retaining talented employees.
|
Effecting Our Initial Business Combination
General
We are not presently
engaged in, and we will not engage in, any operations until our initial business combination. We intend to effectuate our initial
business combination using cash from the proceeds of the initial public offering and the private placement, our capital stock,
debt or a combination of these as the consideration to be paid in our initial business combination.
If we pay for our initial
business combination using stock or debt securities, or we do not use all of the funds released from the trust account for payment
of the purchase price in connection with our business combination or for redemptions of our Class A common stock, we may apply
the balance of the cash released to us from the trust account for general corporate purposes, including for maintenance or expansion
of operations of acquired businesses, the payment of principal or interest due on indebtedness incurred in consummating our initial
business combination, to fund the purchase of other companies or for working capital.
There is no current
basis for stockholders to evaluate the possible merits or risks of the target business with which we may ultimately complete our
initial business combination. Although our management will assess the risks inherent in a particular target business with which
we may combine, we cannot assure you that this assessment will result in our identifying all risks that a target business may encounter.
Furthermore, some of those risks may be outside of our control, meaning that we can do nothing to control or reduce the chances
that those risks will adversely impact a target business.
Nasdaq rules require
that our initial business combination be with one or more target businesses that together have a fair market value equal to at
least 80% of the balance in the trust account (less any deferred underwriting commissions and taxes payable on interest earned)
at the time of our signing a definitive agreement in connection with our initial business combination. However, if our securities
are not listed on Nasdaq or another securities exchange, we will no longer be subject to that requirement.
We may seek to raise
additional funds through a private offering of debt or equity securities to finance our initial business combination, and we may
effectuate an initial business combination using the proceeds of such offering rather than using the amounts held in the trust
account. Subject to compliance with applicable securities laws, we would consummate such financing only simultaneously with the
consummation of our initial business combination. In the case of an initial business combination funded with assets other than
the trust account assets, our tender offer documents or proxy materials disclosing the initial business combination would disclose
the terms of the financing and, only if required by law or Nasdaq, we would seek stockholder approval of such financing. There
are no prohibitions on our ability to raise funds privately or through loans in connection with our initial business combination.
At this time, we are not a party to any arrangement or understanding with any third party with respect to raising any additional
funds through the sale of securities or otherwise.
Sources of Acquisition Candidates
We anticipate that
target business candidates will be brought to our attention from various unaffiliated sources, including investment bankers, attorneys,
accountants, venture capital funds, private equity funds, leveraged buyout funds, management buyout funds, brokers and other members
of the financial community and corporate executives. These target candidates may present solicited or unsolicited proposals. Such
sources became aware that we were seeking a business combination candidate by a variety of means, including publicly available
information relating to the initial public offering, public relations and marketing efforts or direct contact by management following
the completion of the initial public offering.
Our officers and directors,
as well as their affiliates, may also bring to our attention target business candidates of which they become aware through their
contacts. While we do not presently anticipate engaging the services of professional firms or other individuals that specialize
in business acquisitions on any formal basis, we may engage these firms or other individuals in the future, in which event we may
pay a finder’s fee, consulting fee or other compensation to be determined in an arm’s length negotiation based on the
terms of the transaction. We will engage a finder only if our management determines that the use of a finder may bring opportunities
to us that may not otherwise be available to us or if finders approach us on an unsolicited basis with a potential transaction
that our management determines is in our best interest to pursue. Payment of finder’s fees is customarily tied to completion
of a transaction, in which case any such fee will be paid out of the funds held in the trust account. In no event, however, will
our sponsor or any of our officers or directors, or any entity with which they are affiliated, be paid any finder’s fee,
consulting fee or other compensation prior to, or for any services they render in order to effectuate, the consummation of our
initial business combination (regardless of the type of transaction that it is), other than (i) repayment of loans made to us prior
to the date of the initial public offering by our sponsor to cover offering-relating and organization expenses, (ii) repayment
of loans that our sponsor or one of its affiliates may make to finance transaction costs in connection with an intended initial
business combination (provided that if we do not consummate an initial business combination, we may use working capital held outside
the trust account to repay such loaned amounts, but no proceeds from our trust account would be used for such repayment), (iii)
payments to our sponsor or its affiliate of a total of $20,000 per month for office space, administrative and shared personnel
support services, (iv) at the closing of our initial business combination, a customary advisory fee to an affiliate of our sponsor,
in an amount that constitutes a market standard advisory fee for comparable transactions and services provided; and (v) to reimburse
our sponsor, officers or directors for any out-of-pocket expenses related to identifying, investigating and completing an initial
business combination. None of the initial holders, our officers, our directors or any entity with which they are affiliated will
be allowed to receive any compensation, finder’s fees or consulting fees from a prospective acquisition target in connection
with a contemplated acquisition of such target by us. Although some of our officers and directors may enter into employment
or consulting agreements with the acquired business following our initial business combination, the presence or absence of any
such arrangements will not be used as a criterion in our selection process of an acquisition candidate.
We are not prohibited
from pursuing an initial business combination with a company that is affiliated with our sponsor, officers, directors or their
affiliates. Additionally, we are not prohibited from partnering, submitting joint bids, or entering into any similar transaction
with such persons in the pursuit of an initial business combination. If we seek to complete an initial business combination with
such a company or we partner with such persons in our pursuit of an initial business combination, we, or a committee of independent
directors, would obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm that is a member of FINRA or an independent accounting
firm, that such an initial business combination is fair to our stockholders from a financial point of view. Generally, such opinion
is rendered to a company’s board of directors and investment banking firms may take the view that stockholders may not rely
on the opinion. Such view will not impact our decision on which investment banking firm to hire.
Unless we consummate
our initial business combination with an affiliated entity, we are not required to obtain a financial fairness opinion from an
independent investment banking firm. If we do not obtain such an opinion, our stockholders will be relying on the judgment of our
board of directors, who will determine fair market value and fairness based on standards generally accepted by the financial community.
The application of such standards would involve a comparison, from a valuation standpoint, of our business combination target to
comparable public companies, as applicable, and a comparison of our contemplated transaction with such business combination target
to other then-recently announced comparable private and public company transactions, as applicable. The application of such standards
and the basis of our board of directors’ determination will be discussed and disclosed in our tender offer or proxy solicitation
materials, as applicable, related to our initial business combination. If any of our officers or directors becomes aware of an
initial business combination opportunity that falls within the line of business of any entity to which he or she has pre-existing
fiduciary or contractual obligations, he or she may be required to present such business combination opportunity to such entity
prior to presenting such business combination opportunity to us. Our officers and directors currently have certain relevant fiduciary
duties or contractual obligations that may take priority over their duties to us.
Selection of a target business and structuring
of our initial business combination
Nasdaq rules require
that we must complete one or more business combinations having an aggregate fair market value of at least 80% of the value of the
assets held in the trust account (excluding the deferred underwriting commissions and taxes payable on the interest earned on the
trust account) at the time of our signing a definitive agreement in connection with our initial business combination. The fair
market value of our initial business combination will be determined by our board of directors based upon one or more standards
generally accepted by the financial community, such as discounted cash flow valuation, a valuation based on trading multiples of
comparable public businesses or a valuation based on the financial metrics of M&A transactions of comparable businesses. If
our board of directors is not able to independently determine the fair market value of our initial business combination, we will
obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm or another independent entity that commonly renders valuation opinions
with respect to the satisfaction of such criteria. While we consider it unlikely that our board of directors will not be able to
make an independent determination of the fair market value of our initial business combination, it may be unable to do so if it
is less familiar or experienced with the business of a particular target or if there is a significant amount of uncertainty as
to the value of a target’s assets or prospects. We do not intend to purchase multiple businesses in unrelated industries
in conjunction with our initial business combination. Subject to this requirement, our management will have virtually unrestricted
flexibility in identifying and selecting one or more prospective target businesses, although we will not be permitted to effectuate
our initial business combination with another blank check company or a similar company with nominal operations.
In any case, we will
only complete an initial business combination in which we own or acquire 50% or more of the outstanding voting securities of the
target or otherwise acquire a controlling interest in the target sufficient for it not to be required to register as an investment
company under the Investment Company Act. If we own or acquire less than 100% of the equity interests or assets of a target business
or businesses, the portion of such business or businesses that are owned or acquired by the post-transaction company is what will
be taken into account for purposes of Nasdaq’s 80% fair market value test. There is no basis for stockholders to evaluate
the possible merits or risks of any target business with which we may ultimately complete our initial business combination.
To the extent we effect
our initial business combination with a company or business that may be financially unstable or in its early stages of development
or growth we may be affected by numerous risks inherent in such company or business. Although our management will endeavor to evaluate
the risks inherent in a particular target business, we cannot assure you that we will properly ascertain or assess all significant
risk factors.
In evaluating a prospective
business target, we expect to conduct a thorough due diligence review, which may encompass, among other things, meetings with incumbent
management and employees, document reviews, interviews of customers and suppliers, inspection of facilities, as well as a review
of financial and other information that will be made available to us.
The time required to
select and evaluate a target business and to structure and complete our initial business combination, and the costs associated
with this process, are not currently ascertainable with any degree of certainty. Any costs incurred with respect to the identification
and evaluation of a prospective target business with which our initial business combination is not ultimately completed will result
in our incurring losses and will reduce the funds we can use to complete another business combination.
Lack of business diversification
For an indefinite period
of time after consummation of our initial business combination, the prospects for our success may depend entirely on the future
performance of a single business. Unlike other entities that have the resources to complete business combinations with multiple
entities in one or several industries, it is probable that we will not have the resources to diversify our operations and mitigate
the risks of being in a single line of business. In addition, we intend to focus our search for an initial business combination
in a single industry. By consummating a business combination with only a single entity, our lack of diversification may:
|
●
|
subject us to negative economic, competitive and regulatory developments, any or all of which may have a substantial adverse impact on the particular industry in which we operate after our initial business combination, and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
cause us to depend on the marketing and sale of a single product or limited number of products or services.
|
Limited ability to evaluate the target’s
management team
Although we closely
scrutinize the management of a prospective target business when evaluating a target business, our assessment of the target business’
management may not prove to be correct. In addition, the future management may not have the necessary skills, qualifications or
abilities to manage a public company. The future role of members of our management team, if any, in the target business cannot
presently be stated with any certainty. While it is possible that one or more of our directors will remain associated in some capacity
with us following a business combination, it is unlikely that any of them will devote their full efforts to our affairs subsequent
to a business combination. Moreover, we cannot assure you that members of our management team will have experience or knowledge
relating to the operations of the particular target business.
We cannot assure you
that any of our key personnel will remain in senior management or advisory positions with the combined company. The determination
as to whether any of our key personnel will remain with the combined company will be made at the time of our initial business combination.
Following a business
combination, we may seek to recruit additional managers to supplement the incumbent management of the target business. We cannot
assure you that we will have the ability to recruit additional managers, or that additional managers will have the requisite skills,
knowledge or experience necessary to enhance the incumbent management.
Stockholders may not have the ability
to approve a business combination
We may not seek stockholder
approval before we effect our initial business combination as not all business combinations require stockholder approval under
applicable state law. However, we will seek stockholder approval if it is required by law or Nasdaq, or we may decide to seek stockholder
approval for business or other reasons. Presented in the table below is a table of the types of initial business combinations we
may consider and whether stockholder approval is currently required under Delaware law for each such transaction.
Type of Transaction
|
|
Whether
Stockholder
Approval is
Required
|
Purchase of assets
|
|
No
|
Purchase of stock of target not involving a merger with the company
|
|
No
|
Merger of target into a subsidiary of the company
|
|
No
|
Merger of the company with a target
|
|
Yes
|
So long as we obtain
and maintain a listing for our securities on Nasdaq, stockholder approval would be required for our initial business combination
if, for example:
|
●
|
we
issue shares of Class A common stock that will be equal to or in excess of 20% of the number of shares of our Class A common stock
then outstanding (other than in a public offering);
|
|
●
|
any
of our directors, officers or substantial stockholders (as defined by Nasdaq rules) has a 5% or greater interest (or such persons
collectively have a 10% or greater interest), directly or indirectly, in the target business or assets to be acquired or otherwise
and the present or potential issuance of common stock could result in an increase in outstanding common shares or voting power
of 5% or more; or
|
|
●
|
the
issuance or potential issuance of common stock will result in our undergoing a change of control.
|
Permitted purchases of our securities
If we seek stockholder
approval of our initial business combination and we do not conduct redemptions in connection with our business combination pursuant
to the tender offer rules, our sponsor, directors, officers or their respective affiliates may purchase public securities in the
open market or in privately negotiated transactions either prior to or following the consummation of our initial business combination,
although as of the date of this Annual Report they have no commitments, plans or intentions to engage in such transactions. If
they do effect such purchases, we anticipate that they would approach a limited number of large holders of our securities that
have voted against the business combination or sought redemption of their shares, or that have indicated an intention to do so,
and engage in direct negotiations for the purchase of such holders’ positions. All holders approached in this manner would
be institutional or sophisticated holders. There is no limit on the number of shares they may acquire. Our sponsor, directors,
officers, advisors or their affiliates will not make any such purchases when they are in possession of any material nonpublic information
not disclosed to the seller or during a restricted period under Regulation M under the Exchange Act or in transactions that would
violate Section 9(a)(2) or Rule 10(b)-5 under the Exchange Act. Although they do not currently anticipate paying any premium purchase
price for such public shares, there is no limit on the price they may pay. They may also enter into transactions to provide such
holders with incentives to acquire shares or vote their shares in favor of an initial business combination. No funds in the trust
account may be used to effect purchases of public securities in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions.
The purpose of such
purchases of public securities would be to (i) increase the likelihood of obtaining stockholder approval of the business combination
or (ii) to satisfy a closing condition in an agreement with a target that requires us to have a minimum net worth or a certain
amount of cash at the closing of the business combination, where it appears that such requirement would otherwise not be met. The
purpose of any such purchases of public warrants could be to reduce the number of public warrants outstanding or to vote such warrants
on any matters submitted to the warrantholders for approval in connection with our initial business combination. This may result
in the consummation of a business combination that may not otherwise have been possible.
As a consequence of
any such purchases by our sponsor, directors, officers or their affiliates, the public “float” of our common stock
may be reduced and the number of beneficial holders of our securities may be reduced, which may make it difficult to obtain the
continued listing of our securities on Nasdaq or another national securities exchange in connection with our initial business combination.
Our sponsor, officers,
directors and/or their respective affiliates anticipate that they will identify the public stockholders with whom they may pursue
privately negotiated purchases through either direct contact by the public stockholders or by our receipt of redemption requests
or votes against the business combination submitted by such public stockholders following our mailing of proxy materials in connection
with our initial business combination. The sellers of any shares so purchased by our sponsor, officers, advisors, directors and/or
their affiliates would, as part of the sale arrangement, revoke their election to redeem such shares and withdraw their vote against
the business combination. The terms of such purchases would operate to facilitate our ability to consummate a proposed business
combination by potentially reducing the number of shares redeemed for cash.
Any purchases by our
sponsor, officers, directors and/or their affiliates who are affiliated purchasers under Rule 10b-18 under the Exchange Act will
only be made to the extent such purchases are able to be made in compliance with Rule 10b-18, which is a safe harbor from liability
for manipulation under Section 9(a)(2) and Rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act. Rule 10b-18 has certain technical requirements that
must be complied with in order for the safe harbor to be available to the purchaser. Any such purchases will be reported pursuant
to Section 13 and Section 16 of the Exchange Act to the extent such purchases are subject to such reporting requirements.
Redemption rights for public stockholders
upon consummation of our initial business combination
We will provide our
public stockholders with the opportunity to redeem all or a portion of their shares of Class A common stock upon the consummation
of our initial business combination at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the
trust account as of two business days prior to the consummation of our initial business combination, including any amounts representing
deferred underwriting commissions and interest earned on the trust account (net of taxes payable), divided by the number of then
outstanding public shares, subject to the limitations described herein. The amount in the trust account is approximately $10.00
per public share (based on the trust account balance as of December 31, 2020). There will be no redemption rights upon the consummation
of our initial business combination with respect to our warrants. The initial holders, our officers and directors have agreed to
waive their redemption rights with respect to their founder shares and placement shares, as applicable, (i) in connection with
the consummation of a business combination, (ii) in connection with a stockholder vote to amend our amended and restated certificate
of incorporation to modify the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our public shares if we do not complete
our initial business combination by December 22, 2022 and (iii) if we fail to consummate a business combination by December 22,
2022 or if we liquidate prior to December 22, 2022. The initial holders and our directors and officers have also agreed to waive
their redemption rights with respect to public shares in connection with the consummation of a business combination and in connection
with a stockholder vote to amend our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to modify the substance or timing of our
obligation to redeem 100% of our public shares if we do not complete our initial business combination by December 22, 2022. However,
the initial holders and our directors and officers will be entitled to redemption rights with respect to any public shares held
by them if we fail to consummate a business combination or liquidate by December 22, 2022.
Manner of Conducting Redemptions
We will provide our
public stockholders with the opportunity to redeem all or a portion of their public shares upon the completion of our initial business
combination either in connection with a stockholder meeting called to approve the business combination or by means of a tender
offer. The decision as to whether we will seek stockholder approval of a proposed business combination or conduct a tender offer
will be made by us, solely in our discretion, and will be based on a variety of factors such as the timing of the transaction and
whether the terms of the transaction would require us to seek stockholder approval under the law or stock exchange listing requirement.
We currently intend
to conduct redemptions pursuant to a stockholder vote unless stockholder approval is not required by applicable law or stock exchange
listing requirement and we choose to conduct redemptions pursuant to the tender offer rules of the SEC for business or other reasons.
If a stockholder vote
is not required and we do not decide to hold a stockholder vote for business or other legal reasons, we will, pursuant to our amended
and restated certificate of incorporation:
|
●
|
conduct the redemptions pursuant to Rule 13e-4 and Regulation 14E of the Exchange Act, which regulate issuer tender offers, and any limitations (including but not limited to cash requirements) agreed to in connection with the negotiation of terms of the proposed business combination, and
|
|
●
|
file tender offer documents with the SEC prior to consummating our initial business combination that will contain substantially the same financial and other information about the initial business combination and the redemption rights as is required under Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act, which regulates the solicitation of proxies.
|
Upon the public announcement
of our initial business combination, if we elect to conduct redemptions pursuant to the tender offer rules, we and our sponsor
will terminate any plan established in accordance with Rule 10b5-1 to purchase shares of our Class A common stock in the open market,
in order to comply with Rule 14e-5 under the Exchange Act.
