Project Economics Remain Strong Across All Project
Scenarios
VANCOUVER, BC, April 19,
2022 /CNW/ - KORE Mining Ltd. (TSXV: KORE) (OTCQX:
KOREF) ("KORE" or the "Company") is pleased to
announce positive results from additional engineering and economic
assessment work for the Company's 100% owned Imperial Oxide Gold
Deposit ("Imperial" or "Project"), located in
California, USA. The work
assessed various scenarios in response to the position by the
Bureau of Land Management ("BLM") of the possible need to
move project infrastructure as announced August 20, 2021. Economic modelling results
for all scenarios were within the sensitivities of the April 6, 2020 positive Preliminary Economic
Assessment ("PEA"). The work demonstrates that,
regardless of the ultimate location of Imperial's processing
infrastructure, Imperial has the potential to be a mid-tier gold
mine with compelling project economics.
2020 PEA HIGHLIGHTS:
- Base economics: US$ 343 million
NPV5% post-tax with 44% IRR at US$1,450 /oz gold
- Alternate scenarios could increase effective operating costs an
estimated 5-15% from PEA
-
- US$ 263 to 317 million
NPV5% post-tax at US$1,450
/ oz gold from PEA sensitivities
- Project remains highly economic in all scenarios evaluated
- Significant gold leverage: >US$ 600
million PEA NPV5% at recent spot US$1,900 /oz gold
- Unchanged 146,000 ounces gold per year and over 1.2 million
ounces total production
- Additional value enhancement through Mesquite-Imperial-Picacho
District exploration and resource expansion remains untapped
The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes inferred mineral
resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have
the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them
to be categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certainty
that the preliminary economic assessment will be realized. Mineral
resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated
economic viability.
KORE's CEO Scott Trebilcock
stated: "The alternate infrastructure locations assessed in our
recent work shows robust project economics across all scenarios
in-range of our 2020 PEA economic sensitivities. Imperial
remains a technically simple, high-return gold project in a safe,
politically stable jurisdiction with a long tradition of gold
mining. All scenarios use conventional open pit mining
techniques, proven processing technology and existing
infrastructure."
Mr. Trebilcock continued: "With our ACES initiative – A Clean
Environment for the Salton Sea – the Imperial Project aims to
deliver positive social and environmental impacts for local
stakeholders – cleaner air from ACES, generational job creation and
training, respect for land heritage and complete land restoration
post-mining including backfilling open pits. All KORE's
development plans meet or exceed California's stringent reclamation and
environmental laws while delivering meaningful positive local
stakeholder impact."
CORPORATE UPDATE
Marc Leduc, KORE's COO since late
2019, has advised the Company he will be retiring in May of
2022. Mr. Leduc is looking forward to spending more time with
his wife and family. The Board would like to thank Mr. Leduc
for his service over the last several years. A replacement,
who is expected to focus on delivering exploration permits and
drilling, is being actively recruited.
2020 PEA SUMMARY
The PEA was prepared in accordance with National Instrument
43-101 ("NI 43-101") by Global Resource Engineering
(Denver) ("GRE") and
supported by Geo-Logic Associates. The team was led by
Marc Leduc, P.Eng., the COO of KORE
Mining. The results were announced April 6, 2020 and the technical report is
available on KORE's website at www.koremining.com or on our
SEDAR profile at www.sedar.com.
Unless otherwise stated, all dollar figures are in United States dollars ("$") and masses are in
short tons.
Economics
|
Pre-Tax
|
Post-Tax
|
Net present value
(NPV5%) at
C$1.00/US$0.75
|
C$
millions
|
$583
|
$457
|
Net present value
(NPV5%)
|
US$
millions
|
$437
|
$343
|
Internal rate of return
(IRR)
|
%
|
52%
|
44%
|
LOM avg. annual cash
flow after tax &
capital
|
US$
millions
|
$104
|
$90
|
LOM cumulative cash
flow (undiscounted)
|
US$
millions
|
$694
|
$577
|
Gold price
assumption
|
per
ounce
|
$1,450
|
Mine life
|
years
|
8
|
Average annual gold
production
|
thousand
ounces/yr
|
146
|
Total LOM recovered
gold
|
million
ounces
|
1.17
|
Initial capital
costs
|
US$
millions
|
$142
|
Life-of-mine ("LOM") calculation and "Mine Life" is defined as
the duration of mining operations, is eight (8) years. There
are additional years of site work for residual leaching, washing,
back-filling and reclamation modelled.
