ITEM 2.
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
All statements in this document, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements which may be identified by the use of the words "expects," "believes," "anticipates," "plans," "would," "should," "may," "estimates" and similar expressions.
These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties, which may cause our actual results and performance to be materially different from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements.
Factors and risks that may impact our future results and performance include, but are not limited to, those described in Part 1,
Item 1A, "Risk Factors"
and in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on February 29, 2016 and in our other filings with the SEC and the following:
|
·
|
|
general risks associated with the ownership and operation of real estate, including changes in demand, risks related to development of self-storage facilities, potential liability for environmental contamination, natural disasters and adverse changes in laws and regulations governing property tax, real estate and zoning;
|
|
·
|
|
risks associated with downturns in the national and local economies in the markets in which we operate, including risks related to current economic conditions and the economic health of our customers;
|
|
·
|
|
the impact of competition from new and existing self-storage and commercial facilities and other storage alternatives;
|
|
·
|
|
difficulties in our ability to successfully evaluate, finance, integrate into our existing operations, and manage acquired and developed properties;
|
|
·
|
|
risks associated with international operations including, but not limited to, unfavorable foreign currency rate fluctuations, changes in tax laws, and local and global economic uncertainty that could adversely affect our earnings and cash flows;
|
|
·
|
|
risks related to our participation in joint ventures;
|
|
·
|
|
the impact of the regulatory environment as well as national, state, and local laws and regulations including, without limitation, those governing environmental, taxes, our tenant reinsurance business and labor, and risks related to the impact of new laws and regulations;
|
|
·
|
|
risks of increased tax expense associated either with a possible failure by us to qualify as a REIT, or with challenges to the determination of taxable income for our taxable REIT subsidiaries;
|
|
·
|
|
changes in federal or state tax laws related to the taxation of REITs and other corporations;
|
|
·
|
|
security breaches or a failure of our networks, systems or technology could adversely impact our business, customer and employee relationships;
|
|
·
|
|
risks associated with the self-insurance of certain business risks, including property and casualty insurance, employee health insurance and workers compensation liabilities;
|
|
·
|
|
difficulties in raising capital at a reasonable cost;
|
|
·
|
|
delays in the development process;
|
|
·
|
|
ongoing litigation and other legal and regulatory actions which may divert management’s time and attention, require us to pay damages and expenses or restrict the operation of our business; and
|
|
·
|
|
economic uncertainty due to the impact of war or terrorism.
|
These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report. All of our forward-looking statements, including those in this report, are qualified in their entirety by this statement. We expressly disclaim any obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, new estimates, or other factors, events or circumstances after the date of this report, except where expressly required by law. Given these risks and uncertainties, you should not rely on any forward-looking statements in this report, or which management may make orally or in writing from time to time, as predictions of future events nor guarantees of future performance.
Cri
tical Accounting Policies
Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States (“U.S.”) generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and are affected by our judgments, assumptions and estimates. The notes to our June 30, 2016 financial statements, primarily Note 2, summarize our significant accounting policies.
We believe the following are our critical accounting policies, because they have a material impact on the portrayal of our financial condition and results, and they require us to make judgments and estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain.
Income Tax Expense:
We have elected to be treated as a REIT, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). As a REIT, we do not incur federal income tax on our REIT taxable income that is fully distributed each year (for this purpose, certain distributions paid in a subsequent year may be considered), and if we meet certain organizational and operational rules. We believe we have met these REIT requirements for all periods presented herein. Accordingly, we have recorded no federal income tax expense related to our REIT taxable income.
Our evaluation that we have met the REIT requirements could be incorrect, because compliance with the tax rules requires factual determinations, and circumstances we have not identified could result in noncompliance with the tax requirements in current or prior years. For any taxable year that we fail to qualify as a REIT and for which applicable statutory relief provisions did not apply, we would be taxed at the regular corporate rates on all of our taxable income for at least that year and the ensuing four years, we could be subject to penalties and interest, and our net income would be materially different from the amounts estimated in our financial statements.
In addition, our taxable REIT subsidiaries are taxable as regular corporations. To the extent that amounts paid to us by our taxable REIT subsidiaries are determined by the taxing authorities to not be reasonable when compared to similar arrangements among unrelated parties, we could be subject to a 100% penalty tax on the excess payments. Such a penalty tax could have a material adverse impact on our net income.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets:
The analysis of impairment of our long-lived assets involves identification of indicators of impairment, projections of future operating cash flows, and estimates of fair values, all of which require significant judgment and subjectivity. Others could come to materially different conclusions. In addition, we may not have identified all current facts and circumstances that may affect impairment. Any unidentified impairment loss, or change in conclusions, could have a material adverse impact on our net income.
Accrual for Uncertain and Contingent Liabilities:
We accrue for certain contingent and other liabilities that have significant uncertain elements, such as property taxes, workers compensation claims, tenant reinsurance claims, as well as other legal claims and disputes involving customers, employees, governmental agencies and other third parties. Such liabilities we are aware of are estimated based upon many factors such as assumptions of past and future trends and our evaluation of likely outcomes. However, the estimates of known liabilities could be
incorrect or we may not be aware of all such liabilities, in which case our accrued liabilities and net income could be misstated.
Accounting for acquired real estate facilities:
We estimate the fair values of the land, buildings and intangible assets acquired for purposes of allocating the purchase price. Such estimates are based upon many assumptions and judgments, including (i) market rates of return and capitalization rates on real estate and intangible assets, (ii) building and material cost levels, (iii) comparisons of the acquired underlying land parcels to recent land transactions, and (iv) future cash flows from the real estate and the existing tenant base. Others could come to materially different conclusions as to the estimated fair values, which would result in different depreciation and amortization expense, gains and losses on sale of real estate assets, and real estate and intangible assets.
Overview
Our self-storage operations generated most of our net income for all periods presented. Accordingly, a significant portion of management’s time is devoted to maximizing cash flows from our existing self-storage facilities, as well as seeking additional investments in self-storage facilities.
Most of our facilities compete with other well-managed and well-located competitors and we are subject to general economic conditions, particularly those that affect the spending habits of consumers and moving trends. We believe that our centralized information networks, national telephone and online reservation system, the brand name “Public Storage,” and our economies of scale enable us to meet such challenges effectively.
We plan on growing our business organically, as well as through acquisition and development of additional facilities.
During 2015, 2014 and 2013, we acquired a total of 182 facilities from third parties for approximately $1.8 billion. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, we acquired 24 self-storage facilities for $197.6 million.
Subsequent to June 30, 2016, we acquired or were under contract to acquire 21 self-storage facilities for $169.4 million.
We will continue to seek to acquire properties; however, there is significant competition to acquire existing facilities
and there can be no assurance as to the level of facilities we may acquire.
Since the beginning of 2013, we
have
opened development and expansion projects with a total cost of
$
443.9
million
, adding
approximately 4.2
million net rentable square feet. As of
June 30
, 2016, we had additional projects which
will add approximately 4.9 million net rentable square feet of storage space
at a total cost of approximately $
630.7
million
.
A total of $228
.1
million in costs were incurred through June 30, 2016 with respect to these projects, with the remaining costs expected
to
be incurred primarily in the next 18 months.
We expect to continue to seek additional development projects; however, the level of future development may be limited due to various constraints such as difficulty in finding available sites that meet our risk-adjusted yield expectations, as well as challenges in obtaining building permits for self-storage activities in certain municipalities.
We believe that our real estate development activities are beneficial to our business operations over the long run. However, in the short run, due to the three to four year period that it takes to fill up newly developed storage space and achieve a stabilized level of cash flows, our earnings are diluted because earnings from those newly developed and expanded facilities are less than the cost of the capital required in order to fund the development cost. We believe that this dilution will grow in the remainder of 2016 and beyond due to the increasing level of development and unstabilized properties in our portfolio.
We also have equity investments in Shurgard Europe and PS Business Parks, Inc. (“PSB”). We may make further investments in these companies.
As of June 30, 2016, our
capital resources
over the next year are expected to be approximately $1.4 billion which exceeds
our current planned
capital needs over the next year
of approximately
$1.1 billion
. Our ca
pital resources include: (i) $
260
.1
million of cash as of June 30
, 2016, (ii) $484.8
million of available borrowing capacity on our revolving line of credit, (iii) $300
.0
million to $350
.0
million of expected retained operating cash flow for the next twelve months, and (iv) $314
.4
million of net proceeds from the issuance of our Series D Preferred Shares on July 20, 2016. Retained
operating cash flow represents our expected cash
flow provided by operating activities, less shareholder distributions and capital expenditures to maintain real estate facilities.
Our planned capital needs over the next year consist of (i) $402.6 million of remaining spend on our current development pipeline, (ii)
$169
.4
million
in property acquisitions currently under contract, (iii) $26.7 million in principal repayments on existing debt, and (iv) $487.5 million for the redemption of our Series R Preferred Shares on July 26, 2016. Our capital needs may increase significantly over the next year as we expect to increase our development pipeline and acquire additional properties.
See
Liquidity and Capital Resources
for further information regarding our capital requirements and anticipated sources of capital to fund such requirements.
Results of Operations
Operating results for the Three
and Six
Months Ended
June 30
, 2016 and 2015
For the
three months ended June 30, 2016, net income allocable to our
common shareholders was $280.8
million or $1.61 per diluted common share, compared to $263.9 million or $1.52 in 2015 representing an increase of $16.9 million or $0.09. The increase is primarily due to (i) a $33.5 million increase in self-storage net operating income (described below) and (ii) an $8.6 million foreign exchange translation gain associated with our euro denominated debt, partially offset by (iii) a $15.5 million allocation to our preferred shareholders as a result of redemption activities during the three months ended June 30, 2016 and (iv) $16.7 million in gains on sale of real estate investments recorded in the three months ended June 30, 2015.
The $33.5 million increase in self-storage net operating income is a result of a $23.9 million increase in our Same Store Facilities (as defined below) and a $9.6 million increase in our Non Same Store Facilities (as defined below). Revenues for the Same Store Facilities increased 6.0% or $29.4 million in the three months ended June 30, 2016 as compared to 2015, due primarily to higher realized annual rent per occupied square foot. Cost of operations for the Same Store Facilities increased by 4.2% or $5.5 million in the three months ended June 30, 2016 as compared to 2015, due primarily to increased property taxes, repairs and maintenance and payroll. The increase in net operating income for the Non Same Store Facilities is due primarily to the impact of 296 self-storage facilities acquired, developed or expanded since January 2013.
