NOTES
TO THE AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
2007 AND 2006
NOTE
1 - Organization and Business Background
GelStat
Corporation ("the Company" or "GelStat") is a consumer health care company dedicated to the cost-effective
development and marketing of over-the-counter (OTC) and other non-prescription consumer health care products. While development
efforts ceased in 2005 due to lack of capital, its efforts were focused on proprietary, innovative products that addressed multi-billion
dollar global markets.
On
May 9, 2003, Developed Technology Resource, Inc. (DTR) filed a Current Report on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission
reporting the merger of GelStat Corp. with NP Acquisition Corp. (NP Acquisition), then a wholly owned subsidiary of DTR. The stock
exchange transaction has been accounted for as a reverse acquisition and recapitalization of NP Acquisition, whereby Gelstat is
deemed to be the accounting acquirer (legal acquiree) and NP Acquisition to be the accounting acquiree (legal acquirer). The
accompanying consolidated financial statements are in substance those of Gelstat, with the assets and liabilities, and revenues
and expenses, of NP Acquisition being included effective from the date of stock exchange transaction. NP Acquisition
is deemed to be a continuation of the business of Gelstat. Accordingly, the accompanying consolidated financial statements
include the following:
(1) The
balance sheet consists of the net assets of the accounting acquirer at historical cost and the net assets of the accounting acquiree
at historical cost;
(2) The
financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of the accounting acquirer for all periods presented as if the recapitalization
had occurred at the beginning of the earliest period presented and the operations of the accounting acquiree from the date of
stock exchange transaction.
On
October 6, 2003, the Company's Board of Directors approved a stock dividend in the amount of one share for each share held of
record. All share data is presented to give effect to the retroactive application of the stock dividend as if it occurred on June
25, 2002 (date of inception of GelStat Corp.) All share data has been restated to give effect of the merger under which each GelStat
Corp. share was converted into .4360083 shares of DTR as adjusted for the stock dividend declared on July 19, 2004.
Effective
July 14, 2003, DTR changed its name to GelStat Corporation. Effective March 17, 2004, GS Corp. was merged into its parent, GelStat
Corporation.
In
2004, the Company formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, GS Pharma, Inc. (GS Pharma), to pursue various pharmaceutical (prescription
drug) opportunities that might exist relative to the Company's intellectual property. During the remainder of 2004, this subsidiary
evaluated potential business opportunities, but had no financial activity or licensing agreements in place.
Effective
January 1, 2005, GS Pharma entered into a license agreement with DTLL, Inc. ("DTLL"), a Minnesota corporation, in exchange
for 12,500,000 shares of DTLL common stock. Effective March 25, 2005, GS Pharma changed its name to GSC Subsidiary, Inc. On November
14, 2005, the Company sold 12.4 million of its shares in DTLL for gross cash proceeds of $500,000. As a result of the transaction,
the Company will no longer be consolidating DTLL results in the Company’s future financial statements.
NOTE
2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis
of presentation
The
accompanying financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) under the accrual basis of accounting.
Management's
Estimates
In
preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management
makes estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets
and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. These accounts and estimates include, but are not limited to, the valuation of accounts receivables, inventories,
income taxes and the estimation on useful lives of property, plant and equipment. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Basis
of Consolidation
The
consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiary. All inter-company balances
and transactions within the Company and subsidiary have been eliminated upon consolidation.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The
Company considers all short-term investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash and equivalents
for purposes of the statement of cash flows.
Accounts
Receivable
Accounts
receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The Company extends unsecured credit to its customers
in the ordinary course of business but mitigates the associated risks by performing credit checks and actively pursuing past due
accounts. As of December 31, 2007, the Company did not record an allowance for uncollectible accounts
Inventories
Inventories
are valued at the lower of cost (using the first-in, first out (FIFO) method) or market. Inventory items replaced by an alternative
and rendered unusable or diminished in value are considered to be obsolete. Obsolete inventory items are written down to zero.
Intangible
Assets
Patent cost, including legal fees and other costs associated with obtaining this patent, will be amortized over the
life of the patent using the straight-line method after the patent is approved by the authorities.
