Table
of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(
Mark One)
x
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended October 31, 2008
or
o
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
For the transition period from
to
Commission file number:
001-12531
ISONICS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
California
|
|
77-0338561
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(IRS Employer
|
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.)
|
535 8
th
Avenue, 3
rd
Floor
New York, NY 10018-2491
(Address of principal executive offices with zip code)
(212) 356-7400
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
x
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated
filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller
reporting companyin Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
o
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
|
|
Smaller reporting company
x
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) Yes
o
No
x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes
of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class
|
|
Outstanding at
December 12, 2008
|
Common Stock no par value
|
|
27,998,252 shares
|
Table
of Contents
Part I: Financial
Information
Item 1: Financial Statements
Isonics Corporation and
Subsidiaries
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands,
except share amounts)
ASSETS
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31,
2008
|
|
April 30,
2008
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
$
|
558
|
|
$
|
927
|
|
Accounts
receivable (net of allowances of $80 and $58,
respectively)
|
|
2,217
|
|
2,297
|
|
Inventories
|
|
339
|
|
394
|
|
Prepaid expenses
and other current assets
|
|
417
|
|
194
|
|
Assets held for
sale
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
Total current
assets
|
|
3,531
|
|
4,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM
ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and
equipment, net
|
|
3,947
|
|
4,682
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
1,285
|
|
3,631
|
|
Intangible
assets, net
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Other assets
|
|
287
|
|
418
|
|
Total long-term
assets
|
|
5,519
|
|
8,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
9,050
|
|
|
$
|
12,761
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2008
|
|
April 30, 2008
|
|
CURRENT
LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
1,162
|
|
$
|
825
|
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
|
1,774
|
|
2,262
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
4,192
|
|
2,990
|
|
Current portion
of obligations under capital lease
|
|
635
|
|
550
|
|
Current portion
of notes payable, net of discount
|
|
6,936
|
|
10
|
|
Current portion
of convertible debentures, net of discount
|
|
8,994
|
|
10,515
|
|
Total current
liabilities
|
|
23,693
|
|
17,152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations
under capital lease, net of current portion
|
|
266
|
|
591
|
|
Notes payable, net
of current portion
|
|
17
|
|
22
|
|
Other long-term
liabilities
|
|
50
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
LIABILITIES
|
|
24,026
|
|
17,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and
Contingencies (See Notes 1, 6, 8,9 and 10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS
DEFICIT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock -
no par value; 175,000,000 shares authorized; shares issued and outstanding:
October 31, 2008 26,748,252; April 30, 2008 16,063,026
|
|
64,513
|
|
64,448
|
|
Additional paid
in capital
|
|
23,592
|
|
23,186
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
(103,081
|
)
|
(92,683
|
)
|
Total stockholders
deficit
|
|
(14,976
|
)
|
(5,049
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT
|
|
$
|
9,050
|
|
$
|
12,761
|
|
See
notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table
of Contents
Isonics Corporation and
Subsidiaries
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands,
except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Products
|
|
631
|
|
1,145
|
|
1,213
|
|
2,016
|
|
Services
|
|
3,361
|
|
4,910
|
|
7,566
|
|
9,908
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
3,992
|
|
6,055
|
|
8,779
|
|
11,924
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of
revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
579
|
|
1,476
|
|
1,186
|
|
2,351
|
|
Services
|
|
3,228
|
|
4,096
|
|
7,019
|
|
8,219
|
|
Total cost of
revenues
|
|
3,807
|
|
5,572
|
|
8,205
|
|
10,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
185
|
|
483
|
|
574
|
|
1,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general
and administrative
|
|
1,040
|
|
1,864
|
|
2,417
|
|
3,954
|
|
Impairment of
goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,346
|
|
|
|
Impairment loss
on intangible assets
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
Research and
development
|
|
25
|
|
165
|
|
60
|
|
1,182
|
|
Total operating
expenses
|
|
1,065
|
|
2,174
|
|
4,823
|
|
5,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
(880
|
)
|
(1,691
|
)
|
(4,249
|
)
|
(3,927
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
(expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of
debt issuance costs
|
|
(68
|
)
|
(46
|
)
|
(131
|
)
|
(87
|
)
|
Interest and
other income
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
|
2
|
|
99
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
(1,338
|
)
|
(1,497
|
)
|
(4,639
|
)
|
(2,926
|
)
|
Foreign exchange
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Loss on
extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,381
|
)
|
|
|
Gain on
derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
Equity in net
loss of investee
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
Total other
income (expense), net
|
|
(1,405
|
)
|
(1,081
|
)
|
(6,149
|
)
|
(2,483
|
)
|
Loss from
continuing operations before income taxes and minority interest
|
|
(2,285
|
)
|
(2,772
|
)
|
(10,398
|
)
|
(6,410
|
)
|
Income tax
expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority
interest in operations of consolidated subsidiary
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
Loss from
continuing operations
|
|
(2,285
|
)
|
(2,761
|
)
|
(10,398
|
)
|
(6,299
|
)
|
Discontinued
operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on
operations of discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Gain on disposal
of discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
Gain on
discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
553
|
|
NET LOSS
|
|
$
|
(2,285
|
)
|
$
|
(2,761
|
)
|
$
|
(10,398
|
)
|
$
|
(5,746
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss per sharebasic and diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C
ontinuing operations
|
|
$
|
(.10
|
)
|
$
|
(.22
|
)
|
$
|
(.51
|
)
|
$
|
(.50
|
)
|
Discontinued
operations
|
|
$
|
(.00
|
)
|
$
|
(.00
|
)
|
$
|
(.00
|
)
|
$
|
.04
|
|
Attributable to
common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(.10
|
)
|
$
|
(.22
|
)
|
$
|
(.51
|
)
|
$
|
(.46
|
)
|
Weighted average
common shares used in computing per share information
|
|
22,636
|
|
12,658
|
|
20,506
|
|
12,656
|
|
See
notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table
of Contents
Isonics Corporation and
Subsidiaries
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands, except share
amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Six Months Ended October 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in
operating activities
|
|
$
|
(1,211
|
)
|
$
|
(815
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of
property and equipment
|
|
(4
|
)
|
(79
|
)
|
Proceeds from
the sale of assets held for sale, net of selling costs
|
|
221
|
|
60
|
|
Proceeds from
sale of discontinued operations, net of selling costs
|
|
|
|
805
|
|
Cash provided by
investing activities
|
|
217
|
|
786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
payments under capital lease obligations
|
|
(241
|
)
|
(230
|
)
|
Principal
payments on borrowings
|
|
(134
|
)
|
(544
|
)
|
Proceeds from
the issuance of term debt and related common stock warrants, net of offering
costs
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by
(used in) financing activities
|
|
625
|
|
(774
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET DECREASE IN
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
(369
|
)
|
(803
|
)
|
Cash and cash
equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
927
|
|
1,556
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
558
|
|
$
|
753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during
the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
$
|
139
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
disclosure of noncash investing and financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease
obligation for property and equipment
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
628
|
|
Payment in
common stock of principal due on convertible debentures
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
$
|
|
|
See
notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table
of Contents
Isonics Corporation and
Subsidiaries
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1
- BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying condensed consolidated balance
sheet as of April 30, 2008, has been derived from audited financial
statements. The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial
statements of Isonics Corporation and Subsidiaries have been prepared on the
same basis as the annual audited financial statements and in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (US GAAP) for
interim financial information and the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for interim financial statements. In
the opinion of management, such unaudited information includes all adjustments
(consisting only of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation
of this interim information. Operating results and cash flows for interim
periods are not necessarily indicative of results that can be expected for the
entire year. The information included in this report should be read in
conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30,
2008.
Going Concern
As of October 31,
2008, we had a working capital deficit of $(20,162,000) and a stockholders
deficit of $(14,976,000). Furthermore,
included in current liabilities are $15,833,000 of convertible debentures and
term notes (both net of related discounts) for which we may not be in compliance
with certain covenants. As a result and as described in Note 6, the holder may
have the right to call such debentures and term notes for the full-face amount
of $19,003,900 plus accrued interest. In addition, we incurred significant
losses from operations and used significant cash flow to fund operations for
the periods presented. Historically, we have relied upon outside investor funds
to maintain our operations and develop our business. Although we raised an
additional $1,352,500 (net of expenses) through the issuance of $1,550,000 of
term notes in June and November 2008 (see Note 6), we anticipate we
will continue to require funding from investors to finance our negative cash
flow as well as business expansion during this fiscal year and we can provide
no assurance that additional investor funds will be available on terms
acceptable to us. These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to
continue operations as a going concern.
In December 2008, as
a result of a garnishment of our bank account, approximately $200,000 in funds
are not available to us, resulting in our inability to be able to meet certain
corporate obligations. This garnishment has exacerbated our liquidity shortage.
We anticipate that YA Global will take action to enforce its security interest
in those funds.
Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon raising
capital through debt or equity financing and by increasing revenue and
ultimately achieving positive cash flow and profitable operations. We have
substantial limitations on our ability to raise additional financing, and we
can offer no assurance that we will be successful in our efforts to raise
additional funds or achieve positive cash flow or profitable operations. The
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on
a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the
settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business.
NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
Net Income (Loss) Per Share
Basic net income (loss) per share is computed using the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Contingently
issuable shares are included in the computation of basic net income (loss) per
share when the related conditions are satisfied. Diluted net income (loss) per
share is
6
Table
of Contents
Isonics
Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
computed using the weighted average number of common
shares and potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive securities consist of
contingently issuable shares, the incremental common shares issuable upon
conversion of convertible debt (using the if converted method) and shares
issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants (using the treasury
stock method). Potentially dilutive
securities are excluded from the computation if their effect is anti-dilutive.