For the six months ended June 30, 2016, net income allocable to our
common shareholders was $522.1
million or $3.00 per diluted common share, compared to $476.5 million or $2.75 in 2015 representing an increase of $45.6 million or $0.25. The increase is primarily due to (i) a $78.8 million increase in self-storage net operating income offset partially by (ii) a $22.1 million increase in allocation to our preferred shareholders as a result of redemption activities and (iii) a $17.5 million reduction in gains on sales of real estate investments.
The $78.8 million increase in self-storage net operating income is a result of a $58.4 million increase in our Same Store Facilities and a $20.4 million increase in our Non Same Store Facilities. Revenues for the Same Store Facilities increased 6.2% or $60.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2016 as compared to 2015, due primarily to higher realized annual rent per occupied square foot. Cost of operations for the Same Store Facilities increased by 0.6% or $1.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2016 as compared to 2015, due primarily to increased property taxes, repairs and maintenance, and payroll, offset partially by lower snow removal, utilities and advertising and selling expense. The increase in net operating income for the Non Same Store Facilities is due primarily to the impact of 296 self-storage facilities acquired, developed or expanded since January 2013.
Funds from Operations and Core Funds from Operations
Funds from Operations (“FFO”) and FFO per share are non-GAAP measures defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts and are considered helpful measures of REIT performance by REITs and many REIT analysts. FFO represents net income before real estate depreciation, gains and losses, and impairment charges, which are excluded because they are based upon historical real estate costs and assume that building values diminish ratably over time, while we believe that real estate values fluctuate due to market conditions. FFO and FFO per share are not a substitute for net income or earnings per share. FFO is not a substitute for GAAP net cash flow in evaluating our liquidity or ability to pay dividends, because it excludes financing
activities presented on our statements of cash flows. In addition, other REITs may compute these measures differently, so comparisons among REITs may not be
helpful.
For
the three months ended June 30, 2016
, FFO was $2.34 per diluted common share, as compared to $2.15 for the same period in 2015, representing an increase of 8.8%, or $0.19 per
diluted common share.
For
the six months ended June 30,
2016
,
FFO was $4.43 per diluted common share, as compared to $4.06 for the same period in 2015, representing an increase of 9.1%, or $0.37 per
diluted common share.
The following tables reconcile diluted earnings per share to FFO per share and set forth the computation of FFO per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Reconciliation of Diluted Earnings per Share to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings per Share
|
|
$
|
1.61
|
|
$
|
1.52
|
|
$
|
3.00
|
|
$
|
2.75
|
|
Eliminate amounts per share excluded from FFO:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization, including
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amounts from investments and excluding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amounts allocated to noncontrolling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
interests and restricted share unitholders
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
|
1.43
|
|
|
1.44
|
|
Gains on sale of real estate investments,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
including our equity share from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
investments, and other
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
(0.09)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(0.13)
|
|
FFO per share
|
|
$
|
2.34
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
$
|
4.43
|
|
$
|
4.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computation of FFO per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income allocable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
280,775
|
|
$
|
263,926
|
|
$
|
522,110
|
|
$
|
476,539
|
|
Eliminate items excluded from FFO:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
107,013
|
|
|
106,473
|
|
|
212,141
|
|
|
213,619
|
|
Depreciation from unconsolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
real estate investments
|
|
|
19,454
|
|
|
19,035
|
|
|
38,991
|
|
|
37,816
|
|
Depreciation allocated to noncontrolling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
interests and restricted share unitholders
|
|
|
(876)
|
|
|
(828)
|
|
|
(1,758)
|
|
|
(1,755)
|
|
Gains on sale of real estate investments,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
including our equity share from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
investments, and other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(16,625)
|
|
|
(689)
|
|
|
(23,103)
|
|
FFO allocable to common shares
|
|
$
|
406,366
|
|
$
|
371,981
|
|
$
|
770,795
|
|
$
|
703,116
|
|
Diluted weighted average common shares
|
|
|
174,000
|
|
|
173,387
|
|
|
173,925
|
|
|
173,377
|
|
FFO per share
|
|
$
|
2.34
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
$
|
4.43
|
|
$
|
4.06
|
|
We also present “Core FFO per share,” a non-GAAP measure that represents FFO per share excluding the impac
t of (i) foreign currency exchange gains and losses,
(ii) EITF
D-42 charges related to the redemption
of preferred securities, (iii) general and administrative expenses associated with the acquisition of self-storage facilities and (iv) certain other noncash and/or nonrecurring income or expense items. We review Core FFO per share to evaluate our ongoing operating performance, and we believe it is used by investors and REIT analysts in a similar manner. However, Core FFO per share is not a substitute for net income per share. Because other REITs may not compute Core FFO per share in the same manner as we do, may not use the same terminology or may not present such a measure, Core FFO per share may not be comparable among REITs.
The following table reconciles FFO per share to Core FFO per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
Change
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO per share
|
$
|
2.34
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
8.8%
|
|
$
|
4.43
|
|
$
|
4.06
|
|
9.1%
|
Eliminate the per share impact of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
items excluded from Core FFO:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange (gain) loss,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net, including our equity share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from investments
|
|
(0.04)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Application of EITF D-42
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
Property acquisition costs
|
|
-
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
Other items
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Core FFO per share
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
$
|
2.17
|
|
10.6%
|
|
$
|
4.61
|
|
$
|
4.11
|
|
12.2%
|
Analysis of Net Income by Reportable Segment
The following discussion and analysis is presented and organized in accordan
ce with Note 1
0
to our
June
30, 2016
financial statements, “Segment Information.” Accordingly, refer to the tables presented in Note 1
0
in order to reconcile such amounts to our total net income and for further information on our reportable segments.
Self-Storage Operations
Our self-storage operations are analyzed in two groups: (i)
the 2,003 facilities
that we have owned and operated on a stabilized basis since January 1, 201
4
(the “Same Store Facilities”), and (ii) all other facilities, which are newly acquired, newly developed, or recently expanded (the “Non Same Store Facilities”). See Note 1
0
to our
June 30, 2016 financial statements “Segment Information,” for a reconciliation of the amounts in the tables below to our total net income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Self-Storage Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
Change
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
Change
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Store Facilities
|
$
|
521,316
|
|
$
|
491,941
|
|
6.0%
|
|
$
|
1,027,452
|
|
$
|
967,368
|
|
6.2%
|
Non Same Store Facilities
|
|
73,071
|
|
|
59,087
|
|
23.7%
|
|
|
141,521
|
|
|
114,297
|
|
23.8%
|
|
|
594,387
|
|
|
551,028
|
|
7.9%
|
|
|
1,168,973
|
|
|
1,081,665
|
|
8.1%
|
Cost of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Store Facilities
|
|
136,037
|
|
|
130,536
|
|
4.2%
|
|
|
275,850
|
|
|
274,157
|
|
0.6%
|
Non Same Store Facilities
|
|
21,650
|
|
|
17,290
|
|
25.2%
|
|
|
41,700
|
|
|
34,911
|
|
19.4%
|
|
|
157,687
|
|
|
147,826
|
|
6.7%
|
|
|
317,550
|
|
|
309,068
|
|
2.7%
|
Net operating income (a):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Store Facilities
|
|
385,279
|
|
|
361,405
|
|
6.6%
|
|
|
751,602
|
|
|
693,211
|
|
8.4%
|
Non Same Store Facilities
|
|
51,421
|
|
|
41,797
|
|
23.0%
|
|
|
99,821
|
|
|
79,386
|
|
25.7%
|
Total net operating income
|
|
436,700
|
|
|
403,202
|
|
8.3%
|
|
|
851,423
|
|
|
772,597
|
|
10.2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Store Facilities
|
|
(81,889)
|
|
|
(83,418)
|
|
(1.8)%
|
|
|
(163,534)
|
|
|
(166,372)
|
|
(1.7)%
|
Non Same Store Facilities
|
|
(25,124)
|
|
|
(23,055)
|
|
9.0%
|
|
|
(48,607)
|
|
|
(47,247)
|
|
2.9%
|
Total depreciation and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amortization expense
|
|
(107,013)
|
|
|
(106,473)
|
|
0.5%
|
|
|
(212,141)
|
|
|
(213,619)
|
|
(0.7)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Store Facilities
|
|
303,390
|
|
|
277,987
|
|
9.1%
|
|
|
588,068
|
|
|
526,839
|
|
11.6%
|
Non Same Store Facilities
|
|
26,297
|
|
|
18,742
|
|
40.3%
|
|
|
51,214
|
|
|
32,139
|
|
59.4%
|
Total net income
|
$
|
329,687
|
|
$
|
296,729
|
|
11.1%
|
|
$
|
639,282
|
|
$
|
558,978
|
|
14.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of facilities at period end:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Store Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,003
|
|
|
2,003
|
|
-
|
Non Same Store Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
247
|
|
19.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net rentable square footage at period end (in thousands):
|
|
|
Same Store Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,546
|
|
|
127,546
|
|
-
|
Non Same Store Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,788
|
|
|
18,337
|
|
24.3%
|
|
(a)
|
|
Net operating income or “NOI” is a non-GAAP financial measure that excludes the impact of depreciation and amortization expense, which is based upon historical real estate costs and assumes that building values diminish ratably over time, while we believe that real estate values fluctuate due to market conditions. We utilize NOI in determining current property values, evaluating property performance, and in evaluating operating trends. We believe that investors and analysts utilize NOI in a similar manner. NOI is not a substitute for net income, net operating cash flow, or other related GAAP financial measures, in evaluating our operating results.
See Note 10 to our June 30, 2016 financial statements for a reconciliation of NOI to our total net income for all periods presented.
|
Net operating income from our self-storage operations has increased 8.3% and 10.2% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2015. These increases are due to higher revenues in our Same Store Facilities, as well as the acquisition of new facilities and the fill-up of unstabilized facilities.
