PROPOSAL 4 RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
|
Proposal 4 concerns the ratification of the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending
December 31, 2017.
In accordance with its charter, the Audit Committee has selected the firm of Grant Thornton LLP, a registered public accounting firm, to be our
independent auditor for the year ending December 31, 2017 and, with the endorsement of the Board of Directors, recommends that stockholders ratify such appointment. Grant Thornton LLP
has served in this
capacity since June 6, 2014. We expect that representatives of Grant Thornton LLP will be present at the annual meeting. They will have an
opportunity to make a statement if they wish to do so and, if present, will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
A
majority of the votes properly cast at the annual meeting will be necessary to ratify the selection by the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent
registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2017.
Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote
FOR
the
proposed ratification of the appointment by our Audit Committee of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31,
2017.
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
KVH
Industries,
Inc.
2017
Proxy
Statement
|
|
|
Table of Contents
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
|
Our
executive officers are appointed by, and serve at the discretion of, our Board of Directors. Robert W.B. Kits van Heyningen is the brother of Martin A. Kits van Heyningen. Kathleen Keating, our
senior director of creative and customer experience, is the wife of Martin A. Kits van Heyningen.
Information
regarding Bruce J. Ryan, our Class III director being renominating for election, whose term expires at the 2017 annual meeting, is presented above under the heading "Proposal
1 Election of Directors." Our other directors and executive officers are as follows:
Directors serving a term expiring at the 2018 annual meeting (Class I directors):
|
|
Mark S. Ain
Age: 74
Director
Committee Membership:
➤
Compensation Committee Chairman
➤
Audit Committee Member
➤
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chairman
|
Mark
S. Ain has served as one of our directors since 1997, the Chairman of our Compensation Committee since 1997, a member of our Audit Committee since 2000, a member of our Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee since February 2004 and the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee since February 2015. He serves on the Board of Directors of Kronos Incorporated, which he
founded in 1977 and served as CEO until 2005. Mr. Ain also serves on the Board of Directors of Xcerra Corporation and various other private companies and charitable organizations. He received a
B.S. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and an M.B.A. from the University of Rochester. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee determined that Mr. Ain should serve as a
director because of his 20 years of experience as a member of our Board of Directors combined with his executive and management experience serving as founder, chief executive officer and
Chairman of the Board of Directors of Kronos Incorporated as well as his experience as a member of the Board of Directors of Xcerra Corporation and various private companies.
|
|
|
Stanley K. Honey
Age: 62
Director
Committee Membership:
➤
Audit Committee Member
➤
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Member
|
Stanley
K. Honey has served as one of our directors since 1997 and a member of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee since February 2004. Mr. Honey was a member of the Audit
Committee from 1997 to 2003 and was reappointed in February 2011. Mr. Honey served as the Director of Technology for the America's Cup Event Authority from April 2011 through December 2013, and
as a consultant thereafter. From January 2004 through January 2005, Mr. Honey served as the chief scientist of Sportvision Systems, LLC, which he co-founded in November 1997. He served
as president and chief technology officer of Sportvision Systems, LLC, from 2000 to January 2004 and as its executive vice president and chief technology officer from 1998 to 2000. From 1993 to
1997, Mr. Honey served as executive vice president of technology for the New Technology Group of News Corporation. From 1989 to 1993, Mr. Honey served as president and chief executive
officer of ETAK, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of News Corporation. Mr. Honey founded ETAK in 1983 and served as its executive vice president of engineering until News Corporation
acquired it in 1989. Mr. Honey received a B.S. from Yale University and an M.S. from Stanford University. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee determined that Mr. Honey
should serve as a director because of his 20 years of experience as a member of our Board of Directors as well as his executive and management experience serving in numerous senior level
executive positions, his experience as co-founder of Sportvision Systems, LLC and founder of ETAK and his extensive knowledge of our marine customer base and the industry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KVH
Industries,
Inc.
2017
Proxy
Statement
|
|
15
|
Table of Contents
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Directors serving a term expiring at the 2019 annual meeting (Class II directors):
|
|
Martin A. Kits van Heyningen
Age: 58
President
Chief Executive Officer
Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
Martin
A. Kits van Heyningen, one of our founders, has served as our president and a director since 1982, chief executive officer since 1990, and as our chairman of the Board of Directors since 2007.
From 1980 to 1982, Mr. Kits van Heyningen was employed by the New England Consulting Group, a marketing consulting firm, as a marketing consultant. Mr. Kits van Heyningen received a
B.A., cum laude, from Yale University and has been issued six patents. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee determined that Mr. Kits van Heyningen should serve as a director
because of his more than 30 years of industry experience as well as his executive leadership and management experience as our founder, president, chief executive officer and Chairman of the
Board of Directors.
|
|
|
Charles R. Trimble
Age: 75
Director
Committee Membership:
➤
Audit Committee Member
➤
Compensation Committee Member
➤
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Member
|
Charles
R. Trimble has served as one of our directors since 1999, a member of our Audit Committee since 2001, a member of our Compensation Committee since 2000 and a member of our Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee since February 2004. From 1981 to 1998, he served as the president and chief executive officer of Trimble Navigation Limited, a GPS company that he founded in
1978. Previously, he served as the manager of integrated circuit research and development at Hewlett-Packard's Santa Clara Division. Mr. Trimble is an elected member of the National Academy of
Engineering, and he was Chairman of the United States GPS Industry Council from 1996 to 2013. In addition, Mr. Trimble is a member of the California Institute of Technology (Caltech)
Board of Trustees. He received a B.S. in engineering physics, with honors, and an M.S. in electrical engineering from the California Institute of Technology. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee determined that Mr. Trimble should serve as a director because of his 18 years of experience as a member of our Board of Directors combined with his executive leadership and
management experience as co-founder, president and chief executive officer of Trimble Navigation Limited as well as his experience as an elected member of the National Academy of Engineering, Chairman
of the United States GPS Industry Council and a member of the California Institute of Technology Board of Trustees.
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
KVH
Industries,
Inc.
2017
Proxy
Statement
|
|
|
Table of Contents
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Our executive officers who are not also directors are listed below:
|
|
Donald W. Reilly
Age: 58
Chief Financial Officer
|
Donald W. Reilly
has served as our chief financial officer since December 2016. Before joining us, Mr. Reilly served as vice president, corporate
controller and chief accounting officer of Nortek, Inc., a publicly traded manufacturer and distributor of products and systems for use in building and remodeling homes and commercial
structures, from November 2011 until its acquisition by Melrose Industries PLC in September 2016. From January 2011 to November 2011, Mr. Reilly served as chief financial officer of
Evergreen Solar, Inc., a publicly traded manufacturer of solar panels, wafers and cells. In August 2011, Evergreen Solar filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under the United States
Bankruptcy Code. From 2000 until January 2011, Mr. Reilly held several senior financial positions at GTECH Corporation, a gaming technology and services company acquired by Lottomatica, SpA in
August 2006 (and now part of International Game Technology PLC), including chief financial officer of GTECH from June 2007 to January 2011 and vice president of business and financial planning
from 2000 to 2007. Before joining GTECH, Mr. Reilly served as vice president and chief financial officer of Amtrol, Inc., a manufacturer of water system solutions and HVAC products, from
1998 to 2000 and as corporate controller and director of finance for A.T. Cross Company, a publicly traded manufacturer and distributor of fine writing instruments, from 1992 to 1997.
Mr. Reilly began his career at Ernst & Young LLP, where he served as a senior audit manager in Providence, Rhode Island and later at its national office in Cleveland, Ohio. He
holds a B.S. in accounting from Providence college and is a certified public accountant in Rhode Island.
|
|
Brent C. Bruun
Age: 51
Chief Operating Officer
|
Brent
C. Bruun has served as our chief operating officer since July 2016. From November 2012 to June 2016, Mr. Bruun served as our executive vice president of mobile broadband. From January
2011 to November 2012, he served as our senior vice president of global sales and business development. He served as our vice president of global sales and business development from July 2008 to
December 2010. From January 2008 until joining KVH, Mr. Bruun worked as a private consultant. From January 2007 until January 2008, Mr. Bruun served as senior vice president of strategic
initiatives for SES AMERICOM, a satellite operator providing services via its fleet of 16 geosynchronous satellites covering North America. In this position, he concentrated on global mobile broadband
opportunities with particular emphasis on the maritime and aeronautical markets. Other positions held at SES AMERICOM included president of Americom's Managed Solutions Division from July 2004 until
December 2006 and senior vice president of business development from July 2002 until June 2004. Previously, Mr. Bruun held positions at KPMG LLP and General Electric. Mr. Bruun
holds a B.S. in accounting from Alfred University and is a certified public accountant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KVH
Industries,
Inc.
2017
Proxy
Statement
|
|
17
|
Table of Contents
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
|
|
Daniel R. Conway
Age: 63
Executive Vice President, Guidance and Stabilization
|
Daniel
R. Conway has served as our executive vice president of guidance and stabilization since November 2012. From January 2003 to November 2012, he served as our vice president of business
development for military and industrial products. From March 2000 to December 2002, Mr. Conway was the vice president of sales and marketing at BENTHOS Inc., an oceanographic technology
company with customers in the marine, oil and gas, government and scientific markets. From 1980 to January 2000, he served in a variety of positions at Anteon (formerly Analysis & Technology),
including vice president for new business development and acquisition integration from 1997 to January 2000 and vice president of operations for the Newport, Rhode Island operation from 1991 to 1997.
Mr. Conway served for five years as a member of the U.S. Navy nuclear submarine force and was a Commander in the U.S. Naval Reserve (Naval Intelligence) for more than 10 years. He is a
graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy with post-graduate studies in nuclear engineering, and he received an M.B.A. from the University of Rhode Island.
|
|
Robert J. Balog
Age: 53
Senior Vice President, Engineering
|
Robert
J. Balog has served as our senior vice president of engineering since October 2008. Previously, he served as our vice president of engineering, satellite products from February 2005 to October
2008. From June 2003 to January 2005, Mr. Balog served as president of his own engineering contract services company, Automation Services, Inc., a contract product development and
services group specializing in a wide range of automation solutions. From June 2001 to May 2003, Mr. Balog served as vice president of engineering at ADE Corporation. From 1989 to April 2001,
Mr. Balog held a number of positions at Speedline Technologies, Inc., a supplier of capital equipment to the electronics assembly industry, including general manager and vice president
of research and development. He has served on the Board of Directors of the Surface Mount Equipment Manufacturers Association, serving as Chairman and numerous other positions. Mr. Balog is the
recipient of 11 U.S. patents. Mr. Balog holds a B.S. in Computer Science from Purdue University.
|
|
|
Felise B. Feingold
Age: 47
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
|
Felise
B. Feingold has served as our vice president and general counsel since August 2007. Before joining us, from January 2004 until July 2007, she held the position of vice president and general
counsel for The Jean Coutu Group (PJC) USA, Inc., which operated the Brooks/Eckerd pharmacy chain, comprising more than 1,800 stores. Her other experience includes six years, from September
1998 to December 2004, as an attorney with the international law firm of McDermott, Will & Emery. Ms. Feingold holds a B.A. in government from Cornell University, a J.D. from Hofstra
University School of Law, and an M.B.A. from Boston University Graduate School of Management.
