483 meters grade 0.43 g/T gold & 0.56%
copper 400 meters down-dip from known resource
limit
Intercept lies within conceptual block cave
shape designated for underground mining
Trading Symbols:
TSX:
SEA
NYSE:
SA
TORONTO,
Aug. 26, 2015 /CNW/ - Seabridge Gold
today announced that this year's first drill results from the Deep
Kerr deposit at its 100% owned KSM Project in northwestern
British Columbia have confirmed a
substantial expansion of the deposit in an area being evaluated for
low cost, underground block cave mining. Hole K-15-49 intercepted
483 meters averaging 0.43 g/T gold and 0.56% copper including a 250
meter interval grading 0.49 g/T gold and 0.70% copper. This new
hole is a step-out located 400 meters down dip from hole K-14-45,
drilled in 2014, which returned 286 meters of 0.45 g/T gold and
0.77% copper. A follow-up daughter hole, K-15-49A, is now in
progress to test the mineralized zone between these two
intersections. The results are expected to increase resources. (See
http://www.seabridgegold.net/pdf/NAug26-15-map.pdf for Deep Kerr
cross section.)
In the past two years, Seabridge has successfully
targeted higher grade zones beneath KSM's near-surface porphyry
deposits, resulting in the discovery of Deep Kerr and the Iron Cap
Lower Zone, two copper-rich deposits that have added nearly one
billion tonnes of better grade to project resources. The program
this year at Deep Kerr was designed to confirm the continuity of
the mineralized zone below the simulated block cave shape used to
constrain Deep Kerr resources. An area in the north-central part of
the Kerr deposit was selected to test the potential of this
extension.
Seabridge Chairman and CEO Rudi Fronk commented that "we continue to expand
the limits of Deep Kerr while enhancing grade. More importantly, we
are growing the deposit by finding continuous, thick intervals of
better grade material in favorable orientations, all of which
support the potential for efficient extraction. Deep Kerr has very
few equals for size, grade and mineability and it keeps getting
better."
The holes in this year's Deep Kerr program are
being collared well outside the mineral deposit in order to achieve
the deep intersections that test the dip extension. These locations
better defined the western limits of the mineralized system, and
demonstrate that a north-south trending normal fault places
unaltered fine-grained sedimentary rock against the outer weakly
mineralized parts of the mineral system. As the drill holes advance
to the east, alteration and mineralization increase as a series of
potassically-altered intrusions are encountered. Drill hole K-15-49
passed out of the intensely altered and mineralized zone into
younger intrusions with lower concentrations of gold and copper.
The drill hole was not extended into the eastern high-grade zone
encountered in previous shallower drilling because projected depths
would have been prohibitive. This eastern zone remains a high
potential target.
The following table summarizes the drill hole intersections for
K-15-49.
Drill Hole
ID
|
Total
Depth
|
From
(meters)
|
To
(meters)
|
Interval
(meters)
|
Gold
(g/T)
|
Copper
%
|
Silver
(g/T)
|
K-15-49
|
1755.4
including
|
1152.3
|
1253.4
|
101.1
|
0.20
|
0.37
|
1.3
|
1272.0
|
1755.4
|
483.4
|
0.43
|
0.56
|
2.9
|
1466.4
|
1716.4
|
250.0
|
0.49
|
0.70
|
3.7
|
Drill holes were oriented using historical
information and were designed to intercept the mineralized target
at right angles to the strike of the zone. The orientation will be
refined with additional drilling but current information indicates
the intervals listed above approximate the true thickness of the
mineralized zones.
Exploration activities by Seabridge at the KSM
Project are conducted under the supervision of William E. Threlkeld, Registered Professional
Geologist, Senior Vice President of the Company and a Qualified
Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101. Mr. Threlkeld has
reviewed and approved this news release. An ongoing and rigorous
quality control/quality assurance protocol is employed in all
Seabridge drilling campaigns. This program includes blank and
reference standards, and in addition all copper assays that exceed
0.25% Cu are re-analyzed using ore grade analytical techniques.
Cross-check analyses are conducted at a second external laboratory
on at least 10% of the drill samples. Samples are assayed at ALS
Chemex Laboratory, Vancouver,
B.C., using fire assay atomic adsorption methods for gold
and ICP methods for other elements.
Seabridge holds a 100% interest in several North
American gold projects. The Company's principal assets are the KSM
Project located near Stewart, British
Columbia, Canada and the Courageous Lake gold project
located in Canada's Northwest Territories. For a full breakdown of
Seabridge's mineral reserves and mineral resources by category
please visit the Company's website at
http://www.seabridgegold.net/resources.php.
