Warren and Charlie on missing hi-tech investments

Share On Facebook

At the May Berkshire Hathaway shareholders meeting Buffett and Munger were asked about missing out on Google and Amazon.  While, of course, with hindsight they should have bought shares in these entities, at the time they had to stick to their investment principles.  Their responses teach us much about the correct approach to investing – even if you do miss out from time to time.


The question asked:

“I’m wondering about your interests in not just Apple, but all of the tech stocks, like Amazon and Google. Because you’ve avoided them, you’ve stated in the past, because they’re complicated, you should stick with something you understand. On the other hand, Amazon and Google have what you call a very durable competitive advantage. They really hardly have any competitor. And that’s true in China, too, of Alibaba and Tencent. So it seems like it’s a conflict, and I’m wondering if you’re going to be turning the corner and going into these tech companies that seem to have no serious competition.”

Buffett’s response:

“Well, we certainly looked at them. And we don’t think of whether we should be in tech companies or not, or that sort of thing. We are looking for things when we do get into the durability of the competitive advantage, and whether we think that our opinion might be better than other people’s opinion in assessing the probability of the durability, so to speak.

But the truth is that I’ve watched Amazon from the start, and I think what Jeff Bezos has done is something close to a miracle. And the problem is, if I think something will be a miracle, I tend not to bet on it.

It would have been better – far better, obviously – if we – if I had some insights into certain businesses.

But you know, in fact, Bill Gates told me early on, that I think I was on AltaVista and he suggested I turn to Google. But the trouble is I saw that Google was skipping past AltaVista, and then I wondered if anybody could skip past Google.

We’ve looked at it, and you know, I made a mistake in not being able to come to a conclusion where I really felt that at the present prices that the prospects were far better than the prices indicated.

And I didn’t go into Apple because it was a tech stock in the least. I went into Apple because I came to certain conclusions about both the intelligence with which the capital would be employed, but more important, about the value of an ecosystem and how permanent that ecosystem could be, and what the threats were to it, and a whole bunch of things.

And I don’t think that required me to take apart an iPhone or something and figure out what all the components were or anything. It’s much more the nature of consumer behaviour. And some things

……………To read the rest of this article, and more like it, subscribe to my premium newsletter Deep Value Shares – click here http://newsletters.advfn.com/deepvalueshares/subscribe-1

CLICK HERE TO REGISTER FOR FREE ON ADVFN, the world's leading stocks and shares information website, provides the private investor with all the latest high-tech trading tools and includes live price data streaming, stock quotes and the option to access 'Level 2' data on all of the world's key exchanges (LSE, NYSE, NASDAQ, Euronext etc).

This area of the ADVFN.com site is for independent financial commentary. These blogs are provided by independent authors via a common carrier platform and do not represent the opinions of ADVFN Plc. ADVFN Plc does not monitor, approve, endorse or exert editorial control over these articles and does not therefore accept responsibility for or make any warranties in connection with or recommend that you or any third party rely on such information. The information available at ADVFN.com is for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. In particular, the information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by ADVFN.COM and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any investment decisions. Authors may or may not have positions in stocks that they are discussing but it should be considered very likely that their opinions are aligned with their trading and that they hold positions in companies, forex, commodities and other instruments they discuss.

Leave A Reply

Do you want to write for our Newspaper? Get in touch: newspaper@advfn.com

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P:41 V: D:20181118 11:03:43