Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (PK) (DBMM) News

I don't disagree, but my gut says that they never even filed, and may not even have ever intended to!

Trying to retire convertible shares required a boost in the share price... what better way than with an OTCQB carrot? It worked...

It would be just like Linda to file the application for the QB level, while knowing that the company's governance situation made them ineligible for it.

That way, she could put out a nice fluffy update, claiming that DBMM was "working" with the OTCM to uplist to the QB level. She would KNOW that they didn't qualify and would be denied. But the update would be out there and DBMM might enjoy a little "pop" in share price from it.

If the OTC denied the QB application (as Linda knew would happen without DBMM having the proper governance), she was under no obligation to announce the denial. She simply kept quiet and let all the shareholders think it was still an ongoing thing.

Perfect situation for Linda and DBMM. Shareholders still hoping and believing that the QB level up could happen at any time!

It certainly looks as if Linda led people here astray.
And Poo cannot articulate any excuse for it.
Indeed! There really is no excuse for repeatedly claiming that they would file for OTCQB LAST year, but not doing so!

However, the false "promise" led to gamblers and P&Ders driving the price up above .01 for months to qualify!

Imagine those that believed and chased the price to get it up there and hold it there... ONLY TO FIND OUT THAT THE COMPANY NEVER FILED!

💩 can't seem to find a way to spin that FACT!

Poo CANNOT form a valid answer as to WHY Linda has never appointed an Independant director to the Board of Directors or the Audit Committee since coming back to the Pink level, in an attempt to get to the QB level.

The rules are CRYSTAL CLEAR as to the governance needed to be able to get to the QB level.

The FACT remains - she either never really applied for the level up to the QB, OR she applied in SPITE of not having the correct governance and the application was denied.

I cannot find ANY RECORD of DBMM having attempted to appoint ANY independent directors to ANY position, since DBMM announced that they were attempting to get to the QB level. It's clear that the application would have been denied without those directors being appointed.

It certainly looks as if Linda led people here astray.

And Poo cannot articulate any excuse for it.

2025 is coming fast and loud........

.005 minimum bye

And nothing to gift revocation.......

😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭🫤🫤🥺🥺.....

But gnashing of teeth 😬 😫 🙄

😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹

im done posting until at least .005
So you are banking on the reverse split, eh?

Good luck!

Oh my!

I would LOVE for her to have to come out and admit that she (and the TA, FINRA, DTC, SEC, etc.) know damn well that there is no naked short position in DBMM!

There is absolutely nothing to drive a price increase. Nothing but Linda's fluffy "updates". And they have been proven baseless and inaccurate.

No clients, no new revenue. Nothing ahead but more debt. How is THAT going to increase this share price?

My opinion is that you are very wrong.

I'm quite sure we will eventually see you return to your former viewpoint (and probably sooner rather than later).

But good luck. You'll need a LOT of it.

yea but now its .0008!!!!! they havent diluted 1 share for 18months at least. .007 and higher. cu guys then. im done posting until at least .005. bye DBMM

What...you didn't learn your lesson 11 years ago?

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=95212117

You were correct back then. Yup. Linda is STILL running this POS. NOTHING has changed.

See you at $.0001.

You go back quite a ways with this outfit. Yes, Linda still holds the reins but has her own personal mouthpiece (Poo) to spew the vitriol for her. Alas,no more conference calls. The RTGV era was the end of those good times. Anyway, hope you make yourself some dough.

THERE WE GO. see you guy above .007. yes im a chart, SS history, and CHat board EXPERT. watch and learn boyzzzzzzz

theres 3mil on ask at .0008 and they wont even give me 600k? weird

thats odd im trying to buy a measily 600k at .0008 and they wont execute any. strange. normally its like right away

Here's ANOTHER reason why Linda might not want to see DBMM get to the QB level:

Under "OTC Standards" (page 9) https://www.otcmarkets.com/files/OTCQB_Standards.pdf

C. Prompt Disclosure of Material News Releases/Developments: Information that is required to
be released promptly to the public under Section 2.2 (C) should be disclosed in a press release
through the OTC Disclosure & News Service or an Integrated Newswire (or a combination of
methods).

i. An OTCQB Company is expected to promptly release to the public any news or
information which might reasonably be expected to materially affect the market for its
securities; and

ii. An OTCQB Company is expected to act promptly to dispel unfounded rumors that result
in unusual market activity or price variations in its securities.