In the event we conduct
redemptions pursuant to the tender offer rules, our offer to redeem will remain open for at least 20 business days, in accordance
with Rule 14e-1(a) under the Exchange Act, and we will not be permitted to consummate our initial business combination until the
expiration of the tender offer period. In addition, the tender offer will be conditioned on public stockholders not tendering more
than a specified number of public shares, which number will be based on the requirement that we may not redeem public shares in
an amount that would cause our net tangible assets, after payment of the deferred underwriting commissions, to be less than $5,000,001
(so that we do not then become subject to the SEC’s “penny stock” rules), or any greater net tangible asset or
cash requirement which may be contained in the agreement relating to our initial business combination. If public stockholders tender
more shares than we have offered to purchase, we will withdraw the tender offer and not complete such initial business combination.
If, however, stockholder
approval of the transaction is required by law or Nasdaq, or we decide to obtain stockholder approval for business or other reasons,
we will:
|
●
|
conduct the redemptions in conjunction with a proxy solicitation pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act, which regulates the solicitation of proxies, and not pursuant to the tender offer rules, and
|
|
●
|
file proxy materials with the SEC.
|
We expect that a final
proxy statement would be mailed to public stockholders at least 10 days prior to the stockholder vote. However, we expect that
a draft proxy statement would be made available to such stockholders well in advance of such time, providing additional notice
of redemption if we conduct redemptions in conjunction with a proxy solicitation. Although we are not required to do so, we currently
intend to comply with the substantive and procedural requirements of Regulation 14A in connection with any stockholder vote even
if we are not able to maintain our Nasdaq listing or Exchange Act registration.
If we seek stockholder
approval, we will complete our initial business combination only if a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock voted
are voted in favor of the initial business combination. A quorum for such meeting will consist of the holders present in person
or by proxy of shares of outstanding capital stock of the company representing a majority of the voting power of all outstanding
shares of capital stock of the company entitled to vote at such meeting. Our initial stockholders, officers and directors will
count towards this quorum and have agreed to vote any founder shares, placement shares and any public shares held by them in favor
of our initial business combination. We expect that at the time of any stockholder vote relating to our initial business combination,
our initial stockholders and their permitted transferees will own at least 26.7% of our outstanding shares of common stock entitled
to vote thereon. These quorum and voting thresholds and agreements may make it more likely that we will consummate our initial
business combination. Each public stockholder may elect to redeem its public shares without voting, and if they do vote, irrespective
of whether they vote for or against the proposed transaction.
Our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation provides that in no event will we redeem our public shares in an amount that would cause our net tangible
assets to be less than $5,000,001 upon consummation of our initial business combination after payment of deferred underwriting
commissions (so that we are not subject to the SEC’s “penny stock” rules), and, in any event, the terms of the
proposed business combination may require our net tangible assets to be greater than $5,000,001. For example, the proposed business
combination may require: (i) cash consideration to be paid to the target or members of its management team, (ii) cash to be transferred
to the target for working capital or other general corporate purposes or (iii) the allocation of cash to satisfy other conditions
in accordance with the terms of the proposed business combination. If the aggregate cash consideration we would be required to
pay for all shares of Class A common stock that are validly tendered plus the amount of any cash payments required pursuant to
the terms of the proposed business combination exceeds the aggregate amount of cash available to us, taking into consideration
the requirement that we maintain net tangible assets of at least $5,000,001 or such greater amount depending on the terms of our
potential business combination, we will not consummate the business combination and any shares of Class A common stock tendered
pursuant to the tender offer will be returned to the holders thereof following the expiration of the tender offer.
Limitation on redemption upon consummation
of a business combination if we seek stockholder approval
Notwithstanding the
foregoing, if we seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination and we do not conduct redemptions in connection
with our initial business combination pursuant to the tender offer rules, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation
provides that a public stockholder, together with any affiliate of such stockholder or any other person with whom such stockholder
is acting in concert or as a “group” (as defined under Section 13 of the Exchange Act), will be restricted from seeking
redemption rights with respect to an aggregate of more than 20.0% of the shares sold in the initial public offering without our
prior consent. We believe the restriction described above will discourage stockholders from accumulating large blocks of shares,
and subsequent attempts by such holders to use their ability to exercise their redemption rights as a means to force us or our
sponsor or its affiliates to purchase their shares at a significant premium to the then-current market price or on other undesirable
terms. Absent this provision, a public stockholder holding more than an aggregate of 20.0% of the shares sold in the initial public
offering could threaten to exercise its redemption rights against a business combination if such holder’s shares are not
purchased by us or our sponsor or its affiliates at a premium to the then-current market price or on other undesirable terms. By
limiting our stockholders’ ability to redeem to no more than 20.0% of the shares sold in the initial public offering, we
believe we will limit the ability of a small number of stockholders to unreasonably attempt to block our ability to complete our
initial business combination, particularly in connection with a business combination with a target that requires as a closing condition
that we have a minimum net worth or a certain amount of cash. However, we would not be restricting our stockholders’ ability
to vote all of their shares (including all shares held by those stockholders that hold more than 20.0% of the shares sold in the
initial public offering) for or against our initial business combination.
Tendering stock certificates in connection
with redemption rights
We may require our
public stockholders seeking to exercise their redemption rights, whether they are record holders or hold their shares in “street
name,” to either tender their certificates to our transfer agent prior to the date set forth in the tender offer documents
mailed to such holders, or up to two business days prior to the vote on the proposal to approve our initial business combination
in the event we distribute proxy materials, or to deliver their shares to the transfer agent electronically using The Depository
Trust Company’s DWAC (Deposit/Withdrawal At Custodian) System, at the holder’s option, rather than simply voting against
the initial business combination. The tender offer or proxy materials, as applicable, that we will furnish to holders of our public
shares in connection with our initial business combination will indicate whether we are requiring public stockholders to satisfy
such delivery requirements, which will include the requirement that any beneficial owner on whose behalf a redemption right is
being exercised must identify itself in order to validly redeem its shares. Accordingly, a public stockholder would have from the
time we send out our tender offer materials until the close of the tender offer period, or up to two business days prior to the
vote on the initial business combination if we distribute proxy materials, as applicable, to tender its shares if it wishes to
seek to exercise its redemption rights. Given the relatively short exercise period, it is advisable for stockholders to use electronic
delivery of their public shares.
There is a nominal
cost associated with the above-referenced tendering process and the act of certificating the shares or delivering them through
the DWAC System. The transfer agent will typically charge the tendering broker $100.00 and it would be up to the broker whether
or not to pass this cost on to the redeeming holder. However, this fee would be incurred regardless of whether or not we require
holders seeking to exercise redemption rights to tender their shares. The need to deliver shares is a requirement of exercising
redemption rights regardless of the timing of when such delivery must be effectuated.
The foregoing is different
from the procedures used by many blank check companies. In order to perfect redemption rights in connection with their business
combinations, many blank check companies would distribute proxy materials for the stockholders’ vote on an initial business
combination, and a holder could simply vote against a proposed initial business combination and check a box on the proxy card indicating
such holder was seeking to exercise his redemption rights. After the initial business combination was approved, the company would
contact such stockholder to arrange for him to deliver his certificate to verify ownership. As a result, the stockholder then had
an “option window” after the consummation of the business combination during which he could monitor the price of the
company’s stock in the market. If the price rose above the redemption price, he could sell his shares in the open market
before actually delivering his shares to the company for cancellation. As a result, the redemption rights, to which stockholders
were aware they needed to commit before the stockholder meeting, would become “option” rights surviving past the consummation
of the initial business combination until the redeeming holder delivered its certificate. The requirement for physical or electronic
delivery prior to the meeting ensures that a redeeming holder’s election to redeem is irrevocable once the business combination
is approved.
Any request to redeem
such shares, once made, may be withdrawn at any time up to the date set forth in the tender offer materials or the date of the
stockholder meeting set forth in our proxy materials, as applicable. Furthermore, if a holder of a public share delivers its certificate
in connection with an election of redemption rights and subsequently decides prior to the applicable date not to elect to exercise
such rights, such holder may simply request that the transfer agent return the certificate (physically or electronically). It is
anticipated that the funds to be distributed to holders of our public shares electing to redeem their shares will be distributed
promptly after the completion of an initial business combination.
If the initial business
combination is not approved or completed for any reason, then our public stockholders who elected to exercise their redemption
rights would not be entitled to redeem their shares for the applicable pro rata share of the trust account. In such case, we will
promptly return any certificates delivered by public holders who elected to redeem their shares.
If our proposed initial
business combination is not consummated, we may continue to try to consummate a business combination with a different target until
December 22, 2022.
Redemption of public shares and liquidation
if no initial business combination
Our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation provides that we have only until December 22, 2022 to complete our initial business combination. If
we are unable to consummate our initial business combination by December 22, 2022, we will distribute the aggregate amount then
on deposit in the trust account, pro rata to our public shareholders by way of redemption and cease all operations except for the
purposes of winding up of our affairs. If we have not consummated a business combination by December 22, 2022, we will: (i) cease
all operations except for the purpose of winding up, (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business days
thereafter, redeem all public shares then outstanding at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then
on deposit in the trust account, including any amounts representing interest earned on the trust account (net of taxes payable)
and up to $100,000 to pay dissolution expenses, divided by the number of then outstanding public shares, which redemption will
completely extinguish public stockholders’ rights as stockholders (including the right to receive further liquidation distributions,
if any), subject to applicable law, and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval
of our remaining stockholders and our board of directors, dissolve and liquidate, subject in each case to our obligations under
Delaware law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law. There will be no redemption rights
or liquidating distributions with respect to our warrants, which will expire worthless if we fail to complete our initial business
combination within such completion window.
The initial holders,
our officers and directors have agreed to waive their redemption rights with respect to their founder shares and placement shares,
as applicable, (i) in connection with the consummation of a business combination, (ii) in connection with a stockholder vote to
amend our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to modify the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100%
of our public shares if we do not complete our initial business combination by December 22, 2022 and (iii) if we fail to consummate
a business combination by December 22, 2022 or if we liquidate prior to December 22, 2022. The initial holders and our officers
and directors have also agreed to waive their redemption rights with respect to public shares in connection with the consummation
of a business combination and in connection with a stockholder vote to amend our amended and restated certificate of incorporation
to modify the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our public shares if we do not complete our initial business
combination by December 22, 2022. However, the initial holders and our officers and directors will be entitled to redemption rights
with respect to any public shares held by them if we fail to consummate a business combination by December 22, 2022.
The representatives
have agreed to waive their rights to deferred underwriting commissions held in the trust account if we do not consummate a business
combination and subsequently liquidate and, in such event, the deferred underwriting commissions held in the trust account will
be available to fund the redemption of our public shares.
Our initial stockholders,
executive officers and directors have agreed, pursuant to a written agreement with us, that they will not propose any amendment
to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation that would affect the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem
100% of our public shares if we do not complete our initial business combination by December 22, 2022 unless we provide our public
stockholders with the opportunity to redeem their shares of Class A common stock upon approval of any such amendment at a per-share
price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account, including interest earned on the funds
held in the trust account (net of taxes payable), divided by the number of then outstanding public shares. However, we may not
redeem our public shares in an amount that would cause our net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001 (so that we are not subject
to the SEC’s “penny stock” rules). If this optional redemption right is exercised with respect to an excessive
number of public shares such that we cannot satisfy the net tangible asset requirement (described above), we would not proceed
with the amendment or the related redemption of our public shares at such time.
We will pay the costs
of any liquidation from the net proceeds from the initial public offering and the private placement held out of trust, and up to
$100,000 of the interest income on the trust account (net of any taxes payable) which may be released to us, and the balance of
loans from our sponsor or one of its affiliates for working capital purposes and to pay expenses to identify an acquisition target
and consummate an initial business combination up to a maximum of $810,000, although we cannot assure you that there will be sufficient
funds for such purposes. If such funds are insufficient, Cohen & Company, the manager of our sponsor, has agreed to pay the
balance of liquidation expenses and has agreed not to seek repayment for such amounts.
If we were to expend
all of the net proceeds of the initial public offering and the private placement, other than the proceeds deposited in the trust
account, and without taking into account interest, if any, earned on the trust account, the per-share redemption amount received
by stockholders upon our dissolution would be approximately $10.00. The proceeds deposited in the trust account could, however,
become subject to the claims of our creditors which would have higher priority than the claims of our public stockholders. We cannot
assure you that the actual per-share redemption amount received by stockholders will not be less than the $10.00 per public share
initially on deposit in the trust account. Under Section 281(b) of the DGCL, our plan of dissolution must provide for all claims
against us to be paid in full or make provision for payments to be made in full, as applicable, if there are sufficient assets.
These claims must be paid or provided for before we make any distribution of our remaining assets to our stockholders. While we
intend to pay such amounts, if any, we cannot assure you that we will have funds sufficient to pay or provide for all creditors’
claims.
Although we will seek
to have all vendors, service providers, prospective target businesses or other entities with which we do business execute agreements
with us waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies held in the trust account for the benefit of
our public stockholders, there is no guarantee that they will execute such agreements or even if they execute such agreements that
they would be prevented from bringing claims against the trust account including but not limited to fraudulent inducement, breach
of fiduciary responsibility or other similar claims, as well as claims challenging the enforceability of the waiver, in each case
in order to gain an advantage with respect to a claim against our assets, including the funds held in the trust account. If any
third party refuses to execute an agreement waiving such claims to the monies held in the trust account, our management will perform
an analysis of the alternatives available to it and will only enter into an agreement with a third party that has not executed
a waiver if management believes that such third party’s engagement would be significantly more beneficial to us than any
alternative. If we do not obtain a waiver from a third party, we will obtain the written consent of our sponsor before our entering
into an agreement with such third party. Examples of possible instances where we may engage a third party that refuses to execute
a waiver include the engagement of a third party consultant whose particular expertise or skills are believed by management to
be significantly superior to those of other consultants that would agree to execute a waiver or in cases where management is unable
to find a service provider willing to execute a waiver and where our sponsor executes a written consent. In addition, there is
no guarantee that such entities will agree to waive any claims they may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any
negotiations, contracts or agreements with us and will not seek recourse against the trust account for any reason. In order to
protect the amounts held in the trust account, pursuant to a written agreement, Insurance Acquisition Sponsor III, LLC, has agreed
that it will be liable to us if and to the extent any claims by a third party for services rendered or products sold to us, or
a prospective target business with which we have discussed entering into a definitive transaction agreement, reduce the amounts
in the trust account to below $10.00 per share, except as to any claims by a third party who executed a waiver of rights to seek
access to the trust account and except as to any claims under our indemnity of the underwriters of the initial public offering
against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act. In the event that an executed waiver is deemed to
be unenforceable against a third party, Insurance Acquisition Sponsor III, LLC will not be responsible to the extent of any liability
for such third party claims. We cannot assure you, however, that Insurance Acquisition Sponsor III, LLC will be able to satisfy
those obligations. We have not independently verified whether Insurance Acquisition Sponsor III, LLC has sufficient funds to satisfy
its indemnity obligations, we have not asked Insurance Acquisition Sponsor III, LLC to reserve for such obligations and we believe
that its only assets are securities of our company. Therefore, we cannot assure you that Insurance Acquisition Sponsor III, LLC
will be able to satisfy those obligations. We believe the likelihood of Insurance Acquisition Sponsor III, LLC having to indemnify
the trust account is limited because we will endeavor to have all third parties that provide products or services to us and prospective
target businesses execute agreements with us waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to monies held in the
trust account.
If the proceeds in
the trust account are reduced below $10.00 per public share and Insurance Acquisition Sponsor III, LLC asserts that it is unable
to satisfy any applicable obligations or that it has no indemnification obligations related to a particular claim, our independent
directors would determine whether to take legal action against Insurance Acquisition Sponsor III, LLC to enforce its indemnification
obligations. While we currently expect that our independent directors would take legal action on our behalf against Insurance Acquisition
Sponsor III, LLC to enforce its indemnification obligations to us, it is possible that our independent directors in exercising
their business judgment may choose not to do so in a particular instance. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that due to claims
of creditors the actual value of the per-share redemption price will not be less than $10.00 per public share.
We will have access
to the net proceeds from the initial public offering and the private placement held out of trust and the commitment of our sponsor
or one of its affiliates to loan us up to $810,000 with which to pay any such potential claims (including costs and expenses incurred
in connection with our liquidation). If we liquidate and it is subsequently determined that the reserve for claims and liabilities
is insufficient, stockholders who received funds from our trust account could be liable for claims made by creditors.
Under the DGCL, stockholders
may be held liable for claims by third parties against a corporation to the extent of distributions received by them in a dissolution.
The pro rata portion of our trust account distributed to our public stockholders upon the redemption of our public shares if we
do not consummate our initial business combination by December 22, 2022 may be considered a liquidation distribution under Delaware
law. If the corporation complies with certain procedures set forth in Section 280 of the DGCL intended to ensure that it makes
reasonable provision for all claims against it, including a 60-day notice period during which any third-party claims can be brought
against the corporation, a 90-day period during which the corporation may reject any claims brought, and an additional 150-day
waiting period before any liquidating distributions are made to stockholders, any liability of stockholders with respect to a liquidating
distribution is limited to the lesser of such stockholder’s pro rata share of the claim or the amount distributed to the
stockholder, and any liability of the stockholder would be barred after the third anniversary of the dissolution.
Furthermore, if the
pro rata portion of our trust account distributed to our public stockholders upon the redemption of our public shares in the event
we do not consummate our initial business combination by December 22, 2022 is not considered a liquidation distribution under Delaware
law and such redemption distribution is deemed to be unlawful, then pursuant to Section 174 of the DGCL, the statute of limitations
for claims of creditors could then be six years after the unlawful redemption distribution, instead of three years, as in the case
of a liquidation distribution. If we have not consummated a business combination by December 22, 2022, or earlier at the discretion
of our board, we will: (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up, (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but
not more than ten business days thereafter, redeem all public shares then outstanding at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal
to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account, including any amounts representing interest earned on the trust account,
less any interest released to us to pay our franchise and income taxes and up to $100,000 to pay dissolution expenses, divided
by the number of then outstanding public shares, which redemption will completely extinguish public stockholders’ rights
as stockholders (including the right to receive further liquidation distributions, if any), subject to applicable law, and (iii)
as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of our remaining stockholders and our board
of directors, dissolve and liquidate, subject in each case to our obligations under Delaware law to provide for claims of creditors
and the requirements of other applicable law. Accordingly, it is our intention to redeem our public shares as soon as reasonably
possible following December 22, 2022 and, therefore, we do not intend to comply with those procedures. As such, our stockholders
could potentially be liable for any claims to the extent of distributions received by them (but no more) and any liability of our
stockholders may extend well beyond the third anniversary of such date.
