Baytex Energy Corp. ("Baytex") (TSX:BTE) (NYSE:BTE) reports
its operating and financial results for the three months and year
ended December 31, 2017 (all amounts are in Canadian dollars
unless otherwise noted).
“Our fourth quarter results demonstrate the
impressive cash generating capability of our assets as commodity
prices improve. With WTI averaging US$55/bbl, we realized our
strongest operating netback in three years and generated adjusted
funds flow of $106 million, a level we have not seen since
mid-2015. We are delivering outstanding drilling results across our
portfolio, including some of our best ever new well production
rates in the Eagle Ford. In 2017, we continued to drive cost and
capital efficiency in our business and I am pleased that we
increased our production, reserves and adjusted funds flow. Our
plans for 2018 build on this operational momentum,” commented Ed
LaFehr, President and Chief Executive Officer.
Highlights
- Generated production of 69,556 boe/d (81% oil and NGL) during
Q4/2017, an increase of 7% over Q4/2016, and 70,242 boe/d for
full-year 2017, exceeding the high end of guidance, with capital
expenditures of $326 million, in line with annual guidance;
- Delivered adjusted funds flow of $106 million ($0.45 per basic
share) in Q4/2017, an increase of 37% over Q4/2016, and $348
million ($1.48 per basic share) for the full-year 2017, an increase
of 26% over 2016;
- Decreased cash costs (operating, transportation and general and
administrative expenses) by 7.5% on a boe basis as compared to the
mid-point of original guidance;
- Realized an operating netback in Q4/2017 of $21.78/boe
($22.08/boe including financial derivative gains);
- Reduced net debt to $1.73 billion; adjusted funds flow exceeded
capital expenditures by $21 million;
- Continued strong performance in the Eagle Ford with wells that
commenced production during Q4/2017 representing some of the
highest productivity wells drilled to-date with 30-day initial
gross production rates of approximately 1,700 boe/d per well.
Two wells in our new northern Austin Chalk fracture trend
demonstrated 30-day initial gross production rates of approximately
2,400 boe/d per well (89% liquids);
- Increased proved plus probable reserves by 6% to 432 mmboe
(201% production replacement). Year-end 2017 proved plus probable
reserves are comprised of 80% oil and NGL and 20% natural gas;
- Recorded finding and development (“F&D”) costs for proved
plus probable reserves, including changes in future development
costs, of $7.26/boe and generated a recycle ratio of 2.7x. Recorded
finding, development and acquisition (“FD&A”) costs of
$9.11/boe with a recycle ratio of 2.2x;
- In the Eagle Ford, replaced 225% of production and increased
proved plus probable reserves by 8% to 233 mmboe. From the time of
acquisition in June 2014, proved plus probable reserves in the
Eagle Ford have increased by 40%. Prior to deducting total
production of 49 mmboe over this period, reserves growth is
approximately 70%;
- In Canada, replaced 175% of production and increased proved
plus probable reserves by 5% to 199 mmboe, as we returned to active
development, including the integration of the heavy oil assets
acquired in the Peace River region in January 2017;
and
- Net asset value at year-end 2017 increased 11% to $10.08 per
share (before tax and discounted at 10%).
|
Three Months Ended |
Years Ended |
|
December 31,2017 |
|
|
September 30,2017 |
|
|
December 31,2016 |
|
|
December 31,2017 |
|
December 31,2016 |
|
FINANCIAL(thousands of Canadian dollars, except
per common share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
Petroleum and
natural gas sales |
$ |
302,186 |
|
|
$ |
254,430 |
|
|
$ |
233,116 |
|
|
$ |
1,091,534 |
|
$ |
780,095 |
|
Adjusted funds
flow (1) |
105,796 |
|
|
77,340 |
|
|
77,239 |
|
|
347,641 |
|
276,251 |
|
Per share
– basic |
0.45 |
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
1.48 |
|
1.30 |
|
Per share
– diluted |
0.44 |
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
1.47 |
|
1.30 |
|
Net income
(loss) |
76,038 |
|
|
(9,228 |
) |
|
(359,424 |
) |
|
87,174 |
|
(485,184 |
) |
Per share
– basic |
0.32 |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
(1.66 |
) |
|
0.37 |
|
(2.29 |
) |
Per share
– diluted |
0.32 |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
(1.66 |
) |
|
0.37 |
|
(2.29 |
) |
Exploration and
development |
90,156 |
|
|
61,544 |
|
|
68,029 |
|
|
326,266 |
|
224,783 |
|
Acquisitions, net of divestitures |
(3,937 |
) |
|
(7,436 |
) |
|
(322 |
) |
|
59,857 |
|
(63,120 |
) |
Total oil and natural gas capital
expenditures |
$ |
86,219 |
|
|
$ |
54,108 |
|
|
$ |
67,707 |
|
|
$ |
386,123 |
|
$ |
161,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank loan
(2) |
$ |
213,376 |
|
|
$ |
226,249 |
|
|
$ |
191,286 |
|
|
$ |
213,376 |
|
$ |
191,286 |
|
Long-term notes (2) |
1,489,210 |
|
|
1,488,450 |
|
|
1,584,158 |
|
|
1,489,210 |
|
1,584,158 |
|
Long-term
debt |
1,702,586 |
|
|
1,714,699 |
|
|
1,775,444 |
|
|
1,702,586 |
|
1,775,444 |
|
Working capital
(surplus) deficiency |
31,698 |
|
|
34,106 |
|
|
(1,903 |
) |
|
31,698 |
|
(1,903 |
) |
Net debt (3) |
$ |
1,734,284 |
|
|
$ |
1,748,805 |
|
|
$ |
1,773,541 |
|
|
$ |
1,734,284 |
|
$ |
1,773,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
Years Ended |
|
December 31,2017 |
|
September 30,2017 |
|
December 31,2016 |
|
December 31,2017 |
|
December 31,2016 |
|
OPERATING |
|
|
|
|
|
Daily
production |
|
|
|
|
|
Heavy oil
(bbl/d) |
24,945 |
|
26,161 |
|
22,982 |
|
25,326 |
|
23,586 |
|
Light oil
and condensate (bbl/d) |
21,229 |
|
20,041 |
|
20,163 |
|
21,314 |
|
21,377 |
|
NGL
(bbl/d) |
9,872 |
|
8,940 |
|
8,319 |
|
9,206 |
|
9,349 |
|
Total oil
and NGL (bbl/d) |
56,046 |
|
55,142 |
|
51,464 |
|
55,846 |
|
54,312 |
|
Natural
gas (mcf/d) |
81,063 |
|
85,006 |
|
82,032 |
|
86,375 |
|
91,182 |
|
Oil
equivalent (boe/d @ 6:1) (4) |
69,556 |
|
69,310 |
|
65,136 |
|
70,242 |
|
69,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benchmark
prices |
|
|
|
|
|
WTI oil
(US$/bbl) |
55.40 |
|
48.20 |
|
49.29 |
|
50.95 |
|
43.33 |
|
WCS heavy
oil (US$/bbl) |
43.14 |
|
38.26 |
|
34.97 |
|
38.97 |
|
29.49 |
|
Edmonton
par oil ($/bbl) |
69.02 |
|
56.74 |
|
61.58 |
|
62.92 |
|
53.01 |
|
LLS oil
(US$/bbl) |
60.50 |
|
50.27 |
|
49.95 |
|
53.26 |
|
43.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baytex average
prices (before hedging) |
|
|
|
|
|
Heavy oil
($/bbl) (5) |
42.03 |
|
38.18 |
|
34.33 |
|
38.46 |
|
26.46 |
|
Light oil
and condensate ($/bbl) |
72.64 |
|
58.22 |
|
60.12 |
|
63.74 |
|
50.32 |
|
NGL
($/bbl) |
29.14 |
|
25.18 |
|
22.64 |
|
25.86 |
|
17.16 |
|
Total oil
and NGL ($/bbl) |
51.35 |
|
43.36 |
|
42.55 |
|
46.03 |
|
34.25 |
|
Natural
gas ($/mcf) |
2.89 |
|
2.89 |
|
3.61 |
|
3.24 |
|
2.69 |
|
Oil
equivalent ($/boe) |
44.75 |
|
38.04 |
|
38.16 |
|
40.58 |
|
30.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAD/USD noon
rate at period end |
1.2518 |
|
1.2510 |
|
1.3427 |
|
1.2518 |
|
1.3427 |
|
CAD/USD average rate for period |
1.2717 |
|
1.2524 |
|
1.3339 |
|
1.2979 |
|
1.3256 |
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
Years Ended |
|
December 31,2017 |
September 30,2017 |
December 31,2016 |
December 31,2017 |
December 31,2016 |
COMMON SHARE
INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
TSX |
|
|
|
|
|
Share price (Cdn$) |
|
|
|
|
|
High |
4.59 |
4.13 |
7.35 |
6.97 |
9.04 |
Low |
2.95 |
2.76 |
4.85 |
2.76 |
1.57 |
Close |
3.77 |
3.76 |
6.56 |
3.77 |
6.56 |
Volume traded
(thousands) |
195,013 |
156,562 |
351,040 |
823,591 |
1,677,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYSE |
|
|
|
|
|
Share price (US$) |
|
|
|
|
|
High |
3.06 |
3.16 |
5.61 |
5.20 |
7.14 |
Low |
2.30 |
2.13 |
3.60 |
2.13 |
1.08 |
Close |
2.76 |
3.01 |
4.48 |
2.76 |
4.48 |
Volume traded
(thousands) |
25,504 |
81,848 |
186,423 |
356,263 |
707,973 |
Common shares outstanding (thousands) |
235,451 |
235,451 |
233,449 |
235,451 |
233,449 |
Notes:
- Adjusted funds flow is not a measurement based on generally
accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") in Canada, but is a
financial term commonly used in the oil and gas industry. We define
adjusted funds flow as cash flow from operating activities adjusted
for changes in non-cash operating working capital and asset
retirement obligations settled. Our determination of adjusted funds
flow may not be comparable to other issuers. We consider adjusted
funds flow a key measure of performance as it demonstrates our
ability to generate the cash flow necessary to fund capital
investments, debt repayment, settlement of our abandonment
obligations and potential future dividends. In addition, we use the
ratio of net debt to adjusted funds flow to manage our capital
structure. We eliminate changes in non-cash working capital and
settlements of abandonment obligations from cash flow from
operations as the amounts can be discretionary and may vary from
period to period depending on our capital programs and the maturity
of our operating areas. The settlement of abandonment
obligations are managed with our capital budgeting process which
considers available adjusted funds flow. For a reconciliation
of adjusted funds flow to cash flow from operating activities, see
Management's Discussion and Analysis of the operating and financial
results for the year ended December 31, 2017.