Linda would be required to come clean about any knowledge she might possess, regarding some sort of giant "naked short" share position in DBMM. No more silence about the possibility of a major short squeeze that might affect the share price. Or HIDING the fact that she KNOWS that THERE IS NO giant "naked short" position, and that shareholders expecting a giant "squeeze" should be informed that it will not happen!

Why won't you answer the key questions posed to you here 💩?

You don't even attempt to deny writing the company's Shareholder Updates!

We know...

🤣💩🤡

Twisting a shareholder’s words again while twisting in the wind, are you? Talking about 24/7/365 , 50,000+ missives bashers. Trolls desperate to shake shares loose and to depress pps. What a career ! On an OTC chatroom, no less.

Same exact template complete with cartoons and memes.

DBMM long and strong.

When one's role is to promote the shares, the only options are deflection and/or completely ignoring all the negatives!

So damn obvious!

You deflect from the VALID point of my post.

My VALID point is that DBMM MUST have independent directors in place to get on the QB level. They DO NOT HAVE THEM and there is NO RECORD of Linda making an effort to APPOINT any.

How could she expect the OTC to allow DBMM to get approved to the QB level, with no Independant directors on the board or audit committee??????

The FACT of the matter is that she COULD NOT. IF she ACTUALLY APPLED for the level up to the QB level? Then the request would have been DENIED.

I submit that there NEVER WAS an ACTUAL application to the OTC for approval to the QB level! There would have been no point to it, without at least trying to come into compliance with the governance requirement. Or possibly, Linda was stupid enough to try to skirt the governance rule, applied and the application WAS turned down.

Now. Want to try another tack???

So many questions piling up that you won't address, and yet you will repeat your worn out Forward Looking Fantasies (FLF) list endlessly!

Why won't you answer the IMPORTANT questions? Only get paid for pumping, eh?

It is so obvious who is working as promoter/awareness here for the company... 💩🤡

Wrong as always Poo. The presentation is all forward looking statements. The 10k says it all. It says DBMM is a failing business drowning in debt. Bankruptcy is in its near future

Stop the lies Poo28. Shareholders deserve better than your constant misinformation and flat out lies. The SEC really needs to step in here and hold DBMM promoters accountable for the lies they are spreading to con others into buying this garbage stock.

Trouble with bad penny fiction by moon howler is one person would be added, to the Board, not casts of thousands as you make up as you said. The Company has always said relationships are everything.

Showing ignorance just like with OIP.

Pattern of every event made up negative without any information. Never right ever.

Shareholders know.

"The future is very bright for DBMM. DC spent previous fiscal year positioning its management consultancy integrating new AI products. OTCM presentation says it all. 

Shareholders see the same pattern of disinformation behavior from same paid in different forms bashers. One lie after another to create chaos. Just like revocation, just like no sponsoring broker, or no FINRA application or no CE removal, and certainly no dismissal . Wrong every time. No standing , just defamation , until gone. 

Nothing will get in DBMM's way . Watch, like lightning. "

UPDATE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR DBMM 10-K 2024 FROM A SUPPORTIVE SHAREHOLDERS (All quotes from Update)



1. “Public audited reports are the best source of accurate metrics and the Shareholder Updates for clarification and context. All interference from non-credentialed sources should be ignored as directed in the SEC Financial Disclosure regulations.”



2.Every shareholder is encouraged to read the entire text of the 10-K which has been revised extensively because of evolution in digital landscape. “Pat-per-Click and Search Engine Optimization service business has been fully commoditized and is no longer part of DC’s offering….now a full management consultancy provides much higher revenues for longer contracted periods, but entail a longer cash conversion cycle. Likewise, the AI projects….highly remunerative.”



