Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
For
the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
1.
NATURE OF OPERATIONS
The
Company and Nature of Business
Pacific
Ventures Group, Inc. (the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”) was incorporated under the
laws of the state of Delaware on October 3, 1986, under the name AOA Corporation. On November 12, 1991, the Company changed its name
to American Eagle Group, Inc. On October 22, 2012, the Company changed its name to “Pacific Ventures Group, Inc.”.
The
current structure of the Company resulted from a share exchange with Snöbar Holdings, Inc. (“Snöbar Holdings”),
which was treated as a reverse merger for accounting purposes. On August 14, 2015, the Company entered into a share exchange agreement
(the “Share Exchange Agreement”) with Snöbar Holdings, pursuant to which the Company acquired 100% of the issued and
outstanding shares of Snöbar Holdings’ Class A and Class B common stock in exchange for 22,500,000 restricted shares of the
Company’s common stock, while simultaneously issuing 2,500,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock to certain
other persons, including for services provided and to a former officer of the Company (the “Share Exchange”).
As
the result of the Share Exchange, Snöbar Holdings became the Company’s wholly owned operating subsidiary and the business
of Snöbar Holdings became the Company’s sole business operations and MAS Global Distributors, Inc., a California corporation
(“MGD”), became an indirect subsidiary of the Company.
Prior
to the Share Exchange, the Company operated as an insurance holding company and through its subsidiaries, which marketed and underwrote
specialized property and casualty coverage in the general aviation insurance marketplace. However, in 1997, after selling several of
its divisions, the Company’s remaining insurance operations were placed into receivership and the Company ceased operating its
insurance business.
Since
the Share Exchange represented a change in control of the Company and a change in business operations, the Company’s business operations
changed to that of Snöbar Holdings and the discussions of business operations accompanying this filing are solely that of Snöbar
Holdings and its affiliates and subsidiaries comprising of Snöbar Trust , International Production Impex Corporation, a California
corporation (“IPIC”) , and MGD.
Snöbar
Holdings was formed under the laws of the State of Delaware on January 7, 2013. Snöbar Holdings is the trustor and sole beneficiary
of Snöbar Trust, a California trust (“Trust”), which was formed in June 1, 2013. The current trustee that holds legal
title to the Trust is Clark Rutledge, the father of Shannon Masjedi, the Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer, Interim
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and majority stockholder. The Trust owns 100% of the shares of IPIC, which was formed on August 2,
2001. IPIC is in the business of selling alcohol-infused ice cream and ice-pops and holds all of the rights to the liquor licenses to
sell such products and trade names “Snöbar”. As such, the Trust holds all ownership interest of IPIC and its liquor
licenses, permitting IPIC to sell its product to distributors, with all income, expense, gains and losses rolling up to the Trust, of
which Snöbar Holdings is the sole beneficiary. Snöbar Holdings also owns 99.9% of the shares of MGD. MGD is in the business
of selling and leasing freezers and providing marketing services. As a result of the foregoing, Snöbar Holdings is the primary beneficiary
of all assets, liabilities and any income received from the business of the Trust and IPIC through the Trust and is the parent company
of MGD.
The
Trust and IPIC are considered variable interest entities (“VIEs”) and Snöbar Holdings is identified as the primary beneficiary
of the Trust and IPIC. Under the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”)
810, Snöbar Holdings performs ongoing reassessments of whether it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. As the assessment of Snöbar
Holdings’ management is that Snöbar Holdings has the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact
the VIE’s activities (it is responsible for establishing and operating IPIC), and the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that
could potentially be significant to the VIE and the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the
VIE’s economic performance, it was therefore concluded by management that Snöbar Holdings is the primary beneficiary of the
Trust and IPIC. As such, the Trust and IPIC were consolidated in the financial statements of Snöbar Holdings since the inception
of the Trust, in the case of the Trust, and since the inception of Snöbar Holdings, in the case of IPIC.
On
May 1, 2018, Royalty Foods Partners, LLC – a Florida Limited Liability Corporation and a subsidiary of Pacific Ventures Group,
Inc. – completed an asset acquisition of San Diego Farmers Outlet, Inc. (SDFO), a California Corporation. San Diego Farmers Outlet
was started in over thirty-five years ago to provide primarily restaurants customers in southern California’s three largest counties
with quality food and produce and does business under the name of Farmers Outlet and San Diego Farmers Outlet.
On
December 8, 2019, Seaport Group Enterprises LLC—a California Limited Liability Corporation and a subsidiary of Pacific Ventures
Group, Inc.—complete an asset acquisition of Seaport Meat Company, a California Corporation. Seaport Meat Company was started in
over thirty years ago and is a USDA inspected fresh meat processing company. Seaport Meat Company delivers to all of Southern California
as well as Arizona, customers include US Foods, SYSCO, and large restaurant chains.
