UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
Form
10-Q
x
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
OR
¨
TRANSITION REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For
the transition period from ______ to _____
Commission
file number 1-10927
SIMTROL,
INC.
(Exact
name of smaller reporting company as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
58-2028246
|
(State
of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
Incorporation)
|
Identification
No.)
|
520
Guthridge Ct., Suite 250
|
|
Norcross,
Georgia 30092
|
(770)
242-7566
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Issuer’s
telephone number)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90
days.
Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
¨
No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer
|
Accelerated
filer
|
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller
reporting company
x
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes No
x
As of
November 9, 2009 registrant had 12,241,356 shares of $.001 par value Common
Stock outstanding.
SIMTROL,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Form
10-Q
Quarter
Ended September 30, 2009
Index
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1. Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2009 (unaudited) and
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 (unaudited)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September
30, 2009 and 2008 (unaudited)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
4T.Controls and
Procedures
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
6. Exhibits
|
|
|
23
|
|
PART
I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIMTROL,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009 (unaudited)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
$
|
92,537
|
|
|
$
|
997,048
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
|
|
50,840
|
|
|
|
80,015
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
19,399
|
|
|
|
28,905
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
assets
|
|
|
28,874
|
|
|
|
129,873
|
|
Total current
assets
|
|
|
191,650
|
|
|
|
1,235,841
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificate
of deposit-restricted
|
|
|
83,102
|
|
|
|
81,126
|
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
|
|
73,228
|
|
|
|
101,509
|
|
Right
to license intellectual property, net
|
|
|
8,719
|
|
|
|
27,218
|
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
11,458
|
|
|
|
11,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
368,157
|
|
|
$
|
1,457,152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’(DEFICIENCY)/ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
273,173
|
|
|
$
|
188,064
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
66,704
|
|
|
|
43,505
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
31,471
|
|
|
|
19,518
|
|
Common stock to be
issued
|
|
|
26,000
|
|
|
|
26,000
|
|
Derivative
liabilities
|
|
|
30,158
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Notes
payable, net of debt discount of $146,195
|
|
|
416,055
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total current
liabilities
|
|
|
843,561
|
|
|
|
277,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
liabilities
|
|
|
350,030
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Deferred
rent payable
|
|
|
21,186
|
|
|
|
20,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,214,777
|
|
|
|
297,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
Equity/(Deficit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.00025 par
value; 800,000 shares authorized;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series
A Convertible: 770,000 shares designated; 672,664 and 688,664
outstanding; liquidation values of $2,017,992 and
$2,065,992
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
Series
B Convertible: 4,700 shares designated; 4,264 and 4,285 outstanding;
liquidation values of $3,198,000 and $3,213,750
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Series
C Convertible: 7,900 shares designated; 5,534 and 5,534 outstanding;
liquidation values of $4,150,500 and $4,150,500
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Common stock, 100,000,000
shares authorized;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$.001 par value; 12,241,356 and
10,783,882 issued and outstanding
|
|
|
12,241
|
|
|
|
10,784
|
|
Additional paid-in
capital
|
|
|
79,551,228
|
|
|
|
80,338,073
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
(80,410,271
|
)
|
|
|
(79,189,529
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders'
(deficiency)/equity
|
|
|
(846,620
|
)
|
|
|
1,159,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ (deficiency)/equity
|
|
$
|
368,157
|
|
|
$
|
1,457,152
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
SIMTROL,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September
30
|
|
|
September
30
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software
licenses
|
|
$
|
21,346
|
|
|
$
|
63,200
|
|
|
$
|
97,667
|
|
|
$
|
83,655
|
|
Service
and hardware
|
|
|
85,594
|
|
|
|
57,375
|
|
|
|
280,662
|
|
|
|
127,700
|
|
Total
revenues
|
|
|
106,940
|
|
|
|
120,575
|
|
|
|
378,329
|
|
|
|
211,355
|
|
Cost
of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software
licenses
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
3,800
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
Service
and hardware
|
|
|
29,108
|
|
|
|
23,245
|
|
|
|
143,223
|
|
|
|
50,551
|
|
Total
cost of revenues
|
|
|
32,608
|
|
|
|
23,359
|
|
|
|
147,023
|
|
|
|
50,770
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
74,332
|
|
|
|
97,216
|
|
|
|
231,306
|
|
|
|
160,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
general, and administrative
|
|
|
351,904
|
|
|
|
659,741
|
|
|
|
1,726,183
|
|
|
|
2,282,208
|
|
Research
and development
|
|
|
186,330
|
|
|
|
263,818
|
|
|
|
787,203
|
|
|
|
907,280
|
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
538,234
|
|
|
|
923,559
|
|
|
|
2,513,386
|
|
|
|
3,189,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from Operations
|
|
|
(463,902
|
)
|
|
|
(826,343
|
)
|
|
|
(2,282,080
|
)
|
|
|
(3,028,903
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income/(expenses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
of debt discount-warrant fair value
|
|
|
(224,167
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(304,575
|
)
|
|
|
(266,038
|
)
|
Amortization
of beneficial conversion of notes payable
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(266,038
|
)
|
Amortization
of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(16,117
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(21,898
|
)
|
|
|
(21,579
|
)
|
Gain
on derivative liabilities
|
|
|
282,751
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
181,245
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Interest
and other income
|
|
|
669
|
|
|
|
5,122
|
|
|
|
10,479
|
|
|
|
14,861
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(31,690
|
)
|
|
|
(519
|
)
|
|
|
(44,283
|
)
|
|
|
(80,585
|
)
|
Total
other income/(expense), net
|
|
|
11,446
|
|
|
|
4,603
|
|
|
|
(179,032
|
)
|
|
|
(619,379
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Loss
|
|
|
(452,456
|
)
|
|
|
(821,740
|
)
|
|
|
(2,461,112
|
)
|
|
|
(3,648,282
|
)
|
Dividends
on convertible preferred stock paid in common stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(359,338
|
)
|
|
|
(274,368
|
)
|
Deemed
dividend on convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(675,760
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,975,598
|
)
|
Net
loss attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(452,456
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,497,500
|
)
|
|
|
(2,820,450
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,898,248
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss per common share, basic and diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.16
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.70
|
)
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted
|
|
|
12,224,540
|
|
|
|
9,324,521
|
|
|
|
11,335,145
|
|
|
|
8,428,401
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
SIMTROL,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
CASH
FLOWS USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(2,461,112
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,982,557
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
loss to net cash used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock for
services
|
|
|
3,255
|
|
|
|
119,616
|
|
Depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
68,495
|
|
|
|
130,656
|
|
Impairment of right to license
intellectual property
|
|
|
18,499
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Amortization of debt
discounts
|
|
|
304,575
|
|
|
|
532,076
|
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
562,387
|
|
|
|
648,969
|
|
Gain on derivative
liabilities
|
|
|
(181,245
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities
|
|
|
261,573
|
|
|
|
77,599
|
|
Net cash used in operating
activities
|
|
|
(1,423,573
|
)
|
|
|
(2,139,456
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH
FLOWS USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases
of property and equipment
|
|
|
(18,267
|
)
|
|
|
(28,318
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partial
redemption of certificate of deposit
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
24,506
|
|
Net proceeds from notes payable
issuance
|
|
|
562,250
|
|
|
|
1,500,00
|
|
Net proceeds from stock
issuance
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,426,723
|
|
Capitalized
offering costs
|
|
|
(24,921
|
)
|
|
|
(4,979
|
)
|
Net cash provided by financing
activities
|
|
|
537,329
|
|
|
|
3,946,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease)/Increase
in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(904,511
|
)
|
|
|
1,778,476
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of the period
|
|
|
997,048
|
|
|
|
256,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of the period
|
|
$
|
92,537
|
|
|
$
|
2,034,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend
on Convertible Preferred Stock paid in common stock
|
|
$
|
359,338
|
|
|
$
|
274,368
|
|
Exchange
of convertible notes payable for Series C Convertible
Preferred
stock
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,572,750
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
SIMTROL,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
(Unaudited)
Note
1 – Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation
Simtrol,
Inc., formerly known as VSI Enterprises, Inc., was incorporated in Delaware in
September 1988 and, together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the "Company"),
develops, markets, and supports software based audiovisual control systems and
videoconferencing products that operate on PC platforms. The Company
operates at a single facility in Norcross, Georgia and its sales are primarily
in the United States.
