NeoSunTzu
42 minutes ago
@SemperFi ... remember we are talking about journalists here ... one of the problems with our saga, which I've stated repeatedly, is every aspect of this issue has always been too complex for the general public at large, and even for journalists who supposedly specialize in the related fields: mortgages, stocks, financial markets etc. And it is ripe for OTC manipulators to use the ignorance of both to whiplash this stock repeatedly.
However, it is somewhat forgivable in this case as many with a lot of financial experience, even experts, will often use the term "pink sheets" as an off-hand short hand name for stocks that trade in the over-the-counter markets. Even "pink sheet" stocks no longer trade on pink paper, they trade electronically in the OTC markets electronic system. OTC Markets Group "regulates" the OTC markets which is an electronic system with "pink sheet" stocks being a segment of that system. The "pink sheet" portion of the OTC includes stocks that MAY NOT have regular financial report filing or SEC filing requirements. The part of the system (and thus "market") that FnF trade on is the OTCQB. So FnF, as you say, are definitely NOT, strictly speaking "pink sheet" stocks.
navycmdr
46 minutes ago
Best’s Special Report: AM Best Updates Net Capital Charge Tables Associated
with Fannie-Freddie Mortgage Risk Transfers
February 18, 2025 08:35 AM Eastern Standard Time
https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250218030784/en/Best%E2%80%99s-Special-Report-AM-Best-Updates-Net-Capital-Charge-Tables-Associated-With-Fannie-Freddie-Mortgage-Risk-Transfers
OLDWICK, N.J.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--AM Best has released newly updated tables of net capital charges associated with a representative sample of transactions from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s credit risk transfer (CRT) programs—Freddie Mac’s Agency Credit Insurance Structure (ACIS) and Fannie Mae’s Credit Insurance Risk Transfer (CIRT). These tables also highlight some of the key components of the factor-based method used to calculate net capital charges in the Best’s Capital Adequacy Ratio (BCAR) model.
“Updated Net Capital Charge Tables for ACIS/CIRT Reinsurance Transactions”
Post this
The net capital charge of CRT transactions is based on unexpected losses and premiums associated with the transactions and is represented as a fraction of the original exposures. For this Best’s Special Report, “Updated Net Capital Charge Tables for ACIS/CIRT Reinsurance Transactions,” AM Best has selected a broad sample of the 177 CRT transactions effective through December 2024 to calculate the net capital charges associated with individual layers of the CRT transactions.
AM Best publishes these net capital charge tables semi-annually, using the most current performance data available from the government-sponsored enterprises’ websites. Future publications of the net capital charges will be dependent on the continued timely availability of data from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, among other factors.
To access the full copy of this special report, please visit http://www3.ambest.com/bestweek/purchase.asp?record_code=351355.
AM Best is a global credit rating agency, news publisher and data analytics provider specializing in the insurance industry. Headquartered in the United States, the company does business in over 100 countries with regional offices in London, Amsterdam, Dubai, Hong Kong, Singapore and Mexico City. For more information, visit www.ambest.com.
Copyright © 2025 by A.M. Best Rating Services, Inc. and/or its affiliates. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Contacts
Wai Tang, Ph.D.
Senior Director,
Insurance-Linked Securities
+1 908 882 2388
wai.tang@ambest.com
David Mautone
Senior Quantitative Specialist,
Insurance-Linked Securities
+1 908 882 2098
david.mautone@ambest.com
Christopher Sharkey
Associate Director, Public Relations
+1 908 882 2310
christopher.sharkey@ambest.com
Al Slavin
Senior Public Relations Specialist
+1 908 882 2318
al.slavin@ambest.com
navycmdr
2 hours ago
$Boooooom ! - Inside Mortgage Finance News ! today !
Will the Trump budget slashing axe spare the Federal Housing Finance Agency,
which oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac ?
Apparently not, we’re told.
The FHFA, though, is not supported by taxpayer money…
At press time, Fannie’s common was trading on the “pink sheets” for $7.20 a unit
while Freddie’s was going for $6.44. Not bad for two companies that have been in
government conservatorships since the fall of 2008 and earning billions of dollars
a year since 2012.