Principles
of Consolidation
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, Snöbar Holdings and its subsidiaries, in which Snöbar
Holdings has a controlling voting interest and entities consolidated under the variable interest entities (“VIE”) provisions
of ASC 810, “Consolidation” (“ASC 810”). Inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.
The
Company applies the provisions of ASC 810 which provides a framework for identifying VIEs and determining when a company should include
the assets, liabilities, non-controlling interests and results of activities of a VIE in its consolidated financial statements.
In
general, a VIE is a corporation, partnership, limited-liability corporation, trust, or any other legal structure used to conduct activities
or hold assets that either (1) has an insufficient amount of equity to carry out its principal activities without additional subordinated
financial support, (2) has a group of equity owners that is unable to make significant decisions about its activities, (3) has a group
of equity owners that does not have the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive returns generated by its operations or (4)
the voting rights of some investors are not proportional to their obligations to absorb the expected losses of the entity, their rights
to receive the expected residual returns of the entity, or both and substantially all of the entity’s activities (for example,
providing financing or buying assets) either involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor that has disproportionately fewer voting
rights.
ASC
810 requires a VIE to be consolidated by the party with an ownership, contractual or other financial interest in the VIE (a variable
interest holder) that has both of the following characteristics: a) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly
impact the VIE’s economic performance and b) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to
the VIE, or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.
A
variable interest holder that consolidates the VIE is called the primary beneficiary. If the primary beneficiary of a variable interest
entity (VIE) and the VIE are under common control, the primary beneficiary shall initially measure the assets, liabilities, and non-controlling
interests of the VIE at amounts at which they are carried in the accounts of the reporting entity that controls the VIE (or would be
carried if the reporting entity issued financial statements prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles). ASC
810 also requires disclosures about VIEs in which the variable interest holder is not required to consolidate but in which it has a significant
variable interest.
2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles
of Consolidation
The
consolidated financial statements include the Company, Snöbar Holdings, San Diego Farmers Outlet, Seaport Meat Company, MGD, IPIC
and the Trust, which was established to hold IPIC, which in turn holds liquor licenses. All inter-company accounts have been eliminated
during consolidation. See the discussion in Note 1 above for variable interest entity treatment of the Trust and IPIC.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, at the
date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
Revenue
Recognition
The
Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification
(“ASC”) 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires that five basic steps be followed to recognize revenue:
(1) a legally enforceable contract that meets criteria standards as to composition and substance is identified; (2) performance obligations
relating to provision of goods or services to the customer are identified; (3) the transaction price, with consideration given to any
variable, noncash, or other relevant consideration, is determined; (4) the transaction price is allocated to the performance obligations;
and (5) revenue is recognized when control of goods or services is transferred to the customer with consideration given, whether that
control happens over time or not. Determination of criteria (3) and (4) are based on our management’s judgments regarding the fixed
nature of the selling prices of the products and services delivered and the collectability of those amounts. The adoption of ASC 606
did not result in a change to the accounting for any of the in-scope revenue streams; as such, no cumulative effect adjustment was recorded.
Unearned
Revenue
Certain
amounts are received pursuant to agreements or contracts and may only be used in the conduct of specified transactions or the related
services are yet to be performed. These amounts are recorded as unearned or deferred revenue and are recognized as revenue in the year/period
the related expenses are incurred, or services are performed. As of December 31, 2021, and December 31, 2020, the Company had $0 in deferred
revenue.
Leases
ASC
842, Leases, was required to be adopted for all financial years beginning after December 15, 2018 and requires long term leases (longer
than 12 month) to be capitalized with a corresponding liability for the term of the lease and expensed over that term. Currently the
Company has two long-term leases SDFO & Seaport.
Shipping
and Handling Costs
The
Company’s shipping costs are all recorded as operating expenses for all periods presented.
Disputed
Liabilities
The
Company is involved in a variety of disputes, claims, and proceedings concerning its business operations and certain liabilities. We
determine whether an estimated loss from a contingency should be accrued by assessing whether a loss is deemed probable and can be reasonably
estimated. We assess our potential liability by analyzing our litigation and regulatory matters using available information. We develop
our views on estimated losses in consultation with outside counsel handling our defense in these matters, which involves an analysis
of potential results, assuming a combination of litigation and settlement strategies. Should developments in any of these matters cause
a change in our determination as to an unfavorable outcome and result in the need to recognize a material accrual or should any of these
matters result in a final adverse judgment or be settled for significant amounts, they could have a material adverse effect on our results
of operations, cash flows and financial position in the period or periods in which such change in determination, judgment or settlement
occurs. As of December 31, 2021, the Company has $31,858 in disputed liabilities on its balance sheet.
