Urgent Change is Needed to Protect the Investment of
All Methanex Shareholders
Pursuing Geismar 3
Without a Partner Introduces Material Financial Risk to Methanex
Shareholders
M&G is Company's Largest Shareholder and Has Been
Invested for More than a Decade
Lawrence Cunningham,
Paul Dobson, Patrice Merrin and Kevin Rodgers Have the Right
Mix of Experience and Expertise to Ensure Independent and
Appropriate Oversight of Management
LONDON,
March 25, 2019
/PRNewswire/ -- M&G Investments, the investment
manager of approximately 16.5% of the shares of Methanex
Corporation ("Methanex" or the "Company") (TSX:MX) (Nasdaq: MEOH)
is releasing the following open letter to its fellow shareholders
announcing its slate of four highly-qualified and experienced
independent director candidates for election to the Methanex Board
of Directors (the "Board") at the Company's 2019 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders (the "Annual Meeting):
Dear Methanex Shareholders,
I am writing to you on behalf of M&G Investment
Management Limited, M&G Global Dividend Fund and M&G (Lux)
Investment Funds 1 (together "M&G" or "we") in connection with
our investment in Methanex Corporation. We have been investors in
the Company for more than a decade and collectively we own
approximately 16.5% of the outstanding shares, making us by far
Methanex's largest shareholder.
About M&G
M&G Investments is a traditional, long-only investor.
We manage c. $338 billion of customer
assets, helping to manage the long-term savings of millions of
people across Europe, Asia and the Americas and we are first and
foremost stewards of our customer assets.
Our role, as asset managers, long-term shareholders and
stewards of our clients' assets is to hold the Boards of our
investee companies to account, especially regarding strategy,
capital allocation and governance. M&G has been an engaged and
constructive shareholder of Methanex since 2007 and has regularly
engaged with the management and Board of the Company during that
time.
M&G has tried to constructively engage with management
and the Board more recently around the Geismar 3 project but we believe our concerns
are simply being ignored in this case and the issue is so serious
that it threatens our entire investment in Methanex. We were
particularly troubled by the fact that during one of our
conversations with the Chairman of the Board we were effectively
told that if we were unhappy with how the Company is run we should
sell our shares or fight management.
The step we are announcing today – nominating directors at
one of our portfolio companies – is not undertaken lightly.
However, in this situation we feel so strongly about the refusal of
the Methanex Board to rule out the investment in Geismar 3 without a strategic partner that we
feel we have no other choice.
Geismar 3 and the need
for new Directors
In April of 2018, Methanex announced plans to build a
third methanol plant in Geismar,
Louisiana. The scale of the plant is extremely large
relative to Methanex's other operations, and we have, from the time
this project was initially announced, been concerned about the
operational scale and complexity in addition to the financial
commitment. The original Methanex plan had a preference to
undertake the project with a strategic partner as a joint-venture
investment. Such an arrangement would not only have reduced
Methanex's capital commitment and overall financial exposure to the
project but potentially included an offtake agreement which would
further have mitigated industry cyclicality.
After discussing the project with management and the
Board, we gave the Company our support provided the plant was built
with a strategic partner. In June
2018, we received written confirmation from the CEO that
this was the goal and that we were "aligned" on this
issue.
However, in recent months we have been made aware that
Methanex does not currently have a strategic partner and "the Board
believes it is not in the best interest of Methanex to foreclose
the possibility of proceeding with the Geismar 3 project without a
partner."1 Given the level of financial risk
Geismar 3 would entail as an
investment without a strategic partner, M&G firmly rejects
the proposition that the project represents the "exceptional
opportunity" that Methanex claims.
Methanex operates in a highly cyclical industry and has
limited (if any) pricing power. The high fixed cost nature of the
business means that if the methanol price declines management has
limited flexibility to reduce the cost base of the business in the
short-run and the cash flow is negatively impacted. It is therefore
imperative that the business has conservative amounts of leverage
in order to trade through different methanol price
cycles.
