Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (PK) (DBMM) Share Price

$DBMM litigated w/Kramer✅2Protect Shareholders + the Mrktpl✅

Kramer has been sanctioned Again by the SEC for Securities violations & intends to commit more violations

https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-25995
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments/3-17990-event-11.pdf
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments/3-17990-2021-03-26-respondent-appellees-brief.pdf

You and your naked short minion buddies stock barber, Jet, otter man and many others are not a shareholder, so why are you all here 24/7/365, what is your purpose? Oh yes we know why. If you are a shareholder prove it.

JMHO

Do you think Linda knew kramers attracted naked shorters...........

But went on to invite them anyway...........

She knew the kramers like you said........

Or she just knew half of the story.........

Right........Right.........

Did she say she knew her company would be bashed to death 💀 😳.........


😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹

Just taking cues from your fearless leader Poo-Poo! She’s the one who started spouting off about 2009!

Her and that hoot-owl- crazy alliez, about how “DBMM didn’t know” about Asher.

I guess that is why they are weeping and gnashing of teeth 😬..........

Soon they will be gnashing gums, when they ran out of teeth 😬............

I am assuming it sounds better than teeth.......

I am just seated here enjoying this moment and time..........

If one feels like their wounds are being salted 🧂...........

Oh well..........

It's what it is........

😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹

Wow go back in time why don't you.

You definitively PROVED that 💩 is lying her ass off using Linda's own testimony!

Are you going to apologize to the board for lying AGAIN, 💩?

If you had a conscience you would...

Bashers BINGO day~!

Nobody will loan money. Case in point, Mike Lindelll. Nobody will loan him money to pay off lawsuits against him. Banks are dry Mike.

Oh well......

UBS not getting their way~? One tiny domino to fall~?

😂😹😂

$DBMM BABY ~!

So now we are here ,other kramer companies lost their battles...........

And are resting in peace..........

But since Asher aka kramers failed to kill $DBMM.........

That is why we give a rats 🐀 🍑 about it.........

The bet was kramers was going to bury them.......

Oh well........

😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹

💹wow 95-$100 INCOMING✅UCLA💹Xerox|Mercedes|Santander|AbbeyRoadInst|Chatsworth|Ernst&Young|Omnisport|PinsentMasons
https://www.dbmmgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/DBMM_Creds_Deck_2024_2.pdf



Facts and Data Speak for Themselves.
Source: https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=166123457


Clients|4+Years Timely|12Wins|ALJs|Great Stuff

She knew in 2010!

"Digital Brand borrowed "over a half a million dollars from Asher starting in
2010." (Perry Tr. 114:7-8). From the beginning, Linda Perry knew that Asher was a
"toxic lender" -- "I sure did know that." (Perry Tr. 136:10-11).

And Linda said in testimony that she "had borrowed from them previously and had no issues"

"FROM THE BEGINNING!" Right there in the testimony! She knew in 2009 too! I couldn't give a rat's patoot WHAT the "company documentation" said!

SHE KNEW.

Interesting.......

How many are we........

Is tonight Bingo night........

😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹

The chances are higher than the commissioners overturning ALJ Carol Foelak's rulling of revocation........

Does that ring a bell 🔔 🤔.........

😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹

Do you belive Linda knew that $DBMM was going to be bankrupt by kramers........

Because Asher Enterprises went bellly up after they failed.......

Do you think it was a bet between them two........

Do you also belive Linda knew revocation was 100% guarantee.......

She must be a dummy 🙄.......


😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹

Third quarter is ALREADY OVER HALF OVER! And we KNOW that DBMM has not signed on a new client up to the 14th of April, because the recent 10Q said as much:

NOTE 12 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Company has analyzed its operations after February 28, 2025 through the date these financial statements were issued and has determined that it does not have any material subsequent events to disclose.

A "material event" would be the signing of a new revenue producing client!

As far as this hopeful statement:

In other words, the last two (2) quarters, 3Q and 4Q will generate the “best year ever in 2025.

POPPYCOCK! SMOKE AND MIRRORS.

You'd better hope that there's a "Microsoft" or an "Amazon" type of client waiting in the wings. Because only signing one of those will get DBMM to their magical $1M in revenue in fiscal 2025!

