Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s
classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned
issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No
x
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check
mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes ☐ No
x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days. Yes
x
No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically
and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule
405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☐ No
x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated
filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer” and “accelerated
filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer ☐ Accelerated filer ☐ Non-accelerated
filer
x
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant
has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
If “Other” has been checked in the previous question,
indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. Item 17 ☐ Item 18 ☐
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Yes ☐ No
x
The Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, encourages companies to disclose
forward-looking information so that investors can better understand a company’s future prospects and make informed investment
decisions. Except for the historical information contained in this annual report on Form 20-F, the statements contained in this
annual report are “forward-looking statements” which reflect our current view with respect to future events and financial
results.
Words such as “may,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expects,”
“projects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes” and words and terms of similar substance
used in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance, identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements represent management’s present judgment regarding future events and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. These risks include,
but are not limited to, risks and uncertainties regarding our research and development activities, our ability to conduct clinical
trials of our product candidates and the results of such trials, as well as risks and uncertainties relating to litigation, government
regulation, economic conditions, markets, products, competition, intellectual property, services and prices, key employees, future
capital needs, dependence on third parties and other factors. Please also see the discussion of risks and uncertainties under “Risk
Factors” contained in Item 3.D. of this Annual Report.
In light of these assumptions, risks and uncertainties, the results and events discussed
in the forward-looking statements contained in this annual report might not occur. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance
on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this annual report. We are not under any obligation, and
we expressly disclaim any obligation, to update or alter any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information,
future events or otherwise. All subsequent forward-looking statements attributable to us or to any person acting on our behalf
are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this document.
PART I
ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS
Not applicable.
ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
Not applicable.
ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION
3.A. Selected Financial Data
The following summary consolidated financial data for the years ended December 31, 2016
and 2015, six-months ended December 31, 2014, and years ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 are derived from the audited consolidated
financial statements of Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards
issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IFRS”) included elsewhere in this annual report on Form 20-F.
The summary consolidated financial data for the year ended December 31, 2014 and six-months ended December 31, 2013 are derived
from the unaudited consolidated financial information of Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd which is not included in this annual
report on Form 20-F.
Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected
for any other future period. Unless otherwise specified, all amounts are presented in Australian Dollars (AUD).
You should read the selected consolidated financial data set forth below in conjunction
with Item 5, “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and our audited consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto included elsewhere in this annual report.
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Statement of operations data:
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Six-Months Ended
December 31
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
v%
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
(Unaudited)
|
|
v%
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
(Unaudited)
|
|
v%
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
v%
|
Revenues
|
|
|
19,049
|
|
|
|
13,170
|
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
13,170
|
|
|
|
8,361
|
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
|
|
3,663
|
|
|
|
2,843
|
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
7,543
|
|
|
|
9,538
|
|
|
|
(21
|
%)
|
Other Income
|
|
|
916
|
|
|
|
6,725
|
|
|
|
(86
|
%)
|
|
|
6,725
|
|
|
|
5,615
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
4,347
|
|
|
|
980
|
|
|
|
344
|
%
|
|
|
2,248
|
|
|
|
2,203
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(41,647
|
)
|
|
|
(33,630
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
%)
|
|
|
(33,630
|
)
|
|
|
(25,338
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
%)
|
|
|
(9,436
|
)
|
|
|
(8,241
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
%)
|
|
|
(24,144
|
)
|
|
|
(15,892
|
)
|
|
|
(52
|
%)
|
Income/(loss) before income tax (expense)/benefit
|
|
|
(21,682
|
)
|
|
|
(13,735
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
%)
|
|
|
(13,735
|
)
|
|
|
(11,363
|
)
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
(1,426
|
)
|
|
|
(4,418
|
)
|
|
|
67
|
%
|
|
|
(14,353
|
)
|
|
|
(4,151
|
)
|
|
|
(246
|
%)
|
Income tax (expense)/benefit
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(350
|
%)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2,983
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
%)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,980
|
)
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
|
(543
|
%)
|
(Loss)/income for the period
|
|
|
(21,691
|
)
|
|
|
(13,737
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
%)
|
|
|
(13,737
|
)
|
|
|
(14,345
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
%)
|
|
|
(1,428
|
)
|
|
|
(4,418
|
)
|
|
|
67
|
%
|
|
|
(17,333
|
)
|
|
|
(3,478
|
)
|
|
|
(398
|
%)
|
Other comprehensive income/(loss) for the period, net of tax
|
|
|
(728
|
)
|
|
|
(1,630
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
%)
|
|
|
(1,630
|
)
|
|
|
(1,272
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
|
(1,434
|
)
|
|
|
(679
|
)
|
|
|
111
|
%
|
|
|
(517
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
1,513
|
%
|
Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the period
|
|
|
(22,419
|
)
|
|
|
(15,367
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
%)
|
|
|
(15,367
|
)
|
|
|
(15,617
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
%)
|
|
|
(2,862
|
)
|
|
|
(5,097
|
)
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
|
(17,851
|
)
|
|
|
(3,510
|
)
|
|
|
(413
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
AUD$
|
|
|
|
AUD$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AUD$
|
|
|
|
AUD$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AUD$
|
|
|
|
AUD$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AUD$
|
|
|
|
AUD$
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
(1.37
|
)
|
|
|
(1.03
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.03
|
)
|
|
|
(1.32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
(0.59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.18
|
)
|
|
|
(0.46
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
15,809,277
|
|
|
|
13,283,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,283,722
|
|
|
|
10,866,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,283,722
|
|
|
|
7,518,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,960,723
|
|
|
|
7,518,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
|
(1)
|
As noted above, all share, per share and related information has been retroactively adjusted, where applicable, to reflect the impact of the ten-for-one consolidation of our shares, which had the effect of a reverse share split, that we effected on April 28, 2014.
|
Certain amounts may reflect rounding adjustments.
Balance sheet data:
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
At December 31,
2016
|
|
At December 31,
2015
|
|
At December 31,
2014
|
|
At June 30,
2014
|
|
At June 30,
2013
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
7,115
|
|
|
|
5,667
|
|
|
|
15,819
|
|
|
|
20,804
|
|
|
|
860
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
47,579
|
|
|
|
46,209
|
|
|
|
48,240
|
|
|
|
47,744
|
|
|
|
31,563
|
|
Borrowings, including current portion
|
|
|
29,842
|
|
|
|
17,476
|
|
|
|
4,590
|
|
|
|
4,287
|
|
|
|
20,200
|
|
Ordinary Shares
|
|
|
63,522
|
|
|
|
55,343
|
|
|
|
55,343
|
|
|
|
55,343
|
|
|
|
3,104
|
|
Total Equity
|
|
|
8,064
|
|
|
|
20,255
|
|
|
|
33,913
|
|
|
|
36,776
|
|
|
|
2,388
|
|
Certain amounts may reflect rounding adjustments.
Exchange Rates
The following table shows, for the years and dates indicated, certain
information concerning the rate of exchange of U.S. dollars per Australian dollars based on using the Reserve Bank of Australia
rate (the “RBA rate”). The exchange rate in effect on March 29, 2017, as per the RBA was AUD 1.00 = $0.7644.
Month
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
Through March 29, 2017
|
|
|
0.7724
|
|
|
|
0.7514
|
|
February 2017
|
|
|
0.7717
|
|
|
|
0.7566
|
|
January 2017
|
|
|
0.7576
|
|
|
|
0.7234
|
|
December 2016
|
|
|
0.7493
|
|
|
|
0.7202
|
|
November 2016
|
|
|
0.7700
|
|
|
|
0.7324
|
|
October 2016
|
|
|
0.7683
|
|
|
|
0.7537
|
|
September 2016
|
|
|
0.7698
|
|
|
|
0.7469
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
($ per AUD)
|
Period End
|
Average(1)
|
Low
|
High
|
2016
|
|
|
0.7236
|
0.7451
|
0.6867
|
0.7812
|
2015
|
|
|
0.7306
|
0.7576
|
0.6924
|
0.8244
|
2014
|
|
|
0.8202
|
0.9069
|
0.8140
|
0.9458
|
Year ended June 30,
($ per AUD)
|
2014
|
|
|
0.9420
|
0.9182
|
0.8716
|
0.9651
|
2013
|
|
|
0.9275
|
1.0271
|
0.9202
|
1.0593
|
6-month Period ended December 31,
($ per AUD)
|
|
|
|
|
2014
|
0.8202
|
0.8821
|
0.8140
|
0.9458
|
2013
|
0.8948
|
0.9226
|
0.8836
|
0.9672
|
|
(1)
|
Represents the average of the exchange rates on the last day of each month during the year.
|
3.B. Capitalization and Indebtedness
Not applicable.
3.C. Reason for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
3.D. Risk Factors
Our business faces significant risks. You should carefully consider the risks described
below, as well as the other information contained in this annual report, including our financial statements and related notes.
If any of the following risks, as well as other risks and uncertainties that are not yet identified or that we currently think
are immaterial, occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
In that event, the trading price of our ordinary shares could decline, and you may lose part or all of your investment.
Risks Related to Our Business
We have incurred a loss for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2014, the six-month
period ended December 31, 2014, the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2016. If we do not increase our revenues
and/or reduce our costs, we will continue to incur losses and may be reliant upon external capital in order to continue to fund
our operations. Failure to obtain this necessary capital when needed on acceptable terms, or at all, could force us to delay, limit,
reduce or terminate our product development, other operations or commercialization efforts.
In order to access global revenue opportunities and fund the investment in our product
candidate pipeline, we divested certain legacy products and in part used the proceeds therefrom, along with debt financing and
private placements, to expand our operating footprint, including the construction of our U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or
FDA, inspected sterile manufacturing facility in Sydney, Australia. In addition, we have invested in the establishment of a U.S.
sales and marketing presence and we have increased our research and development investment in our pipeline products. As a result
of the divestiture and our investments in major growth assets, our revenues increased, our expenses increased and we have incurred
losses. In order to become profitable, we will need to either reduce our costs and/or increase our revenues, including our reproductive
hormones products and companion products in the U.S. and other markets. If we do not sufficiently reduce our costs and/or increase
our revenues, then we will continue to incur losses and may need to seek additional funds through public or private equity or debt
financings or other sources, such as strategic collaborations. Such financings may result in dilution to shareholders, imposition
of debt covenants and repayment obligations, or other restrictions that may affect our business. In addition, we may seek additional
capital due to favorable market conditions or strategic considerations even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current
or future operating plans. Additional funds may not be available when we need them on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all.
If we are unable to access additional capital as required, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our operations,
research and development activities and commercialization efforts.
Sales of our existing reproductive hormones and osteoarthritis, or OA, products
may decline as a result of increased competition and other market factors.
At least in the near term, we are depending on sales of our reproductive hormone products,
our osteoarthritis products, and contract manufacturing for revenues and profits. All three product portfolios can be susceptible
to pricing and competitive pressures.
In the Middle East, which accounted for approximately 31%, 9% and 6% of our revenues
for the six-months ended December 31, 2014 and fiscal years 2015 and 2016, respectively, and in Canada, which accounted for approximately
0%, 6% and 0% of our revenues for six-months ended December 31, 2014, and fiscal years 2015, and 2016 respectively, we are dependent
upon distribution partners to market and sell our reproductive hormone products. In the Middle East, Canada, Australia and New
Zealand, we have a relatively mature product offering in relatively mature markets. In those markets where we have no direct sales
presence (Middle East and Canada), we have a limited ability to directly grow the market for our products. As a result of these
competitive market pressures, we may see a decline in market share and, as a result, a decline in our revenue.
The market for our OA products is highly competitive. We currently sell Zydax in Australia
and Glyde in Australia and the U.S., but both of these markets have multiple competitive offerings, especially in the nutraceutical
segment in which Glyde operates.
Because the nutraceutical segment is less regulated than
pharmaceuticals, competitors can advertise various claims to sell their products which can cause confusion in the market about
individual product comparisons. Although all products which claim to treat or cure a disease or condition (including nutraceuticals)
are required to be registered with the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority, or APVMA, in practice there are
a number of products which are not, especially in the U.S. where nutraceuticals are not specifically regulated by the FDA. As
such, some competitors may make unjustified claims that to the untrained recipient or consumer seem believable. Thus competition
in this product category in particular manifests as both other technologies/drugs but also a multitude of other competitive offerings
that may not have to act to the same standard as we do. As OA is seen as a lucrative market, there is a strong attraction for
new competitors to enter that market. While we have been able to grow our sales for our OA products in most years, we may not
be able to continue to do so and we may see our existing revenues of Zydax and Glyde decline in future years due to increased
competition.
Zydax, our most advanced product candidate, may take longer to, or may never, receive
regulatory approval in the U.S., Europe or in any other significant market.
Our business model calls for growth, at least in part from the approval of our product
candidates, including Zydax for the treatment of OA in dogs. In order to obtain approval of Zydax for the treatment of OA in dogs,
we are required to submit to the FDA’s Center for Veterinary Medicine, or CVM, three of the major sections of our dossier
including Safety, Efficacy, and Chemistry and Manufacturing Controls, or CMC. We have requested a waiver for the Environmental
Assessment. The Safety section has been completed, submitted and approved by the CVM. We must now fulfill the requirements of the
two remaining sections. In particular we must successfully complete a pivotal efficacy study and submit a Drug Master File, or
DMF, (among other components). Both of these undertakings bear risk of not being successful or may take longer than we currently
anticipate and/or cost more than projected. It may also be that the FDA or the European Medicines Agency, or EMA, or both will
fail to grant approval.
We will require partners to distribute and market our products in those markets
where we do not have or do not expect to have a direct presence.
We currently have the capability to market companion animal and production animal drugs
in those markets where we have an existing presence, but we are reliant on partner organizations to distribute and market our products,
including Zydax for dogs, in those markets where we do not currently have a presence or we do not expect to establish a presence.
Prior to obtaining approval of Zydax for dogs in the EU, we would need to identify a distribution strategy including potentially
appointing a partner in those markets where we are unrepresented. While we are aware of a large number of organizations that could
likely be effective in distributing and marketing our products, we have not appointed a specific partner. Failure to negotiate
a marketing agreement with a partner organization may result in a delay in the launch of Zydax upon approval.
The loss of products or delays in product availability from our manufacturing facility
could substantially harm our business.
We currently manufacture all of our products in our manufacturing facility located in
Sydney, Australia. This facility currently has approximately 64% available capacity, is approved by multiple regulators, and has
been inspected by the FDA. Despite the current operations of this facility being compliant and meeting our forecasted demands for
several years to come, there can be no assurance that our manufacturing facility will be able to meet our supply obligations when
needed. We face the following risks:
●
|
Our manufacturing facility is subject to ongoing, periodic, unannounced inspection by regulatory authorities, including the FDA, the APVMA, Health Canada and other agencies for compliance with strictly enforced regulations. Violations could potentially lead to interruptions in our supply that could lead to lost sales to competitive products that are more readily available.
|
|
|
●
|
We may not be able to control or adequately monitor the quality of
our products. Poor quality products could damage our reputation with our customers or subject us to potential legal liability
toward such customers.
|
We have no timely ability to replace our current manufacturing capabilities.
If our manufacturing facility suffers any type of prolonged interruption, whether caused
by regulator action, equipment failure, critical facility services (such as water purification, clean steam generation or building
management and monitoring system), fire, natural disaster or any other event that causes the cessation of manufacturing activities,
we would be exposed to long-term loss of sales and profits. There are limited facilities which are capable of contract manufacturing
some of our products and product candidates. For example, our estroPLAN product contains a highly potent active ingredient and
hence requires specific containment capabilities. In addition, if we were able to find a contract manufacturer capable of supplying
our needs, it takes considerable time to launch the manufacture of any product and is costly. Replacement of our current manufacturing
capabilities will have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
The Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient, or API, for all our products and product
candidates is supplied by contract manufacturers. If these third party suppliers discontinue our supply relationship or are unable
to supply our needs on a timely basis or on terms and conditions acceptable to us, we may experience disruption to the continuation
of our sales.
We do not manufacture any of the API for any of our products or product candidates and
we are therefore entirely dependent upon contract manufacturers to supply us with our API requirements. Our third party suppliers
may become unable to supply us with stock that meets our specifications or within our required delivery timelines. We may also
be subject to capacity constraints of our suppliers which may disrupt our ability to efficiently manufacture our products. If these
or any other such risks occur, our ability to timely and efficiently manufacture our products will be delayed, or our costs may
increase, including with respect to additional expenses resulting from mitigation such as rush charges and air freight, and our
business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.
Some of our product candidates require our contract manufacturers to develop manufacturing
processes for development of our API. These processes may result in manufacturing delays and increased costs.
For some of our product candidates there is likely to be no current supplier of the API
needed given the proprietary nature of their chemical structure and formulation. This will therefore require us to engage the services
of a contract API supplier. These suppliers may be difficult to identify and they may not have the requisite experience to specifically
synthesize our APIs or the ability to develop a robust and reliable manufacturing process that is scalable for commercial purposes.
The costs associated with this process could be higher than we expect and we may be required to expend funds at our risk and with
no certainty of success. Due to some of our pipeline projects being early stage, we also have no specific indication of what the
cost will be to supply the API at commercial scale and as a result our expected cost of goods may be higher than we anticipate
which may decrease our potential profits. In addition to unforeseen cost increases of development and supply, we may experience
delays in gaining approval as a result of the API development process which could delay the time to which we could potentially
derive revenues from our pipeline product candidates.
We have supply agreements in place for the API contained in our estroPLAN®
and GONAbreed® products. If these contractual arrangements terminate or are otherwise not renewed, our ability to timely acquire
the necessary API will be impaired and may result in a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
We have signed long-term supply agreements for the API contained in our estroPLAN and
GONAbreed products. The estroPLAN API is supplied by Piramal Healthcare (UK) Ltd. under a supply agreement that has one year remaining
on the current renewal term, and GONAbreed is supplied by Bachem A.G. in Switzerland under an agreement that has about two years
remaining of the initial term. We have previously renewed supply contracts with both these parties but in the event that these
arrangements are not renewed or otherwise terminated, it may take us considerable time to identify a new supplier and have the
FDA, or other regulatory bodies, approve such a supplier. As a result, we may be precluded from selling our reproductive hormone
products in some or all of our currently approved or future markets until such a time that an approved manufacturer is able to
supply us with API. Due to estroPLAN and GONAbreed currently being the source of the majority of our revenues, representing AUD$3.0
million for the six months ended December 31, 2014, AUD $11.1 million in fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and AUD $13.8 million
in fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, until such time as we have additional products approved, any delay in the supply of the
API for these products would have a significant impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We currently utilize third party providers to undertake certain aspects of our
R&D operations. If there is an interruption in such service or if our third party researchers are unable to adequately fulfill
our research needs, we may experience delays in advancing our pipeline of product candidates.
For some aspects of our product development we utilize third party service providers.
In particular for primary research, including formulation development we have partnered with various academic institutions. These
facilities also undertake certain studies for us into the mode of action of some of our product candidates. We also utilize contract
research organizations, or CROs, to undertake our target animal safety studies and other aspects of the safety dossier including
pharmacokinetics studies and concomitant use safety studies. All of these service providers are selected based on capability and
resources but there is no guarantee or certainty that they can perform to the level they purport. If we experience an interruption
in these relationships or if our CROs are unable to deliver the outcomes they asserted they could, we may suffer delays to our
development projects and/or increased expenditures.
We utilize marketing partners in many of our markets and as a result our sales
performance is largely dependent on the performance of these local partners.
We currently sell our companion animal and production animal drugs in 11 countries. We
use local marketing partners to sell our reproductive hormones in Canada, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Israel and
Kenya. In all situations we are entirely dependent on the capabilities and business practices of our partners to successfully market
and sell our drugs. We typically have a certain level of engagement with our partners and do offer promotional and clinical science
capabilities to our partners but for daily operations we are still reliant on them to conduct business on our behalf. If these
partners do not perform we have a limited ability to rectify the issue as in some cases a local company must hold the registration
and it can be difficult to take back the marketing rights given local laws can heavily favor and protect local businesses such
as in the Middle East. Similarly, if we do elect to take back our products and either market them in our own right or appoint new
marketing and distribution partners, the incumbent may seek to undertake punitive actions and we would have limited ability to
stop them. Even if we took legal action, in many countries the court systems can be highly complex and inefficient which may cause
us to expend resources and funds on rectifying the situation and in some cases the resolution was not necessarily our desired outcome.
Our operating results may fluctuate due to factors outside of management’s
control.
Our operating results may significantly fluctuate, and you should not rely on them as
an indication of our future results. Our future net sales and results of operations may significantly fluctuate due to a combination
of factors, many of which are outside of management’s control. The most important of these factors include, but are not limited
to:
●
|
changes in customer demands;
|
●
|
fluctuations in commodity prices;
|
●
|
the impact of general economic trends on our business;
|
●
|
currency fluctuations;
|
●
|
increases in reserves for bad debts; and
|
●
|
increases in competition.
|
We may be unable to reduce operating expenses quickly enough to offset any unexpected
shortfall in net sales. If we have a shortfall in net sales without a corresponding reduction to our expenses, operating results
may suffer. Our operating results for any particular period may not be indicative of future operating results.
Our market is highly competitive, and failure to compete successfully could have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The sale and distribution of animal health products is highly competitive, continually
evolving and subject to technological change. We compete directly with both geographically diverse and regional animal health product
manufacturers, as well as companies that promote over-the-counter drugs directly to animal owners and veterinarians. Additionally,
certain drug product manufacturers currently compete through the direct marketing of products, and other manufacturers may decide
to do so in the future. We compete with numerous manufacturers and distributors based on customer relationships, service and delivery,
product selection, price and e-commerce capabilities. In the U.S., we currently utilize two primary third-party distributors, MWI
Veterinary Supply, Inc and Animal Health International, Inc. to provide logistics services. These two companies currently provide
logistics services to the majority of ship-to livestock producer and large animal veterinary clinic locations. As a result of recent
mergers and acquisitions, these two companies may exert market influence across a large cross-section of livestock producers and
veterinary clinics. They may be able to use this influence to position our competitors’ products rather than our products.
Some of our competitors have greater financial and other resources than we do. Many of our competitors have comparable product
lines or distribution strategies that directly compete with ours. Our potential competitors include large animal health companies,
such as Zoetis, Inc.; Merck Animal Health, the animal health division of Merck & Co., Inc.; Elanco, the animal health division
of Eli Lilly and Company; Bayer Animal Health, the animal health division of Bayer AG; Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health, the
animal health division of Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH; Virbac Group; Ceva Animal Health; Vetoquinol and Dechra Pharmaceuticals PLC.
We are also aware of several smaller early stage companies that are developing products for use in the animal health market. If
we do not compete successfully against these organizations, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Our pipeline products, other than Zydax in the U.S. and EU, are all early stage
development projects and there is no clinical data to support their likelihood of success.
A significant component of our future sales growth is dependent upon the successful approval
and commercialization of our pipeline product candidates to achieve substantial revenue and profit uplift. All of our pipeline
opportunities including PAR121, PAR122, are early stage compounds in pilot stage. None of them have substantive clinical efficacy
or safety data in our targeted animal species and these compounds have not had a definitive formulation developed. The clinical
studies completed to date for PAR121 and PAR122 may not be indicative of efficacy when studied under more rigorous and robust experimental
conditions. As a result, we may not be able to transform the product concept into a feasible drug product that can be administered
in-vivo or manufactured at scale to produce a stable product. If all of our pipeline opportunities fail, we will be dependent on
our currently approved drugs to deliver revenue and profit growth and/or we will need to identify additional projects to commence.
Accordingly, we may need to raise more capital to undertake additional projects.
Multiple other companies are developing new product offerings to treat OA in dogs.
The OA market for dogs is a large and attractive market for drug companies and a multitude
of companies producing alternative therapies including nutraceuticals and over-the-counter products. There are already many competitive
offerings in the OA market. Potential new drug products include offerings from companies such as Aratana Therapeutics and Nexvet.
There is also likely to be other potential product offerings that we are not yet aware of. There may also be technologies in development
that are superior to, or obviate, the need for a disease modifying treatment such as Zydax. If such technologies came to market,
we may experience a decline in sales.
Changes in consumer preferences could adversely affect our business.
The demand for production animal health products is heavily dependent upon consumer demand
for beef and dairy products. The food industry in general is subject to changes in consumer demand, trends and preferences. Trends
within the food industry change often and our failure to anticipate, identify or react to changes could lead to, among other things,
reduced product demand and subsequent price reductions for our animal health products, which could have materially adverse effects
on our business.
Consolidation in the animal health industry may decrease our net sales and profitability.
Consolidation in the animal health industry could result in existing competitors increasing
their market share, which could give them greater pricing power and portfolio bundling opportunities and the ability to block market
access into large livestock producers and veterinary clinics thereby leading to a decrease in our net sales and profitability and
increasing the competition for our customers. Furthermore, as our current customers consolidate, they may make changes in purchase
practices and potentially result in the loss of our existing business or lower prices for our products.
Changes in distribution channels for our products could negatively impact our market
share, margins and distribution of our products.
Historically, animal owners (companion animals and production animals) have purchased
animal health pharmaceuticals through their veterinarians. This has changed substantially in recent years with large producers
now buying directly from distributors or from pharmaceutical companies themselves. Similarly for companion animal owners, there
have been changes in regulations in many countries that have allowed non-veterinary outlets to supply pharmaceuticals directly
to the public on the prescription of a veterinarian. This can have the effect of reducing the revenues for veterinary clinics that
correspondingly aim to improve their profitability by exerting pressure on pharmaceutical companies to offer them lower prices
as a means to compete against large retailers and online distributors. Legislation may come into effect in our markets that compels
a veterinarian to disclose to their clients that they can fill prescriptions through a third party. The American Veterinary Medical
Association, or AVMA, has a policy to encourage this practice.
The trend to purchase medications from non-veterinarian channels could negatively impact
our sales and marketing channel through veterinarians. Historically, we have relied upon our veterinarian sales channel to diagnose
new patients and to disseminate information about our company and products. If there is an increasing shift away from this practice,
then our ability to supply information and attract new customers could require us to undertake direct to consumer marketing activities
as an alternative selling and promotional strategy which could be expensive and potentially less effective. Any such alternatives
may have a materially adverse effect upon our financial condition and results of operations.
Consolidation of our customers could negatively affect the pricing of our products.
We rely on veterinarians as a primary point of distribution for our products. In many
countries, the typical suburban veterinary practice is owned by a veterinarian who is approaching retirement age. This has led
to the emergence of veterinary practice consolidators such as Greencross in Australia, VCA Antech in the U.S., and also the emergence
of branded, corporate style clinics such as Banfield. In addition, we have seen the emergence of large, buying groups of multiple
veterinary practices pooling their purchasing power. These large, aggregated veterinary practice groups of various descriptions
typically seek to improve their margins by causing suppliers, including pharmaceutical companies, to offer lower prices, rebates
or other forms of discounts. As a small company, we have limited ability to resist such pricing pressure which may in turn reduce
our margins and profitability or we may lose sales altogether if we cannot compete on price.
Our current indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition and ability
to fulfill our debt obligations and otherwise adversely impact our business and growth prospects.
As of December 31, 2016, we had outstanding indebtedness of approximately AUD$29.8 million.
Such remaining or any future indebtedness could have important consequences to you. For example, it could:
●
|
make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our term loan indebtedness and other current and future indebtedness;
|
●
|
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to the payment of our indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of cash to fund working capital and capital expenditures and for other general corporate purposes;
|
●
|
restrict us from making strategic acquisitions and exploiting business opportunities;
|
●
|
place us at a disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt; and
|
●
|
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate.
|
Our ability to make payments on and refinance our indebtedness, and to fund our operations,
working capital and capital expenditures, depends on our ability to generate cash in the future. We cannot assure you that our
business will generate sufficient cash flow or that future borrowings will be available to us in an amount sufficient to enable
us to pay amounts due on our indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs. If we do not generate sufficient cash flow, additional
borrowings or proceeds of asset sales are not available to us, we may not have sufficient cash to enable us to meet all of our
obligations.
In addition, the agreements governing our indebtedness include certain covenants that,
among other things, restrict our ability to incur additional indebtedness, make certain payments, sell assets, enter into certain
transactions with affiliates and create liens. Moreover, certain of these agreements require us to achieve specified EBITDA targets
and maintain specified cash balances over the life of the loan. These and other covenants in our current and future agreements
may restrict our ability to fully pursue our business strategies and adversely affect our growth prospects. Our ability to comply
with such covenants may be affected by changes in our operating and financial performance, changes in general business and economic
conditions, adverse regulatory developments or other events beyond our control. The breach of any of these covenants could result
in a default under our indebtedness, which could cause those and other obligations to become due and payable.
We may be subject to product liability and other claims in the ordinary course
of business.
We distribute products that are manufactured exclusively by us. As a result, we face
the risk of product liability and other claims in the ordinary course of business, including complaints regarding marketing materials
and promotional claims that we make about our products. We maintain product liability insurance policies; however, our ability
to recover under the policies is subject to the terms of such arrangements and the financial viability of the insurers. We do not,
however, maintain policies specifically insuring against clinical trial liability. We cannot assure you that our insurance coverage
will be available or sufficient in any future cases brought against us.
Our products may cause injury or death to an animal or human and expose us to significant
compensation claims.
Our products are designed and intended to be both efficacious and safe for the animals
in which treatments are targeted. We cannot have any degree of certainty as to how our products will affect all animals. Our drugs
may be used off-label and without our knowledge. In either case, an animal may suffer minor, major or catastrophic side-effects
from our drugs. As a result of such events, we may be exposed to product liability claims from animal owners and potentially from
veterinarians. Some of our products may be potentially dangerous to human beings. For example, estroPLAN (as with all prostaglandin
F
2α
, or PG, drugs) is known to cause abortive effects on pregnant women, potential respiratory effects in humans,
and is easily and rapidly absorbed through the skin. Because estroPLAN is administered in a field setting, the potential for product
container breakage and inadvertent human contact may occur. Likewise, our personnel who manufacture estroPLAN or who utilize it
in a clinical trial setting may be exposed to the risks of estroPLAN and its active ingredients. While we label our products and
take precautionary steps during the manufacturing process including educating our staff to the potentially harmful effects, we
cannot prevent all possible situations that may cause human exposure to estroPLAN. We currently do not know the user-safety profile
of our pipeline drugs and do not know what the animal safety profile will be. Even if we undertake animal safety and user safety
studies, we may not know the full safety profile of a drug for many years after gaining approval. As a result, we may be exposed
to both patent and latent compensation claims for many years to come, the costs of which could be significant.
Some of our products are hormones, and their use may be seen as controversial.
Our reproductive hormones are exact replicas of naturally occurring peptides or analogues
of naturally occurring prostaglandins and maybe commonly referred to as hormones. There is an increased public sensitivity around
the use of growth promoting hormones in production animals and increasingly foods may be labelled as “hormone free.”
While our products are not growth promoting, have an extremely short half-life and have been shown to have no residue in meat or
milk, the public may nevertheless react to the use of our products and other products in the same class of drugs and apply market
pressure to diminish or reduce the use of our products in dairy or beef cows. This could have a significant and long term impact
on the market size for our products and we would likely be impacted along with all participants in the market. This would reduce
our revenues and profits.
Loss of key personnel could adversely affect our operations.
We are currently dependent to a significant degree upon the ability and experience of
our President and Chief Executive Officer Robert Joseph and Chief Financial Officer Brad McCarthy. We currently have employment
agreements with these executives that contain non-competition restrictions following termination of employment. These senior executive
officers collectively hold 11.4% of our ordinary shares all of which is fully vested and unrestricted. As a result, our senior
staff may not have an adequate incentive to remain employed with us or continue to meaningfully grow the business. If these senior
executives were to leave, equity holders might see a devaluation of their ordinary shares because the loss of any of their experience
and knowledge which could adversely affect our ability to conduct our operations or to achieve growth through acquisitions. See
“Management.”
Many of our staff are located in Australia which has a rigorous industrial relations
statutory framework that may expose us to industrial action and governmental sanctions.
Australia has a complex industrial relations environment that is prone to significant
litigation and protections for employees both under the Australia Fair Work Act and other legislative provisions. This industrial
relations framework may expose us to industrial or strike action by our staff, and they may seek to take action under the Fair
Work Australia commission seeking to claim certain or additional entitlements. Currently we expect that our employment contracts
are compliant with all legislative provisions and provide all statutory entitlements. However, we have experienced events in the
past where current or former employees have sought to take action under various employment law provisions which has caused us to
incur significant legal fees and may have exposed us to fines and governmental sanctions. We have no certainty that such actions
may not occur in the future which would cause unexpected expenditure and consume internal resources potentially disrupting other
parts of our business.
We presently report our earnings in Australian dollars, yet the majority of revenues
are derived in U.S. dollars and to a lesser extent in Canadian and New Zealand dollars. A significant appreciation of the Australian
dollar would decrease our revenues and profits.
We are exposed to foreign currency fluctuations and do not maintain structured hedging
positions to protect us from currency movements. We typically utilize forward exchange contracts to convert future, known or expected
sales in U.S. dollars into Australian dollars at predetermined rates. These activities can provide some level of certainty as to
the actual exchange rate we will receive but do not ensure that we are able to convert foreign currencies into Australian dollars
at the rate that we may have expected or budgeted for. As a result we may be deleteriously impacted by significant movements in
the value of the Australian dollar. From time to time this will reduce our Australian dollar denominated corporate earnings and
may reduce the value of dividends paid in Australian dollars to investors located outside Australia.
We have limited redundancy built into our Information Technology, or IT, systems.
The continuing daily operation of our business is heavily dependent on our IT systems.
In particular we operate an Enterprise Resource Planning, or ERP, software platform (Navision®) and we maintain a typical hardware
and network architecture across our two operating premises in Sydney and Kansas City as well as connecting our remote staff across
Australia, New Zealand and the U.S. We utilize our ERP system on a daily basis to maintain our financial systems and we also utilize
it for manufacturing purposes. An interruption to the provision of this service would substantially reduce our ability to transact
sales and make payments and would interrupt our ability to manufacture and release product. We operate a typical IT infrastructure
protection and back-up system and our data can typically be reinstated rapidly; however, we currently have limited built-in hardware
redundancy capabilities and until such time as we implement a more robust system the availability of our systems could be compromised
for several weeks. Similarly, we currently have systems to prevent malicious infiltration of our hardware and data systems but
we cannot be certain of their effectiveness. Because we maintain private information about our customers including financial information
such as credit card details and their animal health records, such infiltration may expose our customers to misuse of their personal
information which could in turn expose us to legal proceedings instituted by our customers for failing to adequately protect their
information. Proceedings or investigations may also be instituted by various government bodies that are responsible for privacy
and/or data protection in certain jurisdictions which could also lead to significant fines or civil penalties.
Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property
We have limited patent protection for our products. While we have applied for and
intend to continue applying for patents, our patent applications may never be granted or, if granted, may be reduced beyond our
current expectations, which could result in no, or reduced intellectual property protections which could expose us to increased
competition and materially impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We currently have limited patent protection for all of our pipeline product candidates.
We have, or our licensing partners have, made various applications which may never result in effective patent coverage. For most
of our product candidates, there is already an existing array of prior art that may preclude us from filing or succeeding at patent
examination due to lack of inventiveness which would mean that any patents we seek may never be granted. Once we file our patent
applications it typically takes several years before our applications are granted and in that time the patent landscape can alter
significantly. The actual process of preparing patents is expensive and time consuming and prone to a significant reliance on the
skill of the patent writer. In most cases we engage legal counsel and other service providers to write our patents and we are therefore
exposed to their individual skill levels and mistake or errors or omissions that they make will potentially render our patent position
useless. Patent examiners are also prone to variability and subjectivity and the cost and time for us to prosecute our filings
is typically substantial running into many hundreds of thousands of dollars with no significant ability to predict the outcome.
Even when our patents are granted we remain exposed to other companies or individuals filing objections or challenging our patent
positions through court proceedings which would cost us a significant amount of money and internal resources to defend or to prosecute
others if we believe they are infringing our patents.
Patent applications we have filed in our major markets may not result in issued
patents and/or the patent may be challenged based on prior art.
We have filed patent applications that cover various aspects of Zydax, including composition
of matter patent and method of manufacture. Various patents have been issued in Australia and New Zealand and a number of other
countries. Additional applications are pending in multiple jurisdictions. There is a risk that our patent applications in other
jurisdictions may not be granted. In addition, competitors may seek to challenge our issued patents and may be successful. This
may lead to competitor generic copies of Zydax entering the market and we may experience a reduction in sales and profits.
If third parties claim that we infringe upon their intellectual property rights,
our operating profits could be adversely affected.
We face the risk of claims that we have infringed third parties’ intellectual property
rights, including trademarks, trade dress, and patents. Third parties may claim that our company name and logos, or the names and
logos of our proprietary branded products infringe their trademarks and/or trade dress and/or that our products infringe such third
parties’ patented animal health products.
The complexities of the technology involved in patents and associated litigation as well
as for trademarks increase the risk of business assets and management’s attention being diverted to intellectual property
litigation. Any claims of patent or other intellectual property infringement, even those without merit, could:
●
|
be expensive and time consuming to defend;
|
●
|
cause us to cease making or using products or services that incorporate the challenged intellectual property;
|
●
|
require us to redesign, reengineer, or rebrand our products or packaging, or change our company name;
|
●
|
divert management’s attention and resources; or
|
●
|
require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements in order to obtain the right to use a third party’s intellectual property.
|
We cannot assure you that our company name or any of our current or future product candidates
will not infringe existing or future patents or trademarks. Because we have not conducted a formal freedom to operate analysis
for patents related to our products, we may not be aware of patents that have already issued that a third party might assert are
infringed by one of our current or future product candidates. In addition, third parties may obtain patents in the future and claim
that use of our technologies infringes upon these patents. Because patent applications can take years to issue and may be confidential
for 18 months or more after filing, there may be applications now pending of which we are unaware and which may later result in
issued patents that we would infringe.
Any royalty or licensing agreements, if required, may not be available to us on acceptable
terms or at all. A successful claim of infringement against us could result in our being required to pay significant damages, enter
into costly license or royalty agreements, stop the sale of certain products, or change the name of our company or certain products,
any of which could have a negative impact on our operating profits and harm our future prospects.
In addition to infringement claims against us, if third parties have prepared and filed
patent applications in the U.S. that also claim technology to which we have rights, we may have to participate in interference
proceedings in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, or PTO to determine the priority of invention. Third parties may also attempt
to initiate re-examination, post grant review or
inter partes
review of our patents in the U.S. PTO. We may also become
involved in similar opposition proceedings in the European Patent Office or similar offices in other jurisdictions regarding our
intellectual property rights with respect to our products and technology.
We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights throughout the world.
Filing, prosecuting and defending patents on product candidates throughout the world
is very expensive. Competitors may use our technologies in jurisdictions where we have not obtained patent protection to develop
their own products and, further, may export otherwise infringing products to territories where we have patent protection, but where
enforcement is not as strong as that in the U.S. These products may compete with our products in jurisdictions where we do not
have any issued or licensed patents and our patent claims or other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient
to prevent them from so competing.
Our intellectual property rights may be inadequate to protect our business.
We attempt to protect our intellectual property rights through a combination of patent,
trademark, copyright and trade secret laws, as well as third-party nondisclosure and assignment agreements. Our failure to obtain
or maintain adequate protection of our intellectual property rights for any reason could have a material adverse effect on our
business.
We rely on our trademarks, trade names and brand names to distinguish our proprietary
branded products and services from the products and services of our competitors, and have registered or applied to register many
of these trademarks. We cannot assure you that our trademark applications will be approved. Third parties may also oppose our trademark
applications, or otherwise challenge our use of the trademarks. In the event that our trademarks are successfully challenged, we
could be forced to rebrand our proprietary branded products and services, which could result in loss of brand recognition, and
could require us to devote resources to advertise and market new brands. Further, we cannot assure you that competitors will not
infringe upon our trademarks, or that we will have adequate resources to enforce our trademarks. If we are unable to maintain the
proprietary nature of our technologies, we could be materially adversely affected.
The patents we own could be challenged, invalidated or circumvented by others and may
not be of sufficient scope or strength to provide us with any meaningful protection or commercial advantage. Further, we cannot
assure you that competitors will not infringe upon our patent, or that we will have adequate resources to enforce our patent.
If we fail to comply with our obligations under our intellectual property licenses
with third parties, we could lose license rights that are essential to our business.
We are party to license agreements for our product candidates that are essential to our
business. These license agreements impose various payment and performance obligations on us. If we fail to develop PAR121 and PAR122
in accordance with the license agreement, CIMTECH Pty Ltd, or CIMTECH, may have the right to terminate the license agreement, in
which event we would no longer have the right to develop or commercialize PAR121 and PAR122. If we lose such license rights, our
business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects may be adversely affected.
We may be subject to claims that our employees, consultants or independent contractors
have wrongfully used or disclosed confidential information of third parties.
We have received confidential and proprietary information from third parties. In addition,
we employ individuals who were previously employed at other biotechnology, pharmaceutical or animal health companies. We may be
subject to claims that we or our employees, consultants or independent contractors have inadvertently or otherwise improperly used
or disclosed confidential information of these third parties or our employees’ former employers. Litigation may be necessary
to defend against these claims. Even if we are successful in defending against these claims, litigation could result in substantial
cost and be a distraction to our management and employees.
Risks Related to Governmental Regulation
Our manufacturing facility is regulated by multiple governmental bodies including
the FDA, the APVMA and Health Canada, among others. Some or all of these regulators may suspend or revoke their approval of this
facility which could substantially harm our business.
We operate a manufacturing facility that produces both sterile and non-sterile drugs.
We are currently approved to manufacture by the APVMA (which also enables us to export products to multiple other jurisdictions
including in Asia, Africa and the Middle East), the ACVM (New Zealand), Health Canada, EC-MRA (Europe) and the FDA. Recently, some
jurisdictions have changed their previous position of recognizing other health agencies/regulatory bodies. For example, in Saudi
Arabia, the newly appointed Saudi Food and Drug Authority, or SFDA, now requires specific approval under their jurisdiction and
no longer recognize the authority of the APVMA or FDA. Compliance with the various standards of multiple jurisdictions is time
consuming and expensive. Our established quality management system is currently compliant with all of the various authorities who
have jurisdiction over our product sales, however there can be no assurances that we will remain in compliance with current standards
or that standards will not be revised. If we fail to comply with regulatory standards, we may receive various actions or sanctions
against us, including warning letters, fines, suspensions of operations, the recall of our products, refusal to permit our products’
entry into foreign markets or cancellation of our manufacturing licenses and approvals. The FDA in particular has been very active
in the sterile manufacturing sector and has recently caused multiple facilities to be either shut down or to have to undertake
very expensive and time consuming recertification, which has resulted in substantial or total inability to supply products to the
market. If this were to occur, we would suffer a significant reduction in sales and profits which would adversely affect the company’s
business.
Failure to obtain regulatory approvals in foreign jurisdictions for our product
candidates would prevent us from marketing our products internationally.
In order to market any product outside of the U.S., including in the EU and many other
foreign jurisdictions, separate regulatory approvals are required. More specifically, in the EU, pet therapeutics can only be commercialized
after obtaining a Marketing Authorization, or MA. Before granting the MA, the EMA or the competent national authorities of the
member states of the EU make an assessment of the risk-benefit balance of the product on the basis of scientific criteria concerning
its quality, safety and efficacy.
The approval procedures vary among countries and can involve additional studies and testing,
and the time required to obtain approval may differ from that required to obtain FDA approval. Animal studies conducted in one
country may not be accepted by regulatory authorities in other countries. Approval by the FDA does not ensure approval by regulatory
authorities in other countries, and approval by one or more foreign regulatory authorities does not ensure approval by regulatory
authorities in other foreign countries or by the FDA. However, a failure or delay in obtaining regulatory approval in one country
may have a negative effect on the regulatory process in others. The foreign regulatory approval process may include all of the
risks associated with obtaining FDA approval. We may not be able to file for regulatory approvals, or to do so on a timely basis
and even if we do file them, we may not receive necessary approvals to commercialize our products in any market.
If approved, any of our current or future products may cause or contribute to adverse
medical events that we are required to report to the FDA and regulatory authorities in other countries and, if we fail to do so,
we could be subject to sanctions that would materially harm our business.
If we are successful in commercializing any of our current or future products, regulations
of the FDA and of the regulatory authorities in other countries require that we report certain information about adverse medical
events if those products may not have caused or contributed to those adverse events. The timing of our obligation to report would
be triggered by the date we become aware of the adverse event as well as the nature of the event. We may fail to report adverse
events we become aware of within the prescribed timeframe. We may also fail to appreciate that we have become aware of a reportable
adverse event, especially if it is not reported to us as an adverse event or if it is an adverse event that is unexpected or removed
in time from the use of our products. If we fail to comply with our reporting obligations, the FDA and regulatory authorities in
other countries could take action including criminal prosecution, the imposition of civil monetary penalties, seizure of our products,
or delay in approval or clearance of future products.
If we fail to comply with or become subject to more onerous government regulations,
our business could be adversely affected.
The animal health industry is subject to changing political and regulatory influences.
Both state and federal government agencies regulate the importation, manufacture, distribution and sale of animal health products.
We are subject to regulation, either directly or indirectly, by numerous governmental authorities, including the FDA and its analogous
U.S. state and other, non-U.S. regulatory counterparts. Some of the potentially applicable regulatory regimes include animal drug
regulations, environmental regulations, transportation regulations, labor regulations and occupational health and safety regulations.
Our contract manufacturers are independently subject to similar legal regimes. Changes in enforcement policy or the interpretation
of such regulatory programs by their relevant agencies can materially affect our business.
We strive to maintain compliance with these laws and regulations. If we are unable to
maintain or achieve compliance with these laws and regulations, we could be subject to substantial fines or other restrictions
on our ability to provide competitive distribution services, which could have an adverse impact on our financial condition.
We cannot assure you that existing laws and regulations will not be revised or that new,
more restrictive laws will not be adopted or become applicable to us or the products that we distribute. We cannot assure you that
our business and financial condition will not be materially and adversely affected by future changes in applicable laws and regulations.
Our customers may rely on government-funded programs whose discontinuance or modification
could erode the market for our products.
Some of our customers may rely, in part, on farm and agricultural subsidy programs. These
programs may provide funds used to support the purchase of the company’s products. Changes initiated by governmental authorities
in the application or terms of these programs may adversely affect our customers’ abilities to finance our products, which
could lead to an erosion of the company’s market and decreased revenues.
Our business will be materially affected if products in development are denied
necessary governmental approval
We must seek, obtain and maintain approval to market our animal health products. In the
U.S., this typically requires the filing of a New Animal Drug Application, or NADA, or an Abbreviated New Animal Drug Application,
or ANADA. The FDA’s approval of these applications requires the agency to assess the quality and quantity of evidence submitted
by the company to demonstrate its products’ safety and efficacy. The FDA is under no obligation to approve a product even
if, during discussions with us, the agency agrees to a product development plan successfully followed by us. The FDA, for example,
may determine that one of our products lacks sufficient evidence of safety or sufficient evidence of efficacy and deny approval.
In the case of a denial of approval, we can expect the value of our development efforts to be greatly reduced or, in the worst
case, lost. In addition, our revenue projections will be adversely affected by the inability to market our product.
Our business may be materially affected by governmental action or inaction in approving
the company’s products
While the FDA operates under specified reviewing timeframes for animal drug applications,
the agency may not adhere to those timeframes. Consequently, we can be exposed to delays in moving our products out of the pipeline
and into the market. Delays can occur for a variety of reasons, many of which are beyond our control. For example, the FDA may
lack adequate resources to review our submissions in a timely manner. As a further example, a study conducted by us may unexpectedly
yield data raising new questions of safety or efficacy which then must be addressed before the product can be finally reviewed.
Due to any such delay, we may experience loss of anticipated revenues and significant increases in pre-market development costs
materially affecting our business.
Development of animal health products involves an expensive and lengthy process
with an uncertain outcome, and results of earlier studies may not be predictive of future study results.
Development of animal health products is expensive and can take many years to complete,
and its outcome is inherently uncertain. To gain approval to market an animal health product for a particular species, we must
provide the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities, as applicable, with data from animal safety and effectiveness studies that adequately
demonstrate the safety and efficacy of that product in the target animal for the intended indication applied for in the NADA, product
license or other regulatory filing. Failure can occur at any time during the development process. Success in prior target animal
studies or in the treatment of human beings with a product candidate does not ensure that our target animal studies will be successful,
and the results of development efforts by other parties may not be indicative of the results of our target animal studies and other
development efforts. Product candidates in our studies may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy despite showing such results
in initial data or previous human or animal studies conducted by other parties. Even if our studies and other development efforts
are completed, the results may not be sufficient to obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates.
Once our target animal studies commence, we may experience delays in such studies and
other development efforts. In addition, we do not know whether planned studies will begin on time, need to be redesigned or be
completed on schedule, if at all. Pet therapeutics studies can be delayed or discontinued for a variety of reasons, including delay
or failure to:
●
|
complete target animal studies due to deviations from study protocol;
|
●
|
address any safety concerns that arise during the course of testing;
|
●
|
address any conflicts with new or existing laws or regulations;
|
●
|
add new study sites; or
|
●
|
manufacture sufficient quantities of formulated drug for use in studies.
|
If we experience delays in the completion or termination of any development
efforts for our product candidates, the commercial prospects of our product candidates will be harmed, and our ability to generate
product revenues from any of these product candidates will be delayed or eliminated. In addition, any delays in completing our
development efforts will increase our costs, slow down our product candidate development and approval process and jeopardize our
ability to commence product sales and generate revenues. Any of these occurrences may harm our business, financial condition and
prospects significantly. In addition, many of the factors that cause, or lead to, a delay in the commencement or completion of
our development efforts may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of our product candidates.
Our products may become the target of malicious tampering or our products may be
deemed to be adulterated due to a breakdown in the quality management system resulting in a requirement to undertake a broad product
recall.
We maintain a quality management system which is designed to assure the purity, strength
and safety of our products and that they will meet the approved specifications and as such not be deemed to be adulterated under
FDA regulations and relevant legislation in other jurisdictions. However, we may experience a breakdown in this system that may
result in either an inadvertent product contamination or adulteration or alternatively a malicious act by our own personnel or
outside individuals. As a result we may undertake voluntarily or be compelled to undertake a broad product recall which may be
required to the level of distribution or potentially to the end-user. We have a validated system in place to undertake such a product
recall but the cost of undertaking such a procedure can be significant and may include making payments to maintain good will such
as full refunds or product replacement or we may have to pay restitution or be subject to litigation which may result in punitive
damages being ordered, especially if the adulteration results in the death or disablement of an animal or person. We maintain insurance
coverage for such events but our insurers may deny our claims or the claims may exceed the limitations of our coverage which would
result in significant costs to the company. We also maintain specified levels of business continuity insurance including for loss
of profits but such insurance may not be sufficient or adequate to protect us from all foreseeable and unforeseen losses. Despite
potential financial protections we have in place, a major product adulteration incident may cause our customers to lose confidence
in our products and we may suffer irreparable harm to our corporate or product reputation and not be able to recover from such
an event.
We are subject to environmental regulation and environmental compliance expenditures.
We are subject to environmental, health and safety laws and regulations concerning, among
other things, air and wastewater discharges, the generation, handling, storage, transportation and disposal of hazardous waste
and toxic substances. Pursuant to some of these laws and regulations, we are required to obtain permits from governmental authorities
for certain operations. We incur costs to comply with such laws, regulations and permits, and we cannot assure you that we have
been or will be at all times in complete compliance with such laws, regulations and permits. If we violate or fail to comply with
these laws, regulations or permits, we could be fined or otherwise sanctioned by regulators. We could also be responsible for costs
incurred relating to contamination at our third party waste disposal sites or relating to damages incurred as a result of human
exposure to such substances or other environmental damage caused by our operations or our disposal of waste.
Environmental, health and safety laws and regulations are complex, change frequently
and have tended to become more stringent over time. We monitor our ongoing costs associated with these laws and regulations. We
believe that in the ordinary course of business, changes in these laws and regulations would be brought to our attention. However,
we cannot assure you that environmental, health and safety laws will not change materially, that we would be able to effectively
identify such changes or that our costs and liabilities relating to these current and future laws will not adversely affect our
business or profitability.
We are subject to the U.K. Bribery Act, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
and other anti-corruption laws. If we fail to comply with these laws, we could be subject to civil or criminal penalties, other
remedial measures, and legal expenses, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our operations are subject to anti-corruption laws, including the U.K. Bribery Act 2010,
or Bribery Act, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or FCPA, and other anti-corruption laws that apply in countries where we
do business. We and our commercial partners operate in a number of jurisdictions that pose a high risk of potential Bribery Act
or FCPA violations, and we participate in collaborations and relationships with third parties whose actions could potentially subject
us to liability under the Bribery Act, FCPA or local anti-corruption laws. Compliance with the FCPA is expensive and difficult,
particularly in countries in which corruption is a recognized problem. Previously, we had not implemented a comprehensive anti-corruption
policy. As a result of the recent and expected future growth of our business, particularly with respect to our international sales,
we plan to establish an anti-corruption policy designed to prevent violation of applicable anti-corruption laws.
There is no assurance that we will be completely effective in ensuring our compliance
with all applicable anti-corruption laws, including the Bribery Act, the FCPA or other legal requirements. If we are not in compliance
with the Bribery Act, the FCPA and other anti-corruption laws, we may be subject to criminal and civil penalties, disgorgement
and other sanctions and remedial measures, and legal expenses, which could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition,
results of operations and liquidity. Likewise, any investigation of any potential violations of the Bribery Act, the FCPA, other
anti-corruption laws or Trade Control laws by U.K., U.S. or other authorities could also have an adverse impact on our reputation,
our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We are subject to export control laws, customs laws, sanctions laws and other laws
governing our operations, including economic and trade sanctions administered and enforced by the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s
Office of Foreign Assets Control. If we fail to comply with these laws, we could be subject to civil or criminal penalties, other
remedial measures, and legal expenses, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We are subject to laws and regulations governing our international operations, including
laws and regulations administered by the governments of the U.S. and Australia and authorities in the European Union, including
applicable export control regulations, economic sanctions on countries and persons, and customs requirements, collectively referred
to as the Trade Control laws.
If our U.S. subsidiaries sell to distributors that we know are reselling products to
the targeted foreign countries, entities and individuals identified by OFAC, we could be subject to enforcement actions. Previously,
we had not implemented a comprehensive Trade Control policy.
If we are not in compliance with the Trade Control laws, we may be subject to criminal
and civil penalties, disgorgement and other sanctions and remedial measures, and legal expenses, which could have an adverse impact
on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. Likewise, any investigation of any potential violations
of the Trade Control law by U.S. or other authorities could also have an adverse impact on our reputation, our business, results
of operations and financial condition.
Legislative or regulatory reforms with respect to pet therapeutics may make it
more difficult and costly for us to obtain regulatory clearance or approval of any of our current or future product candidates
and to produce, market, and distribute our products after clearance or approval is obtained.
From time to time, legislation is drafted and introduced in the U.S. Congress that could
significantly change the statutory provisions governing the testing, regulatory clearance or approval, manufacture, and marketing
of regulated products. In addition, the FDA regulations and guidance are often revised or reinterpreted by the FDA in ways that
may significantly affect our business and our products. Similar changes in laws or regulations can occur in other countries. Any
new regulations or revisions or reinterpretations of existing regulations in the U.S. or in other countries may impose additional
costs or lengthen review times of any of our current or future product candidates. We cannot determine what effect changes in regulations,
statutes, legal interpretation or policies, when and if promulgated, enacted or adopted may have on our business in the future.
Such changes could, among other things, require:
●
|
changes to manufacturing methods;
|
●
|
recall, replacement, or discontinuance of certain products; and
|
●
|
additional record keeping.
|
Each of these would likely entail substantial time and cost and could materially harm
our financial results. In addition, delays in receipt of or failure to receive regulatory clearances or approvals for any future
products would harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
As a public reporting company, we are required, among other obligations, to maintain
effective internal control over financial reporting suitable to prepare our publicly reported financial statements in a timely
and accurate manner.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that public companies maintain effective
internal controls for financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. We are required, under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act, to furnish a report by management on, among other things, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.
This assessment is required to include disclosure of any material weaknesses identified by our management in our internal control
over financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial
reporting that results in more than a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of annual or interim financial statements
will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act also generally requires an attestation
from our independent registered public accounting firm on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. However,
during the year ended December 31, 2016 we remained an emerging growth company as defined in the JOBS Act, as such we took advantage
of the exemption permitting us not to comply with the independent registered public accounting firm attestation requirement.
Any failure to maintain internal control over our financial reporting could severely
inhibit our ability to accurately report our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. If we are unable to conclude
that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, or if we have a material weakness or significant deficiency in
our internal control over financial reporting, we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial
reports, the market price of our ordinary shares could decline, and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by regulatory
authorities . Failure to remedy any material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, or to implement or
maintain other effective control systems required of public companies, could also restrict our future access to the capital markets.
We receive R&D tax incentives from the Australia Taxation Office (ATO). Changes
in our eligibility for this program or tax reform in Australia could affect the amount of funding received from the ATO.
We receive tax credits from the ATO related to cash spent on development and research
and development expenditures. The amounts received or recognized as receivable for the year ended December 31, 2016, December 31,
2015, the six-month period ended December 31, 2014, and the year ended June 30, 2014 were approximately $3.3 million, $3.8 million,
$2.6 million and $0.9 million, respectively. If we fail to meet certain eligibility requirements under these incentives or the
ATO discontinues these incentives, we may not receive such funding in the future.
Risks Related to the Ordinary Shares, the Offering and Our Capital Structure
Our ordinary shares are currently quoted only on the OTC Pink®
Open Market marketplace, which may have an unfavorable impact on our stock price and liquidity.
Parnell lost its “foreign private issuer,” status as
of December 31, 2016 and on December 21, 2016, the Company filed a Form 25, Notification of Removal from Listing and/or Registration
under Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and NASDAQ on December 21, 2016.
The NASDAQ delisting became effective on December 31, 2016 and trading on the NASDAQ Global market continued up until this date.
The Company also filed a Form 15, Notice of Termination of Registration or Suspension of Duty to File, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission to terminate its reporting obligations under the Exchange Act. After delisting from the NASDAQ, the Company
ordinary shares began being quoted on the OTC Pink® Open Market, a centralized electronic quotation service for over-the-counter
securities, which is a significantly more limited market than the New York Stock Exchange or the NASDAQ Stock Market. The quotation
of our ordinary shares on the OTC Pink® Open Market may result in a less liquid market available for existing and potential
stockholders to trade our ordinary shares which in turn could depress the trading price of our ordinary shares and could reduce
the available to raise capital in the future.