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared by the Company in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America and the instructions to Form
10-Q. It is management’s opinion that these statements include all
adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to
present fairly the condensed consolidated financial position as of September 30,
2009, and the condensed consolidated results of operations, and cash flows for
all periods presented. Operating results for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009, are not necessarily indicative of the results
that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2009.
Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in the annual financial
statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. It is
suggested that these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements be
read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto
included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30,
2009.
Certain
amounts in the 2008 condensed consolidated financial statements have been
reclassified for comparative purposes to conform to the presentation in the
current period condensed consolidated financial statements. These
reclassifications have no effect on previously reported net loss.
Note
2 – Liquidity and Going Concern
As of
September 30, 2009, the Company had cash and cash equivalents totaling $92,537
and negative working capital of $651,911. Since inception, the
Company has not achieved a sufficient level of revenue to support its business
and incurred a net loss of $2,461,112 and used net cash of $1,423,573 in
operating activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The
Company will require additional funding to fund its development and operating
activities during the fourth quarter of 2009 or early 2010. The
Company has reduced headcount and reduced the salaries of all employees by 50%
effective August 14, 2009 in order to reduce cash used in
operations. Historically, the Company has relied on private placement
issuances of equity and debt. The Company has commenced efforts to
raise additional capital through a private placement of debt securities and
warrants and issued $562,250 of these securities on May 29, 2009 (see Note
11). The private placement memorandum allows the Company to raise a
maximum of $1.5 million at the current terms. No assurance can be
given that the Company will be successful in raising this capital. If
capital is successfully raised through the issuance of debt, this will increase
interest expense and the warrants will dilute existing
shareholders. If the Company is not successful in raising this
capital, the Company may not be able to continue as a going
concern. In that event, the Company may be forced to cease operations
and stockholders could lose their entire investment in the Company.
Also,
anti-dilution provisions of the existing Series A, B, and C Convertible
Preferred stock might result in additional dilution to existing common
shareholders if such financing results in adjustments to the conversion terms of
the convertible preferred stock. If the Company is unable to obtain
this additional funding, its business, financial condition and results of
operations would be adversely affected.
Even if
the Company obtains additional equity capital, the Company may not be able
to execute its current business plan and fund business operations for the period
necessary to achieve positive cash flow. In such case, the Company
might exhaust its capital and be forced to reduce expenses and cash burn to a
material extent, which would impair its ability to achieve its business
plan. If the Company runs out of available capital, it might be
required to pursue highly dilutive equity or debt issuances to finance its
business in a difficult and hostile market, including possible equity financings
at a price per share that might be much lower than the per share price invested
by current shareholders. No assurance can be given that any source of
additional cash would be available to the Company. If no source of
additional cash is available to the Company, then the Company would be forced to
significantly reduce the scope of its operations or possibly seek court
protection from creditors or cease business operations
altogether.
These
matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a
going concern. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplate the
realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of
business. The condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any
adjustments relating to the recoverability of the recorded assets or the
classification of the liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be
unable to continue as a going concern.
Note
3 – Selected Significant Accounting Policies
Accounting
Standards Codification
The
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) has become the source of authoritative
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP). The ASC only changes
the referencing of financial accounting standards and does not change or alter
existing U.S. GAAP.
Revenue
recognition
The
Company follows the guidance of the ASC 605-10-599, which provides for revenue
to be recognized when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii)
delivery or installation has been completed, (iii) the customer accepts and
verifies receipt, and (iv) collectability is reasonably
assured. Certain judgments affect the application of its revenue
policy. Revenue consists of the sale of device control software and
related maintenance contracts on these systems. Revenue on the sale
of hardware is recognized upon shipment. The Company generally
recognizes revenue from Device Manager
TM
software sales upon shipment as it sells the product to audiovisual integrators,
net of estimated returns and discounts. Revenue on maintenance
contracts is recognized over the term of the related contract.
Capitalized software and
research and development costs
The
Company’s policy on capitalized software and research and development costs
determines the timing of recognition of certain development costs. In addition,
this policy determines whether the cost is classified as development expense or
is capitalized. Software development costs incurred after technological
feasibility has been established are capitalized and amortized, commencing with
product release, using the greater of the income forecast method or on a
straight-line basis over the useful life of the product. Management is required
to use professional judgment in determining whether research and development
costs meet the criteria for immediate expense or capitalization. The Company did
not capitalize any software and research and development costs during either
2009 or 2008, all previously capitalized assets were fully amortized, and
research and development efforts during 2008 and 2009 primarily involved product
improvements to its Device Manager and Video Visitation products to improve
their functionality and ease of use for end users.
Inventory
The
Company purchases certain hardware connectivity devices to allow connectivity of
devices with different interfaces in classrooms. The inventory is
stated at the lower of cost or market value and is recorded at the actual cost
paid to third-party vendors. The Company accounts for the inventory
using the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method of accounting.
Impairment of Long-Lived
Assets
The
Company records impairment losses on assets when events and circumstances
indicate that the assets might be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows
estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the carrying amount of
those items. The Company’s cash flow estimates are based on historical results
adjusted to reflect its best estimate of future market and operating conditions.
The net carrying value of assets not recoverable is reduced to fair value. The
estimates of fair value represent the Company’s best estimate based on industry
trends and reference to market rates and transactions. The Company
recorded an impairment of approximately $18,000 in the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 to lower the carrying value of its right to license
intellectual property based on estimated future gross profit from sales of its
Curiax Arraigner software product and due to sales that occurred during the
period. No impairment was recorded in the nine months ended September
30, 2008. See note 9.
Loss Per
Share
ASC 260,
"Earnings per Share", requires the presentation of basic and diluted earnings
per share ("EPS"). Basic EPS is computed by dividing loss attributable to common
stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the
period. Diluted EPS includes the potential dilution that could occur if options
or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted. The
following equity securities are not reflected in diluted loss per share because
their effects would be anti-dilutive:
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
Options
|
|
|
7,001,950
|
|
|
|
6,452,763
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
27,403,891
|
|
|
|
27,999,509
|
|
Convertible
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
22,286,656
|
|
|
|
22,393,323
|
|
Convertible
Notes Payable
|
|
|
1,612,294
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
58,304,791
|
|
|
|
56,845,595
|
|
Accordingly,
basic and diluted net loss per share are identical.
Derivative Financial
Instruments
The
Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow,
market or foreign currency risks. The Company evaluates all of its
financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or
contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative
financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative
instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each
reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the condensed
consolidated statements of operations. For stock-based derivative
financial instruments, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model
to value the derivative instruments at inception and on subsequent valuation
dates. The classification of derivative instruments, including
whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is
evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument
liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based
on the term of the underlying derivative instrument. See note
10.