3. Follow 10-K text with Update to describe the Company’s strategy to deliver highest revenues the Company has ever achieved in 2025



4. Company operations reorganized from foundation, to changing business model designed around optimum A1, executing representation growth in US , while DC reconfigures . “The pivot to AI and the new world was taking place at the same time as the client mix was changing.”



5. Uplist when pps reaches $0.01 for 30 days and has assurance of maintaining following OTCM instructions.



6. The pivot to the new business model is being executed and certain products will be proprietary. Totally new .



7. EBITDA numbers the better indicators as Net Loss is heavily weighted by derivative liabilities and volatility in pps. It is not a liability. Point in time data can change in a quarter .



8. “The revenues for 2025 are expected to be the highest in DBMM’s public company history. “



9. Derecognition of Liabilities continues as the Company removes aged debt from the balance sheet. DBMM dissolved a dormant UK and collaborated positively with regulators to remove the debt.



10. Tax Carry Forward of $8.1 million is attractive when acquisitions in negotiation or in significant organic growth.



11. “DBMM is step-by-step achieving substantial growth in US and global clients and revenues which exceed any past levels and grow annually thereafter.”



12.”DBMM is externally and internally positioned for success in 2025.”



13. Follow the operating company activity with the Digital Clarity link. https://www.digital-clarity.com/

*****🟥🟥🟥 Oh gosh oh gee ! Now I am hearing nonsense 50 - 85 BUCKS is possible for DBMM ??? not even a 🟥massive reverse split 🟥can get this OTC stinky pinky stock to those numbers

With no revenues ? little assets ? convertible debt ! SMH



ENOUGH SAID HUZZAH🤪 !!

wow💹per SEC 50-$85 Possible💹UCLA💹Xerox|Mercedes| AbbeyRoadInst |Santander|Chatsworth|Ernst&Young|Omnisport|PinsentMasons


Facts and Data Speak for Themselves.
Source: https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=166123457


https://www.dbmmgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/DBMM_Creds_Deck_2024_2.pdf

Clients|3+Years Timely|12Wins|"Scam"|Great Stuff

I think they are working to convince everyone to sell
Linda and Reggie? You may be correct... after reading the 10k I could see why someone would conclude that!

*****🚽DBMM🚽 Stuck in da triple zeros , with no business plan its just a matter of time this ticker will be revoked

HUZZAH🤪 !!! ENOUGH SAID🙃 !!!

I think they are working to convince everyone to sell because they love everyone.

When is the LEGALLY REQUIRED shareholder meeting?

And why aren’t all shareholders asking this? An “investor” would want to know. A gambler is just waiting for Reggie the Croupier to spin the wheel again.

No. It isn't just "water under the bridge". It is ONGOING!

DBMM still maintains they are trying to get on the QB level. Yet Linda has not yet made a move to add
the required INDEPENDANT directors to their Board or Audit committee! That means that DBMM never had a chance to level up to the QB level. Linda would have added those people BEFORE application. Because without those changes, DBMM would not have had a CHANCE to be approved to the QB level!

I mean, I guess she COULD have applied first and THEN made the move to add them. But we would have SEEN the attempt. Anyone see DBMM make a move to add Independant directors to their governance?

NOPE!

I'll submit right now. I don't think Linda EVER even made an ATTEMPT to get to the QB level! She made NOISE about it in the "updates"....but that was IT.

Heck, it's just like the NOISE DBMM is making about "expansion" into other U.S. Cities! Anyone see any "expansion" actually happening?

Nope!

Think about it. DBMM doesn't have two DIMES to rub together! You think they have the money to "expand" anywhere? Linda LOST OVER A MILLION DOLLARS last year operating her little "business" - , and BORROWED $655,638 while losing that MILLION!

She's a real PEACH, eh? A real stinker to be honest. Linda has run up a deficit of OVER EIGHTEEN MILLION DOLLARS as the CEO of DBMM in the last 20+ years! Without a SINGLE profit in ANY year!

Are you boneheads finally starting to see the big picture???