NOTE
2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Cont’d.
Revenue
Recognition
The
Company sells its products to a number of leading regional and national retailers, wholesalers, specialty distributors and catalog
merchandisers, both directly and through the services of external sales brokers. In accordance with the Securities Exchange Commission's
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 (SAB 104) "Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements", the Company recognizes revenue
when persuasive evidence of a customer or distributor arrangement exists, shipment has occurred, the price is fixed or determinable,
and the sales revenues are considered collectible. Subject to these criteria, except with respect to customers that buy products
on Pay on Scan terms, the Company recognizes revenue at the time of shipment of the merchandise. The Company recognizes Pay-on-Scan
sales as revenues at the earliest of the following events: 1) the Company is notified of the customer's sales through periodic
sales reports; 2) the Company receives payments from the customer; or 3) the customer reorders a specified quantity of the relevant
product. Pay-on-Scan revenue recognition treatment typically ends when persuasive evidence exists that a customer or distributor
has agreed to terminate the Pay-on-Scan arrangement in favor of a traditional sales arrangement.
Cost
of Revenue
Cost
of revenues consists primarily of product costs and shipping and handling, which are directly attributable to the sale of products.
Advertising
Advertising
costs are charged to operations when incurred.
Research
and Development Costs
The
company expenses research and development costs as incurred.
Depreciation
Property
and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is provided for using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives ranging
from three to seven years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful life.
Maintenance, repairs and minor renewals are expensed when incurred.
Impairment
Long-lived
assets and certain identifiable intangibles are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison
of the carrying amount of an asset to future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. Assets to be disposed
of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.
Income
Taxes
The
Company accounts for income tax using FASB ASC 740
“Accounting for Income Taxes”
, which requires the asset
and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting for income taxes. Under this approach, deferred income taxes are
provided for the estimated future tax effects attributable to temporary differences between financial statement carrying amounts
of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, and for the expected future tax benefits from loss carry-forwards and
provisions, if any. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates expected in the years of recovery
or reversal and the effect from a change in tax rates is recognized in the statement of operations and comprehensive income in
the period of enactment. A valuation allowance is provided to reduce the amount of deferred tax assets if it is considered more
likely than not that some portion of, or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Stock-Based
Compensation
The
Company accounts for stock-based compensation using the fair value method following the guidance set forth in section 718-10 of
the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosure about Stock-Based Compensation. This section requires a public entity
to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant date fair
value of the award (with limited exceptions). That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required
to provide service in exchange for the award – the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). No compensation
cost is recognized for equity instruments for which the employees do not render the requisite service.
The
Company recognizes expenses for the fair value of its outstanding stock warrants and options as they vest, whether held by employees
or others. The fair value of each stock warrant and option at the grant date is evaluated by using the Black-Scholes option pricing
model based upon certain assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility.
Net
Loss per Common Share
The
Company calculates net loss per share in accordance with FASB ASC 260,
“Earnings per Share”
. Basic
loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. No diluted loss
per share is required to be represented.
Recent
Accounting Standards
The
Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect. These pronouncements did not have any material impact
on the financial statements unless otherwise disclosed, and the Company does not believe that there are any other new accounting
pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.
NOTE
3 – Patents
On
June 6, 2003, the Company filed a patent application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for “Compositions
and methods of treatment to alleviate or prevent migrainous headaches and their associated symptoms”. The patent #7,192,614
was issued on March 7, 2007. Legal fees and other costs associated with obtaining this patent were $25,780 and are being amortized
over the 20 year useful life of the patent, using the straight-line method. At balance sheet date, the carrying value of the patent
is $24,813.