M&G has two serious concerns about Geismar 3 being undertaken without a partner,
as well as a wider concern about the corporate governance of
Methanex:
1)
|
Geismar 3 will place
excessive leverage on the balance sheet of a cyclical
business;
|
2)
|
Geismar 3 will
greatly limit the ability of Methanex to maintain dividends and
share buybacks while its shares trade at levels below those implied
by the replacement cost of existing or new plants; and
|
3)
|
Methanex's
decision-making process regarding Geismar 3 demonstrates the need
for fresh voices in the board room.
|
A more independent and refreshed Board would, we believe,
be in the interest of all shareholders.
1.
Geismar 3 will place
excessive leverage on the balance sheet of a cyclical
business
In the Methanex Q4 2018 financial report Debt was
$1.3bn and Operating Lease
commitments were $0.7bn (as of
Dec. 31, 2018) while operating cash
flow was $0.97bn implying a leverage
ratio of ~2.0x.
The industry standard metric for a new methanol plant is
approximately $1,000 per ton implying
that Methanex will commit CapEx of at least $1bn to Geismar
3. Methanex appears intent on financing this with high yield debt.
Geismar 3 has the potential to
significantly weaken the balance sheet strength of Methanex, and
this weakening of the balance sheet would be magnified in all but
the best of markets. At current share levels an equity raise would
also destroy significant value.
In 2016, when the price of methanol slumped, Methanex's
operating cash flow dropped to c. $250m, maintenance capital expenditure was c.
$100m, and the Company paid c.
$83m in interest. While we
acknowledge Methanex still made dividend payments of c.
$99m, share buybacks were reduced to
nothing (source: Methanex 2016 Annual Report).
M&G is strongly of the view that for an
operationally-leveraged business operating in a cyclical industry,
this level of leverage is far too high for Methanex and poses a
severe risk of a total loss of shareholder value should the price
of methanol decline.
Should such a scenario repeat over the next four years
while Methanex is building Geismar
3, shareholders would risk losing the total value of their
investment and there is no credible scenario under which the
appropriate level of capital return to shareholders could be
maintained.
Our position is that without a partner the
project represents an unnecessary and unacceptable financial risk
to the Company given the cyclical nature of its
cashflows.
2.
Geismar 3 would greatly
limit the ability of Methanex to maintain dividends and share
buybacks while its shares trade at levels below those implied by
the replacement cost of existing or new plants
There are times when, in our view, the market valuation of
Methanex does not reflect the considerable value of its assets. In
fact, at times, the share price has traded at roughly half the
replacement cost of Methanex's assets. On those occasions, it is
clear to M&G that the most efficient use of Methanex's capital
is to repurchase its own shares while this disparity
exists.
We note that since 2017 Methanex has recognised and
adopted this view as the basis for its capital allocation policy.
M&G believe that our active and supportive engagement with
Methanex had a strong influence on this outcome. For example, in
our March 2017 13-D filing, we
explicitly noted that "excess cash flow should be solely directed
towards share buybacks until the share price appreciates beyond the
replacement cost of [Methanex's] assets."
If Methanex does move forward with Geismar 3 without a partner, it would lose the
ability to initiate share buybacks throughout all points in the
commodity cycle. This, in our view, removes one of the benefits of
Methanex remaining a public company. The bottom line is this: if
the Company builds Geismar 3
without a partner they will essentially change Methanex from being
a long-term focused, sustainable income stock into nothing more
than a risky leveraged bet on the methanol price.
Given these circumstances it is therefore our strong
belief that over time the best way to increase shareholder value is
to maximize free cash flow per share within the constraints of
maintaining a robust balance sheet. The balance sheet
strength is crucial in being able to buy shares back and pay
dividends whatever part of the commodity cycle the Company finds
itself in.
M&G remains convinced that Methanex's shares are
trading at levels well below intrinsic value. The benefits of
buying back Methanex stock at these share prices creates immediate
accretion to the benefit of all equity holders with zero
operational or financial risk. This is a fundamentally more
attractive alternative than a large-scale capital project, without
a partner, which introduces substantial financial and operational
risk, and removes the ability of Methanex to buy back shares at
highly-attractive levels.
3.
Governance – a need for fresh voices
All that we as shareholders have requested from the
Company is the assurance that Methanex will not build this plant
without a partner. The Board has resisted providing us this
assurance, stating the need to complete a Front End Engineering and
Design ("FEED") study and business case evaluation before they can
make a decision.
