WandererHero90
1 hour ago
While the shorts/naysayers would prefer that we all look in the rearview mirror, the smart money will be looking ahead. It is true that in the past the industry was not ready for the performance benefits of Perkinamine. There was no urgency for a paradigm shift, and LWLG leadership misread the room. That has now changed on multiple fronts, including the new leadership in Yves. I have not been here as long as many, so I'm still very patient, but I fully believe we are in the right place, and finally at the right time!
prototype_101
2 hours ago
Thin-Film LiNbO3 (TFLN) versus LWLG Electro-optic Polymers
Performance
Thin-Film LiNbO3 (TFLN)
- r33 intrinsically capped at ~ 31 pm/V at 1310 nm
- n = 2.2, er = 30 (high dispersion across frequencies)
LWLG Electro-optic Polymers
- No intrinsic cap on r33 (> 200 pm/V at 1310 nm easily achieved)
- n Λ 1.9, er Λ 3-6 (low dispersion across frequencies)
Integration
Thin-Film LiNbO3 (TFLN)
- Integration with Si/SiN very low yielding & basically still in R&D stage
- Limited wafer size (150 mm)
- Large device footprint (sub-cm scale)
- High material cost w/ only one supplier (NanoLN)
LWLG Electro-optic Polymers
- Fully Si compatible
- Easily scalable to 300 (+) mm wafer
- Very small device footprint (sub-mm scale)
- Low material cost
Processing
Thin-Film LiNbO3 (TFLN)
- Thin film uniformity becomes difficult as wafer size scales up
- Specialized processing/tools needed β leads to higher costs
associated with processing, QC, etc.
LWLG Electro-optic Polymers
- Spin-coating produces films with high uniformity
- No specialized processing/tools needed (completely compatible
with existing Si foundry processes/tools) β reduces costs
associated with processing, QC, etc
Slide 13 from 2025 LWLG ASM presentation found here,
https://irp.cdn-website.com/a5f8ef96/files/uploaded/2025_ASM_Presentation_-_FINAL-40e13d6a.pdf
Where are you Mark Lutkowitz? Here I even DETAILED the differences Yves pointed out on Slide 13 here for you!!!!
prototype_101
3 hours ago
Short Interest rose about 2 million shares in the last 2 weeks from about 19.6 million to 21.2 million more shares Shorted, meanwhile in that same period of time the PPS rose from about 0.90 to 1.30, wow, the Shorts must be in trouble if that is the case!!
https://shortsqueeze.com/?symbol=lwlg&submit=Short+Quote%E2%84%A2
If there is any Institutional forced selling that is not negated by Institutions Short shares forced callbacks, those shares will be sopped up by MM's to Cover their Naked Shorting games of the past handful of years here, once MM's clear their books, they will guaranteed be sure to run this up to force the Shorts to Cover, which will be IMPOSSIBLE at any price under $20, Longs will NEVER give up 20 MILLION shares that Shorts NEED to Cover!!!
iBorrow available to Short has dropped, and the rate shot up to 13%, if Yves drops a Tier 1 deal it's GO TIME and Shorts will be TOAST!!
https://www.iborrowdesk.com/report/LWLG
Stay calm..... forced callbacks by the supertankers Vanguard and Blackrock who own combined close to 20 MILLION shares should be no problem for the Shorts, they will just need to PRY those shares out of the hands of the Longs who are NEVER going to give up the shares!!! watch and learn!!
did Institutions already begin to flip the manipulation script? did Shorts bite the hand that fed them? sure looks like it!! Vanguard and Blackrock DON'T LIKE TO LOSE!!! and each of them own close to 10 MILLION shares apiece and their average purchase price is around $8 slightly above the 5 year VWAP near $7, Will there be "forced callbacks" of 20 MILLION Shorted shares? It sure looks like Institutions are beginning to flip the script on the Shorts already!!
