UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549

FORM 6-K

REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16
OR 15d-16 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the month of May 2015

Commission File Number: 001-31799

ROUGE RESOURCES INC.
(Translation of Registrant’s Name into English)

#203-409 Granville St, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6C 1T2
(Address of principal executive offices)

[Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or
Form 40-F]
Form 20-F [X]      Form 40-F [   ]

[Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation
S-T Rule 101(b)(1)]
Yes [   ]   No [X]

[Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation
S-T Rule 101(b)(7)]
Yes [   ]   No [X]

[Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also
thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12-g-3-3(b) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934]
Yes [   ]   No [X]

If “Yes” is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule
12g3-2(b): 82-_______________


SUBMITTED HEREWITH

Exhibits

  99.1 Audited Financial Statements for year ended January 31, 2015
(audit report dated May 28, 2015)
     
  99.2 Management Discussion and Analysis for year ended January 31, 2015
     
  99.3 Form 52-109FV1 - Certification of Annual Filings - CEO
     
  99.4 Form 52-109FV1 - Certification of Annual Filings - CFO


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on behalf of the Company by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

  Rouge Resources Ltd.
     
Dated: May 28, 2015 By: /s/ Ronald McGregor
     
    Ronald McGregor
  Title: Chief Financial Officer





ROUGE RESOURCES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

YEARS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2015, 2014 AND 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)



INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT

To the Shareholders of Rouge Resources Ltd.:

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Rouge Resources Ltd., which comprise the statements of financial position as at January 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, and the statements of comprehensive loss, changes in equity and cash flows for the years then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management's Responsibility for the Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor’s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity's preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained in our audits is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Rouge Resources Ltd. as at January 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, and its financial performance and its cash flows for the years then ended in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

Emphasis of Matter

Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to Note 1 in the financial statements which describes certain conditions that indicate the existence of a material uncertainty that casts substantial doubt about Rouge Resources Ltd.’s ability to continue as a going concern.

  DALE MATHESON CARR-HILTON LABONTE LLP
  CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

Vancouver, Canada

May 28, 2015

   
   



ROUGE RESOURCES LTD.
Statements of Financial Position
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)

      As at January 31  
  Note   2015     2014     2013  
ASSETS                    
                     
Current assets                    
Cash and cash equivalents   $  271   $  96,466   $  301,845  
GST receivable     749     1,425     4,122  
Prepaid expenses     -     -     1,625  
      1,020     97,891     307,592  
Non-current assets                    
Credit card security deposit     6,900     6,900     6,900  
Equipment 4   888     1,268     1,811  
Exploration and evaluation assets 5   277,341     291,007     268,574  
      285,129     299,175     277,285  
                     
TOTAL ASSETS   $  286,149   $  397,066   $  584,877  
                     
LIABILITIES                    
                     
Current liabilities                    
Trade payables and accrued liabilities 6 $  27,308   $  25,607   $  38,883  
Loan payable 7   39,676     39,676     39,676  
Related party payables 8   120,485     46,555     11,466  
                     
TOTAL LIABILITIES     187,469     111,838     90,025  
                     
EQUITY                    
                     
Share capital 9   3,953,590     3,953,590     3,953,590  
Convertible debt reserve 10   53,357     53,357     53,357  
Deficit     (3,908,267 )   (3,721,719 )   (3,512,095 )
                     
TOTAL EQUITY     98,680     285,228     494,852  
                     
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY   $  286,149   $  397,066   $  584,877  

Going concern 1
Subsequent event 15

Approved on behalf of the Board of Directors:

“Linda Smith”   “Ronald McGregor”
Director   Director

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements 3



ROUGE RESOURCES LTD.
Statements of Comprehensive Loss
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)

      Years ended January 31,  
  Note   2015     2014     2013  
Expenses                    
   Amortization 4 $  380   $  543   $  776  
   Consulting services 8   1,600     5,800     5,670  
   Interest expense     737     408     391  
   Listing application expenses     -     402     62,601  
   Management services 8   60,000     60,000     60,000  
   Office administration and travel 8   52,909     74,286     44,115  
   Professional services 8   20,731     44,368     47,705  
   Transfer agent and filing fees     18,691     23,817     18,000  
                     
Loss before other item     (155,048 )   (209,624 )   (239,258 )
Other item                    
 Impairment of exploration and evaluation assets 5   (31,500 )   -     -  
                     
Net and comprehensive loss   $  (186,548 ) $  (209,624 ) $  (239,258 )
                     
Loss per share – basic and diluted 9 $  (0.01 ) $  (0.01 ) $  (0.01 )
                     
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
   – basic and diluted
  44,633,171     44,633,171     42,299,073  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements 4



ROUGE RESOURCES LTD.
Statement of Changes in Equity
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)

                  Convertible              
      Share capital     Debt              
  Note   Number     Amount     Reserve     Deficit     Total  
Balance at January 31, 2012     40,565,171   $  3,110,796   $  53,357   $  (3,272,837 ) $  (108,684 )
Net loss     -     -     -     (239,258 )   (239,258 )
Shares issued for cash 9   4,068,000     1,017,000     -     -     1,017,000  
Share issue costs 9   -     (174,206 )   -     -     (174,206 )
Balance at January 31, 2013     44,633,171     3,953,590     53,357     (3,512,095 )   494,852  
Net loss     -     -     -     (209,624 )   (209,624 )
Balance at January 31, 2014     44,633,171     3,953,590     53,357     (3,721,719 )   285,228  
Net loss     -     -     -     (186,548 )   (186,548 )
Balance at January 31, 2015     44,633,171   $  3,953,590   $  53,357   $  (3,908,267 ) $  98,680  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements 5



ROUGE RESOURCES LTD.
Statement of Cash Flows
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)

    Years ended January 31,  
    2015     2014     2013  
Operating activities                  
Net loss $  (186,548 ) $  (209,624 ) $  (239,258 )
Adjustment for non-cash item:                  
   Amortization   380     543     776  
   Impairment of exploration and evaluation assets   31,500     -     -  
Changes in non-cash working capital items:                  
   GST receivable   676     2,697     (1,171 )
   Prepaid expenses   -     1,625     (1,625 )
   Trade payables and accrued liabilities   1,701     (13,276 )   (19,147 )
                   
Net cash flows used in operating activities   (152,291 )   (218,035 )   (260,425 )
                   
Investing activities                  
Exploration and evaluation expenditures   (17,834 )   (22,433 )   (55,695 )
                   
Net cash flows used in investing activities   (17,834 )   (22,433 )   (55,695 )
                   
Financing activities                  
Change in related party payables   73,930     35,089     (242,652 )
Shares issued for cash – two private placements   -     -     1,017,000  
Share issue costs – brokered private placement   -     -     (174,206 )
                   
Net cash flows from financing activities   73,930     35,089     600,142  
                   
Increase (decrease) in cash   (96,195 )   (205,379 )   284,022  
Cash, beginning   96,466     301,845     17,823  
                   
Cash, ending $  271   $  96,466   $  301,845  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements 6



ROUGE RESOURCES LTD.
Notes to the Financial Statements
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
For the years ended January 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

  1. Nature and continuance of operations

Rouge Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) was incorporated on March 31, 1988 under the laws of the province of British Columbia, Canada, and its principal activity is the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties in Canada. The Company’s shares are traded on the TSX Venture Exchange (“TSX-V”) under the symbol ROU and quoted on the OTC:BB in the United States. The Company’s registered and records office is located at Suite 203 - 409 Granville St., Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 1T2.

These financial statements have been prepared on the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern, meaning it will continue in operation for the foreseeable future and will be able to realize assets and discharge liabilities in the ordinary course of business. As at January 31, 2015, the Company had not advanced any of its properties to commercial production and is not able to finance day-to-day activities through operations. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent upon the successful results from its mineral property exploration activities; its ability to attain profitable operations and generate funds therefrom; and its ability to raise equity capital or borrowings sufficient to meet current and future obligations. These factors indicate the existence of a material uncertainty that casts substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management intends to finance operating costs over the next twelve months with cash on hand, loans from directors and companies controlled by directors, and/or private placement of common shares. Should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern, the net realizable value of its assets may be materially less than the amounts presented on its Statements of Financial Position.

  2. Significant accounting policies and basis of preparation

These financial statements were authorized for issue on May 28, 2015 by the directors of the Company.

Statement of compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards
These financial statements comply with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) and interpretations of the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC”).

Basis of preparation
These financial statements have been prepared on an accrual basis; are based on historical costs, modified where applicable; and are presented in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted.