Unfortunately, and as we have expressed to the Board, we
do not believe that there is a realistic number this FEED study and
business case could come to that would make financial sense for
Methanex to undertake Geismar 3
alone. It appears to us that the process is designed to approve a
project that would fundamentally change the investment rationale in
Methanex.
The cost of the FEED study we have been informed by the
Company is c. $50m. We regard
sanctioning this level of expenditure for concept proof when there
is no plan to bring a partner in as poor governance. The Board is
allowing internal momentum within Methanex to build-up to the point
where approval will be a forgone conclusion: yet it is clear that
if Geismar 3 is undertaken alone
it would be financially reckless.
As a result, we are concerned that there is not sufficient
oversight from the independent directors within the board room to
maintain financial discipline in what is a relatively indebted
company in a cyclical business. We believe the large number of
long-serving directors may be impeding a proper and robust analysis
of plans proposed by Methanex management. For example, six of the
12 directors have been in their positions for over a decade. This
raises the question of whether, over time, these directors can
truly be expected to maintain their independence and continually
stand up to and challenge management.
Furthermore, the management nominees collectively own less
than 0.33% of the Company and we are concerned that management and
the Board are not fully aligned with shareholders in this
regard.
M&G's Director Nominees
We therefore believe that the Company and all its
shareholders would benefit from having a fresh voice and new
perspective, independent thought and challenge at the table –
particularly as it relates to the decision on Geismar 3 and the overall financial and
capital allocation decision-making and governance the Board
undertakes.
That is why M&G is nominating the following
individuals to the Board. Each of these nominees is independent of
M&G and of Methanex.
Lawrence
Cunningham: Lawrence Cunningham is the Tucker Research
Professor at The George Washington
University Law School in Washington D.C. and is the Founding Director
of GW's Business Law Program in New York
City. He previously served as Professor of Law and Business
and Vice Dean at Boston College and
Director of the Heyman Center on Corporate Governance at Cardozo
Law School. Mr. Cunningham is also Vice Chairman of the board of
Constellation Software Inc., a Toronto Stock Exchange-listed
software provider buyer, builder and owner of vertical market
software companies worldwide, and has previously served on the
boards of Ashford Hospitality Prime, a New York Stock
Exchange-listed investor in luxury hotels; Pearl West Group, a
private investment company in Vancouver; and Strata, a private technology
company in Silicon Valley.
Paul
Dobson: Paul
Dobson, CPA, CMA, is Interim CEO of Hydro One Limited, a
major transmission and distribution provider in Ontario. Prior to being appointed as Interim
CEO, Mr. Dobson was the Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Dobson
previously held executive positions, including CFO and COO, at
Direct Energy, a provider of energy-related services based in
Houston, Texas. He has held
leadership roles in international energy companies in Canada, the US and London.
Patrice
Merrin: Patrice
Merrin is a corporate director. She currently serves on the
board of directors of Glencore plc, a multinational commodity
trading and mining company, Kew Media Group, a producer and
distributor of multi-genre content worldwide, and Samuel, Son and
Co, a distributor of metals and industrial products. Ms. Merrin has
served on a number of other boards, including: Arconic Inc., a
manufacturer of aluminum components and products, Stillwater Mining
Company, a platinum group mining company, Novadaq Technologies
Inc., a fluorescence imaging technology company, CML HealthCare
Inc., a provider of medical diagnostics, EnsSolutions Group Inc.
and The NB Power Group. Ms. Merrin was President, CEO and a
Director of Luscar Ltd., Interim President and CEO of CML
Healthcare Inc. and COO of Sherritt International
Corporation.
