UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark One)
|
T
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended October
2, 2010
OR
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from
______________ to ______________
Commission file number: 0-29464
ROCK OF
AGES CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Vermont
|
03-0153200
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
(I. R.
S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
560 Graniteville Road, Graniteville, Vermont
|
|
05654
|
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
(802)
476-3121
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
x
No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of
"accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated filer
o
Accelerated filer
o
Non-accelerated filer
o
Smaller Reporting Company
x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a
shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act.) Yes
o
No
x
As of November 12, 2010, 4,812,342 shares of Class A
Common Stock and 2,603,721 shares of Class B Common Stock of the registrant
were outstanding.
ROCK OF AGES CORPORATION
INDEX
Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period
Ended October 2, 2010
PART I
|
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
PAGE
NO.
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets - October 2, 2010 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2009
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations (Unaudited) - Three and Nine Months Ended October 2,
2010 and October 3, 2009
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) - Nine Months Ended October 2, 2010 and October
3, 2009
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
|
7
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
15
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
19
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
20
|
|
|
|
PART II
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
20
|
|
|
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
21
|
|
|
|
Item 4
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
21
|
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
Exhibits
|
23
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q,
including "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" in Part I, Item 2,
contains
forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as
assumptions that, if they never materialize or prove incorrect, could cause the
results of Rock of Ages Corporation ("Rock of Ages" or the
"Company") and events to differ materially from those contained in
such statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact could
be deemed forward-looking statements, and may include projections of revenue,
gross profit, expenses, earnings or losses from operations or other financial
items; any statements of the plans, strategies and objectives of the Company or
its management for future operations; any statements regarding future economic
conditions or performance; any statements of expectation or belief; and any
statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing.
The risks, uncertainties and
assumptions may include, but are not limited to, the following:
-
our ability to certify adequate internal controls over our
financial reporting;
-
our reliance on our line of credit with the CIT Group to
fund our business operations and/or strategy;
-
our ability to maintain compliance with our covenants in our
credit facility;
-
our ability to form and maintain strategic alliances with
cemeteries, funeral homes and memorial retailers;
-
uncertainties involving production recovery, quarry yields
and demand for Rock of Ages' dimension stone;
-
the impact of the weak economic conditions and the future
impact of such conditions on the granite and granite memorial industries, and
demand for our products;
-
uncertainties related to the purported class action lawsuit
filed in connection with the acquisition proposal received
from Swenson Granite Company LLC ("Swenson") on May 6, 2010 and the purported
class action lawsuit filed in connection with the recently announced merger
agreement (the "Merger Agreement") among the Company, Swenson and Granite
Acquisition, LLC ("Merger Sub");
-
unanticipated overhead or other expenses, including expenses
in connection with the Merger Agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby;
and other risks and uncertainties
described herein, including, but not limited to the items discussed in
"Risk Factors That May Affect Future Results" in the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed on March 31, 2010
(the "2009 Annual Report") and in Part II, Item 1A of this report, and that are
otherwise described from time to time in Rock of Ages' reports filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission after the date of filing of this report.
We assume no obligation to update
these forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in
factors or assumptions affecting such forward-looking statements.
PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1: Financial Statements
ROCK OF AGES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
($ in thousands, except par value amounts)
|
|
October 2,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
ASSETS
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Audited)
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
1,163
|
|
$
|
1,713
|
Trade receivables, net
|
|
10,954
|
|
|
7,241
|
Inventories
|
|
14,845
|
|
|
15,077
|
Income taxes receivable
|
|
129
|
|
|
429
|
Other current assets
|
|
1,220
|
|
|
1,191
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
621
|
|
|
758
|
Total current
assets
|
|
28,932
|
|
|
26,409
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
30,551
|
|
|
30,559
|
Identified intangible assets, net
|
|
458
|
|
|
582
|
Goodwill
|
|
387
|
|
|
387
|
Other long term assets
|
|
235
|
|
|
515
|
Total assets
|
$
|
60,563
|
|
$
|
58,452
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under line of credit
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
214
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
1,315
|
|
|
801
|
Trade payables
|
|
1,851
|
|
|
1,285
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
2,612
|
|
|
1,264
|
Salary continuation and other post-employment
benefits
|
|
702
|
|
|
691
|
Customer deposits
|
|
1,233
|
|
|
774
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
53
|
|
|
-
|
Current deferred tax liabilities
|
|
-
|
|
|
236
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
7,766
|
|
|
5,265
|
Long-term debt, excluding current installments
|
|
11,660
|
|
|
13,361
|
Salary continuation liability, net of current portion
|
|
5,218
|
|
|
5,386
|
Accrued pension cost
|
|
4,322
|
|
|
4,810
|
Deferred salary liability
|
|
1,504
|
|
|
1,504
|
Accrued other post-employment benefits, net of
current portion
|
|
1,603
|
|
|
1,622
|
Total liabilities
|
|
32,073
|
|
|
31,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock - No par value; 2,500,000 shares
authorized; No shares issued or outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock - Class A, No par value; 30,000,000
shares authorized; 4,812,342
shares issued and outstanding as of October
2, 2010 and December 31, 2009
|
|
48
|
|
|
48
|
Common stock - Class B, No par value; 15,000,000
shares authorized; 2,603,721 shares issued and outstanding as of October
2, 2010 and December 31, 2009
|
|
26
|
|
|
26
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
65,790
|
|
|
65,751
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
(33,077
|
)
|
|
(34,746)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
(4,297
|
)
|
|
(4,575)
|
Total stockholders' equity
|
|
28,490
|
|
|
26,504
|
Total liabilities and stockholders'
equity
|
$
|
60,563
|
|
$
|
58,452
|
SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
ROCK OF AGES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
October 2, 2010
|
|
|
October 3, 2009
|
|
|
October 2, 2010
|
|
|
October 3, 2009
|
|
Net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarry
|
$
|
8,037
|
|
$
|
5,914
|
|
$
|
18,298
|
|
$
|
15,949
|
|
Manufacturing
|
|
7,719
|
|
|
6,967
|
|
|
19,633
|
|
|
17,293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
15,756
|
|
|
12,881
|
|
|
37,931
|
|
|
33,242
|
|
Cost of goods sold:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarry
|
|
5,114
|
|
|
4,003
|
|
|
13,591
|
|
|
12,516
|
|
Manufacturing
|
|
5,322
|
|
|
4,945
|
|
|
14,123
|
|
|
12,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of goods sold
|
|
10,436
|
|
|
8,948
|
|
|
27,714
|
|
|
25,253
|
|
Gross profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarry
|
|
2,923
|
|
|
1,911
|
|
|
4,707
|
|
|
3,433
|
|
Manufacturing
|
|
2,397
|
|
|
2,022
|
|
|
5,510
|
|
|
4,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
5,320
|
|
|
3,933
|
|
|
10,217
|
|
|
7,989
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarry
|
|
604
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
1,694
|
|
|
1,633
|
|
Manufacturing
|
|
1,133
|
|
|
938
|
|
|
3,168
|
|
|
2,964
|
|
Corporate overhead
|
|
622
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
1,977
|
|
|
2,393
|
|
Strategic options and lawsuit expenses
|
|
358
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
-
|
|
Effect of pension curtailment
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
95
|
|
Foreign exchange loss (income)
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(83)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
(46)
|
|
|
(76)
|
|
|
(191)
|
|
|
(219)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total selling, general and administrative
expenses
|
|
2,671
|
|
|
2,025
|
|
|
7,417
|
|
|
6,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before interest expense and income taxes
|
|
2,649
|
|
|
1,908
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
1,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
254
|
|
|
334
|
|
|
827
|
|
|
871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
2,395
|
|
|
1,574
|
|
|
1,973
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
195
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
$
|
2,200
|
|
$
|
1,534
|
|
$
|
1,668
|
|
$
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share - basic
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
Net income per share - diluted
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
- basic
|
|
7,416
|
|
|
7,416
|
|
|
7,416
|
|
|
7,416
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
- diluted
|
|
7,451
|
|
|
7,416
|
|
|
7,435
|
|
|
7,416
|
|
SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ROCK OF AGES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
October 2,
|
|
|
October 3,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
$
|
1,668
|
|
$
|
193
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
(79)
|
|
|
(49)
|
Loss on sale of marketable securities
|
|
11
|
|
|
-
|
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization
|
|
1,796
|
|
|
1,840
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
(238)
|
|
|
-
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
40
|
|
|
46
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables, net
|
|
(3.663)
|
|
|
4,321
|
Inventories
|
|
356
|
|
|
2,004
|
Other assets
|
|
526
|
|
|
(113)
|
Trade payables, accrued
expenses and income taxes
|
|
1,937
|
|
|
(678)
|
Customer deposits
|
|
459
|
|
|
348
|
Salary continuation and
pension
|
|
(666)
|
|
|
(420)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
-
|
|
|
(20)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by
operating activities
|
|
2,147
|
|
|
7,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of other property, plant
and equipment
|
|
(1,633)
|
|
|
(1,406)
|
Proceeds from sale of assets
|
|
246
|
|
|
243
|
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities
|
|
48
|
|
|
-
|
Purchase of land and granite
reserves
|
|
-
|
|
|
(1,428)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in
investing activities
|
|
(1,339)
|
|
|
(2,591)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net repayments under lines of credit
|
|
(216)
|
|
|
(4,863)
|
Principal borrowings on long-term debt
|
|
3,967
|
|
|
-
|
Principal payments on long-term debt
|
|
(5,198)
|
|
|
(251)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in
financing activities
|
|
(1,447)
|
|
|
(5,114)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
89
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and
cash equivalents
|
|
(550)
|
|
|
(46)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
1,713
|
|
|
888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$
|
1,163
|
|
$
|
842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
$
|
864
|
|
$
|
906
|
Income taxes
|
|
198
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ROCK OF AGES CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
(1)
|
Basis of Presentation
|
|
The
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared
pursuant to the rules and regulations for reporting on Form 10-Q.