Recently Implemented
Accounting Pronouncements
In
December 2007, the FASB issued ASC 805,
Business Combinations
(formerly SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007),
Business Combinations
). ASC
805 establishes principles and requirements for how companies recognize and
measure identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interest in connection with a business combination; recognize and
measure the goodwill acquired in a business combination or a gain from a bargain
purchase; and determine what information to disclose to enable users of the
financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the
business combination. The Company adopted ASC 805 on January 1, 2009. ASC 805
will have an impact on the Company’s accounting for future business combinations
but the effect is dependent upon acquisitions that are made in the
future.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued ASC 810, "Consolidations.” ASC 810
establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest
in a subsidiary (previously referred to as minority interests). ASC
810 also requires that a retained noncontrolling interest upon the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary be initially measured at its fair value. Under
ASC 810, noncontrolling interests are reported as a separate component of
consolidated stockholders’ equity. In addition, net income allocable to
noncontrolling interests and net income attributable to stockholders
are reported separately in the consolidated statements of operations. ASC
810 became effective beginning January 1, 2009. ASC 810 would have an
impact on the presentation and disclosure of the noncontrolling interests of any
non-wholly owned businesses acquired in the future.
In
February 2008, the FASB issued an update to ASC 820,
Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures
(formerly FSP No. FAS 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement
No. 157
).
This update amended ASC
820 to delay the effective date for the fair valuation of non-financial assets
and liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value
in the financial statements on a recurring basis. The Company has assessed the
impact of this update for its non-financial assets and liabilities and
determined that there was no material impact.
In
August 2009, the FASB issued an Update to ASC 820,
Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures
2009-05
Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value
to provide guidance on measuring the fair value of liabilities under ASC
820. This update clarifies the fair value measurements for a liability in an
active market and the valuation techniques in the absence of a Level 1
measurement. This update is effective for the interim period beginning
October 1, 2009. The adoption of this update is not anticipated to have a
material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
In April
2008, the FASB issued updates to ASC 350-30-35,
General Intangibles Other Than
Goodwill-Subsequent Measurement
(formerly FSP No. 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets
), which amends the factors that should be considered in
developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of
a recognized intangible asset. The Company’s adoption of these updates, on
January 1, 2009, is effective prospectively for intangible assets acquired or
received after January 1, 2009.
In June
2008, the FASB issued updates to ASC 815-40,
Derivatives and Hedging, Contracts
in Entity’s Own Equity
(ASC 815-40) (formerly EITF Bulletin
No. 07-5,
Determining
Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) is Indexed to an Entity’s Own
Stock
). ASC 815-40 provides guidance on how a company should determine if
certain financial instruments (or embedded features) are considered indexed to
its own stock, including instruments similar to the conversion option of the
Notes, convertible note hedges, and warrants to purchase Company stock. This
update requires that a two-step approach be used to evaluate an instrument’s
contingent exercise provisions and settlement provisions in determining whether
the instrument is considered to be indexed to its own stock, and exempt from the
application of ASC 815,
Derivatives and Hedging
(ASC
815) (formerly SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities).
The Company adopted the updates to
ASC 815-40 effective January 1, 2009. The Company evaluated its financial
instruments and embedded instrument features and determined that the accounting
for certain previously issued financial instruments are impacted by the
provisions of this update to ASC 815. Accordingly, the adoption of this new
update had a material effect on the Company’s results of operations and
financial position. (See Note 9 “Derivatives” for further details)
In June
2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167 “Amendments to FASB Interpretation
No. 46(R)”. This standard changes how a company determines when an entity
that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or
similar rights) should be consolidated. The determination of whether a company
is required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an
entity’s purpose and design and a company’s ability to direct the activities of
the entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance. The
statement is effective for us on December 31, 2010. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact this statement may have on our consolidated
results of operations and financial condition and does not expect the impact, if
any, to be material.
In
October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13,
Multiple-Deliverable Revenue
Arrangements
(ASU 2009-13) (formerly EITF 08-1,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple
Deliverables)
which amends ASC Topic 605,
Revenue
Recognition
. This accounting update establishes a hierarchy for
determining the value of each element within a multiple deliverable
arrangement. ASU 2009-13 is effective for the Company beginning
July 1, 2010 and applies to arrangements entered into on or after this
date. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2009-13 may
have on its financial position and results of operations, and does not expect
the impact, if any, to be material.
In
October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-14,
Certain Revenue Arrangements That
Include Software Elements
(ASU 2009-14) (formerly EITF 09-3,
Applicability of AICPA Statement of
Position 97-2 to Certain Arrangements That Include Software Elements
),
which updates ASC Topic 985,
Software
. ASU 2009-14 clarifies which accounting guidance should be
used for purposes of measuring and allocating revenue for arrangements that
contain both tangible products and software, and where the software is more than
incidental to the tangible product as a whole. ASU 2009-14 is effective for the
Company’s fiscal year beginning July 1, 2010 and applies to arrangements
entered into on or after this date. The Company is currently evaluating the
impact that ASU 2009-14 may have on its financial position and results of
operations, and does not expect the impact, if any, to be material.
Effective
June 30, 2009, the Company adopted a new accounting standard included in
ASC 855
Subsequent
Events
that establishes general standards of accounting for and
disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the
financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. This new
accounting standard provides guidance on the period after the balance sheet date
during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or
transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the
financial statements, the circumstances under which an entity should recognize
events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial
statements and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or
transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. The implementation of
this standard did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated
financial statements. The Company evaluated subsequent events through
November 10, 2009, the date the accompanying financial statements were
issued.
In August
2009, the FASB issued new accounting guidance to provide clarification on
measuring liabilities at fair value when a quoted price in an active market is
not available. This guidance is effective for the Company on October 1, 2009 and
is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated
financial position or results of operations.
Note
4 – Income Taxes
The
Company recognized a deferred tax asset of approximately $18.5 million as of
September 30, 2009, primarily relating to net operating loss carry forwards of
approximately $48.7 million, which expire through 2028. The ultimate
realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future
taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become
deductible. The Company considers projected future taxable income and tax
planning strategies in making this assessment. At present, the Company does not
have a history of income to conclude that it is more likely than not that the
Company will be able to realize all of its tax benefits; therefore, a valuation
allowance of $18.5 million was established for the full value of the deferred
tax asset. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the valuation
allowance decreased by approximately $673,000, due to certain net operating
losses expiring unused. A valuation allowance will be maintained
until sufficient positive evidence exists to support the reversal of any portion
or all of the valuation allowance net of appropriate reserves. Should the
Company be profitable in future periods with supportable trends, the valuation
allowance will be reversed accordingly.
Note
5 – Stockholders’ Equity
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, the Company
issued 52,625 and 10,626 shares of common stock valued at $10,000 and $4,500 to
members of the Board of Directors for attendance at meetings. These
amounts were recorded as selling, general, and administrative
expense.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, the Company
issued 15,500 and 240,300 restricted common shares to Triton Value Partners
valued at $3,255 and $119,616 as part of its 24-month engagement with the
Company that expired in January 2009. These amounts were recorded as selling,
general, and administrative expense.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, one Series A Convertible Preferred
Stock holder converted 16,000 shares of preferred stock and was issued 64,000
shares of common stock.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, two Series B Convertible Preferred
Stock holders converted 21 shares of preferred stock and were issued 42,000
shares of common stock.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, two Series A Convertible Preferred
Stock holders converted 40,000 shares of their Preferred Stock and were issued
160,000 shares of common stock.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, thirteen Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock holders converted 415 shares of Preferred Stock and were issued
830,000 shares of common stock.
