The Ukraine Opportunity Trust PLC
(the "Company")
Result of AGM
The Company announces that all of the Resolutions put to the
Shareholders at the Company's Annual General Meeting held at 34
Brook Street, London W1K 5DN
on 18 June 2015 at 2:30pm were taken on a poll.
Resolutions 1 to 5 related to Ordinary Business. Resolutions 6
to 9 related to Special Business.
A poll was called on Resolution 1 (to receive, and if thought
fit, to accept the Strategic Report, Directors’ Report and the
audited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2014). The results of the poll were
as follows:
|
For |
Against |
Votes Withheld |
|
Votes |
%
Votes Cast |
Votes |
%
Votes
Cast |
Resolution 1
(Approval of Accounts)
|
470,384 |
23.46 |
1,534,424 |
76.54 |
0 |
Accordingly, Resolution 1 was declared not carried.
A poll was called on Resolution 2 (to receive and approve the
Directors’ Remuneration Report for the year ended 31 December 2014). The results of the poll were
as follows:
|
For |
Against |
Votes Withheld |
|
Votes |
%
Votes Cast |
Votes |
%
Votes
Cast |
Resolution 2
(Approval of Directors’ Remuneration Report)
|
470,384 |
23.46 |
1,534,424 |
76.54 |
0 |
Accordingly, Resolution 2 was declared not carried.
A poll was called on Resolution 3 (to re-appoint KPMG LLP as
Auditor to the Company and to authorise the Directors to determine
their remuneration). The results of the poll were as follows:
|
For |
Against |
Votes Withheld |
|
Votes |
%
Votes Cast |
Votes |
%
Votes
Cast |
Resolution 3
(Re-appointment of KPMG LLP as auditor)
|
1,091,353 |
54.44 |
913,455 |
45.56 |
0 |
Accordingly, Resolution 3 was declared carried.
A poll was called on Resolution 4 (to elect Ms Holland as a
Director of the Company). The results of the poll were as
follows:
|
For |
Against |
Votes Withheld |
|
Votes |
%
Votes Cast |
Votes |
%
Votes
Cast |
Resolution 4
(Election of Ms Hollond as a Director of the Company.)
|
465,000 |
23.19 |
1,539,808 |
76.81 |
0 |
Accordingly, Resolution 4 was declared not carried.
A poll was called on Resolution 5 (to re-elect Mr Chernobay as a
Director of the Company). The results of the poll were as
follows:
|
For |
Against |
Votes Withheld |
|
Votes |
%
Votes Cast |
Votes |
%
Votes
Cast |
Resolution 5
(Re-election of Mr Chernobay as a Director of the
Company.) |
470,384 |
23.46 |
1,534,424 |
76.54 |
0 |
Accordingly, Resolution 5 was declared not carried.
A poll was called on Resolution 6 (To authorise the Company to
make market purchases of the Company’s shares pursuant to Section
701 of the Companies Act 2006). The results of the poll were as
follows:
|
For |
Against |
Votes Withheld |
|
Votes |
% Votes
Cast |
Votes |
%
Votes
Cast |
Resolution 6
(Authorisation to make market purchases of the Company’s
shares) |
470,384 |
23.46 |
1,534,424 |
76.54 |
0 |
Accordingly, Resolution 6 was declared not carried.
A poll was called on Resolution 7 (To authorise the Directors to
allot shares pursuant to Section 551 of the Companies Act 2006).
The results of the poll were as follows:
|
For |
Against |
Votes Withheld |
|
Votes |
% Votes
Cast |
Votes |
%
Votes
Cast |
Resolution 7
(Authorisation to allot shares)
|
465,000 |
23.19 |
1,539,808 |
76.81 |
0 |
Accordingly, Resolution 7 was declared not carried.
A poll was called on Resolution 8 (To empower the Directors to
allot equity securities pursuant to Section 570 and 573 of the
Companies Act 2006 otherwise than in accordance with statutory
pre-emption rights). The results of the poll were as follows:
|
For |
Against |
Votes Withheld |
|
Votes |
% Votes
Cast |
Votes |
%
Votes
Cast |
Resolution 8
(Authorisation to disapply pre-emption rights) |
465,000 |
23.19 |
1,539,808 |
76.81 |
0 |
Accordingly, Resolution 8 was declared not carried.
A poll was called on Resolution 9 (To authorise the Directors to
hold general meetings on 14 clear days’ notice). The results of the
poll were as follows:
|
For |
Against |
Votes Withheld |
|
Votes |
%
Votes Cast |
Votes |
%
Votes
Cast |
Resolution 9
(Authorisation to call a general meeting on not less than 14
clear days’ notice)
|
991,955 |
49.48 |
1,012,853 |
50.52 |
0 |
Accordingly, Resolution 9 was declared not carried.