Accordingly, certain information and notes required by accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP") for complete
financial statements are not included herein. In the opinion of management,
all adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered necessary for a fair
presentation have been included. Results of operations for the interim
periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected
for a full year. The Company has historically experienced certain seasonal
patterns. Generally, our net sales have been highest in the second or third
quarter and lowest in the first quarter of each year due primarily to weather
conditions affecting operations in Vermont and Canada and the setting of
memorials in cemeteries located in northern regions. For further information,
refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009,
filed on March 31, 2010 (SEC File No. 000-29464) (the "2009 Annual Report").
|
|
In this
report, the terms "Company," "we," "us," or
"our" mean Rock of Ages Corporation and all subsidiaries included
in our consolidated financial statements.
|
|
The
Company's fiscal year ends on December 31 and its fiscal quarters are the
13-week periods ending on the Saturday nearest March 31, June 30 and
September 30. As a result, the first and fourth quarter may be more or less
than 13 weeks, by 1 to 6 days, which can affect comparability between
periods. The third quarters of 2010 and 2009 each have 91 days.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Stock-Based Compensation
|
|
The following tables
set forth stock option activity for the periods ended October 2, 2010 and October
3, 2009 and information on outstanding and exercisable options at such dates:
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
October
2, 2010
|
|
October
3, 2009
|
|
Number
Of Options
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
Aggregate Intrinsic
Value
|
Number
Of Options
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
Aggregate Intrinsic
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of period
|
314,000
|
|
$
|
4.08
|
|
324,000
|
|
$
|
4.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
2.63
|
|
Exercised
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Canceled
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
(20,000)
|
)
|
|
3.05
|
|
Outstanding at end of period
|
314,000
|
|
$
|
4.08
|
$257,375
|
324,000
|
|
$
|
4.04
|
$97,500
|
Exercisable at end of period
|
193,500
|
|
$
|
4.82
|
$97,150
|
155,000
|
|
$
|
5.25
|
$17,420
|
Weighted average remaining contractual life
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
|
6.6 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
October 2,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Raw materials
|
$
|
9,366
|
$
|
10,402
|
Work-in-process
|
|
1,477
|
|
1,057
|
Finished goods and supplies
|
|
4,002
|
|
3,618
|
|
$
|
14,845
|
$
|
15,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
finished goods and supplies inventory includes $1,810,000 and $1,905,000 of
retail display inventory as of October 2, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively
that is located at various retail locations and is consigned to PKDM Holdings
Inc., ("PKDM") the owner of the Company's former retail division. PKDM is
responsible for purchasing this inventory at the Company's book value, as it
is sold, plus any inventory remaining after the tenth anniversary of the
transaction (January 2018).
|
|
|
(4)
|
Earnings Per Share
|
The following is a reconciliation of shares used in
calculating basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
October 2, 2010
|
|
October 3, 2009
|
|
October 2, 2010
|
|
October 3, 2009
|
Basic weighted average shares
|
|
7,416
|
|
7,416
|
|
7,416
|
|
7,416
|
Effect of dilutive stock options
|
|
35
|
|
-
|
|
19
|
|
-
|
Diluted weighted average shares
|
|
7,451
|
|
7,416
|
|
7,435
|
|
7,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase 136,500 shares of Class A common
stock were outstanding at October 2, 2010, but were not included in the
computation of diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended
October 2, 2010 because they were out of the money.
Options to purchase 324,000 shares of Class A common
stock were outstanding at October 3, 2009, but were not included in the
computation of diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended
October 3, 2009 because they were out of the money.
|
|
|
(5)
|
Segment Information
|
|
The Company is organized based on the products and
services it offers. The Company operates in two segments: quarry and
manufacturing.
|
|
The quarry segment extracts granite from the ground
and sells it to either the Company's manufacturing segment or to outside
manufacturers, as well as to distributors in Europe and China. There were two
quarry customers that represented approximately 25.8% of accounts receivable
at October 2, 2010 and one customer that represented approximately 20.8% of
accounts receivable at December 31, 2009. These receivables were backed by
irrevocable letters of credit.
|
|
The manufacturing segment's principal products are
granite memorials and mausoleums used primarily in cemeteries and, to a
lesser extent, specialized granite products for industrial applications.
|
|
Inter-segment revenues are accounted for as if the
sales were to third parties. These are eliminated on consolidation in the
statements of operations.