- Principal amount of instruments.
- Net debt is not a measurement based on GAAP in Canada, but is a
financial term commonly used in the oil and gas industry. We define
net debt to be the sum of monetary working capital (which is
current assets less current liabilities (excluding current
financial derivatives and onerous contracts)) and the principal
amount of both the long-term notes and the bank loan.
- Barrel of oil equivalent ("boe") amounts have been calculated
using a conversion rate of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas
to one barrel of oil. The use of boe amounts may be misleading,
particularly if used in isolation. A boe conversion ratio of six
thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil is based on
an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the
burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the
wellhead.
- Heavy oil prices exclude condensate blending.
Operating Results
2017 was a year about delivering on our
commitments in a challenging commodity price environment. We
delivered on our operational and financial targets, reduced our
overall debt and acquired a strategic asset in Peace River. In
addition, we continued to drive cost and capital efficiency in our
business and increased our production, reserves and adjusted funds
flow.
Production averaged 69,556 boe/d (81% oil and
NGL) in Q4/2017, as compared to 69,310 boe/d (80% oil and NGL) in
Q3/2017 and 65,136 boe/d in Q4/2016. For the full-year 2017,
production averaged 70,242 boe/d (80% oil and NGL), exceeding the
high end of our production guidance range of 66,000 to
70,000 boe/d announced in December 2016 and subsequently
tightened to 69,500 to 70,000 boe/d.
Capital expenditures for exploration and
development activities totaled $90 million in Q4/2017 and $326
million for full-year 2017, in line with our guidance range of
$300-$350 million announced in December 2016 and subsequently
tightened to $310‑$330 million. We participated in the drilling of
226 (86.6 net) wells with a 100% success rate during the year.
We generated adjusted funds flow of $348 million
during 2017, exceeding capital expenditures by $21 million. We
employ a flexible approach to prudently manage our capital program
as we target exploration and development capital expenditures at a
level that approximates our adjusted funds flow.
Eagle Ford
Our Eagle Ford asset in South Texas is one of
the premier oil resource plays in North America. The assets
generate the highest cash netbacks in our portfolio and contain a
significant inventory of development prospects. In 2017, we
allocated 65% of our exploration and development expenditures to
these assets.
Production averaged 37,362 (78% liquids) during
the fourth quarter, as compared to 34,750 boe/d in Q3/2017.
Production for the full-year 2017 averaged 36,678 boe/d.
We continue to see strong well performance
driven by enhanced completions in the oil window of our acreage. In
2017, we participated in the drilling of 140 (32.8 net) wells and
commenced production from 115 (28.7 net) wells. The wells that have
been on production for more than 30 days during 2017 established
30-day initial production rates of approximately 1,450 boe/d, which
represents an approximate 12% improvement over 2016.
During the fourth quarter, we participated in
the completion of five pads (total of 25 gross wells), including
two in Longhorn and three in Sugarloaf. These pads were completed
with approximately 30 effective frac stages per well and proppant
per completed foot of approximately 2,000 pounds, which is more
than double the frac intensity of wells previously drilled in the
area. The wells that commenced production during the fourth quarter
represent some of the highest productivity wells drilled to-date on
our lands and, on average, established 30-day initial gross
production rates of approximately 1,700 boe/d per well. Two of
these wells in our new northern Austin Chalk fracture trend
demonstrated 30-day initial gross production rates of approximately
2,400 boe/d per well.
Peace River
Our Peace River region, located in northwest
Alberta, has been a core asset since we commenced operations in the
area in 2004. Through our innovative multi-lateral horizontal
drilling and production techniques, we are able to generate some of
the strongest capital efficiencies in the oil and gas industry. In
addition, through detailed re-mapping of the Bluesky formation, we
have been able to effectively increase our exposure to pay in the
laterals of new wells, achieving 97% in zone performance.
Production averaged 16,700 boe/d (93% heavy oil)
during the fourth quarter and 17,550 boe/d for the full-year 2017.
After limited activity on these lands in 2016, we drilled 8 (8.0
net) wells in 2017. These wells established an average 30-day
initial production rate of approximately 400 bbl/d per well
with our highest productivity well averaging over 600 bbl/d.
Lloydminster
Our Lloydminster region, which straddles the
Alberta and Saskatchewan border, is characterized by multiple
stacked pay formations at relatively shallow depths, which we have
successfully developed through vertical and horizontal drilling,
water flood and steam-assisted gravity drainage operations. We have
also adopted, where applicable, the multi-lateral well design and
geosteering capability that we have successfully utilized at Peace
River.
Production averaged 9,600 boe/d (99% heavy oil)
during the fourth quarter and 9,100 boe/d for the full-year 2017.
We drilled 24 (11.4 net) wells during the fourth quarter and
65 (32.8 net) wells in 2017. During the fourth quarter, seven
operated wells (including four multi-lateral horizontal wells)
established an average 30-day initial production rate of
approximately 180 bbl/d per well.
Financial Review
We generated adjusted funds flow of $106 million
($0.45 per basic share) in Q4/2017, compared to $77 million ($0.33
per basic share) in Q3/2017. Full-year adjusted funds flow was $348
million ($1.48 per basic share), compared to $276 million
($1.30 basic per share) in 2016. Excluding financial
derivatives gains, adjusted funds flow in 2017 was $340 million,
compared to $179 million in 2016, an increase of 90% due primarily
to higher commodity prices. This illustrates the sensitivity of our
operations to improvements in commodity prices.
Financial Liquidity
We maintain strong financial liquidity with our
US$575 million revolving credit facilities approximately 70%
undrawn and our first long-term note maturity not until 2021. With
our strategy to target exploration and development capital
expenditures at a level that approximates our adjusted funds flow,
we expect this liquidity position to be stable going forward.
Our revolving credit facilities, which currently
mature in June 2019, are covenant-based and do not require annual
or semi-annual reviews. We are well within our financial covenants
on these facilities as our Senior Secured Debt to Bank EBITDA ratio
as at December 31, 2017 was 0.5:1.0, compared to a maximum
permitted ratio of 5.0:1.0 (which steps down to 3.5:1.0 after
December 31, 2018) and our interest coverage ratio was 4.5:1.0,
compared to a minimum required ratio of 1.25:1.0 (which steps up to
2.0:1.0 after December 31, 2018).
Our net debt totaled $1.73 billion at December
31, 2017, which is down $39 million from December 31, 2016.
Operating Netback
Our fourth quarter operating netback of
$21.78/boe (excluding financial derivatives) is the strongest we
have realized since 2014 and demonstrates the cash generating
ability of our assets in an improved commodity price environment.
The Eagle Ford generated an operating netback of $30.19/boe during
Q4/2017 while our Canadian operations generated an operating
netback of $12.01/boe.
In Q4/2017, the price for West Texas
Intermediate light oil (“WTI”) averaged US$55.40/bbl, as compared
to US$49.29/bbl in Q4/2016. The discount for Canadian heavy oil, as
measured by the price differential between Western Canadian Select
(“WCS”) and WTI, improved slightly during Q4/2017, averaging
US$12.26/bbl, as compared to US$14.32/bbl in Q4/2016.
In the Eagle Ford, our assets are proximal to
Gulf Coast markets with light oil and condensate production priced
off the Louisiana Light Sweet (“LLS”) crude oil benchmark, which is
a function of the Brent price. As a result, we benefited during the
fourth quarter from a widening of the Brent-WTI spread. In
addition, increased competition for physical field supplies has
resulted in improved price realizations relative to LLS. During the
fourth quarter, our light oil and condensate price in the Eagle
Ford of US$57.47/bbl (or $73.08/bbl), which represented a
US$3.03/bbl discount to LLS, as compared to a historical discount
of approximately US$6.00/bbl.
The following table summarizes our operating
netbacks for the periods noted.
|
Three Months Ended December 31 |
|
2017 |
2016 |
($ per boe except for sales volume) |
Canada |
U.S. |
Total |
Canada |
U.S. |
Total |
Sales volume
(boe/d) |
32,194 |
|
37,362 |
|
69,556 |
|
31,704 |
|
33,432 |
|
65,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized sales
price |
$ |
36.89 |
|
$ |
51.53 |
|
$ |
44.75 |
|
$ |
31.10 |
|
$ |
44.84 |
|
$ |
38.16 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royalties |
5.72 |
|
15.30 |
|
10.86 |
|
4.82 |
|
13.52 |
|
9.28 |
|
Operating
expense |
16.57 |
|
6.04 |
|
10.91 |
|
13.10 |
|
6.98 |
|
9.96 |
|
Transportation expense |
2.59 |
|
— |
|
1.20 |
|
2.67 |
|
— |
|
1.30 |
|
Operating netback |
$ |
12.01 |
|
$ |
30.19 |
|
$ |
21.78 |
|
$ |
10.51 |
|
$ |
24.34 |
|
$ |
17.62 |
|
Realized
financial derivatives gain |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
0.30 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
1.62 |
|
Operating netback after
financial derivatives gain |
$ |
12.01 |
|
$ |
30.19 |
|
$ |
22.08 |
|
$ |
10.51 |
|
$ |
24.34 |
|
$ |
19.24 |
|
Risk Management
As part of our normal operations, we are exposed
to movements in commodity prices, foreign exchange rates and
interest rates. In an effort to manage these exposures, we utilize
various financial derivative contracts which are intended to
partially reduce the volatility in our adjusted funds flow. We
realized a financial derivatives gain of $8 million in 2017, as
compared to a gain of $97 million in 2016.
For 2018, we have entered into hedges on
approximately 54% of our net crude oil exposure. This includes 43%
of our net WTI exposure with 38% fixed at US$52.26/bbl and 5%
hedged utilizing a 3-way option structure that provides us with
downside price protection at US$54.40/bbl and upside participation
to US$60.00/bbl. In addition, we have entered into a Brent-based
hedge for 4,000 bbl/d at US$61.31/bbl. We have also entered into
hedges on approximately 33% of our net WCS differential exposure at
a price differential to WTI of US$14.19/bbl and 28% of our net
natural gas exposure through a combination of AECO swaps at
C$2.82/mcf and NYMEX swaps at US$3.01/mmbtu.
As part of our risk management program, we also
transport crude oil to markets by rail when economics warrant. In
2017, we delivered 5,000 bbl/d (approximately 20%) of our heavy oil
volumes to market by rail. We expect our oil volumes delivered to
market by rail to increase to approximately 6,000-7,000 bbl/d
during the first quarter of 2018.