Same Store Facilities
The Same Store Facilities represent those facilities that have been owned and operated on a stabilized level of occupancy, revenues and cost of operations since January 1, 2014. We review the operations of our Same Store Facilities, which excludes facilities whose operating trends are significantly affected by factors such as facilities damaged by casualty events, as well as recently developed or acquired facilities, to more effectively evaluate the ongoing performance of our self-storage portfolio in 2014, 2015, and 2016. We believe the Same Store information is used by investors and analysts in a similar manner. The Same Store pool decreased from the 2,007 facilities at March 31, 2016 to 2,003 facilities at June 30, 2016 due primarily to flooding at certain properties in our Houston market. The following table summarizes the historical operating results of these 2,003 facilities (127.5 million net rentable square feet) that represent approximately 85% of the aggregate net rentable square feet of our U.S. consolidated self-storage portfolio at June 30, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Data for the Same Store Facilities (2,003 facilities)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except weighted average amounts)
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income
|
$
|
498,172
|
|
$
|
469,725
|
|
6.1%
|
|
$
|
980,593
|
|
$
|
922,998
|
|
6.2%
|
Late charges and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
administrative fees
|
|
23,144
|
|
|
22,216
|
|
4.2%
|
|
|
46,859
|
|
|
44,370
|
|
5.6%
|
Total revenues (a)
|
|
521,316
|
|
|
491,941
|
|
6.0%
|
|
|
1,027,452
|
|
|
967,368
|
|
6.2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property taxes
|
|
52,940
|
|
|
50,404
|
|
5.0%
|
|
|
105,776
|
|
|
101,014
|
|
4.7%
|
On-site property manager
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
payroll
|
|
27,058
|
|
|
25,419
|
|
6.4%
|
|
|
54,159
|
|
|
52,527
|
|
3.1%
|
Supervisory payroll
|
|
9,478
|
|
|
9,074
|
|
4.5%
|
|
|
18,616
|
|
|
18,151
|
|
2.6%
|
Repairs and maintenance
|
|
10,324
|
|
|
9,044
|
|
14.2%
|
|
|
21,456
|
|
|
25,267
|
|
(15.1)%
|
Utilities
|
|
8,684
|
|
|
9,270
|
|
(6.3)%
|
|
|
18,736
|
|
|
19,932
|
|
(6.0)%
|
Advertising and selling expense
|
5,563
|
|
|
5,553
|
|
0.2%
|
|
|
10,655
|
|
|
11,758
|
|
(9.4)%
|
Other direct property costs
|
|
13,476
|
|
|
13,418
|
|
0.4%
|
|
|
27,137
|
|
|
26,515
|
|
2.3%
|
Allocated overhead
|
|
8,514
|
|
|
8,354
|
|
1.9%
|
|
|
19,315
|
|
|
18,993
|
|
1.7%
|
Total cost of operations (a)
|
|
136,037
|
|
|
130,536
|
|
4.2%
|
|
|
275,850
|
|
|
274,157
|
|
0.6%
|
Net operating income
|
|
385,279
|
|
|
361,405
|
|
6.6%
|
|
|
751,602
|
|
|
693,211
|
|
8.4%
|
Depreciation and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amortization expense
|
|
(81,889)
|
|
|
(83,418)
|
|
(1.8)%
|
|
|
(163,534)
|
|
|
(166,372)
|
|
(1.7)%
|
Net income
|
$
|
303,390
|
|
$
|
277,987
|
|
9.1%
|
|
$
|
588,068
|
|
$
|
526,839
|
|
11.6%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin (before depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and amortization expense)
|
73.9%
|
|
|
73.5%
|
|
0.5%
|
|
|
73.2%
|
|
|
71.7%
|
|
2.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average for the period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square foot occupancy
|
95.3%
|
|
|
95.4%
|
|
(0.1)%
|
|
|
94.5%
|
|
|
94.4%
|
|
0.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized annual rental income per (b):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupied square foot
|
$
|
16.39
|
|
$
|
15.45
|
|
6.1%
|
|
$
|
16.28
|
|
$
|
15.34
|
|
6.1%
|
Available square foot
|
$
|
15.62
|
|
$
|
14.73
|
|
6.0%
|
|
$
|
15.38
|
|
$
|
14.47
|
|
6.3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square foot occupancy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95.2%
|
|
|
95.7%
|
|
(0.5)%
|
Annual contract rent per
|
|
|
|
|
|
occupied square foot (c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
17.13
|
|
$
|
16.26
|
|
5.4%
|
|
(a)
|
|
Revenues and cost of operations do not include tenant reinsurance and merchandise sale revenues and expenses generated at the facilities.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Realized annual rent per occupied square foot is computed by dividing rental income, before late charges and administrative fees, by the weighted average occupied square feet for the period. Realized annual rent per available square foot (“REVPAF”) is computed by dividing rental income, before late charges and administrative fees, by the total available net rentable square feet for the period. These measures exclude late charges and administrative fees in order to provide a better measure of our ongoing level of revenue. Late charges are dependent upon the level of delinquency, and administrative fees are dependent upon the level of move-ins. In addition, the rates charged for late charges and administrative fees can vary independently from rental rates. These measures take into consideration promotional discounts, which reduce rental income.
|
|
(c)
|
|
Annual contract rent represents the applicable annualized contractual monthly rent charged to our tenants, excluding the impact of bad debt expense, promotional discounts, late charges and administrative fees.
|
Analysis of Same Store Revenue
Reve
nues generated by our Same Store
Facilities increased by 6.0% and 6.2% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2015 due primarily to a 6.1% increase in each of the respective periods in realized annual rental income per occupied square foot. The increase in realized annual rental income per occupied square foot was due primarily to annual rent increases given to existing tenants and
, to a lesser extent, increased move-in rental rates.
Same Store weighted average square foot occupancy remained essentially flat at 95.3% and 94.5% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 as compared to the same periods in 2015.
At June 30, 2016, occupancy was 0.5% lower
than at the same time in 2015. We do not expect any significant impact from occupancy changes in the near term because we believe we are near limitations to occupancy levels inherent with approximately 5% to 7% of our tenant base
vacating each month without notice.
We believe that high occupancies help maximize our rental income. We seek to maintain a weighted average square foot occupancy level of at least 90%, by regularly adjusting the rental rates and promotions offered to attract new tenants as well as adjusting our marketing efforts on both television and the Internet in order to generate sufficient move-in volume to replace tenants that vacate. Demand fluctuates due to various local and regional factors, including the overall economy. Demand is higher in the summer months than in the winter months and, as a result, rental rates charged to new tenants are typically higher in the summer months than in the winter months.
Increasing rental rates to existing tenants, generally on an annual basis, is a key component of our revenue growth. We determine the level of rental increases based upon our expectations regarding the impact of existing tenant rate increases on incremental move-outs. We expect to continue to pass similar rent increases to long-term tenants in the remainder of 2016 as we did the same periods in 2015.
During the three months
ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the average annualized contractual rates per occupied square foot for tenants that moved in were $15.38 and $14.87, respectively, and for tenants that vacated were $15.38 and $14.64, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the average annualized contractual rates per occupied square foot for tenants that moved in were $14.72 and $14.25, respectively, and for tenants that vacated were $15.31 and $14.58, respectively. Realized annual rental income per occupied square foot has increased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same periods in 2015, despite average move-in rates for tenants moving in being generally less than average rates for tenants that vacate, due primarily to rate increases to existing
tenants.
Promotional discounts given, based upon the move-in contractual rates for the related p
romotional period, totaled $21.1 million and $41.5
million for three and six months ended June 30, 2016, re
spectively, as compared to $20.9 million and $41.2
mill
ion for the same periods in 2015.
We believe rental growth in the remainder of 2016 will need to come from continued annual rent increases to existing tenants and higher rental rates charged to new tenants. Our future rental growth will also be dependent
upon many factors for each market that we operate in, including demand for self-storage space, the level of new supply of self-storage space and the average length of stay of our tenants.
We believe that the current trends in move-in, move-out, in place contractual rents and occupancy levels are consistent with our expectation of continued revenue growth in the remainder of 2016. However, such trends, when viewed in the short-run, are volatile and not necessarily predictive of our revenues going forward because they are subject to many short-term factors. Such factors include initial move-in rates, seasonal factors, the unit size and geographical mix of the specific tenants moving in or moving out, the length of stay of the tenants moving in or moving out, changes in our pricing strategies, and the degree and timing of rate increases previously passed to existing tenants.
We expect year-over-year growth in our Same Store revenues will moderate as the year progresses. We are experiencing softness in demand in certain of our major markets, including Houston, Denver, Chicago, New York, and Washington D.C. We attribute some of this softness to local economic conditions and, in some markets, increased supply of newly constructed self-storage facilities; including facilities that we have constructed.
We are taking a number of actions to improve demand into our system, including increasing marketing spend on the Internet, reducing rental rates, and increasing promotional discounts. Even if these actions are successful in improving demand into our system, in at least the near term, we believe these actions will have a negative impact on our operating trends.
Analysis of Same Store Cost of Operations
Cost of operations (excluding depreciation and
amortization) increased 4.2% and 0.6% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2015, due primarily to increased property tax expense, on-site property manager payroll and repairs
and maintenance expense (excluding snow removal cost), and for the six months ended June 30, 2016, offset partially by reduced snow removal cost, utilities and advertising and selling expense.
Property
tax expense increased 5.0% and 4.7% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2015, due
primarily to higher assessed values. We expect property tax expense growth of approximately 4.5% to 5% in the
remainder
of 2016 due primarily to higher assessed values.
On-site property manager payroll
expense increased 6.4% and 3.1% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, as compared to the same periods in 2015, due
primarily to
reductions
in
prior estimates of
workers compensation costs
recorded in the three and six months ended June 30, 2015
, higher
employee
health care expenses and higher wage rates.
We
expect
on-site property manager payroll expense
to increase modestly
in the remainder of 2016 due to
inflationary wage increases and higher employee health care costs
.
Supervisory payroll expense, which
represents compensation paid to the management personnel who directly and indirectly supervise the on-site property managers, increased 4.5% and 2.6% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2015 due primarily to higher wage rates. We expect inflationary increases in compensation
rates in the remainder of 2016.
Repairs and
maintenance expense increased 14.2% and decreased 15.1% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, as compared to the same periods in 2015. Repair and maintenance costs include snow removal expense totaling $0.5 million and $3.3 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, as compared to $0.3 million and $8.5 million in the same periods in 2015. The decrease in snow removal costs was due to less snowfall in the six months ended June 30, 2016, as compared to the same period in 2015. Excluding snow removal costs, repairs and maintenance increased 12.3% and 8.0% in the three
and six months ended June 30
, 2016,
respectively,
as compared to the same period
s
in 2015.
Repairs and maintenance expense levels are dependent upon many factors such as weather conditions, which can impact repair and maintenance needs including snow removal, inflation in material and labor costs, and
random events. We expect inflationary increases in repairs and maintenance expense in the remainder of 2016, excluding snow removal expense, which is primarily weather dependent and not predictable.
