Report of Foreign Issuer (6-k)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 6-K

REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the month of June 2015.

Commission File Number 001-33439

JET METAL CORP.

(Translation of registrant’s name into English)

Suite 1240, 1140 West Pender St., Vancouver, B.C. Canada V6E 4G1

(Address of principal executive office)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

Form 20-F þ

Form 40-F ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): _____

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): _____

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes ¨ No þ

If “Yes” is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-______________

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit	Description of Exhibit
99-1	NI 43-101 Technical Report (Bootheel)
99-2	Consent of Qualified Person NI 43-101 (Wallis)
99-3	Consent of Qualified Person NI 43-101 (Agnerian)

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	JET METAL CORP.
	By:
		/s/ Sheila Paine
		Sheila Paine
Date: June 24, 2015		Corporate Secretary

TECHNICAL REPORT ON

THE BOOTHEEL PROJECT FOR

JET METAL CORP. and

THE BOOTHEEL PROJECT, LLC

NI 43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT

Authors: Hrayr Agnerian, M.Sc. (Applied), P.Geo.

C. Stewart Wallis, P.Geo.

May 20, 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

1	SUMMARY			1
	1.1	Executive Summary		1
		1.1.1	Conclusions	1
		1.1.2	Recommendation	2
	1.2	Technical Summary		2
		1.2.1	Property Status and Infrastructure	2
		1.2.2	History	3
		1.2.3	Geology and Mineralization	4
		1.2.4	Exploration	4
		1.2.5	Mineral Resources	5
2	INTRODUCTION			6
3	RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS			8
4	PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION			9
	4.1	Location		9
	4.2	Property Status		9
	4.3	Land Tenure		9
		4.3.1	JET-URE Energy Agreement	9
		4.3.2	Cameco Agreement	10
5	ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, PHYSIOGRAPHY,
	AND INFRASTRUCTURE			14
	5.1	Accessibility		14
	5.2	Climate		14
	5.3	Physiography and Land Use		14
	5.4	Infrastructure and Local Resources		14
6	HISTORY			15
	6.1	Early Exploration 1950s to 2000		15
	6.2	Recent Exploration		15
7	GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND MINERALIZATION			17
	7.1	Regional Geology		17
	7.2	Property Geology		21
		7.2.1	Chugwater Formation	21
		7.2.2	Sundance Formation	21
		7.2.3	Morrison Formation	23
		7.2.4	Cloverly Formation	23
		7.2.5	Thermopolis Formation	23

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

		7.2.6	Mowry Formation	23
		7.2.7	Frontier Formation	23
		7.2.8	Wind River Formation	23
		7.2.9	Quaternary Sediments	24
	7.3	Structural Setting		24
	7.4	Mineralization		27
		7.4.1	Jurassic Sundance Formation	27
		7.4.2	Cretaceous Cloverly Formation	28
		7.4.3	Tertiary Wind River Formation	28
		7.4.4	Chemical Analyses	29
8	DEPOSIT TYPES			31
9	EXPLORATION			34
	9.1	Exploration Methodology		34
	9.2	Compilation of Exploration Data		34
10	DRILLING			36
	10.1	Lithologic Logging		40
	10.2	Downhole Surveys		41
11	SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSIS, AND SECURITY			43
	11.1	Sampling		43
		11.1.1	Past Work	43
		11.1.2	Recent work	43
	11.2	Sample Preparation		43
		11.2.1	Past Work	43
		11.2.2	2008 Drilling Program	43
		11.2.3	2011 Drilling Program	44
12	DATA VERIFICATION			45
	12.1	Past Work		45
	12.2	Radioactive Equilibrium		45
	12.3	Recent work		46
		12.3.1	Sundance Formation	46
		12.3.2	Wind River Formation	50
		12.3.3	Verification of Historical Data	50
		12.3.4	Independent Sampling	51
13	MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING			52
	13.1	Past Work		52
	13.2	JET Work		52
14	MINERAL RESOURCES			53
	14.1	Database		53
	14.2	Geological Interpretation		54
		14.2.1	Compositing and Statistics	54

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

		14.2.2	Cutting of High Values	54
	14.3	Cut-off Grade		62
	14.4	Density Measurements		62
	14.5	Methodology of Resource Estimation		62
		14.5.1	Sundance Formation	62
		14.5.2	Wind River Formation	67
	14.6	Classification of Mineral Resources		67
		14.6.1	Indicated Mineral Resources	67
		14.6.2	Inferred Mineral Resources	67
15	ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, PERMITTING AND SOCIAL IMPACT			68
	15.1	Health and Safety		68
	15.2	Environmental Considerations		68
	15.3	Hydrogeology		74
	15.4	Permitting		76
16	ADJACENT PROPERTIES			77
17	INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS			78
	17.1	Interpretation		78
	17.2	Conclusions		78
18	RECOMMENDATION			79
19	REFERENCES			80
20	DATE AND SIGNATURE PAGE			81
21	CERTIFICATES OF QUALIFIED PERSONS			82
		Hrayr Agnerian		82
		C. Stewart Wallis		84
22	APPENDIX			85
		Bootheel Property Status		85

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

LIST OF FIGURES

PAGE

Figure 4-1	Location Map	11
Figure 4-2	Property Map	12
Figure 4-3	Area of Interest	13
Figure 7-1	Generalized Structural Map of Wyoming Geology	18
Figure 7-2	Stratigraphic Section of the Bootheel Area	19
Figure 7-3	Regional Geology	20
Figure 7-4	Property Geology	22
Figure 7-5	Formation Contacts on e-Logs	26
Figure 8-1	Cross Section and Plan View of Roll Front-Type Uranium Deposit	32
Figure 8-2	Chemical Processes During the Formation of Roll Front-Type
	Uranium Deposit	33
Figure 10-1	Diamond Drill Core From Jurassic Sundance Formation	37
Figure 10-2	Drill Holes & Mineralization	38
Figure 10-3	2011 Drill Hole Location Map	39
Figure 10-4	Sampling of rotary chips at Bootheel	41
Figure 10-5	Downhole Survey Results, Hole 36-BH4020	42
Figure 12-1	Crosshair 2008 Chemical Assays vs. Gamma Log Probe Values	48
Figure 12-2	Historical Chemical Assays vs. Gamma Log Probe Values	49
Figure 14-1	Jurassic Sundance Resource	55
Figure 14-2	Tertiary Wind River Resource	56
Figure 14-3	Bootheel Uranium Project, Cross Section A-A’	57
Figure 14-4	Bootheel Uranium Project, Cross Section B-B’	58
Figure 14-7	Bootheel Uranium Project Section E-E’	61
Figure 14-8	Bootheel Uranium Project Body 36, Zone D Thickness Contour Map	63
Figure 14-9	Bootheel Uranium Project, Body 36, Zone D, GT Contours	64
Figure 14-10	Body 6 Thickness Contours	65
Figure 14-11	Body 6 GT Contours	66
Figure 15-1	Water Sample Locations	70
Figure 15-2	Property Leks Locations	72
Figure 15-3	Monitor Wells	75

LIST OF TABLES

PAGE

Table 1-1	Mineral Resources of the Bootheel Project as of July 8, 2013	5
Table 2-1	List of Abbreviations	7
Table 7-1	Characteristics of Bootheel Mineralization	30
Table 10-1	Significant Intercepts 2011 Drilling	36
Table 12-1	Downhole Radiometric Probe vs. Chemical Assays, 2008 Program	47

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Table 14-1	Mineral Resources of the Bootheel Project as of July 8, 2013	53
Table 15-1	Permeability Results, 2008 Core Samples	74
Table 22-1	List of Claims	85

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

1 Summary

1.1 Executive Summary

Agnerian Consulting Ltd. (Agnerian) and C. Stewart Wallis (Wallis, together the Authors) have been retained by Jet Metal Corp and The Bootheel Project, LLC (BP LLC) to prepare a supporting Technical Report on the Bootheel Uranium Project (Project). The purpose of this report is to provide documentation of the updated Mineral Resources in terms of potential in-situ recovery (ISR) of uranium mineralization of the Jurassic Sundance Formation and the Tertiary Wind River Formation, of the Bootheel Property, which covers an area of approximately 2,013 acres (815 hectares) in the southeast part of the Shirley Basin, southeastern Wyoming. In 2012, Agnerian audited and reported on a Resource Estimate for the Property. No drilling has been carried out on the Project since the completion of the 2011 exploration program. Since the Agnerian 2012 Technical Report, however, the lease with one of the landowners (MJ Ranches) was terminated and, as a result, the overall Mineral Resources of the property have been reduced by approximately 45%. This report is an update of the Agnerian 2012 Technical Report and has been prepared in accordance with National Instrument (NI) 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. Agnerian visited the project area from September 14 to 15, 2011. Mr. Wallis visited the Project many times since its acquisition in 2008, and most recently on August 20-22, 2011.

BP LLC is an operating company owned by Jet Metal Corp. (JET) and Ur-Energy Inc. (URE). Under agreements in 2007 and 2008, JET, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Target Exploration & Mining Corp. (Target), has earned an 80.9% interest in BP LLC. The remaining 19.1% of BP LLC is owned by URE.

1.1.1 Conclusions

Based on the review of technical reports on past exploration, publications on regional geology and the type of uranium mineralization, and recent drill results, the Authors conclude that:

·	The uranium mineralization at the Bootheel Property is a sandstone-hosted, roll front-type deposit.

At a GT cut-off of 0.15 ft. % or 0.02% equivalent uranium (eU3O8), depending on the host formation, the Mineral Resources of the Bootheel deposit total approximately 1.57 million tons of Indicated Mineral Resources at an average grade of 0.036% eU3O8, containing 1.12 million lbs. of U3O8, and approximately 1.315 million tons of Inferred Mineral Resources at an average grade of 0.040% eU3O8, containing 1.05 million lbs. of U3O8.

·	Uranium mineralization occurs in at least four horizons in the Jurassic rocks, and one horizon in the Tertiary rocks.

Areas of uranium mineralization intersected in rotary drill holes range from 0.015% eU3O8 to 0.15% eU3O8, over thickness ranging from 1.5 m to 18.6 m. These mineralized areas are associated with subhorizontal sandstones of the Lower Jurassic Sundance Formation, Lower Cretaceous Cloverly Formation, and the Lower Tertiary Wind River Formation.

·	The methodology of sampling and assaying during the recent drilling program is consistent with industry standards.

·	The methodologies of lithological and radiometric logging procedures, and sampling and assaying during past drilling campaigns were in keeping with industry standards in place at that time.

·	The Bootheel Project area is underlain by Early Jurassic to Lower Tertiary sedimentary rocks of the Shirley Basin of Wyoming. The Early Jurassic rocks comprise sandstone, shale and conglomerate of the Sundance Formation, and the arkosic sandstone,

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

·	A number of northeast trending normal faults cut the rocks and mineralized units in the area.

·	The source of uranium in the mineralized layers is interpreted to be the Precambrian rocks (including granitic rocks) of the Laramie Range, situated east of the Shirley Basin.

·	Of the 781 rotary drill holes completed on the property from the mid-1960s to 2011, 161 holes encountered significant uranium mineralization of more than 0.02% eU3O8 over intervals ranging from 1 m to approximately 10 m.

·	The methodology of downhole logging and surveying by BP LLC is in keeping with, and even surpasses, industry standards. The database is considered suitable for use in resource estimation.

1.1.2 Recommendation

The Authors recommend that due to market conditions and the current price of uranium that the Project remain on a care and maintenance budget. The annual cost of maintaining the current Project area is $14,000 in government payments plus insurance and accounting.

1.2 Technical Summary

1.2.1 Property Status and Infrastructure

The registered owner of the property is BP LLC. The Project covers a total area of approximately 2,013 acres (815.0 ha) comprising surface and mineral rights, state, and federal mineral rights, as follows:

·	81 unpatented Federal lode mining claims covering a total area of approximately 1,373 acres (555.9 ha).

·	One Wyoming State Mineral Lease (No. 0-40774) covering 640 acres (259.1 ha).

As per an agreement dated June 2007, later amended in December 2007 and February 2008, between URE and Target (a wholly owned subsidiary of JET), JET has spent more than $3 million on exploration and issued 125,000 shares of its capital to URE, thereby earning a 75% interest in BP LLC. URE declined to participate in one later program, and as a result, accepted dilution to its interest to the current level of 19.1% interest in the property. The remaining 80.9% of BP LLC is owned by JET, through Target.

The Federal claims are valid until August 31, 2015, and the Wyoming lease is valid until February 1, 2021. The claims are renewable on a yearly basis.

The Bootheel Uranium Property is located in Albany County, approximately 60 mi south-southeast of Casper and 60 mi north-northwest of Laramie, southeastern Wyoming. Access to the Bootheel Project area is by US Highway 30 from Laramie, then by two-lane paved highway (State Highway 287) to the Town of Rock River, and then by gravel road (County road 61/Fetterman Road) north towards US Highway 25 and Casper.

The property lies within an area of prairie grassland, with relief ranging from 15 m to 30 m. The elevation in the general area ranges from 2,300 m to 2,360 m above mean sea level. The climate at Laramie in southeastern Wyoming is semi-arid with significant difference in seasonal temperature. The average annual precipitation is 14.7 in (37 cm), mostly as snow from October to May.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

The area is covered with extensive shallow overburden and outcrops are not common. Vegetation consists predominantly of sagebrush. Overburden cover ranges from 0.5 m to 2 m. The land in the Shirley Basin area of southeastern Wyoming is high prairie terrain and is used for agriculture. Wildlife in the area includes antelope, and various species of mammals (including chipmunk, deer, and elk), various species of birds (including, hawk and grouse), and various species of insects.

1.2.2 History

There is no infrastructure at the site, and electric power is provided by diesel generators. Infrastructure at Laramie includes all modern amenities, such as electrical power, internet service, cell phone network, and road building equipment. There is regular commercial air service between Laramie and Denver, Colorado.

Exploration for uranium deposits in Wyoming dates back to the 1950s. Exploration in the general area of the property started in 1955 with the discovery of uranium in the Shirley Basin by Teton Exploration Drilling Company (Teton) in 1955. By the end of 1957, some 1,000,000 ft. of drilling had been completed testing for uranium mineralization in the Lower Tertiary Wind River Formation.

The Bootheel area was originally staked by Kerr McGee in 1958 upon discovery of uranium in shallow oxidized sandstones and in deeper sandstone horizons, but the company abandoned the property in 1962.

Cherokee Exploration Inc. (Cherokee) started exploring for uranium in the area, and in 1977 Cherokee, together with Kerr McGee Corp. (Kerr McGee), formed an exploration and drilling participation agreement with Uranium Resources and Development Company (Uradco), a subsidiary of Pennsylvania Power and Light Corp. The partners carried out drilling, and various studies on open pit mining, ISR, metallurgy and economic recovery of uranium, but by 1981, Uradco discontinued its operations and returned the property to Cherokee.

In 1980, Dames & Moore Inc. (Dames & Moore) carried out an assessment for parts of the property. In 1981, Groth Minerals Co. (Groth) carried out limited drilling (33 holes) on the property,

In 2007 Target acquired an option on the property through an agreement between Target, a wholly owned subsidiary, and URE by forming BP LLC to hold the property. In 2008 JET acquired all of the issued and outstanding common shares of Target pursuant to the terms of a plan of arrangement.

In 2008 and 2009, BP LLC acquired the exploration database from Power Resources Inc. (PRI) and commenced a systematic exploration program on the original Bootheel Property, including drilling 93 holes, for a total of 50,163 ft. (16,447 m). Compilation of the historical database indicates that approximately 600,000 ft. (196,700 m) of drilling has been completed in 2,086 holes on the original Bootheel Property. Of this total, 781 rotary holes have been completed on the current property.

In September 2009, Scott Wilson Roscoe Postle Associates Inc., a predecessor company to Roscoe Postle Associates Inc. (RPA), estimated the Mineral Resources of the original Bootheel Property, and reported that they contained 1.44 million tons of Indicated Mineral Resources at an average grade of 0.038% eU3O8, and 4.4 million tons of Inferred Mineral Resources at an average grade of of 0.037% eU3O8 This resource included property which is no longer owned by BH LLC.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

In 2011, Agnerian Consulting Ltd. updated the RPA 2009 Mineral Resource estimate for the original Bootheel Project and reported 2.068 million tons of Indicated Mineral Resources at an average grade of 0.036% eU3O8, containing 1.482 million lbs. of U3O8, and approximately 3.394 million tons of Inferred Mineral Resources an average grade of 0.039% eU3O8, containing 3.126 million lbs. of U3O8. This resource includes property which is no longer owned by BH LLC.

1.2.3 Geology and Mineralization

The Bootheel Project is located within the Shirley Basin, along the western flank of the Laramie Range in southeastern Wyoming, and is underlain by Jurassic to Tertiary sedimentary rocks. Uranium mineralization in and around the Bootheel Project occurs within sandstones of three sedimentary horizons; Lower Jurassic Sundance Formation; Lower Cretaceous Cloverly Formation; and Lower Tertiary Wind River Formation. All three host formations are capped by impervious shale.