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
KVH
Industries,
Inc.
2017
Proxy
Statement
|
|
|
Table of Contents
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Overview of Executive Compensation Program
Our executive compensation program is overseen and administered by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors, which is comprised entirely of
independent directors as determined in accordance with various NASDAQ Stock Market, Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, and Internal Revenue Code rules. None of its members is a current or
former employee of ours. It is the goal of the Compensation Committee to create policies and practices that provide total compensation for executive officers that is fair, reasonable and competitive.
The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter adopted by our Board.
All
principal elements of compensation paid to our executive officers are subject to approval by the Compensation Committee. Specifically, our Board has delegated authority to the Compensation
Committee to determine and approve (1) our compensation philosophy, including evaluating risk management and incentives that create risk, (2) annual base salaries, cash-based incentive
compensation and equity-based compensation for our executive officers, and (3) equity-based compensation for our non-executive employees.
There
are no material differences in the compensation policies, objectives or program elements and administration for our named executive officers, except that the compensation for our President,
Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of the Board of Directors, or CEO, is determined exclusively by the Compensation Committee, whereas the compensation of our other named executive officers is
determined by the Compensation Committee but also takes into account the recommendations of our CEO.
Executive Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
Our executive compensation program is designed to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified executives and align their interests with the interests of our
stockholders. The ultimate goal of our executive compensation program is to increase stockholder value by providing executives with appropriate incentives to achieve
our business goals. In recent years, our executive compensation program has had three principal elements: annual base salary, annual cash-based incentive compensation, and long-term equity-based
compensation.
Our
executive compensation objectives are to:
-
-
offer fair and competitive compensation that attracts and retains superior executive talent;
-
-
directly and substantially link rewards to measurable corporate performance;
-
-
align the interests of executive officers with those of stockholders by providing executive officers with an equity stake in our company;
-
-
optimize the cost to the company and value to executives; and
-
-
promote long-term career commitments that support a long-standing internal culture of loyalty and dedication to our interests.
The
three principal elements of our executive compensation program seek to provide the following rewards:
-
-
Base salaries provide fixed compensation to reward the individual value that an executive officer brings to us through experience and past and
expected future contributions to our success, while factoring in our specific needs and comparable responsibilities at similar organizations.
-
-
Annual cash-based incentive compensation is designed to reward the achievement of our pre-established annual business and financial goals
generally set at the beginning of each year, as well as individual performance, determined on a discretionary basis. This incentive program generally awards compensation based on the degree to which
our actual financial results meet the financial goals of our internal business plan and on the individual performance of each executive. In recent years, our annual incentive compensation program has
been designed to reward achievement of specific targets for internal financial metrics, such as revenue and adjusted EBITDA, over which our executives have more direct control, rather than external
metrics, such as stock price performance or total shareholder return, which are influenced by factors extrinsic to our performance, such as broad market trends or the performance of our industry or
competitors, over which our executives have no direct control.
-
-
Equity grants are designed to reward the achievement of long-term growth in our stock price and retain our executives. Restricted stock awards
were granted with no payment of cash consideration. The restricted stock awards vest in four equal annual installments, the first of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KVH
Industries,
Inc.
2017
Proxy
Statement
|
|
19
|
Table of Contents
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
which
vested on February 17, 2017, the first anniversary of the grant date.
For
a company of our size, we believe that the use of these executive compensation elements strengthens our ability to attract and retain highly qualified executives. We believe this combination of
programs provides an appropriate mix of fixed and variable pay, balances short-term operational performance with long-term stockholder value, and encourages executive recruitment and retention.
Our
equity incentive program is a key retention tool and our vehicle for offering long-term incentives. Equity incentives with four-year vesting periods are granted annually to executive officers to
attract, motivate and retain these executives. We grant equity incentives to executive officers to encourage executive officers to work with a long-term view in the interest of stockholders and to
reward the achievement of long-term growth in our stock price. We believe that granting equity incentives is the best method of motivating the executive officers to perform in a manner that is
consistent with the long-term interests of our stockholders.
We
do not use certain executive pay practices that stockholder advocates consider to be problematic. For example, we do not provide extensive perquisites to our named executive officers, we do not
have long-term employment agreements or change-of-control agreements, we do not have guaranteed severance programs, and we do not provide any tax gross-ups. We have no guaranteed salary increases, no
guaranteed bonuses and no cash-based incentive compensation programs that are not tied to our performance.
The
Compensation Committee also noted that, at our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders, which is the most recent meeting at which our stockholders conducted a "say on pay" vote, our stockholders
approved the compensation of our named executive officers for 2013 by a favorable vote of approximately 95% of the votes cast. Partially as a result of this overwhelmingly positive stockholder
feedback, our Compensation Committee has continued to employ compensation packages having a similar basic structure to the compensation package used in 2013.
Compensation Decision-making Process
Our executives are compensated principally through a combination of base salary, cash-based incentive compensation paid in the first quarter of the following
year and an annual equity grant. In addition, we may also grant an initial equity award to new executive officers when they commence employment. From time to time, we may offer a signing or retention
bonus to attract a new executive officer.
The
base salary and equity award for each executive, together with the overall cash-based incentive
compensation
plan for all executives, are generally established within the first quarter of each fiscal year at meetings of the Compensation Committee held for this purpose. These meetings generally
follow one or more informal presentations or discussions of our financial performance, including achievement of performance targets, for the prior fiscal year and an internal business plan for the
then-current fiscal year for goal-setting purposes. The annual performance goals actually used for the cash-incentive compensation plan for 2016 were presented to the Compensation Committee in March
2016 but for administrative reasons the Compensation Committee did not formally approve the final form of the plan until July 2016. In deciding the compensation to be awarded to the executive officers
other than the CEO for the current year and cash-based incentive compensation earned during the prior fiscal year, the Compensation Committee typically reviews and evaluates recommendations from the
CEO. The CEO and the members of the Compensation Committee discuss the CEO's recommendations. In deciding the compensation to be awarded to the CEO for the current year and the cash-based incentive
compensation earned by the CEO during the prior year, the Compensation Committee typically receives a written self-assessment from the CEO and recommendations from the Chairman of the Compensation
Committee. The members of the Compensation
Committee then discuss the Chairman's recommendations. The CEO is not present at the time of these deliberations. The Compensation Committee may accept or adjust any recommendations, and the
Compensation Committee makes all final compensation decisions.
Our
cash-based incentive compensation program comprises corporate performance goals and, for executives in charge of business units, business unit performance goals, as well as a discretionary element
of individual performance for all executives. Under this program, our Compensation Committee approved two formulas for 2016: one formula for executive officers responsible for our mobile broadband and
guidance and stabilization business units and one formula for other executive officers. For executive officers in charge of business units, the Compensation Committee desired to tie their incentive
compensation more directly to the performance of their respective business units. For executives in charge of a business unit, 50% of each executive's target incentive compensation was based on the
degree of achievement of applicable business unit performance goals for 2016, 25% was based on the degree of achievement of our corporate performance goals for 2016, and 25% was based on individual
performance, as determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion. In 2016, the mobile broadband business unit was led by a named executive officer, but the guidance and stabilization
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
KVH
Industries,
Inc.
2017
Proxy
Statement
|
|
|
Table of Contents
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
business
unit was not. Accordingly, this discussion and analysis does not further address the performance of the guidance and stabilization business unit. For other executive officers, 75% of each
executive's target incentive compensation was based on the degree of achievement of our corporate performance goals for 2016 and 25% was based on individual performance, as determined by the
Compensation Committee in its discretion. The performance portions of the cash-based incentive compensation program are generally based on formulas approved by the Compensation Committee at the start
of each year, but the Compensation Committee has the discretion to award incentive compensation that differs from the formula-based amounts.
Compensation Consultant
Since 2005, the Compensation Committee has engaged Radford as its independent compensation consultant. The Compensation Committee has engaged Radford to
advise on matters related to our executive compensation program and to assist in creating an effective and competitive executive compensation program. In 2016, Radford assisted the Compensation
Committee by providing comparative market data on compensation practices and programs based on an analysis of executive compensation data.
Radford
also provided guidance on industry best practices. In 2016, Radford advised the Compensation Committee in (1) determining base salaries for executives, (2) determining the
targets for total cash-based incentive compensation as a percentage of base salary, and (3) designing and determining individual equity grants for the long-term incentive plan for executives.
Radford's
competitive assessment in the 2016 report with respect to base salary, cash-based incentive compensation and equity-based compensation was taken into consideration by the Compensation
Committee when setting base salaries and making changes to the cash-based incentive compensation and equity-based compensation components of the executive compensation program for 2016. Neither
Radford nor any of its affiliates provided any services to us in 2016 other than Radford's services to the Compensation Committee.
Survey Data
With the assistance of Radford, the Compensation Committee compared our executive officers' compensation to data from the Radford Global Technology Survey,
which included approximately 107 public high technology companies as of October 1, 2015 with revenues between $50 million and $300 million and median revenue of approximately
$178 million.
Compensation Benchmarking Relative to Market
In 2016, the Compensation Committee relied on information provided by Radford in early 2016 for purposes of benchmarking our executive compensation relative
to market. Radford provided the Compensation Committee with a comparison of the compensation of our executives to the compensation of executives in benchmark positions with similar titles and level of
experience for the most recently available period as of October 1, 2015. The comparison did not consider executive tenure, skill or performance. The Radford data reviewed by the Compensation
Committee included market data taken from the aforementioned survey data, which was gathered at the 25
th
, 50
th
, and 75
th
percentiles for
(1) base salaries, (2) short-term incentive opportunity, (3) target total cash compensation (base salary plus short-term incentive opportunity), (4) long-term incentives
(Black-Scholes value of stock options and full value of other awards), and (5) target total direct compensation (target total cash compensation and long-term incentives).
Historically,
the Compensation Committee has generally targeted approximately the median base salary level (50
th
percentile) of the base salaries of executives in the survey data
used by the Compensation Committee as the
basis for comparison. Adjustments to the median base salary levels were made in 2016 based on comparisons to the survey data, market median salary increases and evaluation of other factors, such as
executive tenure, skill and performance relative to expectations for average performance for comparable executives, which are not reflected in the survey data. These factors reflected the value each
individual brought to us through experience, education and training, our specific needs, and the individual's past and expected future contributions to our success. Radford advised the Compensation
Committee that base salary levels are considered to be competitive if they fall within 10% of the desired market position. In 2016, the Compensation Committee concluded that our 2015 base salaries for
our named executive officers, other than the CFO, approximated the market 50
th
percentile for most executives, ranging from 7% below to 1% above the
50
th
percentile of the survey data for their respective positions. The CFO's base salary approximated the 25th percentile of the survey data for his position, which was 11%
below the 50th percentile of the survey data.