Pursuant
to the terms of the Certificates of Designation of Preferences, Rights, and
Limitations (the “Certificates”) of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock,
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, Series C Convertible Preferred Stock of
Simtrol, Inc. (the “Company”), the Company is required to pay a 4% semi-annual
dividend to the holders of its outstanding shares of Series A Preferred
Stock and a 6% semi-annual dividend to holders of its Series B and Series C
Preferred Stock, respectively. The Company has the option to pay
these dividends in cash or in shares of its common stock.
The
Company elected to pay the June 30, 2009 dividends in the form of common stock
valued at $0.75 per common share for the Series A Preferred Stock and $0.375 per
common share for the Series B and Series C Preferred Stock, per the terms of the
Certificates. Based on this value, the Company issued
|
(i)
|
107,629
shares of common stock to the Series A shareholders (672,664 Series A
shares issued and outstanding on that date);
and
|
|
(ii)
|
511,680
shares of common stock to the Series B shareholders (4,286 shares
issued and outstanding on that
date).
|
|
(iii)
|
664,040
shares of common stock to the Series C shareholders (5,534 shares issued
and outstanding on that date).
|
The
Company elected to pay the June 30, 2008 dividends in the form of common stock
valued at $0.75 and 0.375 per common share, per the terms of the
Certificates. Based on this value, the Company
issued
|
(iv)
|
220,375
shares of common stock to the Series A shareholders (688,664 Series A
shares issued and outstanding on that date) The Company erroneously issued
holders of Series A Preferred Stock common stock dividends on September
30, 2008 with a value of $0.375 per share. As a result, the
holders were issued twice the number of common shares to which they were
entitled in payment of the September 30, 2008 dividend and no additional
shares were issued on December 31, 2008;
and
|
|
(v)
|
521,160
shares of common stock to the Series B shareholders (4,343 shares
issued and outstanding on that
date).
|
On April
17, 2009, in conjunction with the termination of the Company’s private placement
of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock and warrants begun in 2008, the Company
issued Gilford Securities as a placement fee, as underwriter, warrants to
purchase 181 units represented by the offering. The 181 units include
181 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase
362,000 share of common stock (2,000 shares of common stock for each share of
Series C Convertible Preferred stock) at an exercise price of $0.375 per
share. The unit exercise price is $750 per unit and the warrants to
purchase the units have five-year terms. The estimated fair value of
the warrants to purchase the 181 units is approximately $97,000 on the date of
issuance using the Black Scholes valuation model for the warrant.
Note
6 - Stock Based Compensation
On
January 1, 2006, the Company adopted, using the modified prospective application
of ASC 718,”Compensation-Stock Compensation”, which requires all share-based
payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be
recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values. Under ASC
718, share-based payment awards result in a cost that will be measured at fair
value on the awards’ grant date based on the estimated number of awards that are
expected to vest. Compensation costs for awards that vest will not be reversed
if the awards expire without being exercised.
Equity-based
compensation expense is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of
the award, and is recognized over the vesting periods. The expenses are included
in selling, general, and administrative or research and development expense
depending on the grant recipient.
Under ASC
718, share-based payment awards result in a cost that will be measured at fair
value on the awards’ grant date based on the estimated number of awards that are
expected to vest. Compensation costs for awards that vest will not be reversed
if the awards expire without being exercised. Stock compensation
expense under ASC 718 was $137,700 and $205,401 during the three months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Of these totals, $26,158
and $41,801were classified as research and development expense and $111,542 and
$163,600 were classified as selling, general, and administrative expense for the
three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Stock
compensation expense under SFAS 123R was $562,387 and $648,969 during the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Of these
totals $116,751 and $129,527 were classified as research and development expense
and $446,636 and $519,442 were classified as selling, general, and
administrative expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
The
Company uses historical data to estimate option exercise and employee
termination data within the valuation model and historical stock prices to
estimate volatility. The fair value for options to purchase 150,000
and 2,856,500 shares issued during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively, were estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes
option-pricing model to be $17,603 and $949,299, with the following
weighted-average assumptions.
|
|
For the three months ended
September 30,
|
|
|
For the Nine months ended
September 30,
|
|
Assumptions
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free
rate
|
|
None
granted
|
|
|
2.70-3.00
|
%
|
|
|
1.90
|
%
|
|
|
2.57-3.67
|
%
|
Annual
rate of dividends
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Volatility
|
|
|
|
|
111-115
|
%
|
|
|
107.8
|
%
|
|
|
111-131
|
%
|
Average
life
|
|
|
|
5
years
|
|
|
5
years
|
|
|
5
years
|
|
The
Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the
fair value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully
transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly
subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. The
Company’s employee stock options have characteristics significantly different
from those of traded options, and changes in the subjective input assumptions
can materially affect the fair value estimate.
A summary
of option activity under the Company’s 1991 Stock Option Plan and the Company’s
2002 Equity Incentive Plan as of September 30, 2009 and changes during the nine
months then ended are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
Average
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Term (in years)
|
|
Outstanding
January 1, 2009
|
|
|
7,420,950
|
|
|
$
|
0.67
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(569,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
7,001,950
|
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
Exercisable
at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
3,941,497
|
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
The
weighted-average grant-date fair values of options granted during the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were $0.12 and $0.33,
respectively. No options were exercised during the nine months
ended September 30, 2009.
As of
September 30, 2009, there was $707,733 of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the
2002 Equity Incentive Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized
over a weighted average period of 1.4 years.
At
September 30, 2009, 899,800 options remain available for grant under the 2002
Equity Incentive Plan. No options are available to be issued under
the 1991 Stock Option Plan.
On March
9, 2009, the Company executed a license agreement with ACIS, Inc. ("ACIS"), that
significantly expanded the scope of the Company's rights to certain ACIS
technology. Pursuant to the agreement, ACIS granted to the Company the
right, in perpetuity, to use and modify the ACIS technology on a royalty-free
basis for all future Company products, without restrictions regarding the
underlying platform. As consideration for the rights to the ACIS
technology, the Company granted to ACIS nonqualified options to purchase 150,000
shares of Company common stock at an exercise price of $0.15 per share, with
immediate vesting. The Black Scholes option valuation model was used to
calculate the estimated fair value of $17,601, which was recorded as stock-based
compensation in selling, general, and administrative expense. The
license agreement replaces and supersedes the license agreement dated September
27, 2001, under which the Company had been required to pay per-unit royalties
for use of the ACIS technology, which was restricted to a single specified
platform.
Note
7- Major Customers
Revenue
from three customers comprised 78% and revenue from two customers comprised 88%
of consolidated revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. At September 30, 2009, related accounts receivable of
$11,928 from these customers comprised 23% of consolidated
receivables.