Individual deposits contain a few tons to several hundred thousand tons of mineralized material, with grades ranging from 0.1% eU3O8 to 0.7% eU3O8. Areas of mineralization extend up to 2,500 ft. along the edges of the altered fronts.

The exploration methodology applied in the past and during recent exploration programs by BP LLC has been to evaluate the mineralized zones across the roll fronts by drilling rotary holes, and determine favourable areas for roll front-type uranium mineralization of the host sandstones.

1.2.4 Exploration

Approximately 600,000 ft. (196,700 m) of drilling in 2,086 rotary drill holes have been completed by BP LLC and previous operators in the general area of the Bootheel Property during the past 53 years. Of the 781 drill holes completed on the current property, 161 holes intersected significant mineralization of more than 0.02% eU3O8, with approximately 600 intervals ranging from less than 1 m to approximately 10 m. Drilling by BP LLC on the current property since 2008 amounts to 88 rotary drill holes totalling 49,265 ft.

Based on its review of exploration data, the Authors are of the opinion that procedures of interpreting and calculation of equivalent uranium grades by BP LLC are in keeping with industry standards.

Data verification is done by BP LLC personnel. These include comparing the lithologic logs with downhole radiometric probe data. BP LLC, however, has not yet carried out a program of QA/QC on rotary drill chips, such as closed can testwork at a laboratory specializing in such work. For future drilling programs, Agnerian recommends that BP LLC carry out closed can tests on selected intervals of the mineralized horizons.

Since the recent exploration program is done by rotary drilling, the Authors did not collect independent samples of drill chips for verification of uranium mineralization on the Bootheel Project. Instead, Agnerian has relied on the independent check work done by Scott Wilson RPA, as part of its due diligence in July 2008, which collected samples of diamond drill core and stated that “the results confirmed the presence of uranium mineralization and detected no concentrations of constituents outside of the normal range for a Wyoming roll-type uranium deposit”.

The Authors are of the opinion that historic sampling and analysis of drill core as well as chips by earlier operators, such as Cherokee and Cameco, were done in accordance with industry practice at the time. The Authors are also of the opinion that the methodology of downhole logging and surveying by BP LLC is in keeping with, and even surpasses, industry standards. The Authors

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

are further of the opinion that the original gamma log data, and subsequent conversion to eU3O8%, are reliable for resource estimation.

In terms of radiometric disequilibrium, no correction is made to the assay data even though historical data indicate that, for values greater than 0.015% eU3O8, the uranium content (chemical U3O8) may be underestimated. Nevertheless, the Authors note that the assay data are reliable, but with slightly conservative estimate of the eU3O8 grade, and hence the contained uranium in the deposit may be conservative.

1.2.5 Mineral Resources

The Mineral Resources of the Bootheel Project were estimated by JET using the Contour Method and Polygonal Method. The database contains 781 drill holes, of which 88 were drilled by JET. Classification of the Mineral Resources is based on continuity of mineralization along strike and drill hole spacing. In general, the majority of the drill holes are spaced 100 ft. apart, along lines spaced 200 ft. apart. Table 1-2 summarizes the Mineral Resources of the Bootheel Project.

Table 1-1 Mineral Resources of the Bootheel Project as of July 8, 2013
Bootheel Project, LLC. – Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Resource Category	Formation	Short Tons	Grade (eU3O8%)	Contained Pounds U3O8
Indicated	Sundance	1,570,000	0.036	1,120,000

Inferred	Sundance	1,007,000	0.031	624,000
Inferred	Wind River	308,000	0.070	426,000
Inferred	Total Inferred	1,315,000	0.040	1,050,000

Notes:

1.	CIM definitions were followed for Mineral Resources.

2.	Mineral Resources of the Sundance Formation are estimated at a cut-off grade of 0.015% eU3O8 over a minimum thickness of 4 ft., and a minimum grade x thickness (GT) product of 0.15 ft.-%.

3.	Mineral Resources of the Wind River Formation are estimated at cut-off grade of 0.02% eU3O8 over a minimum thickness of 4 ft., and a minimum grade x thickness (GT) product of 0.15 ft.-%.

4.	Mineral Resources are estimated using an average long-term uranium price of US$70 per pound U3O8.

5.	A tonnage factor of 16 ft3/ton was used for the Sundance Formation, and 15 ft3/ton was used for the Wind River Formation.

6.	High grades have not been cut for the Mineral Resource estimate.

7.	Tonnage, average grades and contained uranium numbers are rounded.

Wallis has reviewed the JET resource estimate and accepts it as the current estimate of the Mineral Resources of the Bootheel Project. There are no Mineral Reserves on the Bootheel Project at the present time.

Results of drilling completed to date suggest that mineralized zones within the Jurassic Sundance Formation and the Tertiary Wind River Formation may be amenable to the ISR method of recovering uranium.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

2 Introduction

Agnerian Consulting Ltd. (Agnerian) and Stewart Wallis (Wallis, together the Authors) have been retained by Jet Metal Corp. (JET) and The Bootheel Project, LLC (BP LLC) to prepare a Technical Report on the Bootheel Uranium Project. The purpose of this report is to provide an documentation of the potential for the in-situ recovery (ISR) of uranium mineralization of the various horizons of the Jurassic Sundance Formation and the Tertiary Wind River Formation, of the Bootheel Project, which covers an area of approximately 2,013 acres (815.0 ha) in the southeast part of the Shirley Basin, southeastern Wyoming. In 2012, Agnerian audited and reported on a Resource Estimate for the Property. No drilling has been carried out on the Project since the completion of the 2011 exploration program. Since the Agnerian 2012 Technical Report, however, the lease with one of the landowners (MJ Ranches) was terminated and, as a result, the overall Mineral Resources of the property have been reduced by approximately 45%. This report is an update of the Agnerian 2012 Technical Report and has been prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.

BP LLC is an operating company owned by JET and Ur-Energy USA Inc. (URE). Under agreements dated 2007 and 2008, JET, through Target Exploration & Mining Corp. (Target), a wholly owned subsidiary, earned an initial 75% interest in BP LLC. URE declined to participate in one later program and as a result, accepted dilution to its interest to their current level of 19.1% interest in the property. The remaining 80.9% of BP LLC is owned by JET.

JET is a public company listed on the TSX Venture exchange, with the symbol JET and its head office in Vancouver. JET’s former corporate name was Crosshair Energy Corporation (Crosshair).

For this report, the Authors carried out the following tasks:

·	A site visit by Agnerian to the Bootheel Project from September 14 to 15, 2011.

·	Wallis visited the property several times since its acquisition in 2008. Most recently on September 20-22, 2011.

·	Review of exploration results by JET and earlier operators, which include reverse circulation (RC) drilling and downhole radiometric probe results.

·	Review of a Technical Report and audit of Mineral Resources by Scott Wilson Roscoe Postle Associates Inc. in 2009.

·	Review of field procedures for logging drill holes by JET.

·	Review of the current Mineral Resources of the Bootheel Project estimated by JET.

Information for this Technical Report is supplied by JET. Technical documents and other sources of information are listed at the end of this report. The main documents used to prepare this Technical Report are:

·	Internal technical reports by JET.

·	A Technical Report prepared by Scott Wilson Roscoe Postle Associates Inc. (Scott Wilson RPA) dated September 8, 2009.

·	A Technical Report prepared by Agnerian (Agnerian 2012) dated February 27, 2012.

Mr. Hrayr Agnerian, M.Sc. (Applied), P.Geo, President of Agnerian Consulting Ltd., and a Qualified Person, carried out a site visit, and is responsible for all of the sections excluding Item 14 in this Technical Report. Mr. Stewart Wallis P. Geo., a Qualified Person is responsible for Item 14. In preparation of the 2012 Technical Report, Mr. Agnerian also held discussions with professionals knowledgeable on the project including:

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

·	Mr. C. Stewart Wallis, former President and CEO of JET.

·	Mr. Mark Ludwig, PE, former Chief Executive Officer of JET.

·	Mr. Tom Bell, Ph.D., CPG, former Project Manager of JET.

·	Mr. Larry Poznikoff, Manager, Geotechnical Services for King and Bay West.

Units of measurement used in this report conform to both the Imperial and the SI (metric) systems. All currency in this report is in United States dollars (US$) unless otherwise noted. The list of abbreviations used in this report is shown in Table 2-1.

Table 2-1 List of Abbreviations
Bootheel Project, LLC. – Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

°C	degree Celsius	L	Liter
C$	Canadian dollars	lbs.	pound (weight)
Cal	Calorie	m	Micron
cm	centimeter	mg	Microgram
cm2	square centimetres	M	Metre
cm3	cubic centimetres	m2	square metres
°F	degrees Fahrenheit	m3	cubic metres
g	Gram	Masl	metres above sea level
ft.	Feet	Mi	Mile
ft2	square feet	Mm	Millimetre
ft3	cubic feet	M	mega (million)
G	giga (billion)	Millidarcy	unit of permeability (one-thousandth of a Darcy)
g/l	gram per litre	pCi/L	Picocuries per litre (unit of radioactivity)
gpm	Grams per metre	pH	measure of acidity of solutions
g/t	gram per tonne	Ppm	part per million
Ha	Hectare	S	second (time)
K	kilo (thousand)	Ton	short ton (2,000 lbs.)
kg	Kilogram	T	metric tonne
km	kilometre	US$	United States Dollar
km2	square kilometres	yr.	Year

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

3 Reliance on Other Experts

This report has been prepared by the Authors for Jet Metal Corp. and Bootheel Project LLP, and their affiliates. The information, conclusions, and opinions contained herein are based on:

·	Information available to the Authors at the time of preparation of this report,

·	Assumptions, conditions, and qualifications as set forth in this report, and

·	Data, reports, and other information supplied by JET and its representatives.

For technical information on the Bootheel Project, the Authors reviewed the technical data provided by JET.

The Authors have not searched the title to the Bootheel Project, but have relied on reports on past exploration, and information on title documents supplied by JET.

The authors have reviewed requirements for land use regarding the Bootheel property, and have relied on information supplied by JET and by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM).

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

4 Property Description and Location

4.1 Location

The Bootheel Project is located in Albany County, approximately 60 mi south-southeast of Casper and 60 mi north-northwest of Laramie, southeastern Wyoming. The north-south oriented property extends approximately 4.7 mi within the northwest trending Shirley Basin, which is bounded to the east by the mountains of Laramie Range (Figure 4-1). The geographic coordinates of the central part of the property are approximately 42°05’N Latitude and 105°45’W Longitude in Township (T) 24North to 25North, Range (R) 74West to 75West.

4.2 Property Status

The property covers a total area of approximately 2,013 acres (815.0 ha) comprising state and federal mineral rights, as shown in Figure 4-2. They include:

·	81 unpatented Federal lode mining claims covering a total area of approximately 1,373 acres (555.9ha)

·	One Wyoming State Mineral Lease (No. 0-40774) covering 640 acres (259.1 ha).

The lode mining claims control the subsurface mineral rights, and are administered by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM). The individual claims and the section under the lease are listed in Table 22-1 (Appendix) at the end of this report. Some of the lode claims are less than full size (20.66 acres) and, as they have not yet been legally surveyed, the total area has been estimated from the claim maps by JET.

4.3 Land Tenure

The registered owner of the claims and leases is BP LLC. All of the Bootheel claims are reported by JET to be in good standing. The annual holding cost for the Bootheel Project for the assessment year due September 1, 2015, is US$13,997.

The Bootheel Project consists of state, and federal mineral rights with certain surface rights. The Stock Raising Homestead Act was amended in 1993, whereby mineral ownership is removed from surface ownership, and the surface ownership is patent. Where the mineral rights are reserved to the Federal Government of the United States, claimants must record a Notice of Intent to Locate Mining Claims (NOITL) with the surface owner and the local BLM office before entering the land or locating claims. Staking can commence 30 days after the NOITL has been received, but must be completed within 90 days of submittal. There is a limit to the number of NOTILs that an owner can deliver at one time. Compensation must be paid to the surface owner for any disturbance of the land used for access or drilling (Underhill and Roscoe, 2009). All mineral claims are based on the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) system using the NAD27 datum. The surface rights for Section 32, which contains 18 claims, are owned by MJ Ranches, a private corporation.

4.3.1 JET-URE Agreement

Under an agreement dated June 7, 2007, and amended on December 21, 2007, and on February 28, 2008, between URE, several of its subsidiaries, and what is now a wholly owned JET subsidiary, Target and its subsidiary 448018 Exploration Inc. (448018), JET may earn a 75% interest in BP LLC subject to certain Royalties as discussed below, by completing expenditures totalling $3 million and issuing 125,000 common shares.

JET has spent approximately $4.5 million on exploration and issued 125,000 shares of its capital to URE, thereby earned a 75% interest in BP LLC. URE declined to participate in one later

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

exploration program, and as a result, has accepted dilution to its interest to the current level of 19.9% interest in the property. The remaining 80.9% of BP LLC is owned by JET. The Authors understand that the agreement also defines an area of interest (Figure 4-3).

4.3.2 Cameco Agreement

In 2008 and 2009, BP LLC acquired the exploration database on the property from Power Resources Inc. (PRI, a subsidiary of Cameco), which had earlier acquired from Cherokee Exploration Inc. (Cherokee). Under this agreement PRI retains an overriding royalty on the production of uranium, vanadium, and certain other minerals from some parts the Bootheel Project, which include the federal claims and the State Mineral Lease (No. 0-40774). In addition, Uranium One Inc. (formerly Energy Metals Corporation) holds a royalty on future production for uranium, vanadium, and other minerals from the 28 TD claims in Sections 6 and 12, Township 24N, Range 74W and 75W (Table 22-1, Appendix).

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Figure 4-1 Location Map

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Figure 4-2 Property Map

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Figure 4-3 Area of Interest

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

5 Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Physiography, and Infrastructure

5.1 Accessibility

Access to the Bootheel Project area is by US Highway 30 from Laramie, then by two-lane paved highway (State Highway 287) to the Town of Rock River, and then by gravel road (County road 61/Fetterman Road) north towards US Highway 25 and Casper. Supplies and heavy equipment are brought to the camp by trucks.

5.2 Climate

The climate at Laramie in southeastern Wyoming is semi-arid with significant difference in seasonal temperature. The average temperature during the winter months is approximately 14⁰F (-5°C) and ranges from -25°C to 5°C. The average temperature during the summer months is 68⁰F (20°C) and ranges from 10°C to 30°C. The average annual precipitation is 14.7 in (37 cm), mostly as snow from October to May. During the winter months, snow cover is usually less than 3 in.

5.3 Physiography and Land Use

The property lies within an area of prairie grassland, with relief ranging from 15 m to 30 m. The elevation in the general area ranges from 2,300 m to 2,360 m above mean sea level. The area is covered with extensive overburden and outcrops are not common. Along trails and road cuts, however, outcrops are observed. Vegetation consists predominantly of sagebrush. Overburden cover ranges from 0.5 m to 2 m. Locally, however, overburden may be up to 5 m thick.

The land in the Shirley Basin area of southeastern Wyoming is high prairie terrain and is used for agriculture and ranching. Wildlife in the area includes antelope, and various species of mammals (including chipmunk, deer, and elk), various species of birds (including, hawk and grouse), and various species of insects.

5.4 Infrastructure and Local Resources

There is no infrastructure at the site, and electric power for the camp is provided by diesel generators. There are power lines nearby that service the local ranches. Infrastructure at Laramie includes all modern amenities, such as electrical power, internet service, cell phone network and road building equipment. Potable water at the site is provided in bottles, and industrial water is drawn from wells. Drilling equipment is available in Casper, and is also brought from other cities in Wyoming, such as Laramie. There is regular commercial air service between Laramie and Denver, Colorado. In addition, chartered helicopter service is available at Laramie.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

6 History

6.1 Early Exploration 1950s to 2000

Exploration for uranium deposits in Wyoming dates back to the 1950s. Exploration in the general area of the property started in 1955 with the discovery of uranium in the Shirley Basin by Teton Exploration Drilling Company (Teton) in 1955. By the end of 1957 some 1,000,000 ft. of drilling had been completed testing for uranium mineralization in the Lower Tertiary Wind River Formation.

The Bootheel area was originally staked by Kerr McGee Corp. (Kerr McGee) in 1958 upon discovery of uranium in shallow oxidized sandstones, and in deeper sandstone horizons, but that company abandoned the property in 1962. The Kerr McGee acquired the property again in 1968, but subsequently abandoned it again.

In 1959, Utah Mining Corp., which later became Utah Construction and Mining Co. (Utah), started underground mining and producing uranium in the Gas Hills area west of Casper. Late in 1964, Utah stopped underground mining and started producing uranium by ISR techniques, using sulphuric acid and ion exchange for recovery. In 1970, Utah changed its mining method to conventional open pit operation.

By the year 1960, other companies such as Kerr McGee and Petrotomics Co. (Petrotomics) had open pit operations in the area, and by late 1969 there were three operating mines in the Shirley Basin, with total annual production in the order of 34 million pounds of U3O8. Due to the declining price of uranium, however, the mines shut down –the last one in 1992- and most of the open pits were reclaimed. Presently, Cogema Mining Inc. (Cogema, a subsidiary of the French integrated uranium company Areva) retains one tailings impoundment, which is used for the disposal of low-level radioactive waste from its ISR operations in the Powder River Basin.