The
Compensation Committee believes that benchmarking and aligning base salaries is especially critical to a competitive compensation program. Other elements of our compensation are affected by
changes in base salary. For example, our annual cash-based incentive compensation is targeted and paid out as a percentage of base salary.
Our
compensation program allows executives to participate in an annual cash-based incentive compensation program.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KVH
Industries,
Inc.
2017
Proxy
Statement
|
|
21
|
Table of Contents
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Consistent
with prior years, the payouts for our executives for achieving the expected level of corporate performance for 2016 (as a percentage of base salary) were targeted at approximately the
median (50
th
percentile) of payouts for executives in the survey data reviewed by the Compensation Committee in 2016. Radford advised the Compensation Committee that cash-based
incentive compensation targets are considered to be competitive if they fall within 15% of the desired market position. As a percentage of base salary, targets for cash-based incentive compensation
for the named executive officers for 2015, other than one executive in charge of a business unit, were approximately 10% below the 50
th
percentile of the survey data for their
respective positions. The Compensation Committee regarded these targets, as a percentage of base salary, as competitive with the market and therefore made no changes to these targets, as a percentage
of base salary, from 2015 to 2016. The target for the remaining named executive officer for 2015 was approximately 45% below the 50
th
percentile of the survey data for his
position. In the case of this named executive officer, the Compensation Committee decided to increase his target for cash-based incentive compensation for 2016 from 50% of base salary to 60% of base
salary, which approximated the 25
th
percentile for his position.
Our
compensation program allows executives to receive equity incentive awards under our equity incentive plans. Our primary goal is to create long-term value for stockholders, and accordingly the
Compensation Committee believes that equity incentive awards provide an additional incentive to executive officers to work to maximize stockholder value. In 2014, 2015, and 2016, all named executive
officers other than the CEO received the same quantity of equity awards, as their roles and responsibilities were valued at an equivalent level. The Compensation Committee believed that granting
equity incentives in this manner was the best method of motivating our executive team to perform in a manner consistent with the long-term interests of our stockholders. The CEO typically receives a
larger equity award because he has greater responsibility for achieving our long-term goals and improving stockholder value. Radford advised the Compensation Committee that Radford considers long-term
incentive values to be competitive if they fall within 30% of the desired market position. The grant date fair values of the equity awards granted to our named executive officers in 2015 were below
the 25
th
percentile of the survey data and ranged from
approximately 47% below to 57%below the 50
th
percentile of the survey data. In light of this information, the Compensation Committee decided to target grant date fair values of
equity awards closer to the median of the survey data than those of the restricted stock awards granted in 2014 and 2015. However, because the market price of our common stock on the date of grant in
2016
was substantially lower than its market price on the date of grant of the 2015 awards, increasing the grant date fair values of restricted stock awards required increasing the number of shares
subject to the awards. In deciding the number of restricted stock awards to grant, the Compensation Committee took into account the number of shares available for grant under our equity compensation
plans and our historical burn rate for grants under those plans, which together placed certain limitations on the size of any increase in the number of restricted stock awards. As a result of this
combination of factors, the grant date fair value of the 2016 awards was only slightly higher than the grant date fair value of the 2015 awards (and was below the grant date fair value of the 2014
awards). Despite the increase in the number of shares subject to the 2016 awards, the grant date fair value of those awards remained below the 25
th
percentile of the survey data
reviewed by the committee (which reflected data regarding grants in 2015) for each position, including the CEO, and ranged from approximately 46% below to 54%below the
50
th
percentile of the survey data.
Base Salary
The Compensation Committee defines base salary as the annualized regular cash compensation of an employee, excluding cash bonus awards, corporate
contributions to employee benefit plans, and other compensation not designated as salary. As described above, base salaries are set for our named executive officers at a meeting of our Compensation
Committee which is held for that purpose in the first quarter of the year.
In
establishing base salaries for our named executive officers for 2016, the Compensation Committee took into account the value each individual brings to us through experience, education and training,
our specific needs and the individual's past and expected future contributions to our success, as well as our overall corporate performance, the market guidance from the Radford survey data and the
recommendations of our CEO (for named executive officers other than himself). The Compensation Committee also considered appropriate cost-of-living adjustments. For 2016, the Compensation Committee
made a 3% cost-of-living adjustment to the base salaries of our named executive officers, as well as other small merit increases. For 2016, the adjustment to salaries for our named executive officers,
other than our CFO, was an increase equal to approximately 3% of base salary for 2015, and the adjustment for our CFO was an increase of 4% of base salary for 2015. These adjustments were effective
January 1, 2016. In addition, one executive also received an increase in his salary in connection with his promotion to Chief Operating Officer in July 2016 based on competitive market data for
the Chief Operating Officer position
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
KVH
Industries,
Inc.
2017
Proxy
Statement
|
|
|
Table of Contents
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
provided
by Radford in its Radford Global Technology Survey dated April 2016.
Annual Cash-based Incentive Compensation
Our management incentive plan is designed to reward our executives for the achievement of annual goals, principally, achievement of corporate financial goals,
and, secondarily, achievement of individual goals. It is our philosophy that the executives be rewarded for their performance as a team. We believe this is important to align our executive officers'
interests with strong corporate performance and to promote cooperation among them. The executives also are rewarded for achieving individual goals for the year.
Formula for Cash-based Incentive Compensation
The management incentive plan for 2016 was adopted based on our historical financial performance, planned strategic initiatives and the existing economic
environment. Annual cash-based incentive compensation opportunities as a percentage of base salary were targeted at 90% of base salary for the CEO and 35% to 55% of base salary for the other named
executive officers. In 2016, we only had one named executive officer responsible for a business unit, the mobile broadband business unit. The Compensation Committee approved two formulas for
calculating the cash-based incentive compensation with respect to the named executive officers, one formula for the executive responsible for our mobile broadband business unit and one formula for all
other named executive officers. The incentive compensation formula for the executive in charge of our mobile broadband business unit for 2016 was based 50% on mobile broadband business unit
performance goals, 25% on corporate performance goals and 25% on individual performance. The formula for determining the bonus of all other named executive officers was based 75% on corporate
performance goals and 25% on individual performance. The formula for the executive in charge of the mobile broadband business unit gave significantly greater weight to the performance of the mobile
broadband business unit, rather than overall corporate performance, in order to emphasis his unique responsibility for the success of that unit.
The
portion of the bonus based on corporate performance was based on the degree of achievement of our corporate goals for (i) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization,
acquisition-related expenses, equity-based compensation expenses, and any one-time charges approved by the Compensation Committee, or adjusted EBITDA, and (ii) revenue. Our corporate goal for
adjusted EBITDA was $26.6 million, and our corporate goal
for revenue was $206.1 million. The threshold for payment of the portion of the bonus for corporate performance for the
named
executive officers was our achievement of 75% of the adjusted EBITDA target, and at this level of achievement, 50% of the target bonus for corporate performance would have been earned. The bonus
payment for corporate performance would have been 100% for the named executive officers if we had achieved 100% of our target for adjusted EBITDA. The bonus payment would have increased if we had
exceeded our target for corporate revenue by 5%. The maximum bonus payment for corporate performance would have been awarded if we had exceeded the targets for adjusted EBITDA and revenue by 25% and
15%, respectively, in which case the payment would have been 233% of the target bonus for corporate performance. The portion of the bonus plan based on achieving mobile broadband business unit
performance goals used the same general structure as the portion based on corporate performance goals but was based on the degree of achievement of that business unit's goals for (i) business
unit profit, which was defined as business unit revenue less cost of goods sold and direct operating expenses attributable to the operation of that business unit, but without deductions for
depreciation, amortization, acquisition-related expenses, equity-based compensation expenses, or any one-time charges approved by the Compensation Committee, and without any allocation for corporate
engineering, marketing or administrative costs, and (ii) revenue. Our goal for mobile broadband business unit profit was $18.8 million, and our goal for mobile broadband business unit
revenue was $118.1 million. The Compensation Committee selected adjusted EBITDA, business unit profit and revenue as performance measures because it believed that adjusted EBITDA, business unit
profit and revenue are strong operating measurements of how well or poorly we performed from a financial standpoint in 2016. The Compensation Committee believed that sufficient increases in adjusted
EBITDA, business unit profit and revenue should have a favorable impact on the value of our common stock, considering the degree to which improvements in these metrics typically influence the
valuations of investors and stock market analysts.
The
portion of the bonus based on individual performance for named executive officers was based solely on the discretion of the Compensation Committee.
Incentive Compensation Awarded
The Compensation Committee awarded incentive compensation for 2016 based on its assessment of the degree of achievement of performance goals for 2016, as well
as individual performance in that year.
The
Compensation Committee determined that we did not achieve our corporate minimum targets for revenue or adjusted EBITDA. The Compensation Committee determined that we achieved 85% of our target for
mobile
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KVH
Industries,
Inc.
2017
Proxy
Statement
|
|
23
|
Table of Contents
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
broadband
business unit revenue and 80% of our target for mobile broadband business unit profit. Accordingly, based on the sliding scale used in our 2016 non-equity incentive plan, the Compensation
Committee did not make any awards with respect to the portion of each named executive officer's incentive compensation target attributable to corporate performance and awarded 75% of the portion of
the one named executive officer's incentive compensation target attributable to mobile broadband business unit performance. Individual performance bonuses were awarded based on the Compensation
Committee's consideration of qualitative factors (such as the executive's contribution to corporate results and attainment of business unit goals); contribution towards strategic initiatives; and
other priorities. Bonuses awarded for individual performance for the named executive officers ranged from
96%
to 100% of individual performance targets. Accordingly, total cash-based incentive compensation actually awarded to the named executive officers for 2016 performance was, in the case of our CEO,
22% of his base salary, rather than the targeted 90% of base salary, and, in the case of our other named executive officers (excluding our CFO, who did not participate in the plan), ranged from
approximately 9% to 34% of their respective base salaries, rather than the targeted range of 35% to 55% of their respective base salaries. The following table provides information regarding the target
non-equity incentive compensation for our named executive officers participating in the 2016 plan and the amount of non-equity incentive compensation actually awarded to them under the plan.
2016 Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Named Executive Officers (excluding CFOs)
|
|
|
Target ($)
|
|
|
Actual ($)
|
|
Martin A. Kits van Heyningen
|
|
|
432,721
|
|
|
108,180
|
|
Brent C. Bruun
|
|
|
171,194
|
|
|
106,624
|
|
Robert J. Balog
|
|
|
110,221
|
|
|
26,453
|
|
Felise B. Feingold
|
|
|
92,273
|
|
|
23,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In
determining the individual performance bonus for each named executive officer, the Compensation Committee considers individual achievements throughout the year. The following summarizes some of the
individual achievements of our named executive officers considered by the Compensation Committee in determining the amounts awarded for individual performance for 2016:
Martin A. Kits van Heyningen, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
|
-
➤
-
Continued strong leadership and vision for the company, both in the industry
and internally, including the creation of strategic growth initiatives for 2017 and a 2020 vision.