NOTE
4 – Accrued Expenses
Accrued
expenses consisted of the following at December 31:
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Accrued
payroll and payroll taxes
|
|
$
|
80,056
|
|
|
$80,056
|
Accrued
and deferred rent
|
|
|
8,544
|
|
|
8,544
|
Accrued
trade promotions expense
|
|
|
30,342
|
|
|
30,342
|
Accrued
coupon programs
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
-
|
Accrued
co-op advertising expense
|
|
|
34,411
|
|
|
34,411
|
Accrued
merchandising programs expense
|
|
|
101,263
|
|
|
101,263
|
Other
accrued revenue reductions
|
|
|
9,642
|
|
|
9,642
|
Other
accrued expense
|
|
|
3,379
|
|
|
3,379
|
Deferred
Revenue-Pay on Scan
|
|
|
45,656
|
|
|
45,656
|
Deferred
Revenue
|
|
|
69,600
|
|
|
69,600
|
Accrued
interest expense
|
|
|
108,593
|
|
|
65,350
|
Total
accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
491,440
|
|
|
$448,197
|
NOTE
5 - Short Term Convertible Notes Payable
The
Company had outstanding balances on its short-term notes payable of the following amounts at the respective dates:
|
|
12/31/2007
|
|
12/31/2006
|
Related Party, interest rate
6%, original due date, February 2, 2005; extended to June 2, 2005.
|
|
$
|
63,000
|
|
|
$
|
63,000
|
|
Non-affiliate third party, interest rate
6%, original due date, February 2, 2005; extended to June 2, 2005.
|
|
|
72,000
|
|
|
|
72,000
|
|
Non-affiliate third party, interest rate
6%, original due date, February 2, 2005; extended to June 2, 2005.
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
Non-affiliate third party, interest rate
6%, original due date, February 2, 2005; extended to June 2, 2005.
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
Non-affiliate third party, interest rate
6%, original due date, February 2, 2005; extended to June 2, 2005.
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
Non-affiliate third party, interest rate
6%, original due date, February 2, 2005; extended to June 2, 2005.
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
Non-affiliate third party, interest rate
6%, original due date, October 5, 2005.
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Related Parties, interest rate 8%, due
date, September 24, 2007.
|
|
|
13,500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Related Parties,
interest rate 8%.
|
|
|
9,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
558,005
|
|
|
$
|
535,000
|
|
On
December 2, 2004, the Company issued unsecured convertible promissory notes related to a private placement of short term debt.
The notes were issued to six individuals in principal amounts ranging from $60,000 to $120,000 for a total of $474,000. The Company
agreed to repay the principal amount in its entirety within three business days after the Company closed on net proceeds of at
least $2,000,000 obtained through any offering of its securities, including any debt, common stock or preferred stock, or if earlier,
on February 2, 2005. If the Company closed on $2,000,000 or more in net proceeds through an offering of its securities, the promissory
note holders had the option to convert the principal amount into securities of the Company according to the same terms and provisions.
The conversion of the short-term notes payable was contingent upon the closing of a $2,000,000 stock offering and the incremental
intrinsic value would have been recognized when the triggering event occurred. In lieu of interest, the Company issued to the
note holders five-year warrants to purchase 79,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.00. The warrants were valued
using the Black-Scholes pricing model using the following factors: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 158%, risk-free
interest rate of 3.5% and expected lives of five years. The resulting original issue discount and the fair value of the warrants
were amortized over the life of the notes using the straight-line method, which approximates the interest method.
The
Company paid $24,000 of the principal balance of the notes during the three months ended March 31, 2005. During the first quarter
the note holders agreed to extend the payment of the remaining balance of $450,000 to June 2, 2005. In lieu of interest during
the period up to the extended due date, the Company issued to the note holders five-year warrants to purchase 75,000 shares of
common stock at an exercise price of $1.00. The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes pricing model using the following
factors: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 163%, risk-free interest rate of 3.5% and expected lives of five years.
The resulting original issue discount and the fair value of the warrants of $276,000 were amortized over the extended life of
the notes using the straight-line method, which approximates the interest method.
The
Company paid an additional $15,000 of the principal during the three months ended June 30, 2005. During the six months ended December
31, 2005, the Company did not make any principal payments, and accrued 6% interest on the outstanding balance. The Company negotiated
a settlement of the remaining note balance of $435,000 in July 2011.