Cash
Equivalents
The
Company considers highly liquid instruments with original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. As of December 31,
2021, the Company had a cash balance of $16,435 in cash and cash equivalents, compared to $58,234 on December 31, 2020.
Accounts
Receivable
Accounts
receivable are stated at net realizable value of $1,402,334. This value includes an appropriate allowance for estimated uncollectible
accounts. The allowance is calculated based upon the level of past due accounts and the relationship with and financial status of our
customers. As of December 31, 2021, the Company wrote off $588 of bad debt expense. The Company write off $14,588 during the year ended
December 31, 2020.
Inventories
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost has been determined using the first-in, first-out method. Inventory quantities
on-hand are regularly reviewed, and where necessary, reserves for excess and unusable inventories are recorded. Inventory consists of
finished goods and includes ice cream, popsicles and the related packaging materials. As of December 31, 2021, the Company had total
inventory assets of $1,393,215 consisting of fresh and frozen proteins and seafood and all other restaurants supply items. As of December
31, 2020, the Company has $1,216,562 in inventories.
Income
Taxes
Deferred
taxes are provided on an asset and liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and
operating loss carry forwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are
the difference between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax basis. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation
allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not
be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.
Net
Income/(Loss) Per Common Share
Income/(loss)
per share of common stock is calculated by dividing the net income/(loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding
during the period. The Company has no potentially dilutive securities. Accordingly, basic and dilutive income/(loss) per common share
are the same.
Property
and Equipment
Property
and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and includes expenditures that substantially increase the useful lives
of existing property and equipment. Maintenance, repairs, and minor renovations are expensed as incurred. Upon sale or retirement of
property and equipment, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the respective accounts and the resulting gain
or loss is included in the results of operations. The Company provides for depreciation of property and equipment using the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives or the term of the lease, as appropriate. The estimated useful lives are as follows: vehicles,
five years; office furniture and equipment, three to fifteen years; equipment, three years.
Identifiable
Intangible Assets
As
of December 31, 2021, the Company’s Identifiable Intangible Assets are as follows:
Intangible
Assets
Identifiable
Intangible Assets
SCHEDULE
OF IDENTIFIABLE INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Trade
Name (San Diego Farmers Outlet) | |
$ | 193,000 | |
Trade
Name (Seaport Meat) | |
$ | 449,000 | |
Wholesale
Customer Relationships (San Diego Farmers Outlet) | |
$ | 266,000 | |
Wholesale
Customer Relationships (Seaport Meat) | |
$ | 2,334,239 | |
Total
Identifiable Intangible Assets | |
$ | 3,242,239 | |
Goodwill
SCHEDULE OF GOODWILL
Assembled
Workforce | |
$ | 21,000 | |
Unidentified Intangible
Value | |
$ | 470,000 | |
Total
Goodwill | |
$ | 491,000 | |
| |
| | |
Total
Accumulated Amortization is | |
| $483,816 | |
| |
| | |
Total
Intangible Assets and Goodwill | |
$ | 3,249,423 | |
Management
does not believe that there is an impairment as of 2021.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The
carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments, which include cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued
expenses are representative of their fair values due to the short-term maturity of these instruments.
Concentration
of Credit Risk
Financial
instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash and accounts receivable. The
Company maintains cash balances at financial institutions within the United States which are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (“FDIC”) up to limits of approximately $250,000. The Company has not experienced any losses with regard to its
bank accounts and believes it is not exposed to any risk of loss on its cash bank accounts.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The
Company considers revenue recognition and the valuation of accounts receivable, allowance for doubtful accounts, and inventory and reserves
as its significant accounting policies. Some of these policies require management to make estimates and assumptions that may affect the
reported amounts in the Company’s financial statements.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
June 2009, the FASB established the Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification” or “ASC”) as the source
of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). Rules and interpretive
releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) issued under authority of federal securities laws are also
sources of GAAP for SEC registrants. Existing GAAP was not intended to be changed as a result of the Codification, and accordingly the
change did not impact our financial statements. The ASC does change the way the guidance is organized and presented.
In
May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The core principle of this amendment is
that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects
the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services. This standard is effective for
fiscal years and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, Revenue from
Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date. The amendments in this update deferred the effective date for implementation
of ASU 2014-09 by one year and is now effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017.
In
April 2015, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2015-03, “Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic
835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs”, to simplify presentation of debt issuance costs by requiring that
debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying
amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The ASU does not affect the recognition and measurement guidance for debt
issuance costs. For public companies, the ASU is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted.