In the 1970s, other companies such as Rocky Mountain Energy Corporation, a subsidiary of Union Pacific Railroad (Union Pacific) and Cherokee started exploring for uranium in the area, and in 1977 Cherokee, together with Kerr McGee, formed an exploration and drilling participation agreement with Uranium Resources and Development Company (Uradco), a subsidiary of Pennsylvania Power and Light Corp. The partners carried out drilling, and various studies on open pit mining, ISR, metallurgy and economic recovery of uranium, but by 1981, Uradco discontinued its operations and returned the property to Cherokee.

In 1980, Dames & Moore Inc. (Dames & Moore) carried out an assessment for parts of the property. In 1981, Groth Minerals Co. (Groth) carried out limited drilling (33 holes) on the property, and during the same year Nuclear Assurance Corporation (NAC) carried out a resource estimate. In 1995, Power Resources Inc. (PRI) acquired the exploration database from Cherokee, but later abandoned the property due to low uranium prices. The database included reports, gamma logs, drill logs and other data from some 660 drill holes totalling approximately 290,000 ft. (96,000 m).

6.2 Recent Exploration

In 2008 and 2009, BP LLC acquired the exploration database from PRI and commenced a systematic exploration program on the Bootheel Project, which at the time was much larger than the current holdings.

In September 2009, Scott Wilson Roscoe Postle Associates Inc., a predecessor company to Roscoe Postle Associates Inc. (RPA), audited the Mineral Resources of the original larger

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Bootheel Project, and reported that they contained 1.44 million tons of Indicated Mineral Resources at an average grade of 0.038% eU3O8, and 4.4 million tons of Inferred Mineral Resources at an average grade of of 0.037% eU3O8.

In a 2012 Technical Report, Agnerian (2012) updated the RPA 2009 resource for the original Bootheel Project which at that time was much larger. At a GT cut-off of 0.15 ft.-% or 0.02% equivalent uranium (eU3O8), depending on the host Formation, Agnerian reported the Mineral Resources of the Bootheel deposit to total approximately 2.07 million tons of Indicated Mineral Resources at an average grade of 0.036% eU3O8, containing 1.48 million lbs. of U3O8, and approximately 4.0 million tons of Inferred Mineral Resources an average grade of 0.039% eU3O8, containing 3.13 million lbs. of U3O8.

Since the 2012 Technical Report by Agnerian, no further exploration work has been done on the Bootheel property and the property has been reduced to its present size of approximately 815 ha.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

7 Geological Setting and Mineralization

7.1 Regional Geology

The Bootheel Project is located within the Shirley Basin, along the western flank of the Laramie Range in southeastern Wyoming, and is underlain by Jurassic to Tertiary sedimentary rocks (Figure 7-1). The basin is an erosional feature controlled in part by a broad northwest trending syncline in pre-Tertiary rocks. The property is situated adjacent to the Precambrian Wyoming Lineament, which separates the Laramie structural basin in the east from the Wind River structural basin in the west. Both the Shirley Basin and the Laramie Range were formed during the Laramide Orogeny, at the close of the Cretaceous period.

The rocks in the general area range from Precambrian to Quaternary in age. The regional stratigraphy is presented in Figure 7-2, and is interpreted by J.D. Love and A.C. Christiansen (1985) as follows:

·	Precambrian basement rocks: These rocks are extensively exposed in the Laramide Range, and consist of metasedimentary rocks, diabase, and granitic rocks. Past exploration indicates that these rocks extend to more than 5,000 ft. below the surface (Figure 7-3).

·	Paleozoic rocks: They comprise:

The limestones and dolomites of the Mississippian Madison Formation, which overlie the basement rocks, although not present in the area of the Bootheel Project. A major northeast trending thrust fault (Pinto Creek Fault) is situated approximately one mile southeast of the Bootheel claims and separates these rocks from the younger rocks in the area.

o	Red shales, limestone, and gypsum of the Permian Goose Egg Formation

·	Mesozoic rocks: These rocks include:

o	Triassic sandstones, siltstones, and conglomerates.

o	Sandstones and siltstones of the Lower Jurassic Sundance Formation and Upper Jurassic shales.

o	Sandstones and shales of the Lower Cretaceous Cloverly Formation as well as similar rocks of Upper Cretaceous age.

·	Cenozoic rocks: These rocks include:

o	Arkosic sandstones, conglomerates, and siltstones of the Lower Tertiary Wind River Formation, sandstones and conglomerates of Middle Tertiary Wagon Band Formation, and fine-grained sandstones of the Upper Tertiary White River Formation.

o	Quaternary surficial deposits, including unconsolidated gravel and alluvium.

The Precambrian rocks generally occur east of a northwest trending lineament in the northern part of Albany County (Figure 7-3). The Bootheel Fault, as well as all other faults in the area, trend northeast.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Figure 7-1 Generalized Structural Map of Wyoming Geology

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Figure 7-2 Stratigraphic Section of the Bootheel Area

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Figure 7-3 Regional Geology

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

7.2 Property Geology

The Bootheel Project is underlain by the arkosic sandstones and siltstones of the Lower Tertiary Wind River Formation. These rocks have a very gentle (1.5⁰) northeasterly dip, and lie unconformably over gently (3⁰ to 5⁰) southwest dipping sandstones of the Lower Jurassic Sundance Formation. Both the Lower Tertiary and Lower Jurassic rocks are situated within a graben formed by the Pinto Creek Fault and another postulated northeast trending fault near the northwestern margin of the property (Figures 7-3 and 7-4). In a younging direction, the following is a general description of the rock types encountered in drill holes, as interpreted in e-Logs (Figure 7-5).

7.2.1 Chugwater Formation

The lowest formation intersected in drill holes is the Upper Permian to Lower Triassic Chugwater Formation comprising a 600 ft. to 800 ft. thick sequence of red shale, siltstone, sandstone, limestone, and conglomerate.

7.2.2 Sundance Formation

Rocks of the Lower Jurassic Sundance Formation unconformably overlie the rocks of the Chugwater Formation. They comprise white to yellow, very fine-grained cross-bedded sandstone, and pebble conglomerates (Canyon Springs members A, B, C, and D). Unit C, however, has not been encountered in drill holes on the Bootheel Project (Figure 7-5). The following is a description of Units A, B and D by Underhill and Roscoe (2009).

“Units B and D are a remarkably homogeneous sequence of fine- to very fine-grained, well-sorted sandstone, deposited in a marine beach environment. Sand grains are sub- to well-rounded, typically frosted, and can become medium-grained in some intervals. Dune to bar scale cross-bedding is common. Silty shale partings, less than one millimetre thick, were seen in core…the bottom five feet of the unit becomes progressively siltier and contains minor shale laminae near the base. The unit becomes siltier in the upper few feet and visually gradational with the overlying Canyon Springs A bed. The unit ranges from 75 to 105 ft. thick and can be mineralized at any stratigraphic position.

The majority of the B and D beds are weakly cemented and friable. Typically 70% of the rock is easily broken by hand. This often presents difficulties in core recovery, especially in the softest areas where the core diameter erodes and core falls out of the inner tube. Poor recovery can also occur in rotary cuttings. The sandstone disaggregates into very fine sand grains, which become suspended in the drill mud and cannot be collected at the surface. This results in erroneous lithological and oxidation descriptions in some of the old geologic logs. The e-log response of the Canyon Springs B and D is surprisingly flat and matches the visually homogeneous nature of the unit. Permeability is typically high both along and across bedding, ranging from 500 to 3,000 millidarcys. Water dropped onto the surface of saturated core will usually seep into the core in one to three seconds.

The overlying Canyon Springs A bed consists of very fine-grained silty sandstone, from 25 to 35 ft. thick. It appears identical to the Canyon Springs B and D beds in both core and drill cuttings. However, the Canyon Springs A has a very distinctive e-log signature, which is recognizable across the entire project area. The unit is considered to be a weak to moderate confining layer hydrogeologically. Lower permeability is indicated by sharply higher SP/lower resistivity response in the e-logs and a consistent absence of uranium mineralization within the unit.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Figure 7-4 Property Geology

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

7.2.3 Morrison Formation

The Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation is approximately 200 ft. thick and overlies the Sundance Formation. It comprises monotonous carbonaceous shale with minor siltstone interbeds. Many intervals contain 50% streaky hematitic staining, which is a diagnostic recognition characteristic in drill cuttings.

7.2.4 Cloverly Formation

The Cretaceous Cloverly Formation consists of three members, described as follows.

·	Lakota sandstone: consists of poorly cemented, very fine-grained, well-rounded quartz sandstone, with local chert pebble conglomerate, totalling from 45 ft. to 80 ft. thick. The unit is highly permeable, lacks carbonaceous trash and hosts thin weak mineralization.

·	The Fusion shale: consists of an upper black shale, lower sandstone and basal lignite. The total thickness ranges from 2 ft. (in the northwest and southeast portions of the property) to 40 ft. in the central area. Scattered weak mineralization occurs within the sandstone beds.

The Dakota sandstone: is fine- to coarse-grained sucrosic quartz sandstone, ranging from 12 ft. to 40 ft. in thickness, and contains abundant pyrite and carbonaceous material. Limonite and hematite concretions are abundant in outcrop. “This member hosts strong uranium mineralization in section 12 and widely scattered mineralization in sections 2 and 11” (Crosshair, 2011).

7.2.5 Thermopolis Formation

The Thermopolis Formation overlies the Dakota sandstone. It consists of black marine shale and contains the Rusty Beds sandstone member 10 ft. to 30 ft. above its base. Total thickness of the formation is approximately 165 ft. The Rusty Beds consist of very fine- to medium-grained sandstone grading upwards into thinly interbedded siltstone and shale, ranging from 25 ft. to 85 ft. total thick. Both carbonaceous material and pyrite are abundant. “The member hosts strong uranium mineralization in sections 11 and 12 and scattered weak mineralization in section 2” (Crosshair, 2011).

7.2.6 Mowry Formation

The Mowry Formation comprises the basal Muddy Sandstone member and overlying siliceous shale, totalling approximately 110 ft. in thickness. The Muddy Sandstone consists of very permeable, fine- to medium-grained salt and pepper sandstone, ranging from 18 ft. to 45 ft. in thickness. “A small area of potentially economic uranium mineralization is hosted in the Muddy in the northwest portion of section 12, with some weak scattered mineralization in section 11” (Crosshair, 2011).

7.2.7 Frontier Formation

The overlying Frontier Formation consists of an 860 ft. thick sequence of thin-bedded carbonaceous shale and sandstone. The 150 ft. thick Wall Creek Sandstone member consists of interbedded sandstone and siltstone and contains widespread weak mineralization.

7.2.8 Wind River Formation

The Lower Eocene Wind River Formation and other Lower Tertiary rocks were deposited on the Late Cretaceous to Early Tertiary angular erosional unconformity formed during the Laramide Orogeny. “Uranium-rich sediment was derived from Precambrian basement rocks in the Laramie Range to the east. Deposition was controlled by a large paleochannel (Figures 7-3 and 7-4), which trends northeast in the northern portion of the project (graben controlled) and trends northwest in the southern portion of the project (controlled by the strike of easily eroded pre-Tertiary sediments). The southern margin of the paleochannel terminates against the Pinto

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Creek fault complex one mile to the southeast of the project. Topographic relief along the paleochannel (as well as changes in formation thickness) ranges from 100 ft. to 250 ft. As the Eocene landscape matured the confining paleochannels had less influence and deposition occurred across a broad flood plain” (Crosshair, 2009).

The Middle Eocene Wagon Bed Formation conformably overlies the Wind River Formation. These two formations comprise similar lithologic units. Due to the lack of marker beds, however, the two formations cannot be distinguished from each other at the surface and cannot be subdivided in drill holes using either electric logs or drill samples. In the western portion of the Shirley Basin, the base of the Wagon Bed is defined by a lacustrine limestone, which is absent at Bootheel. The formation contact at Bootheel is assumed to be located where siltstones and shales are more common. For practical purposes, both formations are lumped into the Wind River Formation (Crosshair, 2009).

The Tertiary sedimentary rocks range from 100 ft. to 250 ft. in thickness, and are unlithified. “The lower half of the sequence typically consists of coarse-grained sand and conglomerate channel deposits, with lesser amount of silt and clay overbank deposits. Lateral facies changes are common and often abrupt. The historic reports suggest that the primary host for uranium within the Wind River Formation is the carbonaceous, fine-grained sediments at channel margins and overbank deposits. However the lithological drill logs indicate that in many holes the host for the uranium mineralization is the basal conglomerate or coarse-grained sandstone. Some of the logs indicate the sandstones may contain interbedded finer-grained siltstones” (Crosshair, 2009).

Overlying the basal conglomerate the upper half of the Tertiary stratigraphy is typically finer grained sedimentary rocks, dominated by silts and clays with less abundant channel deposits. No significant uranium mineralization occurs in these upper sediments. Conglomerates containing large boulders are uncommon, but do occur, mainly in the eastern half of the project area, within the basal sediments and in the middle of the fine-grained strata. The Tertiary sedimentary rocks at Bootheel are very permeable and strongly oxidized. Coarse-grained sedimentary rocks are 100% oxidized, while silts and clays are approximately 70% oxidized.

7.2.9 Quaternary Sediments

The Quaternary sediments cover much of the Bootheel Project. They consist of alluvial sediments, such as sand and gravel, with thickness ranging from 2 ft. to 30 ft.

7.3 Structural Setting

The Bootheel Project is situated adjacent to the Precambrian Wyoming Lineament, which separates the Laramie structural basin in the east from the Wind River structural basin in the west. Both the Shirley Basin and the Laramie Range were formed during the Laramide Orogeny, at the close of the Cretaceous period.

The Bootheel Project is situated within a graben, which is bounded by two northeast trending faults; the Pinto Creek Fault, approximately one mile southeast of the Bootheel claims and a fault (North Fault) with similar orientation near the northwestern border of the property. Rocks within the graben are younger than those in the surrounding areas (Figures 7-3 and 7-4). The vertical displacement along the Pinto Creek Fault ranges from 1,300 ft. to 2,200 ft., and it can be traced for at least 20 miles. The vertical displacement along the North Fault is reported to be in the order of 500 ft. “Drag folding along each of these faults suggests an oblique slip component to movement” (Underhill and Roscoe, 2009).

There are other northeast trending faults with smaller displacements in the order of 10 ft. to 20 ft. within the graben, which cut the mineralized areas. These are interpreted from breaks in oxidation zones and anomalous radioactivity detected in drill holes. These faults, however, are

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

not common in the mineralized areas, as there are sections of 40 ft. to 50 ft. of drill core without any fractures (Crosshair, 2009).

Three large solution collapse features, ranging from one-half mile to one mile, exist just beyond the northern boundary of the property. They are defined by closed topographic contours and visible on aerial photographs. The collapse features are believed to have formed from dissolution of evaporates within the underlying Triassic and Permian sedimentary rocks. “They have created a geologic paradox along the northern fault margin of the graben, where Tertiary Wind River sediments on the downthrown side of the fault are up to 100 ft. topographically higher than pre-Tertiary sediments on the up-thrown side of the fault. Synclinal folding related to the collapse has been mapped at the margins of the feature in section 35” (Crosshair, 2009).

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Figure 7-5 Formation Contacts on e-Logs

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

7.4 Mineralization

Uranium mining in the Shirley Basin in the past, including ISR operations by Utah, has occurred mostly in the northwestern part of the basin, approximately 25 mi northwest of the Bootheel Project. Exploration data indicate that the style of uranium mineralization is that of roll front-type, with large crescent-shaped hinge zones of yellowish green sandstone (with high iron montmorillonite) occurring on the oxidized side of the roll fronts. The oxidized upper and lower flanks from the hinge zone may extend several hundred to more than a thousand feet away from the roll front. Unaltered sandstone is grey. Individual deposits contain a few tons to several hundred thousand tons of mineralized material, with grades ranging from 0.1% eU3O8 to 0.7% eU3O8. Areas of mineralization extend up to 2,500 ft. along the edges of the altered fronts.

Uranium mineralization in and around the Bootheel Project occurs within seven sandstone beds of three sedimentary horizons. From bottom to top, these are Lower Jurassic Sundance Formation, Lower Cretaceous Cloverly Formation, and Lower Tertiary Wind River Formation (Table 7-1). All three host formations are capped by impervious shales.

7.4.1 Jurassic Sundance Formation

Approximately 76% of the Bootheel deposit is comprised of uranium mineralization hosted by the Jurassic Sundance Formation. The unoxidized Canyon Springs B and D units of the Sundance Formation are medium grey and contain less than 1% iron sulphides. Pyrite occurs as fine disseminations, large clots up to one inch, and as streaks parallel to bedding. Carbonaceous material is rare and is usually coated by iron sulphide. Mineralized portions of the units are visually identical to unmineralized portions of the unit, except for a possible increase of pyrite content. Finely disseminated dark uranium minerals seem to be present, but none have been definitively identified. The oxidized sandstones are limonitic orange in colour. Occasionally, nodular and disseminated calcite cement occurs, usually at the margins of mineralized zones.

