Liquidmetal Technologies Inc (QB) (LQMT) News

There is one significant difference that I can think of. Li is subject to SEC disclosure rules for those owning more than 5% of a company. Whereas, the (strawman?) purchasers individually own 4.899999967% of LQMT, and, consequently, aren’t subject to disclosure rules. Now those 179,787,888 can disappear and then may reappear in the hands of someone hostile to the small shareholder.

I don’t think it was an accident that they individually purchased just below the 5% threshold.

...so let's get this party started!

...so let's get this party started!

They have been doing it well, or they are flying under the SECs radar-no cares about a penny stock.

Time will tell.

"They" who are not afraid of the SEC are not captains of industry, engineers, marketeers, entrepeneurs or business leaders. "They" are two lawyers one dotting all the i's, the other looking out for the controlling holder. That would be TC and Bresnick. And, they have done it well IMO.

Excellent points.

From where I sit, I see no difference between LL owning 400 million shares and LL+ 4 cronies owning 400 million shares. I still think it’s a mechanism to get assets out of China and it doesn’t affect the big picture

SQUIRREL!

I totally understand what you’re saying. I just don’t understand why they don’t appear to worry about it. I’m confident that Martha Stewart didn’t think that she would ever be jailed.

I believe the relevant question is did they make the transaction (I.e., sale/promissory note in October 2024) based on material non public insider knowledge. I don’t believe that there is any escape clause for information that is improperly known now where the information is about something three years down the road.

I would love to hear the explanation on how the COB (who has fiduciary duties to all shareholders) convinced outsiders to invest at approximately 3.5x the going share price without giving the outsiders some information that isn’t publicly available. If LQMT is such a good deal, and all the information needed to recognize that is publicly available, then we wouldn’t be at 4.5 cents.

I don’t care about insider trading if it means that there is something big (and good) on the horizon. I’ll go along for the ride.

If whatever might happen happens in 1 years time...is that considered insider trading?
What constitutes insider trading? I'll Google that......

If whatever might happen happens in 1 years time...is that considered insider trading?
What constitutes insider trading? I'll Google that......

One of the many things that I don’t understand is why aren’t they afraid of an SEC investigation for insider trading? Why would four independent investors buy LQMT shares at those terms unless they had some insider knowledge?

I think it'll be much higher then that...around a buck I'd say.......

Boiling,

You might be right on the buyout, but I hope not!

I haven't held on all these years just to get bot out for 20 cents a share or so!

Tomcat

I like this scenario from Eicheljaeger posted in the other sensible chatroom.....

He says:

Here's my thinking on a potential acquisition scenario:

Li sold at .16 to one or more investors sitting behind 4 shell companies. This is both almost 400% higher than the current price, and only about his break even.
Li reduced his share count by 179 million to 225 million
He is likely not getting the money for his shares for 3 years, therefore allowing the new investors to profit prior to paying him for the shares.

Why would he do this? Giving 3 years doesn't make sense for other investments or cash flow. I don't see immediate cash being the reason.

Throwing in the towel? Tony Chung's actions seem to contradict this.

The four investors, with their Board connections to Li, could signal a coordinated restructuring ahead of a formal offer. It is possible that Li has had discussions with a potential acquirer who wasn't comfortable with him owning close to 50% of the total shares. It gives him too much leverage and could complicate the process.

So Li sells 179 million shares. By doing this he reduces his ownership to 25ish%, increases the public float, sets a floor at .16, and generates cash. He registers all of his shares to make them tradable.

The four investors could be related to the acquirer. They are willing to pay .16, because they know they'll profit either when the deal gets done, or for the same reason the acquirer wants to buy LQMT. They could also be institutional investors who realize we are a target for acquisition and want to profit.

Tony knows in advance that Li plans on selling in 2025 and why, and buys a million shares on the open market.

The acquiring entity proceeds with a formal offer now that Li has reduced his percentage to 25ish%. The acquisition price is likely higher than .16. Li gets a higher return on his 225 million shares, the 4 investors make a profit, and Tony makes money on his purchase.

All of this requires real revenue in waiting. Otherwise, we aren't much of a buyout target.

Just conjecture at this point. I'm trying to think of a scenario where all of this makes sense.

I’ve been there (in Denmark) and nothing smelled rotten. On the other hand my dice roll in this abyss definitely looks, tastes and smells rotten.

