westjtter
10 hours ago
Now this is probably a "done" deal as they did complete a fairness opinion to value the company.....the question is, was this plan in place long before we heard about it and management kind of dogged it on the revenue front to keep the valuation artificially low? No one blamed or punished for missing the routine filing that caused the original debenture to come due immediately and of course this necessitated the need for the new financing which in retrospect, set the table for this take out private offer at a "fair" valuation.
I was always OK with selling, but not at current valuations....the plan was to fill capacity and then sell at a much higher price. The other disappointing thing, is that it looks like financing is loosening for all of these Biotechs that need their drug candidates manufactured and so the future looks really good for CDMO's going forward!!!
So unless one of these law firms can come up with something that sticks, or rather stinks, it is likely this deal goes through!
jbainseky
12 hours ago
The only thing that makes sense is the acquiring entity tells MM, buy everything under $12.50. After the announcement undoubtedly there were large sell lots near the buyout PPS as there are a number of holders with a lower than $12.50 basis. Once those are gobbled up, the MM does both buying and selling within their own portfolios moving the PPS back and forth but just a little. Each of those trades get counted but shares are really not changing hands. MM is justified to make the market orderly, especially when there is low liquidity, which there would be after all the funds that wanted to get out, did. Looks like it is continuing today.
djohn
16 hours ago
Mark Bamforth
IMO this deal was set up years ago
IMO Avid was never going to be successful as a public company
Board Member
Avid Bioservices
Oct 2017 - Jul 2021 · 3 yrs 10 mos
Tustin, CA
Ampersand Capital Partners
Self-employed · 6 yrs 5 mosSelf-employed · 6 yrs 5 mos
Wellesley, Massachusetts, United StatesWellesley, Massachusetts, United States
Executive Advisor
Feb 2023 - Present · 1 yr 10 mosFeb 2023 to Present · 1 yr 10 mos
Operating Partner
Jul 2018 - Jan 2023 · 4 yrs 7 mosJul 2018 to Jan 2023 · 4 yrs 7 mos
Ampersand was founded in the late 1980s and began investing in healthcare in the early 1990s. Today, Ampersand is focused exclusively on growth equity investments in lower middle market healthcare companies. We are typically the first institutional investor in founder-owned businesses, where we work with the entrepreneur to help take the company to the next level.Ampersand was founded in the late 1980s and began investing in healthcare in the early 1990s. Today, Ampersand is focused exclusively on growth equity investments in lower middle market healthcare companies. We are typically the first institutional investor in founder-owned businesses, where we work with the entrepreneur to help take the company to the next level.
4OurRetirement
1 day ago
My Guess Revolves Around Several Points As Follows...
I'm thinking some entity representing the ultimate buyers were given a price range to buy all that was being sold.
They don't want new shorters pushing the price down and risk either retail or II's deciding that the lower price would be worth buying and sitting on the shares for a couple months for an easy fixed profit.
For Instance, it wouldn't take a rocket scientist to see if the stock price hit $11.00, for example. Then when the buyout occurred someone could make an easy $1.50 profit per share for every share they could buy at $11.00
They also don't want any other shorters, that were not part of the underwritten financing, to cover and get cheap shares either!
If anyone will be buying cheap shares, they obviously would want to limit that as much as possible to the new buyers
I also think that I saw that the finalization is a "by a certain date" type of contract.
The way I read it left me with the impression that they could close the deal sooner... like if they ended up buying over 50% of issued shares (probably via a broker that represents the new buyers and is sitting on the BID below the buyout price.
My guess is that the broker worked a deal that ever share they can buy under $12.50, they can eventually sell to new buyers for the full $12.50 and pocket the difference (plus a small fee of course, lol).
On the other hand, I doubt we see the PPS spike over $12.50, unless the buying broker sees a chunk of shares that is above $12.50 and perhaps they decide to dash and buy, then drop again below $12.50.
So, a broker can set multiple buy orders covering like a 10 cent range and set a large possibly hidden buy just below that as a hard bottom price.
As I said, they don't want they price to drop too low by new shorters.
Well, I'm currently multi tasking. I had a couple other ideas to add, but at the moment I can't recall because I'm really focused on something else...
I hope my guesstimate of the situation helps. I can't swear that the contract has the option for an early completion, but I think I read that...
Yes, the deal still needs voting approval, but IF today's trading really was a bunch of II's that had been holding shares for this upcoming buyout, then 50% of the shares were just bought and the board can set a vote whenever they want and guarantee it will be approved.
Yes, it smells of collusion and unpublished material negotiations dating back to potentially as early as the financing was underwritten the first time!
And yes, they probably built the best facility they could afford (with our investing money) while planning to not fill the production to capacity.
Problem is, I can't prove any of that... but it seems highly likely.
Btw, did anyone else notice that there is still an open facility called Peregrine overseas that will be included in this purchase?