And what do you think the chances are of THAT???!

YOU DUMMY.

I just PROVED that Linda said SHE KNEW what Asher was when she entered into the loans. Doesn't matter WHEN she found out. SHE KNEW WHEN SHE ENTERED INTO THE LOAN AGREEMENTS. She said so RIGHT IN THE HEARINGS!

You're higher than Everest!

FACTS MATTER.

Hysterical in delayed filings case of 8 years ago- a case with a Final Order of Dismissal—- to pretend that two negatives (bashers) make a positive for loans during the Great Recession in 2009- 2010. Company was clear in the testimony that there was no funding available, especially for an OTC Company, that Citibank through Bob Rubin, the then CEO and US Treasury Sec’y thereafter went to UAE Abu Dhabi to get funding prior to Citibank’s Reverse Split .

The Company’s documentation said when first loans in 2009 took place the Company did not know, it was only with the Mazuma case in the public press via SEC and Washington Post that there was the first case brought by the SEC.

Silly bashers always cite Enforcement never mentioning they are one of 5 divisions and have been cited many,many times for overreaching.

Nevers never accurate in facts— silly little extracts no matter the context .

Read the company latest PR again carefully, Reggie James the Chief Operating Officer and Director of DBMM and Founder and Managing Director of DC said, “We are fully committed to individually supporting our clients in reshaping how brands leverage data, AI, and strategic insight to outperform in a digital-first marketplace. For DBMM, the expectation was a temporary, flat scenario in short-term revenue, as we evolve from the commoditized business to the higher revenues new business. That pattern is normal for high-impact transformation cycles, as we retool our system, team, and service offerings for long-term scalability, success and sustainability.” In other words, the last two (2) quarters, 3Q and 4Q will generate the “best year ever in 2025.”



Naked short squeeze coming, NOT IF BUT WHEN, keep spreading lies, misinformation, disinformation, will not change anything. I know you naked shorts and your friends and your bosses are very worried, but it is okay to be worried, very anxious and stressed.

We will see a sudden surge in the DBMM pps, it will happen, NOT IF BUT WHEN.

[b]Get Ready for A LOT OF FUN DOING A LARGE AMOUNT OF COVERING, We longs are accumulating even more, as you naked shorts try to depress the pps with your lies, misinformation, disinformation.


JMHO

As far as that case goes, looks like Kramer will negotiate his way out -

Doc # 44 March 10, 2025 There is a motion to dismiss currently pending in this matter, as well as oral argument on that motion scheduled for March 11, 2025. However, on March 6, 2025, the parties filed a letter notifying the Court that they "have been negotiating a potential resolution of this case and, following those negotiations, the SEC's Division of Enforcement is now in the process of submitting the proposed resolution to the Commission for formal approval."

Doc # 45 Apr 15, 2025 Main Doc­ument Extension of Time

Poor naysayers— understanding purpose and finite detail of regulations and their application is why credentials mean licenses, exams and passing them.

Not reading in the absolute from Google. “Review” key—DBMM experts know and always get their approvals-that is why they are carefully in place. To do it right.

Settlements are stepping stones.

Good for all. See Q3 as MD&A says.

Opinions distracting and confusing. MD&A and Updates tell the story.

https://www.dbmmgroup.com/dbmm-shareholder-update-april-14-2025/

SO nice to have hearing testimony that proves who and what is CORRECT!

I'm pretty sure that 💩 was the first one to state the lie that Linda didn't know about Asher's background. And the sheep lapped it up and ran with it!

Any lie to try to retell and/or whitewash the shady history here!

Sad...

🦨💩

Have a HAPPY EASTER EVERYONE!

Indeed. And it's not as if those court passages haven't been copied and pasted on this board before today! It is A WELL-KNOWN FACT that Linda knew ALL about Asher and Kurt Kramer, when she willingly entered into those egregious loans!!

"DBMM didn't know"

Are these people HIGH?

Yes indeed. Another week goes by with no news about Digital Clarity signing on a new revenue producing client for parent company DBMM.

Only another week and a few days until the end of April. Then 4 weeks in May for the end of the 3rd Quarter. Holy smokes! It looks like DBMM is counting on a HELL of a great 4th Q to get most of that $1M in promised fiscal 2025 revenue! Good luck with THAT Linda!