Maybe they can patent a Liquidmetal lock for exterior doors. Lifetime guarantee. Won’t freeze in winter. High volume orders. Gets us out of the garbage heap.

Or maybe they can patent a Liquidmetal corer and peeler. So we can peel those Apples. Another high volume part.

Let’s put those gears to work. Liquidmetal patented corkscrews. Another high volume part to unscrew the outside shareholders.

And then there is the ultimate Liquidmetal patent, where billions and billions are needed in many articles of clothing from women’s and men’s pants to sweaters to coats to handbags to boots to anywhere a patented Liquidmetal zipper is required to replace all of those fricken cheap poorly made ones now in almost every product where there are zippers. The hell with YKK. Make your own damn zippers. Heck, it is estimated there are 5 to 7 billion zippers made each year.

Just collecting a minimum of 1 fricken penny a zipper at minimum sales numbers is equal to $50 million dollars. Get off your un innovative arses and get creative. Gets you to the Nasdaq instantly and no reverse split required. 5 cents a zipper gets you to the moon. The hype potential gets us to Mars before Elon Musk does. :)

And all that is required... Just creative leadership.

Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
And no NDA.

This link may help explain the off market transactions and the s1 amendment.

https://www.sec.gov/about/reports-publications/investorpubsrule144

Should anyone need further help…

https://www.sec.gov/about/contact-sec

To sum up the s1. In my total ignorance, it looks like LL’ the seller and Pong and others the purchasers would be in compliance now and going forward based on their present off market transactions and to cover all or any going forward. Any company can set rules for restricted shares and un restricting those shares for sale.

Perhaps in their own ignorance LQMT unintentionally were not in compliance before the sale of restricted shares but now are and are now compliant in future transactions of selling and purchasing shares. This also covers the issues warrants.

“When you acquire restricted securities or hold control securities, you must find an exemption from the SEC's registration requirements to sell them in a public marketplace. Rule 144 allows public resale of restricted and control securities if a number of conditions are met. This overview tells you what you need to know about selling your restricted or control securities. It also describes how to have a restrictive legend removed”
Source SEC.

It would be nicer to know that an 8K contract worth over $300 million was being inked. Now wouldn’t that be more interesting.

Another week passes and LQMT’s share price is down 10.32% from 0.04795 cents to 0.043 cents on extremely weak trading volumes and little interest. The same when LQMT moves up or down.

On Thursday and Friday of this week the company filed an amended 10k and S1 form governing compliance by the SEC.

Since the company has a history of not communicating with its outside shareholders in a transparent way as many other companies do, regarding as to what they are doing other than what is required by law. There are many opinions up and down as to why the forms were amended and what exactly, might they mean going forward. In lieu of this who is to say if any opinion on these forms are right or wrong? For all opinions in this matter carry the same weight of ignorance in trying to understand what and exactly why the forms were filled.

Not knowing all of the sec rules (and why should we?) it takes time to review the documents to sort out what they mean going forward. Perhaps next week we will know more.

One thing all should be certain of. I don’t think the purpose of rolling the dice here was to know more about business law, then to know more about 8K contracts to earn everyone still alive a happy outcome.

Of another certainty. When looking at this dice roll, no matter what we think. It’s still stuck deep down in an abyss with leadership, that has failed to bring the hard earned money of any long term outsider to a successful conclusion since inception.

The share price languishes in a coma like the new contracts anticipated for almost three years now. Whether it hits the 0.02’s, 0.03’s, 0.04’s or 0.05’s it is still a good entry point for this dice roll, if you like high risk, huge losses and no reward historically. With an occasional wash rinse and repeat cycle and executives as well as ex executives paid off of your dime. In this case your nickel. This stock could be for you.

If anyone is interested in LQMT, you can join any board and ask anyone what they think and if they are in the green, black or red. I think every long term is in the red if that helps you. Always do your own due diligence.

Almost 3 years now, and LQMT is without an 8K announcement for a part contract. One of the longest stretches without a wash rinse and repeat cycle based on 8K’s of insignificant values.

Hmmm 🤔 maybe that’s the reason the SP is under a dollar, fifty cents, a quarter a dime, a nickel almost 100% of the time? Then again, what the heck would I know? After all this crap has been going on for two decades and LQMT still has failed to raise the value for any outsiders still invested, except for those periods of times when the SP goes through those wash rinse spin and repeat cycles.