LOL! I tend to doubt it.

w0w Xcellent💹 Kramers 100% Involved💹 Billions NakedSH0rt ?

It explains the situation about shorting and naked shorting perfectly!

Again, this is a MUST WATCH video for anyone who believes in $DBMM (naked or otherwise)!

I'd love to hear a rebuttal to the facts that he presents! Crickets. chirp.

Watch the WHOLE thing until he starts babbling at the end!
click here for mobile Link

Topics Related to $DBMM:
a ClayTrader Video 2,308 Other Stocks |Kramer |Avid Traders Interview with COO Reggie James

*****🚽DBMM 🚽 FUNDERS ??? LMAO !!! the only funders here are toxic note lenders making a killing off of share holders back

ENOUGH SAID HUZZAH🤪 !!!

Same trolls, different day.

They were busy little bees during Thanksgiving.

Missed some great football games, college and professional.

Too busy with $DBMM and their "football" aka soccer.

Lots and lots of action on this board. Kinda makes ya go Hhhmmmmmm............ why~?

😆😸😅😸🤣😸😂😹😂

$DBMM baby~! baby~!

Too funny.

There’s no FTD’s! If there were naked shorts, there’d be FTDS galore!

See any??

Give it up. There’s no naked shorts PERIOD.

idiot,KramerNakedShorted💹4Bill+$DBMM shares4Charity?🔥💹


Source: TDA 2014 ChartSource: https://fintel.io/s/us/dbmm

$DBMM 2014 Trade Data|Notable Dates
Date(2014)--------(Total Vol)
Nov 26 ------------904,455,961
Jun 23 -------------774,052,890
Jun 17 --------------336,453,305
Jun 03 --------------222,700,162
Jun 02 --------------374,062,639
May 06 -------------257,003,282
May 05 -------------144,298,331
May 02 -------------602,541,670
Feb 26 -------------254,325,277
Feb 21 -------------283,337,500
Jan 10 --------------265,541,278

What passes for "DD" on this board is not "DD" at all. Wild claims are made but NEVER PROVEN with factual information from verifiable sources.
Simple Question: What's the Source for this? Asking for a Friend.

All that is water under the bridge 🌉 😳 🙄........

Can't substitute that wirh revocation 100% guarantee.....

Or the kramers taking over.........

Right.......Right..........

😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹

The super troopers........

They keep winning but get zip.........


😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹

No. It isn’t.

Even if DBMM came up to a penny tomorrow? They couldn’t qualify for the QB level.

They don’t meet the governance requirements.

They need INDEPENDENT directors on the board.

They need INDEPENDENT members on the Audit committee

Right now, Linda and Reggie comprise EVERYTHING. I doubt Linda wants to bring in a bunch of outsiders to see how DBMM runs things. This by itself is the whole reason why she probably didn’t even APPLY for the QB level. I imagine it was easy for her to just bluff her way thru it. And all the moronic longs just lapped up the kool aid!

Since you endlessly, year after year, claim that a BS NSS is coming soon... stand behind your lies... set a limit on it!

How about 6 months? 1 year?

And when this date comes and goes, will you finally acknowledge that you have been peddling a BS narrative?

You pick how long "soon" is for the record here... I DARE YOU?

Naked short covering it is not IF but SOON, get ready for the covering Kramers and the minions and the minion market makers. JMHO

UPDATE 💹Funders Wait 💹2Ensure $DBMM Still Trades💹idiot.

$DBMM has the Ability to move forward, to continue to grow its business, benefits its shareholders and asks that the Commission affirm the decision of the Law Judge denying revocation of its registration.

CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, the Company submits that revocation of its registration is not necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors, and that the denial of revocation should be affirmed.

Dated: March 26, 2021
Respectfully Submitted,
/s/Maranda Fritz_____________________ Maranda E. Fritz
Maranda E. Fritz PC
335 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10017

Source: https://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments/3-17990-2021-03-26-respondent-appellees-brief.pdf

Great Stuff
12 wins
3+Years Compliance
Deterrent
Kramer $DBMM

We can ALL see it!

Care to explain how YOU feel that they didn't qualify here?