Because we will not
be complying with Section 280, Section 281(b) of the DGCL requires us to adopt a plan, based on facts known to us at such time
that will provide for our payment of all existing and pending claims or claims that may be potentially brought against us within
the subsequent 10 years. However, because we are a blank check company, rather than an operating company, and our operations will
be limited to searching for prospective target businesses to acquire, the only likely claims to arise would be from our vendors
(such as lawyers, investment bankers, etc.) or prospective target businesses. As described above, pursuant to the obligation contained
in our underwriting agreement, we will seek to have all vendors, service providers, prospective target businesses or other entities
with which we do business execute agreements with us waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies
held in the trust account.
As a result of this
obligation and Insurance Acquisition Sponsor III, LLC’s indemnification of the trust account against certain claims as previously
described in this section, we believe that the claims that could be made against us will be significantly limited and that the
likelihood that any claim that would result in any liability extending to the trust account is remote. Further, Insurance Acquisition
Sponsor III, LLC may be liable only to the extent necessary to ensure that the amounts in the trust account are not reduced below
$10.00 per public share, and will not be liable as to any claims under our indemnity of the underwriters of the initial public
offering against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act. In the event that an executed waiver is deemed
to be unenforceable against a third party, Insurance Acquisition Sponsor III, LLC will not be responsible to the extent of any
liability for such third-party claims.
If we file a bankruptcy
petition or an involuntary bankruptcy petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, the proceeds held in the trust account
could be subject to applicable bankruptcy law, and may be included in our bankruptcy estate and subject to the claims of third
parties with priority over the claims of our stockholders. To the extent any bankruptcy claims deplete the trust account, we cannot
assure you we will be able to return $10.00 per share to our public stockholders. Additionally, if we file a bankruptcy petition
or an involuntary bankruptcy petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, any distributions received by stockholders could
be viewed under applicable debtor/creditor and/or bankruptcy laws as either a “preferential transfer” or a “fraudulent
conveyance.” As a result, a bankruptcy court could seek to recover all amounts received by our stockholders. Furthermore,
our board may be viewed as having breached its fiduciary duty to our creditors and/or may have acted in bad faith, and thereby
exposing itself and our company to claims of punitive damages, by paying public stockholders from the trust account prior to addressing
the claims of creditors.
We cannot assure you
that claims will not be brought against us for these reasons.
Our public stockholders
will be entitled to receive funds from the trust account only (i) in the event of the redemption of our public shares if we do
not consummate a business combination by December 22, 2022, (ii) in connection with a stockholder vote to amend our amended and
restated certificate of incorporation to modify the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our public shares if
we do not complete our initial business combination by December 22, 2022 or (iii) if they redeem their respective shares for cash
upon the consummation of the initial business combination. Also, our management may cease to pursue a business combination prior
to December 22, 2022 (our board of directors may determine to liquidate the trust account prior to such expiration if it determines,
in its business judgment, that it is improbable within the remaining time to identify an attractive business combination or satisfy
regulatory and other business and legal requirements to consummate a business combination). In no other circumstances will a stockholder
have any right or interest of any kind to or in the trust account. In the event we seek stockholder approval in connection with
our initial business combination, a stockholder’s voting in connection with the business combination alone will not result
in a stockholder’s redeeming its shares for an applicable pro rata share of the trust account. Such stockholder must have
also exercised its redemption rights described above.
Competition
In identifying, evaluating
and selecting a target business for our initial business combination, we encounter intense competition from other entities having
a business objective similar to ours, including other blank check companies, private equity groups and leveraged buyout funds and
operating businesses seeking strategic acquisitions. Many of these entities are well established and have extensive experience
identifying and effecting business combinations directly or through affiliates. Moreover, many of these competitors possess greater
financial, technical, human and other resources than us. Our ability to acquire larger target businesses will be limited by our
available financial resources. This inherent limitation gives others an advantage in pursuing the acquisition of a target business.
Furthermore, our obligation to pay cash to our public stockholders who exercise their redemption rights will reduce the resources
available to us for an initial business combination. In addition, the number of our outstanding warrants, and the future dilution
they potentially represent, may not be viewed favorably by certain target businesses. Either of these factors may place us at a
competitive disadvantage in successfully negotiating an initial business combination.
Facilities
We currently maintain
our executive offices at 2929 Arch Street, Suite 1703, Philadelphia, PA 19104-2870. The cost for our use of this space is included
in the $20,000 per month fee we pay to our sponsor or its affiliate for office space, administrative and shared personnel support
services. We consider our current office space adequate for our current operations.
Employees
We currently have two
executive officers. These individuals are not obligated to devote any specific number of hours to our affairs but they devote as
much of their time as they deem necessary to our affairs until we have completed our initial business combination. The amount of
time they devote in any time period varies based on whether a target business has been selected for our initial business combination
and the stage of the business combination process we are in. We do not intend to have any full time employees prior to the consummation
of our initial business combination.
Periodic Reporting and Financial Information
We have registered
our units, Class A common stock and warrants under the Exchange Act and have reporting obligations, including the requirement that
we file annual, quarterly and current reports with the SEC. In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, our annual
reports contain financial statements audited and reported on by our independent registered public accountants. The SEC maintains
an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically
with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov.
We will provide stockholders
with audited financial statements of the prospective target business as part of the tender offer materials or proxy solicitation
materials sent to stockholders to assist them in assessing the target business. In all likelihood, these financial statements will
need to be prepared in accordance with GAAP, or IFRS, depending on the circumstances, and the historical financial statements may
be required to be audited in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. These financial statement requirements may limit the pool
of potential targets we may conduct an initial business combination with because some targets may be unable to provide such statements
in time for us to disclose such statements in accordance with federal proxy rules and complete our initial business combination
within the prescribed time frame. We cannot assure you that any particular target business identified by us as a potential acquisition
candidate will have financial statements prepared in accordance with the above requirements or that the potential target business
will be able to prepare its financial statements in accordance with the above requirements. To the extent that these requirements
cannot be met, we may not be able to acquire the proposed target business. While this may limit the pool of potential acquisition
candidates, we do not believe that this limitation will be material.
We are required to
evaluate and report on our internal control procedures over financial reporting for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 as
required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. A target company may not be in compliance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act regarding
adequacy of their internal controls. The development of the internal controls of any such entity to achieve compliance with the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act may increase the time and costs necessary to complete any such acquisition.
We are an “emerging
growth company,” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act, as modified by the JOBS Act. As such, we are eligible
to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that
are not “emerging growth companies” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation
requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic
reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation
and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. If some stockholders find our securities less
attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our securities and the prices of our securities may be more
volatile.
In addition, Section
107 of the JOBS Act also provides that an “emerging growth company” can take advantage of the extended transition period
provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an
“emerging growth company” can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise
apply to private companies. We intend to take advantage of the benefits of this extended transition period.
We will remain an emerging
growth company until the earlier of (1) the last day of the fiscal year (a) following the fifth anniversary of the completion of
the initial public offering, (b) in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.07 billion, or (c) in which we are
deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our Class A common stock that is held by non-affiliates
exceeds $700 million as of the prior June 30th, and (2) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible
debt securities during the prior three-year period. References herein to “emerging growth company” shall have the meaning
associated with it in the JOBS Act.
Additionally, we are
a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Rule 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K. Smaller reporting companies may take advantage
of certain reduced disclosure obligations, including, among other things, providing only two years of audited financial statements.
We will remain a smaller reporting company until the last day of the fiscal year in which (1) the market value of our common stock
held by non-affiliates exceeds $250 million as of the prior June 30th, or (2) our annual revenues exceeded $100 million during
such completed fiscal year and the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the prior
June 30th.
You
should consider carefully all of the risks described below, which we believe are the principal risks that we face and of which
we are currently aware, and all of the other information contained in this Annual Report. If any of the events or developments
described below occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be negatively affected.
Risks Relating to our Search for, Consummation
of, or Inability to Consummate,
a Business Combination and Post-Business Combination Risks
Our public stockholders may not be
afforded an opportunity to vote on our proposed business combination, unless such vote is required by law or Nasdaq, which means
we may consummate our initial business combination even though a majority of our public stockholders do not support such a combination.
We may not hold a stockholder
vote to approve our initial business combination unless the business combination would require stockholder approval under applicable
state law or the rules of Nasdaq or if we decide to hold a stockholder vote for business or other reasons. For example, Nasdaq
rules currently allow us to engage in a tender offer in lieu of a stockholder meeting but would still require us to obtain stockholder
approval if we were seeking to issue more than 20% of our outstanding shares to a target business as consideration in any business
combination. Therefore, if we structure a business combination that requires us to issue more than 20% of our outstanding shares,
we would seek stockholder approval of such business combination. However, except as required by law, the decision as to whether
we will seek stockholder approval of a proposed business combination will be made by us, solely in our discretion, and will be
based on a variety of factors, such as the timing of the transaction and whether the terms of the transaction would otherwise require
us to seek stockholder approval. Accordingly, we may consummate our initial business combination even if holders of a majority
of the outstanding shares of our common stock do not approve of the business combination we consummate.
If we seek stockholder approval of
our initial business combination, our sponsor, directors and officers have agreed to vote in favor of such initial business combination,
regardless of how our public stockholders vote.
Our sponsor, officers
and directors have agreed to vote their founder shares and any placement shares and public shares they hold in favor of our initial
business combination. If we seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination, it is more likely that the necessary
stockholder approval will be received than would be the case if holders of founder shares agreed to vote their founder shares,
placement shares and public shares in accordance with the majority of the votes cast by our public stockholders.
Your ability to affect the investment
decision regarding a potential business combination may be limited to the exercise of your right to redeem your shares from us
for cash, unless we seek stockholder approval of the business combination.
At the time of your
investment in us, you will not be provided with an opportunity to evaluate the specific merits or risks of any target businesses.
Since our board of directors may consummate a business combination without seeking stockholder approval, public stockholders may
not have the right to vote on the business combination unless we seek such stockholder vote. Accordingly, your ability to affect
the investment decision regarding a potential business combination may be limited to exercising your redemption rights with respect
to a proposed business combination.
The ability of our public stockholders
to redeem their shares for cash may make us unattractive to potential business combination targets, which may make it difficult
for us to enter into a business combination with a target.
We may enter into a
transaction agreement with a prospective target that requires as a closing condition that we have a minimum net worth or a certain
amount of cash. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation requires us to provide all of our stockholders with an opportunity
to redeem all of their shares in connection with the consummation of any initial business combination, although our sponsor, directors
and officers and each holder of placement units has agreed to waive his, her or its respective redemption rights with respect to
founder shares and placement shares, and in the case of the initial holders, public shares held by him, her or it in connection
with the consummation of our initial business combination. Consequently, if accepting all properly submitted redemption requests
would cause our net tangible assets to be less than the amount necessary to satisfy a closing condition as described above, or
less than the $5,000,001 minimum of tangible net assets which we are required to maintain, we would not proceed with such redemption
and the related business combination. Prospective targets would be aware of these risks and, thus, may be reluctant to enter into
a business combination transaction with us.
The ability of our public stockholders
to exercise redemption rights with respect to a large number of our shares may not allow us to consummate the most desirable business
combination or optimize our capital structure.
At the time we enter
into an agreement for our initial business combination, we will not know how many stockholders may exercise their redemption rights,
and therefore will need to structure the transaction based on our expectations as to the number of shares that will be submitted
for redemption. If our initial business combination agreement requires us to use a portion of the cash in the trust account to
pay the purchase price, or requires us to have a minimum amount of cash at closing, we will need to reserve a portion of the cash
in the trust account to meet such requirements, or arrange for third party financing. In addition, if a larger number of shares
is submitted for redemption than we initially expected, we may need to restructure the transaction to reserve a greater portion
of the cash in the trust account or arrange for third party financing. Raising additional third party financing may involve dilutive
equity issuances or the incurrence of indebtedness at higher than desirable levels. Furthermore, this dilution would increase to
the extent that the anti-dilution provision of the Class B common stock result in the issuance of Class A shares on a greater than
one-to-one basis upon conversion of the Class B common stock at the time of our business combination. The above considerations
may limit our ability to complete the most desirable business combination available to us or optimize our capital structure.
The ability of our public stockholders
to exercise redemption rights with respect to a large number of our shares could increase the probability that our initial business
combination would be unsuccessful and that you would have to wait for liquidation in order to redeem your stock.
If our initial business
combination agreement requires us to use a portion of the cash in the trust account to pay the purchase price, or requires us
to have a minimum amount of cash at closing, the probability that our initial business combination would be unsuccessful increases.
If our initial business combination is unsuccessful, you would not receive your pro rata portion of the trust account until we
liquidate the trust account. If you are in need of immediate liquidity, you could attempt to sell your stock in the open market;
however, at such time our stock may trade at a discount to the pro rata amount per share in the trust account. In either situation,
you may suffer a material loss on your investment or lose the benefit of funds expected in connection with our redemption until
we liquidate or you are able to sell your stock in the open market.
The requirement that we complete
a business combination by December 22, 2022 may give potential target businesses leverage over us in negotiating a business combination
and may decrease our ability to conduct due diligence on potential business combination targets as we approach our dissolution
deadline, which could undermine our ability to consummate a business combination on terms that would produce value for our stockholders.
Any potential target
business with which we enter into negotiations concerning a business combination will be aware that we must consummate a business
combination by December 22, 2022. Consequently, such target businesses may obtain leverage over us in negotiating a business combination,
knowing that if we do not complete a business combination with it, we may be unable to identify another target business and complete
a business combination with any target business. This risk will increase as we get closer to December 22, 2022. Depending upon
when we identify a potential target business, we may have only a limited time to conduct due diligence and may enter into a business
combination on terms that we might have rejected upon a more comprehensive investigation.
We may not be able to consummate
a business combination by December 22, 2022, in which case we would cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up and
we would redeem our public shares and liquidate.
We must complete our
initial business combination by December 22, 2022. We may not be able to find a suitable target business and consummate a business
combination within that time period. Our ability to complete our initial business combination may be negatively impacted by general
market conditions, volatility in the capital and debt markets and the other risks described herein. If we have not consummated
a business combination by December 22, 2022, or earlier, at the discretion of our board pursuant to the expiration of a tender
offer conducted in connection with a failed business combination, we will: (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding
up, (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business days thereafter, redeem all public shares then outstanding
at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account, including any amounts
representing interest earned on the trust account, less any interest released to us for the payment of taxes or dissolution expenses,
divided by the number of then outstanding public shares, which redemption will completely extinguish public stockholders’
rights as stockholders (including the right to receive further liquidation distributions, if any), subject to applicable law, and
(iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of our remaining stockholders and our
board of directors, dissolve and liquidate, subject in each case to our obligations under Delaware law to provide for claims of
creditors and the requirements of other applicable law. In such case, our public stockholders may only receive $10.00 per share
and our warrants will expire worthless.
Our search for a business combination,
and any target business with which we ultimately consummate a business combination, may be materially adversely affected by the
recent coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak and the status of debt and equity markets.
The COVID-19 outbreak
has resulted, and a significant outbreak of other infectious diseases could result, in a widespread health crisis that could adversely
affect the economies and financial markets worldwide, and the business of any potential target business with which we consummate
a business combination could be materially and adversely affected. Furthermore, we may be unable to complete a business combination
if continued concerns relating to COVID-19 continue to restrict travel, limit the ability to have meetings with potential
investors or the target company’s personnel, vendors and services providers are unavailable to negotiate and consummate a
transaction in a timely manner. The extent to which COVID-19 impacts our search for a business combination will depend on
future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information which may emerge concerning
the severity of COVID-19 and the actions to contain COVID-19 or treat its impact, among others. If the disruptions posed
by COVID-19 or other matters of global concern continue for an extensive period of time, our ability to consummate a business
combination, or the operations of a target business with which we ultimately consummate a business combination, may be materially
adversely affected. In addition, our ability to consummate a transaction may be dependent on the ability to raise equity and debt
financing which may be impacted by COVID-19 and other events, including as a result of increased market volatility, decreased
market liquidity and third-party financing being unavailable on terms acceptable to us or at all.
If we seek stockholder approval of
our initial business combination, our sponsor, directors, officers and their affiliates may elect to purchase shares of common
stock from public stockholders, in which case they may influence a vote in favor of a proposed business combination that you do
not support and reduce the public “float” of our Class A common stock or public warrants.
If we seek stockholder
approval of our business combination and we do not conduct redemptions in connection with our business combination pursuant to
the tender offer rules, our sponsor, directors, officers or their respective affiliates may purchase shares or warrants in the
open market or in privately negotiated transactions either prior to or following the consummation of our initial business combination.
Our sponsor, directors, officers and their respective affiliates may also enter into transactions with stockholders and others
to provide them with incentives to, among other things, acquire shares of our common stock or vote their shares in favor of an
initial business combination. Our directors, officers or their affiliates will not make any such purchases when they are in possession
of any material non-public information not disclosed to the seller or during a restricted period under Regulation M under
the Exchange Act or in a transaction which would violate Section 9(a)(2) or Rule 10(b)-5 under the Exchange Act. Such a purchase
would include a contractual acknowledgement that such stockholder, although still the record holder of our shares is no longer
the beneficial owner thereof and therefore agrees not to exercise its redemption rights. In the event that our sponsor, directors,
officers or their affiliates purchase shares in privately negotiated transactions from public stockholders who have already elected
to exercise their redemption rights, such selling stockholders would be required to revoke their prior elections to redeem their
shares. In addition, if such purchases are made, the public “float” of our Class A common stock or public warrants
and the number of beneficial holders of our securities may be reduced, possibly making it difficult to obtain or maintain the quotation,
listing or trading of our securities on a national securities exchange.