In addition, our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting
and “short-swing” profit recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules under the Exchange Act
with respect to their purchases and sales of our ordinary shares. Moreover, we are no longer required to file periodic reports
and financial statements with the SEC. In addition, we are not required to comply with Regulation FD, which restricts the selective
disclosure of material information. As a result of this classification there may be less publicly available information concerning
us than there is for U.S. public companies.
Our directors and certain significant shareholders exercise significant control
over us.
Our directors and significant shareholders, including Alan Bell, Robert Joseph and Brad
McCarthy, collectively control approximately 40.2% of our outstanding ordinary shares. As a result, these shareholders are able
to influence our management and affairs and all matters requiring shareholder approval in ways that may not align with your interest
as a shareholder, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. This concentration of
ownership may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of us even if beneficial to you as a shareholder and
might affect the market price of our ordinary shares.
We may require additional capital in the future, which may not be available to
us. Issuances of our equity securities to provide this capital may dilute your ownership in us.
We may need to raise additional funds through public or private debt or equity financings
in order to:
●
|
take advantage of expansion opportunities;
|
●
|
acquire complementary businesses or technologies;
|
●
|
develop new services and products; or
|
●
|
respond to competitive pressures.
|
Any additional capital raised through the issuance of our equity securities may dilute
your percentage ownership interest in us. Furthermore, any additional financing we may need may not be available on terms favorable
to us or at all. The unavailability of needed financing could adversely affect our ability to execute our growth strategy.
It is unlikely that we will pay dividends, and therefore you may not receive any
return on your investment without selling your shares.
We currently intend to retain any future earnings for funding the growth of our business
and therefore we do not currently anticipate declaring or paying cash dividends on our ordinary shares. In addition, our current
credit agreement restricts us from paying such dividends. As a result, a return on your investment will only occur if our ordinary
share price appreciates.
Australian takeover law may discourage takeover offers being made for us or may
discourage the acquisition of a significant position in our ordinary shares.
We are incorporated in Australia and are subject to the takeover laws of Australia. Among
other things, we are subject to the Australian Corporations Act. Subject to a range of exceptions, the Corporations Act prohibits
the acquisition of a direct or indirect interest in our issued voting shares if the acquisition of that interest will lead to a
person’s voting power in us increasing to more than 20%, or increasing from a starting point that is above 20%, though below
90%. Australian takeover laws may discourage takeover offers being made for us or may discourage the acquisition of a significant
position in our ordinary shares. This may have the ancillary effect of entrenching our Board of Directors and may deprive or limit
our shareholders’ opportunity to sell their ordinary shares and may further restrict the ability of our shareholders to obtain
a premium from such transactions. See “Description of Share Capital - Change of Control.”
Our Constitution and Australian laws and regulations applicable to us may adversely
affect our ability to take actions that could be beneficial to our shareholders.
As an Australian company we are subject to different corporate requirements than a corporation
organized under the laws of the U.S. Our Constitution, as well as the Australian Corporations Act, set forth various rights and
obligations that are unique to us as an Australian company. These requirements may operate differently than those of many U.S.
companies. You should carefully review the summary of these matters set forth under the section entitled, “Description of
Share Capital” as well as our Constitution, which is included as an exhibit to this annual report.
ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
4.A. History and Development of the Company
The original Parnell company was founded by a veterinarian (Richard Boon) in Australia
in the early 1960’s. In 1986 he sold the assets of that business to Dr Alan Bell a practising equine veterinarian. Over the
next twenty years, we developed over 30 generic veterinary products and registered them in over twenty countries. In 2006, Robert
Joseph, our Chief Executive Officer joined Alan Bell to undertake a global expansion of our company focusing on developing proprietary
drug products such as Zydax. As part of this process, we sold our legacy generic drug product assets to fund the development of
new chemical entities and to fund in part the construction of our current FDA approved sterile manufacturing facility. Funding
for this growth also came from various term loan facilities as well as investments by Robert Joseph and Brad McCarthy, our Chief
Financial Officer and their associates.
Over the last decade, we have significantly enhanced our core competencies across the
entire pharmaceutical value chain. A key strength of our business is our R&D, clinical trial and regulatory development experience.
We have conducted over 35 clinical trials across six countries in 70 trial sites during the last ten years. Our products have been
approved by regulators in the U.S., Europe, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and multiple other jurisdictions throughout Latin America,
Asia, the Middle East and Africa. Our clinical science expertise is augmented by a strong network of academic institutions, private
research organizations and veterinary clinics across multiple countries around the world.
We have constructed a sterile manufacturing facility located in Sydney, Australia which
was FDA inspected in September 2012 and deemed acceptable in January 2013 and we were successfully inspected by the Australian
Therapeutic Goods Administration under mutual recognition procedures with the European Medicines Agency, or EMA in April 2015.
We believe this facility provides us with a low-cost and reliable supply of our products and has approximately 64% available capacity
above our current manufacturing demand, creating significant contract manufacturing and pipeline expansion opportunities. We intend
to leverage our manufacturing facility to expand contract manufacturing business segment.
We have expanded our business operations in the last five years to focus on the U.S.
market, relocating all drug development and drug commercialization functions to Overland Park, Kansas. This shift in focus has
enabled us to establish a U.S. sales and marketing presence in the production animal market with the launch in 2013 of our reproductive
hormones; Estroplan and Gonabreed and the recent launch of
mySYNCH
, our digital application for use by dairy producers and
veterinarians and since 2015, to establish a presence in the companion animal segment with the launch of Glyde for dogs and FETCH,
our digital application intended for use by veterinarians and pet parents. We believe this unique commercialization model will
enable us to be well positioned for future potential approvals of our product candidates including Zydax.
The address of our Australia office is Unit 4 Century Estate, 476 Gardeners Road, Alexandria,
NSW, 2015, Australia and the telephone number is +612 9667 4411 and in the U.S. it is 7015 College Blvd, Level 6, Overland Park,
Kansas 66211, and the telephone number is +1 913-274-2100
4.B. Business Overview
We are a fully integrated, veterinary pharmaceutical company focused on developing, manufacturing
and commercializing innovative animal health solutions. We currently manufacture and market five products for companion animals
and production animals in 14 countries and augment our pharmaceutical products with proprietary software platforms – FETCH™
and
mySYNCH
®. These innovative technology solutions are designed to enhance the quality of life and/or performance of
animals and are provided to animal owners who use our drug products as a value added service offering to differentiate us from
our competitors. We also have a pipeline of 4 drug products; Zydax®, PAR121 and PAR122 and Luminous™ covering large therapeutic
areas in orthopedics, dermatology and nutraceuticals.
Our reproductive hormone products, estroPLAN® and GONAbreed®, are designed to
safely and effectively improve cattle breeding performance and are currently marketed in 12 countries. We were the first company
to achieve FDA approval for the indication of estrous synchronization in lactating dairy and beef cows. We market our reproductive
hormone products in conjunction with our proprietary software platform,
mySYNCH,
in order to deliver superior breeding outcomes.
Since launching in the U.S. in mid-2013, we have steadily acquired market share
Our disease-modifying product, Zydax®, for the treatment of osteoarthritis, or OA,
in dogs and horses, both stimulates the growth of new cartilage and inhibits cartilage breakdown. OA is a slowly progressive and
often severely debilitating degenerative joint disease, or DJD. We estimate that the market for OA in animals in the U.S. and the
EU is over $410 million in annual sales of prescription drugs and the global market for alternative treatments such as nutraceutical
products is at least another $500 million in annual sales. The most common treatments for OA are anti-inflammatory drugs, which
ease symptoms but do not address the underlying disease process. By contrast, Zydax is designed to enable veterinarians and animal
owners to safely and effectively address the underlying causes of OA. Zydax has an excellent efficacy and safety profile, with
one million doses sold, and has led to improved quality of life for dogs and improved performance of sport horses.
We have marketed Zydax in Australia, New Zealand, Hong Kong, Singapore and the United
Arab Emirates and we are seeking approval from the FDA for marketing in the U.S. and from the European Medicines Agency, or EMA,
for marketing in the European Union, or EU. Assuming regulatory approval, we plan to launch Zydax for dogs in these markets at
the end of 2017 or early in 2018. In addition to Zydax we also have a nutraceutical product, Glyde®, which is a combination
of glycoaminoglycans, a building block for cartilage (derived from chondroitin sulfate and glucosamine) and a potent natural anti-inflammatory,
ecoisatetranoic acid (derived from New Zealand green-lipped mussels). Glyde is currently marketed in Australia where we also market
Zydax. We launched Glyde in the U.S. in September 2015 through the establishment of our own sales and marketing team, providing
us with an established presence in the U.S. companion animal market in advance of a potential approval of Zydax. We have also recently
launched Reviderm, a patented anti-microbial liquid (spray-on) bandage for use in companion animals. We in-licensed Reviderm from
Chesson Laboratories who manufacture Reviderm for us and we are seeking the rights to distribute Reviderm in Australia. We also
expect to soon launch Glyde for cats as well as Luminous, a nutraceutical product that we expect will help maintain healthy skin
and coat and may be useful for dogs suffering from common dermatological conditions.
We believe our products are differentiated through our complementary digital technologies
designed to assist animal owners in maximizing the performance and application of our products.
Fetch
, for companion animal
customers, and
mySYNCH
, for production animal customers, provide a personalized software solution which is currently provided
as a free service offering to our customers. Our digital technologies provide mobile and interactive education and diagnostics,
data analytics and customer management capabilities.
Fetch
and
mySYNCH
also provide us with direct interaction with
animal owners to manage and personalize their brand experience with our products. Our technology offerings enable us to identify
and win potential new customers, increase customer interaction, provide brand recognition and overall customer satisfaction and
in the future may also provide an additional revenue stream opportunity through charging for the provision of premium services
in our digital technologies.
In the last decade, we have significantly enhanced our core competencies across the entire
pharmaceutical value chain. A key strength of our business is our R&D, clinical trial and regulatory development experience.
We have conducted over 35 clinical trials across six countries in 70 trial sites during the last ten years. Our products have been
approved by regulators in the U.S., Europe, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and multiple other jurisdictions throughout Latin America,
Asia, the Middle East and Africa. Our clinical science expertise is augmented by a strong network of academic institutions, private
research organizations and veterinary clinics across multiple countries. We intend to leverage these core competencies to bring
our pipeline products to market over the coming years, and to further expand our pipeline through targeted development and in-licensing
opportunities.
We have constructed a sterile manufacturing facility located in Sydney, Australia which
has been inspected by the FDA, and other regulatory agencies enabling us to manufacture products for sale in the European Union,
Australia, New Zealand, Canada as well as other jurisdictions under mutual recognition procedures. We believe this new facility
provides us with a low-cost and reliable supply of our products and has approximately 64% available capacity above our current
manufacturing demand which in turn provides significant contract manufacturing and pipeline expansion opportunities. In 2016 we
signed our first contract manufacturing opportunity which is a multi-million dollar opportunity over seven years. We are also in
active contract manufacturing negotiations with various pharmaceutical companies and believe we can sign multiple contract manufacturing
agreements in the future thereby establishing our contract manufacturing business segment as a profitable contributor to our corporate
operations.
Our current revenues are derived from operations in 14 countries, with a direct marketing
presence in Australia, New Zealand and the U.S. We utilize a range of multi-national and local marketing partners in other markets
including Canada, the Middle East and Africa and will continue to seek additional marketing partners who can assist us in bringing
our products to market in those geographies where we do not expect to establish a direct presence such as Europe, Asia and Latin
America. By establishing our drug development and commercialization operations in the U.S. we are well positioned to potentially
increase our revenues from current products and future potential approvals, including Zydax. It has also enabled us to explore
a variety of licensing opportunities arising from the large U.S. animal health and biotechnology industries.
We believe that our fully-integrated, pharmaceutical value chain positions us to effectively
and efficiently leverage our current product portfolios, expand and scale our pipeline of product candidates and elicit attractive
in-licensing or acquisition opportunities. We believe that the combination of these capabilities and opportunities positions us
to become a leading innovator in animal health products.
Our Products and Product Candidates
In addition to our currently marketed products, we are developing a pipeline of clinical
drug candidates that seek to deliver solutions to unmet needs in companion animal health. Currently, we have four product candidates
in our pipeline and we also continue to leverage our established in-house developmental capabilities to investigate additional
in-house and in-licensed pipeline opportunities.
In addition to developing therapeutics that deliver real solutions to unmet animal health
needs, we believe some of our product candidates, including Zydax, PAR121 and PAR122, may have the potential to be applied to human
health. Assuming successful development of each of these product candidates for the animal health market, we would seek to partner
with organizations that can assist in assessing the feasibility and, if warranted, potential development of these product candidates
for human applications.
Our Strategy
Our objective is to become a leading provider of animal health solutions that enhance
the quality of life or performance of animals and enhance operational efficiency and profitability for veterinarians and farmers.
We seek to differentiate ourselves from other animal health companies through leadership in clinical science in our chosen therapeutic
areas and integration of our digital technologies with our animal health products.
We plan to focus on long-term therapies for conditions with a high prevalence rate and
high propensity for treatment by animal owners in the burgeoning companion animal and production animal markets. We believe there
are many segments of the market with a significant unmet need and that we can be competitive in accessing these large opportunities
by leveraging our established drug development infrastructure and our innovative drug commercialization capabilities that harness
our digital technologies.
Primary Strategic Objectives
We have three core areas of focus for the immediate future to drive the value of our
company:
1.
|
|
Continuing the development of Fetch and mySYNCH to drive cost-efficient revenue growth in our Companion and Production Animal business segments respectively
|
Fetch
is our digital application that is available for use by dog owners that
aims to integrate with veterinary practice management software to identify dogs that are at-risk of developing OA, proactively
communicate with the dog owner to help them diagnose the risk factors of OA in their do and thereby commence a proactive joint
management program including the use of our products Glyde and Zydax.
Fetch
is also designed to enable ongoing communication
with dog owners to substantially increase compliance and to enable Parnell to sell directly to the dog owner on an ongoing business
and thereby increase our revenues and profit margins and simultaneously offering a veterinary clinics that we partner with a lucrative
additional revenue stream that is typically being lost to online retailers who are rapidly encroaching on veterinary clinic sales.
We have significant plans to continue the development of
Fetch
for both the Australian
and U.S. markets to become a fully integrated franchise management technology. We have already developed capability for
Fetch
to integrate with veterinary clinics practice management software which provides a seamless patient identification and capture
mechanism through a self-diagnostic tool that is used by dog owners in the veterinary clinic or on their mobile devices or computer
at home. We have also developed a consumer application (App) that is used by dog owners at home to continue monitoring the progress
of their pet whilst being treated with our products.
Fetch
enables us to interact with dog owners in a unique way that enhances
an ongoing direct relationship with our customers in a highly effective, differentiated and very efficient manner and creates an
immersive brand experience. In addition to creating an effective “customer capture” platform,
Fetch
also acts
as a “customer retention” tool. We are able to communicate directly with pet parents through
Fetch
and for example,
remind them about the need to repurchase our products, we can also offer them incentives to do so and we offer a “subscription
plan” whereby a pet parent signs up to automatic delivery for a discounted price. This module of Fetch enables us to capture
a much higher percentage of the retail price whereas the traditional animal pharmaceutical company model is entirely dependent
on the veterinarian to a) initiate treatment (Fetch does this for the veterinarian more effectively and b) relies on the pet parent
to remain compliant with treatment (Fetch can drive much higher compliance rates by reminding the pet parent to repurchase and
giving them a simple mechanism to do so (through their mobile device with home delivery) instead of having to always go back to
the veterinary clinic. In return we are able to generate a higher margin than what is typically generated by other companies who
sell to the veterinary clinic directly. We do however pay the veterinarian a rebate as part of this transaction given we are offering
them a business partnership model. Therefore the pet parent is able to provide optimal health care in a more timely manner and
more conveniently, the veterinarian makes a passive income that they would most likely otherwise not participate in at all (repurchase
rates from veterinarians are typically very low) and we are able to create a more valuable and sustainable commercialization model.
mySYNCH
is a digital tool that integrates with the most commonly used existing
dairy management computer system (Dairy Comp 305®) to enable veterinarians and producers to optimize reproduction and maximize
economic gains. It combines in-field training in both English and Spanish languages, however the most valuable offering
mySYNCH
provides is that it acts as a business intelligence tool over and above that provided by
Dairy Comp
305. This software is
used on dairy farms representing approximately 60% of dairy cows in the US. It is a powerful data management tool but it is reported
by dairy farmers to be cumbersome and difficult to discern real time insights. It is also most typically used as a desk top application.
mySYNCH
integrates with
Dairy Comp
305 and provides data integrity reports. In approximately 80% of dairy farms,
my SYNCH
is able to identify data integrity issues that can affect the breeding metrics that dairy farmers are relying upon.
We then provide a database analysis service to the dairy farmer to correct the “business rules” being used in Dairy
Comp or to identify errant data sets. After this initial service,
mySYNCH
is able to provide headline breeding metrics to
all employees on a dairy farm, on their mobile device, in real time. It also has a proprietary reporting feature whereby it can
show differences in breeding outcomes based on cohorts of cows. For example if a new breeding program is introduced, such as our
patent pending
PROCEPT
breeding program,
mySYNCH
can show the dairy farmer the gains that have been made as compared
to their previous program in a simple and seamless manner. By providing dairy farmers with
mySYNCH
, we are able to demonstrate
a business partnership model which we believe enables us to move away from simply competing on price as most other animal pharmaceutical
companies do. Over 400,000 dairy cows are enrolled in
mySYNCH
and we expect this number to continue to grow substantially
in 2017 and beyond.
2.
|
|
Continuing to develop the Zydax franchise in multiple species and pursuing human opportunities
|
We are focusing on obtaining the regulatory approval from the FDA and EMA for Zydax in
dogs at the end of 2017 or early 2018. We initially filed the two remaining major technical sections of the regulatory dossier
for Zydax; the Target Animal Efficacy and Chemistry and Manufacturing Controls sections, with the FDA in the fourth quarter of
2015. In April 2016, we received a response with questions on both sections from the FDA. We have spent the time since compiling
data and preparing our responses for both technical sections. We expect to refile these sections in the first half of 2017. The
FDA typically takes 180 days to respond to such filings which could lead to these sections being deemed complete toward the end
of 2017.
For our European filings, we converted our FDA filed dossier to the format and content
that is required by the EMA and filed a complete dossier, in February 2016 we received what is known as the “Day 120”
questions from the EMA in the middle of 2016 and in conjunction with our preparations for refiling with the FDA, we have been preparing
responses to the EMA questions. We anticipate refiling in approximately April, 2017 which could lead to a potential approval at
the end of 2017.
We anticipate there are opportunities to seek approval for Zydax in other jurisdictions
including Canada, Asia, and Latin America. We expect to file such applications in 2017. For Canada, we expect a potential approval
in the first half of 2018.]
We have also commenced pilot studies for the use of Zydax in cats. In 2016 we undertook
a successful pilot safety study that showed Zydax is well tolerated in cats and we undertook a pilot efficacy study to elucidate
effective measurement instruments for assessing changes in the clinical signs of osteoarthritis in cats. We believe the market
for osteoarthritis treatments in cats is a significant opportunity given that it has been reported in the literature that up to
90% of cats suffer from degenerative joint disease yet there are very few available treatments. In particular in the US, there
are no drugs approved by the FDA for the long term management of the clinical signs of osteoarthritis in cats. As such, we believe
Zydax has a significant opportunity in this therapeutic segment if it were approved. We expect to continue this development in
2017, and if successful may lead to a potential approval in late 2018.
We believe that we can potentially seek a “disease modifying” label claim
for Zydax. Such a label claim is estimated to be a very lucrative opportunity. To obtain such a label claim we anticipate completing
studies showing the disease modification effects of Zydax and we expect that we may complete one such study in the middle of 2017.
In 2015, Parnell acquired the rights to the only known supply of Xylan which is a starting
material for the manufacture of the Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient, or API, in Zydax along with other sulfated oligosaccharides
including drugs approved for use in humans. Parnell had previously purchased this material from a German company, as did all other
companies using European Beechwood Xylan for various purposes. After being acquired, the new parent company made the decision to
cease manufacture of Xylan. Being the only known available source of European Beechwood Xylan, Parnell acquired the rights to the
manufacturing process, associated know-how and limited equipment and transferred this to a new manufacturing partner in Germany.
As a result of this acquisition, we believe we now control the global supply of European Beechwood Xylan that is available to companies
seeking to develop certain generic human drugs as well as new drug candidates. Therefore in addition to securing the supply of
Xylan for use in the manufacture of Zydax, we believe we have a valuable opportunity to partner with a human pharmaceutical company
to develop a generic equivalent of Elmiron® that is distributed by Johnson and Johnson and we believe that such a partnership
may also lead to the development of additional indications for Zydax for human use and could be a lucrative partnership. We intend
to pursue such a partnership in 2017.
3.
|
|
Launching new products in the US and Australia
|
We believe that our commercialization model is able to be leveraged across multiple therapeutic
categories. For example, our business partnership model based on our digital technologies that we offer to companion animal veterinary
clinics is not exclusive to osteoarthritis just in dogs. As a result we have developed a formulation of Glyde that can be used
by cat owners to treat osteoarthritis which is highly prevalent in cats. We expect to launch Glyde for cats in early Q2, 2017 and
we expect in the future that we can leverage the Fetch platform to assist in customer capture and retention just as we have done
with dog owners. We also expect to launch a dermatology based nutraceutical called
Luminous
in early Q2, 2017. Luminous
is a unique formulation based on the same polyunsaturated fatty acid compound; ecoisatetranoic acid, that is uniquely found in
New Zealand Green Lipped Mussels. It also contains a combination of other compounds known for their beneficial effect on skin and
coat condition. Just as
Fetch
is used in osteoarthritis, we also believe it can act in the same way in the dermatology segment;
to integrate with veterinary practice management software to identify “at risk” dogs and to communicate directly with
them about the benefits of
Luminous
and to capture new customers and then retain them more effectively.
We also launched a unique, anti-microbial, spray-on (liquid) bandage called
Reviderm
.
We in-licensed this product from Chesson Laboratories who market a similar product for human use in a number of countries. Since
launch, we have identified a number of therapeutic categories where we believe Reviderm can be effectively used including replacing
adhesive bandages used on common wounds, including surgical incisions but also in common dermatological conditions such as “hot-spots”
which cause the dog to lick and aggravate irritated skin. Reviderm forms a protective, water-proof, anti-microbial barrier that
enables natural skin healing to occur more effectively. In many cases, this obviates the need for the use of the “cone of
shame”; a lampshade type device affixed around the dog’s neck to stop it from licking or biting at a wound. We now
expect we may be able to launch Reviderm in Australia in Q2, 2017.
4.
|
|
Expanding our contract manufacturing operations
|
We have constructed and commissioned our manufacturing facility in Sydney which was classified
as acceptable by the FDA in January 2013. We currently have approximately 64% available capacity at this facility, which we are
now leveraging for contract manufacturing opportunities. Typically, sterile manufacturing projects, especially those for FDA-approved
products, attract high margins relative to other contract manufacturing sectors. We also have the capability to produce pilot or
research and development, or R&D, batches for biotechnology companies for use in clinical trial materials and due to our highly
efficient and flexible operation we believe we can undertake these projects at a lower cost than other industry participants. We
commenced our contract manufacturing operations in 2016 with the commencement of a multi-year, multi-million dollar deal with a
major animal pharmaceutical company and we are currently in active negotiations with several multi-national pharmaceutical companies,
for both animal and human products, to be appointed as a contract manufacturer of sterile injectable products and we hope to announce
the commencement of one or more contracts in 2017.
We also expect to commission new manufacturing equipment that will enable us to manufacture
pharmaceutical and nutraceutical products in a “chew” dosage form for dogs and cats. Administration of medicinal products
to dogs and cats by oral form can be difficult yet giving a “Chew” has an association with giving a “treat”
to your pet. This is not only preferred by the animal but is preferred by the pet parent as well. We currently sell Glyde, and
will sell Luminous as, a Chew and hence this new manufacturing capability will enable us to create a reliable, high quality and
low cost supply of our own products. We also believe that there is a dearth of FDA and EMA standard manufacturers in this segment
and with the increasing popularity of Chews as a dosage form, we believe that this new capability will add additional contract
manufacturing opportunities. We believe the combination of both our sterile manufacturing and soon, our “Chew” manufacturing
capabilities could substantially increase the revenue generated by our contract manufacturing business segment, this in turn would
not only entirely cover the fixed cost of operating our manufacturing facility but would generate high-margin revenues contributing
to our core objective of becoming profitable.
Future Growth Opportunities
In addition to our core strategic objectives we anticipate additional opportunities to
grow revenues and to enhance the value of our company over the coming years.
1.
|
|
Continuing development of existing pipeline of product candidates
|
We plan to progress our current pipeline of product candidates through proof-of-concept
stage and into animal studies in 2017 and 2018. We seek to adopt for each of our product candidates a well-defined, milestone driven
development path that enables us to determine the most expeditious path to market. We plan to continue our collaboration with development
partners including leading academic institutions to ensure each product has a robust data set to support approval and commercialization.
We expect to work toward the following milestones for our pipeline product candidates:
PAR 121
(canine and equine orthopedics): PAR121 is derived from a known botanical
extract native to the Cook Islands that had shown promise in rapidly regenerating bone. Based on pre-clinical studies we believe
PAR121 has significant applications in orthopedics. We plan to isolate and identify the specific active components of the botanical
extracts and commence development of a semi-synthetic or synthetic manufacturing process. In parallel we will continue in vitro
and in vivo studies of bone growth with the aim of more precisely elucidating the mechanism of action and to demonstrate further
clinical evidence of efficacy in the target species. Based on the studies we undertook in 2016, we plan on moving from rodent and
in-vitro models into larger species including dog bone-regeneration models. If successful, we believe these studies will show effective
bone regeneration, superior to natural healing and will also show “normal” bone growth. We also undertook fractionation
and identification studies in 2016 and we may seek to utilise sub-fractions of the botanical extracts in studies to potentially
identify an active sub-component. Alternatively, we believe we can continue to develop a botanical extract under the published
FDA guidance for such products. We anticipate that if the next round of mode-of-action and pilot efficacy studies are successful,
we will progress to safety studies in target species in 2017.
PAR 122
(canine and feline dermatology): we have been studying PAR122 to assess
the effect of topical application on skin healing and based on 2016 studies we completed, we have shown that PAR122 can cause epidermal
thickening which in turn we believe should help treat animals affected with various dermatological and skin conditions. We may
seek to isolate and identify the specific active components of the botanical extracts or we may continue to develop PAR122 as a
botanical extract and potentially seek a cosmeceutical claim set which would not require regulatory approval and thus would be
a rapid and inexpensive path to market. However, if additional studies continue to show success, we may alternatively, or in addition,
seek a traditional “drug approval” with specified claims. We have also completed pilot safety studies to investigate
the irritant effect of topical application of PAR122 and it was shown to be very safe in this regard. We therefore plan on undertaking
additional mode-of-action and pilot efficacy studies in dogs to elucidate the effectiveness at skin healing in dermatological conditions
in 2017.
2.
|
|
Expanding our existing pipeline
|
Our goal is to bring a new product to market each year through a combination of in-house
drug development and potential in-licensing activities. We continue to assess a number of new in-licensed opportunities and based
on resource availability and likelihood of success, we may commence development on additional projects in 2017 and beyond. However,
we remain heavily focused on our core strategic objectives, which collectively are aimed at becoming profitable and hence additional
development opportunities will need to be consistent with our core objective.
3.
|
|
Developing market entry plans for partnership markets including Europe, Asia and Latin America
|
We have invested in market investigations and partnering discussions in China and Europe
over the last several years, and we intend to focus on multiple growth opportunities in these regions. We believe the Chinese dairy
industry is undergoing structural changes to industrialize. We believe this situation is suited to our innovative solutions that
combine high quality medicines with our
mySYNCH
proprietary technology in order to help dairy producers breed cows more
effectively and as a result positions us to develop a strong foothold in this rapidly growing industrialized Chinese dairy market.
Our Marketed Products
Reproductive Hormones - estroPLAN and GONAbreed
Overview
Our reproductive hormone products, estroPLAN (cloprostenol sodium; a prostaglandin F2α,
or PG, drug) and GONAbreed (gonadorelin acetate; a Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone, or GnRH, drug), are used in breeding programs
which are aimed at increasing pregnancy rates in dairy and beef cows. PG and GnRH drugs are given as a sequence of three injections
over nine days to cause a cow to ovulate which allows artificial insemination, or AI, to be used. These breeding protocols are
typically called Ovsynch programs.
We believe we have conducted more cattle breeding program trials over the last ten years
than any other animal health company. We have also developed a proprietary software platform,
mySYNCH
, to complement the
use estroPLAN and GONAbreed. We believe this model of combining our high quality drug products with our proprietary software platform
improves profitability for producers allowing us to gain market share from much larger animal health companies. Our approach also
enhances the partnership between veterinarians and our producers by allowing the veterinarian to become a consultant in the improvement
of reproductive efficiency.
Market
There are 9.2 million dairy cows in the U.S. and we estimate up to 100 million dairy
cows globally are milked in industrialized countries, including 20 million in Europe and six million in Australia and New Zealand.
In addition to the prolific use of timed AI breeding programs in the dairy industry, the beef market is increasingly using AI to
increase the genetic worth of their herds and thus have increased their use of reproductive hormones. We estimate that the beef
segment currently uses artificial insemination programs in less than 10% of cows and thus has the potential to grow rapidly.
Currently Available Competitive Products
The reproductive hormone market consists of two classes of drugs, GnRH and PG. In the
U.S., approximately 50 million doses of GnRH and PG are sold annually for approximately $80 million. All manufacturers of reproductive
hormones market generic equivalents of GnRH and PG. The current manufacturers include Zoetis (marketing Factrel - GnRH and Lutalyse
- PG), Merck (marketing Fertagyl - GnRH and Estrumate - PG), Bayer (marketing Ovacyst - GnRH and Prostamate - PG) and Merial (marketing
Cystorelin - GnRH). In non-U.S. markets, these same competitors typically exist along with generic offerings from smaller local
pharmaceutical companies. We estimate the global reproductive hormone market is more than $200 million.
Our Solution
Historically, PG-based programs were the most commonly used breeding programs. Prostaglandins
cause a cow to commence a new ovulatory cycle that leads to the release of an ovum (or egg). After injecting PG, a farmer must
observe the cows for signs that the cow is ready to be artificially inseminated (called heat display). In the last decade, the
combination of PG products with GnRH products to synchronize ovulation has led to more accurate breeding programs that allow for
fixed-time artificial insemination that obviate the need for observing cows for heat display thus improving farm labor efficiency
and also increasing pregnancy rates.
We currently have two FDA-approved hormone products, estroPLAN (a PG product) and GONAbreed
(a GnRH product). We have marketed estroPLAN and GONAbreed in other markets for many years. In January 2013, GONAbreed was approved
by the FDA for use in conjunction with cloprostenol sodium in cattle breeding programs.
We currently provide our proprietary
mySYNCH
technology, which was developed to
complement the use of estroPLAN and GONAbreed, to our production animal customers for free.
mySYNCH
provides these customers
with mobile education, data analytics and reporting to help maximize pregnancy rates in their cows when using estroPLAN and GONAbreed.
We believe we can further penetrate the U.S. market by leveraging our proprietary
mySYNCH
software platform which helps
our production animal customers manage reproduction activities on the farm and enhances the implementation of our reproductive
hormones. As a result of this proprietary software and our product portfolio, we have been able to successfully improve reproductive
performance for our dairy customers. For example, a large dairy farm in North America switched from a competitor’s product
to our breeding program, which resulted in a 25% increase in pregnancy outcomes. We will continue to leverage the advocacy from
our early adopters to grow our customer base across the U.S.
Osteoarthritis - Zydax
Overview
Zydax is a sulfated oligosaccharide with disease-modifying characteristics for the treatment
of OA in dogs and horses. Zydax targets the core deficit of OA by impacting both the anabolic and catabolic pathways of articular
cartilage metabolism. Zydax is approved in Australia and New Zealand for the treatment of OA in dogs and marketed in Asia and the
Middle East for the treatment of OA in horses. Specifically, Zydax stimulates proteoglycan synthesis, leading to the growth of
new cartilage, and inhibits the actions of the aggrecanase 1 enzyme, which degrades and breaks down cartilage. Being a sulfated
oligosaccharide, Zydax also has some common properties with heparin in that it reduces micro blood clots at the joint and thus
improves blood flow leading to the enhancement of regenerative processes. We are presently seeking marketing approval from the
FDA and the EMA for Zydax for the treatment of OA in dogs and horses. Under current market conditions, if approved, we believe
Zydax will be the only product with demonstrable disease modifying characteristics. We believe Zydax can be a safe, long-term therapy
for OA in dogs and horses.
Zydax has been safely used in one million doses in dogs for ten years without the harmful
side-effects common to many non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or NSAIDs. The safety aspects of the registration dossier for
the use of Zydax in dogs have been deemed complete by the FDA including for safe combination use with NSAIDs. Zydax has the flexibility
of being used as an adjunctive and a first-line therapy. As a result veterinarians do not have to replace their favored incumbent
therapies but rather could use NSAIDs to alleviate the short-term symptoms of pain and inflammation while commencing a long-term
course of treatment with Zydax to seek to modify the underlying disease process of OA.
In October 2008, we applied for various patent protections for GXS, the API in Zydax,
including composition of matter and method of manufacture. These patents have been granted in six countries and are under review
in a further four countries plus the European Union. Our current patent array would not expire until at least October 2028.
The safety section of the registration dossier for Zydax in dogs has been deemed complete
by the FDA and we have completed several large-scale efficacy studies in dogs which we believe on a weight of evidence basis provides
substantial evidence which may lead to approval by the FDA in late 2017 or early 2018 and by the EMA at a similar time.
We also expect to complete safety and efficacy studies in cats and horses under FDA protocol
concurrences.
The market for Zydax in cats could be as large as the market for use in dogs given there
are not as many cats (in the U.S. there are 72 million dogs and over 50 million cats) but OA is believed to be as prevalent or
more so in cats and there are very few products approved for treating OA in cats (there are many available for treating OA in dogs).
We also believe we could seek an approval for treating the relatively common condition of interstitial cystitis in cats which is
pain and inflammation of the bladder and urethra which causes frequent urination by the cat.
The market for Zydax for horses is significant, especially in those countries where horse
racing is popular such as Australia, New Zealand, Hong Kong, Singapore, Dubai, United Kingdom and France. To date, Zydax has been
sold in Australia, Hong Kong, Singapore, New Zealand and Dubai
.
We are engaged in an FDA and EMA approval process to market
Zydax for horses in the U.S. and Europe. We also plan to target the Chinese and Japanese markets where horse racing is also popular.
Market
Osteoarthritis in animals is a large and growing global market. We estimate the market
for OA prescription drugs in the U.S. and the EU to be over $410 million in annual sales, and the global market for alternative
treatments to be at least another $500 million in annual sales. This large market is driven by increasing pet ownership and the
fact that up to 90% of dogs will develop osteoarthritis in their lifetime with an estimated 20% of dogs suffering from OA at any
one point in time. However in our experience selling Zydax, it is quite common for only a small fraction of the estimated 20% of
dogs that have OA to be under active treatment. We expect that one reason for that may be that there are few safe, long-term therapies
available and as a result OA treatment may be delayed by the veterinarian until the later stages of the disease. We therefore believe
that there may be a significant opportunity for the market to expand considerably in markets like the U.S. and EU once safe, long-term,
effective, non-NSAID therapies such as Zydax are available. Additionally, a large percentage of sport horses develop some form
of DJD and most will regularly receive joint treatments.
Researchers have postulated that the sulfate-ester classes of compounds, including pentosan
polysulfate a related polymer to that used in Zydax, may have applicability to various human disease states including OA. Historically,
these polymers have proven difficult to develop and there has not been a successful approval for human use in treating OA. We believe
that the development path of Zydax may have overcome many of the challenges of these compounds and thus we envision investigating
the applicability of Zydax for treating OA in humans in years to come.
Currently Available Competitive Products
There is currently no cure for OA in animals. Most animals receive treatment after the
clinical signs of pain and inflammation becomes apparent, which is typically very late in the disease progression. Lifestyle management
options include rest and, if applicable, weight loss and physical therapy. Current drug treatments can only alleviate the pain
and inflammation associated with OA, but do not treat the cause of the disease which typically includes a breakdown of cartilage.
There are no current disease-modifying OA drugs that have been proven to control clinical signs of OA, limit disease progression
and reverse and modify existing joint pathology.
The most popular treatments for OA are symptom-modifying drugs such as non-steroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which target pain and inflammation. All NSAIDs, including recently launched products have been
reported to cause one or more significant adverse effects including liver and kidney toxicity and gastro-intestinal bleeding and
gastric ulceration in both dogs and horses. High doses and/or long term use increases the likelihood of such effects, limiting
the utility of NSAID treatment for OA that requires prolonged courses of therapy. In addition, although unrelated to adverse drug
effects, there are restrictions on the use of NSAIDs in performance animals, including race horses.
Despite the limitations of NSAIDs, in the U.S. NSAID treatment remains the primary option
for OA in dogs, representing an estimated $220 million market and we estimate the market in the U.S. and the EU may be over $410
million. Zoetis’ Rimadyl® (carprofen) was the first in this class to be approved and remains the market leader despite
the availability of several generic carprofen products and alternative NSAIDs including meloxicam (Metacam® and its generics)
and newer NSAIDs which are reported to be safer such as deracoxib (Deramax®) and firocoxib (Previcox®).
There are NSAIDs approved for use in horses, with the older NSAID phenylbutazone being
the main treatment of choice in that species. Flunixin, and firocoxib are additionally approved for use in horses. The mainstay
of therapy in horses with OA is short term treatment with NSAIDs and rest.
In some countries there is a class of drug called Pentosan Polysulfate Sodium, or PPS,
which is used to treat the clinical signs of OA in dogs and horses. PPS was developed in Australia for veterinary use and is a
popular product with disease modifying properties. Zydax was developed to be a significant improvement of PPS that sought to overcome
the known weaknesses of the class of drugs, including an unpredictable and inconsistent efficacy profile. PPS is widely used in
Australia, the United Kingdom, France and certain Scandinavian countries for use in dogs and is reportedly used off-label in horses.
PPS products are available for use in horses in countries where the horse racing industry is popular, such as Asia and the Middle
East. Polysulfated Glycoaminoglycan, or PSGAG, is a highly sulfated chondroitin sulfate product and is marketed under the brand
name Adequan® for use in dogs and horses. Although available in the U.S., Adequan has not necessarily demonstrated substantial
proof of safety and efficacy under the standards that are required by the FDA today. The PPS and PSGAG market are much smaller
than the NSAID market, in part due to the lack of available drugs that have robust data to support their efficacy and hence we
estimate that the global market is less than $50 million in annual sales.
In addition to drugs, there are supplements, also known as nutraceuticals that are commonly
used to aid in the control of the clinical signs of OA. There is evidence to demonstrate that glucosamine and chondroitin sulphate
can impact the OA disease process in humans and animals and as such their use has become very common. There are other bioactive
compounds that are also popular including various marine extracts such as fish oils and also green-lipped mussel powder. Products
containing these various nutraceutical ingredients are available in a large variety of products and brands in most countries and
are not regulated as stringently as drugs. As a result the amount of active ingredients in many products may be too little to be
therapeutic. There are some brands that are more effective including Cosequin® which is available in many markets. The global
nutraceutical market is vast and is estimated to be in excess of $500 million in annual sales.
Our Solution
We developed Zydax to be a superior product offering to the PPS class of drugs which
had been available in Australia for many years. The variability of efficacy in PPS products is postulated to be due to the fact
that PPS is a polymer made up of various sub-fractions with differing characteristics, most notably degree of sulfation and molecular
weight. We proposed that the degree of sulfation of PPS was likely to impact pharmacological activity, as would the consistency
of molecular weight and amount of undesirable impurities such as divalent cations. In vitro head-to-head testing has proven that
the patented characteristics of Zydax can inhibit the activity of aggrecanase 1 enzyme which is responsible for the degradation
of articular cartilage, which ultimately leads to the pain and inflammation associated with OA.
Safety of Zydax
The safety section for Zydax was deemed complete by the CVM in October 2013 in dogs.
We completed long term safety studies in laboratory dogs, according to VICH - Guideline 43 (Veterinary International Conference
on Harmonization; Target Animal Safety for Veterinary Pharmaceutical Products). Zydax demonstrated an excellent safety profile
even at five times the recommended dose over a prolonged treatment period (six times the normal duration), with the only significant
effect observed being a short term increase in a standard test for blood clotting (i.e., activated partial thromboplastin time).
Such an effect was anticipated given the relationship of GXS to the anticoagulant heparin and does not impede the clinical utility
of Zydax in veterinary practice.
We also conducted a concomitant-use safety study in mixed breed dogs using Zydax with
the common NSAID, carprofen (Rimadyl®). Both products were studied at their approved dose rates (Zydax by APVMA and carprofen
by CVM-FDA) for their labeled treatment periods to ascertain if there were any safety concerns regarding concurrent use. No safety
effects were evident in the study.
We plan to develop protocols for similar studies for our equine product candidates and
submit to the CVM for protocol concurrence. We anticipate that such studies will commence in 2018.
Effectiveness of Zydax
We have conducted several studies to ascertain the effectiveness of Zydax in dogs using
various efficacy assessment tools. These pilot studies were designed to determine whether Zydax was effective at reducing the clinical
signs of osteoarthritis in dogs to support an approval by the FDA and EMA. Given there had been no previous studies completed for
OA drugs using the FDA’s newly mandated efficacy assessment criteria (dog-owner assessed, ‘clinical success’
end-points) we have undertaken studies using various assessment tools.
We announced the results of our pivotal efficacy study in June 2015. The pivotal efficacy
clinical trial of Zydax was conducted as a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study evaluating the field effectiveness
and safety of Zydax in the treatment of clinical signs of osteoarthritis in dogs. The trial, conducted at 20 sites in the U.S.
and Australia, included 316 client-owned dogs with radiographic evidence of OA, of which 212 were treated with Zydax and 104 with
placebo. The clinical endpoint was improvement in
Client Specific Outcome Measures
(CSOM) that included dog owners' assessment
of improvement in activities such as walking, running and climbing stairs. Treatment was four subcutaneous Zydax injections (or
placebo) given one week apart. Measurements were taken at baseline, day 14 (one week after second injection) and day 28 (one week
after fourth injection). Clinical outcomes were evaluated at day 28 for a reduction in
Activity Impairment Score
(AIS) compared
to baseline, and no increase in any individual CSOM between day 28 and baseline.
The key highlights of the study include the following:
|
☐
|
Using a validated measure for assessing changes in the clinical signs of osteoarthritis, Zydax treated dogs achieved significant improvements in mobility.
|
|
☐
|
Dog owners used the Client Specific Outcome Measures (CSOM) tool to quantify an Activity Impairment Score (AIS) to track changes in their dogs' mobility. After four injections Zydax treated dogs achieved an AIS reduction of 3 (30% improvement; p=0.02 vs. placebo) with 56% of Zydax treated dogs achieving this outcome versus only 40% of Placebo treated dogs achieving an AIS reduction of 3 or more.
|
|
☐
|
Additional trial analysis assessed the spectrum of responses in dogs with early to mid-stage clinical signs of osteoarthritis at enrollment. Zydax treated dogs demonstrated a range of improvements in AIS; after 28 days of treatment with Zydax, 81% of dogs achieved at least an 10% improvement (AIS reduction of ≥1; p=0.02) while 23% of dogs achieved more than 50% improvement (AIS reduction of ≥5; p=0.03).
|
Based on the results of all of our clinical studies, we submitted a weight of evidence
dossier to provide substantial evidence to support the approval of Zydax by the FDA. We received a response to that filing in the
second quarter of 2016 and we met with the FDA to agree on the additional information that is required to support approval. One
option is to utilise data produced from a clinical trial we commenced in early 2016 that was aimed at demonstrating the longevity
of effect of Zydax treatment and also whether additional injections of Zydax in dogs who do not respond to the initial course of
treatment is effective. Both of these end-points are unrelated to the initial approval of Zydax but were aimed at potentially expanding
the label claim post-approval. However, the data generated from the first period of the trial may be used to support our current
data set submitted to the FDA. We currently expect to refile our efficacy dossier with the FDA, including corroborating data from
this new trial once the first period of the study is complete. The trial design is necessarily large to demonstrate the expected
end-points (longevity of effect and treatment-to effect) and as such enrolment has taken some time. We currently expect we will
complete the period-one enrolment of this study in the second quarter of 2017 which would provide the data we intend to submit
with our refiled efficacy dossier to the FDA. If successful, this could lead to a potential approval of the Target Animal Efficacy
technical section in late 2017 or early 2018.
API Source
We partnered with Lonza, a large and renowned Swiss custom synthesis organization to
develop the commercial scale manufacturing process of the API for Zydax. Lonza was able to successfully develop a commercial scale
manufacturing process and the associated Drug Master File which we filed with the FDA in the fourth quarter of 2015 and filed with
EMA in February 2016. We received responses, as was expected, from both the FDA and EMA in the second quarter of 2016 and we have
now compiled all the necessary data and responses to be able to refile the Veterinary (Drug) Master File, or VMF, with the FDA
and the EMA in the second quarter of 2017. The VMF will be filed concurrently with the Chemistry and Manufacturing Controls, or
CMC, section. We believe we have produced a robust data package and if successful, could lead to an approval of the CMC technical
section as early as the fourth quarter of 2017.
Toxicology Studies
We conducted a range of
in vitro
and
in vivo
toxicity studies of GXS and
formulated drug product. All toxicity studies were planned in accordance with Good Laboratory Practices for non-clinical laboratory
studies. The studies were also structured to meet the EU requirement for specific toxicity data in relation to human safety, primarily
related to user safety in relation to companion animals.
Our Product Candidates
Orthopedics - PAR121
Overview
PAR121 may have therapeutic applications in bone-related diseases and injuries in dogs,
cats and horses. It has been shown to significantly enhance bone healing post-fracture.
Experimental formulations of PAR121 have undergone pre-clinical testing in rabbit and
rat models for bone regenerating properties in an induced fracture model with encouraging results. In those pre-clinical studies,
the mammalian safety of PAR121 was assessed with no significant adverse reports. Early tests have shown that the compounds are
non-irritant, non-carcinogenic and have no microbial presence.
PAR121 is being developed from novel botanical extracts. We hold the exclusive worldwide
rights to the technology and patent applications for PAR121 under license with a single digit royalty and modest milestone payments.
Market - Orthopedics
We are developing PAR121 to bring novel advantages to the management of bone injury in
dogs and horses. If recovery were accelerated, performance animals with bone injuries could potentially return to competition earlier,
and pets with fractures could be mobile sooner. Earlier quality-of-life restoration would reduce treatment and care costs and responsibilities
for owners of dogs and horses sustaining bone injuries treatable with PAR121.
There are approximately 150 million pet dogs and cats in the U.S. Approximately $1.5
billion is annually spent on managing knee injuries in dogs, including surgery. We believe these expenditures primarily relate
to surgical procedures and hospitalization as there are currently no available drug therapies. Recovery times from fractures and
orthopedic surgeries typically last several weeks, during which dogs must be immobilized through the application of plaster casts,
an attractive target for dogs to chew on which requires dogs to wear lampshade devices over their heads to restrain them from inadvertently
removing the cast. Ultimately, any opportunity to enhance the recovery process from fractures or orthopedic surgeries would not
only benefit the dog’s quality of life but would greatly reduce the owner’s frustrations of caring for a dog post-surgery.
There are estimated to be 9.2 million horses in the U.S., of which approximately 9% are
racing horses. Approximately 75% of racehorse injuries involve musculoskeletal damage, of which bone injury is a significant part.
An estimated 70% of young racehorses experience buck shins, also known as microfractures, and the recuperative period accounts
for 12,000 lost training days and millions of dollars annually. Such high incidences mean much of the treatment focus and cost
in racing horses is directed at orthopedic conditions. There are no therapies available that can shorten recovery times following
bone injury. The economic and emotional impact of bone injury downtime is substantial and the industry continually seeks ways to
return horses to competition or use.
In human medicine, bone growth factors such as Bone Morphogenic Proteins, or BMPs, have
entered the human market in recent years. BMPs are applied directly to the bone during surgery to promote bone healing. We believe
that PAR121 could be a superior product offering to BMPs as it would not require surgical intervention to be applied yet it may
achieve similar outcomes in promoting bone healing.
Our Solutions
PAR121 is expected to substantially speed the healing of bone post-fracture and post-orthopedic
surgery in dogs, cats and horses. The active ingredients in PAR121 are derived from native botanicals of the Cook Islands, where
these plants have been applied to bone fractures as a natural remedy for hundreds of years. The active component of PAR121 is extracted
from a plant whose genera are distributed widely in the South Pacific and beyond however we believe that it is the unique terroir
of the Cook Islands that gives this plant its medicinal properties. The nominated plant is the subject of patent applications by
for pharmaceutical use.
Pre-clinical bone studies of PAR121 were performed in a rabbit ulnar critical defect
model. A critical defect is a bone deficit with a substantial gap (20mm) rendering the bone unable to heal naturally. In the experiments,
new cartilage and bone development was evident from as early as one week after bone injury.
Further pre-clinical bone studies investigated PAR121 vs. control in a spinal fusion
model in rabbits. In the autograft study PAR121 was associated with advanced fusion at six weeks, while control individuals continued
to show unattached bone fragments in the fusion mass. At eight weeks, the fusion mass of the PAR121 treatment group had similar
tensile strength to controls at 12 weeks.
Spinal Fusion Study - radiographs taken at six weeks
Development Path
The initial investigations into PAR121 for bone fracture repair indicate a promising
development path for this compound. We believe it has a significant potential in fracture treatment for both animals and humans,
as both markets are poorly served by currently available non-drug and drug therapy options.
Parnell has studied this botanical extract in both in vitro and in vivo models of canine
bone growth to elucidate the mechanism of action and the exact method of how PAR121 stimulates bone formation. We anticipate undertaking
additional proof-of concept studies in 2017 in dogs now that we have shown promising results from rodent and rabbit models and
from bone calcification in-vitro studies. The pilot efficacy studies in dogs will investigate whether we can replicate the successful
outcomes of previous studies in our target species and whether we can regenerate “normal” bone. If this study is successful
we will investigate various sub-fractions of the botanical extract and will commence pilot safety studies in 2017.
To provide the clinical materials for our animal studies, we utilized a pilot manufacturing
process in the Cook Islands in 2016. We anticipate that in conjunction with the licensing partner (CIMTECH), we may be able to
utilize funds granted from the U.N. The grant, given under the Nagoya Protocol provides for up to $1 million in matched funds for
establishing infrastructure and capabilities in the Cook Islands for the botanical extractions that we are using in pilot clinical
trials and we may also elect to establish larger infrastructure for producing the botanical extract on the Cook Islands if we are
not successful in elucidating a synthetic API.
Dermatology - PAR122
Overview
PAR122 has potential applications in atopic dermatitis and other dermatological conditions.
It has been shown in pre-clinical studies to substantially increase the thickness of the epidermis of skin which is frequently
diminished in conditions requiring the topical application of corticosteroids such as atopic dermatitis. In vitro investigative
trials of PAR122 have also been conducted with similarly encouraging results. PAR122 is being developed from novel botanical extracts.
We hold the exclusive worldwide rights to the technology and patent applications for PAR122 under license with a single digit royalty
and modest milestone payments.
Market - Dermatology
Flea Allergy Dermatitis, or FAD, is the most common dermatological disease of dogs in
the U.S. FAD is an allergic skin reaction to flea bites. Regular treatment with ectoparasiticide products combined with environmental
control measures limits exposure to fleas but once FAD develops, dogs are afflicted for life. The result of FAD is that dogs itch
themselves excessively as a result of even one flea bite.
In addition to fleas, environmental allergens of various types can cause hypersensitivity
and skin itching in a significant proportion of the dog population. Such atopic dermatitis conditions are believed to be genetically
predisposed and tend to be incurable and expensive to manage at $1,000 or more per year.
Clinical management of both FAD and atopic dermatitis is centered on reducing pruritus
(intense itching) which causes the dog to break the surface of the skin through licking, chewing, scratching and rubbing. This
exposes the dermal layers and can lead to infection. Glucocorticoids are generally prescribed to reduce itching, but they cause
thinning of the skin over time.
The lifelong burden of constant treatment, variable response and regular recurrence can
cause significant emotional impact on a dog owner and reduce the quality of life of the dog. There are no approved treatments available
that that can rapidly improve skin thickness.
Our Solutions
We believe PAR122 could provide a first-in-class product to address the destructive cycle
of pruritic skin disease in dogs. The active ingredients in PAR122 are derived from native botanicals of the Cook Islands, where
these plants have been applied to skin conditions as a natural remedy for hundreds of years. The active components of PAR122 are
extracts of three specifically nominated plants whose genera are distributed widely in the South Pacific and beyond. The nominated
plants are the subject of patent applications by CIMTECH for pharmaceutical, complementary medicinal and cosmetic uses.
PAR122 thickens the epidermis, which should help treat animals affected with flea allergy
dermatitis. Flea allergy dermatitis (FAD) or flea bite hypersensitivity is the most common dermatologic disease of domestic dogs
in the USA. Cats also develop FAD, which is one of the major causes of feline miliary dermatitis. When feeding, fleas inject saliva
that contains a variety of compounds, enzymes, polypeptides, and amino acids that span a wide range of sizes (40–60 kD) and
induce Type I, Type IV, and basophil hypersensitivity. Flea-naive dogs exposed intermittently to flea bites develop immediate (15
min) or delayed (24–48 hr) reactions, or both, and detectable concentrations of both circulating IgE and IgG antiflea antibodies.
In dogs, the pruritus associated with FAD can be intense and may manifest over the entire body. Classic clinical signs are papulocrustous
lesions distributed on the lower back, tailhead, and posterior and inner thighs. In extremely hypersensitive dogs, extensive areas
of alopecia, erythema, and self-trauma are evident. Traumatic moist dermatitis (hot spots) can also occur. As the disease becomes
chronic, the dog may develop generalized alopecia, severe seborrhea, hyperkeratosis, and hyperpigmentation.
In cats, clinical signs vary from minimal to severe, depending on the degree of sensitivity.
The primary dermatitis is a papule, which often becomes crusted. This miliary dermatitis is typically found on the back, neck,
and face. The miliary lesions are not actual flea bites but a manifestation of a systemic allergic reaction that leads to generalized
pruritus and an eczematous rash. Pruritus may be severe, evidenced by repeated licking, scratching, and chewing. Cats with FAD
can have alopecia, facial dermatitis, exfoliative dermatitis, and “racing stripe” or dorsal dermatitis.
Pre-clinical skin studies for PAR122 in rats identified changes to the cutaneous epithelium,
a layer of the skin, in the region of application of PAR122 with no observable adverse reactions. The difference between the regions
of application and control regions revealed thickening of many layers of the epithelium. The increase in thickness was typically
over 100% compared to the adjacent regions of the same animal, and higher if compared to untreated animals. This was reproducible
and statistically quantifiable and may have implications for clinical application ranging from disorders of keratinization, skin
regeneration and repair through to age related thinning of the skin.
Above:
Representative histology at 40x magnification of the skin adjacent to the
treated area (a) and the treated area (b) showing the cellular layers and the absence of inflammatory infiltrate.
Currently the only available treatments are supportive, not curative, to control pruritus
and secondary skin disease in hypersensitive animals. Systemic glucocorticoids are often needed to control inflammation and associated
pruritus. As soon as flea control is accomplished, the glucocorticoid can be discontinued. Secondary bacterial skin infection can
be associated with FAD. Systemic antibiotics are commonly used to control the pyoderma and thus reduce the associated inflammation
and pruritus. Selection of an appropriate antibiotic should be based on bacterial cultures and results of antibiotic sensitivity
tests. We believe that the effects of PAR122 will lead to a paradigm shift in the treatment of FAD and other inflammation associated
skin diseases.
Development Path
The initial investigations into PAR122 for improving the quality of skin in dermatological
conditions indicate a promising development path for both compounds. We believe it has significant potential in highly prevalent
dermatological diseases for both animals and humans, as both markets are poorly served by currently available drug therapy options.
We plan to run the same development process for PAR122 as described for PAR122 above.
Our Other Products and Programs
Glyde
Overview
In Australia, we currently market a dual joint care program that combines our Zydax injectable
product with a daily dose of Glyde Powder, our at-home nutraceutical treatment which contains a therapeutic dose of the building
blocks of cartilage, glycosaminoglycans (glucosamine and chondroitin) and a proven dose of eicosatetranoic acid derived from green-lipped
mussel powder, a potent natural anti-inflammatory. Glyde Chews, our new installment in our OA innovation strategy, are flavored
dog treats that facilitates treatment and enhance the customer experience. We launched Glyde Chews in Australia and the U.S. in
the second half of 2015 by establishing a U.S. companion animal sales and marketing team.
Market
OA in animals is a large and growing global market. We estimate that the market for OA
prescription drugs in the U.S. and the EU to be over $410 million in annual sales and the global market for alternative treatments
to be at least another $500 million in sales. This large market is driven by increasing pet ownership and the fact that up to 90%
of dogs will develop OA in their life time with approximately 20% of dogs suffering osteoarthritis at any one point in time. Additionally,
a large percentage of sport horses develop some form of DJD and most will regularly receive joint treatments.
Currently Available Competitive Products
Treatments that utilize various naturally occurring substances are typically referred
to as nutraceuticals and most commonly contain marine extracts such as glucosamine and chondroitin (also referred to as glycosaminoglycans,
or GAGs). As with popular human supplements for OA, there are a wide-array of products that typically do not require any regulatory
approval and as a result do not always contain a dose of the active ingredient that is consistent with established therapeutic
doses. As a result, many nutraceutical products may not be effective in achieving their stated product benefits. Similarly, fortified
foods from pet food manufacturers are becoming increasingly popular. These specialty dog foods are purported to contain the same
marine extracts and may also contain other claimed ingredients such as Omega 3 fatty acids. While the market is crowded with various
products, there have been some products that are based on therapeutic doses of GAGs such as Cosequin® and Dasequin® marketed
by Nutramax®.
Our Solution
Glyde is our daily nutraceutical for dogs that aids in the treatment of OA. It is provided
to the dog once per day either by mixing it in with the dog’s food, when in powder form, or as a treat, when in chew form.
Glyde contains a combination of three naturally occurring products, which include glucosamine, chondroitin and green-lipped mussel.