Uranium mineralization occurs at depths ranging from 158 ft. to 585 ft. below the surface. The thickness of the mineralized units ranges from 3 ft. to 61 ft., and average grades range from 0.015% eU3O8 to 0.09% eU3O8. The individual zones exhibit good lateral continuity, ranging from approximately 300 ft. to 1,000 ft. wide and 400 ft. to more than 1,000 ft. long (parallel to the general redox boundary). Individual bedded mineralized zones can extend laterally (in the same stratigraphic position) for up to 600 ft., or may “migrate” at 5⁰ to 10⁰ across the stratigraphy. “This gentle cross-cutting of bedding is probably due to a combination of permeability differences in the host rock and broad variations in the redox geometries” (Underhill and Roscoe, 2009). Lateral distance between individual mineralized zones and the Tertiary angular unconformity-Canyon Springs contact varies greatly, ranging from 10 ft. to 4,000 ft.

Two basic styles of uranium mineralization are present in the Canyon Springs segments of the Sundance Formation: thin to moderately thick, laterally continuous zones of bedded mineralization, and; thick, linear zones of cross cutting mineralization, which are laterally much narrower than bedded zones. In some areas, these two styles of mineralization represent the nose and tails of typical roll fronts. Usually the upper tail is poorly developed while the lower tail develops into thick, laterally persistent bedded mineralization. A series of two or three redox fronts can occur over a distance of 1,000 ft. In other areas, linear zones of cross-cutting mineralization occur as gradual thickening of adjacent bedded mineralization and appear structurally controlled. A combination of roll front processes and re-reduction by migration of H2S along faults is interpreted by JET to be responsible for the complex mineralization and oxidation areas present on the Bootheel Project.

Undivided Upper Sundance Formation consists of light to dark grey interbedded sandstone, siltstone and shale, ranging from 120 ft. to 140 ft. thick. The lower third of the unit is dominated by very fine-grained silty sandstones, which are locally oxidized. “The basal very fine-grained

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

silty sandstone (subdivided as the Hulett sandstone by previous workers) is present across the entire project area, averages ten ft. in thickness, and displays a very distinctive rounded SP low/ resistivity high and is very useful in correlating from drill hole to drill hole. The upper two thirds of the unit are dominated by dark gray, thin-bedded siltstone and shale. An important recognition characteristic of the Upper Sundance in drill cuttings is that the entire siltstone-shale sequence is unoxidized and impermeable. The top 10 ft. of the Sundance is also distinctive, containing a series of two to sometimes three thin siltstone-sandstone beds, which create a diagnostic resistivity double peak on the logs. The majority of the unit consists of impermeable lithologic units and represents the overlying aquitard (a bed of low permeability adjacent to an aquifer) for ISR mining of the Canyon Springs B and D hosted mineralization” (Crosshair, 2009).

7.4.2 Cretaceous Cloverly Formation

Three Cretaceous sandstone units host uranium mineralization on the Bootheel Project. There are no mineral resources estimated for this Formation. In decreasing order of importance, these are: Dakota Sandstone of the Cloverly Formation; Rusty Beds Sandstone of the Thermopolis Formation, and; Muddy Sandstone of the Mowry Formation. The Lakota and Fusion members of the Cloverly Formation also host scattered mineralization in thin beds. “All significant Cretaceous hosted mineralization found to date is located in the northwest portion of section 12. Widespread weak mineralization is present in widely spaced drilling in section 2; however, tonnage potential to date appears limited in this area” (Crosshair, 2009). Mineralized units are described by JET as follows:

Dakota Sandstone: fine- to coarse-grained sandstone, 4 ft. to 47 ft. thick, containing abundant pyrite and carbonaceous material. Uranium mineralization occurs at depths ranging from 163 ft. to 325 ft. below the surface. The thickness of the mineralized units ranges from 2 ft. to 14 ft., and average grades range from 0.026% eU3O8 to 0.23% eU3O8. The main zone is approximately 300 ft. wide and 1,000 ft. long. A smaller 200 ft. by 300 ft. zone occurs up-dip to the east (Figure 7-4). Very little oxidation is present in the mineralized zones.

Rusty Beds Sandstone: consists of fine to medium sandstone, with siltstone in the upper portions, ranging from 5 ft. to 87 ft. in thickness. It contains abundant pyrite and carbonaceous debris. Uranium mineralization occurs at depths ranging from 232 ft. to 297 ft. below the surface. The thickness of the mineralized units ranges from 2 ft. to 23 ft., and average grades range from 0.02% eU3O8 to 0.11% eU3O8. Mineralization occurs in three small zones, 300 ft. to 400 ft. in size, which may be laterally continuous. Nearly all the mineralized intercepts are partially oxidized.

Muddy Sandstone: is fine to medium grained, 18 ft. to 45 ft. thick and is very permeable. It is the least well mineralized of the Cretaceous units, with only one zone, which is approximately 200 ft. by 400 ft. in dimension. Uranium mineralization occurs at depths ranging from 138 ft. to 149 ft. below the surface. The thickness of the mineralized units ranges from 2 ft. to 6 ft., and average grades range from 0.02% eU3O8 to 0.16% eU3O8. Uranium mineralization in this zone may extend to the south.

Uranium mineralization in all three host horizons is interpreted to be similar to a typical roll front-type deposit, whereby uranium bearing groundwater migrate down-dip from the Tertiary angular unconformity and forms the roll fronts. Most mineralized zones are oriented roughly parallel to the host unit contact with the unconformity. The main mineralized zone in the Dakota Sandstone, however, has a northeasterly trend, which is perpendicular to the unconformity, and may have been influenced by reduction along a fault.

7.4.3 Tertiary Wind River Formation

Approximately 24% of the Bootheel deposit is comprised of uranium mineralization hosted by the Lower Tertiary Wind River Formation. Uranium mineralization occurs at depths ranging from 50

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

ft. to 215 ft. below the surface. The thickness of the mineralized units ranges from 2 ft. to 23 ft., and average grades range from 0.015% eU3O8 to 0.325% eU3O8.

Uranium mineralization hosted by the Wind River Formation represents cumulative zones, which may contain mineralization in multiple stratigraphic horizons. Mineralized zones commonly have a north-south orientation, which is interpreted by JET to correlate with overbank deposits along the eastern margin of the north-south depositional paleochannel of the formation. In parts of the Bootheel Project, however, the orientation of the mineralization is parallel to the underlying mineralization in the Sundance Formation.

7.4.4 Chemical Analyses

In 2009, Underhill and Roscoe collected 36 samples of drill core and had them analyzed. Results of Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) determinations indicate that the elemental constituents of those samples are similar to those at other roll front-type uranium deposits. The samples contained the following elements:

·	Arsenic: 1 ppm to 12 ppm, averaging 3.7 ppm.

·	Cadmium: 0.01 ppm to 0.09 ppm, averaging 0.03 ppm.

·	Molybdenum: 0.2 ppm to 1.0 ppm, averaging 0.43 ppm.

·	Selenium: 2 ppm to 18 ppm, with three samples containing 28 ppm Se to 68 ppm Se

·	Vanadium: 11 ppm to 261 ppm, averaging 85 ppm.

Based on the above results, Underhill and Roscoe (2009) concluded that the potential for significant vanadium by-product is nil. The authors also noted that there are low levels of potentially deleterious trace elements and heavy metals within the Sundance Sandstone, such as arsenic and cadmium.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

TABLE 7-1 CHARACTERISTICS OF BOOTHEEL MINERALIZATION
Bootheel Project, LLC. – Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Age: Formation: Unit	Depth (ft.), Dip direction (⁰)	Maximum Point Grade (%eU3O8)	Composite Grade (%eU3O8)	Composite Thickness (ft.) at 0.015% eU3O8 cut-off	Width x Length (ft.)	Host Rocks	Type(s) of Mineralization	Degree of Oxidation
Tertiary-Eocene Wind River Fm	54-215 Avg 130, dip 1.5 NE	0.726	0.015–0.325, Avg.0.049	2 – 23, Avg. 4	Up to 300 x 500	Fluvial slst, sst, basal congl, overbank deposits, channel margins	Roll-type remnants in multiple horizons, thin HG, meandering & may be discontinuous	Strong; 100% in sst, 70% in slst
Cretaceous Muddy Fm sst	138-149 Avg 142	0.467	0.016-0.157 Avg.0.035	2 - 6, Avg.3	1 pod: 200x400	f.g.- m.g. marine sst	Roll-type	Average of 25%
Cretaceous Thermopolis Fm, Rusty Beds sst	232-290 Avg.267	0.180	0.015-0.090 Avg.0.038	2 – 13, Avg.6	3 pods: each 300 x 400	f.g.- m.g. hem sst; py, carb	Roll-type	Partially oxidized, Average of 30%
Cretaceous Cloverly Fm, Dakota sst	163-325 Avg.250	0.417	0.026-0.230 Avg.0.060	2 – 14, Avg.5	300x1,000 & 200x300	f.g.- m.g. marine sst; py, carb	Roll-type	Very weak to no oxidation
Cretaceous Cloverly Fm, Lakota sst	310-490 Avg.383	0.093	0.022-0.054 Avg.0.032	2 – 7, Avg.4		f.g.- m.g. sst, congl at base	Roll-type?	30% to 50%
Jurassic Sundance Fm Canyon Springs B & D sst	158-585 Avg.378, dip 3-5 SW	0.423	0.017-0.091 Avg.0.034	2 – 61, Avg.14	Extensive; up to 200-800 wide x 400x1,200 long	Marginal marine: uniform, f.g. beach sands; x-bdd, poorly cem, very permeable; <1% py, rare carb	Roll-type; both nose & tails; Re-reduced structure controlled zones?	Complex: varies from redox fronts to re-reduced zones

Source: Underhill and Roscoe, 2009.

Notes:

1.	Fm (Formation; Avg (average); slst (siltstone); sst (sandstone; congl (conglomerate); f.g. (fine-grained); m.g. (medium-grained);py (pyritic); carb (carbonaceous); bdd (bedded); cem (cemented) .

2.	Point grade is obtained from radiometric downhole probe results.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

8 Deposit Types

The Bootheel Project is located within the Shirley Basin of Wyoming, and uranium mineralization, hosted by the Jurassic, Cretaceous, and Tertiary sandstones, is interpreted to represent a roll front-type mineralization by BP LLC. Sandstone-type uranium deposits are characteristically sedimentary formations of clastic-detrital origin associated with reducing environments. These deposits are usually tabular in shape and may occur in continental sandstones, deltaic or shallow marine environments. Typically, roll front-type uranium deposits have, in the direction of the flow of ore bearing solutions, a barren (oxidized) interior zone surrounded by a (reduced) mineralized zone. Between the barren zone and the mineralized zone is an altered zone. The over-all shape of the roll front is like a crescent with extended tails at each end, which also outline the barren interior zone, and uranium is deposited at the interface between the oxidized zone and the reduced zone (Figures 8-1 and 8-2, and Guilbert and Park, 1986). Ground water flow direction is usually a good guide in detecting roll front-type deposits in sandstones. The principal ore minerals are pitchblende and coffinite, often accompanied by selenium, molybdenum, arsenic and phosphorous.

The most favourable host rocks are friable fine- to coarse-grained arkosic sandstones containing pyrite and carbonaceous material. Interbedded mudstone, claystones, and siltstone interbeds are often present and sand and silt channels with cross-bedding, are common. Below the water table, unaltered sandstones are light grey to greenish grey with abundant pyrite and carbonaceous material while the altered sandstones are reddish or greenish yellow coloured with no pyrite and little carbonaceous material. The alteration that marks the roll front penetrates the sandstone down-dip. The fronts range in size and shape and commonly have lateral extensions of several miles and thicknesses of several tens of feet. Within any one formation there may be many individual beds that contain roll fronts.

The clay minerals within the sandstone sequence of the host rocks in an ideal roll front also show zoning, with montmorillonite at the top, clinoptilolite in the middle and analcite at the bottom of the sequence as evidence of progressive diagenetic zeolitization of the sandstones (de Voto, 1978). Furthermore, there may be several generations of roll-front type uranium mineralization in a sandstone sequence, provided that the geochemical regime prevails for each unit (de Voto, 1978).

The characteristic feature of the style of uranium mineralization in the sedimentary rocks of the Bootheel area is that mineralization is stratabound. The two possible sources of the uranium at Bootheel are the uraniferous Precambrian granites situated east of the Shirley Basin and the uraniferous Oligocene tuffs, which once covered the basins.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Figure 8-1 Cross Section and Plan View of Roll Front-Type Uranium Deposit

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Figure 8-2 Chemical Processes During the Formation of Roll Front-Type Uranium Deposit

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

9 Exploration

9.1 Exploration Methodology

The exploration methodology applied in the past and during recent exploration programs on the Bootheel Project has been to evaluate the interpreted targets for uranium mineralization by drilling. Mud rotary drilling together with radiometric gamma downhole logging has been the primary method to discover and delineate roll front-type uranium deposits in the Shirley Basin. This is supplemented with a small amount of selective core drilling, mostly to supply material for mineralogical studies and metallurgical test work.

The exploration targets are selected based on regional geological mapping and airborne radiometric surveys carried out by the United States Geological Survey (USGS). There is no record of ground radiometric or other geophysical surveys having been carried out on the Bootheel Project, or other areas hosting roll front-type uranium deposits.

Since acquiring the Bootheel Project, JET has recorded the locations of all past and recent drill holes using a hand-held Global Positioning System (GPS) and using the UTM NAD 27 Zone 13 map grid. A legal survey of the claim boundaries and drill hole locations, however, has not yet been carried out. The horizontal accuracy of the GPS-determined hole locations is estimated by JET to be within 5 ft. to 20 ft.

The procedures of marking the locations old and new drill holes are as follows:

·	Old (or legacy) drill holes: mark the locations using GPS and record the radioactivity using a scintillometer. If a monument does not exist, then the location is marked with a wooden picket sticking approximately 6 in. above the ground.

·	New drill holes: the location is marked with a wooden picket using GPS.

The purpose in using a short wooden picket is to minimize the effect on the environment and on wildlife

9.2 Compilation of Exploration Data

Prior to commencing its exploration of the Bootheel Project, JET embarked on a program of compiling all historical data by previous operators. These included a data package of:

·	Excel spreadsheets containing drill hole coordinates, collar elevations, grade-depth intervals and formation intervals.

·	ASCII files containing drill hole grade-depth intervals.

·	Scanned gamma, SP and resistivity e-logs and calculated grade analysis summary sheets.

·	Scanned geologic logs, most with oxidation details.

·	Scanned drill hole summary tables and individual drill hole reports.

·	Scanned drill hole survey tables and reports.

·	Scanned maps and cross sections.

·	Scanned reports and correspondence.

Data collected from JET’s 2008 and 2011 drill program was in the form of:

·	Gamma, SP and Resistivity e-logs.

·	LAS files containing e-log data.

·	Geological logs, with detailed data on extent of oxidation.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Data obtained from Cameco Resources in January 2009 consisted of:

·	Paper gamma logs.

·	Hard copy print outs of the counts per second

·	Lithological logs.

The focus of the data compilation work was to cross-check all available, relevant historical data and bringing it together into the Access Database. Data received in computer file format (ASCII files and Excel spreadsheets) was imported into Access. The remaining data were manually entered from scanned historic data sources: geologic logs, gamma logs, ore grade analysis sheets, drill hole summaries, individual drill hole reports, drill hole survey reports, maps and reports. Additional grade and formation data was entered by JET as taken from the historic gamma logs.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

10 Drilling

In 2008 BP LLC acquired the Bootheel Project and commenced a systematic program of drilling the postulated extensions of the uranium mineralized zones delineated by Kerr McGee, Cherokee, PRI and other past operators. BP LLC used similar truck-mounted mud rotary equipment drilling 4 ¾ in. to 5 ¾ in.-diameter holes using local Wyoming drilling contractors. Since 2008, BP LLC has completed 49,265 ft. of drilling in 88 RC holes (Figure 10-1). The mineralized portions of some of the holes were also cored, as shown in Figure 10-1.

For all the historic drilling campaigns, the drilling contractors were from the State of Wyoming. For the 2008 and 2011 drilling programs by BP LLC, the contractors were companies based in western USA, as follows:

·	2008 Drilling:

o	Eagle Drilling, Glendo, WY.

o	Sharpe Drilling, Cheyenne, WY.

o	Douglas Exploration, Douglas, WY.

o	Layne-Christiansen, Aurora, CO.

o	Diversified Drilling, Missoula, MT.

·	2011 Drilling:

o	Eagle Drilling, Glendo, WY.

o	Fay Drilling, Casper, WY.

o	Douglas Exploration, Douglas, WY.

o	Single Water Services, Glenrock, WY.

Table 10-1 shows the significant mineralized intersections in the 2011 drill holes.

