QED Connect Inc (PK) (QEDN) News

Wonder no longer.

21,489,637 shares sold at $.0001.

The other 100,000 went at $.00015.

Wow..... 0.0002. Hmmm. I wonder if 0.0001 is right around the corner. Almost there.. We will soon be illiquid. Maybe kate can come out with a sacha inchi meme coin, that might get the stock price up... Trust me when I tell you, all your money is gone...

That was wise of her, since there are only a handful of days remaining to get the quarterlies submitted. Frankly, I doubt she make it.

However, the quarterlies are the least of shareholder's worries at this point.

So the website https://gmsacha.com/ is gone. QEDN touched 0.00025 the other day. Kate has gone missing. My guess. QEDN will go down to 0.0001. Become illiquid. And that will be it.

Replying to my question as to when the quarterlies would be out. She said end of month. She was very careful not to say what month.😀

And apparently, she didn't have anything noteworthy to say.

Was she replying to you or did she just contact you out of the blue?

Apparently.

I don't blame Mora. When I think about the spelling errors and randomness of her twitter posts, it makes sense.

That's a little hard to swallow. Putting Mora in as CEO doesn't make the management team bigger, as he was already COO. Now he's both? And Kate is not an officer at all.

Mora must have told Kate to stop posting on X. So now shareholders are more in the dark about what's not happening.

This is from December 6 2024
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GeIG7SJW8AAyX1v?format=jpg&name=900x900
https://x.com/profitiskey/status/1865060829537669366

So, she's still alive, is she?

I received an email from her yesterday.

Besides going dark on Twitter and the website being down, people used to be able to email Kate. I'm guessing that's a thing of the past, too? Or maybe people just don't care anymore and have given up?

I don't know if I'd go so far as to say that. But then, I wouldn't argue strongly against the possibility. Kate hasn't tweeted anything in a couple months, either. And nothing has been filed to get back to Current Info like she said she was in the process of doing. I wonder if her plan is to just to black.

Well, that's it. No more QEDN. Money gone....

Website is gone.

gmsacha.com
is parked free, courtesy of GoDaddy.com.
Get This Domain

Nuckin' Futs

Methinks she fibbed.

I can't understand why anyone would buy this stock at this time. Kate's gone silent since these last tweets of hers.

Nov 15, 2024
GMSacha Inchi #QEDN update on acquisition and sales coming soon

Oct 18, 2024
GMSacha Inchi $QEDN is on the brink of an exciting opportunity, engaging in advanced talks with a renowned healthy brand from a top-tier, multi-8-figure company. We are positioning ourselves for a significant partnership that could pave the way for a joint venture or a buyout.
·
Oct 14, 2024
GMSacha Inchi $QEDN Deal under review. More update toward end of the week. If and when the deal will go through it has the potential of big changes $QEDN #Aquisition #NDA #Stocks #OTC
·
Sep 16, 2024
GMSacha Inchi $QEDN is working with OTC Markets to post financial and be back to pink current ASAP

None of the above has happened and there's been no follow-up on any of them.

24 Civ. 2967 (JHR) (GS)

10-02-2024

JALANDHER BANDARI, Plaintiff, v. QED CONNECT, INC., NANNY KATHARINA BAHNSEN, and DAVID RUMBOLD, Defendants.

The Honorable Gary Stein United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

The Honorable Gary Stein United States Magistrate Judge

By his submission dated July 25, 2024, pro se Plaintiff Jalandher Bandari moves for an order permitting alternative service on Defendant Nanny Katharina Bahnsen (“Bahnsen”) via postal mail to her address in Medellin, Colombia. (Dkt. No. 30). Plaintiff's motion is DENIED as moot for the reasons below and the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to issue a certificate of default as to Bahnsen.

By way of background, on April 17, 2024, Plaintiff initiated this action for securities fraud against Bahnsen; QED Connect, Inc. (“QED”), a New York “pink sheets” corporation of which Bahnsen is the CEO; and David Rumbold (“Rumbold”), a QED note holder residing in Wyoming, Illinois. (Compl. (Dkt. No. 1) ¶¶ 4, 6, 8). Plaintiff submitted affidavits of service for all three Defendants on May 22, 2024. (Dkt. Nos. 12-14). According to the affidavits, QED and Rumbold were both served within the United States via hand delivery (see Dkt. Nos. 12 & 14), while the Complaint and summons were sent to Bahnsen at her address in Colombia via UPS mail (Dkt. No. 13). Attached to the affidavit of service for Bahnsen is a document with the UPS tracking number and a notation stating the shipment was received by Bahnsen on May 9, 2024. (Dkt. No. 13).