A complete listing of our financial derivative
contracts can be found in Note 18 to our 2017 financial
statements.
Outlook for 2018
Commodity prices remain volatile with WTI
currently above US$60/bbl and Canadian heavy oil differentials
averaging US$24/bbl for Q1/2018 due to transportation challenges.
We see these wide differentials as temporary as the industry works
to alleviate the bottlenecks through crude by rail and existing
pipeline optimization and reconfigurations. We remain supporters of
pipeline expansion as our medium term solutions to market access.
We have the operational flexibility to adjust our spending plans
based on changes in the commodity price environment.
We are encouraged by our operating results in
the Eagle Ford and the strong cash generating capability of this
asset as the prices for Brent and LLS are above US$63/bbl. During
the fourth quarter, our netback in the Eagle Ford of $30.19/bbl was
the strongest we have realized since 2014. At current crude oil
prices, we expect the Eagle Ford to generate significant free cash
flow in 2018.
In Canada, we are executing our first quarter
drilling and development program as planned with improved WTI
pricing partially offsetting the widening of the WCS differential.
We continue to manage our heavy oil sales portfolio, including
operational optimization, crude-by rail and the use of financial
and physical hedges to optimize our heavy oil netbacks.
Our 2018 production guidance range is unchanged
at 68,000 to 72,000 boe/d with budgeted exploration and development
capital expenditures of $325 to $375 million.
The following table summarizes our 2018 annual
guidance.
Exploration and development capital |
$325 - $375 million |
Production |
68,000
- 72,000 boe/d |
|
|
Expenses: |
|
Royalty
rate |
~
23% |
Operating |
$10.50
- $11.25/boe |
Transportation |
$1.35 -
$1.45/boe |
General and
administrative |
~$44
million, $1.72/boe |
Interest |
~ $100 million, $3.95/boe |
Year-end 2017 Reserves
Baytex's year-end 2017 proved and probable
reserves were evaluated by Sproule Unconventional Limited
(“Sproule”) and Ryder Scott Company, L.P. (“Ryder Scott”), both
independent qualified reserves evaluators. Sproule prepared our
reserves report by consolidating the Canadian properties evaluated
by Sproule with the United States properties evaluated by Ryder
Scott, in each case using Sproule's December 31, 2017 forecast
price and cost assumptions. Ryder Scott also evaluated the possible
reserves associated with our Eagle Ford assets.
All of our oil and gas properties were evaluated
or audited in accordance with National Instrument 51-101 “Standards
of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities” (“NI 51-101”) and the
Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook (the “COGE Handbook”).
Reserves associated with our thermal heavy oil projects at Peace
River, Gemini (Cold Lake) and Kerrobert have been classified as
bitumen. Complete reserves disclosure will be included in our
Annual Information Form for the year ended
December 31, 2017, which will be filed on or before March
31, 2018.
2017 Highlights
Highlights of the evaluation of our Total Proved
plus Probable (“2P”), Total Proved (“1P”) and Proved Developed
Producing (“PDP”) reserves are provided below. Finding and
development (“F&D”) and finding, development and acquisition
(“FD&A”) costs are all reported inclusive of future development
costs (“FDC”).
- Active Development in the U.S. and Canada Drives
Reserves Growth: Continued strong performance and capital
investment levels in the Eagle Ford along with a resumption of
activity in Canada delivered reserves and value growth. Relative to
year-end 2016, total company 2P reserves increased 6% to
432 mmboe (201% production replacement) while 1P reserves
increased 1% to 256 mmboe (111% production replacement).
As a percentage of 2P reserves, oil and NGL reserves represented
80%.
- Strong Recycle Ratios: Total company 2P
F&D of $7.26/boe and 2P FD&A of $9.11/boe improved relative
to our three-year averages of $10.45/boe and $10.51/boe,
respectively. Based on our 2017 operating netback of $19.62/boe
(including financial derivatives gain), we generated strong recycle
ratios of 2.7x for F&D and 2.2x for FD&A in 2017. 1P and
PDP F&D recycle ratios improved to 2.2x and 1.4x,
respectively.
- Growth in Value: The net present value (before
income taxes) of the future net revenue attributable to our
reserves, discounted at 10%, is estimated to be $4.1 billion ($3.9
billion at year-end 2016). This led to a net asset value(1),
discounted at 10%, of $10.08 per share (11% higher than year-end
2016). We maintained a strong reserves life index (“RLI”),
excluding thermal reserves, of 9.5 years on a proved basis and 14.3
years on a proved plus probable basis, which is calculated using
annualized Q4/2017 production.
- Continued Outperformance in the Eagle Ford:
Eagle Ford 2P reserves increased 8% to 233.3 mmboe, replacing 225%
of production. Since acquiring the assets in June 2014, 2P reserves
in the Eagle Ford have grown 40%. Positive technical revisions of
20.8 mmboe were realized in the Eagle Ford, reflecting enhanced
type well profiles. We have also booked an initial 5.7 mmboe in our
new fractured Austin Chalk play in the northern part of our
acreage.
- Resumption of Activity in Canada: Canada 2P
reserves increased 5% to 198.7 mmboe, replacing 175% of production
due to a return to active development in Canada, including the
integration of the heavy oil assets acquired in the Peace River
region in January 2017.
Note:
- Based on the estimated reserves value of $4.1 billion plus a
value for undeveloped land holdings, net of long-term debt, asset
retirement obligations and working capital. See “Net Asset
Value”.
The following table reconciles the change in
reserves during 2017 by reserves category and operating area.
(gross reserves, mmboe) |
Eagle Ford |
|
Heavy Oil |
|
CanadaConventional |
|
Thermal |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved
Developed Producing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2016 |
60.8 |
|
28.3 |
|
9.0 |
|
0.4 |
|
98.5 |
|
Additions, net
of revisions |
16.7 |
|
9.6 |
|
1.2 |
|
0.0 |
|
27.5 |
|
Production |
(13.4 |
) |
(9.4 |
) |
(2.5 |
) |
(0.3 |
) |
(25.6 |
) |
December 31,
2017 |
64.1 |
|
28.5 |
|
7.7 |
|
0.1 |
|
100.4 |
|
% Change |
5 |
% |
1 |
% |
(14 |
%) |
— |
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2016 |
168.1 |
|
55.2 |
|
15.9 |
|
13.5 |
|
252.7 |
|
Additions, net
of revisions |
17.0 |
|
9.0 |
|
2.3 |
|
0.1 |
|
28.5 |
|
Production |
(13.4 |
) |
(9.4 |
) |
(2.5 |
) |
(0.3 |
) |
(25.6 |
) |
December 31,
2017 |
171.7 |
|
54.8 |
|
15.7 |
|
13.3 |
|
255.6 |
|
% Change |
2 |
% |
(1 |
%) |
(1 |
%) |
(1 |
%) |
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved Plus
Probable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2016 |
216.5 |
|
85.0 |
|
35.3 |
|
69.3 |
|
406.1 |
|
Additions, net
of revisions |
30.2 |
|
20.1 |
|
1.2 |
|
0.0 |
|
51.5 |
|
Production |
(13.4 |
) |
(9.4 |
) |
(2.5 |
) |
(0.3 |
) |
(25.6 |
) |
December 31,
2017 |
233.3 |
|
95.7 |
|
34.0 |
|
69.0 |
|
432.0 |
|
% Change |
8 |
% |
13 |
% |
(4 |
%) |
0 |
% |
6 |
% |
Petroleum and Natural Gas Reserves as at December 31,
2017
The following table sets forth our gross and net
reserves volumes at December 31, 2017 by product type and
reserves category using Sproule's forecast prices and costs. Please
note that the data in the table may not add due to rounding.
