Lightwave Logic Inc (LWLG) Share Price

This is damning information Ted and exactly what I’ve been hearing from anyone involved in the decision making and from those paying attention.

The Vaporwave cult is just dead wrong. Sad group!

#scam

No doubt he has the respect of many in the industry, but after investing millions here to see this from conception being referred to as a cult, honestly I think that he is after clicks and wants to "appear" as a who's who.
I'm just a real person in life that believes what I put money in.  For him to say a cult tells me that he wants us to justify his reporter status to make him feel important, just as many in the media think that it is about them.
Again why would a foundry using the PDK reveal it.  That does not make business sense.
X.  Father's day, crab feast, real people doing real things having fun.

Exactly what I was telling you guys two years ago. This clearly does not jive with the often proclaimed “tier ones are chopping at the bit to work with Lightwave” narrative. I’m sorry to see that’s still where things seem to be.
There just is not much discussion about polymers in any meaningful way in the optics industry for datacom use from the perspective of transceiver suppliers, all the way up to the largest users, including as the hyperscalers

Might have something to do with Ruud begging Yve for deals publicly on linkedin?

We are a unique group

He used the word “cult” when he tried to LinkedIn with me last week and I refused his request.

Funny, the more he DISLIKES Lebby, the more I find myself LIKING Lebby.

Mark doesn't like Polymers, but he respects Yves and most likely Blum.  I've never met the guy but I think that he refers to us as "the mob".  I can not understand why anyone in the industry would want to reveal what they are considering to a journalist whose job it is to leak it to everyone.  Obviosly he did not like Lebby, I don't know of his relationship with Blum.

X. He is posting on father's day so that may tell us where his bread is buttered.  He may have been told to get out and dis polymers to try and affect the industries "public" perception. He does use a lot of what I call eraser words in his writings.

Lots of generalizations and unnecessary “personal” criticisms from him. Why would he think the “mob” (I am assuming he is referring to generalists…not unlike himself IMO…has any influence on polymer success or failure anyway?!). This guy seems overly concerned mainly about trying to cover his own ass.

Why resort to blaming shorts for the price action when the reality does the job far better?

Look at the chart and compare with the reality:

Incredible expectations after the 2021 ASM took the stock from being in the $.50 - $2 range for 10 prior years to $20 in a few months as hopes for massive partnerships by year end predominated shareholder thinking and people were excited about going to Nasdaq..

...only to come crashing down at year end to the $10 range when the directors sold for millions in profits while there was no deal announced.

Ups and down over the next few years in the $6-10 range closely matched new hopes and rumors fueled by the company and the corresponding anxiety when things didn't get announced..

Then it dropped to the $4-6 range as several years went by that exposed the reality of missed goals and continued obfuscation about the obstacles to commercialization.

Finally it sputtered to new lows this year under $1 - after firing Dr Lebby and telling investors to not expect any revenue at all in 2025.

And now they are getting booted out of Russel indexes which comprise some 12 million or more shares getting dumping back onto retail, so they price continues to remain down.

How are you not able to see that SHORTS are not needed to explain ANY of the above?




..

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/mark-lutkowitz-b22abb2_related-to-the-theme-of-execution-in-this-activity-7340011822609014785-ZrMV?utm_medium=ios_app&rcm=ACoAAAcgj48BT9F7PUhNWxJ6hOp1KI16ThOcHBM&utm_source=social_share_send&utm_campaign=copy_link

Mark Lutkowitz answer to David Muench - TFLN has a current advantage in terms of its acceptance in the marketplace (especially on the coherent side of the business). In the market in general, InP will remain a powerful incumbent, minimizing opportunities for all new materials. There just is not much discussion about polymers in any meaningful way in the optics industry for datacom use from the perspective of transceiver suppliers, all the way up to the largest users, including as the hyperscalers. Fairly or unfairly, there needs to develop a comfort level that does not exist today. That might change in the future, especially as a result of the new leadership at Lightwave Logic. One aspect that does not help is the lack of intimacy with the market dynamics by people in the mob following the firm, on both sides of the argument, that result in unnecessarily constraining the firm.

This stock has been manipulated by short sellers from the very beginning, and the SEC does nothing about it. And beside that, if you think t is a bad idea, its probably a very good idea for the longs

Coordinating a market manipulation event is highly illegal. Maybe liddle rikki can let the SEC know what you’re promoting.