-
➤
-
Strong focus on new product development, including future technology platforms
to support our strategic growth initiatives.
-
➤
-
Led the transformation of KVH's leadership/organizational structure and
processes to position KVH for future growth.
-
➤
-
Recruited a new CFO with strong public company financial experience.
Brent C. Bruun, Chief Operating Officer
|
-
➤
-
Finalized an agreement with Intelsat and began overseeing our transition to
the next generation platform for our mini-VSAT service.
-
➤
-
Implemented plans to increase the growth rate of our mini-VSAT service with
improved user tools and new service plan designs with new subscribers added to the mini-VSAT network.
-
➤
-
Positioned IP-MobileCast for success in the market with a net increase in
subscribers, new service models, and cross-selling initiatives.
-
➤
-
Developed an innovative and competitive subscription-based service offering to
attract new customers to our mini-VSAT network.
-
➤
-
Improved coordination and success of cross-selling efforts with training
solutions and media content with organizational and process changes.
Robert J. Balog, Senior Vice President, Engineering
|
-
➤
-
Our new product lifecycle management system has been completed and is now a
standard part of our product development ISO process.
-
➤
-
Rolled out automated test process which allows real-time performance
monitoring of our mini-VSAT products.
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
KVH
Industries,
Inc.
2017
Proxy
Statement
|
|
|
Table of Contents
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
-
➤
-
Expanded our automated test methodology for product development and
performance monitoring.
-
➤
-
Improved predictability and reliability of our process for development and
introduction of new products
-
➤
-
Successfully managed engineering resources within budget to achieve competing
development goals
Felise B. Feingold, Vice President and General Counsel
|
-
➤
-
Achieved continued success in her role as partner and advisor to senior
management on legal and compliance matters
-
➤
-
Sucessfully guided management through numerous contract negotiations critical
to our future
-
➤
-
Led effort to enhance our compliance program for the international legal
environment in which we operate
-
➤
-
Assumed greater responsibility for achieving a successful outcome in numerous
human resource compliance matters
Equity Incentive Program
As noted above, for 2016, the Compensation Committee decided to grant restricted stock awards to our named executive officers other than the CEO with grant
date fair values closer to the median of the survey data than those of the restricted stock awards granted in 2014 and 2015 in order to bring the value of the awards closer to our goals for
competitive compensation, while keeping in mind the total number of shares available for grant and our historical burn rate. The equity grant to our CEO in 2016 was based upon the Radford survey data
for grants to other chief executive officers, the CEO's prior performance, the value of equity awards previously granted and unvested, the importance of retaining the CEO's services and the CEO's
total target direct compensation relative to the applicable benchmark. When granting equity incentives to our other named executive officers in 2016, a team approach was utilized. In 2016, consistent
with the approach used in 2015, all named executive officers other
than the CEO received the same equity awards, as their roles and responsibilities were valued at an equivalent level. The Compensation Committee believed that granting equity incentives in this manner
was the best method of motivating our executive team to perform in a manner consistent with the long-term interests of our stockholders. The CEO received a larger award because he has greater
responsibility for setting the strategy and priorites for achieving our long-term goals.
Timing of Equity Grants
We typically grant equity incentives to executives in the first quarter of each fiscal year, usually in conjunction with the annual review of the individual
and collective performance of our executive officers.
We
grant restricted stock awards or stock options to new hires on a case-by-case basis. In addition, we typically grant restricted stock awards or stock options to certain non-executive employees each
year.
Vesting of Equity Awards
Restricted stock awards are granted with no payment of cash consideration. The restricted stock awards granted to our named executive officers in 2016 vest in
four equal annual installments, the first of which vested on February 17, 2017, the first anniversary of the grant date.
Other Compensation and Perquisites
Our named executive officers are eligible to receive the same health and welfare benefits that are available to other employees in the same jurisdiction and a
contribution to their benefit premium that is the same percentage as provided to other employees in the same jurisdiction. These benefit programs include health and
dental insurance, life insurance, supplemental life insurance, and long-term disability insurance, and certain other benefits. In general, our employees pay between 30% and 34% of the health insurance
premium due.
We
maintain an Employee Stock Purchase Plan and a tax-qualified 401(k) plan, which provides for broad-based employee participation. Under the 401(k) plan, all of our U.S. employees, including
executive officers, are eligible to receive matching contributions from us. We match 50% of all employee 401(k) plan contributions up to 6% of salary, with no maximum annual corporate match per
employee. We do not provide defined benefit pension plans or defined contribution retirement plans to our named executive officers or other U.S. employees other than the 401(k) plan.
We
provided automobile and/or housing allowances to three named executive officers in 2016. Martin A. Kits van Heyningen's automobile allowance was $20,023 and Robert J. Balog's automobile allowance
was $6,000. Brent C. Bruun received $15,000 in 2016 for automobile and housing allowances. No other named executive officers received any other perquisites or other personal benefits or
property from us during 2016.
Compensation Recovery
We are currently entitled to recover compensation paid to certain named executive officers pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Our 2016 Equity and
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KVH
Industries,
Inc.
2017
Proxy
Statement
|
|
25
|
Table of Contents
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
also
includes broad rights to recover both cash and equity incentives awarded under the plan. Specifically, the 2016 Equity and Incentive Plan provides that all awards under the plan are subject to
recoupment or clawback of compensation under any provision of applicable law, any term of any award agreement and any policy that we may adopt from time to time. The administrator is entitled to take
whatever action it determines to be necessary or appropriate to recover all or any portion of an award or any stock, payment or other compensation acquired or received in respect of that award arising
or resulting from any misconduct, accounting restatement to correct an error, or any other miscalculation, error or mistake.
Equity Ownership by Executives
We do not currently have a formal stock ownership requirement for executives or any related hedging policies. However, stock ownership by executives is
encouraged on a voluntary basis. Each of our executive officers holds both vested and unvested stock options and restricted stock awards to the extent shown in the table entitled "Outstanding Equity
Awards as of December 31, 2016." The Compensation Committee reviews the vested and unvested stock options and restricted stock awards held by the executives each year.
Tax and Accounting Considerations
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits our ability to deduct annual compensation in excess of $1,000,000 that is paid to each of our CEO
and our three
most
highly paid executive officers (other than the CEO and the CFO), unless that compensation is "performance-based" within the meaning of Section 162(m) and the regulations promulgated there
under. The restricted stock awards that we granted in 2016 under our Amended and Restated 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, or the 2006 Plan, did not qualify as performance-based compensation. We believe
that all of our stock options do so qualify and therefore are not subject to the deduction limitation of Section 162(m). The salary and bonuses paid to our executive officers are not exempt
from this deduction limit. Accordingly, we may be unable to deduct some of the amounts that may be recognized as ordinary income by our executive officers.
We
consider tax deductibility in the design and administration of our executive officer compensation plans and programs. However, we believe that it is in the best interests of our stockholders that
we retain flexibility and discretion to make compensation awards, whether or not deductible, when such awards are consistent with our strategic goals.
Rules
under generally accepted accounting principles determine the manner in which we account for grants of equity-based compensation to our employees in our consolidated financial statements. Our
accounting policies for equity-based compensation are further discussed in note 7 of our audited consolidated financial statements in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2016, as filed with the SEC on March 9, 2017.
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
KVH
Industries,
Inc.
2017
Proxy
Statement
|
|
|
Table of Contents
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
(1)
|
The
Compensation Committee established by our Board of Directors is currently composed of Messrs. Ain, Ryan and Trimble. Our Board of Directors adopted a charter for the Compensation Committee
in April 2004, which was most recently revised in February 2017. Under the charter, the Compensation Committee is responsible for recommending to the Board the compensation philosophy and policies
that we should follow, particularly with respect to the compensation of the members of our senior management. The Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving the compensation of our executive
officers, including our Chief Executive Officer. In addition, the Board has delegated to the Committee the authority to administer, review and make recommendations with respect to our incentive
compensation plans and our equity-based plans.
The
Compensation Committee has submitted the following report for inclusion in this proxy statement:
Our
Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this proxy statement. Based on our Committee's review of, and the discussions with
management with respect to
the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, our Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and incorporated by reference in our
company's annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Committee
|
|
|
Mark S. Ain (Chairman)
Bruce J. Ryan
Charles R. Trimble
|
-
(1)
-
The material in this report is not soliciting material, is not deemed filed with the SEC
and is not incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made on, before, or after the date
of this proxy statement and irrespective of any incorporation language in such filing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KVH
Industries,
Inc.
2017
Proxy
Statement
|
|
27
|
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation Table For 2016
The following table provides information concerning the compensation earned by our CEO, our current CFO, our former CFO, our former interim
CFO and each of our three most highly compensated executive officers other than the CEO and CFO (collectively, "named executive officers") during 2016. In addition, we are providing information
regarding the compensation earned by Robert W.B. Kits van Heyningen, who during 2016 served as a member of our Board of Directors and is the brother of Martin A. Kits van Heyningen, our President,
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors. We are treating Robert W.B. Kits van Heyningen as a "named executive officer" for purposes of our executive compensation disclosures
(other than the Compensation Discussion and Analysis) in lieu of the information that we would otherwise provide in response to the disclosure requirements for director compensation and related-party
transactions.
In
2016, the salary and bonus (including the non-equity incentive plan compensation) of our named executive officers as a percentage of total compensation ranged from 61% to 68%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Salary
($)
|
|
|
Bonus
($)
(1)
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
($)
(2)
|
|
|
Option
Awards
($)
(3)
|
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
(4)
|
|
|
All Other
Compensation
($)
(5)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
Martin A. Kits van Heyningen
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
480,801
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
437,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,180
|
|
|
20,023
|
|
|
1,047,004
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
466,797
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
426,348
|
|
|
309,837
|
|
|
23,600
|
|
|
1,227,582
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
453,202
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
623,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,773
|
|
|
18,418
|
|
|
1,188,007
|
|
Donald W. Reilly
(6)
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
9,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,863
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brent C. Bruun
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
311,261
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
174,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,624
|
|
|
22,950
|
|
|
616,635
|
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
266,560
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
168,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,959
|
|
|
22,950
|
|
|
562,296
|
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
257,546
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
181,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,584
|
|
|
20,238
|
|
|
491,264
|
|
Robert J. Balog
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
275,552
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
174,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,453
|
|
|
13,950
|
|
|
491,755
|
|
Senior Vice President, Engineering
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
267,526
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
168,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,920
|
|
|
13,898
|
|
|
530,173
|
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
259,454
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
181,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,351
|
|
|
11,360
|
|
|
477,061
|
|
Felise B. Feingold
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
263,636
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
174,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,072
|
|
|
6,035
|
|
|
468,543
|
|
Vice President, General Counsel
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
255,957
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
168,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,080
|
|
|
6,047
|
|
|
497,912
|
|
Robert W.B. Kits van Heyningen
(9)
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
142,177
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
174,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,708
|
|
|
323,685
|
|
Vice President, Research and
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
251,844
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
168,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,804
|
|
|
6,557
|
|
|
491,032
|
|
Development and Director
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
244,245
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
181,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,234
|
|
|
4,928
|
|
|
451,303
|
|
Peter A. Rendall
(7)
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
140,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
174,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,210
|
|
|
319,336
|
|
Former Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
274,404
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
168,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,472
|
|
|
7,464
|
|
|
551,168
|
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
265,125
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
181,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,815
|
|
|
3,160
|
|
|
482,996
|
|
John F. McCarthy
(8)
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
316,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
316,000
|
|
Former Interim Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
(1)
-
Reflects annual holiday bonus earned and paid in 2016, 2015 and 2014.