Our utility expenses are comprised primarily of electricity costs, which are dependent upon energy prices and
usage levels.
Changes in usage levels are driven primarily by weather and temperature. Utility expense decreased 6.3% and 6.0% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2015, due primarily to lower usage as a result of milder weather.
It is difficult to estimate future utility costs, because weather, temperature, and energy prices are volatile and not predictable. However, based upon current trends and expectations regarding commercial electricity rates, we expect inflationary increases in rates.
Advertising and selling expense is comprised principally of Internet advertising, television advertising and the operating costs of our telephone reservation center. Advertising and selling expense varies based upon demand, occupancy levels, and other factors; television and Internet
advertising, in particular, can increase or decrease significantly in the short
run in response to these factors. Advertising and selling expenses increased 0.2% and decreased 9.4% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2015, due primarily to reduced
television advertising costs in the six months ended June 30, 2015. As mentioned above, we have increased our Internet marketing expenditures and we plan on increasing our television advertising expenditures beginning in late August due to softness in demand in several of our larger markets. As a result, we expect advertising and selling expense to increase significantly in the three months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the same period in 2015.
Other direct property costs include administrative expenses incurred at the self-storage facilities, such as property insurance, business license costs, bank charges related to processing the facilities’ cash receipts, credit card fees, and the cost of
operating each property’s rental office including supplies and telephone data communication lines. These costs increased 0.4% and 2.3% in the
three
and six
months ended
June 30
, 2016,
respectively,
as compared to the same period
s
in 2015. The increase
s
were
due primarily to higher credit card fees, offset partially by lower property insurance costs. Credit card fees increased due to a higher proportion of collections being received from credit cards and higher revenues. We expect moderate increases in other direct property costs in the remainder of 2016.
Allocated overhead represents administrative expenses for shared general corporate functions, which are allocated to self-storage property operations to the extent their efforts
are devoted to self-storage operations. Such functions include data processing, human resources, operational accounting and finance, marketing, and costs of senior executives (other than the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, which are included in general and administrative expense). Allocated overhead increased 1.9% and 1.7% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, as compared to the same periods in 2015, due primarily to increased compensation costs. We expect
moderate
growth in allocated overhead in the remainder of 2016 as compared to 2015
due to inflationary wage increases and increased headcount
.
Analysis of Same Store Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and
amortization for Same Store Facilities decreased 1.8% and 1.7% during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2016, as compared to the same periods in 2015. We expect similar decreases in the remainder of 2016 as compared to 2015
.
The following table summarizes selected quarterly financial data with respect to the Same Store Facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
June 30
|
|
September 30
|
|
December 31
|
|
Entire Year
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except for per square foot amounts)
|
Total revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
$
|
506,136
|
|
$
|
521,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015
|
$
|
475,427
|
|
$
|
491,941
|
|
$
|
516,918
|
|
$
|
508,054
|
|
$
|
1,992,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
$
|
139,813
|
|
$
|
136,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015
|
$
|
143,621
|
|
$
|
130,536
|
|
$
|
133,765
|
|
$
|
107,368
|
|
$
|
515,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
$
|
52,836
|
|
$
|
52,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015
|
$
|
50,610
|
|
$
|
50,404
|
|
$
|
50,053
|
|
$
|
27,958
|
|
$
|
179,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repairs and maintenance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
$
|
11,132
|
|
$
|
10,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015
|
$
|
16,223
|
|
$
|
9,044
|
|
$
|
10,198
|
|
$
|
10,318
|
|
$
|
45,783
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertising and selling expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
$
|
5,092
|
|
$
|
5,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015
|
$
|
6,205
|
|
$
|
5,553
|
|
$
|
6,970
|
|
$
|
6,447
|
|
$
|
25,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVPAF:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
$
|
15.13
|
|
$
|
15.62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015
|
$
|
14.22
|
|
$
|
14.73
|
|
$
|
15.44
|
|
$
|
15.19
|
|
$
|
14.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average realized annual rent per occupied square foot:
|
|
|
|
2016
|
$
|
16.16
|
|
$
|
16.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015
|
$
|
15.22
|
|
$
|
15.45
|
|
$
|
16.20
|
|
$
|
16.19
|
|
$
|
15.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average occupancy levels for the period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
93.6%
|
|
|
95.3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
93.4%
|
|
|
95.4%
|
|
|
95.3%
|
|
|
93.9%
|
|
|
94.5%
|
Analysis of
Market
Trends
The following table sets forth
selected market
trends in our Same Store Facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Store Facilities Operating Trends by Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except for weighted average data)
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Los Angeles (204 facilities)
|
$
|
79,736
|
|
$
|
73,996
|
|
7.8%
|
|
$
|
157,322
|
|
$
|
145,717
|
|
8.0%
|
|
San Francisco (126 facilities)
|
|
43,842
|
|
|
40,772
|
|
7.5%
|
|
|
86,155
|
|
|
80,029
|
|
7.7%
|
|
New York (86 facilities)
|
|
35,299
|
|
|
34,016
|
|
3.8%
|
|
|
69,799
|
|
|
66,998
|
|
4.2%
|
|
Chicago (129 facilities)
|
|
29,872
|
|
|
29,287
|
|
2.0%
|
|
|
58,947
|
|
|
57,680
|
|
2.2%
|
|
Washington DC (78 facilities)
|
|
24,215
|
|
|
23,715
|
|
2.1%
|
|
|
47,693
|
|
|
46,606
|
|
2.3%
|
|
Seattle-Tacoma (82 facilities)
|
|
24,334
|
|
|
22,253
|
|
9.4%
|
|
|
47,490
|
|
|
43,616
|
|
8.9%
|
|
Miami (65 facilities)
|
|
22,737
|
|
|
21,468
|
|
5.9%
|
|
|
45,089
|
|
|
42,556
|
|
6.0%
|
|
Dallas-Ft. Worth (98 facilities)
|
20,873
|
|
|
19,408
|
|
7.5%
|
|
|
41,159
|
|
|
38,032
|
|
8.2%
|
|
Houston (75 facilities)
|
|
17,568
|
|
|
17,206
|
|
2.1%
|
|
|
35,091
|
|
|
33,877
|
|
3.6%
|
|
Atlanta (91 facilities)
|
|
18,168
|
|
|
16,749
|
|
8.5%
|
|
|
35,756
|
|
|
33,059
|
|
8.2%
|
|
Philadelphia (56 facilities)
|
|
13,039
|
|
|
12,352
|
|
5.6%
|
|
|
25,726
|
|
|
24,350
|
|
5.7%
|
|
Denver (44 facilities)
|
|
11,443
|
|
|
11,064
|
|
3.4%
|
|
|
22,505
|
|
|
21,447
|
|
4.9%
|
|
Minneapolis-St Paul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41 facilities)
|
9,630
|
|
|
9,267
|
|
3.9%
|
|
|
18,764
|
|
|
18,045
|
|
4.0%
|
|
Portland (40 facilities)
|
|
9,355
|
|
|
8,528
|
|
9.7%
|
|
|
18,273
|
|
|
16,549
|
|
10.4%
|
|
Orlando-Daytona (49 facilities)
|
9,471
|
|
|
8,827
|
|
7.3%
|
|
|