#scam

Short Interest rose about 2 million shares in the last 2 weeks from about 19.6 million to 21.2 million more shares Shorted, meanwhile in that same period of time the PPS rose from about 0.90 to 1.30, wow, the Shorts must be in trouble if that is the case!!

https://shortsqueeze.com/?symbol=lwlg&submit=Short+Quote%E2%84%A2

If there is any Institutional forced selling that is not negated by Institutions Short shares forced callbacks, those shares will be sopped up by MM's to Cover their Naked Shorting games of the past handful of years here, once MM's clear their books, they will guaranteed be sure to run this up to force the Shorts to Cover, which will be IMPOSSIBLE at any price under $20, Longs will NEVER give up 20 MILLION shares that Shorts NEED to Cover!!!

iBorrow available to Short has dropped, and the rate shot up to 13%, if Yves drops a Tier 1 deal it's GO TIME and Shorts will be TOAST!!

https://www.iborrowdesk.com/report/LWLG

Stay calm..... forced callbacks by the supertankers Vanguard and Blackrock who own combined close to 20 MILLION shares should be no problem for the Shorts, they will just need to PRY those shares out of the hands of the Longs who are NEVER going to give up the shares!!! watch and learn!!

did Institutions already begin to flip the manipulation script? did Shorts bite the hand that fed them? sure looks like it!! Vanguard and Blackrock DON'T LIKE TO LOSE!!! and each of them own close to 10 MILLION shares apiece and their average purchase price is around $8 slightly above the 5 year VWAP near $7, Will there be "forced callbacks" of 20 MILLION Shorted shares? It sure looks like Institutions are beginning to flip the script on the Shorts already!!

1) 21 MILLION SHARES SHORTED

2) ALMOST 20 MILLION SHARES HELD BY VANGUARD AND BLACKROCK COMBINED

Shorts best hope is SCENARIO #1 of these only two possible scenarios, in either case it would be in the best interest of the Shorts to Cover all the shares they can right now ahead of EITHER of these two scenarios playing out

Scenario #1 after Yves inks a Tier 1 deal or two in the next 2 months before final decisions, and the PPS moves up to the $3-$5 range before the final decisions day of adds/deletes that LWLG will not be deleted

Scenario #2 let's say LWLG would be a delete from the index, everybody here knows that it was the Institutions (read Vanguard & Blackrock who don't like to lose!!) that LOANED the shares to the Shorts!!! So do you really think the Institutions are going to be the ones to take the hit dumping their shares at rock bottom prices to aid the criminal Shorts? NO WAY!!! Here's what would happen, the Institutions would call back their loaned shares and watch as the Shorts try and find 20 million shares to Cover, good luck with that!!!! this is why it has held 100% true that the Shorts would never get a volume capitulation from the Longs!!! the criminal Shorts and MM's have been using low volume high frequency manipulation games here routinely for many months!!! So only after the Shorts be forced to Cover by the Institutions driving the share price higher, and then the Institutions would be able to sell their shares unharmed!! That's the way it would work, so Shorts better hope LWLG is NOT going to be a deletion!!!

How quickly would the Shorts be forced to Cover in the event of Scenario #2? from AI on the topic here

General Timeframes:

While there's no strict regulatory standard for recall notice periods, here are some general expectations:

Short Notice (Urgent Recall): In some situations, especially due to client sales, short sellers might only receive notice within the trading day or be required to return the shares by the next day. This can lead to forced buy-ins if the short seller cannot locate shares quickly.

Standard Recall: For less urgent reasons, the notice period is typically a few business days (e.g., 2-5 days). This allows the short seller some time to repurchase the shares in the market.

Longer Notice (Less Common): In certain circumstances, the notice period could be longer, but this is less typical for standard recalls.


Important Considerations for Short Sellers:

Recall Risk: Short sellers always face the risk that the borrowed shares will be recalled. This is an inherent risk of short selling and should be factored into their trading strategy

Again, GOOD LUCK to the Shorts on purchasing 20 MILLION Shares in the open market once the FORCED CALL BACK of the loaned shares by Institutions (Vanguard & Blackrock) occurs!!!

Why scheme Teddy paddy?

For 15+ years, the joke has been on retail

You are the real joke 👋

Desperation is in the air. Good luck with your schemes.

You mean W.C or B.A? I can sent it to them both, who knows how this can work out

Show everyone one non-AI quote, PR, link that says lighrwave and NLM are working together/collaborating. They are both collaborating with Polariton. You're acting like a monkey throwing around its shit. (The shit being faulty AI to be crystal clear)

The image is kinda funny of one monkey in the corner throwing its own feces, while the rest of the monkeys are huddling trying to create more bananas with an engineered short squeeze.... This board 🙄

Don't believe everything AI tells you, sometimes it makes things up.
Polariton, yes, NLM would be news to me.
X

Lightwave Logic and NLM Photonics working on polymer-based EO modulators is confirmed, with their joint work on 110 GHz modulators at ECOC 2024 and 200 Gbps PAM-4 performance positioning them as leaders in disrupting silicon-based designs. This aligns with NLM’s broader mission to reduce power consumption by 20–30% in data centers.