CANADA |
|
Forecast Prices and Costs |
|
|
Heavy Oil |
|
Bitumen |
|
Light and Medium Oil |
|
|
Gross(1) |
|
Net(2) |
|
|
Gross(1) |
|
Net(2) |
|
|
Gross(1) |
|
Net(2) |
|
Reserves
Category |
|
(mbbl) |
|
(mbbl) |
|
|
(mbbl) |
|
(mbbl) |
|
|
(mbbl) |
|
(mbbl) |
|
Proved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed
Producing |
|
26,276 |
|
20,748 |
|
|
94 |
|
92 |
|
|
1,482 |
|
1,441 |
|
Developed
Non-Producing |
|
1,750 |
|
1,498 |
|
|
7,744 |
|
7,072 |
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
Undeveloped |
|
18,680 |
|
16,608 |
|
|
5,428 |
|
4,546 |
|
|
125 |
|
122 |
|
Total Proved |
|
46,706 |
|
38,854 |
|
|
13,266 |
|
11,709 |
|
|
1,608 |
|
1,564 |
|
Probable |
|
39,757 |
|
33,563 |
|
|
55,726 |
|
43,833 |
|
|
1,225 |
|
1,090 |
|
Total Proved Plus
Probable |
|
86,463 |
|
72,417 |
|
|
68,992 |
|
55,542 |
|
|
2,833 |
|
2,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CANADA |
|
Forecast Prices and Costs |
|
|
Natural Gas Liquids(3) |
|
ConventionalNatural Gas(4) |
|
Oil Equivalent(5) |
|
|
Gross(1) |
|
Net(2) |
|
|
Gross(1) |
|
Net(2) |
|
|
Gross(1) |
|
Net(2) |
|
Reserves
Category |
|
(mbbl) |
|
(mbbl) |
|
|
(mmcf) |
|
(mmcf) |
|
|
(mboe) |
|
(mboe) |
|
Proved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed
Producing |
|
1,075 |
|
761 |
|
|
43,929 |
|
37,680 |
|
|
36,249 |
|
29,322 |
|
Developed
Non-Producing |
|
21 |
|
12 |
|
|
27,034 |
|
25,309 |
|
|
14,021 |
|
12,801 |
|
Undeveloped |
|
1,522 |
|
1,228 |
|
|
46,856 |
|
41,080 |
|
|
33,564 |
|
29,351 |
|
Total Proved |
|
2,618 |
|
2,002 |
|
|
117,819 |
|
104,069 |
|
|
83,834 |
|
71,474 |
|
Probable |
|
3,132 |
|
2,428 |
|
|
89,963 |
|
77,782 |
|
|
114,834 |
|
93,878 |
|
Total Proved Plus
Probable |
|
5,750 |
|
4,430 |
|
|
207,782 |
|
181,853 |
|
|
198,667 |
|
165,352 |
|
UNITED STATES |
|
Forecast Prices and Costs |
|
|
Tight Oil |
|
Natural Gas Liquids(3) |
|
Shale Gas |
|
|
Gross(1) |
|
Net(2) |
|
|
Gross(1) |
|
Net(2) |
|
|
Gross(1) |
|
Net(2) |
|
Reserves
Category |
|
(mbbl) |
|
(mbbl) |
|
|
(mbbl) |
|
(mbbl) |
|
|
(mmcf) |
|
(mmcf) |
|
Proved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed
Producing |
|
20,191 |
|
14,809 |
|
|
28,052 |
|
20,742 |
|
|
61,139 |
|
45,273 |
|
Developed
Non-Producing |
|
32 |
|
23 |
|
|
111 |
|
81 |
|
|
209 |
|
152 |
|
Undeveloped |
|
30,074 |
|
22,022 |
|
|
53,784 |
|
39,590 |
|
|
111,506 |
|
82,186 |
|
Total Proved |
|
50,296 |
|
36,854 |
|
|
81,947 |
|
60,413 |
|
|
172,855 |
|
127,611 |
|
Probable |
|
11,390 |
|
8,361 |
|
|
35,830 |
|
26,333 |
|
|
75,686 |
|
55,607 |
|
Total Proved Plus
Probable |
|
61,686 |
|
45,215 |
|
|
117,777 |
|
86,745 |
|
|
248,541 |
|
183,218 |
|
Possible(6) |
|
19,992 |
|
14,679 |
|
|
41,964 |
|
30,862 |
|
|
89,370 |
|
65,736 |
|
Total Proved Plus
Probable Plus Possible |
|
81,679 |
|
59,894 |
|
|
159,741 |
|
117,607 |
|
|
337,910 |
|
248,954 |
|
UNITED STATES |
|
Forecast Prices and Costs |
|
|
ConventionalNatural Gas(4) |
|
Oil Equivalent(5) |
|
|
Gross(1) |
|
Net(2) |
|
|
Gross(1) |
|
Net(2) |
|
Reserves
Category |
|
(mmcf) |
|
(mmcf) |
|
|
(mboe) |
|
(mbbl) |
|
Proved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed
Producing |
|
34,115 |
|
25,076 |
|
|
64,119 |
|
47,276 |
|
Developed
Non-Producing |
|
91 |
|
65 |
|
|
193 |
|
140 |
|
Undeveloped |
|
29,812 |
|
21,794 |
|
|
107,410 |
|
78,942 |
|
Total Proved |
|
64,018 |
|
46,935 |
|
|
171,722 |
|
126,358 |
|
Probable |
|
10,761 |
|
7,900 |
|
|
61,628 |
|
45,278 |
|
Total Proved Plus
Probable |
|
74,778 |
|
54,835 |
|
|
233,349 |
|
171,635 |
|
Possible(6) |
|
19,577 |
|
14,372 |
|
|
80,115 |
|
58,892 |
|
Total Proved Plus
Probable Plus Possible |
|
94,356 |
|
69,207 |
|
|
313,464 |
|
230,528 |
|
TOTAL |
|
Forecast Prices and Costs |
|
|
Heavy Oil |
|
Bitumen |
|
Light and Medium Oil |
|
|
Gross(1) |
|
Net(2) |
|
|
Gross(1) |
|
Net(2) |
|
|
Gross(1) |
|
Net(2) |
|
Reserves
Category |
|
(mbbl) |
|
(mbbl) |
|
|
(mbbl) |
|
(mbbl) |
|
|
(mbbl) |
|
(mbbl) |
|
Proved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed
Producing |
|
26,276 |
|
20,748 |
|
|
94 |
|
92 |
|
|
1,482 |
|
1,441 |
|
Developed
Non-Producing |
|
1,750 |
|
1,498 |
|
|
7,744 |
|
7,072 |
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
Undeveloped |
|
18,680 |
|
16,608 |
|
|
5,428 |
|
4,546 |
|
|
125 |
|
122 |
|
Total Proved |
|
46,706 |
|
38,854 |
|
|
13,266 |
|
11,709 |
|
|
1,608 |
|
1,564 |
|
Probable |
|
39,757 |
|
33,563 |
|
|
55,726 |
|
43,833 |
|
|
1,225 |
|
1,090 |
|
Total Proved Plus
Probable |
|
86,463 |
|
72,417 |
|
|
68,992 |
|
55,542 |
|
|
2,833 |
|
2,654 |
|
Possible(6)(7) |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
Total Proved Plus
Probable Plus Possible |
|
86,463 |
|
72,417 |
|
|
68,992 |
|
55,542 |
|
|
2,833 |
|
2,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
Forecast Prices and Costs |
|
|
Tight Oil |
|
Natural Gas Liquids(3) |
|
Shale Gas |
|
|
Gross(1) |
|
Net(2) |
|
|
Gross(1) |
|
Net(2) |
|
|
Gross(1) |
|
Net(2) |
|
Reserves
Category |
|
(mbbl) |
|
(mbbl) |
|
|
(mbbl) |
|
(mbbl) |
|
|
(mmcf) |
|
(mmcf) |
|
Proved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed
Producing |
|
20,191 |
|
14,809 |
|
|
29,128 |
|
21,503 |
|
|
61,139 |
|
45,273 |
|
Developed
Non-Producing |
|
32 |
|
23 |
|
|
131 |
|
93 |
|
|
209 |
|
152 |
|
Undeveloped |
|
30,074 |
|
22,022 |
|
|
55,306 |
|
40,818 |
|
|
111,506 |
|
82,186 |
|
Total Proved |
|
50,296 |
|
36,854 |
|
|
84,564 |
|
62,414 |
|
|
172,855 |
|
127,611 |
|
Probable |
|
11,390 |
|
8,361 |
|
|
38,962 |
|
28,760 |
|
|
75,686 |
|
55,607 |
|
Total Proved Plus
Probable |
|
61,686 |
|
45,215 |
|
|
123,526 |
|
91,175 |
|
|
248,541 |
|
183,218 |
|
Possible(6)(7) |
|
19,992 |
|
14,679 |
|
|
41,964 |
|
30,862 |
|
|
89,370 |
|
65,736 |
|
Total Proved Plus
Probable Plus Possible |
|
81,679 |
|
59,894 |
|
|
165,491 |
|
122,037 |
|
|
337,910 |
|
248,954 |
|
TOTAL |
|
Forecast Prices and Costs |
|
|
ConventionalNatural Gas(4) |
|
Oil Equivalent(5) |
|
|
Gross(1) |
|
Net(2) |
|
|
Gross(1) |
|
Net(2) |
|
Reserves
Category |
|
(mmcf) |
|
(mmcf) |
|
|
(mboe) |
|
(mboe) |
|
Proved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed
Producing |
|
78,045 |
|
62,756 |
|
|
100,368 |
|
76,598 |
|
Developed
Non-Producing |
|
27,125 |
|
25,374 |
|
|
14,214 |
|
12,941 |
|
Undeveloped |
|
76,668 |
|
62,874 |
|
|
140,974 |
|
108,293 |
|
Total Proved |
|
181,837 |
|
151,004 |
|
|
255,556 |
|
197,831 |
|
Probable |
|
100,723 |
|
85,683 |
|
|
176,461 |
|
139,155 |
|
Total Proved Plus
Probable |
|
282,561 |
|
236,687 |
|
|
432,017 |
|
336,987 |
|
Possible(6)(7) |
|
19,577 |
|
14,372 |
|
|
80,115 |
|
58,892 |
|
Total Proved Plus
Probable Plus Possible |
|
302,138 |
|
251,059 |
|
|
512,131 |
|
395,879 |
|
Notes:
- “Gross” reserves means the total working and royalty interest
share of remaining recoverable reserves owned by Baytex before
deductions of royalties payable to others.
- “Net” reserves means Baytex's gross reserves less all royalties
payable to others.
- Natural Gas Liquids includes condensate.
- Conventional Natural Gas includes associated, non-associated
and solution gas.
- Oil equivalent amounts have been calculated using a conversion
rate of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of
oil. BOEs may be misleading, particularly if used in
isolation. A boe conversion ratio of six thousand cubic feet
of natural gas to one barrel of oil is based on an energy
equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner
tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the
wellhead.
- Possible reserves are those reserves that are less certain to
be recovered than probable reserves. There is a 10% probability
that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the sum
of proved plus probable plus possible reserves.
- The total possible reserves include only possible reserves from
the Eagle Ford assets. The possible reserves associated with the
Canadian properties have not been evaluated.
Reserves Reconciliation
The following table reconciles the
year-over-year changes in our gross reserves volumes by product
type and reserves category using Sproule's forecast prices and
costs. Please note that the data in table may not add due to
rounding.