1) 21 MILLION SHARES SHORTED
2) ALMOST 20 MILLION SHARES HELD BY VANGUARD AND BLACKROCK COMBINED
Shorts best hope is SCENARIO #1 of these only two possible scenarios, in either case it would be in the best interest of the Shorts to Cover all the shares they can right now ahead of EITHER of these two scenarios playing out
Scenario #1 after Yves inks a Tier 1 deal or two in the next 2 months before final decisions, and the PPS moves up to the $3-$5 range before the final decisions day of adds/deletes that LWLG will not be deleted
Scenario #2 let's say LWLG would be a delete from the index, everybody here knows that it was the Institutions (read Vanguard & Blackrock who don't like to lose!!) that LOANED the shares to the Shorts!!! So do you really think the Institutions are going to be the ones to take the hit dumping their shares at rock bottom prices to aid the criminal Shorts? NO WAY!!! Here's what would happen, the Institutions would call back their loaned shares and watch as the Shorts try and find 20 million shares to Cover, good luck with that!!!! this is why it has held 100% true that the Shorts would never get a volume capitulation from the Longs!!! the criminal Shorts and MM's have been using low volume high frequency manipulation games here routinely for many months!!! So only after the Shorts be forced to Cover by the Institutions driving the share price higher, and then the Institutions would be able to sell their shares unharmed!! That's the way it would work, so Shorts better hope LWLG is NOT going to be a deletion!!!
How quickly would the Shorts be forced to Cover in the event of Scenario #2? from AI on the topic here
General Timeframes:
While there's no strict regulatory standard for recall notice periods, here are some general expectations:
Short Notice (Urgent Recall): In some situations, especially due to client sales, short sellers might only receive notice within the trading day or be required to return the shares by the next day. This can lead to forced buy-ins if the short seller cannot locate shares quickly.
Standard Recall: For less urgent reasons, the notice period is typically a few business days (e.g., 2-5 days). This allows the short seller some time to repurchase the shares in the market.
Longer Notice (Less Common): In certain circumstances, the notice period could be longer, but this is less typical for standard recalls.
Important Considerations for Short Sellers:
Recall Risk: Short sellers always face the risk that the borrowed shares will be recalled. This is an inherent risk of short selling and should be factored into their trading strategy
Again, GOOD LUCK to the Shorts on purchasing 20 MILLION Shares in the open market once the FORCED CALL BACK of the loaned shares by Institutions (Vanguard & Blackrock) occurs!!!
prototype_101
4 hours ago
writing is on the wall for upcoming Tier 1 deal, frankly it's likely Nvidia and TSMC in the works, why else would LWLG be establishing a Sales and Marketing arm in Asia currently!!
Is LWLG working with TSMC/Nvidia on their Next-gen technology project in Taiwan? the following are reasons why this may quite likely be the case!!
- Yves recent Asia trip included a stop in Taiwan coincident with recent collaborations of TSMC and Nvidia
- Yves spending the first 5-10 minutes of the 2025 ASM on Nvidia's new strategy, you can watch the 2025 ASM replay here
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=176203906
- Tom saying LWLG is now Establishing Sales and Distribution channels in Asia, why would this be being done now if there was not a need for it developing for LWLG's technology in Asia currently
- Eoptolink and Foxconn added to Yves 2025 ASM presentation after his recent trip to Taiwan, obviously one would assume he met with TSMC
https://irp.cdn-website.com/a5f8ef96/files/uploaded/2025_ASM_Presentation_-_FINAL-40e13d6a.pdf
- SemiVision articles tagging LWLG along with TSMC and Nvidia
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=176198177
-Nvidia in GTC 2025 Keynote disclosing they will be using MRR's in their next-generation technology, and it has been proven that LWLG's technology is the solution to the issues that silicon MRR's have with temperature sensitivity that require individual temperature IC's for each and every MRR!!! read all about it in this post of mine
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=176202947
- Nvidia Patents including Polymers as materials being used
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=176159796
- the Lebby exchange with Nvidia VP of R&D who commented directly back to Lebby "some startups are clinging too tightly to their IP" Note: perhaps this is the actual reason Lebby was replaced by Yves, Lebby likely was being too controlling in relationship developing the devices in-house where the recent LWLG shift in business strategy in now allowing the Customer to control the device developments with LWLG technical support and PDK's available to them as needed
- 2024 ASM slides 13 and 14 including the quote from Nvidia executive
----- Quote from Slide 13 >> βin many ways polymers will be an ideal enabler of the growth expected in Infiniband usageβ
----- Infiniband is a key enabler for NVIDIA Γ higher speeds are required now
----- Slide 14 showing the Infiniband Roadmap showing how LWLG would be able to enable with their Polymers
- Jim's 2024 ASM comment regarding working with Nvidia
- Yves LeMaitre asked $LWLG shareholders to do some homework and watch the GTC 2025 hardware presentation of Jensen Huang on copacked optics. Because presentations can be long, Steve Schiets made an AI podcast with NotebookLM. Great listen, imo.