TABLE 10-1 SIGNIFICANT INTERCEPTS 2011 DRILLING
Bootheel Project, LLC. – Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Hole ID	UTM Coordinates		Elevation (m)	Length (ft.)	Intersection (ft.)		Interval (ft.)	Grade (%eU3O8)	Host Formation
Hole ID	UTM Coordinates		Elevation (m)	Length (ft.)	From	To	Interval (ft.)	Grade (%eU3O8)	Host Formation
36-BH4003	491736 N	579292 E	2,318.8	515	484.0	487.5	5.5	0.025	Sundance
36-BH4010	489939 N	579957 E	2,316.6	625	509.0	511.5	2.5	0.052	Sundance
36-BH4008	489886 N	579608 E	2,325.9	660	539.0	542.0	3.0	0.039	Sundance
36-BH4027	491697 N	582390 E	2,326.9	560	518.5	525.5	7.0	0.027	Sundance
36-BH4020	490992 N	580993 E	2,314.4	570	492.0	505.0	13.0	0.039	Sundance
36-BH4020	490992 N	580993 E	2,314.4	570	508.5	520.5	12.0	0.035	Sundance
36-BH4014A	490387 N	580209 E	2,317.7	600	498.5	503.0	4.5	0.031	Sundance
36-BH4014A	490387 N	580209 E	2,317.7	600	517.5	535.5	18.0	0.028	Sundance

Source: BP LLC, 2011.

All holes are vertical. Thickness of the intersection approximates true thickness.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Figure 10-1 Diamond Drill Core From Jurassic Sundance Formation

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Figure 10-2 Drill Holes & Mineralization

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Figure 10-3 2011 Drill Hole Location Map

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

10.1 Lithologic Logging

BP LLC employed four contract geologists to conduct sampling and logging the holes. A continuous stream of drill chips was sampled at five-foot intervals, as the drill advanced (Figure 10-4). The procedures of drill hole logging and sampling are developed by Dr. Tom Bell, who was a consultant of JET at the time, and are as follows:

·	Capturing the stream of chips and drilling fluids from a metal trough between the borehole and mud pit.

·	Arranging each sample in the order that it was recovered, in a series of lines that enabled the driller and geologist to easily identify the depth location of the sample in the hole.

·	Taking a sub-sample and washing away the drill mud in preparation for geological analysis.

·	Washing the sub-sample and examining the chips with a hand lens, and recording the observations on a Trimble Recon directly to a database system, including:

o	Radiometric response in total gamma (in cps) using a hand-held scintillometer.

o	Estimating the redox content (100% oxidized to 100% reduced).

o	Degree of induration (presence and strength of interstitial cement).

o	Grain size.

o	Lithology (sedimentary rock type).

o	Stratigraphic unit.

o	Pyrite content (estimated volumetric percentage).

o	Carbonaceous material (estimated volumetric percentage).

o	Clay content (estimated volumetric percentage).

o	Carbonate test with hydrochloric acid (HCl; a semi quantitative method recording “no reaction”, “weak reaction”, or “strong reaction”).

o	Degree of feldspar alteration, such as “feldspar absent”, “fresh feldspar”, or “altered feldspar”

o	Degree of sorting of sampled material.

o	Colour of sample, using Munsell rock colour chart and recorded as RGB code.

o	Additional notes by the geologist.

·	Collecting approximately 50 g of drill chips and placing it in a plastic bag labeled with the drill hole number and the sampled interval.

·	Arranging the sample bags in depth order and transferring them in a secure storage area in Laramie, Wyoming.

·	Marking preliminary borehole locations in the field with standard GPS measurements.

Recording final coordinates of borehole collars by surveying with a Trimble ProXH GPS receiver and post processing the data using Trimble Pathfinder Office software. This proved an accuracy of less than a foot for the X and Y coordinates, and an accuracy of slightly over a foot in the elevation (Z coordinate) of the collars. For post processing, BP LLC used the CORS Wheatland, CORS Casper, and UVACO Laramie base stations, each of which lies within 100 miles of the Bootheel site.

BP LLC has generated a database of boreholes including information on collar coordinates, all borehole activities and tests marked by a timestamp. Each borehole has a dedicated database spreadsheet containing all observations by the drill site geologist for each interval, also marked by a timestamp (Bell, 2011).

The Authors are of the opinion that procedures for drill chip logging and recording other data by BP LLC are in keeping with industry standards.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Figure 10-4 Sampling of rotary chips at Bootheel

10.2 Downhole Surveys

BP LLC contracted Mr. Richard Heck, Geophysical Technician, with Century Wireline Services (Century) of Tulsa, Oklahoma, to carry out downhole surveys of all the holes completed during the 2011 drilling program. This work was done by using an S-300 probe containing gamma scintillometer, and tools for single point resistance, spontaneous potential, and borehole deviation. Logging speed was approximately 30 ft./sec from the bottom of the hole to the collar. Century calibrated the gamma scintillometer at the U.S. Department of Energy calibration pits in Casper, Wyoming, in the month of September, immediately prior to arriving at the Bootheel site as well as in late October, immediately after the completion of the program. The purpose of the calibrations is to establish the tool K-factor and dead time in order to convert the gamma counts to equivalent uranium grade (% eU3O8). Century reported that:

·	Instrument drift during the drilling program was negligible.

·	Corrections for mud weight, borehole diameter, and water factor were made to the raw gamma counts prior to prior to the calculation of % eU3O8, based on the K-factor and dead time of the instrument.

Century submitted the final results of the downhole probe surveys to BP LLC in the form of LAS ver. 2.0 text files and graphic logs showing the downhole record of radiometric response (cps), %eU3O8, single point resistance (ohms), and spontaneous potential (millivolts). In addition, the borehole deviation is shown as a radial graph (Bell, 2011).

THE AUTHORS UNDERSTAND THAT THE INSTRUMENTATION FOR DOWNHOLE LOGGING IS IN KEEPING WITH INDUSTRY STANDARDS.

An example of downhole survey results by Century for hole 36-BH4020 is shown in Figure 10-5.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Figure 10-5 Downhole Survey Results, Hole 36-BH4020

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

11 Sample Preparation, Analysis, and Security

11.1 Sampling

11.1.1 Past Work

During the past exploration programs drill holes were logged by Kerr McGee, Cherokee, and PRI geologists. Lithologic and other logs, however, are not available at the present time. The Authors are of the opinion that sampling methods used by past operators were reliable and in accordance with industry standards of the time since the work was done by major companies involved with uranium exploration.

11.1.2 Recent work

Since acquiring the Bootheel Project in 2008, BP LLC has been carrying out a systematic program of drilling and utilizes a rigorous program of logging and sampling, as described below.

Downhole gamma logging provides equivalent uranium values, usually referred to as equivalent U3O8 (eU3O8). Geophysical logging is considered standard industry practice and the geophysical probes are calibrated using test pits established by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in Casper, Wyoming, as discussed in Item 10, Drilling.

11.2 Sample Preparation

11.2.1 Past Work

Information on sample preparation, analysis and security of assay data on exploration by Kerr McGee, Cherokee, and PRI is no longer available. The Authors are of the opinion, however, that the procedures of sample collection, analysis and security of exploration data from drilling on the Bootheel Project by past operators were reliable, and in accordance with industry standards of the time, since the work was done by major companies involved with uranium exploration.

During the 1978-1979 exploration program Groth sent a suite of samples on behalf of Uradco to Hazen Research Inc. (Hazen) for uranium analyses by the fluorimetric method as well as to the Chemical & Geological Laboratory of Casper, Wyoming. Methodology used at the latter laboratory, however, is unknown.

Security of samples during the historical programs is assumed to be consistent with standard industry practice at the time (Crosshair, 2009).

11.2.2 2008 Drilling Program

Procedures for sample collection, analysis and security of samples during the 2008 drilling program were as follows:

·	Lithologic logging of diamond drill core in the field.

·	Transporting the logged drill core during the same day to a locked storage area in Laramie where it was sampled with each individual sample stored in a sealed plastic bag.

·	Transporting the samples by truck to Hazen in Denver, CO for crushing and metallurgical test work. The laboratory is certified by various State agencies and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and has been carrying out analyses and metallurgical research for over 40 years.

·	At Hazen, the core was crushed to one inch and composited with ¼ of the sample crushed to -10 mesh. Samples were pulverized and analyzed using X-Ray Fluorescence

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

(XRF) methods. Pulps were also sent to ALS Chemex Laboratories (Chemex) in Elko, NV, for Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) analysis to compare with the other results as part of a QA/QC program. One half of the core was retained at Hazen.

Downhole logging of the holes: The geophysical probing was carried out by Century Wireline Services (Century), an independent contractor, of Tulsa, Oklahoma. The probes included gamma log, resistivity, self-potential, and hole deviation. Geophysical logging is considered standard industry practice and the geophysical probes are calibrated before and after the program using test pits established by the US Department of Energy (DOE) in Casper, Wyoming. JET was provided with the calibration data and confirmed that no significant change had occurred during the program.

11.2.3 2011 Drilling Program

Discussion on sample preparation during the 2011 drilling program is provided as part of lithologic logging in Item 10, Drilling.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

12 Data Verification

12.1 Past Work

Information on data verification of exploration data by Kerr McGee, Cherokee, and PRI is no longer available. The Authors are of the opinion that exploration data from drilling on the Bootheel Project by past operators were reliable, and in accordance with industry standards of the time, since the work was done by major companies involved with uranium exploration.

12.2 Radioactive Equilibrium

Heavy, long-lived radioactive elements, such as U238 decay naturally, producing a series of daughter products, and end up as a stable element, such as lead (Pb206). Since the members of the decay series are different chemical elements, they may be selectively separated from the original element (parent isotope) by geochemical processes. Radioactive equilibrium is attained when all the daughter products disintegrate at the same rate as they are produced by the parent isotopes and all nuclides remain together. In nature, however, this almost never occurs, as explained below.

Since long-lived nuclides disintegrate at a slower rate than short-lived ones, it is necessary to have more of the slower disintegrating daughters in order to have equilibrium. An ideal state of equilibrium, however, is never attained because the parent isotopes are subject to decay without replacement. But if the decay constant of the parent is small (the half-life is large) a state of relative or “secular” equilibrium may be attained. Since most detection methods do not measure the parent material, the amount (or quantity) of the parent material is inferred by measuring the radiation from the daughter products. It is important to determine the state of “secular” equilibrium when one estimates the amount of uranium from gamma ray logs. The main sources of the gamma energy from the U238 decay series are the daughter products Pb214 and Bi214.

Radioactive disequilibrium happens if one or more of the daughter products, or the parent isotope, is completely or partially absent. The various disequilibrium states may be caused by the following:

Radon; the gaseous member of the uranium series, is easily separated from the rest of the elements in the decay series. Since some of the elements which emit radioactivity are produced after the occurrence of radon, a disequilibrium results which will negatively bias the inferred quantity of the parent U238.

·	Recent deposition of parent material either by initial deposition or by remobilization, i.e. little or no daughter products. This will also cause an underestimation of the quantity of the parent material.

·	Estimation of parent material based on measurements on remobilized daughter products, with little or no parent material present. This will result in an overestimation of the parent material.

It is important to note that sometimes disequilibrium may be masked by higher emissions of gamma rays from the daughter products of the Thorium series, especially Th208 (Plouffe et al., 1983)

When there is disequilibrium in the uranium series, and when the absent nuclides are short-lived, approximately 350,000 years are required for the uranium series to regain equilibrium. Normally, if the series is disturbed at the beginning of the chain, then it can take up to 2.5 million years to regain equilibrium. To calculate the time required to regain equilibrium, one considers the longest half-life of the daughters which have been mobilized and multiply it by 10. For example, if radon

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

is lost, the time to regain equilibrium is 3.8 days x 10 or approximately one month. For the long lived U234, with a half-life of 2.5 x 105, the time to regain equilibrium is 2.5 x 105 x 10, or 2.5 million years Schmelling 2007).

12.3 Recent work

The Authors note that data used in the verification process discussed below includes information from adjoining ground which is no longer part of the Project (sections 1, 7 of the original property). However, since the drilling on the current property amounts to only 88 holes, the Authors are of the opinion that it is statistically more accurate to use the entire data package for comparison and for the verification process.

12.3.1 Sundance Formation

As part of its verification of recent exploration data on the Bootheel Project in 2008, JET, on behalf of BP LLC, designed a program of verifying historical data. This included drilling 12 RC holes in sections 1, 6, 7, and 36, with the objective of testing areas of mineralization within the Sundance Formation. The 12 holes were surveyed with downhole probe recording geophysical (gamma log as well as electrical data) by an independent contractor. In addition, JET cored the mineralized intervals of these holes to obtain reliable samples for the determination of uranium at two laboratories; chemical assays at ALS Chemex Laboratories (Chemex) by the ICP method, and by X-Ray Diffraction (XRF) method at the Hazen Research laboratories. Results of this program indicate that:

·	The eU3O8 values calculated from the downhole probe responses compare well with chemical assays as well as values determined by the two methods, with some variations in the eU3O8 grade values, as shown in Table 12-1 and Figure 12-1.

The 24 XRF analyses by Hazen are on average 15% higher than both the Chemex assays and the eU3O8 grades determined from gamma logs. The reason for this discrepancy may be that the XRF method is a semi-quantitative method of analysis and not as accurate as ICP at low concentrations of uranium (Crosshair, 2009).

JET also carried out a limited statistical analysis on the 36 samples from the Sundance Formation comparing chemical assays by Chemex with the geophysical downhole probe results, and notes that the average values are similar; 0.044% U3O8 for chemical assays and 0.048% eU3O8 for geophysical probe results. The relative difference of -8.6% is not considered significant (Crosshair, 2009).

In addition to the 36 samples from the 2008 drilling program, there are comparable data on 520 samples from the historical drilling, comparing chemical analysis with the eU3O8 grades determined from gamma logs for mineralized intervals in both the Sundance Formation and the Wind River Formation (Crosshair, 2009, BH file 195, 255). These data include 348 samples from five holes that penetrated the Sundance Formation, and show an average value of 0.043% U3O8 for chemical assays versus an average value of 0.034% eU3O8 determined from the downhole probe results, a relative difference of +22% (Figure 12-2).

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Table 12-1 Downhole Radiometric Probe vs. Chemical Assays, 2008 Program
Bootheel Project, LLC. – Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

JET 2008 DDH	Intersection (ft.)		Interval (ft.)	% U3O8 (Chemex ICP)	% eU3O8 (probe)	% U3O8 (Hazen XRF)
JET 2008 DDH	From	To	Interval (ft.)	% U3O8 (Chemex ICP)	% eU3O8 (probe)	% U3O8 (Hazen XRF)
36-BH3000	538.0	544.0	6.0	0.025	0.021	0.027
	544.0	550.0	6.0	0.051	0.023	0.059
36-BH3001	416.5	421.5	5.0	0.044	0.042	0.052
	421.5	426.5	5.0	0.018	0.029	0.019
36-BH3007	240.5	245.5	5.0	0.007	0.027	0.007
	245.5	250.5	5.0	0.039	0.046	0.047
	250.5	255.5	5.0	0.045	0.031	0.050
	255.5	260.5	5.0	0.045	0.056	0.054
	260.5	265.5	5.0	0.021	0.036	0.024
06-BH3008	246.5	251.5	5.0	0.025	0.028	0.030
	251.5	256.5	5.0	0.052	0.034	0.061
	256.5	261.5	5.0	0.048	0.049	0.059
	261.5	266.5	5.0	0.118	0.087	0.130
	266.5	271.5	5.0	0.091	0.080	0.114
	271.5	276.5	5.0	0.099	0.123	0.119
	276.5	281.5	5.0	0.033	0.041	0.040
	281.5	286.5	5.0	0.039	0.032	0.046
	286.5	291.5	5.0	0.073	0.045	0.081
	291.5	294.5	3.0	0.024	0.047	0.025
06-BH3009	290.0	295.0	5.0	0.033	0.044	0.040
	318.5	323.5	5.0	0.075	0.062	0.090
	323.5	328.5	5.0	0.058	0.070	0.071
	328.5	333.5	5.0	0.050	0.060	0.063
	333.5	338.5	5.0	0.010	0.037	0.012
Subtotal Average				0.047	0.048	0.055
07-BH3010	249.0	254.0	5.0	0.054	0.072
	254.0	259.0	5.0	0.071	0.056
	259.0	264.0	5.0	0.046	0.070
07-BH3011	340.0	344.0	4.0	0.015	0.034
	344.0	.48.5	4.5	0.002	0.027
	352.0	356.0	4.0	0.046	0.039
	356.0	360.0	4.0	0.074	0.065
	360.0	364.0	4.0	0.065	0.072
	364.0	368.5	4.5	0.023	0.052
01-BH3003	422.5	426.5	4.0	0.026	0.029	0.026
	426.5	430.5	4.0	0.012	0.017	0.021
01-BH3005	466.0	471.0	5.0	0.017	0.031
Total Average				0.044	0.048

Source: Crosshair, 2009.

Intervals approximate true thickness.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Figure 12-1 Crosshair 2008 Chemical Assays vs. Gamma Log Probe Values

Source: Crosshair, 2009.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Figure 12-2 Historical Chemical Assays vs. Gamma Log Probe Values

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

12.3.2 Wind River Formation

JET also collected samples of drill core from holes along sections 1, 6, 31, 32, and 12. Sections 1 and 31 are no longer part of the Bootheel property. In total, 172 samples collected from five holes penetrating the Wind River Formation indicate an average of 0.026% U3O8 in chemical assays versus an average value of 0.021% eU3O8 from downhole probe results, a difference of +21.9% (Figure 12-3).