|
|
Reconciliation of Gross Reserves
(1)(2)By Principal Product Type Forecast Prices
and Costs |
|
|
Heavy Oil |
|
Bitumen |
|
|
Proved |
|
Probable |
|
Proved +Probable |
|
|
Proved |
|
Probable |
|
Proved +Probable |
|
Gross Reserves Category |
|
(mbbl) |
|
(mbbl) |
|
(mbbl) |
|
|
(mbbl) |
|
(mbbl) |
|
(mbbl) |
|
December 31,
2016 |
|
46,875 |
|
29,325 |
|
76,199 |
|
|
13,465 |
|
55,835 |
|
69,300 |
|
Extensions |
|
638 |
|
500 |
|
1,138 |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Infill Drilling |
|
369 |
|
364 |
|
732 |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Improved
Recoveries |
|
— |
|
1,997 |
|
1,997 |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Technical
Revisions |
|
1,121 |
|
(2,861 |
) |
(1,740 |
) |
|
197 |
|
(142 |
) |
55 |
|
Discoveries |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Acquisitions (3) |
|
7,941 |
|
11,334 |
|
19,275 |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Dispositions |
|
(1,221 |
) |
(974 |
) |
(2,195 |
) |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Economic Factors |
|
(89 |
) |
73 |
|
(16 |
) |
|
(80 |
) |
33 |
|
(47 |
) |
Production |
|
(8,927 |
) |
— |
|
(8,927 |
) |
|
(317 |
) |
— |
|
(317 |
) |
December 31,
2017 |
|
46,706 |
|
39,757 |
|
86,463 |
|
|
13,266 |
|
55,726 |
|
68,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Light and Medium Crude Oil |
|
Tight Oil |
|
|
Proved |
|
Probable |
|
Proved +Probable |
|
|
Proved |
|
Probable |
|
Proved +Probable |
|
Gross Reserves Category |
|
(mbbl) |
|
(mbbl) |
|
(mbbl) |
|
|
(mbbl) |
|
(mbbl) |
|
(mbbl) |
|
December 31,
2016 |
|
2,293 |
|
1,794 |
|
4,087 |
|
|
49,714 |
|
8,399 |
|
58,113 |
|
Extensions |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Infill Drilling |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
1,307 |
|
2,252 |
|
3,559 |
|
Improved
Recoveries |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Technical Revisions
(4) |
|
422 |
|
31 |
|
453 |
|
|
3,821 |
|
736 |
|
4,557 |
|
Discoveries |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Acquisitions |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Dispositions |
|
(720 |
) |
(559 |
) |
(1,279 |
) |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Economic Factors |
|
38 |
|
(41 |
) |
(3 |
) |
|
8 |
|
3 |
|
11 |
|
Production |
|
(425 |
) |
— |
|
(425 |
) |
|
(4,553 |
) |
— |
|
(4,553 |
) |
December 31,
2017 |
|
1,608 |
|
1,225 |
|
2,833 |
|
|
50,296 |
|
11,390 |
|
61,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Liquids(5) |
|
Shale Gas |
|
|
Proved |
|
Probable |
|
Proved +Probable |
|
|
Proved |
|
Probable |
|
Proved +Probable |
|
Gross Reserves Category |
|
(mbbl) |
|
(mbbl) |
|
(mbbl) |
|
|
(mmcf) |
|
(mmcf) |
|
(mmcf) |
|
December 31,
2016 |
|
82,692 |
|
31,825 |
|
114,516 |
|
|
173,828 |
|
59,075 |
|
232,903 |
|
Extensions |
|
90 |
|
224 |
|
314 |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Infill Drilling |
|
1,393 |
|
1,095 |
|
2,488 |
|
|
2,096 |
|
6,464 |
|
8,560 |
|
Improved
Recoveries |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Technical Revisions
(4) |
|
6,487 |
|
5,758 |
|
12,245 |
|
|
7,590 |
|
10,190 |
|
17,781 |
|
Discoveries |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Acquisitions |
|
115 |
|
81 |
|
196 |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Dispositions |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Economic Factors |
|
(50 |
) |
(21 |
) |
(71 |
) |
|
(133 |
) |
(43 |
) |
(177 |
) |
Production |
|
(6,162 |
) |
— |
|
(6,162 |
) |
|
(10,526 |
) |
— |
|
(10,526 |
) |
December 31,
2017 |
|
84,564 |
|
38,962 |
|
123,526 |
|
|
172,855 |
|
75,686 |
|
248,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional Natural Gas(6) |
|
Oil Equivalent(7) |
|
|
Proved |
|
Probable |
|
Proved +Probable |
|
|
Proved |
|
Probable |
|
Proved +Probable |
|
Gross Reserves Category |
|
(mmcf) |
|
(mmcf) |
|
(mmcf) |
|
|
(mboe) |
|
(mboe) |
|
(mboe) |
|
December 31,
2016 |
|
172,016 |
|
98,112 |
|
270,127 |
|
|
252,679 |
|
153,375 |
|
406,053 |
|
Extensions |
|
2,067 |
|
5,042 |
|
7,109 |
|
|
1,073 |
|
1,564 |
|
2,637 |
|
Infill Drilling |
|
3,421 |
|
845 |
|
4,266 |
|
|
3,987 |
|
4,929 |
|
8,916 |
|
Improved
Recoveries |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
1,997 |
|
1,997 |
|
Technical Revisions
(4) |
|
21,703 |
|
(6,086 |
) |
15,617 |
|
|
16,931 |
|
4,206 |
|
21,137 |
|
Discoveries |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Acquisitions (3) |
|
4,241 |
|
3,008 |
|
7,249 |
|
|
8,763 |
|
11,916 |
|
20,679 |
|
Dispositions |
|
(2 |
) |
(2 |
) |
(4 |
) |
|
(1,942 |
) |
(1,534 |
) |
(3,475 |
) |
Economic Factors |
|
(608 |
) |
(195 |
) |
(803 |
) |
|
(296 |
) |
8 |
|
(289 |
) |
Production |
|
(21,001 |
) |
— |
|
(21,001 |
) |
|
(25,639 |
) |
— |
|
(25,639 |
) |
December 31,
2017 |
|
181,837 |
|
100,724 |
|
282,560 |
|
|
255,556 |
|
176,461 |
|
432,017 |
|
Notes:
- “Gross” reserves means the total working and royalty interest
share of remaining recoverable reserves owned by Baytex before
deductions of royalties payable to others.
- Reserves information as at December 31, 2017 and 2016 is
prepared in accordance with NI 51-101.
- Heavy oil and conventional natural gas acquisitions are
principally attributable to reserves associated with the Peace
River assets acquired on January 20, 2017.
- Positive technical revisions for tight oil, natural gas liquids
and shale gas are largely the result of enhanced type well profiles
on our Eagle Ford acreage.
- Natural gas liquids include condensate.
- Conventional natural gas includes associated, non-associated
and solution gas.
- Oil equivalent amounts have been calculated using a conversion
rate of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of
oil. BOEs may be misleading, particularly if used in
isolation. A boe conversion ratio of six thousand cubic feet of
natural gas to one barrel of oil is based on an energy equivalency
conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does
not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead.
Reserves Life Index
The following table sets forth our reserves life
index, which is calculated by dividing our proved and proved plus
probable reserves (excluding thermal reserves) at year-end 2017 by
annualized Q4/2017 production.
|
Q4/2017 Actual |
|
Reserves Life Index
(years) |
|
Production |
|
Proved |
|
Proved Plus Probable |
Oil and NGL
(bbl/d) |
56,046 |
|
9.0 |
|
13.4 |
Natural Gas
(mcf/d) |
81,063 |
|
12.0 |
|
17.9 |
Oil Equivalent
(boe/d) |
69,556 |
|
9.5 |
|
14.3 |
Capital Program Efficiency
Based on the evaluation of our petroleum and
natural gas reserves prepared in accordance with NI 51-101 by our
independent qualified reserves evaluators, the efficiency of our
capital programs (including FDC) is summarized in the following
table.
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
Three-Year Total /
Average2015 - 2017 |
Capital Expenditures ($
millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and development |
|
$ |
326.3 |
|
|
$ |
224.8 |
|
|
$ |
521.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,072.1 |
|
Acquisitions (net of dispositions) |
|
59.9 |
|
|
(63.6 |
) |
|
1.6 |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
Total |
|
$ |
386.1 |
|
|
$ |
161.2 |
|
|
$ |
522.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,070.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Future
Development Costs – Proved ($ millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and development |
|
$ |
(132.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(219.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(397.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(749.9 |
) |
Acquisitions (net of dispositions) |
|
|
35.5 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
49.1 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
(97.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(211.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(391.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(700.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Future
Development Costs – Proved plus Probable ($ millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and Development |
|
$ |
(76.4 |
) |
|
$ |
108.8 |
|
|
$ |
(399.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(367.5 |
) |
Acquisitions (net of dispositions) |
|
160.6 |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
163.0 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
84.2 |
|
|
$ |
110.7 |
|
|
$ |
(399.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(204.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved Reserves
Additions (mboe) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and development |
|
21,695 |
|
|
5,041 |
|
|
21,729 |
|
|
48,465 |
|
Acquisitions (net of dispositions) |
|
6,821 |
|
|
(1,564 |
) |
|
537 |
|
|
5,794 |
|
Total |
|
28,516 |
|
|
3,477 |
|
|
22,266 |
|
|
54,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved plus Probable
Reserves Additions (mboe) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and development |
|
34,398 |
|
|
17,253 |
|
|
15,782 |
|
|
67,433 |
|
Acquisitions (net of dispositions) |
|
17,204 |
|
|
(2,408 |
) |
|
126 |
|
|
14,922 |
|
Total |
|
51,602 |
|
|
14,845 |
|
|
15,908 |
|
|
82,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F&D costs ($/boe)
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
$ |
8.93 |
|
|
$ |
1.07 |
|
|
$ |
5.67 |
|
|
$ |
6.65 |
|
Proved
plus probable |
|
$ |
7.26 |
|
|
$ |
19.33 |
|
|
$ |
7.68 |
|
|
$ |
10.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FD&A costs ($/boe)
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
$ |
10.13 |
|
|
$ |
— (5) |
|
|
$ |
5.88 |
|
|
$ |
6.80 |
|
Proved
plus probable |
|
$ |
9.11 |
|
|
$ |
18.33 |
|
|
$ |
7.75 |
|
|
$ |
10.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios (based on proved
plus probable reserves) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production replacement ratio (3) |
|
|
201 |
% |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
Recycle
ratio (4) |
|
|
2.7 |
x |
|
|
0.9 |
x |
|
|
2.9 |
x |
|
|
2.2 |
x |
Notes:
- F&D costs are calculated as total exploration and
development expenditures (excluding acquisition and divestitures
and including the change in FDC) divided by reserves additions from
exploration and development activity.
- FD&A costs are calculated as total capital expenditures
(including acquisition and divestitures and the change in FDC)
divided by total reserves additions.
- Production Replacement Ratio is calculated as total reserves
additions (including acquisitions and divestitures) divided by
annual production.
- Recycle Ratio is calculated as operating netback divided by
F&D costs (proved plus probable). Operating netback is
calculated as revenue (including realized financial derivatives
gains and losses) less royalties, operating expenses and
transportation expenses.
- 2016 FD&A costs (proved) were negative due to the reduction
in estimated Future Development Costs.