As of October 31, 2008, (a) a total of
31,481,500 outstanding stock options and common stock warrants and (b) the
unissued shares underlying our outstanding convertible debentures (with a
cumulative outstanding face amount of $11,858,900 at October 31, 2008)
were excluded from the diluted net loss per share calculation, as their
inclusion would be anti-dilutive. As of October 31, 2007, (a) a
total of 5,112,125 outstanding stock options (excluding 3,550,000 stock options
not deemed granted under US GAAP because the underlying plan or increase to the
underlying plan had not been approved by our shareholders) and common stock
warrants and (b) the unissued shares underlying our outstanding
convertible debentures (with a cumulative outstanding face amount of
$18,0000,000 at October 31, 2007) were excluded from the diluted net loss
per share calculation, as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
During the six months ended October 31, 2008,
we issued the following shares of common stock:
Description
|
|
Number of Common Stock Shares
|
|
Balance as of
April 30, 2008
|
|
16,063,026
|
|
Shares issued
upon conversion of convertible debentures
|
|
10,685,226
|
|
Balance as of
October 31, 2008
|
|
26,748,252
|
|
The aforementioned equity transactions increased
common stock in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets by
$65,000
for the six months ended October 31, 2008.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In September 2006,
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS 157).
SFAS 157 provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and
liabilities. The FASB believes the
standard also responds to investors requests for expanded information about
the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value, the
information used to measure fair value and the effect of fair value
measurements on earnings. The provisions
of SFAS 157 are to be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal
year in which SFAS No. 157 is initially applied. SFAS 157 applies whenever other standards
require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value but does
not expand the use of fair value to any new circumstances. SFAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities
was effective for us on May 1, 2008.
On May 1, 2009 SFAS 157 will also apply to non-financial assets and
liabilities. The adoption of SFAS 157
for financial assets and liabilities did not have a material impact on our
financial position or results of operations.
FASB Staff Position SFAS 157-2
Effective
Date FASB Statement No. 157
(FSP FAS 157-2) delays the
effective date of SFAS 157 for non-financial assets and liabilities, except for
items recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a
recurring basis (at least annually). We
do not expect the application of FSP FAS 157-2 will have a material impact on
our financial position or results of operations.
In February 2007,
the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
(SFAS
159). SFAS 159 provides the option to
report certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value, with the intent
to mitigate volatility in financial reporting that can occur when related
assets and liabilities are recorded on different bases. SFAS 159
also amends SFAS No. 115,
Accounting
for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities
, by providing
the option to record unrealized gains
7
Table
of Contents
Isonics
Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
and losses on
held-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities currently. SFAS 159
was effective for us on May 1, 2008, including interim periods within this
fiscal year. The implementation of FAS
159 did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of
operations.
In December 2007,
the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007),
Business Combinations
(SFAS 141(R)), which establishes
principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its
financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed,
and any noncontrolling interest in an acquiree, including the recognition and
measurement of goodwill acquired in a business combination. SFAS 141(R) is effective for our fiscal
year commencing May 1, 2009.
Earlier adoption is prohibited.
We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS 141(R) on
our results of operations and financial condition.
In December 2007,
the FASB issued SFAS No. 160 ,
Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51(
SFAS 160). SFAS 160 amends
ARB 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling
interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest
in a subsidiary, which is sometimes referred to as minority interest, is an
ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity
in the consolidated financial statements.
Among other requirements, this statement requires consolidated net
income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both
the parent and the noncontrolling interest.
It also requires disclosure, on the face of the consolidated income
statement, of the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent
and to the noncontrolling interest.
SFAS 160 is effective for our fiscal year commencing May 1, 2009,
including interim periods within that fiscal year. Earlier adoption is
prohibited. We are currently evaluating
the impact of adopting SFAS 160 on our results of operations and financial
condition.
NOTE 3 FINANCIAL STATEMENT COMPONENTS
Inventories
Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
October 31, 2008
|
|
April 30, 2008
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
$
|
96
|
|
$
|
187
|
|
Work in process
|
|
52
|
|
25
|
|
Materials and
supplies
|
|
191
|
|
182
|
|
Total
inventories
|
|
$
|
339
|
|
$
|
394
|
|
Property and equipment
Property and
equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
October 31, 2008
|
|
April 30, 2008
|
|
Office furniture
and equipment
|
|
$
|
276
|
|
$
|
351
|
|
Production
equipment
|
|
8,868
|
|
8,822
|
|
Vehicles
|
|
204
|
|
204
|
|
Construction in
process
|
|
22
|
|
66
|
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
|
1,215
|
|
1,215
|
|
|
|
10,585
|
|
10,658
|
|
Accumulated
depreciation and amortization
|
|
(6,638
|
)
|
(5,976
|
)
|
Total property
and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
3,947
|
|
$
|
4,682
|
|
8
Table
of Contents
Isonics
Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 4 SEGMENT INFORMATION
We currently have two
reportable segments: security services and silicon products and services. Our security services segment provides
security and investigative services and is substantially comprised of the
operations of Protection Plus Security Corporation (PPSC). Our silicon products and services segment
provides
300-millimeter
(and smaller diameter) test wafers and reclamation services, wafer thinning and
custom wafer products and services for the silicon industry. Our segments are strategic business
units, each of which consists of similar products or services. They are managed separately because each
segment requires different technology and marketing strategy and because each
segment sells to different customers from different locations. Reconciling items consist primarily of
corporate assets or expenses that have not been allocated to a specific
reportable segment and the assets and results of operations of our former
homeland security products segment. Our
former homeland security products segment included both the operations of our
Ion Mobility Spectroscopy (IMS) technology and, through our 90%-owned subsidiary
SenseIt Corp, the development of next-generation infrared imaging and night
vision technology through our Development and Licensing Agreement with Lucent
Technologies, Inc. (Lucent). We
no longer consider homeland security products to be a reportable segment due to
the suspension of these segment operations during our year ended April 30,
2008. Prior period amounts have been
reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
Information by segment is set forth below (in
thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended
October 31,
|
|
Six Months Ended
October 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Segment
revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security
services
|
|
$
|
2,465
|
|
$
|
3,866
|
|
$
|
5,738
|
|
$
|
7,622
|
|
Silicon products
and services
|
|
1,527
|
|
1,994
|
|
3,041
|
|
4,107
|
|
Reconciling
amounts (1)
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,992
|
|
$
|
6,055
|
|
$
|
8,779
|
|
$
|
11,924
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
October 31,
|
|
Six Months Ended
October 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Segment
operating (loss) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security
services
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
$
|
253
|
|
$
|
(2,203
|
)
|
$
|
323
|
|
Silicon products
and services
|
|
(538
|
)
|
(598
|
)
|
(1,094
|
)
|
(959
|
)
|
Reconciling
amounts (2)
|
|
(378
|
)
|
(1,346
|
)
|
(952
|
)
|
(3,291
|
)
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(880
|
)
|
$
|
(1,691
|
)
|
$
|
(4,249
|
)
|
$
|
(3,927
|
)
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
April 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security
services
|
|
$
|
3,607
|
|
$
|
6,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silicon products
and services
|
|
5,034
|
|
5,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling
amounts (3)
|
|
409
|
|
670
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
9,050
|
|
$
|
12,761
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
Table of Contents
Isonics
Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1)
|
|
Reconciling amounts for revenues
information consists of revenue from our former homeland security products
segment.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Reconciling amounts for the operating
(loss) income information includes corporate expenses consisting primarily of
corporate salaries and benefits, professional and consulting fees, investor
relations costs, insurance, directors compensation and the results of our
former homeland security products segment.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Reconciling amounts for the total asset
information includes corporate assets consisting primarily of cash and cash
equivalents invested centrally, unamortized debt issuance costs and
miscellaneous prepaid items, as well as the assets of our former homeland
security products segment.
|
NOTE 5
IMPAIRMENT OF GOODWILL
Goodwill
related to our security services segment resulted from the acquisition of PPSC
in May 2005. Due to the loss of a
significant customer during the six months ended October 31, 2008, we
determined that there had been a significant adverse change to that
business. We determined that the
$3,631,000 of goodwill associated with our security services segment had been
impaired and as a result, $2,346,000 of
the goodwill was written off to reflect impairment of goodwill during the six
months ended October 31, 2008. The
fair value of the reporting unit was estimated using the present value of
expected future cash flows.
NOTE 6
BORROWINGS
June 2008
Term Note
On June 13, 2008, we completed a private
placement pursuant to which we issued to one accredited investor, YA Global
Investments, L.P. (YA Global), a 13% term promissory note in the principal
amount of $1,175,000 (the June 2008 Term Note), of which the entire
amount remains outstanding as of October 31, 2008, but offset by a
discount of $306,000 for financial statement presentation. In addition we issued to YA Global 13,000,0000
common stock warrants which are exercisable at $.03 per share and expire on June 13,
2015.
The June 2008 Term Note bears an interest rate
of 13% per annum, is secured by individual security agreements with Isonics
Corporation, Isonics Vancouver, Inc. (IVI), Isonics Homeland Security
and Defense Corporation (HSDC) and PPSC and both interest and principal are
due in cash on October 31, 2009. At
October 31, 2008, accrued interest payable on the June 2008 Term Note
was $59,000 and is included in the caption accrued interest in the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
In accordance with the transaction, we paid
Yorkville Advisors, LLC, an affiliate of YA Global, a structuring and
monitoring fee in the total amount of $175,000.
Under the terms of the June 2008 Term Note, we
agreed not to issue or sell any common stock or preferred stock, or any
derivative security exercisable or convertible into shares of common stock, at
a price that is less than the current bid price of our common stock without the
prior consent of YA Global. However this
covenant does not apply to certain excluded securities, as defined. In addition, we agreed to several covenants
including that we will not permit our revenues to fall more than 10% below the
projections provided to YA Global for our three months ended July 31, 2008
or for any monthly period thereafter. As
discussed below, we failed to meet this covenant during the six months ended October 31,
2008 and as a result YA Global can declare an event of default. Remedies for an event of default, include the
option to accelerate payment of the full principal amount of the June 2008
Term Note, together with interest to the date of acceleration.
