ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for tools Level up your trading with our powerful tools and real-time insights all in one place.

Holders Technology - Capital usage in the two business areas

Share On Facebook
share on Linkedin
Print

The key to a revival of Holders Technology (LSE:HDT) is to cut out value-destructive activities, thereby not only reducing losses but releasing cash.
We have seen a decline in the amount of money tied up in inventory and receivables. Is this evidence of partial liquidation by getting out of unprofitable customer servicing?
Start with the overall company numbers:

£m November 2012 November 2014 November 2015
Inventories 3.14 2.74 2.53
Receivables 2.40 1.95 1.56
Total 5.54 4.69 4.09
Reduction 2012 to 2014 (24 months)   0.85

15%

 
Reduction 2014 to 2015 (12 months)     0.6m

13%

Reduction 2012 to 2015 (36 months)     1.45

26%

A company with a market capitalisation of £1m has reduced the cash tied up in inventory and receivables by £1.45m over 36 months.
But also note that over the same period net current asset value has fallen by £1.24m from £4.45m to £3.21m. Trading losses total £0.66m over those three years.
If more cash can be released from the £4.09m in inventory and receivables as unprofitable activities are curtailed then the BS might shift to a higher proportion of cash – perhaps the cash will exceed MCap.
Unfortunately, the recent evidence is not good: cash went down by £191k over the last year rather than up.
Different stories for the PCB and the LED businesses.


Printed circuit board supplies
The business supplying components to printed circuit board manufacturers has been declining for years.
In the most recent 12 months revenue was down 25%, and comments such as “PCB market in 2015 continued to be demanding…..sharply reduced customer demand” and “In the current year, given market conditions, it will be difficult for our PCB activities to make a positive contribution” confirm my view that this division should be killed off, or, at least, reduced to its profitable niches.
However, it would not be sensible to kill it off hastily. As cash tied up in inventory and receivables is released the company will carry on trading with some customers and so is obliged to carry a minimum stock level.
Also German labour laws may not permit rapid redundancy without high cost. So a subtle release of capital is required. How are the managers doing on this score?
First, note that employee numbers across the company have fallen to 78 compared with 107 in 2011 (they were down by 6 in 2015).
Also staff costs were £2.7m five years ago; they are £2.1m now.
It’s unlikely that staff numbers in the LED business have gone down as this division is being built up. I thus surmise that PCB has lost over 40% of its staff.
But has that released any money? Here are some numbers:
PCB Division – Costs, Profits and Assets 

£000’s 2012 2013 2014 2015
Revenue 11,036 11,011 11,025 8,304
Gross profit 2,760 2,640 2,546 1,853
Gross margin 25% 24% 23.1% 22.3%
Distribution costs 316 301 333 272
Administrative costs 2,257 2,154 2,182 1,707
Other operating income 47 56 45 98
Division operating profit 234 241 76 -28
Assets 8,522 9,453 7,314 6,509
Liabilities 2,467 1,919 1,841 1,970
Net assets 6,055 7,534 5,473 4,539

In the last year gross profit fell by £693k compar……….To read the rest of this article, and more like it, subscribe to my premium newsletter Deep Value Shares – click here http://newsletters.advfn.com/deepvalueshares/subscribe-1

CLICK HERE TO REGISTER FOR FREE ON ADVFN, the world's leading stocks and shares information website, provides the private investor with all the latest high-tech trading tools and includes live price data streaming, stock quotes and the option to access 'Level 2' data on all of the world's key exchanges (LSE, NYSE, NASDAQ, Euronext etc).

This area of the ADVFN.com site is for independent financial commentary. These blogs are provided by independent authors via a common carrier platform and do not represent the opinions of ADVFN Plc. ADVFN Plc does not monitor, approve, endorse or exert editorial control over these articles and does not therefore accept responsibility for or make any warranties in connection with or recommend that you or any third party rely on such information. The information available at ADVFN.com is for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. In particular, the information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by ADVFN.COM and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any investment decisions. Authors may or may not have positions in stocks that they are discussing but it should be considered very likely that their opinions are aligned with their trading and that they hold positions in companies, forex, commodities and other instruments they discuss.

Leave A Reply

 
Do you want to write for our Newspaper? Get in touch: newspaper@advfn.com