Glucosamine works to improve the health of, and provide important building blocks for, healthy cartilage growth. It has been shown
to stimulate the production of joint fluid and cartilage by up to 50%. Chondroitin, another direct building block for cartilage,
inhibits cartilage degradation by approximately 59% and blocks the formation of micro blood clots in the small blood vessels that
supply nutrients and oxygen to the bone and cartilage. Green-lipped mussel is the only naturally occurring source of ETA which
has strong anti-inflammatory properties without the risk of gastrointestinal side effects. Glyde is the only nutraceutical product
that contains both glucosamine and chondroitin as well as green-lipped mussel (containing ETA), in a validated, therapeutic dose.
PROCEPT
Overview
We have been marketing our current reproductive hormone products, estroPLAN and GONAbreed,
for more than ten years in over 14 countries. We were one of the first companies to gain approval for the use of a Prostaglandin
(drug class of estroPLAN) with a GnRH (drug class of GONAbreed) for estrous synchronization to allow for FTAI in a breeding program
commonly referred to as Ovsynch. While the active ingredients in both products are generic, the innovation for Ovsynch lies in
the way the drugs are used in combination. Consistent with that innovation, we plan to file multiple applications for method of
use patents for our PROCEPT breeding program which is intended to increase conception rates in AI programs by 10% to 15% as compared
to the Ovsynch program.
Inadequate reproductive programs are widely reported as a significant cause of economic
loss on a dairy farm and yet current performance for typical breeding metrics such as “days open” and “rolling
21-day pregnancy rates” are well short of optimal levels. Multiple factors drive reproductive performance but two major activities
are above all other factors; insemination rates and conception rates. Timed breeding programs such as Ovsynch and our PROCEPT program
can largely overcome the challenges of detecting those cows that are ready to be bred (“in-heat”) and various new technologies
such as electronic heat detection aids can also enhance insemination rates in combination with effective hormone-based programs.
Market
There are 9.2 million dairy cows in the U.S., and 40 million doses of GnRH and PG are
sold annually for approximately $80 million. We estimate up to 100 million dairy cows globally are milked in industrialized dairy
farms, including 20 million in Europe and six million in Australia and New Zealand.
Currently Available Programs
Current options available on the market that seek to increase conception rates above
those that are achieved with Ovsynch programs typically require long complex breeding programs such as Presynch-Ovsynch (38 days
duration vs. ten days for Ovsynch) or the use of intravaginal progesterone devices such as CIDR® which have known shortcomings
including significant cow discomfort and cow-induced expulsion of the device.
Our Solution
PROCEPT is our next generation breeding program which we are developing in conjunction
with Dr. Milo Wiltbank. PROCEPT is expected to increase absolute conception rates by 3% to 5% (from a relative increase of 10%
to 15%) over and above traditional Ovsynch programs yet still maintain the short ten day duration of oysynch. Such an uplift in
conception rates could dramatically improve profitability at a typical U.S. dairy herd by up to $4,200 per year for every 300 cows
being milked. PROCEPT is a novel breeding program that uses our existing products estroPLAN and GONAbreed. It is closely related
to the Ovsynch program that uses three injections of GnRH and PG in sequence over ten days.
Development Path
Because PROCEPT is a breeding program that utilizes our currently available products
(estroPLAN and GONAbreed) under their approved labels there is not expected to be any regulatory approvals necessary. We have applied
for patent protection of PROCEPT in the US and will also seek patents in other markets.
Manufacturing Facility and Laboratories
In 2012, we completed the construction and commissioning of a new 33,000 square foot
manufacturing facility in Alexandria, a suburb of Sydney, Australia. We have the capability to manufacture aseptically filled and
terminally sterilized injectable drugs in vial sizes ranging from 10mL to 200mL on an automated filling line that can produce up
to 20,000 vials per day. We also have an auxiliary filling suite which we use to for semi-automated and hand-filled products such
as low volume R&D and pilot batches. This flexibility gives us a self-sufficient ability to manufacture a wide variety of products
including highly potent drug products at both development and commercial scale. As the facility has been inspected by the FDA,
we can manufacture products for the veterinary and human market. We currently have approximately 75% spare capacity in this facility
which we expect to fill with our own product demand as our pipeline comes to market and additionally through contract manufacturing
opportunities. While our predominant focus in on parenteral drugs, we also have capability to produce oral products such as pastes,
powders, and in the near future, medicated chews and treats. Our facility operates with a highly efficient operating set-up that
means we can often achieve higher margins than our competitors who rely on third-parties or operate more expensive facilities.
We can also further increase our manufacturing capacity through shift expansion and modest investments in larger vessels that enable
larger batch sizes.
We have strong partnerships with several API manufacturers who provide us with the drugs
which we use in production in our own facility. We partner with Piramal, based in the UK, Bachem and Lonza, based in Switzerland,
and several other companies based in Australia and New Zealand. We also procure our product components such as vials from leading
multi-national companies including Saint Gobain and West Pharma.
Pet Therapeutics and Production Animal Markets
Overview - Companion Animals
The companion animal market is typically characterized by products for dogs, cats and
horses. Pet ownership and per capita spending on pets is increasing globally as pet owners desire to foster a strong, long-lasting,
human-animal bond.
Key factors contributing to the growth of companion animal products include:
●
|
Increasing pet ownership;
|
●
|
Growing disposable incomes, particularly in emerging markets;
|
●
|
Increasing medical needs of companion animals as they live longer and begin to experience many of the medical conditions seen in older humans; and
|
●
|
Growing emphasis on development of new medical therapies specifically for pets.
|
The American Pet Products Association, or APPA, reports U.S. consumers spent an estimated
$53 billion on their pets in 2012, up 38% over 2006. The U.S. is the single largest pet market and currently 68% of U.S. households
own a pet.
Pet owners treat their pets as members of the family, and strive to provide quality care
to extend their life and maintain the human-animal bond. We believe the demand for quality of care and effective products to meet
medical needs of pets will continue to grow.
Although the market for pet therapeutics is growing, there are a limited number of products
licensed by the FDA for use in pets. For example, in 2012, 39 new human drugs were approved by FDA, while only 11 new animal drugs
were approved by the FDA, six of which are for use in cats or dogs. In Europe, the EMA approved 52 new drugs for humans in 2012,
and only three drugs for animals. Many of the currently-licensed products are parasiticides. As a result, veterinarians often resort
to using off-label human drugs to address medical needs in pets. However, due to the biological differences between humans and
other species, drugs which are safe and effective in humans can be harmful or not effective when used in other species. Advancements
in human medicine have created new therapies for addressing chronic disease associated with aging including OA, cancer, diabetes
and cardiovascular disease. Pets often suffer from these same diseases as they age. We believe pharmaceuticals specifically designed
for pets can improve their quality and length of life and assist veterinarians in achieving improved medical outcomes for patients.
This can lead to increased owner compliance when giving medications to pets as the products are in more palatable dosage forms.
In addition, we believe pet owners are becoming better informed about the signs of disease in pets and as more safe and effective
treatments become available, they will be more likely to have their pet diagnosed and treated.
Overview - Production Animals
The production animal health industry is primarily focused on providing vaccines and
pharmaceuticals. The industry is growing in response to increasing demands for food from a growing global population. As standard
of living improves, people’s appetite for animal protein grows. Therefore, it is important to consumers and livestock producers
that our food supply is safe and nutritious, and that livestock herds are kept free from disease by using proper husbandry, appropriate
medicines, and vaccines. As a result, livestock owners are always looking for ways to improve production efficiency through the
use of new, innovative, animal health products.
The Dairy Market
In 2012, the U.S. dairy market consisted of 9.2 million cows managed on approximately
58,000 dairy farms. The market is consolidated, with 63% of milk being produced on just 6% of farms, or 3,300, with greater than
500 cows per farm. Milk production is growing annually as milk production per cow continues to increase. U.S. milk production topped
more than 200 billion pounds for the first time in 2013. Export demand for U.S. dairy products is currently robust and dairy farms
are expecting improved profit margins in 2014, allowing them to improve their equity position while funding additional incremental
management strategies to improve farm efficiency. We expect the number of dairy cows to remain stable as milk production per cow
increases; however, there will continue to be fewer dairy farms.
The growing demand for milk and milk products creates increasing need for effective cattle
pharmaceuticals and vaccines. This need is driven by several factors:
●
|
Global human population growth and improving living standards, especially in developing countries;
|
●
|
Increasing demand for quality animal protein including milk and meat;
|
●
|
Natural resource constraints including the scarcity of suitable farm land and fresh water for animal consumption and irrigation of crops resulting in the need for more efficiency to maximize available resources; and
|
●
|
More focus on food safety and security.
|
Since the 1960s, per capita consumption of milk and milk products in many markets has nearly doubled, and meat consumption has
more than tripled according to the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. However, China and other emerging
markets, currently have a much lower per capita consumption than developed markets. As a result, the rising demand for milk and
meat must be met with increasing efficiency using less production resources.
Animal health products have contributed substantially to the efficiency of animal production
since the 1940s resulting in improvements in feed efficiency, production yields and reduced disease pressure in animals. We believe
needed improvements in production efficiency will continue to be closely tied to effective animal health products such as reproductive
hormones to improve pregnancy rates, and effective medicines to control infection. We believe animal health products will continue
to be important tools for dairy producers to meet their productivity enhancement needs.
Product Development Process
The process of developing and commercializing pharmaceuticals for pets is similar to
human drug development and commercialization. Products must be proven safe and effective in clinical trials approved by regulators.
The process depends on new product proof-of-concept, formulation, research, and development. When marketed, companies must adhere
to approved label claims regarding impacts on health. However, there are differences between human drug development and animal
drug development. Regulatory agencies require prior to approval that a product intended for pets is:
●
|
Proven safe for the intended use in the target animal species;
|
●
|
Proven efficacious for the intended use in the target animal species;
|
●
|
Produced under a defined manufacturing process ensuring the product can be made consistently and in a high-quality manner;
|
●
|
Proven to be safe for humans handling the product; and
|
●
|
Proven to be safe for the environment.
|
The pathway for development of pet pharmaceuticals is generally faster and less expensive
than human drug development since fewer clinical studies are required with fewer patients and the trials are conducted directly
in the target animal species. As a result, there is no need to bridge from pre-clinical investigations in one species to the final
target species so decisions regarding safety and efficacy can be made more quickly and the likelihood of success can be established
sooner. In the U.S., the FDA encourages drug sponsors to interact with the agency early in the development process and through
the approval process.
Role of Veterinarians
Veterinarians play an active role in diagnosis and treatment of animal medical needs,
and are involved in generating revenue by prescribing and selling animal pharmaceuticals to animal owners. Unlike in human medicine,
veterinarians perform the dual role of doctor and pharmacist as animal owners typically purchase pharmaceuticals directly from
veterinarians. As a result, product sales are a direct and important contributor to clinic revenue. The frequency of veterinary
office visits has declined somewhat as vaccination intervals have increased to tri-annual versus annual, and as dispensing of medications
has become more common through mail-order catalogs, big-box retailers and online retailers. This is creating a need for veterinarians
to continually seek new ways to support clinic revenue by providing differentiated services and products.
According to DVM Newsmagazine’s state of the Profession Report in 2012, pharmaceutical
sales comprised about 9% of companion animal veterinarian clinic revenue. We believe this revenue can and will increase as new,
novel pharmaceuticals become available specifically designed for animals.
Partnerships with Veterinarians
Veterinarians are typically open to engaging with manufacturer sales representatives.
As compared to a sales detail in human pharmaceutical sales of less than two to three minutes, veterinarians and their staff may
engage with animal health sales reps for 15 to 20 minutes or longer, and frequently participate in learning events to gain a deeper
understanding of patient care options. Sales representatives are able to focus on partnering with customers to educate and support
disease awareness and treatment options. As a result, relationships and consulting visits are usually more meaningful and interactive
than in human. Access to veterinary clinics is normally open and key decision makers within the clinic are willing to meet with
sales representatives in person.
Brand Loyalty to Animal Health Products
Animal health products generally experience strong brand loyalty. Although generic products
do exist in some categories, sales of pioneer brands remain strong as companies continue to support the brands with educational
platforms to veterinarians and livestock producers. In addition, since the products are self-pay, the animal owners, rather than
third-party payer insurance companies or governmental agencies, determine product usage. We believe these dynamics create less
downward pricing pressure than in human health when the exclusivity period expires. In addition, the relative smaller size of the
animal health generic market versus the human generic market has made it less attractive for large, global, generic competitors.
Animal owners are concerned about safety and efficacy of products for their pets and
livestock, which adds to brand loyalty for branded animal health products from reputable companies. We believe this brand loyalty
can be maintained even after the loss of marketing or patent exclusivity.
Our Customers
Our customer is ultimately the animal owner, whether the animal is a family pet or a
production animal. We have also developed a strong capability to create collaborative business relationships with veterinary practices.
This enables us to offer a financially attractive proposition to all stakeholders in the animal health value chain- us, the veterinary
practice, and the animal owner. We believe this sets us apart from some of our multi-national competitors, some of which have diminished
the role of the veterinarian to focus on promoting their products and offering incentives directly to animal owners.
We sell our products in the U.S. through major distributors with a particular focus on
MWI and Animal Health International. We tend to focus on partnering with larger veterinary clinics, typically those which employ
three or more veterinarians. Veterinarians typically purchase our products from distributors and sell to animal owners.
Our Competition
We compete against an array of animal health companies, from large multi-nationals to
smaller single-product entities, in the regulated pharmaceutical market as well as alternative medicine and therapy markets. It
is our view that certain livestock sectors are extremely competitive, and we tend not to focus on them. In particular, we believe
that where the animal itself is the commodity, such as in poultry, swine and beef feedlots, there is a predominance of cost minimization.
As a result, we prefer to focus on markets such as dairy or beef cow-calf ranches, where the animal itself produces the commodity
and therefore provides an opportunity for maximizing animal health. We have never operated in the vaccine market, which we see
as crowded, and a difficult market for our value proposition. We focus on enhancing the performance or quality of life for the
animal, and therapeutics are better suited to our model.
Our primary competitors currently include Zoetis, Merck, Merial and Bayer in dairy, and
Zoetis, Merck, Merial, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH and Ceva in companion animal. In the future, we may compete against
other companies such as Vetoquinol, Virbac and Dechra which are larger European companies, and other emerging growth companies
such as Aratana, Kindred Biosciences and NexVet.
The level of competition from generic products varies from market to market. For example,
the number of smaller, local generic manufacturers is higher in Europe and certain emerging markets than in the U.S. Generic competition
is certainly present in many markets and may increase in the U.S., notwithstanding the stringent standards of the FDA. We believe
that our strong heritage in competing against generic offerings in many markets has enabled us to hone a strong value proposition
that is not always reliant on patent protection. We also believe that because the animal health market is ostensibly a consumer
market, unlike human health, marketing and branding strategies can be very effective tools for competing against generic products.
Our Intellectual Property
Our technology, brands and other intellectual property are important elements of our
business. We rely on patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret laws, as well as regulatory exclusivity periods and non-disclosure
agreements to protect our intellectual property rights. Our policy is to vigorously protect, enforce and defend our rights to our
intellectual property, as appropriate.
Our product portfolio already enjoys the protection of patents, typically with approximately
15 years or more remaining. We see an increasing array of patent protections as crucial to our growth and development. Additionally,
we utilize other mechanisms of protection, including trade secret in manufacturing methods and formulations. We actively seek to
protect our proprietary information, including our trade secrets and proprietary know-how, by requiring our employees, consultants,
advisors and partners to enter into confidentiality agreements and other arrangements upon the commencement of their employment
or engagement.
The chart below highlights our material patents and product groups, the major jurisdictions,
and relevant expiration periods. Additional patents have been filed to extend the patent life on some of these products, but there
can be no assurance that these will issue as filed.
Product
Group
|
|
Description/Indications
|
|
Patent
Term
|
|
Patent
Expiration
|
|
Patent
Type
|
|
Major Jurisdictions
|
Zydax
|
|
Low molecular weight sulfated xylans/osteoarthritis in dogs and horses
|
|
20 years
|
|
October 8, 2028
|
|
Standard
|
|
Australia, New Zealand, Hong Kong, Europe, U.S.*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAR121
|
|
Orthopedics in dogs, cats and horses
|
|
20 years
|
|
December 10, 2030
|
|
Standard
|
|
Australia, Brazil, China, Europe, Singapore, U.S., India
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAR122
|
|
Dermatology in dogs
|
|
20 years
|
|
May 4, 2030
|
|
Standard
|
|
Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Europe, Japan, Korea, Singapore, U.S., India
|
* Patent application pending in the U.S. and Europe.
Regulatory Processes
To obtain regulatory approval for marketing of our veterinary pharmaceutical products,
we have to demonstrate the quality, safety and effectiveness of the product. For products that will be used in food producing animals,
human food safety of produce from treated animals must additionally be demonstrated. Environmental safety and safety to the human
user of the product may also be necessary.
To demonstrate product quality, all products must be manufactured according to
Good
Manufacturing Practice
, or GMP. GMP covers all aspects of manufacturing, including the facility and equipment in which the
product is manufactured, the quality systems in operation, controls and testing of raw materials, packaging materials, the manufacturing
processes, testing methods and the stability profile. The GMP requirements for injectable products are particularly stringent,
given that all products must be sterile to avoid the possibility of introducing infection when treating patients with the product.
Both active ingredients and finished products must be manufactured under GMP, and part of the approval process for any drug application
is inspection and approval of the specified manufacturing facilities for both the API and the finished products by the regulatory
authorities. Our manufacturing facility, located in Sydney, Australia, has been inspected by the FDA.
To demonstrate safety, for new chemical entities, a comprehensive battery of in vitro
(laboratory, non-animal tests, for example cell line tests) and in-vivo (in animal) test are necessary, and this data also contributes
to the determination of acceptable minimal levels of the drug that may be identified in products that will enter the human food
chain, as well as environmental safety and human user safety.
For demonstration of safety in the intended target species, pivotal well controlled studies
are necessary in that species to demonstrate the effects of long term use of the product in the animal at both the recommended
dose rate and at multiples of that dose rate. For products where a recommended treatment course may be prolonged, as may be required
in chronic disease conditions such as OA, such studies must be conducted for a minimum six month period. Additional safety studies
such as concurrent use with other products may be required if such use is likely to be common standard of care in practice.
To demonstrate effectiveness of the product, in vitro or in vivo mode of action studies
may be necessary. In the intended target species, dose determination studies may also be required, followed by pivotal effectiveness
studies in typically 200 or more client-owned animals conducted with veterinarians in several practices. For production animals,
such studies must cover a range of geographic and management conditions such as would be expected to be typical of the industry
as a whole. In addition, a much larger number of animals is generally required. For production animals particularly, local regulators
generally require that studies are conducted within the relevant country, meaning that typically several such studies must be conducted.
Even for companion animals, the FDA in particular generally requires that the majority of the study is conducted in the U.S.
For production animals, it is necessary to conduct pivotal human food safety studies
to demonstrate potential drug concentrations in products that many enter the human food chain. This requires dosing at the maximum
dose rates for the longest proposed course of treatment, followed by laboratory analysis of animal tissues. This analysis is intended
to demonstrate any drug residue and to provide for a drug withdrawal period, which is the period of time required between the final
treatment and potential collection of produce or slaughter for human consumption.
Data regarding the manufacture of the product and the product chemistry and stability
is included in the CMC section.
As the data for each section is generated, it is formatted into a dossier that is specific
to each jurisdiction. Based on the information from all the different technical sections, we develop the proposed product label
which is also submitted to the regulators in the dossier.
Following approval, sponsors of veterinary pharmaceuticals must comply with post-approval
compliance requirements, including monitoring products, submitting any reports of adverse events or product defects, submitting
annual updates to the product dossier, and periodic manufacturing facility inspections.
U.S. Regulatory Process
The CVM is the division of the FDA responsible for regulation of veterinary pharmaceutical
(non-immunological) products.
The FDA’s data requirements and processes for approval of pharmaceuticals intended
for use in animals are largely the same as those required for pharmaceuticals intended for human use. The CVM ensures that animal
drugs are safe and effective, and are manufactured according to GMP requirements.
Each new drug application submitted to the CVM consists of up to five major technical
sections (safety, efficacy, CMCs, human food safety, environmental safety), and additional sections (labeling, freedom of information
summary and all other information), depending whether the application is for a production animal product or a companion animal
product. Applications are either NADAs or Abbreviated New Animal Drug Applications, or ANADA, or Conditional New Animal Drug Applications.
NADAs are used for drug products with, for example, new compositions, uses or dosage forms. ANADAs are used to show that a proposed
drug product is identical, across a number of factors, to an existing, legally marked drug.
The CVM encourages sponsors to schedule prior submission conferences to review development
programs and to discuss aspects of individual technical sections. Although not mandated, they will review with pivotal study protocols.
With protocol concurrence, the FDA effectively agrees that the study’s design will meet their requirements if the study is
conducted with, and data is analyzed in line with, the concurred protocol.
The FDA is required to approve or not approve a complete NADA within 180 days or such
longer period as the sponsor and the FDA may agree upon. This means that if all sections of the NADA are simultaneously submitted
it could take 180 days for the entire NADA to be reviewed. However the FDA encourages phased submissions of each technical section
of the NADA. Typically the FDA applies the same 180 day review period for individual major sections (such as efficacy, safety,
and CMCs) and upon the final section of the NADA being deemed complete, an Administrative NADA process is undertaken which technically
may take 180 days but the FDA has stipulated they expect it to take 60 days. At the end of the 180 day review for each major section
of the NADA, the FDA will typically have two options; deem the section complete or deem it incomplete. If it is incomplete, we
will need to rectify the deficiencies and re-submit for a further review of 180 days as stated above.
Historically, the FDA has used a third option after the 180 day review period. Rather
than deeming the section incomplete, they may request an end-review amendment, or ERA. This process requires the Company to submit
additional information or clarifications within 30 days, and then the FDA takes a further 135 days to complete the review. This
means that under an ERA, a review could take as long as 345 days. There is a proposal by the FDA, which may or may not come into
effect, which would change the ERA process to a similar process called a “Reactivation” that may allow a company to
rectify non-substantial deficiencies and re-submit the section within 120 days and in which case the subsequent review would take
135 days (instead of 180 days).
In addition to the CFRs, the FDA sets performance goals covering all of the various types
of submissions, of which there are many. For major sections of an NADA, the performance goals are set to respond to 90% or more
of submissions within the 180 day goal and for Administrative NADAs (the final process before approval) within 60 days. Performance
goals for review timeframes are not guaranteed, and furthermore, these timeframes do not include the time taken for us to actually
“complete” the application. Therefore, we cannot accurately predict when or whether final approval may actually occur.
Generic drugs are reviewed within timelines established under the Animal Generic Drug
User Fee Act. The performance goal for the review period for an ANADA is 270 days. The performance goal for the review of a completed,
administrative ANADA (used for a phased review process) is 60 days, but again it is not possible to predict whether performance
goals will be met or when or whether final approval of a drug product may actually occur.
The FDA provides a period of three years of marketing exclusivity for a new use of an
animal drug that requires reports of new clinical or filed investigations for its approval. During this time period, no ANADA for
a generic copy may be approved for the new use. There is also a five year marketing exclusivity period for an animal drug no active
ingredient of which has been previously approved in any NADA, during which no generic application may be submitted for that drug.
However, an ANADA for that product may be submitted after four years if the generic applicant claims non infringement of a listed
patent for the approved product or its use. Where an ANADA applicant alleges non infringement or invalidity of a listed patent,
and the patent holder or NADA holder sues within 45 days of receipt of notice of non-infringement or invalidity, there is an automatic
stay of approval for 30 months or until a court finds that the patent has not been infringed upon or is invalid, whichever is earlier.
In the case of an ANADA that is filed after four years of approval of an NADA for a drug subject to five-year exclusivity, the
30-month period is extended until seven and a half years after approval of the NADA.
In all cases, a drug manufacturing facility may not commence initial production of a
drug, or continue production of a drug, without evidence acceptable to the FDA that the facility has been inspected and is suitable
for conducting manufacturing operations for the products to be manufactured.
EU Regulatory Process
The EU is regulated by both central bodies such as the EMA, and national bodies, such
as the U.K. Veterinary Medicines Directorate. The EMA section responsible for review of veterinary products is the Committee for
Veterinary Medicinal Products.
There are four approval processes that can be followed to obtain Marketing Authorizations
within the EU:
●
|
The Centralized Procedure, which is run by EMA, is obligatory for high technology products and growth promotants. It is optional for other innovative products, provided such products are considered to fall within the EMA remit. At the completion of the centralized process, the Marketing Authorization approval is valid for all EU and European Economic Area-European Free Trade Association states.
|
●
|
The Mutual Recognition Procedure is run by the national regulatory bodies, where a product already has an approval within one or more countries within the EU. The country in which the product is approved is selected as Reference Member State, which completes the primary review and makes recommendations to other selected countries acting as Concerned Member States.
|
●
|
The Decentralized Procedure is similar to the Mutual Recognition Procedure for products that have not previously been approved within the EU. The review process is run in parallel by national regulatory bodies with one country selected as a Reference Member State and other countries acting as Concerned Member States, under a Mutual Recognition process.
|
●
|
The National Procedure is used for products for which approval in a single EU country only is being sought.
|
In contrast to the FDA, EMA and the national authorities do not concur with pivotal study
protocols. Scientific advice can be requested but must be paid for; the EMA is obligated to accept the conclusions of a study conducted
following such scientific advice.
The centralized and decentralized procedures have very structured processes and associated
time frames, with regulator review time taking 210 days. At specified points in the process, the regulator may submit questions
to the applicant, which stops the clock pending return of responses. At the successful completion of the processes, each country
must formally register the product, which generally takes an additional 30 days.
In contrast to most of the world, within the EU, the horse is considered a food producing
species, therefore human food safety packages are necessary for products intended for use in horses. However, recently a horse
passport program has been implemented which records all drug administration to a horse and also deems the horse to be not fit for
human consumption. This has allowed the approval of drugs in horses with a contraindication for use in horses destined for human
consumption.
Residues packages for new drug products for use in food producing animals are assessed
by EMA separately to the application for Marketing Authorization, and are typically submitted six months in advance of any associated
application.
A generic equivalent product may not be placed on the market in the EU until ten years
have lapsed from the initial authorization of the pioneer product.
Australia and New Zealand Regulatory Processes
Approval of veterinary chemical products in Australia is controlled by the Australian
Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Agency, and in New Zealand by the Agricultural Compounds and Veterinary Medicines group. In
New Zealand, applications to the EPA are additionally required. Data requirements generally mirror those outlined above, although
there are some unique local requirements. Given that both countries have very large export markets for agricultural produce, international
trade considerations must be considered in applications for products for food producing animals. When global data packages are
generated to primarily meet FDA and EU requirements, international trade considerations generally do not require additional data.
Rest of World Regulatory Processes
Most countries have their own regulatory agencies for veterinary products. Some countries
essentially recognize approvals by other stringent regulatory authorities and have reduced data requirements (for example many
countries in the Middle East). Some follow FDA or EU requirements. Some countries require additional local studies, particularly
of products are for use in production animals where management systems may vary. Non-English speaking countries usually require
submissions to be submitted in their native language; accordingly, it may be necessary to work with local agents or partner countries
to translate and submit dossiers and to manage the regulatory process.
Environmental, Health, and Safety
We are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign environmental, health and
safety laws and regulations. These laws and regulations govern matters such as:
●
|
the emission and discharge of hazardous materials into the ground, air or water;
|
●
|
the generation, use, storage, handling, treatment, packaging, transportation, exposure to, and disposal of hazardous and biological materials, including record keeping, reporting and registration requirements; and
|
●
|
the health and safety of our employees.
|
Due to our operations, these laws and regulations also require us to obtain, and comply
with, permits, registrations or other authorizations issued by governmental authorities. These authorities can modify or revoke
our permits, registrations or other authorizations and can enforce compliance through fines and injunctions.
Certain environmental laws, impose joint and several liability, without regard to fault,
for cleanup costs on persons who have disposed of or released hazardous substances into the environment. In addition to clean-up
actions brought by federal, state, local and foreign governmental entities, private parties could raise personal injury or other
claims against us due to the presence of, or exposure to, hazardous materials on, from or otherwise relating to such a property.
We have made, and intend to continue to make, necessary expenditures for compliance with applicable environmental, health and safety
laws and regulations.
4.C. Organization Structure
The following diagram summarizes the corporate structure of our consolidated group of
companies as of December 31, 2016:
4.D. Property, Plants and Equipment
Our registered headquarters are located in Alexandria, a suburb of Sydney, Australia.
We entered into a lease for 11,550 square feet of office space and 20,161 square feet of manufacturing space. The lessor, Helion
Properties Pty Ltd, is controlled by Alan R. Bell, our Chairman. The initial ten-year term of the lease began on January 1, 2011.
We have an option to renew the lease for up to two terms of five years each by providing notice in writing between three and twelve
months prior to the expiration of the initial term of the lease. This location serves as our manufacturing facility, and also has
offices for manufacturing personnel and our global finance team.
Our R&D, clinical science, regulatory, sales, marketing, digital technologies, U.S.
finance, human resources and administration functions are located in our 20,026 square feet office in Overland Park, Kansas. We
lease this property under a 10-year lease which commenced in December 2014 upon the completion build out. The lease provides for
an option to renew as well as a right of first refusal over additional space on the same level of our building allowing for future
expansion. The landlord provided a building fit out to the value of USD$35 per square foot, as well as rent abatement for the first
six months of the lease term. In addition to the tenant incentives, the Group was also provided with an expansion grant by the
Department of Commerce in the State of Kansas in light of the expansion of our U.S. Headquarters to accommodate up to 32 new positions
to support our future growth. This incentive provided for a cash grant of USD$400,000 with USD$300,000 upon signing the lease on
the new premises and USD$100,000 in twelve months. There are approximately USD$100,000 in ancillary program incentives and USD$200,000
in tax incentives for a total program incentive of USD$700,000
ITEM 4A. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not applicable.
ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
5.A. Operating Results
Operating results
Our revenues, costs and expenses are reported for the fiscal years ended December 31,
2016, December 31, 2015, the six-month periods ended December 31, 2014 and for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. In
order to provide additional meaningful information to investors, we have included unaudited consolidated information related for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 and the six month period ended December 31, 2013. This unaudited information is presented
for comparative purposes to the corresponding fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and the six month period ended December 31, 2014.
Revenues
Our revenues are currently derived from our two major product portfolios that are used
to increase reproductive efficiencies in cattle and treat OA in dogs and horses, and our contract manufacturing division. Generally,
our products are sold to distributors or veterinarians, by our sales team who augment our sales efforts by utilizing our proprietary
and innovative software platforms,
FETCH
and
mySYNCH
, to drive profitability for veterinary clinics and ensure animal
owners gain the maximum advantage from our animal health solutions.
Costs and expenses
Costs of sales — Total
We have made a substantial investment over the last five years in building and constructing
a modern, FDA-inspected sterile manufacturing facility. We estimate that our total costs attributable to running our manufacturing
facility is approximately $5.0 million annually. This represents personnel costs of the production and quality teams, utilities
costs, internal and external quality testing, manufacturing consumables and rent. It does not include the variable costs of the
products such as the product ingredients and packaging.
Because we are focused on operating a cost efficient facility, management uses a activity
based cost basis to determine the specific cost of manufacturing an individual product. This method allows us to attribute the
exact cost of each manufacturing process for a product as well as the exact costs of the product ingredients and packaging.
We use this costing methodology to identify the direct costs of the products we sell
which we call
Cost of Sales — Products
. Due to our new facility having approximately 64% available capacity, we do
not attribute the full overhead costs of operating the facility to our products that we sell. The remainder of unutilized factory
capacity is therefore separately identified as
Cost of Sales — Facility.
This separation allows our management to have a clear understanding of what the cost
of the products are as compared to the cost of not yet utilizing the full capacity of the facility and similarly what the opportunity
is to fill this capacity with either contract manufacturing opportunities and/or developing our own pipeline product candidates.
Specifically, Cost of sales – Products and Cost of sales – Facility are comprised
of:
Costs of sales
–
Products
consist primarily of cost of
materials, facilities and other infrastructure and resources used to manufacture our products based on a standard cost methodology
that uses attribution of direct costs plus the actual absorption of fixed and overhead manufacturing costs to each unit of product
produced. All remaining fixed costs of operating the manufacturing facility that are not absorbed by actual production are reported
in
Cost of sales
–
Facility
, as explained below.
Costs of sales
–
Facility
consist of, among other things
the fixed and semi-variable expenses, infrastructure and resources required to run our FDA-inspected manufacturing facility less
any allocation of these costs based on a standard costing methodology. These net costs represent the costs associated with running
the manufacturing facility whilst the facility is not fully utilized. As our sales and associated cost of sales increases the utilization
of the facility will be increased and
Costs of sales — Facility
will be reduced. In addition, with 64% available capacity
in this facility we expect to augment this fully operational infrastructure by exploring contract manufacturing opportunities into
the future.
Selling and Marketing expenses
consist of, among other things, the internal
and external direct costs of the sales and marketing, functions including headcount costs for the sales force and marketing team
as well as the costs of promotion, advertising and marketing programs.
Regulatory and research and development expenses
consist of the costs of
maintaining regulatory approvals across all jurisdictions for our approved products. Most of these expenses are associated with
the annual government imposed charges to renew registrations as well as the headcount costs of the regulatory affairs team.
Administration expenses
consist of, among other things the costs associated
with running and maintaining the financial systems and processes, information technology, or IT, systems and infrastructure, as
well as the headcount costs of the finance, human resources, executive functions and costs of maintaining our corporate offices.
Net foreign exchange (losses)/gains on borrowings
includes conversion
costs resulting from movement in foreign currency exchange rates associated with our foreign currency denominated debt facilities.
Finance costs
consist primarily of interest and borrowing costs associated
with the indebtedness as represented in our consolidated balance sheet.
Other income
consists of various items which typically include income from
the sale of fixed assets and/or marketing authorizations of products, government grants and tax incentives, adjustments to provisions
and unrealized foreign exchange gains.
Our Segments
The animal pharmaceutical industry is characterized by meaningful differences in customer
needs across different animal species. In addition, our FDA-inspected sterile manufacturing facility has different operational
characteristics. As a result of these differences, among other things, we manage our operations through four separate reportable
segments.
Companion Animal
. This segment covers our OA portfolios across both canine and
equine species. It is currently responsible for the sales of our osteoarthritis suite of products Zydax, Glyde and Tergive in Australia,
New Zealand, the Middle East, Asia and more recently in the U.S with the establishment of our U.S. Companion Animal team in September,
2015, and in the future in EU if regulatory approvals are obtained.
Production Animal — U.S.
This segment covers our reproductive hormone portfolio
across production animals. It is currently responsible for the sales of our reproductive hormone products estroPLAN and GONAbreed
in the U.S.
Production Animal — Rest of World
. This segment covers our reproductive
hormone portfolio in production animal across all regions outside of the U.S. It is responsible for the sales of these reproductive
hormone products in Australia, New Zealand, the Middle East, Asia and Canada.
Contract Manufacturing
. This segment is responsible for the operation of our FDA-inspected
sterile manufacturing facility and the manufacture and release of all of our pharmaceutical products. The manufacturing operations
are also responsible for increasing factory utilization through current and future contract manufacturing opportunities.
New accounting standards
For discussion of the impact and adoption of accounting standards, see Notes to Consolidated
Annual Financial Statements —
Note 2 (aa). New Accounting Standards and Interpretations not yet adopted.
Significant accounting policies and application of critical accounting estimates
In presenting our financial statements in conformity with IFRS, we are required to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, costs and expenses and related disclosures.
We believe that the following accounting policies are critical to an understanding of
our consolidated financial statements as they require the application of the most difficult, subjective and complex judgments and,
therefore, could have the greatest impact on our financial statements: (i) revenue recognition; (ii)provisions; (iii) capitalization
of intangible assets; (iv) impairment reviews — long-lived assets, including intangible assets; (v) income taxes; (vi) share-based
compensation (vii) and release of non-recurring supplier provision.
For more information regarding our significant accounting policies, estimates and assumptions,
see Notes to Consolidated Annual Financial Statements —
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized when the amount of the revenue can be measured reliably, it is
probable that economic benefits associated with the transaction will flow to the entity and specific criteria relating to the type
of revenue as noted below, have been satisfied. Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable
and is presented net of returns, discounts and rebates.
|
•
|
Sale of goods: recognized on transfer of goods to the customer, as this is deemed to be the point in time when risks and rewards are transferred and there is no longer any ownership or effective control over the goods.
|
|
•
|
Grant income: Government grants, including Australian Research and Development incentives, are recognized at fair value where there is reasonable assurance that the grant will be received and all grant conditions will be met. Grants relating to expense items are recognized as income over the periods necessary to match the grant to the costs they are compensating.
|
|
•
|
Interest income: Interest is recognized using the effective interest method.
|
|
•
|
Divestment of product income: Divestment of product income is recognized at the point in when the marketing authorization and the rights to sell the divested product were transferred to the acquirer for consideration received.
|
Fair Value of Warrants
We recognized warrants that were issued in relation to the loan facility from Partners
for Growth III, LP, or PFG, and 2013 Parnell Bonds. At June 30, 2013, we had recorded liabilities totalling $2.9 million which
we estimate to be the fair value of the warrants to be settled with the third parties.
In January 2014, subsequent to the refinancing of the PFG credit facility with SWK Funding
LLC, we purchased the warrant granted to PFG for consideration of USD$2.0 million in cash.
In May 2014, at the election of the 2013 Parnell bondholders, all of the attached warrants
issued with the 2013 Parnell bonds, between February to September 2013, were converted to 140,075 ordinary shares of the Company.
In February 2016, the Company issued 150,000 warrants to Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC
as part of the Securities Purchase Agreement.
Capitalization of Intangible Assets
We recognized costs associated with identifiable finite-life intangible assets that have
been derived from the capitalization of further development of our products upon initial registration in major markets of these
products. These assets consist of, but are not limited to, costs associated with the further development and enhancement of product
attributes and costs associated with increased geographical registrations of the products. These costs are recognized as intangible
assets when:
|
•
|
the technical feasibility of completing the intangible asset so that it will be available for use or sale;
|
|
•
|
the intention to complete the intangible asset and use or sell it;
|
|
•
|
the ability to use or sell the intangible asset;
|
|
•
|
how the intangible asset will generate probable future economic benefits;
|
|
•
|
the availability of adequate technical, financial and other resources to complete the development and to use or sell the intangible asset; and
|
|
•
|
the ability to measure reliably the expenditure attributable to the intangible asset during its development.
|
We consider the criteria met for recognizing an intangible asset, usually when a regulatory
filing has been made in a major market and approval is considered probable. The capitalized expenditure comprises all directly
attributable costs, including costs of materials, services, direct labor and an appropriate proportion of overheads. Other development
expenditures that do not meet these criteria are recognized as an expense as incurred. Development costs previously recognized
as an expense are not recognized as an asset in a subsequent period. Capitalized development costs are recorded as intangible assets
and amortized from the point at which the asset is ready for use on a straight line basis over its useful life, which is estimated
at ten years.
|
•
|
IT development and software: costs incurred in developing IT products or systems and costs incurred in acquiring software and licenses that will contribute to future period financial benefits through revenue generation and/or cost reduction are capitalized to computer software. Capitalized costs include external direct costs of materials and service and direct payroll and payroll related costs of employees’ time spent on the project. Amortization is calculated on a straight line basis over periods generally ranging from three to five years. IT development costs include only those costs directly attributable to the development phase and are only recognized following completion of technical feasibility and where we have an intention and ability to use the asset.
|
See Note 2 (o) and Note 12 of the consolidated annual financial statements for further
details on the accounting treatment of intangible assets.
Impairment review of long-lived assets
We test on an annual basis whether Property, Plant & Equipment and Intangible Assets
have suffered any impairment, in accordance with the accounting policy stated in the Consolidated Annual Financial Statements —
Note 2(n). The recoverable amounts of these assets have been determined based on value in use calculations. These calculations
require the use of assumptions.
Income taxes
At December 31, 2016, based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections
for future taxable income over the periods in which the deductible temporary differences are anticipated to reverse, management
does not believe it is probable that the Group will realize the benefits of the deferred tax assets in relation to tax losses and
has not recognized such benefits.
Share-Based Compensation
During the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company issued Restricted
Stock Units (“RSUs”), stock options, and equity shares to its current employees and directors under the Company's 2014
Omnibus Equity Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”). As a result of the issuance of awards under the Plan, management
has determined this to be a significant accounting policy and critical accounting estimate and has adopted the Share-Based Compensation
accounting policy described below.
We measure share-based compensation expense based on the fair value of share-based awards
on the date of the grant using an option pricing model. The related compensation expense of the awards is recognized net of forfeitures
over the requisite service periods, which correspond to the vesting periods of the awards. During 2016, we issued share options
and RSUs with service-based vesting conditions, and we record compensation expense for these awards using the graded vesting method.
Additionally, we granted shares of the Company’s stock to employees and recognized stock compensation expense based on the
Company’s closing price on the date of the grant.
Determining the fair value of share-based awards at the grant date requires the exercise
of judgment, and our estimates of the fair value of our share-based awards are highly complex and subjective. The fair value of
our ordinary shares is based on the closing price of our ordinary shares on the Nasdaq Global Market.
We use a Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair value of share options.
This determination is affected by our estimated fair value per ordinary share as well as assumptions regarding a number of other
complex and subjective variables. These variables include the fair value of our ordinary shares, the expected term of the share
option, our volatility over that expected term, expected dividend yield, risk-free interest rates and forfeiture rates. RSUs are
valued at the fair value of the underlying ordinary shares as of the grant date. In addition to these assumptions, we estimate
forfeitures based upon our historical experience. At each period end, we review the estimated forfeiture rate and make changes
as factors affecting the forfeiture rate calculations and assumptions change. Refer to Note 2(b) and Noted 28 in the Consolidated
Annual Financial Statements for additional information.
Analysis of the consolidated statements of operations
The following discussion and analysis of our consolidated results of operations for the
years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, 2014, and 2013 six months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 should be read along with our consolidated
financial statements and the notes thereto, which reflect the results of operations of the business for the year ended December
31, 2016. Additional periods are presented below the analysis for the current periods.
Note: we previously announced results for our fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, and comparative
periods. We transitioned to report our results on a calendar year basis (ended December 31, 2015 and 2014), and as such we are
reporting herein audited results for the 12 months ended December 31,2015, and the comparative period for 2014 derived from our
unaudited results.
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
v%
|
Revenues
|
|
|
19,049
|
|
|
|
13,170
|
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
Cost of Goods Sold – Product
|
|
|
(3,543
|
)
|
|
|
(2,368
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
Cost of Goods Sold – Facility
|
|
|
(5,435
|
)
|
|
|
(5,378
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
Cost of Goods Sold – Total
|
|
|
(8,978
|
)
|
|
|
(7,746
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
Gross Margin
|
|
|
10,071
|
|
|
|
5,424
|
|
|
|
86
|
%
|
Selling and Marketing expenses
|
|
|
(14,121
|
)
|
|
|
(11,777
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
Regulatory & R&D expenses
|
|
|
(1,495
|
)
|
|
|
(882
|
)
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
Administration expenses
|
|
|
(13,232
|
)
|
|
|
(11,940
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
Finance Costs
|
|
|
(3,821
|
)
|
|
|
(1,285
|
)
|
|
|
197
|
%
|
Other income
|
|
|
916
|
|
|
|
6,725
|
|
|
|
(86
|
)%
|
Loss before income tax
|
|
|
(21,682
|
)
|
|
|
(13,735
|
)
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
Income tax (expense)/benefit
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
350
|
%
|
Loss for the year
|
|
|
(21,691
|
)
|
|
|
(13,737
|
)
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
Other comprehensive loss for the year, net of tax
|
|
|
(728
|
)
|
|
|
(1,629
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)%
|
Total comprehensive loss for the year
|
|
|
(22,419
|
)
|
|
|
(15,367
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
Revenues
Revenues - Overview
Total revenues increased by $5.9 million, or 45%, to $19.0 million for the twelve months
ended December 31, 2016 compared to $13.2 million in the same period in 2015.
A detailed comparison of global revenues by operating segment is below:
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
Change
$
|
|
Change
%
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companion Animal
|
|
|
3,911
|
|
|
|
2,101
|
|
|
|
1,810
|
|
|
|
86.1
|
%
|
Production Animal - U.S.
|
|
|
9,201
|
|
|
|
8,084
|
|
|
|
1,117
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
Production Animal - Rest of World
|
|
|
2,051
|
|
|
|
2,985
|
|
|
|
(934
|
)
|
|
|
(31.3
|
%)
|
Manufacturing Operations
|
|
|
3,886
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,886
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Total Revenues
|
|
|
19,049
|
|
|
|
13,170
|
|
|
|
5,879
|
|
|
|
44.6
|
%
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Companion Animal
Year ended December 31, 2016 vs. Year ended December 31, 2015
Our Companion Animal sales increased $1.8 million, or 86.1%, to $3.9 million for the
year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015. The increase in revenue is the result of the full year effect
of Glyde Chews and FETCH in the U.S. ($1.3 million), strong demand for our OA products in Australia ($0.4 million) and the launch
of a Reviderm in the US ($0.1 million). We anticipate that Glyde revenues will continue to generate strong revenues in 2017 in
the U.S., Australia, and potentially in Europe in future years through an appointed marketing partner. Additionally, the sales
and marketing team allows the Company to establish a Companion Animal presence in the U.S. in preparation for the future launch
of Zydax, subject to FDA approval.
Our Companion Animal segment in Australia continued to perform strongly nine years after
launch, posting an $0.4 million (27%) revenue increase compared to the same period in 2015.This growth was the combined effect
of Glyde growing by $0.2 million (26%) and our Zydax franchise delivering a $0.2 million (37%) revenue increase over the comparable
period.
Production Animal – U.S.
Year ended December 31, 2016 vs. Year ended December 31, 2015
Production Animal – U.S.: sales directly to distributors and customers (“ex-Parnell”)
increased for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015 by $1.1 million, or 13.8%, to $9.2 million.
Total volumes grew by 18% from 2015 to 2016.
The Company has pursued two pillars of differentiation: clinical science leadership and
technology differentiation. We completed the PROCEPT trial, which was the largest clinical trial of its kind ever performed in
North America, with nearly 4,000 cows completing the study across 12 clinical trial sites. The primary focus of this trial was
to demonstrate that an adapted breeding program using our products (estroPLAN and GONAbreed) could yield a 10% - 15% increase in
conception rates. Not only does this caliber of trial reinforce our position as a leading innovator within the reproduction market,
but we also believe the new PROCEPT breeding protocol will be market expansionary as it utilizes an additional injection of estroPLAN
in the protocol. Full study results of PROCEPT were reported in 2016.
mySYNCH
is also proving to be a key driver of differentiation in our value proposition
to our clients. We continued development and roll out of
mySYNCH
throughout 2016 and now have over 400,000 cows enrolled
into the application.
Production Animal – Rest of World
Year ended December 31, 2016 vs. Year ended December 31, 2015
Production Animal – Rest of World (ROW): sales decreased in the year ended December
31, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015 by $0.9 million, or 31%, to $2.1 million due to increases in Australia ($0.1 million)
and Africa ($0.2 million) offset by declines in New Zealand ($0.3 million), Middle East ($0.2 million) and Canada ($0.7 million).
Manufacturing
Year ended December 31, 2016 vs. Year ended December 31, 2015
Manufacturing: revenues increased in 2016 increased to $3.9 million from $Nil in the
same period in 2015. During 2016 we signed a multi-year agreement with a large Animal Health company and continue to seek out new
revenue-generating opportunities in 2017 that would allow us to take advantage of the capabilities we have within our FDA-inspected
sterile manufacturing facility. We believe we will reach an agreement, within the first half of 2017, with another large Animal
Health organization to conduct contract manufacturing services which would generate revenues in 2017. We are also responding to
other requests for quotation from animal pharmaceutical and human pharmaceutical companies.
Adjusted EBITDAOI (a non-GAAP financial measure)
Adjusted EBITDAOI is a non-GAAP measure we use to evaluate the performance of individual
segments and our overall performance by assessing the results of our underlying operations prior to considering certain income
statement elements and investing activities. A description of Adjusted EBITDAOI and reconciliation to IFRS reported (Loss)/Income
for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 are provided below under, “Adjusted Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation,
Amortization and Other Income (EBITDAOI) (a non-GAAP financial measure).”
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Change
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
Adjusted EBITDAOI
|
|
|
(16,163
|
)
|
|
|
(17,694
|
)
|
|
|
1,531
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Year ended December 31, 2016 vs. Year ended December 31, 2015
For the year ended December 31, 2016, adjusted EBITDAOI increased by $1.5 million compared
to the same period in 2015 as a result of the following:
|
☐
|
Revenues increased by $5.9 million, or 45%, for the period, (see “Revenues” analysis, above). Overall, we maintained a high product gross margin of 81.4%, which is a slight decline, 0.7%, from 82.1% for the same period ended December 31, 2015;
|
|
☐
|
Cost of Goods Sold – Facility increased very slightly as a result of the full year effect of the headcount added in 2015 for additional manufacturing output that occurred in 2016 and in preparation for Contract Manufacturing opportunities including the commencement of our first Contract Manufacturing agreement in Q2’ 2016;
|
|
☐
|
As such, our Gross Margin increased by $5.7 million, or 86%;
|
|
|
Offset by;
|
|
☐
|
$2.3 million increase in Selling and Marketing expenses (see “Selling and Marketing Expenses” analysis, below);
|
|
☐
|
Regulatory and R&D expenses increased $0.6 million (see “Regulatory & R&D Expenses” analysis, below);
|
|
☐
|
$1.3 million increase in Administration expenses, primarily a result of:
|
|
o
|
increased headcount and external costs to support a substantially larger Commercial R&D organization in the US;
|
|
o
|
increased compliance, regulatory and statutory costs associated with being a public company following our IPO in June 2014; and
|
|
o
|
share-based compensation related to stock options and RSUs issued to employees and directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of Goods Sold
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
Change
$
|
|
Change
%
|
Cost of Goods Sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Goods Sold – Product
|
|
|
3,543
|
|
|
|
2,368
|
|
|
|
1,175
|
|
|
|
49.6
|
%
|
% of revenues
|
|
|
18.6
|
%
|
|
|
17.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Goods Sold – Facility
|
|
|
5,435
|
|
|
|
5,378
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
% of revenues
|
|
|
28.5
|
%
|
|
|
40.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Goods Sold – Total
|
|
|
8,978
|
|
|
|
7,746
|
|
|
|
1,232
|
|
|
|
15.9
|
%
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Year ended December 31, 2016 vs. Year ended December 31, 2015
Costs of Goods Sold – Product
Costs of Goods Sold – Product represents the direct manufacturing costs of the
products we sold. These costs increased by $1.2 million, or 49.6%, for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the same period
in 2015. This was due to $2.0 million in additional sales in 2016 compared to 2015. Our product gross margin decreased in 2016
by 0.7% to 81.4% compared to 82.1% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 due to a higher mix of Companion sales in 2016
compared to 2015.
Year ended December 31, 2016 vs. Year ended December 31, 2015
Costs of Goods Sold – Facility
Cost of Goods Sold - Facility reflects the costs associated with our manufacturing facility.
The modest increase in operational costs was due to the full year effect of the headcount added in 2015 for additional manufacturing
output that occurred in 2016 and preparation for Contract Manufacturing opportunities, including the commencement of our first
Contract Manufacturing agreement in Q2’ 2016. As a result of increased production output and higher sales in 2016, Cost of
Goods Sold – Facility as a percentage of revenue decreased to 28.5%, compared to 40.8% for the same period in 2015.
Selling and Marketing Expenses
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
Change
$
|
|
Change
%
|
Selling and Marketing Expenses
|
|
|
14,121
|
|
|
|
11,777
|
|
|
|
2,344
|
|
|
|
19.9
|
%
|
% of revenues
|
|
|
74.1
|
%
|
|
|
89.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Year ended December 31, 2016 vs. Year ended December 31, 2015
Selling and Marketing expenses increased $2.3 million, or 19.9%, for the year ended December
31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 resulting from the full year effect of the U.S. Companion Animal sales and marketing
team and associated support functions to launch Glyde Chews and FETCH in the U.S. in September 2015.
We undertook an analysis of the return on investment from our US Companion Animal sales
and marketing team in 2016 and determined that the most effective strategy would be to reduce the size of this team whilst concurrently
increasing our focus on our digital technology assets as our primary value proposition. This resulted in the elimination of a number
of positions which we expect will reduce total selling and marketing expenses by approximately $6 million in 2017. Despite this
reduction, we believe we are well positioned to take advantage of growth opportunities through market share acquisition in our
new and existing markets and through category expansion from the potential registration of our product candidates while further
leveraging our infrastructure and resources now in place.
Regulatory and R&D Expenses
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
Change
$
|
|
Change
%
|
Regulatory and R&D Expenses
|
|
|
1,495
|
|
|
|
882
|
|
|
|
613
|
|
|
|
69.5
|
%
|
% of revenues
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Year ended December 31, 2016 vs. Year ended December 31, 2015
Regulatory spending in 2016 of $1.5 million was an increase of $0.6 million over the
prior year. The increase is the full year effect of additional staffing added in 2015 to support our new product filings, in addition
to incremental expenditure on product development projects (PAR121 and PAR122). All eligible development costs directly associated
with the Zydax studies and development work during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 have been capitalized.
We believe our R&D processes are cost and time efficient, and are sufficiently precise
to determine the feasibility of prospective products. This approach affords us the ability to both progress our current portfolio
of pipeline candidates while simultaneously pursuing in-licensing opportunities throughout the remainder of 2016.
Administration Expenses
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
Change
$
|
|
Change
%
|
Administration Expenses
|
|
|
13,232
|
|
|
|
11,940
|
|
|
|
1,292
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
%
|
% of revenues
|
|
|
69.5
|
%
|
|
|
90.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Year ended December 31, 2016 vs. Year ended December 31, 2015
Administration expenses increased $1.3 million, or 10.8%, in the year ended December
31, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015. The increase relates to:
|
o
|
increased headcount and external costs to support a substantially larger Commercial R&D organization in the US;
|
|
o
|
increased compliance, regulatory and statutory costs associated with being a public company following our IPO in June 2014;
|
|
o
|
share-based compensation related to stock options and RSUs issued
to employees and directors
|
As stated above in the selling and marketing expenses section, in 2016 we undertook an
analysis of the cost of remaining a NASDAQ listed entity and becoming a US issuer. The combination of these factors would have
resulted in an approximate, ongoing increase in Administration costs of $2 million per year. We believe that shareholder interests
were not best served by remaining NASDAQ listed so we voluntarily delisted in December 2016. In January, 2017 our shares began
trading on the OTC Open Market. The reduction in costs associated with being NASDAQ listed as well as other cost saving measures
instituted in December, 2016 is expected to result in a reduction in Administration Expenses in 2017 of approximately $4 million.
Finance Costs
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
Change
$
|
|
Change
%
|
Finance costs
|
|
|
3,821
|
|
|
|
1,285
|
|
|
|
2,536
|
|
|
|
197.3
|
%
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Year ended December 31, 2016 vs. Year ended December 31, 2015
Total finance costs increased $2.5 million, or 197.3%, for the year ended December 31,
2016 compared to the same period in 2015.
The increase in finance costs in 2016 is predominantly due to the fees associated with
the pay down of our previously held $USD11.0 million term loan. This facility was in place in the first 11 months of 2016 and was
paid off with the issuance of our new $USD20.0 million term loan in November 2016, resulting in approximately $0.3 million in finance
related costs during the full year ended December 31, 2016. In addition, the previously held term loan of $USD11.0 million commenced
in June 2015, so was only in existent for 6 months in 2015.
At the commencement of the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company held outstanding debt related to the 2013 Parnell Bonds of
$2.9 million, this debt was extended for a further twelve months on the same terms.
Other Income
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
Change
$
|
|
Change
%
|
Other Income
|
|
|
916
|
|
|
|
6,725
|
|
|
|
(5,809)
|
|
|
|
(86.4
|
%)
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Year ended December 31, 2016 vs. Year ended December 31, 2015
Other Income decreased $5.8 million, or 86.4%, for the year ended December 31, 2016 as
compared to year ended December 31, 2015.
The decrease in other income was driven by management’s re-assessment of contingent
provisions associated with supplier obligations in 2015. As of June 30, 2015 management determined that a provision was no longer
necessary resulting in $2.6 million (2016: $Nil) being recorded in other income. In addition, exchange gains, realized and unrealized,
reduced by $3.1 million and R&D Incentive grants reduced by $0.1 million in 2016 compared to 2015.
Income Tax Expense
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
Change
$
|
|
Change
%
|
Income Tax Expense
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
350
|
%
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Year ended December 31, 2016 vs. Year ended December 31, 2015
The income tax expense recorded in the consolidated statement of comprehensive loss increased
approximately $7,000 during the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the same period in the prior year.
Adjusted Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation, Amortization and Other Income
(EBITDAOI) (a non-GAAP financial measure)
General description of Adjusted Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation, Amortization
and Other Income
Adjusted EBITDAOI (a non-GAAP financial measure) is an alternative view of business performance
used by the Company, and we believe that investors’ understanding of our performance is enhanced by disclosing this measure.
We report Adjusted EBITDAOI to portray the results of our underlying operations prior
to considering certain income statement elements and investing activities.
The executive directors are our chief operating decision makers (“CODMs”)
and use the revenues and the segment results (Adjusted EBITDAOI) of the four segments, among other factors, for performance evaluation
of both the individual segments and the overall business, as well as for the allocation of resources.
The CODMs believe that Adjusted EBITDAOI represents the results of our underlying operating
segments prior to considering certain income statement elements and certain other significant items, which are not directly associated
with the activities of the operating segment. We measure our overall performance on this basis in conjunction with other performance
metrics. The following are examples of how the Adjusted EBITDAOI measure is utilized:
●
|
Senior management receives a monthly analysis of our operating results that are prepared with this Adjusted EBITDAOI measure included;
|
●
|
The operating segments of our annual budgets are prepared on an Adjusted EBITDAOI basis; and
|
●
|
It is used in other goal-setting and performance measurements.
|
Despite the importance of this measure to directors and the CODM in goal setting and
performance measurement, Adjusted EBITDAOI is a non-GAAP financial measure that has no standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS
and, therefore, has limitations in its usefulness to investors. Because of its non-standardized definition, Adjusted EBITDAOI,
unlike other GAAP measures, may not be comparable to the calculation of similar measures of other companies. Adjusted EBITDAOI
is presented to communicate to investors how management currently assesses performance, primarily of our operating segments.
