dinogreeves
16 hours ago
There are no jocks here, just pumpers and bearish comments that may or may not be true, so far bearish comments definitely out weights pumper comments with nothing to show for GVSI. As for me, I don't care either way what this does, I am just pointing out, your behavior doesn't help the cause, in-fact it hurts it more than it does any good. It makes you look juvenile at best and a pumping scammer at worse, or perhaps you are both, which is scum of the Earth. Stay humble. No need to prove anything to anyone, your account is what matters to you and your family in the end.
Hi_Lo
19 hours ago
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173788321
Just Sharp destroying people's lives.
Yup. There's a reason Sharp dumped all of his 20 million GVSI common shares and then lied about never having been issued those shares (which he did own and needed to own to gain standing in the custodianship court case).
https://twitter.com/GeorgeASharp/status/1628061908250107904?t=pFblKD1dGrf0tjrx9nTwoQ&s=19
The 20 mil shares of $GVSI that was listed with my holdings in today's revised filing, were previously stated in SEC filings, but were overlooked in the original OTCM disclosure. These shares were purchased out of the market prior to my custodianship app. & gave me standing.
9:59 AM · Feb 21, 2023 35.3K Views
https://twitter.com/GeorgeASharp/status/1754967133602173281?t=a1cWrhPRmvvA0Wj_ffxerQ&s=19
For those asking, I was never issued the 20 million $GVSI shares in question, which is why they do not appear on subsequent filings. Contrary to what those who like to "pay me back" would like you to believe, I did not sell those shares.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/359659/content
https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/391857/content
And Sharp didn't recently buy shares as you falsely claimed.
I asked for you to show documentation that he recently bought GVSI shares again and you never do because it's a lie to aid in your pump and dumps.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174201572
I dumped on your asses.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174623127
Hi_Lo
2 days ago
No. But Sharp can now get the name changed when he is ready to.
No he can't because he has to file the missing audited financials first and he already said he has abandoned getting GVSI's financials audited.
Pumpers keep parroting the same nonsense even after documentation has been posted proving them wrong.
The same pumpers were saying the exact same thing right before the merger catastrophically failed last year. The merger failed not because of shareholders and negative comments on social media (as Sharp would want everyone to believe) - Sharp blamed the failure on shareholders, when the truth is that he didn't file any of the proper paperwork with the SEC/FINRA. He couldn't file the proper paperwork because the audited financials from 2008 - 2013 were still missing and he couldn't audit them.
The same thing will happen if he tries a merger again this year.
Pumpers think people will believe whatever they post at face value even when proof is posted that they are lying.
And they will continue parroting the same lies again and again no matter how many times they are proven wrong.
Not only that - pumpers NEVER supply documentation to prove ANY of what they say.
There is a reason Sharp dumped all of his common stock right before the merger failed last year and then lied by saying he was never issued the stock.
https://twitter.com/GeorgeASharp/status/1628061908250107904?t=pFblKD1dGrf0tjrx9nTwoQ&s=19
The 20 mil shares of $GVSI that was listed with my holdings in today's revised filing, were previously stated in SEC filings, but were overlooked in the original OTCM disclosure. These shares were purchased out of the market prior to my custodianship app. & gave me standing.
9:59 AM · Feb 21, 2023 35.3K Views
https://twitter.com/GeorgeASharp/status/1754967133602173281?t=a1cWrhPRmvvA0Wj_ffxerQ&s=19
For those asking, I was never issued the 20 million $GVSI shares in question, which is why they do not appear on subsequent filings. Contrary to what those who like to "pay me back" would like you to believe, I did not sell those shares.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/359659/content
https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/391857/content
Now pumpers are lying by saying that Sharp bought shares again recently yet never provide any documentation to prove that what they are saying is true.
Pretty nefarious stuff.
https://twitter.com/GeorgeASharp/status/1622942829440913408?t=1QrC2O86NpdetHV1DCi9JA&s=19
I had regretted taking over $GVSI. Had I known what I was in for, I would have never had done it. But even my most fervent doubters know that I don't just give up once I start. I spent a lot of my own money to get this done in order to justify the confidence of my supporters.
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments/3-19407-2020-09-16-reply-to-finra-opposition-to-the-application-for-good-vibration-shoes.pdf
The Companyโs many shareholders have essentially all lost their investment in the Company.
This scam will be back to .002 within a few weeks since this last run up had no reason for it other than pumpers giving false hope and a risidual effect from the Calasse's court loss in WNFT.
