SFLMaven Corporation (PK) (SFLM) News

Hes a bad hombre

Even calling Punxsutawney Chad a CEO is giving him way too much credit. 😂


He's clearly a useless nobody that doesn't even have the guts or decency to address shareholders of this two-year dumpster fire. He may have also played a role in a very elaborate scam years in the making.

By all means, someone please prove me wrong. I don't think it's possible.

Our best hope is another change of control. Sell the damn ticker to someone with an actual business and some sort of plan.

If enough of us send in a request to add SFLM back into their database of stocks, maybe Stockcharts will offer SFLM again. It's a free stock charting service . Here's the link to request SFLM be added back.

https://stockcharts.com/support/symbolrequest.html

Same here

Someone… anyone… trying to start anything here with this stale POS ticker is welcomed by me🤷🏻‍♂️

Chad obviously is an incapable imbecile CEO.

Its his third post on SFLM. He doesn't post much on any stocks. I'd like to hear his theory.

Sounds like trying to start a new P & D to me. his/her First Time posting on this board.

wabadon

What makes you think that? I hope you're right .

Starting to firm up finally after 6 mo...feels like a run in the works.

Now you know the load zone :)
SFLM

Same here. As Charlton Heston famously stated, "From my cold head hands."

Here's one theory...


It's a relentless daily game to trick people into selling and it will never stop until they have shaken every damn share out of the tree.


Too bad for them, they'll never get mine hahaha!

From a tech ical standpoint, I wonder why someone triggers a small trade to assure a certain closing price? Something I've learned is these stocks move on mathematical equations. News doesnt always move share price. Often times share price will move without news then news is delivered and the sell off happens.. someone is managing this stock.

I'd love for that to be true, but I'm curious, what makes you say that? All I see is barcoding between 0002 and 0003.

That seems to be a popular perspective

Chart looks hopeful though as if there is one more pump left maybe 2025

I wonder if yesterday's volume over 9m, mostly at 0002, was someone exiting out of frustration?

I still think this stock is being managed. That's why we see almost daily trades, although insignificant often, between 0002-0003.

Two of us were reminiscing about the 2020/2021 OTC payday that season was. We can only hope this election season plays out the same.

I missed it. What did the post say?

What I don't understand is why this ticker even has any volume whatsoever. It should probably be on expert market until someone (and I'm not even going to use the name Chad because he is 100% non-existent to us shareholders) gives it the slightest glimpse of legitimacy.

I cannot find any reason to not think everyone involved with this fiasco is a filthy scammer and deserves a life of agony.

Still nothing coming here?

It makes no sense to me the post that get deleted

I thought it was just me as a novice investor trying to turn beer money into something more tangible🤣

OTC hasn’t done much for me in a while. Been a few years since I’ve had a 5 or 10x + play. Was hoping SFLM would change that trend under new ownership, but it has followed the same downward spiral instead🙃

Now if I could only deduce if it was purposeful and there was intention behind it. Could be an unavoidable circumstance, or possibly a sinister plot of enrichment for those in the “know”🤷🏻‍♂️ I think I’m with you… F the OTC I’m out after this plays out I think.

I noticed in the 2020/2021 mega run it was hard not to pick a winner. Plus it appeared to be coordinated as it was hard not to find one where the 50 crossing the 200 to the upside wasn't in preset play. Sometimes I wonder how much of our reality is random and how much is coordinated and pre planned. The future is so creepy.

It’s been pathetic! Hoping for one last hooray and I’m done with the otc

My bad I meant OS

AS means Available Shares, which has been at 5 billion for as long as I've been watching.

OS means Outstanding Shares, which increased by about 1 billion when the loan sharks converted their notes into shares and dumped them on our faces.

As far as I know, in order for those notes to be issued, the shares have to be available in the total AS.

And yes, I agree it should be easy enough to get an answer to your question. I also agree that if the restriction is true, it should be easy enough to find in a publicly available SEC filing.

When I initially bought this stock (November December 2022 approx) the AS was around 2.1 billion shares and maintained that level for quite a while. In fact it was bragged about how long the AS never grew. Then last December 2023 and possibly into January 2024 the AS grew to where it is now about 3.2 billion. If those were already accounted for in the AS why did it grow like it did? Just trying to understand how distribution works.

Plus, I also just sent an email again to the SEC asking them to be specific. Does SFLM have a 5 year restriction on issuing REG A and REG D shares and if it does, I'd think their records would show it and when that restriction period began and ends. Their last response was an evasion if anything. It should be able to answered I'd think. If any agency places a restriction you'd think they know and have dates when it started and when it would end. I can't be that unreasonable to think that can I?

The way I understand it, those shares were from OLD convertible notes the previous CEO handed out years ago. The shares were presumably already accounted for in the AS.

The supposed 5-year restriction, which we still have no proof even exists, would apply to issuing NEW notes in order to raise capital for a new business venture. Which, if Loyal Companies were a legit private equity form, they shouldn't even need in the first place.

I remember last spring several of the "bashers" here claimed the only reason they got this ticker back to pink current was so everyone that was previously owed money could GTFO with their cash and run. We all dismissed those claims as BS, because nobody wants to hear or believe opinions that conflict with their own. In hindsight, maybe those bashers were the smart ones all along. 

Do any of you have an opinion on how was the company able to increase the OS last December and later to where it is now, if there's supposedly a freeze on such actions for 5 years?