18,741
|
|
|
17,397
|
|
7.7%
|
|
All other markets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(739 facilities)
|
151,734
|
|
|
143,033
|
|
6.1%
|
|
|
298,942
|
|
|
281,410
|
|
6.2%
|
|
Total revenues
|
$
|
521,316
|
|
$
|
491,941
|
|
6.0%
|
|
$
|
1,027,452
|
|
$
|
967,368
|
|
6.2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Los Angeles
|
$
|
65,567
|
|
$
|
60,417
|
|
8.5%
|
|
$
|
128,469
|
|
$
|
117,667
|
|
9.2%
|
|
San Francisco
|
|
35,765
|
|
|
33,174
|
|
7.8%
|
|
|
69,760
|
|
|
64,422
|
|
8.3%
|
|
New York
|
|
25,586
|
|
|
24,435
|
|
4.7%
|
|
|
48,828
|
|
|
45,453
|
|
7.4%
|
|
Chicago
|
|
16,818
|
|
|
17,221
|
|
(2.3)%
|
|
|
32,112
|
|
|
31,007
|
|
3.6%
|
|
Washington DC
|
|
18,262
|
|
|
17,979
|
|
1.6%
|
|
|
35,818
|
|
|
34,478
|
|
3.9%
|
|
Seattle-Tacoma
|
|
19,268
|
|
|
17,332
|
|
11.2%
|
|
|
37,246
|
|
|
33,618
|
|
10.8%
|
|
Miami
|
|
16,453
|
|
|
15,060
|
|
9.2%
|
|
|
32,622
|
|
|
29,449
|
|
10.8%
|
|
Dallas-Ft. Worth
|
|
14,363
|
|
|
13,176
|
|
9.0%
|
|
|
28,190
|
|
|
25,426
|
|
10.9%
|
|
Houston
|
|
12,159
|
|
|
12,281
|
|
(1.0)%
|
|
|
24,459
|
|
|
23,991
|
|
2.0%
|
|
Atlanta
|
|
13,247
|
|
|
11,985
|
|
10.5%
|
|
|
25,952
|
|
|
23,411
|
|
10.9%
|
|
Philadelphia
|
|
9,465
|
|
|
8,888
|
|
6.5%
|
|
|
18,181
|
|
|
16,248
|
|
11.9%
|
|
Denver
|
|
8,533
|
|
|
8,289
|
|
2.9%
|
|
|
16,717
|
|
|
15,553
|
|
7.5%
|
|
Minneapolis-St. Paul
|
|
6,742
|
|
|
6,397
|
|
5.4%
|
|
|
12,755
|
|
|
12,147
|
|
5.0%
|
|
Portland
|
|
7,343
|
|
|
6,614
|
|
11.0%
|
|
|
14,170
|
|
|
12,632
|
|
12.2%
|
|
Orlando-Daytona
|
|
6,568
|
|
|
6,069
|
|
8.2%
|
|
|
13,030
|
|
|
11,811
|
|
10.3%
|
|
All other markets
|
|
109,140
|
|
|
102,088
|
|
6.9%
|
|
|
213,293
|
|
|
195,898
|
|
8.9%
|
|
Total net operating income
|
$
|
385,279
|
|
$
|
361,405
|
|
6.6%
|
|
$
|
751,602
|
|
$
|
693,211
|
|
8.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Store Facilities Operating Trends by Market (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
Change
|
|
Weighted average square foot
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
occupancy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Los Angeles
|
|
96.2%
|
|
|
96.0%
|
|
0.2%
|
|
|
95.8%
|
|
|
95.4%
|
|
0.4%
|
|
San Francisco
|
|
96.8%
|
|
|
96.7%
|
|
0.1%
|
|
|
96.2%
|
|
|
96.0%
|
|
0.2%
|
|
New York
|
|
95.1%
|
|
|
95.6%
|
|
(0.5)%
|
|
|
94.4%
|
|
|
94.6%
|
|
(0.2)%
|
|
Chicago
|
|
93.5%
|
|
|
94.1%
|
|
(0.6)%
|
|
|
91.9%
|
|
|
92.8%
|
|
(1.0)%
|
|
Washington DC
|
|
94.8%
|
|
|
95.0%
|
|
(0.2)%
|
|
|
93.2%
|
|
|
93.1%
|
|
0.1%
|
|
Seattle-Tacoma
|
|
97.1%
|
|
|
96.0%
|
|
1.1%
|
|
|
96.0%
|
|
|
94.9%
|
|
1.2%
|
|
Miami
|
|
95.4%
|
|
|
95.1%
|
|
0.3%
|
|
|
95.2%
|
|
|
94.8%
|
|
0.4%
|
|
Dallas-Ft. Worth
|
|
95.6%
|
|
|
95.8%
|
|
(0.2)%
|
|
|
95.0%
|
|
|
94.8%
|
|
0.2%
|
|
Houston
|
|
92.3%
|
|
|
95.1%
|
|
(2.9)%
|
|
|
92.2%
|
|
|
94.4%
|
|
(2.3)%
|
|
Atlanta
|
|
95.7%
|
|
|
95.0%
|
|
0.7%
|
|
|
94.7%
|
|
|
94.1%
|
|
0.6%
|
|
Philadelphia
|
|
95.2%
|
|
|
94.5%
|
|
0.7%
|
|
|
94.3%
|
|
|
93.4%
|
|
1.0%
|
|
Denver
|
|
96.1%
|
|
|
96.8%
|
|
(0.7)%
|
|
|
95.1%
|
|
|
95.9%
|
|
(0.8)%
|
|
Minneapolis-St. Paul
|
|
95.5%
|
|
|
95.4%
|
|
0.1%
|
|
|
93.0%
|
|
|
92.7%
|
|
0.3%
|
|
Portland
|
|
97.6%
|
|
|
97.3%
|
|
0.3%
|
|
|
97.0%
|
|
|
96.3%
|
|
0.7%
|
|
Orlando-Daytona
|
|
95.5%
|
|
|
95.5%
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
95.1%
|
|
|
95.0%
|
|
0.1%
|
|
All other markets
|
|
95.2%
|
|
|
95.0%
|
|
0.2%
|
|
|
94.2%
|
|
|
94.1%
|
|
0.1%
|
|
Total weighted average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
square foot occupancy
|
|
95.3%
|
|
|
95.4%
|
|
(0.1)%
|
|
|
94.5%
|
|
|
94.4%
|
|
0.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized annual rent per
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
occupied square foot:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Los Angeles
|
$
|
22.92
|
|
$
|
21.28
|
|
7.7%
|
|
$
|
22.68
|
|
$
|
21.07
|
|
7.6%
|
|
San Francisco
|
|
24.08
|
|
|
22.38
|
|
7.6%
|
|
|
23.77
|
|
|
22.10
|
|
7.6%
|
|
New York
|
|
24.06
|
|
|
23.06
|
|
4.3%
|
|
|
23.96
|
|
|
22.93
|
|
4.5%
|
|
Chicago
|
|
15.05
|
|
|
14.67
|
|
2.6%
|
|
|
15.10
|
|
|
14.65
|
|
3.1%
|
|
Washington DC
|
|
20.89
|
|
|
20.43
|
|
2.3%
|
|
|
20.92
|
|
|
20.53
|
|
1.9%
|
|
Seattle-Tacoma
|
|
18.01
|
|
|
16.60
|
|
8.5%
|
|
|
17.75
|
|
|
16.47
|
|
7.8%
|
|
Miami
|
|
19.56
|
|
|
18.48
|
|
5.8%
|
|
|
19.41
|
|
|
18.37
|
|
5.7%
|
|
Dallas-Ft. Worth
|
|
13.32
|
|
|
12.36
|
|
7.8%
|
|
|
13.20
|
|
|
12.23
|
|
7.9%
|
|
Houston
|
|
14.00
|
|
|
13.32
|
|
5.1%
|
|
|
13.99
|
|
|
13.21
|
|
5.9%
|
|
Atlanta
|
|
12.04
|
|
|
11.17
|
|
7.8%
|
|
|
11.93
|
|
|
11.11
|
|
7.4%
|
|
Philadelphia
|
|
14.85
|
|
|
14.15
|
|
4.9%
|
|
|
14.74
|
|
|
14.08
|
|
4.7%
|
|
Denver
|
|
16.15
|
|
|
15.47
|
|
4.4%
|
|
|
16.03
|
|
|
15.13
|
|
5.9%
|
|
Minneapolis-St. Paul
|
|
13.67
|
|
|
13.17
|
|
3.8%
|
|
|
13.67
|
|
|
13.20
|
|
3.6%
|
|
Portland
|
|
17.61
|
|
|
16.07
|
|
9.6%
|
|
|
17.28
|
|
|
15.75
|
|
9.7%
|
|
Orlando-Daytona
|
|
12.62
|
|
|
11.74
|
|
7.5%
|
|
|
12.50
|
|
|
11.61
|
|
7.7%
|
|
All other markets
|
|
13.14
|
|
|
12.40
|
|
6.0%
|
|
|
13.05
|
|
|
12.31
|
|
6.0%
|
|
Total realized rent per
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
occupied square foot
|
$
|
16.39
|
|
$
|
15.45
|
|
6.1%
|
|
$
|
16.28
|
|
$
|
15.34
|
|
6.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Store Facilities Operating Trends by Market (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
Change
|
|
REVPAF:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Los Angeles
|
$
|
22.05
|
|
$
|
20.43
|
|
7.9%
|
|
$
|
21.72
|
|
$
|
20.10
|
|
8.1%
|
|
San Francisco
|
|
23.30
|
|
|
21.63
|
|
7.7%
|
|
|
22.87
|
|
|
21.22
|
|
7.8%
|
|
New York
|
|
22.89
|
|
|
22.05
|
|
3.8%
|
|
|
22.61
|
|
|
21.69
|
|
4.2%
|
|
Chicago
|
|
14.07
|
|
|
13.81
|
|
1.9%
|
|
|
13.88
|
|
|
13.60
|
|
2.1%
|
|
Washington DC
|
|
19.81
|
|
|
19.42
|
|
2.0%
|
|
|
19.49
|
|
|
19.10
|
|
2.0%
|
|
Seattle-Tacoma
|
|
17.49
|
|
|
15.94
|
|
9.7%
|
|
|
17.05
|
|
|
15.63
|
|
9.1%
|
|
Miami
|
|
18.65
|
|
|
17.58
|
|
6.1%
|
|
|
18.47
|
|
|
17.41
|
|
6.1%
|
|
Dallas-Ft. Worth
|
|
12.74
|
|
|
11.83
|
|
7.7%
|
|
|
12.54
|
|
|
11.59
|
|
8.2%
|
|
Houston
|
|
12.93
|
|
|
12.66
|
|
2.1%
|
|
|
12.90
|
|
|
12.47
|
|
3.4%
|
|
Atlanta
|
|
11.52
|
|
|
10.61
|
|
8.6%
|
|
|
11.30
|
|
|
10.45
|
|
8.1%
|
|
Philadelphia
|
|
14.13
|
|
|
13.36
|
|
5.8%
|
|
|
13.91
|
|
|
13.16
|
|
5.7%
|
|
Denver
|
|
15.53
|
|
|
14.98
|
|
3.7%
|
|
|
15.25
|
|
|
14.50
|
|
5.2%
|
|
Minneapolis-St. Paul
|
|
13.05
|
|
|
12.56
|
|
3.9%
|
|
|
12.71
|
|
|
12.24
|
|
3.8%
|
|
Portland
|
|
17.18
|
|
|
15.64
|
|
9.8%
|
|
|
16.77
|
|
|
15.17
|
|
10.5%
|
|
Orlando-Daytona
|
|
12.05
|
|
|
11.22
|
|
7.4%
|
|
|
11.90
|
|
|
11.04
|
|
7.8%
|
|
All other markets
|
|
12.51
|
|
|
11.78
|
|
6.2%
|
|
|
12.30
|
|
|
11.58
|
|
6.2%
|
|
Total REVPAF
|
$
|
15.62
|
|
$
|
14.73
|
|
6.0%
|
|
$
|
15.38
|
|
$
|
14.47
|
|
6.3%
|
|
We believe that our geographic diversification and scale provide some insulation from localized economic effects and add to the stability of our cash flows. It is difficult to predict localized trends in short-term self-storage demand and operating results. Over the long run, we believe that markets that experience population growth, high employment, and otherwise exhibit economic strength and consistency will outperform markets that do not exhibit these characteristics.
Non Same Store Facilities
The Non Same Store Facilities at June 30,
2016 represent 296 facilities
that were not stabilized with respect to occupancies or rental rates since January 1, 2014, or that we did not own as of January 1, 2014
. As a result of the stabilization process and timing of when the facilities were acquired, year-over-year changes can be significant.