10
Table
of Contents
Isonics
Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
While the June 2008 Term Note is outstanding,
YA Global has a first right of refusal to participate in any future financings
to raise capital. We also agreed to not
grant any security interests in any or all of our assets or file a Form S-8
registration statements without the consent of YA Global as long as the June 2008
Term Note is outstanding.
We have the right to prepay the principal amount of
the June 2008 Term Note at any time upon not less than ten trading days
notice. If we prepay the June 2008
Term Note, we are obligated to pay 120% of the outstanding principal amount.
The warrant issued to YA Global is exercisable for
cash only unless there in no effective underlying registration statement or an
event of default exists under the transaction documents, at which point the
holder can elect a cashless exercise.
Under certain circumstances, the warrants exercise price may be
adjusted to correspond to common stockholders rights to any stock dividend,
stock split, stock combination or reclassification of shares. Additionally if we issue common stock or
options or other derivative securities that are exercisable or convertible at a
price less than the then current warrant exercise price, both the warrants
exercise price and the number of shares the warrant may be exercisable into
will be proportionately adjusted. This
adjustment does not apply to certain excluded securities, as defined in the
warrant agreement.
We have an obligation to register the common stock
underlying the warrant upon receiving a request from YA Global. We are required to file the related
registration statement within 30 days of receiving the request and having it be
declared effective within 120 days of the filing date. Our obligation to file and obtain
effectiveness of a registration statement is contingent on us being eligible to
file a registration statement under the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
We allocated the net proceeds received between the June 2008
Term Note and the related warrant based on the relative fair value of each
instrument. The $227,000 allocated to
the warrant was recorded as additional paid-in capital and as a corresponding
reduction to the carrying value of the June 2008 Term Note. The cumulative discount in the amount of
$402,000 (arising from the allocation of a portion of the proceeds to the related
warrants and the cash fees paid to YA Global) is being amortized to interest
expense over the term of the June 2008 Term Note using the effective
interest method at an effective interest rate of 44%. During the six months ended October 31,
2008, $96,000 of discount was amortized to interest expense.
2006 Convertible
Debentures
In May, June and November 2006, we issued
to YA Global convertible debentures with a cumulative face amount of
$16,000,000 (the 2006 Debentures) along with detachable common stock
warrants. During the six months ended October 31,
2008, we issued 10,685,226 shares of common stock as repayment of $73,300 of
principal amount of the 2006 Debentures.
In connection with the issuance of the June 2008 Term Notes,
$5,970,000 of the 2006 Debentures were converted to term notes (the Converted
Term Notes) with the same terms and maturity date as the June 2008 Term
Notes. As a result, as of October 31,
2008 we had outstanding 2006 Debentures with a face amount of $9,858,900 and
Converted Term Notes with a face value of $5,970,000. The 2006 Debentures and the Converted Term
Notes are recorded in our condensed consolidated balance sheets at carrying
amounts (net of discount) of $7,113,000 and $5,970,000, respectively. Subsequent to October 31, 2008 we issued
an additional 2,604,167 shares of common stock as repayment of $2,400 of 2006
Debentures principal.
In connection with the conversion of the 2006
Debentures to Converted Term Notes, the remaining 2006 Debentures were amended
so that the maturity date was extended from May 31, 2009 to October 31,
2009. Furthermore, the conversion price
was modified to be the lower of $0.03 or eighty percent of the lowest
11
Table
of Contents
Isonics
Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
volume weighted average price (as defined) in the
ten trading days prior to the conversion date along with the interest rate
being increased to 13%.
As a result of the modification of the fixed
conversion price on the remaining 2006 Debentures, we recorded a beneficial
conversion feature of $110,000. This
amount was recorded as additional paid-in capital and as a corresponding
reduction to the carrying value of the 2006 Debentures. The discount related to this beneficial
conversion feature is being amortized to interest expense over the remaining
term of the 2006 Debentures using the effective interest method which resulted
in amortization of $30,000 for the six months ended October 31, 2008. In addition, the original discount is being
amortized to interest expense through October 31, 2009 using the effective
interest method, which resulted in amortization of $1,413,000 for the six
months ended October 31, 2008. The
combined discounts on the 2006 Debentures are being amortized to interest
expense using the effective interest method at an effective interest rate of
44%.
For the six months ended October 31, 2008, we
recorded accrued interest associated with the 2006 Debentures of $623,000. As a result, as of October 31, 2008,
cumulative accrued interest associated with the 2006 Debentures is $2,302,000
and is included in accrued interest in the accompanying condensed consolidated
balance sheet.
Converted Term
Notes
At the time of the conversion of $5,970,000 of 2006
Debentures to Converted Term Notes, the original conversion option was
eliminated and as a result, the remaining original discount associated with the
Converted Term Notes of $1,546,000 was immediately charged to interest
expense. For the six months ended October 31,
2008, we recorded accrued interest associated with the Converted Term Notes of
$377,000. As a result, as of October 31,
2008, cumulative accrued interest associated with the Converted Term Notes is
$1,421,000 and is included in accrued interest in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheet.
April 2007
Debenture
In April 2007, we issued to YA Global a
convertible debenture with a face amount of $2,000,000 (the April 2007
Debenture) along with detachable common stock warrants. For the six months ended October 31,
2008, using the effective interest method we amortized $63,000 of the discount
on the April 2007 Debenture to interest expense. As of October 31, 2008, the April 2007
Debenture is recorded in our condensed consolidated balance sheet at a carrying
amount (net of discount) of $1,881,000.
We also recorded accrued interest on the April 2007 Debenture in
the amount of $131,000 for the six months ended October 31, 2008. As of October 31, 2008, cumulative
accrued interest is $406,000 and is included in accrued interest in the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.
In connection with the conversion of the 2006
Debentures to Converted Term Notes, the April 2007 Debentures were amended
so that the maturity date was extended from May 31, 2009 to October 31,
2009. Furthermore, the conversion price
was modified to be the lower of $0.03 or eighty percent of the lowest volume
weighted average price (as defined) in the ten trading days prior to the
conversion date along with the interest rate being increased to 13%. We did not record an additional beneficial
conversion feature resulting from the modifications as it was not deemed to be
material. As a result of the
modification of the fixed conversion feature, the discount associated with the
beneficial conversion feature of $1,381,000 was written off as a loss on
extinguishment of debt. As a result, we
are now amortizing the remaining discount
($119,000 as of October 31, 2008) through October 31, 2009
using the effective interest method at an effective interest rate of 19%.
12
Table
of Contents
Isonics
Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Summary
As of October 31, 2008, we had $8,994,000, net
of discount of remaining convertible debentures (the 2006 Debentures and the April 2007
Debenture, collectively the 13% Debentures) and $6,839,000 in outstanding
non-convertible term debt (the June 2008 Term Note and the Converted Term
Notes, collectively the Term Notes).
Currently, we may not be
in compliance with certain covenants of the remaining 13% Debentures and, in
the June financing, YA Global refused to waive any non-compliance with the
earlier financing documents. In
addition, we have not been able to comply with certain financial covenants of
the Term Notes during the six months ended October 31, 2008 and as a
result YA Global may, in its discretion, declare an event of default on those
notes. If YA Global were to declare an
event of default under the 13% Debentures or the Term Notes it would likely
have the legal right to foreclose against its security interest and take
control of, and/or dispose of, the assets subject to its security
interest. Although YA Global has not yet
declared an event of default, and although we are continuing to have
discussions with YA Global with the aim to further our business operations, we
can offer no assurance that YA Global will not declare an event of default
under the 13% Debentures or the Term Notes and seek to collect the amounts due
by foreclosure on our assets.
November 2008
Term Note
In November 2008, we completed a private
placement pursuant to which we issued to YA Global, a 13% term promissory note
in the principal amount of $375,000 (the November 2008 Term Note). The November 2008
Term Note bears interest at 13% per annum, is secured by individual security
agreements with Isonics Corporation, IVI, HSDC and PPSC and both interest and
principal are due on October 31, 2009.
We had been using these funds for day-to-day corporate expenses,
including salaries and other corporate expenses. The funds were subject to the global security
interest of the lender, YA Global.
Nevertheless, a judgment creditor garnished the remaining portion of
these funds in December 2008, and these funds are no longer available to
us for use (see Note 8). We anticipate
that YA Global will take action to enforce its security interest in those
funds.
NOTE 7 ASSETS HELD FOR SALE
During the fourth quarter of our year ended April 30,
2008, we committed to a plan to sell one specific piece of production equipment
in our silicon products and services segment.
Based on ongoing analysis of the silicon operations, this asset was
deemed to be unnecessary to support our current operations. This asset, with a net book value of $212,000
as of April 30, 2008 was sold by our silicon products and services
subsidiary, IVI in May 2008 for net proceeds of $221,000, resulting in a
net gain of $9,000. In addition, we are
exploring the possibility of the sale of other corporate assets, in all cases
subject to compliance with YA Globals security interest in our assets.
NOTE 8 LEGAL CONTINGENCIES
In February 2007, we entered into a
Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release with James E. Alexander, our former
Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of Directors (our Former
CEO) whereby he resigned his positions, terminated his employment agreement
with us and accepted specified cash-based and stock-based remuneration for the
ensuing twelve months. During August 2007,
due to a lack of sufficient liquidity and a working capital deficit, we stopped
making the contractually required payments to our Former CEO. As a result, as of April 30, 2008 we had
an accrued liability in the amount of $118,000, which represented the remainder
of the contractual amounts due.
On July 22, 2008 our
former CEO filed a complaint against us in the Jefferson County, Colorado,
District Court. The complaint alleged that we breached the Settlement
Agreement and Mutual General Release
13
Table
of Contents
Isonics
Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
entered into by Mr. Alexander
and the Company in February 2007. We did not contest the
complaint. As a result, Mr. Alexander
obtained a judgment of approximately $190,000 (including attorneys fees,
statutory interest and statutory penalties).
