(b) Not applicable.
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
The Board of Directors (“Board”) of Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund Inc. (“Registrant” or “Fund”) has
adopted a code of ethics that applies to the Registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions (“Code of Ethics”). During the period covered by
this Form N-CSR, there were no substantive amendments to the Code of Ethics and there were no waivers from the Code of Ethics granted to the Registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or
controller, or persons performing similar functions.
A copy of the Code of Ethics is
incorporated by reference to Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund's Form N-CSR, Investment Company Act file number 811-21715 (filed January 6, 2025). The Code of Ethics is
also available, without charge, by calling 1-800-877-9700 (toll-free).
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
The Board has determined that the Registrant has three audit committee financial experts serving on its audit
committee. The Registrant’s audit committee financial experts are Michael J. Cosgrove, Martha C. Goss and Deborah C. McLean. Mr. Cosgrove, Ms. Goss and Ms. McLean are independent directors as defined by Form N-CSR.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
Ernst & Young LLP (“E&Y”) serves as the independent registered public accounting firm to the Registrant.
(a) Audit Fees
The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by E&Y for the audit of the annual financial
statements or services that are normally provided by E&Y in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements were $73,800 and $69,400 for the fiscal years ended 2023 and 2024, respectively.
(b) Audit-Related Fees
The aggregate fees billed to the Registrant for assurance and related services by E&Y that are reasonably related
to the performance of the audit of the Registrant’s financial statements and are not reported above in Audit Fees were $0 and $0 for the fiscal years ended 2023 and 2024, respectively. The Audit
Committee approved 0% and 0% of these services provided by E&Y for the fiscal years ended 2023 and 2024, respectively, pursuant to the waiver provisions of Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X.
The fees billed to other entities in the investment company complex for assurance and related services by E&Y that
are reasonably related to the performance of the audit that the Audit Committee was required to approve because the engagement related directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Registrant were $0 and $0 for the fiscal years ended 2023
and 2024, respectively. The Audit Committee approved 0% and 0% of these services provided by E&Y for the fiscal years ended 2023 and 2024, respectively, pursuant to the waiver provisions of Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X.
(c) Tax Fees
The aggregate fees billed to the Registrant for professional services rendered by E&Y for tax compliance, tax
advice, and tax planning were $13,120 and $13,120 for the fiscal years ended 2023 and 2024, respectively. The nature of the services provided includes preparation of the Federal and State tax extensions and tax returns, review of annual excise tax
calculations, and preparation of form 8613, in addition to assistance with the identification of Passive Foreign Investment Companies, and assistance with Internal Revenue Code and tax regulation requirements for fund investments. The Audit Committee
approved 0% and 0% of these services provided by E&Y for the fiscal years ended 2023 and 2024, respectively, pursuant to the waiver provisions of Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X.
The fees billed to other entities in the investment company complex for professional services rendered by E&Y for
tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning that the Audit Committee was required to approve because the engagement related directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Registrant were $0 and $0 for the fiscal years ended 2023 and 2024,
respectively. The Audit Committee approved 0% and 0% of these services provided by E&Y for the fiscal years ended 2023 and 2024, respectively, pursuant to the waiver provisions of Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X.
(d) All Other Fees
The aggregate fees billed to the Registrant for products and services provided by E&Y, other than services reported in Audit Fees,
Audit-Related Fees, and Tax Fees were $0 and $0 for the fiscal years ended 2023 and 2024, respectively. The Audit Committee approved 0% and 0% of these services provided by E&Y for the fiscal years ended 2023 and 2024,
respectively, pursuant to the waiver provisions of Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X.
The fees billed to other entities in the investment company complex for products and services provided by E&Y, other than services
reported in Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees, and Tax Fees, that the Audit Committee was required to approve because the engagement related directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Registrant were $0 and $0 for
the fiscal years ended 2023 and 2024, respectively. The Audit Committee approved 0% and 0% of these services provided by E&Y for the fiscal years ended 2023 and 2024, respectively, pursuant to the waiver provisions of Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of
Regulation S-X.