If a stockholder fails to receive
notice of our offer to redeem our public shares in connection with our initial business combination, or fails to comply with the
procedures for tendering its shares, such shares may not be redeemed.
We will comply with
the tender offer rules or proxy rules, as applicable, when conducting redemptions in connection with our initial business combination.
Despite our compliance with these rules, if a stockholder fails to receive our tender offer or proxy materials, as applicable,
such stockholder may not become aware of the opportunity to redeem its shares. In addition, the tender offer documents or proxy
materials, as applicable, that we will furnish to holders of our public shares in connection with our initial business combination
will describe the various procedures that must be complied with in order to validly tender or redeem public shares. For example,
we may require our public stockholders seeking to exercise their redemption rights, whether they are record holders or hold their
shares in “street name,” to either tender their certificates to our transfer agent prior to the date set forth in the
tender offer materials mailed to such holders, or up to two business days prior to the vote on the proposal to approve the initial
business combination in the event we distribute proxy materials, or to deliver their shares to the transfer agent electronically.
In the event that a stockholder fails to comply with these procedures, its shares may not be redeemed. Please see “Business
— Tendering stock certificates in connection with redemption rights.”
You will not have any rights to or
interest in funds from the trust account, except under limited circumstances. To liquidate your investment, therefore, you may
be forced to sell your shares or warrants, potentially at a loss.
Our public stockholders
will be entitled to receive funds from the trust account only upon the earlier to occur of: (i) the consummation of our initial
business combination; (ii) the redemption of our public shares if we are unable to consummate a business combination by December
22, 2022, subject to applicable law; (iii) the redemption of any public shares properly tendered in connection with a stockholder
vote to amend our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to modify the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem
100% of our public shares if we do not complete our initial business combination by December 22, 2022; or (iv) otherwise upon our
liquidation or in the event our board of directors resolves to liquidate the trust account and ceases to pursue the consummation
of a business combination prior to December 22, 2022 (our board of directors may determine to liquidate the trust account prior
to such date if it determines, in its business judgment, that it is improbable within the remaining time that we will be able to
identify an attractive business combination or satisfy regulatory and other business and legal requirements to consummate a business
combination). In addition, if our plan to redeem our public shares if we are unable to consummate an initial business combination
by December 22, 2022 is not consummated for any reason, Delaware law may require that we submit a plan of dissolution to our then-existing
stockholders for approval prior to the distribution of the proceeds held in our trust account. In that case, public stockholders
may be forced to wait beyond December 22, 2022 before they receive funds from our trust account. In no other circumstances will
a public stockholder have any right or interest of any kind in the trust account. Holders of warrants will not have any rights
to the proceeds from our trust account with respect to their warrants. Accordingly, to liquidate your investment, you may be forced
to sell your public shares or warrants, potentially at a loss.
You will not be entitled to protections
normally afforded to investors of many other blank check companies.
Since we intend to
use the net proceeds of the initial public offering and the private placement to complete an initial business combination with
a target business that has not been identified, we may be deemed to be a “blank check” company under the United States
securities laws. However, because we had net tangible assets in excess of $5.0 million upon the completion of the initial public
offering and the private placement and we filed a Current Report on Form 8-K, including an audited balance sheet demonstrating
this fact, we are exempt from rules promulgated by the SEC to protect investors in blank check companies, such as Rule 419 under
the Securities Act. Accordingly, investors will not be afforded the benefits or protections of those rules. Among other things,
this means our units were immediately tradable and we have a longer period of time to complete a business combination than would
companies subject to Rule 419. Moreover, offerings subject to Rule 419 would prohibit the release of any interest earned on funds
held in the trust account to us, except in connection with our consummation of an initial business combination.
Because of our limited resources
and the significant competition for business combination opportunities, it may be more difficult for us to complete a business
combination. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination, you may receive only $10.00 per share from our redemption
of your shares, and our warrants will expire worthless.
We expect to encounter
intense competition from other entities having a business objective similar to ours, including private investors (which may be
individuals or investment partnerships), other blank check companies and other entities, domestic and international, competing
for the types of businesses we intend to acquire. Many of these individuals and entities are well-established and have extensive
experience in identifying and effecting, directly or indirectly, acquisitions of companies operating in or providing services to
various industries. Many of these competitors possess greater technical, human and other resources, or more industry knowledge
than we do and our financial resources will be relatively limited when contrasted with those of many of these competitors. While
we believe there are numerous target businesses we could potentially acquire, our ability to compete with respect to the acquisition
of certain target businesses that are sizable will be limited by our available financial resources. This inherent competitive limitation
gives others an advantage in pursuing the acquisition of certain target businesses. Furthermore, because we are obligated to pay
cash for the shares of Class A common stock which our public stockholders redeem in connection with our initial business combination,
target companies will be aware that this may reduce the resources available to us for our initial business combination. Any of
these obligations may place us at a competitive disadvantage in successfully negotiating a business combination. If we are unable
to complete our initial business combination, our public stockholders may receive only $10.00 per share (based on the trust account
balance as of December 31, 2020) from our redemption of our shares, and our warrants will expire worthless.
If the net proceeds from the initial
public offering and the private placement not being held in the trust account are insufficient, it could limit the amount available
to fund our search for a target business or businesses and complete our initial business combination and we will depend on loans
from our sponsor to fund our search for an initial business combination, to pay our taxes and to complete our initial business
combination.
Of the net proceeds
of the initial public offering and the private placement, only$544,358 was available to us as of December 31, 2020 outside the
trust account to fund our working capital requirements. If we are required to seek additional capital, we would need to borrow
funds from our sponsor, management team or other third parties to operate or may be forced to liquidate. Our sponsor or one of
its affiliates has committed to loan funds to us in such circumstances up to a maximum of $810,000. Any such loans would be repaid
only from funds held outside the trust account or from funds released to us upon completion of our initial business combination.
Up to $1,500,000 of all loans made to us by our sponsor, an affiliate of our sponsor or our officers and directors may be convertible
into units at a price of $10.00 per unit at the option of the lender at the time of the business combination. The units would be
identical to the placement units. If we are unable to obtain these loans, we may be unable to complete our initial business combination.
If we are unable to complete our initial business combination because we do not have sufficient funds available to us, we will
be forced to cease operations and liquidate the trust account. In such case, our public stockholders may receive only $10.00 per
share, or less in certain circumstances, and our warrants will expire worthless. Please see “— If third parties bring
claims against us, the proceeds held in the trust account could be reduced and the per-share redemption amount received by stockholders
may be less than $10.00 per share” and other risk factors herein.
Subsequent to consummation of our
initial business combination, we may be required to take write-downs or write-offs, restructuring and impairment or other charges
that could have a significant negative effect on our financial condition, results of operations and our stock price, which could
cause you to lose some or all of your investment.
Even if we conduct
extensive due diligence on a target business with which we combine, we cannot assure you that this examination will uncover all
material risks that may be presented by a particular target business, or that factors outside of the target business and outside
of our control will not later arise. Even if our due diligence successfully identifies the principal risks, unexpected risks may
arise and previously known risks may materialize in a manner not consistent with our preliminary risk analysis. As a result, from
time to time following our initial business combination, we may be forced to write-down or write-off assets, restructure our operations,
or incur impairment or other charges that could result in our reporting losses. Even though these charges may be non-cash items
and not have an immediate impact on our liquidity, the fact that we report charges of this nature could contribute to negative
market perceptions about us or our securities. In addition, charges of this nature may cause us to violate net worth or other covenants
to which we may be subject as a result of assuming pre-existing debt held by a target business or by virtue of our obtaining post-combination
debt financing. Accordingly, any securityholders who choose to remain securityholders following the initial business combination
could suffer a reduction in the value of their securities. Such securityholders are unlikely to have a remedy for such reduction
in value unless they are able to successfully claim that the reduction was due to the breach by our officers or directors of a
duty of care or other fiduciary duty owed to them, or if they are able to successfully bring a private claim under securities laws
that the proxy solicitation or tender offer materials, as applicable, relating to the initial business combination constituted
an actionable material misstatement or omission.
If third parties bring claims against
us, the proceeds held in the trust account could be reduced and the per-share redemption amount received by stockholders may be
less than $10.00 per share.
Placing funds in the
trust account may not protect those funds from third party claims against us. Although we seek to have all vendors, service providers,
prospective target businesses or other entities with which we do business execute agreements with us waiving any right, title,
interest or claim in or to any monies held in the trust account for the benefit of our public stockholders, such parties may not
execute such agreements or, even if they execute such agreements, they may not be prevented from bringing claims against the trust
account, including, but not limited to, claims for fraudulent inducement, breach of fiduciary responsibility or other similar claims,
as well as claims challenging the enforceability of the waiver. If any third party refuses to execute an agreement waiving claims
to the monies held in the trust account, our management will perform an analysis of the alternatives available to it and will only
enter into an agreement without a waiver if management believes that such third party’s engagement would be significantly
more beneficial to us than any available alternative. If we do not obtain a waiver from a third party, we will obtain the written
consent of our sponsor before entering into an agreement with such third party.
Examples of possible
instances where we may engage a third party that refuses to execute a waiver include the engagement of a third party consultant
whose particular expertise or skills management believes to be significantly superior to those of other consultants who would execute
a waiver or in cases where management is unable to find a service provider willing to execute a waiver and where our sponsor executes
a written consent. In addition, there is no guarantee that such entities will agree to waive any claims they may have in the future
as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with us and will not seek recourse against the trust
account for any reason. Upon redemption of our public shares, if we are unable to complete a business combination within the required
time frame, or upon the exercise of a redemption right in connection with a business combination, we will be required to provide
for payment of claims of creditors that were not waived that may be brought against us within the 10 years following redemption.
Accordingly, the per-share redemption amount received by public stockholders could be less than the $10.00 per share initially
held in the trust account due to claims of such creditors. Pursuant to a written agreement, Insurance Acquisition Sponsor III,
LLC has agreed that it will be liable to us if and to the extent any claims by a third party for services rendered or products
sold to us, or a prospective target business with which we discussed entering into a transaction agreement, reduce the amounts
in the trust account to below $10.00 per share except as to any claims by a third party who executed a waiver of rights to seek
access to the trust account and except as to any claims under our indemnity of the underwriters of the initial public offering
against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act. Moreover, if an executed waiver is deemed to be unenforceable
against a third party, Insurance Acquisition Sponsor III, LLC will not be responsible to the extent of any liability for such third
party claims. We have not independently verified whether Insurance Acquisition Sponsor III, LLC has sufficient funds to satisfy
its indemnity obligations, we have not asked Insurance Acquisition Sponsor III, LLC to reserve for such indemnification obligations
and we believe that its only assets are securities of our company. Therefore, we cannot assure you that it would be able to satisfy
these obligations.
Our directors may decide not to enforce
the indemnification obligations of Insurance Acquisition Sponsor III, LLC, resulting in a reduction in the amount of funds in the
trust account available for distribution to our public stockholders.
If proceeds in the
trust account are reduced below $10.00 per public share and Insurance Acquisition Sponsor III, LLC asserts that it is unable to
satisfy its obligations or that it has no indemnification obligations related to a particular claim, our independent directors
would determine whether to take legal action against Insurance Acquisition Sponsor III, LLC to enforce its indemnification obligations.
While we currently expect that our independent directors would take legal action on our behalf against Insurance Acquisition Sponsor
III, LLC to enforce its indemnification obligations to us, it is possible that our independent directors in exercising their business
judgment and subject to their fiduciary duties may choose not to do so in any particular instance. If our independent directors
choose not to enforce these indemnification obligations, the amount of funds in the trust account available for distribution to
our public stockholders may be reduced below $10.00 per share.
We may not have sufficient funds
to satisfy indemnification claims of our directors and executive officers.
We have agreed to indemnify
our officers and directors to the fullest extent permitted by law. However, our officers and directors have agreed to waive any
right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies in the trust account and to not seek recourse against the trust
account for any reason whatsoever. Accordingly, any indemnification provided will be able to be satisfied by us only if (i) we
have sufficient funds outside of the trust account or (ii) we consummate an initial business combination. Our obligation to indemnify
our officers and directors may discourage stockholders from bringing a lawsuit against our officers or directors for breach of
their fiduciary duty. These provisions also may have the effect of reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation against our
officers and directors, even though such an action, if successful, might otherwise benefit us and our stockholders. Furthermore,
a stockholder’s investment may be adversely affected to the extent we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards against
our officers and directors pursuant to these indemnification provisions.
If, after we distribute the proceeds
in the trust account to our public stockholders, we file a bankruptcy petition or an involuntary bankruptcy petition is filed against
us that is not dismissed, a bankruptcy court may seek to recover such proceeds, and the members of our board of directors may be
viewed as having breached their fiduciary duties to our creditors, thereby exposing the members of our board of directors and us
to claims of punitive damages.
If, after we distribute
the proceeds in the trust account to our public stockholders, we file a bankruptcy petition or an involuntary bankruptcy petition
is filed against us that is not dismissed, any distributions received by stockholders could be viewed under applicable debtor/creditor
and/or bankruptcy laws as either a “preferential transfer” or a “fraudulent conveyance.” As a result, a
bankruptcy court could seek to recover all amounts received by our stockholders. In addition, by making distributions to public
stockholders before making provision for creditors, our board of directors may be viewed as having breached its fiduciary duty
to our creditors and/or having acted in bad faith, thereby exposing itself and us to claims for punitive damages.
If, before distributing the proceeds
in the trust account to our public stockholders, we file a bankruptcy petition or an involuntary bankruptcy petition is filed against
us that is not dismissed, the claims of creditors in such proceeding may have priority over the claims of our stockholders and
the per-share amount that would otherwise be received by our stockholders in connection with our liquidation may be reduced.
If, before distributing
the proceeds in the trust account to our public stockholders, we file a bankruptcy petition or an involuntary bankruptcy petition
is filed against us that is not dismissed, the proceeds held in the trust account could be subject to applicable bankruptcy law,
and may be included in our bankruptcy estate and subject to the claims of third parties with priority over the claims of our stockholders.
To the extent any bankruptcy claims deplete the trust account, the per-share amount that would otherwise be received by our stockholders
in connection with our liquidation may be reduced.
Our stockholders may be held liable
for claims by third parties against us to the extent of distributions received by them upon redemption of their shares.
Under the DGCL, stockholders
may be held liable for claims by third parties against a corporation to the extent of distributions received by them in a dissolution.
The pro rata portion of our trust account distributed to our public stockholders upon the redemption of our public shares in the
event we do not consummate our initial business combination by December 22, 2022 may be considered a liquidation distribution under
Delaware law. If a corporation complies with certain procedures set forth in Section 280 of the DGCL intended to ensure that it
makes reasonable provision for all claims against it, including a 60-day notice period during which any third-party claims can
be brought against the corporation, a 90-day period during which the corporation may reject any claims brought, and an additional
150-day waiting period before any liquidating distributions are made to stockholders, any liability of stockholders with respect
to a liquidating distribution is limited to the lesser of such stockholder’s pro rata share of the claim or the amount distributed
to the stockholder, and any liability of the stockholder would be barred after the third anniversary of the dissolution. However,
it is our intention to redeem our public shares as soon as reasonably possible following December 22, 2022 if we do not consummate
an initial business combination and, therefore, we do not intend to comply with those procedures.
Because we will not
be complying with Section 280, Section 281(b) of the DGCL requires us to adopt a plan, based on facts known to us at such time
that will provide for our payment of all existing and pending claims or claims that may be potentially brought against us within
the 10 years following our dissolution. However, because we are a blank check company, rather than an operating company, and our
operations are limited to searching for prospective target businesses to acquire, the only likely claims to arise would be from
our vendors (such as lawyers or investment bankers) or prospective target businesses. If our plan of distribution complies with
Section 281(b) of the DGCL, any liability of stockholders with respect to a liquidating distribution is limited to the lesser of
such stockholder’s pro rata share of the claim or the amount distributed to the stockholder, and any liability of the stockholder
would likely be barred after the third anniversary of the dissolution. We cannot assure you that we will properly assess all claims
that may be potentially brought against us. As such, our stockholders could potentially be liable for any claims to the extent
of distributions received by them (but no more) and any liability of our stockholders may extend beyond the third anniversary of
such date. Furthermore, if the pro rata portion of our trust account distributed to our public stockholders upon the redemption
of our public shares if we do not consummate our initial business combination by December 22, 2022 is not considered a liquidation
distribution under Delaware law and such redemption distribution is deemed to be unlawful, then pursuant to Section 174 of the
DGCL, the statute of limitations for claims of creditors could then be six years after the unlawful redemption distribution, instead
of three years, as in the case of a liquidation distribution.
We may not hold an annual meeting
of stockholders until after we consummate a business combination.
We may not hold an
annual meeting of stockholders until after we consummate a business combination (unless required by Nasdaq), and thus may not be
in compliance with Section 211(b) of the DGCL, which requires that an annual meeting of stockholders be held for the purposes of
electing directors in accordance with a company’s bylaws unless directors are elected by written consent in lieu of such
a meeting. Therefore, if our stockholders want us to hold an annual meeting prior to our consummation of a business combination,
they may attempt to force us to hold one by submitting an application to the Delaware Court of Chancery in accordance with Section
211(c) of the DGCL. Even if an annual meeting was held for the purpose of electing directors prior to the consummation of a business
combination, only holders of Class B common stock would be entitled to notice of such meeting and to vote at such meeting.
Because we have not selected a particular
business within the insurance industry or any other industry or any specific target businesses with which to pursue a business
combination, you will be unable to ascertain the merits or risks of any particular target business’ operations.
We will seek to consummate
a business combination with an operating company in the insurance industry, but may also pursue acquisition opportunities in other
business sectors or geographic regions, except that we are not, under our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, permitted
to effectuate a business combination with another blank check company or similar company with nominal operations. Because we have
not yet identified any specific target business with respect to a business combination, you have no basis to evaluate the possible
merits or risks of any particular target business’s operations, results of operations, cash flows, liquidity, financial condition
or prospects. If we consummate our initial business combination, we may be affected by numerous risks inherent in the business
operations of the entity with which we combine. Because we will seek to acquire businesses that potentially need financial, operational,
strategic or managerial redirection, we may be affected by the risks inherent in the business and operations of a financially or
operationally unstable entity. Although our officers and directors will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular
target business, we cannot assure you that we will properly ascertain or assess all of the significant risk factors or that we
will have adequate time to complete due diligence. Furthermore, some of these risks may be outside of our control and leave us
with no ability to control or reduce the chances that those risks will adversely impact a target business. Accordingly, any securityholders
who choose to remain securityholders following the initial business combination could suffer a reduction in the value of their
securities. We also cannot assure you that an investment in our securities will ultimately prove to be more favorable to investors
than a direct investment, if such opportunity were available, in an acquisition target.