-
(2)
-
Amounts shown do not reflect compensation actually received by the named executive officer. Instead, the amounts shown represent
the aggregate grant date fair value, computed using the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 718,
Compensation Stock
Compensation
(ASC 718), of restricted stock awards granted during each year, excluding the impact of estimated
forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions.
-
(3)
-
Amounts shown do not reflect compensation actually received by the named executive officer. Instead, the amounts shown represent
the aggregate grant date fair value, computed using the Black-Scholes option pricing model in accordance with ASC 718, of options granted during each year excluding the impact of estimated forfeitures
related to service-based vesting conditions. The assumptions made to determine the value of these awards are set forth in Note 7 of our Consolidated Financial Statements included in our annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the SEC on March 9, 2017.
-
(4)
-
For 2016, the table reflects amounts that were earned under our management incentive plan for 2016 performance and that were
determined and paid in March 2017. For 2015, the table reflects amounts that were earned under our management incentive plan for 2015 performance and that were determined and paid in March 2016. For
2014, the table reflects amounts that were earned under our management incentive plan for 2014 performance and that were determined and paid in March 2015.
-
(5)
-
Reflects the value of 401(k) matching contributions and auto and housing allowances. See "Compensation Discussion and
Analysis Other Compensation and Perquisites" for more information on these allowances. Named executive officers did not receive any other perquisites, personal benefits or
property.
-
(6)
-
Mr. Reilly commenced employment on December 19, 2016 at an annual salary of $300,000.
-
(7)
-
Mr. Rendall's employment with us ended on June 22, 2016.
-
(8)
-
Mr. McCarthy served as our interim CFO from May 27, 2016 to December 19, 2016.
-
(9)
-
Mr. Robert W.B. Kits van Heyningen was on an approved medical leave of absence at the beginning of 2016 and continued to
receive his base salary until May 24, 2016, when he returned to work on a part-time basis, at a reduced base salary of $5,000 per month, as approved by the Compensation Committee. Mr. Robert
W.B. Kits van Heyningen did not participate in our non-equity incentive compensation plan for 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
KVH
Industries,
Inc.
2017
Proxy
Statement
|
|
|
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Grants of Plan-Based Awards For 2016
The following table provides information regarding grants of plan-based awards made to our named executive officers during 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
(2)
|
|
|
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
|
|
|
Grant
Date
Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Grant
Date
(1)
|
|
|
Threshold
($)
|
|
|
Target
($)
|
|
|
Maximum
($)
|
|
|
Stock
(#)
(3)
|
|
|
Awards
($)
(4)
|
|
Martin A. Kits van Heyningen
|
|
|
2/17/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
437,000
|
|
|
|
|
7/15/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
432,721
|
|
|
864,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donald W. Reilly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brent C. Bruun
|
|
|
2/17/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
174,800
|
|
|
|
|
7/15/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,194
|
|
|
341,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert J. Balog
|
|
|
2/17/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
174,800
|
|
|
|
|
7/15/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,221
|
|
|
220,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Felise B. Feingold
|
|
|
2/17/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
174,800
|
|
|
|
|
7/15/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,273
|
|
|
184,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert W.B. Kits van Heyningen
|
|
|
2/17/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
174,800
|
|
|
|
|
7/15/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,591
|
|
|
133,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter A. Rendall
|
|
|
2/17/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
174,800
|
|
John F. McCarthy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
(1)
-
Reflects the respective dates on which the grants and 2016 management incentive plan were approved by the Compensation Committee.
-
(2)
-
The amounts shown in these columns represent the executives' annual incentive opportunity under the 2016 management incentive
plan, which has corporate performance goals, business unit performance goals and an element of individual performance, as determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion. The thresholds for
achievement of corporate performance goals and sales performance goals vary by goal. All target and maximum amounts reflect payment of 100% of the bonus opportunity for individual performance. See
"Compensation Discussion and Analysis Annual Cash-based Incentive Compensation" for more information regarding this plan.
-
(3)
-
Represents the grant of restricted stock awards under the 2006 Plan. The restricted stock awards were received without payment of
cash consideration. The restricted stock awards vest in four equal annual installments. See "Compensation Discussion and Analysis Equity Incentive Program" for more information
regarding these grants.
-
(4)
-
Reflects the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards granted to our named executive officers computed using the market
price on the date of grant in accordance with ASC 718, excluding the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KVH
Industries,
Inc.
2017
Proxy
Statement
|
|
29
|
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2016
The following table provides information concerning outstanding equity awards held by the named executive officers on December 31,
2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
|
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
(1)
|
|
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
|
|
|
Option
Expiration
Date
(2)
|
|
|
Grant Date
of Shares
of Stock
That Have
Not
Vested
|
|
|
Number of
Shares of
Stock
That Have
Not
Vested
(#)
(3)
|
|
|
Market
Value of
Shares of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)
(4)
|
|
Martin A. Kits van Heyningen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/11/2013
|
|
|
11,250
|
|
|
132,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/12/2014
|
|
|
22,627
|
|
|
266,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/17/2016
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
590,000
|
|
|
|
|
87,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.32
|
|
|
2/28/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,500
|
|
|
67,500
|
|
|
12.79
|
|
|
3/9/2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donald W. Reilly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brent C. Bruun
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/11/2013
|
|
|
3,281
|
|
|
38,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/12/2014
|
|
|
6,600
|
|
|
77,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/9/2015
|
|
|
9,900
|
|
|
116,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/17/2016
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
236,000
|
|
Robert J. Balog
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/11/2013
|
|
|
3,281
|
|
|
38,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/12/2014
|
|
|
6,600
|
|
|
77,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/9/2015
|
|
|
9,900
|
|
|
116,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/17/2016
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
236,000
|
|
Felise B. Feingold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/11/2013
|
|
|
3,281
|
|
|
38,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/12/2014
|
|
|
6,600
|
|
|
77,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/9/2015
|
|
|
9,900
|
|
|
116,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/17/2016
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
236,000
|
|
Robert W.B. Kits van Heyningen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/11/2013
|
|
|
3,281
|
|
|
38,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/12/2014
|
|
|
6,600
|
|
|
77,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/9/2015
|
|
|
9,900
|
|
|
116,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/17/2016
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
236,000
|
|
|
|
|
26,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.32
|
|
|
2/28/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter A. Rendall
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John F. McCarthy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
(1)
-
The options vest and become exercisable in equal installments on the first four anniversaries of the grant date.
-
(2)
-
Each option was granted five years prior to the option expiration date and has a five-year term.
-
(3)
-
The restricted stock awards vest in equal installments on the first four anniversaries of the grant date.
-
(4)
-
Market value is calculated by multiplying the number of restricted stock awards that have not vested by $11.80, which was the
closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on December 30, 2016, the last trading day of 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
KVH
Industries,
Inc.
2017
Proxy
Statement
|
|
|
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Option Exercises and Stock Vested During 2016
The following table provides information regarding the exercise of stock options and the vesting of restricted stock awards for each of our
named executive officers during 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise (#)
|
|
|
Value Realized
on Exercise
($)
(1)
|
|
|
Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting (#)
|
|
|
Value Realized
on Vesting
($)
(2)
|
|
Martin A. Kits van Heyningen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,564
|
|
|
222,255
|
|
Donald W. Reilly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brent C. Bruun
|
|
|
26,250
|
|
|
67,689
|
|
|
9,881
|
|
|
95,183
|
|
Robert J. Balog
|
|
|
26,250
|
|
|
55,913
|
|
|
9,881
|
|
|
95,183
|
|
Felise B. Feingold
|
|
|
26,250
|
|
|
65,904
|
|
|
9,881
|
|
|
95,183
|
|
Robert W.B. Kits van Heyningen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,881
|
|
|
95,183
|
|
Peter A. Rendall
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,100
|
|
|
87,490
|
|
John F. McCarthy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
(1)
-
The value realized equals the difference between the option exercise price and the closing price of our common stock on the
NASDAQ Global Select Market on the date of exercise, multiplied by the number of shares for which the option was exercised.
-
(2)
-
Value realized is calculated by multiplying the number of restricted stock awards vested by the closing price of our common stock
on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on the vesting date.
We
have no pension plan or nonqualified deferred compensation plan, and accordingly the tables of pension benefits and nonqualified deferred compensation are omitted.
Director Compensation
Our director compensation program for 2016 was unchanged from 2015. At the first meeting of the Board of Directors following the annual meeting of stockholders, non-employee directors automatically
receive a restricted stock award of 5,000 shares of our common stock. Each restricted stock award vests in four equal quarterly installments after the date of grant. In accordance with this policy,
each of Messrs. Ain, Honey, Ryan and Trimble, our non-employee directors, received a restricted stock award of 5,000 shares of common stock effective August 5, 2016, the fair value of
which was $43,050 on the date of grant.
In
addition, each non-employee director who is appointed to serve on the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors will receive, on the date of his or her initial appointment, a restricted stock award
of 5,000 shares of our common stock and an additional restricted stock award of 5,000 shares on each annual reappointment to the Audit Committee. Each restricted stock award vests in four equal
quarterly installments after the date of grant. In
accordance with this policy, each of Messrs. Ain, Honey, Ryan and Trimble received a restricted stock award of 5,000 shares of common stock effective August 5, 2016, the fair value of
which was $43,050 on the date of grant.
Each
newly elected non-employee director will automatically receive on the date of his or her election a restricted stock award of 10,000 shares of our common stock. Each initial grant will vest in
four equal quarterly installments after the date of grant.
We
also paid our non-employee directors a $26,250 annual retainer and $2,625 for each regularly scheduled quarterly Board meeting attended during 2016.
Non-employee
directors who also served as members of the Audit and Compensation Committees received additional annual compensation of $3,150 and $2,100, respectively, except that the Chairman of each
of the Audit and Compensation Committees received additional annual compensation of $6,825 and $3,150, respectively, during 2016. No other cash compensation was paid for attending any other Board or
Committee meetings. Directors who are employees did not receive separate fees for their services as directors.
We
paid compensation to Martin A. Kits van Heyningen and Robert W.B. Kits van Heyningen as set forth in the tables entitled "Summary Compensation Table For 2016," "Grants of Plan-Based Awards For
2016," and "Option Exercises and Stock Vested During 2016".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KVH
Industries,
Inc.