|
|
The following tables present unaudited segment
information for the three and nine month periods ended October 2, 2010 and October
3, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
Three month period:
|
2010
|
|
Quarry
|
|
|
Manufacturing
|
|
|
Unallocated Corporate
Overhead
|
|
|
Total
|
Total net revenues
|
$
|
8,700
|
|
$
|
7,719
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
16,419
|
Inter-segment net revenues
|
|
(663
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(663)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
8,037
|
|
|
7,719
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
15,756
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
3,135
|
|
|
2,185
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
5,320
|
Inter-segment gross profit
|
|
(212
|
)
|
|
212
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
2,923
|
|
|
2,397
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
5,320
|
Selling, general & administrative
expenses
|
|
604
|
|
|
1,133
|
|
|
622
|
|
|
2,359
|
Strategic options and lawsuit expenses
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
358
|
Other income, net
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
(46)
|
Income before interest and taxes
|
$
|
2,319
|
|
$
|
1,264
|
|
$
|
(934
|
)
|
$
|
2,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Quarry
|
|
|
Manufacturing
|
|
|
Unallocated Corporate
Overhead
|
|
|
Total
|
Total net revenues
|
$
|
6,486
|
|
$
|
6,967
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
13,453
|
Inter-segment net revenues
|
|
(572
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(572)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
5,914
|
|
|
6,967
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
12,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
2,074
|
|
|
1,859
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
3,933
|
Inter-segment gross profit
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
163
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
1,911
|
|
|
2,022
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
3,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general & administrative expenses
|
|
503
|
|
|
938
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
2,101
|
Other income, net
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
(76)
|
Income before interest and taxes
|
$
|
1,408
|
|
$
|
1,084
|
|
$
|
(584
|
)
|
$
|
1,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine month period:
2010
|
|
Quarry
|
|
|
Manufacturing
|
|
|
Unallocated Corporate
Overhead
|
|
|
Total
|
Total net revenues
|
$
|
20,398
|
|
$
|
19,633
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
40,031
|
Inter-segment net revenues
|
|
(2,100
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(2,100)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
18,298
|
|
|
19,633
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
37,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
5,183
|
|
|
5,034
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
10,217
|
Inter-segment gross profit
|
|
(476
|
)
|
|
476
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
4,707
|
|
|
5,510
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
10,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general & administrative expenses
|
|
1,694
|
|
|
3,168
|
|
|
1,977
|
|
|
6,839
|
Strategic options and lawsuit expenses
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
852
|
Foreign exchange income
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
(83)
|
Other income, net
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
|
(191)
|
Income before interest and taxes
|
$
|
3,013
|
|
$
|
2,342
|
|
$
|
(2,555
|
)
|
$
|
2,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Quarry
|
|
|
Manufacturing
|
|
|
Unallocated Corporate
Overhead
|
|
|
Total
|
Total net revenues
|
$
|
17,175
|
|
$
|
17,293
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
34,468
|
Inter-segment net revenues
|
|
(1,226
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(1,226)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
15,949
|
|
|
17,293
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
33,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
3,667
|
|
|
4,322
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
7,989
|
Inter-segment gross profit
|
|
(234
|
)
|
|
234
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
3,433
|
|
|
4,556
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
7,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general & administrative expenses
|
|
1,633
|
|
|
2,964
|
|
|
2,393
|
|
|
6,990
|
Effect of pension curtailment
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
95
|
Other income, net
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
(219)
|
Income (loss) before interest and taxes
|
$
|
1,800
|
|
$
|
1,592
|
|
$
|
(2,269
|
)
|
$
|
1,123
|
Net revenues by geographic area, based on shipping
destination, for the three and nine months ended October 2, 2010 and October
3, 2009 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
October 2, 2010
|
|
October 3, 2009
|
|
October 2, 2010
|
|
October 3, 2009
|
Net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China
|
$
|
3,332
|
$
|
1,741
|
$
|
6,541
|
$
|
5,177
|
Italy
|
|
138
|
|
68
|
|
580
|
|
103
|
Other foreign countries
|
|
19
|
|
90
|
|
146
|
|
191
|
|
|
3,489
|
|
1,899
|
|
7,267
|
|
5,471
|
United States and Canada
|
|
12,267
|
|
10,982
|
|
30,664
|
|
27,771
|
Total net revenues
|
$
|
15,756
|
$
|
12,881
|
$
|
37,931
|
$
|
33,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
property, plant and equipment by geographic area are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
October 2, 2010
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
United States
|
$
|
26,488
|
$
|
26,232
|
Canada
|
|
4,063
|
|
4,327
|
|
$
|
30,551
|
$
|
30,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss consists of the following components (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency
Translation
|
|
|
Unfunded Pension
Liability
|
|
|
Investment Available
for Sale
|
|
|
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Loss
|
Balance
at December 31, 2009
|
$
|
3,028
|
|
$
|
(7,569)
|
|
$
|
(34)
|
|
$
|
(4,575)
|
Changes
in 2010
|
|
252
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
278
|
Balance
at October 2, 2010
|
$
|
3,280
|
|
|
(7,569)
|
|
|
(8)
|
|
|
(4,297)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in other comprehensive income/loss was a
reclassification adjustment of $235,000 and $397,000 in 2010 and 2009,
respectively for the unfunded pension liability.
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
October 2,
|
|
|
October 3,
|
|
|
October 2,
|
|
|
October 3,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
$
|
2,200
|
|
$
|
1,534
|
|
$
|
1,668
|
|
$
|
193
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment
|
|
327
|
|
|
752
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
1,200
|
Unrealized gain on
investment in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
available for sale securities
|
|
9
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
95
|
Pension related adjustment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,503
|
Pension liability adjustment,
net of
reclassification adjustment
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
$
|
2,536
|
|
$
|
2,286
|
|
$
|
1,946
|
|
$
|
5,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost for the
three months ended October 2, 2010 and October 3, 2009 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
NON-UNION
PENSION BENEFITS
|
|
|
SALARY
CONTINUATION BENEFITS
|
|
|
OTHER
POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, 2010
|
|
|
October 3, 2009
|
|
|
October 2, 2010
|
|
|
October 3, 2009
|
|
|
October 2, 2010
|
|
|
October 3,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
$
|
1
|
Interest cost
|
|
347
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
26
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
(379
|
|
)
|
(302
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Amortization of prior service costs
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
12
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss
|
|
43
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
$
|
11
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
$
|
98
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost for the nine
months ended October 2, 2010 and October 3, 2009 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
NON-UNION
PENSION BENEFITS
|
|
|
SALARY
CONTINUATION BENEFITS
|
|
|
OTHER
POST-EMPLOYMENT
BENEFITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, 2010
|
|
|
October 3, 2009
|
|
|
October 2, 2010
|
|
|
October 3,
2009
|
|
|
October 2, 2010
|
|
|
October 3, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
1,129
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
78
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
(1,137)
|
|
|
(922)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Amortization of prior service costs
|
|
-
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
36
|
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss
|
|
129
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Effect of curtailment
|
|
-
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
$
|
33
|
|
$
|
644
|
|
$
|
295
|
|
$
|
336
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective March 31, 2009, the Company's defined
benefit pension plan was amended by freezing membership and future benefits
in the plan. We recognized additional pension expense of $95,000 as the
effect of the pension curtailment in the first quarter of 2009. Additionally,
the defined benefit pension plan was revalued as of the date of the
curtailment. The effect of the curtailment and re-measurement resulted in a decrease
of the projected benefit obligation of $3.8 million and a decrease in the
accumulated other comprehensive loss of $4.0 million.
|
|
The Company expects to contribute approximately $850,000
to the defined benefit pension plan during 2010. A $212,000 contribution was
made during the quarter ended October 2, 2010, bringing the total
contribution to $423,000 for 2010. We also contributed $98,000 in January
2010 for the 2009 plan year.
|
|
|
(8)
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
|
|
Effective January 1,
2010, the Company adopted new accounting guidance on fair value measurements
and disclosures. The new guidance requires more robust disclosures about
(1) the different classes of assets and
|
liabilities measured at fair value,
(2) the valuation techniques and inputs used, (3) the activity in Level 3 fair
value measurements, and (4) the transfers between Levels 1, 2, and 3. The
adoption of this new accounting guidance did not have a material effect on the
Company's financial position or results of operations.
|
|
(9)
|
Credit Facility
|
|
In October 2007, the Company entered into a new
credit facility with its existing lenders, the CIT Group/Business Credit and
Chittenden Trust Company (the "Lenders") that will expire in October 2012 and
is secured by substantially all assets of the Company located in the United
States. The credit facility consists of an acquisition term loan line of
credit of up to $30.0 million and a revolving credit facility of up to
another $20.0 million based on eligible accounts receivable, inventory and
certain fixed assets. Amounts outstanding were $-0- and $11,206,000 as of October
2, 2010 and $2,565,000 and $13,886,000 as of October 3, 2009 on the revolving
credit facility and the term loan line of credit, respectively. Availability
under the revolving credit facility was $12.9 million as of October 2, 2010.
The credit facility financing agreement places restrictions on our ability
to, among other things, sell assets, participate in mergers, incur debt, pay
dividends, make capital expenditures, repurchase stock and make investments
or guarantees, without pre-approval by the Lenders.
|
|
Repayment Terms.
As the aggregate unpaid principal
balance of the outstanding term loan is less than $17,500,000, quarterly
principal payments are no longer required. The principal balance is payable
in full on the expiration date of the facility in October 2012. The Company
does have the right to make voluntary pre-payments on the term loan. In the
first quarter of 2010 our Canadian subsidiary borrowed $4 million on its term
loan. The proceeds, net of the Canadian withholding tax, were used to pay $2
million on the term debt with the remainder used for working capital. During
the second and third quarters the company voluntarily pre-paid an additional
$680,000 on its term loan. The revolving credit facility is paid down daily
with all proceeds received by the Company.
|
|
The Company is required to repay its term loan to
the extent it sells certain assets collateralizing the loan. Accordingly, the
Company has classified a portion of the term loan as a current liability
based on the estimated proceeds of fixed assets classified as held for sale.
|
|
Minimum Fixed Charge Coverage
Ratio
. The
facility requires the ratio of the sum of earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), to the sum of income taxes paid,
capital expenditures, interest and scheduled debt repayments be at least 1.10
for the trailing twelve-month period at the end of each quarter. The Company
was in compliance with this covenant at October 2, 2010.
|
|
Total Liabilities to Net Worth
Ratio.