Revenue
from three customers comprised 71% and revenue from two
customers comprised 83% of consolidated revenues for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Note
8 – Intangibles
In
conjunction with the purchase of the Integrated Digital Systems (“IDS”) interest
in Justice Digital Solutions, LLC (“JDS”) in November 2006, the Company recorded
an intangible asset of $130,000 on November 28, 2006, representing the fair
value of 500,000 shares of common stock paid and payable to IDS, to reflect the
value of the license to use the OakVideo Software. In accordance with
the purchase agreement, 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock were issued
to IDS on November 22, 2008 and the final issuance of 100,000 shares is due on
November 22, 2009. Prior to December 31, 2008, the amount was being
amortized over the estimated remaining life of the license agreement for JDS’
use of the OakVideo software through October 2015. At December 31,
2008, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $76,782 to reduce the value
of the intangible to the amount of gross profit anticipated in the year ending
December 31, 2009 from purchase orders previously received for the Company’s
Curiax Arraigner software. During the nine months ended September 30,
2009, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $18,499 to reduce the value
of the intangible to the amount of gross profit anticipated in the remainder of
2009 on sales of the Company’s Curiax Arraigner software from previously
received purchase orders. The charge during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 equaled the approximate gross profit on the revenue recorded
for a Curiax Arraigner sale made during the nine months ended September 30,
2009. Due to difficulties in gaining end user acceptance of the
product, the Company is unable to estimate whether any additional future sales
of the product will take place. Amortization during the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 totaled $7,428. No impairment charge
occurred during the three months ended September 30, 2009.
Note
9 – Derivatives
In
September 2008, the FASB finalized Update ASC 815-40, “
Derivatives and Hedging”, “Contracts
in an Entity’s Own
Equity
”. Under the
update, instruments which do not have fixed settlement provisions are deemed to
be derivative instruments. The warrants issued to a placement agent in 2004
(“Placement Agent Warrants”) and the placement agent and investors in 2005
(“2005 Warrants”) do not have fixed settlement provisions because their exercise
prices, may be lowered if the Company issues securities at lower prices in the
future. The 2004 Placement Agent Warrants expired on various dates
during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and none were outstanding on
that date. Also, convertible notes and warrants issued to investors
in a private placement of convertible notes and warrants on May 29, 2009 (“2009
Warrants”) do not contain fixed settlement provisions. See Note
11. In accordance with the update, the Placement Agent Warrants
and 2005 Warrants have been re-characterized as derivative liabilities and the
2009 Warrants classified as derivative liabilities. The update requires that the
fair value of these liabilities be re-measured at the end of every reporting
period with the change in value reported in the statement of operations.
The
Derivative Warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and
the following assumptions:
|
|
September
30, 2009
|
|
|
January 1,
2009
|
|
|
Date of
Issuance
|
|
Placement Agent
Warrants:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free
rate
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
0.37
|
%
|
|
|
3.38-3.97
|
%
|
Annual
rate of dividends
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
109.9
|
%
|
|
|
169-171
|
%
|
Weighted
Average life (years)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
Warrants
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free
rate
|
|
|
0.40
|
%
|
|
|
0.76
|
%
|
|
|
3.98
|
%
|
Annual
rate of dividends
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
91.0
|
%
|
|
|
109.9
|
%
|
|
|
134.3
|
%
|
Weighted
Average life (years)
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
Warrants
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free
rate
|
|
|
2.31
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2.34
|
%
|
Annual
rate of dividends
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
91.0
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
108.8
|
%
|
Weighted
Average life (years)
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
$
|
380,188
|
|
|
$
|
110,663
|
|
|
$
|
2,161,141
|
|
The
derivative liability amounts reflect the fair value of each derivative
instrument as of the January 1, 2009 date of implementation.
ASC
815-40 was implemented in the first quarter of 2009 and is reported as the
cumulative effect of a change in accounting principles. At January 1, 2009, the
cumulative effect on the accounting for the warrants was recorded as decrease in
additional accumulated deficit by $1,599,708. The difference was recorded as
derivative liability for $110,663. At September 30, 2009, the derivative
liability associated with the Placement Agent Warrants and 2005 Warrants were
revalued, the $88,497 decrease in the derivative liability at September 30, 2009
is included as other income in the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of
operations for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The fair
value of the 2009 Warrants was estimated at $350,030 at the date of issuance and
this amount was classified as a derivative liability. The 2009
Warrants were revalued as of September 30, 2009 and the $194,253 decrease in the
value of the derivative liability is included as other income in the Company’s
condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended
September 30, 2009.
Note
10 - Fair Value Measurement
Valuation
Hierarchy
ASC 820
establishes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to valuation used
to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad
levels as follows. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in
active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs
are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs
that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly
through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial
instrument. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on the
Company’s own assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair
value. A financial asset or liability’s classification within the
hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to
the fair value measurement.
The
following table provides the assets and liabilities carried at fair value
measured on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at September 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
Total Carrying
Value at
September 30,
2009
|
|
|
Quoted prices
in active
markets
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant
other
observable
inputs (Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
unobservable
inputs (Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
liabilities
|
|
$
|
380,188
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
380,188
|
|
The
derivative liabilities are measured at fair value using quoted market prices and
estimated volatility factors based on historical quoted market prices for the
Company’s common stock, and are classified within Level 3 of the valuation
hierarchy.
The
following table sets forth a summary of the changes in the fair value of our
Level 3 financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring
basis:
|
|
Three Months
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
balance
|
|
$
|
(662,939
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(110,663
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Net
unrealized gain on derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
282,751
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
181,245
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
New
derivative liabilities issued
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(450,770
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Ending
balance
|
|
$
|
(380,188
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(380,188
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Note
11 – Notes Payable
On May
29, 2009, the Company completed the sale of $562,250 of Participation Interests
(“Participation Interests”) in a secured master promissory note (“Master Note”)
and five-year investor warrants to purchase 2,998,667 shares of common stock at
an exercise price of $0.375 per share to accredited private
investors.
The
net proceeds of $537,329 from this offering will be used for working capital and
general corporate purposes. Important terms of the Master Note
include:
|
·
|
The
Master Note bears interest at the rate of 22% per annum, is payable Nine
months from the issue date (“Maturity Date”) and can be pre-paid at any
time. Accrued interest is payable in cash on the Maturity
Date.
|
|
·
|
The
Maturity Date of the Master Note may be extended by the Company for two
30-day periods. If the Company elects to extend the Maturity
Date, the Company will pay a 5% Extension Fee at the conclusion of each
such 30-day Extension Period, payable at the option of the Company in cash
or the Company’s common stock.
|
|
·
|
The
Master Note is secured by all of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents,
accounts receivable, prepaid assets, and equipment. The Master
Note and Participation Interests will be convertible into equity
securities on the following terms:
|
|
·
|
If
the Company closes a “Qualifying Next Equity Financing” before the
Maturity Date, the then-outstanding balance of principal and accrued
interest on the Master Note will automatically convert into shares of the
“Next Equity Financing Securities” the Company issues. “Next
Equity Financing Securities” means the type and class of equity securities
that the Company sells in a Qualifying Next Equity Financing or a
Non-Qualifying Next Equity Financing. If the Company sells a
unit comprising a combination of equity securities, then the Next Equity
Financing Securities shall be deemed to constitute that
unit. Upon conversion, the Company would issue that number of
shares of Next Equity Financing Securities equal the quotient obtained by
dividing the then-outstanding balance of principal and accrued interest on
the Master Note by the price per share of the Next Equity Financing
Securities.
|
|
·
|
If
the Company closes a “Non-Qualifying Next Equity Financing” before the
Maturity Date, the then-outstanding balance of principal and accrued
interest represented by a Participation Interest can be converted, at the
option and election of the investor, into shares of the “Next Equity
Financing Securities” the Company
issues.
|
|
·
|
A
“Qualifying Next Equity Financing” means the first bona fide equity
financing (or series of related equity financing transactions) occurring
subsequent to the date of issue of the Master Note in which the Company
sells and issues any securities for total consideration totaling not less
than $2.0 million in the aggregate (including the principal balance and
accrued but unpaid interest to be converted on all our outstanding
Participation Interests in the Master Note) at a price per share for
equivalent shares of common stock that is not greater than $0.375 per
share.
|
|
·
|
A
“Non-Qualifying Next Equity Financing” means that the Company completes a
bona fide equity financing but fails to raise total consideration of at
least $2.0 million, or the price per share for equivalent shares of common
stock is greater than $0.375 per
share.
|
At any
time prior to payment in full of this Note, an Investor may convert all, but not
less than all, of such Investors interest in this Note (as represented by such
Investor’s Participation Interest) into that number of Series C Preferred Stock
Units equal to (A) the principal balance plus accrued but unpaid interest
hereunder due and payable to the investor in accordance with such Investor’s
Participation Interest, divided by (B) $750. Each Series C Preferred
Stock Unit comprises one share of our Series C Convertible Preferred Stock and
detachable five-year warrants (“Series C Warrants”) to acquire 2,000 shares of
our common stock at an exercise price of $0.375 per share.