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/steve-schiets-1016aa21_ai-photonics-cpo-activity-7329210816216403968-StF4/
Marco commented, This podcast summary of what came out of Jensen"s Huang's talk on co-packaged optics is absolutely great! It pieces together what Nvidia wants and sees the industry moving towards while pointing out the things that will allow LWLG's polymers to meet the checklist of requirements without each company talking about the other. A match made in heaven so to speak. The critical concept of moving the optics as close as possible to the compute functions can be facilitated using polymers as part of the device configuration. Accomplishing this either using tiny MRRs with polymers inside or using co-packaged optics with polymers incorporated the goal is obtained. Either way, it looks like Lightwave's polymers will become critical enablers of the marriage of optics and compute.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=176202918
x993231
5 hours ago
From Foxcon
In the midst of this technological revolution, Lightwave Logic, Inc., has emerged as a major focal point. Lightwave Logic is dedicated to developing and commercializing next-generation high-performance electro-optic (EO) polymer materials, aiming to significantly enhance data transmission rates and energy efficiency for data centers and telecommunications networks, with a special focus on high-speed data exchange scenarios required by generative artificial intelligence (Generative AI).
Lightwave Logicβs core technology is its proprietary Perkinamine® electro-optic (EO) polymer platform. This material offers key advantages including a high electro-optic coefficient (r33), low power consumption, and high-frequency response, making it suitable for manufacturing electro-optic modulators that can efficiently convert electrical signals into optical signals at extremely high speeds.
These capabilities enable data transmission rates exceeding 400 Gbps, with scalability toward 800 Gbps, 1.6 Tbps and 3.2Tbps platforms. Such platforms are aimed at supporting the next generation of large-scale generative AI data center clusters and campus network architectures, laying the foundation for future interconnect demands
Lightwave Logic adopts a business model based on technology licensing and co-development, entering into non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) with Tier-1 and Tier-2 strategic partners to jointly evaluate the application potential of its EO polymer technology across data center equipment, optical modules, and CPO (Co-Packaged Optics) platforms.
The company is committed to providing solutions that are simple and compatible with existing semiconductor wafer fabrication processes, with the goal of reducing the power consumption of thousands of optical components through advanced materials, while offering a sustainable evolutionary path for future bandwidth upgrades such as 3.2 Tbps and 6.4 Tbps, thus avoiding the high costs and risks traditionally associated with system upgrades.
In terms of enabling commercial deployment, Lightwave Logic has introduced a Process Design Kit (PDK) compatible with silicon photonic integrated circuits, successfully achieving seamless integration of its Perkinamine® materials with existing semiconductor manufacturing workflows.
The company has demonstrated the practicality and manufacturability of this PDK through collaborations with two semiconductor foundries, laying a strong foundation for commercializing EO polymer technology and enabling large-scale production.
Meanwhile, Lightwave Logic has also established collaborations with institutions such as ETH Zurich and Polariton Technologies to co-develop plasmonic Mach-Zehnder modulators (Plasmonic MZMs) based on EO polymers.
These modulators have already demonstrated single-channel transmission rates exceeding 1.6 Tbps. This achievement not only validates the technical feasibility of EO polymers for ultra-high-speed applications but also positions Lightwave Logic as one of the most closely watched emerging material suppliers in the fields of CPO and next-generation high-speed optical modules.
x993231
5 hours ago
Against the backdrop of the rapid advancement of high-speed optical communication technologies, electro-optic (EO) polymer technology is increasingly emerging as a key enabler for upgrading data centers and artificial intelligence infrastructure. Particularly at the OFC50 conference, the industry engaged in in-depth discussions regarding the potential of EO polymers in 400G/lane and co-packaged optics (CPO) applications, as well as the future challenges that high-frequency modulators might face.During this major technical event, Lightwave Logic, a technology company based in Englewood, Colorado, attracted widespread attention.
prototype_101
6 hours ago
Mark L even takes shots at TSMCβs plans to do CPO. No wonder he is skeptical of a startup like LWLG who has never sold a product. He is skeptical of the largest foundry in the world that theyβll never sell a silicon photonics product.