AI - Collaboration with Lightwave Logic
Partnership Details: Confirmed in June 2024, NLM Photonics collaborates with Lightwave Logic, Inc. to develop hybrid EO modulators using Lightwave’s Perkinamine™ chromophores integrated with NLM’s silicon photonics platform.

Achievements:
Demonstrated a packaged hybrid EO modulator at ECOC 2024 with 110 GHz bandwidth, combining Lightwave’s polymers and NLM’s design.

Achieved 200 Gbps PAM-4 at sub-1V drive, compatible with 200mm wafers via Advanced Micro Foundry (AMF), targeting 800 Gbps and 1.6 Tbps transceivers.

Disruptive Impact: Outperforms silicon photonics (50 GHz limit) and lithium niobate (bulky, high-power) with 90% power reduction, smaller footprint (0.58 µm³), and foundry scalability, disrupting the $10 billion optical transceiver market.

IF / THEN

So if NLM Photonics and LWLG are working together, and NLM Photonics is collaborating closely with partners in Taiwan to co-develop the next generation of silicon photonics technologies, then the next generation silicon phononics will have #LWLG Inside.

You need to coordinate this with the Benelux investors. We represent about 20% of Lwlg (rough estimate). If you’re in the inner circle, you know who to talk to. He is the man who can coordinate this if he thinks it’s a good idea.

“Beyond integration architectures, we’ve also addressed material innovation in photonic devices—highlighting, for instance, Lightwave Logic’s polymer-based electro-optic modulators as a disruptive alternative to conventional silicon-based designs. In parallel, NLM Photonics has been actively developing cutting-edge solutions, collaborating closely with partners in Taiwan to co-develop the next generation of silicon photonics technologies.”

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jett-c-17972258_optical-nvlink-serdes-activity-7339861493108129793-LNV5?utm_medium=ios_app&rcm=ACoAAAcgj48BT9F7PUhNWxJ6hOp1KI16ThOcHBM&utm_source=social_share_send&utm_campaign=copy_link

It is a nice thought but I doubt the discipline and coordination is there like it was at https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/s/Tyc48rZou and you would certainly need the help of wall street bets.

Let’s Squeeze the Shorts – Together We Make History

It’s time to ask the right questions and take bold action. Over the next two weeks, we have a unique opportunity. If we unite—young or old, rich or poor—and everyone buys shares on June 27 or 28, we could trigger something big.

A coordinated move, a powerful message.

Every contribution counts, whether it’s one share or a hundred. This isn’t just about numbers—it’s about showing the power of collective action. Think GME, but this time, even more focused, even more prepared.

If someone can start building momentum, sharing this idea on forums, socials, and communities, we can ignite the movement.

14 days. One goal. One shot to make it count.

We stand stronger together.
Let’s make history.


Anybody ideas where and hoe to start?

Thin-Film LiNbO3 (TFLN) versus LWLG Electro-optic Polymers

Performance

Thin-Film LiNbO3 (TFLN)
- r33 intrinsically capped at ~ 31 pm/V at 1310 nm
- n = 2.2, er = 30 (high dispersion across frequencies)

LWLG Electro-optic Polymers
- No intrinsic cap on r33 (> 200 pm/V at 1310 nm easily achieved)
- n ˜ 1.9, er ˜ 3-6 (low dispersion across frequencies)

Integration

Thin-Film LiNbO3 (TFLN)
- Integration with Si/SiN very low yielding & basically still in R&D stage
- Limited wafer size (150 mm)
- Large device footprint (sub-cm scale)
- High material cost w/ only one supplier (NanoLN)

LWLG Electro-optic Polymers
- Fully Si compatible
- Easily scalable to 300 (+) mm wafer
- Very small device footprint (sub-mm scale)
- Low material cost

Processing

Thin-Film LiNbO3 (TFLN)
- Thin film uniformity becomes difficult as wafer size scales up
- Specialized processing/tools needed – leads to higher costs
associated with processing, QC, etc.

LWLG Electro-optic Polymers
- Spin-coating produces films with high uniformity
- No specialized processing/tools needed (completely compatible
with existing Si foundry processes/tools) – reduces costs
associated with processing, QC, etc

Slide 13 from 2025 LWLG ASM presentation found here,
https://irp.cdn-website.com/a5f8ef96/files/uploaded/2025_ASM_Presentation_-_FINAL-40e13d6a.pdf

Where are you Mark Lutkowitz? Here I even DETAILED the differences Yves pointed out on Slide 13 here for you!!!!

Never fails! I think to myself what are the Vaporwave retards saying today, then click the link to the ihub board. Thanks for the laughs.

#scam

If they put you in a room with a terrorist, he would give up all the information within 10 minutes just to get the hell out of the room.

