NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited, condensed, consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position of Mediware Information Systems, Inc. (“Mediware” or the “Company”) and its results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. Such financial statements have been condensed in accordance with the applicable regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and, therefore, do not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with Mediware's audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, included in Mediware's Annual Report filed on Form 10-K for such fiscal year.
The results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire fiscal year. Certain costs previously included within cost of systems are included within costs of services for the period ended September 30, 2012. Prior periods have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.
Merger Agreement
On September 11, 2012, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Project Ruby Parent Corp., a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), and Project Ruby Merger Corp., a New York corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Subsidiary”), providing for the merger (“Merger”) of Merger Subsidiary with and into the Company, with the Company surviving the Merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent. Parent and Merger Subsidiary are controlled affiliates of Thoma Bravo, LLC.
At the effective time of the Merger, each share of Common Stock outstanding immediately prior to the effective time (other than shares held by Parent, Merger Subsidiary, or any subsidiary of Parent or held in the treasury of the Company or owned by any wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company) will be cancelled and converted into the right to receive $22.00 in cash, without interest. Consummation of the Merger is subject to customary conditions, including without limitation, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast at a meeting of shareholders held for the purpose of approving the Merger Agreement and the Merger, which has been called for November 8, 2012.
If approved by shareholders, the Company will be delisted and will no longer be a registrant with the Securities Exchange Commission.
In connection with the execution of the Merger Agreement, the directors and named executive officers (who own shares) of the Company each entered into a Voting Agreement, dated the date of the Merger Agreement, with Parent, pursuant to which, among other things, each such director and officer agreed, subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein, to vote their shares of Common Stock in favor of the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.
2. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding, par value $0.10 (“Common Stock”), of Mediware. For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the dilutive effect of Common Stock equivalents is included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share using the treasury stock method.
3. TREASURY STOCK
In February 2008, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized Mediware to repurchase up to $4,000,000 of its Common Stock, at times and prices as the President and Chief Executive Officer or the Chief Financial Officer of the Company shall determine to be appropriate (the “Share Repurchase Program”). In October 2008, the Board of Directors expanded the Share Repurchase Program by $3,318,000, bringing the total amount authorized under the Share Repurchase Program to $7,318,000. The program has no expiration date, and Mediware has no obligation to purchase shares under the Share Repurchase Program.
As of September 30, 2012, the Company has repurchased a total of 590,000 shares of Common Stock at a cost of $3,503,000 under the Share Repurchase Program, excluding the transactions described below. As of September 30, 2012, the Company is authorized to purchase up to an additional $3,815,000 of Common Stock under the Share Repurchase Program.
The Company permits a net exercise for certain equity-based awards made to employees and directors. As of September 30, 2012 and 2011, 41,318 and 37,623 shares of Common Stock with a fair value of $475,000 and $428,000, respectively, were surrendered in order to satisfy statutory tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of a stock-based compensation awards. These surrenders were accounted for as repurchases of common stock but are not part of our Share Repurchase Program.
Shares of Common Stock repurchased by the Company are recorded at cost as treasury stock and result in a reduction of stockholders' equity in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. When shares are reissued, the Company will use the weighted average cost method for determining cost. The difference between the cost of the shares and the issuance price is added or deducted from additional paid-in capital.
Furthermore, under the Merger Agreement discussed in Note 1 above, Mediware has agreed not to repurchase any shares of Common Stock without the prior written consent of Parent and Merger Subsidiary except in connection with the exercise of outstanding options or the vesting of restricted stock.
4. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate their fair value due to the short-term nature of their underlying terms.
5. ACQUISITIONS
Strategic Healthcare Group, LLC
On September 10, 2012, the Company acquired certain assets of Strategic Healthcare Group, LLC (“SHG”). The SHG business provides blood management consulting, education and informatics solutions to blood collection centers, hospitals and healthcare systems in the United States. The acquisition expanded Mediware’s performance management software product and service offerings.
The purchase price paid for SHG assets consists of $4,476,000 in cash with potential additional cash consideration of up to $3,510,000 if the SHG business achieves certain future operating and financial performance criteria. The purchase price is also subject to a working capital adjustment. The Company estimated the fair value of the contingent consideration at the acquisition date to be $2,463,000 using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model. This fair value is based on significant inputs not observable in the markets and thus represents a Level 3 measurement as defined in ASC 820.