How seriously should one take TSMCβs involvement with silicon photonics/co-packaged optics (please see: https://lnkd.in/eCqm33-6)? The initial news out of Taiwan appeared to suspiciously come out just before New Yearβs Day, when it would presumably get an inadequate amount of attention. Earlier in 2024, this writer told an exec at TSMC that it would not be surprising if that firm drags its feet indefinitely on SiPh. The person just laughed and said, "No comment." In 2025, there have also been large market research firms, which are not historically known for their courage, either making jokes about CPO or going out of their way to attack any speculation of extensive volume at Nvidia in the near term. (It would have been more helpful to be so diligent, when it was not as fashionable to be critical of the concept, when transceiver suppliers were forced to unnecessarily devote extensive resources, about seven years ago -- please see: https://lnkd.in/eENWZGE). Most critically, this latest plan does not represent TSMCβs first effort in SiPh, and the lack of progress previously involved three factors at the corporation: 1) if you put together all of the optics wafers together (not just SiPh), they would only fill up a little more than half of its smallest fab; 2) not getting the necessary leadership in place to pull it off; and 3) its setup heavily favors electronics chip production. The difference this time is that an important customer, Nvidia, is requesting TSMCβs involvement. Nvidia anticipates that the market will move to "beyond CPO", -- the close coupling of SiPh with CMOS chips on the same substrate, which would permit TSMC to produce the full assembled system. Yet, fibeReality agrees with the point of view that although volume at least theoretically demanded by the former would make it more appealing to the latter, that solution will likely never approach being a substantial business.
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/mark-lutkowitz-b22abb2_how-seriously-should-one-take-tsmcs-involvement-activity-7340416257155821568-8kVX/
prototype_101
1 day ago
AES3 Polariton's Koch going to China, Taiwan! sounds familiar as Yves was recently there as well, all signposts point to Nvidia and TSMC partnering with Polymers and Plasmonics!!
Between the worldβs leading photonics conferences, OFC, Laser Munich and ECOC, our team leader and VP marketing & sales Stephan Koch, takes the opportunity to travel to China and Taiwan, connecting face-to-face with key partners, customers, and industry peers.
From bustling cityscapes to productive lab visits, we engage in insightful discussions, align on upcoming sample deliveries, and share the latest updates on our fast-progressing plasmonics technology.
Thank you to everyone who welcomes us, your collaboration is key as we accelerate the path forward.
Discover what makes Polariton a leader in plasmonic devices here: https://www.polariton.ch/
#Plasmonics
#PIC
#China
#Taiwan
#Photonics
#PolaritonTechnologies
#FastModulation
#SemiconductorIndustry
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7340377089260331008/
x993231
1 day ago
LWLG is up, Oil is down, gold is down the overall market is up, G7 over the next couple of days with a few trade deals to be announced this week (Britian?) Boy did the market shake off concern of recent events or what?
Interesting times indeed.
I thought the world was ending? How about the Russell doomsday prediction, I wonder if anyone sold then, I hope not cause it is up 35% since that call.
X end of Q2 next week, options this Friday, robots walking down the street, pretty soon AI computers on your key chain or I mean fob which will be embedded in your wrist.
Shorts reported an extra 30k shares put out in the first hours of the day to slow down and get the shakey boyz crowd shaking.
prototype_101
1 day ago
all the signposts point to upcoming Tier 1 deal, frankly it's likely Nvidia and TSMC in the works, why else would LWLG be establishing a Sales and Marketing arm in Asia currently!!
Is LWLG working with TSMC/Nvidia on their Next-gen technology project in Taiwan? the following are reasons why this may quite likely be the case!!
- Yves recent Asia trip included a stop in Taiwan coincident with recent collaborations of TSMC and Nvidia
- Yves spending the first 5-10 minutes of the 2025 ASM on Nvidia's new strategy, you can watch the 2025 ASM replay here
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=176203906
- Tom saying LWLG is now Establishing Sales and Distribution channels in Asia, why would this be being done now if there was not a need for it developing for LWLG's technology in Asia currently
- Eoptolink and Foxconn added to Yves 2025 ASM presentation after his recent trip to Taiwan, obviously one would assume he met with TSMC
https://irp.cdn-website.com/a5f8ef96/files/uploaded/2025_ASM_Presentation_-_FINAL-40e13d6a.pdf
- SemiVision articles tagging LWLG along with TSMC and Nvidia
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=176198177
-Nvidia in GTC 2025 Keynote disclosing they will be using MRR's in their next-generation technology, and it has been proven that LWLG's technology is the solution to the issues that silicon MRR's have with temperature sensitivity that require individual temperature IC's for each and every MRR!!! read all about it in this post of mine
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=176202947
- Nvidia Patents including Polymers as materials being used
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=176159796
- the Lebby exchange with Nvidia VP of R&D who commented directly back to Lebby "some startups are clinging too tightly to their IP" Note: perhaps this is the actual reason Lebby was replaced by Yves, Lebby likely was being too controlling in relationship developing the devices in-house where the recent LWLG shift in business strategy in now allowing the Customer to control the device developments with LWLG technical support and PDK's available to them as needed
- 2024 ASM slides 13 and 14 including the quote from Nvidia executive
----- Quote from Slide 13 >> βin many ways polymers will be an ideal enabler of the growth expected in Infiniband usageβ
----- Infiniband is a key enabler for NVIDIA Γ higher speeds are required now
----- Slide 14 showing the Infiniband Roadmap showing how LWLG would be able to enable with their Polymers
- Jim's 2024 ASM comment regarding working with Nvidia
- Yves LeMaitre asked $LWLG shareholders to do some homework and watch the GTC 2025 hardware presentation of Jensen Huang on copacked optics. Because presentations can be long, Steve Schiets made an AI podcast with NotebookLM. Great listen, imo.
