- Quarterly Report (10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission file number: 333-131651

BETAWAVE CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	20-2471683
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

706 Mission Street, 10th Floor San Francisco, CA 94103 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(415) 738-8706 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable ( Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

þ Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

¨ Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨	Accelerated filer ¨

Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

¨ Yes þ No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: The issuer had 29,229,284 shares of common stock outstanding as of August 10, 2009.

BETAWAVE CORPORATION

TABLE OF CONTENTS

			Page No.
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Financial Statements	2
		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)	2
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)	3
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)	4
		Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	5
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	19
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	26
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	26
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	28
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	28
	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	43
	Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	43
	Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	43
	Item 5.	Other Information	43
	Item 6.	Exhibits	43
SIGNATURES			44
EXHIBIT INDEX			45

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

Betawave Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)

	June 30,			December 31,
	2009			2008
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	5,735,562		$	11,863,121
Restricted cash		53,750			—
Trade accounts receivable		2,009,363			3,108,136
Prepaid expenses		713,510			961,829
Total current assets		8,512,185			15,933,086

Property and equipment, net		141,025			236,448
Financing costs, net of amortization of $14,922		104,451			—
Deposits		117,179			113,029
Total assets	$	8,874,840		$	16,282,563

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	1,981,716		$	4,085,886
Line of credit		1,000,000			—
Accrued liabilities		783,444			1,601,840
Deferred revenue		67,831			109,243
Total current liabilities		3,832,991			5,796,969

Commitments and contingencies		—			—

Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred Stock: $0.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; 7,065,293 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008		7,065			7,065
Common Stock: $0.001 par value; 400,000,000 shares authorized; 29,229,284 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008		29,230			29,230
Notes receivable from stockholders		(18,910	)		(18,910	)
Additional paid-in capital		53,115,195			51,563,483
Accumulated deficit		(48,090,731	)		(41,095,274	)
Total stockholders’ equity		5,041,849			10,485,594
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	8,874,840		$	16,282,563

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Betawave Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

	Three			Three			Six			Six
	Months			Months			Months			Months
	Ended			Ended			Ended			Ended
	June 30,			June 30,			June 30,			June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
Revenues	$	2,282,325		$	1,282,439		$	3,670,745		$	1,939,589

Cost of revenues and expenses:
Cost of revenues		1,407,352			1,350,931			3,254,424			2,154,737
Sales and marketing		1,993,312			1,409,444			4,209,792			3,096,333
Product development		106,772			165,563			333,345			339,944
General and administrative		1,399,991			1,146,108			2,916,465			2,631,171
Total costs of revenues and expenses		4,907,427			4,072,046			10,714,026			8,222,185
Operating loss		(2,625,102	)		(2,789,607	)		(7,043,281	)		(6,282,596	)

Other income (expense):
Interest income		3,153			5,659			8,553			10,184
Miscellaneous income		71,874			—			71,874			100
Interest expense		(31,715	)		(778,104	)		(32,603	)		(1,469,138	)
Total other income (expense)		43,312			(772,445	)		47,824			(1,458,854	)
Net loss before provision for income taxes		(2,581,790	)		(3,562,052	)		(6,995,457	)		(7,741,450	)

Provision for income taxes		—			—			—			—
Net loss	$	(2,581,790	)	$	(3,562,052	)	$	(6,995,457	)	$	(7,741,450	)

Net loss per share – basic and diluted	$	(0.09	)	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.24	)	$	(0.30	)

Shares used to compute net loss per share – basic and diluted		29,229,284			25,483,475			29,229,284			25,531,174

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Betawave Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

	Six Months			Six Months
	Ended			Ended
	June 30,			June 30,
	2009			2008
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(6,995,457	)	$	(7,741,450	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Increase in fair value of warrant liability		—			46,586
Loss on disposal of fixed assets		1,976			—
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment		113,746			130,063
Amortization of financing costs and convertible note fees		14,922			250,795
Stock-based compensation		1,517,918			1,019,514
Non cash interest expense		—			862,884
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Trade accounts receivable		1,098,773			240,342
Prepaid expenses		248,319			41,061
Other assets		(4,150	)		—
Accounts payable		(2,104,171	)		1,190,284
Accrued liabilities		(818,395	)		1,100,055
Deferred revenue		(41,412	)		39,811
Net cash used in operating activities		(6,967,931	)		(2,820,055	)

Cash flows from investing activities:
Funds held as restricted cash		(53,750	)		(550,000	)
Purchase of property and equipment		(20,299	)		(16,810	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(74,049	)		(566,810	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Payment of financing costs		(85,579	)		—
Advances from a stockholder		—			210,000
Reclassed as unsecured convertible discount note		—			(210,000	)
Borrowing on line of credit		1,300,000			—
Payment on line of credit		(300,000	)		—
Proceeds from issuance of unsecured convertible original discount notes due June 2010 and related warrants, net of fees of $70,050		—			2,754,949
Net cash provided by financing activities		914,421			2,754,949
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(6,127,559	)		(631,916	)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period		11,863,121			1,108,834
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period	$	5,735,562		$	476,918

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

1.	The Company

General - Unibio Inc. was incorporated in the state of Nevada on February 2, 2005. On September 14, 2006, Unibio Inc. changed its name to GoFish Corporation. In January 2009, GoFish Corporation changed its name to Betawave Corporation and launched a rebranding campaign focused on attention-based digital media.

Betawave Corporation (the “Company,” “we,” our,” or us”) is the industry’s first attention-based media company. The Company delivers quality advertising and content to large audiences of highly-engaged users through innovative ad formats. The Company has assembled a platform of some of the leading immersive casual gaming, virtual world, social play and entertainment websites into a network of sites (the “Betawave Network”). The Company generates revenues by selling innovative, accountable and attention-grabbing advertising campaigns on those sites to brand advertisers.

Management's Plan - The Company has incurred operating losses and negative cash flows since inception. Management expects that the Company’s revenues will increase from current levels as a result of increased sales of advertising on the Betawave Network. The Company also expects to incur additional expenses for the development and expansion of its publisher network. In addition, the Company anticipates gains in operating efficiencies as a result of the increase to its sales and marketing organization. However, the Company expects that operating losses and negative cash flows will continue for the foreseeable future but anticipates that losses will decrease from current levels to the extent that the Company continues to grow and develop. The Company’s expectations are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such expectations, including those identified under the heading “Risk Factors” in Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and those discussed in other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). While the Company believes that it will be able to expand operations and gain market share, there can be no assurance that such progress will be possible. For example, in the event that the Company requires additional financing, such financing may not be available on terms that are favorable or at all. Failure to generate sufficient cash flows from operations or raise additional capital would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s ability to achieve its intended business objectives. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Going Concern - The Company's condensed consolidated financial statements have been presented on a basis that contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company continues to face significant risks associated with the successful execution of its strategy given the current market environment for similar companies. The condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

2.	Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation - The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual consolidated financial statements as discussed below. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of the financial statements, have been included. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the full year or any other subsequent interim period. Further, the preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the recorded amounts reported therein. Actual results could differ from those estimates. A change in facts or circumstances surrounding the estimate could result in a change to estimates and impact future operating results.

The condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures have been prepared with the presumption that users of the interim financial statements have read or have access to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the preceding fiscal year. Accordingly, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 filed with the SEC on March 31, 2009 (our “2008 Form 10-K”).

Comprehensive Loss - The Company has no components of comprehensive loss other than its net loss and, accordingly, comprehensive loss is the same as the net loss for all periods presented.

Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications were made to the prior period consolidated financial statements in order to conform to the current consolidated financial statement presentation.

Net Loss Per Share - Basic net loss per share is calculated based on the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period excluding those shares that are subject to repurchase by the Company. Diluted net loss per share would give effect to the dilutive effect of stock options, warrants, convertible debt and preferred stock. Dilutive securities have been excluded from the diluted net loss per share computations as they have an antidilutive effect due to the Company’s net loss.

The following outstanding stock options, warrants, convertible debt and preferred stock (on an as-converted into common stock basis) were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share as they had an antidilutive effect for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:

	Three		Three		Six		Six
	Months		Months		Months		Months
	Ended		Ended		Ended		Ended
	June 30,		June 30,		June 30,		June 30,
	2009		2008		2009		2008
Shares issuable upon exercise of employee and non-employee stock options		79,040		17,427,770		79,040		17,427,770
Shares issuable upon exercise of warrants		-		11,295,615		-		11,295,615
Nonvested restricted stock		-		300,000		-		300,000
Shares issuable upon conversion of convertible notes		-		8,025,861		-		8,025,861
Total		79,040		37,049,246		79,040		37,049,246

Concentration of Credit Risk - Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. The Company’s credit risk is managed by investing its cash in a certificate of deposit account. The receivables credit risk is controlled through credit approvals, credit limits and monitoring procedures.

The Company places its cash in banks. Cash in excess of federally insured limits totaled $5,289,312 at June 30, 2009 and $11,613,121 at December 31, 2008.

Accounts Receivable Concentrations - At June 30, 2009, four customers accounted for 22%, 11%, 9% and 7%, respectively, of the Company’s accounts receivable. At December 31, 2008, three customers accounted for 26%, 13% and 7%, respectively, of the Company’s accounts receivable.

Revenue Concentrations - The Company’s revenues are generated mainly from advertisers who purchase inventory in the form of graphical, text-based or video ads on the Betawave Network. These advertisers’ respective agencies facilitate the purchase of inventory on behalf of their advertisers. For the three months ended June 30, 2009, five customers accounted for 19%, 18%, 14%, 7% and 5%, respectively, of the Company’s revenues. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, five customers accounted for 17%, 16%, 10%, 8% and 5%, respectively, of the Company’s revenues. For the three months ended June 30, 2008, five customers accounted for 26%, 15% , 10%, 9% and 7%, respectively, of the Company’s revenues. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, five customers accounted for 37%, 12%, 7%, 6% and 5%, respectively, of the Company’s revenues.

Stock-Based Compensation - Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of the FASB’s Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (“SFAS 123(R)”) using the modified prospective transition method. Under that transition method, compensation cost recognized for the periods ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 includes: (a) compensation cost for all stock-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (“SFAS 123”), and (b) compensation cost for all stock-based payments granted or modified subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R).

Stock-based compensation expense for performance-based options granted to non-employees is determined in accordance with SFAS 123(R) and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services (EITF 96-18”), at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measured. The fair value of options granted to non-employees is measured as of the earlier of the performance commitment date or the date at which performance is complete (“measurement date”). When it is necessary under U.S. GAAP to recognize the cost for the transaction prior to the measurement date, the fair value of unvested options granted to non-employees is re-measured at the balance sheet date.

The Company currently uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options. The determination of the fair value of stock-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model is affected by our stock price as well as by assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables. These variables include our expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors, risk-free interest rate and expected dividends. We estimate the volatility of our common stock at the date of the grant based on a combination of the implied volatility of publicly traded options on our common stock and our historical volatility rate. The dividend yield assumption is based on historical dividend payouts. The risk-free interest rate is based on observed interest rates appropriate for the term of our employee options. We use historical data to estimate pre-vesting option forfeitures and record stock-based compensation expense only for those awards that are expected to vest. For options granted, we amortize the fair value on a straight-line basis. All options are amortized over the requisite service periods of the awards, which are generally the vesting periods. If factors change we may decide to use different assumptions under the Black-Scholes option model and stock-based compensation expense may differ materially in the future from that recorded in the current period.

Included in cost of revenues and expenses is $707,796 and $339,058 of stock-based compensation for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2009, this amount included ($13,751) of stock-based compensation related to non-employees on the issuance of options, ($1,727) related to warrants and $723,274 related to employees. For the three months ended June 30, 2008, this amount included $10,489 of stock-based compensation related to non-employees on the issuance of options, $14,781 related to warrants, $34,755 on the issuance of restricted stock and $279,033 related to employees.

Included in cost of revenues and expenses is $1,517,918 and $1,019,514 of stock-based compensation for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. At June 30, 2009, this amount included ($8,568) of stock-based compensation related to non-employees, $1,524,864 of stock-based compensation related to employees and $1,622 related to warrants. At June 30, 2008, this amount included $10,488 of stock-based compensation related to non-employees, $936,014 of stock-based compensation related to employees, $49,334 related to restricted stock and $23,678 related to the warrants.

The following table presents stock-based compensation expense included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations related to employee and non-employee stock options, restricted shares and warrants as follows for the three months and the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2009			Three Months Ended June 30, 2008		Six Months Ended June 30, 2009			Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
Cost of revenues	$	(1,209	)	$	46,297	$	(1,795	)	$	67,230
Sales and marketing		215,690			75,421		442,322			315,361
Product development		3,249			11,745		78,583			27,131
General and administrative		490,066			205,595		998,808			609,792
Total stock-based compensation	$	707,796		$	339,058	$	1,517,918		$	1,019,514

Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the calculated fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the service period, generally the vesting period of the equity grant.