As a result of the judgment,
we increased our accrued liability to $190,000,
which resulted in a charge to selling, general and administrative expenses
of $72,000 during the six months ended October 31,
2008.
In an effort to collect on his judgment, in December 2008
our Former CEO garnished one of our bank accounts and has prevented our access
to approximately $200,000 of the funds we were using for our day-to-day
operations, including salaries for our operating personnel. We believe that the garnishment, which
attempts to take possession of assets in which YA Global has a security
interest, is improper, and we anticipate that YA Global will seek to enforce
its security interest.
In February through April 2007, we
also entered into Settlement Agreements and Mutual Releases with other
officers. In order to conserve liquidity
and with their consent, in August 2007 we reduced the amount payable to
them. Commencing in August 2008,
because of our liquidity limitations, we were unable to continue payments for
their benefit. It is currently unclear
as to when, if ever we will be able to resume payments. They have not commenced or threatened
litigation, but may do so in the future.
On September 12, 2008 we received
notification from a former customer claiming approximately $1,000,000 in
damages it had suffered from several alleged breaches of contract. We
have only begun to review the underlying facts and have not had a chance to
discuss them with our legal counsel or the former customer and therefore we are
unable to determine the probability of an unfavorable outcome at this time.
NOTE 9 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
As of October 31, 2008, we had no
commitments outstanding for capital expenditures.
NOTE 10- SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Certain events occurring
subsequent to October 31, 2008, are discussed within other notes to the
condensed consolidated financial statements.
Effective October 31,
2008 (and as reported in a Form 8-K as of that date), we terminated
various employment agreements with persons who were then our senior officers,
and we entered into a new employment agreement with Christopher Toffales, then
our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, who became our
President. At the same time, George OLeary,
a member of the board of directors became our Chief Financial Officer.
14
Table
of Contents
Item 2: Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Certain
statements in this report, other than purely historical information, including
estimates, projections, statements relating to our business plans, objectives
and expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements
are based, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities
Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements generally
are identified by the words believe, expect, intend, estimate, anticipate,
project, will, plan, will continue, will likely result and similar
expressions. Forward-looking statements
are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and
uncertainties which may cause actual results to differ materially from the
forward-looking statements. A detailed
discussion of these and other risks and uncertainties that could cause actual
results and events to differ materially from such forward-looking statements is
included in the section entitled Risk Factors (refer to Item 1A of our Form 10-K
for the year ended April 30, 2008 and the risks identified elsewhere
herein).
A significant risk of which all reading this report should be aware is
that we have significant cash shortages as a result of a garnishment, which
blocked our access to our principal bank account and has resulted in our
inability to meet certain corporate obligations.
We undertake no obligation to update or revise
publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
General
Discussion
We
are focused on the provision of security services and 300-millimeter (and
smaller diameter) test wafers and reclamation services, wafer thinning and
custom wafer products and services for the silicon industry. As a result of working capital shortages
previously reported in our quarterly and annual reports and the garnishment
resulting from a judgment, we have limited to no ability to finance our
day-to-day operations and we cannot offer any assurance that we will be able to
continue operations into calendar year 2009 without the infusion of capital
and/or the sale of assets approved by YA Global.
During
the year ended April 30, 2008, and the six months ended October 31,
2008, we generated sales from 300-millimeter (and smaller diameter) test wafers
and reclamation services, wafer thinning and custom wafer products and services
for the silicon industry and the provision of security services for leading
businesses and institutions in healthcare, education, retail, manufacturing,
banking and art industries. In addition,
during the six months ended October 31, 2007 we also generated sales from
stable and radioactive isotopes, although these sales were reported as
discontinued operations in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements
of operations as described below.
In June 2007, we sold
our life sciences business (which supplied isotopes for life sciences and
health-care applications) as it no longer fit our long-term strategy for
building a sustainable and profitable security and silicon company and because
of deteriorating business conditions in the historical revenue producing
products in this business. Accounting rules required
us to treat the operations of the life sciences business as discontinued
operations whereby the net financial impact of the operations of the business
(including revenue) was combined into a single line item and prior periods are
reclassified for this presentation.
Revenue for the life sciences business, reported in the single line item
of gain on operations of discontinued operations, net of income taxes, was
$101,000 for the six months ended October 31, 2007.
In August 2007, we
elected to suspend the development, manufacture and sale of our IMS based
products. The suspension was due
primarily to our limited success in completing any sales of our IMS based
products and a lack of working capital to sustain our efforts in the market
space. We continue to seek alternatives
to finding a means of monetizing our investment in this product line, including
an outright sale of the technology. It
is unclear as to when (if at all) we will resume activity on our IMS-based
products and we can offer no assurance that we will be able to monetize any
portion of our IMS technology investment.
In October 2007, as a result of our inability to meet our financial
commitments, Lucent terminated our
15
Table
of Contents
agreement for the
development of next-generation infrared imaging and night vision surveillance
technology.
Consistent
with management focus during the year ended April 30, 2008 and the six
months ended October 31, 2008, we continue to evaluate our operating
businesses and technology portfolio with the goal of operating our business
more efficiently and monetizing assets as we deem to be appropriate and as our
senior secured creditor may consent.
Additionally, we have considered and will continue to consider business
expansion through merger, acquisition, joint venture or other means, although
we can offer no assurance as to our ultimate success in increasing the scope of
our business through such means. Because
substantially all of our assets are subject to a perfected security interest,
we have in the past, and will likely continue to engage in discussions on these
issues with YA Global as our primary debt holder.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We
have had liquidity shortages in the past and, although we raised $1,000,000
(net of expenses) through the issuance of $1,175,000 of Term Notes to YA Global
in June 2008 and an additional $352,500 (net of expenses) through the issuance
of $375,000 of Term Notes to YA Global in November 2008, we have generated
significant losses, which have exacerbated our working capital deficit. As of October 31, 2008, our condensed
consolidated balance sheet reflects a working capital deficit of
$(20,162,000). In addition, as a result
of our continued operating losses, working capital deficit and negative cash
flow during the year ending April 30, 2008, the auditors report included
with our financial statements for the year ended April 30, 2008 includes
an explanatory paragraph indicating substantial doubt about our ability to
continue as a going concern. This
condition has continued since the date of those financial statements, and we
expect that these conditions will continue for the foreseeable future unless we
are able to raise a substantial amount of additional financing (of which there
can be no assurance and which would be subject to the approval of YA Global).
Currently, we may not be
in compliance with certain covenants of the remaining 13% Debentures and, in
the June financing, YA Global refused to waive any non-compliance with the
earlier financing documents. In
addition, we have not been able to comply with certain financial covenants of
the Term Notes during the six months ended October 31, 2008 and as a
result YA Global may, in its discretion, declare an event of default on those
notes. If YA Global were to declare an
event of default under the 13% Debentures or the Term Notes it would likely
have the legal right to foreclose against its security interest and take
control of, and/or dispose of, the assets subject to its security
interest. Although YA Global has not yet
declared an event of default, and although we are continuing to have discussions
with YA Global with the aim to further our business operations, we can offer no
assurance that YA Global will not declare an event of default under the 13%
Debentures or the Term Notes and seek to collect the amounts due by foreclosure
on our assets. In addition, a judgment
creditor, our Former CEO, has sought to garnish approximately $200,000, which
has resulted in our inability to meet certain corporate obligations and
consequently, we may not be able to continue operations into calendar year 2009
without the infusion of capital and/or sale of assets approved by YA Global.
As a result of our
significant working capital deficit and lack of operating funds resulting from
the garnishment, we are financing our operations and negative cash flow from
our liquid assets, which we allocate to pay our most urgent obligations. During the six months ended October 31,
2008, we used $1,211,000 in operating activities. At our current burn rate, it is unclear if
our remaining liquidity is sufficient to finance our anticipated operations and
projected negative cash flow into calendar year 2009. In addition, it is unlikely that we will be
able to continue the operations of the parent corporation beyond the near
future without immediate additional financing from the sale of assets or a
further investment by our principal creditor, YA Global, neither of which can
be assured. If we are able to secure an
offer for asset based financing from a third party, YA Global has agreed to
review that proposed financing and, in its sole discretion, consider releasing
its security interest in certain of our assets to secure that financing. Because
16
Table of Contents
of the
terms of the existing YA Global financing, we are unable to collateralize any
additional financing without YA Globals consent and approval.
See additional discussion of
liquidity and capital resources in the Liquidity
and Capital Resources section included further below in this Item 2:
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations.
Security Services
Since the effective
date of our acquisition of PPSC in May 2005, PPSC has delivered
significant revenue to our condensed consolidated financial statements and has
provided gross margins of approximately 22% and 23% of revenues for the six
months ended October 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
During the fourth
quarter of our year ended April 30, 2007, and subsequently, we implemented
cost cutting initiatives that have positively impacted the results of PPSCs
operations. Additionally we initiated
plans (with limited success) to improve operating margins at PPSC by focusing
on customers that are willing to pay for premium security services, a market in
which we believe that PPSC is able to differentiate itself from its peers. The segment generated an operating loss of
$(2,203,000) for the six months ended October 31, 2008 as compared to
operating income of $323,000 for the six months ended October 31, 2007
primarily due to the inclusion of a $2,346,000 non-cash writedown of goodwill
during the six months ended October 31, 2008 (see additional discussion
below).
While these cost
cutting initiatives and focused sales and marketing efforts have enabled PPSC
to positively impact its results for the six months ended October 31,
2008, the industry is cost competitive and customers switch security service
providers on short notice. In addition,
effective August 1, 2008, one of our significant customers (who accounted
for $802,000 of revenue for the three months ended July 31, 2008) is no
longer using our services. This customer
accounted for $1,459,000 of revenue for the six months ended October 31,
2007. As a result of these factors and
the $2,346,000 impairment of goodwill, it is unlikely that we will be able to
generate positive operating income in this segment for the year ending April 30,
2009 even assuming that we are able to continue operations through that period
notwithstanding our cash and working capital deficits. In addition, we can offer no assurance that
PPSC will be able to contribute positive cash flow as well.