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/steve-schiets-1016aa21_ai-photonics-cpo-activity-7329210816216403968-StF4/
Marco commented, This podcast summary of what came out of Jensen"s Huang's talk on co-packaged optics is absolutely great! It pieces together what Nvidia wants and sees the industry moving towards while pointing out the things that will allow LWLG's polymers to meet the checklist of requirements without each company talking about the other. A match made in heaven so to speak. The critical concept of moving the optics as close as possible to the compute functions can be facilitated using polymers as part of the device configuration. Accomplishing this either using tiny MRRs with polymers inside or using co-packaged optics with polymers incorporated the goal is obtained. Either way, it looks like Lightwave's polymers will become critical enablers of the marriage of optics and compute.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=176202918
prototype_101
1 day ago
Robert Blum's Arrival@LWLG: Glimpse Behind the Curtain
Robert Blumβs recent appointment at Lightwave Logic has triggered an impressive wave of congratulations on LinkedIn β but beyond the celebration lies something more telling: a strategic snapshot of where LWLG might be headed.
As someone closely tracking the company and its ecosystem, I see these reactions not just as polite gestures, but as early signals of industry alignment, partner readiness, and cross-domain anticipation.
🔍 Here are some standout commenters and what they suggest:
🚀 Key Industry Executives Who Congratulated Robert:
Daniel Zhu (NVIDIA) β Director of Photonic Design
Signals potential relevance of LWLG's polymer platform in high-speed GPU or AI interconnects.
Babak Sabi (AWS Annapurna Labs) β VP
AWS is deeply invested in silicon photonics and custom AI infrastructure.
Manish Mehta (Broadcom) β VP, Optical Systems
Broadcom is a giant in CPO (co-packaged optics). A strategic nod?
Takashi Saida (NTT) β VP, Head of Device Innovation
Could reflect testing, R&D collaboration, or foundry-level engagement.
Jens Dieckroeger (ADTRAN) β Sr. Director Governance
ADTRAN has engaged with polymer-based solutions; may already be in exploratory talks.
Susmita Joshi, PhD (Photonics & Connectivity)
Highly respected voice in silicon photonics, DWDM, and high-speed AI fabrics.
Preet Virk (Celestial AI) β COO
A potential technology convergence: photonic AI compute meets next-gen interconnects.
Chris Pfistner (Avicena Tech) β VP Sales & Marketing
Active in photonic links for AI β market overlap or parallel momentum.
Paul Diglio (GlobalFoundries) β Principal Engineer
May indicate contact with manufacturing partners to align with foundry capabilities.
Vincent Di Caprio (ICAPS) β VP, Advanced Packaging
Points to polymer relevance in advanced chip packaging ecosystems.
Faraz Monifi (Intel) β Photonics Design Lead
Intel's ecosystem interest is particularly telling, considering historic skepticism.
Dieter Hoffend (imec Automotive) β Business Director
imec as a potential European integration partner or validator?
Jeroen Duis (PHIX Photonics Assembly) β CTO
PHIX plays a role in photonic chip packaging β relevant for commercial rollout.
Ed Baichtal (Data Center Architect)
His excitement suggests attention from hyperscaler design circles.
🧭 What this all points to:
AI, Datacenter & Optical Interconnects: Many well-placed figures in these sectors congratulated Robert β suggesting LWLG's pivot may focus more sharply on high-performance, scalable optical solutions.
Foundry & Packaging Ecosystem Readiness: Involvement of GlobalFoundries, imec, and ICAPS hints at backend alignment for real-world integration.
Go-to-Market Foundations: Multiple VP-level voices from marketing, sales, and operations are engaging β a clue that commercialization is a priority.