Would you like to recant YOUR post that DBMM "didn't know" Asher was a toxic lender?
FACTS have NEVER stopped the pumpers from lying!

I guess they really believe that repeating a lie often enough makes others believe that it is the truth!

Are we still on track to make $1 million this year AS PROMISED IN WRITING by the CEO???😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Yet ANOTHER batch of bullshit served up warm and hungrily devoured by the blind. It’s a lot like the movie Snowpiercer, isn’t it? Here, have a bar of mulched up cockroaches to eat while Linda and Reggie drink champagne and eat cavier off of each other. They toast your stupidity and smugly laugh.

The long litany of broken promises, grandiose predictions and shady book keeping practices is truly stunning. The SEC can’t shut this charade down and put a couple of executives in orange jumpsuits fast enough.

This 10Q was a travesty. Even bigger than past travesties. And THAT’S a difficult feat!!! Best year ever? $1 million in revenue? Something pretty damn DRASTIC better happen in the next few months!!!! My guess is, ONCE AGAIN, when this year proves to be total, complete bullshit, ya’ll will start up with some more nonsense to excuse management for beating the hell out of you. This is THE most incredible display of Stockholm Syndrome I’ve ever seen.

Two more weeks until “something big” happens that all shorts are terrified of. Can’t WAIT!!!!!!!

And yeah, Jealous J, it was a lot of money. A whole LOT. Too bad you can’t say the same. You keep on hanging in there and getting your ass pounded, though! Broke looks good on you!!!

Why won't you admit that you write for Bashers entities against DBMM?
Can you please translate that into English? Maybe I could answer if the question made any sense whatsoever!

Nice tap dance!
Shareholders know the Company has stated in Updates that if anyone was doing IR and being paid
That is NOT the question that I asked you!

Drop the damn "paid" excuse!

Now stop ducking and answer the question:

True or False: You have written Shareholder Updates for DBMM

The answer is "True"... and you won't even deny it! Because you can't...

And I have already PROVEN to you that they used Paid Awareness in the past without disclosing it in their filings! Need to see it again?

GIANT horse apples!

Unbeknownst to DBMM, Asher Enterprises, Inc. and its principal Curt Kramer was subsequently classified as a bad actor by FINRA.

Linda knew ALL about Asher and the type of lender it was! It is stated RIGHT IN COURT TESTIMONY that she knew Asher was a lender of "last resort", that she didn't want to use them, but Asher was "the only act in town".

She needed moolah and Asher was the ONLY one lending to DBMM!

If you like, I can find the exact words and paste them right up here....

https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/apdocuments/3-17990-event-43.pdf

Page 28 and page 29:

"Digital Brand borrowed "over a half a million dollars from Asher starting in
2010." (Perry Tr. 114:7-8). From the beginning, Linda Perry knew that Asher was a
"toxic lender" -- "I sure did know that." (Perry Tr. 136:10-11). Digital Brand's
borrowing from Asher was always based on "egregious terms," including conversion
rights, which Asher always was "relentless" in exercising. (Perry Tr. 114:6-9; 122:6-7).
Digital Brand was well aware of, was "fine" and in "good stead" with, and accepted the
known requirements for it to obtain financing from Asher, even as egregious and
potentially deleterious as the requirements were. (Id.)

Ms. Perry knew that other financing was unavailable in the microcap world, and she willingly
accepted the Asher financing even though the cost and risk were high. As she testified:

• "I made a decision to borrow money from Asher knowing the egregious
terms". (Perry Tr. 125:25; 126:1).

• "I knew the terms. I knew what they were, and I felt that because it was
so difficult to get financing, I would live with it ... so that we could reach
that crossover point where we would never need anybody like Asher
again." (Perry Tr. 136:11-15).

• "I was willing to accept Asher's terms. It's not that I didn't realize. I
knew they were a toxic lender charging high rates of interest. It was the
only act in town, and I could live with it and did for a couple of years .... "
(Perry Tr. 176:11-14).

• " ... as bad as Asher was, I just felt at least that was a direct loan for which
it was convertible debenture, egregious but I could live with it for the
period of time that I needed it and then I never wanted to see them again."
(Perry Tr. 179:18-21)

That good enough for you? Would you like to recant YOUR post that DBMM "didn't know" Asher was a toxic lender?