The Company incurred insignificant legal, accounting and other professional fees related to this transaction, which were expensed. The results of the SHG operations are included in the accompanying financial statements from the date of acquisition. SHG revenue and earnings during the period from September 10, 2012 to September 30, 2012 were not significant.
The Company accounted for the SHG transaction as a business acquisition under applicable accounting guidance. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed of SHG were recorded as of the acquisition date, at their respective fair values. The preparation of these estimated fair values required the use of significant assumptions and estimates. These estimates were based on assumptions that the Company believes to be consistent with the assumptions that would be considered by market participants.
The following summarizes the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date (in thousands):
|
|
Purchase
Price
Allocation
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
332
|
|
Prepaid and other current assets
|
|
|
47
|
|
Fixed assets
|
|
|
139
|
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization
|
|
|
5,317
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,618
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(430
|
)
|
Other long-term liabilities - contingent consideration
|
|
|
(2,463
|
)
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$
|
4,476
|
|
Details of acquired intangibles and goodwill are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Amount Assigned
|
|
Weighted
Average
Amortization
Period
|
|
Risk-Adjusted
Discount Rate
Used in Purchase
Price
Allocation
|
|
Amortizable Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tradenames
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
2.0 years
|
|
|
23.4%
|
|
|
Purchased technology - database
|
|
|
1,873
|
|
4.0 years
|
|
|
23.4%
|
|
|
Purchased technology - software
|
|
|
873
|
|
4.0 years
|
|
|
23.4%
|
|
|
Customer backlog
|
|
|
90
|
|
2.0 years
|
|
|
23.4%
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
1,861
|
|
5.0 years
|
|
|
23.6%
|
|
|
Non-compete agreement
|
|
|
566
|
|
5.0 years
|
|
|
23.4%
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
1,618
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company valued the tradenames and purchased technology - database using the relief from royalty method of the income approach. The approach considers the hypothetical royalty or rental payment that the Company would be willing to pay to a third party in order to obtain the use and the rights to the intangible assets. This method requires the use of certain estimates, including future revenue, royalty rate and discount rate. The values assigned to the tradenames and database represent the estimated cost savings the Company would achieve by not having to license the intangible assets.
The Company valued the purchased technology - software using the cost savings method of the cost approach. The approach considers the current estimated cost of reproducing or replacing an asset, less accrued depreciation from functional obsolescence and economic obsolescence. Utilizing this approach, the Company estimated the fully burdened hourly rates for the developers who might be involved in the replacement of the current software. This amount was multiplied by the estimated number of hours to reprogram the software. Based on this methodology the Company assigned the value of software at $873,000. The Company will amortize this amount over the estimated useful life of four years.
The Company valued the customer relationships and customer backlog using the excess earnings method of the income approach. Utilizing this approach, the Company projected revenue and related expenses. These projected income amounts were then reduced by the return on contributory assets and discounted to present value. This method requires the use of certain estimates, including revenue growth rates, customer attrition, expenses, contributory asset charges and discount rates.
The Company valued the non-compete agreement using a discounted cash flow method of the income approach. Utilizing this approach, the Company prepared two discounted cash flow models, one that assumes a non-compete agreement is in place and a second that assumes the agreement is not in place. The value assigned to the agreement represents the difference between the present values of the two projections.
Goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
Proforma information for the acquisition of SHG has not been presented as the acquisition is not significant.
Cyto Management System
On April 18, 2012, the Company acquired the assets of Cyto Management System (“CMS”) from Cobbler ICT Services BV for $2,191,000 paid in cash. The CMS software, which was deployed in Holland and Belgium at the date of acquisition, provides healthcare organizations a chemotherapy management solution to track patients, manage highly individualized medication-based treatment plans and help control costs and report outcomes associated with cancer therapies. The software utilizes a multilingual language platform that facilitates configuration for new international markets.
The Company incurred insignificant legal, accounting and other professional fees related to this transaction, which were expensed. The results of the CMS operations are included in the accompanying financial statements from the date of acquisition.
The Company accounted for the CMS transaction as a business acquisition under applicable accounting guidance. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed of CMS were recorded as of the acquisition date, at their respective fair values. The preparation of these estimated fair values required the use of significant assumptions and estimates. These estimates were based on assumptions that the Company believes to be consistent with the assumptions that would be considered by market participants.