A limitation of the Adjusted EBITDAOI measure is that it provides a view of our operations
without including all events during a period and does not provide a comparable view of our performance to other companies. As such,
this is not the only measure by which the executive directors may assess performance.
Certain significant items
Adjusted EBITDAOI is calculated based on the profit/(loss) for the period, by adding
back income tax expense, depreciation, amortization, interest and other finance costs and by removing three significant items:
●
|
Net foreign exchange losses/(gains) associated with the translation of foreign currency-denominated indebtedness over time, which are considered to be a direct result of financing activities that are dependent upon fluctuations in foreign currency rates;
|
●
|
Other income, which typically includes income from the sale of assets, adjustments to provisions or research and grant income received; and
|
●
|
Certain transactions and events where expenses associated with the capital structure of the Company or with certain significant purchase accounting items that result from business combinations and/or asset acquisitions and divestments.
|
Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDAOI
A reconciliation of
Adjusted EBITDAOI
to Loss for the year ended December 31,
2016 and 2015, as reported under IFRS, is as follows:
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
Change
$
|
|
Change
%
|
Loss for the period
|
|
|
(21,691
|
)
|
|
|
(13,735
|
)
|
|
|
(7,956
|
)
|
|
|
57.9
|
%
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
350
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
2,625
|
|
|
|
1,479
|
|
|
|
1,146
|
|
|
|
77.5
|
%
|
Finance costs
|
|
|
3,821
|
|
|
|
1,285
|
|
|
|
2,536
|
|
|
|
197.4
|
%
|
Other (Income)/Expense
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Other Income
|
|
|
(916
|
)
|
|
|
(6,725
|
)
|
|
|
5,809
|
|
|
|
(86.4
|
%)
|
Adjusted EBITDAOI
|
|
|
(16,163
|
)
|
|
|
(17,694
|
)
|
|
|
1,531
|
|
|
|
(8.7
|
%)
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Analysis of the consolidated statements of cash flows
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands)
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
Cash provided by/(used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
(12,116
|
)
|
|
|
(16,417
|
)
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(5,082
|
)
|
|
|
(7,881
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
19,963
|
|
|
|
12,089
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents held
|
|
|
2,765
|
|
|
|
(12,208
|
)
|
Operating Activities
Year ended December 31, 2016 vs. Year ended December 31, 2015
Our net cash outflow from operating activities was $12.1 million for the year ended December
31, 2016 compared to $16.4 million in 2015. The outflow in operating cash flows during 2016 was primarily attributed to:
●
|
$35.2 million outflow associated with (1) the running of our operations because of our increased investment in our commercial infrastructure in the US; (2) the fixed costs associated with the unutilized capacity within our manufacturing facility; (3) financing costs.
|
●
|
The cash outflows were offset by inflows of (1) $22.9 million in sales revenue collected during the period; and (2) collections of R&D tax incentives and interest related to operating activities during the year of $0.2 million.
|
Cash generated by operating activities fluctuates with changes in net income, non-cash
items, such as foreign exchange, share-based compensation and depreciation and working capital.
Investing Activities
Year ended December 31, 2016 vs. Year ended December 31, 2015
Our net cash used in investing activities was $5.1 million for the year ended December
31, 2016 compared to $7.9 million in 2015, a reduction of $2.8 million. This decrease is the combined effect of reduced PP&E
and intangible purchases of $1.2 million and $3.3 million, respectively, offset by a $1.7 million decrease in tax receipts.
Financing Activities
Year ended December 31, 2016 vs. Year ended December 31, 2015
Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $20.0
million compared to $12.1 million in 2015, an increase of $7.9 million, due to the following:
|
☐
|
Net increase of $12.1 million associated with the loan redemption/reissuance, being $27.9 million raised from the new 2016 Term Loan Facility of which $14.9 million was utilized to repay the MIDCAP Term Loan in full.
|
|
☐
|
Net proceeds from the issuance of ordinary shares of $7.7 million.
|
|
☐
|
Issuance of warrants $0.1 million
|
Year ended December 31, 2015 vs. Year ended December 31, 2014
The following discussion and analysis of our consolidated results of operations for the
years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 should be read along with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, which
reflect the results of operations of the business for the year ended December 31, 2015. Additional periods are presented below
the analysis for the current periods.
Note: we previously announced results for our fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, and comparative
periods. We transitioned to report our results on a calendar year basis (ended December 31, 2015 and 2014), and as such we are
reporting herein audited results for the 12 months ended December 31,2015, and the comparative period for 2014 derived from our
unaudited results.
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
December 31, 2014
(unaudited)
|
|
v%
|
Revenues
|
|
|
13,170
|
|
|
|
8,361
|
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
Cost of Goods Sold - Product
|
|
|
(2,368
|
)
|
|
|
(1,796
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
Cost of Goods Sold - Facility
|
|
|
(5,378
|
)
|
|
|
(4,967
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Cost of Goods Sold - Total
|
|
|
(7,746
|
)
|
|
|
(6,763
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
Gross Margin
|
|
|
5,424
|
|
|
|
1,597
|
|
|
|
240
|
%
|
Selling and Marketing expenses
|
|
|
(11,777
|
)
|
|
|
(5,999
|
)
|
|
|
96
|
%
|
Regulatory & R&D expenses
|
|
|
(882
|
)
|
|
|
(846
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
%)
|
Administration expenses
|
|
|
(11,940
|
)
|
|
|
(4,794
|
)
|
|
|
149
|
%
|
Finance Costs
|
|
|
(1,285
|
)
|
|
|
(5,912
|
)
|
|
|
(78
|
%)
|
Net foreign exchange losses on borrowings
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,022
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
%)
|
Other income
|
|
|
6,725
|
|
|
|
5,615
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
Loss before income tax
|
|
|
(13,735
|
)
|
|
|
(11,363
|
)
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
Income tax (expense)/benefit
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2,983
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
%)
|
Loss for the year
|
|
|
(13,737
|
)
|
|
|
(14,345
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
%)
|
Other comprehensive loss for the year, net of tax
|
|
|
(1,629
|
)
|
|
|
(1,272
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
Total comprehensive loss for the year
|
|
|
(15,367
|
)
|
|
|
(15,617
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
%)
|
Revenues
Revenues - Overview
Total revenues increased by $4.8 million, or 58%, to $13.2 million for the twelve months
ended December 31, 2015 compared to $8.4 million in the same period in 2014. In addition, we had a very strong second half performance
in 2015 with total revenues increasing by $4.7 million, or 130% as both our U.S. Production Animal and total Companion Animal operating
segments continued to perform strongly.
A detailed comparison of global revenues by operating segment is below:
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
December 31, 2014
(unaudited)
|
|
Change
$
|
|
Change
%
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companion Animal
|
|
|
2,101
|
|
|
|
1,391
|
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
51.0
|
%
|
Production Animal - U.S.
|
|
|
8,084
|
|
|
|
2,192
|
|
|
|
5,892
|
|
|
|
268.8
|
%
|
Production Animal - Rest of World
|
|
|
2,985
|
|
|
|
4,778
|
|
|
|
(1,793
|
)
|
|
|
(37.5
|
%)
|
Manufacturing Operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
|
13,170
|
|
|
|
8,361
|
|
|
|
4,809
|
|
|
|
57.5
|
%
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Companion Animal
Year ended December 31, 2015 vs. Year ended December 31, 2014
Our Companion Animal sales increased $0.7 million, or 51.0%, to $2.1 million for the
year ended December 31, 2015, compared to the same period in 2014. The increase in revenue was related to the launch of Glyde Chews
and FETCH in the U.S. in September 2015. As part of the U.S. launch of Glyde Chews and FETCH we expanded our presence in the U.S.
Companion Animal market with a sales and marketing team consisting of 55 personnel. We anticipate that Glyde could generate strong
revenues in 2016 in the U.S. and potentially in Europe in future years through an appointed marketing partner. Additionally, presence
of the sales and marketing team allows the Company to establish a Companion Animal presence in the U.S. in preparation for the
expected launch of Zydax in 2016, subject to FDA approval.
Our Companion Animal segment in Australia continued to perform strongly seven years after
launch, although regulatory delays for the approval of Glyde Chews impacted Australian sales in the first half of 2015, such that
full year sales in 2015 were flat when compared to the same period in 2014. With this fully resolved in May 2015, sales of our
Companion Animal products in Australia for the six-months to December 31, 2015, were up $0.3 million, or 51%, compared to the same
period in 2014, building strong momentum as we proceed into 2016.The sales of our Companion products in Australia remained flat
year over year due to a lengthy and unanticipated delay in regulatory approval of Glyde Chews in that country. As a result we were
out of the market with both Glyde Chews and Glyde Powder for all of April and much of May 2015. Since 2012 we have operated the
Australian Companion Animal business utilizing two Territory Managers and a Sales and Marketing Associate. In 2015, we deployed
two additional territory managers in Victoria and Queensland, which we anticipate will increase the number of new clinics we can
target to adopt FETCH (our digital technology that we provide to vet clinics to manage their osteoarthritis franchises) in addition
to our osteoarthritis products. We have also recruited a Sales & Marketing Director who is responsible for our commercial operations
in Australia and New Zealand. This role will further enhance our leadership presence in the Australia and New Zealand markets.
These changes, in conjunction with Glyde being fully available for the second half of 2015, resulted in a strong second half of
2015 for the Australian Companion Animal team with total revenues increasing by $0.3 million, or 51%, for the six months ended
December 31, 2015 compared to the same period in 2014. This was the result of Zydax sales increasing by 45% and Glyde sales increasing
by 74% during this six month period.
Production Animal – U.S.
Year ended December 31, 2015 vs. Year ended December 31, 2014
Production Animal – U.S.: sales directly to distributors and customers (“ex-Parnell”)
increased in the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to the same period in 2014 by $5.9 million, or 269%, to $8.1 million. The
increase in 2015 as compared to 2014 was due to an increase in volumes of 251%, price increase of 9% and favorable foreign currency
movements 9%. Furthermore, U.S. sales (ex-Parnell) increased in the second half of 2015 compared to the first half by $3.9 million,
or 330%, showing continued growth in the U.S. Production Animal market in the second half of 2015. In addition, sales in-market
(sales from distributors to veterinarians and dairy producers) over twelve months ended December 31, 2015 were up 55% from USD$3.1
million in 2014 to USD$4.9 million in 2015. As previously communicated, this clearly demonstrates that the inventory run-down by
distributors that occurred throughout 2014 has been completed and that ex-Parnell sales will now track in-market demand. Furthermore,
sales in-market for the six months ended December 31, 2015 were up 58% to $USD2.8 million compared to $USD1.7 million for the same
period in 2014, demonstrating again that sales demand for our products and value proposition continued to grow in the second half
of the year.
Strong growth in 2015 was primarily driven by the recent expansion of our sales team
to now cover 7 territories and the continued implementation of our value proposition. In 2014 for the same period, we only had
4 territories and we had not commenced the marketing of
mySYNCH
®, our innovative digital technology that assists dairy
farmers to improve the profitability of their operations.
The ongoing success in commercializing our reproductive hormones in the U.S. saw our
market share in December 2015 reach its highest level since our launch in the U.S.. Whilst we continue to establish our commercial
presence in the U.S. Production Animal segment, we have noted many positive indications that our value proposition is being well-received
by the market, and we continue to compete effectively against much larger incumbents as seen by our continued increase in share
of market.
The Company has pursued two pillars of differentiation: clinical science leadership and
technology differentiation. We completed the PROCEPT trial, which was the largest clinical trial of its kind ever performed in
North America, with nearly 4,000 cows completing the study across 12 clinical trial sites. The primary focus of this trial was
to demonstrate that an adapted breeding program using our products (estroPLAN and GONAbreed) could yield a 10% increase in conception
rates. Not only does this caliber of trial reinforce our position as a leading innovator within the reproduction market, but we
also believe the new PROCEPT breeding protocol will be market expansionary as it utilizes an additional injection of estroPLAN
in the protocol. Full study results of PROCEPT will be reported in 2016.
mySYNCH
is also proving to be a key driver of differentiation in our value proposition
to our clients. We continued development of
mySYNCH
in the first half of 2015, in conjunction with our territory managers
and customers, and rolled out to the technology to the US, Australia and New Zealand in Q3, 2015.
Production Animal – Rest of World
Year ended December 31, 2015 vs. Year ended December 31, 2014
Production Animal – Rest of World (ROW): sales decreased in the year ended December
31, 2015, compared to the same period in 2014 by $1.8 million, or 37%, to $3.0 million due primarily by volume declines due to
timing difference of shipments to distribution partners in Canada and Turkey. Due to inventory levels, Canada placed two orders
in 2014 compared to only one in 2015, resulting in the year on year decrease in ex-Parnell sales in 2015, however these inventory
levels are now normalized and are not expected to impact 2016 sales. We expect the trajectory of sales in this segment to improve
as our marketing partner inventory levels are normalized. Nevertheless we continue to focus on improving operational performance
in the key markets for this segment; in Australia-New Zealand, where declining milk prices are causing some headwinds and in Canada
where entry of a low price competitor has caused our growth to slow in the last twelve months. The launch of
mySYNCH
®
into Australia and New Zealand in the second half of 2015 is expected to be a major contributor to improved results in this region
as enhanced reproductive performance is especially important during periods of low milk prices. We are also working with our Canadian
distribution partner to increase market share and with several orders already received in other regions we expect to improve this
segment result in 2016.
Manufacturing
Year ended December 31, 2015 vs. Year ended December 31, 2014
We did not generate contract manufacturing revenues during 2015 or the comparable period
of 2014. We are focused on identifying revenue-generating opportunities that would commence in 2016, taking advantage of the capabilities
we have within our FDA-inspected sterile manufacturing facility. We believe we will reach an agreement, within the first half of
2016, with potentially two large Animal Health organizations to conduct contract manufacturing services which would generate revenues
in 2016.
Adjusted EBITDAOI (a non-GAAP financial measure)
Adjusted EBITDAOI is a non-GAAP measure used by our directors and senior executives to
evaluate the performance of individual segments and our overall performance by assessing the results of our underlying operations
prior to considering certain income statement elements and investing activities. A description of Adjusted EBITDAOI and reconciliation
to IFRS reported (Loss)/Income for the year ended December31, 2015 and 2014 are provided below under, “Adjusted Earnings
before Interest, Tax, Depreciation, Amortization and Other Income (EBITDAOI) (a non-GAAP financial measure).”
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
Change
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2015
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
Adjusted EBITDAOI
|
|
|
(17,694
|
)
|
|
|
(8,343
|
)
|
|
|
(9,351
|
)
|
|
|
(112.1
|
%)
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Year ended December 31, 2015 vs. Year ended December 31, 2014
For the year ended December 31, 2015, adjusted EBITDAOI decreased by $9.4 million compared
to the same period in 2014 as a result of the following:
|
☐
|
Revenues increased by $4.8 million, or 58%, for the period, (see “Revenues” analysis, above). Overall, we maintained a high product gross margin of 82.1%, which is a 3.6% improvement from 78.5% for the same period ended December 31, 2014;
|
|
☐
|
Cost of Goods Sold – Facility increased slightly as a result of additional headcount due to additional manufacturing output and preparation for Contract Manufacturing opportunities;
|
|
☐
|
As such, our Gross Margin increased by $3.8 million, or 240%;
|
|
|
Offset by;
|
|
☐
|
$5.8 million increase in Selling and Marketing expenses (see “Selling and Marketing Expenses” analysis, below);
|
|
☐
|
Regulatory and R&D expenses remained consistent with the prior period (see “Regulatory & R&D Expenses” analysis, below);
|
|
☐
|
$7.1million increase in Administration expenses, primarily a result of:
|
|
o
|
increased headcount and external costs to support a substantially larger Commercial R&D organization in the US;
|
|
o
|
increased compliance, regulatory and statutory costs associated with being a public company following our IPO in June 2014; and
|
|
o
|
share-based compensation related to stock options and RSUs issued to employees and directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of Goods Sold
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
December 31, 2014
(unaudited)
|
|
Change
$
|
|
Change
%
|
Cost of Goods Sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Goods Sold - Product
|
|
|
2,368
|
|
|
|
1,796
|
|
|
|
572
|
|
|
|
31.8
|
%
|
% of revenues
|
|
|
17.9
|
%
|
|
|
21.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Goods Sold - Facility
|
|
|
5,378
|
|
|
|
4,967
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
% of revenues
|
|
|
40.8
|
%
|
|
|
59.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Goods Sold - Total
|
|
|
7,746
|
|
|
|
6,763
|
|
|
|
983
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
%
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Year ended December 31, 2015 vs. Year ended December 31, 2014
Costs of Goods Sold – Product
Costs of Goods Sold – Product represents the direct manufacturing costs of the
products we sold. These costs increased by $0.6 million, or 31.8%, for the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to the same period
in 2014. This was due to $4.8 million in additional sales in 2015 compared to 2014. Our product gross margin continued to improve
throughout 2015, increasing 3.6% to 82.1% compared to 78.5% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014.
Year ended December 31, 2015 vs. Year ended December 31, 2014
Costs of Goods Sold – Facility
Cost of Goods Sold - Facility reflects the costs associated with our manufacturing facility.
The increase in operational costs, $0.4 million, was due to two additional headcount added in 2015as a result of higher volumes
and in anticipation of 2016 contract manufacturing opportunities, partially offset by increased production resulting in a higher
overhead recovery in 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014. As a result of increase production output and higher sales in
2015, Cost of Goods Sold – Facility as a percentage of revenue decreased to 40.8%, compared to 59.4% for the same period
in 2014.
Selling and Marketing Expenses
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
December 31, 2014
(unaudited)
|
|
Change
$
|
|
Change
%
|
Selling and Marketing Expenses
|
|
|
11,777
|
|
|
|
5,999
|
|
|
|
5,778
|
|
|
|
96.3
|
%
|
% of revenues
|
|
|
89.4
|
%
|
|
|
71.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Year ended December 31, 2015 vs. Year ended December 31, 2014
Selling and Marketing expenses increased $5.8 million, or 96.3%, for the year ended December
31, 2015 compared to the same period in 2014 as a result of the expansion of our U.S. commercial presence in both our Production
Animal and Companion Animal business segments and unfavorable foreign exchange variances of approximately 9%. With the results
of our Zydax efficacy study, we recruited a 50-person national Companion Animal sales and marketing team and associated support
functions to launch Glyde Chews and FETCH in the U.S. in September 2015.
In 2015 we also expanded our U.S. Production Animal infrastructure by adding a seventh
Territory Manager and enhancing our marketing leadership and support functions of our U.S. Production Animal sales team. In addition
to utilizing this infrastructure for the launch of our newly developed
mySYNCH
program in 2015, this team is also responsible
for marketing our future product pipeline candidates GONADOPRO and PAR061 in future years, if approved by the FDA.
In the future, we expect our current sales and marketing capability will enable us to
take advantage of growth opportunities through market share acquisition in our new and existing markets and through category expansion
from the potential registration of our product candidates while further leveraging our infrastructure and resources now in place.
Regulatory and R&D Expenses
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
December 31, 2014
(unaudited)
|
|
Change
$
|
|
Change
%
|
Regulatory and R&D Expenses
|
|
|
882
|
|
|
|
846
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
% of revenues
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
10.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Year ended December 31, 2015 vs. Year ended December 31, 2014
Regulatory spending increased slightly for the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared
to the same period in 2014. The small increase was primarily from additional staffing to support our new product filings. All development
costs directly associated with the Zydax studies and development work during the year ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 have been
capitalized.
We believe our R&D processes are cost and time efficient, and are sufficiently precise
to determine the feasibility of prospective products. This approach affords us the ability to both progress our current portfolio
of pipeline candidates while simultaneously pursuing in-licensing opportunities throughout the remainder of 2015.
Administration Expenses
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
December 31, 2014
(unaudited)
|
|
Change
$
|
|
Change
%
|
Administration Expenses
|
|
|
11,940
|
|
|
|
4,794
|
|
|
|
7,146
|
|
|
|
149.1
|
%
|
% of revenues
|
|
|
90.7
|
%
|
|
|
57.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Year ended December 31, 2015 vs. Year ended December 31, 2014
Administration expenses increased $8.9 million, or 149.0%, in the year ended December
31, 2015, compared to the same period in 2014. The increase relates to:
|
o
|
increased headcount and external costs to support a substantially larger Commercial R&D organization in the US;
|
|
o
|
increased compliance, regulatory and statutory costs associated with being a public company following our IPO in June 2014;
|
|
o
|
Unfavorable foreign currency exchange of approximately 9%; and
|
|
o
|
share-based compensation related to stock options and RSUs issued to employees and directors of approximately $0.6 million
|
Finance Costs and net foreign exchange losses on borrowings
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
December 31, 2014
(unaudited)
|
|
Change
$
|
|
Change
%
|
Finance costs
|
|
|
1,285
|
|
|
|
5,912
|
|
|
|
(4,627
|
)
|
|
|
(78.3
|
%)
|
Net foreign exchange losses on borrowings
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,022
|
|
|
|
(1,022
|
)
|
|
|
(100.0
|
%)
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Year ended December 31, 2015 vs. Year ended December 31, 2014
Total finance costs and net foreign exchange losses on borrowings decreased $5.6 million,
or 81.5%, for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to the same period in 2014.
Finance costs decreased in 2015 predominantly due to the pay down of our previously held
$US25 million senior debt facility. This facility was in place in the first six months of 2014 but was repaid from the proceeds
of our initial public offering, or IPO, in June 2014. Further, we incurred non-recurring expenses of $0.3 million in 2014 associated
with our IPO.
At the commencement of the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company held outstanding debt related to the 2013 Parnell Bonds of
$4.3 million, $1.5 million of which were settled in cash during the period and the remaining balance of $2.9 million was extended
for a further twelve months on the same terms. In addition, the Company entered into a debt agreement to obtain a $USD11.0 million
term loan on June 15, 2015, resulting in approximately $0.7 million in finance related costs during the full year ended December
31, 2015.
We did not incur foreign exchange losses on borrowing during the year ended December
31, 2015 as the outstanding borrowings consist of the 2013 Parnell Bonds which are denominated in Australian dollars and the term
loan is a U.S. dollar loan held in a U.S. dollar entity.
Other Income
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
December, 2014
(unaudited)
|
|
Change
$
|
|
Change
%
|
Other Income
|
|
|
6,725
|
|
|
|
5,615
|
|
|
|
1,110
|
|
|
|
19.8
|
%
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Year ended December 31, 2015 vs. Year ended December 31, 2014
Other Income increased $1.1 million, or 19.9%, for the year ended December 31, 2015 as
compared to year ended December 31, 2014.
The increase in other income was primarily driven by management’s re-assessment
of contingent provisions associated with supplier obligations. As of June 30, 2015 management determined that a provision was no
longer necessary resulting in $2.6 million (2014: $Nil) being recorded in other income. This was partially offset more favorable
exchange gains in 2014 as compared to 2015.
Income Tax Expense
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
December 31, 2014
(unaudited)
|
|
Change
$
|
|
Change
%
|
Income Tax Expense
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2,983
|
|
|
|
(2,981
|
)
|
|
|
(99.9
|
%)
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Year ended December 31, 2015 vs. Year ended December 31, 2014
The income tax expense recorded in the consolidated statement of comprehensive loss decreased
approximately $3.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to the same period in the prior year.
During 2014, management evaluated the evidence bearing upon the potential realization
of its deferred tax assets, which primarily consist of net losses carried forward. Based on the analysis, management determined
that the Company will not utilize certain tax benefits and accordingly derecognized approximately $3.0 million of deferred tax
assets. The elements of unrecognized future tax benefits will be assessed by management going forward and potentially recorded
at a point in which management believes they will be utilized.
Adjusted Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation, Amortization and Other Income
(EBITDAOI) (a non-GAAP financial measure)
General description of Adjusted Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation, Amortization
and Other Income
Adjusted EBITDAOI (a non-GAAP financial measure) is an alternative view of business performance
used by the Company, and we believe that investors’ understanding of our performance is enhanced by disclosing this measure.
We report Adjusted EBITDAOI to portray the results of our underlying operations prior
to considering certain income statement elements and investing activities.
The executive directors are our chief operating decision makers (“CODMs”)
and use the revenues and the segment results (Adjusted EBITDAOI) of the four segments, among other factors, for performance evaluation
of both the individual segments and the overall business, as well as for the allocation of resources.
The independent directors and the CODMs believe that Adjusted EBITDAOI represents the
results of our underlying operating segments prior to considering certain income statement elements and certain other significant
items, which are not directly associated with the activities of the operating segment. We measure our overall performance on this
basis in conjunction with other performance metrics. The following are examples of how the Adjusted EBITDAOI measure is utilized:
●
|
Senior management receives a monthly analysis of our operating results that are prepared with this Adjusted EBITDAOI measure included;
|
●
|
The operating segments of our annual budgets are prepared on an Adjusted EBITDAOI basis; and
|
●
|
It is used in other goal-setting and performance measurements.
|
Despite the importance of this measure to directors and the CODM in goal setting and
performance measurement, Adjusted EBITDAOI is a non-GAAP financial measure that has no standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS
and, therefore, has limitations in its usefulness to investors. Because of its non-standardized definition, Adjusted EBITDAOI,
unlike other GAAP measures, may not be comparable to the calculation of similar measures of other companies. Adjusted EBITDAOI
is presented to communicate to investors how management currently assesses performance, primarily of our operating segments.
A limitation of the Adjusted EBITDAOI measure is that it provides a view of our operations
without including all events during a period and does not provide a comparable view of our performance to other companies. As such,
this is not the only measure by which the executive directors may assess performance.
Certain significant items
Adjusted EBITDAOI is calculated based on the loss for the period, by adding back depreciation
and amortization and by removing three significant items:
●
|
Net foreign exchange losses/(gains) associated with the translation of foreign currency-denominated indebtedness over time, which are considered to be a direct result of financing activities that are dependent upon fluctuations in foreign currency rates;
|
●
|
Other income, which typically includes income from the sale of assets, adjustments to provisions or research and grant income received; and
|
●
|
Certain transactions and events where expenses associated with the capital structure of the Company or with certain significant purchase accounting items that result from business combinations and/or asset acquisitions and divestments.
|
Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDAOI
A reconciliation of
Adjusted EBITDAOI
to Loss for the year ended December 31,
2015 and 2014, as reported under IFRS, is as follows:
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
December 31, 2014
(unaudited)
|
|
Change
$
|
|
Change
%
|
Loss for the period
|
|
|
(13,735
|
)
|
|
|
(14,345
|
)
|
|
|
610
|
|
|
|
(4.3
|
%)
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2,982
|
|
|
|
(2,980
|
)
|
|
|
(99.9
|
%)
|
Transaction related costs
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
(352
|
)
|
|
|
(100.0
|
%)
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
1,479
|
|
|
|
1,349
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
Finance costs
|
|
|
1,285
|
|
|
|
5,912
|
|
|
|
(4,627
|
)
|
|
|
(78.3
|
%)
|
Net foreign exchange losses on borrowings
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,022
|
|
|
|
(1,022
|
)
|
|
|
(100.0
|
%)
|
Other Income
|
|
|
(6,725
|
)
|
|
|
(5,615
|
)
|
|
|
(1,110
|
)
|
|
|
19.8
|
%
|
Adjusted EBITDAOI
|
|
|
(17,694
|
)
|
|
|
(8,343
|
)
|
|
|
(9,351
|
)
|
|
|
112.1
|
%
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Analysis of the consolidated statements of cash flows
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands)
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
December 31, 2014
(unaudited)
|
Cash provided by/(used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
(16,417
|
)
|
|
|
(16,253
|
)
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(7,881
|
)
|
|
|
(2,896
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
12,089
|
|
|
|
31,008
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents held
|
|
|
(12,208
|
)
|
|
|
11,859
|
|
Operating Activities
Year ended December 31, 2015 vs. Year ended December 31, 2014
Our net cash outflow from operating activities was $16.4 million for the year ended December
31, 2015 compared to $16.2 million in 2014. The outflow in operating cash flows during 2015 was primarily attributed to:
●
|
$28.5 million outflow associated with (1) the running of our operations as a result of our increased investment in our commercial infrastructure in the US; (2) the fixed costs associated with the unutilized capacity within our manufacturing facility; (3) $1.2 million in financing costs.
|
●
|
The aforementioned cash outflows were offset by an inflow due to (1)
$12.5 million in sales revenue collected during the period; and (2) collections of R&D tax incentives related to operating
activities during the year of $0.8 million.
|
Cash generated by operating activities fluctuates with changes in net income, non-cash
items, such as foreign exchange, share-based compensation and depreciation and working capital.
Investing Activities
Year ended December 31, 2015 vs. Year ended December 31, 2014
Our net cash used in investing activities was $7.9 million for the year ended December
31, 2015 compared to $2.9 million in 2014, due to significant investment made in the pivotal efficacy clinical trial and Active
Product Ingredient (API) development for Zydax, $5.4 million during the period, continued investment in the development of our
digital technology platforms,
mySYNCH
and FETCH, $1.6 million, development of product pipeline, $0.4 million, and the establishment
of our new offices in Overland Park, KS and refurbishment of our Australian offices and manufacturing facility improvements, $1.7
million. These were partially offset by the $1.7 million in receipts related to R&D government (or tax) Incentives.
Financing Activities
Year ended December 31, 2015 vs. Year ended December 31, 2014
Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $12.1
million compared to $31.0 million in 2014, attributable to:
|
☐
|
Net proceeds from a term loan secured in June 2015 of USD$11 million (AUD$13.6 million, net of borrowing costs); and offset by
|
|
☐
|
Repayment of $1.5 million on 2013 Parnell bonds
|
Six Months ended December 31, 2014 vs. Six Months ended December 31, 2013
The following discussion and analysis of our consolidated results of operations for the
six months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 should be read along with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto,
which reflect the results of operations of the business for the six months ended December 31, 2014.
Note: we previously announced results for our fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, and comparative
periods. We transitioned to report our results on a calendar year basis (ended December 31, 2014), and as such we are reporting
herein audited results for the six-months from July 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014, and the comparative period for 2013 derived from
our unaudited results.
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
6 months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2014
|
|
December 31, 2013
(unaudited)
|
|
v%
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companion Animal
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
654
|
|
|
|
(17
|
%)
|
Production Animal - U.S.
|
|
|
1,189
|
|
|
|
643
|
|
|
|
85
|
%
|
Production Animal - Rest of World
|
|
|
1,932
|
|
|
|
1,546
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
Manufacturing Operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
|
3,663
|
|
|
|
2,843
|
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Revenues
Revenues - Overview
Total revenue increased by $0.8 million (29%) for the six months ended December 31, 2014,
compared to the same period in 2013. This indicates strong revenue growth in the second half of 2014.
Global revenues by operating segment were as follows:
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
6 months Ended
|
|
6 months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2014
|
|
December 31, 2013
(unaudited)
|
|
v%
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companion Animal
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
654
|
|
|
|
(17
|
%)
|
Production Animal - U.S.
|
|
|
1,189
|
|
|
|
643
|
|
|
|
85
|
%
|
Production Animal - Rest of World
|
|
|
1,932
|
|
|
|
1,546
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
Manufacturing Operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
|
3,663
|
|
|
|
2,843
|
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Revenues - Segments
Companion Animal segment
Six Months ended December 31, 2014 vs. Six Months ended December 31, 2013
Sales in 2014 were affected by the carry-over effects (into early 2014) of stock outages
of Zydax due to the transition to a new API supplier that occurred throughout 2013 and into 2014. Specifically we were able to
supply the market with product in late 2013 but only for a limited period before an additional delay in supply in the first four
months of 2014. The result of this was that our customers purchased larger quantities of product, at normal, commercial terms and
conditions, in late 2013 in advance of the stock outage. Most importantly, the API supply for Zydax has now been fully resolved
with Lonza producing sufficient quantities of API in the second half of 2014 to last well into 2015. We also expect full commercial
supply of API to be readily available in time for anticipated launches in the U.S. and Europe in 2016.
Due to these variations in availability of stock year on year, total Companion Animal
sales for the six months ended December 31, 2014 decreased by $0.1 million (17%) compared to the six months ended December 31,
2013.
Glyde sales were flat (up 1%) in calendar year 2014 compared to 2013 largely due to the
delayed launch of Glyde Chews, which was initially expected in the second-half of 2014. We did not launch Glyde Chews until September
2015.
Zydax sales increased 18%, or $0.1 million, for the full calendar year of 2014 over calendar
year 2013. Whilst this is encouraging, it is also fewer sales than we expected to achieve and was caused by supply challenges in
2013 and early 2014. Availability of API for the Australian market has now been fully resolved given the successful scale up of
manufacturing of API by Lonza. Lonza produced three commercial-scale batches in the second half of 2014, which will provide ample
API for the Australian market. We also expect that Lonza will produce large quantities of Zydax API in preparation for our anticipated
U.S. and European launches in 2016 upon gaining approval.
Since 2012 we have operated the Australian Companion Animal business with two Territory
Managers and a Sales and Marketing Associate. In 2015, we established two additional territory managers in Victoria and Queensland
which we expect will increase the number of new clinics we can target to adopt FETCH (our digital technology we provide to vet
clinics to manage their osteoarthritis franchise, formerly known as iKAM) and our osteoarthritis products. We have also established
a new role of Sales & Marketing Director – ANZ who is responsible for the commercial operations of Australia and New
Zealand. This role will further enhance our leadership presence in the Australia and New Zealand markets following the move of
our corporate headquarters to the USA in 2012.
Production Animal - U.S. segment
Six Months ended December 31, 2014 vs. Six Months ended December 31, 2013
Sales from Parnell to distributors (ex-Parnell) increased in the six months ended December
31, 2014, compared to the same period in 2013 by $0.5 million, or 85%, to $1.2 million. Furthermore, ex-Parnell sales increased
in the second half of 2014 compared to the first half by $0.2 million, or 18%, showing continued growth in the U.S. Production
Animal market.
Parnell has pursued two pillars of differentiation: clinical science leadership and technology
differentiation. In 2014, we completed the PROCEPT trial, which was the largest clinical trial of its kind ever run in North America
with nearly 4,000 cows completing the study across 12 clinical trial sites. The aim of this trial was to demonstrate that an adapted
breeding program using our products estroPLAN and GONAbreed could deliver a 10% increase in conception rates. Not only does this
caliber of trial reinforce our position as a leader in innovation in the reproduction segment, but we believe the new PROCEPT breeding
protocol will be market expansionary as it utilizes an additional injection of estroPLAN in the protocol.
mySYNCH
is also proving to be a key driver of differentiation in our value proposition
to our clients. We have developed an operational model of
mySYNCH
which we rolled out to our key customers for their use.
Based on their feedback, we expect to continue to develop
mySYNCH
in 2015 and to offer a truly unique value proposition
to our customers.
Production Animal - Rest of World segment
Six Months ended December 31, 2014 vs. Six Months ended December 31, 2013
For the six months ended December 31, 2014, over the same period in 2013, total Production
Animal – ROW sales increased by 25% to $0.4 million
All markets experienced growth driven by market share acquisition. In Australia and New
Zealand we recovered sales we had lost in 2013 to competitors who had utilized extensive marketing programs to grab market share.
We also won some additional large veterinary clinics.
We have also established a new position of Sales & Marketing Director –ANZ
based in Sydney. This role will provide leadership to the production and Companion Animal teams in Australia and New Zealand. Mr.
Geoff Henthorn has been appointed to this role. Geoff was previously the country manager for New Zealand at Novartis Animal Health
and we expect he will bring valuable contacts and networks to our New Zealand Dairy business.
Our marketing partner in Canada, Vetoquinol, has continued to grow market share since
their appointment in 2009. At the end of 2015, market share for estroPLAN (we do not currently sell GONAbreed in Canada) was over
30%.
Sales in the Middle East and Africa have improved in 2014 with moderation of economic
challenges driven by political instability in previous years.
Manufacturing Operations segment
Six Months ended December 31, 2014 vs. Six Months ended December 31, 2013
Manufacturing Operations segment revenues were $Nil for the six months ended December
31, 2014 as they were for the same period in 2013.
We currently have approximately 75% available capacity at our manufacturing facility,
which we believe we can leverage to manufacture our current products and pipeline product candidates and for further contract manufacturing
opportunities into the future. Typically, sterile manufacturing projects, especially those for FDA-approved products, attract high
margins relative to other contract manufacturing sectors. We also have the capability to produce pilot or R&D batches for biotechnology
companies for use in clinical trial materials, and due to our highly efficient and flexible operation, we believe we can undertake
these projects at a lower cost than other industry participants. Furthermore, recent mergers in the CMO industry potentially open
up opportunities for Parnell to enter this market and to generate an additional, high-profit revenue stream.
Adjusted EBITDAOI (a non-GAAP financial measure)
A reconciliation to IFRS reported (Loss)/Income for six months ended December 31, 2014
and 2013 are provided below - “Adjusted Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation, Amortization and Other Income (EBITDAOI)
(a non-GAAP financial measure).”
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
6 months
Ended
|
|
6 months
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2014
|
|
December 31, 2013
(unaudited)
|
|
v%
|
Adjusted EBITDAOI
|
|
|
(4,791
|
)
|
|
|
(2,798
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
%)
|
Six Months ended December 31, 2014 vs. Six Months ended December 31, 2013
For the six months ended December 31, 2014, adjusted EBITDAOI decreased by $2.0 million
compared to the same period in 2013.
☐
|
Revenues increased by $0.8 million for the period and a resultant increase in Cost of Goods Sold - Product of $0.2 million contributing to a net increase in product gross margin of $0.6 million (see Revenue analysis above and Cost of Goods Sold - Product analysis below). Overall, we maintained a high product gross margin of 74% to revenue, which was in line with the same period ended December 31, 2013;
|
☐
|
We saw a small increase in our Cost of Goods Sold – Facility of $0.2 million due to a slight reduction in manufactured volumes during the period, attributing to a reduction in absorption of manufacturing overheads (see Cost of Goods Sold – Facility analysis below);
|
☐
|
$0.5 million increase in Selling and Marketing expenses as we continue to increase our commercial presence in the U.S. following our successful IPO in June 2014 (see Selling and Marketing expense analysis below),
|
☐
|
$0.3 million increase in Regulatory and R&D expenses primarily due to an increase in R&D activities associated with our pipeline candidate products following our IPO (See Regulatory & R&D expense analysis below); and
|
☐
|
$1.8 million increase in Administration expenses, primarily as a result of increased headcount and external costs to support a substantially larger Commercial and R&D organization in the U.S. and increased compliance, regulatory and statutory costs associated with being a public organization following our successful IPO in June 2014 (see Administration expense analysis below).
|
Costs and expenses
Cost of Goods Sold - Total
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
6 months
Ended
|
|
6 months
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2014
|
|
December 31, 2013
(unaudited)
|
|
v%
|
Cost of Goods Sold - Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Goods Sold - Product
|
|
|
887
|
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
% of revenues
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Goods Sold - Facility
|
|
|
2,457
|
|
|
|
2,267
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
% of revenues
|
|
|
67
|
%
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Goods Sold - Total
|
|
|
3,344
|
|
|
|
2,997
|
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Six Months ended December 31, 2014 vs. Six Months ended December 31, 2013
Cost of Goods Sold - Product
Cost of Goods Sold - Product
represents the direct manufacturing costs of the
products we sold. This cost increased by $0.2 million, or 21%, in the six months ended December 31, 2014, compared to the same
period in 2013, primarily due to a 29% ($0.8 million) increase in revenues during this period. There was a small mix variance of
products sold during this period which resulted in the
Cost of Goods Sold - Product
as a percentage of revenue decreasing
from 25.7% in the six months ended December 31, 2013, to 24.2% for the six months ended December 31, 2014.
Six Months ended December 31, 2014 vs. Six Months ended December 31, 2013
Cost of Goods Sold - Facility
The increase in
Cost of Goods Sold - Facility
reflect the fact that our new manufacturing
facility is currently operating with 75% spare capacity resulting in unrecovered overhead costs. These costs increased $0.2 million,
or 8%, in six months ended December 31, 2014, compared to the six months ended December 31, 2013. The small increase in operational
running costs of our facility was due to a $0.2 million reduction in absorption of manufacturing overhead costs resulting from
a slightly lower number of units produced the second half of 2014.
Selling and Marketing expenses
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
6 months
Ended
|
|
6 months
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2014
|
|
December 31, 2013
(unaudited)
|
|
v%
|
Selling and Marketing expenses
|
|
|
2,448
|
|
|
|
1,923
|
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
% of revenues
|
|
|
67
|
%
|
|
|
68
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Six Months ended December 31, 2014 vs. Six Months ended December 31, 2013
Selling and marketing expenses increased $0.5 million, or 27%, in the six months to December
31, 2014, compared to the same period in 2013, as a result of increased employee headcount and related costs associated with the
continued sales and marketing of our reproductive hormones in the U.S. During the period we added two additional territory managers
in our U.S. Production Animal business unit as we continue to increase our footprint in this market and increase our market share.
Furthermore, late in Q4, 2014, we added two additional personnel to commence the establishment of our Companion Animal commercial
team in the U.S.
Regulatory & R&D expenses
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
6 months
Ended
|
|
6 months
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2014
|
|
December 31, 2013
(unaudited)
|
|
v%
|
Regulatory & R&D expenses
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
501
|
%
|
% of revenues
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Six Months ended December 31, 2014 vs. Six Months ended December 31, 2013
Regulatory and Research & Development expenses increased $0.3 million, during the
second half of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013, which was due to an increase in R&D activities associated with our
pipeline candidate products following our IPO.
Over the last several years, we have focused heavily on progressing Zydax and, before
that, on obtaining the approval for our reproductive hormones in the U.S. and Canada. In the second half of 2014, we started to
again focus on our pipeline products, and we expect to invest heavily in the development of these six products in 2015.
Administration expenses and transaction related costs
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
6 months
Ended
|
|
6 months
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2014
|
|
December 31, 2013
(unaudited)
|
|
v%
|
Administration expenses
|
|
|
3,042
|
|
|
|
1,267
|
|
|
|
140
|
%
|
% of revenues
|
|
|
83
|
%
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Six Months ended December 31, 2014 vs. Six Months ended December 31, 2013
Administration expenses increased $1.8 million, in the six months ended December 31,
2014, compared to the same period in 2013, primarily as a result of increased headcount and external costs to support a substantially
larger Commercial and R&D organization in the U.S. and increased compliance, regulatory and statutory costs associated with
being a public organization following our successful IPO in June 2014.
As we are an organization focused on development of new product candidates and continued
development of our current product portfolio, our administration activities are required to support our research and development
function. As such, under the Australian Taxation Office’s Research & Development Incentives program, an Australian government
initiative that offers a 45% rebate on eligible research and development investment, certain of these administration activities
are determined to be eligible research and development expenditures and may be claimed as part of the R&D Incentive program.
Eligible research and development expenditures recorded within administration expenses for six months ended December 31, 2014,
was $0.4 million.
Finance Costs and Net foreign exchange losses on borrowings
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
6 months
Ended
|
|
6 months
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2014
|
|
December 31, 2013
(unaudited)
|
|
v%
|
Finance Costs
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
1,639
|
|
|
|
(82
|
%)
|
Net foreign exchange losses on borrowings
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Six Months ended December 31, 2014 vs. Six Months ended December 31, 2013
Total finance costs and net foreign exchange losses on borrowings decreased $1.7 million,
or 86% in the second half of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013.
Finance costs decreased by $1.3 million due to full repayment of our senior debt facility
with SWK Holdings LLC of USD$25.0 million from the proceeds of the initial public offering. Prior to that, in January 2014, the
SWK facility was used to repay our previous senior debt facility with Partners for Growth LLC of USD$10 million. Finance costs
of $1.6 million incurred in the six months ended December 31, 2013, related to interest and borrowing costs of the
Partners
for Growth
facility.
Following our successful IPO in June 2014, the only borrowings that remain are the Company's lease liabilities, which are secured
by the related leased assets of $0.2 million and the 2013 Parnell Bonds of $4.3 million, which resulted in finance costs of $0.3
million for the six months ended December 31, 2014.
In addition, as the 2013 Parnell Bonds and lease liabilities are both denominated in
Australian dollars, we have not incurred any net foreign losses on borrowings in the last six months of 2014 calendar year.
Other income
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
6 months
Ended
|
|
6 months
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2014
|
|
December 31, 2013
(unaudited)
|
|
v%
|
Other income
|
|
|
4,347
|
|
|
|
980
|
|
|
|
343
|
%
|
Certain amounts may reflect rounding adjustments.
Six Months ended December 31, 2014 vs. Six Months ended December 31, 2013
Other income was $4.4 million for the six months ended December 31, 2014, compared to
$1.0 million for the same period ended December 31, 2013. This increase of $3.4 million was driven by an increase in unrealized
foreign exchange gains on foreign currency loans within the company of $1.3 million in FY2014 compared to FY2013. An additional
$1.8 million was due to net favorable foreign currency movements over the period, primarily due to the Australian dollar depreciating
from USD$0.942 as at June 30, 2014 to USD$0.8202 as at December 31, 2014.
Income Tax Benefit/(Expense)
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
6 months
Ended
|
|
6 months
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2014
|
|
December 31, 2013
(unaudited)
|
|
v%
|
Income tax (expense)/benefit
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
The tax expense recognized in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income/(loss)
relates to current income tax expense plus deferred tax expense (being the movement in deferred tax assets and liabilities and
unused tax losses during the year).
Current tax is the amount of income taxes payable (refundable) in respect of the taxable
profit (loss) for the year and is measured as the amount expected to be paid to (refunded by) the taxation authorities, using the
tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the end of the reporting period.
Deferred tax is provided on temporary differences which are determined by comparing the
carrying amounts of tax bases of assets and liabilities to the carrying amounts in the consolidated financial statements.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -
Note 2 (e). Income Tax
for further
details on the accounting treatment of income tax expense and benefits.
Six Months ended December 31, 2014 vs. Six Months ended December 31, 2013
The income tax expense recorded for the six-month periods ended December 31, 2014 and
2013, respectively, is $Nil due to income tax losses incurred during those periods.
Tax losses carried forward
During 2014, management evaluated the evidence bearing upon the potential realization
of its deferred tax assets, which primarily consist of net losses carried forward. Management considered the (1) the Company has
historically been able to generate income; (2) future forecasts and investment costs of pipeline products; (3) the non-recurring
expenses incurred with the development of an FDA approved manufacturing facility; (4) the costs of completing an initial public
offering; and (5) other tax planning strategies. Based on its analysis management determined that the Company will not utilize
$6.4 million of tax losses in the short term and accordingly did not record this amount as a deferred tax asset at June 30, 2014.
This element of unrecognized future tax benefits will be assessed by management going forward and may be recorded at a point at
which management believes they will be utilized.
At December 31, 2014, the Company had a potential tax benefit related to tax losses carried
forward of $7.7 million. Such amount includes net losses of $4.0 million related to subsidiaries in the U.S. that would expire
after 20 years, starting in 2032 (recognized at a tax rate of 35%). The remaining tax losses carried forward of $3.7 million are
indefinite and are attributable to the Company’s operations in Australia (recognized at a tax rate of 30%), of which $1.7
million relate to transaction costs and are directly recorded to equity. As such, the total unused tax losses available to the
Company equal $39.0 million.
Adjusted Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation, Amortization and Other Income
(EBITDAOI) (a non-GAAP financial measure)
Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDAOI
A reconciliation of
Adjusted EBITDAOI
to Loss for the six month periods ended
December 31, 2014 and 2013, as reported under IFRS, is as follows:
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
6 months
Ended
|
|
6 months
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2014
|
|
December 31, 2013
(unaudited)
|
|
v%
|
Loss for the period
|
|
|
(1,428
|
)
|
|
|
(4,418
|
)
|
|
|
68
|
%
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization expense
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
597
|
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
Finance Costs
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
1,639
|
|
|
|
(82
|
%)
|
Net foreign exchange losses on borrowings
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
|
(100
|
%)
|
Other income
|
|
|
(4,347
|
)
|
|
|
(980
|
)
|
|
|
343
|
%
|
Adjusted EBITDAOI
|
|
|
(4,791
|
)
|
|
|
(2,800
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
%)
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Analysis of the consolidated statements of cash flows
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands)
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
Cash provided by/(used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
(5,418
|
)
|
|
|
(11,456
|
)
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(1,809
|
)
|
|
|
(483
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(726
|
)
|
|
|
31,890
|
|
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents held
|
|
|
(7,953
|
)
|
|
|
19,952
|
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Operating activities
Six Months ended December 31, 2014
Our net cash outflow from operating activities was $5.4 million in the six months ended
December 31, 2014. The outflow in operating cash flows was primarily attributable to:
●
|
$4.3 million outflow associated with (1) the running of our operations as a result of our increased investment in our commercial infrastructure in the US; (2) the fixed costs associated with the unutilized capacity within our manufacturing facility; (3) our increased investment in primary research and development activities; and (4) $0.3 million in financing costs; and
|
●
|
An outflow due to (1) an increase in trade receivables from customers; (2) inventory levels and prepayments of $1.1 million, partially offset by a $0.3 million increase in trade creditors; and (3) provisions due to the seasonality of our business and resultant increases in sales and inventory levels towards the end of the calendar year.
|
Investing activities
Six Months ended December 31, 2014
Our net cash inflow from investing activities was $1.8 million for the six months ended
December 31, 2014, due to investment made in the commercial scale-up of the API for Zydax and the commencement of the Zydax efficacy
trial during the period, in addition to continued investment in the development of our digital technology platforms,
mySYNCH
and FETCH (formerly known as iKAM) and the establishment of our offices in Kansas City, KS.
Financing activities
Six Months ended December 31, 2014
Financing activities for the six months ended December 31, 2014, resulted in a cash outflow
of $0.7 million, attributable to:
●
|
The final $0.6 million of fees associated with our initial public offering in June 2014, which have been accrued as at June 30, 2014 and paid in the current period; and
|
●
|
$0.1 million paid in lease obligations for the period.
|
The following discussion and analysis of our consolidated statements of operations for
the years ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 should be read along with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, which
reflect the results of operations of the business for the periods presented.
|
|
($AUD in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
v%
|
Revenues
|
|
|
7,543
|
|
|
|
9,538
|
|
|
|
(21
|
%)
|
Cost of sales - Product
|
|
|
1,641
|
|
|
|
1,832
|
|
|
|
(10
|
%)
|
Cost of sales - Facility
|
|
|
4,776
|
|
|
|
3,809
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
Cost of Sales - Total
|
|
|
6,418
|
|
|
|
5,642
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
Gross Margin
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
|
|
3,896
|
|
|
|
(71
|
%)
|
Selling and Marketing expenses
|
|
|
5,475
|
|
|
|
3,341
|
|
|
|
64
|
%
|
Regulatory expenses
|
|
|
586
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
322
|
%
|
Administration expenses
|
|
|
2,667
|
|
|
|
1,904
|
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
Transaction Related Costs
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Finance Costs
|
|
|
7,262
|
|
|
|
2,840
|
|
|
|
156
|
%
|
Net foreign exchange losses on borrowings
|
|
|
1,384
|
|
|
|
2,027
|
|
|
|
(32
|
%)
|
Other income/(expense)
|
|
|
2,248
|
|
|
|
2,203
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Income/(loss) before income tax (expense)/benefit
|
|
|
(14,353
|
)
|
|
|
(4,151
|
)
|
|
|
(246
|
%)
|
Income tax (expense)/benefit
|
|
|
(2,980
|
)
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
|
(543
|
%)
|
(Loss)/income for the period
|
|
|
(17,733
|
)
|
|
|
(3,478
|
)
|
|
|
(398
|
%)
|
Other comprehensive income/(loss) for the period, net of tax
|
|
|
(517
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(1,513
|
%)
|
Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the period
|
|
|
(17,851
|
)
|
|
|
(3,510
|
)
|
|
|
(413
|
%)
|
Certain amounts may reflect rounding adjustments.
Fiscal Years ended June 30, 2014 vs. June 30, 2013
Revenues
Revenues — Overview
Fiscal Year 2014 (year ended June 30, 2014) vs. Fiscal Year 2013 (year ended June
30, 2013)
Total revenues declined $2.0 million, or 21%, in fiscal year (FY) 2014 compared to FY2013
primarily due to the timing of the launch of our reproductive hormones in the U.S. in FY2013 and the resultant inventory build
with distributors prior to June 30, 2013. Distributors purchased $3.7 million of estroPLAN and GONAbreed in the 4 months following
launch (Feb 2013 – Jun 2013) in order to build-up inventory levels in the distribution channel. This initial inventory build
by distributors carried over into FY2014 resulting in lower ex-Parnell sales (sales from Parnell to distributors) in FY2014 compared
to FY2013. However, our in-market sales (sales from distributors to veterinarians and dairy producers) have increased significantly
in FY2014 compared to FY2013. The inventory build of FY2013 has been eliminated and as such ex-Parnell sales in the U.S. will match
the in-market sales growth we are seeing.
Other areas of the business performed well:
·
|
|
Production Animal – Rest of World sales increased by $0.4 million, or 10%, following growth in Australian reproductive hormone sales of 14%, New Zealand reproductive hormone sales of 22% and other markets increasing 6% (See Production Animal – Rest of World segment revenue analysis). Furthermore, reproductive hormone sales in the second-half of FY2014 compared to the second-half of FY2013 increased in Australia, New Zealand and other international markets by 31%, 59% and 68% respectively as a result of a significant focus on sales growth in these markets.
|
·
|
|
Our Companion Animal segment also continues to grow in Australia 7 years after launch and with a highly efficient sales footprint. Glyde sales increased by $0.1 million, or 9% in FY2014 compared to FY2013. In the second-half of 2014 there was 29% growth in total Companion Animal segment over the same period in FY2013 following the successful re-launch of Zydax in Australia in April 2014.
|
·
|
|
Zydax had been out of stock for the first seven months of FY2014 due to the failure of the API supplier. With Lonza now completing the technology transfer and commercial scale production of API this issue has been resolved. As testament to the brand loyalty to Zydax and the effectiveness of the dual-joint care sales model (See Companion Animal segment revenue analysis) we experienced strong sales growth in the second-half of FY2014 (when Zydax was back in stock) of 25% compared to the same period in 2013. Overall sales for Zydax decreased $0.2 million in FY2014 compared to FY2013.
|
·
|
|
Our sales from contract manufacturing operations decreased $0.2 million in FY2014 due to the completion of certain contract manufacturing activities that was part of a deal in March 2012 where we divested our legacy products (See Manufacturing Operations segment revenue analysis).
|
Global revenues by operating segment were as follows:
|
|
($AUD in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
v%
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companion Animal
|
|
|
1,503
|
|
|
|
1,638
|
|
|
|
(8
|
%)
|
Production Animal - U.S.
|
|
|
1,647
|
|
|
|
3,662
|
|
|
|
(55
|
%)
|
Production Animal - Rest of World
|
|
|
4,393
|
|
|
|
4,004
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Manufacturing Operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
(100
|
%)
|
Total Revenues
|
|
|
7,543
|
|
|
|
9,538
|
|
|
|
(21
|
%)
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Revenues — Segments
Companion Animal segment
Fiscal Year 2014 vs. Fiscal Year 2013
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
v%
|
Companion Animal Revenues
|
|
|
1,503
|
|
|
|
1,638
|
|
|
|
(8
|
%)
|
Total Companion Animal Revenues
|
|
|
1,503
|
|
|
|
1,638
|
|
|
|
(8
|
%)
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Companion animal segment revenues decreased by $0.1 million, or 8%, in FY2014 compared
to the same period in FY2013. $0.2 million of this was due to the delayed supply of API for Zydax resulting in an out of stock
situation for seven of the twelve months reported. In April 2014 we were resupplied with the API and returned to market and we
have significantly increased our API and finished goods inventory levels. As above, we have already seen a 25% increase in Zydax
sales in the second-half of FY2014 compared to the same period in FY2013.
Glyde and Tergive sales increased 9% and 23% respectively in FY2014 compared to FY2013
with Glyde sales increasing 33% in the second-half of FY2014 compared to the same period in 2013. We believe this was due to the
return of Zydax which provided us the ability to market our ‘Dual Joint Care’ program effectively through the
iKAM
(now called FETCH) platform.
Production Animal — U.S. segment
Fiscal Year 2014 vs. Fiscal Year 2013
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
v%
|
Production Animal - U.S.
|
|
|
1,647
|
|
|
|
3,662
|
|
|
|
(55
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Production Animal - U.S. Revenues
|
|
|
1,647
|
|
|
|
3,662
|
|
|
|
(55
|
%)
|
Certain amounts may reflect rounding adjustments.
Production Animal — U.S. segment revenues decreased by $2.0 million, or 55% in
FY2014 compared to the same period in FY2013. After the approval of estroPLAN and GONAbreed in the U.S. in February 2013, we launched
our new products and distributors purchased $3.7 million of product through to June 30, 2013 to build-up inventory both in the
distribution channel and veterinarian channel. For FY2014 sales totaled $1.6 million ex-Parnell which was based on re-purchases
by Distributors from Parnell. From an ‘in-market’ sales perspective, our sales increased from $0.3 million for the
period Feb-Jun 2013 to $2.1 million for FY2014. Most notably we saw acceleration in our market share acquisition with the month
of June 2014 reaching 5.1%, at the time our highest month since launch.
Within our most established territories (where we launched first) in the North East and
West, our market shares reached 8.7% and 8.9% respectively. Subsequent to the end of the financial year, we have established two
more territories in the large dairy regions of Minnesota, Wisconsin and surrounding states. Our market share in this region as
at June 30, 2014 was only 1.6%.
Certain amounts may reflect rounding adjustments.
Production Animal — Rest of World segment
Fiscal Year 2014 vs. Fiscal Year 2013
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
v%
|
Production Animal - Rest of World Revenues
|
|
|
4,393
|
|
|
|
4,004
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Total Production Animal - R.O.W Revenues
|
|
|
4,393
|
|
|
|
4,004
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Certain amounts may reflect rounding adjustments.
Production animal – Rest of World segment revenues increased by $0.4 million, or
10% in FY2014 compared to FY2013. This was driven by continued growth in our Australian, New Zealand and other international markets,
as our service based offering and global recognition as the leader in clinical science and technology for dairy reproduction continues
to drive customer retention in this region. FY2014 sales in Australia, New Zealand and other international markets saw growth of
14%, 22% and 6% respectively with the second-half of the fiscal year demonstrating even greater growth rates of 31% in Australia,
59% in New Zealand and 68% in other international markets compared to the same period in FY2013.