Significant estimates and assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions concerning the future. The Company’s management reviews these estimates and underlying assumptions on an ongoing basis, based on experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Revisions to estimates are adjusted for prospectively in the period in which the estimates are revised.

Estimates and assumptions where there is significant risk of material adjustments to assets and liabilities in future accounting periods include: the useful lives of equipment, the recoverability of the carrying value of exploration and evaluation assets, fair value measurements for financial instruments, the recoverability and measurement of deferred tax assets, and provisions for restoration and environmental obligations and contingent liabilities.

Significant judgments
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS requires the Company to make judgments, apart from those involving estimates and assumptions, in applying accounting policies. The most significant judgments in preparing the Company’s financial statements include:

- assessment of the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern and whether there are events or conditions that may give rise to significant uncertainty; and
  - classification / allocation of expenditures as exploration and evaluation assets or operating expenses.

7



ROUGE RESOURCES LTD.
Notes to the Financial Statements
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
For the years ended January 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

Foreign currency translation, transactions and balances
The functional currency of a Company is measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which it operates. These financial statements are presented in Canadian dollars which is the Company’s functional and presentation currency.

Foreign currency transactions, where applicable, are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the date of the transaction. Foreign currency monetary items are translated at the period-end exchange rate. Non-monetary items measured at historical cost continue to be carried at the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. Non-monetary items measured at fair value are reported at the exchange rate at the date when fair values were determined.

Exchange differences arising on the translation of monetary items or on settlement of monetary items are recognized in the Statement of Comprehensive Loss in the period in which they arise, except where deferred in equity as a qualifying cash flow or net investment hedge.

Exchange differences arising on the translation of non-monetary items are recognized in other comprehensive income to the extent that gains and losses arising on those non-monetary items are also recognized in other comprehensive income. Where the non-monetary gain or loss is recognized in profit or loss, the exchange component is also recognized in profit or loss.

Exploration and evaluation expenditures
Costs incurred before the Company has obtained the legal rights to explore an area are expensed as incurred.

Exploration and evaluation expenditures include the costs of acquiring licenses and costs associated with exploration and evaluation activity. Option payments are considered acquisition costs provided that the Company has the intention of exercising the underlying option.

Property option agreements are exercisable entirely at the option of the optionee. Therefore, option payments (or recoveries) are recorded when payment is made (or received) and are not accrued.

Exploration and evaluation expenditures are capitalized. The Company capitalizes costs to specific blocks of claims or areas of geological interest. Government tax credits received are recorded as a reduction to the cumulative costs incurred and capitalized on the related property.

Exploration and evaluation assets are tested for impairment if facts or circumstances indicate that impairment exists. Examples of such facts and circumstances are as follows:

-

the period for which the Company has the right to explore in the specific area has expired during the period or will expire in the near future, and is not expected to be renewed;

     
-

substantive expenditure on further exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources in the specific area is neither budgeted nor planned;

     
-

exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources in the specific area have not led to the discovery of commercially viable quantities of mineral resources and the entity has decided to discontinue such activities in the specific area; and

     
-

sufficient data exist to indicate that, although a development in the specific area is likely to proceed, the carrying amount of the exploration and evaluation asset is unlikely to be recovered in full from successful development or by sale.

After technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting a mineral resource are demonstrable, the Company stops capitalizing expenditures for the applicable block of claims or geological area of interest and tests the asset for impairment. The capitalized balance, net of any impairment recognized, is then reclassified to either tangible or intangible mine development assets according to the nature of the asset.

8



ROUGE RESOURCES LTD.
Notes to the Financial Statements
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
For the years ended January 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

Development expenditures
Costs arising from the construction, installation or completion of infrastructure facilities are capitalized within mine development assets until the mine achieves commercial production at which point accumulated costs are transferred to producing mine assets.

Share-based payments
The Company has a stock option plan. Share-based payments to employees are measured at the fair value of the instruments issued and amortized over the vesting periods. Share-based payments to non-employees are measured at the fair value of goods or services received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, if it is determined the fair value of the goods or services cannot be reliably measured, and are recorded at the date the goods or services are received. Compensation expense is recognized and the corresponding amount is recorded in the share option reserve. The fair value of options is determined using the Black–Scholes Option Pricing Model. The number of shares and options expected to vest is reviewed and adjusted at the end of each reporting period such that the amount recognized for services received as consideration for the equity instruments granted shall be based on the number of equity instruments that eventually vest. When the options are exercised, share capital is credited for the consideration received and the related share option reserve is decreased.

Loss per share
Basic loss per share is calculated by dividing the loss attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding in the period. For all periods presented, the loss attributable to common shareholders equals the reported loss attributable to owners of the Company. Diluted loss per share is calculated by the treasury stock method. Under this method, the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the calculation of diluted loss per share assumes that the proceeds to be received on the exercise of dilutive share options and warrants are used to repurchase common shares at the average market price during the period. Any stock options or share purchase warrants outstanding cause the calculation of diluted loss per share to be anti-dilutive and are therefore not included in the calculation.

Financial instruments
The Company classifies its financial instruments in the following categories: fair value through profit or loss , loans and receivables, held-to-maturity investments, available-for-sale and financial liabilities. The classification depends on the purpose for which the financial instruments were acquired. Management determines the classification of its financial instruments at initial recognition.

Fair value through profit or loss investments are either held-for-trading for the purpose of short-term profit taking, derivatives not held for hedging purposes, or held on a fair value basis in accordance with a documented risk management or investment strategy when designated as such to avoid an accounting mismatch or to enable performance evaluation where a group of financial assets is managed by key management personnel. Such assets are subsequently measured at fair value with unrealized changes in carrying value being included in profit or loss.

Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market and are subsequently measured at amortized cost. They are included in current assets except for maturities greater than 12 months after the end of the reporting period. These are classified as non-current assets.

Held-to-maturity investments are non-derivative financial assets that have fixed maturities and fixed or determinable payments with Company’s intention to hold these investments to maturity. They are subsequently measured at amortized cost. Held-to-maturity investments are included in non-current assets, except for those instruments that are expected to mature within 12 months after the end of the reporting period.

Available-for-sale investments are non-derivative financial assets that are designated as available-for-sale or are not suitable to be classified as financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables or held-to-maturity investments and are subsequently measured at fair value. These are included in current assets to the extent they are expected to be realized within 12 months after the end of the reporting period. Unrealized gains and losses are recognized in other comprehensive income, except for impairment losses and foreign exchange gains and losses on monetary financial assets which are recognized in profit or loss.

9



ROUGE RESOURCES LTD.
Notes to the Financial Statements
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
For the years ended January 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

Non-derivative financial liabilities (excluding financial guarantees) are subsequently measured at amortized cost.

Regular purchases and sales of financial assets are recognized on the trade-date, being the date when the Company commits to purchase the asset.

Financial assets are derecognized when the rights to receive cash flows from the investments have expired or have been transferred and the Company has transferred substantially all risks and rewards of ownership.

At each reporting date, the Company assesses whether there is objective evidence that a financial instrument has been impaired. In the case of available-for-sale financial instruments, a significant and prolonged decline in the value of the instrument is considered to determine whether an impairment has arisen.

Transaction costs related to financial instruments include professional, consulting, regulatory, agency commissions and other costs that are incremental to the acquisition, issuance or disposition of financial assets, liabilities or equity instruments. Transaction costs are initially charged to the related financial instrument or equity instrument, except where the financial instrument is classified as fair value through profit or loss, in which case transaction costs are expensed to the Statement of Comprehensive Loss immediately.

The Company does not have any derivative financial assets and liabilities.

Impairment of assets
The carrying amount of the Company’s non-current assets, which include equipment and exploration and evaluation assets, is reviewed at each reporting date to determine whether there is an indication of impairment. If such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss. An impairment loss is recognized in the Statement of Comprehensive Loss whenever the carrying amount of the asset, or its cash-generating unit, exceeds its recoverable amount.

The recoverable amount is the greater of an asset’s fair value less costs to sell and its value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. For an asset that does not generate cash flows largely independent of those from other assets, the recoverable amount is determined for the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs.

A cash-generating unit is the smallest identifiable group of assets that generates cash inflows largely independent of the cash flows from other assets or groups of assets. Impairment losses recognized in respect of cash-generating units are allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the cash-generating unit and then to reduce the carrying amount of the other assets in the unit on a pro-rata basis.

An impairment loss is only reversed if there is an indication that the impairment loss may no longer exist and there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable amount. However, any reversal of impairment cannot increase the carrying value of the asset to an amount higher than the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognized in previous years. An impairment loss with respect to goodwill is never reversed.