GVSI is a regulatory nightmare and a dead stock walking.
surfkast
3 days ago
BULLSHIT!!!!!!~
over $1,000,000 of his own money to be exact
Does anyone question where the money went. Over $900,000 just on FORW Professional fees? Was that for trainers and jockeys? Seriously? What about the "loans" and shares?
FORW - Professional fees $619,384 December 31,2023
Professional fees $293,838 SEPTEMBER 30, 2024
GVSI - Professional fees $40,631 DECEMBER 31, 2023
Professional fees $12,904 SEPTEMBER 30, 2024
SRNW Professional fees $267,727 DECEMBER 31, 2023
Related party consulting expense for common stock $319,000 DECEMBER 31, 2023
Professional fees $62,571 SEPTEMBER 30, 2024
Hi_Lo
3 days ago
Correct. Past means nothing here.
If the pumpers here are falsely saying that GVSI's past means nothing and that GVSI only needs its most recent two years of audited financials to get SEC current, then why did Sharp say that FINRA "is concerned with acts by previous management, particularly, missing financials from that period?"
https://x.com/OTCpinkGVSI/status/1729558323119202449?t=lyxxf6o-7YVztHjo1fL8jg&s=19
$GVSI has finally received comments from FINRA who is concerned with acts by previous management, particularly, missing financials from that period. Management continues to cooperate with FINRA at its own expense in order to achieve the name & symbol changes.
11:50 AM · Nov 28, 2023 · 51.7K Views
FINRA is not so much "concerned" (those are Sharp's words) as it is signaling that GVSI won't be able to get SEC registered and current because of those missing financials. And Sharp already said he abandoned getting GVSI's financials audited.
https://twitter.com/GeorgeASharp/status/1622941929762615296?t=zsQ9O8VdSZ_MX2wq0a_GcA&s=19
I had hope to start $GVSI as an SEC reporter, but after over a year of having two accounting firms work on it & discussions with the SEC, I begrudgingly agreed that I would not be able to get the books audited.
https://x.com/OTCpinkGVSI/status/1542485294464860160?t=68jmueQpA5mO5E8xSBCZVw&s=19
Our attorneys & auditors have concluded that it is impossible to audit $GVSI due to past corporate mismanagement of records/actions. Therefore, we are abandoning efforts to become an SEC reporter & are preparing an application for OTCIQ access to be filed with OTCM within 60 days.
https://twitter.com/OTCpinkGVSI/status/1740377588865130859?t=uF3kaF0oJzO-_MVI5tootQ&s=19
Here, the filing of the Form 15 did not absolve GVSI of it's delinquency. Nor does making the company Pink Current, as was accomplished during 2023. While the company is in good standing with OTC Markets, in the eyes of the SEC and FINRA, GVSI remains a delinquent reporter. FINRA will not process any corporate action such as a name change, symbol change or reverse (or forward) split while an issuer is deemed delinquent in its reporting requirements.
- George Sharp
December 28, 2023
Sharp fails to mention that it also won't be able to do a reverse merger since that is also a corporate action.
https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/how-finra-rule-6490-lmpacts-reverse-mergers-30567
HOW FINRA RULE 6490 lMPACTS REVERSE MERGERS
FINRA Rule 6490, has evolved since it was enacted over two years ago. For some time, FINRA has required that issuers provide expansive disclosures and supporting documentation not only for the corporate change subject to the notice but for the companyโs entire corporate history from inception.
These disclosures are required of both SEC reporting and non-reporting issuers if they undertake corporate actions including reverse mergers. Compliance with Rule 6490's requirements is a minor task for companies going public by filing a registration statement with the SEC. Companies filing registration statements rarely have difficulties obtaining DTC eligibility unlike reverse merger issuers.
(My note: GVSI withdrew its registration statement and never refiled it: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1068618/000149315221029704/formrw.htm)
The public filings of companies who register with the SEC contain most of the supporting documentation required by Rule 6490.
It is no surprise that compliance with the requirements of Rule 6490 is less burdensome for companies going public using a registration statement because these companies have fewer corporate changes in their company history than companies engaging in reverse mergers. This is especially true for reverse merger issuers who undergo multiple changes of control and periods of inactivity.
The Problem with Reverse Mergers & Disclosure under Rule 6490
For companies that engage in reverse mergers as part of their going public transaction, compliance with Rule 6490's requirements can be impossible particularly when custodianship or receivership actions have been used by shell brokers to create public shells after years of inactivity. These companies may have multiple corporate actions related to prior changes of control and often have sketchy corporate histories. Some have even been hijacked through custodianship or receivership actions. In these circumstances, documents may be unavailable or if provided to FINRA, it could potentially result in FINRA referring the matter to the SECโs Division of Enforcement.