2017
Proxy
Statement
|
|
31
|
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Director Compensation Table for 2016
The following table provides information regarding the compensation of our directors who are not named executive officers for 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash ($)
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
($)
(1)
|
|
|
Total
($)
(2)
|
|
Bruce J. Ryan
|
|
|
45,675
|
|
|
86,100
|
|
|
131,775
|
|
Mark S. Ain
|
|
|
43,050
|
|
|
86,100
|
|
|
129,150
|
|
Charles R. Trimble
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
|
86,100
|
|
|
128,100
|
|
Stanley K. Honey
|
|
|
39,900
|
|
|
86,100
|
|
|
126,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
(1)
-
Amounts shown do not reflect compensation actually received by the director. Instead, the amounts shown represent the aggregate
grant date fair value, computed using the market price on the date of grant in accordance with ASC 718, of restricted stock awards granted during 2016, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures.
-
(2)
-
Amounts shown reflect actual cash earned during 2016 as well as the aggregate grant-date fair value of stock awards granted
during 2016. Refer to the "Outstanding Director Equity Awards" table for information concerning outstanding equity awards held by our non-employee directors.
Outstanding Director Equity Awards at December 31, 2016
The following table provides information concerning outstanding equity awards held by our directors who were not named executive officers on
December 31, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Grant Date
of Shares of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
|
|
|
Number of
Shares
of Stock
That Have
Not
Vested
(#)
|
|
|
Market
Value
of Shares
of Stock
That Have
Not
Vested
($)
(1)
|
|
Bruce J. Ryan
|
|
|
8/5/2016
|
|
|
7,500
|
(2)
|
|
88,500
|
|
Mark S. Ain
|
|
|
8/5/2016
|
|
|
7,500
|
(2)
|
|
88,500
|
|
Charles R. Trimble
|
|
|
8/5/2016
|
|
|
7,500
|
(2)
|
|
88,500
|
|
Stanley K. Honey
|
|
|
8/5/2016
|
|
|
7,500
|
(2)
|
|
88,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
(1)
-
Value is calculated by multiplying the number of restricted stock awards that have not vested by $11.80, the closing price of our
common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on December 30, 2016, the last trading day of 2016.
-
(2)
-
Amounts include restricted stock awards granted on August 5, 2016 which vest in four equal quarterly installments, the
first of which vested on November 5, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
KVH
Industries,
Inc.
2017
Proxy
Statement
|
|
|
Table of Contents
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
|
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2016 regarding shares authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans, including
individual compensation arrangements.
The
equity compensation plans approved by our stockholders as of December 31, 2016 were our 2016 Equity and Incentive Plan (2016 Plan), our 2006 Plan, and our Amended and Restated 2003
Incentive and Nonqualified Stock Option Plan Under the 2016 Plan, each share issued under awards other than options and stock appreciation rights reduces the number of shares reserved for issuance by
two shares (but reduces the maximum annual number of shares that may be granted to a participant only by one share), and each share issued under options or stock appreciation rights reduces the number
of shares reserved for issuance by one share. The following table does not reflect grants from January 1, 2017 through April 17, 2017 of 209,114 restricted stock awards
with
a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $8.31 per share, nor does it reflect grants during that period of non-qualified stock options to purchase an aggregate of 530,831 shares of common
stock at a weighted-average exercise price of $7.85 per share. The restricted stock awards and stock options reflected in the table were granted on the following terms as determined by the
Compensation Committee: (a) in the case of restricted stock awards, the grantee received the restricted stock award without payment of cash consideration, (b) in the case of stock
options, the exercise price per share of the stock option was equal to the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on the date of the grant, and (c) the total
number of shares subject to the award will vest annually in four equal installments, the first of which vests on the first anniversary of the grant date. As of December 31, 2016, we did not
have any equity compensation plans not approved by our stockholders.
Equity Compensation Plan Information as of December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan category
|
|
|
Number of shares to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights (#)
(a)
|
|
|
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights ($)
(b)
|
|
|
Number of shares remaining
available for future issuance
under equity compensation
plans (excluding shares
reflected in column (a)(#))
(c)
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders
|
|
|
635,883
|
(1)
|
|
11.27
|
|
|
3,895,520
(2)
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
635,883
|
(1)
|
|
11.27
|
|
|
3,895,520
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
(1)
-
Does not include 644,439 shares of restricted stock granted under the 2006 Plan which were not vested as of December 31,
2016 and therefore subject to forfeiture. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of these shares of restricted stock was $10.58.
-
(2)
-
Each share issued under awards other than options or stock appreciation rights reduces the number of shares reserved for issuance
by two shares (but reduces the maximum annual number of shares that may be granted to a participant only by one share), and each share issued under options or stock appreciation rights reduces the
shares reserved for issuance by one share. Includes 1,000,520 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under our Amended and Restated 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KVH
Industries,
Inc.
2017
Proxy
Statement
|
|
33
|
Table of Contents
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
|
At
the close of business on April 17, 2017, there were 17,024,170 shares of our common stock outstanding. On April 17, 2017, the closing price of our common stock as reported on the
NASDAQ Global Select Market was $$7.85 per share.
Principal stockholders
The
following table provides, to the knowledge of management, information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of April 17, 2017, or as otherwise noted,
by:
-
-
each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of
more than five percent of our common stock;
-
-
each of our directors;
-
-
each executive officer named in the summary compensation table; and
-
-
all of our current directors and executive officers as a group.
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
KVH
Industries,
Inc.
2017
Proxy
Statement
|
|
|
Table of Contents
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The
persons named in this table have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares listed, except as otherwise indicated. The inclusion of shares listed as beneficially owned does not
constitute an admission of beneficial ownership. Shares included in the "Right to acquire" column consist of shares that may be purchased through the exercise of options that are vested or will vest
within 60 days after April 17, 2017.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares beneficially owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Right to
acquire
|
|
Total
|
|
Percent
|
|
5% Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Systematic Financial Management, LP
(1)
300 Frank W. Burr Blvd., Glenpointe East, 7
th
Floor
Teaneck, NJ 07666
|
|
1,254,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,254,601
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Needham Investment Management, LLC
(2)
445 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10022
|
|
1,124,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,124,000
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock, Inc.
(3)
55 East 52
nd
Street
New York, NY 10055
|
|
1,122,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,122,185
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP
(4)
Building One
6300 Bee Cave Road
Austin, TX 78746
|
|
1,059,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,059,166
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Martin A. Kits van Heyningen
(5)
|
|
652,428
|
|
|
46,232
|
|
|
698,660
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert W.B. Kits van Heyningen
|
|
203,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
203,949
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stanley K. Honey
(6)
|
|
126,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,875
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark S. Ain
(7)
|
|
123,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,246
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles R. Trimble
(8)
|
|
92,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,000
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce J. Ryan
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Named Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brent C. Bruun
|
|
110,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,139
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert J. Balog
|
|
81,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,999
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Felise B. Feingold
|
|
48,186
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,186
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donald W. Reilly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter A. Rendall
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John F. McCarthy
|
|
8,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,700
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All current directors and executive officers as a group
(11 persons)
(9)
|
|
1,610,887
|
|
|
46,232
|
|
|
1,657,119
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
*
-
Less than one percent.
-
(1)
-
Information is based on a Schedule 13G filed by Systematic Financial Management, L.P. with the SEC on
February 10, 2017. The Schedule 13G states that Systematic Financial Management, L.P. has sole voting power for 960,639 shares and sole dispositive power for 1,254,601 shares.
-
(2)
-
Information is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed jointly by Needham Investment Management L.L.C., Needham Asset
Management, LLC and George A. Needham with the SEC on February 14, 2017. The Schedule 13G/A indicates that Needham Asset Management, LLC is the managing member of Needham
Investment Management L.L.C. and that George A. Needham is a control person of Needham Asset Management, LLC. The Schedule 13G/A states that each reporting person may be deemed to share
voting and dispositive power for all 1,124,000 shares.
-
(3)
-
Information is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by BlackRock, Inc. with the SEC on January 25, 2017. The
Schedule 13G/A states that BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power for 1,095,313 shares and sole dispositive power for 1,122,185 shares.
-
(4)
-
Information is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP with the SEC on February 9,
2017. The Schedule 13G/A states that Dimensional Fund Advisors LP has sole voting power for 1,028,020 shares and sole dispositive power for 1,059,166 shares.
-
(5)
-
Includes 10,201 shares of common stock and 1,232 stock options held by Martin A. Kits van Heyningen's spouse, who is our creative
director.
-
(6)
-
Includes 118,000 shares of common stock held in trust for Stanley K. Honey and spouse.
-
(7)
-
Includes 43,000 shares of common stock held in trust for Mark S. Ain.
-
(8)
-
Includes 25,000 shares of common stock held by Charles R. Trimble's spouse.
-
(9)
-
Includes 2,523 shares of common stock held by Daniel R. Conway's spouse, who retired as our program manager in November 2013 and
served as an engineering program management consultant until June 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KVH
Industries,
Inc.
2017
Proxy
Statement
|
|
35
|
Table of Contents
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
|
Section 16(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our executive officers and directors and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of our common stock to file reports of
ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. SEC regulations require executive officers, directors and greater-than-ten-percent stockholders to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a)
forms they file.
Based
solely upon a review of Forms 3, 4, and 5, and amendments thereto, furnished to us with respect to 2016, we believe that all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our
executive officers, directors and greater-than-ten-percent stockholders were fulfilled in a timely manner.
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
KVH
Industries,
Inc.
2017
Proxy
Statement
|
|
|
Table of Contents
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD
|
Director Independence
A majority of our directors are independent directors under the rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market. Our Board of Directors has determined that
our independent directors are Messrs. Ain, Honey, Ryan and Trimble.
Board Meetings
During 2016, our Board of Directors met nine times. Each incumbent director, other than Robert W.B. Kits van Heyningen (who was on a medical
leave of absence during 2016), attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings held by the Board and the committees of the Board on which he served during 2016. To the extent reasonably
practicable, directors are expected to attend Board meetings, meetings of committees on which they serve, and our annual meeting of stockholders. Last year, one of the six individuals then serving as
directors attended the annual meeting.
Board Leadership Structure
Martin A. Kits van Heyningen currently serves as our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. The Board has determined
that, at present, combining the positions of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer serves the best interests of KVH and our stockholders. The Board believes that the CEO's extensive
knowledge of our businesses, expertise and leadership skills make him a more effective Chairman than an independent director.
The
functions of the Board are carried out by the full Board, and when delegated, by the Board committees. The Board has delegated significant authority to the Audit, Compensation and Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committees, each of which is comprised entirely of independent directors. The independent directors typically meet in an executive session at regularly scheduled Board meetings
and additional executive sessions may be convened at any time at the request of a director.