Assets that have an indefinite useful life are not subject to amortization and are tested annually for impairment.

Cash
Cash includes cash on hand and deposits held at call with banks.

10



ROUGE RESOURCES LTD.
Notes to the Financial Statements
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
For the years ended January 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

Income taxes
Current income tax
Current income tax assets and liabilities for the current period are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amount are those that are enacted or substantively enacted, at the reporting date, in the countries where the Company operates and generates taxable income.

Current income tax relating to items recognized directly in other comprehensive income or equity is recognized in other comprehensive income or equity and not in profit or loss. Management periodically evaluates positions taken in the tax returns with respect to situations in which applicable tax regulations are subject to interpretation and establishes provisions where appropriate.

Deferred income tax
Deferred income tax is recognized using the asset and liability method on temporary differences at the reporting date arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes.

The carrying amount of deferred income tax assets is reviewed at the end of each reporting period and recognized only to the extent that it is probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred income tax asset to be utilized.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the year when the asset is realized or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the end of the reporting period.

Deferred income tax assets and deferred income tax liabilities are offset, if a legally enforceable right exists to set off current tax assets against current income tax liabilities and the deferred income taxes relate to the same taxable entity and the same taxation authority.

Flow-through shares
On the issuance of flow-through shares, any premium received in excess of the closing market price of the Company’s common shares is initially recorded as a liability (“flow-through tax liability”). Provided that the Company has renounced the related expenditures, or that there is a reasonable expectation that it will do so, the flow-through tax liability is reduced on a pro-rata basis as the expenditures are incurred. If such expenditures are capitalized, a deferred tax liability is recognized. To the extent that the Company has suitable unrecognized deductible temporary differences, an offsetting recovery of deferred income taxes would be recorded.

Restoration and environmental obligations
The Company recognizes liabilities for statutory, contractual, constructive or legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-term assets, when those obligations result from the acquisition, construction, development or normal operation of the assets. The net present value of future restoration cost estimates arising from the decommissioning of plant and other site preparation work is capitalized to the related asset along with a corresponding increase in the restoration provision in the period incurred. Discount rates using a pre-tax rate that reflects the time value of money are used to calculate the net present value.

The Company’s estimates of restoration costs could change as a result of changes in regulatory requirements, discount rates and assumptions regarding the amount and timing of the future expenditures. These changes are recorded directly to exploration and evaluation assets with corresponding entries to the related asset and the restoration provision. The Company’s estimates are reviewed annually for changes in regulatory requirements, discount rates, effects of inflation and changes in estimates.

Changes in the net present value, excluding changes in the Company’s estimates of restoration costs, are charged to the Statement of Comprehensive Loss for the period. The net present value of restoration costs arising from subsequent site damage that is incurred on an ongoing basis during production are charged to the Statement of Comprehensive Loss in the period incurred. These changes are recorded directly to the related asset with a corresponding entry to the provision. The increase in the restoration provision due to the passage of time is recognized as interest expense.

11



ROUGE RESOURCES LTD.
Notes to the Financial Statements
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
For the years ended January 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

The net present value of restoration costs arising from subsequent site damage that is incurred on an ongoing basis during production are charged to the Statement of Comprehensive Loss in the period incurred.

The costs of restoration projects that were included in the provision are recorded against the provision as incurred. The costs to prevent and control environmental impacts at specific properties are capitalized in accordance with the Company’s accounting policy for exploration and evaluation assets.

At present, the Company has not identified any significant restoration and environmental obligations in its operations. Accordingly, no provision has been made.

Equipment
Equipment is stated at historical cost less accumulated amortization and accumulated impairment losses.

Subsequent costs are included in the asset's carrying amount or recognized as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Company and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. The carrying amount of the replaced part, if applicable, is derecognized. All other repairs and maintenance are charged to the Statement of Comprehensive Loss during the financial period in which they are incurred.

Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing the proceeds with the carrying amount and are recognized in the Statement of Comprehensive Loss.

Amortization is calculated on a declining balance method to write-off the cost of the equipment to its residual value over its estimated useful life at the rate of 30% per year.

Comparative figures
Certain comparative figures have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation.

  3.

Accounting standards issued but not yet effective

New standard IFRS 9 “Financial Instruments”

This new standard is a partial replacement of IAS 39 “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement”. IFRS 9 introduces new requirements for the classification and measurement of financial assets, additional changes relating to financial liabilities, a new general hedge accounting standard which will align hedge accounting more closely with risk management. The new standard also requires a single impairment method to be used, replacing the multiple impairment methods in IAS 39. IFRS 9 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018 with early adoption permitted.

New standard IFRS 15 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”

This new standard contains a single model that applies to contracts with customers and two approaches to recognizing revenue: at a point in time or over time. The model features a contract-based five-step analysis of transactions to determine whether, how much and when revenue is recognized. New estimates and judgmental thresholds have been introduced, which may affect the amount and/or timing of revenue recognized. IFRS 15 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2017 with early adoption permitted.

The Company has not early adopted these standards and is currently assessing the impact that these standards will have on its financial statements.

Other accounting standards or amendments to existing accounting standards that have been issued but have future effective dates are either not applicable or are not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

12



ROUGE RESOURCES LTD.
Notes to the Financial Statements
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
For the years ended January 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

  4.

Equipment


            Accumulated     Net book  
      Cost     amortization     Value  
                     
  Balance at January 31, 2012 $  8,710   $  (6,123 ) $  2,587  
 

    Amortization expense

  -     (776 )   (776 )
  Balance at January 31, 2013   8,710     (6,899 )   1,811  
 

   Amortization expense

  -     (543 )   (543 )
  Balance at January 31, 2014   8,710     (7,442 )   1,268  
     Amortization expense   -     (380 )   (380 )
  Balance at January 31, 2015 $  8,710   $  (7,822 ) $  888  

  5.

Exploration and evaluation assets

The following table summarizes the amounts expended on exploration and evaluation assets as at and for the years ended January 31:

      North-Central Ontario     Totals for years ended January 31,  
      Dotted     Lampson                    
      Lake mining     Lake mining     2015     2014     2013  
      claims     claims                    
                                 
  Property acquisition costs                              
  Balance, beginning $  24,607   $  49,533   $ 74,140   $  61,640   $  36,294  
     Expenditures   4,400     12,500     16,900     12,500     25,346  
     Impairment   (24,607 )   (2,820 )   (27,427 )   -     -  
  Balance, ending   4,400     59,213     63,613     74,140     61,640  
                                 
  Exploration and evaluation costs                              
  Balance, beginning   216,867     -     216,867     206,934     176,585  
  Expenditures                              
     Field and camp costs   -     -     -     -     21,477  
     Geological consulting and reporting   -     -     -     -     3,488  
     Geo-referencing   -     -     -     9,933     -  
     Project administration   934     -     934     -     3,606  
     Soil sample analysis   -     -     -     -     1,778  
     Impairment   (4,073 )   -     (4,073 )   -     -  
      (3,139 )   -     (3,139 )   9,933     30,349  
  Balance, ending   213,728     -     213,728     216,867     206,934  
                                 
  Total balance, ending $ 218,128   $  59,213   $ 277,341   $  291,007   $  268,574  

13



ROUGE RESOURCES LTD.
Notes to the Financial Statements
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
For the years ended January 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

On April 20, 2010, a director of the Company entered into an exclusive option agreement with local prospectors (“Optionors”) on behalf of the Company in order to acquire 100% interest in two additional claims adjacent to the Dotted Lake Property, known as the Lampson Lake Property. Option payments totaling $60,000 were required as follows: $7,000 payment when the agreement was signed on April 20, 2010 (paid); $12,000 payment on April 20, 2011 (paid); $16,000 payment on April 20, 2012 (paid); and a final payment of $25,000 on April 20, 2013. However on March 1, 2013, the Company agreed with the optionors to split the final payment into two equal amounts of $12,500. The first was paid on April 20, 2013 and the second was paid on April 20, 2014.

These claims are subject to a 2% net smelter royalty (“NSR”) in favour of the optionors on one claim and with respect to the other, a combination of a 2% NSR in favour of the optionors and a 1% NSR on any metals and/or a 1% NSR payable to Ontario Exploration Company (“OEC”) on any precious metals recovered from the property. The Company has the right to buy back 1% of the NSR in favour of the optionors for $1,000,000 and to buy back three-quarters of 1% of the royalty vested with OEC over 10 years on an increasing scale from $15,000 to $750,000.