Apparently you are the ONLY one here who knows what happened as it is NOT PUBLIC INFORMATION!

But CLEARLY we can see that they were over .01 for well over 30 days... so why didn't they apply?

Please leave your tap shoes in the closet while answering!

See Item 5 and STOP the disinformation. Shareholders know

UPDATE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR DBMM 10-K 2024 FROM A SUPPORTIVE SHAREHOLDERS (All quotes from Update)



1. “Public audited reports are the best source of accurate metrics and the Shareholder Updates for clarification and context. All interference from non-credentialed sources should be ignored as directed in the SEC Financial Disclosure regulations.”



2.Every shareholder is encouraged to read the entire text of the 10-K which has been revised extensively because of evolution in digital landscape. “Pat-per-Click and Search Engine Optimization service business has been fully commoditized and is no longer part of DC’s offering….now a full management consultancy provides much higher revenues for longer contracted periods, but entail a longer cash conversion cycle. Likewise, the AI projects….highly remunerative.”



3. Follow 10-K text with Update to describe the Company’s strategy to deliver highest revenues the Company has ever achieved in 2025



4. Company operations reorganized from foundation, to changing business model designed around optimum A1, executing representation growth in US , while DC reconfigures . “The pivot to AI and the new world was taking place at the same time as the client mix was changing.”



5. Uplist when pps reaches $0.01 for 30 days and has assurance of maintaining following OTCM instructions.



6. The pivot to the new business model is being executed and certain products will be proprietary. Totally new .



7. EBITDA numbers the better indicators as Net Loss is heavily weighted by derivative liabilities and volatility in pps. It is not a liability. Point in time data can change in a quarter .



8. “The revenues for 2025 are expected to be the highest in DBMM’s public company history. “



9. Derecognition of Liabilities continues as the Company removes aged debt from the balance sheet. DBMM dissolved a dormant UK and collaborated positively with regulators to remove the debt.



10. Tax Carry Forward of $8.1 million is attractive when acquisitions in negotiation or in significant organic growth.



11. “DBMM is step-by-step achieving substantial growth in US and global clients and revenues which exceed any past levels and grow annually thereafter.”



12.”DBMM is externally and internally positioned for success in 2025.”



13. Follow the operating company activity with the Digital Clarity link. https://www.digital-clarity.com/

Always cherry picking what you respond to!

So many questions piling up that you won't address, yet you will repeat your worn out word-salad diatribes endlessly!

It is so obvious who is working as promoter/awareness here for the company...

More crap from Never. DBMM is already a fully reporting and fully compliant . The full NASDAQ has the same reporting requirementas DBMM currently does . The QB is also the same.

Another FALSE statement DUDE!

The howling at the moon is endless by people who create chaos and been wrong every time. Just like OIP. Ignore non-credentialed howlers. Instead understand the discretion is with the OTCM . There was egregious bashing by the usual suspects in 2023. That is a fact .

Ever actually discuss the company, or are you here to just throw out VERY FAKE accusations about justifiably unhappy/dissatisfied/critical shareholder posters?

Just curious...

You are the only dipstick here.

The chart is RIGHT THERE dipstick.

DID DBMM get above a penny for thirty days? The answer is right there for ALL to see.

Why didn't DBMM level up to QB when it happened?

The answer is obvious. There's only two possibilities - either they did NOT apply for the level up....or the Nasdaq refused their request. I think it's pretty telling that Linda NEVER came right out and said "we applied for the QB uplist on XXX date and we are awaiting the Nasdaq determination of our request". Nothing of the sort was ever said!

Now, they did get above $.01 for a period of a few days after that (roughly May 22nd to June 13th, 2023). They STILL didn't level up to the QB level. So that pretty much answers those who said they previously applied and all they had to do was TOUCH $.01 to get on the QB level.

I for one doubt that they EVER applied for the level up to QB. I don't think they want to have to deal with the extra reporting requirements that go with getting onto the QB level. I think that shouting about getting up to the QB level was just a ploy by Linda. She probably figured the share price could use the bump!