The fair value of each option grant has been estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model with the following assumptions (weighted-average) for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:

	Six Months Ended			Six Months Ended
	June 30,			June 30,
	2009			2008
Risk free interest rate		1.97	%		3.20	%
Expected lives	6.16 years			5.82 years
Expected volatility		74.00	%		68.62	%
Dividend yields		0	%		0	%

The Company estimates the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes valuation model. Key input assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock options include the exercise price of the award, expected option term, expected volatility of the stock over the option’s expected term, risk-free interest rate over the option’s expected term, and the expected annual dividend yield. The Company believes that the valuation technique and approach utilized to develop the underlying assumptions are appropriate in calculating the fair values of the stock options granted in the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (“SFAS 165”). SFAS 165 sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements, and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. SFAS 165 will be effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 and will be applied prospectively. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 165 on April 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 165 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168 The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles — A Replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 (“SFAS 168”). SFAS 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM (Codification) as the single source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative U.S. GAAP for SEC registrants. SFAS 168 and the Codification are effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. When effective, the Codification will supersede all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other nongrandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become nonauthoritative. Following SFAS 168, the FASB will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, the FASB will issue Accounting Standards Updates, which will serve only to: (a) update the Codification; (b) provide background information about the guidance; and (c) provide the bases for conclusions on the change(s) in the Codification. The Company does not expect that the adoption of SFAS 168 to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (“FSP FAS 115-2/124-2”). FSP FAS 115-2/124-2 requires entities to separate any other-than-temporary impairment of a debt security into two components when there are credit related losses associated with the impaired debt security for which management asserts that it does not have the intent to sell the security, and it is more likely than not that it will not be required to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis. The amount of the other-than-temporary impairment related to a credit loss is recognized in earnings, and the amount of the other-than-temporary impairment related to other factors is recorded in other comprehensive loss. The Company adopted the provisions of FSP FAS 115-2/124-2 on April 1, 2009. The adoption of FSP FAS 115-2/124-2 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions that are Not Orderly (“FSP FAS 157-4”). Under FSP FAS 157-4, if an entity determines that there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or the liability in relation to the normal market activity for the asset or liability (or similar assets or liabilities), then transactions or quoted prices may not accurately reflect fair value. In addition, if there is evidence that the transaction for the asset or liability is not orderly, the entity shall place little, if any weight on that transaction price as an indicator of fair value. The Company adopted FSP FAS 157-4 on April 1, 2009. The adoption of FSP FAS 157-4 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (“FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1”). FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim and annual financial statements. The company adopted FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 on April 1, 2009. The adoption of FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (Revised 2007), Business Combinations (“SFAS 141R”). We adopted SFAS 141(R) on January 1, 2009, the first day of our 2009 fiscal year. SFAS 141(R) significantly changed the accounting for business combinations. Under SFAS 141(R), an acquiring entity is required to recognize all the assets acquired and all the liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with limited exceptions. Transaction costs are no longer included in the measurement of the business acquired. Instead, these costs are expensed as they are incurred. SFAS 141(R) also includes a substantial number of new disclosure requirements. SFAS 141(R) applies to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008, which for us was the beginning of our 2009 fiscal year. The adoption of SFAS 141(R) did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

We adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”) on January 1, 2008, the first day of our 2008 fiscal year. FSP FAS No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (“FSP FAS 157-2”), amended SFAS 157 by delaying its effective date, by one year, for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. In accordance with FSP FAS 157-2, we adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 to non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities in the first quarter of 2009. The adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

We adopted SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of ARB No. 51 (“SFAS 160”) on January 1, 2009, the first day of our 2009 fiscal year. SFAS 160 establishes new accounting and reporting standards for noncontrolling interests, previously known as minority interest, in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Specifically, this statement requires the recognition of noncontrolling interests as equity in the consolidated financial statements separate from the parent’s equity. The amount of net income or loss attributable to the noncontrolling interests is included in consolidated net income on the face of the income statement. SFAS 160 clarifies that changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation are equity transactions if the parent retains its controlling financial interest. In addition, this statement requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. Such gain or loss is measured using the fair value of the noncontrolling equity investment on the deconsolidation date. SFAS 160 also includes expanded disclosure requirements regarding the interests of the parent and its noncontrolling interests. SFAS 160 is applied prospectively for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning with the current fiscal year, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements, which are applied retrospectively for all periods presented. The adoption of SFAS 160 did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

We adopted SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (“SFAS 161”) on January 1, 2009, the first day of our 2009 fiscal year. SFAS 161 requires enhanced disclosure of derivatives and hedging activities in order to improve the transparency of financial reporting. Under SFAS 161, entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures relating to: (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments; (b) how derivative instruments and related hedge items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS 133”), and its related interpretations; and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 is applied prospectively to all derivative instruments and non-derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments and related hedged items accounted for under SFAS 133 for all financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning with our current fiscal year. The adoption of SFAS 161 did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

3.	Fair value

SFAS 157 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based upon whether the inputs to those valuation techniques reflect assumptions other market participants would use based upon market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) or reflect the company’s own assumptions of market participant valuation (unobservable inputs). In accordance with SFAS 157, these two types of inputs have created the following fair value hierarchy:

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets that are unadjusted and accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;

Level 2 - Quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or financial instruments for which significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly;

Level 3 - Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

SFAS 157 requires the use of observable market data if such data is available without undue cost and effort.

Measurement of Fair Value - The Company measures fair value as an exit price using the procedures described below for all assets and liabilities measured at fair value. When available, the company uses unadjusted quoted market prices to measure fair value and classifies such items within Level 1. If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon internally developed models that use, where possible, current market-based or independently-sourced market parameters such as interest rates and currency rates. Items valued using internally generated models are classified according to the lowest level input or value driver that is significant to the valuation. Thus, an item may be classified in Level 3 even though there may be inputs that are readily observable. If quoted market prices are not available, the valuation model used generally depends on the specific asset or liability being valued.

Credit risk adjustments are applied to reflect the Company’s own credit risk when valuing all liabilities measured at fair value. The methodology is consistent with that applied in developing counterparty credit risk adjustments, but incorporates the Company’s own credit risk as observed in the credit default swap market.

The following table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2009:

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Cash and cash equivalents	$	5,735,562	$	—	$	—	$	5,735,562
Restricted cash		53,750		—		—		53,750
Total assets	$	5,789,312	$	—	$	—	$	5,789,312

4.	Property and Equipment

Property and equipment, net consisted of the following at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

	June 30,			December 31,
	2009			2008
Computer equipment and software	$	670,522		$	652,877
Leasehold improvements		145,794			145,794
Furniture and fixtures		7,737			7,737
Total property and equipment		824,053			806,408
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(683,028	)		(569,960	)
Property and equipment, net	$	141,025		$	236,448

Depreciation and amortization expense totaled $48,942 and $64,918 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, and $113,746 and $130,063 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2009, respectively.

5.	Accrued Liabilities

Accrued liabilities consisted of the following at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

	June 30,		December 31,
	2009		2008
Accrued vendor obligations	$	283,732	$	687,928
Accrued compensation		357,005		777,290
Accrued city and county taxes		27,341		41,836
Other		115,366		94,786
Total accrued liabilities	$	783,444	$	1,601,840

6.	Credit Facility

On March 27, 2009, the Company entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan and Security Agreement”) with Silicon Valley Bank that provides for a secured revolving credit arrangement to provide advances in an aggregate principal amount of up to $4,000,000 on the terms and conditions set forth in the Loan and Security Agreement. The Loan and Security Agreement consists of a $4,000,000 credit facility with a $500,000 sublimit for stand-by letters of credit, a $500,000 sublimit for cash management services and a $500,000 sublimit for foreign exchange contracts. The borrowings are secured based upon a percentage of certain eligible billed and unbilled receivables. The Company may borrow, repay and reborrow under the line of credit facility at any time. As of March 27, 2009, the advances under the line of credit facility accrue interest at a per annum rate equal to 3.0% above the greater of (i) Silicon Valley Bank’s announced prime rate or (ii) 7.0%. This interest rate shall be adjusted upward at times when the Company’s liquidity ratio (as described in the Loan and Security Agreement) equals less than 2.25 to 1.00. The Company is required to pay a termination fee if the Loan and Security Agreement is terminated prior to March 27, 2011 (the “Maturity Date”) in an amount equal to the interest that would have accrued on an advance of an aggregate principal amount of $1,000,000 through the Maturity Date.

The Company’s Loan and Security Agreement is collateralized by substantially all of the Company’s assets and requires the Company to comply with customary affirmative and negative covenants principally relating to liens, indebtedness, investments, distributions to shareholders, use and disposition of assets, the satisfaction of a liquidity ratio test and minimum tangible net worth requirements. At June 30, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all covenants. In addition, the Loan and Security Agreement contains customary events of default. Upon occurrence of an uncured event of default, among other things, Silicon Valley Bank may declare that all amounts owing under the credit arrangement are due and payable and the applicable interest rate shall become 4% above the rate that would otherwise apply. The line of credit and facility expire on the Maturity Date. As of June 30, 2009, there is $1,000,000 outstanding under this revolving credit arrangement. The amount available for borrowing totaled approximately $392,633 at June 30, 2009.

7.	Stock Options and Warrants

In 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) adopted a 2004 Stock Plan (the “2004 Plan”). The 2004 Plan authorized the Board of Directors to grant incentive stock options and nonstatutory stock options to employees, directors, and consultants for up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock. Options vested over a period of time according to the Option Agreement, and are exercisable for a maximum period of ten years after date of grant. In May 2006, the Company increased the shares reserved for issuance under the 2004 Plan from 2,000,000 to 4,588,281. Upon completion of the October 27, 2006 mergers, the Company decreased the shares reserved under the 2004 Plan from 4,588,281 to 804,188 and froze the 2004 Plan resulting in no additional options being available for grant under the 2004 Plan.

In 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted a 2006 Stock Plan (the “2006 Plan”).The 2006 Plan authorized the Board of Directors to grant incentive stock options and nonstatutory stock options to employees, directors, and consultants for up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock. In October 2006, the Board of Directors increased the shares available under the 2006 Plan to 4,000,000 shares. Options will vest over a period according to the Option Agreement, and are exercisable for a maximum period of ten years after date of grant. In March 2008, the Board of Directors froze the 2006 Plan resulting in no additional options being available for grant under the 2006 Plan.

On October 24, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan (as amended, the “Non-Qualified Plan”). The purposes of the Non-Qualified Plan are to attract and retain the best available personnel, to provide additional incentives to employees, directors and consultants and to promote the success of our business. The Non-Qualified Plan initially provided for a maximum aggregate of 3,600,000 shares of our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options granted pursuant to the Non-Qualified Plan. On November 1, 2007, the Board adopted an amendment to the Non-Qualified Plan to increase the total number of shares of our common stock that may be issued pursuant to the Non-Qualified Plan from 3,600,000 shares to 4,000,000 shares. On December 18, 2007, the Board adopted a further amendment to the Non-Qualified Plan to increase the total number of shares of our common stock that may be issued pursuant to the Non-Qualified Plan from 4,000,000 shares to 5,500,000 shares. On February 5, 2008, the Board adopted an additional amendment to the Non-Qualified Plan to increase the total plan shares that may be issued from 5,500,000 shares to 10,500,000 shares. On June 4, 2008, the Board further increased the number of shares reserved under the 2007 Plan to 16,500,000. On December 2, 2008 the Board increased the number of shares reserved under the 2007 Plan to 69,141,668. On January 16, 2009, the Board increased the number of shares reserved under the 2007 Plan to 82,963,169. The Board (or any committee composed of members of the Board appointed by it to administer the Non-Qualified Plan), has the authority to administer and interpret the Non-Qualified Plan. The administrator has the authority to, among other things, (i) select the employees, consultants and directors to whom options may be granted, (ii) grant options, (iii) determine the number of shares underlying option grants, (iv) approve forms of option agreements for use under the Non-Qualified Plan, (v) determine the terms and conditions of the options and (vi) subject to certain exceptions, amend the terms of any outstanding option granted under the Non-Qualified Plan. The Non-Qualified Plan authorizes grants of nonqualified stock options to eligible employees, directors and consultants. The exercise price for an Option shall be determined by the administrator. The term of each option under the Non-Qualified Plan shall be no more than ten years from the date of grant. The Non-Qualified Plan became effective upon its adoption by the Board and will continue in effect for a term of ten years, unless sooner terminated. The Board may at any time amend, suspend or terminate the Non-Qualified Plan. The Non-Qualified Plan also contains provisions governing: (i) the treatment of options under the Non-Qualified Plan upon the occurrence of certain corporate transactions (including merger, consolidation, sale of all or substantially all the assets of our company, or complete liquidation or dissolution of our company) and changes in control of our company, (ii) transferability of options and (iii) tax withholding upon the exercise or vesting of an option.

On March 31, 2008, the Board adopted the Betawave Corporation 2008 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended, the “2008 Plan”). The 2008 Plan is intended to replace the frozen 2006 Plan and permits options and other equity compensation to be awarded to employees, directors and consultants. As originally adopted, the 2008 Plan provided for the issuance of up to 2,400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to awards granted thereunder, up to 2,200,000 of which may be issued pursuant to incentive stock options granted thereunder. On June 4, 2008, the Board adopted an amendment to the 2008 Plan to (i) decrease the maximum aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to awards granted under the plan from 2,400,000 shares to 1,500,000 shares and (ii) decrease the maximum aggregate number of shares of the Company’s common stock that may be issued pursuant to incentive stock options granted under the plan from 2,200,000 shares to 1,500,000 shares. On December 2, 2008 the Board increased the number of shares reserved under the Plan to a maximum of 19,224,774. The 2008 Plan is administered, with respect to grants to employees, directors, officers, and consultants, by the plan administrator (the “Administrator”), defined as the Board or one or more committees designated by the Board. The Board is currently the Administrator for the 2008 Plan.

A summary of stock option transactions for the period January 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009 is as follows:

				Options Outstanding
	Options available for grant			Number of options			Weighted average exercise price
Balances at January 1, 2008		3,021,584			7,194,770		$	0.91
Additional shares reserved		82,866,442			—		$	—
Shares frozen under the 2004 and 2006 Plans		(3,370,966	)		—		$	—
Options granted		(75,606,727	)		75,606,727		$	0.39
Options cancelled		2,754,001			(2,754,001	)	$	1.30
Balances at January 1, 2009		9,664,334			80,047,496		$	0.41
Additional shares reserved		13,821,501			—		$	—
Options granted		(3,805,325	)		3,805,325		$	0.16
Options cancelled		424,606			(1,237,040	)	$	0.41
Balances at June 30, 2009		20,105,116			82,615,781		$	0.39

The following table summarizes information concerning outstanding options as of June 30, 2009:

		Options Outstanding						Options Exercisable
Exercise price		Number of Options		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value		Number of Options		Weighted Averag e Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
$	0.06		139,100		4.99				134,787		4.95
$	0.08		117,000		9.99				7,000		9.99
$	0.16		3,633,325		9.72				104,708		9.72
$	0.19		129,765		9.39				4,765		9.39
$	0.20		48,206,467		9.43				11,723,775		9.43
$	0.23		4,825,000		8.79				2,514,583		8.72
$	0.24		102,000		8.93				53,500		8.93
$	0.25		65,000		9.09				35,833		9.09
$	0.27		400,000		8.34				222,222		8.34
$	0.29		400,000		8.75				93,827		8.75
$	0.35		4,840,000		8.59				3,472,778		8.59
$	0.37		1,742,650		8.30				1,306,000		8.30
$	0.42		130,000		8.53				46,042		8.53
$	0.60		2,998,324		9.42				-		-
$	0.80		5,498,324		9.20				833,333		8.93
$	1.00		2,998,324		9.42				-		-
$	1.20		2,998,324		9.42				-		-
$	1.40		2,998,324		9.42				-		-
$	1.50		62,500		7.33				41,667		7.33
$	3.08		40,000		7.47				24,167		7.47
$	3.65		64,271		7.37				64,271		7.37
$	3.78		15,000		7.89				7,813		7.89
$	3.80		65,000		7.80				35,208		7.80
$	5.79		147,083		7.59				99,167		7.59
			82,615,781		9.29	$	7,904		20,825,446		9.04	$	5,531

The weighted-average grant date fair value of the options granted during the three month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were $0.10 and $0.16, respectively.

On December 2, 2008, the Company granted (under the Non-Qualified Plan) certain employees options to purchase 14,991,620 shares of Company common stock. These options will only vest with a change in control of the Company, as defined in the option agreement. As the condition for vesting is not probable, the Company has not recognized any compensation expense related to these options at June 30, 2009. At June 30, 2009, all of these options remain outstanding.

At June 30, 2009, there was $5,997,920 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock-based compensation arrangements granted under the plans. This cost is expected to be recognized over the weighted average period of 2.42 years.

The Company did not realize any tax benefits from tax deductions of stock-based payment arrangements during the six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.

Stock-based compensation expense related to stock options granted to non-employees is recognized as earned. In accordance with EITF 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services, the Company re-values the non-employee stock-based compensation, at each reporting date, using the Black-Scholes pricing model. As a result, stock-based compensation expense will fluctuate as the estimated fair market value of the Company’s common stock fluctuates. The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense related to non-employees of ($6,945) and $83,500 for the six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

A summary of outstanding Common Stock Warrants included those issued as non-employee compensation as of June 30, 2009 is as follows:

Securities into which warrants are convertible and reference	Shares		Exercise Price		Expiration Date
Common Stock- Non-employee compensation		300,000	$	1.75	February 2013
Common Stock- Non-employee compensation		80,000	$	0.20	February 2013
Common Stock- Non-employee compensation		3,133,333	$	1.72	October 2011
Common Stock- Series A preferred stock units		56,522,344	$	0.20	December 2013
Common Stock- Non-employee compensation		6,665,343	$	0.20	December 2013
Common Stock- Non-employee compensation		50,000	$	0.20	November 2013
Common Stock- See below		600,000	$	0.20	March 2014
Total		67,351,020

8.	Cash Flow Information

Cash paid during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 is as follows:

	Six Months Ended June 30,		Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008
Interest	$	17,681	$	279,000
Income taxes	$	—	$	—

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 is as follows:

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2009		Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
Issuance of warrants to Silicon Valley Bank	$	33,794	$	—
Issuance of common stock to publisher	$	—	$	102,000

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations provides information that we believe is relevant to an assessment and understanding of our financial condition and results of operations. This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included under the heading “Financial Statements” in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on March 31, 2009.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains, in addition to historical information, forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements of our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Any statements that are not statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. When used, the words “believe,” “plan,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “target,” “estimate,” “expect,” and the like, and/or future-tense or conditional constructions (e.g., “will,” “may,” “could,” “should,” etc.) or similar expressions identify certain of these forward-looking statements. These forward-statements include, without limitation: (i) management’s expectation that our revenues will increase from current levels as a result of our planned continued expansion of the Betawave Network’s reach, scale and scope; (ii) our expectations regarding the incurrence of additional expenses for the development and expansion of our publisher network, marketing campaigns for a number of our programming launches and the continuing integration of our businesses; (iii) our anticipation of gains in operating efficiencies as a result of the increase to our sales and marketing organization; (iv) our expectation that operating losses and negative cash flows will continue for the foreseeable future but that losses will decrease from current levels to the extent that we continue to grow and develop; (v) our expectation that we will be able to expand operations and gain market share; our anticipation that that our revenues will show quarter over quarter and year over year growth for 2009 as the launch of the Betawave Network, the increase in the size of the Betawave Network and the sales cycle all are expected to mature; (vi) our belief that consumers will increasingly spend time online relative to other media; and (vii) our expectation that large sites will continue to lose traffic to smaller sites.

These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and in particular, the risks discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” in Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and those discussed in other documents we file with the SEC. We undertake no obligation to revise or publicly release the results of any revision to these forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are urged not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Overview

Betawave Corporation (the “Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us”) is an attention-based digital media company. We have assembled some of the leading immersive casual gaming, virtual world, social play and entertainment websites into a network of sites (the “Betawave Network”). We generate revenues by selling innovative, accountable and attention-grabbing advertising campaigns on those sites to brand advertisers.

Trends in Our Business

During the first quarter of 2009, we added key publishers and increased the “reach” of our network to over 32 million domestic unique users per month (according to comScore Media Metrix, July 2009). When ranked against the online properties in comScore Media Metrix, we place first or second in total audience reach and time spent in several key categories:

In the Kids-Entertainment category, first in reach and in total time spent;

In the Lifestyles-community category, second in reach and first in total time spent; and

In the Parenting-community category, second in reach and first in total time spent.

Since our rebranding and the expansion of our network in January 2009, we have pitched more business and, as a result, we believe we have built a robust sales pipeline. We anticipate that our revenues will show year over year growth in 2009 as the launch of the Betawave Network, the increase in the size of the Betawave Network and the sales cycle all are expected to mature. We remain subject to seasonal fluctuations in our business. In general, in our industry, the first half of the year tends to experience lower spending, while the second half of the year tends to experience higher spending. In general, online advertising has, in the past, peaked during the fourth quarter holiday season.

Due to the continued negative macroeconomic environment for online advertising, the sales cycle in the industry has shortened significantly. The sales cycle in our business traditionally ranged from three to nine months due to the general practice for most advertiser categories to plan at least one quarter in advance. However, as a result of the economic crisis, advertising buys across all mediums in key advertiser categories have shortened significantly, resulting in less visibility into our expected future revenue.

In addition, according to MediaPost, a survey of eight revenue forecasts issued between June 2007 and December 2008 (from Veronis Suhler Stevenson, Jupiter Research, the Kelsey Group, Lehman Bros., Magna, eMarketer, J.P. Morgan, and ZenithOptimedia) demonstrates that, on average, forecasts for Internet advertising revenue growth in 2008 were approximately 100% higher than the actual growth rate (with an average prediction of 20% versus actual growth of just 10%, according to the Interactive Advertising Bureau). Even the modest original forecasts for 2009 appear to be too optimistic based on performance in the first quarter of 2009, which actually saw negative growth in online ad spending with a decrease of 5%. eMarketer is now predicting overall ad growth in 2009 to be flat, growing to $31.43 billion by 2013 (down from their prediction of $37.2 billion from earlier this year). Some online advertising formats are performing better than others. According to the Wall Street Journal, search advertising grew 20% in 2008 whereas display advertising grew 8% in 2008. eMarketer predicts only 3% growth for display advertising in 2009.

Despite the negative macroeconomic news, we continue to believe that advertisers must reach consumers online, as this is where we believe they are increasingly spend time relative to other media. Online advertising continues to increase as a percentage of advertising across all media. In addition, the advertiser’s ability to effectively reach consumers is being impacted by several trends taking place on the Internet. Consumer behavior online is changing through an accelerated progression towards “deportalization.” Deportalization describes the phenomenon of Internet traffic moving from large portals to smaller, niche sites. The drivers of this trend are search and increased user confidence with regard to the medium. We expect that, in the next several years, the large sites will continue to lose traffic to smaller sites. Our goal is to fill in the gap for brand advertisers by uniting attractive, content-rich mid-size sites, providing the size and scale of portals, with the immersive experience and customization of niche sites.

We are seeking to invest significantly in building the employee and systems infrastructures that we believe are necessary to manage our growth and develop and promote our products and services in order to take advantage of the trends described above, requiring us to continue to use significant cash resources in the near future. In general, the demand for high quality salespeople in online advertising sales is very competitive and requires paying competitive market salaries in order to obtain the results we seek to grow our business. In addition, we believe that attracting, hiring and retaining mid-level digital advertising executives is important to building our business, and the market for these executives in our industry is also very competitive.

Results of Operations - Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2008

Revenues

Total revenues increased to $2,282,325 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 from $1,282,439 for the three months ended June 30, 2008, representing an increase of $999,886. Total revenues increased to $3,670,745 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 from $1,939,589 for the six months ended June 30, 2008, representing an increase of $1,731,156. These increases reflected higher sales from advertising that was sold across the Betawave Network. Revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 consisted of advertising fees, primarily from graphical and rich-media ads.

We anticipate that our total revenues for the full fiscal year of 2009 will be higher than our total revenues for the full fiscal year of 2008. While management believes this projection has a reasonable basis, this projection is subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such projections, including those identified under the heading “Risk Factors” in Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and those discussed in other documents we file with the SEC.

Costs of Revenues

Cost of revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 consisted primarily of direct payments to publishers for revenue share on advertising revenues, costs associated with hosting our websites and ad serving costs for impressions delivered in connection with advertising revenues.

Cost of revenues increased to $1,407,352 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 from $1,350,931 for the three months ended June 30, 2008, representing an increase of $56,421. This increase included $146,218 of payments made to publishers and $85,988 for game design. These increases were offset by a decrease of $15,665 for ad serving, $62,502 for web hosting costs, $51,321 for licensing expenses and $46,297 for stock-based compensation expenses related to SFAS 123(R).

For the six months ended June 30, 2009, cost of revenues increased to $3,254,424 from $2,154,737 for the six months ended June 30, 2008, representing an increase of $1,099,687. The increase included $1,136,505 of payments made to publishers, $48,248 for ad serving costs, $173,537 for custom media player and game design and $6,240 for Betawave TV production costs. These increases were offset by a $124,195 reduction for web hosting, $73,418 for licensing expenses and $67,230 for stock-based compensation expenses related to SFAS 123(R).

Sales and Marketing

Sales and marketing expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 consisted primarily of advertising and other marketing related expenses, compensation-related expenses, sales commissions, and travel costs.

Sales and marketing expenses increased to $1,993,312 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 from $1,409,444 for the three months ended June 30, 2008, representing an increase of $583,868. This increase was attributable to a $364,554 increase in personnel and other benefits related costs, including a $140,269 increase in stock-based compensation expenses related to SFAS 123(R), a $29,221 increase in travel expenses, a $71,625 increase in advertising and other marketing related expenses and a $118,468 increase in allocation of facilities, IT and other operating expenses.

