Okay. So as an aside, I did want to be clear that in our modeling, we made pretty conservative assumptions
about certain specific items in the transaction. So first, Zymergen plans to explore strategic alternatives for its advanced materials and drug discovery businesses pre-close. So this is Zymergens
process, theyre running this, but were very supportive of it. And think we can, given our history at Ginkgo of launching and forming companies, youve seen us do this a number of times, and we think we can help. An outright sale of
a business unit could create additional cash proceeds and reduce operating expenses. The spin-out could reduce costs, create a new customer for Ginkgo, could provide opportunity for additional upside through
appreciation of equity holding we would have.
So we didnt assume these outcomes in our base case, but believe Zymergens product portfolio is
strong, and theyve already received serious inbound interest since the announcement.
Second, Zymergen has a deferred lease liability largely in
connection with its new headquarters in Emeryville. Weve assume that liability stays with Ginkgo, but well be actively evaluating real estate portfolio rationalization, and any successful effort to consolidate the real estate could
represent meaningful upside to the base case and further reduce incremental cash burn.
Im outlining these examples, not to promise that
theyre going to happen, but just to highlight that while were not counting on these items occurring, there are ways that we can improve the Zymergen deals financial case, were these things that come about.
. . .
And so my view, bioengineering in particular is a key
technology that will be capable of solving some of our biggest challenges on this front. And a couple recent pieces of US legislation, I think, very nicely highlight this. So just last week, President Biden signed the CHIPS and Science Act. As I
mentioned in our July call about the Zymergen acquisition, I strongly believe on a personal level that we should be investing in critical technologies in the US, and our acquisition of Zymergen helps keep bio foundries growing in the US. Were
having this issue with chips, were trying to bring chip foundries back, we should just not lose the bio foundries to begin with. And thats one of the reasons I think this acquisition is so important that were doing.
. . .
Matt Larew, William Blair & Company:
Okay. And then, Jason, as a follow-up, you walk through this Zymergen and Bayer transaction. Well, both are...
Theyre obviously different, both involve harnessing capabilities that were formally internally focused at each company, and leveraging them with your assets and turning them external. I was curious, neither are closed, but you
referenced, outside interest in Zymergen sale or spin assets. Potentially, what outside interest or industry chatter, or customer chatter, have you heard about those assets under your hood, and how customers might view working with you differently
than perhaps they did before?
Jason Kelly, Co-founder & CEO, Ginkgo Bioworks:
Yeah, I dont know. Anna Marie, do you want to speak to this? I know youve-
Anna Marie Wagner, SVP, Corporate Development, Ginkgo Bioworks:
Sure. Yeah. Obviously, deals havent closed yet, and so we dont want to speak for Zymergen. But certainly weve been speaking with our
customers about both transactions and a lot of excitement, obviously, about both the expansion of capabilities, as well as the strengthening of our platform. In terms of the inbound interest you referenced relative to the product portfolio,
thats about as much as we can and should stay at this point. But certainly, real interest and an opportunity to see additional value there.
Matt
Larew, William Blair & Company:
Okay. Thank you.
. . .
Anna Marie Wagner, SVP, Corporate Development, Ginkgo
Bioworks: