Stock_Barber
1 week ago
About 3 years late, but chopping the stores in high crime and politically corrupt areas, that the previous woke management refused to... will IMMEDIATELY improve numbers substantially!
12 San Francisco Walgreens Stores to Close in February
SAN FRANCISCO–Walgreens will close 12 stores in San Francisco between February 24 and 27, according to a company spokesperson.
“Our retail pharmacy business is central to our go-forward business strategy,” Marty Maloney, the company’s Media Relations Director, said in an email to The Epoch Times.
“However, increased regulatory and reimbursement pressures are weighing on our ability to cover the costs associated with rent, staffing, and supply needs.
“It is never an easy decision to close a store. We know that our stores are important to the communities that we serve, and therefore do everything possible to improve the store’s performance. When closures are necessary, like those here in San Francisco, we will work in partnership with community stakeholders to minimize customer disruptions.”
One store on the closing list, 5280 Geary Blvd., has been suffering 20 thefts per day. The employees have had to chain the shelves to mitigate the problem, at least in July 2023, as reported by The Epoch Times.
The retail drugstore chain company announced in October 2024 its plan to close about 1,200 stores in the next three years, including approximately 500 in fiscal year 2025, to gain immediate accretive to adjusted EPS (earnings per share) and more cash flow.
The San Francisco stores to be closed in late February are as follows:
Parkside – 1201 Taraval St.
Marina – 3201 Divisadero St.
Western Addition – 1363 Divisadero St.
South of Market – 825 Market St.
Outer Sunset – 1750 Noriega St.
Central Richmond – 5280 Geary Blvd.
Lower Nob Hill – 1524 Polk St.
Cathedral Hill – 1301 Franklin St.
Mission – 1189 Potrero Ave.
Downtown – 135 Powell St.
Ingleside – 1630 Ocean Ave.
Bayview – 5300 3rd St.
bar1080
1 week ago
Doesn't look great, but I still have my kids shares. I tend to ignore most adjusted numbers and go with GAAP. Fact is, closing stores is expensive.
" However, Walgreens posted a net loss of $265 million, contrary to analyst forecasts for a modest profit. On an adjusted basis, the company recorded net income of $440 million, or $0.51 per share, outpacing consensus estimates of $329.34 million, or $0.38 per share.
"Adjustments accounted for expenses related to store closures"
bar1080
1 week ago
"WBA reported quarterly revenue of $39.46 billion, exceeding the $36.71 billion achieved in the same period last year and the $37.33 billion projected by analysts, according to Visible Alpha. However, Walgreens posted a net loss of $265 million, contrary to analyst forecasts for a modest profit. On an adjusted basis, the company recorded net income of $440 million, or $0.51 per share, outpacing consensus estimates of $329.34 million, or $0.38 per share.
Adjustments accounted for expenses related to store closures and fluctuations in investment valuations. Previously, Walgreens outlined plans to shut down 1,200 underperforming locations over the next three years, including 500 during the current fiscal year. The latest report did not specify how many closures occurred in the first quarter."
bar1080
4 weeks ago
WBA isn't "a quarter away from turning a_profit." WBA is closing stores right and left even as I type thiis, so there will be sizable asset impairments for several years.
"Walgreens to close 1,200 unprofitable stores across US as part of 'turnaround'"
"Walgreens is closing approximately 1,200 stores across the United States as the pharmacy chain struggles with slumping consumer spending.
The closures will occur within the next three years, starting with 500 stores being shuttered in fiscal year 2025, Walgreens announced Tuesday in an earnings report. The company had confirmed plans in June to USA TODAY to close unprofitable stores but had not disclosed how many locations would be affected.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/retail/2024/10/15/walgreens-closing-stores-locations/75683122007/
Prudent Capitalist
1 month ago
I had CNBC on this am as always. He just said it is likely a long shot deal given certain factors, including the debt, and whether Sycamore could pull it off on terms that made sense for it long term. I would rather WBA work to recover and restore its financial strength, but we are long time holders. Given the strong dividend yield and the undervalued position of the shares, I do not want to see it go private at a very low share price.
You mentioned Jim Cramer earlier. He used to be a huge fan of Walgreens and a longtime customer, but he has been turned off by the fact that the Walgreens stores he uses, like many in the larger cities, have had to put any products of any value locked up in or behind thick plexiglass, etc. WBA has been hit hard by the flashmob looters that band together in mobs and hit retail stores in quick hit smash and grabs, stealing huge amounts of product and cleaning out much of entire stores, as happened in many instances in California and elsewhere, with little effort from law enforcement to effectively address the practice and problem.
Prudent Capitalist
1 month ago
What was, and perhaps still is, apparently being discussed is not really a buyout, but rather a private equity group taking WBA private. As pointed out in the story on CNBC this am, there may not be a strong likelihood of it happening, and if it does, it will be at a pitifully low share price relative to WBA's trading history over the past many years, e.g. $80's - $90's down to this disappointing share price level. Would be great for short term WBA holders who bought down under $10, but perhaps not so much for long term holders.