For the six months ended June 30, 2009, sales and marketing expenses increased to $4,209,792 from $3,096,333 for the six months ended June 30, 2008, representing an increase of $1,113,459. This increase was attributable to a $794,463 increase in personnel and other benefits related costs, including a $126,961 increase in stock-based compensation expenses related to SFAS 123 (R), a $92,157 increase in professional services for public relations and related development research expense, a $59,625 increase in travel expenses and a $180,103 increase in allocation of facilities, IT and other operating expenses. These increases were offset by a $12,889 decrease in advertising and other marketing related expenses.

Employees in sales and marketing at June 30, 2009 and 2008 were 38 and 25, respectively.

Product Development

Product development expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 consisted primarily of compensation-related expenses incurred for the development of, and enhancement to systems that enable us to drive and support revenue-generating activities across our network of websites.

Product development expenses decreased to $106,772 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 from $165,563 for the three months ended June 30, 2008, representing a decrease of $58,791. This decrease was attributable primarily to a $33,986 reduction in compensation related expenses, including a $8,496 decrease in stock-based compensation expenses related to SFAS 123(R), and a $24,805 decrease in allocation of facilities, IT and other operating expenses.

For the six months ended June 30, 2009, product development expense decreased to $333,345 from $339,944 for the six months ended June 30, 2008, representing a decrease of $6,599. The decrease was attributed primarily to a $52,966 reduction in allocation of facilities, IT and other operating expenses. This decrease was offset by an increase in compensation related expenses of $46,367, including a $51,452 increase in stock-based compensation expenses related to SFAS 123(R).

Employees in product development at June 30, 2009 and 2008 were 4 and 5, respectively.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 consisted primarily of compensation-related expenses related to our executive management, finance and human resource organizations and legal, accounting, insurance, investor relations and other operating expenses to the extent not otherwise allocated to other functions.

General and administrative expenses increased to $1,399,991 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 from $1,146,108 for the three months ended June 30, 2008, representing an increase of $253,883. This increase was attributable to a $486,639 increase in compensation-related expenses, including a $284,471 increase in stock-based compensation expenses related to SFAS 123(R). This increase was partly offset by a $218,417 decrease in accounting, investor relations and other professional services and a $14,339 reduction in travel expenses.

For the six months ended June 30, 2009, general and administrative expenses increased to $2,916,465 from $2,631,171 for the six months ended June 30, 2008, representing an increase of $285,294. The increase was attributable to a $750,876 increase in personnel and other benefits related costs, including a $389,016 increase in stock-based compensation expenses related to SFAS 123(R). These increases were offset by a $297,058 decrease in accounting, investor relations and other professional services, a $27,816 reduction in travel expenses, and a $140,708 decrease in unallocated facilities, IT and other operating expenses.

Employees in general and administrative at June 30, 2009 and 2008 were 9 and 5, respectively.

Other Income and Expenses

Other income (expense) changed to $43,312 of income for the three months ended June 30, 2009 from $772,445 of expense for the three months ended June 30, 2008. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, other income (expense) changed to $47,824 of income from $1,458,854 of expense for the six months ended June 30, 2008, representing a change of $1,506,678.

Interest income is derived primarily from short-term interest earned on operating cash balances. Miscellaneous income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 represents settlement from a claim with a third party.

Interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 was related to the financing costs for our directors and officers insurance policy and the interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 was related to financing costs for our directors and officers insurance policy and our convertible debt, which was retired in December 2008.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

To date, we have funded our operations primarily through private sales of securities and borrowings. As of June 30, 2009, we had $5,735,562 in cash and cash equivalents. Because we expect to continue to incur an operating loss in fiscal 2009, we may need to raise additional capital in the future, which may not be available on reasonable terms or at all. The raising of additional capital may dilute our current stockholders’ ownership interests.

As of June 30, 2009, we had a secured revolving credit arrangement with Silicon Valley Bank available that provides advances in an aggregate principal amount of up to $4,000,000 on the terms and conditions set forth in a Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of March 27, 2009 (the “Loan and Security Agreement”). The Loan and Security Agreement consists of a $4,000,000 credit facility with a $500,000 sublimit for stand-by letters of credit, a $500,000 sublimit for cash management services and a $500,000 sublimit for foreign exchange contracts. The borrowings are secured based upon a percentage of certain eligible billed and unbilled receivables. We may borrow, repay and reborrow under the line of credit facility at any time. As of March 27, 2009, the advances under the line of credit facility accrue interest at a per annum rate equal to 3.0% above the greater of (i) Silicon Valley Bank’s announced prime rate or (ii) 7.0%. This interest rate shall be adjusted upward at times when our liquidity ratio (as described in the Loan and Security Agreement) equals less than 2.25 to 1.00. We are required to pay a termination fee if the Loan and Security Agreement is terminated prior to March 27, 2011 (the “Maturity Date”) in an amount equal to the interest that would have accrued on an advance of an aggregate principal amount of $1,000,000 through the Maturity Date. The Loan and Security Agreement is collateralized by substantially all of our assets and requires us to comply with customary affirmative and negative covenants principally relating to liens, indebtedness, investments, distributions to shareholders, use and disposition of assets, the satisfaction of a liquidity ratio test and minimum tangible net worth requirements. At June 30, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all covenants. In addition, the Loan and Security Agreement contains customary events of default. Upon occurrence of an uncured event of default, among other things, Silicon Valley Bank may declare that all amounts owing under the credit arrangement are due and payable and the applicable interest rate shall become 4% above the rate that would otherwise apply. The line of credit and facility expire on the Maturity Date. As of June 30, 2009, there was $1,000,000 outstanding under this revolving credit arrangement. The amount available for borrowing totaled approximately $392,633 at June 30, 2009.

Net cash used in operating activities was $6,967,931 and $2,820,055 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, the cash used in operating activities consisted of a net loss, net of non cash expenses of $1,648,562, of $5,346,895 and a negative change in working capital of $1,621,036. The non cash expense items included loss on disposal of fixed assets of $1,976, depreciation and amortization of $113,746, amortization of financing costs of $14,922 and stock-based compensation of $1,517,918. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, the primary use of cash was due to a net loss of $5,431,608, which is net of non cash expenses of $2,309,842, and a change in working capital of $2,611,553. The non cash expense items included an increase in the fair value of warrant liability of $46,586, depreciation and amortization of $130,063, amortization of convertible note fees of $250,795, stock-based compensation of $1,019,514 and non cash interest expense of $862,884.

Net cash used in investing activities was $74,049 and $566,810 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, net cash used in investing activities consisted of $53,750 deposited as security for a letter of credit and $20,299 for the purchase of property and equipment. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, net cash used in investing activities consisted of $550,000 deposited as security for a letter of credit and the purchase of property and equipment of $16,810.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $914,421 and $2,754,949 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 consisted of borrowings of $1,300,000 under the revolving credit arrangement with Silicon Valley Bank, offset by the repayment of $300,000 of such borrowings and the payment of $85,579 for financing costs related to the revolving credit arrangement. The net cash from financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2008 consisted of $210,000 of advances from a stockholder, which were offset by the conversion of this amount of $210,000 to unsecured discount notes and net proceeds of $2,754,949 from the issuance of our unsecured convertible 15% original issue discount notes due June 8, 2010, which were cancelled in December 2008.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“U.S. GAAP”) . The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

An accounting policy is considered to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and if different estimates that reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting estimate that are reasonably likely to occur, could materially impact the consolidated financial statements. We believe that the following critical accounting policies reflect the more significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenues from the display of graphical advertisements on the websites of the publishers in the Betawave Network as “impressions” are delivered up to the amount contracted for by the advertiser. An “impression” is delivered when an advertisement appears in pages viewed by users. Arrangements for these services generally have terms of less than one year.

We recognize these revenues as such because the services have been provided, and the other criteria set forth under Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 13: Revenue Recognition have been met: namely, the fees charged by the Company are fixed or determinable, the advertisers understand the specific nature and terms of the agreed-upon transactions and collectability is reasonably assured. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 99-19, Reporting Revenue Gross as Principal Versus Net as an Agent (“EITF 99-19”), Betawave reports revenues on a gross basis principally because the Company is the primary obligor to the advertisers.

Costs of Revenues and Expenses

Cost of revenues and expenses primarily consist of payments to publishers in the Betawave Network, personnel-related costs, including payroll, recruitment and benefits for executive, technical, corporate and administrative employees, in addition to professional fees, insurance and other general corporate expenses. We believe that a key element to the execution of our strategy is the hiring of personnel in all areas that are vital to our business. Our investments in personnel include hiring employees in the areas of business development, sales and marketing, advertising, service and general corporate marketing and promotions.

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

Prior to January 1, 2006, we used the intrinsic value method to record stock-based compensation for employees, which requires that deferred stock-based compensation be recorded for the difference between an option’s exercise price and the fair value of the underlying common stock on the grant date of the option.

Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123 (R), Share-Based Payment , (“SFAS 123 (R)”) using the modified prospective transition method. Under that transition method, compensation cost recognized for the periods ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 includes: (a) compensation cost for all stock-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (“SFAS 123”), and (b) compensation cost for all stock-based payments granted or modified subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R).

We currently use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options. The determination of the fair value of stock based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model is affected by our stock price as well as by assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables. These variables include our expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors, risk-free interest rate and expected dividends. We estimate the volatility of our common stock at the date of the grant based on a combination of the implied volatility of publicly traded options on our common stock and our historical volatility rate. The dividend yield assumption is based on historical dividend payouts. The risk-free interest rate is based on observed interest rates appropriate for the term of our employee options. We use historical data to estimate pre-vesting option forfeitures and record stock-based compensation expense only for those awards that are expected to vest. For options granted, we amortize the fair value on a straight-line basis. All options are amortized over the requisite service periods of the awards, which are generally the vesting periods. If factors change we may decide to use different assumptions under the Black-Scholes option model and stock-based compensation expense may differ materially in the future from that recorded in the current periods.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Major improvements are capitalized, while repair and maintenance costs that do not improve or extend the lives of the respective assets are expensed as incurred. Depreciation and amortization charges are calculated using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:

		Estimated Useful Life
Computer equipment and software		3 years
Furniture and fixtures		5 years
Leasehold improvements		Shorter of estimated useful life or lease term

Upon retirement or sale of property or equipment, the associated cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the balance sheet and the resulting gain or loss is reflected in operating expenses. If factors change we may decide to use shorter or longer estimated useful lives and depreciation and amortization expense may differ materially in the future from that recorded in the current periods.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We continually evaluate whether events and circumstances have occurred that indicate the remaining estimated useful life of long-lived assets may warrant revision or that the remaining balance of long-lived assets may not be recoverable. When factors indicate that long-lived assets should be evaluated for possible impairment, we typically make various assumptions about the future prospects the asset relates to, consider market factors and use an estimate of the related undiscounted future cash flows over the remaining life of the long-lived assets in measuring whether they are recoverable. If the estimated undiscounted future cash flows exceed the carrying value of the asset, a loss is recorded as the excess of the asset’s carrying value over its fair value. There have been no such impairments of long-lived assets through December 31, 2008.

Assumptions and estimates about future values are complex and often subjective. They can be affected by a variety of factors, including external factors such as industry and economic trends, and internal factors such as changes in our business strategy and our internal forecasts. Although we believe the assumptions and estimates we have made in the past have been reasonable and appropriate, different assumptions and estimates could materially affect our reported financial results. More conservative assumptions of the anticipated future benefits could result in impairment charges, which would increase net loss and result in lower asset values on our balance sheet. Conversely, less conservative assumptions could result in smaller or no impairment charges, lower net loss and higher asset values.

Income Taxes

We are subject to federal and state income taxes in the United States of America. We use the asset and liability approach to account for income taxes. This methodology recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax base of assets and liabilities and operating loss and tax carryforwards. We then record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount that more likely than not will be realized. In evaluating our ability to recover our deferred income tax assets we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including our operating results, ongoing tax planning and forecasts of future taxable income. Through December 31, 2008, we have provided a valuation allowance of approximately $15.8 million against our entire net deferred tax asset, primarily consisting of net operating loss carryforwards. In the event we were to determine that we would be able to realize our deferred income tax assets in the future in excess of their net recorded amount, we would make an adjustment to the valuation allowance which would reduce the provision for income taxes.

Advertising and Promotion Costs

Expenses related to advertising and promotions of products are charged to expense as incurred. Advertising and promotional costs totaled $0 and $0 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, and $0 and $113,146 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See “Recent Accounting Pronouncements” under Note 2 to the unaudited consolidated financial statements included under the heading “Financial Statements” in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for information on recent accounting pronouncements.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Not applicable.

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our management performed, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to reasonably ensure that information required to be disclosed in the report we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Accounting Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

As previously disclosed in our 2008 Form 10-K, in connection with our assessment of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 as required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we had identified the following material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting:

•

Our control environment did not sufficiently promote effective internal control over financial reporting resulting in recurring material weaknesses which were not remediated.