Lebbies might be your best yet. You are entertaining for your spelling, I will give you that.

Folks have to admit this is a good exchange of ideas.

Some say it will never happen because it hasn't.

Others say, I see the future and the need.

Then you have the market, shorts betting against it, others disagree and say, just wait for the demand.

Fascinating to say the least.  I don't jump in and out here, others do it literally by the minute.  I've always been a do my homework and wait and see.  Doesn't make anyone right or wrong.

I say $15 to $20 is coming, shorts say the end is near, however the company has no debt, that is huge, and that is where companies get in trouble always refinancing this or that. Honest.

X. Most young folks want it to happen tomorrow at 10 A.M. and get disapointed, others have patience.  Enjoy your life today and plan for tomorrow, but most of all enjoy your life today because tomorrow is not guaranteed.

Just answer my question, that's enough for me and I don't think you can!!

Rikki don’t lose that number, I have a question for you. I agree that we do have the best material in the world for multibillion, and probably multi-trillion dollar industries that need what we have. But for years, I’ve just been wondering why haven’t the most knowledgeable technology billionaires like a Bill Gates, Mark Cuban just to name a couple out of dozens, that understand about speed and energy savings for AI and Bitcoin, why aren’t they buying us up for what is literally chump change?

Well, if they only get 1 or 2 I won't panic.
X. Have a cheerful day.  I have a feeling if they get 4 you will complain that they didn't get 5.

Don’t need to, I didn’t buy back then.

"the goal is 3 to 5 new users committing by the end of this year"...you gonna find your balls with mngt if (99.9 percent when) lwlg fails this goal? Instead of being just a 3 decade fanboy/message board cheerleader/excuse maker/pump profiteer.....

I hear you. I agree with you. But what do you mean "Wait No More"?

Wait no more.  The simplest way to put it is that it was far ahead of its time.  Everytime Lightwave advanced, silicon advanced, so why would anyone not just use what they knew worked.

But now silicon has hit the performance wall.

GPU'S are replacing CPU'S.  Data centers that simply used to retrieve answers are being replaced with forward thinking AI Factories that generate tokens to make money.

Twas before its time, now it isn't. 

I get it.  Lebbies time spent working on a devices and submitting patents was well spent.

Now lightwave will use that information to market to the players willing to make the move, the goal is 3 to 5 new users commiting by the end of this year.

Oh and let's not forget that when Polariton put the Perkinamine in their device they are now 2 to 3 generations ahead of the crowd.

X

LWLG but still there, and now please an answer to my question!

Since you're fond of asking questions, Rikkie, here's one: name another company with an alleged stellar product, which hasn't made a sale in 20 plus years, and whose stock has dropped 98% since its highs? Oh, and has no analyst following and no revenue guidance. 
I'll wait. 

Polymer Paul , 1 name of a product or a company is enough for me .I would like an answer to my question because I notice that this forum often beats around the bush ! Thank you very much for your answer .

June 13, 2025 Is LWLG set to rally? New Uptrend shows up after crashing 8.96%

LWLG closed down 8.96% on Friday, June 13th, with volume running 1.1× above average. The session formed a New Uptrend, often signaling a possible continuation. Key support levels exist at 1.17, 1.12 & 1.04, with resistance at 1.3, 1.38 & 1.43.

New ADX Uptrend – Strengthening Bullish Trend Signal
This screen identifies stocks entering a strong uptrend using the Average Directional Index (ADX)indicator. Specifically, the ADX has risen above 25and the Directional Movement Index (DMI)shows that bullish momentum is in control.

An ADX reading above 25 confirms that a trend is gaining strength. When combined with positive directional movement, it suggests a powerful and potentially sustainable bullish trend. Traders often use this setup to find stocks with growing momentum and breakout potential

Says the smuck who just lost another ten percent in his investment??? Lol .. your getting crushed at the end of this month... Please don't disappear. I want to laugh at you on here and listen to your new stories that you come up with !! Hahahaha

I can name you 2million companies with better revenue and partnerships and CEO that don't talk shit for a living. Is lebby in jail yet guys a creep and a fraud

Paul, congrats! 🎉 You are officially a big loser 👍

Polymer Paul , I noticed that you are very negative about LWLG polymers! Maybe you can help me out of this. Do you know a better solution or product that is faster, more compact and also greatly reduces consumption? Or in other words a product with better properties, advantages, characteristics than "Perkinamine".
I ask this because I can then perhaps invest in something better because I do believe in polymers. I would like an answer to my question because I notice that this forum often beats around the bush. Thanks for your answer!!!

Next time you look at the chart ...... Scroll out! Eom

Yeah, so what? Doesn’t seem to matter by looking at the chart.

They are nothing more than online salesmen !!!

The longs on here--except maybe me--aren't morons.

this you Paul?