These companies are almost always plagued with incomplete or fraudulent corporate records which make it extremely difficult for the post-reverse merger company to comply with FINRA Rule 6490. As a result, these companies may never get FINRA approval of the contemplated corporate action.
Rule 6490 Disclosures
Issuers must provide a cover letter disclosing the full corporate history for the issuer itemizing all material facts including every corporate change that has occurred from inception to present day.
Triggers for Review under FINRA RULE 6490
A FINRA review will be triggered if any of the five factors set forth in Rule 6490 are thought to be present:
โข FINRA believes the forms are incomplete, inaccurate or filed without the appropriate corporate authority;
โข The issuer is not current in its reporting obligations with the Securities and Exchange Commission;
โข Persons involved in or related to the corporate action are the subject of pending or settled regulatory action or are under investigation by a regulatory body or are the subject of a pending criminal action related to fraud or securities law violations;
โข Persons related to the corporate action are likely involved in fraudulent activities involving securities or may pose a threat to investors;
โข There is significant uncertainty in the settlement and clearance process for the issuerโs securities.
Any company contemplating going public using a reverse merger must consider the potential impact Rule 6490 could have on its future corporate actions. Rule 6490 provides one more compelling reason why private companies seeking to go public should do so using a registration statement instead of a reverse merger.
GVSI is a dead stock walking.
Major Profits
4 days ago
"In a custodianship Sharp is only obligated to financial liabilities, not past filings. He got a reset on that."
Hmmm, can you provide a link to where you got that information from? Frankly, some of us have been trying to find out about that "two years of audited financials only" and what you say seems to contradict this:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/replies.aspx?msg=174063538
Take a look at a balance sheet and an equity statement. A number of those items require full and complete financial information to be accurate. An income statement is a snapshot of the 2 (or 3) years covered by the date of the statement, but a balance sheet and equity statement are since inception. If information is missing, it is impossible to present those statements accurately. Even 1 year's information that is missing can easily cause the financial statements to not be accurate, and therefore not auditable.
TIA
P.S. What I find odd is if the "two years of audited financials" is all GS needs, and considering he became GVSI custodian on May 4, 2021, why didn't he get those two years of audited financials sometime in 2023? Or 2024? Why wait until 2025?
Major Profits
4 days ago
Nah, because I don't think he said that, unless I missed a newer tweet by GS than this one where he said he wanted to retire last year:
George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC
@GeorgeASharp
7h
During 2024, I will be vending assets into $FORW $GVSI $SRNW and $WNFT in order that I might be able to resign all officer and director positions and retire. Rest assured, these assets will be legitimate and vetted to the best of my ability. twitter.com/ForwardlyInc/sโฆ
8:05 AM · Dec 18, 2023
noradio
4 days ago
To the misguided, and what frankly, seems unhinged poster, that is claiming pumping, dilution, and GS using others to promote the stock, I must say, Do you know a single thing about GS? Obviously not that is clear. The last thing in the world he would ever do is let anyone profit or take credit from his work before he wants it to happen. He is the DJT of the Otc with a huge ego. So the stuff being floated around here was so comical it is obviously coming from someone who has absolutely no clue about the situation here and has either an axe to grind with GS or some other poster here.
GS has spent years of time and effort, 5 years and literally over $1,000,000 of his own money to be exact, trying to make a go of GVSI, and some here think he's either going to run a scam or simply abandon it? No shot, no way, no how. He has bigtime connections, many in Israel, and I believe that is when and where what happens here will come from.
noradio
4 days ago
Boom exactly! I am amazed people misunderstand all of that. He has said numerous times starting a year ago that the summer of 2025 will be the rocket launch when all the regulatory issues will be taken care of and we are now only about 3 months away from that. If you arent buying right now you are going to miss out in a big way.
8th and final Quarter filings needed to kickstart everything should be dropping any day now, literally, so anyone selling here and not buying is going to feel very foolish very soon.
Chance of a lifetime to ride on the back of a Kentucky Derby winner, the King of the Otc, the master behind the greatest Otc run in history, the guy who has literally not said a word about anything in a year and is the antithesis of a pumper as some here claim. As a matter of fact he despises pumping, the owner of the shell who has not diluted a single solitary share, ever. Some pumper and diluter he is.