You would think by now that all would have a clue that the share price by now is not where it’s at by any manipulation, but by the facts of it’s (performance) numbers achieved by executives operating the company. Hmmm 🤔 , what a novel idea. And if you are having trouble with that idea, then perhaps you might want to read the warnings of why the company may not succeed and the difficulties involved in selling amorphous metal materials as a replacement for existing materials in there sec filed statements every year. That plus the actual trading interest in the stock should dispel any manipulation theory.

You would have to know by now the share price sits under a nickel not due to any imaginary manipulation, but due to failed growth in both potential, contracts and interest.

You would also have to know, all hold on because there is a feeling not based on any provable opinion, that LQMT can rocket up on a high volume part order coupled with rumors and hype.

Could be why all pro or con outside shareholders are looking for an exit strategy with less losses or some breakfast money.

LQMT has reported four consecutive quarterly increases in revenues starting with the 4th quarter of last year Much or all of the new revenues comes from undisclosed agreement terms with the ring company. These new revenues are insufficient to attract the attention of new investors to add liquidity daily. FDA approval might change that, if new investors see the connection between the ring’s possible success and LQMT’s undisclosed terms.

Back to LQMT. Missing from the 10Q3. Was there any mention of the MIM order TC touted earlier this year? Has anyone else mentioned it? Just one.

Was there really a MIM order in the first place? I saw no big amount in the accounts receivable section of the 10Q. I’m now beginning to doubt there ever was one. The way LQMT communicates one can conclude it was cancelled or never existed in the manner portrayed. So that means there was an order received, but we don’t know what the hell happened to it. Not even a discussion commentary follow up in the latest 10Q.

So to be fair I’ll ask humbly; HEY TC, WHATEVER HAPPENED TO THE MIM ORDER YOU TOUTED ON THE BLOG? Like I expected…No answer. 5 months and counting.

There was a trade show announcement on the blog.

https://www.liquidmetal.com/blog/medevice-silicon-valley-2024


IMO, it is time for new leadership in the company. Eight years of LL and endless years of TC has factually decreased shareholder value.

Is it their fault? Well before anyone criticizes people for thinking so, let’s look at a fact.

The argument that the material is new and it takes time blah blah blah blah seems plausible. LQMT clearly makes that case.

But, if the same material is purported to be making $$$$ in China with 3 or 4 various whale companies, then that argument is no longer plausible and opens many doors for why LQMT is failing to increase $$$$ the bottom line significantly. Heck, even a few recently have noticed some stocks abroad selling amorphous metals with rites to LQMT’s ip, doubling. And add to this that one of the founders who originated the LQMT/Eontec agreement became the largest shareholder, CEO and now COB and still owns about 8% of eontec’s interests.

So yes, it is their fault! It’s an argument supported by competition in every facet of industry.
One business chain of outlets succeeds in selling the same products on their shelves, or off assembly lines, while others file for bankruptcy. Why? Leadership!

Examples of failures:

Sears, Kmart, Rite-Aid, Bed Bath and Beyond, Lehman Brothers, Chrysler, Texaco, Radio Shack, Toys-R-Us Remington, A&P, and sadly on and on.

And be careful again not to buy into the spin/BS if you hear of a new partnership announcement with a domestic manufacturer. It means crap just like the partnership with yian in China. After all where the hell did the share price go after that PR and blog touting debacle?

And if someone tells you look somebody paid 0.16 cents a share for LQMT and that means it’s worth more than a nickel, grab an oxygen tank. You may need it after laughing so hard.

It’s the same thinking of continued stupidity when someone says look LL is the largest shareholder and then they say that’s the reason it was and is going up. Its BS. Eight years of BS.
It’s also the same reason why LQMT is not successful as well and the share price went down.

A more plausible (theory) thought might be that the new off market transactions for selling the shares and getting paid over a three year period will allow for a business opportunity to develop by some people not beholden to restrictions from a government abroad. Whereas the current holder of all of those shares was and is restricted by the ccp or government. Pick whatever answer fits the ego.

Thus this theory if it works out is beneficial to all regardless of whatever anyone’s opinions are. It’s more plausible. Not a guarantee for success but an opportunity to explore unrestricted opportunities for success, where again all benefit from.

Note: At the end of 2023 China has banned all export of rare earth minerals to control, to stay dominant. However, the USA has been increasing production for the past 7 years. With the new political administration taking office it bodes well for the possibility of LQMT becoming competitive. Albeit we may or may not see that in our lifetime.