JET notes that there is a minor difference between the 2008 data and the historical data. In general, the uranium grades calculated from downhole probe results are higher than the chemical assays at lower concentrations of uranium (less than 0.02% U3O8 to 0.03% U3O8), with greater difference in low grade material. The difference is approximately the same for grades in the range from 0.03% U3O8 and 0.05% U3O8, whereas the difference is smaller for grades in the order of 0.05% U3O8 or at higher concentrations of uranium. In general, the lower grades occur in the tails of the roll front deposit, whereas the high grades occur within the nose of the roll front. Additional samples are required to further examine the variance in the chemical/probe results between the historical and recent data (Crosshair, 2009).

JET also notes that “this disequilibrium effect is not unexpected since sandstone uranium deposits are contained within actively flowing groundwater systems. The gamma probe indirectly measures the uranium content by measuring the gamma radiation of its daughter product, i.e., Bi214. This element may be displaced from the original uranium or not yet completely formed in equilibrium. This causes disequilibrium between uranium content as measured by the probe and as measured by chemical assay. Negative disequilibrium results if the uranium has been preferentially leached from the sandstone and positive disequilibrium results if the uranium is less than a million years old and the chemical grade is greater than the gamma equivalent grade. Based on the historical comparisons which indicate positive equilibrium, the grade as measured by the eU3O8 on the Bootheel project may be considered conservative. Scott Wilson RPA is of the opinion that the eU3O8 values are appropriate for use in the resource estimate” (Crosshair, 2009).

12.3.3 Verification of Historical Data

Prior to commencing the exploration programs, JET carried out compilation of historical data from several sources. This included data on historical holes from computer printouts, which were used by NAC in its 1982 resource estimate. JET had the old hard copy data converted into the digital format by a data entry contractor in Denver, CO. Data also received from Cameco, both in digital and analog form, were added to the database. Original gamma logs are available for most of the holes and they were compared to the data entry sheets. Data verification by JET included the following:

·	Computer files of historic data were checked for record duplication and data discrepancies prior to importing into Access format. A significant number of duplicates in data entry were removed, while the negligible number of data discrepancies (typographical errors) had obvious resolutions.

All potentially resource-grade intercepts reported in all available grade data sources were compared against each other. The only significant issue was the omission from secondary grade sources of many e-log gamma spikes. For all such occurrences, JET measured grades and intervals from the detailed e-logs, adding them to the database.

·	Spikes in gamma-ray responses from 20 historic e-logs were recalculated by JET for comparison against historic reported grades. No significant differences were noted.

·	The majority of the depths of the historical formation contacts were compared against the available e-logs. Due to interpretative inconsistencies by different historical operators, all formational contacts were verified using new interpretations on the e-logs to conform to a

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

consistent formation profile definitions. JET also compiled additional e-log formation contact data.

·	Historic data on lithologic units and intensity of oxidation could not be checked due to the non-preservation of original drill cuttings, and were accepted as presented.

·	Approximately 25% of JET’s manual data entry records were randomly cross-checked, showing very high levels of data entry accuracy (well above 99% accuracy).

·	Preparing a set of cross sections covering the entire resource area allowed for easy identification of any remaining data entry errors (elevation, formation picks).

·	Removing approximately 100 drill holes (the 800 series) from the database as no drill hole data (other than collar coordinates) or surface evidence was found.

·	Checking all drill hole collar elevations on a topographic contour map (1:24,000, with 10 ft. contour interval) and correcting them where required.

12.3.4 Independent Sampling

During a site visit in July 2008, Scott Wilson RPA collected three samples of split core from a diamond drill hole for analyses at Energy Laboratories Inc. (Energy Labs) in Casper, WY, and The Mineral Lab Inc. (Mineral Lab) in Denver, CO, and compared them against values obtained from ALS Chemex Laboratories (Chemex) and uranium grades calculated from downhole gamma log probe results. The Mineral Lab carried out the analyses for 31 elements and oxides using XRF method, whereas Energy Labs and Chemex used the ICP method for determining the uranium content. In general, the gamma log eU3O8 assays calculated from downhole probe data are higher for results with values less than 0.070 %U3O8 and lower for results greater than 0.070 %U3O8. The drill hole sampled in 2008 is no longer on the Bootheel Project.

The Authors of this Technical Report did not take independent samples as previous work has well documented the presence of uranium mineralization on the Bootheel property. The Authors also note that BP LLC has generated a database of boreholes including information on collar coordinates, all borehole activities and tests marked by a timestamp. Each borehole has a dedicated database spreadsheet containing all observations by the drill site geologist for each interval, also marked by a timestamp.

The Authors are of the opinion that the Bootheel check assay results are reliable and confirm the regular eU3O8 results calculated from the downhole probe surveys. The authors believe that the sample preparation, security procedures and sample analysis are consistent with current industry standards and the data are suitable for use in a resource estimate.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

13 Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing

13.1 Past Work

In 1979, Hazen carried out metallurgical testwork on two composite samples on behalf of Uradco. Two composites of the Sundance Formation assayed 0.069 %U3O8 and 0.049 %U3O8. Eight agitated leach tests were completed; four using sulphuric acid as lixiviant (98% recovery after five days), two using sodium bicarbonate, and two using ammonium bicarbonate (96.4% recovery after five days).

The early work included two column tests using the same lixiviants. The acid leach indicated 97.5% recovery after 25 pore volumes while the sodium bicarbonate leach indicated 87.6% recovery. In the industry, some companies use this term (pore volume) as the product of the percentage of porosity and the volume of the column of rock.

In 1994, Cameco carried out an agitated leach test using a bicarbonate lixiviant which indicated 107.8% recovery from a sample grading of 0.052 %U3O8. A column test using the same lixiviant indicated 85.6% extraction in 10 pore volumes and a total recovery of 98.4% after 49.1 pore volumes (Crosshair, 2009). A pore volume is defined as % porosity multiplied by the column volume.

13.2 JET Work

In 2008, JET carried out three bottle roll leach tests at Hazen using sodium bicarbonate as a lixiviant. The results are reported as follows:

The first two tests showed initial recoveries of uranium in the order of 70% to 80% within a day, but then the recoveries regressed to 30% to 40% after seven days. A mineralogical study indicated that uranium may have precipitated as calcium uranium oxide or silicate as a result of exchange of calcium with sodium in uranium bearing solutions and clay.

·	Leach tests on a third sample under similar conditions as the initial two samples, and for a period of seven days, indicated a similar extraction of 30% to 40% of the contained uranium. JET interpreted this level of extraction to be due to a greater wash volume applied to the tails.

·	Follow up leach tests on the tails for an additional 24 hours with fresh lixiviant resulted in a total extraction of 80% of the contained uranium.

·	The initial two samples were then tested with new material but half of the lixiviant was filtered and replenished every 24 hours for five days. Both samples indicated uranium extractions of greater than 90% after five days based on the calculated head grade.

JET noted that under typical ISR conditions, the pregnant fluid would be stripped of uranium prior to being re-injected. JET also noted that the “oxygen levels within the bottles during the tests was measured as 20 ppm to 30 ppm with residual dissolved oxygen measurements barely above ambient conditions of 7 ppm to 8 ppm, whereas targeting a level of 300 ppm is considered more realistic in a leach simulation. There appears to be room for improvement in the testing procedures and the results may be improved upon” (Crosshair, 2009).

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

14 Mineral Resources

The Mineral Resources of the Bootheel Project are summarized in Table 14-1. JET has estimated these resources using the contour method or the polygonal method. Wallis has accepted these resources by reviewing the drill hole density, geological information, and the parameters and methodology of the JET estimate, and considers them to be in accordance with CIM Standards.

TABLE 14-1 MINERAL RESOURCES OF THE BOOTHEEL PROJECT AS OF JULY 8, 2013
Bootheel Project, LLC. – Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Resource Category	Formation	Short Tons	Grade (%eU3O8)	Contained Pounds U3O8
Indicated	Sundance	1,570,000	0.036	1,120,000
Inferred	Sundance	1,007,00	0.031	624,000
Inferred	Wind River	308,000	0.070	426,000
Inferred	Total Inferred	1,315,000	0.040	1,050,000

Notes:

1.	CIM definitions were followed for Mineral Resources.

2.	Mineral Resources of the Sundance Formation are estimated at a cut-off grade of 0.015% eU3O8 over a minimum thickness of 4 ft., and a minimum grade x thickness (GT) product of 0.15 ft.-%.

3.	Mineral Resources of the Wind River Formation are estimated at cut-off grade of 0.02% eU3O8 over a minimum thickness of 4 ft., and a minimum grade x thickness (GT) product of 0.15 ft.-%.

4.	Mineral Resources are estimated using an average long-term uranium price of US$70 per pound U3O8.

5.	A tonnage factor of 16 ft3/ton was used for the Sundance Formation, and 15 ft3/ton was used for the Wind River Formation.

6.	High grades have not been cut for the Mineral Resource estimate.

7.	Tonnage, average grades and contained uranium numbers are rounded.

14.1 Database

The database used for the Mineral Resource estimate of the Bootheel Project comprises results from 781 rotary holes, of which 291 holes penetrated mineralized layers of the Tertiary Wind River Formation and 195 holes penetrated mineralized layers of the Jurassic Sundance Formation. The mineral resource estimate is based on a model using exclusively drill hole assay data, i.e., eU3O8 values calculated from downhole radiometric probe data. The method is standard and certified for uranium fields of the region. The estimate was carried out by JET.

The Bootheel deposit has been modelled by taking into consideration similar structural and tectonic characteristics, lithological and facies types and hydrogeological and geotechnical features. The resource has been estimated considering the following criteria:

·	Uniform structural and morphological features.

·	Delineation of areas of mineralization into horizons and parts of the roll front.

·	Proximity of lithological filtration properties of mineralized rocks included in the block.

Modelling of the deposit is influenced by the drill hole density. In general, one quarter of the drill hole distance is used to extrapolate at the flanks of the mineralized bodies and one half of the drill hole distance is used to differentiate between mineralized and unmineralized drill holes in the interpretative process. Drill hole intervals identified for the resource estimate are, as follows:

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

·	Sundance Formation: 212 intervals in 172 holes with intervals greater than 0.015% eU3O8 values.

·	Wind River Formation: 76 intervals in 61 holes with greater than 0.020% eU3O8 values.

14.2 Geological Interpretation

Uranium mineralization at Bootheel occurs as distinct mineralized layers within Jurassic and Tertiary sandstones, ranging from less than a metre to more than 6 m in thickness, which in places, in aggregate, such as close to or within the nose of a roll front, form thicker zones of mineralization. These northwest trending sinuous subhorizontal layers exhibit varied intensity of oxidation. Moderate hematitic alteration imparts a distinctive light grey colouration to the reduced side of the host sandstones, and orange to yellow colouration to the host rocks on the oxidized side of the roll front. In general, the orientation of the mineralized layers is subhorizontal and conformable to the host lithology. The general outlines of the mineralized zones within the Jurassic Sundance Formation and the Tertiary Wind River Formation are shown in Figures 14-1 and 14-2.

JET outlined the mineralized layers based on lithology, and assay levels, with a threshold of approximately 0.015% eU3O8 for the Sundance Formation and approximately 0.020% eU3O8 for the Wind River Formation over and a minimum mineralized thickness of 4 ft. Drill hole geological data were plotted on cross sections at intervals of 100 ft. and 200 ft. and oriented orthogonal to the average strike of the uranium layers. Lithologic units and mineralized intersections were correlated along a continuous mineralized zone.

14.2.1 Compositing and Statistics

JET compiled the 0.5 ft. radiometric assays (eU3O8 values) into composites for each drill hole and plotted on cross sections along with stratigraphic unit designations, percent oxidation, and the 0.5 ft. assays. A representative set of cross sections and plans are shown in Figures 14-3 to 14-11.

14.2.2 Cutting of High Values

Since there are very few high values in the assay database, JET did not consider it necessary to cut any values.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Figure 14-1 Jurassic Sundance Resource

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Figure 14-2 Tertiary Wind River Resource

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Figure 14-3 Bootheel Uranium Project, Cross Section A-A’

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Figure 14-4 Bootheel Uranium Project, Cross Section B-B'

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Figure 14-5 Bootheel Uranium Project, Cross Section C-C'

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Figure 14-6 Bootheel Uranium Project, Cross Section D-D’

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Figure 14-7 Bootheel Uranium Project Section E-E’

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

14.3 Cut-off Grade

JET has considered separate cut-off grades for the Sundance Formation and Wind River Formation. For both cases, however, the cut-off grade is based on an estimated production cost of US$20 per pound of U3O8 and a long term uranium price of US$70 per pound of U3O8. Although the current spot price of uranium is in the order of US$39 and the current long term price of uranium is US$49, analysts have been forecasting a US$70 long term price by 2018.

For the Sundance Formation, a cut-off grade of 0.015% eU3O8 over a minimum thickness of 4 ft. and a minimum grade x thickness (GT) value of 0.15 ft.-% was used to estimate the tonnes and average grade of the deposit.

For the Wind River Formation, a cut-off grade of 0.020% eU3O8 over a minimum thickness of 4 ft. and a minimum grade x thickness (GT) value of 0.15 ft.-% were used to estimate the tonnes and average grade of the deposit. This higher cut-off grade was used to allow for the possibility of lower recoveries and additional cost of increased drill hole density required for potential development of ISR well fields.

14.4 Density Measurements

JET has not carried out density measurements on material recovered during the 2008 or 2011 drilling. Based on historical data, an average tonnage factor of 16 ft3/ton for the Sundance Formation, and a tonnage factor of 15 ft3/ton for the Wind River Formation were used.

14.5 Methodology of Resource Estimation

JET used two methods to estimate the Mineral Resources of the Bootheel deposit; the contour method for the Sundance Formation and the polygonal method for the Wind River Formation.

14.5.1 Sundance Formation

JET estimated the Mineral Resources within the Sundance Formation deposit using the Contour Method, which is well suited for estimating tonnage and average grade of mineralized bodies with planar geometry, where two dimensions of the mineralized body are much greater than the third dimension (Agnerian and Roscoe, 2001). For each of the mineralized zones and subzones, drill hole intercept composite values of grade, thickness, and GT were plotted on plans and contoured. For GT values geometric (logarithmic) contour intervals were used, because of the positively skewed statistical distribution of these values. The thickness values were contoured in a linear progression. Contouring was done with computer software, but subsequently modified by hand to correspond better with the geological interpretation, trends, and the geometry of the roll front noses and limbs. To obtain the volume of the mineralized zone, areas between each contour were multiplied by the average T value for each contour interval and summed. Tonnage was estimated by applying the tonnage factor of 16 ft3/ton to the total volume. Average grade was estimated by dividing the total tonnage x grade (ΣG x tons) by the tonnage.

JET notes that in most drill holes, there was only one composite for each of the mineralized zones. In rare cases where there was more than one composite, they were added together for contouring purposes.

JET established the 0.015% eU3O8 grade contour as an outer boundary for mineralization to be considered as resource. JET then contoured the GT and T values within this boundary, and prepared separate contour plans for roll front noses and limbs. Only the GT and T areas within the 0.015% eU3O8 grade boundary were used to estimate tonnage and average grade. Isolated areas over 0.015% eU3O8 defined by a single hole were removed (Figures 14-8 to 14-11)

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Figure 14-8 Bootheel Uranium Project Body 36, Zone D Thickness Contour Map

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Figure 14-9 Bootheel Uranium Project, Body 36, Zone D, GT Contours

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Figure 14-10 Body 6 Thickness Contours

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Figure 14-11 Body 6 GT Contours

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

14.5.2 Wind River Formation

JET estimated the Mineral Resources within the Wind River Formation using the polygonal block method. Drill holes with composites higher than the cut-off grade of 0.02% eU3O8 over a minimum thickness of 4 ft. and minimum GT value of 0.15 ft.-% eU3O8 were designated on horizontal plans. Polygons were drawn around these drill holes with a maximum extent of 200 ft. from a drill hole. The distribution of the drill holes shows that, in general, these polygons are clustered and outline several mineralized areas (Figure 14-2).

Areas of the polygons were measured using MapInfo GIS software and multiplied by the composite thickness to obtain the volume for each polygon. Tonnage was estimated by applying the tonnage factor of 15 ft3/ton to the total volume. Average grade was estimated by dividing the total tonnage x grade (ΣG x tons) by the tonnage.

Wallis inspected some of the drill hole files and found them to be in keeping with industry standards. With few exceptions, the data are free of any entry errors. Wallis interprets that the mineralized intersections of the selected area for this audit define a continuous zones of mineralization.

14.6 Classification of Mineral Resources

JET has classified the Mineral Resources of the Bootheel uranium deposit as described below and shown in Table 14-1. The bulk of the resources are contained within the Sundance Formation.

14.6.1 Indicated Mineral Resources

Indicated Mineral Resources include all mineralized areas within the Sundance Formation that are defined by drill holes 50 m. apart or less, along drill sections spaced 50 m to 100 m. Indicated Mineral Resources total approximately 1.57 million tons at an average grade of 0.036% U3O8, containing approximately 1.12 million lbs U3O8.