As none of the Defendants have appeared in this action or answered Plaintiff's Complaint to date, on June 21, 2024, Plaintiff requested the Clerk issue certificates of default as to each Defendant. (Dkt. Nos. 22, 23, 25, 26, 28, 29). The Clerk issued certificates of default as to QED and Rumbold. (Dkt. Nos. 24 & 27). However, after consulting with the undersigned, the Clerk declined to issue a certificate of default as to Bahnsen because “service was not properly effectuated; there is no order giving permission for alternate service (mail).” (See Dkt. Entry dated June 28, 2024). Thereafter, Plaintiff filed the instant motion for alternative service. (Dkt. No. 30).

Upon further review of the applicable law, it is evident that the Court need not authorize alternative service of Bahnsen, as service was properly effected upon her originally under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(f)(1). Service may be made on an individual in a foreign country under Rule 4(f)(1) “by any internationally agreed means of service that is reasonably calculated to give notice, such as those authorized by the Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents” (the “Hague Convention”). Article 10(a) of the Hague Convention “authorizes the use of ‘postal channels' to effectuate service on an international litigant” under the “[c]lear precedent of this Circuit.” Zamora v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 14 Civ. 5344 (WHP) (SN), 2017 WL 2954680, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. June 21, 2017) (quoting Art. 10(a) of the Hague Convention), R&R adopted, 2017 WL 2937683 (S.D.N.Y. July 10, 2017).

Colombia is a signatory to the Hague Convention and has not objected to Article 10(a). See, e.g., Zamora, 2017 WL 2954680, at *3 (“Colombia has not objected to the use of ‘postal channels' under Article 10(a)”); State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. LaRocca, No. 8:21 Civ. 2536 (SCB) (AEP), 2022 WL 19561965, at *2 (M.D. Fla. July 15, 2022) (“Because Colombia does not oppose Article 10(A), it does not oppose service of judicial documents by postal channel.”). Accordingly, courts have found service by mail on defendants in Colombia to be sufficient. See, e.g., Zamora, 2017 WL 2954680, at *3 (holding “service has been effected in satisfaction of Article 10(a)” where plaintiff used certified mail to send summonses and complaint to defendants' addresses in Colombia); Evergreen Shipping Agency (Am.) Corp. v. Glob. Shipping Agencies, No. Civ. 19-4958, 2019 WL 5901506, at *2 (D.N.J. Nov. 12, 2019) (finding plaintiff effected service by sending “the summons and Amended Complaint to Defendants at their principal place of business in Medellin, Colombia via DHL”).

See Zamora, 2017 WL 2954680, at *1; Status Table: Hague Convention, available at https://www.hcch net/en/instruments/conventions/status-table/?cid=17.

The same conclusion is warranted here. The affidavit submitted by Plaintiff states the summons and Complaint were mailed to Bahnsen at her Colombia address, includes a UPS tracking number, and confirms Bahnsen received the mailing. (Dkt. No. 13). That is sufficient to show Bahnsen was properly served in this action under Rule 4(f)(1) and Article 10(a) of the Hague Convention. And while court approval of alternative service is necessary under Rule 4(f)(3), service may be effected under Rule 4(f)(1) without court intervention. See, e.g., Wood v. Carl's, No. 2:20 Civ. 2329 (APG) (BNW), 2021 WL 4851090, at *1 (D. Nev. May 5, 2021) (“Plaintiff's motion seeks authorization to effect service upon [defendant] under Rule 4(f)(1). However, no such authorization is required.”); Reintegrative Therapy Ass'n, Inc. v. Kinitz, No. 3:21 Civ. 1297 (BEN) (BLM), 2021 WL 5140195, at *4 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2021) (“under the Hague Convention, a party may serve documents in several ways that would not require a court order under Rule 4(f)(1) because they are authorized by international agreement”).

Accordingly, Plaintiff's service of Bahnsen under Rule 4(f)(1) obviates the need for him to move for alternative service under Rule 4(f)(3). Plaintiff's motion (Dkt. No. 30) is therefore DENIED as moot. The Clerk is directed to issue a certificate of default as to Bahnsen for the reasons stated above, provided Plaintiff's pending application is otherwise proper. (See Dkt. Nos. 28 & 29).

SO ORDERED.

No tweets since late November and the website is gone as well.

Things are not looking good for shareholders.