In addition and primarily due to continuing uncertainty in the market conditions of the junior mining exploration sector, the Company started a claims reconfiguration plan on its Dotted Lake Property and adjacent Lampson Lake Property during the year ended January 31, 2015 and completed it subsequent to the year end in May 2015. The plan was designed to focus entirely on claims of merit and resulted in certain claims being allowed to lapse, certain claims being partially re-staked, and certain land positions were modified or increased. As a result of these changes, the Company paid $4,400 during the year ended January 31, 2015 and $7,000 subsequent to January 31, 2015 (Note 15). The Company recorded an impairment charge of $31,500 representing the portion of lapsed claims.

  6.

Trade payables and accrued liabilities

Trade payables and accrued liabilities included in the Statement of Financial Position are as follows:

      As at January 31,                        
      2015     2014     2013  
                     
  Trade payables $  16,943   $  10,367   $  17,958  
  Accrued liabilities   10,365     15,240     20,925  
    $  27,308   $  25,607   $  38,883  

  7.

Loan payable

This $39,676 debt to a former professional advisor is unsecured and non-interest bearing is a current liability but to date there has been no demand for repayment.

  8.

Related party payables and transactions

Related party payables included in the Statement of Financial Position are as follows:

      As at January 31,                        
      2015     2014     2013  
  Payable to Company directors or companies controlled by its directors $  120,485   $  46,555   $  11,466  

These amounts are non-interest bearing and unsecured with no fixed term of repayment.

14



ROUGE RESOURCES LTD.
Notes to the Financial Statements
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
For the years ended January 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

The Company had the following transactions with its directors or companies controlled by its directors during the years:

      Years ended January 31,  
      2015     2014     2013  
  Consulting services $  1,600   $  2,800   $  4,500  
  Management services   60,000     60,000     60,000  
  Office rent   30,000     30,000     30,000  
  Professional services   8,113     16,170     16,322  
    $  99,713   $  108,970   $  110,822  

Key management personnel compensation:

      Years ended January 31,  
      2015     2014     2013  
  Management services $  60,000   $  60,000   $  60,000  
  Professional services   8,113     16,170     16,322  
    $  68,113   $  76,170   $  76,322  

  9.

Share capital

Authorized share capital
The Company’s authorized share capital consisted of an unlimited number of common shares without par value.

Issued share capital
As at January 31, 2015, there were 44,633,171 issued and fully paid common shares outstanding (January 31, 2014 and 2013 – 44,633,171) of which 1,894,800 shares remained in escrow (January 31, 2014 and 2013 – 3,789,600), subject to release following regulatory approval.

Private placements
No shares were issued during the years ended January 31, 2015 and 2014.

During the year ended January 31, 2013, the Company completed two private placements, one brokered and the other non-brokered, of 4,068,000 units for combined gross proceeds of $1,017,000. Share issuance costs of $174,206 were incurred in relation to the brokered private placement.

Basic and diluted loss per share
The calculation of basic and diluted loss per share for year ended January 31, 2015 was based on the net loss attributable to common shareholders of $186,548 (January 31, 2014 - $209,624; January 31, 2013 - $239,258) and the weighted average number of common shares outstanding of 44,633,171 (January 31, 2014 – 44,633,171 and January 31, 2013 – 42,299,073). The diluted loss per share will not include the effect of any share purchase warrants outstanding in the future since the effect would be anti-dilutive.

Stock options
The Company has adopted an incentive stock option plan which provides that the Board of Directors of the Company may from time to time, in its discretion and in accordance with the TSX-V requirements, grant to directors, officers, employees and technical consultants to the Company, non-transferable stock options to purchase common shares, provided that the number of common shares reserved for issuance in any twelve month period will not exceed 10% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common shares. Such options will be exercisable for a period of up to 10 years from the date of grant at a price not less than the closing price of the Company’s shares on the last trading day before the grant of such options less any discount, if applicable, but in any event not less than $0.10 per share. In connection with the foregoing, the number of common shares reserved for issuance to any one optionee insider in any twelve month period will not exceed ten percent (10%) of the issued and outstanding common shares and the number of common shares reserved for issuance to any one employee or consultant will not exceed two percent (2%) of the issued and outstanding common shares. Options may be exercised no later than 90 days following cessation of the optionee’s position with the Company or 30 days following cessation of an optionee conducting investor relations activities.

15



ROUGE RESOURCES LTD.
Notes to the Financial Statements
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
For the years ended January 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

As at January 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, there were no stock options outstanding.

Share purchase warrants
Share purchase warrants outstanding are as follows:

                  Years ended January 31,              
                                                                                                            2015     2014     2013  
    Number of       Exercise      Number of     Exercise     Number of     Exercise  
    warrants     price     warrants     price     warrants     price  
           

                         
  Balance, beginning   -     -     4,068,000   $  0.40     30,000,000   $  0.10  
       Warrants issued   -     -     -     -     4,068,000     0.40  
       Warrants expired   -     -     (4,068,000 )   0.40     (30,000,000 )   0.10  
                                       
  Balance, ending   -     -     -   $  -     4,068,000   $  0.40  

  10.

Convertible debt reserve

The convertible debt reserve records the fair value of equity component until such time the debt is converted to common shares, at which time the corresponding amount is transferred to share capital.

  11.

Income tax recovery and deferred tax assets

A reconciliation of the expected income tax recovery to the actual income tax recovery is as follows:

      Years ended January 31,  
      2015   2014     2013  
  Loss before income taxes $  186,548   $ 209,624   $  239,258  
  Combined statutory tax rate   26.0%     26.0%     25.0%  
  Expected income tax recovery at the statutory tax rate   (48,502 )   (54,502 )   (59,815 )
  Adjustments resulting from:                  
       Temporary differences   1,158     -     (43,549 )
       Impact of change in tax rates   (21,784 )   2,096     -  
       Change in valuation allowance   69,128     52,406     103,364  
  Income tax recovery $  -   $ -   $  -  

The Company’s deferred income tax assets are estimated as follows:

      Years ended January 31,  
      2015     2014     2013  
  Non-capital losses carried-forward $  535,023   $  468,048   $  406,934  
  Share issuance costs   18,118     26,265     35,109  
  Equipment   395     285     149  
  Resource development and exploration costs   60,190     50,000     50,000  
  Net potential deferred income tax asset   613,726     544,598     492,192  
  Valuation allowance   (613,726 )   (544,598 )   (492,192 )
  Net deferred income tax asset $  -   $  -   $  -  

16



ROUGE RESOURCES LTD.
Notes to the Financial Statements
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
For the years ended January 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

A valuation allowance has been used to offset the net potential benefit related to the future tax assets due to the uncertainty associated with the ultimate realization of the non-capital losses and resources pool before expiry.

The tax pools relating to these deductible temporary differences expire as follows:

      Canadian non-     Resources           Share  
      capital losses     Pool     Equipment     issuance costs  
                           
  2015 $  83,521   $  -   $  -   $  -  
  2026   132,052     -     -     -  
  2027   175,837     -     -     -  
  2028   152,040     -     -     -  
  2029   182,808     -     -     -  
  2030   105,295     -     -     -  
  2031   243,513     -     -     -  
  2032   278,811     -     -     -  
  2033   273,858     -     -     -  
  2034   240,001     -     -     -  
  2035   190,044                    
  No expiry   -     508,841     2,407     69,683  
    $  2,057,780   $  508,841   $  2,407   $  69,683  

  12.

Financial instruments and financial risk management

The Company is exposed in varying degrees to financial instrument related risks. The Board of Directors approves and monitors the risk management processes, inclusive of documented investment policies, counterparty limits, and controlling and reporting structures. The type of risk exposure and the way in which such exposure is managed is provided as follows:

Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk that one party to a financial instrument will fail to discharge an obligation and cause the other party to incur a financial loss. The Company’s primary exposure to credit risk is on its cash held in bank accounts and its credit and security deposit. The Company’s cash and credit card deposit are deposited in bank accounts held with one major bank in Canada so there is a concentration of credit risk. This risk is managed by using a major bank that is a high credit quality financial institution as determined by rating agencies.

Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The Company has a planning and budgeting process in place to help determine the funds required to support the Company’s normal operating requirements on an on-going basis. The Company ensures there are sufficient funds to meet short-term business requirements, taking into account its current cash position and potential funding sources.

Historically, the Company's source of funding has been either the issuance of equity securities for cash through private placements or loans from Company directors and officers. The Company’s access to financing is always uncertain and there can be no assurance of continued access to significant funding from these sources.