•

Our board of directors has not established adequate financial reporting monitoring activities to mitigate the risk of management override, specifically:

a majority of our board of directors is not independent;

no financial expert on our board of directors has been designated;

no formally documented financial analysis is presented to our board of directors, specifically fluctuation, variance, trend analysis or business performance reviews;

delegation of authority has not been formally communicated;

an effective whistleblower program has not been established;

there is insufficient oversight of external audit specifically related to fees, scope of activities, executive sessions, and monitoring of results; and

there is insufficient oversight of accounting principle implementation.

•

Due to an insufficient number of personnel in our accounting group there have been material audit adjustments to the annual financial statements.

•

We have not maintained sufficient competent evidence to support the effective operation of our internal controls over financial reporting, specifically related to our board of director’s oversight of quarterly and annual SEC filings; and management’s review of SEC filings, journal entries, account analyses and reconciliations, and critical spreadsheet controls.

•

We have not sufficiently restricted access to data or adequately divided, or compensated for, incompatible functions among personnel to reduce the risk that a potential material misstatement of the financial statements would occur without being prevented or detected. Specifically we have not divided the authorizing of transactions, recording of transactions, reconciling of information, and maintaining custody of assets within the financial closing and reporting, revenues and accounts receivable, purchases and accounts payable, and cash receipts and disbursements processes.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by our internal controls. As previously disclosed in our 2008 Form 10-K, because of the material weaknesses noted above, our management had concluded that we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on Internal Control over Financial Reporting – Guidance for Smaller Public Companies issued by COSO.

As previously disclosed in our 2008 Form 10-K, we have been in the process of implementing remediation efforts with respect to the material weaknesses noted above as follows:

•

We plan, over the course of this year, to evaluate the composition of our board of directors and to determine whether to add independent directors or to replace an inside director with an independent director, in both cases, in order to have a majority of our board of directors become independent. We will determine whether any of its current directors is a financial expert and, if not, will ensure that one of the new directors is a financial expert.

•

We plan on drafting quarterly financial statement variance analysis of actual versus budget with relevant explanations of variances for distribution to our board of directors.

•

We are currently working on formally documenting the delegation of authority. There will be a document that specifies exactly what requires board approval. Other than the specific items that our board of directors must authorize, all other authority will be delegated to the Chief Accounting Officer and point to the further delegation from the Chief Accounting Officer to employees.

•

We are in the process of developing, documenting, and communicating a formal whistleblower program to employees. We expect to post the policy on the web site in the governance section and in the common areas in the office. We plan on providing a 1-800 number for reporting complaints and will hire a specific 3rd party whistleblower company to monitor the hotline and provide monthly reports of activity to our board of directors.

•

Management intends to continue to provide SEC and US GAAP training for employees and retain external consultants with appropriate SEC and US GAAP expertise to assist in financial statement review, account analysis review, review and filing of SEC reports, policy and procedure compilation assistance, and other related advisory services.

•

We intend on developing an internal control over financial reporting evidence policy and procedures which contemplates, among other items, a listing of all identified key internal controls over financial reporting, assignment of responsibility to process owners within the Company, communication of such listing to all applicable personnel, and specific policies and procedures around the nature and retention of evidence of the operation of controls.

•

We intend on undertaking a restricted access review to analyze all financial modules and the list of persons authorized to have edit access to each. We will remove or add authorized personnel as appropriate to mitigate the risks of management or other override.

•

We plan to re-assign roles and responsibilities in order to improve segregation of duties.

We believe the foregoing efforts will enable us to improve our internal control over financial reporting. Management is committed to continuing efforts aimed at improving the design adequacy and operational effectiveness of its system of internal controls. The remediation efforts noted above will be subject to our internal control assessment, testing, and evaluation process.

While we have been in the process of implementing the remediation efforts with respect to the material weaknesses noted above, these material weaknesses were not fully remediated as of June 30, 2009.

Based on our management’s evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, including the continuing unremediated material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Accounting Officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2009, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the second quarter ended June 30, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

From time to time we may be named in claims arising in the ordinary course of business. Currently, no legal proceedings, government actions, administrative actions, investigations or claims are pending against us or involve us that, in the opinion of our management, would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS.

We face a variety of risks that may affect our financial condition, results of operations or business, and many of those risks are driven by factors that we cannot control or predict. The following discussion addresses those risks that management believes are the most significant, although there may be other risks that could arise, or may prove to be more significant than expected, that may affect our financial condition, results of operations or business.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMPANY

We have a history of operating losses which we expect to continue, and we may not be able to achieve profitability.

We have a history of losses and expect to continue to incur operating and net losses for the foreseeable future. We incurred a net loss of approximately $17.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, a net loss of approximately $16.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 and a net loss of approximately $7.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. As of June 30, 2009, our accumulated deficit was approximately $48.1 million. We have not achieved profitability on a quarterly or on an annual basis. We may not be able to achieve profitability. Our revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2009 were approximately $2.3 million. If our revenues grow more slowly than anticipated or if our operating expenses exceed expectations, then we may not be able to achieve profitability in the near future or at all, which may depress the price of our common stock.

The effects of the current global economic crisis may impact our business, operating results, or financial condition.

The current global economic crisis has caused significant disruptions and extreme volatility in global financial markets and increased rates of default and bankruptcy, and has significantly impacted levels of consumer spending. The current deterioration in economic conditions has caused and could cause additional decreases in or delays in advertising spending in general. In addition, many industry forecasts are predicting negative growth or a decrease in the rate of growth in certain channels of online advertising in 2009. These developments could negatively affect our business, operating results, or financial condition in a number of ways. Current or potential customers such as advertisers may delay or decrease spending with us or may not pay us or may delay paying us for previously purchased services. For example, the sales cycle in our industry has recently shortened significantly. The sales cycle in our business traditionally ranged from three to nine months due to the general practice for all advertiser categories to plan at least one quarter in advance. However, as a result of the current global economic crisis, advertising buys in all mediums have shortened significantly. In addition, if consumer spending continues to decrease, this may affect consumer’s behavior on the Internet and online advertising spending.

A limited number of advertisers account for a significant percentage of our revenue, and a loss of one or more of these advertisers could materially adversely affect our results of operations.

We generate almost entirely all of our revenues from advertisers on our network. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and the year ended December 31, 2008, revenues from our five largest advertisers accounted for 40% and 36%, respectively, of our revenues. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and the year ended December 31, 2008, our largest advertiser accounted for 13% and 12%, respectively, of our revenues. Our advertisers can generally terminate their contracts with us at any time. The loss of one or more of the advertisers that represent a significant portion of our revenues could materially adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, our relationships with publishers participating in our network require us to bear the risk of non-payment of advertising fees from advertisers. Accordingly, the non-payment or late payment of amounts due to us from a significant advertiser could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

A small number of publishers account for a substantial percentage of our revenues and our failure to develop and sustain long-term relationships with our publishers, or the reduction in traffic of a current publisher in our network, could limit our ability to generate revenues.

For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and the year ended December 31, 2008, advertising revenues connected to our largest publisher accounted for approximately 50% and 66%, respectively, of our revenues. Until the sales cycle on the newest sites in our publisher network matures, a small number of publishers will account for a substantial percentage of our revenues. We cannot assure you that any of the publishers participating in our network will continue their relationships with us. Moreover, we may lose publishers to competing publisher networks that have longer operating histories, the ability to attract higher ad rates, greater brand recognition, or the ability to generate greater financial, marketing and other resources. Furthermore, we cannot assure you that we would be able to replace a departed publisher with another publisher with comparable traffic patterns and demographics, if at all. Accordingly, our failure to develop and sustain long-term relationships with publishers or the reduction in traffic of a current publisher in our network could limit our ability to generate revenues.

Our future financial results, including our expected revenues, are unpredictable and difficult to forecast.

Our revenues, expenses and operating results fluctuate from quarter to quarter and are unpredictable which could increase the volatility of the price of our common stock. We expect that our operating results will continue to fluctuate in the future due to a number of factors, some of which are beyond our control.

These factors include:

our ability to attract and incorporate publishers into our network;

the ability of the publishers in our network to attract visitors to their websites;

the amount and timing of costs relating to the expansion of our operations, including sales and marketing expenditures;

our ability to control our gross margins;

our ability to generate revenues through third-party advertising and our ability to be paid fees for advertising on our network; and

our ability to obtain cost-effective advertising throughout our network.

Due to all of these factors, our operating results may fall below the expectations of investors, which could cause a decline in the price of our common stock. In addition, since we expect that our operating results will continue to fluctuate in the future, it is difficult for us to accurately forecast our revenues.

Our limited operating history in the operation of an advertising network of websites makes evaluation of our business difficult, and our revenues are currently insufficient to generate positive cash flows from our operations.

We have limited historical financial data upon which to base planned operating expenses or forecast accurately our future operating results. We formally launched our website in October 2004 and only began building our advertising network during 2007. We formally launched our network in February 2008 and we rebranded as Betawave Corporation in January 2009. Our revenues are currently insufficient to generate positive cash flows from our operations.

We may need to raise additional capital to meet our business requirements in the future and such capital raising may be costly or difficult to obtain and could dilute current stockholders’ ownership interests.

We may need to raise additional capital in the future, which may not be available on reasonable terms or at all, especially in light of the recent downturn in the economy and dislocations in the credit and capital markets. The raising of additional capital may dilute our current stockholders’ ownership interests. We may need to raise additional funds through public or private debt or equity financings to meet various objectives including, but not limited to:

pursuing growth opportunities, including more rapid expansion;

acquiring complementary businesses;

growing our network, including the number of publishers and advertisers in our network;

hiring qualified management and key employees;

responding to competitive pressures; and

maintaining compliance with applicable laws.

In addition, the raising of any additional capital through the sale of equity or equity-backed securities would dilute our current stockholders’ ownership percentages and would also result in a decrease in the fair market value of our equity securities because our assets would be owned by a larger pool of outstanding equity. The terms of those securities issued by us in future capital transactions may be more favorable to new investors, and may include preferences, superior voting rights and the issuance of warrants or other derivative securities, which may have a further dilutive effect.

If we are unable to obtain required additional capital, we may have to curtail our growth plans or cut back on existing business and, further, we may not be able to continue operating if we do not generate sufficient revenues from operations needed to stay in business.

We may incur substantial costs in pursuing future capital financing, including investment banking fees, legal fees, accounting fees, securities law compliance fees, printing and distribution expenses and other costs. We may also be required to recognize non-cash expenses in connection with certain securities we issue, such as convertible notes and warrants, which may adversely impact our financial condition.

Our auditors have indicated that there are a number of factors that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Our audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 were prepared on a going concern basis in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The going concern basis of presentation assumes that we will continue in operation for the foreseeable future and will be able to realize our assets and discharge our liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. However, the report of our independent registered public accounting firm on our audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 has indicated that we have incurred net losses since our inception, have experienced liquidity problems, negative cash flows from operations, and a working capital deficit at December 31, 2008, that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

We have a material amount of indebtedness, and may incur further indebtedness in the future, under our revolving credit arrangement, which could require the use of a substantial portion of our cash and cash flows and may limit our access to additional capital.

As of June 30, 2009, we had $1.0 million in borrowings outstanding under our revolving credit arrangement with Silicon Valley Bank pursuant to a Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of March 27, 2009. We may incur further indebtedness under this credit arrangement on the terms and conditions set forth in the Loan and Security Agreement. The level of our indebtedness could have important consequences for us such as the following:

it may be difficult for us to satisfy our obligations, including debt service requirements under our outstanding indebtedness, and a substantial portion of our existing cash and cash flows could be required to be dedicated to service this indebtedness, which would reduce the funds available for reinvesting in our company, our business and other purposes;

our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements or other general corporate purposes may be impaired;

we may be more vulnerable to economic downturns and adverse industry conditions and our flexibility to plan for, or react to, changes in our business or industry may be more limited;

our ability to capitalize on business opportunities and to react to competitive pressures, as compared to our competitors, may be compromised due to a higher level of debt; and

our ability to borrow additional funds or to refinance debt may be limited.

If we do not maintain compliance with the covenants in our revolving credit arrangement, which we are partially dependent upon as a source of cash for our operations, we may lose our ability to draw upon it and the bank may accelerate our obligation to repay the amounts due.

We are partially dependent upon our revolving credit arrangement with Silicon Valley Bank as a source of cash for our operations. The availability of advances under this credit arrangement is conditioned upon our compliance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Loan and Security Agreement. The Loan and Security Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants principally relating to liens, indebtedness, investments, distributions to shareholders, use and disposition of assets, the satisfaction of a liquidity ratio test and minimum tangible net worth requirements and customary events of default. As of June 30, 2009, we were in compliance with all covenants. However, upon the occurrence of an uncured event of default, Silicon Valley Bank may declare that all amounts owing under this credit arrangement are due and payable and may stop advancing money or extending credit to us under this credit arrangement and the applicable interest rate shall become 4% above the rate that would otherwise apply. Should this credit arrangement become unavailable, we may be required to use more of our existing cash and cash flows to fund our operations.