Short Takes: A New CFPB Tip Line for Violators
A Confirmation From the New Director
Job Cuts Blocked…
For Now / FHFA RIFs? / GSE Stock Gains
February 18, 2025 - Shannon Clark, Namrata Bhatia, and Paul Muolo
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau recently set up an X account entitled “CFPB Tip Line” that allows commenters to report on bureau enforcement or supervision staff who are “in violation of Acting Director Russ Vought’s stand down order.” The order serves, you might say, as a government holiday from Uncle Sam taking action against companies that might be doing something unscrupulous…
Acting Director Vought confirmed the X notice was legit on Feb. 13, the day before Valentine’s Day…
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT: U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson signed an order last week restricting the Trump administration from cutting staff and funding and deleting data at the CFPB. The order is tied to two lawsuits filed by the National Treasury Employees Union, a group that represents CFPB employees, against Vought's actions.
Will the Trump budget slashing axe spare the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac? Apparently not, we’re told. The FHFA, though, is not supported by taxpayer money…
At press time, Fannie’s common was trading on the “pink sheets” for $7.20 a unit while Freddie’s was going for $6.44. Not bad for two companies that have been in government conservatorships since the fall of 2008 and earning billions of dollars a year since 2012.
jog49
3 hours ago
"No, FNMA did not "lower underwriting standards to be competitive". Instead, TBTF banks lowered theirs, then sold these toxic loans to Fannie, lying about the quality of loans to get Fannie to buy them. Those of us who follow Fannie know that several of the banks admitted to lying about toxic loans sold to Fannie, but were penalized "pennies on the dollar" for the losses, so banks can go back and do the same thing again. Banks paid billions in fines, but it was peanuts to the losses to Fannie and Freddie's massive loan losses on these toxic loans. They called them "toxic" for a reason."
PRECISELY!!!!!!! Those lender bundles were like buying a car with 50,000 miles to later find out the odometer had been around three times; then the car dealer wanting to refund you for a car with 350,000 miles.
Donotunderstand
3 hours ago
Under the terms governing the senior preferred stock, no dividends were payable to Treasury for the third quarter of 2024 and none are payable for the fourth quarter of 2024.
Under the terms governing the senior preferred stock, through and including the capital reserve end date, any increase in our net worth during a fiscal quarter results in an increase of the same amount in the aggregate liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock in the following quarter. The capital reserve end date is defined as the last day of the second consecutive fiscal quarter during which we have had and maintained capital equal to, or in excess of, all of the capital requirements and buffers under the enterprise regulatory capital framework.
As a result of these terms governing the senior preferred stock, the aggregate liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock increased to $208.0 billion as of September 30, 2024 from $203.5 billion as of June 30, 2024, due to the $4.5 billion increase in our net worth in the second quarter of 2024. The aggregate liquidation preference of the senior
preferred stock will further increase to $212.0 billion as of December 31, 2024, due to the $4.0 billion increase in our net worth in the third quarter of 2024. See “Business—Conservatorship and Treasury Agreements—Treasury Agreements” in our 2023 Form 10-K for more information on the terms of our senior preferred stock, including how the aggregate liquidation preference is determined
Do not shoot the messenger ---- this $208 B is viewed by the TREASURY as due to them and as such subtracted from the CASH reserves F and F could keep
https://www.fanniemae.com/about-us/investor-relations/quarterly-and-annual-results
chessmaster315
3 hours ago
USA Today, said:
Before the financial crisis, Fannie and Freddie were private companies. As the subprime bubble inflated in the early 2000s, they lowered their underwriting standards to remain competitive. When the bubble burst in 2008, the two enterprises were rushed into government-controlled conservatorship.
End of USA Today quote.
My response:
No, FNMA did not "lower underwriting standards to be competitive". Instead, TBTF banks lowered theirs, then sold these toxic loans to Fannie, lying about the quality of loans to get Fannie to buy them. Those of us who follow Fannie know that several of the banks admitted to lying about toxic loans sold to Fannie, but were penalized "pennies on the dollar" for the losses, so banks can go back and do the same thing again. Banks paid billions in fines, but it was peanuts to the losses to Fannie and Freddie's massive loan losses on these toxic loans. They called them "toxic" for a reason.