Jury Awards $110 Million to Plaintiff in Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder Case -- 2nd Update
May 05 2017 - 11:08AM
Dow Jones News
By Anne Steele and Jonathan D. Rockoff
Johnson & Johnson was hit with a $110 million jury decision
in favor of a woman who said talc in the company's baby powder gave
her ovarian cancer, the latest -- and largest -- verdict yet in the
litigation saga.
The company said it would quickly appeal the verdict awarded by
a St. Louis jury, the fourth such losing case for J&J and
Imerys SA, the talc mining company.
A J&J spokeswoman said a jury decision in the company's
favor in St. Louis in March and the dismissal of two cases in New
Jersey in September 2016 "further highlight the lack of credible
scientific evidence behind plaintiffs' allegations." In the New
Jersey cases, a state court judge ruled that plaintiffs' scientific
experts couldn't adequately support their theories that talcum
powder causes ovarian cancer.
J&J has said talc is safe to use in cosmetic products and
that its baby-powder labeling is appropriate. The spokeswoman said
the company has no plans to settle any related pending
litigation.
"We are preparing for additional trials this year and we will
continue to defend the safety of Johnson's Baby Powder," she
said.
Many jury verdicts are often reduced, if not thrown out, on
appeal.
J&J has argued that juries in St. Louis, in particular, have
been tainted by a deluge of trial-lawyer advertisements promoting a
link between talcum powder and ovarian cancer, but a judge refused
the company's requests to move the trials.
J&J won the most recent trial in March but lost three
others, which led to verdicts totaling more than $194 million that
are now on appeal. Thursday's verdict in St. Louis in favor of a
62-year-old Virginia woman capped the fifth trial alleging the
company's talc is tied to ovarian cancer.
Lawyers for the plaintiff said the litigation continues with
"thousands more claimants across the globe."
"We don't care how many trials it takes," said James Onder, one
of the trial attorneys, noting that his firm will continue to
support those suing the companies "until Johnson & Johnson and
Imerys stand up and do the right thing."
Talcum powder is commonly used because the mineral isn't only
good at absorbing moisture but also keeps skin dry and prevents
rashes.
In its natural form, talc contains some asbestos, which can
"cause cancers in and around the lungs when inhaled," according to
the American Cancer Society. But manufacturers have been removing
asbestos from talc products since the 1970s, and evidence of a link
between asbestos-free talc and cancer is "less clear," the society
said.
Studies probing a connection between talc and ovarian cancer
have returned mixed findings. If talc does raise the risk of
ovarian cancer, the increased risk "is likely to be very small,"
according to the American Cancer Society.
An independent review of 16 studies examining whether there is a
link to talc exposure and ovarian cancer, conducted for the
National Cancer Institute's cancer-information database, found the
"weight of evidence does not support an association."
Write to Anne Steele at Anne.Steele@wsj.com and Jonathan D.
Rockoff at Jonathan.Rockoff@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
May 05, 2017 11:53 ET (15:53 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2017 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Imerys (EU:NK)
Historical Stock Chart
From Oct 2024 to Nov 2024
Imerys (EU:NK)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2023 to Nov 2024