On
July 1, 2005, the Company issued a secured short term convertible promissory note payable in the amount of $100,000. The note
was secured by the outstanding receivables of the Company, which, as of July 1, 2005, totaled approximately $200,000. The Company
agreed to repay the principal amount in its entirety at the sooner of (i) three business days of that date on which the Company
closed on cumulative net proceeds of $2,000,000 or greater which were obtained through any offering of its securities, including
without limitation any debt, common stock or preferred stock or (ii) October 1, 2005. If the Company closed on $2,000,000 or more
in net proceeds through an offering of its securities, the promissory note holder had the option to convert the principal amount
into securities of the Company according to the same terms and provisions. The conversion of the short-term notes payable was
contingent upon the closing of a $2,000,000 stock offering and the incremental intrinsic value would be recognized when the triggering
event occurred. In lieu of interest, the Company issued to the note holder 50,000 shares of common stock valued at $39,000. The
Company negotiated a settlement of the note balance of $100,000 in November 2009.
During
the quarter ended September 30, 2007, the Company borrowed $13,500 from various related parties at an interest rate of 8%. The
Company agreed to repay the principal amount in its entirety, with all unpaid interest then accrued on September 24, 2007. No
principal or interest payments were made on the notes. Settlement agreements were reached with each of the related parties on
July 2011.
During
the quarter ended December 31, 2007, the Company borrowed $9,505 from various related parties at an interest rate of 8%. No principal
or interest payments were made. Settlement agreements were reached with each of the related parties on July 2011.
NOTE
6 – Deferred Compensation
The
Company’s deferred compensation includes common stock or warrants issued to consultants for services to be rendered related
to public relations, sales distribution consulting, investor relations and general operations conducted in the normal course of
business. The following table sets forth the details of deferred compensation:
|
|
12/31/2007
|
|
12/31/2006
|
728,000 shares of common
stock at prices ranging from $0.54 - $0.98 per share were issued during the year ended December 31, 2005 for consulting services
rendered from 05/01/2005 to 10/03/2006.
|
|
$
|
(468,140
|
)
|
|
$
|
(468,140
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five-year warrants to purchase 285,000
shares of common stock were granted during the year ended December 31, 2005 with exercise prices ranging from $.50-$3.00 per
share for services rendered from 5/1/2005 to 10/03/2006. The Company determined the fair value of the warrants based
on the Black Scholes pricing model using the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 201.89%,
and risk-free interest rates ranging from 3.63% - 4.1%
|
|
|
(195,650
|
)
|
|
|
(195,650
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,700,000 shares of common stock at
a share price of $0.10 were issued during the period ending 09/30/2006 for consulting services rendered from 08/28/2006 to
08/27/2007.
|
|
|
(170,000
|
)
|
|
|
(170,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five-year warrants to purchase 3,000,000
shares of common stock were granted during the period ended 09/30/2006 with exercise prices ranging from $0.25 - $0.50
per share for services rendered from 08/28/2006 to 08/27/2007. The Company determined the fair value of the warrants
based on the Black Scholes pricing model using the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 216.54%,
and risk-free interest rate of 4.77%.
|
|
|
(300,000
|
)
|
|
|
(300,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500,000 shares of common stock at
a share price of $0.08 were issued during the period ending 12/31/2006 for consulting services rendered from 11/01/2006 to
10/31/2007.
|
|
|
(120,000
|
)
|
|
|
(120,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,000 shares of common stock at a
share price of $0.10 were issued during the period ending 03/31/2007 for consulting services rendered from 03/28/2007 to 03/28/2008.
|
|
|
(40,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five-year warrants to purchase 250,000
shares of common stock were granted during the period ended 06/30/2007 with an exercise price of $0 .10 per share
for services rendered from 05/01/2007 to 04/30/2010. The Company determined the fair value of the warrants based on
the Black Scholes pricing model using the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 468.93%, and
risk-free interest rate of 4.54%.
|
|
|
(27,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350,000 shares of common stock at a
share price of $0.20 were issued during the period ending 09/30/2007 for consulting services rendered from 09/04/2007 to 03/03/2008.
|
|
|
(70,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred compensation
|
|
|
1,335,803
|
|
|
|
860,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(55,487
|
)
|
|
$
|
(393,334
|
)
|
NOTE 7 – Common Stock to be
Issued
As
of December 31, 2007, the balance of common stock to be issued was $95,000 due to the transactions as follows:
During
the three months ended September 30, 2007, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the issuance of 250,000 shares of common
stock at a price of $.01 per share, in exchange for cash payment of total $25,000. The cash payment was received in full during
the three months ended September 30, 2007, but the 250,000 shares had not been issued as of the date of this report.