Foreign exchange risk
Foreign currency risk is the risk that the fair values of future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because they are denominated in currencies that differ from the Company’s functional currency. The Company only operates in Canada and is therefore not exposed to foreign exchange risk arising from transactions denominated in a foreign currency.

17



ROUGE RESOURCES LTD.
Notes to the Financial Statements
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
For the years ended January 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

Interest rate risk
Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value of future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates. The Company’s exposure to interest rate risk relates to its ability to earn interest income on cash balances at variable rates. Changes in short term interest rates will not have a significant effect on the fair value of the Company’s cash account.

Classification of financial instruments
Financial assets included in the Statements of Financial Position are as follows:

                             As at January 31,  
      2015     2014     2013  
  Loans and receivables:                  
         Cash and cash equivalents $  271   $  96,466   $  301,845  
         Credit card security deposit   6,900     6,900     6,900  
    $  7,171   $  103,366   $  308,745  

Financial liabilities included in the Statements of Financial Position are as follows:

                          As at January 31,  
      2015     2014     2013  
  Non-derivative financial liabilities:                  
       Trade payables $  16,943   $  10,367   $  17,958  
       Loan payable   39,676     39,676     39,676  
       Related party payables   120,485     46,555     11,466  
    $  177,104   $  96,598   $  69,100  

Fair value
The fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities approximate the carrying amounts.

  13.

Capital management

The Company's policy is to maintain a sufficient capital base so as to maintain investor and creditor confidence, safeguard the Company’s ability to support its exploration and development expenditures and to sustain future development of its business. The capital structure of the Company consists of share and working capital. There were no changes in the Company's approach to capital management during the year and the Company is not subject to any restrictions on its capital.

  14.

Segmented information

The Company operates in a single reportable operating segment being the exploration and development of mineral properties, currently all located in Canada.

  15.

Subsequent event

The Company paid $7,000 subsequent to the year end in order to complete its claims reconfiguration plan of the Dotted Lake-Lampson Lake Property and thereby keep its new claims in good standing until January, March and May 2017.

18





Rouge Resources Ltd.
Management Discussion and Analysis
Year Ended January 31, 2015

 

ROUGE RESOURCES LTD.
(An Exploration Stage Company)

 

MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 2015
(Stated in Canadian Dollars)

 


 

1


Rouge Resources Ltd.
Management Discussion and Analysis
Year Ended January 31, 2015

ITEM 1.1             DATE AND INTRODUCTION

This Management Discussion and Analysis was prepared as of May 28, 2015 and was authorized for issuance by the directors of the Company effective on this date. This report should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes for the year ended January 31, 2015. It focuses on events and activities that affected the Company during the year ended January 31, 2015 and to the date of this report.

The financial information contained in this report complies with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) along with interpretations of the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC”).

The Company (“We”) was incorporated under the name “Gemstar Resources Ltd.” on March 31, 1988 pursuant to the provisions of the Company Act (British Columbia). In March 2006, we were transitioned to the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia). On March 25, 2008, the Company changed its name to Rouge Resources Ltd. and its registered and records office is located at 203-409 Granville Street, Vancouver BC, V6C 1T2.

We have been a reporting issuer in British Columbia and Alberta since April 3, 1989 and became a “foreign private issuer” in the United States pursuant to filings with the US Securities and Exchange Commission on or about November 15, 2003. Prior to August 30, 2012, our common shares were quoted only on the OTC:BB in the United States under the symbol ROUGF and since this date, have also been listed for trading on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol ROU.

At January 31, 2015, there were 44,633,171 issued and fully paid common shares outstanding (January 31, 2014 and 2013 – 44,633,171) of which 1,894,800 shares are held in escrow (January 31, 2014 and 2013 – 3,789,600), subject to release following regulatory approval.

We have not been involved in any bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceedings, nor have we been a party to any material reclassification, merger, consolidation, purchase or sale of a significant amount of assets. Additional information relating to the Company is available on both SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov/edgar.

Description of business

The Company is a Vancouver-based junior mineral exploration company engaged in the business of acquiring, exploring, evaluating and, if warranted, developing mineral resource properties in Canada. No revenue has been generated since inception and there is no assurance that a commercially viable mineral deposit exists on our exploration and evaluation assets. Further exploration is required before a final evaluation of its Property’s economic feasibility can be determined. Moreover, significant financing and considerable time and effort will be required before our mineral claims can be further explored and, if warranted, developed into a commercial enterprise.

We hold a 100% interest in 9 claims in the Thunder Bay Mining District of North Central Ontario area, called the Dotted Lake Property which includes the Lampson Lake claims acquired under the now completed option agreement dated April 10, 2010. We continue to monitor claims in North-Central Ontario and plan to make additional acquisitions in this and other areas when and if The Property is considered to be strategic or otherwise beneficial to the Company.

ITEM 1.2             OVERALL OPERATING PERFORMANCE

During the year ended January 31, 2015, the Company reported a net loss of $186,548, which included a $31,500 impairment of its exploration and evaluation assets following commencement of its claim reconfiguration plan. This compares to a net loss of $209,624 for year ended January 31, 2014 and $239,258 for year ended January 31, 2013. In addition, we spent $17,834 on our exploration and evaluation assets of which $12,500 related to the final payment on the Lampson Lake option agreement and $4,400 related to starting-up a claims reconfiguration plan on its Dotted Lake-Lampson Lake Property completed subsequent to the year end.

2


Rouge Resources Ltd.
Management Discussion and Analysis
Year Ended January 31, 2015

Exploration and evaluation assets

The following table summarizes the amounts expended on exploration and evaluation assets as at and for the years ended January 31:

    North-Central Ontario     Totals for years ended January 31,  
    Dotted     Lampson                    
    Lake     Lake     2015     2014     2013  
    mining     mining                    
    claims     claims                    
                               
Property acquisition costs                    
Balance, beginning $  24,607   $  49,533   $ 74,140   $  61,640   $  36,294  
   Expenditures   4,400     12,500     16,900     12,500     25,346  
   Impairment   (24,607 )   (2,820 )   (27,427 )   -     -  
Balance, ending   4,400     59,213     63,613     74,140     61,640  
                               
Exploration and evaluation costs                    
Balance, beginning   216,867     -     216,867     206,934     176,585  
Expenditures                              
   Field and camp costs   -     -     -     -     21,477  
   Geological consulting and reporting   -     -     -     -     3,488  
   Geo-referencing   -     -     -     9,933     -  
   Project administration   934     -     934     -     3,606  
   Soil sample analysis   -     -     -     -     1,778  
   Impairment   (4,073 )   -     (4,073 )   -     -  
    (3,139 )   -     (3,139 )   9,933     30,349  
Balance, ending   213,728     -     213,728     216,867     206,934  
                               
Total balance, ending $ 218,128   $  59,213   $ 277,341   $  291,007   $  268,574  

On April 20, 2010, a director of the Company entered into an exclusive option agreement with local prospectors (“Optionors”) on behalf of the Company in order to acquire 100% interest in two additional claims adjacent to the Dotted Lake Property, known as the Lampson Lake Property. Option payments totaling $60,000 were required as follows: $7,000 payment when the agreement was signed on April 20, 2010 (paid); $12,000 payment on April 20, 2011 (paid); $16,000 payment on April 20, 2012 (paid); and a final payment of $25,000 on April 20, 2013. However on March 1, 2013, the Company agreed with the optionors to split the final payment into two equal amounts of $12,500. The first was paid on April 20, 2013 and the second was paid on April 20, 2014.

These claims are subject to a 2% net smelter royalty (“NSR”) in favour of the optionors on one claim and with respect to the other, a combination of a 2% NSR in favour of the optionors and a 1% NSR on any metals and/or a 1% NSR payable to Ontario Exploration Company (“OEC”) on any precious metals recovered from the property. The Company has the right to buy back 1% of the NSR in favour of the optionors for $1,000,000 and to buy back three-quarters of 1% of the royalty vested with OEC over 10 years on an increasing scale from $15,000 to $750,000.

In addition and primarily due to continuing uncertainty in the market conditions of the junior mining exploration sector, the Company started a claims reconfiguration plan on its Dotted Lake-Lampson Lake Property (“The Property”) during the year ended January 31, 2015 and completed it subsequent to the year end in May 2015. The plan was designed to focus entirely on claims of merit and resulted in certain claims being allowed to lapse, certain claims being partially re-staked, and certain land positions were modified or increased as follows:

3


Rouge Resources Ltd.
Management Discussion and Analysis
Year Ended January 31, 2015

  -

Low potential claims were allowed to lapse when due and not re-staked. This resulted in 3 claims being cancelled during the year ended January 31, 2015 and 3 more being cancelled subsequent to the year end.