In
April 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-04, “Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Practical Expedient for the Measurement
Date of an Employer’s Defined Benefit Obligation and Plan Assets”, which permits the entity to measure defined benefit plan
assets and obligations using the month-end that is closest to the entity’s fiscal year-end and apply that practical expedient consistently
from year to year. The ASU is effective for public business entities for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted.
In
April 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-05, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40):
Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement”, which provides guidance to customers about whether
a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If such includes a software license, then the customer should account for
the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If the arrangement does not
include a software license, the customer should account for it as a service contract. For public business entities, the ASU is effective
for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early application is permitted.
We are currently reviewing the provisions of this ASU to determine if there will be any impact on our results of operations, cash flows
or financial condition.
In
April 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-06, “Earnings Per Share (Topic 260): Effects on Historical Earnings per Unit of Master Limited
Partnership Dropdown Transactions”, which specifies that, for purposes of calculating historical earnings per unit under the two-class
method, the earnings (losses) of a transferred business before the date of a drop down transaction should be allocated entirely to the
general partner. In that circumstance, the previously reported earnings per unit of the limited partners (which is typically the earnings
per unit measure presented in the financial statements) would not change as a result of the dropdown transaction. Qualitative disclosures
about how the rights to the earnings (losses) differ before and after the dropdown transaction occurs for purposes of computing earnings
per unit under the two-class method also are required. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim
periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is permitted.
In
June 2014, FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10, “Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements,
Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation”. The update removes all incremental
financial reporting requirements from GAAP for development stage entities, including the removal of Topic 915 from the FASB Accounting
Standards Codification. In addition, the update adds an example disclosure in Risks and Uncertainties (Topic 275) to illustrate one way
that an entity that has not begun planned principal operations could provide information about the risks and uncertainties related to
the company’s current activities. Furthermore, the update removes an exception provided to development stage entities in Consolidations
(Topic 810) for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity-which may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation
decision, and disclosure requirements for a company that has an interest in a company in the development stage. The update is effective
for the annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, including interim periods therein. Early application is permitted
with the first annual reporting period or interim period for which the entity’s financial statements have not yet been issued (Public
business entities) or made available for issuance (other entities). Our company adopted this pronouncement.
In
June 2014, FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718); Accounting for Share-Based Payments
When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period”. The amendments
in this ASU apply to all reporting entities that grant their employees share-based payments in which the terms of the award provide that
a performance target that affects vesting could be achieved after the requisite service period. The amendments require that a performance
target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. A reporting
entity should apply existing guidance in Topic 718 as it relates to awards with performance conditions that affect vesting to account
for such awards. For all entities, the amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual
periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in this ASU either (a) prospectively
to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding
as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter.
If retrospective transition is adopted, the cumulative effect of applying this Update as of the beginning of the earliest annual period
presented in the financial statements should be recognized as an adjustment to the opening retained earnings balance at that date. Additionally,
if retrospective transition is adopted, an entity may use hindsight in measuring and recognizing the compensation cost. This updated
guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
In
August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15 on “Presentation of Financial Statements Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) – Disclosure
of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern”. Currently, there is no guidance in GAAP about
management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going
concern or to provide related footnote disclosures. The amendments in this Update provide that guidance. In doing so, the amendments
are intended to reduce diversity in the timing and content of footnote disclosures. The amendments require management to assess an entity’s
ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards.
Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period
including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain
disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement
and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date
that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued).
All
other newly issued accounting pronouncements which are not yet effective have been deemed either immaterial or not applicable.
We
reviewed all other recently issued accounting pronouncements and determined these have no current applicability to the Company or their
effect on the financial statements would not have been significant.
3.
GOING CONCERN
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As shown in
the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred a net loss of $5,557,679 for the year ended December 31,
2021 and has an accumulated deficit of $21,235,728 as of December 31, 2021.
In
order to continue as a going concern, the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources. The Company is significantly
dependent upon its ability, and will continue to attempt, to secure equity and/or additional debt financing. There are no assurances
that the Company will be successful and without sufficient financing it would be unlikely for the Company to continue as a going concern.
The
audited consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded
assets, or the amounts of and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in existence.
These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These audited consolidated
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might arise from this uncertainty.
4.
INVENTORIES
As
of December 31, 2021, the Company had inventory assets for a total of $1,393,215. Inventory of $1,216,562 was recorded as of December
31, 2020.