Knowing the policies and beliefs from past experience, I believe President Donald Trump will want to accelerate production for rare earth minerals. Like both his successes and failures, he is a very competitive businessman and leader. He likes to win. He likes to succeed. Now all we need are leaders or shareholders with deep pockets to think in the same way for LQMT.

Anyone who still doesn’t understand how business is run in China or conducted are either ignorant, stupid, a member of the ccp, a supporter of the ccp out of ignorance and or stupidity or they just have their head stuck up their arse. Or perhaps are just being an argumentative clown.

Looking again at the other theories and one might say this…

LQMT is way overdue in getting a whale contract! It makes the argument for scam more plausible! So too, do the theories and the maze depicted on this board, they never ever pan out! In order to side with those theories and lines and dots and dashes, you have to believe in the broken clock being correct twice a day or the blind squirrel catching a nut once in awhile metaphors as well.
To me that is not a good strategy for investing or dice rolling.

Excluding all of the theories, and based on the performance of and not on unproven manipulation, LQMT, unfortunately can still go into the 0.03’s again. A prolonged delay of FDA approval and a poor relaunch or no other new income agreements will guarantee the 0.03’s again. Add to this a reversal of growth from LQMT in the fourth quarter plus cash burn imo, and LQMT could reach the 0.02’s.

On the positive side LQMT can break a dime within this quarter as well if TC’s integrity for new deals comes to fruition. But as time goes on for this year it is looking less and less likely to happen.

Thus the outlook for setting up another possible wash rinse and repeats cycle, rather than establishing a new long term trend is more likely. Again I say this in lieu of LQMT’s consistent historical factual record of not improving on the fundamentals of the company and not on any negative opinion, not on any bias.

For those still not understanding the above opinions or facts, it’s simple. You look at your investments in LQMT and then you look at your wallet! At that point it doesn’t matter what anyone including myself thinks.

For now, LQMT’s share price is holding in the low pennies. Bouncing around in the 0.04’s on anemic trading volumes and barely hitting the low 0.05’s.

Perhaps in 2025 or 2026 LQMT might succeed and if they ever do make it in 2024, all in it will be very thankful and glad that they did.

I try to present a balanced view based on the facts not on the emotions of anyone hyping or bashing LQMT. I believe I nailed it correctly. This board has had it correct past and present from potential to expectations to hope to FOMO.

Will this be the year revenues increase consistently? Only the 4th Q’s will tell. 3 down and 1 to go. So far it looks good.

As of now, believe it or not, LQMT is into the fourth quarter. It sure looked much better in March. It’s up to TC to keep his integrity intact or lose all respect imo. Putting it more bluntly there are about 30 more trading days to go before the 4th quarter is over! Or dare I say 30 more working days! From company communications and blog updates, I can’t tell if they are working or on a vacation or a leave of absence or having dinner on our dime at a trade show.

I would rather see a weekly LQMT blog update on any progress from the company, than to post another week passes post. I’m sure everyone else would agree.

Do some research on this gent, Bill Liu AKA Lou Zihong. If you need a link, you haven’t been reading the filed forms carefully. I’m shocked the great finds people around the www haven’t pumped out the dots and dashes on this individual. His company I understand recently this year filed for bankruptcy.

It seems no one else checked out Lou Zihong.

Need a link?

In closing. Back in the spring this was stated: “ CEO, Tony Chung, painted a rosy picture for LQMT this year during his CC, for all in LQMT. Especially for outside shareholders, I hope his picture this time, is worth more than just a thousand words to make our shares worth more than just three, four, or five cents. So far his artwork is not worth much more than last year and it’s beginning to decline in value again.
Why am I not surprised?”

Now setting aside all arguments and opinions. How many would sell their shares at 0.16 cents a share?

Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
DM seems to be the only one left looking out for the outside shareholders. Hope he had more success and posts a blog update on how it went.

Good point, makes sense. However the question remains 'what will become of LQMT Valencia if LL actually bails out). Beyond Pong. Not much here anymore, back to 2016? At least there is something happening.

You say, "More questions than answers".

Is this something new?

The only thing unquestionable about LQMT is the lunacy of the people who post here daily.

A realist would say, "Bender Don Dat".

Sumpkins rotten in DENMARK

Chat GPT says the following. I don’t think this has anything to do with being registered to sell securities on an exchange. That happened already in 2007.