Pursuant
to a consulting agreement, the Company agreed to issue 2,333,333 shares of common stock to a consultant at $.03 per share for
services rendered or to be rendered valued at $70,000. The shares have not been issued as of the date of this report.
NOTE
8 - Stockholders' Equity
During
the three months ended December 31, 2007, the Company had no equity transactions.
During
the three months ended September 30, 2007 the Company issued 750,000 options at an exercise price of $.12 per share for services
rendered or to be rendered valued at $90,000. The Company determined the fair value of the warrants based on the Black Scholes
pricing model using the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 749.04%, risk-free interest rate of
4.41% and an expected life of five years.
During
the three months ended September 30, 2007 the Company issued 400,000 shares of common stock and 400,000 warrants with an exercise
price of $.25 for gross proceeds of $40,000 which was allocated between common stock and warrants on a pro rata basis based on
the known fair values of both securities. The fair value of the common stock was $40,000 determined using the market price of
$.10 per share at issuance date; the fair value of the warrants was $56,000 determined based on the Black Scholes pricing model
using the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 468.93%, risk-free interest rate of 4.60% and an
expected life of five years.
During
the three months ended June 30, 2007 the Company issued 250,000 warrants at an exercise price of $.10 per share for services rendered
or to be rendered valued at $27,500. The Company determined the fair value of the warrants based on the Black Scholes pricing
model using the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 468.93%, risk-free interest rate of 4.54%
and an expected life of five years.
During
the three months ended June 30, 2007, the Company issued 200,000 shares of common stock at $.10 per share for services rendered
or to be rendered valued at $20,000.
During
the three months ended June 30, 2007 the Company issued 700,000 shares of common stock and 700,000 warrants with an exercise price
of $.25 for gross proceeds of $70,000 which was allocated between common stock and warrants on a pro rata basis based on the known
fair values of both securities. The fair value of the common stock was $70,000 determined using the market price of $.10 per share
at issuance date; the fair value of the warrants was $98,000 determined based on the Black Scholes pricing model using the following
assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 468.93%, risk-free interest rate of 4.60% and an expected life of five
years.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Company issued 400,000 shares of common stock at $.10 per share for services rendered
or to be rendered valued at $40,000.
During
the three months ended December 31, 2006 the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock and 250,000 warrants with an exercise
price of $.25 for gross proceeds of $25,000 which was allocated between common stock and warrants on a pro rata basis based on
the known fair values of both securities. The fair value of the common stock was $25,000 determined using the market price of
$.10 per share at issuance date; the fair value of the warrants was $30,000 determined based on the Black Scholes pricing model
using the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 216.54%, risk-free interest rate of 4.57% and an
expected life of five years.
During
the three months ended December 31, 2006 the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock and 250,000 warrants with an exercise
price of $.25 for gross proceeds of $25,000 which was allocated between common stock and warrants on a pro rata basis based on
the known fair values of both securities. The fair value of the common stock was $25,000 determined using the market price of
$.10 per share at issuance date; the fair value of the warrants was $30,000 determined based on the Black Scholes pricing model
using the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 216.54%, risk-free interest rate of 4.57% and an
expected life of five years.
During
the three months ended December 31, 2006 the Company issued 1,150,000 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $.06 to $0.15
per share for services rendered or to be rendered valued at $136,000.
During
the three months ended December 31, 2006 the Company issued 1,500,000 shares of common stock at $0.08 per share for services rendered
or to be rendered valued at $120,000.
During
the three months ended December 31, 2006, 242,847 five-year options were exercised with a weighted average exercise price of $0.69
on a "cashless" or "net exercise" basis (based on the market price of the Company's common stock the day before
exercise) resulting in the issuance of 2,428 shares of common stock.