We may
seek investment opportunities in sectors outside of our industry focus (which may or may not be outside of our management’s
area of expertise).
Although we currently
intend to consummate a business combination in the insurance industry, we will consider a business combination outside this industry
if a business combination candidate is presented to us and we determine that such candidate offers an attractive investment opportunity
for our company. If we elect to pursue an investment outside of the insurance industry, as INSU I elected to do in connection with
its initial business combination, our management’s expertise in that industry would not be directly applicable to its evaluation
or operation, and the information contained herein regarding the insurance industry might not be relevant to an understanding of
the business that we elect to acquire.
Although we have identified general
criteria and guidelines that we believe are important in evaluating prospective target businesses, we may enter into a business
combination with a target that does not meet such criteria and guidelines and, as a result, the target business with which we enter
into our initial business combination may not have attributes entirely consistent with our general criteria and guidelines.
Although we have identified
specific criteria and guidelines for evaluating prospective target businesses, it is possible that a target business with which
we enter into a business combination will not have all of these positive attributes. If we consummate a business combination with
a target that does not meet some or all of these guidelines, such combination may not be as successful as a combination with a
business that does meet all of our general criteria and guidelines. We also cannot assure you that an investment in our units will
not ultimately prove to be less favorable to investors than a direct investment, if an opportunity were available, in an initial
business combination candidate. In addition, if we announce a prospective business combination with a target that does not meet
our general criteria and guidelines, a greater number of stockholders may exercise their redemption rights, which may make it difficult
for us to meet any closing condition with a target business that requires us to have a minimum net worth or a certain amount of
cash. In addition, if stockholder approval of the transaction is required by law or Nasdaq, or we decide to obtain stockholder
approval for business or other reasons, it may be more difficult for us to obtain stockholder approval of our initial business
combination if the target business does not meet our general criteria and guidelines. If we are unable to complete our initial
business combination, our public stockholders may only receive $10.00 per share (based on the trust account balance as of December
31, 2020) on our redemption, and our warrants will expire worthless.
We may seek acquisition opportunities
with an early stage company, a financially unstable business or an entity lacking an established record of revenue or earnings,
which could subject us to volatile revenues or earnings, intense competition and difficulties in obtaining and retaining key personnel.
To the extent we complete
our initial business combination with an early stage company, a financially unstable business or an entity lacking an established
record of sales or earnings, we may be affected by numerous risks inherent in the operations of the business with which we combine.
These risks include investing in a business without a proven business model and with limited historical financial data, volatile
revenues or earnings, intense competition and difficulties in obtaining and retaining key personnel. Although our officers and
directors will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular target business, we may not be able to properly ascertain
or assess all of the significant risk factors and we may not have adequate time to complete due diligence. Furthermore, some of
these risks may be outside of our control and leave us with no ability to control or reduce the chances that those risks will adversely
impact a target business.
We are not required to obtain an
opinion from an independent investment banking firm and, consequently, you may have no assurance from an independent source that
the price we are paying for the target in our initial business combination is fair to our stockholders from a financial point of
view.
Unless we consummate
our initial business combination with an affiliated entity or our board cannot independently determine the fair market value of
the target business, we are not required to obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm that the price we are
paying is fair to our stockholders from a financial point of view. If we do not obtain an opinion, our stockholders will be relying
on the judgment of our board of directors, who will determine fair market value based on standards generally accepted by the financial
community. Such standards used will be disclosed in our tender offer documents or proxy solicitation materials, as applicable,
related to our initial business combination.
If we hold a stockholder vote and
must furnish our stockholders with target business financial statements, we may lose the ability to complete an otherwise advantageous
initial business combination with some prospective target businesses.
If we hold a stockholder
vote to approve our initial business combination, the federal proxy rules require that a proxy statement with respect to a vote
on a business combination meeting certain financial significance tests include historical and/or pro forma financial statement
disclosure. If we make a tender offer for our public shares, we will include the same financial statement disclosure in our tender
offer documents whether or not they are required under the tender offer rules. These financial statements must be prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, or international financial reporting standards
as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, or IFRS, depending on the circumstances, and the historical financial
statements must be audited in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), or
PCAOB. These financial statement requirements may limit the pool of potential target businesses we may acquire because some targets
may be unable to provide such statements in time for us to disclose such statements in accordance with federal proxy rules and
consummate our initial business combination by December 22, 2022.
The requirement that we maintain
a minimum net worth or retain a certain amount of cash could increase the probability that we will be unable to complete a proposed
business combination and that you would have to wait for liquidation in order to redeem your stock.
If, pursuant to the
terms of our proposed business combination, we are required to maintain a minimum net worth or retain a certain amount of cash
in trust in order to consummate the business combination, the ability of our public stockholders to cause us to redeem their shares
in connection with such proposed transaction will increase the risk that we will not meet that condition and, accordingly, that
we will not be able to complete the proposed transaction. If we do not complete a proposed business combination, you would not
receive your pro rata portion of the trust account until we liquidate or you are able to sell your stock in the open market. If
you were to attempt to sell your stock in the open market at that time, the price you receive could represent a discount to the
pro rata amount in our trust account. In either situation, you may suffer a material loss on your investment or lose the benefit
of funds expected in connection with our redemption until we liquidate.
Compliance obligations under the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act may make it more difficult for us to effectuate a business combination, require substantial financial and management
resources, and increase the time and costs of completing an acquisition.
The Sarbanes-Oxley
Act requires that we maintain a system of internal controls and, beginning with our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2021, that we evaluate and report on such system of internal controls. In addition, once we are no longer
an “emerging growth company,” we must have our system of internal controls audited. The fact that we are
a blank check company makes compliance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act particularly burdensome on us as compared
to other public companies because a target company with which we seek to complete a business combination may not be in compliance
with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act regarding adequacy of its internal controls. The development of the internal controls
of any such entity in order to achieve compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may increase the time and costs necessary to complete
any such acquisition.
Our warrants
are accounted for as liabilities and the changes in value of our warrants could have a material effect on our financial results.
The
SEC Warrant Accounting Statement regarding the accounting and reporting considerations for warrants issued by SPACs focused on certain
settlement terms and provisions related to certain tender offers following a business combination. The terms described in the SEC Warrant
Accounting Statement are common in SPACs and are similar to the terms contained in the warrant agreement governing our warrants. In response
to the SEC Warrant Accounting Statement, we reevaluated the accounting treatment of our public warrants and placement warrants, and determined
to classify the warrants as derivative liabilities measured at fair value, with changes in fair value each period reported in earnings.
As a result, included on our balance sheet as of December 31, 2020 contained elsewhere in this Annual Report are derivative liabilities
related to embedded features contained within our warrants. ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, provides for the remeasurement of the fair
value of such derivatives at each balance sheet date, with a resulting non-cash gain or loss related to the change in the fair value
being recognized in earnings in the statement of operations. As a result of the recurring fair value measurement, our financial statements
and results of operations may fluctuate quarterly based on factors which are outside of our control. Due to the recurring fair value
measurement, we expect that we will recognize non- cash gains or losses on our warrants each reporting period and that the amount of
such gains or losses could be material.
We have identified
a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. This material weakness could continue to adversely affect our ability
to report our results of operations and financial condition accurately and in a timely manner.
Our
management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with GAAP. Our management is likewise required, on a quarterly basis, to evaluate the effectiveness of our internal controls and to disclose
any changes and material weaknesses identified through such evaluation in those internal controls. A material weakness is a deficiency,
or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material
misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
As
described elsewhere in this Annual Report, we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related
to the accounting for a significant and unusual transaction related to the warrants we issued in connection with our initial public offering
in December 2020. As a result of this material weakness, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting
was not effective as of December 31, 2020. This material weakness resulted in a material misstatement of our warrant liabilities and
related financial disclosures for the affected periods.
To
respond to this material weakness, we have devoted, and plan to continue to devote, significant effort and resources to the remediation
and improvement of our internal control over financial reporting. While we have processes to identify and appropriately apply applicable
accounting requirements, we plan to enhance these processes to better evaluate our research and understanding of the nuances of the complex
accounting standards that apply to our financial statements. Our plans at this time include providing enhanced access to accounting literature,
research materials and documents and increased communication among our personnel and third-party professionals with whom we consult regarding
complex accounting applications. The elements of our remediation plan can only be accomplished over time, and we can offer no assurance
that these initiatives will ultimately have the intended effects. For a discussion of management’s consideration of the material
weakness identified related to our accounting for a significant and unusual transaction related to the warrants, see Note 2 to the accompanying
financial statements, as well as Part II, Item 9A: Controls and Procedures included in this Annual Report.
Any
failure to maintain such internal control could adversely impact our ability to report our financial position and results from operations
on a timely and accurate basis. If our financial statements are not accurate, investors may not have a complete understanding of our
operations. Likewise, if our financial statements are not filed on a timely basis, we could be subject to sanctions or investigations
by the stock exchange on which our common stock is listed, the SEC or other regulatory authorities. In either case, there could result
a material adverse effect on our business. Ineffective internal controls could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported
financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our stock.
We
can give no assurance that the measures we have taken and plan to take in the future will remediate the material weakness identified
or that any additional material weaknesses or restatements of financial results will not arise in the future due to a failure to implement
and maintain adequate internal control over financial reporting or circumvention of these controls. In addition, even if we are successful
in strengthening our controls and procedures, in the future those controls and procedures may not be adequate to prevent or identify
irregularities or errors or to facilitate the fair presentation of our financial statements.
We do not have a specified maximum
redemption threshold. The absence of such a redemption threshold will make it easier for us to consummate a business combination
with which a substantial number of our stockholders do not agree.
We may be able to consummate
a business combination even though a substantial number of our public stockholders do not agree with the transaction and have redeemed
their shares or, if we seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination and do not conduct redemptions in connection
with our business combination pursuant to the tender offer rules, if our sponsor, officers, directors or their affiliates have
entered into privately negotiated agreements with public stockholders to acquire public shares. However, in no event will we redeem
our public shares in an amount that would cause our net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001 upon consummation of our initial
business combination, and the amount that we redeem may be further limited by the terms and conditions of our initial business
combination. In such case, we would not proceed with the redemption of our public shares and the related initial business combination,
and instead may search for an alternate business combination.
Unlike many blank check companies, our
balance sheet reflects negative stockholders’ equity.
The financial statements
in this annual report, after collaboration with our independent registered public accounting firm, reflect that all of the public shares
are subject to redemption, even though we are prohibited under our amended and restated certificate of incorporation from redeeming all
of the public shares since such redemption would result in our failure to have net tangible assets (as determined in accordance with
Rule 3a51-1(g)(1) of the Exchange Act) in excess of $5,000,000. As a result, all of the public shares are classified as temporary equity,
presented outside of the stockholders’ deficit section of our balance sheet. This accounting presentation may not be consistent
with that of other blank check companies and may make comparison of our financial statements to that of other blank check companies more
difficult.
In order to effectuate an initial
business combination, blank check companies have, in the recent past, amended various provisions of their charters and other governing
instruments, including their warrant agreements. We cannot assure you that we will not seek to amend our amended and restated certificate
of incorporation or governing instruments in a manner that will make it easier for us to complete our initial business combination
that our stockholders may not support.
In order to effectuate
an initial business combination, blank check companies have, in the recent past, amended various provisions of their charters and
modified governing instruments, including their warrant agreements. For example, blank check companies have amended the definition
of business combination, increased redemption thresholds and extended the time to consummate an initial business combination and,
with respect to their warrants, amended their warrant agreements to require the warrants to be exchanged for cash and/or other
securities. Amending our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will require the approval of holders of 65% of our common
stock, and amending our warrant agreement will require a vote of holders of at least 65% of the public warrants. In addition, our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation requires us to provide our public stockholders with the opportunity to redeem
their public shares for cash if we propose an amendment to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation (A) to modify
the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our public shares if we do not complete our initial business combination
by December 22, 2022 or (B) with respect to any other provision relating to stockholders’ rights or pre-initial business
combination activity. To the extent any such amendments would be deemed to fundamentally change the nature of our outstanding securities,
we would register, or seek an exemption from registration for, the affected securities. We cannot assure you that we will not seek
to amend our charter or governing instruments or extend the time to consummate an initial business combination in order to effectuate
our initial business combination.
We may have a limited ability to
assess the management of a prospective target business and, as a result, may effect our initial business combination with a target
business whose management may not have the skills, qualifications or abilities to manage a public company.
When evaluating the
desirability of effecting a business combination with a prospective target business, our ability to assess the target business’
management may be limited due to a lack of time, resources or information. Our assessment of the capabilities of the target’s
management, therefore, may prove to be incorrect and such management may lack the skills, qualifications or abilities we expected.
Should the target’s management not possess the skills, qualifications or abilities necessary to manage a public company,
the operations and profitability of the post-combination business may be negatively impacted.
The provisions of our amended and
restated certificate of incorporation that relate to our pre-business combination activity (and corresponding provisions of the
agreement governing the release of funds from our trust account), including an amendment to permit us to withdraw funds from the
trust account such that the per share amount investors will receive upon any redemption or liquidation is substantially reduced
or eliminated, may be amended with the approval of holders of 65% of our common stock, which is a lower amendment threshold than
that of some other blank check companies. It may be easier for us, therefore, to amend our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation and the trust agreement to facilitate the completion of an initial business combination that some of our stockholders
may not support.
Our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation provides that any of its provisions related to pre-initial business combination activity (including
the requirement to deposit proceeds of the initial public offering and the private placement into the trust account and not release
such amounts except in specified circumstances, and to provide redemption rights to public stockholders as described herein and
including to permit us to withdraw funds from the trust account such that the per share amount investors will receive upon any
redemption or liquidation is substantially reduced or eliminated) may be amended if approved by holders of 65% of our common stock
entitled to vote thereon, and corresponding provisions of the trust agreement governing the release of funds from our trust account
may be amended if approved by holders of 65% of our common stock entitled to vote thereon. In all other instances, our amended
and restated certificate of incorporation may be amended by holders of a majority of our outstanding common stock entitled to vote
thereon, subject to applicable provisions of the DGCL or applicable stock exchange rules. We may not issue additional securities
that can vote with common stockholders on matters related to our pre-initial business combination activity, on any amendment to
certain provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or on our initial business combination. Our initial
stockholders, who collectively beneficially own 26.7% of our common stock, will participate in any vote to amend our amended and
restated certificate of incorporation and/or trust agreement and will have the discretion to vote in any manner they choose. As
a result, we may be able to amend the provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation which govern our pre-initial
business combination behavior more easily than some other blank check companies, and this may increase our ability to complete
an initial business combination with which you do not agree. Our stockholders may pursue remedies against us for any breach of
our amended and restated certificate of incorporation.
Our sponsor, officers
and directors have agreed, pursuant to a written agreement with us, that they will not propose any amendment to our amended and
restated certificate of incorporation to modify the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our public shares if
we do not complete our initial business combination by December 22, 2022, unless we provide our public stockholders with the opportunity
to redeem their shares of Class A common stock upon approval of any such amendment at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal
to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account (net of taxes payable), divided by the number of then outstanding
public shares. These agreements are contained in a letter agreement that we have entered into with our sponsor, officers and directors.
Our stockholders are not parties to, or third-party beneficiaries of, these agreements and, as a result, will not have the ability
to pursue remedies against our sponsor, officers or directors for any breach of these agreements. As a result, in the event of
a breach, our stockholders would need to pursue a stockholder derivative action, subject to applicable law.
We may be unable to obtain additional
financing to complete our initial business combination or to fund the operations and growth of a target business, which could compel
us to restructure or abandon a particular business combination. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination,
our public stockholders may only receive $10.00 per share on our redemption.
Because of the size
of our initial business combination, the obligation to repurchase for cash a significant number of shares from stockholders who
elect redemption in connection with our initial business combination, or the terms of negotiated transactions to purchase shares
in connection with our initial business combination, we may be required to seek additional financing or to abandon the proposed
business combination. We may be unable to obtain any necessary financing on acceptable terms, if at all. The current economic environment
has made it especially difficult for companies to obtain acquisition financing. To the extent that additional financing proves
to be unavailable when needed to consummate our initial business combination, we would be compelled to either restructure or abandon
the transaction and seek an alternative target business candidate. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination,
our public stockholders may only receive $10.00 per share (based on the trust account balance as of December 31, 2020) on our redemption.
In addition, even if we do not need additional financing to consummate our initial business combination, we may require such financing
to fund the operations or growth of the target business. The failure to secure additional financing could have a material adverse
effect on the continued development or growth of the target business. None of our officers, directors or stockholders is required
to provide any financing to us after a business combination.
Our initial stockholders will control
the election of our board of directors until consummation of our initial business combination and will hold a substantial interest
in us. As a result, they will elect all of our directors prior to the consummation of our initial business combination and may
exert a substantial influence on actions requiring a stockholder vote, potentially in a manner that you do not support.
Our initial stockholders
own approximately 26.7% of our outstanding common stock, including placement shares. In addition, the founder shares, all of which
are held by our initial stockholders, entitle the holders to elect all of our directors prior to the consummation of our initial
business combination. Holders of our public shares have no right to vote on the election of directors during such time. These provisions
of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation may only be amended by a majority of at least 90% of our common stock
voting at a stockholder meeting. As a result, you will not have any influence over the election of directors prior to our initial
business combination.
Neither our initial
stockholders nor, to our knowledge, any of our officers or directors, have any current intention to purchase additional securities.
Factors that would be considered in making such additional purchases would include consideration of the current trading price of
our Class A common stock. In addition, as a result of their substantial ownership in our company, our initial stockholders may
exert a substantial influence on other actions requiring a stockholder vote, potentially in a manner that you do not support, including
amendments to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and approval of major corporate transactions. If our initial
stockholders purchase any additional shares of common stock in the aftermarket or in privately negotiated transactions, this would
increase their influence over these actions. Accordingly, our initial stockholders will exert significant influence over actions
requiring a stockholder vote.