The
Investor Warrants have a term ending on the earlier to occur of (i) the
fifth anniversary of the Investor Warrant issue date; or (ii) the closing
of a change of control event. The Investor Warrants have a cashless
exercise feature and anti-dilution provisions that adjust both the exercise
price and quantity if subsequent equity offerings are completed where Simtrol
issues common stock at a lower effective price per share than the exercise
price. The Investor Warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model and the following assumptions:
Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free
rate
|
|
|
2.34
|
%
|
Annual
rate of dividends
|
|
|
0
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
108.8
|
%
|
Average
life
|
|
5
years
|
|
The fair
value of the warrants, $450,770, was classified as a discount on the notes
payable issued on May 29, 2009. This amount will be amortized over
the life of the convertible notes and $224,167 and $304,575 was amortized as a
financing expense during the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009. $31,177 and $42,361 of interest payable was accrued during the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Note
12 – Subsequent Event
On
October 23, 2009, the Company assigned ownership of its Simtrol Visitor™ and
Simtrol Scheduler™ software (“Software”) to Strike Industries, Inc., a Florida
corporation, (“Strike”) granting Strike the right to modify, advertise, promote,
market, and license the software in exchange for $100,000 cash and a $400,000
note payable with the following terms:
|
·
|
6%
simple interest calculated on an annual
basis
|
|
·
|
Minimum
payment of $6,000 per quarter
|
|
·
|
Note
secured by the Software
|
Simtrol
will be due a software royalty for sales of Visitor and Scheduler as
follows:
Until the
note is fully paid, the royalty will be 45% of net Software revenues earned by
Strike. Upon payment in full of the note, the royalty will be 10% of
net Software revenues.
In the
event that the Strike sells, assigns or otherwise liquidates the Software,
derivative works or other applications utilizing the Company’s Device
Manager
TM
software, the Company will receive 10% of the proceeds resulting from such an
event.
On
November 6, 2009, the Company received notification of a compliant draw on its
standby letter of credit from its landlord on its office space lease totaling
$53,476, representing the past due rent on the office space for the four months
of August through November 2009, including late fees. The
funds were withdrawn, without penalty, from the restricted certificate of
deposit collateralizing the standby letter of credit on November 9,
2009.
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
The
following discussion highlights the material factors affecting our results of
operations and the significant changes in the balance sheet items. The notes to
our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report and the
notes to our consolidated financial statements included in our Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008 should be read in conjunction with this discussion
and our consolidated financial statements.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
We
prepare our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
As such, we are required to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions
that we believe are reasonable based upon the information available. These
estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the periods presented. The significant accounting policies which
we believe are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating
our reported financial results include the following:
|
·
|
Revenue
recognition
.
We follow the guidance ASC 605-10-599 for revenue
recognition. We adhere strictly to the criteria outlined in ASC
605-10-599, which provides for revenue to be recognized when (i)
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery or
installation has been completed, (iii) the customer accepts and verifies
receipt, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. Certain
judgments affect the application of our revenue policy. Revenue
consists of the sale of device control software and related maintenance
contracts on these systems. Revenue on the sale of hardware is
recognized upon shipment. We recognize revenue from Device
Manager
TM
software sales upon shipment as we sell the product to audiovisual
integrators, net of estimated returns and discounts. Revenue on
maintenance contracts is recognized over the term of the related
contract.
|
|
·
|
Capitalized
software and research and development costs
.
Our policy on
capitalized software and research and development costs determines the
timing of our recognition of certain development costs. In addition, this
policy determines whether the cost is classified as development expense or
is capitalized. Software development costs incurred after technological
feasibility has been established are capitalized and amortized, commencing
with product release, using the greater of the income forecast method or
on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the product. Management
is required to use professional judgment in determining whether research
and development costs meet the criteria for immediate expense or
capitalization. We did not capitalize any software and research and
development costs during either 2009 or 2008 and all assets were fully
amortized by December 31, 2006. Our research and development
efforts during 2008 and 2009 primarily involved product improvements to
our Device Manager and Video Visitation products to improve their
functionality and ease of use for end
users.
|
|
·
|
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
. We record impairment losses on assets when
events and circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired and
the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are
less than the carrying amount of those items. Our cash flow estimates are
based on historical results adjusted to reflect our best estimate of
future market and operating conditions. The net carrying value of assets
not recoverable is reduced to fair value. Our estimates of fair value
represent our best estimate based on industry trends and reference to
market rates and transactions. We recorded an impairment of
approximately $18,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to lower
the carrying value of our right to license intellectual property based on
estimated future gross profit from sales of our Curiax Arraigner software
product and due to sales that occurred during the period. No
impairment was recorded in the nine months ended September 30,
2008. See Note 8 to our condensed consolidated financial
statements.
|
|
·
|
Derivative
Financial Instruments
.
We do not use derivative
instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market or foreign currency
risks and we evaluates all of our financial instruments to determine if
such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as
embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that
are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially
recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date,
with changes in the fair value reported in the condensed consolidated
statements of operations. For stock-based derivative financial
instruments, we use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to value the
derivative instruments at inception and on subsequent valuation
dates. The classification of derivative instruments, including
whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity,
is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative
instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or
non-current based on the term of the underlying derivative
instrument. See Note 9
to our condensed consolidated
financial statements
.
|
FINANCIAL
CONDITION
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, total current assets decreased
approximately 84% to $191,650 from $1,235,841 at December 31,
2008. The decrease in assets was primarily due to the approximate
$1,424,000 cash used to fund operations during the period.
Total
current liabilities increased $566,474 or 204%, due primarily to the issuance of
convertible notes payable on May 29, 2009 in a financing transaction as well as
increases in accounts payable and accrued expenses during the
period.
See Note
2 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements regarding the
Company’s going concern uncertainty. The Company needs to raise additional
working capital during the fourth quarter 2009 or early in 2010 to fund ongoing
operations and growth and has commenced efforts to raise additional capital
through a private placement of debt securities and warrants and issued $562,250
of convertible notes on May 29, 2009. The Company can raise up
to $1.5 million in the private placement under the current terms if market
conditions allow. No assurance can be given that the Company will be
successful in raising this capital and, in order to reduce cash used from
operations, the Company has terminated and furloughed employees as well as
reducing salaries of all personnel by 50% effective August 14,
2009.