The
credit facility also requires that the ratio of our total liabilities to net
worth (the "Leverage Ratio") not exceed 2.25 for the first two quarters of
2009 and 2.00 for the remainder of the term of the loan. The Leverage Ratio
excludes from the calculation the change in tangible net worth directly
resulting from the Company's compliance with changes in accounting for
pensions of $6.0 million. As of October 2, 2010, we were in compliance with
the Leverage Ratio covenant.
|
|
Canadian Facility.
The Company's Canadian subsidiary has a
line of credit agreement with the Royal Bank of Canada that is renewable
annually. Under the terms of this agreement, a maximum of $2.5 million CDN
may be advanced based on eligible accounts receivable, eligible inventory,
and tangible fixed assets. The line of credit bears interest at the Canadian
prime rate plus 0.5%. There was $-0- outstanding as of October 2, 2010 and October
3, 2009, respectively.
|
|
The Canadian subsidiary also has a non-revolving
term loan with the Royal Bank of Canada which cannot exceed $4 million CDN
bearing interest at the Canadian prime rate plus 0.95%. There was $1.5
million and $-0- outstanding as of October 2, 2010 and October 3, 2009,
respectively. The effective interest rate was 3.95% as of October 2, 2010.
|
|
(10)
|
Income Taxes
|
|
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S.
federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company
is no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax examinations by tax
authorities for years before 2007 or Canadian tax authorities for years
before 2004. However, even though the tax years are closed the tax attributes
may remain open to adjustment. On October 6, 2010 we were notified that the
Canada Revenue Agency will be auditing our income tax return for the 2008 tax
year.
|
|
Income tax expense in
the first half of 2010 and 2009 result primarily from income at our Canadian
subsidiary. Tax expense is calculated based on the estimated annual effective
Canadian tax rate of 29.9% for 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
In 2005, the Company adjusted its valuation
allowance to fully reserve for the entire net U.S. deferred tax asset. At
each subsequent period, including at the end of the third quarter of 2010, we
reached a similar conclusion, therefore we have continued to fully reserve
for the entire net U.S. deferred tax asset. We will continue to assess the
valuation allowance on a regular basis and may reduce the valuation allowance
if and/or when the Company has taxable income from its U.S. operations.
|
|
As of October 2, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the
Company recorded no unrecognized tax benefits or liabilities related to
uncertain tax positions.
|
|
|
(11)
|
Intangible Assets and Goodwill
|
|
We test goodwill for impairment annually and when an
event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce
the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value.
In the first quarter of 2010, we
performed our annual assessment for the quarry reporting unit. We calculated
the fair value of the quarry reporting unit based on the estimated expected
discounted future cash flows. Based on this analysis we concluded that there
was no indication of impairment as of April 3, 2010, although there can be no
assurance that goodwill will not become impaired in future periods. We have
reviewed the events of the last two quarters and believe that no triggering
events have occurred that would require an assessment of impairment.
|
|
|
(12)
|
Fair Value Measurements
|
|
The carrying value of cash and cash
equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates fair value
because of the short-term nature of these instruments. Investment securities
are carried at fair value using level one inputs. The long-term and
short-term debt instruments bear interest at variable rates, which at October
2, 2010 and December 31, 2009 we estimated to be at market.
|
|
The assets in our pension plan are
Separate Investment Accounts and their fair value is based on unit values and
not net asset values. Unit values are calculated based on observable net
asset values of the underlying investment and are considered Level 2 inputs.
|
|
|
(13)
|
Regulatory Matters
|
|
In 2009 the U.S. Mine Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA) issued citations to one of our subsidiaries,
Pennsylvania Granite, asserting various violations and assessed fines
totaling approximately $280,000. The Company disagrees with the validity of
these violations and how they are characterized. We are appealing the
citations. Based on experience of our legal counsel in settling similar
assessments and available historical MSHA settlement data, we estimate our
final exposure will be no greater than $125,000.
In 2010 MSHA
again inspected the Pennsylvania Quarry operations and issued 25 citations.
We were assessed additional fines totaling $4,575 for these citations. We are
contesting these citations and additional fines. We also received five
citations of a more serious nature for which we have not been assessed
additional fines yet. We do not have an estimate of the amount of the
additional fines but are planning on contesting those citations as well.
|
|
|
(14)
|
Assets Held For Sale
|
|
As of October
2, 2010, the Company held various assets for sale, which were no longer being
used in production, totaling $621,000 and $758,000 at December 31, 2009. During
the quarter ended July 3, 2010, we sold property located in Hardwick, Vermont
with a book value of $137,000. The remaining assets have been classified as
current assets held for sale. The estimated sales prices for the assets are
expected to exceed the carrying values therefore no impairments were recognized.
Accordingly, these amounts have been reclassified from the term loan to
current maturities of long term debt since the Company is required to apply
the proceeds from the sale of these assets, when they are sold, against the
term loan.
|
|
|
(15)
|
Merger Agreement
|
|
On October 15, 2010, a special
committee of the Company's independent directors, formed for the purpose of
exploring and considering
possible strategic alternatives for the Company (the
"Special Committee"), and the Company's Board of Directors, approved the
Merger Agreement by and among Rock of Ages, Swenson and Merger Sub. The Merger
Agreement, dated as of October 18, 2010, provides for the merger of Merger Sub
with and into
|
the Company, with the Company continuing as the surviving
corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Swenson. Merger Sub, which is
wholly owned by Swenson, is a recently-formed Vermont limited liability
company established for the sole purpose of effecting the merger.
If the proposed merger is consummated,
shareholders of the Company (other than shareholders who are members of
Swenson to the extent they have contributed their shares of Company common
stock in exchange for additional shares of membership interest in Swenson,
and other than shareholders to the extent they have properly asserted
dissenters' rights in accordance with the Vermont Business Corporation Act)
will be entitled to receive $5.25 in cash per share of common stock, without
interest.
|
|
The merger is subject to a number of
conditions, including, in addition to approval by a majority of the votes
represented by the outstanding shares of Class A and Class B common stock
voting together, approval by a majority of the outstanding shares of the
Company's Class A common stock, not including (in the number of outstanding
shares of Class A common stock, or in the number of shares of Class A common
stock voted in favor of the merger agreement) shares of Class A common stock
owned directly or through a broker or other nominee by members of Swenson.
Although the merger is not subject to a financing contingency, Swenson is
seeking debt financing in connection with the merger and will require that
financing in order to consummate the merger and related transactions. Swenson
has received an amended and restated commitment letter from certain lenders,
pursuant to which such lenders have committed, subject to certain specified
conditions, to enter into a definitive financing agreement to provide funding
for, among other things, the merger.
|
|
The Company plans to schedule a special meeting of its shareholders for
the purpose of obtaining shareholder approval of the merger agreement. If the
necessary shareholder approval is obtained, then the merger is expected to be
completed as quickly as possible after the special meeting, subject to
customary conditions.
See Item 1A - "Risk Factors" of this Form 10-Q.
|
|
(16)
|
Litigation
|
A purported shareholder of Rock of Ages commenced a purported class
action lawsuit against Rock of Ages, all of the members of its Board of
Directors, certain of its officers, and Swenson, shortly after Swenson's
initial proposal, submitted to the Company's board of directors on May 6,
2010, to acquire the Company at $4.38 per share of common stock. The
complaint was filed in Vermont Superior Court, Washington County and
subsequently removed to the United States District Court for the District of
Vermont. The plaintiff alleges, among other things, that the Rock of Ages directors
and officers named in the complaint breached their fiduciary duties in
connection with the Swenson proposal, that Swenson's proposed offer is
inadequate, and that the defendants would benefit from the proposed
transaction to the detriment of Rock of Ages' other shareholders. Plaintiff
seeks an order certifying the proposed class, granting preliminary and
permanent injunctive relief against the consummation of the merger, or if the
merger is consummated, rescinding the merger and/or awarding rescissory
damages and ordering an accounting, and an award of costs and attorneys fees.