Manufacturing Operations segment
Fiscal Year 2014 vs. Fiscal Year 2013
Manufacturing Operations segment revenues for the twelve months ended June 30, 2014 decreased
by $0.2 million compared to the same period in FY2013 due to the completion of certain contract manufacturing obligations associated
with the divestment of legacy products. In March 2012, we sold the rights to market a number of legacy products that we deemed
were not congruent with our global strategy and in doing so provided investment capital for our current product portfolios and
candidates. As part of that sale we were engaged to contract manufacture a number of these products for a period of approximately
six months. This contract manufacturing commenced in April 2013 and was completed in September 2013 and as such $0.2 million of
the revenues from this project were earned in FY2013.
We currently have approximately 75% available capacity at our manufacturing facility,
which we believe we can leverage to manufacture our anticipated product candidates and for further contract manufacturing opportunities
into the future. Typically, sterile manufacturing projects, especially those for FDA-approved products, attract high margins relative
to other contract manufacturing sectors. We also have the capability to produce pilot or R&D, batches for biotechnology companies
for use in clinical trial materials and due to our highly efficient and flexible operation we believe we can undertake these projects
at a lower cost than other industry participants.
Adjusted EBITDAOI (a non-GAAP financial measure)
A reconciliation to IFRS reported (Loss)/Income for the years ended June 30, 2014, 2013
and 2012 are provided below under – “Adjusted Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation, Amortization and Other Income
(EBITDAOI) (a non-GAAP financial measure)”
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
v%
|
Adjusted EBITDAOI
|
|
|
(6,349
|
)
|
|
|
(488
|
)
|
|
|
(1,200
|
%)
|
Fiscal Year 2014 vs. Fiscal Year 2013
In FY2014, adjusted EBITDAOI decreased by $5.9 million compared to FY2013. Revenues decreased
by $2.0 million for the period and Cost of Sales — Product decreased by $0.2 million) contributing to a net reduction in
product gross margin of $1.8 million (see Revenue analysis above and Cost of Sales — Product analysis below). Overall, we
maintained a high product gross margin of 78% compared to 81% in FY2013, with the slight reduction year on year attributable to
a product mix variance (see Cost of Sales – Product analysis below).
In the second half of FY2013, subsequent to our successful FDA inspection of our manufacturing
facility, we officially completed commissioning works and thus commenced operating the manufacturing facility as a full commercial
operation. Previously, much of the expenditure relating to the manufacturing facility was capitalized to the related fixed assets.
As such, the operational costs of running our facility increased by $1.0 million in FY2014 as compared to FY2013 (see Cost of Sales
— Facility analysis below). However with 75% available capacity in this facility we expect to extract improved value from
this fully operational asset by exploring contract manufacturing opportunities and by increasing revenues of our own products and
seeking approval of our product candidates into the future.
FY2014 also included a full year of costs of our new U.S sales and marketing team and
Kansas City Headquarters to support the launch of our reproductive hormones which resulted in an increase in operating expenditure
of $2.1 million (see Selling and Marketing expense analysis below). We also had a $0.4 million increase in Regulatory and Research
& Development expenses as a result of our first FDA GMP license fee and Product Approval fees of our reproductive hormones
and commence of initial R&D work on pipeline product candidates PAR121 & PAR122 (see Regulatory and R&D expense analysis
below). In addition, a total of $0.4 million has been incurred in IPO transaction related costs in FY2014 which was not incurred
during the same period in 2013 and a further $0.2 million has been incurred in general and administration expenses, before depreciation
expense, in FY2014 over FY2013 relating to the expansion of our operations into the U.S. (see Administration expense analysis below)
Costs and expenses
Cost of sales — Total
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
v%
|
Cost of Sales - Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales - Product
|
|
|
1,641
|
|
|
|
1,832
|
|
|
|
(10
|
%)
|
% of revenues
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales - Facility
|
|
|
4,776
|
|
|
|
3,809
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
% of revenues
|
|
|
63
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Sales - Total
|
|
|
6,418
|
|
|
|
5,642
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Fiscal Year 2014 vs. Fiscal Year 2013
Cost of sales — Product
Cost of sales — Product
represents the direct manufacturing costs of the
products we sold. This cost decreased $0.2 million, or 10%, in FY2014 compared to FY2013, due to a mix variance of products sold
during this period. During FY2013, sales of estroPLAN in Canada and sales of Zydax in Australia equated to 29% of total sales for
the period and for the same period 2014, these sales equated to 22% of total revenues. Both of these products generate a greater
gross margin than sales of estroPLAN and GONAbreed into Asia and the Middle East, which represented 8% of total sales in FY2013
and 24% of total sales for the same period in FY2014. As such,
Cost of sales — Product
as a percentage of revenue
increased from 19% in FY2013 to 22% during the same period in FY2014 as a result of a greater portion of sales coming from our
lower margin geographies and products.
Fiscal Year 2014 vs. Fiscal Year 2013
Cost of sales — Facility
The increase in
Cost of sales — Facility
reflect the fact that our new manufacturing
facility is currently operating with 75% spare capacity resulting in unrecovered overhead costs. These costs increased $1.0 million,
or 25%, in FY2014 compared to FY2013 due to operating our facility for the entire year in FY2014. In FY2013, much of the expenditure
attributable to the manufacturing facility was related to commissioning the new facility and was hence capitalized to the related
fixed asset. In FY2014, the increase in operational running costs of our facility was due to a $0.7 million increase employee costs
from additional headcount to operate the facility, and a $0.2 million reduction in absorption of manufacturing overhead costs resulting
from a lower number of units produced FY2014. The lower number of units produced was due to the manufacturing of a higher level
of inventory in the period January to March 2013 in preparation for the launch of our reproductive hormones in the U.S. market.
With 75% available capacity in this facility we expect to continue to augment this fully operational infrastructure by exploring
contract manufacturing opportunities into the future.
Selling and Marketing expenses
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
v%
|
Selling and Marketing expenses
|
|
|
5,475
|
|
|
|
3,341
|
|
|
|
64
|
%
|
% of revenues
|
|
|
73
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Fiscal Year 2014 vs. Fiscal Year 2013
Selling and marketing expenses increased $2.1 million, or 64%, in FY2014 compared to
the same period in FY2013, as a result of increased employee headcount and related costs associated with the launch of our reproductive
hormones in the U.S. FY2014 included the costs of implementing and running our U.S based sales and marketing operation, which resulted
in increased employee and associated costs of $1.4 million, increased advertising and promotion costs of $0.3 million, increased
travel related costs of $0.2 million and an increase of $0.1 million in depreciation and amortization expense (development costs
for the U.S. reproductive hormones had been capitalized under IFRS and as a result upon approval amortization of these capitalized
expenses commenced).
Regulatory and R&D expenses
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
v%
|
Regulatory & R&D expenses
|
|
|
586
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
322
|
%
|
% of revenues
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Fiscal Year 2014 vs. Fiscal Year 2013
Regulatory and Research & Development expenses increased $0.4 million, or 322% in
FY2014 compared to FY2013. $0.2 million as a result of increased FDA GMP license and product renewal fees following the approval
of our sterile manufacturing facility and reproductive hormones in January 2013 and $0.2 million increase in Research & Development
costs associated with the commencement of initial development work and licensing cost for PAR 121 and PAR122.
Administration expenses
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
v%
|
Administration expenses
|
|
|
2,667
|
|
|
|
1,904
|
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
% of revenues
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Fiscal Year 2014 vs. Fiscal Year 2013
Administration expenses increased $0.8 million, or 40%, in FY2014 compared to the same
period in FY2013, as a result of $0.4 million of transaction costs associated with the IPO, an $0.2 million increase in professional,
insurance and audit fees and a $0.2 million increase in depreciation and amortization cost.
Eligible research and development expenditure recorded within administration expenses
for FY2014 was $0.4 million compared to $1.5 million for FY2013. This was due to focusing our operational expenditure during FY2014
on the launch of our reproductive hormones into the U.S market, the establishment of U.S. sales and marketing infrastructure and
a full period of operational costs associated with operating our FDA-inspected manufacturing facility.
Finance Costs and Net foreign exchange losses on borrowings
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
v%
|
Finance Costs
|
|
|
7,262
|
|
|
|
2,840
|
|
|
|
156
|
%
|
Net foreign exchange losses on borrowings
|
|
|
1,384
|
|
|
|
2,027
|
|
|
|
(32
|
%)
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Fiscal Year 2014 vs. Fiscal Year 2013
Total Finance costs and Net foreign exchange losses on borrowings increased $3.8 million,
or 78% in FY2014 compared to FY2013.
Finance costs increased by $4.4 million due to:
•
|
|
$0.8 million in higher interest costs from an increased utilization of our senior line-of-credit, which was a revolver facility, compared to FY2013 and the interest costs associated with the $4.3 million raised from the 2013 Parnell Bonds issued between February 2013 and September 2013.
|
•
|
|
$1.3 million was incurred due to an increase in financing expense in FY2014 as a result of the costs associated with the repayment of our previous senior debt facility with Partners For Growth, LLC.
|
•
|
|
A further, $2.3 million in financing costs was paid in relation to the debt facility raised from SWK Holdings LLC in FY2014. $0.4 million relating to the first three months of the facility and $1.9 million in at the termination of the loan, as per the terms of the agreement, following our successful IPO.
|
which was
partially offset by a decrease in foreign exchange losses on borrowings of $0.6 million. The decrease in foreign exchange losses
in FY2014 compared to FY2013 was a result of our U.S denominated indebtedness being impacted by the year on year foreign exchange
movement of the U.S. dollar as compared to the Australian dollar. As at June 30, 2014, all our U.S denominated indebtedness has
been repaid so no foreign exchange losses on borrowings will be incurred unless we decide to enter into further foreign currency
denominated loan facilities or instruments
Other income
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
v%
|
Other income
|
|
|
2,248
|
|
|
|
2,203
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Certain amounts may reflect rounding adjustments.
Fiscal Year 2014 vs. Fiscal Year 2013
Other income was flat in FY2014 compared to FY2013 due to:
|
•
|
an increase in unrealized foreign exchange gains on intergroup balances of $1.5 million in FY2014 compared to FY2013, relating to the transfer of certain intergroup balances from our Australian group to our U.S group following the refinancing of our senior debt facility with SWK Holdings LLC in January 2014;
|
which was partially offset by:
•
|
|
a reduction in research and development incentives of $0.7 million ($0.3 million was received in FY2014 compared to $1.0 million in FY2013) as a result of reduced eligible expenditure on research and development projects during this period due to the focusing our investment expenditure in FY2014 on the launch of our newly approved reproductive hormones in the U.S market;
|
•
|
|
a reduction in grants received from the Kansas State Government of $0.4 million (see below);
|
•
|
|
a reduction in fair value gains recorded on derivatives of $0.3 million in FY2014 compared to FY2013 due to the extinguishing of warrants with our senior debt facilities during the year.
|
Income Tax Benefit/(Expense)
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
v%
|
Income tax (expense)/benefit
|
|
|
(2,980
|
)
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
|
(543
|
%)
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
The tax expense recognized in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income/(loss)
relates to current income tax expense plus deferred tax expense (being the movement in deferred tax assets and liabilities and
unused tax losses during the year).
Current tax is the amount of income taxes payable (refundable) in respect of the taxable
profit (loss) for the year and is measured as the amount expected to be paid to (refunded by) the taxation authorities, using the
tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the end of the reporting period.
Deferred tax is provided on temporary differences which are determined by comparing the
carrying amounts of tax bases of assets and liabilities to the carrying amounts in the consolidated financial statements.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements —
Note 2 (e). Income Tax
for further details on the accounting treatment of income tax expense and benefits.
Fiscal Year 2014 vs. Fiscal Year 2013
The income tax expense recorded of $3.0 million in FY2014 related entirely to the movement
in deferred tax due to the group no longer recognizing certain carried forward tax losses, based upon the projections for future
taxable income over the periods in which the deductible temporary differences are anticipated to reverse.
Tax losses carried forward
During 2014, management evaluated the evidence bearing upon the realizability of its
deferred tax assets, which primarily consist of net losses carry forward. Management considered the facts that the Group has historically
been able to generate income, considered the future forecasts and investment costs of pipeline products, the non-recurring expenses
incurred with the development of an FDA approved manufacturing facility, and the costs completing an initial public offering and
other tax planning strategies. Based on the analysis management determined that the Group will not utilize $5.5 million of tax
losses in the short term and accordingly did not record this amount as a deferred tax asset at June 30, 2014. This element of unrecognized
future tax benefits will be assessed by management going forward and maybe recorded at a point in which management believes they
will be utilized.
At June 30, 2014, the Group had total tax losses carried forward of $6.5 million. Such
amount includes net losses of $2.6 million related to subsidiaries in the U.S. which would expire after 20 years starting in 2032
(recognized at a tax rate of 35%). The remaining tax losses carried forward of $3.9 million are indefinite and are attributable
to the Group’s operations in Australia (recognized at a tax rate of 30%), of which $1.5 million relate to transaction costs
and are directly recorded to equity. As such, the total potential tax losses available to the Group, equal $20.6 million.
Adjusted Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation, Amortization and Other Income
(EBITDAOI) (a non-GAAP financial measure)
Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDAOI
A reconciliation of
Adjusted EBITDAOI
to (Loss)/Income for the years ended June
30, 2014 and 2013, as reported under IFRS, is as follows:
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
v%
|
(Loss)/income for the period
|
|
|
(17,333
|
)
|
|
|
(3,478
|
)
|
|
|
(398
|
%)
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
2,980
|
|
|
|
(673
|
)
|
|
|
(543
|
%)
|
Transaction Related Costs
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Depreciation and Amortization expense
|
|
|
1,254
|
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
Finance Costs
|
|
|
7,262
|
|
|
|
2,840
|
|
|
|
156
|
%
|
Net foreign exchange losses/(gains) on borrowings
|
|
|
1,384
|
|
|
|
2,027
|
|
|
|
(32
|
%)
|
Other income
|
|
|
(2,248
|
)
|
|
|
(2,203
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Adjusted EBITDAOI
|
|
|
(6,349
|
)
|
|
|
(488
|
)
|
|
|
(1,200
|
%)
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Analysis of the consolidated statements of cash flows
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
Cash provided by/(used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
(11,456
|
)
|
|
|
(2,981
|
)
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(483
|
)
|
|
|
(2,414
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
31,890
|
|
|
|
6,173
|
|
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
19,952
|
|
|
|
778
|
|
Certain amounts and percentages may reflect rounding adjustments.
Operating activities
Fiscal Year 2014 vs. Fiscal Year 2013
Our net cash outflow from operating activities was $11.4 million in the twelve months
ended June 30, 2014 compared to an outflow of $3.0 million for the same period in 2013. The increase in operating cash outflows
was primarily attributable to:
•
|
|
the increase finance costs paid of $2.7 million, including the payment of borrowing costs associated with the establishment of our senior debt facility with SWK Holding, LLC and the final repayment of interest costs upon the repayment in full of this facility following the completion of our IPO on June 18, 2014;
|
•
|
|
a reduction in receipts from customers of $2.4 million in relation to our recorded reduction in sales for the fiscal year 2014 of $2.0 million, as explained above, and a slight increase in trade debtors of $0.4 million due to timing receipts being due. As per note 9 of our financial statements, the aging profile of our trade receivables has effectively remained the same as at June 30, 2014 compared to June 30, 2013.
|
•
|
|
a reduction in other receivables of $1.3 million in relation to a reduction in eligible expenditure on research and development projects during this period due to the group focusing our investment expenditure in FY2014 on the launch of our newly approved reproductive hormones in the U.S market; and
|
•
|
|
an increase in payments to suppliers and employees of $2.1 million due to increased headcount and costs of running our FDA-inspected sterile manufacturing facility of $1.0 million, an increase in the costs of our U.S. sales and marketing operation of $2.1 million, increased regulatory and administration costs of $0.8 million, and an increase in IPO related transaction costs of $0.4 million (as explained above), offset by an increase in trade and other payables and accrued expenses of $2.2 million as at June 30, 2014 compared to June 30, 2013.
|
Investing activities
Fiscal Year 2014 vs. Fiscal Year 2013
Our net cash inflow from investing activities was $0.5 million in FY2014 compared to
an outflow of $2.4 million in FY2013. The decrease in investing activity cash flows was primarily attributable to:
|
•
|
a reduction in development costs of $0.7 million in FY2014, mainly due to our reproductive hormones receiving FDA approval in January 2013;
|
|
•
|
the increase in government R&D incentives received of $0.9 million in FY2014 primarily from our previous investment in the development of our U.S. hormones and manufacturing facility; and
|
|
•
|
a reduction in expenditure relating to the commissioning our of sterile manufacturing facility of $0.3 million following the facility being classified as acceptable by the FDA in January 2013.
|
Financing activities
Fiscal Year 2014 vs. Fiscal Year 2013
Our net cash generated from financing activities was $31.9 million in FY2014 compared
to a $6.2 million in FY2013. The increase in net cash generated in FY2014 was primarily attributable to:
|
•
|
net proceeds of $48.0 million from the completion of our initial public offering on June 18, 2014, being $53.1 million (USD$50.0 million) gross proceeds less $5.1 million (USD$4.8 million) in fees and commissions paid associated with the raise. A further $0.6 million of fees have been accrued as at June 30, 2014 and paid in FY2015 (see discussion below under Liquidity and Capital resources);
|
|
•
|
net outflows from refinancing of bank loans and other debt facilities of $15.9 million in FY2014, made up of the net payment of bank loans of $9.3 million, net repayment of bonds issued of $4.3 million and the payment of $2.3 million associated with the buying back of warrants that were granted to our previous senior debt facility with Partners for Growth, LLC (see discussion below under Liquidity and Capital resources); and.
|
|
•
|
a reduction in dividends paid of $0.7 million (2014: $0; 2013: $0.7 million)
|
5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources
Analysis of financial condition, liquidity and capital resources
As of December 31, 2016, we had cash and cash equivalents of $7.1 million.
The primary portion of our cash balance at December 31, 2016 is related to the proceeds
from a term loan secured in November 2016. Such proceeds will be used for developing our current pipeline candidates and expanding
our U.S. business and customer base. Management believes that the Company’s current available working capital is adequate
to sustain its operations at current levels through at least the next twelve months.
During the year, we have expended more on investing activities, for the geographical
expansion of our product portfolio, and further expansion of our U.S. presence than we have generated from our operating activities.
At the end of 2016 we made decisions to significantly reduce operational costs that should translate to a reduction in costs of
over $10 million. We also expect to again grow revenues significantly in 2017 and become cash flow positive and EBITDA positive
in 2017. However if we do not, increase our revenues and/or reduce our costs sufficiently our costs may continue to exceed our
revenues, which could impact our liquidity and may also impact our ability to continue to invest in future product opportunities.
The global financial markets have recently undergone and may continue to experience significant
volatility and disruption. The timing and sustainability of an economic recovery is uncertain and additional macroeconomic, business
and financial disruptions may arise. As markets change, we will continue to monitor our liquidity position, and there can be no
assurance that the challenging economic environment or a further economic downturn will not impact our liquidity or our ability
to obtain future financing.
On January 11, 2016, we entered into a share purchase agreement, and a registration rights
agreement with Lincoln Park. Under the terms and subject to the conditions of the Lincoln Park Purchase Agreement, the Company
has the right to sell to and Lincoln Park is obligated to purchase up to $15,000,000 in amounts of ordinary shares of the Company,
no par value (“Ordinary Shares”) as described below, subject to certain limitations, from time to time, over the 36-month
period commencing on February 16, 2016. The Company may direct Lincoln Park, at its sole discretion and subject to certain conditions,
to purchase up to 35,000 shares of Ordinary Shares on any business day, increasing to up to 55,000 shares depending upon the closing
sale price of the Ordinary Shares (such purchases, “Regular Purchases”). However, in no event shall a Regular Purchase
be more than $500,000. The purchase price of Ordinary Shares related to the future funding will be based on the prevailing market
prices of such shares at the time of sales. In addition, the Company may direct Lincoln Park to purchase additional amounts as
accelerated purchases if on the date of a Regular Purchase the closing sale price of the Ordinary Shares is not below the threshold
price as set forth in the Purchase Agreement. The Company may deliver multiple purchase notices to Lincoln Park so long as at least
one (1) business day has passed since the most recent Regular Purchase was completed. On December 21, 2016 we filed a Form S-8
to deregister all unsold securities under this registration statement and terminated the Share Purchase Agreement
In addition, on February 23, 2016, the Company entered into an additional Securities
Purchase Agreement with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC. In recognition of Lincoln Park’s belief in the company and its potential
long term value, and under the terms and subject to the conditions of the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company will issue
and sell to Lincoln Park, and Lincoln Park will purchase from the Company, at the closing (a) 175,000 ordinary shares at a price
of $3.50 per share and (b) a Warrant to purchase up to an additional 150,000 ordinary shares (the “Warrant Shares”)
for an exercise price of $5.00 per share. The Purchase Agreement and the Warrant contain customary representations, warranties,
agreements and conditions. The Company expects that the net proceeds received by the Company from such sales to Lincoln Park under
the Purchase Agreement and the Warrant will be used for general corporate purposes and working capital requirements.
Selected measures of liquidity and capital resources
Historically, we have obtained funding from equity, borrowings and cash provided by operating
activities. The following shows our liquidity and capital resources as of the stated periods.
|
|
(AUD$ in thousands)
|
|
|
At December 31,
2016
|
|
At December 31,
2015
|
|
At December 31,
2014
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
7,115
|
|
|
|
5,667
|
|
|
|
15,819
|
|
Trade and other receivables
|
|
|
4,922
|
|
|
|
7,227
|
|
|
|
4,825
|
|
Borrowings, including non-current portion
|
|
|
29,842
|
|
|
|
17,476
|
|
|
|
4,590
|
|
Ordinary Shares
|
|
|
63,522
|
|
|
|
55,343
|
|
|
|
55,343
|
|
Certain amounts may reflect rounding adjustments.
Trade receivables are usually collected over a period of less than 30 days following
the due date of each invoice
.
Our collection of these receipts has historically been strong with bad debts totalling approximately
$0.2 million, less than 0.5%, being written off in the last 5 years. In our consolidated statement of financial position as of
December 31, 2016, trade receivables include a $4,286 allowance for doubtful debts. While we believe, based on the historic profile
of the collection of our account receivable amounts, that this is sufficient, we may be required to allow for a provision for doubtful
debts in the future if this profile were to adversely change. Trade and other receivables decreased in the year ended December
31, 2016, primarily due to a decrease in trade receivables of $1.8 million and a decrease in other receivables of $0.6 million
which relates to research and development tax incentives receivable from the Australian Taxation Office for the year ended December
31, 2015. Based on our planned investment, it is expected that as long as the research and development scheme is in place, future
research and development tax incentives will be available, with an amount of $3.3 million recorded as receivable for the year ended
December 31, 2016, compared to $3.8 million recorded as receivable for the year ended December 31, 2015 and $1.6 million recorded
as receivable for the six months ended December 31, 2014. The $0.9 million receivable recorded as of June 30, 2014 was collected
in February 2015.
2013 Parnell Bonds
The parent entity issued $4.3 million in "2013 Parnell Bonds" yielding 10%
p.a. between February and September 2013. The bonds had a two year term with repayment due between February and September 2015,
but may be redeemed earlier by the Company. On May 20, 2014, in association with our IPO, all bondholders, at the option of the
Company, exercised their stapled warrant for share consideration. The amount of share consideration was the number of bonds x 0.0000004%
of the fully diluted share capital of the Company, as of the date of exercise.
The warrants stapled to the 2013 Parnell Bonds converted into 140,075 ordinary shares
of the Company. Subsequent to this conversion, no further warrant obligations exist within the Company. The Company redeemed $1.5
million of these bonds during 2015 and extended the terms of the remaining outstanding bonds. As at December, 31 2016 the balance
of the outstanding bonds was $2.8 million and these were extended for at least an additional one-year term at the election of the
bondholders.
SWK Holdings LLC Term Loan
In January 2014, we entered into a credit agreement with a U.S. based lender, SWK Holdings
LLC, for a USD$25.0 million senior secured credit facility. The credit facility was utilized to refinance our previous senior debt
facility of USD$9.9 million with Partners For Growth, LLC, which was due to mature in June 2014, and to redeem USD$4.0 million
of 2011 Convertible Bonds that were due to mature in March 2014. USD$2.0 million was also paid to Partners for Growth III, L.P.
to buy back a warrant attached to their facility. In addition, holders of $2.0 million of the 2011 Convertible Bonds chose to convert
their bonds into ordinary shares of the parent entity.
In June 2014, the Company repaid the SWK facility USD$25.0 million, plus of interest
of USD$1.7 million from the proceeds of the initial public offering. The unamortized borrowing costs of approximately $1.3 million
were charged to expense upon extinguishment of the debt. As at June 30, 2014, all registered mortgages associated with the SWK
credit facility and the 2011 have been released. The 2013 Parnell Bonds still hold a mortgage over all assets of the Company.
MidCap Term Loan
In June 2015, the Company entered into a non-dilutive $USD11 million term loan agreement
with MidCap Financial. The Company intends to use the proceeds of the loan for the expansion of our Companion Animal sales team
in the U.S.
The Term Loan has a 45-month term, being interest only for the first 18 months and straight-line
amortization for the remaining 27 months. Parnell is able to extend the interest only period to the first 24 months of the term
loan upon achieving certain revenue targets as stipulated in the agreement. Interest on the outstanding balance is payable monthly
in arrears at an annual rate of the one month LIBOR plus 7.45% subject to a LIBOR floor of 0.50%, current rate of 7.95%. The Term
Loan has no warrant coverage and is secured by substantially all of the Company's assets.
Covenants imposed by the lender include various customary negative covenants and require
that the Company maintain various levels of trailing twelve-month revenues that increase over the term of the loan. As of December
31, 2015, and for the period from start of the loan to the period end date, the Company was in compliance with all covenants.
In November 2016, the Company repaid the MidCap Term Loan balance of approximately USD$
11,751,000, inclusive of accrued interest and prepayment fees. The unamortized borrowing costs of approximately USD$ 380,537 were
charged to expense upon extinguishment of the debt. The MidCap term loan was registered by a first mortgage over all assets of
the Group. As of December 31, 2016, this first registered mortgage has been released.
2016 Term Loan Facility
In November 2016, the Group entered into a credit arrangement with U.S. based lenders,
SWK Holdings LLC, HI PPH LLC, and R-S Healthcare Management for a four-year USD $20,000,000 senior security credit facility. The
credit facility was utilized to pay off our previous term loan with MidCap Financial Services, LLC, which was due to mature in
2020. Following the payment of fees and associated costs of establishing this new four-year credit facility of approximately USD$
692,248, USD$7,666,307 of funds were immediately available to us for working and growth capital. The credit facility contains two
financial covenants requiring the Company to maintain a ratio of fair market value of its inventory to employee liabilities of
70% and to have unencumbered liquid assets of greater than USD$ 1,000,000 as measured on the last day of any fiscal quarter. In
addition, the credit facility contained other customary affirmative and negative covenants.
Lincoln Park Capital Fund
On January 11, 2016, the Company entered into the Lincoln Park Purchase Agreement and
the Lincoln Park Registration Rights Agreement with Lincoln Park.
Under the terms and subject to the conditions of the Lincoln Park Purchase Agreement,
the Company has the right to sell to and Lincoln Park is obligated to purchase up to $15,000,000 in amounts of ordinary shares
of the Company as described below, subject to certain limitations, from time to time, over the 36-month period commencing on February
16, 2016. The Company may direct Lincoln Park, at its sole discretion and subject to certain conditions, to purchase up to 35,000
shares of ordinary shares of the Company on any business day, increasing to up to 55,000 shares depending upon the closing sale
price of the ordinary shares (such purchases, “Regular Purchases”). However, in no event shall a Regular Purchase be
more than $500,000. The purchase price of ordinary shares of the Company related to the future funding will be based on the prevailing
market prices of such shares at the time of sales. In addition, the Company may direct Lincoln Park to purchase additional amounts
as accelerated purchases if on the date of a Regular Purchase the closing sale price of the Ordinary Shares is not below the threshold
price as set forth in the Purchase Agreement. The Company may deliver multiple purchase notices to Lincoln Park so long as at least
one (1) business day has passed since the most recent Regular Purchase was completed.
As consideration for entering into the Purchase Agreement, the Company initially issued
to Lincoln Park 47,746 ordinary shares of the Company and is required to issue up to 38,197 additional ordinary shares of the Company
pro rata as the Company requires Lincoln Park to purchase the Company’s shares under the Lincoln Park Purchase Agreement
over the term of the agreement. The net proceeds under the Purchase Agreement to the Company will depend on the frequency and prices
at which the Company sells shares to Lincoln Park. The Company expects that any proceeds received by the Company from such sales
to Lincoln Park under the Purchase Agreement will be used for general corporate purposes and working capital requirements. No other
matters or circumstances have arisen since the end of the financial period which significantly affected or could significantly
affect the operations of the Group, the results of those operations, or the state of affairs of the Group in future financial years.
In addition, on February 23, 2016, the Company entered into an additional Securities
Purchase Agreement with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC. In recognition of Lincoln Park’s belief in the company and its potential
long term value, and under the terms and subject to the conditions of the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company will issue
and sell to Lincoln Park, and Lincoln Park will purchase from the Company, at the closing (a) 175,000 ordinary shares at a price
of $3.50 per share and (b) a Warrant to purchase up to an additional 150,000 ordinary shares (the “Warrant Shares”)
for a purchase price of $5.00 per share. The Purchase Agreement and the Warrant contain customary representations, warranties,
agreements and conditions. The Company expects that the net proceeds received by the Company from such sales to Lincoln Park under
the Purchase Agreement and the Warrant will be used for general corporate purposes and working capital requirements.
On December 21, 2016 the Company filed a Form S-8 to deregister all unsold securities
under this registration statement and terminated the Share Purchase Agreement with Lincoln park Capital Fund LLC.
Initial Public Offering
On April 28, 2014, the shareholders and the directors of the Company approved a ten-for-one
consolidation of shares, which had the effect of a reverse share split that became effective on June 6, 2014, when the Australian
Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) altered the registration details of the parent entity. All share, per share and related
information presented in these consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes has been retroactively adjusted, where
applicable, to reflect the impact of the reverse share split.
On June 18, 2014, the Company completed an initial public offering of 5,000,000 shares
on the NASDAQ at a share price of USD$10.00 per share resulting in gross proceeds of AUD$53.1 million (USD$50.0 million). The proceeds
were partially offset by commissions and issuance costs of AUD$5.7 million for net proceeds of AUD$47.4 million.
Future Funding Requirements
We generate free cash flow from our operating segments and in all cases, other than our
contract manufacturing segment and U.S. Companion Animal business, our established business units generate positive EBITDAOI. Our
manufacturing facility is only operating at 36% capacity which means we do not recover approximately $4 million in overhead annually.
We anticipate that in the future this will change as our own revenues (and hence manufacturing requirements) increase and as we
pursue contract manufacturing. We have also invested in establishing our Companion Animal commercial infrastructure in the U.S.
in anticipation of our Companion Animal product launches, and, as such, our expenditures on facilities, administration, and Companion
Animal marketing and digital technology development are all higher than in previous years and are expected to remain so under as
we build demand for sales of our U.S. Companion Animal products during 2016. We are also investing in our pipeline product candidates
including Zydax for the U.S. and Europe, to bring them closer to approvals. All of these potential growth-related investments mean
that we anticipate that we will continue to incur net losses through at least 2016.
As of the date of the filing of this annual report, based on our revenue sources from
our five marketed products, our anticipated growth-related investments, and our existing cash and cash equivalents, and our existing
financing agreement, we expect to fund our operations through at least the current period ending December 31, 2017. Our operating
plans may change as a result of many factors and we may seek additional funds through public or private equity, debt financings
or other sources, such as strategic collaborations and partnering arrangements. Such financing may result in dilution to stockholders,
imposition of debt covenants and repayment obligations, or other restrictions that may affect our business. In addition, we may
seek additional capital due to favorable market conditions or strategic considerations even if we believe we have sufficient funds
for our current and future operating plans. Our forecast of the period of time through which our financial resources will be adequate
to support our operations is a forward-looking statement and involves risks and uncertainties, and actual results could vary as
a result of a number of factors, including the risk factors disclosed in our previous filings.
Our future capital requirements depend on many factors, including but not limited
to:
☐
|
The results of our target animal studies for our current and future product candidates;
|
☐
|
The amount and timing of any milestone payments or royalties we must pay pursuant to our current or future license agreements or collaboration agreements;
|
☐
|
The timing of, and costs involved in, obtaining regulatory approvals for any of our current or future product candidates;
|
☐
|
The upfront and other payments, and associated costs, related to our identification, acquisition and in-licensing of new product candidates;
|
☐
|
The number and characteristics of the product candidates we pursue;
|
☐
|
The scope, progress, results and costs of researching and developing any of our current or future product candidates and conducting target animal studies;
|
☐
|
Our ability to partner with companies with established presence in Europe to provide our products in that market;
|
☐
|
Whether we acquire any other companies, assets, intellectual property or technologies in the future;
|
☐
|
The cost of commercialization activities, if any of our current or future product candidates are approved for sale, including marketing, sales and distribution costs;
|
☐
|
The cost of manufacturing our current and future product candidates and any products we successfully commercialize;
|
☐
|
Our ability to establish and maintain strategic collaborations, licensing or other arrangements and the financial terms of such agreements;
|
☐
|
The costs of attracting and retaining skilled personnel;
|
☐
|
The costs associated with being a public company; and
|
☐
|
The costs involved in preparing, filing, prospecting, maintaining, defending and enforcing patent claims or other legal proceedings including litigation costs and the outcome of such litigation.
|
5.C. Research and Development
The Group is a fully integrated pharmaceutical company focused on developing, manufacturing
and commercializing innovative animal health solutions and performs substantial research and development projects to develop candidate
products and improve current products. Our research and development policy is described below.
Research expenditure is recognized as an expense as incurred. Costs incurred on development
projects (relating to the design and testing of enhancements or extensions of products) are recognized as intangible assets when:
|
|
|
|
-
|
the technical feasibility of completing the intangible asset so that it will be available for use or sale;
|
|
-
|
the intention to complete the intangible asset and use or sell it;
|
|
-
|
the ability to use or sell the intangible asset;
|
|
-
|
how the intangible asset will generate probable future economic benefits;
|
|
-
|
the availability of adequate technical, financial and other resources to complete the development and to use or sell the intangible asset; and
|
|
-
|
the ability to measure reliably the expenditure attributable to the intangible asset during its development.
|
The Group considers the criteria met for recognizing an intangible asset, usually when
a regulatory filing has been made in a major market and approval is considered probable.
The expenditure capitalized comprises all directly attributable costs, including costs
of materials, services, direct labor and an appropriate proportion of overheads. Other development expenditures that do not meet
these criteria are recognized as an expense as incurred. Development costs previously recognized as an expense are not recognized
as an asset in a subsequent period. Capitalized development costs are recorded as intangible assets and amortized from the point
at which the asset is ready for use on a straight-line basis over its useful life, which is estimated at 10 years.
Research and development costs of approximately $2.5 million in the year ended December
31, 2016, $4.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2015, $2.0 million for the six month period ended December 31, 2014, and
$1.6 million, in the year ended June 30, 2014 were capitalized. Research and development costs of approximately $0.2 million in
the year ended December 31, 2015, $0.6 million for the six month period ended December 31, 2014, and $0.6 million for the year
ended June 30, 2014 were expensed.
5.D. Trend Information
Our current growth plans are focused in the near term around our Companion Animal portfolio.
We launched Glyde in the U.S. in September 2015 and expect we may receive FDA approval and would subsequently launch Zydax in the
U.S. in late 2017 or early 2018 utilizing our recently established U.S. Companion Animal Sales team. We also anticipate we may
receive approval for Zydax in late 2017 or early 2018 in the E.U. and in 2018 in Canada and would subsequently launch both Zydax
and Glyde in these markets through a marketing partner.
In addition to marketing Glyde and our digital application
Fetch
in the U.S. market,
we are expecting to launch
Luminous
our nutraceutical product for dermatological conditions in the U.S. in Q2, 2017.We also
expect to continue to grow revenues of Reviderm, our recently launched anti-microbial liquid bandage in the U.S. and potentially
launch it in Australia.
We also expect to continue to rapidly grow our U.S. sales of our reproductive hormones,
including through the enhancement of additional functionality in
mySYNCH
in 2017. From these growth opportunities plus continuing
sales of our companion animal and production animal products in established markets, we anticipate we may grow our 2017 revenues
to $20 million to $22 million in 2017.
In addition to our marketed products, we expect to focus our product development efforts
on developing further opportunities for using Zydax in treating osteoarthritis in cats, interstitial cystitis in cats as well as
seeking additional geographic expansion of our near-term approvals including filing for approval in additional markets such as
Asia and Latin America. In 2017 we expect to focus our R&D efforts on our key pipeline product candidates PAR121 (orthopedics)
and PAR122 (dermatology). We also intend to explore further in-licensing and acquisition opportunities as well as complete contract
manufacturing agreements with one or more multinational pharmaceutical companies as well as appoint a marketing parent for Zydax
in Europe and potentially Canada.
We believe that our planned allocation of resources over the next five years will give
us a strong focus on growth opportunities in the multi-billion dollar pet market. Future investment in our pipeline product candidates
will allow us to deliver solutions to unmet animal health needs through geographical and category expansion of the OA and reproductive
hormone markets and by entering new therapeutic areas that we believe offer significant opportunities. We expect to utilize our
currently available spare capacity in our sterile manufacturing facility to efficiently manufacture our products.
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, we have continued to invest in our fully-integrated
pharmaceutical value chain, specifically in our U.S.-based sales and marketing operation and the running costs associated with
our FDA-inspected sterile manufacturing facility. This operational investment, in addition to the previously incurred capital expenditure,
provides us with the unique infrastructure to continue to grow our current products within the markets in which we already operate
while also allowing us to take advantage of additional growth prospects from our pipeline product candidates, further geographical
expansion, further contract manufacturing opportunities and future in-licensing or acquisition opportunities.
The disclosure set forth in Item 5.A of this Form 20-F further discusses trend information
and is incorporated herein by reference.
5.E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not currently use off-balance sheet arrangements for the purposes of credit enhancement,
investment or other financial purposes.
In the ordinary course of business and in connection with the sale of assets and businesses,
we may indemnify our counterparties against certain liabilities that may arise in connection with a transaction or that are related
to activities prior to a transaction. If the indemnified party were to make a successful claim pursuant to the terms of the indemnification,
we would be required to reimburse the loss. These indemnifications generally are subject to threshold amounts, specified claim
periods and other restrictions and limitations. Historically, we have not paid significant amounts under these provisions and,
as of December 31, 2016, there are no recorded amounts for these arrangements.
5.F. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and other commercial
commitments at December 31, 2016 as well as the effect these obligations and commitments are expected to have on our liquidity
and cash flow in future periods:
|
|
Payments due by period
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Less than 1 year
|
|
1-3 years
|
|
3-5 years
|
|
More than 5 years
|
Long-Term Debt Obligations
|
|
$
|
30,815,195
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
19,951,482
|
|
|
$
|
10,863,713
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Operating Lease Obligations
|
|
$
|
7,756,582
|
|
|
$
|
1,160,056
|
|
|
$
|
2,423,937
|
|
|
$
|
1,865,709
|
|
|
$
|
2,306,881
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$
|
38,571,777
|
|
|
$
|
1,160,056
|
|
|
$
|
22,375,419
|
|
|
$
|
12,729,422
|
|
|
$
|
2,306,881
|
|
ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
6.A. Directors and Senior Management
The following table presents our directors and executive officers that served
in 2016. The directors have served in their respective capacities since their appointment, and unless otherwise stated will serve
until their removal pursuant to our constitution.
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
Executive Officers
|
|
|
Robert Joseph
|
40
|
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
Brad McCarthy
|
41
|
Director and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
Directors*
|
|
|
Alan Bell
|
60
|
Director and Chairman
|
Peter Croden*
|
69
|
Director
|
Ellen Richstone*
|
64
|
Director
|
David Rosen*
|
57
|
Director
|
William Hunsinger*
|
47
|
Director
|
*Peter Croden, Ellen Richstone, David Rosen and William Hunsinger resigned
from Parnell’s board on November 28, 2016 consistent with the decision to deregister from the NASDAQ and achieve significant
cost savings.
Executive Officers
Robert Joseph - Mr. Joseph has served as our President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
since joining us in August 2006. Previously, Mr. Joseph was employed with Eli Lilly and Company, a global pharmaceutical company,
serving in various sales and senior marketing roles in Australia and the US from 2002 to 2006. From 2000 to 2002, Mr. Joseph served
as a Financial Planning Manager with Allergan, Inc., a global specialty pharmaceutical company, and from 1998 to 2000, was employed
as a Business Performance Manager with Herron Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd, an Australian manufacturer of pharmaceutical and natural
healthcare products which has now become a subsidiary of Sigma Pharmaceuticals Limited. Mr. Joseph has undergraduate degrees in
science (pre-medicine), finance (accounting and commercial law) and marketing from the University of Queensland in Australia, and
is a qualified Certified Public Accountant in Australia.
Brad McCarthy - Mr. McCarthy joined us as Chief Financial Officer and Director in February
2010, and was appointed Chief Operating Officer of Parnell Manufacturing Pty Ltd, one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, in 2012.
Prior to joining us, Mr. McCarthy worked in several positions with subsidiaries of SIRVA, Inc., formerly Allied Worldwide, a privately
owned moving industry company, including as Chief Financial Officer from 2007 to 2010 of Pickfords Removals, a former subsidiary
company of SIRVA, Inc, and Head of Forecasting, Planning and Analysis, Europe,. Earlier in his career Mr. McCarthy served in financial
and accounting positions with Centrica PLC, a multinational utility company, and Volkswagen Group Australia Pty Ltd, a subsidiary
of Volkswagen Group, a manufacturer of passenger and commercial vehicles. Mr. McCarthy began his career as a financial accountant
with Beale Gaertner Young, an Australian accounting firm. He has undergraduate degrees in science (pharmacology and physiology)
from the University of Queensland, as well as degrees in accounting (accounting and corporate law) and management from Macquarie
University in Australia. He is also a Certified Public Accountant in Australia.
Directors
The current board of directors is comprised of executive officers, Mr. Robert Joseph,
Mr. Brad McCarthy and Mr. Alan Bell.
Alan Bell. Mr. Bell has been our Director and Chairman since 2006. From July 1986 until
2006, he was the sole owner and Managing Director of Parnell Laboratories (Aust) Pty Ltd, our legacy entity. Earlier in his career,
Dr. Bell worked in private veterinary practice for eight years. He received his bachelor of veterinary science degree from the
University of Queensland in Australia, and is a member of the Australian Institute of Company Directors.
Board of Directors
Our Board of Directors currently consists of three members, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer. We believe that each of our current directors has relevant industry experience. Our Constitution
specifies that there must be a minimum of one director and a maximum of ten, and our Board of Directors may determine the number
of directors within those limits. Our directors serve until removed by us by resolution.
Our Board of Directors has established delegated limits of authority, which define the
matters that are delegated to management and those that require Board of Directors approval. Our non-executive directors do not
have any service contracts with the Company or any of its subsidiaries providing for benefits upon termination of employment. Our
executive directors, as employees, have entered into employment agreements with us that provide for certain benefits upon termination
of employment, as discussed in “Employment Agreements with Executive Officers.”
Arrangements Concerning Election of Directors; Family Relationships
We are not a party to, nor are we aware of, any voting agreements among our shareholders.
In addition, no family relationships exist among our directors and executive officers.
6.B. Compensation
Compensation
Our Board of Directors recognizes that the attraction and retention of high-caliber directors
and executives with appropriate incentives is critical to generating shareholder value. We have designed our compensation program
to provide rewards for individual performance and corporate results and to encourage an ownership mentality among our executives
and other key employees.
Non-executive directors receive an annual fee for board membership and committee chairmanships
and are eligible persons under the Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan. Directors do not receive any other benefits or incentive.
In the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, the aggregate remuneration we paid to our
directors and senior management, including salary, director’s fees, retirement contributions (if applicable), and cash bonuses
paid under our quarterly and annual bonus scheme was $2.1 million. We also recorded share-based compensation expense of $0.8 million
related to shares issuable to employees and directors.
Bonuses
We currently operate a cash bonus plan for all employees. This plan is based on the performance
of the company against the annual Board-approved business plan for sales and operating profit (stated as EBITDAOI).
2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan
We adopted an omnibus equity incentive plan during the year ended June 30, 2014. The
plan provides us flexibility to grant a variety of share-based awards to incentivize our employees, officers, consultants and members
of our board of directors. Under the plan, we are able to grant share options, share awards, share units, performance-based awards
and other share-based awards.
We have reserved a total of 3,000,000 ordinary shares for issuance under the equity incentive
plan, subject to adjustment for changes in capitalization as provided in the plan. Shares underlying awards that are cancelled,
forfeited, expired, terminated unearned or settled in cash or that use a “net settled option” exercise will be returned
to the plan and may be used for future awards.
The plan for awards to employees and for awards to directors and senior management (CEO,
CFO, CCO, CSO and SVP Finance) is administered by our compensation committee. The compensation committee has full power to select
the individuals to whom awards are granted and to determine the specific terms and conditions of each award, subject to the provisions
of the plan.
The following is a brief summary of the types of awards that may be granted under the
plan:
Share Options. Share options represent a right to purchase a specified number of ordinary
shares from us at a specified price during a specified period of time. Share options granted under the plan will have an exercise
price that is not less than the fair market value of an ordinary share on the date of grant. Options will be exercisable at times
and under conditions as determined by the compensation committee, but in no event will they be exercisable later than ten years
from the date of grant. We use a net settled option exercise process whereby we deliver only gain shares, that is shares with a
fair market value equal to the option spread upon exercise directly to the employee or director. The net economic result to the
employee or director is the same as a broker-assisted cashless exercise however net share settlement has the important benefit
of reducing the number of shares that must be issued in connection with an option exercise and thereby reduces shareholder dilution.
Share Awards. Share awards may be unrestricted, or vested, at grant or restricted shares.
Restricted shares are actual ordinary shares that are issued to a participant, but that are subject to forfeiture if the participant
does not remain employed by us for a certain period of time and/or if certain performance goals are not met. Except for these restrictions
and any others imposed by the compensation committee, the participant will generally have all of the rights of a shareholder with
respect to the restricted shares, including the right to vote the shares, but will not be permitted to sell, assign, transfer,
pledge or otherwise encumber the shares before the risk of forfeiture lapses.
Share Units. Share units may be unrestricted, or vested, at grant or restricted share
units. An award of restricted share units represents a contractual obligation of the Company to deliver a number of ordinary shares,
an amount in cash equal to the fair market value of the specified number of shares subject to the award, or a combination of shares
and cash, upon vesting. Until our ordinary shares are issued to the participant in settlement of share units, the participant does
not have any rights of a shareholder with respect to the underlying shares. Vesting of restricted share units may be subject to
performance goals, the continued service of the participant or both. The compensation committee may provide that dividend equivalents
will be paid or credited with respect to restricted share units.
Performance-Based Awards. An award of performance shares refers to ordinary shares or
share units that are expressed in terms of our ordinary shares, the issuance, vesting, lapse of restrictions or payment of which
is contingent on performance as measured against predetermined objectives over a specified performance period. An award of performance
units refers to dollar-denominated units valued by reference to designated criteria established by the compensation committee,
other than our ordinary shares, whose issuance, vesting, lapse of restrictions or payment is contingent on performance as measured
against predetermined objectives over a specified performance period. The compensation committee will determine whether the award
will be settled in cash or ordinary shares.
Contributions to retirement plans
Our employees in Australia receive retirement contributions at the superannuation guarantee
contribution amount required by the Australian government, which was 9.5% as of December 31, 2016, we also sponsor a 401K Plan
for our U.S. employees and make matching contributions up to 4% of employee’s annual salary. We are not required to set aside
any amount to meet future retirement benefit obligations.
Employment Agreements with Executive Officers
Our executive directors, Mr. Joseph and Mr. McCarthy, have entered into employment agreements
with us which provide for certain benefits in the event of a termination of their employment with us. In the event that we terminate
our employment with either of Mr. Joseph or Mr. McCarthy without the requisite notice, Mr. Joseph or Mr. McCarthy would be entitled
to six months’ salary continuation in lieu of notice of termination.
6.C. Board Practices
Our Board of Directors is currently composed of three members, Mr. Bell, Mr. Joseph and
Mr. McCarthy. Mr Bell serves a term that extends to the next annual meeting of stockholders and until his successors are duly elected
and qualified or until his earlier resignation or removal. Mr Joseph and Mr McCarthy do not require to be re-elected at each annual
Meeting Mr. Bell, Mr. Joseph and Mr. McCarthy do not qualify as independent directors under ASX rules.
None of our directors is a party to a service contract that provides for benefits upon
termination of service.
6.D. Employees
As of December 31, 2016, we had 78 employees including 34 employees based in Australia
and 44 in the U.S. We have approximately 26 employees in Manufacturing, 34 employees in Sales, Marketing and Digital Technology,
13 employees in Corporate and Administration functions and 5 employees in R&D and Regulatory functions.
6.E. Share Ownership
The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our
outstanding ordinary shares as of December 31, 2016, by:
● each of our directors and executive officers individually;
● all our directors and executive officers as a group; and
● each beneficial owner of 5% or more of our ordinary shares.
Beneficial ownership generally includes voting or investment power over securities. Percentage
of beneficial ownership is based on 18,145,760 of our ordinary shares outstanding as of December 31, 2016,
|
|
|
Ordinary Shares Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
|
Number
|
Percent
|
Alan R. Bell
|
Unit 4, Century Estate, 476 Gardeners Road, Alexandria NSW 2015 Australia
|
|
5,226,432 (1)
|
28.80 %
|
Robert T. Joseph
|
7015 College Blvd, Overland Park, KS 66211
|
|
1,308,435 (2)
|
7.21 %
|
Brad R. McCarthy
|
Unit 4, Century Estate, 476 Gardeners Road, Alexandria NSW 2015 Australia
|
|
753,769 (3)
|
4.15 %
|
All directors and executive officers as a group
|
|
|
7,288,626
|
40.17 %
|
(1)
|
|
Includes 5,226,430 shares held by Pinehill Pty Ltd. Pinehill Pty Ltd is beneficially owned by, and is the trustee for, the Bell Family Trust, of which Dr. Bell is the sole director.
|
(2)
|
|
Includes 70,177 shares held by RT Joseph Holdings Pty Ltd ATF Joseph Superannuation Fund. Mr. Joseph and his spouse are directors of RT Joseph Holdings Pty Ltd, the corporate trustee of Joseph Superannuation Fund, an Australian-domiciled retirement savings fund of which Mr. Joseph and his spouse are beneficiaries.
|
(3)
|
|
Includes 507,687 shares held by McCarthy B&J Pty Ltd ATF McCarthy B&J Family Trust, 41,997 shares held by McCarthy B&J Superfund Pty Ltd ATF McCarthy B&J Superfund, and 18,242 shares held by Mr. McCarthy’s spouse. Mr. McCarthy’s spouse is the sole director of McCarthy B&J Pty Ltd, the corporate trustee of (i) McCarthy B&J Family Trust, a discretionary trust of which Mr. McCarthy and his spouse are beneficiaries, and (ii) McCarthy B&J Superfund, an Australian-domiciled retirement savings fund of which Mr. McCarthy and his spouse are beneficiaries.
|
|
Restricted Share Awards
|
Stock Awards
|
Stock Options
|
|
Shares Awarded
|
Value of Shares on Grant date ($US)
|
Shares Awarded
|
Value of Shares on Grant date ($US)
|
Options Awarded
|
Exercise Price ($US)
|
Value Realized on Exercise
|
Expiration Date of Options
|
Alan R. Bell, (1) (3)
|
9,375
|
$24,375
|
-
|
-
|
9,375
|
$4.00
|
-
|
2/1/2026
|
Robert T. Joseph (2) (3)
|
-
|
-
|
315,208
|
$217,494
|
264,948
|
$4.00
|
-
|
2/1/2026
|
Brad R. McCarthy (2) (3)
|
-
|
-
|
185,843
|
$128,232
|
125,283
|
$4.00
|
-
|
2/1/2026
|
Peter Croden (2) (3)
|
-
|
-
|
1433
|
$1,820
|
7,667
|
$4.00
|
-
|
8/5/2026
|
Ellen Richstone (2) (3)
|
-
|
-
|
287
|
$364
|
5,557
|
$4.00
|
-
|
2/1/2026
|
William Hunsinger (3)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3,867
|
$4.00
|
-
|
2/1/2026
|
David Rosen (2) (3)
|
-
|
-
|
287
|
$364
|
5,557
|
$4.00
|
-
|
2/1/2026
|
(1)
|
|
Represents Ordinary Shares of Restricted Share Units under the 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan. These shares are restricted by service conditions and vest over a two-year period (50% on February 1, 2017 and 50% on February 1, 2018).
|
(2)
|
|
Represents Ordinary Shares under the 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan. These shares were granted on December 31, 2016.
|
(3)
|
|
Represents Ordinary Share Options issued under the 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan. These options vest over 3 year service period
|
ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
7.A. Major Shareholders
The table in Section “ITEM 6.E. Share Ownership” above sets forth the beneficial
ownership of our ordinary shares as of December 31, 2016 held by each person known to us to have 5.0% of more beneficial share
ownership based on an aggregate of 18,145,760 ordinary shares outstanding as of that date.
All our shares, both issued and unissued, are ordinary shares of the same class and rank
equally as to dividends, voting powers and participation powers. Accordingly, there are no special voting powers held by our major
shareholders.
We are an Australian public company limited by shares with shareholders in Australia,
the U.S. and other foreign jurisdictions. We are not controlled by any foreign governments or other person. We are not aware of
any arrangements that would result in a change of control of our Company.
As of December 31, 2016, we had 18,145,760 ordinary shares issued. We believe that the
number of beneficial owners is substantially greater than the number or record holders because a large portion of our outstanding
ordinary shares are held in broker “street” names for the benefit of individual investors or other nominees. Management
believes that the U.S. shareholders hold approximately 58% of our outstanding ordinary shares. In addition to these record holders
there may be more persons located in the U.S. holding our ordinary shares in “street’ name.
7.B. Related Party Transactions
Bonds:
Between February and September 2013, we issued to certain qualified subscribers 4,300,000
2013 Parnell Bonds (with an interest rate of 10%) for an aggregate offering price of AUD$4,300,000. In accordance with our Constitution,
our Board of Directors passed resolutions approving this issuance on February 8, 2013. Robert Joseph, our President and Chief Executive
Officer, and certain of his relatives, as well as certain relatives of Brad McCarthy, our Chief Financial Officer, participated
in this bond offering as follows: Robert Joseph and his relatives purchased an aggregate of 625,000 bonds for an aggregate of AUD
$625,000 and Brad McCarthy’s relatives purchased 960,000 bonds for an aggregate of AUD $960,000. The bonds matured between
February and September 2015, but could be redeemed early by us or by the bondholder in accordance with the Conditions of 2013 Bonds.
The Bonds were issued with a stapled warrant which converted into 140,075 ordinary shares of the Company, pursuant to the election
of the bondholders on May 20, 2014. In 2015 AUD$125,000 of the bonds sold to Robert Joseph were redeemed. The remaining AUD $2,845,000
bond maturities were extended for an additional period and will mature throughout 2018.
Lease
On June 27, 2011, Parnell Manufacturing Pty Limited, or Parnell Manufacturing, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company, entered into a lease for 11,550 square feet of office space and 20,161 square feet of manufacturing
space at Unit 4, Century Estate, 476 Gardeners Road, Alexandria NSW 2015, Australia. The lessor, Helion Properties Pty Ltd, is
controlled by Alan R. Bell, our Chairman. The initial ten-year term of the lease began on January 1, 2011. Parnell Manufacturing
has an option to renew the lease for up to two terms of five years each by providing notice in writing between three and 12 months
prior to the expiration of the initial term of the lease. The base rent for this property is AUD$443,445 per annum, plus Goods
and Services Tax of 10%, payable monthly. The rent is subject to two market review dates during the initial term to determine the
prevailing market rent for the premises, and may be adjusted accordingly. The lease may be terminated by mutual agreement of the
Company and Helion Properties Pty Ltd or in certain events of breach by either party. We refurbished made various improvements
to this facility in 2015 of which AUD$77,000 was paid by Mr. Bell.
Consultancy Agreement
On April 1, 2015, the Company entered into a Consultancy Agreement with the Chairman
of the Board, Dr. Alan Bell. The Company desired that Dr. Bell will provide consulting services and periodic advice to the Company,
primarily in relation to product development activities. The Compensation Committee authorized the Company to engage Dr. Bell as
needed, in the discretion of the CEO of the Company, to a maximum of $60,000 per calendar quarter. To the extent that Dr. Bell’s
services are utilized by the Company, Dr. Bell shall report to the Committee promptly after the end of each quarter on the services
provided by him during that quarter.
Transactions with Shareholders
Beginning on February 18, 2014, Pinehill Pty Ltd sold an aggregate of 513,972 Class A
shares of the Company to 17 shareholders of the Company. Pinehill Pty Ltd is beneficially owned by, and is the trustee for, the
Bell Family Trust, of which Dr. Bell is the sole director.
7.C. Interests of Experts and Counsel
Not applicable
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
8.A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information
Financial Statements
Our financial statements are stated in Australian Dollars (AUD) and are prepared in accordance
with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IFRS”).
See our audited financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016, December
31, 2015, and June 30, 2014, and the six-month period ended December 31, 2014 are included under Item 18 of this annual report.
Legal Proceedings
As at December 31, 2016, we were not a party to any material legal proceedings. We are
from time to time subject to claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. We intend to defend vigorously against
any future claims and litigation.
8.B. Significant Changes
Since December 31, 2016, the date of our most recent financial statements there have
been no significant changes except for the matter described below:
Our ordinary shares began trading on the OTC Pink® Open Market on January 3, 2017
under the symbol PARNF. Prior to January 3, 2017, and through June 18, 2014, our ordinary shares were listed on the NASDAQ Global
Market under the symbol PARN. Prior to June 18, 2014, our ordinary shares were not traded in public markets.
ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING
9.A. Offer and Listing Details
Our ordinary shares qualified for listing on the OTC Pink® Open Market
on January 3, 2017 under the symbol PARNF. Prior to January 3, 2017, and through June 18, 2014, our ordinary shares were listed
on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol PARN. Prior to June 18, 2014, our ordinary shares were not traded in public markets.
The following sets forth the high and low prices expressed in U.S. Dollars on the NASDAQ Global Market for August, 2016 through
December, 2016 and on the OTC Pink® Open Market from January, 2017 through March 29, 2017, for each quarter for the past two
fiscal years, and for the one completed fiscal year (ended December 31, 2014, at which time we changed from a June 30 fiscal year
to a December 31 fiscal year) for which our stock was publicly traded.