5.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property,
plant and equipment at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, consisted of:
SCHEDULE OF PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
| |
December
31, 2021 | | |
December
31, 2020 | |
Computers | |
$ | 11,788 | | |
$ | 11,788 | |
Office
Furniture | |
| 23,908 | | |
| 23,908 | |
Building
& Improvement | |
| 29,673 | | |
| 29,673 | |
Forklift 1 | |
| 4,533 | | |
| 3,000 | |
Forklift 2 | |
| 2,871 | | |
| 2,871 | |
Truck
2019 Hino 3710 | |
| 24,865 | | |
| 24,865 | |
Truck
2019 Hino 7445 | |
| 34,213 | | |
| 34,213 | |
Truck
2018 Hino 155 5347 | |
| | | |
| 30,181 | |
Truck
2018 Hino 155 5647 | |
| 30,181 | | |
| 30,181 | |
Truck
2018 Hino 155 5680 | |
| | | |
| 29,592 | |
Machinery
& Equipment | |
| 1,109,811 | | |
| 994,540 | |
Leasehold
Improvements | |
| 66,932 | | |
| 66,932 | |
Office
Equipment | |
| 62,400 | | |
| 62,400 | |
Vehicles | |
| 409,108 | | |
| 409,108 | |
Accumulated
Depreciation | |
| (932,054 | ) | |
| (583,810 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Property,
plant and equipment, net | |
$ | 878,229 | | |
$ | 1,169,441 | |
Depreciation
and Amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2021 was $602,987 compared to $696,144 for the same period of December 31, 2020.
6.
ACCRUED EXPENSE
As
of December 31, 2021, the Company had accrued expenses of $1,414,526 compared to $902,442 for the year ended December 31, 2020.
7.
INCOME TAX
The
Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities
for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax
assets and liabilities are determined on the basis of the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities
using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.
8.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The
following table presents a summary of the Company’s promissory notes issued to related parties as of December 31, 2021:
SCHEDULE OF PROMISSORY NOTES ISSUED TO RELATED PARTIES
Noteholder | |
Note
Amount | | |
Issuance
Date | |
Unpaid
Amount | |
S.
Masjedi | |
$ | 150,000 | | |
12/10/2010 | |
| $
| |
A.
Masjedi | |
| 500,000 | | |
6/1/2013 | |
| 425,398 | |
M.
Shenkman | |
| 10,000 | | |
2/21/2012 | |
| 10,000 | |
M.
Shenkman | |
| 10,000 | | |
2/23/2012 | |
| 10,000 | |
M.
Shenkman | |
| 10,000 | | |
3/14/2013 | |
| 6,000 | |
M.
Shenkman (Entrust) | |
| 16,000 | | |
9/9/2014 | |
| 16,000 | |
| |
$ | 696,000 | | |
| |
$ | 467,398 | |
The
following description represent note payable-related party transaction pre-Share Exchange that were assumed by the Company as a condition
to the Share Exchange:
In
January 2011, MGD, which is now a majority owned subsidiary of Snöbar Holdings, entered into an unsecured promissory note with Shannon
Masjedi, who is now the Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer, Interim Chief Financial Officer, director and majority stockholder.
The note had a principal balance of $150,000 with an interest rate of 3% and has a maturity date of December 31, 2022. The balance of
the note at December 31, 2021 was $0.
On
February 21, 2012, Snöbar Holdings entered into an unsecured promissory note with Mr. Shenkman, who is Chairman of the Board of
Directors and a shareholder of the Company. The note had a principal balance of $10,000 with an interest rate of 5% and is due on demand.
The note’s maturity date has subsequently been extended to December 31, 2022. Interest against the note was extinguished in a subsequent
extension of the term. The note had a principal balance of $10,000 as of December 31, 2021.
On
February 23, 2012, Snöbar Holdings entered into a promissory note with Mr. Shenkman for $10,000, maturing in one year at an interest
of 8%. The note has subsequently been extended to December 31, 2022. Interest under the note was extinguished in a subsequent extension
of the term. The note had an outstanding balance of $10,000 as of December 31, 2021.
On
March 14, 2013, Snöbar Holdings entered into an unsecured promissory note with a Mr. Shenkman, the Company’s Chairman of the
Board of Directors. The note had a principal balance of $10,000 with an interest rate of 5% and an original maturity date of March 14,
2014, subsequently extended to December 31, 2022 with a lower interest rate of 2%/year. Mr. Shenkman also agreed to make all interest
retroactive and deferred. The note had an outstanding balance of $6,000 as of December 31, 2021.
On
June 1, 2013, Snöbar Holdings entered into a promissory note with Azizollah Masjedi, father-in-law to Shannon Masjedi
who’s the Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer, Interim Chief Financial Officer, director and majority
stockholder, in an amount of $500,000
to purchase all the shares and interests of IPIC. The note matured on June
30, 2017. As of December 31, 2021, the outstanding balance under this note was $425,398,
which includes interest and penalty charges.