Rock of Ages believes the complaint is without merit and is engaged in a
vigorous defense
.
The plaintiff has asserted to the court that he intends
to amend his complaint, but has not indicated when he will do so.
|
|
A second purported class action was commenced by a
purported shareholder against Rock of Ages, each of its current directors,
Swenson and Merger Sub on October 27, 2010 in the United States District
Court for the District of Vermont. The plaintiff alleges, among other things,
that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties in approving
the previously announced merger agreement among the Company, Swenson and Merger
Sub, providing for the acquisition of the Company through a merger of Merger
Sub with and into the Company, with the Company surviving the merger as a
wholly owned subsidiary of Swenson. Plaintiff further alleges that Swenson
and Merger Sub aided and abetted such breaches of duty.
Plaintiff seeks an order certifying the proposed class,
granting preliminary and permanent injunctive relief against the consummation
of the merger, or, if the merger is consummated, rescinding the merger and/or
awarding rescissory damages and ordering an accounting, and an award of costs
and attorneys fees. Rock of Ages
believes the complaint is without
merit and plans a vigorous defense.
Plaintiff's
counsel has notified defendants' counsel that they intend to amend their
complaint, but have not yet done so.
|
|
|
(17)
|
Subsequent Events
|
In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09,
Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure
Requirements
. The standard amends ASC Topic 855 to address
certain implementation issues related to an entities requirement to perform
and disclose subsequent-event procedures. The standard requires SEC
filers to "evaluate subsequent events through the date the financial
statements are issued" and exempts SEC filers from disclosing the date
through which subsequent events have been evaluated. The Company evaluates
subsequent events through the date and time of the filing of the applicable
periodic report with the SEC. The Company evaluated subsequent events
through the date of issuance of its
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
|
Item 2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
Overview
|
|
Rock of Ages is an integrated quarrier and
manufacturer of granite and products manufactured from granite. During the
first three quarters of 2010, we had two business segments: quarry and
manufacturing. The quarry division sells granite blocks to the manufacturing
division and to outside manufacturers, as well as to customers outside North
America. The manufacturing division's principal products are granite
memorials and mausoleums used primarily in cemeteries. It also manufactures
specialized granite products for industrial applications.
|
|
Historically, the Company's operations have
experienced certain seasonal patterns. Generally, our net sales have been
highest in the second or third quarter and lowest in the first quarter of
each year due primarily to weather. Cemeteries in northern areas generally do
not accept granite memorials during winter months when the ground is frozen
because they cannot be properly set under those conditions. In addition, we either
close or reduce the operations of our Vermont and Canadian quarries during
these months because of increased operating costs attributable to adverse
weather conditions. As a result, we have historically incurred a significant
net loss during the first three months of each calendar year.
|
|
In the third quarter of 2010 total revenue increased
$2.9 million or 22% from the same period last year mainly due to increased export
granite sales of our Bethel and Salisbury quarries and increased sales of
industrial products and monumental sales in our Canadian subsidiary. Total
gross profit increased $1.4 million from the same period last year. SG&A
expenses increased 32% or $646,000 due partly to costs associated with the
consideration of the Swenson proposal, and the process commenced by the
special committee of independent directors (the "Committee") to explore and
consider strategic alternatives for the Company (the "Strategic Process"), as
well as costs associated with defending against the shareholder lawsuit
described in Part II, Item 1 of this Report. Total net income increased by
$666,000 over the same period last year.
|
|
Critical Accounting Policies
|
|
General
|
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations is based upon our Consolidated Financial
Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP). The
preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities,
revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on
various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
|
|
An accounting policy is deemed to be critical if it
requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters
that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and if different
estimates that reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting
estimates that are reasonably likely to occur periodically, could materially
impact the financial statements.
|
|
Our critical accounting policies are as follows:
revenue recognition, impairment of long-lived assets, valuation of deferred
tax assets, accounting for pensions and other post-employment benefits and
valuation of inventory. There have been no material changes in the Company's
critical accounting policies or changes in the methodology applied by
management for critical accounting policies from what was previously
disclosed in our most recent Form 10-K.
|
|
Results of Operations
The
following table sets forth certain statement of operations data as a
percentage of total net revenues with the exception of quarry and
manufacturing gross profit and SG&A, which are shown as a percentage of
their respective segment's net revenues.
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
October 2, 2010
|
|
October 3, 2009
|
|
October 2, 2010
|
|
October 3, 2009
|
Net Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarry
|
|
51.0%
|
|
45.9%
|
|
48.2%
|
|
48.0%
|
Manufacturing
|
|
49.0%
|
|
54.1%
|
|
51.8%
|
|
52.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
net revenues
|
|
100.0%
|
|
100.0%
|
|
100.0%
|
|
100.0%
|
Quarry
|
|
36.4%
|
|
32.3%
|
|
25.7%
|
|
21.5%
|
Manufacturing
|
|
31.1%
|
|
29.0%
|
|
28.1%
|
|
26.3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
gross profit
|
|
33.8%
|
|
30.5%
|
|
26.9%
|
|
24.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarry
|
|
7.5%
|
|
8.5%
|
|
9.3%
|
|
10.2%
|
Manufacturing
|
|
14.7%
|
|
13.5%
|
|
16.1%
|
|
17.1%
|
Corporate
overhead
|
|
3.9%
|
|
5.1%
|
|
5.2%
|
|
7.2%
|
Strategic
options and lawsuit expenses
|
|
2.3%
|
|
-
|
|
2.2%
|
|
-
|
Effect
of pension curtailment
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
0.3%
|
Foreign
exchange loss (income)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(0.2%
|
)
|
-
|
Other
income, net
|
|
(0.3%
|
)
|
(0.6%
|
)
|
(0.5%
|
)
|
(0.7%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
SG&A expenses
|
|
17.0%
|
|
15.7%
|
|
19.5%
|
|
20.6%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before interest and income taxes
|
|
16.8%
|
|
14.8%
|
|
7.4%
|
|
3.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
1.6%
|
|
2.6%
|
|
2.2%
|
|
2.6%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
15.2%
|
|
12.2%
|
|
5.2%
|
|
0.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
1.2%
|
|
0.3%
|
|
0.8%
|
|
0.2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
14.0%
|
|
11.9%
|
|
4.4%
|
|
0.6%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended October 2, 2010
Compared to Three Months Ended October 3, 2009
|
On a consolidated basis for the three-month period
ended October 2, 2010, compared to the three-month period ended October 3,
2009, revenue increased $2.9 million or 22%, gross profit increased $1.4
million or 35% and total operating expenses increased $646,000 or 32%. The
Company reported net income of $2.2 million in the third quarter of 2010 compared
to $1.5 million for the third quarter of 2009.
|
|
Quarry Segment Analysis
|
In the third quarter of 2010 revenues in our quarry
division increased $2.1 million or 36% from the same period last year mainly
due to increased export sales of Bethel White and Salisbury. The development
performed at our quarries earlier in the year is allowing us to produce
higher volumes of quality granite to meet demand and bring sales back to
historical levels. Gross profit increased $1 million from the same period
last year mainly due to increased sales and higher profit margins in our Barre
and Salisbury quarries. In each of these quarries the cost per cubic foot has
decreased and the gross profit margins have increased.
|
|
SG&A expenses increased 20% or $101,000 due to an
increase in our incentive accrual and a large repair to a holding pond in
Vermont. Despite the higher SG&A expenses quarry divisional operating
income increased 65% or $910,000 compared to the same period last year.
|
|
Manufacturing Segment Analysis
|
Revenue in our manufacturing division was $752,000
higher in the third quarter of 2010 than the same period last year. The
increase in manufacturing revenue is due to increased shipments of industrial
products and monumental sales from our Canadian subsidiary, which is partly
due to the increase in the exchange rate.
|
|
Gross profit for the third quarter of 2010 was $2,397,000
or 19% higher than the same period last year. The gross profit margin
increased from 29% to 31%. Even though shipments from our Barre monumental
plant were down from the prior year, the gross profit margin on those
shipments increased from 20% to 22%, due to cost savings from a smaller
workforce.