The following summarizes the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date (in thousands):
|
|
Purchase Price Allocation
|
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization
|
|
$
|
2,184
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
7
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$
|
2,191
|
|
Details of acquired intangibles and goodwill are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Amount
Assigned
|
|
Weighted
Average
Amortization
Period
|
|
Risk-Adjusted
Discount Rate
Used in Purchase
Price
Allocation
|
|
Amortizable Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tradename
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
2.0 years
|
|
|
22.6%
|
|
|
Purchased technology
|
|
|
1,721
|
|
5.0 years
|
|
24.0%
|
–
|
22.6%
|
|
Customer backlog
|
|
|
68
|
|
4 months
|
|
|
22.6%
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
369
|
|
9.0 years
|
|
23.0%
|
-
|
25.0%
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
13
|
|
6 months
|
|
|
23.0%
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company valued the purchased technology using the cost savings method of the cost approach. The approach considers the current estimated cost of reproducing or replacing an asset, less accrued depreciation from functional obsolescence and economic obsolescence. Utilizing this approach, the Company estimated the fully burdened hourly rates for the developers who might be involved in the replacement of the current software. This amount was multiplied by the estimated number of hours to reprogram the software. Based on this methodology the Company assigned the value of purchased technology at $1,721,000. The Company will amortize this amount over the estimated useful life of five years.
The Company valued the customer relationships and contracted backlog using the excess earnings method of the income approach. Utilizing this approach, the Company projected revenue and related expenses. These projected income amounts were then reduced by the return on contributory assets and discounted to present value. This method requires the use of certain estimates, including revenue growth rates, customer attrition, expenses, contributory asset charges and discount rates.
Goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
Proforma information for the acquisition of CMS has not been presented as the acquisition is not significant.
Transtem, LLC
On January 3, 2012, Mediware acquired substantially all of the assets, excluding certain contracts, of St. Louis, MO-based Transtem, LLC (“Transtem”), a provider of software that manages the collection and transplantation of adult stem cells in cellular-based therapies and medical research in a growing field that includes cancer treatment and regenerative medicine. The acquisition expanded Mediware’s blood and biologics management software product and service offerings.
The purchase price paid for Transtem consisted of an initial purchase price of $667,000 paid in cash. The Company incurred insignificant legal, accounting and other professional fees related to this transaction, which were expensed. The results of the Transtem operations are included in the accompanying financial statements from the date of acquisition.
The Company accounted for the Transtem transaction as a business acquisition under applicable accounting guidance. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed of Transtem were recorded as of the acquisition date, at their respective fair values. The preparation of these estimated fair values required the use of significant assumptions and estimates. These estimates were based on assumptions that the Company believes to be consistent with the assumptions that would be considered by market participants.
The following summarizes the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date, net of cash acquired (in thousands):
|
|
Purchase
Price
Allocation
|
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization
|
|
$
|
813
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
62
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
5
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$
|
667
|
|
Details of acquired intangibles and goodwill are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Amount
Assigned
|
|
Weighted
Average
Amortization
Period
|
|
Risk-Adjusted
Discount Rate
Used in Purchase
Price
Allocation
|
|
Amortizable Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased technology
|
|
$
|
813
|
|
5.0 years
|
|
24.0%
|
–
|
22.6%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company valued the purchased technology using the cost savings method of the cost approach. The approach considers the current estimated cost of reproducing or replacing an asset, less accrued depreciation from functional obsolescence and economic obsolescence. Utilizing this approach, the Company estimated the fully burdened hourly rates for the developers who might be involved in the replacement of the current software. This amount was multiplied by the estimated number of hours to reprogram the software. Based on this methodology the Company assigned the value of purchased technology at $813,000. The Company will amortize this amount over the estimated useful life of five years.
Goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
Pro forma information for the acquisition of Transtem has not been presented as the acquisition is not significant.
6. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill
The carrying amount of the Company’s goodwill at September 30, 2012 and June 30, 2012 was $14,956,000 and $13,338,000, respectively. The change in goodwill is attributable to the September 2012 acquisition of SHG assets.