If we acquire or invest in other companies, assets or technologies and we are not able to integrate them with our business, or we do not realize the anticipated financial and strategic goals for any of these transactions, our financial performance may be impaired.

As part of our growth strategy, we occasionally consider acquiring or making investments in companies, assets or technologies that we believe are strategic to our business. We do not have extensive experience in integrating new businesses or technologies, and if we do succeed in acquiring or investing in a company or technology, we will be exposed to a number of risks, including:

we may find that the acquired company or technology does not further our business strategy, that we overpaid for the acquired company or technology or that the economic conditions underlying our acquisition decision have changed;

we may have difficulty integrating the assets, technologies, operations or personnel of an acquired company, or retaining the key personnel of the acquired company;

our ongoing business and management’s attention may be disrupted or diverted by transition or integration issues and the complexity of managing geographically or culturally diverse enterprises;

we may encounter difficulty entering and competing in new markets or increased competition, including price competition or intellectual property litigation; and

we may experience significant problems or liabilities associated with technology and legal contingencies relating to the acquired business or technology, such as intellectual property or employment matters.

If we were to proceed with one or more significant acquisitions or investments in which the consideration included cash, we could be required to use a substantial portion of our available cash. To the extent we issue shares of capital stock or other rights to purchase capital stock, including options and warrants, existing stockholders might be diluted.

Our recently-announced refined business model and rebranding of our business using the “Betawave” name carry a number of risks that could adversely affect our company, business prospects and operating results.

We recently refined our business model to become an attention-based media company and launched a campaign to rebrand our business using the “Betawave” name, including changing the name of our company from GoFish Corporation to Betawave Corporation. If we are unable to effectively implement our refined business model and rebranding campaign, it would adversely affect our company, business prospects and operating results. Our future success will depend in significant part on our ability to forge contractual relationships with additional third-party websites (“publishers”) under which we assume responsibility for selling their inventory of available advertising opportunities, as well as syndicating video content to them. We are susceptible to the risks of operating an advertising-supported business. There is no guarantee that we will be able to enter into contracts with such publishers and, if we are unable to enter into such contractual relationships, our business and revenues will be adversely affected. In addition, as a result of our rebranding campaign, we may lose any brand recognition associated with the “GoFish” name that we previously established with advertisers, publishers in our network and other partners. We may not be able to establish, maintain or enhance brand recognition associated with the “Betawave” name that is comparable to the brand recognition that we may have previously had associated with the “GoFish” name. We have observed that there has been some confusion from our advertising customers regarding our name change and whether or not our company is still in business. If we fail to establish, maintain and enhance brand recognition associated with the “Betawave” name, it could affect our ability to attract advertisers, publishers in our network and other partners, which could adversely affect our ability to generate revenues and could impede our business plan. Furthermore, in connection with the development and implementation of our refined business model and rebranding campaign, we have spent, and continue to expect to spend, additional time and costs, including those associated with advertising and marketing efforts and building a network that includes other publishers.

Our business model is unproven and may not be viable.

Our business model is new and unproven and reflects our belief that brand advertisers will alter their advertising strategy in light of the changes in online consumer behavior and will spend advertising dollars differently than they traditionally have – with the large Internet portals. In addition, we believe that having few quality publishers which allows us to execute advertising campaigns efficiently, is beneficial to having a large number of medium and small publishers. If we are mistaken in our beliefs, it could adversely affect our ability to generate revenues.

Our business depends on enhancing our brand, and any failure to enhance our brand would hurt our ability to expand our base of advertisers and publishers in our network.

Enhancing our brand is critical to expanding our base of advertisers, publishers in our network, and other partners. We believe that the importance of brand recognition will increase due to the relatively low barriers to entry in the Internet market. If we fail to enhance our brand, or if we incur excessive expenses in this effort, our business, operating results and financial condition will be materially and adversely affected. Enhancing our brand will depend largely on our ability to provide high-quality products and services, which we may not do successfully.

We intend to expand our operations and increase our expenditures in an effort to grow our business. If we are unable to achieve or manage significant growth and expansion, or if our business does not grow as we expect, our operating results may suffer.

Our business plan anticipates continued additional expenditure on development and other growth initiatives. We may not achieve significant growth. If achieved, significant growth would place increased demands on our management, accounting systems, network infrastructure and systems of financial and internal controls. We may be unable to expand associated resources and refine associated systems fast enough to keep pace with expansion. If we fail to ensure that our management, control and other systems keep pace with growth, we may experience a decline in the effectiveness and focus of our management team, problems with timely or accurate reporting, issues with costs and quality controls and other problems associated with a failure to manage rapid growth, all of which would harm our results of operations.

Payments to certain of our publishers have exceeded the related fees we receive from our advertisers.

We are obligated under certain agreements to make non-cancelable guaranteed minimum revenue share payments to certain of our publishers. In these agreements, we promise to make these minimum payments to the publisher for a pre-negotiated period of time. At June 30, 2009, our aggregate outstanding non-cancelable guaranteed minimum revenue share commitments totaled $4.05 million through 2010. It is difficult to forecast with certainty the fees that we will earn under agreements with guarantees, and sometimes the fees we earn fall short of the guaranteed minimum payment amounts.

Losing key personnel or failing to attract and retain other highly skilled personnel could affect our ability to successfully grow our business.

Our future performance depends substantially on the continued service of our senior management, sales and other key personnel. We do not currently maintain key person life insurance. If our senior management were to resign or no longer be able to serve as our employees, it could impair our revenue growth, business and future prospects. In addition, the success of our monetization and sales plans depends on our ability to retain people in direct sales and to hire additional qualified and experienced individuals into our sales organization.

To meet our expected growth, we believe that our future success will depend upon our ability to hire, train and retain other highly skilled personnel. Competition for quality personnel is intense among technology and Internet-related businesses such as ours. We cannot be sure that we will be successful in hiring, assimilating or retaining the necessary personnel, and our failure to do so could cause our operating results to fall below our projected growth and profit targets.

Decreased effectiveness of equity compensation could adversely affect our ability to attract and retain employees and harm our business.

We have historically used stock options as a key component of our employee compensation program in order to align employees’ interests with the interests of our stockholders, encourage employee retention, and provide competitive compensation packages. Volatility or lack of positive performance in our stock price may adversely affect our ability to retain key employees, many of whom have been granted stock options, or to attract additional highly-qualified personnel. As of August 10, 2009, a majority of our outstanding employee stock options have exercise prices in excess of the stock price on that date.

Rules issued under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 may make it difficult for us to retain or attract qualified officers and directors, which could adversely affect the management of our business and our ability to retain the trading status of our common stock on the OTC Bulletin Board.

We may be unable to attract and retain those qualified officers, directors and members of board committees required to provide for our effective management because of rules and regulations that govern publicly held companies, including, but not limited to, certifications by principal executive officers. The enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has resulted in the issuance of rules and regulations and the strengthening of existing rules and regulations by the SEC. The perceived increased personal risk associated with these recent changes may deter qualified individuals from accepting roles as directors and executive officers.

We may have difficulty attracting and retaining directors with the requisite qualifications. If we are unable to attract and retain qualified officers and directors, the management of our business and our ability to retain the quotation of our common stock on the OTC Bulletin Board or obtain a listing of our common stock on a stock exchange or NASDAQ could be adversely affected.

Our management has identified a number of material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which, if not sufficiently remediated, could result in material misstatements in our annual or interim financial statements in future periods and the ineffectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures.

In connection with our management’s assessment of our internal control over financial reporting as required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, our management identified a number of material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by our internal controls. As a result, our management concluded that we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008. In addition, based on the evaluation and the identification of these material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Accounting Officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2009, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.

We are in the process of implementing remediation efforts with respect to our control environment and these material weaknesses. However, if these remediation efforts are insufficient to address these material weaknesses, or if additional material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting are discovered in the future, we may fail to meet our future reporting obligations, our consolidated financial statements may contain material misstatements and our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely impacted. Any such failure could also adversely affect our results of periodic management assessment regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, as required by the SEC’s rules under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The existence of a material weakness could result in errors in our consolidated financial statements that could result in a restatement of financial statements or failure to meet reporting obligations, which in turn could cause investors to lose confidence in reported financial information leading to a decline in our stock price.

Although we believe that these remediation efforts will enable us to improve our internal control over financial reporting, we cannot assure you that these remediation efforts will remediate the material weaknesses identified or that any additional material weaknesses will not arise in the future due to a failure to implement and maintain adequate internal control over financial reporting. Furthermore, there are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and circumvention or overriding of controls and procedures.

We may have undisclosed liabilities that could harm our revenues, business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

Our present management had no affiliation with Unibio Inc. (which changed its name to GoFish Corporation on September 14, 2006 and subsequently to Betawave Corporation on January 20, 2009) prior to the October 27, 2006 mergers, in which we acquired GoFish Technologies, Inc. as a wholly-owned subsidiary in a reverse merger transaction and IDT Acquisition Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, simultaneously merged with and into Internet Television Distribution, Inc. as a wholly-owned subsidiary. Pursuant to the mergers, the officers and board members of Betawave Corporation resigned and were replaced by officers of GoFish Technologies, Inc. along with newly elected board members.

Although the October 27, 2006 Agreement and Plan of Merger contained customary representations and warranties regarding our pre-merger operations and customary due diligence was performed, all of our pre-merger material liabilities may not have been discovered or disclosed. We do not believe this to be the case but can offer no assurance as to claims which may be made against us in the future relating to such pre-merger operations. The Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization contained a limited, upward, post-closing, adjustment to the number of shares of common stock issuable to pre-merger GoFish Technologies Inc. and Internet Television Distribution Inc. shareholders as a means of providing a remedy for breaches of representations made by us in the Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, including representations related to any undisclosed liabilities, however, there is no comparable protection offered to our other stockholders. Any such undisclosed pre-merger liabilities could harm our revenues, business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations upon our acceptance of responsibility for such liabilities.

Regulatory requirements may materially adversely affect us.

We are subject to various regulatory requirements, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires the evaluation and determination of the effectiveness of a company’s internal control over its financial reporting. In connection with management’s assessment of our internal control over financial reporting as required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008. As a result, we have incurred additional costs and may suffer adverse publicity and other consequences of this determination.

We may be subject to claims relating to certain actions taken by our former external legal counsel.

In February 2007, we learned that approximately half of the three million shares of our common stock issued as part of a private placement transaction we consummated in October 2006 to entities controlled by Louis Zehil, who at the time of the purchase was a partner of our former external legal counsel for the private placement transaction, McGuire Woods LLP, may have been improperly traded. We believe that Mr. Zehil improperly caused our former transfer agent not to place a required restrictive legend on the certificate for these three million shares and that Mr. Zehil then caused the entities he controlled to resell certain of these shares. Mr. Zehil’s conduct was reported to the SEC, and the SEC recently sued Mr. Zehil in connection with this matter and further alleged that Mr. Zehil engaged in a similar fraudulent scheme with respect to six additional public companies represented at the relevant time by McGuire Woods LLP. Mr. Zehil also is the subject of criminal charges brought by federal prosecutors in connection with the fraudulent scheme.

In December 2008, Sunrise Equity Partners, L.P. (“Sunrise”) brought an action against us in the United States District Court in the Southern District of New York on behalf of itself and all other purchasers of our securities in our 2006 private placement. In the complaint, Sunrise alleged, among other things, that we breached the representation in the subscription agreement for the 2006 private placement which provided that no purchaser in the private placement had an agreement or understanding on terms that differed substantially from those of any other investor. Sunrise claimed that we breached this representation because Mr. Zehil’s entities received certificates without any restrictive legend while all other investors in the private placement received certificates with such restrictive legends. In February 2009, the complaint was dismissed without prejudice. It is possible that Sunrise will re-file the complaint in federal or state court or that one or more other stockholders could also claim that they somehow suffered a loss as a result of Mr. Zehil’s conduct and attempt to hold us responsible for their losses. If any such claims are successfully made against us and we are not adequately indemnified for those claims from available sources of indemnification, then such claims could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition. We also may incur significant costs resulting from our investigation of this matter, defending any litigation against us relating to this matter, and our cooperation with governmental authorities. We may not be adequately indemnified for such costs from available sources of indemnification.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS

We may be unable to attract advertisers to our network.

Advertising revenues comprise, and are expected to continue to comprise, almost entirely all of our revenues. Most large advertisers have fixed advertising budgets, only a small portion of which have traditionally been allocated to Internet advertising. In addition, the overall market for advertising, including Internet advertising, has been generally characterized in recent periods by softness of demand, reductions in marketing and advertising budgets, and by delays in spending of budgeted resources. Advertisers may continue to focus most of their efforts on traditional media or may decrease their advertising spending. If we fail to convince advertisers to spend a portion of their advertising budgets with us, we will be unable to generate revenues from advertising as we intend.