|
|
SG&A costs for the quarter ended October 2, 2010
for the manufacturing division increased $195,000 or 21% compared to the quarter
ended October 3, 2009. This increase is due to additional sales personnel, increased
incentive expenses at both the Barre and Beebe plants, increased bad debt accruals
for the industrial products division and the increase in the Canadian
exchange rate. The manufacturing operating income was $180,000 higher than
last year's third quarter.
|
Consolidated Items
|
Corporate overhead, consisting of operating costs
not directly related to an operating segment, decreased 6%, or $38,000, for
the quarter ended October 2, 2010 compared to the quarter ended October 3,
2009 due in part to decreased salaries & benefits, legal expenses and
Delaware franchise tax accruals which were partially offset by increased bank
charges and incentive accrual. In the third quarter of 2010 we incurred $217,000
in costs related to the Strategic Process and we incurred $141,000 in costs
related to the shareholder lawsuit Described in Part II, Item 1 of this
Report.
|
|
Other income, which includes rental income from
non-operating properties and miscellaneous reimbursements, was down 39%, or $30,000,
in the third quarter of 2010.
|
|
Due to the decreased level of U.S. debt in 2010, net
interest expense decreased $81,000, or 24%, for the quarter ended October 2,
2010 compared to the quarter ended October 3, 2009. On March 30, 2009, we
reached a definitive agreement with our lenders on the conditions of the
grant of a waiver from compliance with certain covenants contained in our
Amended and Restated Financing Agreement. In consideration of the consents
and waivers, the unused line fee went from .25% to .50% and the existing
interest rate pricing grid was changed and interest rates increased
approximately 3%. Despite the higher rates the decreased level of debt and
the decreased interest rate on the Canadian debt, resulted in a decrease in
interest expense.
|
|
Income tax expense was $195,000 for the quarter
ended October 2, 2010, compared to $40,000 for the same quarter in 2009. The
tax expense reported in both periods was primarily due to our Canadian
subsidiary and is more in 2010 than 2009 due to a larger third quarter net
income in our Canadian subsidiary and the increase in the exchange rate. During
the third quarter of both years we continued to fully reserve against all our
U.S. deferred tax assets.
|
|
Nine Months Ended October 2, 2010
Compared to Nine Months Ended October 3, 2009
|
On a consolidated basis for the nine-month period
ended October 2, 2010, compared to the nine-month period ended October 3,
2009, revenue increased $4.7 million or 14%, gross profit increased $2.2
million or 28% and total operating expenses increased $551,000 or 8%. The
Company reported net income of $1.7 million in the third quarter of 2010
compared to net income of $193,000 for the third quarter of 2009.
|
|
Quarry Segment Analysis
|
In the first nine months of 2010 revenues in our
quarry division increased $2.3 million or 15% from the same period last year mainly
due to increased sales in all but one quarry. The increase in the sales of
Stanstead is due in part to the purchase of the Polycor quarry which was
completed in April 2009 and in part due to the increase in the exchange rate.
Gross profit increased $1.3 million from the same period last year due to
increased sales and an overall increase in the quarry profit margin from 22%
to 26% which was mainly due to our Stanstead, Barre, Salisbury and Gardenia
quarries. In each of these quarries the cost per cubic foot has decreased and
the gross profit margins have increased. In 2010 we had a mild winter so quarry
operations started sooner in 2010 than in 2009 resulting in much better
production. Production in both Salisbury and Gardenia is better in 2010 due
to the development we have done in each of those quarries.
|
|
SG&A expenses increased 4% or $61,000 due to increases
in sales travel and convention expenses, a one-time repair to a holding pond
in Vermont and incentive accrual. The increases were somewhat offset by
decreases in pension, office expenses and legal expense related to the appeal
of our property tax valuations. The quarry divisional operating income
increased 67% or $1.2 million compared to the same period last year.
|
|
Manufacturing Segment Analysis
|
Revenue in our manufacturing division was 14% or $2.3
million higher in the first nine months of 2010 than the same period last
year. The increase in manufacturing revenue is due to increased shipments of
industrial products and monumental shipments from our plant in Canada and the
increase in the exchange rate.
|
|
Gross profit for the first nine months of 2010 was $954,000
or 21% higher than the same period last year. The gross profit margin
increased from 26% to 28% due to the larger profit margin for industrial
products.
|
|
SG&A costs for the nine-month period ended October
2, 2010 for the manufacturing division increased $204,000, compared to the
nine-month period ended October 3, 2009 mainly due to increased incentive
accrual and the increase in the exchange rate. The manufacturing operating
income was $750,000 higher than the same period last year.
|
Corporate overhead, consisting of operating costs
not directly related to an operating segment, decreased 17%, or $416,000, for
the nine-month period ended October 2, 2010 compared to the nine-month period
ended October 3, 2009 due to decreased pension, legal and accounting expenses
and Delaware franchise tax accruals. The decreases were somewhat offset by
increased bank fees and accruals for incentive payments. In the first nine
months of 2010 we incurred $553,000 in costs related to the Strategic Process
and $299,000 in costs related to the shareholder lawsuit described in Part
II, Item 1 of this Report.
|
|
Other income, which includes rental income from
non-operating properties and miscellaneous reimbursements, decreased by
$28,000 or 13% in the first nine-months compared to the prior year.
|
|
Effective March 31, 2009 the Company's defined
benefit pension plan was amended by freezing membership and future benefits
in the plan. Accordingly, we recognized an additional pension expense of
$95,000 as the effect of the pension curtailment in the first nine months of
2009. There was no comparable expense in 2010.
|
|
Net interest expense decreased $44,000, or 5%, for
the nine-month period ended October 2, 2010 compared to the nine-month period
ended October 3, 2009. On March 30, 2009, we reached a definitive agreement
with our lenders on the conditions of the grant of a waiver from compliance
with certain covenants contained in our Amended and Restated Financing
Agreement. In consideration of the consents and waivers the unused line fee
went from .25% to .50% and the existing interest rate pricing grid was
changed and interest rates increased approximately 3%.
|
|
Income tax expense was $305,000 for the nine-month
period ended October 2, 2010, compared to $59,000 for the same nine-month
period in 2009. The tax expense reported in both periods was primarily due
to our Canadian subsidiary; is calculated using an effective rate of 29.9%
and is more in 2010 than 2009 due to a larger pre-tax income in our Canadian
subsidiary and the increase in the exchange rate. During the first nine
months of both years we continued to fully reserve against all our U.S.
deferred tax assets.
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
Historically, we have met our short-term liquidity
requirements primarily from cash generated by operating activities and
periodic borrowings under the commercial credit facilities described below.
Our $50 million credit facility with our Lenders was renewed on October 24,
2007 for a term of five years.
|
|
We have historically contributed between $800,000
and $1.0 million per year to the defined benefit pension plan. We expect to
contribute $850,000 to the defined benefit plan this year, which, we believe,
we will be able to fund from cash from operations. A $212,000 contribution
was made to the plan during the quarter ended October 2, 2010 for 2010
bringing total contributions to $423,000 for 2010. We also contributed
$98,000 in January 2010 for the 2009 plan year. See note 7 of the Notes to Unaudited
Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
Our primary need for capital will be to maintain and
improve our quarry and manufacturing facilities. We have approximately $2
million planned for capital expenditures in 2010 and have spent $1.6 million
to date. We believe we will be able to fund these capital expenditures either
from cash from operations or borrowings under our credit facilities.
|
|
On April 17, 2009, ROA Canada signed an Asset
Purchase Agreement and completed the purchase of the real and personal
property comprising the Polycor Stanstead Quarry, located in Stanstead,
Quebec, Canada from Carrieres Polycor, Inc. ("Polycor"). The purchase
price for the quarry, building and inventory was $1.3 million CDN. This
purchase was funded by ROA Canada's line of credit with the Royal Bank of
Canada.
|
|
In March 2010, we received $3.8 million, net of the
Canadian withholding taxes, as a dividend from our Canadian subsidiary. We
applied $2 million of this dividend to the long-term debt and $1.8 million was
retained for working capital needs.
|
|
Cash Flows
|
|
At October 2, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents
of $1.2 million and working capital of $21.2 million, compared to $1.7
million of cash and cash equivalents and working capital of $21.1 million at December
31, 2009.
|
|
Cash Flows from Operations.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $2.1 million for the
nine-month period ended October 2, 2010 compared to $7.5 million in the
nine-month period ended October 3, 2009. The decrease in cash flow from
operations is due primarily to the decrease in the amount of collections on
accounts receivable and the change in inventory in the first nine months of
2010 compared to 2009. The significant decrease in trade
|
receivables in 2009 was partly due to the high level of
receivables as of December 31, 2008 which was driven by a very large sale at
the end of the year of $1.4 million and the high level of sales in Q4 2008 in
general - especially quarry export sales. Combine this with a very low level
of accounts receivable at the end of 2009 and accounts receivable goes from a
source of funds of $4.3 million in the first nine months of 2009 to a use of
funds of $3.7 million in the first nine months of 2010.