     
  -

Some claims were allowed to lapse when due and only partially re-staked in order to recapture the most promising geology at significantly lower cost compared to expensive assessment work otherwise required to keep the claims in good standing. In this connection, 6 existing claims were re-staked and combined into 3 new claims costing only $4,400 during fourth quarter of the year ended January 31, 2015;

   

 

  -

Some land positions forming part of or adjacent to existing claims were modified or increased when due in order to enhance exposure to the gold-bearing areas previously identified from earlier exploration on the original property. In this connection, $7,000 was paid subsequent to the year-end for staking 6 new claims at much lower cost than assessment work otherwise required. This action completed the reconfiguration plan on schedule in May 2015, notwithstanding 5 additional claims will be allowed to lapse when due in August 2015 without re-staking.

The Company now has a 100% interest in 9 claims of merit going forward consisting of 101 units or 4,040 acres in The Property, located in the Thunder Bay Mining District of North Central Ontario, until renewal is required in January, March and May 2017. This compares to 18 claims consisting of 171 units or 6,840 acres as at year ended January 31, 2014. As a result of these changes, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $31,500 representing the portion of lapsed claims.

Future exploration plans will be developed when the market for precious metals begins to improve in due course.

ITEM 1.3             SELECTED ANNUAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The following table summarizes selected comparative financial information as at and for the years ended January 31:

    2015     2014     2013     2012  
FINANCIAL POSITION                        
Total assets $  286,149   $  397,066   $  584,877   $  243,140  
Total liabilities $  187,469   $  111,838   $  90,025   $  351,824  
Deficit   ($3,908,267 )   ($3,721,719 )   ($3,512,095 )   ($3,272,837 )
OPERATIONS                        
Total revenues   Nil     Nil     Nil     Nil  
Net loss   ($186,548 )   ($209,624 )   ($239,258 )   ($279,284 )
Loss per share   ($0.004 )   ($0.004 )   ($0.005 )   ($0.006 )

4


Rouge Resources Ltd.
Management Discussion and Analysis
Year Ended January 31, 2015

ITEM 1.4             RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 2015

The following table summarizes comparative results of operations for the years ended January 31:

    2015     2014     2013  
Revenue $  Nil   $  Nil   $  Nil  
                   
Expenses                  
 Amortization and accretion $  380   $  543   $  776  
 Consulting services   1,600     5,800     5,670  
 Interest expense   737     408     391  
 Listing application expenses   -     402     62,601  
 Management services   60,000     60,000     60,000  
 Office admin. and travel   52,909     74,286     44,115  
 Professional fees   20,731     44,368     47,705  
 Transfer agent and filing fees   18,691     23,817     18,000  
Loss before other item $  (155,048 ) $  (209,624 ) $  (239,258 )
Other item                  
Impairment of exploration and evaluation assets   (31,500 )   -     -  
                   
Net loss $ (186,548 ) $  (209,624 ) $  (239,258 )
Loss per share                  
   – basic and diluted $  (0.01 ) $  (0.01 ) $  (0.01 )
Weighted average number of shares outstanding                  
   – basic and diluted   44,633,171     44,633,171     42,299,073  

Revenue

The Company is in the exploration stage and has not generated any revenues since inception.

Net Loss

The Company reported a net and comprehensive loss of $186,548 for year ended January 31, 2015 compared to $209,624 for last year. This $23,076 decrease in loss resulted from the following:

  -

$163 minor decrease in amortization due to use of declining balance method.

  -

$4,200 decrease in consulting fees for business planning purposes

  -

$329 increase in interest expense

  -

$402 decrease in Listing Application expenses following approval of Listing Application on TSX- V Exchange 2 years ago.

  -

$21,377 decrease in office administration and travel expenses primarily due to much lower level of business activity.

  -

$23,637 decrease in professional fees (legal, audit and accounting) due to much lower level of business activity and an audit fee over accrual from year ended January 31, 2014.

  -

$5,126 decrease in transfer agent and filing fees due to much lower level of business activity.

  -

$31,500 one-time impairment of exploration and evaluation assets described in Item 1.2 above.

5


Rouge Resources Ltd.
Management Discussion and Analysis
Year Ended January 31, 2015

ITEM 1.5             SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS

The following table summarizes comparative operating results for the eight most recently completed quarters during the years ended January 31, 2015 and 2014:



  4th Qtr
ended
Jan. 31 15
    3rd Qtr
ended
Oct. 31 14
    2nd Qtr
ended
July 31 14
    1st Qtr
ended
Apr. 30 14
    4th Qtr
ended
Jan. 31 14
    3rd Qtr
ended
Oct. 31 13
    2nd Qtr
ended
July 31 13
    1st Qtr
ended
Apr. 30 13
 
                                                 
Total revenues   Nil     Nil     Nil     Nil     Nil     Nil     Nil     Nil  
Net Loss   ($75,502 )   ($35,926 )   ($34,536 )   ($40,584 )   ($62,627 )   ($41,982 )   ($47,429 )   ($57,586 )
Loss per share   ($0.00 )   ($0.00 )   ($0.00 )   ($0.00 )   ($0.00 )   ($0.00 )   ($0.00 )   ($0.00 )
Operating cash flow                                                
(Deficiency)   ($34,734 )   ($35,776 )   ($35,769 )   ($46,012 )   ($47,102 )   ($42,345 )   ($60,411 )   ($68,177 )

Our quarterly losses during year ended January 31, 2015 were lower on average than the same quarters last year due to much lower levels of business activity. In addition, the fourth quarter loss in both years was greater than the quarterly averages primarily due to year-end adjustments, not the least of which was the one-time non-cash $31,500 impairment of exploration and evaluation assets as at year ended January 31, 2015.

ITEM 1.6             LIQUIDITY

The following table summarizes comparative working capital (deficiency) positions as at years ended January 31:

Working Capital (Deficiency)   2015     2014     2013  
Current assets $  1,020   $  97,891   $  307,592  
Current liabilities   (187,469 )   (111,838 )   (90,025 )
Working capital (deficiency) $  (186,449 ) $  (13,947 ) $  217,567  

During the year ended January 31, 2015, the working capital deficiency increased to $186,449 from $13,947 as at January 31, 2015. This $172,502 increase resulted primarily from the $155,048 loss for the current year before the non-cash impairment of exploration and evaluation assets.

The current assets at January 31, 2015 consisted of a nominal cash position of $271 (January 31, 2014 - $96,466) and GST receivable $749 (January 31, 2014 - $1,425). The current liabilities at January 31, 2015 consisted of $66,984 of trade payables, accrued liabilities & loan payable (January 31, 2014 - $65,283) and $120,485 of related party payables (January 31, 2014 - $46,555).

The following table summarizes comparative cash flows for the years ended January 31:

Cash Flows   2015     2014     2013  
                   
Net cash used in operating activities   ($ 152,291 )   ($ 218,035 )   ($ 260,425 )
Net cash used in investing activities   (17,834 )   (22,433 )   (55,695 )
Net cash from financing activities   73,930     35,089     600,142  
                   
Increase (decrease) in cash   ($ 96,195 )   ($ 205,379 ) $  284,022  
                   
Cash, beginning $  96,466     301,845     17,823  
Cash, end $  271   $  96,466   $  301,845  

As at January 31, 2015, the Company’s cash position was $271 compared to $96,466 as at last year end. The $96,195 decrease in cash during year ended January 31, 2015 resulted from the following cash flow activities:

  (i)

Net cash used in operating activities of $152,291 in 2015 and $218,035 in 2014 was due in both years to on-going operating losses adjusted for changes in non-cash working capital items, including the $31,500 one-time impairment of exploration and evaluation assets in 2015.

6


Rouge Resources Ltd.
Management Discussion and Analysis
Year Ended January 31, 2015

  (ii)

Net cash used in investing activities of $17,834 in 2015 and $22,433 in 2014 related to expenditures on exploration and evaluation assets to keep the Dotted Lake Property in good standing with the Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines and continuation of scheduled payments under the Lampson Lake option agreement.

     
  (iii)

Net cash from financing activities of $73,930 in 2015 and $35,089 in 2014 arose from an increase in related party payables used to partially fund ongoing operating expenses.

ITEM 1.7             CAPITAL RESOURCES

Share Capital

Authorized share capital
The Company’s authorized share capital consisted of an unlimited number of common shares without par value.