Other Intangible Assets
The carrying amount of our other intangible assets as of September 30, 2012 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Gross Carrying Amount
|
|
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
|
|
Net Carrying Amount
|
|
|
Weighted Average Remaining Useful Life (in years)
|
|
Purchased technology
|
|
$
|
8,479
|
|
|
$
|
(2,101
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,378
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
8,540
|
|
|
|
(3,148
|
)
|
|
|
5,392
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
Customer backlog
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
515
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Tradenames
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,074
|
|
|
$
|
(5,632
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense for purchased technology, which was recorded as selling, general and administrative expense, amounted to $324,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and $162,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011. Amortization expense for other intangible assets amounted to $690,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and $422,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011. The following represents the expected amortization in future periods (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
2013 (remainder)
|
|
$
|
2,461
|
|
2014
|
|
|
3,274
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2.949
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2,429
|
|
2017
|
|
|
1,086
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,442
|
|
7. STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
The aggregate noncash stock based compensation expense totaled $239,000 and $297,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Stock Based Plans
The Company's 2011 Equity Incentive Plan, approved by the shareholders in December 2011, provides additional compensation incentives to encourage high levels of performance and employee retention. Key employees of the Company and directors, as well as persons who render services to the Company as consultants, advisors or independent contractors, are eligible to receive grants under this plan. The number of shares that may be issued under this plan is 2,000,000. Shares may be issued as either incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, or restricted common stock. Options may be granted for a period of up to ten years. Restricted common stock awards may be subject to vesting restrictions and may be forfeited if certain performance factors are not maintained. As of September 30, 2012, there were 1,913,004 shares available for issuance under this plan.
The Company's 2003 Equity Incentive Plan, approved by the shareholders in December 2003, provided additional compensation incentives to encourage high levels of performance and employee retention. Key employees of the Company and directors, as well as persons who rendered services to the Company as consultants, advisors or independent contractors, were eligible to receive grants under this plan. The number of shares that could be issued under this plan was 2,000,000 but use of the plan for new awards ceased upon the adoption of the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan. Awards outstanding under the plan were not affected. Shares were issued as incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, or restricted common stock. Options may have a period of up to ten years. Restricted common stock awards may be subject to vesting restrictions and may be forfeited if certain performance factors are not maintained. The plan provided that a maximum of 1,700,000 shares could be issued as any combination of restricted stock, options and restricted stock unit awards. The additional 300,000 shares of common stock could only be granted as option awards. As of September 30, 2012 no shares were available for issuance under this Plan.
The Company permits net share exercises of certain awards made to employees and directors. Shares reacquired under net share exercises are included within treasury stock.
The Merger Agreement discussed in Note 1 above requires the Company to settle all outstanding awards under the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2003 Equity Incentive Plan and to terminate the plans as of the effectiveness of the Merger.
Restricted Common Stock Awards
Beginning in fiscal 2007, each member of the Company’s Board of Directors received an annual grant of $10,000 of restricted common stock (the “Director Shares”) as part of their compensation for serving on the Company’s Board of Directors. The number of shares granted is determined based upon the fair market value of the Company’s stock on January 1 of each year. These Director Shares vest on June 30 each fiscal year based upon the director’s continued service on the Company’s Board of Directors. The Company recorded compensation expense of $18,000 related to these Director Shares for both the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. The Director Shares will result in compensation expense in future periods of up to $52,000, representing the fair value on the date of the grant less the amount of compensation expense already recorded.
During fiscal 2010, the Company entered into agreements to provide long-term incentive compensation opportunities to certain employees. Under the terms of these agreements, the Company will grant up to a total of 168,750 restricted shares of common stock (the “2010 Enhanced Performance Shares”) in three annual tranches. The 2010 Enhanced Performance Shares vest upon both continued employment and upon the achievement of certain performance goals. Each tranche is deemed to be granted upon the annual establishment of the performance criteria. Through year end June 30, 2012, the Company had granted 131,000 2010 Enhanced Performance shares. In each of the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 the Company granted 37,500 2010 Enhanced Performance Shares and recorded $164,000 and $159,000 of compensation expense, respectively. The Company will continue to assess whether or not the achievement of any performance goals is probable at each reporting period, and will recognize the related expense if and when the performance conditions become probable.
In the three months ended September 30, 2012 the Company reversed $25,000 of compensation expense related to 2,245 shares from the second tranche of Enhanced Performance Shares that did not vest. At September 30, 2012, 110,255 2010 Enhanced Performance Shares had fully vested and all related compensation expense had been recognized. The third tranche of 45,000 shares awarded under the 2010 Enhanced Performance Shares may result in compensation expense in future periods of up to $473,000, representing the fair value on the date of the grant less the amount of compensation expense already recorded.
Also under the terms of these agreements, the Company will grant up to a total of 56,250 restricted shares of common stock (the “Market Condition Shares”) in three annual tranches. The Market Condition Shares vest upon the achievement of certain market condition criteria and the continued employment of the key employees. Following the grants of the initial tranches, each tranche of the Market Condition Shares is deemed to be granted upon the annual reset of the market condition criteria. During each of the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company granted 12,500 of the Market Condition Shares and recorded $24,000 and $21,000 of compensation expense, respectively. At September 30, 2012, the first and second tranches of Market Condition Shares had fully vested and all related compensation expense had been recognized. The third tranche of 15,000 shares awarded as Market Condition Shares may result in compensation expense in future periods of up to $71,000, representing the fair value on the date of the grant less the amount of compensation expense already recorded.