UPDATE💹Funders Wait 💹 2Ensure $DBMM Still Trades✅ idiot.

$DBMM has the Ability to move forward, to continue to grow its business, benefits its shareholders and asks that the Commission affirm the decision of the Law Judge denying revocation of its registration.

CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, the Company submits that revocation of its registration is not necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors, and that the denial of revocation should be affirmed.

Dated: March 26, 2021
Respectfully Submitted,
/s/Maranda Fritz_____________________ Maranda E. Fritz
Maranda E. Fritz PC
335 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10017

Source: https://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments/3-17990-2021-03-26-respondent-appellees-brief.pdf

Great Stuff
12 wins
4+Years Compliance
Deterrent
Kramer $DBMM $GTII $HPIL HUD

11 years later, crooks still active ➡️Securities and Exchange Commission v. Kramer et al, No. 1:2024cv03498 https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/53433983/Securities_and_Exchange_Commission_v_Kramer_et_al
Unbeknownst to DBMM, Asher Enterprises, Inc. and its principal Curt Kramer was subsequently classified as a
bad actor by FINRA...etc...etc https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/apdocuments/3-17990-event-11.pdf
Kramer still busy with SEC 🥳Tick...Tock...

Between + 700 Million shares and 5 Billion shares to cover the short position in $DBMM will be costly for these crooks.

$DBMM would Investigate Naked Short Selling and Market Manipulation like other stocks actually...Shorties ramparts begin to crack.
The dikes will give way and the crooks will have to pay/cover for their mistakes.

The 10Q is really trying to pull the wool over the eyes of investors.

DBMM had a whopping $27,604 in total revenue for the 2nd quarter. But the real eye-opener would be when a prospective stock buyer goes down to the bottom line and sees a net profit of $184,504! Now he KNOWs there's a little accounting sleight-of-hand going on!

It doesn't take long to see that if the "gain on derecognition of liabilities" of $459,415 and the "change in fair value of derivative liability" of $42,779 is removed from the equation? DBMM ACTUALLY had a net LOSS of $-317,690 for the quarter.

And not only THAT, but it took a 100M shares of DBMM stock added to the OS (yea Poo, at "some point TBD"...sure) to GET that gain on derecognition of liabilities! That added a lot of dilution to shareholder value. But DBMM got its debt pared down. That's the important thing....right Poo??!! SURE!

Now it's perfectly legal for DBMM to do this. But it just shows how carefully one must go over the figures in DBMM's financials. A modest gain through accounting trickery doesn't show the true story of DBMM's ACTUAL operations.

The TRUE story? They are LOSING MONEY EVERY QUARTER.

and 99.99% of your comments are oriented against $DBMM stock, management, shareholders, in favor of Naysayers/shorties entities and individuals.

BTW... Why won't you admit that you write for Bashers entities against DBMM?

Know what everyone else knows? The OTC is the motherland of rules made to be broken. So who cares what you write, 99% of the filings made on the OTC are bogus.

Awe, did we touch on regulations you dont know about. Poor pooie.

Got anything relevant to my post or you just going to throw shame on anyone you can.

I know more than you think and I AM a shareholder so save your blather or Ill have you cited for harassment. And you know I have the documentation to prove it.

Shareholders know the Company has stated in Updates that if anyone was doing IR and being paid for it in any way, it must be disclosed. No one is and no one has been for over 12 years — as stated by the Company. Updates are written and posted on Company website by the Management.

Periodically professional reports may by commissioned and those are stated. As I recall , Digital Clarity ordered an industry overview and disclosed cash payment on document in public information.

To ally basher’s deflection, many many paid naysayers have converged over the years particularly when positive stepping steps have been solid wins.

DBMM always prevails.

https://www.dbmmgroup.com/dbmm-shareholder-update-april-14-2025/

I know 🦜's that are less repetitive than you 💩!

BTW... Why won't you admit or deny that you write the Shareholder Updates for DBMM?

We know that you do... and attempting to hide that fact leaves your other very biased "opinions" irrelevant!

You CANNOT BE OBJECTIVE because you are on the payroll!

Just fess up already... WE KNOW!