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing
Activities.
Cash flows used in investing activities were $1.3 million in the first nine
months of 2010 compared to $2.6 million for the same period in 2009. In 2010
we spent $1.6 million for capital expenditures, of which, $819,000 was for
quarry development. We also received $246,000 on sales of assets and $48,000
from sales of stock in Family Memorials. In 2009, we purchased property,
plant and equipment (PP&E) totaling $1.4 million and land and granite
reserves in Canada for $1.4 million less $243,000 received on sales of
assets. Cash used in investing activities comes from either borrowings under
our credit facilities or from operations.
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing
Activities.
Net
cash used in financing activities in the nine-month period ended October 2,
2010 was $1.4 million which consisted of $4 million in gross proceeds from
long-term debt of our Canadian subsidiary less $5.2 million paid on long-term
debt in the U.S. and Canada plus $216,000 paid on the revolving line of
credit. This compares to $5.1 million used in financing activities in the nine-month
period ended October 3, 2009 which consisted of repayments on the long-term
debt of $251,000 and net repayments on the revolving line of credit of $4.9
million.
|
|
CIT Credit Facility
|
We have a credit facility with the CIT
Group/Business Credit and Chittenden Trust Company (the "Lenders")
that is scheduled to expire in October 2012 and is secured by substantially
all assets of the Company located in the United States. The credit facility
consists of an acquisition term loan line of credit of up to $30.0 million
and a revolving credit facility of up to another $20.0 million based on
eligible accounts receivable, inventory and certain fixed assets. Amounts
outstanding were $-0- and $11,206,000 as of October 2, 2010 and $2,565,000
and $13,886,000 as of October 3, 2009 on the revolving credit facility and
the term loan line of credit, respectively. Availability under the revolving
credit facility was $12.9 million as of October 2, 2010. The credit facility
financing agreement places restrictions on our ability to, among other
things, sell assets, participate in mergers, incur debt, pay dividends, make
capital expenditures, repurchase stock and make investments or guarantees,
without pre-approval by the Lenders. The credit facility requires a minimum
fixed charge coverage ratio and a total liabilities to net worth ratio. See
footnote No. 9 to the financial statements for more details.
|
|
Interest Rates.
We can elect the interest rate under
the credit facility based on the prime rate or LIBOR for both the revolving
credit facility and the term loan. The revolving credit facility's rate is
based on Prime plus 3% or LIBOR plus 4% with a 2% floor for LIBOR. The term
loan's rate is based on Prime plus 3.5% or LIBOR plus 4.5% with a 2% floor
for LIBOR.
|
|
The rates in effect as of October 2, 2010 were as
follows:
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Formula
|
|
Effective
Rate
|
Revolving Credit Facility
|
$
|
-
|
|
Prime + 3.00%
|
|
6.25%
|
Term Loan
|
$
|
2.2 million
|
|
Prime + 3.50%
|
|
6.75%
|
Term Loan
|
$
|
9.0 million
|
|
Libor + 4.5%
|
|
6.50%
|
|
Canadian
Credit Facility
|
The
Company's Canadian subsidiary has a line of credit agreement with the Royal
Bank of Canada that is renewable annually. Under the terms of this agreement,
a maximum of $2.5 million CDN may be advanced based on eligible accounts
receivable, eligible inventory, and tangible fixed assets. The line of
credit bears interest at the Canadian prime rate plus 0.5%. There was $-0- outstanding
as of October 2, 2010 and October 3, 2009, respectively.
|
|
The Canadian subsidiary also has a non-revolving
term loan which cannot exceed $4 million CDN bearing interest at the Canadian
prime rate plus 0.95%. There was $1.5 million and $-0- outstanding as of October
2, 2010 and October 3, 2009, respectively. The effective rate was 3.95% as of
October 2, 2010.
|
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
|
|
With the exception of our operating leases, we do
not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, and we do not have, nor do we
engage in, transactions with any special purpose entities.
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
|
The
Company has financial instruments that are subject to interest rate risk,
principally debt obligations under its credit facilities. Historically, the
Company has not experienced material gains or losses due to interest rate
changes. Based on the October 2, 2010 outstanding borrowings under the credit
facilities of $13 million, the impact of a 1% increase in the interest rates
would be approximately $130,000 a year.
|
|
The
Company is subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk primarily from the
operations of its Canadian subsidiary. At October 2, 2010, the Canadian subsidiary
had total assets of $11.3 million exposed to changes in the Canadian/U.S.
dollar exchange rate. The impact of the change in the exchange rate in the
first nine months of 2010 was $252,000 due to an increase in the value of the
Canadian dollar.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls and Procedures
|
Disclosure Controls and
Procedures.
The
Company, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and
Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"), has evaluated the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Based on this evaluation, our CEO and CFO have determined, that such
disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in our filings under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms.
Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed
to reasonably ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to
our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. Management has concluded that the
consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q fairly present, in all
material respects, the Company's financial position, results of operations
and cash flows for the periods and dates presented.
|
|
Changes in Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting.
There have been no significant changes in the Company's internal
control over financial reporting identified during the quarter ended October
2, 2010.
|
|
|
PART II
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal Proceedings
|
We are a party to legal proceedings that arise from
time to time in the ordinary course of our business. While the outcome of
these proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not expect them
to have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition.
|
|
The Company carries insurance with coverage that it
believes to be customary in its industry. Although there can be no assurance
that such insurance will be sufficient to protect us against all
contingencies, management believes that its insurance protection is
reasonable in view of the nature and scope of our operations.
|
|
The U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration
(MSHA) issued citations to one of our subsidiaries, Pennsylvania Granite,
asserting various violations and assessed fines totaling approximately
$280,000. The Company disagrees with the validity of these violations and
how they are characterized. We are appealing the citations. Based on
experience of our legal counsel in settling similar assessments and available
historical MSHA settlement data, we estimate our final exposure will be no
greater than $125,000.
|
|
A purported shareholder of Rock of Ages commenced a
purported class action lawsuit against Rock of Ages, all of the members of
its Board of Directors
,
certain
of its
officers, and Swenson,
shortly after
Swenson's initial
proposal
,
submitted
to the Company's board of directors on May 6, 2010, to
acquire the Company at $4.38 per share of common stock. The complaint was
filed in Vermont Superior Court, Washington County and subsequently removed
to the United States District Court for the District of Vermont
.
The plaintiff alleges, among other things, that the
Rock of Ages
directors and
officers
named
in the complaint
breached their fiduciary duties in connection with the Swenson proposal, that
Swenson's proposed offer is inadequate, and that the
defendants
would benefit from
the proposed transaction to the detriment of Rock of Ages' other shareholders.
Plaintiff seeks an order
certifying the proposed class, granting preliminary and permanent
injunctive relief against the consummation of the
merger, or, if the merger is consummated, rescinding
the merger and/or awarding rescissory damages and ordering an accounting, and
an award of costs and attorneys fees
. Rock of Ages
believes the complaint is without merit and is engaged in a vigorous defense.
The plaintiff has asserted to
the court that he intends to amend his complaint, but has not indicated when
he will do so.