14.6.2 Inferred Mineral Resources

Inferred Mineral Resources include all mineralized areas that are defined by drill holes spaced 100 m or farther apart or isolated areas. JET estimates the Inferred Mineral Resources of approximately 1.32 million tons at an average grade of 0.040% U3O8. These include Inferred Mineral Resources of the Sundance Formation to be in the order of 1.0 million tons at an average grade of 0.031% U3O8, containing approximately 624,000 lbs U3O8, and Inferred Mineral Resources of the Wind River Formation of approximately 308,000 tons at an average grade of 0.070% U3O8, containing approximately 1.05 million lbs U3O8.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

15 Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social Impact

Discussion in this Item is mainly taken from Crosshair, 2009.

15.1 Health and Safety

The Authors understand that all staff and contractors wore dosimeters at all times while on the project. There was no significant exposure to radioactivity detected by the dosimeters.

15.2 Environmental Considerations

In 2008, BP LLC contracted AATA International Inc., which initiated a surface and groundwater sampling program. Two small reservoirs and two wells were sampled in June, 2008 and July 2011 (Figure 20-1). Water quality at each site has remained relatively stable over the duration of the program with minor seasonal variation due to changes in evaporation rate, precipitation, and temperature. Surface water samples show the highest degree of variation (Crosshair, 2011). The following is information obtained from JET.

“Storm water samplers were installed during the winter of 2011 in ephemeral stream courses receiving surge run-off water entering and leaving the BP LLC Project. Samples taken in May of 2011 were of insufficient quantity to analyze for radionuclides. A sample taken in July of 2011 was found to have radionuclide concentrations below the maximum contaminant level ((MCL) 15.0 µCi/L)).

Both sampled wells are 120 ft. deep, drawing from the Wind River Formation, host to the upper most unconfined aquifer in the area. Well SSW is used as a stock well. Well CW1 is normally used as a stock well except when the drilling camp is occupied. The reservoirs are used for watering livestock. The reservoirs are fed by snow melt, surface runoff, and seasonal groundwater discharge.

The 2008 and 2011 ground water results were very similar and exhibited similar trends (e.g., CW1, generally, had lower ionic concentrations than SSW in both 2008 and 2011). Furthermore, observed exceedance of water quality standards were consistent for both samples between the two sampling events with the exception of the Gross Alpha Standard (15 pCi/L), which was exceeded in the 2011 sample (17.4 pCi/L) but not in the 2008 sample (14.9 pCi/L).

Surface water results were less consistent than ground water results between the two sampling events; however, in general the same trends were exhibited between the two samples (e.g. SP32, generally, had higher ionic concentrations than SP1 in both 2008 and 2011). All water quality standard exceedances were consistent in 2008 and 2011 in the SP1 samples. Differences in water quality standard exceedances between the two sampling events were observed in pH, turbidity, aluminum, iron, and gross alpha in samples from SP32. The pH measured during the 2011 sampling in SP32 (10.62-10.7) was substantially higher than that measured in 2008 (8.25-8.29), and outside of the 6.5-8.5 range prescribed for livestock use. Turbidity was approximately 30 times lower in the 2011 sampling (2-2.8 mg/L) than in the 2008 sample (68.1-76.5 mg/L). Dissolved aluminum and iron concentrations were both approximately 10 times lower in the 2011 sampling (both below the detection limits) than in the 2008 sample (0.9 and 0.94 mg/L, respectively); the 2008 sample exceeded WDEQ water quality standards. The concentration of gross alpha in SP32 observed in 2011 (12.8 pCi/L) was close to, but did not exceed the water quality standard of 15 pCi/L and was less than half of that observed in 2008 (30.8 pCi/L).

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Monitoring wells were installed in Section 36 and Section 7 in November of 2011. Water quality samples were taken from the basal Canyon Springs aquifer and analysed as required for surface discharge of two aquifer tests. Both wells exceeded the EPA MCL for drinking water. Gross alpha (TW-36-01 – 193 pCi/L and TW-07-01 – 92.5 pCi/L), gross beta (TW-36-01 – 57.2 pCi/L and TW-07-01 – 29.9 pCi/L), total radium (TW-36-01 – 35.5 pCi/L), and uranium (TW-36-01 – 75.9 µg/L and TW-07-01 – 43.4 µg/L), exceed the MCL for radionuclides (Crosshair, 2011).

There were no excessive delays in obtaining the drilling permits from the WDEQ and the BLM. No archaeological surveys were required although a Level III will be required for the mine permitting process. There is no direct evidence of any Threatened or Endangered Species on the property. The BP LLC raptor and sage grouse surveys have not identified the potential for project interruptions from nesting raptors. The regulatory environment surrounding sage grouse remain a project concern though the no work interruptions have been experienced to date.

All the drill holes were reclaimed according to DEC regulations in the same year they were drilled. Reseeding took place in the fall of 2011 and again in 2013. The monitor wells were reclaimed in 2013.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Figure 15-1 Water Sample Locations

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

By executive order of the Governor of Wyoming, an analysis of the impact of all development activities on sage grouse habitat must be performed in core habitat areas. The latest boundaries for sage grouse core areas released by the State in 2011 include the BH LLC. All project activities must be reviewed by the Wyoming Game and Fish Department (WG&FD) for compliance with the Governor’s Executive Order (EO 2011-5). In 2011 a Density and Disturbance Calculation Tool (DDCT) prepared by the BH LLC was reviewed by WG&FD and the project activities planned for the 2011 field season were found to be in compliance. The DDCT must be updated annually and submitted for review prior to any new field activities. Drilling, aquifer testing, and other mechanized activities are currently prohibited from March 15 until July 1 by the State. The BLM has extended the dates to July 15.

The DDCT identifies existing and historic human disturbance in an area of project impact that greatly exceeds the actual project boundaries. The impact area of the BH LLC is approximately 100 sq. mi. New development that causes historic plus proposed disturbance to exceed 5% of this area is prohibited. The DDCT identified approximately 2.6% of the project area of impact was disturbed. The remaining unused disturbance permitted is at least 2.4 sq. mi., more than enough to accommodate projected mine infrastructure.

Sage grouse breeding grounds (leks) consist of areas of open prairie approximately an acre in size. The most restrictive regulations of human disturbance currently apply to a zone 0.6 miles in diameter around leks. Three leks have been identified in proximity to known mineralization and potentially impact approximately 50% of the estimated resource area (Figure 20-2). The BP LLC has been monitoring breeding activity on these sites each spring since 2009. Breeding sage grouse have only been observed on one of the leks. One of the unoccupied leks was identified in 2000 by WG&F and monitored by the state for two years. No sage grouse were found on the lek between 2000 and 2001. The BP LLC has not observed sage grouse on this lek in annual surveys from 2009 to 2011. A lek may be considered abandoned if no breeding birds are observed on it for ten years. The BP LLC will petition the state to declare this lek abandoned. A second lek approximately 500 yards from the active lek was identified by the State. The BP LLC believes this lek is mislocated in the State’s database and the occupied lek is the actual site of the lek. The BP LLC will petition the state to merge this lek with the occupied lek. If these two petitions are successful, the area of mineralization within 0.6 mi. of a lek will be reduced to 12%

Regulations promulgated by the state Sage-Grouse Implementation Team (SGIT) are a work in progress. In that approximately 40% of the surface area of the State of Wyoming lies within a sage grouse core area, exemptions from the full impact of the current regulations are possible on a case by case basis (http://www.bwenergylaw.com/News/documents/AttachmentB_000.pdf). The BP LLC is working closely with the State to explore the potential for habitat enhancement and restoration projects to offset any long term disturbance to the local sage grouse population and a local relaxation of the prohibition of disturbance during the breeding season.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Figure 15-2 Property Leks Locations

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

15.3 Hydrogeology

Both the Canyon Springs and Tertiary aquifers are reported to have relative high permeability. A water supply well completed in the Tertiary aquifer is reported to yield in excess of 20 gpm to 30 gpm.

Uranium mineralization in the Jurassic and Cretaceous horizons is hosted within permeable sandstones which are hydrologically confined between thick impermeable shale units. Mineralization in Wind River Formation is hosted by conglomerates, sandstones and siltstones. Although mineralization is generally confined below shale or siltstone layers all interpretations are based on the lithological chip logs as only one partial core log is available from the historic work. Additional core drilling is required to confirm the amenability of the Wind River mineralization to ISR method of recovering uranium (Crosshair, 2009).

The static water level occurs in the highly transmissive sands and gravels of the Tertiary Wind River Formation. Static water levels as measured by AATA are: 1) SW ¼, section 36, water level at 80 ft. below surface and 2) SW ¼, section 31, water level at 20 ft. below surface. Based on the resistivity logs for 52 holes, the depth to the water table varies between 17 and 59 ft. averaging 35 ft. Except for a very few cases the mineralization is greater than 50 ft. below the water table (Crosshair, 2009).

Historic hydrogeological test work performed on the project consisted of permeability measurements on core samples. Seven tests performed in 1979 by Hazen show an average permeability of 2,200 millidarcys for the Canyon Springs B and D. During 2008, permeability tests were conducted on 21 core samples from a wide range of lithologies, including some confining shale units. .

Fourteen plug analyses on the Canyon Springs sandstone host rock carried out at Core Labs Inc. and Advanced Testing in Denver, Colorado, returned an average porosity of 30.4% and permeability of 913 millidarcys (md) (Table 15-1). This compares with an average of 2,293 millidarcys from seven historical samples taken from one drill hole.

The Canyon Springs B and D sandstone hosts the vast majority of potentially economic mineralization on the project and is hydrologically confined above and below by impermeable strata. Drilling has penetrated at least 75 ft. of shale-type rocks in the Chugwater Formation directly underlying the uranium resource. Lab tests on core samples show very low permeability for Chugwater samples (0.01 md). The aquitard above the Canyon Springs B and D resources has a more gradational contact, with 50 to 70 ft. of silty sandstone (Canyon Springs A bed and undivided Sundance Formation) directly overlying the resource. These silty sandstones are overlain by several hundred ft. of shale, which show very low permeability in lab results (0.086 md). The B and D sandstone samples show mostly high permeability, ranging from 338 millidarcys to 2,320 millidarcys. One strongly cross-bedded sandstone sample (01-BH3003, 424) showed very low permeability across bedding, however, since uranium mineralization followed permeability along bedding, this is not considered a negative indication for ISR production (Crosshair, 2009).

Although the Canyon Springs B and D is a relatively homogenous unit, both visually and in the e-logs, subtle variations in lithology, permeability and cementation have been observed. Future aquifer testing within the B and D should be designed to test horizontal permeability in both the north-easterly and north-westerly directions.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

BP LLC conducted aquifer tests in section 36 in November of 2011 (Figure 15-3). Aquifer characteristics in Section 36 were tested by one pumping well and four observation wells.

Table 15-1 Permeability Results, 2008 Core Samples
Bootheel Project, LLC. – Bootheel Uranium Property, Wyoming

Hole	Depth (ft.)	Fm.	Stress (psig)	Porosity %	Permeability (md)	Grain Density (g/cm³
36-BH3001	418.50	Jcsbd ss	500	36.14	338	2.621
36-BH3001	422.50	Jcsbd ss	500	35.37	446	2.631
01-BH3003	424.00	Jcsbd ss	100	27.50	0.00098	NA
06-BH3007	250.50	Jcsbd ss	500	33.07	1470	2.618
06-BH3007	260.50	Jcsbd ss	500	32.93	1520	2.641
06-BH3008	259.70	Jcsbd ss	500	32.30	2320	2.626
06-BH3008	282.30	Jcsbd ss/sltst	500	29.24	1250	2.638
06-BH3009	196.00	Jsu sh	Ambient	2.21	0.088	2.476
06-BH3009	211.70	Jsu sltst/ss	Ambient	2.05	0.008	2.424
06-BH3009	215.60	Jsu ss	500	14.33	1.08	2.631
06-BH3009	220.00	Jsu sltst/ss	Ambient	3.75	0.023	2.444
06-BH3009	234.50	Jcsa ss	500	16.13	3.10	2.639
06-BH3009	265.50	Jcsbd ss	500	27.78	1020	2.623
06-BH3009	290.00	Jcsbd ss	100	25.63	890	NA
06-BH3009	323.00	Jcsbd ss	500	31.16	1540	2.640
06-BH3009	334.00	Jcsbd ss	500	29.11	1210	2.635
06-BH3009	359.00	Jcsbd ss	500	14.44	.817	2.663
06-BH3009	363.00	Trcw sltst/sh	Ambient	1.24	0.013	2.506
06-BH3009	364.70	Trcw sltst/sh	500	1.37	0.013	2.594
36-BH3001	418.50	Jcsbd ss	500	36.14	338	2.621
36-BH3001	422.50	Jcsbd ss	500	35.37	446	2.631

Notes:

1.	Jcsu: Upper Canyon Springs (undivided.

2.	Jcsa: Canyon Springs A bed sandstone.

3.	Trcw: Triassic Chugwater siltstone.

4.	Jcsbd Jurassic Canyon Springs sandstone, B& D beds (Sundance Fm).

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Figure 15-3 Monitor Wells

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

The 5 ½” pumping well was screened at the base of the Canyon springs from 509 ft. to 549 ft. One of the observation wells was located adjacent to the pumping well and screened in the base of the Wind River Formation. The other three observation wells were screened in the Canyon Springs. The test ran for five days and at equilibrium, the pumping well discharged at approximately 10 gpm. No drawdown was observed in the Wind River observation well confirming that the unconfined Wind River Aquifer is not hydraulically connected to the underlying Sundance aquifer at this point.

The Theis aquifer test and recovery analysis resulted in a T of ~1.3 x 10-1 cm2/sec in section 36. MODFLOW analysis of the test parameters is consistent with the Theis analysis. Drawdown patterns indicate isotropic transmissivity. Leakage across the Jurassic-Tertiary boundary is negligible to none indicating the Canyon Springs appears to be hydrologically isolated from the unconfined upper aquifer in proximity to known mineralization.

15.4 Permitting

Mine permitting will require submissions to both the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality (WDEQ) and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). A 12 month base line study will be required for such items as meteorology and air quality, surface and ground water sampling. Time sensitive items include sage grouse mating season and raptor nests. Total permitting costs are estimated at one million dollars and it would take three to four years to obtain mining permits.

In 2011, a meteorological station was established and water sampling commenced on a quarterly basis. Bird surveys have been conducted on a yearly basis since 2009. A Class 1 archeological literature review of the property was completed in 2011. The only historic site eligible for listing on the National Register is the Fetterman Road. The two segments identified to date are considered noncontributing to the sites overall eligibility.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

16 Adjacent Properties

Historic Mining was carried out in the northwest part of the Shirley Basin, (Figure 7-3), 20 miles from Bootheel. In a press release dated July 22, 2014, URE released a Measured Mineral Resource on the former Pathfinder Property of 1.367 million tons at an average grade of 0.275 eU3O8 and an Indicated Mineral Resource of 0.549 million tons at an average grade of 0.118 eU3O8.

The information set out above is provided by third party sources and the Authors have been unable to verify the information. The information is not necessarily indicative of the mineralization on the Bootheel Project.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

17 Interpretation and Conclusions

17.1 Interpretation

The Bootheel Uranium Project is at an intermediate stage of exploration. A number of areas of anomalous concentrations of uranium occur in Jurassic, Cretaceous, and Tertiary sandstones within the property.

Results of drilling completed to date suggest that mineralized zones within the Jurassic Sundance Formation and the Tertiary Wind River Formation may be amenable to ISR method of recovering uranium.

17.2 Conclusions

Based on the review of technical reports on past exploration, publications on regional geology and the type of uranium mineralization, and recent drill results, The Authors conclude that:

·	The uranium mineralization at the Bootheel Project is a sandstone-hosted, roll front-type deposit.

At a GT cut-off of 0.15 ft.-% or 0.20% equivalent uranium (eU3O8), depending on the host formation, the Mineral Resources of the Bootheel deposit total approximately 1.570 million tons of Indicated Mineral Resources at an average grade of 0.036% eU3O8, containing 1.12 million lbs. of U3O8, and approximately 1.315 million tons of Inferred Mineral Resources at an average grade of 0.040% eU3O8, containing 1.05 million lbs. of U3O8.

·	Uranium mineralization occurs in at least four horizons in the Jurassic rocks, and one horizon in the Tertiary rocks.

Areas of uranium mineralization intersected in rotary drill holes range from 0.015% eU3O8 to 0.15% eU3O8, over thickness ranging from 1.5 m to 15 m. These mineralized areas are associated with subhorizontal sandstones of the Lower Jurassic Sundance Formation Lower Cretaceous Cloverly Formation and the Lower Tertiary Wind River Formation.

·	The methodology of sampling and assaying during the recent drilling program is consistent with industry standards.

·	The methodologies of lithologic and radiometric logging procedures, and sampling and assaying during past drilling campaigns were in keeping with industry standards.

The Bootheel Project area is underlain by Early Jurassic to Lower Tertiary sedimentary rocks of the Shirley River Basin of Wyoming. The Early Jurassic rocks comprise sandstone, shale and conglomerate of the Sundance Formation, and the arkosic sandstone, conglomerate and siltstones of the Lower Tertiary Wind River Formation commonly are unconformably overlain over the Sundance Formation. Occasional units of the Lower Cretaceous Dakota Sandstone are also present between the Jurassic Sundance and Tertiary Wind River Formations.