(e) Audit Committee’s Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
(1) The Audit Committee’s pre-approval policies and procedures for the Registrant to engage an accountant to render
audit and non-audit services delegate to each member of the Committee the power to pre-approve services between meetings of the Committee.
(2) None of the services described in paragraphs (b) through (d) above were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to
paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.
(f) Hours Attributed to Other Persons
Not applicable.
(g) Non-Audit Fees
Non-audit fees billed by E&Y for services rendered to the Registrant were $13,120 and $13,120 for the fiscal years
ended 2023 and 2024, respectively.
Non-audit fees billed by E&Y for services rendered to the Registrant’s investment adviser and any entity
controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the Registrant were $0 and $0 for the fiscal years ended 2023 and
2024, respectively.
(h) The Audit Committee of the Board considered whether the provision of non-audit services rendered to the
Registrant’s investment adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the Registrant that were not pre-approved by the Audit Committee because the engagement did not
relate directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Registrant is compatible with maintaining E&Y’s independence.
(i) Not applicable.
(j) Not applicable.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
(a) The Board has established a separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”). Its members are Michael J. Cosgrove (Chair), Martha C. Goss (Vice Chair), Deborah C. McLean, and Paul M. Nakasone.
(b) Not applicable to the Registrant.
Item 6. Investments.
(a) The complete schedule of investments for the Registrant is disclosed in the Registrant’s Annual Report, which is
included as Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
(b) Not applicable.
Item 7. Financial Statements and Financial Highlights for Open-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable to closed-end investment companies.
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable to closed-end investment companies.
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable to closed-end investment companies.
Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment
Companies.
Not applicable to closed-end investment companies.
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Advisory Contract.
See the section titled “Board Consideration of the Management Agreement,” in the Registrant’s Annual Report, which is
included as Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
Item 12. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment
Companies.
As of October 31, 2024, the Board has delegated to Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC (“NBIA”) the responsibility
to vote proxies related to the securities held in the Registrant’s portfolio. Under this authority, NBIA is required by the Board to vote proxies related to portfolio securities in the best interests of the Registrant and its stockholders. The Board
permits NBIA to contract with a third party to obtain proxy voting and related services, including research of current issues.
NBIA has implemented written Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures (“Proxy Voting Policy”) that are designed to
reasonably ensure that NBIA votes proxies prudently and in the best interest of its advisory clients for whom NBIA has voting authority, including the Registrant. The Proxy Voting Policy also describes how NBIA addresses any conflicts that may arise
between its interests and those of its clients with respect to proxy voting.
NBIA’s Governance and Proxy Committee (“Proxy Committee”) is responsible for developing, authorizing, implementing and
updating the Proxy Voting Policy, administering and overseeing the proxy voting process and engaging and overseeing any independent third-party vendors as voting delegates to review, monitor and/or vote proxies. In order to apply the Proxy Voting
Policy noted above in a timely and consistent manner, NBIA utilizes Glass, Lewis & Co. (“Glass Lewis”) to vote proxies in accordance with NBIA’s voting guidelines or, in instances where a material conflict has been determined to exist, in
accordance with the voting recommendations of an independent third party.
NBIA retains final authority and fiduciary responsibility for proxy voting. NBIA believes that this process is
reasonably designed to address material conflicts of interest that may arise between NBIA and a client as to how proxies are voted.
In the event that an investment professional at NBIA believes that it is in the best interests of a client or clients
to vote proxies in a manner inconsistent with the voting guidelines, the Proxy Committee will review information submitted by the investment professional to determine that there is no material conflict of interest between NBIA and the client with
respect to the voting of the proxy in the requested manner.
If the Proxy Committee determines that the voting of a proxy as recommended by the investment professional would not be
appropriate, the Proxy Committee shall: (i) take no further action, in which case Glass Lewis shall vote such proxy in accordance with the voting guidelines; (ii) disclose such conflict to the client or clients and obtain written direction from the
client as to how to vote the proxy; (iii) suggest that the client or clients engage another party to determine how to vote the proxy; or (iv) engage another independent third party to determine how to vote the proxy.