A summary of the status of the Company’s nonvested restricted common stock as of September 30, 2012, and changes during the three months ended September 30, 2012, is presented below (shares amounts in thousands):
|
|
Market Condition Shares
|
|
|
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
|
|
|
2010 Enhanced Performance Shares
|
|
|
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
|
|
Nonvested at June 30, 2012
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
5.98
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
12.05
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
6.61
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
14.60
|
|
Canceled or forfeited
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
5.78
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
13.71
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
11.32
|
|
Nonvested at September 30, 2012
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
6.56
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
14.55
|
|
The foregoing information does not reflect any shares that are deemed not granted as described above.
The fair value of the restricted shares is determined based on the average trading price of the Company’s shares on the grant date, except for the Director Shares which is determined based on the average trading price of the Company’s shares as of January 1 of each year, pursuant to the directors’ compensation plan and the Market Condition Shares which were valued by an outside party to take into account the market condition criteria.
Restrictions on shares of restricted stock will be caused to lapse immediately prior to the Merger, and the shares will be subject to the same terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement discussed in Note 1 above that are applicable to all other shares of Common Stock. However, if there are any terms or conditions more favorable to a holder of restricted stock under any employment or related agreement, those terms or conditions will remain in full force and effect.
Stock Option Awards
The fair value of stock options is determined at the date of grant and is charged to compensation expense over the vesting period of the options. The fair value of options at date of grant is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. There were no stock options granted in the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.
The following table sets forth summarized information concerning the Company's stock options as of September 30, 2012 (shares and aggregate intrinsic value amounts in thousands):
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
|
|
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term
|
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2012
|
|
|
742
|
|
|
$
|
9.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
7.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or expired
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
11.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2012
|
|
|
528
|
|
|
$
|
9.74
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
$
|
6,427
|
|
Options exercisable at September 30, 2012
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
$
|
9.43
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
$
|
4,131
|
|
Nonvested at September 30, 2012
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
$
|
10.27
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
$
|
2,296
|
|
The strike price of the options is determined based on the average trading price of the Company’s shares on the grant date.
The total fair value of shares vested during the three months ended September 30, 2012 was $649,000. Historically, the Company has issued new shares upon the exercise of stock options.
The Company recorded $58,000 and $100,000 of compensation expense for stock options for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Estimated future stock-based compensation expense relating to outstanding stock options is as follows (in thousands):
Fiscal Years Ending June 30,
|
|
Future Stock Option Compensation
Expense
|
|
2013 (Remainder)
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
2014
|
|
|
117
|
|
2015
|
|
|
32
|
|
2016
|
|
|
9
|
|
2017
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total estimated future stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
341
|
|
The following table presents information relating to stock options at September 30, 2012 (share amounts in thousands):
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
Range of Exercise
Prices
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life in Years
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
$ 0.00 - $ 4.49
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
3.89
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
3.89
|
|
$ 4.50 - $ 7.49
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
$
|
6.08
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
$
|
6.01
|
|
$ 7.50 - $ 8.99
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
$
|
8.86
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
8.85
|
|
$ 9.00 - $ 10.49
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
$
|
9.45
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
$
|
9.63
|
|
$ 10.50 - $11.99
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
11.19
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
11.19
|
|
$12.00 - $13.49
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
$
|
12.93
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
12.67
|
|
$13.50 - $14.99
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
13.97
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
13.73
|
|
|
|
|
528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each option to purchase Common Stock that is outstanding as of the effective time of the Merger will be automatically cancelled in exchange for the right to receive the excess, if any, of $22.00 over the exercise price of such option, less applicable taxes required to be withheld.
8. INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense decreased to $734,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to $758,000 in the same quarter of fiscal 2012, primarily related to the decrease in operating income. The effective tax rate increased to 48% in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to 34% in the same quarter of fiscal 2012, primarily due to nondeductible professional fees paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 related to the Merger Agreement and the Merger.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences attributed to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is provided against net deferred tax assets when it is not more likely than not that a tax benefit will be realized. Income taxes include U.S. and foreign taxes.