The
Company does not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Three
Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
Revenues
Revenues
were $106,940 and $120,575 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively. The decreased revenues of $13,635 during the
current year were due primarily to decreased software license revenues of
$41,854, as we recognized our first license revenues from our video visitation
software during the three months ended September 30, 2008. The
increased service revenue of $28,219 in the current period was due primarily to
programming service revenue from three customers for which the Company provided
outsourced software development services, in order to reduce the Company’s cash
used from operations. The effects of inflation and changing prices on
revenues and loss from operations during the periods presented have been de
minimus.
Cost
of Revenues and Gross Profit
Cost of
revenues increased $9,249, or 40%, for the three months ended September 30, 2009
compared to the three months ended September 30, 2008 due primarily to the
increased service revenues during the current period, as these revenues have
lower gross margins than software license sales.
Gross
margins were approximately 70% and 81% for each of the three months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The lower margins during
the current period are due to the higher mix of lower margin service sales
during the current period.
Selling,
General, and Administrative Expenses
Selling,
general, and administrative expenses were $351,904 and $659,741 for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease in the
expenses for three-month period ended September 30, 2009 resulted primarily from
decreased headcount as the Company reduced headcount during the quarter and also
reduced the salaries of personnel 50% on August 14, 2009 in order to reduce cash
used from operations. Additionally, professional fees related to the payments
made to Triton Value Partners in cash and common stock in the prior year (see
Note 5 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements) were not
incurred during the three months ended September 30, 2009. Total
expense recorded during the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 for
common stock payments made to Triton per the terms of the consulting agreement
were $0 and $34,977, respectively, and cash expenses were $0 and $30,000 for the
corresponding periods, as Triton’s 24-month agreement expired in January
2009. The decrease was due to the Company’s lower stock price during
the current year.
During
the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, stock-based
compensation of $111,542 and $163,600 was included in selling, general, and
administrative expense to record the amortization of the estimated fair value of
the portion of previously granted stock options that vested during the current
period. The lower current period amortization is due primarily to the lower
number of options vesting during the current period compared to the prior
period.
Research
and Development Expenses
Research
and development costs were $186,330 and $263,818 for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease in expense
during the current year was due primarily to 50% reduction in salaries
implemented during the current period as well as lower stock-based compensation
and outsourced development costs as the Company has attempted to reduce cash
used from operations. During the three months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008, we did not capitalize any software development costs related to
new products under development.
During
the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, stock-based
compensation of $26,158 and $41,801was included in research and development
expense to record the amortization of the estimated fair value of the portion of
previously granted stock options that vested during the current
period.
Other
Income/(Expense)
Other
income/(expense) of $11,446 during the three months ended September 30, 2009
consisted primarily of a $282,571 gain on our derivative liabilities during the
period, offset primarily by $224,167 to record amortization of the fair value of
warrants issued to noteholders in our May 29, 2009 private placement of
convertible notes payable and warrants. The gain on derivative
liabilities during the period was due primarily to the decrease in our stock
price from $0.28 at June 30, 2009 to $0.20 at September 30, 2009 as well as the
expiration of the remaining 2004 Placement Agent Warrants during the period, as
well as the shorter remaining outstanding term for the 2005 and 2009
Warrants.
Net
Loss and Net Loss Attributable to Common Stockholders
Net loss
for the three months ended September 30, 2009 was $452,456 compared to a net
loss of $821,740 for the three months ended September 30, 2008. The
decrease in net loss was due primarily to lower operating expenses due to
aggressive efforts to reduce cash used from operating activities during the
current year. Net loss attributable to common stockholders of
$1,497,500 for the three months ended September 30, 2008 included $675,760 to
record the deemed preferred dividend on the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
issued on September 30, 2008. See note 6 to the condensed
consolidated financial statements.
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
Revenues
were $378,329 and $211,355 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively. The 79% increase in revenues earned during the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 were primarily due to increased programming service
revenues to multiple customers and hardware revenues in conjunction with a sale
of our judicial software at one county. The effects of inflation and
changing prices on revenues and loss from operations during the periods
presented have been de minimus. Due to our small customer base, we face the risk
of fluctuating revenues should any of our customers discontinue using our
products.
Cost
of Revenues and Gross Profit
Cost of
revenues increased $96,253, or 190%, for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008 due primarily to
hardware costs associated with the Curiax Arraigner and Court Recording sales
above as these sales involved a higher mix of hardware revenues.
Gross
margins were approximately 61% and 76% for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively. Lower margins during the current period
resulted primarily from a higher mix of lower margin hardware and programming
service sales during the current year. We began earning revenue
during the current year from outsourced software development that we provided
for new customers, in order to reduce our cash used from operations, and these
revenues carry lower margins than software license revenues.
Selling,
General, and Administrative Expenses
Selling,
general, and administrative expenses were $1,726,183 and $2,282,208 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease
in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 compared to the similar period
in 2008 resulted primarily from lower headcount, lower salary expense due to
salary reductions, and lower overhead during the current year as well as
separation costs of approximately $53,000 accrued in conjunction with
the termination of our former Chief Executive Officer in 2008. Lower
stock payments of approximately $116,000 resulted from the expiration of the
24-month consulting agreement with Triton Value Partners in January
2009.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, stock-based
compensation of $446,636 and $519,442 was included in selling, general, and
administrative expenses to record the amortization of the estimated fair value
of the portion of previously granted stock options that vested during the
current period.
Research
and Development Expenses
Research
and development expenses were $787,203 in the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and $907,280 in the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The
decrease in expense was due mainly to the higher use of third-party development
personnel during 2008, reductions in salaries during the current year, as well
as lower stock-based compensation.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, stock-based
compensation of $116,751 and $129,527 was included in research and development
expense to record the amortization of the estimated fair value of the portion of
previously granted stock options that vested during the current
period.
Other
expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 of $179,032 consisted
primarily $304,575 recorded to amortize the fair value of warrants issued to
convertible noteholders in a financing transaction on May 29, 2009, partially
offset by a gain of $181,245 recorded on our derivative
liabilities.
Other
expense during the Nine months ended September 30, 2008 of $619,379 consisted
primarily of $532,076 to amortize debt discount and the value of warrants
granted to the convertible note holders in January 2008, $78,894 to record the
interest accrued on the convertible notes prior to their exchange into the
Series C convertible stock offering, and debt offering costs of $21,579
amortized over the term of the notes.
Net
Loss and Net Loss Attributable to Common Stockholders
Net loss
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $2,461,112 compared to a net
loss of $3,648,282 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The lower loss
during the current period was due primarily to lower operating expenses during
the current year due to attempts to lower our cash used from operations as well
as greater financing costs incurred during the nine months ended September 30,
2008 in conjunction with our notes payable financing in January
2008. Additionally, we recorded gains on derivative liabilities
totaling $181,245 during the current year due primarily to the expiration of
certain warrants classified as derivatives as well as due to lower remaining
terms of our derivative liabilities. Net loss attributable to common
stockholders of $2,820,450 included $359,338 to record the value of common stock
dividends paid to Series A, B, and C Convertible Preferred Stock holders on June
30, 2009. Net loss attributable to common stockholders of $5,898,248
included $274,368 to record the value of common stock dividends paid on June 30,
2008 to Series A and Series B Convertible Preferred Stock holders and $1,975,598
to record the deemed preferred dividend on the Series C Convertible Preferred
Stock issued on June 30 and September 26, 2008. See note 6
to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Due to
continuing losses during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 of $2,461,112,
cash used in operating activities amounted to $1,423,573 during the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, and an accumulated deficit of $80.4 million at
September 30, 2009, and our inability to date to obtain sufficient financing to
support current and anticipated levels of operations, there is a substantial
doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our revenues since
inception have not provided sufficient cash to fund our operations.