Item 13. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
(a)(1) The following Portfolio Managers have day-to-day management responsibility of the
Registrant’s portfolio as of the date of the filing of this Form N-CSR.
Christopher Kocinski, CFA, is a Managing Director of NBIA. Mr. Kocinski joined the firm in 2006 and is Co-Head of U.S. High Yield and a member of the Credit Committee for Non-Investment Grade Credit. Before being named co-Portfolio Manager to the Fund in
2019, Mr. Kocinski was co-director of non-investment grade credit research and a senior research analyst for NBIA.
Joseph Lind, CFA, is a Managing Director of NBIA. He has served as a Portfolio Manager for the Fund since 2018. Mr. Lind is Co-Head of U.S. High Yield and a member of the Credit Committee for Non-Investment Grade Credit. He joined the firm in 2018.
(a)(2) The table below describes the other accounts for which the Registrant’s Portfolio Managers have day-to-day management responsibility
as of October 31, 2024.
|
Type of Account
|
Number of Accounts Managed
|
Total Assets Managed
($ millions)
|
Number of Accounts Managed for which
Advisory Fee is Performance-Based
|
Assets Managed for
which Advisory Fee is Performance-Based
($ millions)
|
|
Christopher Kocinski
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
2
|
$953
|
--
|
-
|
|
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles**
|
21
|
$10,038
|
1
|
$655
|
|
Other Accounts***
|
21
|
$5,532
|
3
|
$244
|
|
Joseph Lind
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
2
|
$953
|
--
|
-
|
|
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles**
|
21
|
$10,038
|
1
|
$655
|
|
Other Accounts***
|
22
|
$5,604
|
3
|
$244
|
|
*
|
Registered Investment Companies include: Mutual Funds.
|
|
**
|
A portion of certain accounts may be managed by other portfolio managers; however, the total assets of such accounts are included above even though the portfolio manager listed above is
not involved in the day-to-day management of the entire account.
|
|
***
|
Other Accounts include: Institutional Separate Accounts, Sub-Advised Accounts and Managed Accounts (WRAP Accounts).
|
Conflicts of Interest (as of October 31, 2024)
Actual or apparent conflicts of interest may arise when a Portfolio Manager has day-to-day
management responsibilities with respect to more than one fund or other account. The management of multiple funds and accounts (including proprietary accounts) may give rise to actual or potential conflicts of interest if the funds and accounts have
different or similar objectives, benchmarks, time horizons, and fees, as the Portfolio Manager must allocate his or her time and investment ideas across multiple funds and accounts. The Portfolio Manager may execute transactions for another fund or
account that may adversely impact the value of securities or instruments held by the Fund, and which may include transactions that are directly contrary to the positions taken by the Fund. For example, a Portfolio Manager may engage in short sales
of securities or instruments for another account that are the same type of securities or instruments in which the Fund it manages also invests. In such a case, the Portfolio Manager could be seen as harming the performance of the Fund for the
benefit of the account engaging in short sales if the short sales cause the market value of the securities or instruments to fall. Additionally, if a Portfolio Manager identifies a limited investment opportunity that may be suitable for more than
one fund or other account, the Fund may not be able to take full advantage of that opportunity. There may also be regulatory limitations that prevent the Fund from participating in a transaction that another account or fund managed by the same
Portfolio Manager will invest. For example, the 1940 Act prohibits the Fund from participating in certain transactions with certain of its affiliates and from participating in “joint” transactions alongside certain of its affiliates. The prohibition
on “joint” transactions may limit the ability of the Fund to participate alongside its affiliates in privately negotiated transactions unless the transaction is otherwise permitted under existing regulatory guidance and may reduce the amount of
privately negotiated transactions that the Funds may participate. Further, NBIA may take an investment position or action for a fund or account that may be different from, inconsistent with, or have different rights than (e.g., voting rights,
dividend or repayment priorities or other features that may conflict with one another), an action or position taken for one or more other funds or accounts, including the Fund, having similar or different objectives. A conflict may also be created
by investing in different parts of an issuer’s capital structure (e.g., equity or debt, or different positions in the debt structure).