A second purported
class action was
commenced by
a purported shareholder against Rock of Ages, each of its
current directors, Swenson and Merger Sub
on October 27, 2010 in the
United States District Court for the
|
District of Vermont. The plaintiff alleges,
among other things, that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary
duties in approving the previously announced merger agreement among the
Company, Swenson and
Merger Sub
, providing for the
acquisition of the Company through a merger of
Merger Sub
with and into the
Company, with the Company surviving the merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of
Swenson. Plaintiff further alleges that Swenson and
Merger Sub
aided and abetted
such breaches of duty.
Plaintiff
seeks an order certifying the proposed class, granting preliminary and
permanent injunctive relief against the consummation of the merger, or, if
the merger is consummated, rescinding the merger and/or awarding rescissory
damages and ordering an accounting, and an award of costs and attorneys
fees. Rock of Ages
believes the complaint is
without merit and plans a vigorous defense.
Plaintiff's counsel has notified defendants' counsel
that they intend to amend their complaint, but have not yet done so.
|
|
Item 1A.
|
Risk Factors
|
Other than the risk factors described below, there
have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in
Part I, Item 1A of the Company's 2009 Annual Report.
|
|
As described above in this Form
10-Q, the Company recently
entered into a merger agreement with Swenson which
provides for the acquisition of the Company by Swenson at a cash price of
$5.25 per share
; there can be no assurance that
the merger agreement will receive the necessary
shareholder approval required under the merger agreement or that the merger
will be consummated
. The Company has incurred, and will continue
to incur, significant fees and expenses in connection with the proposed
merger and related matters whether or not the merger agreement receives the
requisite shareholder approval of the merger is consummated.
|
|
On October 15,
2010, the Company's
Board of Directors and the
Special Committee approved a definitive merger agreement by and among the
Company, Swenson and Merger Sub. For further information, refer to Footnote
15 - "Merger Agreement" under "ROCK OF AGES CORPORATION -
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS" of this Form 10-Q,
above
.
|
|
The Company is responsible for payment of the fees
and expenses of the Special Committee's financial advisor and counsel, as
well as of its own counsel; such fees and expenses are, and will continue to
be, significant and will adversely impact the Company's results of
operations.
|
|
A purported shareholder of Rock of
Ages has commenced a purported class action lawsuit against Rock of Ages, all
of the members of its Board of Directors, certain of its officers, and
Swenson, in connection with Swenson's initial proposal, submitted to the
board of directors on May 6, 2010, to acquire the Company at $4.38 per share
of Company common stock.
|
|
A second purported shareholder of Rock of Ages has
commenced another purported class action lawsuit against Rock of Ages, all of
the members of its Board of Directors, Swenson and Merger Sub
, in connection with the
approval of the acquisition proposal by the Rock of Ages' Board of Directors
on October 15, 2010.
|
|
For further information regarding these class action
lawsuits, please refer to Part II, Item 1 - "Legal Proceedings" of
this Form 10-Q, above
.
|
|
There can be no assurance that we will prevail in
our defense and even if we do, the legal fees and expenses related to these
lawsuits are, and will likely continue to be significant. To the extent these
legal fees and expenses are not promptly paid or reimbursed by the Company's
director and officer liability insurance carrier, such fees and expenses will
adversely impact the Company's results of operations.
|
|
If we are unable to
affirm the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting in
future years, the market value of our common stock could be adversely
affected.
|
|
We must report on our internal controls over
financial reporting as of the end of each fiscal quarter and as of the end of
each fiscal year. In 2007 we disclosed material weaknesses in our internal
controls over financial reporting in Item 9A(T) - Controls and
Procedures of the Annual Report on Form 10-K. In 2008 we remediated the
weaknesses and accordingly reported no material weaknesses in our internal
controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 and December 31,
2009. However, we cannot assure you that we will continue to be able to
report that our internal controls over financial reporting are effective as
of December 31, 2010 and subsequent fiscal year end dates, respectively. In
this event, investors could lose confidence in the reliability of our
financial statements, which could result in a decrease in the market value of
our Class A Common Stock.
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
The Company held its annual meeting of stockholders
on August 12, 2010 (the "Annual Meeting"), to elect two each Class
I, II and III directors and to ratify the selection of Grant Thornton LLP as
the Company's registered public accounting firm for the 2010 fiscal year.
|
|
Kurt M. Swenson and Frederick E. Webster, Jr. were
elected to serve as Class I directors for a one-year term expiring at the
annual meeting of stockholders in 2011 and until their successors are duly
elected and qualified. Pamela G. Sheiffer and Donald M. Labonte were elected
to serve as Class II directors for a two-year term expiring at the annual
meeting of stockholders in 2012 and until their successors are duly elected
and qualified. James L. Fox and Richard C. Kimball were elected to serve as
Class III directors for a three-year term expiring at the annual meeting of
stockholders in 2013 and until their successors are duly elected and
qualified.
|
|
The following table sets forth the number of votes
cast for, against or withheld, as well as the number of abstentions, as to
the election of each of the directors and the ratification of the selection
of Grant Thornton LLP as the Company's registered public accounting firm for
the 2010 fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For
|
|
Votes Withheld/
Votes Against
|
|
Abstentions
|
Election of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kurt M. Swenson
|
|
25,082,295
|
|
3,140,777
|
|
-
|
Frederick E. Webster, Jr.
|
|
25,367,994
|
|
2,855,078
|
|
-
|
Pamela G. Sheiffer
|
|
25,366,194
|
|
2,856,878
|
|
-
|
Donald M. Labonte
|
|
25,368,494
|
|
2,854,578
|
|
-
|
James L. Fox
|
|
25,368,394
|
|
2,854,678
|
|
-
|
Richard C. Kimball
|
|
25,354,933
|
|
2,868,139
|
|
-
|
Grant Thornton LLP
|
|
28,171,392
|
|
48,323
|
|
3,357
|
Item 6.
|
Exhibits
|
|
|
Number
|
Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
Agreement
and Plan of Merger dated October 18, 2010 by and among Swenson Granite
Company, LLC, Granite Acquisition, LLC, and Rock of Ages Corporation
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company's Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
October 18, 2010).
|
|
|
2.2
|
Agreement
and Plan of Merger dated October 21, 2009 by and between Rock of Ages
Corporation, a Delaware corporation and Rock of Ages Corporation (Vermont), a
Vermont corporation, (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the
Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on December 8, 2009).
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
Articles
of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on December 8, 2009).
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
By-laws
of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the
Company's Current Report on Form 8-K and filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on December 8, 2009).
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
Articles of Merger filed with the Vermont Secretary
of State dated December 7, 2009 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
3.3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on December 8, 2009).
|
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
Certificate of Merger filed with the Delaware
Secretary of State dated December 7, 2009 (incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 3.4 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on December 8, 2009).
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
Specimen
Certificate representing the Class A Common Stock incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on
Form 8-A (Commission File No. 0-2964) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on December 15, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of CEO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of CFO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
of CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
Certification of CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
SIGNATURE
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
hereunto duly authorized.
|
|
ROCK OF
AGES CORPORATION
|
|
|
Dated: November
16, 2010
|
By:
/s/
Laura A Plude
Laura A. Plude
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
Number
|
Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
Agreement
and Plan of Merger dated October 18, 2010 by and among Swenson Granite
Company, LLC, Granite Acquisition, LLC, and Rock of Ages Corporation
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company's Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
October 18, 2010).
|
|
|
2.2
|
Agreement
and Plan of Merger dated October 21, 2009 by and between Rock of Ages
Corporation, a Delaware corporation and Rock of Ages Corporation (Vermont), a
Vermont corporation, (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the
Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on December 8, 2009).
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
Articles
of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on December 8, 2009).
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
By-laws
of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the
Company's Current Report on Form 8-K and filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on December 8, 2009).
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
Articles of Merger filed with the Vermont Secretary
of State dated December 7, 2009 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
3.3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on December 8, 2009).
|
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
Certificate of Merger filed with the Delaware
Secretary of State dated December 7, 2009 (incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 3.4 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on December 8, 2009).
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
Specimen
Certificate representing the Class A Common Stock incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on
Form 8-A (Commission File No. 0-2964) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on December 15, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of CEO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of CFO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
of CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
Certification of CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|