Holders of founder shares and purchasers
of placement units will control a substantial interest in us and thus may exert a substantial influence on actions requiring a
stockholder vote, potentially in a manner that you do not support.
Holders of founder
shares and placement units own 26.7% of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock. Accordingly, they may exert a substantial
influence on actions requiring a stockholder vote, potentially in a manner that you do not support, including amendments to our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation. Holders of founder shares are not restricted from purchasing Class A common
stock in the aftermarket or in privately negotiated transactions, which would increase their control. The holders of founder shares
do not have any current intention to purchase additional securities. Factors that would be considered in making such additional
purchases would include consideration of the current trading price of our common stock. In addition, our board of directors, whose
members were elected by the initial holders, is divided into two classes with only one class of directors being elected in each
year and each class (except for those directors appointed prior to our first annual meeting of stockholders) serving a two-year
term. At each annual meeting, as a consequence of our “staggered” board of directors, only a minority of the board
of directors will be considered for election and our sponsor, because of its ownership position, will have considerable influence
regarding the outcome. Accordingly, you should anticipate that holders of founder shares and purchasers of placement units will
continue to exert control at least until the consummation of our initial business combination.
Resources could be wasted in researching
acquisitions that are not consummated, which could materially adversely affect subsequent attempts to locate another target business
and consummate our initial business combination. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination, our public stockholders
may only receive $10.00 per share from our redemption of our shares and our warrants will expire worthless.
We anticipate that
the investigation of each specific target business and the negotiation, drafting, and execution of relevant agreements, disclosure
documents, and other instruments will require substantial management time and attention and substantial costs for accountants,
attorneys and others. If we decide not to complete a specific initial business combination, the costs incurred up to that point
for the proposed transaction likely would not be recoverable. Furthermore, if we reach an agreement relating to a specific target
business, we may fail to consummate our initial business combination for any number of reasons including those beyond our control.
Any such event will result in a loss to us of the related costs incurred, which could materially adversely affect subsequent attempts
to locate and acquire or merge with another business due to a reduction in the funds available for expenses relating to such efforts.
If we are unable to complete our initial business combination, our public stockholders may only receive $10.00 per share (based
on the trust account balance as of December 31, 2020) from our redemption of their shares and our warrants will expire worthless.
Our key personnel may negotiate employment
or consulting agreements with a target business in connection with our initial business combination. These agreements may provide
for them to receive compensation following our initial business combination and, as a result, may cause them to have conflicts
of interest in determining whether a particular business combination would be advantageous to us.
Our key personnel may
decide to remain with the company after the consummation of our initial business combination only if they are able to negotiate
employment or consulting agreements in connection with the business combination. Such negotiations would take place simultaneously
with the negotiation of the business combination and could provide for such individuals to receive compensation in the form of
cash payments and/or our securities for services they would render to us after the consummation of our initial business combination.
The personal and financial interests of such individuals may influence their motivation in identifying and selecting a target business
and cause them to have conflicts of interest in determining whether a particular business combination would be advantageous to
us. However, we believe the ability of such individuals to remain with us after the consummation of our initial business combination
will not be the determining factor in our decision as to whether or not we will proceed with any potential business combination.
There is no certainty, however, that any of our key personnel will remain with us after the consummation of our initial business
combination. We cannot assure you that any of our key personnel will remain in senior management or advisory positions with us.
The determination as to whether any of our key personnel will remain with us will be made at the time of our initial business combination.
We may attempt to consummate business
combinations with multiple prospective targets simultaneously, which may hinder our ability to consummate an initial business combination
and give rise to increased costs and risks that could negatively impact our operations and profitability.
If we determine to
acquire several businesses simultaneously that are owned by different sellers, we will need each seller to agree that our purchase
of its business is contingent on the simultaneous closings of the other business combinations, which may make it more difficult
for us, and delay our ability, to complete the initial business combination. With multiple business combinations, we could also
face additional risks, including additional burdens and costs with respect to possible multiple negotiations and due diligence
investigations (if there are multiple sellers) and the additional risks associated with the subsequent assimilation of the operations
and services or products of the acquired companies in a single operating business. If we are unable to adequately address these
risks, we may be unable to operate the combined business successfully, and you could lose some or all of your investment in us.
We may attempt to consummate our
initial business combination with a private company about which little information is available, which may result in a business
combination with a company that is not as profitable as we expected, or at all.
In pursuing our acquisition
strategy, we may seek to effectuate our initial business combination with a privately held company. Very little public information
exists about private companies, and we could be required to make our decision on whether to pursue a potential initial business
combination on the basis of the information developed during our due diligence examination, which may be limited. As a result,
we could acquire a company that is not as profitable as we expected, or at all. Furthermore, the relative lack of information about
a private company may hinder our ability to properly assess the value of such a company which could result in our overpaying for
that company.
If we effect our initial business
combination with a company located outside of the United States, we would be subject to a variety of additional risks that may
adversely affect us.
If we pursue a target company with operations
or opportunities outside of the United States for our initial business combination, we may face additional burdens in connection
with investigating, agreeing to and completing such initial business combination, and if we effect such initial business combination,
we would be subject to a variety of additional risks that may negatively impact our operations.
If we pursue a target a company with operations
or opportunities outside of the United States for our initial business combination, we would be subject to risks associated
with cross-border business combinations, including in connection with investigating, agreeing to and completing our initial
business combination, conducting due diligence in a foreign jurisdiction, having such transaction approved by any local governments,
regulators or agencies and changes in the purchase price based on fluctuations in foreign exchange rates.
If we effect our initial business combination
with such a company, we would be subject to any special considerations or risks associated with companies operating in an international
setting, including any of the following:
|
●
|
costs
and difficulties inherent in managing cross-border business operations;
|
|
●
|
rules
and regulations regarding currency redemption;
|
|
●
|
complex
corporate withholding taxes on individuals;
|
|
●
|
laws
governing the manner in which future business combinations may be effected;
|
|
●
|
exchange
listing and/or delisting requirements;
|
|
●
|
tariffs
and trade barriers;
|
|
●
|
regulations
related to customs and import/export matters;
|
|
●
|
local
or regional economic policies and market conditions;
|
|
●
|
unexpected
changes in regulatory requirements;
|
|
●
|
challenges
in managing and staffing international operations;
|
|
●
|
tax
issues, such as tax law changes and variations in tax laws as compared to the United States;
|
|
●
|
currency
fluctuations and exchange controls;
|
|
●
|
challenges
in collecting accounts receivable;
|
|
●
|
cultural
and language differences;
|
|
●
|
employment
regulations;
|
|
●
|
underdeveloped
or unpredictable legal or regulatory systems;
|
|
●
|
protection
of intellectual property;
|
|
●
|
social
unrest, crime, strikes, riots and civil disturbances;
|
|
●
|
regime
changes and political upheaval;
|
|
●
|
terrorist
attacks and wars; and
|
|
●
|
deterioration
of political relations with the United States.
|
We may not be able to adequately address
these additional risks. If we were unable to do so, we may be unable to complete such initial business combination, or, if we complete
such initial business combination, our operations might suffer, either of which may adversely impact our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
We may not be able to maintain control
of a target business after our initial business combination. We cannot provide assurance that, upon loss of control of a target
business, new management will possess the skills, qualifications or abilities necessary to profitably operate such business.
We anticipate structuring
our initial business combination to acquire 100% of the equity interest or assets of the target business or businesses. However,
we may structure our initial business combination to acquire less than 100% of the equity interest or assets of the target business,
but only if we (or any entity that is a successor to us in a business combination) acquire a majority of the outstanding voting
securities or assets of the target. Even if we own a majority interest in the target, our stockholders prior to the initial business
combination may collectively own a minority interest in the post business combination company, depending on valuations ascribed
to the target and us in the business combination transaction. For example, we could pursue a transaction in which we issue a substantial
number of new shares of Class A common stock in exchange for all of the outstanding capital stock of a target. In this case, we
would acquire a 100% interest in the target. However, as a result of the issuance of a substantial number of new shares of common
stock, our stockholders immediately prior to such transaction could own less than a majority of our outstanding shares of common
stock subsequent to such transaction. In addition, other minority stockholders may subsequently combine their holdings resulting
in a single person or group obtaining a larger share of the company’s stock than we initially acquired. Accordingly, this
may make it more likely that we will not be able to maintain our control of the target business.
We may issue notes or other debt
securities, or otherwise incur substantial debt, to complete a business combination, which may adversely affect our financial condition
and the value of our stockholders’ investment in us.
We may choose to incur
substantial debt in order to complete our initial business combination. The incurrence of debt could have a variety of negative
effects, including:
|
●
|
default and foreclosure on our assets if our operating revenues after an initial business combination are insufficient to meet our debt service obligations;
|
|
●
|
acceleration of our obligations to repay the indebtedness, even if we make all principal and interest payments when due, if we breach covenants that require the maintenance of financial ratios or reserves without a waiver or renegotiation of that covenant;
|
|
●
|
our immediate payment of all principal and accrued interest, if any, if the debt is payable on demand and the lender demands payment;
|
|
●
|
our inability to obtain necessary additional financing if any debt we incur contains covenants restricting our ability to obtain additional financing while the debt is outstanding;
|
|
●
|
prohibitions of, or limitations on, our ability to pay dividends on our common stock;
|
|
●
|
use of a substantial portion of our cash flow to pay principal and interest on our debt, which will reduce the funds available for dividends on our common stock if declared, as well as for expenses, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes;
|
|
●
|
limitations on our flexibility in planning for and reacting to changes in our business and in the industry in which we operate;
|
|
●
|
increased vulnerability to adverse changes in general economic, industry and competitive conditions and adverse changes in government regulation; and
|
|
●
|
limitations on our ability to borrow additional amounts for expenses, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service requirements, execution of growth strategies and other purposes and other disadvantages compared to our competitors who have less debt.
|
We do not have a policy
with respect to how much debt we may incur. To the extent that the amount of our debt increases, the impact of the effects listed
above may also increase.
We may complete a business combination
with only one business, which would result in our success being dependent solely on a single business which may have a limited
number of products or services. This lack of diversification may harm our operations and profitability.
We are not limited
as to the number of businesses we may acquire in our initial business combination. However, we may not be able to effectuate a
business combination with more than one target business because of various factors, including the limited amount of the net proceeds
of the initial public offering, the existence of complex accounting issues and the requirement that we prepare and file pro forma
financial statements with the SEC that present operating results and the financial condition of several target businesses as if
they had been operated on a combined basis. By consummating an initial business combination with only a single entity, our lack
of diversification may subject us to numerous economic, competitive and regulatory risks particular to the industry area in which
the acquired business operates. Further, we would not be able to diversify our operations or benefit from the possible spreading
of risks or offsetting of losses, unlike other entities which may have the resources to complete several business combinations
in different industries or different areas of a single industry. Accordingly, the prospects for our success may:
|
●
|
solely depend upon the performance of a single business, property or asset, or
|
|
●
|
depend upon the development or market acceptance of a single or limited number of products, processes or services.
|
This lack of diversification
may subject us to numerous economic, competitive and regulatory risks, any or all of which may have a substantial adverse impact
upon the particular industry in which we may operate subsequent to our initial business combination.
The officers and directors of an
acquisition candidate may resign upon consummation of a business combination. The loss of an acquisition target’s key personnel
could negatively impact the operations and profitability of our post-combination business.
The role of an acquisition
candidate’s key personnel upon the consummation of our initial business combination cannot be ascertained at this time. Although
we contemplate that certain members of an acquisition candidate’s management team will remain associated with us following
our initial business combination, it is possible that members of the management of an acquisition candidate will not wish to remain
in place. The loss of an acquisition target’s key personnel could negatively impact the operations and profitability of our
post-combination business.
We
may partner, submit a joint bid or enter into a similar transaction with holders of founder shares or an affiliate in connection
with our pursuit of, or in connection with, a business combination.
We
are not prohibited from partnering, submitting a joint bid or entering into any similar transaction with holders of founder shares
or their affiliates in our pursuit of a business combination. Although we currently have no plans to do so, we could pursue such
a transaction if we determined that such affiliated entity met our criteria for a business combination and the transaction was
approved by a majority of our disinterested directors. Despite our agreement to obtain an opinion from an independent investment
banking firm or an independent accounting firm regarding the fairness to our stockholders from a financial point of view of a
business combination with any holder of founder shares or its affiliates, the terms of the business combination may not be as
advantageous to our public stockholders as they would be absent any conflicts of interest. Additionally, were we successful in
consummating such a transaction, conflicts could invariably arise from the interest of the holder of founder shares or its affiliate
in maximizing its returns, which may be at odds with the strategy of the post-business combination company or not in the best
interests of the public stockholders of the post-business combination company. Any or all of such conflicts could materially reduce
the value of your investment, whether before or after our initial business combination.
A
failure to comply with privacy regulations could adversely affect relations with customers and have a negative impact on business.
Depending
upon the type of business we acquire, in the course of providing services to our customers we may collect, process and retain
sensitive and confidential information on our customers and their clients. A failure of our systems due to security breaches,
acts of vandalism, computer viruses, misplaced or lost data, programming and/or human errors, or other causes could result in
the misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized disclosure of confidential customer information. Any such failure could result
in damage to our reputation with our customers, expose us to the risk of litigation and liability, disrupt our operations, and
impair our ability to operate profitably.
We
may not be able to protect our intellectual property and we may be subject to infringement claims.
We
expect to rely on a combination of contractual rights and copyright, trademark, patent and trade secret laws to establish and
protect any proprietary technology of a target business. Although we intend to protect vigorously any intellectual property we
acquire, third parties may infringe or misappropriate our intellectual property or may develop competitive technology. Our competitors
may independently develop similar technology, duplicate our products or services or design around our intellectual property rights.
We may have to litigate to enforce and protect our intellectual property rights, trade secrets and know-how or to determine their
scope, validity or enforceability, which is expensive, could cause a diversion of resources and may not prove successful. The
loss of intellectual property protection or the inability to secure or enforce intellectual property protection could harm our
business and ability to compete.
We
also may be subject to claims by third parties for infringement of another party’s proprietary rights, or for breach of
copyright, trademark or license usage rights. Any such claims and any resulting litigation could subject us to significant liability
for damages. An adverse determination in any litigation of this type could require us to design around a third party’s intellectual
property, obtain a license for that technology or license alternative technology from another party. None of these alternatives
may be available to us at a price which would allow us to operate profitably. In addition, litigation is time consuming and expensive
to defend and could result in the diversion of the time and attention of management and employees. Any claims from third parties
may also result in limitations on our ability to use the intellectual property subject to these claims.
Risks
Relating to our Sponsor and Management Team
We
are dependent upon our officers and directors; the loss of any one or more of them could adversely affect our ability to complete
a business combination.
Our
operations depend upon the background, experience and contacts of our officers and directors. We believe that our success depends
on the continued service of our officers and directors, at least until we have consummated a business combination. We do not have
an employment agreement with, or key-man insurance on the life of, any of our directors or officers. In addition, our executive
officers and directors are not required to, and do not, commit their full time to our affairs, which may result in a conflict
of interest in allocating their time between our operations and the search for a business combination and their other business
commitments. We do not intend to have any full-time employees prior to the consummation of our business combination. Each of our
executive officers and directors is engaged in other business endeavors and is not obligated to contribute any specific number
of hours per week to our affairs. If our executive officers’ and directors’ other business commitments require them
to devote substantial amounts of time in excess of their current commitment levels, it could limit their ability to devote time
to our affairs which make it more difficult for us to identify an acquisition target and consummate our business combination.
Our
success following our initial business combination likely will depend upon the efforts of management of the target business. The
loss of any of the key personnel of the target’s management team could make it more difficult to operate the target profitably.
Although
some of our key personnel may remain with the target business in senior management or advisory positions following a business
combination, we can offer no assurance that any will do so. Moreover, as a result of the existing commitments of our key personnel,
it is likely that we will retain some or all of the management of the target business to conduct its operations. The departure
of any key members of the target’s management team could thus make it more difficult to operate the post-combination business
profitably. Moreover, to the extent that we will rely upon the target’s management team to operate the post-combination
business, we will be subject to risks regarding their managerial competence. While we intend to closely scrutinize the skills,
abilities and qualifications of any individuals we retain after a business combination, our ability to do so may be limited due
to a lack of time resources or information. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that our assessment of these individuals will prove
to be correct and that they will have the skills, abilities and qualifications we expect.
Certain
of our officers and directors are now, and all of them may in the future become, affiliated with entities engaged in business
activities similar to those intended to be conducted by us, including another blank check company, and, accordingly, may have
conflicts of interest in allocating their time and determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented.
Following
the completion of the initial public offering and until we consummate our initial business combination, we will engage in the
business of identifying and combining with one or more businesses. Our sponsor and officers and directors are, and may in the
future become, affiliated with entities that are engaged in a similar business. In addition, our sponsor, officers and directors
may participate in the formation of, or become an officer or director of, any other blank check company prior to completion of
our initial business combination. As a result, our sponsor, officers or directors could have conflicts of interest in determining
whether to present business combination opportunities to us or to any other blank check company with which they may become involved.
Although we have no formal policy in place for vetting potential conflicts of interest, our board of directors will review any
potential conflicts of interest on a case-by-case basis.
Our
officers and directors also may become aware of business opportunities which may be appropriate for presentation to us and the
other entities to which they owe certain fiduciary or contractual duties. Accordingly, they may have conflicts of interest in
determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented. These conflicts may not be resolved in our
favor and a potential target business may be presented to another entity prior to its presentation to us. Our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation contains a waiver of the corporate opportunity doctrine, which provides that we renounce our interest
in any corporate opportunity offered to any director or officer unless (i) such opportunity is expressly offered to such
person solely in his or her capacity as a director or officer of our company, (ii) such opportunity is one we are legally
and contractually permitted to undertake and would otherwise be reasonable for us to pursue and (iii) the director or officer
is permitted to refer the opportunity to us without violating another legal obligation. The purpose for the surrender of corporate
opportunities is to allow officers, directors or other representatives with multiple business affiliations to continue to serve
as an officer of our company or on our board of directors. Our officers and directors may from time to time be presented with
opportunities that could benefit both another business affiliation and us. In the absence of the “corporate opportunity”
waiver in our charter, certain candidates would not be able to serve as an officer or director. We believe we substantially benefit
from having representatives, who bring significant, relevant and valuable experience to our management, and, as a result, the
inclusion of the “corporate opportunity” waiver in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides
us with greater flexibility to attract and retain the officers and directors that we feel are the best candidates.