The following table summarizes operating data with respect to the Non Same Store Facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON SAME STORE
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
FACILITIES
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
Change
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
Change
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except square foot amounts)
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 acquisitions
|
$
|
3,264
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
3,264
|
|
$
|
5,103
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
5,103
|
2015 acquisitions
|
|
3,777
|
|
|
1,019
|
|
|
2,758
|
|
|
7,372
|
|
|
1,642
|
|
|
5,730
|
2014 acquisitions
|
|
11,500
|
|
|
10,334
|
|
|
1,166
|
|
|
22,435
|
|
|
20,006
|
|
|
2,429
|
2013 acquisitions
|
|
24,582
|
|
|
22,475
|
|
|
2,107
|
|
|
48,392
|
|
|
43,849
|
|
|
4,543
|
Developed facilities
|
|
5,194
|
|
|
1,830
|
|
|
3,364
|
|
|
9,451
|
|
|
3,016
|
|
|
6,435
|
Other facilities
|
|
24,754
|
|
|
23,429
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
|
48,768
|
|
|
45,784
|
|
|
2,984
|
Total revenues
|
|
73,071
|
|
|
59,087
|
|
|
13,984
|
|
|
141,521
|
|
|
114,297
|
|
|
27,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 acquisitions
|
|
1,174
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,174
|
|
|
1,725
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,725
|
2015 acquisitions
|
|
1,275
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
901
|
|
|
2,567
|
|
|
578
|
|
|
1,989
|
2014 acquisitions
|
|
3,143
|
|
|
2,989
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
6,246
|
|
|
6,137
|
|
|
109
|
2013 acquisitions
|
|
7,094
|
|
|
6,803
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
14,211
|
|
|
13,966
|
|
|
245
|
Developed facilities
|
|
2,623
|
|
|
956
|
|
|
1,667
|
|
|
4,433
|
|
|
1,573
|
|
|
2,860
|
Other facilities
|
|
6,341
|
|
|
6,168
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
12,518
|
|
|
12,657
|
|
|
(139)
|
Total cost of operations
|
|
21,650
|
|
|
17,290
|
|
|
4,360
|
|
|
41,700
|
|
|
34,911
|
|
|
6,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 acquisitions
|
|
2,090
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2,090
|
|
|
3,378
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
3,378
|
2015 acquisitions
|
|
2,502
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
1,857
|
|
|
4,805
|
|
|
1,064
|
|
|
3,741
|
2014 acquisitions
|
|
8,357
|
|
|
7,345
|
|
|
1,012
|
|
|
16,189
|
|
|
13,869
|
|
|
2,320
|
2013 acquisitions
|
|
17,488
|
|
|
15,672
|
|
|
1,816
|
|
|
34,181
|
|
|
29,883
|
|
|
4,298
|
Developed facilities
|
|
2,571
|
|
|
874
|
|
|
1,697
|
|
|
5,018
|
|
|
1,443
|
|
|
3,575
|
Other facilities
|
|
18,413
|
|
|
17,261
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
36,250
|
|
|
33,127
|
|
|
3,123
|
Net operating income
|
|
51,421
|
|
|
41,797
|
|
|
9,624
|
|
|
99,821
|
|
|
79,386
|
|
|
20,435
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expense
|
|
(25,124)
|
|
|
(23,055)
|
|
|
(2,069)
|
|
|
(48,607)
|
|
|
(47,247)
|
|
|
(1,360)
|
Net income
|
$
|
26,297
|
|
$
|
18,742
|
|
$
|
7,555
|
|
$
|
51,214
|
|
$
|
32,139
|
|
$
|
19,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square foot occupancy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91.7%
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
2015 acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92.3%
|
|
|
88.0%
|
|
|
4.9%
|
2014 acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94.5%
|
|
|
93.4%
|
|
|
1.2%
|
2013 acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94.6%
|
|
|
94.7%
|
|
|
(0.1)%
|
Developed facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65.8%
|
|
|
77.3%
|
|
|
(14.9)%
|
Other facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90.3%
|
|
|
91.1%
|
|
|
(0.9)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89.4%
|
|
|
91.9%
|
|
|
(2.7)%
|
Annual contract rent per
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
occupied square foot:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11.10
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
2015 acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.09
|
|
|
12.94
|
|
|
1.2%
|
2014 acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.09
|
|
|
13.04
|
|
|
8.1%
|
2013 acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.08
|
|
|
14.04
|
|
|
7.4%
|
Developed facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.73
|
|
|
11.37
|
|
|
12.0%
|
Other facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.46
|
|
|
16.45
|
|
|
6.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14.93
|
|
$
|
14.48
|
|
|
3.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON SAME STORE
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
FACILITIES (Continued)
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
Change
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
Change
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except square foot amounts)
|
Number of facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
24
|
2015 acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
2014 acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
-
|
2013 acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
-
|
Developed facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
16
|
Other facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
49
|
Net rentable square feet (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,703
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,703
|
2015 acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,285
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
725
|
2014 acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,457
|
|
|
3,457
|
|
|
-
|
2013 acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,906
|
|
|
6,906
|
|
|
-
|
Developed facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,113
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
|
1,989
|
Other facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,324
|
|
|
6,290
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,788
|
|
|
18,337
|
|
|
4,451
|
The facilities included above under “2016 acquisitions
,”
“2015 acquisitions,” “2014 acquisitions” and “2013 acquisitions,” were acquired at a
cost of $197.6 million
, $168.8 million, $430.7 million, and $
938.3
mi
llion, respectively.
For the six months ended June 30, 2016, the weighted average annualized yield on cost, based upon net operating income, for the facilities acquired in each of 2015
, 2014 and 2013 was
5.7
%, 7.
5
% and
7.3
%, respectively. The yields for the facilities acquired in
the
six months ended June
30, 2016 were not meaningful due to our limited ownership period.
We believe that our management and operating infrastructure allows us to generate higher net operating income from newly acquired facilities than was achieved by the previous owners. However, it can take 24 or more months for us to fully achieve the higher net operating income, and the ultimate levels of net operating income to be achieved can be affected by changes in general economic conditions. As a result, there can be no assurance that we will
achieve our expectations with respect to these newly acquired facilities.
Since the beginning of 2013, we have opened development and expansion projects with a total cost of
$
443.9
million
. These expanded and newly developed facilities are included in
“Developed facilities” and
“Other facili
ties”
in the table above. We believe that
our real estate development activities are beneficial to our business operations over the long run. However, in the short run, due to the three to four year period that it takes to fill up newly developed storage space and reach a stabilized level of cash flows, our earnings are diluted because of an increasing level of development and unstabilized properties in our portfolio.
We expect the Non Same Store Facilities to continue to provide increased net operating income in the remainder of 2016 as these facilities approach stabilized occupancy levels and the earnings of the 2015 acquisitions are reflected in our operations for a longer period in 2016 as compared to 2015.
We also expect to increase the number and net rentable square feet of Non Same Store Facilities over at least the next 24 months through development of new self-storage facilities, expansions to existing facilities and acquisitions of facilities.
As of
June 30
, 2016, we had development and expansion projects which will add
approximately 4.9 million net rentable square feet of storage space at a
total cost of
approximately $630.7
million
.
Some of these projects are
subject to significant contingencies such as entitlement approval. We expect to continue to seek additional development projects; however, the level of future development may be limited due to various constraints such as difficulty in finding projects that
meet our risk-adjusted yield expectations and challenges in obtaining building permits for self-storage activities in certain municipalities.
Subsequent to
June 30
, 2016,
we acquired or were
under contract to acquire 21 self-storage facilities (eleven in Oklahoma, four in Kentucky, two in Ohio, and one each in Georgia, Colorado, Michigan and Utah), with 1.7 million net rentable square feet, for $1
69.4
million
.
We will continue to seek to acquire facilities in the remainder of 2016; however, there is significant competition to acquire existing facilities and there can be no assurance we will continue to be successful.
Depreciation and amortization with respect to the Non Same Store Facilities increased $2.1 million and $1.4 million during the three and six months ended
June 30
, 2016, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2015. Included in
depreciation and amortization is amortization of intangible assets, which represent
s
the value of the tenants
in place at the time the facilities are acquired and are amortized relative to the benefit of the tenants to each period. The increases in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, as compared to the same periods in 2015 were due primarily to the acquisition
and development of additional facilities.
Based
upon the facilities we own at
June 30
, 2016, amortization expense with respect to intangibles is estimated at $
7.5
million
for the remainder of 2016. The level of future depreciation and amortization will also depend upon the level of acquisitions of facilities, as well as the level of newly developed storage space.
Ancillary Operations
Ancillary revenues and expenses include amounts associated with the reinsurance of policies against losses to goods stored by tenants in our self-storage facilities in the U.S. and the sale of merchandise at our self-storage facilities. The following table sets forth our ancillary operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
Change
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenant reinsurance premiums
|
$
|
29,829
|
|
$
|
27,432
|
|
$
|
2,397
|
|
$
|
58,471
|
|
$
|
53,442
|
|
$
|
5,029
|
Merchandise
|
|
9,972
|
|
|
10,155
|
|
|
(183)
|
|
|
18,530
|
|
|
18,387
|
|
|
143
|
Total revenues
|
|
39,801
|
|
|
37,587
|
|
|
2,214
|
|
|
77,001
|
|
|
71,829
|
|
|
5,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenant reinsurance
|
|
8,257
|
|
|
6,780
|
|
|
1,477
|
|
|
16,432
|
|
|
12,361
|
|
|
4,071
|
Merchandise
|
|
6,060
|
|
|
6,491
|
|
|
(431)
|
|
|
11,308
|
|
|
11,680
|
|
|
(372)
|
Total cost of operations
|
|
14,317
|
|
|
13,271
|
|
|
1,046
|
|
|
27,740
|
|
|
24,041
|
|
|
3,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenant reinsurance
|
|
21,572
|
|
|
20,652
|
|
|
920
|
|
|
42,039
|
|
|
41,081
|
|
|
958
|
Merchandise
|
|
3,912
|
|
|
3,664
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
7,222
|
|
|
6,707
|
|
|
515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net income
|
$
|
25,484
|
|
$
|
24,316
|
|
$
|
1,168
|
|
$
|
49,261
|
|
$
|
47,788
|
|
$
|
1,473
|
Tenant reinsurance operations:
Our
tenants have the option of purchasing insurance from a non-affiliated insurance company to cover certain losses to their goods stored at our facilities. A wholly-owned, consolidated subsidiary of Public Storage fully reinsures such policies, assuming all risk of losses under these policies. The subsidiary received reinsurance premiums, substantially equal to the premiums collected from our tenants, from the non-affiliated insurance company. Such reinsurance premiums are shown as “Tenant reinsurance premiums” in the above table.
The subsidiary pays a fee to Public Storage to assist with the administration of the program and to allow the insurance to be marketed to our customers. Such fee represents a substantial amount of the reinsurance premiums received by our subsidiary. The fee is eliminated in consolidation and is therefore not shown in the above table.
Tenant reinsurance revenue increased from $27.4 million and $53.4 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2015,
respectively, to $29.8 million and $58.5 million in the same periods in 2016, due to (i) increased average premiums per insured tenant resulting from higher average policy limits, (ii) a higher proportion of tenants having insurance, and (iii) a larger number of potential insurance customers due to newly acquired facilities in 2015 and 2016.