Yes all scenarios are possible

It's absolutely possible that Chad simply has no idea what to do. Honestly, I'd prefer that to be the case at this point, because the other possibilities as I see it are:

A) He was too oblivious to even realize what he was buying and how much of a mess Laden left behind.

or

B) He knew exactly what he was doing all along and he was working with previous insiders to help them make huge bank on their convertible notes. Which in reality, would make him a scammer, just like a few of his "business associates".

Regardless, the one positive to keep grasping at is that it's a seemingly debt-free shell with a not-so-terrible share structure. Someone with an actual business plan could do something positive with it someday.

I recommend going back to Scotty’s Post with the LinkedIn link of the “Bigfoot sighting” picture.

Look at Chad McKay. To me, he looks like he has the mental capacity of a child. Certainly not someone who has serious business experience. I absolutely agree with the theory he has no idea what to do with this thing.

And I want to laugh out loud when I read the comments. That does not look like any kind of dream team to me. Chad and his whole posse are a bunch of frauds in my opinion, until I see anything that proves differently.

I will continue to hold, as I have no reason to sell for a loss, but my confidence level is as low as it’s been. This is what happens when morons buy the controlling interest in a company you are invested in😒

Perhaps that Hi-Lo guy can shed some light on the situation? He said he quietly continues to research SFLM and his positive opinion hasn't changed. Surely he must know something we don't?

Maybe, but how longs it’s been since we heard anything. Just seems like a PnD scam at this point imo

OTC updated today. OS still the same. I must remain positive. Have too much invested but yes I believe like JB that some knew all along the plan here. It seems that way on every stock. It's that corrupt on Wall Street.

It's hard to argue against that being a strong possibility at this point.

It's also hard to not suspect AT LEAST 3 frequent posters on this board were in on it the whole time. I don't think I have to call them out. Everyone knows who they are.

Yes

Can we all can we all just get along

-Rodney king-

Almost as good as your POS CBDD YES LOL

Now that’s Funny.

SFLM has nothing, interest rates can’t affect a company that has NOTHING

It has lots of Dilution, that’s about all SFLM has.

I think he just may not know what to do with it at this point. Interest rates went up and without a good merger candidate it’s hopeless. As interest rates come down we stand a better chance imo

We’ve been scammed imo, until chad speaks up nothing will change my mind

I heard back from the SEC. They did not give me any details specific to SFLM. They only provided links to the provisional rules about REG A and REG D. and what makes stocks ineligible. I still default back to my first conversation with the SEC when I was told she could see the levy of the $25k fine but saw nothing about a 5 year restriction. And let's not forget The Chad did say they were going to seek a remedy to that 5 year restriction. Maybe he did and was removed.

I still say if they weren't able to issue shares how did the shares become available to sell last December and January when the OS rose to where it is today? Which we are assuming were sold to pay off debt.

Any opinions are welcome on what to ponder about our situation. I wish others would call and get feedback that may be more defining of what's going one here.

I'd call that a fair description of this situation.

I don't understand how that dilution was allowed last December into January if a 5 year restriction was in place or did those shares come from a different pot? Most of us believe that dilution was to pay of old debt but we're just guessing as the CEO has never stated.

I emailed the following to the SEC contact I have from my original call earlier this year.

"I spoke with a representative at the SEC about a penny stock ticker symbol SFLM - SFLMaven in either late May or or early June 2024. We had a lengthy conversation and my questions at the time were answered. I did inquire about a supposed SEC initiated 5 year ineligibility on selling pursuant to REG A or REG D shares as noted in this press release below from approximately October 2023. The SEC rep I spoke with could not find any mention of a 5 year ineligibility to sell REG A OR REG D securities. She did find the part about $25,000 fine and as far as we know it was paid by the new owner Mr McKay . This company was bought by a man named Chad McKay with Loyal Companies. The sale of SFLMaven to Mr McKay was pr'd in November 2022.

Many of us stock holders are perplexed by the fact the SEC rep I spoke with could find no 5 year restrictions pursuant to selling REG A OR REG D shares but the CEO said there was in that press release noted below.

What can you tell us that either confirms the press release and a waiver is in process ( maybe status if possible) or tell us there's no such 5 year restrictions. The CEO Mr McKay has been silent and unreachable for nearly a year and has never responded to any attempts by shareholders to reach him. This isn't so much a complaint as it is a verification of the press release noted below. We'd love to have Mr McKay clear this up.

Respectfully
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Retail shareholder of OTC stock ticker SFLM


"Mr. MacKay continued, "In addition to the delays in the change of control process, immediately following our purchase of the controlling shares of SFLM, the Company became the subject of an SEC Action. The SEC Action arose out of the Company's Reg A offering originally filed in April 2019 and involved actions taken by the Company's prior management and legal counsel. We determined that the Company's best path forward, the path that impaired the least amount of capital, monetary and human, was to settle the SEC Action and, in a manner of speaking, get on with business. The Company agreed to the payment of a $25,000 civil penalty and to being ineligible to sell securities pursuant to Regulation A and Regulation D for a period of five years. In this regard, in March of this year, the Company submitted a waiver request, such that it would be able to avail itself of Regulation A and Regulation A; this waiver request is still pending."

This sucks Chad I feel like a bagholder instead of investor

Yeah! An update would be nice lol

It does look like they're pursuing a waiver, so that's hopeful.

Thanks. I will look back in my email history this evening and get this off to her.