Deny it... I'd love a screenshot of that! I Triple Dog Dare you!

Should we have a celebration 🍾 🤔........

Since we missed the revocation party 🥳.......

For not so moron 🙄 party........

😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹

The Company got a Final Order of Dismissal and had many levels of review to trade and do business. The interference can be deemed defamation when it is a pattern of behavior is deemed intended to do damage.

Roll your dice dude , the Company has its experts and they are approved. But you guys keep creating nonsense. Check out the archives.

Shareholders do their own due diligence and make their own decisions. Opinions of non-credentialed people are without any expert validation. DBMM has the facts and the credentialed experts who make certain they are always right.

For bashers to think that SEC Approved Auditors , Accountants and Attorneys know better that the credentialed experts is ludicrous. Ignoring and omitting facts to weave fictional narratives, is not factual nor honest.

You make your decisions and supportive shareholders make theirs. Adults do not need opinions which only cause confusion and chaos . Twas ever this. DBMM always prevails and the experts are real , not sofa surfers or bad actors.

https://www.dbmmgroup.com/dbmm-shareholder-update-april-14-2025/

I have previously stated that I see DBMM as a shareholder funded hobby, not an actual for-profit business!

There is a 3 out of 5 year rule for the IRS to make a determination as to whether a business has a profit motive. The rule means that a business must show a net profit for 3 out of the first 5 years that the business is in operation or the IRS will make the determination that the business is a hobby.

If the IRS determines that the business is a hobby, they will change the tax returns that the business has filed under hobby income and expense rules (the income is reported on line 21 of the return, and the expenses are limited to the gross income and they are deducted as a miscellaneous itemized deduction.

What a moronic comparison. Please let us know when Warren Buffett loses money for 22 straight years.

Ya know one call to the IRS and this company is toast. Its illegal to run a losing business for more than 3 consecutive years.

How exactly did diluting 100 million shares decreasing each holders value to clear aged debt benefit shareholders? What a moron

Bashers do not know how to read a financial statement and that is why they should be on ignore! DBMM is prevailing one step at a time.

They call anything which doesn’t fit fictional narrative a “trick.” Meanwhile it is financial SEC instructions for a point in time data point. Bashers on a chatroom say they know better, but always negative and always omit key data. They omitted 4//14/25 Net Loss for $170,510 eroding considerably because of the elimination of considerable derivative liability from the most recent Settlement.

Blathering on about net loss was always a non issue as it is NOT a liability, nor money owed . It is a point in time heavily impacted by pps and existence of derivative liabilities driven. Compare $170,510 in 2Q25!

Berkshire Hathaway ,the preeminent
US investor , had a Net Loss of $22billion two years ago at a point of time , followed by $97billion gain the next year. It is NOT a significant data point as NOT carry forward or owed.

Why the disinformation ? It is deceptive and false. Documented in Archives.

Shareholders make their own decisions and DBMM removal of aged debt cleans up balance sheet to add revenues and all metric positives for DBMM underway. See presentation at OTCM Conference on Technology and AI.

https://www.dbmmgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/LINK-OTCM_DBMM.pdf

Uber,

If you’re going to mock a strategy, at least get the **facts** right:

1. **ERHC is *not* revoked.**
The SEC *dismissed* the revocation case. That’s public record. It remains **CE-listed**, which gives it cover—but not death. It’s in deep freeze, not delisted.

2. **That’s exactly why DBMM is *better positioned* than ERHC.**
- DBMM is **Pink Current**
- Filed its 211
- Maintains basic reporting
So it can take action *without* triggering regulatory issues—but it lacks the protective silence CE status gives ERHC. That’s the tradeoff.

3. **The “playbook” isn’t about copying ERHC’s past mistakes.**
It’s about using one of the few tools available in the OTC to force **settlement and reconciliation**—a **fractional preferred share dividend**. Not to raise capital. Not to dilute. But to force the clearing system to square up the real float.

If you think the idea is bad, critique the **mechanics**, not the **ticker**. I don’t care if it’s DBMM, ERHC, Overstock, or a can of tuna—if a preferred dividend forces brokers to reveal synthetic positions, that’s a strategy worth considering.

And as for the Saints… I’d say we’re still in the playoffs until the tape says otherwise.

—Krombacher