BRUSSELS—About 35 multinationals, including brewer
Anheuser-Busch InBev NV, will be required to pay roughly €700
million ($765 million) in additional taxes in Belgium after
European Union regulators ruled they had benefited from an illegal
tax break.
After an 11-month investigation, the European Commission, the
bloc's top antitrust regulator, concluded Monday that a Belgian
tax-discount plan for multinationals amounted to "a very serious
distortion of competition within the EU's single market," and
ordered Belgium to recover the unpaid taxes.
Other companies facing back-tax demands as a result of the
decision include BP PLC, German chemicals giant BASF SE and Pfizer
Inc., a person familiar with the case said.
The tax bill dwarfs an earlier ruling against Starbucks Corp.
and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles in October, setting an ominous new
benchmark in an expanding inquiry into tax deals that has ensnared
major U.S. multinationals including Apple Inc. and Amazon.com
Inc.
It comes at a sensitive time for Belgium-based AB InBev, which
is in the middle of a complicated $108 billion deal to buy the
world's second-largest brewer, SAB Miller PLC of London.
Belgian Finance Minister Johan Van Overtveldt warned that the
EU's decision, if implemented, would have considerable consequences
for the companies concerned, and that the reimbursement itself
would be complex.
The tax scheme, in place since 2005, allowed certain
corporations to reduce their tax base by between 50% and 90% to
discount for so-called excess profits that allegedly result from
being part of a multinational group, the commission said.
At a news conference, EU antitrust chief Margethe Vestager said
the scheme had given "carte blanche to double non-taxation" of
certain multinationals in Belgium. Ms. Vestager declined to name
the companies affected, but she stressed that they were primarily
European, seeking to deflect criticism that she has focused too
much of her firepower on U.S. multinationals.
A person familiar with the matter said the largest beneficiaries
of the Belgian scheme—and therefore those likely to face the
biggest back-tax bills—were AB InBev, Swedish industrial company
Atlas Copco, BP, BASF, Belgian telecommuications operator Belgacom,
now known as Proximus Group, French retailer Celio and
vehicle-component manufacturer Wabco.
AB InBev confirmed in a statement that it benefits from the type
of Belgian tax ruling deemed illegal by Brussels. It said it was
disappointed by the EU's decision and was confident that it had
always complied with "Belgian and international tax
provisions."
"We will consider our options, taking into account the reactions
by the Belgian authorities," the company said—leaving the door open
to an appeal with the EU's top courts in Luxembourg.
BASF said it was closely following the case, adding it was one
of the largest taxpayers in Belgium. Atlas Copco declined to
comment, citing a "quiet period" before its results later this
month. A spokesman for Wabco said the company was reviewing the
EU's announcement and would "issue its own statement in due
course." BP declined to comment.
Other companies involved didn't respond to requests for
comment.
Tax experts warned that the EU's decision would create
uncertainty for corporate directors, and risked driving investment
away from Belgium.
"The reputation of Belgium as an investment location will
certainly be damaged as trust and legal certainty is key," said
Dirk Van Stappen, a tax partner at KPMG in Belgium and professor at
the University of Antwerp.
Mr. Van Overtveldt said Belgian authorities would hold further
negotiations with EU regulators, and didn't rule out lodging an
appeal with the bloc's top courts in Luxembourg, depending on the
outcome of those talks.
Geert De Neef, a Brussels-based partner with international tax
consultancy Taxand, said multinationals might consider moving their
headquarters to London, the Netherlands or Luxembourg, where
headline corporate tax rates are lower than Belgium's 34%. "Then
you don't need special tricks, you know it is acceptable for the
European Commission," Mr. De Neef said.
The EU's widening tax inquiry has also drawn criticism from the
U.S. government over its apparent disproportionate targeting of
American companies, which have been targeted with four separate
probes.
Responding directly to such criticism on Monday, Ms. Vestager
said the latest ruling would affect mainly European multinationals.
Of the €700 million in back taxes to be repaid, €500 million would
come from European companies, she said.
"I, of course, hear the criticism that this is about U.S.
companies, which it is obviously not," Ms. Vestager said. "What we
are interested in is fair competition."
The multinationals that benefited are from a variety of sectors,
but are generally involved in producing goods, Ms. Vestager
said.
The tax probes are a top political priority for European policy
makers, who are under pressure to show that the biggest companies
are paying their fair share during an age of austerity. But tax
experts complain that the inquiry might have repercussions for
investment in Europe because it risks overturning thousands of
long-established corporate tax structures.
EU regulators have so far closed two probes, into Starbucks's
tax affairs in the Netherlands and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV's
in Luxembourg. The EU ruled in October that both companies had
benefited from illegal tax deals and ordered the governments to
reclaim between €20 million and €30 million from each company.
Both decisions are expected to be appealed at the EU's courts in
Luxembourg, a process that can take years. The governments involved
in the investigation have denied giving special treatment, and the
companies have denied receiving it.
Write to Tom Fairless at tom.fairless@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
January 11, 2016 13:25 ET (18:25 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2016 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Proximus (PK) (USOTC:BGAOY)
Historical Stock Chart
From Feb 2025 to Mar 2025
Proximus (PK) (USOTC:BGAOY)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Mar 2025