Silicon Products and
Services
Our silicon operations, based in
Vancouver, Washington, continue to focus on the provision of 300-millimeter
(and smaller diameter) test wafers and reclamation services, wafer thinning and
custom wafer products and services for the silicon industry. We are particularly focused on the
300-millimeter segment of the market.
This large-diameter wafer segment has become one of the fastest growing
segments of the silicon wafer market and the revenues and gross margins
associated with the services are greater than those associated with the small
diameter market. At the same time, we
have also been focused on operational efficiency and effectiveness, which has
resulted in increased productivity and processing yields. Further, we continue to gain new customers
(both large and smaller diameter) and are also in the process of attempting to
qualify our products at others.
While we reported significant
revenue and operating income growth in our silicon operations for the year
ended April 30, 2007, many of our top silicon customers experienced
weakened business results during our year ended April 30, 2008. In addition, some customers reported
inventory buildup in reclaim and/or test products while one other top customer
ceased doing business with us as we could no longer meet the required
specifications for their product. As a
result of these factors, during the year ended April 30, 2008, we
experienced a slowdown in orders and a reduction in average selling prices of
reclaim and test materials, which had a negative impact on our results. This trend has continued through the six
months ended October 31, 2008.
17
Table
of Contents
The slowdown significantly
impacted our revenues, results of operations and cash flows from our silicon
products and services segment for the six months ended October 31, 2008
and 2007, in which we generated operating losses of $(1,094,000) and
$(959,000), respectively.
In order to minimize the effect
of the continuing slowdown, during our year ended April 30, 2008 we
implemented many cost cutting measures in our silicon operations and are
continuing to do so. We have also
increased our marketing efforts and are hopeful that we will see a recovery
during the year ending April 30, 2009 if our cash resources allow us to
continue operations through that period (which cannot be assured). During the latter portion of our year ended April 30,
2008 and into our six months ended October 31, 2008 we have started to
obtain new customers (both large and smaller diameters) and are in the process
of attempting to qualify our products at others. In an effort to control our marketing
expenses, in August 2008 we entered into a distribution agreement with
Silicon Quest International, Inc. (SQI), by which SQI agreed to act as
an exclusive independent contractor to market, sell and distribute our silicon
products and services to customers who are not previously our customers. We continue to monitor our silicon operation
closely and while we are hopeful that we will see improving financial results
in this operating segment over the long-term, we cannot offer any assurance
that we will be able to regain or sustain operating profitability in future
periods.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth, for the periods
indicated, condensed consolidated statements of operations data expressed as a
percentage of revenues. The table and
the discussion below should be read in conjunction with the condensed
consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in
this report. This should also be read
with an understanding of the significant cash shortages that we currently have,
which are discussed more completely above in
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
.
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
95.4
|
|
92.0
|
|
93.5
|
|
88.6
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
4.6
|
|
8.0
|
|
6.5
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general
and administrative
|
|
26.1
|
|
30.8
|
|
27.5
|
|
33.2
|
|
Impairment of
goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.7
|
|
|
|
Impairment loss
on intangible assets
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Research and
development
|
|
0.6
|
|
2.7
|
|
0.7
|
|
9.9
|
|
Total operating
expenses
|
|
26.7
|
|
35.9
|
|
54.9
|
|
44.3
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
(22.1
|
)
|
(27.9
|
)
|
(48.4
|
)
|
(32.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
(expense), net
|
|
(35.2
|
)
|
(17.9
|
)
|
(70.0
|
)
|
(20.8
|
)
|
Loss from
continuing operations before income taxes and minority interest
|
|
(57.3
|
)
|
(45.8
|
)
|
(118.4
|
)
|
(53.7
|
)
|
Income tax
expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority
interest in operations of consolidated subsidiary
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
Loss from
continuing operations
|
|
(57.3
|
)
|
(45.7
|
)
|
(118.4
|
)
|
(52.8
|
)
|
Gain on
discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
NET LOSS
|
|
(57.3
|
)%
|
(45.7
|
)%
|
(118.4
|
)%
|
(48.2
|
)%
|
18
Table
of Contents
Revenues
Revenues from our
security services and silicon products and services segments decreased for the
three and six months ended October 31, 2008, as compared to the same
periods of our prior fiscal year, as described in the following table:
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Security
services
|
|
$
|
2,465,000
|
|
$
|
3,866,000
|
|
$
|
5,738,000
|
|
$
|
7,622,000
|
|
Silicon products
and services
|
|
1,527,000
|
|
1,994,000
|
|
3,041,000
|
|
4,107,000
|
|
Reconciling
amounts (1)
|
|
|
|
195,000
|
|
|
|
195,000
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,992,000
|
|
$
|
6,055,000
|
|
$
|
8,779,000
|
|
$
|
11,924,000
|
|
(1) Reconciling
amounts for revenues information consists of revenue from our former homeland
security products segment.
The decrease in revenue
from the security services segment for the three and six months ended October 31,
2008, is due to the effect of the loss of several security services contracts
during the year ended April 30, 2008 and the six months ended October 31,
2008 partially offset by the addition of new customers as well as by increases
in work performed at certain existing customers.
Effective August 1, 2008, one of our
significant customers (who accounted for $802,000 of revenue for the three
months ended July 31, 2008) ceased using our services. This customer accounted for $1,459,000 of
revenue for the six months ended October 31, 2007. As a result, our revenue for the three
months ended October 31, 2008 was lower than the revenue for both the
three months ended October 31, 2007 and the three months ended July 31,
2008. In an effort to increase our
revenue,
we continue to market
our services aggressively by seeking
premium
accounts that prefer higher quality of service. W
hile we are hopeful that in the long-term we
will be able to grow revenue in this segment by securing new security contracts
in our PPSC subsidiary and retaining existing customers under contract
currently with PPSC, we cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to do
so and we may in the short-term fail to retain certain of our customers.
While we reported significant
revenue and operating income growth in our silicon operations for the year
ended April 30, 2007, many of our top silicon customers experienced
weakened business results during our year ended April 30, 2008. In addition, some customers reported
inventory buildup in reclaim and/or test products while one other top customer
ceased doing business with us as we could no longer meet the required
specifications for their product. As a
result of these factors, during the year ended April 30, 2008, we
experienced a slowdown in orders and a reduction in average selling prices of
reclaim and test materials, which had a negative impact on our results. This trend has also continued through the six
months ended October 31, 2008.
Although we have diversified our sources of revenue,
we continue to have concentrations of revenue with certain customers. For the six months ended October 31,
2008, two security services customers accounted for 26% and 9% of revenues,
respectively, and one silicon products and services customer accounted for 13%
of revenues as compared to the six months ended October 31, 2007, in which
two security services customers accounted for 19% and 12% of revenues,
respectively, and one silicon products and services customer accounted for 12%
of revenues. Significant reductions in
sales to any of our large customers have had, and may in the future have, a
material adverse effect on us by reducing our revenues and our gross
margins. Present or future customers
could terminate their purchasing patterns with us or significantly reduce or
delay the amount of products or services ordered from us.
19
Table
of Contents
For the six months ended October 31, 2008, the
silicon products and services customer mentioned above accounted for 38% of
silicon products and services revenue as compared to 34% for the six months
ended October 31, 2007. Due to the
relationship of revenues to the absorption of fixed facility costs, the
elimination or even a significant reduction in sales to this customer would
have a material adverse effect on our silicon products and services operations.
Gross Margin
Our gross margin
decreased for the three and six months ended October 31, 2008, as compared
to the same periods of our prior fiscal year, both on a dollar amount and on a
percentage of revenues, as reflected in the following table:
|
|
Three months ended October 31,
|
|
Six months ended October 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Dollar amount
|
|
$
|
185,000
|
|
$
|
483,000
|
|
$
|
574,000
|
|
$
|
1,354,000
|
|
Percent of
revenues
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
8.0
|
%
|
6.5
|
%
|
11.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in gross
margin on a percentage basis is due primarily to the downturn in our silicon
products and services segment resulting in a significant decrease in revenue,
which has forced us to allocate our fixed facility costs over a lower revenue
base, correspondingly decreasing gross margins on a percentage basis. To a lesser extent, the decrease on a
percentage basis is also due to the provision of lower prices in order to
obtain new or keep existing business.
The decrease in gross margin on a dollar basis is due to the decrease in
revenue for both our silicon products and services and security services
segments.
On a dollar basis, gross
margin is expected to increase correspondingly with increases in revenue, if
any, with dependencies on customer and supplier pricing. Our ability to positively impact consolidated
gross margin will in a large part be dependent upon our ability to grow sales
in our security service segment through increased sales of security services
and in our silicon products and services segment through increased sales of
300-millimeter products and services and wafer thinning services.
On a percentage of
revenues basis, in general we anticipate that the gross margin percentage in
our security services segment (within 1-2 percentage points) will remain
relatively stable. However, as a result
of the ongoing downturn in our silicon products and services segment, we have
experienced and expect to continue to experience increased competition and
lower prices. As a result, there has been
a focus on operational efficiency and effectiveness, which has resulted in
increased productivity and processing yields in order to reduce our costs. In addition, due to fixed facility costs
included in cost of revenues in the silicon products and services segment, the
gross margin percentage is particularly sensitive to volume and revenue
changes.
We have increased our
marketing efforts and are hopeful that we will see a rebound in our customers
demand and we have (and are hopeful to continue to) added several new silicon
products and services customers during the year ending April 30,
2009.
Effective August 1, 2008, one of our
significant security services customers (who accounted for $802,000 of revenue
for the three months ended July 31, 2008) ceased using our services. As a result, our revenues and gross margin
for the three months ending October 31, 2008 was lower than the revenues
and gross margin for both the three months ended October 31, 2007 and July 31,
2008.