On
September 9, 2014, Snobar Holdings entered into a second unsecured promissory note with Mr. Shenkman, through his affiliate company Entrust
Group for a total amount of $6,000 and a third unsecured promissory note for a total amount of $10,000, both at an annual interest rate
of 2%. No term was provided for in each note, but Mr. Shenkman has agreed to a maturity date of December 31, 2022 and the accrual of
interest rates and deferral to maturity. The notes had an aggregate outstanding balance of $16,000 as of December 31, 2021.
As
of December 31, 2021, the Company had total short-term notes payable of $1,514,942 and long-term notes payable of $13,594,008.
9.
NOTES PAYABLE
The
following table presents a summary of the Company’s promissory notes issued to unrelated third parties as of December 31, 2021:
SCHEDULE OF PROMISSORY NOTES ISSUED TO UNRELATED THIRD PARTIES
| |
Note
Amount | | |
Issuance
Date | | |
Balance | |
A.
Rodriguez | |
$ | 86,821 | | |
| 3/14/13 | | |
$ | 86,821 | |
A.
Rodriguez | |
| 15,000 | | |
| 7/22/13 | | |
| 15,000 | |
A.
Rodriguez | |
| 10,000 | | |
| 2/21/14 | | |
| 10,000 | |
Henry
Mahgerefteh | |
| 144,000 | | |
| 2/15/15 | | |
| 129,595 | |
TRA
Capital | |
| 106,112 | | |
| 3
loans | | |
| 125,247 | |
BNA
Inv | |
| 223,499 | | |
| 6
loans | | |
| 53,753 | |
Brian
Berg | |
| 30,000 | | |
| 2/1/12 | | |
| 25,000 | |
Classic
Bev | |
| 73,473 | | |
| 5/1/17 | | |
| 269,740 | |
TysAdco
Partners | |
| 1,405,000 | | |
| 3
loans | | |
| 1,281,000 | |
LGH
Investments | |
| 850,000 | | |
| 2
loans | | |
| 748,000 | |
PowerUp | |
| 257,000 | | |
| 2
loans | | |
| 181,210 | |
Jefferson
Capital | |
| 330,000 | | |
| 12/2021 | | |
| 330,000 | |
SBA
Loan | |
| 309,900 | | |
| 4/1/20 | | |
| 159,900 | |
Dicer | |
| 64,678 | | |
| 7/20/20 | | |
| 141,424 | |
Seaport
Loan | |
| 437,500 | | |
| 9/30/21 | | |
| 375,000 | |
TCA Global fund | |
| 2,150,000 | | |
| 5/1/18 | | |
| 3,413,862 | |
TCA Global fund 2 | |
| 3,000,000 | | |
| 12/17/19 | | |
| 7,296,001 | |
| |
$ | 10,002,633 | | |
| | | |
$ | 14,641,553 | |
The
following description represent unrelated notes payable transactions pre-reverse merger between Snöbar and the Company that were
assumed by the Company as a condition to the Share Exchange Agreement:
In
February 2012, MGD entered into an unsecured promissory note with a certain unrelated party, now a shareholder of the Company for a principal
balance of $30,000 at in interest rate of 8% per year and maturity date of August 1, 2014. The note’s maturity date has been extended
to December 31, 2025 and the interest rate under the extinguished as part of the extension. The note had an outstanding balance of $25,000
as of December 31, 2021.
On
March 14, 2013, Snöbar Holdings entered into an unsecured promissory note with a certain unrelated third party, now a shareholder
of the Company. The note had a principal balance of $86,821 with an interest rate of 5% and had a maturity date of March 14, 2014. The
note’s maturity date has subsequently been extended to February 1, 2025. The balance of the note is $86,821 as of December 31,
2021.
On
July 22, 2013, Snöbar Holdings entered into an unsecured promissory note with a certain unrelated third party. The note had a principal
balance of $15,000 with an original interest rate of 5%. Maturity date has been extended to December 31, 2018, and interest rate has
been reduced to 2%, and lender agreed to make all interest retroactive and deferred. The balance of the note was $15,000 as of December
31, 2021.
The
following description represents unrelated note payable transactions post-merger between Snöbar and the Company:
In
March 16, 2021 and March 26, 2021, the Company entered into a financing arrangement with Power Up Lending pursuant to which the Company
borrowed a two loans both with total principal of $128,500 secured by shares of the Company’s common stock. The notes were subject
to a 6 month hold before any stock was issued. The current balance as of December 31, 2021 is $181,210.
