ADVFN ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for smarter Trade smarter, not harder: Unleash your inner pro with our toolkit and live discussions.

RBS Change(s) at the Top

Share On Facebook
share on Linkedin
Print

The Royal Bank of Scotland (LSE:RBS) captured headlines over the weekend with two major stories.  It was just three days ago, on 24 May, we reported that RBS had yet another service issue, this time with it’s mobile banking app.  Of course it wasn’t especially ‘news’ to some two million who tried to access the app, but could not.

New Hire

Yesterday, the bank announced that it has hired Jon Pain to fill a newly-created, executive-level position in which he will be in charge of of “conduct and regulatory affairs.”  Pain, who will join the company in August, spent several years as a managing director at the FSA from 2008 to 2011.  Most recently he has been a partner in financial services at KPMG.    The board more definitively described Pain’s role as “oversight of conduct and compliance globally across all RBS divisions as well as strategic leadership of the group’s relationships with regulators.”

RBS CEO, Stephen Hester, told reporters that “The creation of this position sends a clear message about how we want to do business – serving customers well, completing our return to a safe and conservative risk profile, and generating sustainable returns for shareholders.  If we achieve these objectives, and do so in the right way, RBS will become a really good bank.”

Speaking of Stephen Hester

Sometimes executives’ attempts to spin a story strike me as quite odd, and often comical.  Does Hester realize that he said, “If we achieve these objectives” and “If we do so in the right way“?  That’s certainly inspirational.  And IF they are able to, “RBS will become a really good bank.”  Hello?  Are you telling us that it currently is NOT a really good bank?  It’s OK Mr. Hester.  We already know the answer.  It’s just a bit of a wonderment that you would acknowledge, by implication, at least, that  you recognize the bank for what it is . . . and still be adamant that you deserve your exorbitant salary and annual bonus.

Oddly enough, the second, and certainly not the lesser, report about RBS this weekend revealed that the directors have held at least one clandestine meeting to identify a successor to Stephen Hester.  The meeting was initiated at the behest of Sir Philip Hampton, the bank’s Chairman.  It is believed that he presented a list of potential candidates to those in attendance.  The import of the meeting is difficult to discern as the stories of its occasion are being spun for political correctness.

While, on the one hand, the report raises speculation that we could soon hear that Hester is “leaving to pursue other interests,” on the other hand, the board could simply be taking the Boy Scout approach to “Be prepared.”  It could also mean that there is some division among board members as to the current and future operations of the bank under Hester’s tenure as RBS appears to be moving, slowly but surely, toward re-privatization.

CLICK HERE TO REGISTER FOR FREE ON ADVFN, the world's leading stocks and shares information website, provides the private investor with all the latest high-tech trading tools and includes live price data streaming, stock quotes and the option to access 'Level 2' data on all of the world's key exchanges (LSE, NYSE, NASDAQ, Euronext etc).

This area of the ADVFN.com site is for independent financial commentary. These blogs are provided by independent authors via a common carrier platform and do not represent the opinions of ADVFN Ltd. ADVFN Ltd does not monitor, approve, endorse or exert editorial control over these articles and does not therefore accept responsibility for or make any warranties in connection with or recommend that you or any third party rely on such information. The information available at ADVFN.com is for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. In particular, the information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by ADVFN.COM and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any investment decisions. Authors may or may not have positions in stocks that they are discussing but it should be considered very likely that their opinions are aligned with their trading and that they hold positions in companies, forex, commodities and other instruments they discuss.

Leave A Reply

 
Do you want to write for our Newspaper? Get in touch: newspaper@advfn.com