I think someone attempted to initiate action for securities fraud against Kate Bahnsen; QED Connect, Inc on April 17 2024. I believe that's it for Kate. I think she has giving up. It does not look good for QEDN.

Bandari v. QED Connect, Inc.

GARY STEIN, United States Magistrate Judge: By his submission dated July 25, 2024, pro se Plaintiff Jalandher Bandari moves for an order permitting alternative service on Defendant Nanny Katharina Bahnsen (“Bahnsen”) via postal mail to her address in Medellin, Colombia. (Dkt. No. 30). Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED as moot for the reasons below and the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to issue a certificate of default as to Bahnsen.

It's not. No brokerage firm would complete a trade for such a low amount. You'd have to buy 34 shares for it to amount to even a penny trade.

It's most likely either an MM completing a trade that was split up or MMs working together to even out an odd lot position they hold.

But you'd probably get a better answer if you talked to your broker.

We traded one share today. How is that even possible?

We're saved boys. Someone traded 40 dollars worth of QEDN, now we're at 0.0004.

Today's lone trade of 50 shares at $.0003 is a penny and a half.

Soon. QEDN will be 0.0001. And watch it be a 100 share trade, Essentially, a one penny trade.

And here's that "soon" again.

Sep 3
GMSacha Inchi $QEDN submitted the required documents to OTC. $QEDN should be back to pink current soon

"ASAP". Another word Kate doesn't know the meaning of.

Sep 16
GMSacha Inchi $QEDN is working with OTC Markets to post financial and be back to pink current ASAP

"Soon". That tweet was from almost a month ago.

And the original announcement was from almost two months ago.

GMSacha Inchi $QEDN
@GMSachaInchi
GMSacha Inchi #QEDN update on acquisition and sales coming soon
7:01 AM · Nov 15, 2024
·
1,957
Views https://x.com/GMSachaInchi/status/1857408586726494639

And still, shareholders wait.

Oct 18
GMSacha Inchi $QEDN is on the brink of an exciting opportunity, engaging in advanced talks with a renowned healthy brand from a top-tier, multi-8-figure company. We are positioning ourselves for a significant partnership that could pave the way for a joint venture or a buyout.

Nov 15
GMSacha Inchi #QEDN update on acquisition and sales coming soon

Yep. New low. No one knows if Kate is the CEO. No announcements. No nothing. Just stock price going down.

QEDN hit a new one year low today.

I'm thinking Christmas will come first.

Which will come first. The acquisition or financials finally posted at OTC Markets?

Place your bets.

GMSacha Inchi $QEDN
@GMSachaInchi
·
Nov 15
GMSacha Inchi #QEDN update on acquisition and sales coming soon

GMSacha Inchi $QEDN
@GMSachaInchi
·
Oct 14
GMSacha Inchi $QEDN Deal under review. More update toward end of the week. If and when the deal will go through it has the potential of big changes

GMSacha Inchi $QEDN
@GMSachaInchi
·
Aug 19
QED Connect $QEDN shareholders we are working with OTC to post our financial disclosure ASAP and we should be back to pink current short thank you for all the support

"Spaceship Superstar"

Only if you're a starship captain.

Q.....
A Force to Be Reckoned With.

Nothing but posts from 2021 and 2022.

https://x.com/GMSachaInchi 1st

But the original post doesn't appear on the company's page does it?

On top comment on X... 3 comments under Homer digging a hole...🙂 https://x.com/GMSachaInchi/status/1857408586726494639

Where did you see that? Can you post a link? As I posted earlier, I don't see any tweets after 2022.

GMSacha Inchi $QEDN
@GMSachaInchi
·
Nov 15
GMSacha Inchi #QEDN update on acquisition and sales coming soon. ??

What's not clear is which came first, the CEO designation or Morales's bio. I would expect the latter since I saw it long ago. Designating him as CEO is new.

The company actually has a password to access their OTC Market page to enter information. OTC Market personnel doesn't decide who is put in as CEO. Is it a mistake? Possibly. But it would be Kate's mistake. Somebody could notify her of it and see if it is a mistake. Or not. If I were more curious, I'd contact her. But I'm not.

Seems pretty clear...

Has anyone noticed that all tweets from the past 2 years have been removed from the company's Twitter page?

It's always so complicated with Kate

Perhaps. Unless you click on the drop down, you'd have to go with what it shows.

Company Officers & Contacts
Carlos Andres Mora Morales CEO

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/QEDN/profile

But COO does make more sense.