Issued share capital
As at January 31, 2015, there were 44,633,171 issued and fully paid common shares outstanding (January 31, 2014 and 2013 – 44,633,171) of which 1,894,800 shares remained in escrow (January 31, 2014 and 2013 – 3,789,600), subject to release following regulatory approval.

Private placements
No shares were issued during the years ended January 31, 2015 and 2014.

During the year ended January 31, 2013, the Company completed two private placements, one brokered and the other non-brokered, of 4,068,000 units for combined gross proceeds of $1,017,000. Share issuance costs of $174,206 were incurred in relation to the brokered private placement.

Basic and diluted loss per share
The calculation of basic and diluted loss per share for year ended January 31, 2015 was based on the net loss attributable to common shareholders of $186,548 (January 31, 2014 - $209,624; January 31, 2013 - $239,258) and the weighted average number of common shares outstanding of 44,633,171 (January 31, 2014 – 44,633,171 and January 31, 2013 – 42,299,073). The diluted loss per share will not include the effect of any share purchase warrants outstanding in the future since the effect would be anti-dilutive.

Stock options
The Company has adopted an incentive stock option plan which provides that the Board of Directors of the Company may from time to time, in its discretion and in accordance with the TSX-V requirements, grant to directors, officers, employees and technical consultants to the Company, non-transferable stock options to purchase common shares, provided that the number of common shares reserved for issuance in any twelve month period will not exceed 10% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common shares. Such options will be exercisable for a period of up to 10 years from the date of grant at a price not less than the closing price of the Company’s shares on the last trading day before the grant of such options less any discount, if applicable, but in any event not less than $0.10 per share. In connection with the foregoing, the number of common shares reserved for issuance to any one optionee insider in any twelve month period will not exceed ten percent (10%) of the issued and outstanding common shares and the number of common shares reserved for issuance to any one employee or consultant will not exceed two percent (2%) of the issued and outstanding common shares. Options may be exercised no later than 90 days following cessation of the optionee’s position with the Company or 30 days following cessation of an optionee conducting investor relations activities.

7


Rouge Resources Ltd.
Management Discussion and Analysis
Year Ended January 31, 2015

As at January 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, there were no stock options outstanding.

Share purchase warrants
Share purchase warrants outstanding are as follows:

    Years ended January 31,  
    2015     2014     2013  
    Number of     Exercise     Number of     Exercise     Number of     Exercise  
    warrants     Price     warrants     price     warrants     price  
                                     
Balance, beginning   -     -     4,068,000   $  0.40     30,000,000   $  0.10  
     Warrants issued   -     -     -     -     4,068,000     0.40  
     Warrants expired   -     -     (4,068,000 )   0.40     (30,000,000 )   0.10  
                                     
Balance, ending   -     -     -   $  -     4,068,000   $  0.40  

Capital Management
The Company's policy is to maintain a sufficient capital base so as to maintain investor and creditor confidence, safeguard the Company’s ability to support its exploration and evaluation assets and to sustain future development of the business. The capital structure of the Company consists of share and working capital. There were no changes in the Company's approach to capital management during the year and the Company is not subject to any restrictions on its capital.

With no operating revenues to date, we continue to finance our operations through the issuance of common shares and advances from related parties. Although there were two private placements completed during year ended January 31, 2013, there is no assurance that additional financing will be available when needed in the future nor, if available, on commercially reasonable terms. If we are unable to obtain additional financing on a timely basis, either through issuance of more common shares or obtaining additional advances from related parties, we may not be able to meet our obligations as they come due which may impact our ability to continue as a going concern in the future.

To a significant extent, our ability to raise capital is affected by trends and uncertainties beyond our control. These include general economic conditions, the market prices for precious metals and results from our exploration programs. The Company’s ability to reach its business objectives may be significantly impaired if general economic conditions continue to deteriorate, prices for metals such as gold, silver and molybdenum fall or if results from planned exploration programs are unsuccessful.

ITEM 1.8             OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements.

8


Rouge Resources Ltd.
Management Discussion and Analysis
Year Ended January 31, 2015

ITEM 1.9             TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES

Related party payables included in the Statements of Financial Position as at January 31 are as follows:

    2015     2014     2013  
Payable to Company directors and companies controlled by its directors $  120,485   $  46,555   $  11,466  

These amounts are non-interest bearing, unsecured with no fixed term of repayment.

The following transactions with company directors and companies controlled by its directors in the Statement of Comprehensive Loss for the years ended January 31 are as follows:

    2015     2014     2013  
Consulting services $  1,600   $  2,800   $  4,500  
Management services   60,000     60,000     60,000  
Office rent   30,000     30,000     30,000  
Professional services   8,113     16,170     16,322  
  $  99,713   $  108,970   $  110,822  

Key management personnel compensation for the years ended January 31:

    2015     2014     2013  
Management services $  60,000   $  60,000   $  60,000  
Professional services   8,113     16,170     16,322  
  $  68,113   $  76,170   $  76,322  

ITEM 1.10           FOURTH QUARTER ENDED JANUARY 31, 2015

The 4th quarter net loss was $75,502 compared to an average quarterly loss of approximately $37,000 during the first nine months of the year. This difference resulted primarily from the $31,500 one-time non-cash impairment of exploration and evaluation assets described in Item 1.2 above along with normal year-end adjustments in preparation for audit.

ITEM 1.11           SUBSEQUENT AND PROPOSED TRANSACTIONS

As mentioned in Item 1.2 above, the Company paid $7,000 subsequent to the year end in order to complete its claims reconfiguration plan of The Property and thereby keep its new claims in good standing until January, March and May 2017.

ITEM 1.12           CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND JUDGEMENTS

Basis of preparation
These financial statements have been prepared on an accrual basis; are based on historical costs, modified where applicable; and are presented in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted.

Significant estimates and assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions concerning the future. The Company’s management reviews these estimates and underlying assumptions on an ongoing basis, based on experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Revisions to estimates are adjusted for prospectively in the period in which the estimates are revised.

Estimates and assumptions where there is significant risk of material adjustments to assets and liabilities in future accounting periods include: the recoverability of the carrying value of exploration and evaluation assets, fair value measurements for financial instruments, the recoverability and measurement of deferred tax assets, and provisions for restoration and environmental obligations and contingent liabilities.

9


Rouge Resources Ltd.
Management Discussion and Analysis
Year Ended January 31, 2015

Significant judgments
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS requires the Company to make judgments, apart from those involving estimates and assumptions, in applying accounting policies. The most significant judgments in preparing the Company’s financial statements include:

-

assessment of the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern and whether there are events or conditions that may give rise to significant uncertainty; and

   
-

classification/ allocation of expenditures as exploration and evaluation assets or operating expenses.

ITEM 1.13            CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Accounting standards issued but not yet effective

New standard IFRS 9 “Financial Instruments”

This new standard is a partial replacement of IAS 39 “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement”. IFRS 9 introduces new requirements for the classification and measurement of financial assets, additional changes relating to financial liabilities, a new general hedge accounting standard which will align hedge accounting more closely with risk management. The new standard also requires a single impairment method to be used, replacing the multiple impairment methods in IAS 39. IFRS 9 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018 with early adoption permitted.

New standard IFRS 15 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”

This new standard contains a single model that applies to contracts with customers and two approaches to recognizing revenue: at a point in time or over time. The model features a contract-based five-step analysis of transactions to determine whether, how much and when revenue is recognized. New estimates and judgmental thresholds have been introduced, which may affect the amount and/or timing of revenue recognized. IFRS 15 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2017 with early adoption permitted.

The Company has not early adopted these standards and is currently assessing the impact that these standards will have on its financial statements.

Other accounting standards or amendments to existing accounting standards that have been issued but have future effective dates are either not applicable or are not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

ITEM 1.14.           FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT

The Company is exposed in varying degrees to financial instrument related risks. The Board of Directors approves and monitors the risk management processes, inclusive of documented investment policies, counterparty limits, and controlling and reporting structures. The type of risk exposure and the way in which such exposure is managed is provided as follows:

Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk that one party to a financial instrument will fail to discharge an obligation and cause the other party to incur a financial loss. The Company’s primary exposure to credit risk is on its cash held in bank accounts and its credit and security deposit. The Company’s cash and credit card deposit are deposited in bank accounts held with one major bank in Canada so there is a concentration of credit risk. This risk is managed by using a major bank that is a high credit quality financial institution as determined by rating agencies.