Those positions and actions may adversely impact, or in some instances benefit, one or more affected accounts or funds,
including the Fund. Potential conflicts may also arise because portfolio decisions and related actions regarding a position held for a fund or another account may not be in the best interests of a position held by another fund or account having
similar or different objectives. If one account were to buy or sell portfolio securities or instruments shortly before another account bought or sold the same securities or instruments, it could affect the price paid or received by the second
account. Securities selected for funds or accounts other than the Fund may outperform the securities selected for the Fund. Finally, a conflict of interest may arise if NBIA and a Portfolio Manager have a financial incentive to favor one account
over another, such as a performance-based management fee that applies to one account but not the Fund or other funds or accounts for which the Portfolio Manager is responsible. In the ordinary course of operations, certain businesses within the
Neuberger Berman organization (the “Firm”) will seek access to material non-public information. For instance, NBIA portfolio managers may obtain and utilize material non-public information in purchasing loans and other debt instruments and certain
privately placed or restricted equity instruments. From time to time, NBIA portfolio managers will be offered the opportunity on behalf of applicable clients to participate on a creditors or other similar committee in connection with restructuring or
other “work-out” activity, which participation could provide access to material non-public information. The Firm maintains procedures that address the process by which material non-public information may be acquired intentionally by the Firm. When
considering whether to acquire material non-public information, the Firm will attempt to balance the interests of all clients, taking into consideration relevant factors, including the extent of the prohibition on trading that would occur, the size
of the Firm’s existing position in the issuer, if any, and the value of the information as it relates to the investment decision-making process. The acquisition of material non-public information would likely give rise to a conflict of interest since
the Firm may be prohibited from rendering investment advice to clients regarding the securities or instruments of such issuer and thereby potentially limiting the universe of securities or instruments that the Firm, including the Fund, may purchase
or potentially limiting the ability of the Firm, including the Fund, to sell such securities or instruments. Similarly, where the Firm declines access to (or otherwise does not receive or share within the Firm) material non-public information
regarding an issuer, the portfolio managers could potentially base investment decisions with respect to assets of such issuer solely on public information, thereby limiting the amount of information available to the portfolio managers in connection
with such investment decisions. In determining whether or not to elect to receive material non-public information, the Firm will endeavor to act fairly to its clients as a whole. The Firm reserves the right to decline access to material non-public
information, including declining to join a creditors or similar committee.
NBIA and the Registrant have adopted certain compliance procedures which are designed to address
these types of conflicts. However, there is no guarantee that such procedures will detect each and every situation in which a conflict arises.
(a)(3) Compensation (as of October 31, 2024)
Our compensation philosophy is one that focuses on rewarding performance and incentivizing our employees. We are also
focused on creating a compensation process that we believe is fair, transparent, and competitive with the market.
Compensation for Portfolio Managers consists of either (i) fixed (salary) and variable (discretionary bonus) compensation
but is more heavily weighted on the variable portion of total compensation, (ii) on a production model, whereby formulaic compensation is paid from the team compensation pool on a fixed schedule (typically monthly) or (iii) a combination of salary,
bonus and/or production compensation. Compensation is paid from a team compensation pool made available to the portfolio management team with which the Portfolio Manager is associated. The size of the team compensation pool is determined based on a
formula that takes into consideration a number of factors including the pre-tax revenue that is generated by that particular portfolio management team, less certain adjustments. The amount allocated to individual portfolio managers is determined on
the basis of a variety of criteria, including investment performance (including the aggregate multi-year track record), utilization of central resources (including research, sales and operations/support), business building to further the longer term
sustainable success of the investment team, effective team/people management, and overall contribution to the success of Neuberger Berman. Certain Portfolio Managers may manage products other than mutual funds, such as high net worth separate
accounts. The percentage of pre-tax revenue a Portfolio Manager receives pursuant to any such arrangement will vary based on certain revenue thresholds.
The terms of our long-term retention incentives are as follows:
Employee-Owned Equity.