Kevin
Rodgers: Kevin
Rodgers is a consultant with a deep understanding of
finance, leverage, and commodities gained during a 29 year career
in financial services. He has been an expert witness in various
high profile legal cases and was Partner and Senior Advisor to the
CIO at Cumulus Asset Management LLP, an asset management company,
prior to its takeover by Citadel. Previously, Mr. Rodgers was a
Managing Director of Deutsche Bank, a multinational investment
bank, for 15 years, holding a variety of managerial roles within
the FX and commodities space, including the Global Head of Foreign
Exchange, Global Head of FX Trading and Global Head of Energy
Trading, among others. He is also the author of the book, "Why
Aren't They Shouting? A Banker's Tale of Change, Computers and
Perpetual Crisis." Mr. Rodgers holds a master's degree in Chemical
Engineering from Imperial College London, an MBA from London Business School and a master's degree in
Economic History from London School of
Economics.
M&G looks forward to engaging with the Company's
shareholders in the coming weeks to share its views on these
critical issues.
Sincerely,
Stuart
Rhodes
Fund Manager
M&G
Investment Management
About M&G
M&GPrudential has c. $338
billion of assets under management (as at Dec 2018) and has more than 7 million customers
in the UK, Europe, Asia and the Americas including individual
savers and investors, life insurance policy holders and pensions
scheme members.
Investor Contact
D.F. King & Co.,
Inc.
Edward
McCarthy / Geoffrey Weinberg
/ Susy Monteiro:
1-212-269-5550
Media Contact
Sloane & Company
Dan Zacchei / Joe Germani: 1-212-486-9500
E-mail: Dzacchei@sloanepr.com
JGermani@sloanepr.com
Required Information Under Canadian Law
Information in Support of Public Broadcast
Exemption
The information contained in this press release does not
and is not meant to constitute a solicitation of a proxy within the
meaning of applicable securities laws. Methanex shareholders are
not being asked at this time to execute a proxy in favour of
M&G's director nominees. In connection with the Annual Meeting,
M&G intends to file a dissident information circular in due
course in compliance with applicable corporate and securities laws.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, M&G has voluntarily provided in
this press release the disclosure required under section 9.2(4) of
National Instrument 51-102 – Continuous Disclosure
Obligations (NI 51-102) and has filed a document (the Document)
containing the disclosure required under section 9.2(6) of NI
51-102 in respect of M&G's director nominees in accordance with
corporate and securities laws applicable to public broadcast
solicitations. The Document is available under Methanex's profile
on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. The head office of Methanex is 1800
Waterfront Centre, 200 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C
3M1.
This press release and any solicitation made by M&G in
advance of the Annual Meeting is, or will be, as applicable, made
by M&G, and not by or on behalf of the management of Methanex.
Any solicitation will be made by M&G and will not be made by or
on behalf of management of the Methanex. Proxies may be
solicited by proxy circular, mail, telephone, telecopier, email or
other electronic means, as well as by newspaper or other media
advertising and in person by managers, directors, officers and
employees of M&G who will not be specifically remunerated
therefor. In addition, M&G may solicit proxies by way of
public broadcast, including press release, speech or publication
and any other manner permitted under applicable Canadian
laws. M&G may engage the services of one or more agents
and authorize other persons to assist it in soliciting proxies on
behalf of M&G. The costs incurred in the preparation and
mailing of any proxy circular or proxy solicitation by M&G will
be borne directly and indirectly by M&G. M&G has not yet
determined whether it intends to seek reimbursement from Methanex
of such solicitation expenses.
M&G has entered into an agreement with D.F. King &
Co., Inc. (D.F. King) pursuant to which D.F. King has agreed that
it will provide certain consulting and related services, including
acting as M&G's proxy solicitor. Pursuant to this
agreement, D.F. King will receive an initial fee of $10,000 and an additional fee of $200,000 upon the mailing of final proxy
materials, plus an additional fee for telephone calls and
telecommunication charges in an amount to be agreed upon by the
parties. In addition, D.F. King may be entitled to a success
fee on the successful completion of a solicitation, as determined
by M&G in consultation with D.F. King.