Over
the past year Classic Beverage has periodically issued loans to the Company. The Company has agreed to pay interest 10% per year and
has agreed on penalty fees if late on payments. The note is due on demand. The current balance is $269,740, including capitalized interests
and penalty fees.
On
May 1, 2018, Pacific Ventures Group entered into a secured promissory note with TCA Global Master Fund. The note was secured by interests
in tangible and intangible property of Pacific Ventures Group. The effective interest rate on the note is 16.50%. The outstanding balance
of the notes with TCA Global Fund for San Diego Farmers Outlet is $3,413,862 as of December 31, 2021, which includes capitalized interests.
On
December 17, 2019 Pacific Ventures Group entered into a secured promissory note with TCA Special Situations Credit Strategies ICAV. The
note was secured by interests in tangible and intangible property of Pacific Ventures Group. The effective interest rate is 16.50%. The
outstanding balance of the notes for Seaport Meat is $7,296,001 as of December 31, 2021, which includes capitalized interests.
On
July 20,2020, Seaport Group Enterprises LLC entered into a note in the amount of $64,678.00 for a new piece of machinery in order to
upgrade the processing line. The note is payable monthly in installment payments of $1500.00. As of December 31, 2021, the note is current.
In
August, 2021, The Company entered into a settlement agreement on the Seller Carryback note with PNC Inc in the amount of $700,000. The
payment schedule calls for $200,000 payment that was made in July and $61,500 every quarter for a period of two years. As of December
31, 2021, the note is current.
In
the second quarter 2021, The Company entered into three notes with Tysadco Partners in the total amount of $1,405,000. The note can be
repaid in cash or converted common stock or a combination of both. Balance of the note is $1,281,000.
In
May of 2021, The Company entered into two notes with LGH Financial in the total amount of $850,000. The note can be repaid in cash or
converted common stock or a combination of both. As of December 31, 2021, the balance of the notes is $748,000.
In
December 2021, the company entered into a convertible promissory note with Jefferson Street Capital in the amount of $330,000 and can
be repaid in cash or converted into common stock. As of December 31, 2021 the note was current.
As
of December 31, 2021, the Company had short-term notes payable of $1,514,942
and long-term notes payable of $13,594,008.
The Company had purchase receivables of $1,703,625.
10.
PURCHASE RECEIVABLES
In
October, November, and December of 2021, Seaport Group Enterprises LLC and CapCall entered into a revenue based factoring agreement and
received an aggregate of $1,000,000 in exchange for $1,300,000 of future receipts relating to monies collected from customers or other
third-party payors. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company is required to make payments of $21,500, $13,000 and $8,995. As of
December 31, 2021 the balance was $1,118,125.
In
November 2021, Seaport Group Enterprises LLC and Fox Capital entered into a revenue based factoring agreement and received an aggregate
of $475,000 in exchange for $607,500 of future receipts relating to monies collected from customers or other third-party payors. Under
the terms of the agreement, the Company is required to make daily payments to $4,050. As of December 31, 2021 the balance was $585,500.
The
following table presents a summary of the Company’s purchase receivables with unrelated third parties as of December 31, 2021:
SCHEDULE
OF PURCHASE RECEIVABLES
Vendor | |
Amount | | |
Issuance
Date | |
Balance | |
Cap
Call | |
$ | 1,000,000 | | |
3
loans 2020 | |
$ | 1,118,125 | |
Fox
Capital | |
| 607,500 | | |
12/1/20 | |
| 585,500 | |
| |
| | | |
| |
| | |
| |
$ | 1,607,500 | | |
| |
$ | 1,703,625 | |
As
of December 31, 2020, the Company had a total of $1,703,625 of purchase receivables.
11.
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Share
Exchange
On
August 14, 2015, Snöbar Holdings entered into the Share Exchange Agreement with the Company and Snöbar Holdings’ shareholders
(the “Snöbar Shareholders”) who held of record (i) at least 99% and up to 100% of the total issued and outstanding shares
of Class A Common Stock and (ii) 100% of the total issued and outstanding shares of Class B Common Stock, of Snöbar Holding. In
accordance with the terms and provisions of the Share Exchange Agreement, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares
of Snöbar Holdings’ Class A and Class B Common Stock from Snöbar Shareholders, with Snöbar Holdings becoming a wholly
owned subsidiary of the Company, in exchange for the issuance to the Snöbar Shareholders of 22,500,000 shares of restricted common
stock of the Company and the issuance of 2,500,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock to certain other persons (as
set forth below).
The
14,747,791 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock issued during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 were for the following:
2,207,142 shares issued in exchange of cash, 2,040,054 shares for debt conversion, 500,595 for issued shares of its common stock for
services and 10,000,000 of common stocks in exchange of 1,000,000 Preferred “E” shares. On April 13, 2020, the Company authorized
a 1-for-500 reverse stock split.