10


Rouge Resources Ltd.
Management Discussion and Analysis
Year Ended January 31, 2015

Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The Company has a planning and budgeting process in place to help determine the funds required to support the Company’s normal operating requirements on an on-going basis. The Company ensures there are sufficient funds to meet short-term business requirements, taking into account its current cash position and potential funding sources.

Historically, the Company's source of funding has been either the issuance of equity securities for cash through private placements or loans from Company directors and officers. The Company’s access to financing is always uncertain and there can be no assurance of continued access to significant funding from these sources.

Foreign exchange risk
Foreign currency risk is the risk that the fair values of future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because they are denominated in currencies that differ from the Company’s functional currency. The Company only operates in Canada and is therefore not exposed to foreign exchange risk arising from transactions denominated in a foreign currency.

Interest rate risk
Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value of future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates. The Company’s exposure to interest rate risk relates to its ability to earn interest income on cash balances at variable rates. Changes in short term interest rates will not have a significant effect on the fair value of the Company’s cash account.

Commodity Price Risk
The Company’s ability to raise capital to fund exploration or development activities is subject to risks associated with fluctuations in the market price of gold, silver and molybdenum. The Company closely monitors commodity prices to determine the most appropriate course of actions.

Classification of financial instruments
Financial assets included in the Statements of Financial Position as at January 31 are as follows:

          January 31,        
    2015     2014     2013  
Loans and receivables:                  
         Cash and cash equivalents $  271   $  96,466   $  301,845  
         Credit card security deposit   6,900     6,900     6,900  
  $  7,171   $  103,366   $  308,745  

Financial liabilities included in the Statements of Financial Position as at January 31 are as follows:

          January 31,        
    2015     2014     2013  
Non-derivative financial liabilities:                  
       Trade payables $  16,943   $  10,367   $  17,958  
       Loan payable   39,676     39,676     39,676  
       Related party payables   120,485     46,555     11,466  
  $  177,104   $  96,598   $  69,100  

Fair value
The fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities approximate the carrying amounts.

11


Rouge Resources Ltd.
Management Discussion and Analysis
Year Ended January 31, 2015

ITEM 1.15           OTHER MD&A REQUIREMENTS

Management’s Responsibility for Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the Company’s financial statements in accordance with IFRS, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Conflicts of interest
The Company’s directors and officers may serve as directors or officers, or may be associated with, other reporting companies, or have significant shareholdings in other public companies. To the extent that such other companies may participate in business or asset acquisitions, dispositions, or ventures in which the Company may participate, the directors and officers of the Company may have a conflict of interest in negotiating and concluding on terms with respect to the transaction. If a conflict of interest arises, the Company will follow the provisions of the Business Corporations Act (BC) (“Corporations Act”) dealing with conflict of interest. These provisions state that where a director has such a conflict, that director must, at a meeting of the Company’s directors, disclose his or her interest and refrain from voting on the matter unless otherwise permitted by the Corporations Act. In accordance with the laws of the Province of British Columbia, the directors and officers of the Company are required to act honestly, in good faith, and in the best interest of the Company.

Business and Regulatory Risks
We are engaged in the mineral exploration business and manage related industry risk directly. We are potentially at risk for environmental reclamation and fluctuations and commodity-based market prices associated with resource property interests. Management is of the opinion that the Company addresses environmental risk and compliance in accordance with industry standards and specific project environmental requirements. At present, the Company is not required to provide for restoration and environmental obligations so no provision has been made. However, there is no certainty that all environmental risks and contingencies have been addressed.

Our exploration program will require significant future expenditures and there is no assurance any commercial mineral quantities will be found. If we are unable to generate significant revenues from our mineral claims, continued losses are expected into the foreseeable future. There is no history upon which to base any assumption as to the likelihood we will prove successful, and there is no assurance that we will generate any revenues nor ever achieve profitability. If unsuccessful in addressing these risks, the business will fail and investors could lose all of their investment in the company.

Regulatory risks include the possible delays in getting regulatory approval to the transactions that senior management and the Board of Directors believe to be in the Company’s best interest, increased fees for statutory filings, and the introduction of increasingly more complex reporting requirements which must be complied with in order to maintain our public company position.

12


Rouge Resources Ltd.
Management Discussion and Analysis
Year Ended January 31, 2015

Cautionary note regarding forward-looking statements
This Management Discussion and Analysis may contain certain “forward-looking statements”, as defined in the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation, relating to the proposed use of proceeds. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts; they are generally, but not always, identified by the words “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “intends,” “estimates,” ”projects,” “aims,” “potential,” “goal,” “objective,” “prospective,” and similar expressions, or that events or conditions “will,” “would,” “may,” “can,” “could” or “should” occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company’s management on the date the statements are made and they involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Consequently, there can be no assurances that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Factors that could cause future results to differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following: a change in the use of proceeds, the volatility of mineral prices, the possibility that exploration efforts will not yield economically recoverable quantities of minerals, accidents and other risks associated with mineral exploration and development operations, the risk that the Company will encounter unanticipated geological factors, the Company’s need for and ability to obtain additional financing, the possibility that the Company may not be able to secure permitting and other governmental clearances necessary to carry out the Company’s exploration and development plans, and the other risk factors discussed in greater detail in the Company’s various filings on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) with Canadian securities regulators and its filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on EDGAR (www.sec.gov). Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

13





FORM 52-109FV1

CERTIFICATE OF ANNUAL FILINGS

VENTURE ISSUER BASIC CERTIFICATE

I, Linda Smith, Chief Executive Officer for Rouge Resources Ltd., certify the following:

1.

Review: I have reviewed the annual financial statements and annual MD&A (together the “annual filings”) of Rouge Resources Ltd. (the "Issuer") for the financial year ended January 31, 2015.

   
2.

No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, for the period covered by the annual filings.

   
3.

Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual financial statements together with the other financial information included in the annual filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the annual filings.

Date: May 28, 2015

/s/ Linda Smith
_________________________________________
Linda Smith
Chief Executive Officer
Rouge Resources Ltd

 NOTE TO READER
 

In contrast to the certificate required for non-venture issuers under National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuer's Annual and Interim Filings (NI 52-109), this Venture Issuer Basic Certificate does not include representations relating to the establishment and maintenance of disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as defined in NI 52-109. In particular, the certifying officers filing this certificate are not making any representations relating to the establishment and maintenance of:

 

i)

controls and other procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

    
ii)

a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer's GAAP.

 

The issuer's certifying officers are responsible for ensuring that processes are in place to provide them with sufficient knowledge to support the representations they are making in this certificate.

 

Investors should be aware that inherent limitations on the ability of certifying officers of a venture issuer to design and implement on a cost effective basis DC&P and ICFR as defined in NI 52-109 may result in additional risks to the quality, reliability, transparency and timeliness of interim and annual filings and other reports provided under securities legislation.






FORM 52-109FV1

CERTIFICATE OF ANNUAL FILINGS

VENTURE ISSUER BASIC CERTIFICATE

I, Ronald McGregor, Chief Financial Officer for Rouge Resources Ltd., certify the following:

4.

Review: I have reviewed the annual financial statements and annual MD&A (together the “annual filings”) of Rouge Resources Ltd. (the "Issuer") for the financial year ended January 31, 2015.

   
5.

No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, for the period covered by the annual filings.

   
6.

Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual financial statements together with the other financial information included in the annual filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the annual filings.

Date: May 28, 2015

/s/ Ronald McGregor
___________________
Ronald McGregor (CPA, CA)
Chief Financial Officer
Rouge Resources Ltd

 NOTE TO READER
 

In contrast to the certificate required for non-venture issuers under National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuer's Annual and Interim Filings (NI 52-109), this Venture Issuer Basic Certificate does not include representations relating to the establishment and maintenance of disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as defined in NI 52-109. In particular, the certifying officers filing this certificate are not making any representations relating to the establishment and maintenance of:

 

i)

controls and other procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

    
ii)

a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer's GAAP.

 

The issuer's certifying officers are responsible for ensuring that processes are in place to provide them with sufficient knowledge to support the representations they are making in this certificate.

 

Investors should be aware that inherent limitations on the ability of certifying officers of a venture issuer to design and implement on a cost effective basis DC&P and ICFR as defined in NI 52-109 may result in additional risks to the quality, reliability, transparency and timeliness of interim and annual filings and other reports provided under securities legislation.



Fiore Cannabais (CE) (USOTC:FIORF)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2024 to Jun 2024 Click Here for more Fiore Cannabais (CE) Charts.
Fiore Cannabais (CE) (USOTC:FIORF)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2023 to Jun 2024 Click Here for more Fiore Cannabais (CE) Charts.