While we are hopeful
that revenues (and corresponding gross margins) will increase (as compared to
the year ended April 30, 2008) for the year ending April 30, 2009, we
can offer no assurance that this will actually occur.
20
Table
of Contents
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Our selling, general and
administrative expenses decreased both as a dollar amount and as a percentage
of revenue for the three and six months ended October 31, 2008, as
compared to the same respective periods of our prior fiscal year, as reflected
in the following table:
|
|
Three months ended October 31,
|
|
Six months ended October 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Dollar amount
|
|
$
|
1,040,000
|
|
$
|
1,864,000
|
|
$
|
2,417,000
|
|
$
|
3,954,000
|
|
Percent of
revenues
|
|
26.1
|
%
|
30.8
|
%
|
27.5
|
%
|
33.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $1,537,000 decrease in selling, general and
administrative expenses for the six months ended October 31, 2008,
compared to the six months ended October 31, 2007 is attributable to a
combination of factors, including:
·
approximately $300,000 due to a decrease in staffing and expenditures at
the corporate office,
·
approximately $300,000 due to a decrease in staffing and expenditures in
the security services segment,
·
approximately $650,000 due to a decrease in staffing and expenditures in
our former homeland security products segment, and
·
an approximate $270,000 decrease in staffing and expenditures at our
silicon products and services segment.
We continue to be actively focused on reducing
selling, general and administrative expenses and are hopeful that we will be
able to further reduce these expenses for the three months ending January 31,
2009 as compared to the three months ended October 31, 2008. However, any reduction in selling, general
and administrative expenses most likely would be less significant as compared
to the reductions realized for the three months ended October 31, 2008 as
compared to the three months ended October 31, 2007.
Impairment of Goodwill
Our impairment of goodwill increased on both a dollar
and a percentage of revenues basis for the six months ended October 31,
2008, as compared to the same periods of our prior fiscal year, as reflected in
the following table:
|
|
Three months ended October 31,
|
|
Six months ended October 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Dollar amount
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
2,346,000
|
|
$
|
|
|
Percent of
revenues
|
|
|
%
|
|
%
|
26.7
|
%
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to the loss of a
significant security services customer during the six months ended October 31,
2008, we determined that there had been a significant adverse change to the
security services business. We
determined that the $3,631,000 of goodwill associated with our security
services segment had been impaired and as a result, $2,346,000 of the goodwill
was written off to reflect impairment of goodwill during the six months ended October 31,
2008.
Impairment Loss on Intangible Assets
Our impairment loss on intangible assets decreased
on both a dollar and a percentage of revenues basis for the three and six
months ended October 31, 2008, as compared to the same periods of our
prior fiscal year, as reflected in the following table:
|
|
Three months ended October 31,
|
|
Six months ended October 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Dollar amount
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
145,000
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
145,000
|
|
Percent of
revenues
|
|
|
%
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
%
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
Table
of Contents
The impairment loss for the three and six months
ended October 31, 2007 relates to a write off of the unamortized balance
of the trace and bulk detection technology intangible asset. Due to suspension of development, manufacture
and sale of our IMS-based products, we determined that the trace and bulk
detection technology intangible asset was fully impaired.
Research and Development Expenses
Our research and development expenses decreased on
both a dollar and a percentage of revenues basis for the three and six months
ended October 31, 2008, as compared to the same periods of our prior
fiscal year, as reflected in the following table:
|
|
Three months ended October 31,
|
|
Six months ended October 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Dollar amount
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
$
|
165,000
|
|
$
|
60,000
|
|
$
|
1,182,000
|
|
Percent of
revenues
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
2.7
|
%
|
0.7
|
%
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The majority of research and development expenses
for the three and six months ended October 31, 2007 related primarily to (1) the
development of next-generation infrared imaging and night vision surveillance
technology through our now-terminated Lucent relationship and (2) our IMS
based products. Due to the termination
of our Lucent relationship and the suspension of development of our IMS-based
products, we did not incur material research and development expenses during
the three and six months ended October 31, 2008 for these projects and we
do not expect to incur material additional research and development expense for
any projects during the remainder of our year ending April 30, 2009.
Historically a significant amount of the research
and development on the IMS-based products was performed by Institut fur
Umwelttechnologien GmbH (IUT). We
funded $0 and $80,000 under our agreement with IUT for the six months ended October 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively. As a result of the suspension of the development,
manufacture and sale of our IMS-based products as described above, we intend to
provide no further funds pursuant to this agreement.
Except for work being performed
on our silicon products at our facilities in Vancouver, Washington, we operate
no other facilities of our own for research and development. Although we have in the past expended
significant resources on research and development, we cannot offer any
assurance that we will receive future financial benefit from our research and
development efforts made to date.
Operating
(Loss) Income
For the six months ended October 31,
2008 and 2007, our operating segments incurred operating (loss) income as
follows:
|
|
Three months ended October 31,
|
|
Six months ended October 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Security
services
|
|
$
|
36,000
|
|
$
|
253,000
|
|
$
|
(2,203,000
|
)
|
$
|
323,000
|
|
Silicon products
and services
|
|
(538,000
|
)
|
(598,000
|
)
|
(1,094,000
|
)
|
(959,000
|
)
|
Reconciling
amounts (1)
|
|
(378,000
|
)
|
(1,346,000
|
)
|
(952,000
|
)
|
(3,291,000
|
)
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(880,000
|
)
|
$
|
(1,691,000
|
)
|
$
|
(4,249,000
|
)
|
$
|
(3,927,000
|
)
|
22
Table
of Contents
(1) Reconciling amounts for the operating (loss) income
information includes corporate expenses consisting primarily of corporate
salaries and benefits, professional and consulting fees, investor relations
costs, insurance, directors compensation and the results of our former
homeland security products segment.
During the fourth quarter of our year ended April 30, 2007, and
subsequently, we implemented cost cutting initiatives that have positively
impacted the results of PPSCs operations.
Additionally we initiated plans (with limited success) to improve
operating margins at PPSC by focusing on customers that are willing to pay for
premium security services, a market in which we believe that PPSC is able to
differentiate itself from its peers. The
segment generated an operating loss of $(2,203,000) for the six months ended October 31,
2008 as compared to operating income of $323,000 for the six months ended October 31,
2007 primarily due to the inclusion of a $2,346,000 non-cash writedown of
goodwill during the six months ended October 31, 2008.
While these cost cutting initiatives and focused sales and marketing
efforts have enabled PPSC to positively impact its results for the six months
ended October 31, 2008, the industry is cost competitive and customers
switch security service providers on short notice. In addition, effective August 1, 2008,
one of our significant customers (who accounted for $802,000 of revenue for the
three months ended July 31, 2008) is no longer using our services. This customer accounted for $1,459,000 of
revenue for the six months ended October 31, 2007. As a result of these factors and the
$2,346,000 impairment of goodwill, it is unlikely that we will be able to
generate positive operating income in this segment for the year ending April 30,
2009 even assuming that we are able to continue operations through that period
notwithstanding our cash position and working capital deficits. In addition, we can offer no assurance that
PPSC will be able to contribute positive cash flow as well.
While we reported
significant revenue and operating income growth in our silicon operations for
the year ended April 30, 2007, many of our top silicon customers
experienced weakened business results during our year ended April 30,
2008. In addition, some customers
reported inventory buildup in reclaim and/or test products while one other top
customer ceased doing business with us as we could no longer meet the required
specifications for their product. As a
result of these factors, during the year ended April 30, 2008, we
experienced a slowdown in orders and a reduction in average selling prices of
reclaim and test materials, which had a negative impact on our results. This trend has continued through the six
months ended October 31, 2008.
The slowdown significantly
impacted our revenues, results of operations and cash flows from our silicon
products and services segment for the six months ended October 31, 2008
and 2007, in which we generated operating losses of $(1,094,000) and
$(959,000), respectively.
In order to minimize the
effect of the continuing slowdown, during our year ended April 30, 2008 we
implemented many cost cutting measures in our silicon operations and are
continuing to do so. We have also
increased our marketing efforts and are hopeful that we will see a recovery
during the year ending April 30, 2009 if our cash resources allow us to
continue operations through that period (which cannot be assured). During the latter portion of our year ended April 30,
2008 and into our six months ended October 31, 2008 we have started to
obtain new customers (both large and smaller diameters) and are in the process
of attempting to qualify our products at others. In an effort to control our marketing
expenses, in August 2008 we entered into a distribution agreement with
SQI, by which SQI agreed to act as an exclusive independent contractor to
market, sell and distribute our silicon products and services to customers who
are not previously our customers. We
continue to monitor our silicon operation closely and while we are hopeful that
we will see improving financial results in this operating segment over the
long-term, we cannot offer any assurance that we will be able to regain or
sustain operating profitability in future periods.
23
Table of Contents
Other
Income (Expense), net
Other income (expense),
net increased on both a dollar and a percentage of revenues basis for the three
and six months ended October 31, 2008, as compared to the same periods of
our prior fiscal year, as reflected in the following table:
|
|
Three months ended October 31,
|
|
Six months ended October 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Dollar amount
|
|
$
|
(1,405,000
|
)
|
$
|
(1,081,000
|
)
|
$
|
(6,149,000
|
)
|
$
|
(2,483,000
|
)
|
Percent of
revenues
|
|
(35.2
|
)%
|
(17.9
|
)%
|
(70.0
|
)%
|
(20.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
the six months ended October 31, 2008, other income (expense), net
consists primarily of interest expense of $(4,639,000), a loss on
extinguishment of debt $(1,381,000) and the amortization of debt issuance costs
of $(131,000). Included in interest
expense for the six months ended October 31, 2008 are non-cash charges of
$4,528,000 related primarily to the amortization of the discount and the
accrual of interest on our outstanding term notes and convertible debentures.
For
the six months ended October 31, 2007, other income (expense), net
consists of interest expense of $(2,926,000), the amortization of debt issuance
costs of $(87,000) and equity in the net loss of an investee of $(80,000)
partially offset by interest and other income of $99,000 and a gain on
derivative instruments of $504,000.