During
the three months ended December 31, 2006 the Company issued 120,000 warrants at an exercise price of $.20 per share for services
rendered or to be rendered valued at $8,400. The Company determined the fair value of the warrants based on the Black Scholes
pricing model using the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 216.54%, risk-free interest rate of
4.55% and an expected life of five years.
During
the three months ended December 31, 2006 the Company issued 950,000 options at an exercise price of $.06 per share for services
rendered or to be rendered valued at $95,000. The Company determined the fair value of the warrants based on the Black Scholes
pricing model using the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 216.54%, risk-free interest rate of
4.6% and an expected life of five years.
During
the three months ended September 30, 2006 the Company issued 2,433,888 shares of common stock and 2,433,888 warrants with an exercise
price of $.20 for gross proceeds of $219,050 which was allocated between common stock and warrants on a pro rata basis based on
the known fair values of both securities. The fair value of the common stock was $219,500 determined using the market price of
$.09 per share at issuance date; the fair value of the warrants was $255,899 determined based on the Black Scholes pricing model
using the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 216.54%, risk-free interest rate ranging from 4.76%
- 5.08% and an expected life of five years.
During
the three months ended September 30, 2006 the Company issued 197,010 shares of common stock at $.09 per share for services rendered
or to be rendered valued at $17,731.
During
the three months ended September 30, 2006 the Company issued 1,700,000 shares of common stock at $.10 per share for services rendered
or to be rendered valued at $170,000.
During
the three months ended September 30, 2006 the Company issued 3,000,000 warrants at exercise prices ranging from $.25 - $.50 per
share for services rendered or to be rendered valued at $300,000. The Company determined the fair value of the warrants based
on the Black Scholes pricing model using the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 216.54%, risk-free
interest rate of 4.77% and an expected life of five years.
During
the three months ended September 30, 2006 the Company issued 760,000 options at exercise prices ranging from $.07 - $.11 per share
for services rendered or to be rendered valued at $57,200. The Company determined the fair value of the warrants based on the
Black Scholes pricing model using the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 216.54%, risk-free interest
rates ranging from 4.86% - 5.10% and an expected life of five years.
During
the three months ended June 30, 2006, the Company issued 320,000 shares of common stock at $.12 per share for services rendered
or to be rendered valued at $38,400.
During
the three months ended June 30, 2006, the Company issued 500,000 warrants at an exercise price of $.09 per share for severance
valued at $60,000. The Company determined the fair value of the warrants based on the Black Scholes pricing model using the following
assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 216.54%, risk-free interest rate of 5.08% and an expected life of five
years.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2006 the Company issued 60,000 shares of common stock and 30,000 warrants with an exercise price
of $.70 for gross proceeds of $30,000 which was allocated between common stock and warrants on a pro rata basis based on the known
fair values of both securities. The fair value of the common stock was $30,000 determined using the market price of $.50 per share
at issuance date; the fair value of the warrants was $22,200 determined based on the Black Scholes pricing model using the following
assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 216.54%, risk-free interest rate of 4.32% and an expected life of five
years.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2006, the Company issued 535,000 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $.74 to $.22 per
share for services rendered or to be rendered valued at $241,700.
Stock
Option Plan
The
Company had a stock option plan (1997 Plan) in which the Company reserved 100,000 shares of common stock for issuance to outside
directors as compensation for their services as board members. During 2003, the Company terminated the 1997 Plan.
During
2003, the Company adopted the 2003 Incentive Plan (the Plan), pursuant to which stock options to acquire an aggregate of 3,600,000
shares of the Company's common stock may be granted to employees, directors and consultants. In general, options vest over a period
of up to three years and expire five years from the date of grant.