The document you’ve referenced is an Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1, filed on June 29, 2007. Form S-1 is used by companies to register securities with the SEC, typically in preparation for a public offering. This amendment was filed to update or correct information in the original registration statement.

Does this raise more questions…

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sec-form-s-1.asp

Great post! Great find!

Now I have to read.
And the sad part….its a dice roll under a nickel with enough material comparable to a mega cap.

Who the heck put a fire under IB’s and TC’s seat?

Thank you TC,

Guess that question was answered…

Researchfyi
Re: None
Tuesday, 11/19/2024 1:44:38 AM
I raised this question before. I always thought LL paid $63 million for 405 million common unrestricted shares per each PR and filled documents. How the heck did these shares become restricted stock? Restricted stock is not bought. They are granted. Restricted stock normally do not have voting rights until vested.
What the hell is going on then?
What am I missing here? Anyone?
Hmmm 🤔????

Researchfyi
Re: iateclube post# 233608
Tuesday, 11/19/2024 11:12:47 AM
Well I’m inclined to look into it further with a more knowledgeable authority regarding this curiosity. I would rather see the company just spell it out in an executive blog update.

There always seem to be negative clouds surrounding this. It’s easy to tell when no one to my knowledge who are positive or bullish has posted about these shares as noted in the off market transactions.

Absolutely no curiosity how shares sold to a non citizen abroad and held in Hong Kong went from a misunderstood purchased status of non restricted shares to a granted status of restricted shares with zero time mentioned for vesting rights to allow for voting rights.

Being no legal scholar, one would think all would want to know just what the heck is going on.

My way of thinking is when out of ignorance, something looks suspicious, it could be something or it could be nothing. Always keep an open mind.

I think if the stock hit 0.50 cents today, no one would give a rats A$$.

Now, all I have to do is go review the filed answers.

Thank you TC.

I think Chip has all the angles covered. Hmm 🤔

This may have a simple explanation…If, when setting up the arrangement with Pong et al the fact that the shares were “restricted” popped up as surprise which could limit their use as collateral etc. it was further determined that ALL of LL shares were restricted so paperwork (S-1) has been filed to convert all the shares to unrestricted resalable shares.

Occam’s Razor

Could be fait accompli!

Maybe.... since all the warrants are now gone ...converted to common and being offered up but at what price and to whom? The pps action does not appear to be feeling much selling. So would this be a bullish sign that not much selling is a result of things about to happen in the midterm or so. And will those selling converted shareholders use those shares in some offer from a client or prospective client or partnership? Are we in an oversold condition with a real bottom being closer to the price when Pong bought those 100,000 shares from his own pocket? Was that a headfake or hint of things to come? I guess time will tell if such speculation is near target or way off. It's late, better stop rambling. For certain I am no decoder only offering up some requested specuation as the clock rolls around and the wine box goes dry. Good weekend to all.

I’m really confused about the “Pong” thing and how it all fits together….I was originally thinking that transferring the shares to Pong et al was a way to create offshore assets (in the US) for future use and that still may be true.

Why agree to transfer them at an inflated price? If the transfer has zero gain/loss, does it avoid some sort of tax scrutiny in China? Everything has a purpose but I can’t figure the angle. If Pong defaults on the promissory notes, the stock reverts to LL but does it mean it’s in the US or China?

It appears that we are 2 moves into a big chess game where the next 7 moves are predetermined and we are spectators with no clue as to the next move.

Impossible to say it’s good or bad…..I’m inclined to say it will be negative initially but then get better as it plays out. One thing for sure…nobody is going to dump a 10 million share block without crushing the price so they just won’t do it.

400+ million shares at $0.045 is less than $20 million so I’m thinking it invites an offer from a specialty metals company play the “white knight” and we end up as part of Materion, Allegheny (ATI) or Carpenter. Big issue is the Yi’an connection since we have nothing if we have no manufacturing partner…second issue is the patents are getting old and the manufacturing process knowledge is held in the form of “trade secrets” that they don’t want to share (which is why we don’t have a domestic manufacturing partner). Apple has the process knowledge but I really don’t see any advantage for them from a relationship.

Way more questions than answers!

Maybe they already have a buyer lined up..

Does this suggest it’s bad news? Think we need to worry about our share value falling of a cliff

I was wondering why we had several 2 million share days in the last week or so…big % drop on those days and taking several days to recover and then happening again. Obviously a leak but not really many shares in the total scheme of things.