Included in interest expense for the six months ended October 31,
2007 are non-cash charges of $2,752,000 related primarily to the amortization
of the discount and the accrual of interest on our outstanding convertible
debentures.
We
expect that our other expenses will be volatile based on the future timing of
repayment, if ever, of the remaining convertible debentures and term notes (see
the Liquidity and Capital Resources discussion below).
Income Taxes
We
currently operate at a loss and expect to operate at a loss until (if ever) our
operations begin to generate sufficient revenue. The losses incurred in the
current year are not expected to generate an income tax benefit because of the
uncertainty of the realization of the deferred tax asset. As a result, we have
provided a valuation allowance against our net deferred tax asset because,
based on available evidence including our continued operating losses, it is
more likely than not that all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Additionally, due to certain change in ownership rules (as defined by
the IRS), utilization of our federal net operating losses may be subject to
certain annual limitations.
Minority
Interest in Operations of Consolidated Subsidiary
Minority interest in operations
of consolidated subsidiary for the three and six months ended October 31,
2008 and 2007 is reflected in the following table:
|
|
Three months ended October 31,
|
|
Six months ended October 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Dollar amount
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
11,000
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
111,000
|
|
Percent of
revenues
|
|
|
%
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
%
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of minority
interest in operations of consolidated subsidiary recorded for the six months
ended October 31, 2007, relates to our purchase of a 90% interest in
SenseIt Corp in October 2006 and the subsequent operation of the
business. Due to the cancellation of the
Lucent Agreement, we do not expect minority interest in operations of SenseIt
to be material in future periods.
24
Table
of Contents
Gain on
Discontinued Operations, net of Income Taxes
Gain on discontinued
operations, net of income taxes for the three and six months ended October 31,
2008 and 2007 is reflected in the following table:
|
|
Three months ended October 31,
|
|
Six months ended October 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Dollar amount
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
553,000
|
|
Percent of
revenues
|
|
|
%
|
|
%
|
|
%
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In January 2007, we
decided to discontinue the operation of our life sciences business and to put
the assets and business up for sale (which was sold in June 2007). We decided to sell this business as it no
longer fit our long-term strategy and because of deteriorating business
conditions in the historical, revenue producing products in the segment. Accounting rules required us to treat
the operations of the life sciences business as discontinued operations whereby
the net financial impact of the operations of the business is combined into a
single line item and prior periods are reclassified for this presentation. The gain, net of income taxes, resulting from
operations of the life sciences business was $37,000 for the six months ended October 31,
2007. The gain on sale of the life
sciences business was recorded in the six months ended October 31, 2007,
in the amount of $516,000. Revenue for
the life sciences business, reported in the single line item of gain on
operations of discontinued operations, net of income taxes, was $101,000 for
the six months ended October 31, 2007.
Net Loss
Net loss for the three and
six months ended October 31, 2008 and 2007 is reflected in the following
table:
|
|
Three months ended October 31,
|
|
Six months ended October 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Dollar amount
|
|
$
|
(2,285,000
|
)
|
$
|
(2,761,000
|
)
|
$
|
(10,398,000
|
)
|
$
|
(5,746,000
|
)
|
Percent of
revenues
|
|
(57.3
|
)%
|
(45.7
|
)%
|
(118.4
|
)%
|
(48.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We anticipate that
consolidated losses will continue until (if ever) revenues from our current
operations substantially increase or we increase the scope of our operations
through a merger, acquisition or other means.
Further, the revenue increases must increase faster than any increases
in operating and research and development expenses.
We anticipate that our
operations during the remainder of the year ending April 30, 2009 will
result in a net loss since we are not likely to increase our revenues from our
existing products or generate additional sales from the new products we may
develop in a sufficient amount (if at all) to offset our operating and interest
expenses and the non-cash writedown of goodwill.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Given our significant
working capital deficit, we are dependent on our liquidity to fund our
operations and to pay our vendors. A significant part of our working capital
deficit includes 13% Debentures, Term Notes, and accrued interest due to YA
Global. Because the amounts are due October 31,
2009 and with circumstances existing by which YA Global could declare an event
of default and accelerate the obligations, these amounts are characterized as
current liabilities.
Included in the following
table are condensed consolidated balance sheet items as of October 31,
2008 and April 30, 2008 and condensed consolidated cash flow items for the
six months ended October 31, 2008 and 2007:
25
Table of Contents
|
|
As of
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
October 31,
2008
|
|
Change
|
|
April 30,
2008
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
558
|
|
$
|
(369
|
)
|
$
|
927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
deficit
|
|
(20,162
|
)
|
(7,034
|
)
|
(13,128
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion
of notes payable, net of discount
|
|
6,936
|
|
6,926
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion
of convertible debentures, net of discount
|
|
8,994
|
|
(1,521
|
)
|
10,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
convertible debentures, face value outstanding
|
|
11,859
|
|
(6,043
|
)
|
17,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total term
notes, face value outstanding
|
|
$
|
7,145
|
|
7,145
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
October 31,
2008
|
|
Change
|
|
October 31,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in
operating activities
|
|
$
|
(1,211
|
)
|
$
|
(396
|
)
|
$
|
(815
|
)
|
Net cash
provided by investing activities
|
|
217
|
|
(569
|
)
|
786
|
|
Net cash
provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
625
|
|
1,399
|
|
(774
|
)
|
Net decrease in
cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
(369
|
)
|
$
|
434
|
|
$
|
(803
|
)
|
Working
Capital Deficit
Our working capital
deficit was $(20,162,000) as of October 31, 2008, as compared to a working
capital deficit of $(13,128,000) as of April 30, 2008. This $7,034,000
increase in working capital deficit for the six months ended October 31,
2008, is due to a combination of factors, of which the significant factors are
set out below:
Factors which reduced our working capital
deficit
·
$214,000
of unamortized prepaid insurance premiums in excess of the related notes
payable;
·
$131,000
representing the excess of the proceeds received over the carrying value of the
June 2008 Term Note of $869,000
Factors which increased our working capital deficit
·
$2,060,000
of cash consumed directly in operating activities (calculated as $1,211,000 of
cash used in operating activities, increased by $849,000 of the cash impact of
net changes in other current assets or liabilities included therein);
·
$3,340,000
representing the amortization of the discount on the convertible debentures and
term debt;
·
$1,381,000
representing the charge for the modification of the April 2007 Debenture,
reflected as an increase in the book value of the April 2007 Debenture;
·
$203,000
representing the reclassification of capital leases from long-term to current
Based on the amount of
capital we have remaining, our expected negative cash flow from operations and
investing activities and our obligations to YA Global, we anticipate that we
will not be able to positively impact our working capital unless we are able to
restructure our current obligations due to YA Global. In order to continue funding our operations
from liquidity, we must obtain additional financing (above and beyond the net
$352,500 raised from the issuance of an additional Term Note in November 2008)
which we
26
Table
of Contents
can obtain only with the
consent of YA Global, and ultimately substantially increase our revenues or
reduce our expenses thereby generating positive cash flow from operations and
(ultimately) operating income.
As a result of our
significant working capital deficit and the lack of operating funds resulting
from the garnishment, we are financing our operations and negative cash flow
from our liquid assets, which we allocate to pay our most urgent
obligations. During the six months ended
October 31, 2008, we used $1,211,000 in operating activities. At our current burn rate, it is unclear if
our remaining liquidity is sufficient to finance our anticipated operations and
projected negative cash flow into calendar year 2009. In addition, it is unlikely that we will be
able to continue the operations of the parent corporation beyond the near
future without immediate additional financing from the sale of assets or a
further investment by our principal creditor, YA Global, neither of which can
be assured. If we are able to secure an
offer for asset based financing from a third party, YA Global has agreed to
review that proposed financing and, in its sole discretion, consider releasing
its security interest in certain of our assets to secure that financing. Because of the terms of the existing YA
Global financing, we are unable to collateralize any additional financing
without YA Globals consent and approval.
Convertible Debentures and Term
Notes
In June 2008 we raised $1,000,000 (net of
expenses) through the issuance of a $1,175,000 Term Note. In November 2008, we raised an
additional $352,500 (net of expenses) through the issuance of a $375,000 Term
Note. The Term Notes mature on October 31,
2009, bear interest at 13% per annum and are collateralized by substantially
all of our assets. The Term Notes are
not convertible into our common stock but only repayable in cash.
In June 2008, YA Global exchanged two of
the 2006 Debentures having an aggregate principal balance of $5,970,000 into
Term Notes.
As a result, we now have (face value):
·
$7,520,000
in Term Notes; and
·
$11,857,800
(net of conversions to common stock) of remaining 13% Debentures.
Currently, we may not be
in compliance with certain covenants of the remaining 13% Debentures and, in
the June financing, YA Global refused to waive any non-compliance with the
earlier financing documents. In
addition, we have not been able to comply with certain financial covenants of
the Term Notes during the six months ended October 31, 2008 and as a
result YA Global may, in its discretion, declare an event of default on those
notes. If YA Global were to declare an
event of default under the 13% Debentures or the Term Notes it would likely
have the legal right to foreclose against its security interest and take control
of, and/or dispose of, the assets subject to its security interest. Although YA Global has not yet declared an
event of default, and although we are continuing to have discussions with YA
Global with the aim to further our business operations, we can offer no
assurance that YA Global will not declare an event of default under the 13%
Debentures or the Term Notes and seek to collect the amounts due by foreclosure
on our assets.
Cash
Flows
As of October 31, 2008, we had $558,000 of
cash and cash equivalents, a decrease of $369,000 as compared to $927,000 at April 30,
2008. Our principal source of funding for the six months ended October 31,
2008 was from our existing liquidity as of April 30, 2008 (which existed
notwithstanding our significant working capital deficit), the issuance of a
Term Note in June 2008 (with a face value of $1,175,000) for which we
received net proceeds of $1,000,000 and $221,000 in net proceeds received from
the sale of assets held for
27
Table
of Contents
sale. Our
principal source of funding for the six months ended October 31, 2007 was
$805,000 (net of selling costs of $45,000) received for the sale of our life
sciences business in June 2007.