Net Present Value of Reserves (Forecast
Prices and Costs)
The following table summarizes Sproule and Ryder
Scott's estimate of the net present value before income taxes of
the future net revenue attributable to our reserves using Sproule's
forecast prices and costs (and excluding the impact of any hedging
activities). Please note that the data in the table may not add due
to rounding.
|
|
Summary of Net Present Value of Future Net
RevenueAs at December 31,
2017Forecast Prices and
CostsBefore Income Taxes and Discounted at
(%/year) |
CANADA |
|
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
5 |
% |
|
10 |
% |
|
15 |
% |
|
20 |
% |
Reserves
Category |
|
|
($000s |
) |
|
|
($000s |
) |
|
|
($000s |
) |
|
|
($000s |
) |
|
|
($000s |
) |
Proved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed
Producing |
|
$ |
394,678 |
|
|
$ |
392,339 |
|
|
$ |
359,063 |
|
|
$ |
327,713 |
|
|
$ |
300,965 |
|
Developed
Non-Producing |
|
322,386 |
|
|
195,869 |
|
|
135,648 |
|
|
98,310 |
|
|
73,393 |
|
Undeveloped |
|
475,480 |
|
|
362,040 |
|
|
278,773 |
|
|
216,443 |
|
|
168,923 |
|
Total Proved |
|
1,192,544 |
|
|
950,248 |
|
|
773,484 |
|
|
642,465 |
|
|
543,281 |
|
Probable |
|
2,428,609 |
|
|
1,326,481 |
|
|
806,284 |
|
|
526,528 |
|
|
360,482 |
|
Total Proved Plus
Probable |
|
$ |
3,621,153 |
|
|
$ |
2,276,730 |
|
|
$ |
1,579,768 |
|
|
$ |
1,168,994 |
|
|
$ |
903,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNITED STATES |
|
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
5 |
% |
|
10 |
% |
|
15 |
% |
|
20 |
% |
Reserve
Category |
|
|
($000s |
) |
|
|
($000s |
) |
|
|
($000s |
) |
|
|
($000s |
) |
|
|
($000s |
) |
Proved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed
Producing |
|
$ |
1,771,167 |
|
|
$ |
1,311,579 |
|
|
$ |
1,045,543 |
|
|
$ |
875,040 |
|
|
$ |
757,316 |
|
Developed
Non-Producing |
|
4,334 |
|
|
3,227 |
|
|
2,537 |
|
|
2,080 |
|
|
1,763 |
|
Undeveloped |
|
2,492,733 |
|
|
1,523,326 |
|
|
1,009,941 |
|
|
705,898 |
|
|
510,856 |
|
Total Proved |
|
4,268,233 |
|
|
2,838,131 |
|
|
2,058,020 |
|
|
1,583,018 |
|
|
1,269,934 |
|
Probable |
|
1,679,658 |
|
|
812,362 |
|
|
452,804 |
|
|
276,144 |
|
|
178,484 |
|
Total Proved Plus
Probable |
|
|
5,947,892 |
|
|
|
3,650,494 |
|
|
|
2,510,824 |
|
|
|
1,859,162 |
|
|
|
1,448,419 |
|
Possible (1) |
|
|
2,750,546 |
|
|
|
1,581,035 |
|
|
|
1,046,186 |
|
|
|
752,174 |
|
|
|
570,766 |
|
Total Proved Plus
Probable Plus Possible (1) |
|
$ |
8,698,438 |
|
|
$ |
5,231,529 |
|
|
$ |
3,557,009 |
|
|
$ |
2,611,337 |
|
|
$ |
2,019,185 |
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
5 |
% |
|
10 |
% |
|
15 |
% |
|
20 |
% |
Reserve
Category |
|
|
($000s |
) |
|
|
($000s |
) |
|
|
($000s |
) |
|
|
($000s |
) |
|
|
($000s |
) |
Proved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed
Producing |
|
$ |
2,165,845 |
|
|
$ |
1,703,918 |
|
|
$ |
1,404,606 |
|
|
$ |
1,202,752 |
|
|
$ |
1,058,281 |
|
Developed
Non-Producing |
|
326,719 |
|
|
199,096 |
|
|
138,185 |
|
|
100,390 |
|
|
75,156 |
|
Undeveloped |
|
2,968,213 |
|
|
1,885,366 |
|
|
1,288,713 |
|
|
922,341 |
|
|
679,779 |
|
Total Proved |
|
5,460,777 |
|
|
3,788,380 |
|
|
2,831,504 |
|
|
2,225,483 |
|
|
1,813,216 |
|
Probable |
|
4,108,268 |
|
|
2,138,844 |
|
|
1,259,087 |
|
|
802,673 |
|
|
538,966 |
|
Total Proved Plus
Probable |
|
|
9,569,045 |
|
|
|
5,927,224 |
|
|
|
4,090,592 |
|
|
|
3,028,156 |
|
|
|
2,352,182 |
|
Possible (1)(2) |
|
|
2,750,546 |
|
|
|
1,581,035 |
|
|
|
1,046,186 |
|
|
|
752,174 |
|
|
|
570,766 |
|
Total Proved Plus
Probable Plus Possible (1)(2) |
|
$ |
12,319,591 |
|
|
$ |
7,508,259 |
|
|
$ |
5,136,777 |
|
|
$ |
3,780,330 |
|
|
$ |
2,922,948 |
|
Notes:
- Possible reserves are those reserves that are less certain to
be recovered than probable reserves. There is a 10% probability
that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the sum
of proved plus probable plus possible reserves.
- The total possible reserves include only possible reserves from
the Eagle Ford assets. The possible reserves associated with the
Canadian properties have not been evaluated.
Sproule Forecast Prices and
Costs
The following table summarizes the forecast
prices used by Sproule in preparing the estimated reserves volumes
and the net present values of future net revenues at
December 31, 2017.
Year |
WTI
CushingUS$/bbl |
Canadian LightSweetC$/bbl |
WesternCanada SelectC$/bbl |
Henry HubUS$/MMbtu |
AECO-C SpotC$/MMbtu |
Operating CostInflation Rate%/Yr |
Capital CostInflation Rate%/Yr |
Exchange Rate$US/$Cdn |
2017
act. |
50.95 |
61.84 |
48.78 |
3.02 |
2.20 |
2.2 |
(3.4) |
0.771 |
2018 |
55.00 |
65.44 |
51.05 |
3.25 |
2.85 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.790 |
2019 |
65.00 |
74.51 |
59.61 |
3.50 |
3.11 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
0.820 |
2020 |
70.00 |
78.24 |
64.94 |
4.00 |
3.65 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
0.850 |
2021 |
73.00 |
82.45 |
68.43 |
4.08 |
3.80 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
0.850 |
2022 |
74.46 |
84.10 |
69.80 |
4.16 |
3.95 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
0.850 |
2023 |
75.95 |
85.78 |
71.20 |
4.24 |
4.05 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
0.850 |
2024 |
77.47 |
87.49 |
72.62 |
4.33 |
4.15 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
0.850 |
2025 |
79.02 |
89.24 |
74.07 |
4.42 |
4.25 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
0.850 |
2026 |
80.60 |
91.03 |
75.55 |
4.50 |
4.36 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
0.850 |
2027 |
82.21 |
92.85 |
77.06 |
4.59 |
4.46 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
0.850 |
2028 |
83.86 |
94.71 |
78.61 |
4.69 |
4.57 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
0.850 |
Thereafter |
Escalation rate of 2.0% |
Future Development Costs
The following table sets forth future
development costs deducted in the estimation of the future net
revenue attributable to the reserves categories noted below.
|
|
Future Development CostsAs of
December 31, 2017Forecast Prices and
Costs($000s) |
|
|
|
|
|
CANADA |
|
|
UNITED STATES |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
ProvedReserves |
|
Proved plusProbableReserves |
|
|
ProvedReserves |
|
Proved plusProbableReserves |
|
|
ProvedReserves |
|
Proved plusProbableReserves |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018 |
|
98,043 |
|
126,225 |
|
|
136,837 |
|
149,937 |
|
|
234,879 |
|
276,163 |
2019 |
|
155,071 |
|
188,546 |
|
|
311,259 |
|
315,979 |
|
|
466,330 |
|
504,524 |
2020 |
|
133,323 |
|
357,593 |
|
|
302,301 |
|
316,986 |
|
|
435,624 |
|
674,579 |
2021 |
|
6,348 |
|
263,674 |
|
|
232,243 |
|
297,916 |
|
|
238,591 |
|
561,590 |
2022 |
|
12,401 |
|
122,321 |
|
|
146,451 |
|
249,786 |
|
|
158,852 |
|
372,107 |
Remaining |
|
1,734 |
|
309,933 |
|
|
141,785 |
|
471,862 |
|
|
143,519 |
|
781,794 |
Total
(undiscounted) |
|
406,921 |
|
1,368,291 |
|
|
1,270,875 |
|
1,802,465 |
|
|
1,677,796 |
|
3,170,757 |
Properties with No Attributed
Reserves
The following table sets forth our undeveloped
land holdings as at December 31, 2017.
|
|
Undeveloped Acres |
|
|
Gross |
|
Net |
Canada |
|
|
|
|
Alberta |
|
748,920 |
|
688,166 |
Saskatchewan |
|
111,360 |
|
105,901 |
Total
Canada |
|
860,280 |
|
794,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
|
|
|
Texas |
|
117 |
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Company |
|
860,397 |
|
794,169 |
Undeveloped land holdings are lands that have
not been assigned reserves as at December 31, 2017. We
estimate the value of our net undeveloped land holdings at
December 31, 2017 to be approximately $75.9 million, as
compared to $67.1 million as at December 31, 2016. This
internal evaluation generally represents the estimated replacement
cost of our undeveloped land. In determining replacement
cost, we analyzed land sale prices paid at Provincial Crown and
State land sales for properties in the vicinity of our undeveloped
land holdings, less an allowance for near-term expiries, net of
undeveloped acreage that has reserves value attributed.
Net Asset Value
Our estimated net asset value is based on the
estimated net present value of all future net revenue from our
reserves, before income taxes, as estimated by the Company's
independent reserves engineers, Sproule and Ryder Scott, at
year-end, plus the estimated value of our undeveloped land
holdings, less asset retirement obligations, long-term debt and net
working capital. This calculation can vary significantly depending
on the oil and natural gas price assumptions used by the
independent reserves evaluators.
In addition, this calculation does not consider
"going concern" value and assumes only the reserves identified in
the reserves reports with no further acquisitions or incremental
development, including development of possible reserves or
contingent resources. As we execute our capital programs, we expect
to convert possible reserves and contingent resources to reserves
which may result in an increase in booked proved plus probable
reserves.
The following table sets forth our net asset
value as at December 31, 2017.
|
Net Asset ValueForecast
Prices and CostsBefore Income Taxes and Discounted
at (%/year) |
($
millions except per share amounts) |
5 |
% |
|
10 |
% |
|
15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net present value
of proved plus probable reserves (before tax) |
$ |
5,927 |
|
|
$ |
4,091 |
|
|
$ |
3,028 |
|
Undeveloped land
holdings (1) |
76 |
|
|
76 |
|
|
76 |
|
Asset retirement
obligations (2) |
(122 |
) |
|
(59 |
) |
|
(42 |
) |
Net debt |
(1,734 |
) |
|
(1,734 |
) |
|
(1,734 |
) |
Net Asset Value |
$ |
4,147 |
|
|
$ |
2,374 |
|
|
$ |
1,328 |
|
Net Asset Value per
Share (3) |
$ |
17.61 |
|
|
$ |
10.08 |
|
|
$ |
5.64 |
|
Notes:
- The value of undeveloped land holdings generally represents the
estimated replacement cost of our undeveloped land.
- Asset retirement obligations may not equal the amount shown on
the statement of financial position as a portion of these costs are
already reflected in the present value of proved plus probable
reserves and the discount rates applied differ.