2020 PEA OPERATING COST
SENSITIVITIES
The following table demonstrates the post-tax sensitivities of
NPV and IRR to operating cost changes. Recent assessment of
alternate mill sites following BLM challenge to the mill sites used
in the PEA base case showed potential effective operating cost
increases of 5-15% (bold):
Sensitivity to
Operating Cost (post-tax US$) at $1,450 per
ounce gold
|
% of Base Case
Operating Cost
|
(NPV5%) millions
|
IRR%
|
-20%
|
446
|
53%
|
-15%
|
420
|
51%
|
-10%
|
395
|
48%
|
-5%
|
370
|
46%
|
BASE CASE
|
343
|
44%
|
+5%
|
317
|
41%
|
+10%
|
290
|
39%
|
+15%
|
263
|
36%
|
+20%
|
236
|
34%
|
2020 PEA GOLD PRICE
SENSITIVITIES
At current gold spot price of ~$1,900 per ounce gold, NPV is US$610 million with a 70% IRR. The
following table presents the post-tax sensitivities of NPV and IRR
to gold price per ounce:
Economic
Sensitivities to Gold Prices
(post-tax)
|
Per ounce of
gold
|
(NPV5%) millions
|
IRR%
|
US$1,200
|
US$195
|
22%
|
US$1,300
|
US$234
|
34%
|
US$1,450 BASE
CASE
|
US$343
|
44%
|
US$1,600
|
US$450
|
52%
|
US$1,800
|
US$590
|
64%
|
US$1,900
|
US$610
|
70%
|
US$2,000
|
US$729
|
75%
|
RECENT ALTERNATE MINE SCENARIO
ENGINEERING WORK
In response to the BLM's position as set out in KORE's press
release issued August 20, 2021,
KORE re-engaged the 2020 PEA engineering team to assess the
potential impact of moving Imperial infrastructure from locations
south of the open pits assumed in the PEA to east of the open
pits. The alternate infrastructure locations, outside of the
Indian Pass mineral entry withdrawal, would avoid the matters
raised by the BLM. The alternate infrastructure locations
would only be used if the PEA base case south infrastructure
options were not available in the future as KORE has the right to
challenge the BLM views.
The engineering work developed eight mine plans and supporting
economic scenarios that looked at alternate infrastructure
configurations and trade-offs including conveying and crushing
scenarios. Crushing and conveying were further investigated
to offset the longer haul distances to the alternate infrastructure
locations. The work was conducted to the same standard as the
previous PEA work.
The results were all positive economically with ranges from an
equivalent of 5-15% increases in operating cost from the PEA mine
plan economic sensitivities at $1,450/oz gold. At higher gold prices, the
crushing and conveying cases become more attractive due to higher
recoveries post-crushing. Whichever infrastructure locations
are ultimately used to permit the Imperial Project, the work shows
potential for a robust mid-tier gold mine with compelling project
economics.
KORE considers the results of these studies as demonstrating the
flexibility of the mine plan to changes to location of
infrastructure within the cost sensitivities of the PEA study, and
not a material change to the results of the PEA study.
About the Imperial Gold
Project
KORE owns 100% of the Mesquite-Imperial-Picacho District
("District") which consists approximately 31,000 acres of claims
capturing the entire 28-kilometer trend from the operating Mesquite
mine (Equinox Gold – TSX:EQX) to the closed Picacho mine and
including KORE's Imperial project. In the District, gold is
hosted in local fault structures related to a series of regional
faults connecting the known District deposits. Those three
District deposits (Mesquite, Imperial and Picacho) were discovered
in exposed outcrops and from placer workings. The rest of the
District is covered by alluvium and has never been systematically
explored.
The Mesquite-Imperial-Picacho District centers on KORE's
Imperial project. Imperial is a structurally controlled
intermediate sulfidation epithermal gold deposit. The 100%
oxide gold deposit is currently defined at 2.44 kilometer long and
up to 0.75 kilometer wide and is open both along strike and
downdip. It is hosted in a shallowly southwest dipping,
amphibolite grade metamorphic rock suite along a west-northwest
trending low-angle regional thrust fault system which controls the
regional geometry of mineralization. East-west striking,
post-mineralization normal faults control the property scale
geometry of mineralization. Geophysical characterization of
the deposit and regional controlling structures is an essential
component of exploration for additional resources.
The Company's mineral resource estimate is prepared in
accordance with NI 43-101 and the preliminary economic assessment
is summarized in the report titled "Preliminary Economic Assessment
– Technical Report Imperial Gold Project" effective as of
April 6, 2020 and revised and amended
on June 10, 2021, prepared by
Terre Lane and Todd Harvey of Global Resource Engineering and
Glen Cole of SRK Consulting
(Canada) Inc.
About KORE Mining
KORE Mining is focused on responsibly creating value from its
portfolio of gold assets in California,
USA. The Company is advancing the Imperial project towards
development while continuing to explore across both district-scale
gold assets. Management and Board, along with strategic
investor, Eric Sprott (26% owner),
are aligned with all KORE shareholders with the goal of creating
per share value.
Further information on Imperial and KORE can
be found on the Company's website at
www.koremining.com or by contacting us as
info@koremining.com or by telephone at (888)
407-5450.
On behalf of KORE Mining
Ltd
"Scott Trebilcock"
Chief
Executive Officer
(888) 407-5450
Technical information with respect to the District and Imperial
Gold Project contained in this news release has been reviewed and
approved by Marc Leduc, P.Eng., who is KORE's COO and is the
qualified person under National Instrument 43-101 responsible for
the technical matters of this news release.
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services
Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX
Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or
accuracy of this release.
