Nasdaq Study Shows Structural Reform Needed to Unlock Global Carbon
Markets
Nasdaq (Nasdaq: NDAQ) today published the results of a global
survey examining the voluntary carbon market (VCM) ecosystem, with
responses from over 130 decision-makers across project owners,
financial investors, commercial banks, brokers, and market
operators, produced in partnership with the ValueExchange.
The survey reveals that the market for voluntary carbon credits
is growing and attracting more diverse participants, but price
transparency, market inefficiencies and fragmentation are
preventing scale. Carbon credit registries are seen as having the
power to address many of these challenges and unlock the potential
of the industry.
Roland Chai, Executive Vice President and Head of European
Market Services, at Nasdaq said: “Global carbon markets are at a
critical juncture. Truly scalable, trusted carbon markets can have
a profound and lasting impact; the question is how we get there. By
identifying the structural inefficiencies holding the market back,
we can propose long-term solutions and help build global consensus.
Addressing these barriers to scale can only come from a coordinated
push from policymakers, market infrastructure providers, and
participants across the financial services ecosystem.”
Demand for carbons credits is being
constrained
Demand for carbon credits arises from a broad range of players
and objectives: 67% of corporates are driven by their ESG
priorities, 50% of commercial banks purchase credits to decarbonize
their investment portfolio, and 45% of investors are primarily
seeking a financial return. There is also a clear desire for
companies to expand their activity with more than half of
corporates expressing a desire to double their exposure to the
asset class.
However, despite the diversified demand for carbon credits,
current market structures are stifling demand as well as the
broader evolution of the market. Challenges in issuance,
verification, trading, reporting, and retirement processes prevent
18% of all survey respondents from participating in today's
voluntary carbon markets. A further 11% saw their volumes capped at
less than half of their targets due to the same issues, with 40%
constrained by at least a quarter.
Price transparency, inefficiencies, and market
fragmentation
Nearly one-third (30%) of all respondents had low confidence in
the pricing of carbon assets, leaving them unable to efficiently
discover price or benchmark credits on the demand side. A lack of
pricing transparency prevents brokers from trading and investors
from holding the asset, leaving volumes capped at an artificially
low level. This rate of low confidence rises to 66% in commercial
banks, which constrains supply because financiers can’t accurately
model risk or efficiently deploy capital.
The overall structure of voluntary carbon markets is
characterized by inconsistency across credit types, with a heavy
reliance on manual interactions and onerous data collection tools.
This lack of standardization not only hampers trading but also
limits the accessibility of local markets to foreign investors. The
persistent need to perform manual due diligence and pricing for
individual projects remains a significant barrier to scale: For
example, 63% of respondents handled project listings via phone and
email, but 79% would ideally like to manage such activities through
a registry platform. Higher costs stemming from non-standardization
and manual methods will inevitably drive commercial banks,
corporates, and investors to seek out larger deals, cutting out
smaller project owners, leading to decreased deal volumes and
bottlenecked financing.
These challenges are further compounded by widespread
fragmentation. Almost half of survey respondents across project
owners, financiers, intermediaries, and investors are forced to
interact with four or more registries. With little to no
standardization or interoperability, this market inefficiency and
fragmentation forces small “puddles of liquidity"—each isolated,
devoid of scale, and requiring entirely bespoke, manual resources
to interact.
How global carbon markets can achieve scale
A clear and proven source of transparency for all securities is
exchange trading, which is the preferred market model for 58% of
all respondents. Positively, pioneering exchange venues are
receiving extensive support from governments, regulatory
authorities, and banks, addressing some market constraints.
However, much more work is needed to address post trade
infrastructure.
Two-thirds of respondents (66%) see registries as the most
important facilitator to improving markets and leading change. As
the guarantors of quality in the voluntary carbon markets,
registries have two core levers to drive confidence. The first is
their traditional strength of project verification and methodology,
where evolution continues. And second, as the key enabler of buyer
confidence, is their ability to drive standardization in the
products that they hold, in the data that describes them, and in
the availability of that data across multiple platforms.
Through standardization they can enable automation and
connectivity, which accelerates due diligence, increases price
transparency, and reduces transaction costs. In doing so they can
address the fundamental confidence issues that undermine the
industry today and help to put the world’s voluntary carbon markets
on a scalable growth path.
Magnus Haglind, Senior Vice President and Head of Marketplace
Technology, at Nasdaq said: “Without a credible foundation for
building trust, liquidity, and connectivity across voluntary carbon
markets, they cannot scale. We must evolve the structure of the
market, drawing on the institutional knowledge and framework of
other global asset classes, to establish an institutional ecosystem
around carbon credits. Registries lie at the heart of the solution,
with the ability to embrace new technologies, set internationally
consistent standards, and accelerate the market’s growth
trajectory.
About Nasdaq Nasdaq (Nasdaq: NDAQ)
is a leading global technology company serving corporate clients,
investment managers, banks, brokers, and exchange operators as they
navigate and interact with the global capital markets and the
broader financial system. We aspire to deliver world-leading
platforms that improve the liquidity, transparency, and integrity
of the global economy. Our diverse offering of data, analytics,
software, exchange capabilities, and client-centric services
enables clients to optimize and execute their business vision with
confidence. To learn more about the company, technology solutions,
and career opportunities, visit us on LinkedIn, on X @Nasdaq, or at
www.nasdaq.com.
Nasdaq Media Contact:Andrew
Hughes+44 (0)7443 100896Andrew.Hughes@nasdaq.com
-NDAQG-
Nasdaq (TG:NAQ)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2024 to Dec 2024
Nasdaq (TG:NAQ)
Historical Stock Chart
From Dec 2023 to Dec 2024