Information
regarding the Company's stock options is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Weighted Avg
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Exercise
Price
|
Options Outstanding -
|
|
|
December
31, 2005
|
|
|
|
2,658,750
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,710,000
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Canceled/Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(895,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding -
|
|
|
December
31, 2006
|
|
|
|
3,473,750
|
|
|
|
0.59
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Canceled/Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
-
|
|
|
December
31, 2007
|
|
|
|
4,223,750
|
|
|
$
|
0.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable -
|
|
|
December
31, 2006
|
|
|
|
2,485,750
|
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable -
|
|
|
December
31, 2007
|
|
|
|
3,959,750
|
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value of options
granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
during the year-ended
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value of options
granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
during the year-ended
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2007 are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
Number of
|
|
Average
|
Range
of exercise prices
|
|
Options
|
|
Exercise
Price
|
|
Life
Years
|
|
Options
|
|
Exercise
Price
|
|
$0.06
- $0.12
|
|
|
|
2,460,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
5.54
|
*
|
|
|
2,196,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
770,000
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
2.88
|
|
|
|
770,000
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
$0.92
- $1.20
|
|
|
|
656,250
|
|
|
|
0.93
|
|
|
|
0.65
|
|
|
|
656,250
|
|
|
|
0.93
|
|
|
$2.67
-$3.37
|
|
|
|
337,500
|
|
|
|
3.23
|
|
|
|
1.48
|
|
|
|
337,500
|
|
|
|
3.23
|
|
|
$0.30
-
$3.37
|
|
|
|
4,223,750
|
|
|
$
|
0.51
|
|
|
|
3.97
|
|
|
|
3,959,750
|
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
|
*
Note: 750,000
option, exercise price
$.12, exercise
period 10 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
Warrants
The
Company has also issued warrants in connection with equity offerings, for services rendered, and with short term notes payable,
as summarized below:
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Weighted Avg
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
Exercise
Price
|
Warrants Outstanding -
|
|
|
December
31, 2005
|
|
|
|
1,683,529
|
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,333,888
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(500,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
Canceled/Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants Outstanding -
|
|
|
December
31, 2006
|
|
|
|
7,517,417
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,350,000
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Canceled/Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,000
|
)
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants Outstanding
-
|
|
|
December
31, 2007
|
|
|
|
8,849,417
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value of Warrants granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
during the year-ended
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value of Warrants granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
during the year-ended
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the year-end December 31, 2007
warrants were issued for the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,100,000 in connection with equity
financing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants outstanding at December 31, 2007
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
& Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
Contractual
|
Range
of exercise prices
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
|
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
|
Life
Years
|
|
$.10-$.15
|
|
|
904,015
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
1.22
|
|
$.20-$.35
|
|
|
5,903,888
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
3.82
|
|
$.50-$1.00
|
|
|
1,728,701
|
|
|
|
0.64
|
|
|
|
0.31
|
|
$1.20-$1.67
|
|
|
90,525
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
1.26
|
|
$2.00-$3.00
|
|
|
222,288
|
|
|
|
2.68
|
|
|
|
1.93
|
|
$0.15-$3.00
|
|
|
8,849,417
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
3.95
|
|
NOTE
9 – Income Taxes
Due
to the operating loss and the inability to recognize an income tax benefit there is no provision for current or deferred federal
or state income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Deferred
income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial
reporting purposes and the amount used for federal and state income tax purposes.
Because
of the Company’s lack of earnings history, the deferred tax asset has been fully offset by a valuation allowance. The valuation
allowance increased by approximately $417,134 and $758,350 for the years ending December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Components
of the net deferred income taxes are as follows at December 31:
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
Deferred
income tax assets
|
|
$
|
6,368,899
|
|
|
$
|
5,951,765
|
|
Less:
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(6,368,899
|
)
|
|
|
(5,951,765
|
)
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Deferred
income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net
deferred income tax assets
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
reconciliation of income taxes computed at the federal statutory income tax rate to total income taxes for the period from
inception through December 31, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Income
tax computed at the federal statutory rate
|
|
|
-34.00
|
%
|
|
|
-34.00
|
%
|
State
income tax, net of federal tax benefit
|
|
|
-4.50
|
%
|
|
|
-4.50
|
%
|
Total
|
|
|
-38.50
|
%
|
|
|
-38.50
|
%
|
Valuation
Allowance
|
|
|
38.50
|
%
|
|
|
38.50
|
%
|
Total
deferred tax asset
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
NOTE
10 - Related Party Transactions
On
December 2, 2004, the Company borrowed $102,000 from a director of the Company for a term ending on February 2, 2005, or, if earlier,
upon a $2,000,000 financing, as discussed in Note 5, above. In lieu of interest, the Company issued to the director a five-year
warrant to purchase 17,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.00. The repayment date for $78,000 of the note was
extended to June 2, 2005, and in lieu of interest for the extension period, the Company issued to the director a five-year warrant
to purchase 13,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.00. The Company paid an additional $15,000 of the principal
note balance during the three months ended June 30, 2005. During the six months ended December 31, 2005, the Company did not make
any principal payments, and accrued 6% interest on the outstanding balance. The Company negotiated a settlement of the remaining
note balance of $63,000 outstanding in July 2011.