ALTERNATIVE PERFORMANCE MEASURES
(NON-IFRS MEASURES)
Items marked with a * in this news release are alternative
performance measures. Alternative performance measures are
furnished to provide additional information. These
non-IFRS performance measures are included in this news release
because the Company believes these statistics are key performance
measures that provide investors, analysts and other stakeholders
with additional information to understand the costs associated with
the Project. These performance measures do not have a
standard meaning within IFRS and, therefore, amounts presented may
not be comparable to similar data presented by other mining
companies. These performance measures should not be
considered in isolation as a substitute for measures of performance
in accordance with IFRS.
"Cash Costs" and "Cash Costs (LOM)" are a non-IFRS measure
reported by KORE on an ounces of gold sold basis. Cash costs
include mining, processing, refining, general and administration
costs and royalties but excludes depreciation, reclamation, income
taxes, capital and exploration costs for the life of the mine,
defined above as 8 years.
"All-In-Sustaining-Costs" ("ASIC") is a non-IFRS measure
reported by KORE on a per ounce of gold sold basis that includes
all cash costs noted above (mining, processing refining, general
and administration and royalties), as well as sustaining capital
and closure costs, but excludes depreciation, capital costs and
income taxes.
Cautionary Statement Regarding
Forward-Looking Information
This news release contains forward-looking statements relating
to the future operations of the Company and other statements that
are not historical facts. Forward-looking statements are
often identified by terms such as "will", "may", "should",
"anticipate", "expects", "intends", "indicates" and similar
expressions. All statements other than statements of
historical fact, included in this release, including, without
limitation, statements regarding the future plans and objectives of
the Company are forward-looking statements.
Forward‐looking statements in this news release include, but are
not limited to, statements with respect to: the strategy, timing
and implementation of permit regional exploration drilling in
the 28-kilometer Mesquite-Imperial-Picacho District ("Regional
Exploration Drilling") and permit drilling to advance the
existing Imperial gold deposit ("Imperial Zone") toward
feasibility and mine permitting at the Imperial project; the timing
of submitting Environmental Assessment report(s) for one or more
areas of the Imperial project; potential actions, behavior or
position of the BLM; the underexplored and prospective
nature of the Imperial Regional Exploration Drilling area; the
results of the preliminary economic assessments for the Imperial
Project, including future project opportunities, the projected NPV,
permit timelines, the current mineral resource estimate, and the
ability to obtain the requisite permits; the market and future
price of and demand for gold; the opportunities of expansion at the
Imperial Project; and the ability to work cooperatively with
stakeholders, including all levels of government. Such
forward‐looking statements, and any assumptions upon which they are
based, are made in good faith and reflect our current judgment
regarding the direction of our business. In connection with
the forward‐looking information contained in this presentation, the
Company has made numerous assumptions, including, among others:
there being no significant change to current geotechnical,
metallurgical, hydrological and other physical conditions at the
Imperial Project; exploration, permitting, and development of the
Imperial Project being consistent with current expectations and
planning; the geological, permitting and economic advice that the
Company has received is reliable and is based upon practices and
methodologies which are consistent with industry standards; and
other planning assumptions. While the Company considers these
assumptions to be reasonable, these assumptions are inherently
subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies.
Forward looking information involves known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results,
performance or achievements of the Company to be materially
different from any future results, performance or achievements
expressed or implied by the forward‐looking information.
Known risk factors include, among others: the outcome of BLM's
review processes for permitting, including the final outcome(s) of
BLM's mineral claim validity examination(s) and administrative
review process(es) with respect to the Imperial Zone, including a
change to the findings from the mineral claim validity examination
conducted in 2002 for the mill sites at the Imperial Zone,
resulting in the Company having to move its future Imperial Zone
project support facilities to areas that are not within the Indian
Pass mineral withdrawal area; the possibility that BLM may require
and/or conduct further mineral claim validity examinations with
respect to the Imperial project, and the outcome and final
determination of such examination could, among other things,
invalidate one or more mining claims; the possibility that BLM or
other governmental authority review of the Regional Exploration
Drilling program, delays or changes the Company's plan for Regional
Exploration Drilling permitting, which could result, among other
things, in delays, additional project requirements, additional
costs and uncertainty of meeting anticipated program milestones;
the exploration drill program may not be completed as planned; the
need to obtain additional financing; uncertainty as to the
availability and terms of future financing; the possibility of
delay in exploration or development programs and uncertainty of
meeting anticipated program milestones; uncertainty as to timely
availability of permits and other government approvals.
Additional risks and uncertainties are described in the "Risks"
sections of (i) the Company's Annual Information Form for the year
ended December 31, 2020 prepared as
of April 29, 2021, and (ii) the
Company's Management's Discussion and Analysis for the nine months
ended September 30, 2021, both
available under the Company's issuer profile on www.sedar.com.
Forward-looking statements contained herein are made as of the
date of this news release and the Company disclaims any obligation
to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of
new information, future events or results, except as may be
required by applicable securities laws. There can be no
assurance that forward-looking information will prove to be
accurate, as actual results and future events could differ
materially from those anticipated in such statements.
Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on
forward-looking information.
View original content to download
multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/kore-mining-completes-additional-engineering-and-economic-assessment-of-imperial-project-scenarios-301527899.html
SOURCE Kore Mining