Last Six (6) Months
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
For the Month Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Through March 29, 2017
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.92
|
|
February
|
|
|
1.05
|
|
|
|
0.92
|
|
January 2017
|
|
|
1.32
|
|
|
|
0.99
|
|
December 2016
|
|
|
1.45
|
|
|
|
0.66
|
|
November 2016
|
|
|
1.37
|
|
|
|
1.09
|
|
October 2016
|
|
|
1.51
|
|
|
|
1.02
|
|
September 2016
|
|
|
1.62
|
|
|
|
1.37
|
|
August 2016
|
|
|
1.72
|
|
|
|
1.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last Two (2) Fiscal Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
1.51
|
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
September 30, 2016
|
|
|
1.62
|
|
|
|
1.37
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
1.42
|
|
March 31, 2016
|
|
|
3.85
|
|
|
|
1.75
|
|
For the Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
5.11
|
|
|
$
|
3.20
|
|
September 30, 2015
|
|
|
5.11
|
|
|
|
3.20
|
|
June 30, 2015
|
|
|
5.98
|
|
|
|
3.47
|
|
March 31, 2015
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
3.59
|
|
For the Period Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
6.00
|
|
|
$
|
3.20
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
3.85
|
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
As of December 31, 2016, there were outstanding 18,145,760 shares of our ordinary no
par value shares held of record by approximately 58 holders.
9.B. Plan of Distribution
Not applicable.
9.C. Markets
Our ordinary shares qualified for listing on the OTC Pink® Open Market on January
3, 2017 under the symbol PARNF. Prior to January 3, 2017, and through June 18, 2014, our ordinary shares were listed on the NASDAQ
Global Market under the symbol PARN. Prior to June 18, 2014, our ordinary shares were not traded in public markets.
9.D. Selling Shareholders
Not applicable.
9.E. Dilution
Not applicable.
9.F. Expense of the Issue
Not applicable.
ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
10.A. Share Capital
Not applicable.
10.B. Memorandum and Articles of Association
Information relating to our Articles of Association is incorporated by reference to the
Constitution of Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 on Form 6-K for May 2015, filed
with the SEC on May 7, 2015.
10.C. Material Contracts
Our Commercial Agreements
Supply Agreements
Bachem AG, or Bachem
On September 26, 2011, Parnell Manufacturing Pty Ltd, our wholly-owned manufacturing
subsidiary, or Parnell Manufacturing, entered into a non-exclusive Supply Agreement with Bachem to supply us Gonadorelin Acetate,
the API in our GONAbreed product. Certain minimum purchases are required by Parnell Manufacturing under the agreement. The agreement
contains standard termination provisions and provides for an initial term of seven years, with the right to negotiate subsequent
terms beginning upon the sooner of (i) 24 months prior to expiration, or (ii) the supply to Parnell Manufacturing of five kilograms
of Gonadorelin Acetate. The per-gram price of the API is set in the agreement, and may be increased by Bachem; however, increases
of over 2% require Bachem to provide Parnell Manufacturing with at least 60 days’ advanced notice of the increase, and provide
Parnell Manufacturing the right to renegotiate the price. The agreement also contains a provision that limits the supply by Bachem
of gonadorelin acetate to any other veterinary products company in the U.S. for five years following approval of our GONAbreed
product.
Piramal Healthcare (UK) Ltd, or Piramal
On January 1, 2014, Parnell Manufacturing renewed a Supply Agreement with Piramal to
supply Cloprostenol Sodium, the API for our estroPLAN product. The agreement requires Parnell Manufacturing to make an annual minimum
purchase of 1,500 grams of API. Any purchases by Parnell Manufacturing in excess of 5,000 grams per calendar year will be provided
by Piramal on a best-efforts basis. The agreement contains standard termination provisions and provides for an initial term of
four years, with the right to negotiate subsequent terms upon 90 days’ notice prior to expiration. The per-gram price of
the API is set in the agreement, and may be reviewed and renegotiated by Parnell Manufacturing and Piramal at any time following
January 1, 2016, or following a fluctuation in currency resulting in the U.S. dollar increasing by more than 10% against the base
ratio in the agreement equating $1.60 to £1.00.
In-License Agreements
CIMTECH Pty Ltd, or CIMTECH
On March 18, 2014, Parnell Technologies Pty Ltd, our wholly-owned subsidiary, or Parnell
Tech, entered into an exclusive, perpetual, and irrevocable worldwide License Agreement with CIMTECH, to develop and commercialize
products using certain intellectual property of CIMTECH.
The agreement requires Parnell Tech to pay a modest up-front payment and certain fees
upon achievement of regulatory milestones totalling up to $2.0 million, and royalty payments ranging from 10% to 1% depending on
the total cost of development and the total annual sales of any approved product.
The agreement provides that all new intellectual property that is developed by Parnell
Tech using the patents that Parnell Tech licensed from CIMTECH will be owned by us. CIMTECH will continue to own all patents and
applications existing as of the date of the agreement. CIMTECH may only terminate the agreement if Parnell becomes insolvent, materially
breaches and does not cure such breach or in the event Parnell Tech does not undertake any development work on a product in a 12
month period.
Contract Manufacturing Agreements
Merial
On May 27, 2016, Australian Pharma Services Pty Ltd, our wholly-owned subsidiary, entered
into a contract manufacturing agreement with Merial, Inc, as the exclusive supplier of the Synchsure product for SALE by Merial
in the U.S. Under the terms of the Contract Manufacturing Agreement, Merial will purchase certain sterile injectable products,
exclusively from Parnell, with minimum annual purchase commitments over the 10-year term of the agreement.
Financing Arrangements
Partners for Growth III, L.P., or PFG
On October 14, 2011, in connection with a now-terminated credit agreement with PFG, originally
for a $10.0 million revolving line of credit, we and our non-U.S. subsidiaries entered into a Revenue Sharing Agreement with PFG.
The revenue sharing agreement, which survived the termination of the credit agreement, provides PFG the right to receive revenue
payments comprised of 5% of total gross sale revenue, including payments and fees, resulting from all sales or disposals of our
estroPLAN and GONAbreed products in the U.S.
The term of the revenue sharing agreement is through June 30, 2021, or until maximum
aggregate payments of $3.0 million have been made by us under the agreement. As of December 31, 2016 we have paid an aggregate
total of $0.9 million. In addition to standard termination provisions, the agreement may be terminated by us at any time upon payment
of an early redemption fee of $3.0 million less any revenue payments we have already made. The agreement may also be terminated
by PFG following the occurrence of certain events, including our inability to sell our estroPLAN and GONAbreed products in the
U.S., and if we experience a change in control, which includes change in the power to exercise or the power to control the exercise
of at least half of the voting power of any class of our shares. Upon such termination, PFG is entitled to a minimum payment of
$3.0 million.
2013 Parnell Bonds
Between February and September 2013, we issued to certain qualified subscribers 4,300,000
2013 Parnell Bonds (with an interest rate of 10%) for an aggregate offering price of AUD$4,300,000. In accordance with our Constitution,
our Board of Directors passed resolutions approving this issuance on February 8, 2013. Robert Joseph, our President and Chief Executive
Officer, and certain of his relatives, as well as certain relatives of Brad McCarthy, our Chief Financial Officer, participated
in this bond offering as follows: Robert Joseph and his relatives purchased an aggregate of 625,000 bonds for an aggregate of AUD
$625,000 and Brad McCarthy’s relatives purchased 960,000 bonds for an aggregate of AUD $960,000. The bonds mature between
February and September 2015, but may be redeemed early by us or by the bondholder in accordance with the Conditions of 2013 Bonds.
Term Loan
MidCap Term Loan
In June 2015, the Company entered into a non-dilutive $USD11 million term loan agreement
with MidCap Financial. The Company intended to use the proceeds of the loan for the expansion of our Companion Animal sales team
in the US.
The Term Loan had a 45-month term, being interest only for the first 18 months and straight-line
amortization for the remaining 27 months. Parnell was able to extend the interest only period to the first 24 months of the term
loan upon achieving certain revenue targets as stipulated in the agreement. Interest on the outstanding balance was payable monthly
in arrears at an annual rate of the one month LIBOR plus 7.45% subject to a LIBOR floor of 0.50%, current rate of 7.95%. The Term
Loan had no warrant coverage and was secured by substantially all of the Company's assets.
Covenants imposed by the lender included various customary negative covenants and required
that the Company maintain various levels of trailing twelve-month revenues that increased over the term of the loan. As of December
31, 2015, and for the period from start of the loan to the period end date, the Company was in compliance with all covenants.
In November 2016, the Company repaid the MidCap Term Loan balance of approximately USD
$11,751,000, inclusive of accrued interest and prepayment fees. The unamortized borrowing costs of approximately USD $380,537 were
charged to expense upon extinguishment of the debt. The MidCap term loan was registered by a first mortgage over all assets of
the Group. As at December 31, 2016, this first registered mortgage has been released.
2016 Term Loan Facility
In November 2016, the Group entered into a credit arrangement with U.S. based lenders,
SWK Holdings LLC, HI PPH LLC, and R-S Healthcare Management for a four-year USD $20,000,000 senior security credit facility. The
credit facility was utilized to pay off our previous senior debt facility with MidCap Financial Services, LLC, which was due to
mature in 2020. Following the payment of fees and associated costs of establishing this new four-year credit facility of approximately
USD $692,248, USD $7,666,307 of funds were immediately available to us for working and growth capital. The credit facility contained
two financial covenants requiring the Company to maintain a ratio of fair market of its inventory to employee liabilities of 70%
and to have unencumbered liquid assets of greater than USD $1,000,000 as measured on the last day of any fiscal quarter. In addition,
the credit facility contained other customary affirmative and negative covenants.
Lincoln Park Capital Fund
On February 23, 2016, the Company
entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Lincoln Park. In recognition of Lincoln
Park’s belief in our company’s business and the potential value, under the terms and subject to the conditions of the
Purchase Agreement, the Company will issue and sell to Lincoln Park, and Lincoln Park will purchase from the Company, at the closing
(a) 175,000 ordinary shares (the “Initial Shares”) at a price of $3.50 per share and (b) a Warrant to purchase up to
an additional 150,000 ordinary shares (the “Warrant Shares”) for a purchase price of $5.00 per share (the “Warrant”).
Lincoln Park represented to the Company, among other things, that it was an “accredited investor” (as such term is
defined in Rule 501 (a) of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the
Company is selling the Initial Shares and the Warrant Shares in reliance upon an exemption from registration contained in Section
4(2) under the Securities Act. The securities sold may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable
exemption from registration requirements. The Purchase Agreement and the Warrant contain customary representations, warranties,
agreements and conditions. The Company expects that the net proceeds received by the Company from such sales to Lincoln Park under
the Purchase Agreement and the Warrant will be used for general corporate purposes and working capital requirements. The Purchase
Agreement and associated Registration Statement with the SEC was terminated as at December 31, 2016.
The representations, warranties and covenants contained in the aforementioned agreements
were made only for purposes of such agreements and as of specific dates, were solely for the benefit of the parties to such agreements,
and may be subject to limitations agreed upon by the contracting parties, including being qualified by confidential disclosures
exchanged between the parties in connection with execution of the agreements. On December 21, 2016 the Company filed a Form S-8
to deregister all unsold securities under this registration statement.
On May 17, 2016, the Company completed a secondary public offering of 2,550,000 shares
on the NASDAQ at a share price of USD$1.65 per share resulting in gross proceeds of USD$4,207,500. The proceeds were partially
offset by commissions and issuance costs of USD$252,450 for net proceeds of USD$3,955,050.
On June 8, 2016, the underwriters of the secondary public offering elected to take-up
380,500 overallotment shares on the NASDAQ at a share price of USD$1.65 per share resulting in gross proceeds of USD$627,825. The
proceeds were partially offset by commissions and issuance costs of USD$37,669 for net proceeds of USD$590,156.
10.D. Exchange Controls
There are no Australian governmental laws, decrees or regulations that restrict, in a
manner material to the Company, the export or import of capital, including any foreign exchange controls, or that generally affect
the remittance of dividends or other payments to non-residents or non-citizens of Australia who hold shares of the Company.
10.E. Taxation
The following is a summary of material U.S. federal and Australian income tax considerations
to U.S. holders, as defined below, of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of ordinary shares. This discussion is based on
the laws in force as at the date of this annual report, and is subject to changes in the relevant income tax law, including changes
that could have retroactive effect. The following summary does not take into account or discuss the tax laws of any country or
other taxing jurisdiction other than the U.S. and Australia. Holders are advised to consult their tax advisors concerning the overall
tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of ordinary shares in their particular circumstances. This discussion
is not intended, and should not be construed, as legal or professional tax advice.
This summary does not describe U.S. federal estate and gift tax considerations, or
any state and local tax considerations within the U.S., and is not a comprehensive description of all U.S. federal or Australian
income tax considerations that may be relevant to a decision to acquire or dispose of ordinary shares. Furthermore, this summary
does not address U.S. federal or Australian income tax considerations relevant to holders subject to taxing jurisdictions other
than or in addition to the U.S. and Australia, and does not address all possible categories of holders, some of which may be subject
to special tax rules.
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
The following discussion is limited to the material U.S. federal income tax consequences
relating to the purchase, ownership and disposition of ordinary shares by U.S. holders (as defined below). This discussion applies
to U.S. holders that purchase ordinary shares pursuant to the offering and hold such ordinary shares as capital assets for U.S.
federal income tax purposes. This discussion is based on the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, U.S.
Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder and administrative and judicial interpretations thereof, all as in effect on the date
hereof and all of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect. There can be no assurances that the U.S. Internal
Revenue Service, or the IRS, will not take a different position concerning the tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and
disposition of ordinary shares or that such a position would not be sustained. This discussion does not address all of the tax
consequences that may be relevant to specific U.S. holders in light of their particular circumstances or to U.S. holders subject
to special tax rules, such as banks, insurance companies, individual retirement and other tax-deferred accounts, regulated investment
companies, individuals who are former U.S. citizens or former long-term U.S. residents, dealers in securities or currencies, tax-exempt
entities, persons subject to the alternative minimum tax, persons that hold ordinary shares as a position in a straddle or as part
of a hedging, constructive sale or conversion transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes, persons that have a functional
currency other than the U.S. dollar, investors in pass-through entities, or persons that own (directly, indirectly or constructively)
10% or more of our equity.
For purposes of this description, a “U.S. holder” means a beneficial owner
of ordinary shares that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
|
•
|
an individual who is a citizen or resident of the U.S. for U.S. federal income tax purposes;
|
|
•
|
a corporation, or other entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, created or organized in or under the laws of the U.S. or any state thereof or the District of Columbia;
|
|
•
|
an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or
|
|
•
|
a trust (i) the administration of which is subject to the primary supervision of a court in the U.S. and for which one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions or (ii) that has an election in effect under applicable income tax regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.
|
A “non-U.S. holder” is a beneficial owner of ordinary shares that is not
a U.S. holder.
If an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes
holds ordinary shares, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner generally will depend on the status of the partner and
the activities of the partnership. Partners of partnerships that will hold ordinary shares should consult their tax advisors.
You are urged to consult your own tax advisor with respect to the U.S. federal,
as well as state, local and non-U.S., tax consequences to you of acquiring, owning and disposing of ordinary shares in light of
your particular circumstances, including the possible effects of changes in U.S. federal and other tax laws.
Distributions
Subject to the discussion below under “Passive Foreign Investment Company Considerations,”
a U.S. holder that receives a distribution with respect to ordinary shares generally will be required to include the U.S. dollar
value of the gross amount of such distribution (before reduction for any Australian withholding taxes) in gross income as a dividend
when actually or constructively received to the extent of the U.S. holder’s pro rata share of our current and/or accumulated
earnings and profits (as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles). To the extent a distribution received by a U.S.
holder is not a dividend because it exceeds the U.S. holder’s pro rata share of our current and accumulated earnings and
profits, the distribution will be treated first as a tax-free return of capital and reduce (but not below zero) the adjusted tax
basis of the U.S. holder’s ordinary shares. To the extent the distribution exceeds the adjusted tax basis of the U.S. holder’s
ordinary shares, the remainder will be taxed as capital gain. Notwithstanding the foregoing, we do not intend to maintain calculations
of earnings and profits, as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Consequently, any distributions generally will be
reported as dividend income for U.S. information reporting purposes. See “Backup Withholding Tax and Information Reporting”
below. Dividends paid by us will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction generally allowed to U.S. corporate shareholders.
The U.S. dollar value of any distribution on ordinary shares paid in Australian dollars,
including any Australian withholding taxes, should be calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the date of actual
or constructive receipt of such distribution, regardless of whether the Australian dollars are converted into U.S. dollars at that
time. If Australian dollars are converted into U.S. dollars on the date of actual or constructive receipt of the distribution,
the tax basis of the U.S. holder in those Australian dollars will be equal to their U.S. dollar value on that date and, as a result,
a U.S. holder generally should not be required to recognize any foreign exchange gain or loss. If Australian dollars so received
are not converted into U.S. dollars on the date of actual or constructive receipt, the U.S. holder will have a basis in the Australian
dollars equal to their U.S. dollar value on the date of receipt. Any gain or loss on a subsequent conversion or other disposition
of the Australian dollars generally will be treated as ordinary income or loss to such U.S. holder and generally such gain or loss
will be income or loss from sources within the U.S. for U.S. foreign tax credit limitation purposes.
Subject to the passive foreign investment company rules, certain distributions treated
as dividends that are received by non-corporate U.S. holders from a “qualified foreign corporation” generally qualify
for a 20% reduced maximum tax rate so long as certain holding period and other requirements are met. A non-U.S. corporation (other
than a corporation that is treated as a passive foreign investment company for the taxable year in which the dividend is paid or
the preceding taxable year) generally will be considered to be a qualified foreign corporation (i) if it is eligible for the benefits
of a comprehensive tax treaty with the U.S. which the Secretary of Treasury of the U.S. determines is satisfactory for purposes
of this provision and which includes an exchange of information program, or (ii) with respect to any dividend it pays on stock
which is readily tradable on an established securities market in the U.S. We expect to be considered a qualified foreign corporation
with respect to our ordinary shares because we believe we are eligible for the benefits under the Double Taxation Convention between
Australia and the U.S. and because our ordinary shares are listed on the NASDAQ. Accordingly, dividends we pay generally should
be eligible for the reduced income tax rate. However, the determination of whether a dividend qualifies for the preferential tax
rates must be made at the time the dividend is paid. U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors.
The additional 3.8% “net investment income tax” (described below) may apply
to dividends received by certain U.S. holders who meet certain modified adjusted gross income thresholds.
Dividends received by a U.S. holder with respect to ordinary shares will be treated as
foreign source income, which may be relevant in calculating the holder’s foreign tax credit limitation. The limitation on
foreign taxes eligible for credit is calculated separately with respect to specific classes of income. For these purposes, dividends
will be categorized as “passive” or “general” income depending on a U.S. holder’s circumstance.
Subject to certain complex limitations, a U.S. holder generally will be entitled, at
its option, to claim either a credit against its U.S. federal income tax liability or a deduction in computing its U.S. federal
taxable income in respect of any Australian taxes withheld by us. If a U.S. holder elects to claim a deduction, rather than a foreign
tax credit, for Australian taxes withheld by us for a particular taxable year, the election will apply to all foreign taxes paid
or accrued by or on behalf of the U.S. holder in the particular taxable year.
The availability of the foreign tax credit and the application of the limitations on
its availability are fact specific. You are urged to consult your own tax advisor as to the consequences of Australian withholding
taxes and the availability of a foreign tax credit or deduction. See “Australian Tax Considerations — Taxation of Dividends.”
Sale, Exchange or Other Taxable Disposition of Ordinary Shares
Subject to the passive foreign investment company rules, discussed below, a U.S. holder
generally will, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, recognize capital gain or loss on a sale, exchange or other disposition of
ordinary shares equal to the difference between the amount realized on the disposition and the U.S. holder’s tax basis in
the ordinary shares. This gain or loss recognized on a sale, exchange or other disposition of ordinary shares generally will be
long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. holder has held the ordinary shares for more than one year. Generally, for U.S. holders
who are individuals (as well as certain trusts and estates), long-term capital gains are subject to U.S. federal income tax at
preferential rates. For foreign tax credit limitation purposes, gain or loss recognized upon a disposition generally will be treated
as from sources within the U.S. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
You should consult your own tax advisor regarding the availability of a foreign tax credit or deduction in respect of any Australian
tax imposed on a sale or other disposition of ordinary shares. See “Australian Tax Considerations — Tax on Sales or
other Dispositions of Shares.”
Passive Foreign Investment Company Considerations
The Code provides special, generally adverse, rules regarding certain distributions received
by U.S. holders with respect to, and sales, exchanges and other dispositions, including pledges, of shares of stock of, a passive
foreign investment company, or PFIC. A foreign corporation will be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year if at least 75% of its
gross income for the taxable year is passive income or at least 50% of its gross assets during the taxable year, based on a quarterly
average and generally by value, produce or are held for the production of passive income. Passive income for this purpose generally
includes, among other things, dividends, interest, rents, royalties, gains from commodities and securities transactions and gains
from assets that produce passive income. In determining whether a foreign corporation is a PFIC, a pro-rata portion of the income
and assets of each corporation in which it owns, directly or indirectly, at least a 25% interest (by value) is taken into account.
The determination of whether or not we are a PFIC is a factual determination that must
be determined annually at the close of each taxable year. Based on our business results for the last fiscal year and composition
of our assets, we do not believe that we were a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes for the taxable year ended June 30, 2014.
Similarly, based on our business projections and the anticipated composition of our assets for the current and future years, we
do not expect that we will be a PFIC for the taxable year ended June 30, 2015. Even if we determine that we are not a PFIC after
the close of our taxable year ended June 30, 2014, there can be no assurance that the IRS will agree with our conclusion. Because
PFIC status is a fact-intensive determination made on an annual basis, no assurance can be given that we are not or will not become
a PFIC. Our U.S. counsel expresses no opinion with respect to our PFIC status in any prior taxable year or the current taxable
year ended June 30, 2014 and also expresses no opinion with respect to our predictions regarding our PFIC status in the future.
If we are a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. holder holds ordinary shares,
any “excess distribution” that the holder receives and any gain realized from a sale or other disposition (including
a pledge) of such ordinary shares will be subject to special tax rules, unless the holder makes a mark-to-market election or qualified
electing fund election as discussed below. Any distribution in a taxable year that is greater than 125% of the average annual distribution
received by a U.S. holder during the shorter of the three preceding taxable years or such holder’s holding period for the
ordinary shares will be treated as an excess distribution.
Under these special tax rules:
|
•
|
the excess distribution or gain will be allocated ratably over the U.S. holder’s holding period for the ordinary shares;
|
|
•
|
the amount allocated to the current taxable year, and any taxable year prior to the first taxable year in which we were a PFIC, will be treated as ordinary income; and
|
|
•
|
the amount allocated to each other year will be subject to income tax at the highest rate in effect for that year and the interest charge generally applicable to underpayments of tax will be imposed on the resulting tax attributable to each such year.
|
The tax liability for amounts allocated to years prior to the year of disposition or
excess distribution cannot be offset by any net operating loss, and gains (but not losses) realized on the transfer of the ordinary
shares cannot be treated as capital gains, even if the ordinary shares are held as capital assets. In addition, individual shareholders
will be denied a “step up” in the tax basis of any shares in a PFIC at death.
If we are a PFIC for any taxable year during which any of our non-U.S. subsidiaries is
also a PFIC, a U.S. holder of ordinary shares during such year would be treated as owning a proportionate amount (by value) of
the shares of the lower-tier PFIC for purposes of the application of these rules to such subsidiary. You should consult your tax
advisors regarding the tax consequences if the PFIC rules apply to any of our subsidiaries.
If a U.S. holder owns ordinary shares during any year in which we are a PFIC, the U.S.
holder generally will be required to file an IRS Form 8621 (Information Return by a Shareholder of a Passive Foreign Investment
Company or Qualified Electing Fund) with respect to the company, generally with the U.S. holder’s federal income tax return
for that year. U.S. holders should consult their tax advisors regarding whether we are a PFIC and the potential application of
the PFIC rules.
A U.S. holder may avoid some of the adverse tax consequences of owning shares in a PFIC
by making a “qualified electing fund” election. The availability of this election with respect to our ordinary shares
requires that we provide information to shareholders making the election. We do not intend to provide you with the information
you would need to make or maintain a qualified electing fund election and you will, therefore, not be able to make such an election
with respect to your ordinary shares.
Alternatively, a U.S. holder owning marketable stock in a PFIC may make a mark-to-market
election to elect out of the tax treatment discussed above. If a valid mark-to-market election for the ordinary shares is made,
the electing U.S. holder will include in income each year an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the
ordinary shares as of the close of the holder’s taxable year over the adjusted basis in such ordinary shares. The U.S. holder
is allowed a deduction for the excess, if any, of the adjusted basis of the ordinary shares over their fair market value as of
the close of the holder’s taxable year. Deductions are allowable, however, only to the extent of any net mark-to-market gains
on the ordinary shares included in the U.S. holder’s income for prior taxable years. Amounts included in the U.S. holder’s
income under a mark-to-market election, as well as gain on the actual sale or other disposition of the ordinary shares, are treated
as ordinary income. Ordinary loss treatment also applies to the deductible portion of any mark-to-market loss on the ordinary shares,
as well as to any loss realized on the actual sale or disposition of the ordinary shares, to the extent the amount of such loss
does not exceed the net mark-to-market gains previously included for such ordinary shares. The tax basis in the ordinary shares
will be adjusted to reflect any such income or loss amounts. A mark-to-market election will be effective for the taxable year for
which the election is made and all subsequent taxable years unless the ordinary shares are no longer regularly traded on an applicable
exchange or the IRS consents to the revocation of the election.
The mark-to-market election is available only for stock which is regularly traded on
(i) a national securities exchange that is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, (ii) NASDAQ, or (iii) an
exchange or market that the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury determines has rules sufficient to ensure that the market price represents
a legitimate and sound fair market value. Our ordinary shares are listed on the NASDAQ and actively traded, as such mark-to-market
election would be available to you were we to be or become a PFIC.
U.S. holders are urged to contact their own tax advisors regarding the determination
of whether we are a PFIC and the tax consequences of such status.
Medicare Tax
With respect to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2013, certain U.S. persons,
including individuals, estates and trusts, will be subject to an additional 3.8% Medicare surtax, or “net investment income
tax,” on unearned income. For individuals, the additional net investment income tax applies to the lesser of (i) “net
investment income” or (ii) the excess of “modified adjusted gross income” over $200,000 ($250,000 if married
and filing jointly or $125,000 if married and filing separately). “Net investment income” generally equals the taxpayer’s
gross investment income reduced by the deductions that are allocable to such income. Investment income generally includes, among
other things, passive income such as interest, dividends, annuities, royalties, rents, and capital gains. U.S. holders are urged
to consult their own tax advisors regarding the implications of the additional net investment income tax resulting from their ownership
and disposition of ordinary shares.
Foreign Asset Reporting
Certain U.S. holders who are individuals are required to report information relating
to an interest in our common stock, subject to certain exceptions (including an exception for shares held in accounts maintained
by financial institutions) by filing IRS Form 8938 (Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets) with their U.S. federal income
tax return. U.S. holders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding their information reporting obligations, if any, with
respect to their ownership and disposition of our common stock.
Backup Withholding Tax and Information Reporting Requirements
U.S. holders that are “exempt recipients” (such as corporations) generally
will not be subject to U.S. backup withholding tax and related information reporting requirements on payments of dividends on,
and the proceeds from the disposition of, ordinary shares unless, when required, they fail to demonstrate their exempt status.
Other U.S. holders (including individuals) generally will be subject to U.S. backup withholding tax at the applicable statutory
rate, currently 28%, in respect of any payments of dividends on, and the proceeds from the disposition of, ordinary shares if they
fail to furnish their correct taxpayer identification number or otherwise fail to comply with applicable backup withholding requirements.
Information reporting requirements generally will apply to payments of dividends on, and the proceeds from the disposition of,
ordinary shares to a U.S. holder that is not an exempt recipient. U.S. holders who are required to establish their exempt status
generally must provide IRS Form W-9 (Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification).
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Amounts withheld as backup withholding may
be credited against a U.S. holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability. A U.S. holder may obtain a refund of any amounts withheld
under the backup withholding rules by filing the appropriate claim for refund with the Internal Revenue Service in a timely manner
and furnishing any required information.
U.S. holders are urged to contact their own tax advisors as to their qualification for
an exemption from backup withholding tax and the procedure for obtaining this exemption.
The discussion above is not intended to constitute a complete analysis of all tax
considerations applicable to an investment in ordinary shares. You should consult with your own tax advisor concerning the tax
consequences to you in your particular situation.
Australian Tax Considerations
In this section, we discuss the material Australian income tax, stamp duty and goods
and services tax considerations related to the acquisition, ownership and disposal by the absolute beneficial owners of the ordinary
shares. This discussion represents the opinion of Atanaskovic Hartnell, our Australian counsel. It is based upon existing Australian
tax law as of the date of this annual report, which is subject to change, possibly retrospectively. This discussion does not address
all aspects of Australian tax law which may be important to particular investors in light of their individual investment circumstances,
such as shares held by investors subject to special tax rules (for example, share traders holding shares as trading stock). In
addition, this summary does not discuss any foreign or state tax considerations, other than stamp duty and goods and services tax.
Prospective investors are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the Australian and foreign income and other tax considerations
of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the shares. This summary is based upon the premise that the holder is not an Australian
tax resident and is not carrying on business in Australia through a permanent establishment.
Taxation of Dividends
Australia operates a dividend imputation system under which dividends may be declared
to be `franked’ to the extent of tax paid on company profits. Fully franked dividends are not subject to dividend withholding
tax. Unfranked dividends payable to non-Australian resident shareholders that are not operating from an Australian permanent establishment
(Foreign Shareholders) will be subject to dividend withholding tax, to the extent the dividends are Australian sourced. Unfranked
dividends which are foreign sourced and declared to be conduit foreign income, or CFI, should not be subject to dividend withholding
tax. Dividend withholding tax will be imposed at 30%, unless a shareholder is a resident of a country with which Australia has
a double taxation agreement, or DTA, and qualifies for the benefits of the treaty. Under the provisions of the current DTA, between
Australia and the U.S., the Australian tax withheld on unfranked dividends that are not CFI paid by us to which a resident of the
U.S. is beneficially entitled is limited to 15%.
If a company that is a non-Australian resident shareholder owns a 10% or more interest,
the Australian tax withheld on dividends paid by us to which a resident of the U.S. is beneficially entitled is limited to 5%.
In limited circumstances the rate of withholding can be reduced to zero.
Tax on Sales or other Dispositions of Shares — Shareholders Holding Shares
on Capital Account
Foreign Shareholders who hold shares on capital account will not be subject to Australian
capital gains tax on the gain made on a sale or other disposal of our shares, unless they, together with associates, hold 10% or
more of our issued capital, at the time of disposal or for 12 months of the last two years prior to disposal.
Foreign Shareholder who, together with associates, owns a 10% or more interest would
be subject to Australian capital gains tax if more than 50% of our direct or indirect assets determined by reference to market
value, consists of Australian land, leasehold interests or Australian mining, quarrying or prospecting rights. The DTA between
the U.S. and Australia is unlikely to limit the amount of this taxable gain. Australian capital gains tax applies to net capital
gains at a taxpayer’s marginal tax rate. We note that a bill was passed by both houses of the Australian Parliament in June
2013 to remove the 50% discount for foreign resident individuals on gains accrued after May 8, 2012. Companies are not entitled
to a discount on capital gains tax. Net capital gains are calculated after reduction for capital losses, which may only be offset
against capital gains.
Tax on Sales or other Dispositions of Shares — Shareholders Holding Shares
on Revenue Account
Some Foreign shareholders may hold shares on revenue rather than on capital account,
for example, share traders. These shareholders may have the gains made on the sale or other disposal of the shares included in
their assessable income under the ordinary income provisions of the income tax law, if the gains are sourced in Australia.
Non-Australian resident shareholders assessable under these ordinary income provisions
in respect of gains made on shares held on revenue account would be assessed for such gains at the Australian tax rates for non-Australian
residents, which start at a marginal rate of 32.5% (with respect to the income year from July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014. Some relief
from Australian income tax may be available to such non-Australian resident shareholders under the DTA between the U.S. and Australia.
To the extent an amount would be included in a non-Australian resident shareholder’s
assessable income under both the capital gains tax provisions and the ordinary income provisions, the capital gain amount would
generally be reduced, so that the shareholder would not be subject to double tax on any part of the income gain or capital gain.
Dual Residency
If a shareholder were a resident of both Australia and the U.S., under those countries’
domestic taxation laws, the shareholder’s residency status for tax purposes will be determined by the provisions of the DTA
between the U.S. and Australia. Tax consequences follow from the determination of residency status of the shareholder. Shareholders
should obtain specialist taxation advice in these circumstances.
Stamp Duty
No stamp duty is payable by Australian residents or foreign residents on the issue and
trading of shares that are quoted on NASDAQ at all relevant times and the shares do not represent 90% or more of all issued shares
in the Company.
Australian Death Duty
Australia does not have estate or death duties. As a general rate, no capital gains tax
liability is realized upon the inheritance of a deceased person’s shares. The disposal of inherited shares by beneficiaries,
may, however, give rise to a capital gains tax liability if the gain falls within the scope of Australia’s jurisdiction to
tax (as discussed above).
Goods and Services Tax, or GST
The issue or transfer of shares to a non-Australian resident investor will not incur
Australian GST. Foreign shareholders may not be entitled to input tax credits for GST included in the price of services, if any,
associated with the purchase of shares.
10.F. Dividends and Paying Agents
Not applicable.
10.G. Statement by Experts
Not applicable.
10.H. Documents on Display
Publicly filed documents concerning our Company which are referred to in this Annual
Report may be inspected and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington,
D.C. 20549. Copies of these materials can also be obtained from the Public Reference Room at the SEC’s principal office,
100 F Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20549, after payment of fees at prescribed rates.
The SEC maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information
statements and other information regarding registrants that make electronic filings through its Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis,
and Retrieval or EDGAR, system. We have made all our filings with SEC using the EDGAR system.
For further information on the Public Reference Room, please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
Our SEC filings, including the Annual Report, are also available to you on the SEC’s website at
http://www.sec.gov
.
Information may also be found on the Investor Relations section of our website at http://investors.parnell.com/.
10.I. Subsidiary Information
Not applicable.
ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Foreign exchange rates
A substantial portion of our current revenues and costs are exposed to changes in foreign
exchange rates. Our products are sold in 14 countries predominantly under U.S. dollar denominated contracts. We do however have
sales in Canadian dollars, New Zealand dollars and Australian dollars. As a result, our revenues are influenced by changes in foreign
exchange rates. In fiscal year 2016, approximately 81% of our revenues were denominated in foreign currencies (non-Australian dollars):
80% in U.S. dollars and 1% in New Zealand dollars. We seek to manage our foreign exchange risk in part through operational means,
including managing same-currency revenues in relation to same-currency costs and implementing both U.S. dollar and Australian dollar
denominated debt liabilities to offset exposure from U.S. dollar and Australian dollar denominated revenues. Additionally, we occasionally
secure forward foreign exchange contracts against known foreign currency receipts. Going forward, we will evaluate if a similar
approach to managing foreign exchange risk is appropriate for our company. Exchange rate fluctuations may also have an impact beyond
our reported financials and directly impact operations. These fluctuations may affect the ability to buy and sell our goods and
services between markets impacted by significant exchange rate variances.
Refer to the Notes to Consolidated Annual Financial Statements —
Note 20 Financial
Risk Management
for additional disclosures related to market risk.
ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
A.
Debt Securities
Not applicable.
B.
Warrants and Rights
Not applicable.
C.
Other Securities
Not applicable.
D.
American Depositary Shares
Not applicable.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and shareholders of Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated
statement of loss and comprehensive loss, consolidated statement of changes in equity and consolidated statement of cash flows
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd and its subsidiaries at
31 December 2016, 31 December 2015 and 31 December 2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the twelve
month period ended 31 December 2016 and 2015, the six months ended 31 December 2014 and the twelve month period ended 30 June 2014
in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and International Standards on Auditing. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.
An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
Sydney, Australia
31 March 2017
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Consolidated statement of loss and
comprehensive loss
|
|
|
12 months to
31 December
|
|
12 months to
31 December
|
|
6 months to
31 December
|
|
12 months to
30 June
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2014
|
|
Note
|
|
AUD$
|
|
AUD$
|
|
AUD$
|
|
AUD$
|
Revenue
|
3
|
|
|
19,048,651
|
|
|
|
13,169,753
|
|
|
|
3,662,452
|
|
|
|
7,542,600
|
|
Other income
|
3
|
|
|
916,358
|
|
|
|
6,725,142
|
|
|
|
4,346,784
|
|
|
|
2,248,195
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
|
(8,977,871
|
)
|
|
|
(7,745,865
|
)
|
|
|
(3,343,802
|
)
|
|
|
(6,417,593
|
)
|
Selling and marketing expenses
|
|
|
|
(14,121,493
|
)
|
|
|
(11,777,492
|
)
|
|
|
(2,447,578
|
)
|
|
|
(5,474,826
|
)
|
Regulatory and research and development expenses
|
|
|
|
(1,494,800
|
)
|
|
|
(881,909
|
)
|
|
|
(311,931
|
)
|
|
|
(586,149
|
)
|
Administration expenses
|
|
|
|
(13,231,889
|
)
|
|
|
(11,940,246
|
)
|
|
|
(3,042,221
|
)
|
|
|
(3,018,782
|
)
|
Net foreign exchange losses on borrowings
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,384,335
|
)
|
Finance costs
|
|
|
|
(3,821,345
|
)
|
|
|
(1,284,802
|
)
|
|
|
(289,784
|
)
|
|
|
(7,262,020
|
)
|
Loss before income tax
|
|
|
|
(21,682,389
|
)
|
|
|
(13,735,419
|
)
|
|
|
(1,426,080
|
)
|
|
|
(14,352,910
|
)
|
Income tax expense
|
5
|
|
|
(9,054
|
)
|
|
|
(2,113
|
)
|
|
|
(2,442
|
)
|
|
|
(2,980,412
|
)
|
Loss for the period
|
|
|
|
(21,691,443
|
)
|
|
|
(13,737,532
|
)
|
|
|
(1,428,522
|
)
|
|
|
(17,333,322
|
)
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of income tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Items that will be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
(727,603
|
)
|
|
|
(1,629,523
|
)
|
|
|
(1,434,235
|
)
|
|
|
(517,525
|
)
|
Other comprehensive loss for the year, net of tax
|
|
|
|
(727,603
|
)
|
|
|
(1,629,523
|
)
|
|
|
(1,434,235
|
)
|
|
|
(517,525
|
)
|
Total comprehensive loss for the year
|
|
|
|
(22,419,046
|
)
|
|
|
(15,367,055
|
)
|
|
|
(2,862,757
|
)
|
|
|
(17,850,847
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share
|
|
|
|
AUD$
|
|
|
|
AUD$
|
|
|
|
AUD$
|
|
|
|
AUD$
|
|
Net loss attributable to common stockholders, Basic and diluted
|
16(a)
|
|
|
(1.37
|
)
|
|
|
(1.03
|
)
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
(2.18
|
)
|
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Consolidated balance sheet
|
|
|
|
31 December
2016
|
|
31 December
2015
|
|
31 December
2014
|
|
|
Note
|
|
AUD$
|
|
AUD$
|
|
AUD$
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
8
|
|
|
7,115,498
|
|
|
|
5,666,679
|
|
|
|
15,819,418
|
|
Trade and other receivables
|
|
9
|
|
|
4,922,086
|
|
|
|
7,266,662
|
|
|
|
4,825,193
|
|
Inventories
|
|
10
|
|
|
3,622,891
|
|
|
|
3,426,926
|
|
|
|
2,755,956
|
|
Prepayments
|
|
|
|
|
441,189
|
|
|
|
531,843
|
|
|
|
470,568
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
16,101,664
|
|
|
|
16,892,110
|
|
|
|
23,871,135
|
|
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other receivables
|
|
9
|
|
|
723,739
|
|
|
|
67,457
|
|
|
|
50,184
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
11
|
|
|
12,128,392
|
|
|
|
12,666,214
|
|
|
|
11,899,006
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
12
|
|
|
18,624,832
|
|
|
|
16,583,360
|
|
|
|
12,419,614
|
|
TOTAL NON-CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
31,476,963
|
|
|
|
29,317,031
|
|
|
|
24,368,804
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
47,578,627
|
|
|
|
46,209,141
|
|
|
|
48,239,939
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables
|
|
13
|
|
|
7,875,987
|
|
|
|
6,780,440
|
|
|
|
8,614,034
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
14
|
|
|
10,178
|
|
|
|
3,122,553
|
|
|
|
4,590,483
|
|
Provision for employee benefits
|
|
15
|
|
|
623,574
|
|
|
|
438,008
|
|
|
|
379,558
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
8,509,739
|
|
|
|
10,341,001
|
|
|
|
13,584,075
|
|
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables
|
|
13
|
|
|
1,087,670
|
|
|
|
1,106,360
|
|
|
|
668,037
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
14
|
|
|
29,831,992
|
|
|
|
14,353,203
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Provision for employee benefits
|
|
15
|
|
|
85,528
|
|
|
|
153,781
|
|
|
|
74,364
|
|
TOTAL NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
31,005,190
|
|
|
|
15,613,344
|
|
|
|
742,401
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
39,514,929
|
|
|
|
25,954,345
|
|
|
|
14,326,476
|
|
NET ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
8,063,698
|
|
|
|
20,254,796
|
|
|
|
33,913,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares
|
|
16
|
|
|
63,522,251
|
|
|
|
55,343,451
|
|
|
|
55,343,451
|
|
Share-based compensation reserve
|
|
17
|
|
|
3,757,536
|
|
|
|
1,708,388
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Reserves
|
|
17
|
|
|
(3,942,161
|
)
|
|
|
(3,214,558
|
)
|
|
|
(1,585,035
|
)
|
Accumulated losses
|
|
18
|
|
|
(55,273,928
|
)
|
|
|
(33,582,485
|
)
|
|
|
(19,844,953
|
)
|
TOTAL EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
8,063,698
|
|
|
|
20,254,796
|
|
|
|
33,913,463
|
|
The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Consolidated statement of changes in
equity
|
|
Ordinary Shares
AUD$
|
|
Accumulated
Losses
AUD$
|
|
Foreign Currency
Translation Reserve
AUD$
|
|
Share-Based
Compensation Reserve
AUD$
|
|
Total
AUD$
|
Balance at 1 January 2016
|
|
|
55,343,451
|
|
|
|
(33,582,485
|
)
|
|
|
(3,214,558
|
)
|
|
|
1,708,388
|
|
|
|
20,254,796
|
|
Loss for the period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(21,691,443
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(21,691,443
|
)
|
Other comprehensive loss for the period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(727,603
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(727,603
|
)
|
Issue of shares, net of costs and tax benefits
|
|
|
8,178,800
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8,178,800
|
|
Share based payment transactions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,049,148
|
|
|
|
2,049,148
|
|
Balance at 31 December 2016
|
|
|
63,522,251
|
|
|
|
(55,273,928
|
)
|
|
|
(3,942,161
|
)
|
|
|
3,757,536
|
|
|
|
8,063,698
|
|
|
|
Ordinary Shares
AUD$
|
|
Accumulated
Losses
AUD$
|
|
Foreign Currency
Translation Reserve
AUD$
|
|
Share-Based
Compensation Reserve
AUD$
|
|
Total
AUD$
|
Balance at 1 January 2015
|
|
|
55,343,451
|
|
|
|
(19,844,953
|
)
|
|
|
(1,585,035
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
33,913,463
|
|
Loss for the period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(13,737,532
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(13,737,532
|
)
|
Other comprehensive loss for the period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,629,523
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,629,523
|
)
|
Share based payment transactions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,708,388
|
|
|
|
1,708,388
|
|
Balance at 31 December 2015
|
|
|
55,343,451
|
|
|
|
(33,582,485
|
)
|
|
|
(3,214,558
|
)
|
|
|
1,708,388
|
|
|
|
20,254,796
|
|
|
|
Ordinary Shares
AUD$
|
|
Accumulated
Losses
AUD$
|
|
Foreign Currency
Translation Reserve
AUD$
|
|
Share-Based
Compensation Reserve
AUD$
|
|
Total
AUD$
|
Balance at 1 July 2014
|
|
|
55,343,451
|
|
|
|
(18,416,431
|
)
|
|
|
(150,800
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
36,776,220
|
|
Loss for the period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,428,522
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,428,522
|
)
|
Other comprehensive loss for the period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,434,235
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,434,235
|
)
|
Balance at 31 December 2014
|
|
|
55,343,451
|
|
|
|
(19,844,953
|
)
|
|
|
(1,585,035
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
33,913,463
|
|
|
|
Ordinary Shares
AUD$
|
|
Accumulated
Losses
AUD$
|
|
Foreign Currency
Translation Reserve
AUD$
|
|
Share-Based
Compensation Reserve
AUD$
|
|
Total
AUD$
|
Balance at 1 July 2013
|
|
|
3,104,415
|
|
|
|
(1,083,109
|
)
|
|
|
366,725
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,388,031
|
|
Loss for the period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(17,333,322
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(17,333,322
|
)
|
Other comprehensive loss for the period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(517,525
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(517,525
|
)
|
Issue of shares, net of costs and tax benefits
|
|
|
52,239,036
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
52,239,036
|
|
Balance at 30 June 2014
|
|
|
55,343,451
|
|
|
|
(18,416,431
|
)
|
|
|
(150,800
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
36,776,220
|
|
The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Consolidated statement of cash flows
|
|
|
|
12 months to
31 December
2016
|
|
12 months to
31 December
2015
|
|
6 months to
31 December
2014
|
|
12 months to
30 June
2014
|
|
|
Note
|
|
AUD$
|
|
AUD$
|
|
AUD$
|
|
AUD$
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receipts from customers
|
|
|
|
|
22,905,433
|
|
|
|
12,491,208
|
|
|
|
3,911,953
|
|
|
|
5,409,553
|
|
Receipts from government grants
|
|
|
|
|
138,198
|
|
|
|
812,141
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
810,267
|
|
Payments to suppliers and employees
|
|
|
|
|
(32,763,246
|
)
|
|
|
(28,525,648
|
)
|
|
|
(9,317,933
|
)
|
|
|
(13,292,432
|
)
|
Interest received
|
|
|
|
|
11,173
|
|
|
|
8,704
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
24,243
|
|
Finance costs
|
|
|
|
|
(2,397,679
|
)
|
|
|
(1,203,359
|
)
|
|
|
(11,591
|
)
|
|
|
(4,407,555
|
)
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
|
|
|
(9,393
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
27
|
|
|
(12,115,514
|
)
|
|
|
(16,416,954
|
)
|
|
|
(5,417,571
|
)
|
|
|
(11,455,924
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
(556,321
|
)
|
|
|
(1,727,666
|
)
|
|
|
(1,022,203
|
)
|
|
|
(59,993
|
)
|
Purchases of intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
(4,526,008
|
)
|
|
|
(7,826,823
|
)
|
|
|
(786,592
|
)
|
|
|
(1,861,692
|
)
|
Receipts from tax incentives
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,673,904
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,378,733
|
|
Loans repaid by related parties
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
60,416
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
(5,082,329
|
)
|
|
|
(7,880,585
|
)
|
|
|
(1,808,795
|
)
|
|
|
(482,536
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from initial public offering
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
53,067,289
|
|
Payments of initial public offering costs
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(612,386
|
)
|
|
|
(5,112,252
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of 2013 Parnell Bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of shares
|
|
|
|
|
8,962,229
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Payment of share issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
(1,225,233
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Redemption of 2013 Convertible Bonds
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,455,000
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Redemption of 2011 Convertible Bonds
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4,495,317
|
)
|
Proceeds from bank loans
|
|
|
|
|
30,034,334
|
|
|
|
13,593,562
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
28,415,549
|
|
Repayment of bank loans
|
|
|
|
|
(17,868,883
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(37,744,027
|
)
|
Warrant costs paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,273,244
|
)
|
Issuance of warrants
|
|
|
|
|
74,234
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Payment of lease liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
(13,568
|
)
|
|
|
(49,178
|
)
|
|
|
(114,054
|
)
|
|
|
(181,991
|
)
|
Repayment of loans from directors
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
64,064
|
|
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
19,963,113
|
|
|
|
12,089,384
|
|
|
|
(726,440
|
)
|
|
|
31,890,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents held
|
|
|
|
|
2,765,270
|
|
|
|
(12,208,155
|
)
|
|
|
(7,952,806
|
)
|
|
|
19,951,611
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
5,666,679
|
|
|
|
15,819,418
|
|
|
|
20,804,339
|
|
|
|
859,708
|
|
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
(1,316,451
|
)
|
|
|
2,055,416
|
|
|
|
2,967,885
|
|
|
|
(6,980
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period
|
|
8
|
|
|
7,115,498
|
|
|
|
5,666,679
|
|
|
|
15,819,418
|
|
|
|
20,804,339
|
|
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
This financial report covers the consolidated financial statements and notes
of Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Limited (the 'Company') and controlled entities (the 'Group'). The Company is limited by shares
and domiciled in Australia.
The Group is a fully integrated veterinary pharmaceutical company focused
on developing, manufacturing and commercializing innovative health solutions. We currently market five products for companion and
production animals in 14 countries and augment our pharmaceutical products with our proprietary iKAM and
mySYNCH
software
platforms.
The principal activities of the Group during the financial period were:
|
·
|
the manufacture for global sale of animal pharmaceutical product; and
|
|
·
|
the research and development of pharmaceutical products for global animal health markets.
|
The Group is subject to risks common to companies in the biotechnology and
pharmaceutical industries. There can be no assurance that the Group's research and development will be successfully completed,
that adequate protection for the Group's technology will be obtained, that any products developed will obtain necessary government
regulatory approval or that any approved products will be commercially viable. The Group operates in an environment of substantial
competition from other animal health companies. In addition, the Group is dependent upon the services of its employees and consultants,
as well as third-party contract research organizations and manufacturers.
Each of the entities within the Group prepare their financial statements
based on the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (functional currency). The consolidated
financial statements are presented in Australian dollars which is the parent entity’s functional and presentation currency.
On April 28, 2014, the shareholders and the directors of the Group approved
a ten for one consolidation of shares, which had the effect of a reverse share split that became effective on June 6, 2014 when
the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) altered the registration details of the parent entity. All share, per
share and related information presented in these consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes has been retroactively
adjusted, where applicable, to reflect the impact of the reverse share split.
On May 20, 2014, at the election of the 2013 Parnell bondholders, all of
the attached warrants issued with these 2013 Parnell Bonds were converted into 140,075 ordinary shares of the Company. Subsequent
to this conversion no further warrant obligations exist within the Company.
On June 18, 2014, the Company completed an initial public offering of 5,000,000
shares on the NASDAQ at a share price of USD$10.00 per share resulting in gross proceeds of AUD$53,067,289. The proceeds were partially
offset by commissions and issuance costs of AUD$5,724,638 for net proceeds of AUD$47,363,267.
On December 8, 2014, the Board of Directors of Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings
Ltd. (the "Company") authorized a change of fiscal year end to December 31, 2014 to align fiscal reporting with existing
management processes which use calendar year planning and to provide more efficient reporting for US investors. The change was
approved by the Australian Tax Office (ATO) on December 8, 2014. As a result, the Company was required to file a transition report
for the period of July 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014.
On January 11, 2016, the Company entered into a purchase agreement (the "Purchase
Agreement"), and a registration rights agreement (the "Registration Rights Agreement") with Lincoln Park Capital
Fund, LLC ("Lincoln Park").
Under the terms and subject to the conditions of the Purchase Agreement, the
Company has the right to sell to and Lincoln Park is obligated to purchase up to $15,000,000 in amounts of ordinary shares of the
Company, no par value ("Ordinary Shares") as described below, subject to certain limitations, from time to time, over
the 36-month period commencing on the date that a registration statement, which the Company agreed to file with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement, is declared effective by the SEC and
a final prospectus in connection therewith is filed (the "Commencement Date"). The Company may direct Lincoln Park, at
its sole discretion and subject to certain conditions, to purchase up to 35,000 shares of Ordinary Shares on any business day,
increasing to up to 55,000 shares depending upon the closing sale price of the Ordinary Shares (such purchases, "Regular Purchases").
However, in no event shall a Regular Purchase be more than $500,000. The purchase price of Ordinary Shares related to the future
funding will be based on the prevailing market prices of such shares at the time of sales. In addition, the Company may direct
Lincoln Park to purchase additional amounts as accelerated purchases if on the date of a Regular Purchase the closing sale price
of the Ordinary Shares is not below the threshold price as set forth in the Purchase Agreement.
As consideration for entering into the Purchase Agreement, the Company initially
issued to Lincoln Park 47,746 Ordinary Shares and is required to issue up to 38,197 additional Ordinary Shares pro rata as the
Company requires Lincoln Park to purchase the Company's shares under the Purchase Agreement over the term of the agreement. The
net proceeds under the Purchase Agreement to the Company will depend on the frequency and prices at which the Company sells shares
to Lincoln Park. The Company expects that any proceeds received by the Company from such sales to Lincoln Park under the Purchase
Agreement will be used for general corporate purposes and working capital requirements. This registration statement was terminated
on December 21, 2016.
On February 23, 2016, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement
(the “Purchase Agreement”) with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (“Lincoln Park”). In recognition of Lincoln
Park’s belief in our company’s business and the potential value, under the terms and subject to the conditions of the
Purchase Agreement, the Company will issue and sell to Lincoln Park, and Lincoln Park will purchase from the Company, at the closing
(a) 175,000 ordinary shares (the “Initial Shares”) at a price of $3.50 per share and (b) a Warrant to purchase up to
an additional 150,000 ordinary shares (the “Warrant Shares”) for a purchase price of $5.00 per share (the “Warrant”).
Lincoln Park represented to the Company, among other things, that it was an “accredited investor” (as such term is
defined in Rule 501 (a) of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the
Company is selling the Initial Shares and the Warrant Shares in reliance upon an exemption from registration contained in Section
4(2) under the Securities Act. The securities sold may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable
exemption from registration requirements. The Purchase Agreement and the Warrant contain customary representations, warranties,
agreements and conditions. The Company expects that the net proceeds received by the Company from such sales to Lincoln Park under
the Purchase Agreement and the Warrant will be used for general corporate purposes and working capital requirements.
The representations, warranties and covenants contained in the aforementioned
agreements were made only for purposes of such agreements and as of specific dates, were solely for the benefit of the parties
to such agreements, and may be subject to limitations agreed upon by the contracting parties, including being qualified by confidential
disclosures exchanged between the parties in connection with execution of the agreements.
On December 21, 2016 the Company filed a Form S-8 to deregister
all unsold securities under this registration statement.
On May 17, 2016, the Company completed a secondary public offering of 2,550,000
shares on the NASDAQ at a share price of USD$1.65 per share resulting in gross proceeds of USD$4,207,500. The proceeds were partially
offset by commissions and issuance costs of USD$252,450 for net proceeds of USD$3,955,050.
On June 8, 2016, the underwriters of the secondary public offering elected
to take-up 380,500 overallotment shares on the NASDAQ at a share price of USD$1.65 per share resulting in gross proceeds of USD$627,825.
The proceeds were partially offset by commissions and issuance costs of USD$37,669 for net proceeds of USD$590,156.
On December 21, 2016, the Company filed a Form 25, Notification of Removal
from Listing and/or Registration under Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act, with the Securities and Exchange Commission
and NASDAQ on December 21, 2016.
The NASDAQ delisting became effective on December 31, 2016 and trading on
the NASDAQ Global market will continued up until this date. The Company also filed a Form 15, Notice of Termination of Registration
or Suspension of Duty to File, with the Securities and Exchange Commission to terminate its reporting obligations under the Exchange
Act.
The Company moved the trading of its ordinary shares to be quoted on the OTC
Pink® Open Market, a centralized electronic quotation service for over-the-counter securities. This service enables current
shareholders of the Company to continue to buy and sell their shares in the Company after delisting from the NASDAQ.
This financial report covers the consolidated financial statements of the
Group and were authorized for issue by the directors on , 2017.
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
2
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
These financial statements and notes comply with International Financial
Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
The significant accounting policies used in the preparation and presentation
of these financial statements are provided below and are consistent with prior reporting periods unless otherwise stated.
The financial statements are based on historical costs, except for the measurement
at fair value of selected financial assets and financial liabilities.
The financial statements have been prepared on the basis of going concern
which contemplates continuity of normal business activities and the realisation of assets and settlement of liabilities in the
ordinary course of business.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Group experienced a loss from continuing
operations of AUD$21,691,443 and operating cash outflows of AUD$12,115,514 for the year then ended. The loss was largely driven
by continued investment in the US market.
During the period the Group refinanced the Midcap loan facility (USD$11,000,000)
with a new USD$20,000,000 term loan from SWK Holdings LLC (“SWK”). The new facility with SWK is a four year revenue
sharing facility which, after the payment of fees and associated costs, which generated approximately USD$8,000,000 of additional
funds for the Group to use for working capital purposes. The SWK facility contains a number of covenants, including a financial
covenant requiring the Group maintains employee related liabilities at less than 70% of the market value of inventory and also
that the Group maintains unencumbered liquid assets at no less than USD$1,000,000 at the end of each fiscal quarter. At December
31, 2016, the Company was in compliance with these covenants.
The continuing viability of the Group and its ability to continue as a going
concern and meet its debts and commitments as and when they fall due requires that it meets or exceeds operational budgets in the
future, delivers on its existing and new contract manufacturing agreements and continues to have the support from its lenders.
The Directors and management believe that the Group will be successful in the above matters and, accordingly, have prepared the
financial report on a going concern basis.
The Directors and management have a responsibility to prepare the financial
statements in accordance with accounting standards, which requires entities to prepare financial statements on a going concern
basis unless the directors intend to liquidate the entity, cease trading or have no realistic alternative but to do so. No adjustments
have been made to the financial statements relating to the recoverability and classification of the asset carrying amounts or classification
of liabilities that might be necessary should the Group not continue as a going concern.
(b)
|
Critical accounting estimates and judgments
|
|
Key estimates
|
The preparation of financial statements requires the use of certain critical
accounting estimates. It also requires management to exercise its judgment in the process of applying the Group's accounting policies.