During
the quarter ended September 30, 2007, the Company borrowed $13,500 from various related parties at an interest rate of 8%. The
Company agreed to repay the principal amount in its entirety, with all unpaid interest then accrued on September 24, 2007. No
principal or interest payments were made on the notes. Settlement agreements were reached with each of the related parties on
July 2011.
During
the quarter ended December 31, 2007, the Company borrowed $9,505 from various related parties at an interest rate of 8%. No principal
or interest payments were made. Settlement agreements were reached with each of the related parties on July 2011.
NOTE
11 - Legal Proceedings
On
January 19, 2006, the Company was served with a Summons and Complaint entitled “Milgaard RE Partnership vs. Gelstat Corporation.”
Milgarrd RE Partnership, a promissory note holder, alleged Gelstat owed $76,734 regarding the note, interest and fees. On July
1, 2011, a settlement agreement was reached among parties wherein Milgarrd RE Partnership was issued 114,000, $0.03, 5 year warrants
and $3,600 cash.
On
September 7, 2006, the Company was served with a Summons and Complaint entitled “Dr. Steven Klos vs. Gelstat Corporation.”
Dr. Steven Klos, a promissory note holder, alleged Gelstat owed $100,000 regarding the note, interest and fees. On November 3,
2009, a settlement agreement was reached among parties wherein Dr. Steven Klos was paid $25,000 cash.
On
September 10, 2007, the Company was served with a Summons and Complaint entitled “Unicep Packaging, Inc. vs. Gelstat Corporation.”
Unicep Packaging, Inc., a vendor, alleged Gelstat owed $190,340 on an agreement entered into by the parties regarding packaging
of Gelstat’s products. On July 11, 2011, a settlement agreement was reached among parties wherein Unicep was issued 400,000,
$0.03, 5 year warrants and $20,000 cash.
On
December 11, 2007, the Company was served with a Summons and Complaint entitled “Angela Diliddo and Bioinitiate Capital,
LLC. vs. Gelstat Corporation.” Angela Diliddo and Eleanor Kelly (sole principal of Bioninitiate), promissory note holders,
alleged Gelstat owed $120,000 and $60,000, respectively, regarding the notes. On July 1, 2011, a settlement agreement was reached
among parties wherein Angela Diliddo was issued 240,000 $0.03, 5 year warrants and $6,000 cash and Eleanor Kelly was issued 120,000
$0.03, 5 year warrants and $3,000 cash.
On
December 14, 2007, the Company was served with a Summons and Complaint entitled “Stepping Stones Partners, LP and Daniel
D. Hickey vs. Gelstat Corporation.” Stepping Stones Partners, LP/Daniel D. Hickey, a promissory note holder, alleged Gelstat
owed $120,000 regarding the note. On July 1, 2011, a settlement agreement was reached among parties wherein Stepping Stones Partners,
LP/Daniel D. Hickey was issued 120,000 $0.03, 5 year warrants and $16,000 cash.
NOTE
12 – Going Concern
As
shown in the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations
to date. It experienced a loss of $1,083,466 during 2007. The Company had a net deficiency of $16,542,595 as of December 31, 2007.
These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
The
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate future profitable operations
and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations
when they come due. Management’s plan includes obtaining additional funds by equity financing and/or related party advances;
however there is no assurance of additional funding being available. These circumstances raise substantial doubt about the Company’s
ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might arise
as a result of this uncertainty.