Historically, we have relied on private placement issuances of equity and
debt. We need to raise additional working capital during the fourth
quarter of 2009 or early 2010 to fund our ongoing operations and growth. We have
commenced efforts to raise additional capital through a private placement of
debt securities and warrants and issued $562,250 of convertible notes on May 29,
2009. We can raise up to $1.5 million in the private placement under the current
terms if market conditions allow. No assurance can be given that we
will be successful in raising this capital and we have significantly reduced our
cash used from operating activities by reducing salaries of all employees by 50%
effective August 14, 2009. Additionally, we began
performing outsourced software development activities during the three months
ended September 30, 2009 in order to further reduce our cash used from
operations. If we successfully raise additional capital through the
issuance of debt, this will increase our interest expense and the warrants will
dilute our existing shareholders. If we are not successful in raising
this capital, we may not be able to continue as a going concern. In
that event, we may be forced to cease operations and our stockholders could lose
their entire investment in our company.
As of
September 30, 2009, we had cash and cash equivalents of $92,537. We
currently require substantial amounts of capital to fund current operations and
the continued development and deployment of our Device Manager
TM
and
Curiax
TM
product
lines. This additional funding could be in the form of the sale of
assets, debt, equity, or a combination of these financing methods. However,
there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain such financing if and
when needed, or that if obtained, such financing will be sufficient or on terms
and conditions acceptable to us. If we are unable to obtain this additional
funding, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be
adversely affected.
We used
$1,423,573 in cash from operating activities during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 due primarily to our net loss during the period of
$2,461,112. We used $2,139,456 in cash from operating activities
during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 due primarily to our net loss
during the period of $3,648,282. The decrease in cash used during the
current period was due primarily to the higher revenues and lower operating
expenses during the current period as we attempted to reduce operating expenses
to reduce cash use. Cash used from operations totaled approximately
$257,000 in the three months ended September 30, 2009, compared to approximately
$596,000 and $571,000 used in the first two quarters of 2009,
respectively. Cash received during the nine months ended September
2009 included approximately $537,000 net proceeds from the issuance of
convertible notes payable and warrants to purchase our common
stock. Cash received from financing activities during the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 included the $1,500,000 of convertible notes payable
issued less approximately $5,000 of deferred financing costs incurred during the
period and we raised an additional $1,053,153 from the equity offering on June
30, 2008 and $1,373,000 (net of offering costs) on September 26, 2008.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, we used $18,267
and $28,318 in investing activities primarily to purchase new computer
equipment.
In view
of the matters described in the preceding paragraph, recoverability of a major
portion of the recorded asset amounts shown in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheet is dependent upon our continued operations, which in
turn is dependent upon our ability to meet our financing requirements on a
continuing basis and attract additional financing. The unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the
recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or amounts and
classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to
continue in existence.
The
Company expects to spend less than $5,000 for capital expenditures for the
remainder of fiscal 2009.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
Certain
statements contained herein are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning
of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, such as statements
relating to financial results and plans for future sales and business
development activities, and are thus prospective. Such forward-looking
statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, which could
cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed or
implied by such forward-looking statements. Potential risks and uncertainties
include, but are not limited to, economic conditions, competition, our ability
to complete the development of and market our new Device Manager product line
and other uncertainties detailed from time to time in our Securities and
Exchange Commission (“the SEC”) filings, including our Annual Report on Form
10-K and our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q.
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The
Company had no material exposure to market risk from derivatives or other
financial instruments as of September 30, 2009.
ITEM
4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The
Company maintains a system of internal controls designed to provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are executed in accordance with management’s general
or specific authorization; transactions are recorded as necessary to (1) permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepting in the United States of America, and (2) maintain
accountability for assets. Access to assets is permitted only in
accordance with management’s general or specific authorization. In
2007, the Company adopted and implemented the control requirements of Section
404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Act”).
It is the
responsibility of the Company’s management to establish and maintain adequate
internal control over financial reporting. However, due to its
limited financial resources, there is only limited segregation of duties within
the accounting function, leaving most significant aspects of financial reporting
in the hands of the Chief Financial Officer.
A
significant deficiency is defined as a deficiency, or a combination of
deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting that is less severe
than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those
responsible for oversight of a registrant’s financial reporting.
A
material weakness is a significant deficiency (or a combination of significant
deficiencies) that result in a more-than-remote likelihood that a material
misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented
or detected.
The
Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed in our Securities Exchange Act reports
is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods
specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated
and communicated to our management, including the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure. The Company previously disclosed that it
had difficulty in evaluating, applying, and documenting complex accounting
principles, and in preparing a complete report without major errors, within our
accounting function and reported that a material weakness existed within its
system of controls.
Our
management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, evaluated as of September 30, 2009, the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. In their evaluation, our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer identified the changes and
enhancements in our control environment, as described below, that we have
implemented prior to December 31, 2008, that remedied our previously
disclosed material weaknesses. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer has concluded that the Company's
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period
covered by this report to provide reasonable assurance that information required
to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms
and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company's
management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
The
Company implemented additional procedures at December 31, 2008, regarding the
review and preparation of the accounting related to complex accounting
principles and the Company’s reports. On an as-needed basis, the
Company will use outside consultants to assist in the preparation of the
Company’s financial accounting records and financial reports. No such
assistance was deemed to be required as of September 30, 2009.
The
Company’s significant deficiency involves a lack of segregation of duties within
its internal control function. Due to the inherent issue of segregation of
duties in a small company, we have relied heavily on entity or management review
controls to lessen the issue of segregation of duties.
Management
is aware that there is a lack of segregation of duties at the Company due to the
small number of employees dealing with general, administrative and financial
matters. This constitutes a significant deficiency in financial reporting.
However, at this time, management has decided that considering the employees
involved and the control procedures in place, the risks associated with such
lack of segregation of duties are insignificant and the potential benefits of
adding additional employees to clearly segregate duties do not justify the
expenses associated with such increases. Management will periodically reevaluate
this situation. If the volume of the business increases and sufficient capital
is secured, it is the Company's intention to further increase staffing to
mitigate the current lack of segregation of duties within the general,
administrative and financial functions.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There
have been no significant changes in internal controls over financial reporting
that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2009 that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
Part
II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
The
following exhibits are filed with or incorporated by reference into this report.
The exhibits which are denominated by an asterisk (*) were previously filed as a
part of, and are hereby incorporated by reference from either (i) the
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form
S-18 (File No. 33-27040-D) (referred to as “S-18 No. 1”) or (ii) ) the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 (referred to
as “2006 10-KSB”).
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
3.1*
|
|
Certificate
of Incorporation as amended through March 8, 2007 (2006
10-KSB)
|
|
|
|
3.2*
|
|
Amended
Bylaws of the Company as presently in use (S-18 No. 1, Exhibit
3.2)
|
|
|
|
10.9*
|
|
Triton
Business Development Services Engagement Agreement dated January 31, 2007
(2006 10-KSB)
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule
13a-14(a).
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification
of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule
13a-14(a).
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification
of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
|
SIMTROL,
INC.
|
|
|
Date:
November 10, 2009
|
/s/ Oliver M. Cooper III
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
(Principal
executive officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ Stephen N. Samp
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
(Principal
financial and accounting
officer)
|
Simtrol (CE) (USOTC:SMRL)
Historical Stock Chart
From Feb 2025 to Mar 2025
Simtrol (CE) (USOTC:SMRL)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Mar 2025