Cash used in operating
activities of $(1,211,000) and $(815,000) for the six months ended October 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively, was primarily the result of a net loss of
$(10,398,000) (which included noncash expenses and gains in the net amount of a
$(8,333,000) expense) and of $(5,746,000) (which included noncash expenses and
gains in the net amount of a $(2,050,000), respectively.
Investing activities
provided cash of $217,000 and $786,000 for the six months ended October 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively. Cash provided by investing activities for the six
months ended October 31, 2008, consisted of $221,000 (net of selling costs
of $4,000) from the sale of assets held for sale offset by $4,000 expended on
additions of property and equipment.
Cash provided by investing activities for the six months ended October 31,
2007, consisted of $805,000 (net of selling costs of $45,000) received for the
sale of our life sciences business in June 2007 and $60,000 from the
assignment of our silicon-28 licenses offset by $79,000 expended on additions
of property and equipment.
Financing activities
provided cash of $625,000 and used cash of $(774,000) for the six months ended October 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively. Cash provided by financing activities for the six
months ended October 31, 2008, was due to the issuance of a Term Note in June 2008
(with a face value of $1,175,000) for which we received net proceeds of
$1,000,000 partially offset by the payments of principal on capital leases and
notes payable in the amounts of $241,000 and 134,000, respectively. Cash used in financing activities for the six
months ended October 31, 2007, consisted of payments of principal on
capital leases and notes payable in the amounts of $230,000 and $544,000,
respectively.
Additional
Liquidity Considerations
As of October 31,
2008, we had no commitments outstanding for capital expenditures.
The assumptions underlying
the above statements include, among other things, that there will be no
material adverse developments in the business or market in general. There can
be no assurances however that those assumed events will occur. If our plans are
not achieved, there may be further negative effects on the results of
operations and cash flows, which could have a material adverse effect on our
financial position.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no material changes to the disclosure on
this matter made in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30,
2008.
Critical
Accounting Estimates
Our condensed consolidated financial statements are
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the
Unites States, which require management to make estimates, judgments and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes. We
consider an accounting estimate to be critical if 1) the accounting estimate
requires us to make assumptions about matters that were highly uncertain at the
time the accounting estimate was made, and 2) changes in the estimate that are
reasonably likely to occur from period to period, or use of different estimates
that we reasonably could have used in the current period, would have a material
impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
Management has discussed the development and
selection of these critical accounting estimates with our Board of Directors
and the Board of Directors has reviewed the foregoing disclosure. In addition, there are other items within our
financial statements that require estimation, but are not deemed critical as
defined
28
Table
of Contents
above.
Changes in estimates used in these and other items could have a material
impact on our financial statements. We believe that our most critical
accounting policies and estimates are as follows:
Goodwill
Goodwill is recorded on our books when the purchase price paid for an acquisition
exceeds the estimated fair value of the net identified tangible and intangible
assets acquired. The assignment of fair
value to the identified tangible and intangible assets requires significant
judgment and may require independent valuations of certain identified
assets. Once goodwill and other
intangible assets are established on our balance sheet, we evaluate the assets
for impairment as described in the following paragraphs.
In accordance with SFAS No. 142
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS 142), goodwill is not amortized,
but instead is tested for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if
the presence of certain circumstances indicates that impairment may have
occurred. The impairment review process,
which is subjective and requires significant judgment at many points during the
analysis, compares the fair value of the reporting unit in which goodwill
resides to its carrying value. If the
carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, then the amount of
the impairment loss must be measured. The impairment loss is calculated by
comparing the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill to its carrying
amount. In calculating the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill, the
fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the other assets and
liabilities of that unit based on their fair values. The excess of the fair
value of a reporting unit over the amount assigned to its other assets and
liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill. An impairment loss would be
recognized when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value.
During the six months ended October 31, 2008, due to the loss of a
significant customer, we concluded there were sufficient indicators to require
us to perform an analysis to assess whether any portion of our goodwill balance
of $3,631,000 related to our acquisition of PPSC in May 2005 was
impaired. In completing our analysis of
the security services reporting unit, we used the Discounted Cash Flow Method (DCF
Method) in which the reporting unit was valued by discounting the projected
cash flows to its present value based upon a risk adjusted discount rate. As a result of the testing, we determined
that $2,346,000 of the recorded goodwill had been impaired and was required to
be expensed as a non-cash charge to continuing operations during the six months
ended October 31, 2008. In
performing the calculation under SFAS No. 142, we made several assumptions
requiring significant judgment, including the use of the DCF Method, the number
of years used in the projection, the discount rate and growth assumptions. If we had elected to use different variables,
the outcome of the calculation could have been different. As of October 31, 2008, we have
$1,285,000 of goodwill remaining on our condensed consolidated balance sheet.
Valuation of Equity Transactions
We value transactions associated with common or preferred stock that is
convertible into common stock based on the market value of the underlying
common stock on the date of the signing of the agreement (or, sometimes, at the
date of conversion). We value transactions associated with common stock
warrants at the appropriate measurement date utilizing at a minimum, the
Black-Scholes pricing model, with assumptions as to volatility, risk-free
interest rate and estimated life of the warrants based on historical
information related to the life of the underlying warrant. If the assumptions
used, as they relate to volatility, risk-free interest rate and estimated life
of the warrants, were materially different, the overall valuation of these
transactions could change significantly.
Valuation of Convertible Debenture Transactions
We enter into transactions that include debentures that are convertible
into common stock at rates that may be fixed or variable and also include
detachable common stock warrants. We
allocate the proceeds from the debenture transactions based on the estimated
fair values of the debentures and the warrants.
If the assumptions used, as they relate to volatility, risk-free
interest rate and estimated life of the warrants
29
Table of Contents
(including any anti-dilution adjustment provisions) and the fair value
of the debentures (included the specific conversion features) were materially
different, the overall allocation of proceeds for these transactions could
change significantly. Further, at times
we have classified certain embedded conversion features or warrants issued in
convertible debenture transactions as derivative liabilities in accordance with
US GAAP. The estimates of fair value of
these derivative liabilities involve complex assumptions in the initial recording
of the liabilities and in the mark-to-market required for each reporting
period. If the assumptions used to
determine the fair value of these liabilities were materially different, the
valuation of the liabilities could change significantly.
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS
123(R). Under the fair value recognition
provisions of SFAS 123(R), stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the
grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense
ratably over the requisite service period of the award. Determining the appropriate fair value model
and calculating the fair value of stock-based awards, which includes estimates
of stock price volatility, forfeiture rates and expected lives, requires
judgment that could materially impact our operating results.
Item 3:
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures Ab
out Market Risk
Not Applicable
Item 4T:
Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the 1934 Act), as of October 31, 2008, we carried out an
evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures. This evaluation was carried out under the
supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (our
principal executive officer) and our Chief Financial Officer (our principal
financial officer). Based upon and as of the date of that evaluation, our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures were not effective because of the
identification of material weaknesses in our internal control over financial
reporting which are identified in Item 9A(T) included with our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2008, which we view
as an integral part of our disclosure controls and procedures.
Disclosure controls and
procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures
include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to our management, including
our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have not been any
changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f) promulgated by the SEC under the Exchange Act) during the three
months ended October 31, 2008 that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting. Effective October 31, 2008, our Chief Financial Officer
resigned as described in a Form 8-K dated October 31, 2008, filed on November 6,
2008. The board of directors appointed George OLeary to succeed to the
position of Chief Financial Officer and he has assumed those duties effective
as of October 31, 2008. The Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Financial Officer are of
30
Table
of Contents
the opinion that the
change has not materially affected, and is not reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Part II: Other Information
Item 1: Legal Proceedings
On July 22,
2008 James E. Alexander, our former CEO, filed a complaint against us in the
Jefferson County, Colorado, District Court (case no. 08cv3085). The
complaint alleged that we breached the Settlement Agreement and Mutual General
Release entered into by Mr. Alexander and the Company in February 2007.
We did not contest the complaint. As a
result, Mr. Alexander obtained a judgment of approximately $190,000
(including attorneys fees, statutory interest and statutory penalties). Subsequently Mr. Alexander has garnished our
principal bank account and has commenced other collection efforts. We
anticipate that YA Global will take action to enforce its security interest in
those funds.
Item 1A: Risk
Factors
There are no material changes to the risk factors
set forth in Part I Item 1A: Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended April 30, 2008.
As a result, we incorporate those risk factors by reference into this
report.
Item 2:
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities a
nd Use of Proceeds
During the six months
ended October 31, 2008 (and subsequently) we did not enter into any
transactions that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended and were not previously reported on a Form 8-K.
Item 4: Submission of
M
atters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item 5: Other
Informa
tion
None
Item 6: Exhibi
ts
Exhibits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Restated
articles of incorporation (incorporated by reference from
our Current Report on Form 8-K (File
No. 001-12531), dated June 13, 2007 and filed on June 25,
2007, and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Restated bylaws (incorporated by
reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-12531),
dated March 27, 2006, and filed on March 31, 2006, and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Amended and restated employment
agreement with Christopher Toffales (incorporated by reference from our
current report on Form 8-K dated October 31, 2008 and filed on
November 6, 2008).
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the
Exchange Act
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the
Exchange Act
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
|
31
Table
of Contents
SIGNATUR
ES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City and County of New York,
State of New York, on the 22nd day of December 2008.
Isonics Corporation
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
|
By
|
/s/ Christopher Toffales
|
|
|
Christopher Toffales
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
/s/ George OLeary
|
|
|
George OLeary
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
32
Isonics (CE) (USOTC:ISON)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2024 to Dec 2024
Isonics (CE) (USOTC:ISON)
Historical Stock Chart
From Dec 2023 to Dec 2024