M&G is not requesting that Methanex shareholders
submit a proxy at this time. Once M&G has commenced a formal
solicitation of proxies in connection with the Annual Meeting,
proxies may be revoked by a registered holder of Methanex shares
(i) by completing and signing a valid proxy bearing a later date
and returning it in accordance with the instructions contained in
the accompanying form of proxy; (ii) by depositing an instrument in
writing executed by the shareholder or by their attorney authorized
in writing, as the case may be: (a) at the registered office of
Methanex at any time up to and including the last business day
preceding the day the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or
postponement of the Annual Meeting is to be held, or (b) with the
Chairman of the Annual Meeting prior to its commencement on the day
of the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the
Meeting; or (iii) in any other manner permitted by
law. Once M&G has commenced a formal solicitation of proxies in
connection with the Annual Meeting, proxies may be revoked by a
non-registered holder of Methanex shares at any time by written
notice to the intermediary in accordance with the instructions
given to the non-registered holder by its intermediary.
None of M&G Investment Management Limited, M&G
Global Dividend Fund or M&G (Lux) Investment Funds 1 or any of
their associates or affiliates (i) has any material interest,
direct or indirect, by way of beneficial ownership of securities of
Methanex or otherwise, in any matter to be acted upon at the Annual
Meeting, other than the election of directors, or (ii) has had any
material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction or
proposed transaction since the commencement of Methanex's last
financial year that has materially affected or would or could
materially affect Methanex or any of its subsidiaries.
Information Concerning Early Warning
Requirements
In addition to the other information contained in this
press release, M&G Investment Management Limited (MAGIM) is
providing the additional disclosure required under section 3.1(1)
of National Instrument 62-103 – The Early Warning System and
Related Take-Over Bid and Insider Reporting Issues (NI 62-103)
in respect of its ownership of common shares of Methanex. No
securities of Methanex were acquired or disposed of in connection
with the filing of this press release. In accordance with NI
62-103, an early warning report will be filed under Methanex's
SEDAR profile at www.sedar.com.
The address of MAGIM is Governors House, Laurence Pountney Hill, London, EC4R 0HH, United Kingdom. MAGIM collectively exercises
control and direction over 12,738,068 common shares of Methanex
(the Shares), representing approximately 16.49% of 77,265,973
outstanding Shares, as published by Methanex on March 21, 2019.
As discussed in this press release, MAGIM today released
an open letter to the shareholders of Methanex announcing that it
intends to nominate the following individuals for election to the
Board of Directors of Methanex at Annual Meeting: Lawrence Cunningham, Paul Dobson, Patrice
Merrin and Kevin Rodgers. As
discussed in this press release, MAGIM intends to solicit proxies
for the election of its nominee directors in accordance with
applicable corporate and securities laws. Except as disclosed below
and in this press release, neither MAGIM nor any joint actor has
any plans or future intentions with respect to any of the items
listed in Part 5 of Form 62-103F1 Required Disclosure under the
Early Warning Requirements.
MAGIM intends to review its investments in Methanex on a
continuing basis. Depending on various factors and subject to the
obligations described herein, including, without limitation,
Methanex's financial position and strategic direction, actions
taken by the board of directors, price levels of the Shares, other
investment opportunities available to MAGIM, concentration of
positions in the portfolios managed by MAGIM, tax considerations
for investors in MAGIM's funds, market conditions and general
economic and industry conditions, MAGIM may take such actions with
respect to its investments in Methanex as it deems appropriate,
including, without limitation, purchasing additional Shares or
other financial instruments related to Methanex or selling some or
all of its beneficial or economic holdings, engaging in hedging or
similar transactions with respect to the securities relating to
Methanex and/or otherwise changing its intentions with respect to
the purposes of its investment in Methanex.
MAGIM has filed this press release, which contains the
information required by section 9.2(4)(c), and the Document which
contains the information required by section 9.2(6) of NI 51-102
and Form 51-102F5 Information Circular in respect of the
proposed nominees, under Methanex's profile on SEDAR at
www.sedar.com. For further information and to obtain a copy of the
early warning report that will be filed under applicable Canadian
securities laws, please contact:
Mark Thomas, Head of
M&G Shareholder Disclosures
Email: mark.thomas@mandg.co.uk
1 Methanex Press Release, "Methanex
Comments on Shareholder Letter," March 18,
2019.
https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2019/03/18/1756694/0/en/Methanex-Comments-on-Shareholder-Letter.html
View original
content:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/mg-investments-announces-four-highly-qualified-director-nominees-for-methanex-board-300817670.html
SOURCE M&G Investments