- Based on 235.5 million common shares outstanding as at December
31, 2017.
Contingent Resources Assessment
We commissioned Sproule to conduct an evaluation
of our contingent resources in the Lloydminster, Peace River, North
East Alberta and Pembina areas in Canada. We commissioned Ryder
Scott to audit our internal evaluation of our contingent resources
in the Eagle Ford area of Texas. Both assessments were effective
December 31, 2017, and were prepared in accordance with the
Canadian definitions, standards and procedures contained in the
COGE Handbook and NI 51-101.
Contingent resources represent the quantity of
oil and natural gas estimated to be potentially recoverable from
known accumulations using established technology or technology
under development, but which do not currently qualify as reserves
or commercially recoverable due to one or more contingencies. There
is no certainty that it will be commercially viable to produce any
portion of our contingent resources or that we will produce any
portion of the volumes currently classified as contingent
resources. The recovery and resource estimates provided are
estimates. Actual contingent resources (and any volumes that may be
reclassified as reserves) and future production from such
contingent resources may be greater than or less than the estimates
provided.
The contingent resources described below
represent our gross interests (unless otherwise indicated) and are
a best estimate. A “best estimate” is considered to be the best
estimate of the quantity of resources that will actually be
recovered. It is equally likely that the actual quantities
recovered will be greater or less than the best estimate. Those
resources identified in the best estimate have a 50% probability
that the actual quantities recovered will equal or exceed the
estimate. The contingent resources herein are presented as
deterministic cumulative best estimate volumes.
Our contingent resources fall within the
development pending and development unclarified sub-classes, which
are defined as follows:
- Development Pending – are economic contingent resources that
have a high chance of development. Contingencies are directly
influenced by the developer, are actively being pursued and
resolution is expected in a reasonable time period.
- Development Unclarified – are contingent resources that have a
chance of development which is difficult to assess, and have an
economic status which is undetermined. Projects are currently under
evaluation and therefore contingencies are not clearly defined.
Progress is expected within a reasonable time period.
Development Pending
The following table summarizes the status of our
development pending contingent resources.
Development Pending - Project
Status |
Area |
|
Product Type |
|
Project Status |
|
FutureDevelopment Costs($ millions)(1) |
|
Timing of FirstCommercialProduction |
|
Recovery Technology |
Peace
River |
|
Bitumen |
|
Pre-Development |
|
$127 |
|
2019-2021 |
|
Cyclic
steam stimulation (“CSS”) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peace
River,Lloydminster andNorth East Alberta |
|
Heavy
Oil |
|
Pre-Development |
|
$227 |
|
2018-2023 |
|
Horizontal, vertical and multilateral welland polymer flood
development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pembina |
|
Light
&Medium Oil,Natural Gas |
|
Pre-Development |
|
$5 |
|
2022 |
|
Horizontal well development withmulti-stage fracturing
completion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle
Ford |
|
Tight
Oil, ShaleGas and NGL |
|
Pre-Development |
|
$128 |
|
2018-2028 |
|
Horizontal well development withmulti-stage fracturing
completion |
Note:
- Undiscounted and unrisked.
The following table presents a summary of the
quantitative risk of the chance of development we have applied to
our development pending contingent resources.
Development Pending - Chance of Development
Risk (1) |
Area |
|
Product Type |
|
Unrisked(MMboe) |
|
Chance ofDevelopment |
|
Risked(MMboe) |
|
Risked NPV (2)Discounted at 10%(before tax)($ millions) |
Peace
River |
|
Bitumen |
|
19 |
|
81% |
|
16 |
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peace
River,Lloydminster andNorth EastAlberta |
|
Heavy
Oil |
|
15 |
|
88% |
|
13 |
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pembina |
|
Light
& MediumOil and NaturalGas |
|
1 |
|
90% |
|
1 |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle
Ford |
|
Tight
Oil, ShaleGas and NGL |
|
14 |
|
80% |
|
11 |
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
236 |
Notes:
- Numbers may not add due to rounding.
- An estimate of risked net present value of future net revenue
of contingent resources is preliminary in nature and is provided to
assist the reader in reaching an opinion on the merit and
likelihood of the company proceeding with the required
investment. It includes contingent resources that are
considered too uncertain with respect to the chance of development
to be classified as reserves. There is no certainty that the
estimate of risked net present value of future net revenue will be
realized.
The principal risks that would influence the
development of the Lloydminster, North East Alberta, Peace River
and Pembina development pending contingent resources are: the
timing of regulatory approvals to expand the project areas; the
results of delineation drilling and seismic activity necessary for
project development; the ability of these projects to compete for
capital against our other projects; our corporate commitment to the
timing of development; and the commodity price levels affecting the
economic viability of bitumen and heavy oil production in Alberta.
The principal risks specific to the development of the Eagle Ford
development pending contingent resources are: our reliance on the
operator’s capital commitment and development timing; the ability
of these projects to compete for capital against our other
projects; and the possibility of inter-well communication from
infill drilling. Development Unclarified
Our development unclarified contingent resources
are conceptual project scenarios with no specific company defined
development plan in the near-term. The following table presents a
summary of the quantitative risk of the chance of development we
have applied to our development unclarified contingent
resources.
Development Unclarified - Chance of Development
Risk (1) |
Area |
|
Product Type |
|
Unrisked(MMboe) |
|
Chance of Development |
|
Risked(MMboe) |
Peace
River and North EastAlberta |
|
Bitumen |
|
944 |
|
58% |
|
552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peace
River, Lloydminsterand North East Alberta |
|
Heavy
Oil |
|
32 |
|
57% |
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pembina |
|
Light
& MediumOil and NaturalGas |
|
12 |
|
55% |
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle
Ford |
|
Tight
Oil, ShaleGas and NGL |
|
135 |
|
50% |
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
1,123 |
|
|
|
644 |
Note:
- Numbers may not add due to rounding.
In addition to the risks identified for the
development pending sub-class, the projects in the Lloydminster,
North East Alberta, Peace River and Pembina areas development
unclarified sub-class are also subject to risks pertaining to
commercial productivity of the reservoirs. The geological
complexity and variability in these reservoirs may require the
implementation of pilot projects to test the viability of CSS and
steam-assisted gravity drainage thermal recovery technologies. The
risks outlined for the contingent resources in the Eagle Ford
development pending sub-class also apply to the development
unclarified sub-class but are greater in magnitude.
Additional disclosures related to our contingent
resources will be included in Appendix A to our Annual Information
Form for the year ended December 31, 2017, which will be filed on
or before March 31, 2018.
Additional Information
Our audited consolidated financial statements
for the year ended December 31, 2017 and the related Management's
Discussion and Analysis of the operating and financial results can
be accessed immediately on our website at www.baytexenergy.com and
will be available shortly through SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR
at www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml.
Conference Call Today9:00 a.m. MST (11:00
a.m. EST) |
Baytex will host a conference call today, March 6, 2018, starting
at 9:00am MST (11:00am EST). To participate, please dial toll free
in North America 1-800-319-4610 or international 1-416-915-3239.
Alternatively, to listen to the conference call online, please
enter http://services.choruscall.ca/links/baytex20180306.html
in your web browser. An archived recording of the conference
call will be available shortly after the event by accessing the
webcast link above. The conference call will also be archived on
the Baytex website at www.baytexenergy.com. |
Advisory Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements
In the interest of providing Baytex's
shareholders and potential investors with information regarding
Baytex, including management's assessment of Baytex's future plans
and operations, certain statements in this press release are
"forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the United
States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and
"forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable
Canadian securities legislation (collectively, "forward-looking
statements"). In some cases, forward-looking statements can
be identified by terminology such as "anticipate", "believe",
"continue", "could", "estimate", "expect", "forecast", "intend",
"may", "objective", "ongoing", "outlook", "potential", "project",
"plan", "should", "target", "would", "will" or similar words
suggesting future outcomes, events or performance. The
forward-looking statements contained in this press release speak
only as of the date thereof and are expressly qualified by this
cautionary statement.
Specifically, this press release contains
forward-looking statements relating to but not limited to: our
business strategies, plans and objectives; our 2018 plan to build
on operational momentum; our strategy to target capital
expenditures at a level that approximates our adjusted funds flow;
our Eagle Ford assets, including our assessment that: it is a
premier oil resource play, generates our highest cash netbacks and
has a significant development inventory; that we can generate some
of the strongest capital efficiencies in the oil and gas industry
at our Peace River assets; the sensitivity of our operations to
improvements in commodity prices; that we expect our liquidity
position to be stable; our ability to partially reduce the
volatility in our adjusted funds flow by utilizing financial
derivative contracts for commodity prices, foreign exchange rates
and interest rates; the volume of oil that we expect to deliver to
market by railways in Q1/2018; that we view the current price
differential between WTI and Canadian heavy oil as temporary; that
we have operational flexibility to adjust our spending plans based
on commodity prices; that we expect the Eagle Ford assets to
generate significant free cash flow in 2018; our 2018 production
and capital expenditure guidance; our expected royalty rate and
operating, transportation, general and administration and interest
expenses for 2018; our reserves life index; the net present value
before income taxes of the future net revenue attributable to our
reserves; forecast prices for petroleum and natural gas; forecast
inflation and exchange rates; future development costs; the value
of our undeveloped land holdings; our estimated net asset value;
that we expect to convert possible reserves and contingent
resources to reserves; our development pending contingent
resources, including future development costs, timing of first
commercial production, risked and unrisked volumes, chance of
development and the net present value before income taxes of the
future net revenue; and our development unclarified contingent
resources, including risked and unrisked volumes and chance of
development. In addition, information and statements relating
to reserves and contingent resources are deemed to be
forward-looking statements, as they involve implied assessment,
based on certain estimates and assumptions, that the reserves and
contingent resources described exist in quantities predicted or
estimated, and that they can be profitably produced in the
future.
These forward-looking statements are based on
certain key assumptions regarding, among other things: petroleum
and natural gas prices and differentials between light, medium and
heavy oil prices; well production rates and reserve volumes; our
ability to add production and reserves through our exploration and
development activities; capital expenditure levels; our ability to
borrow under our credit agreements; the receipt, in a timely
manner, of regulatory and other required approvals for our
operating activities; the availability and cost of labour and other
industry services; interest and foreign exchange rates; the
continuance of existing and, in certain circumstances, proposed tax
and royalty regimes; our ability to develop our crude oil and
natural gas properties in the manner currently contemplated; and
current industry conditions, laws and regulations continuing in
effect (or, where changes are proposed, such changes being adopted
as anticipated). Readers are cautioned that such assumptions,
although considered reasonable by Baytex at the time of
preparation, may prove to be incorrect.