The
independent directors have designated Mr. Ain to serve as our Lead Independent Director. The Lead Independent Director will, among other functions, preside at all meetings of the Board at
which the Chairman is not present and will serve as a liaison between the CEO and the independent directors. The Lead Independent Director also presides at executive sessions of the independent
directors.
Risk Management
Our Board of Directors administers its risk oversight role both directly and through its Committee structure. The Board consists of only six
directors, four of whom are independent directors and one of whom is our President and CEO. Of the four independent directors, three serve on each of the three principal Board committees, which makes
them knowledgeable about the aspects of our business under the jurisdiction of those committees. The Board's Audit Committee meets frequently during the year and discusses with management, our CFO and
our independent auditor: (a) current business trends affecting us; (b) the major risk exposures that we face; (c) the steps management has taken to monitor and control these
risks; and (d) the adequacy of internal controls that could significantly affect our financial statements. The Board also receives regular reports from senior management about business plans
and opportunities, as well as the challenges and risks associated with implementing those plans and taking advantage of new opportunities.
Board Committees
Our Board of Directors has three standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and the
Compensation Committee. Each member of the Audit Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and the Compensation Committee meets the independence requirements of the NASDAQ Stock
Market for membership on the committees on which he serves. The Audit Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee each have the authority to retain
independent advisors and consultants. We pay the fees and expenses of these advisors. Our Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for each of the Audit Committee, the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee. We have made each of these charters available through the Investors Relations page of our website at http://kvh.com/ircharters.
Audit Committee
As of December 31, 2016, our Audit Committee was comprised of Messrs. Ain, Honey, Ryan, and Trimble. Our Audit Committee provides the
opportunity for direct contact between our independent registered public accounting firm and members of the Board of Directors;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KVH
Industries,
Inc.
2017
Proxy
Statement
|
|
37
|
Table of Contents
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD
the
auditors report directly to the Committee. The Committee assists the Board in overseeing the integrity of our financial statements, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, our
independent registered public accounting firm's qualifications and independence, and the performance of our independent registered public accounting firm. The Committee is directly responsible for
appointing, compensating, evaluating and, when necessary, terminating our independent registered public accounting firm. Our Audit Committee has established procedures for the treatment of complaints
regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, including procedures for the confidential and anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding questionable
accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters. Our Board has determined that Mr. Ryan is an Audit Committee financial expert under the rules of the SEC. Our Audit Committee met
six times during 2016. For additional information regarding the Audit Committee, please see "Report of the Audit Committee."
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
As of December 31, 2016, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee was comprised of Messrs. Ain, Honey, Ryan and Trimble. Our Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee's responsibilities include providing recommendations to our Board of Directors regarding nominees for director and membership on the committees of our Board. An
additional function of the committee is to develop corporate governance practices to recommend to our Board and to assist our Board in complying with those practices. Our Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee met once during 2016.
Compensation Committee
As of December 31, 2016, our Compensation Committee was comprised of Messrs. Ain, Ryan and Trimble. The Compensation Committee's
responsibilities include providing recommendations to our Board regarding the compensation levels of directors, reviewing and approving the compensation levels of executive officers, providing
recommendations to our Board regarding compensation programs, administering our incentive-compensation plans and equity-based plans, authorizing grants under our stock option and incentive plans, and
authorizing other equity compensation arrangements. Our Compensation Committee met twice during 2016. For more information regarding the authority of the Compensation Committee, the extent of
delegation to the Compensation Committee, our processes and procedures for determining executive compensation and the role of executive officers and compensation consultants in determining or
recommending the amount or form of compensation for
directors
and executive officers, please see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis."
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During 2016, the members of our Compensation Committee were Messrs. Ain, Ryan and Trimble. No member of our Compensation Committee has
ever been an officer or employee of ours or any of our subsidiaries. None of our executive officers serves as a director or member of the compensation committee of another entity in a case where an
executive officer of such other entity serves as a director of ours or a member of our Compensation Committee.
Director Candidates and Selection Processes
The process followed by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to identify and evaluate director candidates includes, as necessary,
requests to our Board members and others for recommendations, meetings from time to time to evaluate biographical information and background materials relating to potential candidates, and interviews
of selected candidates by members of the Committee and other members of our Board. The Committee may also solicit the opinions of third parties with whom the potential candidate has had a business
relationship. Once the committee is satisfied that it has collected sufficient information on which to base a judgment, the committee votes on the candidate or candidates under consideration.
In
evaluating the qualifications of any candidate for director, the Committee considers, among other factors, the candidate's depth of business experience, reputation for personal integrity,
understanding of financial matters, familiarity with the periodic financial reporting process, reputation, degree of independence from management, possible conflicts of interest and willingness and
ability to serve. The Committee also considers whether the candidate will add diversity to the Board, including the degree to which the candidate's skills, experience and background complement or
duplicate those of our existing directors and the long-term interests of our stockholders. In the case of incumbent directors whose terms are set to expire, the Committee also gives consideration to
each director's prior contributions to the Board. The minimum qualifications that each director must possess consist of general familiarity with fundamental financial statements, ten years of relevant
business experience, no identified conflicts of interest, no convictions in a criminal proceeding
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
KVH
Industries,
Inc.
2017
Proxy
Statement
|
|
|
Table of Contents
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD
during
the five years prior to the date of selection and the willingness to execute and comply with our code of ethics. Although the Committee considers diversity as a factor in assessing any
nomination, the Board does not have a formal policy with regard to diversity in identifying director nominees. In selecting candidates to recommend for nomination as a director, the Committee abides
by our company-wide non-discrimination policy.
The
Committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders and use the same process to evaluate candidates regardless of whether the candidates were recommended by stockholders,
directors, management or others. The Committee has not adopted any particular method that stockholders must follow to make a recommendation. We suggest that stockholders make recommendations by
writing to the Chairman of the Board who will in turn forward the nomination to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, in care of our offices, with sufficient information about the
candidate, his or her work experience, his or her qualifications for director, and his or her references as will enable the Committee to evaluate the candidacy properly. We also suggest that
stockholders make their recommendations well in advance of the anticipated mailing date of our next proxy statement so as to provide our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee an adequate
opportunity to complete a thorough evaluation of the candidacy, including personal interviews. We remind stockholders of the
separate requirements set forth in our by-laws for nominating individuals to serve as directors, which we discuss elsewhere in this proxy statement.
Corporate Governance
Our board believes that our corporate governance practices have been fundamental to our success. We seek to ensure that good governance and
responsible business principles and practices are part of our culture and values and the way we do business. To maintain and enhance our corporate governance, the Board of Directors and the Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee periodically refine our corporate governance policies, procedures and practices.
Majority Voting in Uncontested Director Elections
Our by-laws provide for majority voting in uncontested director elections. A contested election is an election in which the number of director candidates
exceeds the number of available director positions. Our by-laws require that, in order for a nominee for election to the Board of Directors in an uncontested election to be elected, he or she must
receive a majority of the votes properly cast at the meeting. Ballots for uncontested elections, including the elections at the 2017 annual meeting, will allow
stockholders
to vote "FOR" or "AGAINST" each nominee and will also allow stockholders to abstain from voting on any nominee. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of any
election for director. Under our by-laws and in accordance with Delaware law, an incumbent director's term extends until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified, or until he or she resigns
or is removed from office. Thus, an incumbent director who fails to receive the required vote for re-election at our annual meeting would continue serving as a director (sometimes referred to as a
"holdover director") until his or her term ends for one of the foregoing reasons. In order to address the situation where an incumbent director receives more votes "AGAINST" his or her re-election
than votes "FOR" his or her re-election, the Board has adopted a policy to the effect that, in order for an incumbent director in an uncontested election to be nominated for re-election, that director
should tender a resignation that would become effective only upon both (i) the failure to obtain the requisite majority vote and (ii) the acceptance of the resignation by the Board of
Directors. If an incumbent director were to fail to obtain the requisite majority vote for re-election, the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (or another appropriate committee) and the Board would consider the resignation in light of the surrounding circumstances. The policy adopted by the Board
states that the Board will publicly announce its decision regarding the resignation within 90 days after certification of the results of the applicable annual meeting.
Communications with our Board of Directors
Our Board, including all of the independent directors, has established a process for facilitating stockholder communications with our Board.
Stockholders wishing to communicate with our Board should send written correspondence to the attention of our corporate secretary, Felise B. Feingold, KVH Industries, Inc., 50 Enterprise
Center, Middletown, RI 02842, USA, and should include with the correspondence evidence that the sender of the communication is one of our stockholders. Satisfactory evidence would include, for
example, contemporaneous correspondence from a brokerage firm indicating the identity of the stockholder and the number of shares held. Our secretary will forward all mail to each member of our Board
of Directors.
Code of Ethics
We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to all of our directors, executive officers and employees, including our principal executive
officer and principal financial and accounting officer. The code of ethics includes provisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KVH
Industries,
Inc.
2017
Proxy
Statement
|
|
39
|
Table of Contents
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD
covering
compliance with laws and regulations, insider trading practices, conflicts of interest, confidentiality, protection and proper use of our assets, accounting and record keeping, fair
competition and fair dealing, business gifts and entertainment, payments to government personnel and the reporting of illegal or unethical behavior.
You
can obtain a copy of our code of ethics through the Investor Relations page of our website at http://kvh.com/ircoe.
Certain Relationships and Related-Party Transactions
Pursuant to our Code of Ethics, our executive officers, directors and employees are to avoid conflicts of interest, except with the approval
of the Board of Directors. A related-party transaction would be a conflict of interest. Pursuant to its charter, the Audit Committee must review and approve in advance all related-party transactions.
It is our policy that the Audit Committee review and approve transactions involving us and "related parties" (which includes our directors, director nominees and executive officers and their immediate
family members, as well as stockholders known by us to own five percent or more of our common stock and their immediate family members). The policy applies to any transaction in which we are a
participant and any related party has a direct or indirect material interest, where the amount involved in the transaction exceeds $120,000 in a single calendar year, excluding transactions in which
standing pre-approval has been given. Pre-approved transactions include:
-
-
compensation of directors and executive officers provided that such compensation is approved by the Board of Directors or Compensation
Committee or such compensation plan or other arrangement is generally available to full-time employees in the same jurisdiction; and
-
-
transactions where the related party's interest arises solely from ownership of our common stock and such interest is proportionate to the
interests of stockholders. The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing the material facts of all related-party transactions, subject to the exceptions described above. The Audit Committee will
either approve or disapprove the entry into the related-party transaction. If advance approval is not
-
-
feasible,
the transaction will be considered and, if the Audit Committee determines it to be appropriate, ratified at the Audit Committee's next
regularly scheduled meeting. In determining whether to approve or ratify a transaction with a related party, the Audit Committee will take into account, among other factors that it determines to be
appropriate:
-
-
whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar
circumstances;
-
-
the business reasons for the transaction;
-
-
whether the transaction would impair the independence of an outside director; and
-
-
the extent of the related party's interest in the transaction.