Things that make ya go hmmm... ikr?
OK, I gotta run.
Everyone can feel free to post your comments.
I freely admit that I may have made typos, or included incomplete thoughts, since I was multitasking.
Hopefully this all makes sense... not that it makes me or any of you happy, but there ya go!
Good nite for now & best wishes that someone comes up with a good loophole for us to recover a little more than $12.50 per share.
Preciouslife1
1 day ago
https://eresearch.fidelity.com/eresearch//evaluate/news/basicNewsStory.jhtml?symbols=CDMO&storyid=202411071127PRIMZONEFULLFEED9269579&provider=PRIMZONE&product=FULLFEED&exConsumer=Alerts
CDMO Alert: Monsey Firm of Wohl & Fruchter Investigating Fairness of the Sale of Avid Bioservices to GHO Capital Partners and Ampersand Capital Partners
BY GlobeNewswire
— 11:27 AM ET 11/07/2024
MONSEY, New York, Nov. 07, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The law firm of Wohl & Fruchter LLP is investigating the fairness of the proposed sale of Avid Bioservices (CDMO) (“Avid”) to GHO Capital Partners (“GHO”) and Ampersand Capital Partners (“Ampersand”) for $12.50 per share in cash.
The sale price is below the price target for Avid of $14.00 per share of Wall Street analyst Paul Knight of KeyBanc (source: TipRanks).
If you remain an Avid shareholder and question the fairness of the price, you may contact our firm at the following link to discuss your legal rights at no charge:
https://wohlfruchter.com/cases/avid-bioservices/
Alternatively, you may contact us by phone at 866-833-6245, or via email at alerts@wohlfruchter.com.
Why is there an investigation?
On November 7, 2024, Avid announced that it had agreed to be sold to GHO and Ampersand for $12.50 per share in cash.
Notably, the sale price is below the price target for Avid of $14.00 per share of Wall Street analyst Paul Knight of KeyBanc (source: TipRanks).
“We are investigating whether the Avid Board of Directors acted in the best interests of Avid shareholders in approving the sale,” explained Joshua Fruchter, a founding partner of Wohl & Fruchter. “This includes whether the price agreed upon is fair to Avid shareholders, as well as whether all material information regarding the transaction has been fully disclosed.”
About Wohl & Fruchter
Wohl & Fruchter LLP has for over a decade been representing investors in litigation arising from fraud and other corporate misconduct, and recovered hundreds of millions of dollars in damages for investors. Please visit our website, www.wohlfruchter.com, to learn more about our Firm, or contact one of our partners.
Contact:
Wohl & Fruchter LLP
Joshua E. Fruchter
Toll Free 866.833.6245
alerts@wohlfruchter.com
www.wohlfruchter.com
Image: https://www.globenewswire.com/newsroom/ti?nf=OTI2OTU3OSM2NTcxMTM2IzIyMzMyNzc=
Image: https://ml.globenewswire.com/media/NDVhNzk3OTItZjhiZi00ZTc0LTliOGUtZjliYTI3NGNmMzA5LTEyNDQ4MzA=/tiny/Wohl-Fruchter-LLP.png Source: Wohl & Fruchter LLP
Preciouslife1
1 day ago
HI Loofman, sorry but Colonel Gaddy Passed away several years ago, Frootie, Jazzbeerman,
and the old crew long gone from here! ... some of us from the mid 90's are still here and were hoping for a $30, $40, $50 Buyout based upon the Increased Capacity and Viral Vector Facility cash outlays .. to "Have to Settle" for $12.50 down from previous High of $34.50 is very disappointing and costly for all of us! ... I'm thankful I sold some at the $33 level, and bought more back at $4-$4.50 at the low sensing blood in the streets of oversold territory ...
Hopefully or maybe a "White Knight" could roll in bringing another higher bid, to bless us longstanding shareholders ... King, Bonfiglio, Lias, Legere, now Green in no particular order.... way too bad and RIP Dr THorpe!!!
north40000
1 day ago
In a sense, geo, we already have gone. How many of you use Schwab as a trading platform? Our tile view of our 10 biggest daily gain movers today in our taxable account shows that CDMO heads that list with 48k shares listed as #1. NVDA is #2 with 7550 shares. VCEL is #3 with 11,800 shares. CPRX is #4 with 12k shares. AMAT is next with 800 shares. AMD(1000 shares), AAPL(800 shares), MSFT(500 shares), CRWD(200 shares) and IONQ(400 shares) follow. IONQ is new in 2024, and I continue to add shares there.
In my IRA, GILD(3200 shares) and CDMO(4000 shares) are #1 and #2. CPRX, VCEL, VKTX, PWR and ORCL follow in daily gains. INSM, CG, and AMRN are losers in daily gain. Day gain in both accounts is ~ $184k. JNJ is down for the day at ~ $156/share in a separate account.