Certain employees (primarily senior leadership and investment professionals) participated in Neuberger Berman’s equity ownership structure, which was launched as part of the firm’s management buyout in 2009 and designed to incentivize and retain
key personnel. We currently offer an equity acquisition program which allows employees a more direct opportunity to invest in Neuberger Berman.
For confidentiality and privacy reasons, we cannot disclose individual equity holdings or program participation.
Contingent Compensation Plan.
Certain employees may participate in the Neuberger Berman Group Contingent Compensation Plan (the “CCP”) to serve as a means to further align the interests of our employees with the success of the firm and the interests of our clients, and to
reward continued employment. Under the CCP, up to 20% of a participant’s annual total compensation in excess of $500,000 is contingent and subject to vesting. The contingent amounts are maintained in a notional account that is tied to the
performance of a portfolio of Neuberger Berman investment strategies as specified by the firm on an employee-by-employee basis. By having a participant’s contingent compensation tied to Neuberger Berman investment strategies, each employee is given
further incentive to operate as a prudent risk manager and to collaborate with colleagues to maximize performance across all business areas. In the case of members of investment teams, including Portfolio Managers, the CCP is currently structured
so that such employees have exposure to the investment strategies of their respective teams as well as the broader Neuberger Berman portfolio.
Restrictive Covenants. Most
investment professionals, including Portfolio Managers, are subject to notice periods and restrictive covenants which include employee and client non-solicit restrictions as well as restrictions on the use of confidential information. In addition,
depending on participation levels, certain senior professionals who have received equity grants have also agreed to additional notice and transition periods and, in some cases, non-compete restrictions. For confidentiality and privacy reasons, we
cannot disclose individual restrictive covenant arrangements.
(a)(4) Ownership of Securities
Set forth below is the dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned by the Registrant’s Portfolio Managers in
the Registrant as of October 31, 2024.
|
Portfolio Manager
|
Dollar Range of Equity
Securities Owned in the
Registrant
|
|
Christopher Kocinski
|
A
|
|
Joseph Lind
|
E
|
|
A = None
B = $1-$10,000
C = $10,001 - $50,000
D =$50,001-$100,000
|
E = $100,001-$500,000
F = $500,001-$1,000,000
G = Over $1,000,000
|
(b) Not applicable.
Item 14. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated
Purchasers.
No reportable purchases for the period covered by this report.
Item 15. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
There were no material changes to the procedures by which stockholders may recommend nominees to the Board.
Item 16. Controls and Procedures.
| (a) |
Based on an evaluation of the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Act) as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report, the Chief Executive Officer and President and the Treasurer and
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Registrant have concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures are effectively designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant on Form N-CSR is
accumulated and communicated to the Registrant’s management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
|
| (b) |
There were no significant changes in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Act) that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|
Item 17. Disclosure of Securities Lending Activities for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
| (a) |
The Fund did not engage in any securities lending activity during its most recent fiscal year.
|
| (b) |
The Fund did not engage in any securities lending activity and no services were provided by the securities lending agent to the Fund during its most recent fiscal year.
|
Item 18. Recovery of Erroneously Awarded Compensation.
Not applicable to the Registrant.
Item 19. Exhibits.
| (a)(1) |
A copy of the Code of Ethics is incorporated by reference to Neuberger Berman Absolute Return Multi-Manager Fund's Form N-CSR, Investment Company Act
file number 811-21715 (filed January 6, 2025).
|
| (a)(2) |
Not applicable to the Registrant. |
| (a)(4) |
Not applicable to the Registrant.
|
| (a)(5) |
Not applicable to the Registrant.
|
The certification furnished pursuant to Rule 30a-2(b) under the Act and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act will not
be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund Inc.
By:
|
/s/ Joseph V. Amato |
|
|
|
Joseph V. Amato |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and President |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: January 6, 2025 |
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By:
|
/s/ Joseph V. Amato |
|
|
|
Joseph V. Amato |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and President |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: January 6, 2025 |
|
By:
|
/s/ John M. McGovern |
|
|
|
John M. McGovern |
|
|
|
Treasurer and Principal Financial |
|
|
|
and Accounting Officer |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Date: January 6, 2025 |
|