We expect continued increases in tenant insurance revenues in the remainder of 2016 due to the same factors
noted above.
Cost of operations primarily includes claims paid that are not covered by our outside third-party insurers, as well as claims adjustment expenses. Tenant reinsurance cost of operations increased from $6.7 million and $12.4 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, to $8.3 million and $16.4 million in the same periods in 2016. These increases are due primarily to an increase in exposure associated with more insured tenants and increased claims.
Merchandise sales:
We sell locks, boxes, and packing supplies at our self-storage facilities, and the level of sales of these items is primarily impacted by
the level of move-ins and other customer traffic at our self-storage facilities. We do not expect any significant changes in revenues or profitability from our merchandise sales in 2016.
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated real estate entities
At June 30, 2016, we have equity investments in PSB, Shurgard Europe and various limited partnerships. We account for such investments using the equity method and record our pro-rata share of the net income of these entities for each period. The following table, and the discussion below, sets forth the significant components of our equity in earnings of unconsolidated real estate entities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
Change
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
Change
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
Equity in earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PSB
|
$
|
7,869
|
|
$
|
5,516
|
|
$
|
2,353
|
|
$
|
15,200
|
|
$
|
15,411
|
|
$
|
(211)
|
Shurgard Europe
|
|
1,706
|
|
|
1,355
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
7,942
|
|
|
7,091
|
|
|
851
|
Other Investments
|
|
652
|
|
|
609
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
1,249
|
|
|
1,162
|
|
|
87
|
Total equity in earnings
|
$
|
10,227
|
|
$
|
7,480
|
|
$
|
2,747
|
|
$
|
24,391
|
|
$
|
23,664
|
|
$
|
727
|
Investment in PSB:
At June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we had approximately a 42% common equity interest in PSB, comprised of our ownership of 7,158,354 shares of PSB’s common stock
and 7,305,355 limited partnership units in an operating partnership controlled by PSB. The limited partnership units are convertible at our option, subject to certain conditions, on a one-for-one basis into PSB common stock.
At June 30, 2016, PSB owned and
operated 28.0 million rentable square feet of commercial space located in six states. PSB also manages commercial space that we own
pursuant to property management agreements.
Equity in earnings from PSB increased $2.4 million in the three months ended June 30, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015, due primarily to improved same store and new store operations. Equity in earnings of PSB decreased $0.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015, due to our $5.0 million equity share of a gain on sale of real estate recorded by PSB in the three months ended March 31, 2015, offset partially by improved property operations. See Note 4 to
our June 30, 2016 financial statements for selected financial information on PSB, as well as PSB’s filings and selected financial information that can be accessed through the SEC, and on PSB’s website, www.psbusinessparks.com.
Investment in Shurgard Europe:
We have a 49%
equity share in Shurgard Europe’s net income. At June 30, 2016, Shurgard Europe’s operations are comprised of 217 wholly-owned facilities with 12 million net rentable square feet. See Note 4 to our June 30, 2016 financial statements for selected financial data on Shurgard Europe for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. As described
in more detail in Note 4, we receive trademark license fees from Shurgard Europe.
In
2015, Shurgard Europe acquired 21 facilities in the Netherlands (0.9 million net rentable square feet), for an aggregate of approximately $146 million (€132 million), and issued €300.0 million of unsecured senior notes with maturities in 10, 12 and 15 years and an average interest rate of 2.7%.
Our equity in earnings from Shurgard Europe increased
$0.4 million and $0.9 million, respectively, in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 as compared to the same periods in 2015. The increases are due primarily to (i) improved same-store and increased earnings from acquired properties, and (ii) lower expenses associated with property acquisitions, offset partially by (iii) increased interest expense due to increased outstanding borrowings, and (iv) increased depreciation expense on acquired properties. Our earnings for the three months ended June 30, 2016 were also impacted by our $2.1 million equity share of a foreign currency exchange loss on an intercompany note between entities consolidated by Shurgard Europe. Our earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2016 were also impacted by increased income tax expense.
For purposes of recording our equity in earnings from Shurgard Europe, the Euro was translated into U.S. Dollars based upon average exchange rates of
1.129 and 1.116 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 as compared to 1.106 and 1.116 for the same periods in 2015
.
Our future earnings from Shurgard Europe will be affected primarily by the operating results of its existing facilities, as well as the exchange rate between the U.S. Dollar and currencies in the countries in which Shurgard Europe conducts its business, principally the Euro, as well as the impact of income taxes.
Unlike our operations in the United States, Shurgard Europe operates as a taxable corporation in each of the countries in which it does business and incurs tax expense. Our equity share of such income tax expense has increased to
approximately $
2.8 million in
the
six
months ended
June 30
, 201
6, as compared to
$
1.7 million for the same period in 2015. We expect continued increases in tax expense incurred by Shurgard Europe in the remainder of 2016 and beyond, as its operations improve and its taxable income increases.
Analysis of items not allocated to segments
General and administrative expense:
The following table sets forth our general and administrative expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
Change
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
Change
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
$
|
8,431
|
|
$
|
7,334
|
|
$
|
1,097
|
|
$
|
16,483
|
|
$
|
14,492
|
|
$
|
1,991
|
Costs of senior executives
|
|
416
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
5,216
|
|
|
4,716
|
|
|
500
|
Development and acquisition costs
|
|
2,275
|
|
|
2,184
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
5,089
|
|
|
5,012
|
|
|
77
|
Tax compliance costs and taxes paid
|
767
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
(647)
|
|
|
2,205
|
|
|
2,759
|
|
|
(554)
|
Legal costs
|
|
1,027
|
|
|
3,905
|
|
|
(2,878)
|
|
|
3,808
|
|
|
8,933
|
|
|
(5,125)
|
Public company costs
|
|
906
|
|
|
891
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
1,923
|
|
|
1,896
|
|
|
27
|
Other costs
|
|
4,499
|
|
|
4,844
|
|
|
(345)
|
|
|
6,644
|
|
|
7,340
|
|
|
(696)
|
Total
|
$
|
18,321
|
|
$
|
20,988
|
|
$
|
(2,667)
|
|
$
|
41,368
|
|
$
|
45,148
|
|
$
|
(3,780)
|
Share-based compensation expense includes the amortization of restricted share units and stock options granted to employees, as well as related employer taxes. The level of share-based compensation expense varies based upon the level of grants and forfeitures as well as the Company’s stock price on the date of grant. The increases in share-based compensation costs in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 as compared to the same periods in 2015 are due primarily to additional share-based grants and a higher average grant-date fair value
per share. We expect similar increases in share-based compensation in the remainder of 2016 as was experienced in the first six months of 2016. See Note 9 to our June 30, 2016 financial statements for further information on our share-based compensation.
Costs of senior executives represent the cash compensation paid to our chief executive officer and chief financial officer.
Development and acquisition costs represent internal and external expenses related to our acquisition and development activities and varies
primarily based upon the level of development and acquisition activities undertaken. The amounts
in the
above
table
are net of $2.2 million and $4.3 million in development costs that were capitalized in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, as compared to $2.0
million
and $3.9
million for
the same periods in 2015, to newly developed and expanded self-storage facilities. Real estate development
and acquisition cost
s
are expected to increase modestly in the remainder of 2016.
Tax compliance costs and taxes paid include taxes paid to various state and local authorities, the internal and external costs of filing tax returns, costs associated with complying with federal and state tax laws, and maintaining our compliance with Internal Revenue Service REIT rules. Such costs vary primarily based upon the tax rates of the various states in which we do business.
Legal costs
include internal personnel as well as fees paid to legal firms and other third parties with respect to general corporate legal matters and risk management, and varies based upon the level of litigation. The decreases of $2.
9
million and $5.1 million in legal costs in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2015 are due primarily to legal fees and expenses associated with certain litigated matters in the three and
six
months
ended
June 30, 2015. The future level of legal costs is not determinable.
Public company costs represent the incremental costs of operating as a publicly-traded company, such as internal and external investor relations expenses, stock listing and transfer agent fees, board of trustees’ costs, and costs associated with maintaining compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including the Dodd-Frank Act and Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Other costs represent professional and consulting fees, payroll and overhead that are not directly attributable to our property operations. Such costs vary depending upon the level of corporate activities and initiatives and, as such, are not predictable.
Our future general and administrative expenses are difficult to estimate, due to their dependence upon many factors, including those noted above.
Interest and other income:
Interest and other income is comprised primarily of the net income from our commercial operations and property management operations and to a lesser
extent
interest earned on cash balances, trademark license fees received from Shurgard Europe, as well as sundry other income items that are received from time to time in varying amounts.
Interest income on cash balances has been minimal, because rates have been at historic lows of 0.1% or less, and we expect this trend to continue in the foreseeable future.
We do not expect any significant changes in interest and other income in the remainder of 2016.
Interest expense:
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, we incurred $2.6 million and $4.7 million, respectively, of interest on our outstanding debt, as compared to $0.6 million and $1.2 million for the same periods
in 2015. The increases in interest expense incurred are due to increased outstanding debt. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, we capitalized interest of $1.2 million and $2.6 million, respectively, associated with our development activities, and $0.6 million and $1.2 million for the same periods in 2015. These increases are due to increased development activities. Future interest expense will be dependent upon the level of outstanding debt and the amount of in-process development costs.
Foreign Exchange
Gain (
Loss):
We recorded a foreign currency translation gain of $8.6 million and a foreign currency translation loss of $2.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, representing the change in the U.S. Dollar equivalent of our Senior Unsecured Notes due to fluctuations in exchange
rates. The Euro was translated at exchange rates of approximately 1.110 U.S. Dollars per Euro at June 30, 2016, 1.136 at March 31, 2016 and 1.091 at December 31, 2015. Future gains and losses on foreign currency translation will be dependent upon changes in the relative
value of the Euro to the U.S. Dollar,
and the level of Euro-denominated debt outstanding
.
Net Income Allocable to Preferred Shareholders:
Net income allocable to preferred shareholders based upon distributions
de
creased during the three
and six
months ended
June 30
, 2016 as compared to the same period
s
in 2015; due primarily to
lower
average outstanding preferred shares
and lower average rates
. We also allocated
$15.5 million and
$
26.9
million of income from our common shareholders to the holders of our Preferred Shares in
the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively
, in
connection with the
rede
mption of our Preferred Shares
.