However,
the personal and financial interests of our directors and officers may influence their motivation in timely identifying and selecting
a target business and completing a business combination. The different timelines of competing business combinations could cause
our directors and officers to prioritize a different business combination over finding a suitable acquisition target for our business
combination. Consequently, our directors’ and officers’ discretion in identifying and selecting a suitable target
business may result in a conflict of interest when determining whether the terms, conditions and timing of a particular business
combination are appropriate and in our stockholders’ best interest, which could negatively impact the timing for a business
combination.
For
a discussion of our officers’ and directors’ business affiliations and the potential conflicts of interest that you
should be aware of, please see the sections of this prospectus entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,
and Director Independence — Conflicts of Interest.”
We
may engage in a business combination with one or more target businesses that have relationships with entities that may be affiliated
with our executive officers, directors or existing stockholders, which may raise potential conflicts of interest.
We
may decide to acquire one or more businesses affiliated with holders of founder shares, or our officers and directors. Our officers
and directors also serve as officers and board members of other entities. Such entities may compete with us for business combination
opportunities. The holders of founder shares and our officers and directors are not currently aware of any specific opportunities
for us to consummate a business combination with any entities with which they are affiliated, and there have been no preliminary
discussions concerning a business combination with any such entity or entities. Although we will not be specifically focusing
on, or targeting, any transaction with any affiliated entities, we would pursue such a transaction if we determined that the targeted
affiliated entity met our criteria for a business combination and the transaction was approved by a majority of our disinterested
directors. Despite our agreement to obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm or an independent accounting
firm regarding the fairness to our stockholders from a financial point of view of a business combination with one or more businesses
affiliated with our executive officers, directors or holders of founder shares, potential conflicts of interest still may exist
and, as a result, the terms of the business combination may not be as advantageous to our public stockholders as they would be
absent any conflicts of interest.
Since
holders of founder shares and placement units will lose some or all of their investment in us if we do not consummate a business
combination, a conflict of interest may arise in determining whether a particular acquisition target is appropriate for our initial
business combination.
Our
initial holders currently own 8,525,000 founder shares, which will be worthless if we do not consummate our initial business combination.
Our sponsor has also purchased 575,000 placement units for an aggregate purchase price of $5.75 million. There will be no redemption
rights or liquidating distributions from the trust account with respect to the founder shares, placement shares or placement warrants,
which will expire worthless if we do not consummate a business combination by December 22, 2022. If we do not consummate a business
combination, our sponsor will realize a loss on the placement units it purchased. As a result, the personal and financial
interests of certain of our officers and directors, directly or as members of our sponsor, in consummating an initial business
combination, along with their flexibility in identifying and selecting a prospective acquisition candidate, may influence their
motivation in identifying and selecting a target business combination and completing an initial business combination that is not
in the best interests of our stockholders. Consequently, the discretion of our officers and directors, in identifying and selecting
a suitable target business combination may result in a conflict of interest when determining whether the terms, conditions and
timing of a particular initial business combination are appropriate and in the best interest of our public stockholders.
Risks
Relating to our Securities
The
securities in which we invest the funds held in the trust account could bear a negative rate of interest, which could reduce the
value of the assets held in trust such that the per-share redemption amount received by public stockholders may be less than $10.00
per share.
The
proceeds held in the trust account will be invested only in U.S. government treasury obligations with a maturity of 185 days
or less or in money market funds meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act, which
invest only in direct U.S. government treasury obligations. While short-term U.S. government treasury obligations currently
yield a positive rate of interest, they have briefly yielded negative interest rates in recent years. Central banks in Europe
and Japan pursued interest rates below zero in recent years, and the Open Market Committee of the Federal Reserve has not ruled
out the possibility that it may in the future adopt similar policies in the United States. In the event that we are unable
to complete our initial business combination or make certain amendments to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation,
our public stockholders are entitled to receive their pro-rata share of the proceeds held in the trust account, plus any
interest income, net of taxes paid or payable (less, in the case we are unable to complete our initial business combination, $100,000
of interest). Negative interest rates could reduce the value of the assets held in trust such that the per-share redemption
amount received by public stockholders may be less than $10.00 per share.
If
we are deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, we may be required to institute burdensome compliance
requirements and our activities may be restricted, which may make it difficult for us to complete our initial business combination.
If
we are deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, our activities may be restricted, including:
|
●
|
restrictions
on the nature of our investments; and
|
|
●
|
restrictions
on the issuance of securities;
|
each
of which may make it difficult for us to complete our initial business combination.
In
addition, we may have imposed upon us burdensome requirements, including:
|
●
|
registration
as an investment company with the SEC;
|
|
●
|
adoption
of a specific form of corporate structure; and
|
|
●
|
reporting,
record keeping, voting, proxy and disclosure requirements and compliance with other rules and regulations that we are currently
not subject to.
|
In
order not to be regulated as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, unless we can qualify for an exclusion, we
must ensure that we are engaged primarily in a business other than investing, reinvesting or trading of securities and that our
activities do not include investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading “investment securities” constituting
more than 40% of our total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. Our business
is to identify and complete an initial business combination and thereafter to operate the post-transaction business or assets
for the long term. We do not plan to buy businesses or assets with a view to resale or profit from their resale. We do not plan
to buy unrelated businesses or assets or to be a passive investor.
We
do not believe that our anticipated principal activities will subject us to the Investment Company Act. To this end, the proceeds
held in the trust account may only be invested in United States “government securities” within the meaning of Section
2(a)(16) of the Investment Company Act having a maturity of 185 days or less or in money market funds meeting certain conditions
under Rule 2a-7 promulgated under the Investment Company Act which invest only in direct U.S. government treasury obligations.
Pursuant to the trust agreement, the trustee is not permitted to invest in other securities or assets. By restricting the investment
of the proceeds to these instruments, and by having a business plan targeted at acquiring and growing businesses for the long
term (rather than on buying and selling businesses in the manner of a merchant bank or private equity fund), we intend to avoid
being deemed an “investment company” within the meaning of the Investment Company Act. Our securities are not intended
for persons who are seeking a return on investments in government securities or investment securities. The trust account is intended
as a holding place for funds pending the earliest to occur of: (i) the completion of our primary business objective, which is
a business combination; (ii) the redemption of any public shares properly submitted in connection with a stockholder vote to amend
our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to modify the substance or timing of our obligation to provide for the redemption
of our public shares in connection with an initial business combination or to redeem 100% of our public shares if we do not complete
our initial business combination within the completion window; and (iii) absent a business combination, our return of the funds
held in the trust account to our public stockholders as part of our redemption of the public shares. If we do not invest the proceeds
as discussed above, we may be deemed to be subject to the Investment Company Act. If we were deemed to be subject to the Investment
Company Act, compliance with these additional regulatory burdens would require additional expenses for which we have not allotted
funds and may hinder our ability to consummate our initial business combination. If we are unable to complete our initial business
combination, our public stockholders may receive only approximately $10.00 per share (based on the trust account balance as of
December 31, 2020) on the liquidation of our trust account and our warrants will expire worthless. In certain circumstances, our
public stockholders may receive less than $10.00 per share on the redemption of their shares. Please see “— If third
parties bring claims against us, the proceeds held in the trust account could be reduced and the per-share redemption amount received
by stockholders may be less than $10.00 per share” and other risk factors herein.
If
we seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination and we do not conduct redemptions pursuant to the tender offer
rules, a stockholder, or a “group” of stockholders, who are deemed to hold an aggregate of more than 20.0% of our
common stock may not redeem any shares they hold that exceed such 20.0% amount.
If
we seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination and we do not conduct redemptions in connection with our business
combination pursuant to the tender offer rules, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that a public stockholder,
together with any affiliate of such stockholder or any other person with whom such stockholder is acting in concert or as a “group”
(as defined under Section 13 of the Exchange Act), will be restricted from seeking redemption rights with respect to shares in
excess of 20.0% of the shares sold in the initial public offering without our prior written consent. We refer to such shares in
excess of 20.0% or more of the shares sold in the initial public offering as “Excess Shares”. However, we would not
be restricting our stockholders’ ability to vote all of their shares (including Excess Shares) for or against our initial
business combination. Your inability to redeem any Excess Shares will reduce your influence over our ability to consummate a business
combination and you could suffer a material loss on your investment in us if you sell Excess Shares in open market transactions.
Additionally, you will not receive redemption distributions with respect to the Excess Shares if we consummate our business combination.
As a result, you would continue to hold that number of shares exceeding 20.0% and, in order to dispose of such shares, would be
required to sell them in open market transactions, potentially at a loss.
Nasdaq
may delist our securities from trading which could limit investors’ ability to make transactions in our securities and subject
us to additional trading restrictions.
We
cannot assure you that our securities will continue to be listed on Nasdaq in the future or prior to our initial business combination.
In order to continue listing our securities on Nasdaq prior to our initial business combination, we must maintain certain financial,
distribution and stock price levels. Generally, we must maintain a minimum amount in stockholders’ equity (generally $2,500,000)
and a minimum number of holders of our securities (generally 300 public holders). Additionally, in connection with our initial
business combination, we will be required to demonstrate compliance with Nasdaq’s initial listing requirements, which are
more rigorous than Nasdaq’s continued listing requirements, in order to continue to maintain the listing of our securities
on Nasdaq. For instance, our stock price would generally be required to be at least $4.00 per share, our stockholders’ equity
would generally be required to be at least $5.0 million and we would be required to have a minimum of 300 round lot holders
(with at least 50% of such round lot holders holding securities with a market value of at least $2,500) of our securities. We
cannot assure you that we will be able to meet those initial listing requirements at that time.
If
Nasdaq delists our securities from trading on its exchange and we are not able to list our securities on another national securities
exchange, we expect our securities could be quoted on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board or the “pink sheets.” If
this were to occur, there could be material adverse consequences, including:
|
●
|
a
limited availability of market quotations for our securities;
|
|
●
|
reduced
liquidity for our securities;
|
|
●
|
a
determination that our common stock is a “penny stock” which will require brokers trading in our common stock
to adhere to more stringent rules and possibly result in a reduced level of trading activity in the secondary trading market
for our securities;
|
|
●
|
a
limited amount of, or no, news and analyst coverage; and
|
|
●
|
a
decreased ability to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future.
|
The
National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996, which is a federal statute, prevents or preempts the states from regulating
the sale of certain securities, which are referred to as “covered securities.” Because our units, Class A common stock
and warrants are listed on Nasdaq, our units, Class A common stock and warrants are covered securities. Although the states are
preempted from regulating the sale of our securities, the federal statute does allow the states to investigate companies if there
is a suspicion of fraud and, if there is a finding of fraudulent activity, then the states can regulate or bar the sale of covered
securities in a particular case. While we are not aware of a state, other than the state of Idaho, having used these powers to
prohibit or restrict the sale of securities issued by blank check companies, certain state securities regulators view blank check
companies unfavorably and might use these powers, or threaten to use these powers, to hinder the sale of securities of blank check
companies in their states. Further, if we were no longer listed on Nasdaq, our securities would not be covered securities and
we would be subject to regulation in each state in which we offer our securities.
Purchases
of Class A common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions by our sponsor, directors, officers or their
affiliates may make it difficult for us to continue to list our common stock on Nasdaq or another national securities exchange.
If
our sponsor, directors, officers or their affiliates purchase shares of our Class A common stock in the open market or in privately
negotiated transactions, it would reduce the public “float” of our Class A common stock and the number of beneficial
holders of our common stock, which may make it difficult to maintain the listing or trading of our common stock on a national
securities exchange if we determine to apply for such listing in connection with the business combination. If the number of our
public holders falls below 300 or if the total number of shares held by non-affiliates is less than 500,000, we will be non-compliant
with Nasdaq’s continued listing rules and our common stock could be de-listed. If our common stock were de-listed, we could
face the material consequences set forth in the immediately preceding risk factor.
We
may issue additional common or preferred shares to complete our initial business combination or under an employee incentive plan
after consummation of our initial business combination, which would dilute the interest of our stockholders and likely present
other risks.
Our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes the issuance of up to 60,000,000 shares of Class A common stock,
par value $0.0001 per share, and 10,000,000 shares of Class B common stock, par value $0.0001 per share and 1,000,000 shares of
undesignated preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share. There are currently 25,900,000 and 1,475,000 authorized but unissued
shares of Class A and Class B common stock, respectively, available for issuance, which amount takes into account shares reserved
for issuance upon exercise of outstanding warrants but not upon the conversion of the Class B common stock. Shares of Class B
common stock are automatically convertible into shares of our Class A common stock at the time of our initial business combination,
initially at a one-for-one ratio but subject to adjustment. There are no shares of preferred stock currently issued and outstanding.
We
may issue a substantial number of additional shares of common stock, and may issue shares of preferred stock, in order to complete
our initial business combination or under an employee incentive plan after completion of our initial business combination (although
our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that we may not issue additional securities that can vote with
common stockholders on matters related to our pre-initial business combination activity, on any amendment to certain provisions
of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or on our initial business combination or that would entitle holders
thereof to receive funds from the trust account). We may also issue shares of Class A common stock upon conversion of the Class
B common stock at a ratio greater than one-to-one at the time of our initial business combination as a result of the applicable
anti-dilution provisions. However, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides, among other things, that prior
to our initial business combination, we may not issue additional shares of capital stock that would entitle the holders thereof
to (1) receive funds from the trust account or (2) vote on any initial business combination.
The
issuance of additional shares of common or preferred stock:
|
●
|
may
significantly dilute the equity interest of investors in the initial public offering;
|
|
●
|
may
subordinate the rights of holders of common stock if preferred stock is issued with rights senior to those afforded our common
stock;
|
|
●
|
could
cause a change in control if a substantial number of shares of common stock are issued, which may affect, among other things,
our ability to use our net operating loss carry forwards, if any, and could result in the resignation or removal of our present
officers and directors; and
|
|
●
|
may
adversely affect prevailing market prices for our units, common stock and/or warrants.
|
We
are not registering the shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants under the Securities Act or any
state securities laws at this time, and such registration may not be in place when an investor desires to exercise warrants, thus
precluding such investor from being able to exercise its warrants except on a cashless basis. If the issuance of the shares upon
exercise of warrants is not registered, qualified or exempt from registration or qualification, the holder of such warrant will
not be entitled to exercise such warrant and such warrant may have no value and expire worthless.
We
are not registering the shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants under the Securities Act or any
state securities laws at this time. However, under the terms of the warrant agreement, we have agreed that as soon as practicable,
but in no event later than 20 business days after the closing of our initial business combination, we will use our best efforts
to file with the SEC a registration statement for the registration under the Securities Act of the shares of Class A common stock
issuable upon exercise of the warrants and thereafter will use our best efforts to cause the same to become effective within 60
business days following our initial business combination and to maintain a current prospectus relating to the Class A common stock
issuable upon exercise of the warrants, until the expiration of the warrants in accordance with the provisions of the warrant
agreement. We cannot assure you that we will be able to do so if, for example, any facts or events arise which represent a fundamental
change in the information set forth in the registration statement or prospectus, the financial statements contained or incorporated
by reference therein are not current or correct or the SEC issues a stop order. If the shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants
are not registered under the Securities Act, we will be required to permit holders to exercise their warrants on a cashless basis.
However, no warrant will be exercisable for cash or on a cashless basis, and we will not be obligated to issue any shares to holders
seeking to exercise their warrants, unless the issuance of the shares upon such exercise is registered or qualified under the
securities laws of the state of the exercising holder, or an exemption from registration is available. Notwithstanding the above,
if our Class A common stock is at the time of any exercise of a warrant not listed on a national securities exchange such that
it satisfies the definition of a “covered security” under Section 18(b)(1) of the Securities Act, we may, at our option,
require holders of public warrants who exercise their warrants to do so on a “cashless basis” in accordance with Section
3(a)(9) of the Securities Act and, in the event we so elect, we will not be required to file or maintain in effect a registration
statement, and in the event we do not so elect, we will use our commercially reasonable best efforts to register or qualify the
shares under applicable blue sky laws to the extent an exemption is not available. In no event will we be required to net cash
settle any warrant, or issue securities or other compensation in exchange for the warrants in the event that we are unable to
register or qualify the shares underlying the warrants under applicable state securities laws and there is no exemption available.
If the issuance of the shares upon exercise of the warrants is not so registered or qualified or exempt from registration or qualification,
the holder of such warrant will not be entitled to exercise such warrant and such warrant may have no value and expire worthless.
In such event, holders who acquired their warrants as part of a purchase of units will have paid the full unit purchase price
solely for the shares of Class A common stock included in the units. If and when the warrants become redeemable by us, we may
not exercise our redemption right if the issuance of shares of common stock upon exercise of the warrants is not exempt from registration
or qualification under applicable state blue sky laws or we are unable to effect such registration or qualification. We will use
our best efforts to register or qualify such shares of common stock under the blue sky laws of the state of residence in those
states in which the warrants were offered by us in the initial public offering. However, there may be instances in which holders
of our public warrants may be unable to exercise such public warrants but holders of our placement warrants may be able to exercise
such placement warrants.
If
you exercise your public warrants on a “cashless basis,” you will receive fewer shares of Class A common stock from
such exercise than if you were to exercise such warrants for cash.
There
are circumstances in which the exercise of the public warrants may be required or permitted to be made on a cashless basis. First,
if a registration statement covering the shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants is not effective
by the 60th business day after the closing of our initial business combination, warrantholders may, until such time as there is
an effective registration statement, exercise warrants on a cashless basis in accordance with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities
Act or another exemption. Second, if our Class A common stock is at any time of any exercise of a warrant not listed on a national
securities exchange such that it satisfies the definition of a “covered security” under Section 18(b)(1) of the Securities
Act, we may, at our option, require holders of public warrants who exercise their warrants to do so on a cashless basis in accordance
with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act and, in the event we so elect, we will not be required to file or maintain in effect
a registration statement, and in the event we do not so elect, we will use our best efforts to register or qualify the shares
under applicable blue sky laws to the extent an exemption is not available. Third, if we call the public warrants for redemption,
our management will have the option to require all holders that wish to exercise warrants to do so on a cashless basis. In the
event of an exercise on a cashless basis, a holder would pay the warrant exercise price by surrendering the warrants for that
number of shares of Class A common stock equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (x) the product of the number of shares of
Class A common stock underlying the warrants, multiplied by the difference between the exercise price of the warrants and the
“fair market value” (as defined in the next sentence) by (y) the fair market value. The “fair market value”
is the average reported last sale price of the Class A common stock for the 10 trading days ending on the third trading day prior
to the date on which the notice of exercise is received by the warrant agent or on which the notice of redemption is sent to the
holders of warrants, as applicable. As a result, you would receive fewer shares of Class A common stock from such exercise than
if you were to exercise such warrants for cash.