The areas involving a higher degree of judgment or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the
financial statements are:
Estimated impairment of long life assets
|
We review intangible assets and property, plant and equipment for impairment
whenever external or internal factors indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. Factors we
consider in deciding when to perform an impairment review include significant declines in market value, negative outlooks on the
industry or economy, obsolescence or damage to the assets, significant underperformance of the business compared to expectations
and changes in the use of the assets. If an impairment analysis is performed to evaluate a long-lived asset for recoverability,
we compare forecasts of cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the long-lived asset to its carrying
value. If the expected cash flows are less than the carrying amount an impairment charge would be recognized. To date, we have
not recorded any impairment losses on intangible assets or property, plant and equipment.
The Group is subject to income taxes in numerous jurisdictions. Significant
judgment is required in determining the worldwide provision for income taxes. There are many transactions and calculations for
which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. The Group recognizes liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues based on estimates
of whether additional taxes will be due. Where the final tax outcome of these matters is different from the amounts that were initially
recorded, such differences will impact the current and deferred income tax assets and liabilities in the period in which such determination
is made.
The Group has not recognized deferred tax assets relating to carried forward
tax losses as at December 31, 2016. However, utilization of the tax losses going forward will depend on the ability of the entity,
to satisfy certain tests at the time the losses are recouped.
The Group had recognized warrants that were issued by the Company in relation
to the loan facility from Partners for Growth III LP and 2013 Parnell Bonds. At December 31, 2015 the Group has $Nil (December
31, 2014: $Nil, June 30, 2014: $Nil, June 30, 2013: $2,952,954) recorded in liabilities for warrants as all existing warrants were
extinguished during the year ended June 30, 2014. In connection with the Lincoln Park transactions (note 16), the Company issued
150,000 warrants which allow the warrant holder to convert at an exercise price of USD$5. As the exercise price is denominated
in US dollars and the Company’s functional currency is Australian dollars, the warrants are classified as a financial liability
and measured at fair value through profit and loss.
The Group has recognized government grant revenue receivable at December
31, 2016 of $3,258,350 (December 31, 2015: $3,807,193, December 31, 2014: $1,610,986, June 30, 2014: $913,719, June 30, 2013: $2,189,000).
Management estimates that the costs applied are consistent with the requirements of the R&D incentive scheme.
The key judgment relating to the Group is the recognition criteria for the
capitalization of intangible assets which accounting treatment of these assets has been documented in Note 2(o)
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
2
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
|
(c)
|
Principles of Consolidation
|
The consolidated financial statements include the financial position and
performance of controlled entities from the date on which control is obtained until the date that control is lost.
Intragroup assets, liabilities, equity, income, expenses and cashflows relating
to transactions between entities in the consolidated entity have been eliminated in full for the purpose of these financial statements.
Appropriate adjustments have been made to a controlled entity’s financial
position, performance and cash flows where the accounting policies used by that entity were different from those adopted by the
consolidated entity. All controlled entities have a June financial year end.
A list of controlled entities is contained in Note 23 to the financial statements.
Subsidiaries
Subsidiaries are all entities (including structured entities) over which
the parent has control. Control is established when the parent is exposed to, or has rights to variable returns from its involvement
with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power to direct the relevant activities of the entity.
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal
reporting provided to the chief operating decision maker. The executive directors are the chief operating decision maker, responsible
for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating segments.
The tax expense recognized in the consolidated statement of profit/(loss)
and comprehensive income/(loss) relates to current income tax expense plus deferred tax expense (being the movement in deferred
tax assets and liabilities and unused tax losses during the period).
Current tax is the amount of income taxes payable (recoverable) in respect
of the taxable profit (tax loss) for the period and is measured at the amount expected to be paid to (recovered from) the taxation
authorities, using the tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the end of the reporting period.
Deferred tax is provided on temporary differences which are determined by
comparing the carrying amounts of tax bases of assets and liabilities to the carrying amounts in the consolidated financial statements.
Deferred tax is not provided for the following:
|
·
|
The initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and at the time of the
transaction, affects neither accounting profit nor taxable profit (tax loss).
|
|
·
|
Taxable temporary differences arising on the initial recognition of goodwill.
|
|
·
|
Temporary differences related to investment in subsidiaries, associates and jointly controlled entities to the extent that
the Group is able to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences and it is probable that they will not reverse
in the foreseeable future.
|
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are
expected to apply to the period when the asset is realized or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that
have been enacted or substantively enacted by the end of the reporting period.
Deferred tax assets are recognized for all deductible temporary differences
and unused tax losses to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary
differences and losses can be utilised.
Current tax assets and liabilities are offset where there is a legally enforceable
right to set off the recognized amounts and there is an intention either to settle on a net basis or to realise the asset and settle
the liability simultaneously.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset where there is a legal right
to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and the deferred tax assets and the deferred tax liabilities relate
to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority on either the same taxable entity or different taxable entities which intend
either to settle current tax liabilities and assets on a net basis, or to realize the assets and settle the liabilities simultaneously
in each future period in which significant amounts of deferred tax liabilities or assets are expected to be settled or recovered.
Current and deferred tax is recognized as income or an expense and included
in profit or loss for the period except where the tax arises from a transaction which is recognized in other comprehensive income
or equity, in which case the tax is recognized in other comprehensive income/(loss) or equity respectively.
The Company and its wholly-owned Australian controlled entities have formed
a tax-consolidated group under the legislation and as a consequence these entities are taxed as a single entity.
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
2
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
|
Leases of fixed assets where substantially all the risks and benefits incidental
to the ownership of the asset, but not the legal ownership that are transferred to entities in the Group, are classified as finance
leases.
Finance leases are capitalized by recording an asset and a liability at the
lower of the amounts equal to the fair value of the leased property or the present value of the minimum lease payments, including
any guaranteed residual values. Lease payments are allocated between the reduction of the lease liability and the lease interest
expense for the period.
Lease payments for operating leases, where substantially all of the risks
and benefits remain with the lessor, are charged as expenses on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease term.
Lease incentives under operating leases are recognized as a liability and
amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease term.
(g)
|
Revenue and other income
|
Revenue is recognized when the amount of the revenue can be measured reliably,
it is probable that economic benefits associated with the transaction will flow to the entity and specific criteria relating to
the type of revenue as noted below, has been satisfied.
Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable
and is presented net of returns, discounts and rebates.
Sale of goods
Revenue is recognized on local sales on delivery of goods to the customer
as this is deemed to be the point in time when risks and rewards are transferred and there is no longer any ownership or effective
control over the goods. Revenue is recognized on international sales when the goods are available for collection by the customer,
and a firm purchase commitment is received. This is the point in time when risks and rewards are transferred and there is no longer
any ownership or effective control over the goods.
Government grant revenue
Government grants, including Australian Research and Development incentives,
are recognized at fair value where there is reasonable assurance that the grant will be received and all grant conditions will
be met. Grants relating to expense items are recognized as income over the periods necessary to match the grant to the costs they
are compensating.
Interest revenue
Interest is recognized using the effective interest method.
(h)
|
Goods and Services Tax (GST)
|
Revenue, expenses and assets are recognized net of the amount of goods and
services tax (GST), which is recoverable from the Australian Taxation Office (ATO).
Receivables and payable are stated inclusive of GST.
The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the ATO is included
as part of receivables or payables in the consolidated balance sheet. Cash flows in the consolidated statement of cash flows are
included on a gross basis which is recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority is classified as operating cash flows.
(i)
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
Cash and cash equivalents comprises cash on hand, demand deposits and short-term
investments which are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of change in
value.
Bank overdrafts also form part of cash and cash equivalents for the purpose
of the consolidated statement of cash flows and are presented within current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.
Trade receivables are amounts due from customers for products sold or services
performed in the ordinary course of business. If collection is expected in one year or less, they are classified as current assets.
If not, they are presented as non-current assets.
Trade receivables are recognized initially at fair value and subsequently
measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less provision for impairment.
Inventories are measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost
of inventory is determined using the weighted average cost basis and are net of any rebates and discounts received.
Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course
of business, less the estimated costs of completion and the costs necessary to make the sale. Net realizable value is estimated
using the most reliable evidence available at the reporting date and inventory is written down through an obsolescence provision
if necessary.
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
2
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
|
(l)
|
Property, Plant and Equipment
|
Classes of property, plant and equipment are measured using the cost model
as specified below.
Under the cost model the asset is carried at its cost less any accumulated
depreciation and any impairment losses. Costs include purchase price, other directly attributable costs and the initial estimate
of the costs of dismantling and restoring the asset, where applicable. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance of assets are charged
to expense as incurred.
Expenditures of repairs and maintenance of assets are charged to expense
as incurred.
Depreciation
The depreciable amount of all property, plant and equipment is depreciated
on a straight-line method from the date that management determine that the asset is available for use.
Assets held under a finance lease and leasehold improvements are depreciated
over the shorter of the term of the lease and the assets useful life.
The depreciation rates used for each class of depreciable asset are shown
below:
Fixed asset class
|
|
Depreciation rate
|
Plant and Equipment
|
|
|
5% - 33
|
%
|
Leased plant and equipment
|
|
|
20% - 30
|
%
|
Motor Vehicles
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
Office Equipment
|
|
|
10% - 50
|
%
|
At the end of each annual reporting period, the depreciation method, useful
life and residual value of each asset is reviewed. Any revisions are accounted for prospectively as a change in estimate.
An asset's carrying amount is written down immediately to its recoverable
amount if the asset's carrying amount is greater that its estimated recoverable amount.
Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing the proceeds with
the carrying amount and are recognized within Other Income and Other Expenses.
Capital works in progress of AUD$709,483 relates to enhancements to the manufacturing
facility (December 31, 2015: $509,620, December 31, 2014: AUD$52,193, June 30, 2014: $Nil, June 30, 2013: $Nil).
(m)
|
Financial instruments
|
Derivative instruments
Derivative instruments, including warrants, are measured at fair value. Gains
and losses arising from changes in fair value are taken to the consolidated statement of profit/(loss) and comprehensive income/(loss)
unless they are designated as hedges.
Financial instruments are recognised initially using trade date accounting,
i.e. on the date that the Group becomes party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.
On initial recognition, all financial instruments are measured at fair value
plus transaction costs (except for instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss where transaction costs are expensed
as incurred).
Financial Assets
Financial assets are divided into the following categories which are described
in detail below:
|
·
|
loans and receivables; and
|
|
·
|
financial assets at fair value through profit or loss.
|
The classification depends on the purpose for which the investments were
acquired. Management determines the classification of its investments at initial recognition.
Loans and receivables
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable
payments that are not quoted in an active market. They arise principally through the provision of goods and services to customers
but also incorporate other types of contractual monetary assets.
After initial recognition these are measured at amortized cost using the
effective interest method, less provision for impairment. Any change in their value is recognized in profit or loss.
The Group’s trade and most other receivables fall into this category
of financial instruments.
Receivables are considered for impairment on an individual asset basis when
they are past due at the reporting date or when objective evidence is received that a specific counterparty will default.
The amount of the impairment is the difference between the net carrying amount
and the present value of the future expected cash flows associated with the impaired receivable.
For trade receivables, impairment provisions are recorded in a separate allowance
account with the loss being recognized in profit or loss. When confirmation has been received that the amount is not collectable,
the gross carrying value of the asset is written off against the associated impairment provision.
Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited against
other expenses in profit or loss.
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
2
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
|
In some circumstances, the Group renegotiates repayment terms with customers
which may lead to changes in the timing of the payments, the Group does not necessarily consider the balance to be impaired, however
assessment is made on a case-by-case basis.
Financial liabilities
Financial liabilities are recognized when the Group becomes a party to the
contractual agreements of the instrument. All interest-related charges and, if applicable, changes in an instrument's fair value
that are reported in profit or loss are included in the income statement line items 'finance costs' or 'finance income', unless
these interest related charges relate to a qualifying asset in which case they are capitalised to that asset.
Financial liabilities are classified as either financial liabilities ‘at
fair value through profit or loss’ or other financial liabilities at amortized cost depending on the purpose for which the
liability was acquired. Although the Group uses derivative financial instruments in economic hedges of currency and interest rate
risk, it does not hedge account for these transactions.
The Group‘s financial liabilities include borrowings, trade and other
payables (including finance lease liabilities), which are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method.
All of the Group‘s derivative financial instruments that are not designated
as hedging instruments are accounted for at fair value through profit or loss.
(n)
|
Impairment of non-financial assets
|
At the end of each reporting period, the Group determines whether there is
evidence of an impairment indicator for non-financial assets. Where there is evidence of such an impairment indicator, the recoverable
amount of the assets is estimated.
Where assets do not operate independently of other assets, the recoverable
amount of the relevant cash-generating unit (CGU) is estimated.
The recoverable amount of an asset or CGU is the higher of the fair value
less costs of disposal and the value in use. Value in use is the present value of the future cash flows expected to be derived
from an asset or cash-generating unit.
Where the recoverable amount is less than the carrying amount, an impairment
loss is recognized in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income immediately.
Reversal indicators are considered in subsequent periods for all assets which
have suffered an impairment loss, except for goodwill.
Research and development
Research expenditure is recognized as an expense as incurred. Costs incurred
on development projects (relating to the design and testing of enhancements or extensions of products) are recognized as intangible
assets when all of the below criteria exist:
|
·
|
the technical feasibility of completing the intangible asset so that it will be available for use or sale;
|
|
·
|
the intention to complete the intangible asset and use or sell it;
|
|
·
|
the ability to use or sell the intangible asset;
|
|
·
|
how the intangible asset will generate probable future economic benefits can be demonstrated;
|
|
·
|
the availability of adequate technical, financial and other resources to complete the development and to use or sell the intangible
asset; and
|
|
·
|
the ability to measure reliably the expenditure attributable to the intangible asset during its development.
|
The Group considers the criteria met for recognizing an intangible asset,
usually when a regulatory filing has been made in a major market and approval is considered probable.
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
2
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
|
Research and development
The expenditure capitalized comprises all directly attributable costs, including
costs of materials, services, direct labour and an appropriate proportion of overheads. Other development expenditures that do
not meet these criteria are recognized as an expense as incurred. Development costs previously recognized as an expense are not
recognized as an asset in a subsequent period. Capitalized development costs are recorded as intangible assets and amortized from
the point at which the asset is ready for use on a straight-line basis over its useful life, which is estimated at 10 years.
IT development and software
Costs incurred in developing products or systems and costs incurred in acquiring
software and licenses that will contribute to future period financial benefits through revenue generation and/or cost reduction
are capitalised to software and systems. Costs capitalized include external direct costs of materials and service and direct payroll
and payroll related costs of employees' time spent on the project. Amortization is calculated on a straight-line basis over periods
generally ranging from 3 to 5 years
IT development costs include only those costs directly attributable to the
development phase and are only recognized following completion of technical feasibility and where the group has an intention and
ability to use the asset.
(p)
|
Trade and other payables
|
These amounts represent liabilities for goods and services provided to the
Group prior to the end of financial year which are unpaid. The amounts are unsecured and are usually paid within 30 days of recognition.
Trade and other payables are presented as current liabilities unless payment is not due within 12 months from the reporting date.
They are recognized initially at their fair value and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.
Provisions are recognized when the Group has a legal or constructive obligation,
as a result of past events, for which it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will result and that outflow can be reliably
measured.
Provisions are measured at the present value of management's best estimate
of the outflow required to settle the obligation at the end of the reporting period. The discount rate used is a pre-tax rate that
reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the liability. The increase in the provision
due to the unwinding of the discount is taken to finance costs in the consolidated statement of profit/(loss) and comprehensive
income/(loss).
(i) Short-term obligations
Liabilities for annual leave that are expected to be settled wholly within
12 months after the end of the period in which the employees render the related service are recognised in respect of employees'
services up to the end of the reporting period and are measured at the amounts expected to be paid when the liabilities are settled.
The liability for annual leave is recognized in the provision for employee
benefits as a current liability.
(ii) Other long-term employee benefit obligations
The liabilities for long service leave are not expected to be settled wholly
within 12 months after the end of the period in which the employees render the related service. They are therefore recognized in
the provision for employee benefits and measured as the present value of expected future payments to be made in respect of services
provided by employees up to the end of the reporting period using the projected unit credit method. Consideration is given to expected
future wage and salary levels, experience of employee departures and periods of service. Expected future payments are discounted
using market yields at the end of the reporting period of corporate bonds with terms and currencies that match, as closely as possible,
the estimated future cash outflows.
The obligations are presented as current liabilities in the balance sheet
if the entity does not have an unconditional right to defer settlement for at least 12 months after the reporting date, regardless
of when the actual settlement is expected to occur.
(iii) Profit-sharing and bonus plans
The Group recognizes a liability and an expense for bonuses and profit-sharing
based on a formula that takes into consideration the profit attributable to the Company's shareholders after certain adjustments.
The Group recognizes a provision where contractually obliged or where there is a past practice that has created a constructive
obligation.
Secured and unsecured loans have been obtained. Loans that are repayable
within 12 months are presented as current liabilities.
The fair value of the liability portion of the convertible notes are determined
using a market interest rate for an equivalent non-convertible bond. This amount is recorded as a liability on an amortized cost
basis until extinguished on conversion or maturity of the notes. The remainder of the proceeds is allocated to the conversion option/warrants.
This is recognized separately as a derivative on the balance sheet.
Borrowings are removed from the balance sheet when the obligation specified
in the contract is discharged, cancelled or expired. The difference between the carrying amount of the financial liability that
has been extinguished or transferred to another party and the consideration paid, including any non-cash assets transferred or
liabilities assumed, is recognised in profit and loss as other income or finance costs.
Borrowings are classified as current liabilities unless the Group has an
unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least 12 months after the reporting period.
(t)
|
Capitalized borrowing costs
|
Borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction
or production of a qualifying asset are capitalized as part of the cost of that asset.
All other borrowing costs are recognized as an expense in the period in which
they are incurred.
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
2
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
|
Borrowing costs incurred for the construction or development of any qualifying
asset are capitalized during the period of time that is required to complete and prepare the asset for its intended use or sale.
Other borrowing costs are expensed.
Ordinary shares are classified as equity.
Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares are shown
in equity as a deduction, net of tax from the proceeds.
Provision is made for the amount of any dividend declared, being appropriately
authorised and no longer at the discretion of the entity, on or before the end of the reporting period but not distributed at the
end of the reporting period.
(i) Basic net loss per share
Basic net loss per share is calculated by dividing:
|
·
|
the profit attributable to owners of the Company, excluding any costs of servicing equity other than ordinary shares
|
|
·
|
by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the financial year.
|
(ii) Diluted net loss per share
Diluted net loss per share adjusts the figures used in the determination of basic earnings per share to take into account:
|
·
|
the after income tax effect of interest and other financing costs associated with dilutive potential ordinary shares, and
|
|
·
|
the weighted average number of additional ordinary shares that would have been outstanding assuming the conversion of all dilutive
potential ordinary shares.
|
For periods in which the Company has reported net losses, diluted net loss
per share attributable to common shareholders is the same as basic net loss per share attributable to common stockholders, since
their impact would be anti-dilutive to the calculation of net loss per share. Diluted net loss per share attributable to common
stockholders is the same as basic net loss per share attributable to common stockholders for the years ended December 31, 2016,
December 31, 2015, the six month period ended December 31, 2014 and the year ended June 30, 2014, respectively.
(y)
|
Foreign currency transactions and balances
|
Functional and presentation currency
The functional currency of each of the Group's entities is measured using
the currency of the primary economic environment in which that entity operates. The consolidated financial statements are presented
in Australian dollars which is the parent entity's functional and presentation currency.
Transaction and balances
Foreign currency transactions are recorded at the spot rate on the date of
the transaction.
At the end of the reporting period:
|
·
|
Foreign currency monetary items are translated using the closing rate;
|
|
·
|
Non-monetary items that are measured at historical cost are translated using the exchange rate at the date of the transaction;
and
|
|
·
|
Non-monetary items that are measured at fair value are translated using the rate at the date when fair value was determined.
|
Exchange differences arising on the settlement of monetary items or on translating
monetary items at rates different from those at which they were translated on initial recognition or in prior reporting periods
are recognized through profit or loss, except where they relate to an item of other comprehensive income or whether they are deferred
in equity as qualifying hedges.
Group companies
The financial results and position of foreign operations whose functional
currency is different from the Group's presentation currency are translated as follows:
|
·
|
assets and liabilities are translated at period-end exchange rates prevailing at that reporting date;
|
|
·
|
income and expenses are translated at average exchange rates for the period where the average rate approximates the rate at
the date of the transaction; and
|
|
·
|
retained earnings are translated using the historical method.
|
Exchange differences arising on translation of foreign operations are transferred
directly to the Group's foreign currency translation reserve in the consolidated balance sheet. These differences are recognized
in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss in the period in which the operation is disposed.
(z)
|
Adoption of new and revised accounting standards
|
The Group has applied the following standards and amendments for the first time for their reporting period commencing 1 January
2016:
|
·
|
Accounting for acquisitions of interest in joint operations – Amendments to IFRS 11
|
|
·
|
Clarification of acceptable methods of depreciation and amortisation – Amendments to IAS 16 and IAS 38
|
|
·
|
Annual improvements to IFRSs 2012 – 2014 cycle; and
|
|
·
|
Disclosure initiative – amendments to IAS 1.
|
The adoption of these standards did not have any impact on the current period
or any prior period and is not likely to affect future periods.
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
2
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
|
(aa)
|
New Accounting Standards and Interpretations not yet adopted
|
Certain new accounting standards and interpretations have been published that
are not mandatory for December 31, 2016 reporting periods and have not been early adopted by the Group. The Group’s assessment
of the impact of these new standards and interpretations is set out below.
Title of Standard
|
Nature of change
|
Impact
|
Mandatory application date/ Date of
adoption by Group
|
IFRS 9
Financial Instruments
|
IFRS 9 addresses the classification, measurement and derecognition of financial assets and financial liabilities and introduces new rules for hedge accounting. In December 2014, the IASB made further changes to the classification and measurement rules and also introduced a new impairment model. These latest amendments now complete the new financial instruments standard.
|
Following the changes approved by the IASB in December 2014, the Group no longer expects
any impact from the new classification, measurement and derecognition rules on the Group's financial assets and financial liabilities.
While the group has yet to undertake a detailed assessment of the debt instruments currently
classified as available-for-sale financial assets, it would appear that they would satisfy the conditions for classification as
at fair value through other comprehensive income (FVOCI) and hence there will be no change to the accounting for these assets.
There will also be no impact on the group's accounting for financial liabilities, as
the new requirements only affect the accounting for financial liabilities that are designated at fair value through profit or loss
and the group does not have any such liabilities.
The new hedging rules align hedge accounting more closely with the group's risk management
practices. As a general rule it will be easier to apply hedge accounting going forward as the standard introduces a more principles-based
approach. The new standard also introduces expanded disclosure requirements and changes in presentation.
The new impairment model is an expected credit loss (ECL) model which may result in the
earlier recognition of credit losses.
The group has no hedging instruments in place at this time.
|
Must be applied for financial years commencing on or after January 1, 2018.
Based on the transitional provisions in the completed IFRS 9, early adoption was only
permitted for annual reporting periods beginning before February 1, 2015. After that date, the new rules must be adopted in their
entirety.
Expected date of adoption by the Group: January 1, 2018.
|
IFRS 15
Revenue from Contracts
with Customers
|
The IASB has issued a new standard for the recognition of revenue.
This will replace IAS 18 which covers contracts for goods and services and IAS 11 which
covers construction contracts.
The new standard is based on the principle that revenue is recognized when control of
a good or service transfers to a customer - so the notion of control replaces the existing notion of risks and rewards.
The standard permits a modified retrospective approach for the adoption. Under this approach
entities will recognize transitional adjustments in retained earnings on the date of initial application (e.g. 1 July 2017), i.e.
without restating the comparative period.
They will only need to apply the new rules to contracts that are not completed as of
the date of initial application.
|
Management is currently assessing the impact of the new rules and does not believe the adoption of the provisions of this update will have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
|
Mandatory for financial years commencing on or after January 1, 2018.
Expected date of adoption by the group: January 1, 2018.
|
IFRS 16
Leases
|
The IASB has issued a new standard for leases. This will replace IAS 17.
The main impact on lessees is that almost all leases go on balance sheet. This is because
the balance sheet distinction between operating and finance leases is removed for lessees. Instead, under the new standard an asset
(the right to use the leased item) and a financial liability to pay rentals are recognised. The only exemptions are short-term
and low-value leases.
|
Management is currently assessing the impact of the new rules and believes the adoption
of the provisions of this update will have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
The new standard will require that we record a liability and a related asset on the balance
sheet for our leased facilities in the U.S. and Australia. These facilities are currently leased through 2025 and 2020, respectively.
|
Management is currently assessing the impact of the new rules and believes the adoption
of the provisions of this update will have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
The new standard will require that we record a liability and a related asset on the balance
sheet for our leased facilities in the U.S. and Australia. These facilities are currently leased through 2025 and 2020, respectively.
|
There are no other standards that are not yet effective and that would be
expected to have a material impact on the entity in the current or future reporting periods and on foreseeable future transactions.
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
3
|
Revenue and Other Income
|
|
|
12 months to
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
12 months to
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
6 months to
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
|
12 months to
30 June
2014
AUD$
|
Sales revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of goods
|
|
|
17,691,351
|
|
|
|
13,169,753
|
|
|
|
3,662,452
|
|
|
|
7,542,600
|
|
Services revenue
|
|
|
1,357,300
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
19,048,651
|
|
|
|
13,169,753
|
|
|
|
3,662,452
|
|
|
|
7,542,600
|
|
|
|
12 months to
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
12 months to
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
6 months to
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
|
12 months to
30 June
2014
AUD$
|
Other Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government grants (a)
|
|
|
999,749
|
|
|
|
1,070,526
|
|
|
|
298,777
|
|
|
|
239,782
|
|
Unrealized foreign exchange (loss)/gain
|
|
|
(100,423
|
)
|
|
|
3,034,234
|
|
|
|
3,916,711
|
|
|
|
1,929,851
|
|
Fair value gain on derivative
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
126,438
|
|
|
|
54,319
|
|
Interest received
|
|
|
11,173
|
|
|
|
8,704
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
24,243
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
5,859
|
|
|
|
2,611,677
|
|
|
|
4,858
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
916,358
|
|
|
|
6,725,142
|
|
|
|
4,346,784
|
|
|
|
2,248,195
|
|
International and domestic government grants/tax incentives recognised during
the year totalled $999,749 (12 months ended December 31, 2015: $1,070,526, 6 months ended December 31, 2014: $298,777 year ended
June 30, 2014: $239,782) and recognised as other income. Included in other receivables are government grants for tax incentives
totalling $3,258,350 (December 31, 2015: $3,807,193, December 31, 2014: $2,571,559). There are no unfulfilled conditions or contingencies
attaching to these grants.
(a)
|
Loss before income tax includes the
following specific expenses:
|
|
|
Note
|
|
12 months to
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
12 months to
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
6 months to
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
|
12 months to
30 June
2014
AUD$
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
3,275,044
|
|
|
|
1,347,798
|
|
|
|
291,566
|
|
|
|
4,275,222
|
|
Borrowing costs
|
|
|
|
|
811,310
|
|
|
|
214,557
|
|
|
|
216,666
|
|
|
|
3,126,310
|
|
Amounts capitalised
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(265,009
|
)
|
|
|
(277,553
|
)
|
|
|
(218,448
|
)
|
|
|
(139,512
|
)
|
Finance costs expensed
|
|
|
|
|
3,821,345
|
|
|
|
1,284,802
|
|
|
|
289,784
|
|
|
|
7,262,020
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
1,113,167
|
|
|
|
948,723
|
|
|
|
496,659
|
|
|
|
848,907
|
|
Amortisation
|
|
|
|
|
1,512,041
|
|
|
|
529,840
|
|
|
|
195,103
|
|
|
|
406,128
|
|
Employee benefits expense
|
|
|
|
|
18,562,097
|
|
|
|
16,185,137
|
|
|
|
3,375,269
|
|
|
|
5,962,259
|
|
Transaction related expenses
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
352,225
|
|
Rental expense relating to operating leases
|
|
|
|
|
1,103,607
|
|
|
|
1,051,820
|
|
|
|
390,179
|
|
|
|
680,367
|
|
Defined contribution superannuation expense
|
|
|
|
|
345,243
|
|
|
|
321,176
|
|
|
|
154,775
|
|
|
|
312,203
|
|
(Recovery)/impairment of bad debts
|
|
|
|
|
(2,672
|
)
|
|
|
1,018
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
80,434
|
|
Foreign exchange loss relating to borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,384,335
|
|
(b)
|
Capitalized borrowing costs
|
The capitalization rate used to determine the amount of borrowing costs to
be capitalized is the weighted average interest rate applicable to the entity's outstanding borrowings during the year ended December
31, 2016, in this case 9.3% (year ended December 31, 2015: 9%, six-month period ended December 31, 2014: 10%, year ended June 30,
2014: 14%).
(a)
|
The major components
of tax expense comprise:
|
|
|
12 months to
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
12 months to
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
6 months to
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
|
12 months to
30 June
2014
AUD$
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
9,054
|
|
|
|
2,113
|
|
|
|
2,442
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Deferred tax expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,980,412
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
9,054
|
|
|
|
2,113
|
|
|
|
2,442
|
|
|
|
2,980,412
|
|
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
5
|
Income Tax Expense (continued)
|
(b) Reconciliation of income tax to accounting profit:
|
|
12 months to
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
12 months to
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
6 months to
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
|
12 months to
30 June
2014
AUD$
|
Loss before income tax
|
|
|
(21,682,389
|
)
|
|
|
(13,735,419
|
)
|
|
|
(1,426,080
|
)
|
|
|
(14,352,910
|
)
|
At 30% tax rate
|
|
|
(6,504,717
|
)
|
|
|
(4,120,626
|
)
|
|
|
(427,824
|
)
|
|
|
(4,305,873
|
)
|
Tax effect of amounts which are not deductible (taxable) in calculating taxable income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Non-assessable research and development income
|
|
|
(259,950
|
)
|
|
|
(211,455
|
)
|
|
|
(89,629
|
)
|
|
|
(73,934
|
)
|
- Non-deductible research and development expenditure
|
|
|
867,007
|
|
|
|
722,159
|
|
|
|
724,944
|
|
|
|
411,174
|
|
- Non-deductible expenditure
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
- Amount of share issues costs not able to be recognised
|
|
|
(367,570
|
)
|
|
|
303,647
|
|
|
|
(355,169
|
)
|
|
|
553,896
|
|
- Difference in overseas tax rates
|
|
|
755,422
|
|
|
|
255,849
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
- Entertainment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,918
|
|
- Tax losses unrecognized during the year
|
|
|
583,689
|
|
|
|
449,299
|
|
|
|
145,887
|
|
|
|
1,384,062
|
|
- Tax losses incurred but not recognized during the year
|
|
|
4,935,173
|
|
|
|
2,603,240
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,997,948
|
|
- Sundry items
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,233
|
|
|
|
7,221
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
9,054
|
|
|
|
2,113
|
|
|
|
2,442
|
|
|
|
2,980,412
|
|
|
|
12 months to
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
12 months to
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
6 months to
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
|
12 months to
30 June
2014
AUD$
|
Unrecorded tax losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential tax benefit @ 30% for unused tax losses for which no deferred tax asset has been recognized - available for use in Australia
|
|
|
10,544,076
|
|
|
|
7,067,408
|
|
|
|
3,753,696
|
|
|
|
3,762,445
|
|
Potential tax benefit @ 35% for unused tax losses for which no deferred tax asset has been recognized - available for use in USA
|
|
|
8,450,717
|
|
|
|
5,411,536
|
|
|
|
3,982,069
|
|
|
|
2,619,565
|
|
|
|
|
18,994,793
|
|
|
|
12,478,944
|
|
|
|
7,735,765
|
|
|
|
6,382,010
|
|
Total tax losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential tax benefit @ 30% for total Australian tax losses carried forward
|
|
|
10,544,076
|
|
|
|
7,067,408
|
|
|
|
3,753,696
|
|
|
|
3,762,445
|
|
Potential tax benefit @ 35% for total USA tax losses carried forward
|
|
|
8,450,717
|
|
|
|
5,411,536
|
|
|
|
3,982,069
|
|
|
|
2,619,565
|
|
|
|
|
18,994,793
|
|
|
|
12,478,944
|
|
|
|
7,735,765
|
|
|
|
6,382,010
|
|
Total unused tax losses
|
|
|
59,291,828
|
|
|
|
30,019,557
|
|
|
|
23,889,660
|
|
|
|
20,025,955
|
|
The tax losses available for future use in U.S. will expire starting in 2033.
The tax losses available for future use in Australia do not expire but are subject to satisfying certain conditions (e.g. same
business and continuity of ownership).
(c)
Amounts recognized directly in equity
Aggregate deferred tax arising in the reporting period are not recognized
in net profit or loss or other comprehensive income/(loss) but are directly credited to equity.
|
|
12 months to
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
12 months to
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
6 months to
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
|
12 months to
30 June
2014
AUD$
|
Net deferred tax - credited directly to equity
|
|
|
367,570
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,717,391
|
|
Note there is a further deferred tax asset of $485,402 that has not been
recognised as at 30 June 2014 but is available for future use by the Group.
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
|
|
Opening
Balance
AUD$
|
|
Charged to
Income
AUD$
|
|
Charged
directly to
Equity
AUD$
|
|
Exchange
Differences
AUD$
|
|
Closing
Balance
AUD$
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
89,899
|
|
|
|
60,147
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,842
|
|
|
|
152,888
|
|
Accruals
|
|
|
313,935
|
|
|
|
195,138
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(18,351
|
)
|
|
|
490,722
|
|
Share issue expenses
|
|
|
1,163,495
|
|
|
|
355,169
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,518,664
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7,563
|
|
|
|
4,233
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
12,003
|
|
Balance at 31 December 2014
|
|
|
1,574,892
|
|
|
|
614,687
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(15,302
|
)
|
|
|
2,174,277
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
152,888
|
|
|
|
(2,376
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
150,512
|
|
Accruals
|
|
|
490,722
|
|
|
|
(64,994
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
425,728
|
|
Share issues expenses
|
|
|
1,518,664
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,518,664
|
|
Other
|
|
|
12,003
|
|
|
|
(12,003
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Balance at 31 December 2015
|
|
|
2,174,277
|
|
|
|
(79,373
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,094,904
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
150,512
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
150,512
|
|
Accruals
|
|
|
425,728
|
|
|
|
(259,017
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
934
|
|
|
|
167,645
|
|
Share issues expenses
|
|
|
1,518,664
|
|
|
|
(367,570
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,151,094
|
|
Balance at 31 December 2016
|
|
|
2,094,904
|
|
|
|
(626,587
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
934
|
|
|
|
1,469,251
|
|
|
|
Opening
Balance
AUD$
|
|
Charged to
Income
AUD$
|
|
Charged
directly to
Equity
AUD$
|
|
Exchange
Differences
AUD$
|
|
Closing
Balance
AUD$
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
873,399
|
|
|
|
65,534
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
938,933
|
|
Borrowing cost asset
|
|
|
93,157
|
|
|
|
(64,676
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
28,481
|
|
Unrealized foreign exchange
|
|
|
608,336
|
|
|
|
598,527
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,206,863
|
|
Balance at 31 December 2014
|
|
|
1,574,892
|
|
|
|
599,385
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,174,277
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
938,933
|
|
|
|
115,359
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,054,292
|
|
Borrowing cost asset
|
|
|
28,481
|
|
|
|
182,392
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
210,873
|
|
Unrealized foreign exchange
|
|
|
1,206,863
|
|
|
|
(377,124
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
829,739
|
|
Balance at 31 December 2015
|
|
|
2,174,277
|
|
|
|
(79,373
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,094,904
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
1,054,292
|
|
|
|
96,565
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,150,857
|
|
Borrowing cost asset
|
|
|
210,873
|
|
|
|
67,159
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
278,032
|
|
Unrealized foreign exchange
|
|
|
829,739
|
|
|
|
(789,377
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
40,362
|
|
Balance at 31 December 2016
|
|
|
2,094,904
|
|
|
|
(625,653
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,469,251
|
|
During 2016, management evaluated the evidence bearing upon the realizability of its deferred tax assets, which primarily consist
of net loss carry forwards. Management considered the facts that the Group has historically been able to generate income, considered
the future forecasts and investment costs of pipeline products, the incurred with the development of an FDA approved manufacturing
facility, and the costs completing an initial public offering and other tax planning strategies. Based on the analysis management
determined that the Group will not utilize of tax benefit of $18,994,793 as of December 31, 2016 ($12,478,944 as of December 31,
2015, December 31, 2014: $7,735,765) and accordingly did not record these amounts as a deferred tax asset at December 31, 2016,
December 31, 2015, or December 31, 2014. This element of unrecognized future tax benefits will be assessed by management going
forward and maybe recorded at a point in which management believes they will be utilized
Description of segments
The animal health pharmaceutical industry is characterized by meaningful differences
in customer needs across different animal species and regions. In addition, our FDA approved sterile manufacturing facility has
different operational characteristics. As a result of these differences, among other things, we manage our operations through four
separate reportable segments.
Companion Animal
This segment covers the Groups Osteoarthritis portfolios across both Canine
and Equine species. It is responsible for sales of our patented product Zydax, along with the complementary product Glyde across
Australia, New Zealand, the Middle East and Asia.
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
Description of segments
Production Animal - U.S.
This segment covers the Groups Reproductive Hormone portfolio across Production
Animal in the United States of America. It is responsible for the sales of the first reproductive hormone products approved for
the indication of estrous synchronization in both dairy and beef cows in the U.S.
Production Animal - Rest of World
This segment covers the Group's Reproductive Hormone portfolio in Production
Animal across all regions outside of the United States of America. It is responsible for the sales of these reproductive hormone
products in Australia, New Zealand, the Middle East, Asia and Canada.
Manufacturing Operations
This segment is responsible for the operation of the Group's FDA approved
sterile manufacturing facility, the manufacture and release of all of the Groups pharmaceutical products and performing contract
manufacturing. The Manufacturing operations are also responsible for increasing factory utilization via exploring future contract
manufacturing opportunities.
Review of information by the CODM's
The Executive Directors (which includes the CEO, CFO and Chairman), who are
the Group's chief operating decision maker's ("CODM's"), use the revenues and the segment results, being Adjusted Earnings
Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation, Amortization and Other Income (Adjusted EBITDAOI) of the four segments, among other factors,
for performance evaluation of the individual segments and the overall Group, and the allocation of resources.
The CODM's believe that Adjusted EBITDAOI represents the results of our underlying
operating segments prior to considering certain income statement elements and other certain significant items, which are not directly
associated with the activities of the operating segment.
The basis of calculating Adjusted EBITDAOI is by the removal of certain significant
items and also additional items that are substantive and non-operating in nature. The items that are always removed are:
|
·
|
net foreign exchange losses/(gains) associated with the translation of foreign currency denominated indebtedness over time,
which is considered to be a direct result of financing activities that is dependent upon fluctuations in foreign currency rates
|
|
·
|
other income which typically include; income from the sale of assets or research and grant income received
|
|
·
|
Certain transactions and events where expenses are incurred that are associated with capital structure of the Group or certain
significant purchase accounting items that result from business combinations and/or asset acquisitions and divestments.
|
Other Costs and Business Activities
Certain costs are not allocated to our reporting segment results, such as
costs associated with the following:
|
·
|
Corporate overheads, which is responsible for centralized functions such as information technology, facilities, legal, finance,
human resources, business development, and procurement. These costs also include compensation costs and other miscellaneous operating
expenses not charged to our operating segments, as well as interest and tax income and expense.
|
These costs are included within 'unallocated' in our segment performance.
Other Assets and Liabilities
We manage our assets and liabilities on a Group basis, not by segment. CODM
does not regularly review any asset or liability information by segment and its preparation is impracticable. Accordingly, we do
not report asset and liability information by segment.
Segment performance
|
|
Companion
Animal
AUD$
|
|
Production
Animal - U.S.
AUD$
|
|
Production
Animal - Rest
of World
AUD$
|
|
Manufacturing
Operations
AUD$
|
|
Unallocated
AUD$
|
|
Total
AUD$
|
12 months to 31 December 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
3,911,287
|
|
|
|
9,200,731
|
|
|
|
2,050,977
|
|
|
|
3,885,656
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
19,048,651
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
|
3,911,287
|
|
|
|
9,200,731
|
|
|
|
2,050,977
|
|
|
|
3,885,656
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
19,048,651
|
|
Cost of Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
(1,153,529
|
)
|
|
|
(1,476,249
|
)
|
|
|
(515,814
|
)
|
|
|
(693,918
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,839,510
|
)
|
Facility costs
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4,371,942
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4,371,942
|
)
|
Total Costs of Sales
|
|
|
(1,153,529
|
)
|
|
|
(1,476,249
|
)
|
|
|
(515,814
|
)
|
|
|
(5,065,860
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(8,211,452
|
)
|
Gross Margin
|
|
|
2,757,758
|
|
|
|
7,724,482
|
|
|
|
1,535,163
|
|
|
|
(1,180,204
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10,837,199
|
|
Segment Costs
|
|
|
(9,944,463
|
)
|
|
|
(3,211,482
|
)
|
|
|
(955,718
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(14,111,663
|
)
|
Adjusted EBITDAOI
|
|
|
(7,186,705
|
)
|
|
|
4,513,000
|
|
|
|
579,445
|
|
|
|
(1,180,204
|
)
|
|
|
(12,888,363
|
)
|
|
|
(16,162,827
|
)
|
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
7
|
Segment Information (continued)
|
|
|
Companion
Animal
AUD$
|
|
Production
Animal - U.S.
AUD$
|
|
Production
Animal - Rest
of World
AUD$
|
|
Manufacturing
Operations
AUD$
|
|
Unallocated
AUD$
|
|
Total
AUD$
|
12 months to 31 December 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
2,100,718
|
|
|
|
8,084,159
|
|
|
|
2,984,876
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
13,169,753
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
2,100,718
|
|
|
|
8,084,159
|
|
|
|
2,984,876
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
13,169,753
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
(711,335
|
)
|
|
|
(1,169,569
|
)
|
|
|
(654,715
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,535,619
|
)
|
Facility costs
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4,535,065
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4,535,065
|
)
|
Total Cost of Sales
|
|
|
(711,335
|
)
|
|
|
(1,169,569
|
)
|
|
|
(654,715
|
)
|
|
|
(4,535,065
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(7,070,684
|
)
|
Gross Margin
|
|
|
1,389,383
|
|
|
|
6,914,590
|
|
|
|
2,330,161
|
|
|
|
(4,535,065
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,099,069
|
|
Segment Costs
|
|
|
(6,775,203
|
)
|
|
|
(3,622,295
|
)
|
|
|
(1,327,451
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(11,724,949
|
)
|
Adjusted EBITDAOI
|
|
|
(5,385,820
|
)
|
|
|
3,292,295
|
|
|
|
1,002,711
|
|
|
|
(4,535,065
|
)
|
|
|
(12,071,316
|
)
|
|
|
(17,697,195
|
)
|
|
|
Companion
Animal
AUD$
|
|
Production
Animal - U.S.
AUD$
|
|
Production
Animal - Rest
of World
AUD$
|
|
Manufacturing
Operations
AUD$
|
|
Unallocated
AUD$
|
|
Total
AUD$
|
6 months to 31 December 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
541,852
|
|
|
|
1,188,791
|
|
|
|
1,931,808
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,662,451
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
|
541,852
|
|
|
|
1,188,791
|
|
|
|
1,931,808
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,662,451
|
|
Cost of Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
(144,438
|
)
|
|
|
(275,947
|
)
|
|
|
(539,481
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(959,866
|
)
|
Facility costs
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,959,689
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,959,689
|
)
|
Total Cost of Sales
|
|
|
(144,438
|
)
|
|
|
(275,947
|
)
|
|
|
(539,481
|
)
|
|
|
(1,959,689
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,919,555
|
)
|
Gross Margin
|
|
|
397,414
|
|
|
|
912,844
|
|
|
|
1,392,327
|
|
|
|
(1,959,689
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
742,896
|
|
Segment Costs
|
|
|
(348,748
|
)
|
|
|
(1,442,205
|
)
|
|
|
(470,022
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,260,975
|
)
|
Adjusted EBITDAOI
|
|
|
48,666
|
|
|
|
(529,361
|
)
|
|
|
922,305
|
|
|
|
(1,959,689
|
)
|
|
|
(3,273,239
|
)
|
|
|
(4,791,318
|
)
|
12 months to 30 June 2014
|
|
Companion
Animal
AUD$
|
|
Production
Animal - U.S.
AUD$
|
|
Production
Animal - Rest
of World
AUD$
|
|
Manufacturing
Operations
AUD$
|
|
Unallocated
AUD$
|
|
Total
AUD$
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
1,502,944
|
|
|
|
1,646,503
|
|
|
|
4,393,153
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,542,600
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
|
1,502,944
|
|
|
|
1,646,503
|
|
|
|
4,393,153
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,542,600
|
|
Cost of Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
(363,267
|
)
|
|
|
(314,688
|
)
|
|
|
(1,108,949
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,786,904
|
)
|
Facility costs
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,888,176
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,888,176
|
)
|
Total Cost of Sales
|
|
|
(363,267
|
)
|
|
|
(314,688
|
)
|
|
|
(1,108,949
|
)
|
|
|
(3,888,176
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(5,675,080
|
)
|
Gross Margin
|
|
|
1,139,677
|
|
|
|
1,331,815
|
|
|
|
3,284,204
|
|
|
|
(3,888,176
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,867,520
|
|
Segment Costs
|
|
|
(451,272
|
)
|
|
|
(4,171,246
|
)
|
|
|
(325,069
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4,947,587
|
)
|
Adjusted EBITDAOI
|
|
|
688,405
|
|
|
|
(2,839,431
|
)
|
|
|
2,949,135
|
|
|
|
(3,888,176
|
)
|
|
|
(3,268,687
|
)
|
|
|
(6,358,754
|
)
|
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
7
|
Segment Information (continued)
|
Cost of sales reconciliation
|
|
12 months to
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
12 months to
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
6 months to
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
|
12 months to
30 June
2014
AUD$
|
Total segment cost of sales
|
|
|
(8,211,452
|
)
|
|
|
(7,070,684
|
)
|
|
|
(2,919,555
|
)
|
|
|
(5,675,080
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
(766,419
|
)
|
|
|
(675,181
|
)
|
|
|
(424,247
|
)
|
|
|
(742,513
|
)
|
Total cost of sales
|
|
|
(8,977,871
|
)
|
|
|
(7,745,865
|
)
|
|
|
(3,343,802
|
)
|
|
|
(6,417,593
|
)
|
Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDAOI result to loss before
income tax
|
|
12 months to
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
12 months to
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
6 months to
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
|
12 months to
30 June
2014
AUD$
|
Adjusted EBITDAOI
|
|
|
(16,162,827
|
)
|
|
|
(17,697,195
|
)
|
|
|
(4,791,318
|
)
|
|
|
(6,384,754
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
916,358
|
|
|
|
6,725,142
|
|
|
|
4,346,784
|
|
|
|
2,248,195
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(1,113,167
|
)
|
|
|
(948,723
|
)
|
|
|
(496,659
|
)
|
|
|
(847,643
|
)
|
Amortization
|
|
|
(1,512,041
|
)
|
|
|
(529,841
|
)
|
|
|
(195,103
|
)
|
|
|
(406,128
|
)
|
Finance costs
|
|
|
(3,821,345
|
)
|
|
|
(1,284,802
|
)
|
|
|
(289,784
|
)
|
|
|
(7,262,020
|
)
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
10,633
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Transaction related expenses
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(352,225
|
)
|
Foreign exchange loss on borrowings
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,384,335
|
)
|
Loss before income tax
|
|
|
(21,682,389
|
)
|
|
|
(13,735,419
|
)
|
|
|
(1,426,080
|
)
|
|
|
(14,352,910
|
)
|
The total segment costs and unallocated expenses reconcile
to selling and marketing expenses, regulatory expenses and administration expenses on the statement of comprehensive loss less
depreciation and amortization. reconciliation of segment and unallocated costs to operating costs provided as follows:
|
|
12 months to
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
12 months to
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
6 months to
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
|
12 months to
30 June
2014
AUD$
|
Segment and unallocated costs
|
|
|
(27,000,026
|
)
|
|
|
(23,796,264
|
)
|
|
|
(5,534,214
|
)
|
|
|
(8,216,274
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
(1,858,789
|
)
|
|
|
(803,383
|
)
|
|
|
(267,516
|
)
|
|
|
(511,259
|
)
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
10,633
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Transaction related expenses
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(352,225
|
)
|
Operating costs as presented in the statement of comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(28,848,182
|
)
|
|
|
(24,599,647
|
)
|
|
|
(5,801,730
|
)
|
|
|
(9,079,758
|
)
|
Selling and marketing expenses
|
|
|
(14,121,493
|
)
|
|
|
(11,777,492
|
)
|
|
|
(2,447,578
|
)
|
|
|
(5,474,826
|
)
|
Regulatory expenses
|
|
|
(1,494,800
|
)
|
|
|
(881,909
|
)
|
|
|
(311,931
|
)
|
|
|
(586,149
|
)
|
Administration expenses
|
|
|
(13,231,889
|
)
|
|
|
(11,940,246
|
)
|
|
|
(3,042,221
|
)
|
|
|
(3,018,783
|
)
|
Operating costs as presented in statement of comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(28,848,182
|
)
|
|
|
(24,599,647
|
)
|
|
|
(5,801,730
|
)
|
|
|
(9,079,758
|
)
|
(b)
|
Geographical information
|
In presenting information on the basis of geographical segments, segment
revenue is based on the geographical location of customers whereas segment assets are based on the location of the assets.
The Group is domiciled in Australia, with the amount of its revenue from
external customers for the year ended December 31, 2016 in Australia totalling $2,387,870 (year ended December 31, 2015: $1,936,632,
six months to December 31, 2014: $836,337, and year ended June 30, 2014:$2,179,765), revenues from external customers in the USA
totalling $15,266,462 (year ended December 31, 2015: $8,807,405, six months to December 31, 2014: $1,188,791, and year ended June
30, 2014: $1,646,503), revenues from external customers in Canada totalling $Nil (year ended December 31, 2015: $735,125, six months
ended December 31, 2014: $485,204, and year ended June 30, 2014: $1,159,243), revenues from external customers in New Zealand totalling
$222,956 (year ended December 31, 2015: $539,265, six months ended December 31, 2014: $121,335, and year ended June 30, 2014: $755,327)
and the total revenues from external customers in other countries totalling $1,171,362 (year ended December 31, 2015: $1,151,326,
six months ended December 31, 2014: $1,030,785, and year ended June 30, 2014: $1,801,761). Segment revenues are based on the country
in which the customer is based.
|
|
No of
customers
31 December
2016
|
|
Total
revenues
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
No of
customers
31 December
2015
|
|
Total
revenues
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
No of
customers
31 December
2014
|
|
Total
revenues
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
|
No of
customers
30 June
2014
|
|
Total
revenues
30 June
2014
AUD$
|
Major customers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production Animal - US
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
9,938,811
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
8,319,419
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1,188,791
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1,212,766
|
|
Production Animal - Rest of World
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
955,178
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
560,494
|
|
Manufacturing Operations
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3,885,656
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
8
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
Cash on hand
|
|
|
1,426
|
|
|
|
1,437
|
|
|
|
1,410
|
|
Cash at bank
|
|
|
7,114,072
|
|
|
|
5,665,242
|
|
|
|
15,818,008
|
|
|
|
|
7,115,498
|
|
|
|
5,666,679
|
|
|
|
15,819,418
|
|
The Group's exposure to interest rate risk is discussed in note 20. The maximum
exposure to credit risk at the end of the reporting period is the carrying amount of each class of cash and cash equivalents mentioned
above.
9
|
Trade and other receivables
|
|
|
|
|
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
CURRENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,637,646
|
|
|
|
3,427,827
|
|
|
|
2,128,398
|
|
Provision for impairment
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
(4,286
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,288,726
|
|
|
|
3,838,835
|
|
|
|
2,696,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,922,086
|
|
|
|
7,266,662
|
|
|
|
4,825,193
|
|
Current other receivables relate primarily to Australian Tax Office R&D
Incentives receivable, recorded as per the terms of the R&D Incentive Scheme.
|
|
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
NON-CURRENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term trade receivables
|
|
|
655,719
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
68,020
|
|
|
|
67,457
|
|
|
|
50,184
|
|
Total non-current
|
|
|
723,739
|
|
|
|
67,457
|
|
|
|
50,184
|
|
Non-current other receivables relate to deposits paid by the Group in the
ordinary course of business.
(a)
|
Impairment of receivables
|
The Group's accounts receivable balances are usually
collected within a period of less than 30 days following due date of invoice. Our collection of these receipts has historically
been strong with less than 0.5% of bad debts being written off during the last three financial years, as such we have not provided
for doubtful debts in the Groups accounts over this period. In our consolidated balance sheet as at December 31, 2016 trade receivables
includes a $4,286 allowance for doubtful debts (year ended December 31, 2015: Nil, six months to December 31, 2014: Nil). While
we believe, based on the historic profile of the collection of our account receivables amounts, that this is sufficient, we may
be required to allow for a provision for doubtful debts in the future if this profile is to adversely change.
(b)
|
Amounts recognized in profit or loss
|
During the year, the following losses recognized in profit or loss in relation
to impaired receivables.
|
|
12 months to
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
12 months to
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
Six months ended
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
|
12 months to
30 June
2014
AUD
|
Bad debts (recovered)/written off
|
|
|
(2,672
|
)
|
|
|
1,018
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
80,434
|
|
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
9
|
Trade and other receivables (continued)
|
Credit risk
The Group has no significant concentration of credit risk with respect to
any single counterparty or group of counterparties. The class of assets described as 'trade and other receivables' is considered
to be the main source of credit risk related to the Group.
On a geographical basis, the Group has significant credit risk exposures in
Australia, New Zealand, Canada and United States of America given the substantial operations in those regions. The Group's exposure
to credit risk for receivables at the end of the reporting period in those regions is as follows:
|
|
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
Australia
|
|
|
274,698
|
|
|
|
178,565
|
|
|
|
269,585
|
|
New Zealand
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
26,318
|
|
|
|
54,979
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
703,863
|
|
|
|
485,204
|
|
United States of America
|
|
|
2,018,666
|
|
|
|
2,519,081
|
|
|
|
1,318,630
|
|
|
|
|
2,293,364
|
|
|
|
3,427,827
|
|
|
|
2,128,398
|
|
The following table details the Group's trade and other receivables exposure
to credit risk (prior to collateral and other credit enhancements) with aging analysis and impairment provided for thereon. Amounts
are considered as 'past due' when the debt has not been settled, within the terms and conditions agreed between the Group and the
customer or counter party to the transaction. Receivables that are past due are assessed for impairment by ascertaining solvency
of the debtors and are provided for where there is objective evidence indicating that the debt may not be fully repaid to the Group.
The balances of receivables that do not remain within initial trade terms
(as detailed in the table) are considered to be of high credit quality.
|
|
Past due but not impaired
(days overdue)
|
|
Past due but not impaired
(days overdue)
|
|
Past due but not impaired
(days overdue)
|
|
Past due but not impaired
(days overdue)
|
|
|
< 30
AUD$
|
|
31-60
AUD$
|
|
61-90
AUD$
|
|
> 90
AUD$
|
31 December 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and term receivables
|
|
|
58,143
|
|
|
|
14,140
|
|
|
|
2,426
|
|
|
|
667,678
|
|
31 December 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and term receivables
|
|
|
29,262
|
|
|
|
16,174
|
|
|
|
8,516
|
|
|
|
100,565
|
|
31 December 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and term receivables
|
|
|
130,217
|
|
|
|
42,421
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
The Group does not hold any financial assets with terms that have been renegotiated,
but which would otherwise be past due or impaired.
The other classes of receivables do not contain impaired assets.
The carrying value of trade and other receivables is considered a reasonable
approximation of fair value.
The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date is the carrying
amount of each class of receivable in the financial statements.