Nobody is going to enter a sell order for 10 million shares but “perceived overhang” can have a real dampening effect on any demand.

It may attract the attention of a Materion or Allegheny or other specialty alloy companies

I was wondering why we had several 2 million share days in the last week or so…big % drop on those days and taking several days to recover and then happening again. Obviously a leak but not really many shares in the total scheme of things.

A lot to unpack here, will have to come back, but the LL and LQMT HK holdings somehow now are more than 50%???
Sure looks to me like the controlling interests are wanting to unload. Now that is interesting, and not surprising. What is the silver lining for us, one wonders.

This is a prospectus to sell all the shares owned by LL and his friends to anyone at “market price” Looks like we are searching for a new owner…or

They don’t have to sell any or they could sell all…It may be just to convert “restricted shares” to “resale shares” that could be sold sometime in the future.

An optimist could say that bullish news is coming and they want their shares to be marketable.

A pessimist would say it’s the second step in the process of “cashing out”

S-1 ::: https://liquidmetal.gcs-web.com/node/12081/html

Care to decode and speculate?

Interesting viewpoint….if you consider LQMT. (and MOVE) to be single product companies…which is a good approximation, one can use the 10Q’s to develop insights into the goings on.

LQMT revenues starting in Q4-2023 for the last 4 quarters go from $108k to $173k to $242k to $316k.
LQMT Cost of Goods Sold tracks at …..$89k to $134k to $187 to $239.

COGS is composed of the transfer price from Yi’an Technology plus a few adders (allocated costs and profit) from LQMT Valencia.

MOVE is more difficult….we have visibility for unit sales but no idea what the inventory pipeline looks like so developing the number of units actually produced (and billed) is impossible. That would be useful.

Still crunching

Aside from what you just accurately outlined. Who the hell is trading in this abyss daily?

Even if the volumes are anemic. It seems like the MM’s are playing solitaire. I can understand the sells. But on what inspiration are the buys.

Remains a mystery to me.

I think it is a mistake to look at this company as a normal U.S. publicly held entity, with the bizzy school obectives of growth, profitability, and accountability to shareholders. That is not the reality we see every day, faithfully recorded in the numbers, as the Chinese make use of the brand and IP. Seems to me the objectives of the controlling interests are not in sync with Valencia and it's general shareholders. A better analysis would be to figure out just what the LL, the politburo, and the CCP are going to do about it.

I hope your daughter has a better outcome. Please keep us updated.

It’s probably a sign of my age. Growing up many years ago, it seems the products made and the technology available had more integrity back then.

A small example is the integrity of the landline phone vs the cellular phone, when used to communicate voice. Analog washers and dryers and dishwashers vs digital ones.

People today knowingly or unknowingly are forced to settle for less integrity in the name of advancing technology or customer service.

Heaven forbid one demands accountability. To do that you need to be either educated, rich or have luck if you are lucky enough to get through an automated system or a human being without tunnel vision to resolve an order or product issue.

The ring may have its faults. But it does appear they are trying their best to rectify those faults with a very friendly customer service policy overall to learn, improve and help build a good relationship with their customers.

Truly amazing, when you consider very few companies today, offer that type of service.

More stock authorized for financing activities? Looks like the company is gearing up. Hope those gears have liquid metal and don't rust.
On another related note. I bought my daughter an Evie ring.with the Black Week discount for $219...She should get the sizing kit in a few days. Should be interesting her experience with it.
The ring website is pretty good with good helpful instructions, and their marketing is impressive with automatic follow up. With the app one can download any new updates for the ring.
I like their exchange program as well. They seem to be doing things much better.

Read page three.

Okay what's this 10K all about?? https://liquidmetal.gcs-web.com/node/12076/html

Would be nice. There’s plenty to choose from…

https://www.liquidmetal.com/medical

Just scroll…

Christmas comes once a year. 

Eontec and others are expected to open CE markets incoming 2025 expansion.

We still have time for a Christmas surprise...maybe a birthday gift 1Q25.

My wife’s Fitbit charge 3 from 4 years ago started to not hold charges anymore and the led was too dim. Bought her a charge 6 this summer and the charge last 7 to 8 days. She wears it all of the time and the screen brightness is fantastic. The last charge was done Saturday and the charge as of this post is 53%.