Even if we initially attract advertisers to our network, they may decide not to advertise to our community if their investment does not have the desired result, or if we do not deliver their advertisements in an appropriate and effective manner. If we are unable to provide value to our advertisers, advertisers may reduce the rates they are willing to pay or may not continue to place ads with us.

We generate almost entirely all of our revenues from advertising, and the reduction in spending by, or loss of, advertisers could seriously harm our business.

We generate almost entirely all of our revenues from advertisers on our network and we are susceptible to the risks of operating an advertising supported business. Our advertisers can generally terminate their contracts with us at any time. If we are unable to remain competitive and provide value to our advertisers, they may stop placing ads with us, which would negatively affect our revenues and business. In addition, expenditures by advertisers tend to be cyclical, reflecting overall economic conditions and budgeting and buying patterns. Any decreases in or delays in advertising spending due to general economic conditions could reduce our revenues or negatively impact our ability to grow our revenues. We also may encounter difficulty collecting from our advertisers. We are a relatively small company and advertisers may choose to pay our bills after paying debts owed to their larger clients.

If we fail to compete effectively against other Internet advertising companies, we could lose customers or advertising inventory and our revenues and results of operations could decline.

The Internet advertising markets are characterized by rapidly changing technologies, evolving industry standards, frequent new product and service introductions, and changing customer demands. The introduction of new products and services embodying new technologies and the emergence of new industry standards and practices could render our existing products and services obsolete and unmarketable or require unanticipated technology or other investments. Our failure to adapt successfully to these changes could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The market for Internet advertising and related products and services is highly competitive. We expect this competition to continue to increase, in part because there are no significant barriers to entry to our industry. Increased competition may result in price reductions for advertising space, reduced margins and loss of market share. We compete against well-capitalized advertising companies as well as smaller companies.

We compete against self-serve advertising networks such as Google AdSense, Valueclick, Advertising.com and Tribal Fusion that serve impressions onto a wide variety of mostly small and medium sites. We compete against behavioral networks, such as Tacoda and Blue Lithium, which serve the same inventory as general networks, but add behavioral targeting. We also compete against other full-service advertising networks that provide a more complete service when selling advertising, such as Gorilla Nation and Glam.

If existing or future competitors develop or offer products or services that provide significant performance, price, creative or other advantages over those offered by us, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be negatively affected. Many current and potential competitors enjoy competitive advantages over us, such as longer operating histories, greater name recognition, larger customer bases and significantly greater financial, technical, sales and marketing resources. As a result, we may not be able to compete successfully. If we fail to compete successfully, we could lose customers or advertising inventory and our revenues and results of operations could decline.

We face competition from websites catering to consumers, as well as traditional media companies, and we may not be included in the advertising budgets of large advertisers, which could harm our revenues and results of operations.

In the online advertising market, we compete for advertising dollars with all websites catering to consumers, including portals, search engines and websites belonging to other advertising networks. We also compete with traditional advertising media, such as direct mail, television, radio, cable, and print, for a share of advertisers’ total advertising budgets. Most large advertisers have fixed advertising budgets, a small portion of which is allocated to Internet advertising. We expect that large advertisers will continue to focus most of their advertising efforts on traditional media. If we fail to convince these companies to spend a portion of their advertising budgets with us, or if our existing advertisers reduce the amount they spend on our programs, our revenues and results of operations would be harmed.

We may be unable to attract and incorporate high quality publishers into our network.

Our future revenues and success depend upon, among other things, our ability to attract and contract with high-quality publishers to participate in our network. We cannot assure you that publishers will want to participate, or continue to participate, in our network. If we are unable to successfully attract publishers to our network, it could adversely affect our ability to generate revenues and could impede our business plan. Even if we do successfully attract publishers, there can be no assurance that we will be able to incorporate these publishers into our network without substantial costs, delays or other problems.

In addition, the number of websites has increased substantially in recent years. Our publishers’ websites face numerous competitors both on the Internet, and in the more traditional broadcasting arena. Some of these companies have substantially longer operating histories, significantly greater financial, marketing and technical expertise, and greater resources and name recognition than the sites in our network. Moreover, the offerings on our network may not be sufficiently distinctive or may be copied by others. If we fail to attain commercial acceptance of our services and to be competitive with these companies, we may not ever generate meaningful revenues.

Our services may fail to maintain the market acceptance they have achieved or to grow beyond current levels, which would adversely affect our competitive position.

We have not conducted any independent studies with regard to the feasibility of our proposed business plan, present and future business prospects and capital requirements. Our services may fail to gain market acceptance and our infrastructure to enable such expansion is still limited. Even if adequate financing is available and our services are ready for market, we cannot be certain that our services will find sufficient acceptance in the marketplace to fulfill our long and short-term goals. Failure of our services to achieve or maintain market acceptance would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we fail to anticipate, identify and respond to the changing tastes and preferences of consumers, our business is likely to suffer.

Our business and results of operations depend upon the appeal of the sites in our network to consumers. The tastes and preferences of our consumers frequently change, and our success depends on our ability to anticipate, identify and respond to these changing tastes and preferences by incorporating appropriate publishers into our network. If we are unable to successfully anticipate, identify or respond to changing tastes and preferences of consumers or misjudge the market for our network, we may not be able to establish relationships with the most popular publishers, which may cause our revenues to decline.

We may be subject to market risk and legal liability in connection with the data collection capabilities of the publishers in our network.

Many components of websites on our network are interactive Internet applications that by their very nature require communication between a client and server to operate. To provide better consumer experiences and to operate effectively, many of the websites on our network collect certain information from users. The collection and use of such information may be subject to U.S. state and federal privacy and data collection laws and regulations, as well as foreign laws such as the EU Data Protection Directive. Recent growing public concern regarding privacy and the collection, distribution and use of information about Internet users has led to increased federal, state and foreign scrutiny and legislative and regulatory activity concerning data collection and use practices. Any failure by us to comply with applicable federal, state and foreign laws and the requirements of regulatory authorities may result in, among other things, in liability and materially harm our business.

The websites on our network post privacy policies concerning the collection, use and disclosure of user data, including that involved in interactions between our client and server products. Because of the evolving nature of our business and applicable law, such privacy policies may now or in the future fail to comply with applicable law. The websites on our network are subject to various federal and state laws concerning the collection and use of information regarding individuals. These laws include the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act, the Federal Drivers Privacy Protection Act of 1994, the privacy provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the Federal CAN-SPAM Act of 2003, as well as other laws that govern the collection and use of information. We cannot assure you that the websites on our network are currently in compliance, or will remain in compliance, with these laws and their own privacy policies. Any failure to comply with posted privacy policies, any failure to conform privacy policies to changing aspects of the business or applicable law, or any existing or new legislation regarding privacy issues could impact the market for our publishers’ websites, technologies and products, and this may adversely affect our business.

Activities of advertisers or publishers in our network could damage our reputation or give rise to legal claims against us.

The promotion of the products and services by publishers in our network may not comply with federal, state and local laws, including but not limited to laws and regulations relating to the Internet. Failure of our publishers to comply with federal, state or local laws or our policies could damage our reputation and adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition. We cannot predict whether our role in facilitating our customers’ marketing activities would expose us to liability under these laws. Any claims made against us could be costly and time-consuming to defend. If we are exposed to this kind of liability, we could be required to pay substantial fines or penalties, redesign our business methods, discontinue some of our services or otherwise expend resources to avoid liability.

We depend on third-party Internet, telecommunications and technology providers for key aspects in the provision of our services and any failure or interruption in the services that third parties provide could disrupt our business.

We depend heavily on several third-party providers of Internet and related telecommunication services, including hosting and co-location facilities, as well as providers of technology solutions, including software developed by third party vendors, in delivering our services. In addition, we use third party vendors to assist with product development, campaign deployment, video streaming for Betawave TV and support services for some of our products and services. These companies may not continue to provide services or software or license their technology to us without disruptions in service, at the current cost or at all.

If the products and services provided by these third-party vendors are disrupted or not properly supported, our ability to provide our products and services would be adversely impacted. In addition, any financial or other difficulties our third party providers face may have negative effects on our business, the nature and extent of which we cannot predict. While we believe our business relationships with our key vendors are good, a material adverse impact on our business would occur if a supply or license agreement with a key vendor is materially revised, is not renewed or is terminated, or the supply of products or services were insufficient or interrupted. The costs associated with any transition to a new service provider could be substantial, require us to reengineer our computer systems and telecommunications infrastructure to accommodate a new service provider and disrupt the services we provide to our customers. This process could be both expensive and time consuming and could damage our relationships with customers.

In addition, failure of our Internet and related telecommunications providers to provide the data communications capacity in the time frame we require could cause interruptions in the services we provide. Unanticipated problems affecting our computer and telecommunications systems in the future could cause interruptions in the delivery of our services, causing a loss of revenues and potential loss of customers.

More individuals are using non-PC devices to access the Internet. We may be unable to capture market share for advertising on these devices.

The number of people who access the Internet through devices other than personal computers, including mobile telephones, smart phones, handheld computers and video game consoles, has increased dramatically in the past few years. Most of the publishers in our network originally designed their services for rich, graphical environments such as those available on desktop and laptop computers. The lower resolution, functionality and memory associated with alternative devices make the use of these websites difficult and the publishers in our network developed for these devices may not be compelling to users of alternative devices. In addition, the creative advertising solutions that thrive in rich environments may be less attractive to advertisers on these devises. The use of such creative advertising is part what makes our services attractive to advertisers and is what most contributes to our margins. If we are slow to develop services and technologies that are more compatible with non-PC communications devices or if we are unable to attract and retain a substantial number of publishers that focus on alternative device users to our online services, we will fail to capture a significant share of an increasingly important portion of the market for online services, which could adversely affect our business.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR INDUSTRY

Anything that causes users of websites on our network to spend less time on their computers, including seasonal factors and national events, may impact our profitability.

Anything that diverts users of our network from their customary level of usage could adversely affect our business. Geopolitical events such as war, the threat of war or terrorist activity, and natural disasters such as hurricanes or earthquakes all could adversely affect our profitability. Similarly, our results of operations historically have varied seasonally because many of our users reduce their activities on our website with the onset of good weather during the summer months, and on and around national holidays.

If the delivery of Internet advertising on the Web is limited or blocked, demand for our services may decline.

Our business may be adversely affected by the adoption by computer users of technologies that harm the performance of our services. For example, computer users may use software designed to filter or prevent the delivery of Internet advertising; block, disable or remove cookies used by our ad serving technologies; prevent or impair the operation of other online tracking technologies; or misrepresent measurements of ad penetration and effectiveness. We cannot assure you that the proportion of computer users who employ these or other similar technologies will not increase, thereby diminishing the efficacy of our products and services. In the event that one or more of these technologies became more widely adopted by computer users, demand for our products and services would decline.

Advertisers may be reluctant to devote a portion of their budgets to marketing technology and data products and services or online advertising.

Companies doing business on the Internet, including us, must compete with traditional advertising media, including television, radio, cable and print, for a share of advertisers' total marketing budgets. Potential customers may be reluctant to devote a significant portion of their marketing budget to online advertising or marketing technology and data products and services if they perceive the Internet to be a limited or ineffective marketing medium. Any shift in marketing budgets away from marketing technology and data products or services or online advertising spending, or our offerings in particular, could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition. In addition, online advertising could lose its appeal to those advertisers using the Internet as a result of its ad performance relative to other media.

The lack of appropriate measurement standards or tools may cause us to lose customers or prevent us from charging a sufficient amount for our products and services.

Because many online marketing technology and data products and services remain relatively new disciplines, there is often no generally accepted methods or tools for measuring the efficacy of online marketing and advertising as there are for advertising in television, radio, cable and print. Therefore, many advertisers may be reluctant to spend sizable portions of their budget on online marketing and advertising until more widely accepted methods and tools that measure the efficacy of their campaigns are developed.

We could lose customers or fail to gain customers if our services do not utilize the measuring methods and tools that may become generally accepted. Further, new measurement standards and tools could require us to change our business and the means used to charge our customers, which could result in a loss of customer revenues and adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operation.

We may infringe on third-party intellectual property rights and could become involved in costly intellectual property litigation.

Third parties claiming infringement by the advertisements or video content we deliver on behalf of our publishers could sue us. We may be held liable to third parties for elements of advertising campaigns designed by us if the music, artwork, text or other content involved violates the copyright, trademark or other intellectual property rights of such third parties or if the content is defamatory, deceptive or otherwise violates applicable laws or regulations.

In addition, any future claims, with or without merit, could impair our business and financial condition because they could:

result in significant litigation costs;

divert the attention of management;

divert resources;

require us to enter into royalty and licensing agreements that may not be available on terms acceptable to us or at all; or

require us to stop using the intellectual property that is the subject of the claim.

It is not yet clear how laws designed to protect children that use the Internet may be interpreted and enforced, and whether new similar laws will be enacted in the future which may apply to our business in ways that may subject us to potential liability.

The Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (“COPPA”) imposes civil penalties for collecting personal information from children under the age of 13 without complying with the requirements of COPPA. Publishers in our network may violate COPPA on their websites. Although COPPA is a relatively new law, the Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) has recently been more active in enforcing violations with COPPA. In the last two years, the FTC has brought a number of actions against website operators for failure to comply with COPPA requirements, and has imposed fines of up to $3 million. Future legislation similar to these Acts could subject us to potential liability if we were deemed to be noncompliant with such rules and regulations.

Increasing governmental regulation of the Internet could harm our business.

The publishers in our network are subject to the same federal, state and local laws as other companies conducting business on the Internet. Today there are relatively few laws specifically directed towards conducting business on the Internet. However, due to the increasing popularity and use of the Internet, many laws and regulations relating to the Internet are being debated at the state and federal levels. These laws and regulations could cover issues such as user privacy, freedom of expression, pricing, fraud, quality of products and services, advertising, intellectual property rights and information security. Furthermore, the growth and development of Internet commerce may prompt calls for more stringent consumer protection laws that may impose additional burdens on companies conducting business over the Internet.

Applicability to the Internet of existing laws governing issues such as property ownership, copyrights and other intellectual property issues, libel, obscenity and personal privacy could also harm our business. The majority of these laws were adopted before the advent of the Internet, and do not contemplate or address the unique issues raised by the Internet. The courts are only beginning to interpret those laws that do reference the Internet, such as the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and COPPA, and their applicability and reach are therefore uncertain. These current and future laws and regulations could harm our business, results of operation and financial condition.

In addition, several telecommunications carriers have requested that the Federal Communications Commission regulate telecommunications over the Internet. Due to the increasing use of the Internet and the burden it has placed on the current telecommunications infrastructure, telephone carriers have requested the FCC to regulate Internet service providers and impose access fees on those providers. If the FCC imposes access fees, the costs of using the Internet could increase dramatically which could result in the reduced use of the Internet as a medium for commerce and have a material adverse effect on our Internet business operations.

We depend on the growth of the Internet and Internet infrastructure for our future growth, and any decrease or less than anticipated growth in Internet usage could adversely affect our business prospects.

Our future revenues and profits, if any, depend upon the continued widespread use of the Internet as an effective commercial and business medium. Factors which could reduce the widespread use of the Internet include:

possible disruptions or other damage to the Internet or telecommunications infrastructure;

failure of the individual networking infrastructures of our merchant advertisers and distribution partners to alleviate potential overloading and delayed response times;

a decision by merchant advertisers to spend more of their marketing dollars in offline areas;

increased governmental regulation and taxation; and

actual or perceived lack of security or privacy protection.

In addition, websites have experienced interruptions in their service as a result of outages and other delays occurring throughout the Internet network infrastructure, and as a result of sabotage, such as electronic attacks designed to interrupt service on many websites. The Internet could lose its viability as a commercial medium due to reasons including increased governmental regulation or delays in the development or adoption of new technologies required to accommodate increased levels of Internet activity. If use of the Internet does not continue to grow, or if the Internet infrastructure does not effectively support our growth, our revenues and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMON STOCK

You may have difficulty trading our common stock as there is a limited public market for shares of our common stock.

Our common stock is currently quoted on the NASD’s OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “BWAV.OB.” Our common stock is not actively traded and there is a limited public market for our common stock. As a result, a stockholder may find it difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations of the price of, our common stock. This severely limits the liquidity of our common stock, and would likely have a material adverse effect on the market price for our common stock and on our ability to raise additional capital. An active public market for shares of our common stock may not develop, or if one should develop, it may not be sustained.

Applicable SEC rules governing the trading of “penny stocks” may limit the trading and liquidity of our common stock which may affect the trading price of our common stock.

Our common stock is currently quoted on the NASD’s OTC Bulletin Board. On August 10, 2009, the closing bid price of our common stock was $0.08 per share. Stocks such as ours which trade below $5.00 per share are generally considered “penny stocks” and subject to SEC rules and regulations which impose limitations upon the manner in which such shares may be publicly traded. These regulations require the delivery, prior to any transaction involving a penny stock, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the associated risks. Under these regulations, certain brokers who recommend such securities to persons other than established customers or certain accredited investors must make a special written suitability determination regarding such a purchaser and receive such purchaser’s written agreement to a transaction prior to sale. These regulations have the effect of limiting the trading activity of our common stock and reducing the liquidity of an investment in our common stock.

There is a limited public market for shares of our common stock, which may make it difficult for investors to sell their shares.

There is a limited public market for shares of our common stock. An active public market for shares of our common stock may not develop, or if one should develop, it may not be sustained. Therefore, investors may not be able to find purchasers for their shares of our common stock.

The price of our common stock has been and is likely to continue to be highly volatile, which could lead to losses by investors and costly securities litigation.

The trading price of our common stock has been and is likely to continue to be highly volatile and could fluctuate in response to factors such as:

actual or anticipated variations in our operating results;

announcements of technological innovations by us or our competitors;

announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;

adoption of new accounting standards affecting our industry;

additions or departures of key personnel;

introduction of new services by us or our competitors;

sales of our common stock or other securities in the open market;

conditions or trends in the Internet and online commerce industries; and

other events or factors, many of which are beyond our control.

The stock market has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations, and the market prices of stock in technology companies have been highly volatile. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been initiated against the Company. Litigation initiated against us, whether or not successful, could result in substantial costs and diversion of our management’s attention and resources, which could harm our business and financial condition.

We do not anticipate dividends to be paid on our common stock, and stockholders may lose the entire amount of their investment.

A dividend has never been declared or paid in cash on our common stock, and we do not anticipate such a declaration or payment for the foreseeable future. We expect to use future earnings, if any, to fund business growth. Therefore, stockholders will not receive any funds absent a sale of their shares. We cannot assure stockholders of a positive return on their investment when they sell their shares, nor can we assure that stockholders will not lose the entire amount of their investment.

Securities analysts may not initiate coverage or continue to cover our common stock, and this may have a negative impact on our market price.

The trading market for our common stock will depend, in part, on the research and reports that securities analysts publish about us and our business. We do not have any control over these analysts. There is no guarantee that securities analysts will cover our common stock. If securities analysts do not cover our common stock, the lack of research coverage may adversely affect its market price. If we are covered by securities analysts, and our stock is downgraded, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases to cover us or fails to publish regular reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.

You may experience dilution of your ownership interests because of the future issuance of additional shares of our common stock and our preferred stock.

In the future, we may issue our authorized but previously unissued equity securities, resulting in the dilution of the ownership interests of our present stockholders. We are currently authorized to issue an aggregate of 410,000,000 shares of capital stock consisting of 400,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and 10,000,000 shares of "blank check" preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, of which we have designated 8,003,000 of such shares of Series A preferred stock. As of August 10, 2009, there were: (i) 29,229,284 shares of common stock outstanding; (ii) 7,065,293 shares of Series A preferred stock outstanding; (iii) 102,720,897 shares reserved for issuance upon the exercise of options granted or available for grant under our 2004 stock plan, our 2006 equity incentive plan, our 2007 non-qualified stock option plan and our 2008 stock incentive plan; and (iv) 67,351,020 shares reserved for issuance upon the exercise of outstanding warrants.

We may also issue additional shares of our common stock or other securities that are convertible into or exercisable for common stock in connection with hiring or retaining employees or consultants, future acquisitions, future sales of our securities for capital raising purposes, or for other business purposes. The future issuance of any such additional shares of our common stock or other securities may create downward pressure on the trading price of our common stock. There can be no assurance that we will not be required to issue additional shares, warrants or other convertible securities in the future in conjunction with hiring or retaining employees or consultants, future acquisitions, future sales of our securities for capital raising purposes or for other business purposes, including at a price (or exercise prices) below the price at which shares of our common stock are currently quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board.

Even though we are not a California corporation, our common stock could still be subject to a number of key provisions of the California General Corporation Law.

Under Section 2115 of the California General Corporation Law (the “CGCL”), corporations not organized under California law may still be subject to a number of key provisions of the CGCL. This determination is based on whether the corporation has significant business contacts with California and if more than 50% of its voting securities are held of record by persons having addresses in California. In the immediate future, we will continue the business and operations of GoFish Technologies Inc. and a majority of our business operations, revenues and payroll will be conducted in, derived from, and paid to residents of California. Therefore, depending on our ownership, we could be subject to certain provisions of the CGCL. Among the more important provisions are those relating to the election and removal of directors, cumulative voting, standards of liability and indemnification of directors, distributions, dividends and repurchases of shares, shareholder meetings, approval of certain corporate transactions, dissenters’ and appraisal rights, and inspection of corporate records.

Panorama Capital, L.P., Rembrandt Venture Partners Fund Two, L.P., Rembrandt Venture Partners Fund Two-A, L.P. and Rustic Canyon Ventures III, L.P., whose interests may not be aligned with yours, collectively control approximately 66% of our company, which could result in actions of which you or other stockholders do not approve.

In two closings that occurred on December 3, 2008 and December 12, 2008, we completed a $22.5 million preferred stock financing pursuant to the terms of a securities purchase agreement dated December 3, 2008 that we entered into with Panorama Capital, L.P. (“Panorama”), Rembrandt Venture Partners Fund Two, L.P. (“Rembrandt Fund Two”), Rembrandt Venture Partners Fund Two-A, L.P. (“Rembrandt Fund Two-A” and, together with Rembrandt Fund Two, “Rembrandt”) and Rustic Canyon Ventures III, L.P. (“Rustic” and, together with Panorama and Rembrandt, the “Lead Investors”). The Lead Investors currently own, collectively, approximately 66% of our outstanding shares of common stock, assuming the conversion of Series A preferred stock. Prior to the December 2008 financing, the Lead Investors did not own any shares of our common stock.

In addition, pursuant to the investors’ rights agreement we entered into with the Lead Investors in connection with the December 2008 financing, we granted the following rights: (i) Panorama has the right to designate one board member for so long as Panorama shall own not less than 16,666,667 shares of common stock issued or issuable upon conversion of Series A preferred stock, (ii) Rustic has the right to designate one board member for so long as Rustic shall own not less than 12,500,000 shares of common stock issued or issuable upon conversion of Series A preferred stock, (iii) Rembrandt has the right to designate one board member for so long as Rembrandt shall own not less than 8,333,333 shares of common stock issued or issuable upon conversion of Series A preferred stock and (iv) Internet Television Distribution, Inc. and its affiliates have the right to appoint one board member for so long as Internet Television Distribution, Inc. shall own not less than 3,088,240 shares of common stock issued or issuable upon conversion of Series A preferred stock. The investors’ rights agreement also provides that each investor party to the investors’ rights agreement shall take all actions necessary within its control so that for as long as Panorama owns at least 16,666,667 shares of common stock issued or issuable upon conversion of Series A preferred stock, (i) the compensation committee of the board of directors shall consist of three members, at least two of which shall be directors appointed by the Lead Investors as stated above, and (ii) each committee of the board of directors shall include, at the option of Panorama, the member of the board of directors designated by Panorama.

As a result of the foregoing, and provided that the Lead Investors do vote their shares together, they will be able to determine a significant part of the composition of our board of directors, will hold significant voting power with respect to matters requiring stockholder approval and will be able to exercise significant influence over our operations. The interests of the Lead Investors may be different than the interests of other stockholders on these and other matters. This concentration of ownership also could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in our control or otherwise discouraging a potential acquirer from attempting to obtain control of us, which could reduce the price of our common stock.

ITEM 2.

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

None.

ITEM 3.

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

None.

ITEM 4.

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

None.

ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION.

On August 14, 2009, we issued a press release regarding our results for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. The text of this press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1. The information in this Item 5 and Exhibit 99.1 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS.

The exhibits filed as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are listed in the Exhibit Index immediately preceding such exhibits, which Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference into this Item 6.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	BETAWAVE CORPORATION

Date: August 14, 2009	By:	/s/ Matt Freeman
	Name: Matt Freeman
	Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 14, 2009	By:	/s/ Lennox L. Vernon
	Name: Lennox L. Vernon
	Title: Chief Accounting Officer and Director of Operations

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.	Description	Filed Herewith or Incorporated by Reference
31.1	Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a).	Filed herewith.

31.2	Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a).	Filed herewith.

32.1	Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	Filed herewith.

32.2	Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	Filed herewith.

99.1	Press release issued by Betawave Corporation on August 14, 2009	Filed herewith.

Betawave (CE) (USOTC:BWAV)
Historical Stock Chart
From Dec 2024 to Jan 2025

Click Here for more Betawave (CE) Charts.

Betawave (CE) (USOTC:BWAV)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jan 2024 to Jan 2025

Market Data

News

Trading Tools

Markets

Discover

Hot Features

Follow Feed

Options Flow

Monitor

BWAV Betawave Corp (CE)

News

Your Recent History

Company

Business

Popular

Get The App

Trending Now

Toplists

Market Data

News

Trading Tools

Markets

Discover

Hot Features

Follow Feed

Options Flow

Monitor

BWAV Betawave Corp (CE)

News

Your Recent History

Company

Business

Popular

Get The App

Go Ad-Free