·	A number of northeast trending normal faults cut the rocks and mineralized units in the area.

·	The source of uranium in the mineralized layers is interpreted to be the Precambrian rocks (including granitic rocks) of the Laramie Range, situated east of the Shirley Basin.

·	Of the 781 rotary drill holes completed on the property from the mid-1960s to 2011, 161 holes encountered significant uranium mineralization of more than 0.02% eU3O8 over intervals ranging from 1 m to approximately 10 m.

·	Past and recent exploration has established some favourable criteria suggesting the possibility of sizeable accumulations of uranium within the sandstones, at depths ranging from 100 ft. to more than 600 ft. below the surface.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

The style of uranium mineralization on the Bootheel Project is similar to other roll front-type uranium deposits in the Shirley Basin, Wind River basin, and other sedimentary basins in Wyoming. The uranium constituent within the mineralized units is assumed to be uraninite (UO2). Detailed mineralogical studies, however, have not yet been carried out.

·	The methodology of downhole logging and surveying by BP LLC is in keeping with, and even surpasses, industry standards.

18 Recommendation

The Authors recommend that BP LLC maintain the Project on a care and maintenance budget until market conditions improve. The annual cost of maintaining the Project is US$14,000 in fees to the State of Wyoming and Federal Governments.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

19 References

Agnerian, H. 2012, Technical Report on the Bootheel Project for Crosshair Energy Corp. and The Bootheel Project, LLC. NI 43-101 Technical Report. February 2012. Filed on SEDAR.

Agnerian, H. and Roscoe, W.E.R., 2002, The Contour Method of Estimating Mineral Resources: Can. Inst. Min. & Metallurgy Bulletin, v. 95 pp. 100-107, July 2002.

Bell, T, 2011, Personal Communication.

Crosshair Exploration & Mining Corp., 2011, Miscellaneous Technical Data,

Crosshair Exploration & Mining Corp., 2009, Technical Report on the Bootheel Project, Albany County, Wyoming, USA: Unpublished Report, May 2009.

Jet Metals Corp., 2015, Miscellaneous Technical Data and Information on Land Status.

De Voto, R.H., 1978, Uranium in Phanerozoic Sandstone and Volcanic Rocks, in Uranium Deposits, Their Mineralogy and Origin, M.M. Kimberly (ed): Short Course Handbook Volume 3 by Mineralogical Association of Canada, University of Toronto Press, October, 1978.

Guilbert, J.M. and Park Jr., C.F., 1986, Western States Uranium Deposits, in The Geology of Ore Deposits: W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, 1986.

Plouffe, R., Schmeling, B. and Reinders, P., 1983, Radiometric Downhole Logging and Evaluation of eU3O8: Uranerz Exploration and Mining Limited, Exploration Development Services Group, Project 71-51 Key Lake Special Report (Revised), Saskatoon, December 30, 1983.

Schmeling, B., 2007, Down Hole Logging and Radiometric Data Interpretation, A Technical Manual, March 2007.

Underhill, D. and Roscoe, W.E.R., 2009, Technical Report on the Bootheel Project, Wyoming: NI 43-101 Technical Report by Scott Wilson Roscoe Postle Associates Inc., September 8, 2009.

Ur-Energy Inc. July 22, 2014, Ur-Energy Announces Mineral Resource at Shirley Basin Project. Press Release.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

20 Date and Signature Page

This report titled “Technical Report on Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming” and dated May 20, 2015, was prepared by and signed by the authors:

“Signed and Sealed”

“Hrayr Agnerian”

Dated at Toronto, Ontario Hrayr Agnerian, M.Sc.(Applied), P.Geo.

May 20, 2015 Consulting Geologist, President

Agnerian Consulting Ltd.

“Signed and Sealed”

“C. Stewart Wallis”

Dated at Vancouver C. Stewart Wallis, P.Geo

May 20, 2015

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

21 Certificates of Qualified Persons

Hrayr Agnerian

I, Hrayr Agnerian, M. Sci. (Applied), P. Geo., as the author of this report entitled “Technical Report on the Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming”, prepared for Crosshair Energy Corp. and The Bootheel Project LLP., and dated May xx, 2015, do hereby certify that:

1.	I am a Consulting Geologist and President of Agnerian Consulting Ltd. of 82 Mentor Boulevard, Toronto, ON, M2H 2N1.

I am a graduate of the American University of Beirut, Lebanon, in 1966 with a Bachelor of Science degree in Geology, of the International Centre for Aerial Surveys and Earth Sciences, Delft, the Netherlands, in 1967 with a diploma in Mineral Exploration, and of McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada, in 1972 with a Master of Science (Applied) degree in Geological Sciences.

I am registered as a Professional Geoscientist in the Provinces of Ontario (Reg.# 0757), Saskatchewan (Reg.# 4305), Newfoundland and Labrador (Member # 06152), and British Columbia (Lic. # 36864), and as a Professional Geologist in the Province of Québec (Reg.# 302). I have worked as a geologist for a total of 42 years since my graduation. My relevant experience for the purpose of the Technical Report is:

Review and report as a consultant on more than ninety mining and exploration projects around the world for due diligence and regulatory requirements. A number of these projects include estimation of Mineral Resources of uranium projects in Canada, Guyana, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Niger, Paraguay, Peru, and the United States.

·	Project/Exploration Geologist for several Canadian exploration companies.

I have read the definition of "qualified person" set out in National Instrument 43-101 ("NI43-101") and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as defined in NI43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a "qualified person" for the purposes of NI43-101.

5.	I visited the Project site from September 14 to 15, 2011.

6.	I am responsible for the overall preparation of the Technical Report excluding Item 14.

7.	I am independent of the Issuer applying the test set out in Section 1.5 of National Instrument 43-101.

8.	I previously wrote a Technical Report dated February 27, 2012 on the property that is the subject of the Technical Report.

9.	I have read National Instrument 43-101F1, and the Technical Report has been prepared in compliance with National Instrument 43-101 and Form 43-101F1.

10.	To the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, the Technical Report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the technical report not misleading.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Dated 20th day of May, 2015

“Signed and Sealed”

“Hrayr Agnerian”

Hrayr Agnerian, M.Sc.(Applied), P.Geo.

Consulting Geologist and President

Agnerian Consulting Ltd.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

C. Stewart Wallis

I, C. Stewart Wallis, P. Geo., President of Sundance Geological Ltd. with offices at 1419-133A Street Surrey BC V4A 6A2, certify that:

1.	I am a graduate of McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada, in 1967 with a Bachelor of Science degree in Geology.

I am registered as a Professional Geologist in the Province of British Columbia (Reg. #27372). I have worked as a geologist for over 40 years since my graduation. My relevant experience for the purpose of this Technical Report includes the authorship of numerous Technical Reports on uranium properties throughout the world since 2005. I have audited uranium resources for many projects since 2005.

I have read the definition of "Qualified Person" set out in National Instrument 43-101 ("NI43-101") and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as defined in NI43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a "Qualified Person" for the purposes of NI43-101.

4.	I have visited the property several times since 2009, most recently September 20-22, 2011.

5.	I am responsible for Item 14 of the Technical Report.

6.	I am not independent of the Issuer as I am currently a director of the Company and hold stock in the Company.

7.	I have been involved with exploration on the Project that is the subject of the Technical Report since its acquisition in 2008.

8.	I have read National Instrument 43-101F1, and the Technical Report has been prepared in compliance with National Instrument 43-101 and Form 43-101F1.

9.	To the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, as of the date of this certificate, the Technical Report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the technical report not misleading.

Dated this 20th day of May, 2015

“Signed and Sealed”

“C. Stewart Wallis”

C. Stewart Wallis, P.Geo.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

22 Appendix

Bootheel Property Status

State of Wyoming Uranium Lease No. 0-40774 covering all of Section 36, Township 25 North, Range 75 West, 6th P.M., Albany County, Wyoming, containing 640 acres, more or less.

TABLE 22-1 LIST OF CLAIMS
Bootheel Project, LLC. – Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Claim Name	SEC	TWP	RGE	County	Original Recordation Book/Page	State	BLM Serial #
BH 145	11,12	24N	75W	Albany	#2005-4294	Wyoming	WMC267277
BH 146	11,12	24N	75W	Albany	#2005-4295	Wyoming	WMC267278
BH 147	12	24N	75W	Albany	#2005-4296	Wyoming	WMC267279
BH 148	12	24N	75W	Albany	#2005-4297	Wyoming	WMC267280
BH 149	12	24N	75W	Albany	#2005-4298	Wyoming	WMC267281
BH 150	12	24N	75W	Albany	#2005-4299	Wyoming	WMC267282
BH 151	12	24N	75W	Albany	#2005-4300	Wyoming	WMC267283
BH 152	12	24N	75W	Albany	#2005-4301	Wyoming	WMC267284
BH 163	11,12	24N	75W	Albany	#2005-4312	Wyoming	WMC267295
BH 164	11,12, 13,14	24N	75W	Albany	#2005-4313	Wyoming	WMC267296
BH 165	12	24N	75W	Albany	#2005-4314	Wyoming	WMC267297
BH 166	12,13	24N	75W	Albany	#2005-4315	Wyoming	WMC267298
BH 167	12	24N	75W	Albany	#2005-4316	Wyoming	WMC267299
BH 168	12,13	24N	75W	Albany	#2005-4317	Wyoming	WMC267300
BH 169	12	24N	75W	Albany	#2005-4318	Wyoming	WMC267301
BH 170	12,13	24N	75W	Albany	#2005-4319	Wyoming	WMC267302
BH 171	12	24N	75W	Albany	#2005-4320	Wyoming	WMC267303
BH 172	12,13	24N	75W	Albany	#2005-4321	Wyoming	WMC267304
BH 173	12	24N	75W	Albany	#2005-4322	Wyoming	WMC267305
BH 174	12,13	24N	75W	Albany	#2005-4323	Wyoming	WMC267306
BH 175	12	24N	75W	Albany	#2005-4324	Wyoming	WMC267307
BH 176	12,13	24N	75W	Albany	#2005-4325	Wyoming	WMC267308
BH 177	12	24N	75W	Albany	#2005-4326	Wyoming	WMC267309
BH 178	12,13	24N	75W	Albany	#2005-4327	Wyoming	WMC267310
BH 179	12	24N	75W	Albany	#2005-4328	Wyoming	WMC267311
BH 180	12,13	24N	75W	Albany	#2005-4329	Wyoming	WMC267312
BH GAP 1	12,7	24N	74W	Albany	#2007-3664	Wyoming	WMC287333
BH GAP 2	12	24N	75W	Albany	#2007-3665	Wyoming	WMC287334
BH GAP 3	12	24N	75W	Albany	#2007-3666	Wyoming	WMC287335
BH GAP 4	12	24N	75W	Albany	#2007-3667	Wyoming	WMC287336
Rob 19	6,24,32	24N	74W	Albany	#2006-6294	Wyoming	WMC278687
Rob 20	6,32**	24N	74W	Albany	#2006-6295	Wyoming	WMC278688
Rob 21	32	25N	74W	Albany	#2006-6296	Wyoming	WMC278689
Rob 22	31,32	25N	74W	Albany	#2006-6297	Wyoming	WMC278690

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

Rob 23	32	25N	74W	Albany	#2006-6298	Wyoming	WMC278691
Rob 24	31,32	25N	74W	Albany	#2006-6299	Wyoming	WMC278692
Rob 25	32	25N	74W	Albany	#2006-6300	Wyoming	WMC278693
Rob 26	31,32	25N	74W	Albany	#2006-6301	Wyoming	WMC278694
Rob 27	32	25N	74W	Albany	#2006-6302	Wyoming	WMC278695
Rob 28	31,32	25N	74W	Albany	#2006-6303	Wyoming	WMC278696
Rob 29	32	25N	74W	Albany	#2006-6304	Wyoming	WMC278697
Rob 30	31,32	25N	74W	Albany	#2006-6305	Wyoming	WMC278698
Rob 31	32	25N	74W	Albany	#2006-6306	Wyoming	WMC278699
Rob 32	31,32	25N	74W	Albany	#2006-6307	Wyoming	WMC278700
Rob 33	32	25N	74W	Albany	#2006-6308	Wyoming	WMC278701
Rob 34	31,32	25N	74W	Albany	#2006-6309	Wyoming	WMC278702
Rob 35	29,32	25N	74W	Albany	#2006-6310	Wyoming	WMC278703
Rob 36	29,30,31,32	25N	74W	Albany	#2006-6311	Wyoming	WMC278704
TD #9	6	24N	74W	Albany	2004.6250	Wyoming	WMC260873
TD #10	6	24N	74W	Albany	2004.6251	Wyoming	WMC260874
TD #11	6	24N	74W	Albany	2004.6252	Wyoming	WMC260875
TD #12	6	24N	74W	Albany	2004.6253	Wyoming	WMC260876
TD #13	6	24N	74W	Albany	2004.6254	Wyoming	WMC260877
TD #14	6	24N	74W	Albany	2004.6255	Wyoming	WMC260878
TD #15	6	24N	74W	Albany	2004.6256	Wyoming	WMC260879
TD #16	6	24N	74W	Albany	2004.6257	Wyoming	WMC260880
TD #17	6	24N	74W	Albany	2004.6258	Wyoming	WMC260881
TD #18	6	24N	74W	Albany	2004.6259	Wyoming	WMC260882
TD #19	1,6	24N	75W	Albany	2004.6260	Wyoming	WMC260883
TD #20	1,6	24N	75W	Albany	2004.6261	Wyoming	WMC260884
TD #21	1,6	24N	75W	Albany	2004.6262	Wyoming	WMC260885
TD #22	6	24N	74W	Albany	2004.6263	Wyoming	WMC260886
TD #23	6	24N	74W	Albany	2004.6264	Wyoming	WMC260887
TD #24	6	24N	74W	Albany	2004.6265	Wyoming	WMC260888
TD #25	6	24N	74W	Albany	2004.6266	Wyoming	WMC260889
TD #26	6	24N	74W	Albany	2004.6267	Wyoming	WMC260890
TD #31	12	24N	75W	Albany	2004.6268	Wyoming	WMC260891
TD #32	12	24N	75W	Albany	2004.6269	Wyoming	WMC260892
TD #33	12	24N	75W	Albany	2004.6270	Wyoming	WMC260893
TD #34	12	24N	75W	Albany	2004.6271	Wyoming	WMC260894
TD #35	12	24N	75W	Albany	2004.6272	Wyoming	WMC260895
TD #36	12	24N	75W	Albany	2004.6273	Wyoming	WMC260896
TD #37	12	24N	75W	Albany	2004.6274	Wyoming	WMC260897
TD #38	12	24N	75W	Albany	2004.6275	Wyoming	WMC260898
TD #39	12	24N	75W	Albany	2004.6276	Wyoming	WMC260899
TD #40	12	24N	75W	Albany	2004.6277	Wyoming	WMC260900

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

TDGap 61	6	24N	74W	Albany	2009-6642	Wyoming	WMC298564
TDGap 62	6	24N	74W	Albany	2009-6643	Wyoming	WMC298565
TDGap 63	6	24N	74W	Albany	2009-6644	Wyoming	WMC298566
TDGap 64	6	24N	74W	Albany	2009-6645	Wyoming	WMC298567
TDGap 65	6	24N	74W	Albany	2009-6646	Wyoming	WMC298568

Source: JET, 2015.

The Bootheel Project, LLC.- Bootheel Uranium Project, Wyoming

Technical Report, May 20, 2015

SUNDANCE GEOLOGICAL LTD.

1419 – 133 A Street

Surrey BC V4A 6A2

Cell Ph 604-351-4675

Email sunven@telus.net

CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON

I, C. Stewart Wallis, consent to the public filing of the technical report titled “Technical Report on the Bootheel Project for Jet Metal Corp. and The Bootheel Project, LLC” and dated May 20, 2015, (the “Technical Report”) by Jet Metal Corp.

I also consent to any extracts from or a summary of the Technical Report in the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended April 30, 2014, dated August 25, 2014, of Jet Metal Corp. (the “Annual Report”)

I certify that I have read the Annual Report filed by Jet Metal Corp. and that it fairly and accurately represents the information in the sections of the technical report for which I am responsible.

Dated this 16th day of June 2015

C. Stewart Wallis P.Geo.

President

Sundance Geological Ltd.

Global Crossing Airlines (QB) (USOTC:JETMF)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2024 to Jul 2024

Click Here for more Global Crossing Airlines (QB) Charts.

Global Crossing Airlines (QB) (USOTC:JETMF)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2023 to Jul 2024

Market Data

News

Trading Tools

Markets

Discover

Hot Features

Follow Feed

Options Flow

Monitor

JETMF Global Crossing Airlines Group Inc (QB)

Jet Metal Corp. News

Your Recent History

Company

Business

Popular

Get The App

Trending Now

Toplists

Market Data

News

Trading Tools

Markets

Discover

Hot Features

Follow Feed

Options Flow

Monitor

JETMF Global Crossing Airlines Group Inc (QB)

Jet Metal Corp. News

Your Recent History

Company

Business

Popular

Get The App