The
grant of registration rights to our initial stockholders and purchasers of placement units may make it more difficult to complete
our initial business combination, and the future exercise of such rights may reduce the market price of our Class A common stock.
Pursuant
to an agreement entered into concurrently with the issuance and sale of the securities in the initial public offering, our initial
stockholders and their permitted transferees and purchasers of placement units can demand that we register the founder shares,
placement shares, placement warrants and the shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of the placement warrants.
This would include the 8,525,000 founder shares, 575,000 placement shares and 191,667 placement warrants. These registration rights
will be exercisable at any time commencing upon the date that such shares are released from transfer restrictions. We will also
grant registration rights to our sponsor or one of its affiliates in connection with the issuance of any working capital warrants.
We will bear the cost of registering these securities. The registration and availability of such a significant number of securities
for trading in the public market may reduce the market price of our Class A common stock. In addition, the existence of the registration
rights may make our initial business combination more costly or difficult to conclude because the stockholders of the target business
may increase the equity stake they seek in the combined entity or ask for more cash consideration to offset the negative impact
on the market price of our Class A common stock that is expected when the securities owned by our initial stockholders or their
permitted transferees are registered.
We
may amend the terms of the warrants in a manner that may be adverse to holders with the approval by the holders of at least 65%
of the then outstanding public warrants.
Our
warrants were issued in registered form under a warrant agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company,
as warrant agent, and us. The warrant agreement provides that the terms of the warrants may be amended without the consent of
any holder to cure any ambiguity or correct any defective provision, but requires the approval by the holders of at least 65%
of the then outstanding public warrants to make any change that adversely affects the interests of the registered holders of public
warrants. Accordingly, we may amend the terms of the public warrants in a manner adverse to a holder if holders of at least 65%
of the then outstanding public warrants approve of such amendment. Although our ability to amend the terms of the public warrants
with the consent of at least 65% of the then outstanding public warrants is unlimited, examples of such amendments could be amendments
to, among other things, increase the exercise price of the warrants, convert the warrants into cash or stock, shorten the exercise
period or decrease the number of shares of our Class A common stock purchasable upon exercise of a warrant.
We
may redeem your unexpired warrants prior to their exercise at a time that is disadvantageous to you, thereby making your warrants
worthless.
We
have the ability to redeem outstanding warrants (excluding any placement warrants held by our sponsor or its permitted transferees)
at any time after they become exercisable and prior to their expiration, at $0.01 per warrant, provided that the last reported
sales price (or the closing bid price of our Class A common stock in the event the shares of our Class A common stock are not
traded on any specific trading day) of the Class A common stock equals or exceeds $18.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits,
stock dividends, reorganizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within a 30 trading-day period ending on the third trading
day prior to the date we send proper notice of such redemption, provided that on the date we give notice of redemption and during
the entire period thereafter until the time we redeem the warrants, we have an effective registration statement under the Securities
Act covering the shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants and a current prospectus relating to them
is available. If and when the warrants become redeemable by us, we may exercise our redemption right even if we are unable to
register or qualify the underlying securities for sale under all applicable state securities laws. Redemption of the outstanding
warrants could force you: (i) to exercise your warrants and pay the exercise price therefor at a time when it may be disadvantageous
for you to do so, (ii) to sell your warrants at the then-current market price when you might otherwise wish to hold your warrants
or (iii) to accept the nominal redemption price which, at the time the outstanding warrants are called for redemption, is likely
to be substantially less than the market value of your warrants.
Our
warrants and founder shares may have an adverse effect on the market price of our Class A common stock and make it more difficult
to effectuate a business combination.
In
the initial public offering, we issued warrants to purchase 8,333,333 shares of our Class A common stock as part of the public
units. In addition, on the closing date of the initial public offering, we sold 575,000 placement units to our sponsor, with each
unit consisting of one placement share and one-third of one placement warrant, each whole warrant exercisable to purchase one
share of Class A common stock. Prior to the initial public offering, we issued an aggregate of 8,525,000 founder shares in a private
placement. The founder shares are convertible into shares of Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis, subject to adjustment.
In addition, our sponsor or one of its affiliates has committed to loan us a maximum of $810,000 to fund working capital requirements
or finance transaction costs in connection with an intended initial business combination. Should these amounts be insufficient,
our sponsor or one of its affiliates may fund our additional working capital requirements or finance transaction costs, as necessary.
However, they are under no obligation to do so.
To
the extent we issue shares of Class A common stock to effect a business combination, the potential for the issuance of a substantial
number of additional shares of Class A common stock upon exercise of these warrants and conversion rights could make us a less
attractive acquisition vehicle to a target business. Any such issuance will increase the number of issued and outstanding shares
of our Class A common stock and reduce the value of the shares of Class A common stock issued to complete the business combination.
Therefore, our warrants and founder shares may make it more difficult to effectuate a business combination or increase the cost
of acquiring the target business.
The
placement warrants are identical to the warrants sold as part of the units in the initial public offering except that, so long
as they are held by the initial purchasers or their permitted transferees, (i) they will not be redeemable by us, (ii) they may
not (including the Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of these warrants), subject to certain limited exceptions, be transferred,
assigned or sold until 30 days after the completion of our initial business combination, (iii) they may be exercised by the holders
on a cashless basis, and (iv) they will be entitled to registration rights.
Because
each unit contains one-third of one warrant and only a whole warrant may be exercised, the units may be worth less than units
of other blank check companies.
Each
unit contains one-third of one warrant. Because, pursuant to the warrant agreement, the warrants may only be exercised for a whole
number of shares, only a whole warrant may be exercised at any given time. This is different from other blank check companies
similar to ours whose units include one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase one whole share. We established the
components of the units in this way in order to reduce the dilutive effect of the warrants upon completion of a business combination
since the warrants will be exercisable in the aggregate for one-third of the number of shares compared to units that each contain
a warrant to purchase one whole share, thus making us, we believe, a more attractive business combination partner for target businesses.
Nevertheless, this unit structure may cause our units to be worth less than if they included a warrant to purchase one whole share.
A
provision of our warrant agreement may make it more difficult for us to consummate an initial business combination.
Unlike
many blank check companies, if (x) we issue additional shares of Class A common stock or equity-linked securities
for capital raising purposes in connection with the closing of our initial business combination at an issue price or effective
issue price of less than $9.20 per share (with such issue price or effective issue price to be determined in good faith by us
and in the case of any such issuance to our sponsors or their affiliates, without taking into account any founder shares held
by our initial shareholders or such affiliates, as applicable, prior to such issuance) (the “Newly Issued Price”),
(y) the aggregate gross proceeds from such issuances represent more than 50% of the total equity proceeds, and interest
thereon, available for the funding of our initial business combination on the date of the completion of our initial business combination
(net of redemptions), and (z) the volume-weighted average trading price of our shares of Class A common stock during
the 20 trading day period starting on the trading day prior to the day on which we complete our initial business combination (such
price, the “Market Value”) is below $9.20 per share, the exercise price of the warrants will be adjusted (to the nearest
cent) to be equal to 115% of the higher of the Market Value and the Newly Issued Price, and the $18.00 per share redemption trigger
price will be adjusted (to the nearest cent) to be equal to 180% of the higher of the Market Value and the Newly Issued Price.
This may make it more difficult for us to consummate an initial business combination with a target business.
Provisions
in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and Delaware law may inhibit a takeover of us, which could limit the
price investors might be willing to pay in the future for our common stock and could entrench management.
Our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation contains provisions that may discourage unsolicited takeover proposals that
stockholders may consider to be in their best interests. These provisions include a staggered board of directors and the ability
of the board of directors to designate the terms of and issue new series of preferred shares. We are also subject to anti-takeover
provisions under Delaware law, which could delay or prevent a change of control. Together these provisions may make the removal
of management more difficult and may discourage transactions that otherwise could involve payment of a premium over prevailing
market prices for our securities.
Our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation will require, to the fullest extent permitted by law, that derivative actions
brought in our name, actions against our directors, officers, other employees or stockholders for breach of fiduciary duty and
other similar actions may be brought only in the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware and, if brought outside of Delaware,
the stockholder bringing the suit will be deemed to have consented to service of process on such stockholder’s counsel,
which may have the effect of discouraging lawsuits against our directors, officers, other employees or stockholders.
Our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation requires, to the fullest extent permitted by law, that derivative actions brought
in our name, actions against our directors, officers, other employees or stockholders for breach of fiduciary duty and other similar
actions may be brought only in the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware and, if brought outside of Delaware, the stockholder
bringing the suit will be deemed to have consented to service of process on such stockholder’s counsel except any action
(A) as to which the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware determines that there is an indispensable party not subject to
the jurisdiction of the Court of Chancery (and the indispensable party does not consent to the personal jurisdiction of the Court
of Chancery within ten days following such determination), (B) which is vested in the exclusive jurisdiction of a court or forum
other than the Court of Chancery, or (C) for which the Court of Chancery does not have subject matter jurisdiction. Any person
or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of our capital stock shall be deemed to have notice of and
consented to the forum provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation.
This
choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable
for disputes with us or any of our directors, officers, other employees or stockholders, which may discourage lawsuits with respect
to such claims. Alternatively, if a court were to find the choice of forum provision contained in our amended and restated certificate
of incorporation to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such
action in other jurisdictions, which could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
Our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the exclusive forum provision will be applicable to the fullest
extent permitted by applicable law, subject to certain exceptions. Section 27 of the Exchange Act creates exclusive federal jurisdiction
over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. As
a result, the exclusive forum provision will not apply to suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange
Act or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction. In addition, our amended and restated certificate
of incorporation provides that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts
of the United States of America shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the exclusive forum for the resolution of any
complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder. We note, however, that there is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce this provision and that investors
cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. Section 22 of the Securities
Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for state and federal courts over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created
by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder.
General
Risk Factors
We
are an early stage company with no operating history and no revenue and, accordingly, you have no basis on which to evaluate our
ability to achieve our business objective.
We
are an early stage company with no operating history and no revenue. We will not commence operations until we consummate our initial
business combination. Because we lack an operating history, you have no basis upon which to evaluate our ability to achieve our
business objective of acquiring one or more operating businesses in the insurance industry. We may be unable to complete a business
combination. If we fail to complete a business combination, we will never generate any operating revenues.
Changes
in laws or regulations, or a failure to comply with any laws and regulations, may adversely affect our business, investments and
results of operations.
We
are subject to laws and regulations enacted by national, regional and local governments, including in particular, reporting and
other requirements under the Exchange Act. Compliance with, and monitoring of, applicable laws and regulations may be difficult,
time consuming and costly. Those laws and regulations and their interpretation and application may also change from time to time
and those changes could have a material adverse effect on our business, investments and results of operations. In addition, a
failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations, as interpreted and applied, could result in fines, injunctive relief or
similar remedies which could be costly to us or limit our ability to complete an initial business combination or operate the post-combination
company successfully.
Past
performance by our management team may not be indicative of future performance of an investment in the Company.
Past
performance by our management team is not a guarantee either (i) of success with respect to any business combination we may consummate
or (ii) that we will be able to locate a suitable candidate for our initial business combination. You should not rely on the historical
record of our management team’s performance as indicative of our future performance of an investment in the company or the
returns the company will, or is likely to, generate going forward.
We
are an emerging growth company and a smaller reporting company within the meaning of the Securities Act, and if we take advantage
of certain exemptions from disclosure requirements available to emerging growth companies or smaller reporting companies, this
could make our securities less attractive to investors and may make it more difficult to compare our performance with other public
companies.
We
are an “emerging growth company” within the meaning of the Securities Act, as modified by the JOBS Act, and we may
take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are
not emerging growth companies including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor internal controls attestation
requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our
periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive
compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. As a result, our stockholders
may not have access to certain information they may deem important. We could be an emerging growth company for up to five years,
although circumstances could cause us to lose that status earlier, including if the market value of our Class A common stock held
by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of any June 30 before that time, in which case we would no longer be an emerging growth
company as of the following December 31. We cannot predict whether investors will find our securities less attractive because
we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our securities less attractive as a result of our reliance on these exemptions,
the trading prices of our securities may be lower than they otherwise would be, there may be a less active trading market for
our securities and the trading prices of our securities may be more volatile.
Further,
Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial
accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared
effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised
financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and
comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies but any such election to opt out is irrevocable. We have
elected not to opt out of such extended transition period which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different
application dates for public or private companies, we, as an emerging growth company, can adopt the new or revised standard at
the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard. This may make comparison of our financial statements with another
public company which is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company which has opted out of using the extended
transition period difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used.
Additionally,
we are a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Rule 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K. Smaller reporting companies
may take advantage of certain reduced disclosure obligations, including, among other things, providing only two years of audited
financial statements. We will remain a smaller reporting company until the last day of the fiscal year in which (1) the market
value of our common stock held by non-affiliates exceeds $250 million as of the prior June 30th, or (2) our
annual revenues exceeded $100 million during such completed fiscal year and the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates exceeds
$700 million as of the prior June 30th. To the extent we take advantage of such reduced disclosure obligations, it may also
make comparison of our financial statements with other public companies difficult or impossible.
The
requirements of being a public company may strain our resources and divert management’s attention.
As
a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (which we refer
to as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act), the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (which we refer to as the Dodd-Frank
Act), the listing requirements of Nasdaq and other applicable securities rules and regulations. Compliance with these rules and
regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming or costly
and increase demand on our systems and resources, particularly after we are no longer an “emerging growth company.”
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal
control over financial reporting. In order to maintain and, if required, improve our disclosure controls and procedures and internal
control over financial reporting to meet this standard, significant resources and management oversight may be required. As a result,
management’s attention may be diverted from other business concerns, which could adversely affect our business and operating
results. We may need to hire more employees in the future or engage outside consultants to comply with these requirements, which
will increase our costs and expenses.
In
addition, changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure are creating uncertainty
for public companies, increasing legal and financial compliance costs and making some activities more time consuming. These laws,
regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and, as a result,
their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could
result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure
and governance practices. We intend to invest resources to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards, and this investment
may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management’s time and attention from revenue-generating
activities to compliance activities. If our efforts to comply with new laws, regulations and standards differ from the activities
intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related to their application and practice, regulatory authorities
may initiate legal proceedings against us and our business may be adversely affected.
However,
for as long as we remain an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act, we may take advantage of certain
exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to “emerging growth companies” including, but not
limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure
obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirement
of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not
previously approved. We may take advantage of these reporting exemptions until we are no longer an “emerging growth company.”
We
will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier of (1) the last day of the fiscal year (a) following the fifth anniversary
of the completion of the initial public offering, (b) in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.07 billion, or
(c) in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our shares of common stock that are
held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the prior June 30, and (2) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion
in non-convertible debt during the prior three year period.
We
face risks related to insurance sector companies.
Business
combinations with companies in the insurance sector entail special considerations and risks. If we are successful in completing
a business combination with such a target business, we will be subject to, and possibly adversely affected by, the following risks:
|
●
|
Compliance
with state and governmental regulations and changes in laws and regulations and risks from
investigations and legal proceedings could be costly and could adversely affect operating
results;
|
|
●
|
We
may not be able to obtain regulatory approvals in connection with a business combination
in a timely manner, or at all, and this delay or failure may result in additional expenditures
of money and resources, jeopardize our efforts to consummate a business combination within
required time periods and force us to liquidate;
|
|
●
|
Each
of our target businesses will be subject to extensive regulation, which may adversely affect our ability to achieve our business objectives;
in addition, if a target business fails to comply with these regulations, it may be subject to penalties, including fines and suspensions,
which could reduce our earnings significantly;
|
|
●
|
If
we fail to properly evaluate the financial position and reserves of a target business with
which we enter into a business combination, our losses and benefits from the operation of
that business may exceed our loss and benefit reserves, which could have a significantly
adverse effect on our results of operations;
|
|
●
|
A
downgrade in the claims paying and financial strength ratings of a target business may cause
significant declines in its revenues and earnings;
|
|
●
|
Changes
in market interest rates or in the equity security markets may impair the performance of
a target business’ investments, the sales of its investment products and issuers of
securities held in the portfolio of the target business;
|
|
●
|
The
exclusions and limitations in policies written by a target business may not be enforceable;
|
|
●
|
Cyclical
changes in the property/casualty insurance industry may negatively impact a target business’
results of operations;
|
|
●
|
Catastrophic
losses are unpredictable and may adversely affect the results of operations, liquidity and
financial condition of a target business;
|
|
●
|
Periods
of adverse frequency of losses are unpredictable and may adversely affect the results of
operations, liquidity and financial condition of a target business;
|
|
●
|
Availability
of adequate and cost-effective reinsurance coverage is unpredictable and may adversely affect
the ability of the company to offset excess risks from the balance sheet of a target business;
|
|
●
|
A
target business may be subject to assessments and other surcharges from state guaranty
funds, mandatory reinsurance arrangements and state insurance facilities, which may reduce
or otherwise impair profitability;
|
|
●
|
Reliance
by a target business on information technology and telecommunications systems and the
failure or disruption of these systems could disrupt its operations and adversely affect
its results of operations;
|
|
●
|
If
our target business’ established reserves for insurance claims are insufficient, its
earnings may be reduced or it could suffer losses; and
|
|
●
|
If
a target business is engaged in insurance brokerage, a reduction in insurance premium rates
and commission rates may have an adverse effect on its operations and profits.
|
Any
of the foregoing could have a negative adverse impact on our operations following a business combination. However, our efforts
in identifying prospective target businesses will not be limited to the insurance sector. Accordingly, if we acquire a target
business in another industry, these risks will likely not affect us and we will be subject to other risks attendant with the specific
industry in which we operate or target business which we acquire, none of which can be presently ascertained.