As of September 30, 2012 the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits totaled $624,000. Accrued interest and penalties at September 30, 2012 were $168,000. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties in income tax expense.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions. In general, the Company’s filed income tax returns are no longer subject to examination by the respective taxing authorities for years ending before June 30, 2009. However, to the extent utilized, the Company’s net operating loss carryforwards originating in closed years, remain subject to examinations.
9. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company has four distinct product lines: Medication Management systems, Blood and Biologics Management systems, Performance Management systems and Perioperative Management systems. Based on similar economic characteristics, as well as the nature of products, production processes, customers and distribution methods, the Company has aggregated these product lines into one reporting segment. Revenue by product line is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Medication Management Systems:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
System sales
|
|
$
|
2,670
|
|
|
$
|
1,854
|
|
Services
|
|
|
5,593
|
|
|
|
5,437
|
|
Billing and collections
|
|
|
1,305
|
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
|
9,568
|
|
|
|
8,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blood and Biologics Management Systems:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
System sales
|
|
|
983
|
|
|
|
2,283
|
|
Services
|
|
|
4,654
|
|
|
|
4,034
|
|
|
|
|
5,637
|
|
|
|
6,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Management Systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
System sales
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
Services
|
|
|
464
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perioperative Management Systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
System sales
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Services
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
15,985
|
|
|
$
|
15,453
|
|
Billing and collections revenue is generated from the acquired assets of Advantage Reimbursement, Inc., and to a lesser extent, certain assets of CareCentric, Inc.
Selected financial information by geographic area is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Revenue from Unaffiliated Customers:
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
14,000
|
|
|
$
|
13,658
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
1,985
|
|
|
|
1,795
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
15,985
|
|
|
$
|
15,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
824
|
|
|
$
|
1,329
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
164
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
801
|
|
|
$
|
1,493
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Identifiable Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
89,655
|
|
|
$
|
78,765
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
9,041
|
|
|
|
8,086
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
98,696
|
|
|
$
|
86,851
|
|
10. CONTINGENCIES
From time to time, Mediware becomes involved in routine litigation incidental to the conduct of its business, including employment disputes and litigation alleging product defects, intellectual property infringements, violations of law and breaches of contract and warranties. Mediware believes that such routine litigation, if adversely determined, would not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Payment of Fees and Expenses Pursuant to Merger Agreement
The Company may be required to pay to Parent a termination fee in the amount of $5,769,000 (less any amount previously paid to Parent in reimbursement of Parent’s transaction expenses) if the merger agreement is terminated under certain specified circumstances. The Company may also be required to pay to Parent its reasonable and documented out-of-pocket fees and expenses (including legal fees and expenses) of up to $2,000,000 under certain specified circumstances in which Parent is not entitled to the termination fee described above.
11. RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In July 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02 “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment” (“ASU No. 2012-02”), to simplify the testing for a drop in value of intangible assets such as trademarks, patents and distribution rights. Under ASU No. 2012-02, an entity has the option of first performing a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired before proceeding to the quantitative impairment test in ASC 350-30 under which it would calculate the asset’s fair value. When performing the qualitative assessment, the entity must evaluate events and circumstances that may affect the significant inputs used to determine the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset. ASU No. 2012-02 is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted. The Company’s adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on its financial statements.
12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Putative Class Action
On October 18, 2012, a shareholder filed a putative class action lawsuit in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, against us, our directors, Thoma Bravo, LLC, an affiliate of Parent and Merger Subsidiary, and Merger Subsidiary. The complaint for the case, styled
Kempf v. Mediware Information Systems, Inc. et al.
, Index No.: 653649/2012, alleges that the Company’s directors breached their fiduciary duties by failing to maximize shareholder value in the merger and by failing to disclose certain material information in the proxy statement. The complaint also alleges that Thoma Bravo, LLC and Merger Subsidiary aided and abetted these breaches. The complaint seeks to enjoin the transaction as well as rescission, damages, legal fees and other relief. As of November 5, 2012, the Company had not been served with the complaint, and therefore has no obligation to respond. If the Company is served with the complaint, it intends to vigorously defend against the action as it does not believe that the claims alleged have merit.
REVIEW REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Mediware Information Systems, Inc.
We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of Mediware Information Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of September 30, 2012, the related condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of June 30, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended not presented herein, and in our report dated September 10, 2012, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2012, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/ EisnerAmper LLP
New York, New York
November 6, 2012
The "Review Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" included above is not a “Report as part of Registration Statement” prepared or certified by an independent accountant within the meanings of Section 7 and 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, and the accountants' Section 11 liability does not extend to such report.