Common
Stock and Preferred Stock
The
Company is authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of its preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share. The Company designated 6,000,000
shares of preferred stock as Series E Preferred Stock (the “Series E Preferred Stock”). Under the rights, preferences and
privileges of the Series E Preferred Stock, for every share of Series E Preferred Stock held, the holder thereof has the voting rights
equal to 10 shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2021, there were 4,000,000 shares of Series E Preferred Stock issued and outstanding.
From
January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021, the Company issued 500,595 shares of its common stock in exchange for various services, 2,040,054
shares for repayment of debt and 10,000,000 shares in exchange of 1,000,000 Series E preferred shares.
From
January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021, the Company issued 2,207,142 shares of its common stock for cash.
The
Company is authorized to issue up to 900,000,000 shares of its common stock, $0.4988 par value per share. Holders of common stock have
one vote per share. As of December 31, 2020, and 2021, there were 16,871,351 and 31,619,142 shares of the Company’s common stock
issued and outstanding, respectively. On April 13, 2020, the Company authorized a 1-for-500 reverse stock split of its common shares.
12.
COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND UNCERTAINTIES
Operating
Lease
The
Company is currently obligated under two operating leases for office spaces and associated building expenses. Both leases are on a month-to-month
basis at a monthly rate of $450 and $330, respectively.
SDFO
operations are located at 10407 Friars Rd, San Diego, CA 92110, where they occupy an aggregate of approximately 10,000 square feet pursuant
to leases. The 5-year leases are on an annual basis at a monthly rate of $6,000 per month.
Seaport
Group Enterprise LLC is located at 2533 Folex Way, Spring Valley CA 91978, where they occupy an aggregate of approximately 12,000 square
feet pursuant to the lease. The 5-year leases are on an annual basis starting at a monthly rate of $14,750.00 per month.
San
Diego Farmers Outlet and Seaport Meat Company Operating Leases
The
Company on May 1, 2018 assumed a lease agreement for a facility site and entered into a lease agreement for office space for San Diego
Farmers Outlet. The lease has a term of five years expiring on April 30, 2023.
Future
minimum lease payments, as set forth in the lease, are below:
SCHEDULE OF FUTURE MINIMUM RENTAL PAYMENTS FOR OPERATING LEASES
YEAR | |
AMOUNT | |
2022 | |
$ | 72,000 | |
2023 | |
$ | 72,000 | |
2024 | |
$ | 72,000 | |
2025 | |
$ | 24,000 | |
The
Company on December 1, 2019 entered into a lease agreement for a facility site for office space for Seaport Meat Company. The lease has
a term of five years expiring on November 30, 2024.
Future
minimum lease payments, as set forth in the lease, are below:
SCHEDULE OF FUTURE MINIMUM RENTAL PAYMENTS FOR OPERATING LEASES
YEAR | |
AMOUNT | |
2022 | |
$ | 177,000 | |
2023 | |
$ | 177,000 | |
2024 | |
$ | 177,000 | |
2025 | |
$ | 177,000 | |
2026 | |
$ | 162,250 | |
Concentration
Risk
The
Company is potentially subject to concentration risk in its sales revenue and from a major supplier of goods for sale.
Major
Customer
The
Company has one major customer that accounted for approximately 42.65 % and $16,798,454 of sales for the year ended December 31, 2021.
The Company expects to maintain this relationship with the customer.
Major
Vendor
The
Company has one major vendor that accounted for approximately 32.97% and $11,170,593 of cost of sales for the year ended December 31,
2021. The Company expects to maintain this relationship with the vendor.
13.
EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
On
November 3, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the Company’s 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2017 Plan”),
which reserves a total of 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for issuance under the 2017 Plan. Incentive awards authorized
under the 2017 Plan include, but are not limited to, incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended, subject to the approval of the 2017 Plan by the Company’s stockholders. If an incentive award granted
under the 2017 Plan expires, terminates, is unexercised or is forfeited, or if any shares are surrendered to us in connection with the
exercise of an incentive award, the shares subject to such award and the surrendered shares will become available for further awards
under the 2017 Plan. All of the shares under the 2017 Plan were registered in the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 21, 2017 (the “Form S-8”).
14.
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
ASC
855-16-50-4 establishes accounting and disclosure requirements for subsequent events. ASC 855 details the period after the balance sheet
date during which we should evaluate events or transactions that occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements,
the circumstances under which we should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements
and the required disclosures for such events.
The
Company has evaluated all subsequent events through the date these consolidated financial statements were issued, and determined the
following are material to disclose.