Actual results achieved will vary from the
information provided herein as a result of numerous known and
unknown risks and uncertainties and other factors. Such factors
include, but are not limited to: the volatility of oil and natural
gas prices and price differentials; the availability and cost of
capital or borrowing; that our credit facilities may not provide
sufficient liquidity or may not be renewed; failure to comply with
the covenants in our debt agreements; risks associated with a
third-party operating our Eagle Ford properties; availability and
cost of gathering, processing and pipeline systems; public
perception and its influence on the regulatory regime; changes in
government regulations that affect the oil and gas industry;
changes in environmental, health and safety regulations;
restrictions or costs imposed by climate change initiatives;
variations in interest rates and foreign exchange rates; risks
associated with our hedging activities; the cost of developing and
operating our assets; depletion of our reserves; risks associated
with the exploitation of our properties and our ability to acquire
reserves; changes in income tax or other laws or government
incentive programs; uncertainties associated with estimating oil
and natural gas reserves; our inability to fully insure against all
risks; risks of counterparty default; risks associated with
acquiring, developing and exploring for oil and natural gas and
other aspects of our operations; risks associated with large
projects; risks related to our thermal heavy oil projects; risks
associated with our use of information technology systems; risks
associated with the ownership of our securities, including changes
in market-based factors; risks for United States and other
non-resident shareholders, including the ability to enforce civil
remedies, differing practices for reporting reserves and
production, additional taxation applicable to non-residents and
foreign exchange risk; and other factors, many of which are beyond
our control. These and additional risk factors are discussed
in our Annual Information Form, Annual Report on Form 40-F and
Management's Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December
31, 2017, to be filed with Canadian securities regulatory
authorities and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission not
later than March 31, 2018 and in our other public filings.
The above summary of assumptions and risks
related to forward-looking statements has been provided in order to
provide shareholders and potential investors with a more complete
perspective on Baytex’s current and future operations and such
information may not be appropriate for other purposes.
There is no representation by Baytex that actual
results achieved will be the same in whole or in part as those
referenced in the forward-looking statements and Baytex does not
undertake any obligation to update publicly or to revise any of the
included forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required
by applicable securities law.
Non-GAAP Financial and Capital Management
Measures
Adjusted funds flow is not a measurement based
on generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") in Canada, but
is a financial term commonly used in the oil and gas industry. We
define adjusted funds flow as cash flow from operating activities
adjusted for changes in non-cash operating working capital and
asset retirement obligations settled. Our determination of adjusted
funds flow may not be comparable to other issuers. We consider
adjusted funds flow a key measure of performance as it demonstrates
our ability to generate the cash flow necessary to fund capital
investments, debt repayment, settlement of our abandonment
obligations and potential future dividends. In addition, we use the
ratio of net debt to adjusted funds flow to manage our capital
structure. We eliminate changes in non-cash working capital and
settlements of abandonment obligations from cash flow from
operations as the amounts can be discretionary and may vary from
period to period depending on our capital programs and the maturity
of our operating areas. The settlement of abandonment
obligations are managed with our capital budgeting process which
considers available adjusted funds flow. For a reconciliation of
adjusted funds flow to cash flow from operating activities, see
Management's Discussion and Analysis of the operating and financial
results for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Net debt is not a measurement based on GAAP in
Canada. We define net debt to be the sum of monetary working
capital (which is current assets less current liabilities
(excluding current financial derivatives and onerous contracts))
and the principal amount of both the long-term notes and the bank
loan. We believe that this measure assists in providing a more
complete understanding of our cash liabilities.
Bank EBITDA is not a measurement based on GAAP
in Canada. We define Bank EBITDA as our consolidated net
income attributable to shareholders before interest, taxes,
depletion and depreciation, and certain other non-cash items as set
out in the credit agreement governing our revolving credit
facilities. Bank EBITDA is used to measure compliance with certain
financial covenants.
Operating netback is not a measurement based on
GAAP in Canada, but is a financial term commonly used in the oil
and gas industry. Operating netback is equal to petroleum and
natural gas sales less blending expense, royalties, production and
operating expense and transportation expense divided by barrels of
oil equivalent sales volume for the applicable period. Our
determination of operating netback may not be comparable with the
calculation of similar measures for other entities. We
believe that this measure assists in characterizing our ability to
generate cash margin on a unit of production basis.
Advisory Regarding Oil and Gas Information
The reserves information contained in this press
release has been prepared in accordance with National Instrument
51-101 "Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities" of the
Canadian Securities Administrators ("NI 51-101"). Complete NI
51-101 reserves disclosure will be included in our Annual
Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2017, which will
be filed on or before March 31, 2018. Listed below are
cautionary statements that are specifically required by NI
51-101:
- Where applicable, oil equivalent amounts have been calculated
using a conversion rate of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas
to one barrel of oil. BOEs may be misleading, particularly if
used in isolation. A boe conversion ratio of six thousand
cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil is based on an
energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the
burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the
wellhead.
- With respect to finding and development costs, the aggregate of
the exploration and development costs incurred in the most recent
financial year and the change during that year in estimated future
development costs generally will not reflect total finding and
development costs related to reserves additions for that
year.
- This press release contains estimates of the net present value
of our future net revenue from our reserves. Such amounts do
not represent the fair market value of our reserves.
This press release contains metrics commonly
used in the oil and natural gas industry, such as “recycle ratio,”
“operating netback,” and “reserves life index.” These terms do not
have a standardized meaning and may not be comparable to similar
measures presented by other companies, and therefore should not be
used to make such comparisons. Such metrics have been included in
this press release to provide readers with additional measures to
evaluate Baytex’s performance, however, such measures are not
reliable indicators of Baytex’s future performance and future
performance may not compare to Baytex’s performance in previous
periods and therefore such metrics should not be unduly relied
upon.
This press release contains estimates as of
December 31, 2017 of the volumes of "contingent resources"
attributable to our properties. These estimates were prepared by
independent qualified reserves evaluators.
"Contingent resources" are not, and should not
be confused with, petroleum and natural gas reserves. "Contingent
resources" are defined in the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation
Handbook as: "those quantities of petroleum estimated, as of a
given date, to be potentially recoverable from known accumulations
using established technology or technology under development, but
which are not currently considered to be commercially recoverable
due to one or more contingencies. Contingencies may include factors
such as economic, legal, environmental, political and regulatory
matters or a lack of markets. It is also appropriate to classify as
contingent resources the estimated discovered recoverable
quantities associated with a project in the early evaluation
stage."
There is no certainty that it will be
commercially viable to produce any portion of the contingent
resources or that we will produce any portion of the volumes
currently classified as contingent resources. The estimates
of contingent resources involve implied assessment, based on
certain estimates and assumptions, that the resources described
exists in the quantities predicted or estimated and that the
resources can be profitably produced in the future.
The recovery and resource estimates provided
herein are estimates only. Actual contingent resources (and any
volumes that may be reclassified as reserves) and future production
from such contingent resources may be greater than or less than the
estimates provided herein.
References herein to average 30-day initial
production rates and other short-term production rates are useful
in confirming the presence of hydrocarbons, however, such rates are
not determinative of the rates at which such wells will commence
production and decline thereafter and are not indicative of long
term performance or of ultimate recovery. While encouraging,
readers are cautioned not to place reliance on such rates in
calculating aggregate production for us or the assets for which
such rates are provided. A pressure transient analysis or well-test
interpretation has not been carried out in respect of all wells.
Accordingly, we caution that the test results should be considered
to be preliminary.
Notice to United States Readers
The petroleum and natural gas reserves contained
in this press release have generally been prepared in accordance
with Canadian disclosure standards, which are not comparable in all
respects to United States or other foreign disclosure standards.
For example, the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "SEC") requires oil and gas issuers, in their
filings with the SEC, to disclose only "proved reserves", but
permits the optional disclosure of "probable reserves" and
"possible reserves" (each as defined in SEC rules). Canadian
securities laws require oil and gas issuers disclose their reserves
in accordance with NI 51-101, which requires disclosure of not only
"proved reserves" but also "probable reserves" and permits the
optional disclosure of "possible reserves". Additionally, NI
51-101 defines "proved reserves", "probable reserves" and "possible
reserves" differently from the SEC rules. Accordingly,
proved, probable and possible reserves disclosed in this press
release may not be comparable to United States standards.
Probable reserves are higher risk and are generally believed to be
less likely to be accurately estimated or recovered than proved
reserves. Possible reserves are higher risk than probable
reserves and are generally believed to be less likely to be
accurately estimated or recovered than probable reserves.
In addition, under Canadian disclosure
requirements and industry practice, reserves and production are
reported using gross volumes, which are volumes prior to deduction
of royalty and similar payments. The SEC rules require
reserves and production to be presented using net volumes, after
deduction of applicable royalties and similar payments.
Moreover, Baytex has determined and disclosed
estimated future net revenue from its reserves using forecast
prices and costs, whereas the SEC rules require that reserves be
estimated using a 12-month average price, calculated as the
arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each
month within the 12-month period prior to the end of the reporting
period. As a consequence of the foregoing, Baytex's reserve
estimates and production volumes in this press release may not be
comparable to those made by companies utilizing United States
reporting and disclosure standards.
We also included in this press release estimates
of contingent resources. Contingent resources represent the
quantity of petroleum and natural gas estimated to be potentially
recoverable from known accumulations using established technology
or technology under development, but which do not currently qualify
as reserves or commercially recoverable due to one or more
contingencies. Contingencies may include factors such as
economic, legal, environmental, political and regulatory matters or
a lack of markets. The SEC does not permit the inclusion of
estimates of resource in reports filed with it by United States
companies.
All amounts in this press release are stated in
Canadian dollars unless otherwise specified.
Baytex Energy Corp.
Baytex Energy Corp. is an oil and gas
corporation based in Calgary, Alberta. The company is engaged in
the acquisition, development and production of crude oil and
natural gas in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin and in the
Eagle Ford in the United States. Approximately 80% of Baytex’s
production is weighted toward crude oil and natural gas liquids.
Baytex’s common shares trade on the Toronto Stock Exchange and the
New York Stock Exchange under the symbol BTE.
For further information about Baytex, please
visit our website at www.baytexenergy.com or contact:
Brian Ector, Senior Vice President,
Capital Markets and Public Affairs
Toll Free Number: 1-800-524-5521Email:
investor@baytexenergy.com
Baytex Energy (TSX:BTE)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jan 2025 to Feb 2025
Baytex Energy (TSX:BTE)
Historical Stock Chart
From Feb 2024 to Feb 2025