Major Profits
15 hours ago
"None of us here know anything - we're all just guessing and hoping one way or the other."
Well, methinks if you read this article from 2022 you'll know something:
https://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-racing/articles/257102/racing-game-all-about-love-of-horses-for-sharp
But whether or not it's related to why, after some FOUR YEARS, not a single ticker in the much-hyped "Trifecta" ("REDfecta" to some) has yet to see a merger/acquisition I dunno. But there's been posted reasons such as he was waiting for all the tickers to be SEC Reporting, waiting for a better market, the Calasse case, etc. But there's this:
A year and a half ago, I started focusing more on building my stable.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175802283&txt2find=100%20horses
Oh well, I guess we can HOPE the "Action junkie" will want some "action" with the "Trifecta" tickers soon. About time no?
Hi_Lo
2 days ago
but talk trash about GS all on the other boards
I only post on WNFT and GVSI so I don't know what other "boards" you are talking about.
You are just lying again.
But we all know your problems with the truth.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174623127
And the true pea brain is the one who can't differentiate between the different Sharp shells - their strengths and weaknesses.
GVSI is in free fall again like I said it would because of all of its regulatory problems.
People are starting to figure out that GVSI will never get a SEC Form 10 registration approved. That's the most likely reason Sharp dumped all of his 20 million GVSI common shares and he didn't buy stock recently as you have lied about. I asked for you to show documentation that he did and you never do because all you post are lies. Lies that aid in your pump and dumps.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174201572
I dumped on your asses.
How are your stock picks CNNA, SAPX, GVSI, MEDH, CIVX, BCAP and HQGE doing?
You can't seem to pick a winner Mr
self-proclaimed "successful expert trader" LOL!!!
Yolo
4 days ago
So your opinion nothing will happen. The name change and ticker change was just BS? And will never happen ? Just asking
My point was only that March is a fake deadline for anything to change. It is meaningless, Sharp was not waiting to announce a major merger until he dismissed the lawsuit that he filed against Calasse.
That doesn't mean that he will never announce a merger, just that it isn't imminent or dependent on the case being dismissed. Any attempt to pinpoint an exact time for news is typically just pumpers trying to pump.
Whether the name change and ticker change was just BS is still unknown. I do think it was performative, as in Sharp thought it sounded cool or would drive interest, and not chosen because a merger was lined up. But that doesn't mean he won't end up landing a merger eventually.
Honestly I think Sharp's previous success and ability to hype the trifecta has actually made his task a nightmare and he can't find a good exit. WNFT had a market cap of $200M+ at its peak before he crashed the price with bad news. He can't put a normal company into it or he'll be crucified; he has to find something that can justify the hype and live up to those lofty expectations. If he finds some company with minimal revenue, he'll be guilty of exactly what he's accused everybody else in the OTC of doing.
And unfortunately, there aren't many mega companies looking to merge into an OTC shell.
surfkast
6 days ago
Why would he have left?
Does anyone question where the money went. Over $900,000 just on FORW Professional fees? Was that for trainers and jockeys? Seriously?
FORW - Professional fees $619,384 December 31,2023
Professional fees $293,838 SEPTEMBER 30, 2024
GVSI - Professional fees $40,631 DECEMBER 31, 2023
Professional fees $12,904 SEPTEMBER 30, 2024
SRNW Professional fees $267,727 DECEMBER 31, 2023
Related party consulting expense for common stock $319,000 DECEMBER 31, 2023
Professional fees $62,571 SEPTEMBER 30, 2024
Yolo
7 days ago
Funny how Yolo stopped posting entirely on ihub right after the Calasse court case was dismissed and Calasse lost. Yolo kept manipulatively posting that Calasse would win.
His alias was created during th court case and he ceased posting entirely once Calasse lost.
Yolo seems to have been a Calasse hired hand which he repeatedly denied but all evidence points to him being here on Calasse's behalf.
Nope. If you go through my posting history, you'll see that I lost $30k on GVSI and stopped posting in any forum except WNFT long before the NVSC decision, because I stopped investing in crappy penny stocks. No money to invest, really.
And I haven't posted in here in weeks simply because there's nothing new to say. I stand by my arguments that Calasse should eventually prevail on the merits, if he files a writ. Having the appeal be dismissed is just a temporary setback, which happened in Gladys Baker like I've shared repeatedly.
Since you probably didn't bother reading it, I'll summarize:
- NVSC dismissed an appeal for lack of standing because the trust was not a named party and therefore lacked standing to appeal.
- The trust filed a writ of prohibition arguing that as they weren't a named party, the decision was void.
- The NVSC agreed with this argument, granting the writ and reversing the district court decision as void.
In the instant case, the Trust has legal title to, and claims absolute ownership of, all Trust assets which are the subject matter of the action in the lower court. Pursuant to NRCP 19(a) and this court's holdings in Robinson, Lewis, and Schwob, Betty was required to join the Trust as a party. Therefore, we conclude that Betty's failure to join the Trust as a party is fatal to the district court's judgment.
Further, we conclude that the order of the district court is void. Accordingly, we grant this petition. The clerk of this court shall forthwith issue a writ of prohibition precluding the district court from enforcing its void order and from issuing any orders affecting the rights of the Trust until it is properly joined as a party.
https://casetext.com/case/olsen-family-trust-v-district-court#p781
That's still what I expect to happen here, but there's no sense in arguing with you over and over about it.