Except
as stated below, as of the date of this proxy statement there have been no reportable related-party transactions since January 1, 2016, nor are there any pending related-party
transactions.
Kathleen
Keating, the spouse of Mr. Martin A. Kits van Heyningen, serves as our senior director of creative and customer experience. For fiscal year 2016, total individual compensation for
Kathleen Keating, based on total salary, bonus, aggregate grant date fair value of stock option awards granted during the year and all other compensation, as calculated in a manner consistent with our
Summary Compensation Table for 2016, was approximately $198,000.
Thomas
Kits van Heyningen, the son of Mr. Martin A. Kits van Heyningen, worked for us as an intern during the summer of 2016. During this time, total compensation for Thomas Kits van Heyningen
was approximately $3,300.
Mark
S. Ain, a director, is a minority owner of and advisor to ETS International, a ground transportation service company. In 2016, we paid ETS International $37,324 for services rendered in 2016. The
Audit Committee has determined such services are reasonable, in our best interest and on terms no less favorable than could be obtained from an unrelated third party. In assessing Mr. Ain's
independence, our Board of Directors was aware of this information and concluded that it had no impact on his independence as a director.
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
KVH
Industries,
Inc.
2017
Proxy
Statement
|
|
|
Table of Contents
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
(1)
|
The
Board of Directors appointed an Audit Committee to monitor the integrity of our company's consolidated financial statements, its system of internal control over financial
reporting and the independence and performance of our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also selects our company's independent registered public accounting firm. Our
Board of Directors adopted a charter for the Audit Committee in February 2004, which was most recently revised in February 2017. The Audit Committee currently consists of four independent directors.
Each member of the Audit Committee meets the independence requirements of the NASDAQ Stock Market for membership on the Audit Committee.
Our
company's management is responsible for the financial reporting process, including the system of internal control over financial reporting, and for the preparation of consolidated financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our company's independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing those consolidated financial statements
and auditing the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to monitor and review these processes. We have relied, without independent verification, on the
information provided to us and on the representations made by our company's management and independent registered public accounting firm.
In
fulfilling our oversight responsibilities, we discussed with representatives of Grant Thornton LLP, our company's independent registered public accounting firm, the overall scope and plans
for their audit of our company's consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016. We met with them, with and without our company's management present, to discuss the
results of their audits of our consolidated financial statements and of
our company's internal control over financial reporting and to discuss with them the overall quality of our company's financial reporting.
We
reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 with management and the independent registered public accounting firm.
We
discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) Auditing Standard No. 16,
Communications with Audit
Committees
, as amended. In addition, we have discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm its independence
from our company and our company's management, including the matters in the written disclosures and letter which we received from the independent registered public accounting firm under applicable
requirements of the PCAOB. We also considered whether the independent registered public accounting firm's performance of non-audit services for our company is compatible with the auditors'
independence, and concluded that the performance of such non-audit services did not impair the auditors' independence.
Based
on our review and these meetings, discussions and reports, and subject to the limitations on our role and responsibilities referred to above and in the Audit Committee charter, we recommended to
the Board of Directors that our company's audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 be included in our company's annual report on Form 10-K for that
year.
|
|
|
|
|
The Audit Committee
|
|
|
Bruce J. Ryan (Chairman)
Mark S. Ain
Stanley K. Honey
Charles R. Trimble
|
-
(1)
-
The material in this report is not soliciting material, is not deemed filed with the SEC
and is not incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made on, before, or after the date
of this proxy statement and irrespective of any incorporation language in such filing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KVH
Industries,
Inc.
2017
Proxy
Statement
|
|
41
|
Table of Contents
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|
We expect that representatives of Grant Thornton LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, will be present at the annual meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement
if they wish and, if present, will be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.
Fees for Professional Services
The following table provides a summary of the fees for professional services rendered by Grant Thornton LLP for 2016 and 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee category
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
Audit fees
(1)
|
|
$
|
760,617
|
|
$
|
728,331
|
|
Audit-related fees
(2)
|
|
21,740
|
|
4,000
|
|
Tax fees
(3)
|
|
68,495
|
|
33,071
|
|
Total fees
|
|
$
|
850,851
|
|
$
|
765,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
(1)
-
Audit fees consist of amounts billed for professional services rendered for the integrated audit of our consolidated financial
statements, including compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, review of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports, and the
statutory audits of our foreign locations.
-
(2)
-
Audit-related fees consist of amounts billed arising from translation of statutory statements for our Denmark location in 2016
and 2015 and amounts billed for services relating to our SEC comment letter and registration statement on Form S-8 in 2016.
-
(3)
-
Tax fees consist of amounts billed arising from services rendered for tax compliance for our Denmark, Norway, Singapore, Cyprus,
United Kingdom and Hong Kong locations.
We did not engage Grant Thornton LLP to provide any other services during or with respect to 2016 or 2015.
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
Our Audit Committee approves each engagement for audit or non-audit services before we engage our independent registered public accounting
firm to provide those services.
Our
Audit Committee has not established any pre-approval policies or procedures that would allow our management to engage our independent registered public accounting firm to provide any specified
services with only an obligation to notify the Audit Committee of the engagement for those services.
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
KVH
Industries,
Inc.
2017
Proxy
Statement
|
|
|
Table of Contents
Stockholder
proposals for inclusion in our proxy materials relating to our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders must be received by us at our executive offices no later than December 29, 2017
or, if the date of that meeting is more than 30 calendar days before or after June 7, 2018, a reasonable time before we begin to print and mail our proxy materials with respect to that meeting.
In
addition, our by-laws provide that a stockholder desiring to bring business before any meeting of stockholders or to nominate any person for election to the Board of Directors must give timely
written notice to our secretary in accordance with the procedural requirements set forth in our by-laws. In the case of a regularly scheduled annual meeting, written notice must be delivered to or
mailed and received at our principal executive offices not less than 60 days before the scheduled annual meeting, must describe the business to be brought before the meeting
and
must provide specific information about the stockholder, other supporters of the proposal, their stock ownership and their interest in the proposed business. For example, if we were to hold our
2018 annual meeting on May 2, 2018, in order to bring an item of business before the 2018 annual meeting in accordance with our by-laws, a stockholder would be required to have delivered the
requisite notice of that item of business to us not later than March 2, 2018. If we were to hold our 2018 annual meeting before May 2, 2018, and if we were to give less than
70 days' notice or prior public disclosure of the date of that meeting, then the stockholder's notice must be delivered to or mailed and received at our principal executive offices not later
than the close of business on the tenth day after the earlier of (1) the day on which we mailed notice of the date of the meeting and (2) the day on which we publicly disclosed the date
of the meeting.
Stockholders
of record on April 17, 2017 will receive a proxy statement and our annual report to stockholders, which contains detailed financial information about us. The annual report is not
incorporated herein and is not deemed a part of this proxy statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KVH
Industries,
Inc.
2017
Proxy
Statement
|
|
43
|
MMMMMMMMMMMM . MMMMMMMMMMMMMMM C123456789 000004 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext ENDORSEMENT_LINE______________ SACKPACK_____________ Electronic Voting Instructions Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week! Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy. VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR. Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m., Central Time, on June 7, 2017. MR A SAMPLE DESIGNATION (IF ANY) ADD 1 ADD 2 ADD 3 ADD 4 ADD 5 ADD 6 Vote by Internet Go to www.investorvote.com/KVHI Or scan the QR code with your smartphone Follow the steps outlined on the secure website Vote by telephone Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories & Canada on a touch tone telephone Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. q IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q Proposals The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all the nominees listed, FOR Proposals 2 and 4 and 1 YEAR for Proposal 3. + 1. To vote upon the election of two Class III directors to a three-year term: For Against Abstain For Against Abstain 01 - Bruce Ryan 02 - James S. Dodez For Against Abstain 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years Abstain 2. To approve, in a non-binding say on pay vote, the compensation of our named executive officers 3. To determine, in a non-binding say on frequency vote, the frequency of the vote on our executive compensation program (once every year, once every two years or once every three years) For Against Abstain 4. To ratify the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm Non-Voting Items Change of Address Please print new address below. Comments Please print your comments below. Authorized Signatures This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. Date and Sign Below Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) on the books of KVH Industries, Inc. Joint owners should each sign personally. Trustees and other fiduciaries should indicate the capacity in which they sign, and where more than one name appears, a majority must sign. If a corporation, this signature should be that of an authorized officer who should state his or her title. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) Please print date below. Signature 1 Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 Please keep signature within the box. MMMMMMMC 1234567890 J N T MR A SAMPLE (THIS AREA IS SET UP TO ACCOMMODATE 140 CHARACTERS) MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND + 1 U P X3 2 6 3 0 4 1 02KNLD MMMMMMMMM C B A Annual Meeting Proxy Card1234 5678 9012 345 X IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION
. Dear Stockholder, Please take note of the important information enclosed with this proxy card. Your vote counts, and you are strongly encouraged to exercise your right to vote your shares. Please mark the boxes on this proxy card to indicate how you would like your shares to be voted. Then sign the card, detach it and return it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. Alternatively, you can vote by Internet or telephone using the instructions on the back of this card. Your vote must be received prior to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 7, 2017. Thank you in advance for your prompt consideration of these matters. Sincerely, KVH Industries, Inc. Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on June 7, 2017 The proxy statement for the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders of KVH Industries, Inc. and the related 2016 annual report to stockholders are available on the Internet at www.kvh.com/annual. You can read, print, download and search these materials at that website. The website does not use cookies or other tracking devices to identify visitors. You can obtain directions to be able to attend the meeting and vote in person at www.kvh.com/annual. q IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q Proxy KVH Industries, Inc. THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF KVH INDUSTRIES, INC. A STOCKHOLDER WISHING TO VOTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS NEED ONLY SIGN AND DATE THIS PROXY AND RETURN IT IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. Proxy for Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 7, 2017 The undersigned, revoking all prior proxies, hereby appoints Donald W. Reilly and Felise Feingold, and each of them, proxy and attorney-in-fact, with power to act without the other and with full power of substitution, to vote all shares of Common Stock of KVH Industries, Inc., which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at the offices of KVH Industries, Inc., 50 Enterprise Center, Middletown, RI 02842, on June 7, 2017, at 11:00 a.m., Eastern time, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof, upon matters set forth in the Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement dated April 28, 2017, a copy of which has been received by the undersigned, and in their discretion upon any business that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. Attendance of the undersigned at the meeting or any adjourned or postponed session thereof will not be deemed to revoke this proxy unless the undersigned shall affirmatively indicate the intention of the undersigned to vote the shares represented hereby in person prior to the exercise of this proxy. The shares represented by this proxy will be voted as directed. If no voting direction is given on a proposal, the shares represented by this proxy will be voted as recommended by the Board of Directors. PLEASE VOTE, DATE AND SIGN ON REVERSE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
KVH Industries (NASDAQ:KVHI)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2024 to Jul 2024
KVH Industries (NASDAQ:KVHI)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2023 to Jul 2024