All reserve and resource estimates reported by
the Corporation were calculated in accordance with the Canadian
National Instrument 43-101 and the Canadian Institute of Mining and
Metallurgy Classification system. These standards differ
significantly from the requirements of the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission. Mineral resources which are not mineral
reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
This document contains "forward-looking
information" within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation
and "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the United
States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. This
information and these statements, referred to herein as
"forward-looking statements" are made as of the date of this
document. Forward-looking statements relate to future events or
future performance and reflect current estimates, predictions,
expectations or beliefs regarding future events and include, but
are not limited to, statements with respect to: (i) that finding
continuous, thick intervals of better grade material in favorable
orientations at Deep Kerr support the potential for efficient
extraction; (ii) the estimated amount and grade of mineral reserves
at a deposit; (iii) the estimated amount and grade of mineral
resources at the core zone deposits. Any statements that express or
involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations,
beliefs, plans, projections, objectives or future events or
performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as
"expects", "anticipates", "plans", "projects", "estimates",
"envisages", "assumes", "intends", "strategy", "potential",
"appears", "goals", "objectives" or variations thereof or stating
that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would",
"might" or "will" be taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative
of any of these terms and similar expressions) are not statements
of historical fact and may be forward-looking statements.
All forward-looking statements are based on
Seabridge's or its consultants' current beliefs as well as various
assumptions made by them and information currently available to
them. The principle assumptions are listed above, but others
include: (i) the presence of and continuity of metals at the
Project at modeled grades; (ii) the capacities of various machinery
and equipment and the geotechnical characteristics of the resource
material and its continuity; (iii) the availability of personnel,
machinery and equipment at estimated prices; (iv) exchange rates;
(v) metals sales prices; (vi) appropriate discount rates; (vii) tax
rates and royalty rates applicable to the proposed mining
operation; (viii) financing structure and costs; (ix) anticipated
mining losses and dilution; * metallurgical performance; (xi)
reasonable contingency requirements; (xii) success in realizing
proposed operations; (xiii) receipt of regulatory approvals on
acceptable terms; and (xiv) the negotiation of satisfactory terms
with impacted First Nations groups. Although management considers
these assumptions to be reasonable based on information currently
available to it, they may prove to be incorrect. Many
forward-looking statements are made assuming the correctness of
other forward looking statements, such as statements of net present
value and internal rates of return, which are based on most of the
other forward-looking statements and assumptions herein. The cost
information is also prepared using current values, but the time for
incurring the costs will be in the future and it is assumed costs
will remain stable over the relevant period.
By their very nature, forward-looking
statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, both general
and specific, and risks exist that estimates, forecasts,
projections and other forward-looking statements will not be
achieved or that assumptions do not reflect future experience. We
caution readers not to place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements as a number of important factors could
cause the actual outcomes to differ materially from the beliefs,
plans, objectives, expectations, anticipations, estimates
assumptions and intentions expressed in such forward-looking
statements. These risk factors may be generally stated as the risk
that the assumptions and estimates expressed above do not occur,
but specifically include, without limitation: risks relating to
variations in the mineral content or geotechnical characteristics
within the material identified as mineral reserves or mineral
resources from that predicted; variations in rates of recovery and
extraction; developments in world metals markets; risks relating to
fluctuations in the Canadian dollar relative to the US dollar;
increases in the estimated capital and operating costs or
unanticipated costs; difficulties attracting the necessary work
force; increases in financing costs or adverse changes to the terms
of available financing, if any; tax rates or royalties being
greater than assumed; changes in development or mining plans due to
changes in logistical, technical or other factors; changes in
project parameters as plans continue to be refined; risks relating
to receipt of regulatory approvals or settlement of an agreement
with impacted First Nations groups; the effects of competition in
the markets in which Seabridge operates; operational and
infrastructure risks and the additional risks described in
Seabridge's Annual Information Form filed with SEDAR in
Canada (available at
www.sedar.com) for the year ended December 31, 2014 and in the Corporation's Annual
Report Form 40-F filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission on EDGAR (available at
www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml). Seabridge cautions that the
foregoing list of factors that may affect future results is not
exhaustive.
When relying on our forward-looking statements
to make decisions with respect to Seabridge, investors and others
should carefully consider the foregoing factors and other
uncertainties and potential events. Seabridge does not undertake to
update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that
may be made from time to time by Seabridge or on our behalf, except
as required by law.
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD
"Rudi Fronk"
Chairman & C.E.O.
SOURCE Seabridge Gold Inc.