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
|
|
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
CURRENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials and consumables
|
|
|
855,323
|
|
|
|
1,006,668
|
|
|
|
1,292,668
|
|
Work in progress
|
|
|
253,468
|
|
|
|
190,392
|
|
|
|
183,505
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
2,514,100
|
|
|
|
2,229,866
|
|
|
|
1,279,783
|
|
|
|
|
3,622,891
|
|
|
|
3,426,926
|
|
|
|
2,755,956
|
|
Write downs of inventories to net realizable value during the period were
$ NIL (year ended December 31, 2015: $Nil, six months to December 31, 2014: $Nil, year ended June 30, 2014: $ Nil).
|
|
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
Capital works in progress
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At cost
|
|
|
709,483
|
|
|
|
509,620
|
|
|
|
52,193
|
|
Plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At cost
|
|
|
15,604,590
|
|
|
|
15,246,454
|
|
|
|
14,367,251
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(4,681,425
|
)
|
|
|
(3,760,832
|
)
|
|
|
(3,000,648
|
)
|
Total plant and equipment
|
|
|
10,923,165
|
|
|
|
11,485,622
|
|
|
|
11,366,603
|
|
Leased plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized leased assets
|
|
|
325,801
|
|
|
|
325,801
|
|
|
|
325,801
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(325,801
|
)
|
|
|
(325,801
|
)
|
|
|
(325,801
|
)
|
Total leased plant and equipment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Motor vehicles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At cost
|
|
|
21,086
|
|
|
|
55,479
|
|
|
|
55,479
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(21,086
|
)
|
|
|
(55,479
|
)
|
|
|
(49,625
|
)
|
Total motor vehicles
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,854
|
|
Office equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At cost
|
|
|
1,301,613
|
|
|
|
1,268,898
|
|
|
|
873,582
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(805,869
|
)
|
|
|
(597,926
|
)
|
|
|
(399,226
|
)
|
Total office equipment
|
|
|
495,744
|
|
|
|
670,972
|
|
|
|
474,356
|
|
Total plant and equipment
|
|
|
12,128,392
|
|
|
|
12,666,214
|
|
|
|
11,899,006
|
|
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
11
|
Plant and equipment (continued)
|
(a)
|
Movements in carrying amounts of plant and equipment
|
Movement in the carrying amounts for each class of property, plant and equipment
between the beginning and the end of the current financial period:
Consolidated
|
|
Capital Works
in Progress
AUD$
|
|
Plant and
Equipment
AUD$
|
|
Motor
Vehicles
AUD$
|
|
Office
Equipment
AUD$
|
|
Total
AUD$
|
Year ended 31 December 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at the beginning of year
|
|
|
509,620
|
|
|
|
11,485,622
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
670,972
|
|
|
|
12,666,214
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
199,863
|
|
|
|
358,136
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
32,715
|
|
|
|
590,714
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(920,593
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(207,943
|
)
|
|
|
(1,128,536
|
)
|
Balance at the end of the year
|
|
|
709,483
|
|
|
|
10,923,165
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
495,744
|
|
|
|
12,128,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Capital
Works
in Progress
AUD$
|
|
|
Plant and
Equipment
AUD$
|
|
|
Motor
Vehicles
AUD$
|
|
|
Office
Equipment
AUD$
|
|
|
Total
AUD$
|
Year ended 31 December 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at the beginning of year
|
|
|
52,193
|
|
|
|
11,366,603
|
|
|
|
5,854
|
|
|
|
474,356
|
|
|
|
11,899,006
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
457,427
|
|
|
|
879,203
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
395,316
|
|
|
|
1,731,946
|
|
Disposals - written down value
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(16,015
|
)
|
|
|
(16,015
|
)
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(760,184
|
)
|
|
|
(5,854
|
)
|
|
|
(182,685
|
)
|
|
|
(948,723
|
)
|
Balance at the end of the year
|
|
|
509,620
|
|
|
|
11,485,622
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
670,972
|
|
|
|
12,666,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Capital Works
in Progress
AUD$
|
|
|
Plant and
Equipment
AUD$
|
|
|
Motor
Vehicles
AUD$
|
|
|
Office
Equipment
AUD$
|
|
|
Total
AUD$
|
Period ended 31 December 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at the beginning of period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11,028,699
|
|
|
|
12,880
|
|
|
|
168,863
|
|
|
|
11,210,442
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
52,193
|
|
|
|
774,284
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
366,694
|
|
|
|
1,193,171
|
|
Disposals - written down value
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(7,129
|
)
|
|
|
(7,129
|
)
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(436,380
|
)
|
|
|
(7,026
|
)
|
|
|
(54,072
|
)
|
|
|
(497,478
|
)
|
Balance at the end of the period
|
|
|
52,193
|
|
|
|
11,366,603
|
|
|
|
5,854
|
|
|
|
474,356
|
|
|
|
11,899,006
|
|
|
|
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
Development costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
30,652,557
|
|
|
|
24,777,880
|
|
|
|
17,005,759
|
|
Grants (b)
|
|
|
(9,435,354
|
)
|
|
|
(7,042,130
|
)
|
|
|
(3,929,596
|
)
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(2,702,417
|
)
|
|
|
(1,197,231
|
)
|
|
|
(697,282
|
)
|
Total development costs
|
|
|
18,514,786
|
|
|
|
16,538,519
|
|
|
|
12,378,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computer software
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
343,849
|
|
|
|
255,776
|
|
|
|
218,928
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(233,803
|
)
|
|
|
(210,935
|
)
|
|
|
(178,195
|
)
|
Total computer software
|
|
|
110,046
|
|
|
|
44,841
|
|
|
|
40,733
|
|
Total Intangibles
|
|
|
18,624,832
|
|
|
|
16,583,360
|
|
|
|
12,419,614
|
|
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
12
|
Intangible
Assets (continued)
|
(a)
|
Movements in carrying amounts of intangibles
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Development
costs
AUD$
|
|
Computer
software
AUD$
|
|
Total
AUD$
|
Year ended 31 December 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at the beginning of the year
|
|
|
16,538,519
|
|
|
|
44,841
|
|
|
|
16,583,360
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
5,874,677
|
|
|
|
88,073
|
|
|
|
5,962,750
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
(1,505,186
|
)
|
|
|
(22,868
|
)
|
|
|
(1,528,054
|
)
|
Grants receivable
|
|
|
(2,393,224
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,393,224
|
)
|
Closing value at 31 December 2016
|
|
|
18,514,786
|
|
|
|
110,046
|
|
|
|
18,624,832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Development
costs
AUD$
|
|
|
|
Computer
software
AUD$
|
|
|
|
Total
AUD$
|
|
Year ended 31 December 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at the beginning of the year
|
|
|
12,378,881
|
|
|
|
40,733
|
|
|
|
12,419,614
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
7,769,272
|
|
|
|
36,848
|
|
|
|
7,808,969
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
(497,100
|
)
|
|
|
(32,740
|
)
|
|
|
(529,840
|
)
|
Grants receivable
|
|
|
(3,112,534
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,112,534
|
)
|
Closing value at 31 December 2015
|
|
|
16,538,519
|
|
|
|
44,841
|
|
|
|
16,583,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Development
costs
AUD$
|
|
|
|
Computer
software
AUD$
|
|
|
|
Total
AUD$
|
|
Period ended 31 December 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at the beginning of the period
|
|
|
10,119,953
|
|
|
|
44,592
|
|
|
|
10,164,545
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
3,801,835
|
|
|
|
7,150
|
|
|
|
3,808,985
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
(183,835
|
)
|
|
|
(11,009
|
)
|
|
|
(194,844
|
)
|
Grants receivable
|
|
|
(1,359,072
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,359,072
|
)
|
Closing value at 31 December 2014
|
|
|
12,378,881
|
|
|
|
40,733
|
|
|
|
12,419,614
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2016 the Group recorded a receivable related
to Government Grants for tax incentives totalling $3,258,350 (December 31, 2015: $3,807,193, December 31, 2014: $2,571,559), which
is included in Note 9 in Other Receivables, with $2,393,224 (December 31, 2015: $3,112,534, December 31, 2014: $1,359,072) offsetting
development costs and $865,123 (December 31, 2015: $758,207, December 31, 2014: $251,914, June 30, 2014: $246,445) included in
Other Income.
13
|
Trade and other payables
|
|
|
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
CURRENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
5,860,335
|
|
|
|
4,012,645
|
|
|
|
4,148,433
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,806,242
|
|
|
|
2,578,469
|
|
|
|
1,880,045
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
55,954
|
|
|
|
25,035
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Provision for fees received in advance
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,438,430
|
|
Other payables
|
|
|
153,456
|
|
|
|
164,291
|
|
|
|
147,126
|
|
Total current trade and other payables
|
|
|
7,875,987
|
|
|
|
6,780,440
|
|
|
|
8,614,034
|
|
|
|
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
NON-CURRENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred lease incentive
|
|
|
1,087,670
|
|
|
|
1,106,360
|
|
|
|
668,037
|
|
Total non-current trade and other payables
|
|
|
1,087,670
|
|
|
|
1,106,360
|
|
|
|
668,037
|
|
All the carrying values are considered to be a reasonable approximation of
fair value.
Information about the Group's exposure to foreign exchange risk is provided
in note 20.
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
13
|
Trade and other payables (continued)
|
(b)
|
Movement in provisions
|
|
|
On-Costs for Stock-based Compensation
AUD$
|
|
Total
AUD$
|
31 December 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount at start of year
|
|
|
25,035
|
|
|
|
25,035
|
|
Charged to profit or loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Additional provision recognized
|
|
|
30,919
|
|
|
|
30,919
|
|
Carrying amount at end of year
|
|
|
55,954
|
|
|
|
55,954
|
|
|
|
Note
|
|
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
CURRENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease liability
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
10,178
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
49,178
|
|
2013 Parnell bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,122,553
|
|
|
|
4,636,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,178
|
|
|
|
3,122,553
|
|
|
|
4,685,420
|
|
Less: borrowing costs attributable to loan facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(94,937
|
)
|
Total current borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,178
|
|
|
|
3,122,553
|
|
|
|
4,590,483
|
|
|
|
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
NON-CURRENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan facility
|
|
|
27,639,580
|
|
|
|
15,056,118
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
2013 Parnell Bonds
|
|
|
3,119,188
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
30,758,768
|
|
|
|
15,056,118
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Less: borrowing costs attributable to loan facility
|
|
|
(926,776
|
)
|
|
|
(702,915
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total non-current borrowings
|
|
|
29,831,992
|
|
|
|
14,353,203
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
As at December 31, 2016, the Company had borrowings related to a term-loan of $27,639,580 and the 2013 Parnell Bonds of $2,845,000
(December 31, 2015: $2,845,000, December 31, 2014: $4,300,000), excluding capitalized interest. The Company had lease liabilities
that are secured by the related leased assets of $10,178 (December 31, 2015: $Nil, December 31, 2014: $49,178).
Loan Facility
In June 2011, the Company entered into credit agreement with Partners For
Growth III, L.P., originally for a USD$7,000,000 revolving line of credit. In October 2011, the Company and its U.S. subsidiaries
increased this revolving line of credit by USD$3,000,000 and entered into a Revenue Sharing Agreement with Partners For Growth
III, L.P. In December 2013, the parties amended the revenue sharing agreement to add our U.S. subsidiaries as parties. The revenue
sharing agreement provides Partners For Growth III, L.P. the right to receive revenue payments comprised of 5% of total gross sales
revenue including payments and fees and resulting sales or disposals of our estroPLAN and GONAbreed products in the U.S. The term
of the revenue sharing agreement is through June 30, 2021, or until a maximum aggregate payment of $3.0 million has been made.
The Agreement may be terminated by us at any time upon payment of an early redemption fee of USD$3,000,000 less any revenue payments
already made. The agreement also provides that Partners For Growth III, L.P. is entitled to minimum payment of USD$3,000,000 upon
the change in control of the business. The Company's IPO did not trigger a change of control event as stipulated in the agreement.
Covenants imposed by the lender required that Earnings before Income Tax,
Interest, Depreciation and Amortization ("EBITDA") for the prior twelve months was not less than AUD$3,000,000, that
a current ratio of 1.25:1.0 be maintained, and a minimum net worth of AUD$12,500,000 be maintained. The loan facility was extinguished
in February 2014 and a charge for unamortized borrowing costs of AUD$75,053 was recorded upon extinguishment. The Company was in
breach of its covenants at the time the facility was extinguished. The revenue sharing agreement remains in place in accordance
with the terms above and the Group accrued AUD$496,407, AUD$109,885, AUD$191,042 and AUD$17,901 in current liabilities as of December
31, 2016, December 31, 2015, June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.
2011 Convertible Bonds
In March 2011, the parent entity issued 12% convertible notes for USD$6,250,000.
The notes were convertible into ordinary shares of the parent entity, at the option of the holder, or repayable in March 2014.
The conversion rate is AUD$0.3710526 (AUD$3.71 after ten for one share consolidation) for each note held, which is based on the
market price per share at the date of the issue of the notes, but subject to adjustments for reconstructions of equity. In January
2014, USD$2,042,105 of these 2011 Convertible Bonds converted into ordinary equity of the parent entity and USD$3,957,895 (AUD$4,495,317)
was redeemed.
The 2011 Convertible Bonds were registered by a second mortgage over all assets
of the Group. As at January 31, 2014, this second registered mortgage has been released.
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
14
|
Borrowings (continued)
|
2013 Parnell Bonds
The parent entity issued 10% 2013 Parnell Bonds totalling AUD$4,150,000 from
February 2013 to June 2013, with another AUD$150,000 issued in 2014 with the same terms. The bonds have a two year term with repayment
due between February and September 2015, but may be redeemed earlier by the Company. In addition, at maturity or upon a valuation
event, bondholders had the option to exercise an attached warrant for cash and/or share consideration at the election of the bondholder.
The amount of cash consideration is calculated at 20% of total bond investment and warrant shares are represented by the number
of bonds x 0.0000004% of the fully diluted share capital of the Company, as at the date of the valuation event.
On May 20, 2014, at the election of the 2013 Parnell bondholders, all of the
attached warrants issued with these 2013 Parnell Bonds were converted into 140,075 ordinary shares of the Company. Subsequent to
this conversion no further warrant obligations exist within the Company.
In 2015, the Company redeemed $1,455,000 of 2013 Parnell bonds in cash and
the remaining outstanding bonds were extended for an additional one-year term at the election of the bondholders.
In 2016, the outstanding bonds were extended for an additional one-year term
at the election of the bondholders.
The 2013 Parnell Bonds were registered by a third mortgage over all assets
of the Group, which upon full payment of the loan facility and term facility became a first ranking mortgage over all of the assets
of the Group.
SWK Holdings LLC Term Loan
In January 2014, the Group entered into a credit agreement with a U.S. based
lender, SWK Holdings LLC, for a seven year USD$25,000,000 senior secured credit facility. The credit facility was utilized to refinance
our previous senior debt facility of USD$9,900,000 with Partners For Growth, LLC, which was due to mature in June 2014, and to
redeem USD$3,957,895 of Convertible Bonds that were due to mature in March 2014. USD$2,000,000 was paid to Partners for Growth
III, L.P. to pay out a warrant attached to their facility. In addition, 2.0 million 2011 Convertible Bonds converted to ordinary
shares of the parent entity. Following the payment of fees and associated costs of establishing this new seven-year credit facility
of approximately AUD$1.45 million, USD$7,900,000 of funds were immediately available to us for working and growth capital. The
credit facility contained two financial covenants requiring us to retain a current asset ratio of greater than 1.25, after adjusting
for subordinated debt (2013 Parnell Bonds), and to maintain a level of last 12 months revenues greater than that stipulated in
the credit agreement, measured at the end of each quarter and increasing over time to a maximum of AUD$16,000,000 by quarter ending
December 31, 2017. In addition, the credit facility contained other customary affirmative and negative covenants.
In June 2014, the Company repaid the term loan balance of approximately USD$26,750,000,
inclusive of interest of USD$1,750,000, which equated to a total Internal Rate of return, or IRR, of 20%, from the proceeds of
the initial public offering. The unamortized borrowing costs of approximately AUD$1.26 million were charged to expense upon extinguishment
of the debt.
The SWK Holdings LLC term loan facility was registered by a first mortgage
over all assets of the Group. As at June 30, 2014, this first registered mortgage had been released.
MidCap Term Loan
In June 2015, the Company entered into a non-dilutive $USD11 million term
loan agreement with MidCap Financial. The Company intends to use the proceeds of the loan for the expansion of our Companion Animal
sales team in the US.
The Term Loan has a 45-month term, being interest only for the first 18 months
and straight-line amortization for the remaining 27 months. Parnell is able to extend the interest only period to the first 24
months of the term loan upon achieving certain revenue targets as stipulated in the agreement. Interest on the outstanding balance
is payable monthly in arrears at an annual rate of the one month LIBOR plus 7.45% subject to a LIBOR floor of 0.50%, current rate
of 7.95%. The Term Loan has no warrant coverage and is secured by substantially all of the Company's assets.
Covenants imposed by the lender include various customary negative covenants
and require that the Company maintain various levels of trailing twelve-month revenues that increase over the term of the loan.
As of December 31, 2015, and for the period from start of the loan to the period end date, the Company was in compliance with all
covenants.
In November 2016, the Company repaid the MidCap Term Loan balance of approximately
USD $11,751,000, inclusive of accrued interest and prepayment fees. The unamortized borrowing costs of approximately USD $380,537
were charged to expense upon extinguishment of the debt. The MidCap term loan was registered by a first mortgage over all assets
of the Group. As at December 31, 2016, this first registered mortgage has been released.
2016 Term Loan Facility
In November 2016, the Group entered into a credit arrangement with U.S. based
lenders, SWK Holdings LLC, HI PPH LLC, and R-S Healthcare Management for a four-year USD $20,000,000 senior security credit facility.
The credit facility was utilized to pay off our previous senior debt facility with MidCap Financial Services, LLC, which was due
to mature in 2020. Following the payment of fees and associated costs of establishing this new four-year credit facility of approximately
USD $692,248, USD $7,666,307 of funds were immediately available to us for working and growth capital. The credit facility contained
two financial covenants requiring the Company to maintain a ratio of fair market of its inventory to employee liabilities of 70%
and to have unencumbered liquid assets of greater than USD $1,000,000 as measured on the last day of any fiscal quarter. In addition,
the credit facility contained other customary affirmative and negative covenants.
2013 Parnell Bonds
|
|
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
CURRENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Face value of bonds*
|
|
|
4,300,000
|
|
|
|
4,300,000
|
|
|
|
4,300,000
|
|
Bond redemptions
|
|
|
(1,455,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,455,000
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Interest expense - current year**
|
|
|
289,528
|
|
|
|
337,494
|
|
|
|
216,768
|
|
Interest expense - brought forward
|
|
|
277,553
|
|
|
|
336,242
|
|
|
|
134,474
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
|
(292,893
|
)
|
|
|
(396,183
|
)
|
|
|
(15,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
3,119,188
|
|
|
|
3,122,553
|
|
|
|
4,636,242
|
|
* Movement in face value of notes issued relates to the movement in USD/AUD exchange rate and redemption of one bondholder during
the year. This movement has been recognized as part of the "net foreign exchange losses on borrowings".
** Interest expense is calculated by applying the effective interest rate
of 12% to the liability component for the 2011 Parnell bonds and 10% for the 2013 Parnell bonds.
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
15
|
Provision for Employee Benefits
|
|
|
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual leave
|
|
|
486,782
|
|
|
|
422,138
|
|
|
|
308,875
|
|
Long service leave
|
|
|
136,792
|
|
|
|
15,870
|
|
|
|
70,683
|
|
Total current employee benefits
|
|
|
623,574
|
|
|
|
438,008
|
|
|
|
379,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
|
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
|
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long service leave
|
|
|
85,528
|
|
|
|
153,781
|
|
|
|
74,364
|
|
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
|
|
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
Ordinary Class shares
|
|
|
63,522,251
|
|
|
|
55,343,451
|
|
|
|
55,343,451
|
|
Total
|
|
|
63,522,251
|
|
|
|
55,343,451
|
|
|
|
55,343,451
|
|
Movements in ordinary share capital
Date
|
|
Details
|
|
No of shares
|
|
Issue price
AUD$
|
|
AUD$
|
30/6/12
|
|
|
Opening balance
|
|
|
|
7,523,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,104,964
|
|
22/5/13
|
|
|
D Class Shares repurchased
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(549
|
)
|
30/6/13
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
7,518,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,104,415
|
|
28/1/14
|
|
|
Issue of CB Shares
|
|
|
|
625,048
|
|
|
|
3.71
|
|
|
|
2,318,994
|
|
20/5/14
|
|
|
Issues of 2013 Parnell Bond Shares (A Class shares)
|
|
|
|
140,075
|
|
|
|
6.37
|
|
|
|
860,000
|
|
6/6/14
|
|
|
Transfer of original A Class shares to Ordinary Class shares
|
|
|
|
(5,700,000
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
6/6/14
|
|
|
Transfer of 2013 Parnell Bond shares to Ordinary Class shares
|
|
|
|
(140,075
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
6/6/14
|
|
|
Transfer of all B Class shares to Ordinary Class shares
|
|
|
|
(923,050
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
6/6/14
|
|
|
Transfer of all C Class shares to Ordinary Class shares
|
|
|
|
(507,687
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
6/6/14
|
|
|
Transfer of all D Class shares to Ordinary Class shares
|
|
|
|
(20,000
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
6/6/14
|
|
|
Transfer of all E Class shares to Ordinary Class shares
|
|
|
|
(367,863
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
6/6/14
|
|
|
Transfer of all CB Class shares to Ordinary Class shares
|
|
|
|
(625,048
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
6/6/14
|
|
|
Transfer of all classes of shares to Ordinary Class
|
|
|
|
8,283,722
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
18/6/14
|
|
|
Issue of Ordinary Shares
|
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
|
10.61
|
|
|
|
53,067,289
|
|
18/6/14
|
|
|
Commission and issuance costs of initial public offering
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(5,724,638
|
)
|
18/6/14
|
|
|
Tax effect relating to commission and insurance costs of initial public offering
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,717,391
|
|
30/6/14
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
13,283,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,343,451
|
|
31/12/14
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
13,283,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,343,451
|
|
31/12/15
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
13,283,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,343,451
|
|
Feb 16 - Oct 16
|
|
|
Equity line facility
|
|
|
|
855,914
|
|
|
|
2.68
|
|
|
|
2,468,150
|
|
Feb 16 - Oct 16
|
|
|
Equity issuance costs
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(242,775
|
)
|
Feb 16 - Oct 16
|
|
|
Tax effect relating to equity issuance costs
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
72,832
|
|
2/1/16
|
|
|
Employee Issuance 2015 RSU grants
|
|
|
|
131,407
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
2/1/16
|
|
|
Issue of Ladenburg shares
|
|
|
|
2,930,500
|
|
|
|
2.23
|
|
|
|
6,568,314
|
|
2/1/16
|
|
|
Ladenburg shares equity issuance costs
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(982,459
|
)
|
2/1/16
|
|
|
Tax effect relating to Ladenburg issuance costs
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
294,738
|
|
30/12/16
|
|
|
Employee share issuance
|
|
|
|
944,217
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
31/12/16
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
18,145,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,522,251
|
|
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
16
|
Ordinary shares (continued)
|
On April 28, 2014, the shareholders and the directors of the Group approved
a ten for one consolidation of shares, which had the effect of a reverse share split that became effective on June 6, 2014 when
the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) altered the registration details of the parent entity. All share, per
share and related information presented in these consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes has been retroactively
adjusted, where applicable, to reflect the impact of the reverse share split.
On June 18, 2014, the Company completed an initial public offering of 5,000,000
shares on the NASDAQ Global Market at a share price of USD$10.00 (AUD$10.61) per share resulting in proceeds of AUD$53,067,289.
The proceeds were partially offset by commissions and issuance costs of AUD$5,724,638 for net proceeds of AUD$47,363,267.
On January 11, 2016, the Company entered into a purchase agreement (the "Purchase
Agreement"), and a registration rights agreement (the "Registration Rights Agreement") with Lincoln Park Capital
Fund, LLC ("Lincoln Park").
Under the terms and subject to the conditions of the Purchase Agreement, the
Company has the right to sell to and Lincoln Park is obligated to purchase up to $15,000,000 in amounts of ordinary shares of the
Company, no par value ("Ordinary Shares") as described below, subject to certain limitations, from time to time, over
the 36-month period commencing on the date that a registration statement, which the Company agreed to file with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement, is declared effective by the SEC and
a final prospectus in connection therewith is filed (the "Commencement Date"). The Company may direct Lincoln Park, at
its sole discretion and subject to certain conditions, to purchase up to 35,000 shares of Ordinary Shares on any business day,
increasing to up to 55,000 shares depending upon the closing sale price of the Ordinary Shares (such purchases, "Regular Purchases").
However, in no event shall a Regular Purchase be more than $500,000. The purchase price of Ordinary Shares related to the future
funding will be based on the prevailing market prices of such shares at the time of sales. In addition, the Company may direct
Lincoln Park to purchase additional amounts as accelerated purchases if on the date of a Regular Purchase the closing sale price
of the Ordinary Shares is not below the threshold price as set forth in the Purchase Agreement.
As consideration for entering into the Purchase Agreement, the Company initially
issued to Lincoln Park 47,746 Ordinary Shares and is required to issue up to 38,197 additional Ordinary Shares pro rata as the
Company requires Lincoln Park to purchase the Company's shares under the Purchase Agreement over the term of the agreement. The
net proceeds under the Purchase Agreement to the Company will depend on the frequency and prices at which the Company sells shares
to Lincoln Park. The Company expects that any proceeds received by the Company from such sales to Lincoln Park under the Purchase
Agreement will be used for general corporate purposes and working capital requirements. This registration statement was terminated
on December 21, 2016.
On February 23, 2016, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement
(the “Purchase Agreement”) with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (“Lincoln Park”). In recognition of Lincoln
Park’s belief in our company’s business and the potential value, under the terms and subject to the conditions of the
Purchase Agreement, the Company will issue and sell to Lincoln Park, and Lincoln Park will purchase from the Company, at the closing
(a) 175,000 ordinary shares (the “Initial Shares”) at a price of $3.50 per share and (b) a Warrant to purchase up to
an additional 150,000 ordinary shares (the “Warrant Shares”) for a purchase price of $5.00 per share (the “Warrant”).
Lincoln Park represented to the Company, among other things, that it was an “accredited investor” (as such term is
defined in Rule 501 (a) of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the
Company is selling the Initial Shares and the Warrant Shares in reliance upon an exemption from registration contained in Section
4(2) under the Securities Act. The securities sold may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable
exemption from registration requirements. The Purchase Agreement and the Warrant contain customary representations, warranties,
agreements and conditions. The Company expects that the net proceeds received by the Company from such sales to Lincoln Park under
the Purchase Agreement and the Warrant will be used for general corporate purposes and working capital requirements.
The representations, warranties and covenants contained in the aforementioned
agreements were made only for purposes of such agreements and as of specific dates, were solely for the benefit of the parties
to such agreements, and may be subject to limitations agreed upon by the contracting parties, including being qualified by confidential
disclosures exchanged between the parties in connection with execution of the agreements.
On May 17, 2016, the Company completed a secondary public offering of 2,550,000
shares on the NASDAQ at a share price of USD$1.65 per share resulting in gross proceeds of USD$4,207,500. The proceeds were partially
offset by commissions and issuance costs of USD$252,450 for net proceeds of USD$3,955,050.
On June 8, 2016, the underwriters of the secondary public offering elected
to take-up 380,500 overallotment shares on the NASDAQ at a share price of USD$1.65 per share resulting in gross proceeds of USD$627,825.
The proceeds were partially offset by commissions and issuance costs of USD$37,669 for net proceeds of USD$590,156.
There were no other movements in other classes of ordinary shares in 2015,
2014 and 2013, other than those previously discussed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
Ordinary shares of the Company have no par value.
Basic and diluted net loss per share calculated for the Group have been disclosed
in the Statements of Comprehensive Loss.
A reconciliation of the net loss used in calculating net loss per share is
included below:
|
|
12 months to 31
December 2016
AUD$
|
|
12 months to 31
December 2015
AUD$
|
|
6 months to 31
December 2014
AUD$
|
|
12 months to 30
June 2014
AUD$
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss for the year
|
|
|
(21,691,443
|
)
|
|
|
(13,737,532
|
)
|
|
|
(1,428,522
|
)
|
|
|
(17,333,322
|
)
|
A calculation of the weighted average number of shares used for the denominator
is included below:
|
|
12 months to 31
December 2016
|
|
12 months to 31
December 2015
|
|
6 months to 31
December 2014
|
|
12 months to
30 June 2014
|
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in the basic and diluted net loss per share calculation
|
|
|
15,809,277
|
|
|
|
13,283,722
|
|
|
|
13,283,722
|
|
|
|
7,690,723
|
|
A summary of the conversion details relating to the different classes of bonds
is included in Note 14.
The Group's objectives when managing capital are to safeguard their ability
to continue as a going concern, so that they can continue to provide returns for shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders,
and to maintain an optimal capital structure to reduce the cost of capital.
In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Group may adjust
the amount of dividends paid to shareholders, return capital to shareholders, issue new shares or sell assets to reduce debt. Consistently
with others in the industry, the Group monitors capital on the basis of the gearing ratio. The ratio is calculated as net debt
divided by total capital. Net debt is calculated as total borrowings (including 'borrowings' and 'derivatives' as shown in the
balance sheet) less cash and cash equivalents. Total capital is calculated as 'equity' as shown in the balance sheet plus net debt.
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
16
|
Ordinary shares (continued)
|
The gearing ratios at 31 December 2016, 31 December 2015, 31 December 2014,
30 June 2014 and 30 June 2013 were as follows:
|
|
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
|
30 June
2014
AUD$
|
Total indebtedness and derivatives
|
|
|
30,768,946
|
|
|
|
18,178,671
|
|
|
|
4,685,420
|
|
|
|
4,597,706
|
|
Less: cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(7,115,498
|
)
|
|
|
(5,666,679
|
)
|
|
|
(15,819,417
|
)
|
|
|
(20,804,339
|
)
|
Net debt
|
|
|
23,653,448
|
|
|
|
12,511,992
|
|
|
|
(11,133,997
|
)
|
|
|
(16,206,633
|
)
|
Total equity (default)
|
|
|
8,063,698
|
|
|
|
20,254,801
|
|
|
|
33,885,082
|
|
|
|
36,776,220
|
|
Total capital
|
|
|
31,717,146
|
|
|
|
38,433,472
|
|
|
|
38,570,502
|
|
|
|
41,373,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gearing ratio
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
The increase in the gearing ratio for 2016 resulted primarily from the increase
in borrowings to fund our operations. The increase in the gearing ratio during 2015 resulted primarily from the increase in borrowings
to fund our operations and development of a Companion Animal sales team. In 2014, the large majority of our borrowings were paid
down from funds raised at IPO, resulting in the reduction in the gearing ratio.
|
|
12 months to 31
December 2016
AUD$
|
|
12 months to 31
December 2015
AUD$
|
|
6 months to 31
December 2014
AUD$
|
|
12 months to 30
June 2014
AUD$
|
Foreign currency translation reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance
|
|
|
(3,214,558
|
)
|
|
|
(1,585,035
|
)
|
|
|
(150,800
|
)
|
|
|
366,725
|
|
Currency translation differences arising during the period
|
|
|
(727,603
|
)
|
|
|
(1,629,523
|
)
|
|
|
(1,434,235
|
)
|
|
|
(517,525
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3,942,161
|
)
|
|
|
(3,214,558
|
)
|
|
|
(1,585,035
|
)
|
|
|
(150,800
|
)
|
Share-based compensation reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance
|
|
|
1,708,388
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
2,049,148
|
|
|
|
1,708,388
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
3,757,536
|
|
|
|
1,708,388
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
(a)
|
Foreign currency translation reserve
|
Exchange differences arising on translation of the foreign controlled entity
are recognized in other comprehensive income - foreign currency translation reserve. The cumulative amount is reclassified to profit
or loss when the net investment is disposed of.
|
|
12 months to 31
December 2016
AUD$
|
|
12 months to 31
December 2015
AUD$
|
|
6 months to 31
December 2014
AUD$
|
|
12 months to 30
June 2014
AUD$
|
Accumulated losses at the beginning of the financial period
|
|
|
(33,582,485
|
)
|
|
|
(19,844,953
|
)
|
|
|
(18,416,431
|
)
|
|
|
(1,083,109
|
)
|
Loss for the period
|
|
|
(21,691,443
|
)
|
|
|
(13,737,532
|
)
|
|
|
(1,428,522
|
)
|
|
|
(17,333,322
|
)
|
Accumulated losses at end of the financial period
|
|
|
(55,273,928
|
)
|
|
|
(33,582,485
|
)
|
|
|
(19,844,953
|
)
|
|
|
(18,416,431
|
)
|
19
|
Capital and Leasing Commitments
|
|
|
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
|
30 June
2014
AUD$
|
Minimum lease payments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- not later than one year
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
50,439
|
|
|
|
170,693
|
|
- between one year and five years
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Minimum lease payments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
50,439
|
|
|
|
170,693
|
|
Less: finance changes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,261
|
)
|
|
|
(7,461
|
)
|
Present value of minimum lease payments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
49,178
|
|
|
|
163,232
|
|
The Group leases various plant and equipment expiring within one and four
years. The leases have purchase options.
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
19
|
Capital and Leasing Commitments (continued)
|
|
|
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
|
30 June
2014
AUD$
|
Minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- not later than one year
|
|
|
1,160,056
|
|
|
|
1,056,875
|
|
|
|
873,706
|
|
|
|
601,826
|
|
- between one year and five years
|
|
|
4,289,646
|
|
|
|
4,753,257
|
|
|
|
4,057,802
|
|
|
|
2,209,113
|
|
- later than five years
|
|
|
2,306,881
|
|
|
|
2,903,257
|
|
|
|
2,837,057
|
|
|
|
825,821
|
|
|
|
|
7,756,583
|
|
|
|
8,713,389
|
|
|
|
7,768,565
|
|
|
|
3,636,760
|
|
The Group leases various offices, warehouses and equipment under non-cancellable
operating leases expiring within 6 months to 10 years. The leases have varying terms, escalation clauses and renewal rights. On
renewal, the terms of these leases are renegotiated.
20
|
Financial Risk Management
|
The Group is exposed to a variety of financial risks through its use of financial
instruments.
This note discloses the Group‘s objectives, policies and processes
for managing and measuring these risks.
The Group‘s overall risk management plan seeks to minimize potential
adverse effects due to the unpredictability of financial markets.
The Group does not speculate in financial instruments.
The most significant financial risks to which the Group is exposed to are
described below:
Specific risks
|
·
|
Market risk - currency risk and cash flow interest rate risk
|
Financial instruments used
The principal categories of financial instrument used by the Group are:
|
·
|
Trade and other payables
|
Objectives, policies and processes
Risk management is carried out by the Group’s Risk Management Committee
under the delegated power from the Board of Directors. The Finance Manager has primary responsibility for the development of relevant
policies and procedures to mitigate the risk exposure of the Group, these policies and procedures are then approved by the risk
management committee and tabled at the board meeting following their approval.
Reports are presented at each Board meeting regarding the implementation
of these policies and any risk exposure which the Risk Management Committee believes the Board should be aware of.
Specific information regarding the mitigation of each financial risk to which
Group is exposed is provided below.
Credit risk
Exposure to credit risk relating to financial assets arises from the potential
non-performance by counterparties of contract obligations that could lead to a financial loss to the Group and arises principally
from the Group's receivables.
It is the Group’s policy that all customers who wish to trade on credit
terms undergo a credit assessment process which takes into account the customer’s financial position, past experience and
other factors. Credit limits are then set based on ratings in accordance with the limits set by the Board of Directors, these limits
are reviewed on a regular basis.
Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk arises from the Group’s management of working capital
and the finance charges and principal repayments on its debt instruments. It is the risk that the Group will encounter difficulty
in meeting its financial obligations as they fall due.
The Group’s policy is to ensure that it will always have sufficient
cash to allow it to meet its liabilities when they become due. The Group maintains cash and marketable securities to meet its liquidity
requirements for up to 30-day periods. Funding for long-term liquidity needs is additionally secured by an adequate amount of committed
credit facilities and the ability to sell long-term financial assets.
The Group manages its liquidity needs by carefully monitoring scheduled debt
servicing payments for long-term financial liabilities as well as cash-outflows due in day-to-day business.
Liquidity needs are monitored in various time bands, on a day-to-day and
week-to-week basis, as well as on the basis of a rolling 30-day projection. Long-term liquidity needs for a 180-day and a 360-day
period are identified monthly.
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
20
|
Financial Risk Management (continued)
|
At the reporting date, these reports indicate that the Group expected to
have sufficient liquid resources to meet its obligations under all reasonably expected circumstances.
The Group’s liabilities have contractual maturities which are summarized
below:
|
|
Not later than 1 month
|
|
1 to 3 months
|
|
3 months to 1 year
|
|
1 to 5 years
|
|
|
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
Borrowings and warrants (excluding finance leases)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
120,505
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,197,814
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
767,862
|
|
|
|
30,815,195
|
|
|
|
16,303,894
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
6,574,475
|
|
|
|
4,901,414
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
|
6,574,475
|
|
|
|
5,021,919
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,197,814
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
767,862
|
|
|
|
30,815,195
|
|
|
|
16,303,894
|
|
Market risk
(i) Foreign currency sensitivity
Most of the Group's transactions are carried out in Australian Dollars. Exposures
to currency exchange rates arise from the Group's overseas sales and purchases, which are primarily denominated in US dollars,
Canadian dollars and New Zealand dollars.
To mitigate the Group's exposure to foreign currency risk, non-Australian
Dollar cash flows are monitored in accordance with Group‘s risk management policies.
In order to monitor the effectiveness of this policy, the Board receives
a monthly report showing the settlement date of transactions denominated in non-Australian Dollar currencies and expected cash
reserves in that currency.
Foreign currency denominated financial assets and liabilities, translated
into Australian Dollars at the closing rate, are as follows:
|
|
Consolidated
|
31 December 2016
|
|
USD
$
|
|
CAD
$
|
|
CHF
$
|
|
GBP
$
|
|
NZD
$
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
2,018,666
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Borrowing cost asset
|
|
|
926,776
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
(2,918,538
|
)
|
|
|
(256
|
)
|
|
|
(1,427,072
|
)
|
|
|
(4,598
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Loan facility
|
|
|
(27,639,580
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 December 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
2,519,081
|
|
|
|
703,863
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
26,834
|
|
Borrowing cost asset
|
|
|
702,915
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
(1,489,500
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,549,992
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,566
|
)
|
Loan facility
|
|
|
(15,056,118
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 December 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
1,330,249
|
|
|
|
482,808
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
54,979
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
(3,108,183
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,916,913
|
)
|
|
|
(427
|
)
|
|
|
(3,582
|
)
|
The following table illustrates the sensitivity of the net result for the
period and equity in regards to the Group‘s financial assets and financial liabilities and the US Dollar, Canadian Dollar
and New Zealand Dollar to the Australian dollar exchange rate. There have been no changes in the assumptions calculating this sensitivity
from prior periods.
It assumes a +/- 10% change of the Australian Dollar/foreign currency exchange
rate for the period ended 31 December 2016 (31 December 2015, 31 December 2014 and 30 June 2014: $10%). This percentages has been
determined based on the average market volatility in exchange rates in the previous 12 months.
The sensitivity analysis is based on the foreign currency financial instruments
held at the reporting date.
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
20
|
Financial Risk Management (continued)
|
If the Australian dollar had strengthened and weakened against the following
currencies by 10% (31 December 2015: 10%, 31 December 2014: 10% and 30 June 2014: 10%) then this would have had the following impact:
|
|
31 December 2016
|
|
31 December 2015
|
|
31 December 2014
|
|
|
+10%
|
|
-10%
|
|
+10%
|
|
-10%
|
|
+10%
|
|
-10%
|
USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net results/equity impact
|
|
|
1,312,791
|
|
|
|
(2,036,346
|
)
|
|
|
1,028,274
|
|
|
|
(934,795
|
)
|
|
|
(34,494
|
)
|
|
|
31,358
|
|
CAD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net results/equity impact
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
68,241
|
|
|
|
(62,037
|
)
|
|
|
43,739
|
|
|
|
(39,762
|
)
|
NZD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net results/equity impact
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,820
|
|
|
|
(2,564
|
)
|
|
|
5,905
|
|
|
|
(5,368
|
)
|
GBP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net results
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
CHF
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net results
|
|
|
(77,809
|
)
|
|
|
70,735
|
|
|
|
(154,999
|
)
|
|
|
140,908
|
|
|
|
(191,946
|
)
|
|
|
174,496
|
|
Exposures to foreign exchange rates vary during the year depending on the
volume of overseas transactions. Nonetheless, the analysis above is considered to be representative of the Group's exposure to
foreign currency risk.
(ii) Cash flow interest rate sensitivity
The Group was exposed to interest rate risk as the loan facility funds borrowed
in 2013, 2014 and 2015 were at floating rates.
At December 31, 2014, the Group was not exposed to changes in market interest
rates as all borrowings had been settled in the prior period.
The following table illustrates the sensitivity of the net result for the
year and equity to a reasonably possible change in interest rates of +0.75% and -0.75% (31 December 2015: +0.75%/-0.75%), with
effect from the beginning of the period. These changes are considered to be reasonably possible based on observation of current
market conditions.
The calculations are based on the financial instruments held at each reporting
date. All other variables are held constant.
|
|
12 months to 31 December 2016
|
|
12 months to 31 December 2015
|
|
6 months to 31 December 2014
|
|
|
+0.75%
|
|
-0.75%
|
|
+0.75%
|
|
-0.75%
|
|
+0.75%
|
|
-0.75%
|
|
|
AUD$
|
|
AUD$
|
|
AUD$
|
|
AUD$
|
|
AUD$
|
|
AUD$
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net results
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(538,245
|
)
|
|
|
538,245
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
The 2016 Term Loan facility is a fixed rate facility; as such there is no
interest sensitivity on this facility.
Credit risk
Credit risk refers to the risk that counterparties will default on its contractual
obligations resulting in a financial loss to the Group.
Credit risk arises from cash and cash equivalents, derivative financial instruments
and deposits with banks and financial institutions, as well as credit exposure to wholesale and retail customers, including outstanding
receivables and committed transactions.
The Group has adopted a policy of only dealing with creditworthy counterparties
as a means of mitigating the risk of financial loss from defaults. The utilization of credit limits by customers is regularly monitored
by line management. Customers who subsequently fail to meet their credit terms are required to make purchases on a prepayment basis
until creditworthiness can be re-established.
Trade receivables consist of a large number of customers, spread across diverse
industries and geographical areas. Ongoing credit evaluation is performed on the financial condition of accounts receivable.
The five largest trade receivables balance total $1,922,638 as at 31 December,
2016.
The Board receives monthly reports summarising the turnover, trade receivables
balance and aging profile of each of the key customers individually and the Group's other customers analyzed by industry sector
as well as a list of customers currently transacting on a prepayment basis or who have balances in excess of their credit limits.
Refer to Note 7.
Management considers that all the financial assets that are not impaired
for each of the reporting dates under review are of good credit quality, including those that are past due.
The credit risk for liquid funds and other short-term financial assets is
considered negligible, since the counterparties are reputable banks with high quality external credit ratings.
Credit quality
|
|
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
Cash at bank
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AA-
|
|
|
572,979
|
|
|
|
1,036,303
|
|
|
|
15,450,295
|
|
A-
|
|
|
6,542,519
|
|
|
|
4,628,939
|
|
|
|
369,537
|
|
|
|
|
7,115,498
|
|
|
|
5,665,242
|
|
|
|
15,819,832
|
|
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
20
|
Financial Risk Management (continued)
|
Fair value estimation
The fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities are presented
in the following table and can be compared to their carrying values as presented in the consolidated balance sheet. Fair values
are those amounts at which an asset could be exchanged, or a liability settled, between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm’s
length transaction.
Fair values derived may be based on information that is estimated or subject
to judgment, where changes in assumptions may have a material impact on the amounts estimated. Areas of judgment and the assumptions
have been detailed below. Where possible, valuation information used to calculate fair value is extracted from the market, with
more reliable information available from markets that are actively traded. In this regard, fair values for listed securities are
obtained from quoted market bid prices. Where securities are unlisted and no market quotes are available, fair value is obtained
using discounted cash flow analysis and other valuation techniques commonly used by market participants.
|
|
31 December 2016
|
|
31 December 2015
|
|
31 December 2014
|
|
|
Net Carrying
Value
AUD$
|
|
Net Fair
Value
AUD$
|
|
Net Carrying
Value
AUD$
|
|
Net Fair
Value
AUD$
|
|
Net Carrying
Value
AUD$
|
|
Net Fair
Value
AUD$
|
Financial liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term loan
|
|
|
27,639,580
|
|
|
|
31,232,725
|
|
|
|
15,056,118
|
|
|
|
16,207,911
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
2013 Parnell bonds
|
|
|
3,119,188
|
|
|
|
3,774,218
|
|
|
|
3,122,553
|
|
|
|
3,778,289
|
|
|
|
4,636,242
|
|
|
|
5,562,604
|
|
Lease liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
49,178
|
|
|
|
50,439
|
|
|
|
|
30,758,768
|
|
|
|
35,006,943
|
|
|
|
18,178,671
|
|
|
|
19,986,200
|
|
|
|
4,685,420
|
|
|
|
5,613,043
|
|
21
|
Key Management Personnel Disclosures
|
Key management personnel remuneration included within employee expenses for
the period is shown below:
|
|
12 months to 31
December 2016
AUD$
|
|
12 months to 31
December 2015
AUD$
|
|
6 months to 31
December 2014
AUD$
|
|
12 months to 30
June 2014
AUD$
|
Short-term employee benefits
|
|
|
2,082,476
|
|
|
|
1,942,772
|
|
|
|
651,012
|
|
|
|
1,702,398
|
|
Long-term benefits
|
|
|
22,692
|
|
|
|
70,778
|
|
|
|
17,874
|
|
|
|
5,967
|
|
Share-based payments
|
|
|
837,358
|
|
|
|
1,032,053
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
2,942,526
|
|
|
|
3,045,603
|
|
|
|
668,886
|
|
|
|
1,708,365
|
|
For the purposes of this note, Key Management Personnel has been assessed
as being the Board of Directors, which includes the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer.
Other key management personnel transactions
For details of other transactions with key management personnel, refer to
Note 26: Related Party Transactions.
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
22
|
Remuneration of Auditors
|
|
|
12 months to
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
12 months to
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
6 months to 31
December
2014
AUD$
|
|
12 months to
30 June
2014
AUD$
|
Remuneration of the auditor of the parent entity, PricewaterhouseCoopers Australia, for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- auditing or reviewing the financial report
|
|
|
270,000
|
|
|
|
352,500
|
|
|
|
245,000
|
|
|
|
205,000
|
|
-
SEC Registration statements
|
|
|
425,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
- taxation services
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
33,520
|
|
|
|
76,750
|
|
|
|
101,458
|
|
- assurance services relating to IPO
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
|
|
389,950
|
|
- auditing or reviewing of financial information for IPO
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
Total remuneration of PricewaterhouseCoopers Australia
|
|
|
740,000
|
|
|
|
386,020
|
|
|
|
406,750
|
|
|
|
916,408
|
|
23
|
Interests in Subsidiaries
|
The parent entity within the Group is Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Limited,
which changed its name from Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Pty Limited on June 6, 2014 upon becoming a public entity. There is
no ultimate parent entity above the Group.
(a)
|
Composition of the Group
|
|
|
Principal place of
business / Country of
Incorporation
|
|
Percentage
Owned (%)*
31 December
2016
|
|
Percentage
Owned (%)*
31 December
2015
|
|
Percentage
Owned (%)*
31 December
2014
|
|
Percentage
Owned (%)*
30 June
2014
|
Subsidiaries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parnell Technologies Pty Limited
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Pty Limited
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Parnell Laboratories (Aust) Pty Limited
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Parnell, Inc.
|
|
United States of America
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Parnell Technologies NZ Pty Limited
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Parnell Technologies (UK) Limited
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Australian Pharma Services Pty Limited
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Parnell Manufacturing Pty Limited
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Parnell Corporate Services Pty Limited
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Parnell Australia Pty Limited
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Parnell North America Pty Limited
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Parnell Europe Pty Limited
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Parnell NZ Co Limited
|
|
New Zealand
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Parnell Group Pty Limited
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Parnell Corporate Services U.S., Inc.
|
|
United States of America
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Parnell U.S. 1, Inc.
|
|
United States of America
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Veterinary Investigative Services, Inc.
|
|
United States of America
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
*The percentage of ownership interest held is equivalent to the percentage
voting rights for all subsidiaries.
24
|
Fair Value Measurement
|
The Group measures the following assets and liabilities at fair value on
a recurring basis:
Fair value hierarchy
All assets and liabilities measured at fair value are required to be assigned
to a level in the fair value hierarchy as follows:
Level 1
|
|
|
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity can access at the measurement date.
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
|
|
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
24
|
Fair Value Measurement (continued)
|
Unobservable inputs and sensitivities relating to 2013:
Description
|
Fair value at 30
June 2013
AUD$
|
Valuation
technique
|
Unobservable
inputs
|
Range of inputs
(probability weighted average)
|
Relationship of
unobservable inputs to fair value
|
Derivatives
|
224,169
|
Discounted cash flows
|
Weighted average forward foreign exchange rate
|
5 - 50% (25%)
|
A change in the weighted average forward foreign exchange rate of +/- 5% would change fair value by AUD$229,554 and (AUD$501,237) respectively.
|
Warrants
|
2,952,954
|
Discounted cash flows
|
Risk adjusted discount rate
|
10% - 20% (15%)
|
A change in the discount rate by 50bps would not increase/decrease the fair value of the warrants.
|
Valuation process
The finance function of the group includes a team that performs the valuations
of non-property assets required for financial reporting purposes, including level 3 fair values. The team reports directly to the
Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and the Board of Directors. Discussion of the valuation processes and results are held between the
CFO, Board of Directors and the finance function at least once every twelve months, in line with the Group's annual reporting dates.
Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (level 3)
The main level 3 inputs used by the Group in measuring the fair value of
the financial instruments are derived and evaluated as follows:
|
·
|
Weighted average forward foreign exchange rates: these are determined using expected future foreign exchange rates based on
the information available at each reporting date.
|
|
·
|
Discount rates: these are determined using a capital asset pricing model to calculate a pre-tax rate that reflects current
market assessments of the time value of money and the risk specific to the asset.
|
Changes in level 2 and 3 fair values are analysed at each reporting date
during the annual valuation discussion between the CFO, Board of Directors and the finance function.
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
In the opinion of management, the Group did not have any material contingencies
at December 31, 2016 (December 31, 2015: None, December 31, 2014: None, June 30, 2014: None).
Transactions between related parties are on normal commercial terms and conditions
no more favourable than those available to other parties unless otherwise stated.
Transaction with related parties:
|
|
12 months to
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
12 months to 31
December
2015
AUD$
|
|
6 months to
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
|
12 months to
30 June
2014
AUD$
|
Contributions to superannuation funds on behalf of employees
|
|
|
345,243
|
|
|
|
321,176
|
|
|
|
154,775
|
|
|
|
312,303
|
|
Repayment of loans to related parties (employees)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
60,416
|
|
Repayment of loan from directors
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
64,063
|
|
Rental and outgoings amounts paid to a Company controlled by a director
|
|
|
572,778
|
|
|
|
566,427
|
|
|
|
275,274
|
|
|
|
551,056
|
|
Interest paid/payable to associated connected to related parties for the 2013 Parnell Bonds
|
|
|
156,442
|
|
|
|
162,000
|
|
|
|
87,463
|
|
|
|
75,812
|
|
Consulting fees paid to a director
|
|
|
218,587
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
In addition to the above, $175,000 of 2013 Parnell Bonds were redeemed in
the six months ended June 30, 2015 (2016: $Nil, 2014: $Nil) from associates connected to related parties and an additional $2,886,923
of 2013 Parnell Bonds to associates were extended by an additional one-year term.
The Company also issued 13,386 Restricted Stock Units and 31,949 stock options
to directors of the Company in the year ended December 31, 2016 (six months ended June 30, 2015: 68,909 and 488,515 respectively,
year ended December 31, 2014: Nil).
Related Parties
The Group's main related parties are as follows:
(i) Key management personnel:
Any person(s) having authority and responsibility for planning, directing
and controlling the activities of the entity, directly or indirectly, including any director (whether executive or otherwise) of
that entity are considered key management personnel.
For the purposes of this note, Key Management Personnel has been assessed
as being the Board of Directors.
For details of remuneration disclosures relating to key management personnel,
refer to Note 21: Interests of Key Management Personnel (KMP).
Other transactions with KMP and their related entities are shown below.
(ii) Subsidiaries:
The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Limited and those entities disclosed in note 23.
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
Reconciliation of result for the year to cash flows from operating
activities
|
|
12 months to
31 December
2016
AUD$
|
|
12 months to
31 December
2015
AUD$
|
|
6 months to
31 December
2014
AUD$
|
|
12 months to
30 June
2014
AUD$
|
Net (loss) attributable to members
|
|
|
(21,691,443
|
)
|
|
|
(13,737,532
|
)
|
|
|
(1,428,522
|
)
|
|
|
(17,333,322
|
)
|
Cash flows excluded
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Capitalized finance costs
|
|
|
(302,699
|
)
|
|
|
(837,965
|
)
|
|
|
263,296
|
|
|
|
215,512
|
|
- Bad debts expense
|
|
|
4,286
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Non-cash flows in profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,622,197
|
|
|
|
1,478,563
|
|
|
|
691,762
|
|
|
|
1,253,772
|
|
- Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
2,049,118
|
|
|
|
1,708,388
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
- net gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,722
|
)
|
|
|
9,020
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
- tax effect on IPO transaction costs
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,717,391
|
|
- net exchange differences
|
|
|
1,006,886
|
|
|
|
(2,765,797
|
)
|
|
|
(4,022,876
|
)
|
|
|
(943,061
|
)
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- decrease/(increase) in trade and other receivables
|
|
|
3,125,955
|
|
|
|
(1,316,701
|
)
|
|
|
(74,407
|
)
|
|
|
(1,562,561
|
)
|
- (increase) in inventories
|
|
|
(195,965
|
)
|
|
|
(670,969
|
)
|
|
|
(746,114
|
)
|
|
|
(102,696
|
)
|
- decrease/(increase) in other assets
|
|
|
114,400
|
|
|
|
153,278
|
|
|
|
(138,465
|
)
|
|
|
555,888
|
|
- (decrease) in capitalized debt interest
|
|
|
(3,365
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
- decrease in deferred tax assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,021,026
|
|
- increase/(decrease) in trade and other payables
|
|
|
1,037,804
|
|
|
|
1,047,718
|
|
|
|
(266,019
|
)
|
|
|
2,180,722
|
|
- decrease in income tax incentives receivable
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
812,141
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,275,282
|
|
- decrease in deferred tax liability
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
215,962
|
|
- increase/(decrease) in deferred revenue
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
181,298
|
|
|
|
315,287
|
|
|
|
(33,258
|
)
|
- increase in employee benefits
|
|
|
117,312
|
|
|
|
137,867
|
|
|
|
30,730
|
|
|
|
84,638
|
|
- (decrease) in other provisions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,605,521
|
)
|
|
|
(51,263
|
)
|
|
|
(1,219
|
)
|
Cash flow used in operating activities
|
|
|
(12,115,514
|
)
|
|
|
(16,416,954
|
)
|
|
|
(5,417,571
|
)
|
|
|
(11,455,924
|
)
|
The Company established the 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the "2014
Plan") in June 2014 to allow for the issuance of up to 1,500,000 shares to officers and employees, and other individuals,
including non-employee directors. The Company amended the Plan in May 2015 increasing the available shares for issuance to 3,000,000
shares. The Company may issue share options, share awards, share units, performance shares, performance units, and other share-based
awards to eligible individuals. The 2014 Plan is administered by the Company's board of directors. All awards are evidenced by
a written agreement between the Company and the holder of the award. The board of directors has the authority to construe or interpret
the terms of the 2014 Plan and awards granted under the 2014 Plan.
Pursuant to the 2014 Plan the board of directors approved the initial issuance
of stock option and restricted stock units during the year ended December 31, 2015.
The fair value of each share option is estimated on the date of grant using
the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Company historically has been a private company and lacks company-specific historical
and implied volatility information. Therefore, it estimates its expected share volatility based on the historical volatility of
its publicly traded peer companies and expects to do so until such time as it has adequate historical data regarding the volatility
of its own traded share price. The risk-free interest rate is determined by reference to the appropriate reserve bank yield in
effect at the time of grant of the award for time periods approximately equal to the expected term of the award. The expected term
is determined based on the life of the grant of 10 years. Expected dividend yield is based on the fact that the Company has never
paid cash dividends and does not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The fair value of the underlying ordinary
shares is determined by the closing price of our ordinary shares on the NASDAQ Global Market. The fair value of the share options
was estimated using the following assumptions:
|
|
12 months ended
December 31, 2016
|
|
12 months ended
December 31, 2015
|
Share price at grant date per ordinary share
|
|
|
$2.26 - $2.60
|
|
|
|
$4.38 - $4.77
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
1.82 - 1.85%
|
|
|
|
1.89 - 2.55%
|
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
44% - 48%
|
|
|
|
37%
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
zero
|
|
|
|
zero
|
|
If any assumptions used in the option-pricing model changed significantly,
share-based compensation for future awards may differ materially from the awards granted previously.
The following table summarizes share option activity for the year ended December
31, 2016:
|
|
Shares Issuable
Under Options
|
|
Weighted- Average
Exercise Price
|
|
Weighted- Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
(in years)
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2015
|
|
|
529,591
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
846,939
|
|
|
|
4.04
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Expired or forfeited
|
|
|
(118,121
|
)
|
|
|
4.16
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2016
|
|
|
1,258,409
|
|
|
|
4.44
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Options vested and expected to vest, as of December 31, 2016
|
|
|
385,469
|
|
|
|
4.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
|
28
|
Share-based Payments (continued)
|
The following table summarizes share option activity for the year ended December
31, 2015:
|
|
Shares Issuable
Under Options
|
|
Weighted- Average
Exercise Price
|
|
Weighted- Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
(in years)
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2014
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
714,856
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Expired or forfeited
|
|
|
(185,265
|
)
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2015
|
|
|
529,591
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Options vested and expected to vest, as of December 31, 2014
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options vested and expected to vest, as of December 31, 2015
|
|
|
137,251
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value of share options is calculated as the difference
between the exercise price of the share options and the fair value of the Company's ordinary shares for those share options that
had exercise prices lower than the fair value of the Company's ordinary shares.
There were no options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2016
and December 31, 2015. The Company did not receive cash proceeds from stock option exercises for the years ended December 31, 2016
and December 31, 2015.
In addition to the stock options described above, the Company has granted
service-based RSU's to its employees. RSU's are valued at the fair value of the underlying ordinary shares as of the date of the
grant. The following table summarizes restricted stock unit activity for the year ended December 31, 2016:
|
|
Number of
Restricted Share
Units
|
|
Weighted- Average
Grant Date Fair Value
|
|
Weighted- Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
(in years)
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2015
|
|
|
177,570
|
|
|
|
4.38
|
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
171,058
|
|
|
|
2.49
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(303,498
|
)
|
|
|
3.55
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Expired or forfeited
|
|
|
(31,744
|
)
|
|
|
2.78
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2016
|
|
|
13,386
|
|
|
|
2.60
|
|
|
|
1.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes restricted stock unit activity for the year
ended December 31, 2015:
|
|
Number of
Restricted Share
Units
|
|
Weighted- Average
Grant Date Fair Value
|
|
Weighted- Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
(in years)
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2014
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
236,748
|
|
|
|
4.38
|
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Expired or forfeited
|
|
|
(59,178
|
)
|
|
|
4.38
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2015
|
|
|
177,570
|
|
|
|
4.38
|
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
|
|
On December 30, 2016 the board approved a grant of 782,702 shares of the
Company's stock. This grant resulted in an additional AUD$744,371 of stock compensation expense.
For the years ended December 31, 2016 and December, 31, 2015, share-based
compensation expense was $2.2 million and $1.7 million. The Company had an aggregate of USD$537,854 of unrecognized share-based
compensation expense as of December 31, 2016, which we expect to recognize over an estimated period of 1.4 years for outstanding
awards.
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Fiscal Period Ended 31 December 2016
|
29
|
Events Occurring After the Reporting Date
|
No other matters or circumstances have arisen since the end of the financial
period which significantly affected or could significantly affect the operations of the Group, the results of those operations,
or the state of affairs of the Group in future financial years.
The registered office and principal place of business of the company in Australia is:
Parnell Pharmaceuticals Holdings Limited
Unit 4 Century Estate
476 Gardeners Road
Alexandria NSW 2015
The principal place of business of the company in the United States is:
7015 College Blvd
Level 4
Overland Park KS 66211
F-41
Parnell Pharmaceuticals (CE) (USOTC:PARNF)
Historical Stock Chart
From Dec 2024 to Jan 2025
Parnell Pharmaceuticals (CE) (USOTC:PARNF)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jan 2024 to Jan 2025