We allocated
$4.8
million of income from our common shareholders to the holders of our Preferred Shares in
the six months ended June 30, 2015,
in
connection with the
rede
mption of our Preferred Shares
. Based upon our preferred shares
outstanding at June 30, 2016, including the redemption of our Series R Preferred Shares and the issuance of our Series D Preferred Shares, each of which occurred in July 2016, our quarterly distribution to our preferred shareholders is expected to be approximately $57.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 and approximately $55.8 million thereafter.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Financial Strategy:
As a REIT, we generally distribute 100% of our taxable income to our shareholders, which relative to a taxable C corporation, limits the amount of cash flow from operations that we can retain for investments. As a result, in order to grow our asset base, access to capital is important. Historically we have primarily financed our cash investment activities with retained operating cash flow combined with the proceeds from the issuance of preferred securities. Over the past twelve months, we began to diversify our capital sources by issuing medium term debt.
Our financial profile is characterized by strong credit metrics, including low leverage relative to our total capitalization and operating cash flows. We are one of the highest rated REITs, as rated by major rating agencies Moody’s and Standard and Poor’s. Our senior debt has an “A” credit rating by Standard and Poor’s and “A2” by Moody’s. Our credit ratings on each of our series of preferred shares are “A3” by Moody’s and “BBB+” by Standard & Poor’s. Our credit profile and ratings enables us to effectively access both the public and private capital markets to raise capital.
We have a $500.0 million revolving line of credit which we occasionally use as temporary “bridge” financing until we are able to raise longer term capital. As of June 30, 2016, there we no borrowings outstanding on the revolving line of credit. Over the long-term, we expect to continue to fund our capital requirements with retained operating cash flow, the issuance of medium or long term debt, and proceeds from the issuance of common and preferred securities.
Liquidity and Capital Resource Analysis:
We believe that our net cash provided by our operating activities will continue to be sufficient to enable us to meet our ongoing requirements for capital improvements, principal payments on debt, and distributions to our shareholders for the foreseeable future.
As of June 30, 2016, our capital resources over the next year are expected to be approximately $1.4 billion which exceeds our current planned capital needs over the next year of $1.1 billion. Our capital resources include: (i) $260.1 million of cash as of June 30, 2016, (ii) $484.8 million of available borrowing capacity on our revolving line of credit, (iii) $300.0 million to $350.0 million of expected retained operating cash flow for the next twelve months, and (iv) $314.4 million of net proceeds from the issuance of our Series D Preferred Shares on July 20, 2016. Retained operating cash flow represents our expected cash flow provided by operating activities, less shareholder distributions and capital expenditures to maintain real estate facilities.
Our planned capital needs over the next year consist of (i) $402.6 million of remaining spend on our current development pipeline, (ii) $169.4 million in property acquisitions currently under contract, (iii) $26.7 million in principal repayments on existing debt, and (iv) $487.5 million for the redemption of our Series R Preferred Shares
on July 26, 2016. Our capital needs may increase significantly over the next year as we expect to increase our development pipeline and acquire additional properties.
We believe we have a variety of possibilities to raise additional capital, if needed, to fund such future commitments including issuing common or preferred securities, issuing debt, or entering into joint venture arrangements to acquire or develop facilities.
Required
Debt Repayments:
As of June 30, 2016, our outstanding debt totaled approximately $436.8 million, consisting of $57.0 million of secured debt and $379.8 million of unsecured debt. Approximate principal maturities are as follows (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of 2016
|
$
|
18,236
|
2017
|
|
9,434
|
2018
|
|
11,333
|
2019
|
|
1,505
|
2020
|
|
1,585
|
Thereafter
|
|
394,742
|
|
$
|
436,835
|
The remaining maturities on our debt over at least the next five years are nominal compared to our expected annual retained operating cash flow and we do not expect to refinance such debt with the issuance of new secured debt.
Capital Expenditure Requirements:
Capital expenditures include major repairs or replacements to elements of our facilities to keep our facilities in good operating condition and maintain their visual appeal to the customer, which totaled $44.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2016. Capital expenditures do not include costs relating to the development of new facilities
or the expansion of net rentable square footage of existing facilities. For the
year ending December 31, 2016
, we expect to incur approximately $
86
million
for capital expenditures and to fund such amounts with
cash provided by operating activities. For the last four years, such capital expenditures have ranged between
approximately $0.45 and $0.55 per net
rentable square foot per year.
Requirement to Pay Distributions:
For all periods presented herein, we have elected to be treated as a REIT, as defined in the Code. As a REIT, we do not incur federal income tax on our REIT taxable income (generally, net rents and gains from real property, dividends, and interest) that is fully distributed each year (for this purpose, certain distributions paid in a subsequent year may be considered), and if we meet certain organizational and operational rules. We believe we have met these requirements in all periods presented herein, and we expect to continue to elect and qualify as a REIT. We believe that our net cash provided by our operating activities will continue to be sufficient to enable us to meet our ongoing requirements for operating expenses, capital improvements and distributions to our shareholders for the foreseeable future.
Distributions paid during the six months ended June 30,
2016 totaled $729.0 million, consisting of $121.5 million to preferred shareholders and $607.5 million
to common shareholders and restricted share unitholders. All of these distributions were REIT qualifying distributions.
We estimate the annual distribution requirements with respect to our Preferred Shares outstanding at June 30, 2016, excluding our Series R Preferred Shares that we redeemed on July
26, 2016 and including our Series D Preferred Shares that we issued on July 20, 2016, to be approximately $223
.3
million
per year.
On July 27, 2016, our Board declared a regular common quarterly
dividend of $1.
8
0
per common share. Our consistent, long-term dividend policy has been to distribute only our taxable income. Future quarterly distributions with respect to the common shares will continue to be determined based upon our REIT distribution requirements after taking into consideration distributions to the preferred shareholders and will be funded with cash provided by operating activities.
We estimate we will pay
approximately $8
.0
million
per year in distributions to noncontrolling interests outstanding at June 30, 2016.
Real Estate Investment Activities:
Subsequent to
June 30
,
2016
, we acquired or were
under contract to acquire 21 self-storage facilities (eleven in Oklahoma, four in Kentucky, two in Ohio, and one each in Georgia, Colorado, Michigan and Utah), with 1.7 million net rentable square feet, for $1
69.4
million
.
We will continue to seek to acquire properties; however, there is significant competition to acquire existing facilities and there can be no assurance as to the level of facilities we may acquire.
As of June 30, 2016 we had development and expansion projects
which will add approximately 4.9 million net rentable square feet of storage space at a total cost of approximately $6
30.7
million. A total of $228
.1
million of these costs were incurred through June 30, 2016, with the remaining cost to complete of $
402.6
million expected
to be incurred primarily in the next 18 months. Some of these projects are subject to significant contingencies such as entitlement approval. We expect to continue to seek additional development projects; however, the level of future development may be limited due to various constraints such as difficulty in finding projects that meet our risk-adjusted yield expectations and challenges in obtaining building permits for self-storage activities in certain municipalities.
Redemption of Preferred Securities
: Historically, we have taken advantage of refinancing higher coupon preferred securities with lower coupon preferred securities. During the first seven months of 2016, we redeemed two series of preferred securities totaling $862.5 million which had a weighted average coupon of 6.42%. During the same period, we issued $825.0 million of preferred securities which have a weighted average coupon of 5.156%. We currently have no outstanding preferred securities that we can call for redemption until 2017, when four series of preferred securities become redeemable, at our option, with coupons ranging from 5.90% to 5.375% (see Note 7 to our June 30, 2016 financial statements). Redemption of such preferred shares will depend upon many factors including whether we can issue capital at a lower cost of capital than the shares that would be redeemed. None of our preferred securities are redeemable at the option of the holders.
Repurchases of Company’s Common Shares
: Our Board has authorized management to repurchase up to 35,000,000 of our common shares on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, we did not repurchase any of our common shares. From the inception of the repurchase program through
August
4
, 2016,
we have repurchased a total of 23,721,916 common shares at an aggregate cost of approximately $679.1 million. We have no current plans to repurchase additional common shares; however, future levels of common share repurchases will be dependent upon our available capital, investment alternatives and the trading price of our common shares.
Contractual Obligations
Our significant contractual obligations at June 30, 2016 and their impact on our cash flows and liquidity are summarized below for the years ending December 31 (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
of 2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2020
|
|
Thereafter
|
Mortgage notes (1)
|
$
|
63,965
|
|
$
|
19,569
|
|
$
|
10,838
|
|
$
|
12,601
|
|
$
|
2,316
|
|
$
|
2,316
|
|
$
|
16,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior unsecured notes (2)
|
|
447,117
|
|
|
3,778
|
|
|
7,556
|
|
|
7,556
|
|
|
7,556
|
|
|
7,556
|
|
|
413,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares called
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for redemption (3)
|
|
487,500
|
|
|
487,500
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases (4)
|
|
65,125
|
|
|
1,869
|
|
|
2,830
|
|
|
2,556
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
2,499
|
|
|
52,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction commitments (5)
|
112,358
|
|
|
89,886
|
|
|
22,472
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
$
|
1,176,065
|
|
$
|
602,602
|
|
$
|
43,696
|
|
$
|
22,713
|
|
$
|
12,372
|
|
$
|
12,371
|
|
$
|
482,311
|
(1)
Amounts include principal and interest payments (all of which are fixed-rate) on our secured notes (the “Mortgage Notes”) based on their contractual terms. See Note 5 to our June 30, 2016 financial statements for additional information on our notes payable.
(2)
Reflects interest and principal on €342.0 million of Euro-denominated senior unsecured notes
. See Note 5 to our June 30, 2016 financial statements for further inform on our senior unsecured notes
.
(3)
Represents the liquidation amount for our Series R Preferred Shares which were redeemed on July 26, 2016.
(4)
Represents future contractual payments on land, equipment and office space under various operating leases.
(5)
Amounts exclude future expected development spending that was not under contract at June 30, 2016.
We estimate the annual distribution requirements with respect to our Preferred Shares outstanding at June 30, 2016, excluding our Series R Preferred Shares that we called for redemption and including our Series D Preferred Shares that we issued on July 20, 2016, to be
approximately $223.
3
million
per year. Dividends are paid when and if declared by our Board and accumulate if not paid.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
: At June 30, 2016, we had no material off-balance sheet arrangements as defined under Regulation S-K 303(a)(4) and the instructions thereto.