ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for tools Level up your trading with our powerful tools and real-time insights all in one place.
Voip Pal Com Inc (QB)

Voip Pal Com Inc (QB) (VPLM)

0.0083
0.00065
( 8.50% )
Updated: 11:48:05

Empower your portfolio: Real-time discussions and actionable trading ideas.

VPLM News

Official News Only

VPLM Discussion

View Posts
ORCA ORCA 18 minutes ago
I TOLD YOU WHEN IT WAS AT .005.BTW CLOSING THIS YEAR WITH AROUND $260,000.00 NET PROFITS IN TRADING MY PENNY STOCKS.ON VPLM I MADE A LOT CHICKEN TRIOS.BUT ON VDRM I MADE A LUXURY CAR.
AND OTHER STOCKS.GOING TO 2025 HOPING I MAKE A HOUSE ON VPLM.BUT I NEED MORE SHARES.SELL.LMAO.
ORCA

Re: fung_derf post# 134298

Friday, December 06, 2024 10:33:38 AM

Post#
134299
of 134453
IF YOU THINK I AM GOING TO LOSE MONEY HERE THEY ARE LYING TO YOU.MY SMALL BUYS???LMAOOOOOO
THE LOWER SHE GOES THE MORE MONEY I WILL MAKE.THE SAME HAPPENED WITH VDRM.THEY TOOK HER TO .0025.I WAS LAUGHING MY A$$ OFF.NEXT THING YOU KNOW IT HITS .014.ORCA HAD 20 MILLION SHARES.I BANKED BIG.THE SAME WILL HAPPEN HERE.IMO.REMEMBER ORCA LOVES THE STOCKS TO KEEP GOING LOWER AND LOWER.SO I CAN KEEP ADDING.THE LOWER THE BETTER.NO ONE TRADES LIKE ME.
THEY ARE FALLING IN THE HOLE WITH BOTH FEET.LOL.I WANT TO SEE HOW THEY WILL GET OUT.LMAOOO
👍️0
ORCA ORCA 23 minutes ago
lmaooooooooo.jealous little jelly bean.I want my Chicken Trios.BTW IS STILL TAX SELLING SEASON.THUS WE ARE NOT MUCH HIGHER.THE SCAMBAGS THE MMs TRYING HARD TO SHAKE OUT LONGS.I WANT THEM TO LET ME KNOW HOW MANY MILLIONS THEY WANT TO SELL.I ONLY HAVE A 3 MILLION BID.IN ALL DAY.BUT IF THEY WANT TO SELL MORE I CAN TRIPLE IT:))))LIKE I SAID WHEN IT WAS AT .005s.

ORCA

Re: ORCA post# 134309

Monday, December 09, 2024 11:49:29 PM

Post#
134313
of 134453
ORCA KEEPS LOADING.KEEP THEM COMING LIONS.LET ME KNOW IF YOU WANT TO SELL A BIG BLOCK 5 MILLION AND UP.I WILL TAKE IT WITH ONE HIT.LET ME KNOW.VIA P.M

ORCA

Re: None

Monday, December 09, 2024 10:13:26 AM

Post#
134308
of 134453
I JUST GAVE A BUY ORDER FOR 5 MILLION AT .004.SELLERS DO NOT WASTE YOUR STUPID TIME WITH 100K AND 200K. SELLS.COME ON A LITTLE LOWER AND FILL THE 5 MILLION AND RELAX.THEN I WOULD LIKE 10 MILLION AT .003,THEN 30 MILLION AT .002.AND 100 MILLION AT .001.GET TO WORK MFs,
VPLM
VOIP-PAL COM INC
Open
Buy 5,000,000 Limit $0.004 Day
- $0.0056 $0.006 $0.006 $0.006 10:08 AM 12/09/2024
👍️0
fung_derf fung_derf 1 hour ago
Since I've never been a market maker, I'm not sure how it works. However, a good enough chance any of them need to clean up their books each year, so would have to buy shares to cover their position to close out their gain?
This might explain the temporary move up in price.
Be careful for what 2025 might bring as the plays resume.
Also keep in mind there is someone posting on here they want shares to close out as well.
Makes me sick to see him making money off of you all, but I've tried to warn you hundreds of times.
👍️0
Seriously folks Seriously folks 3 hours ago
DB….yes, thank you sooo much for all of your insightfulness and valuable information!
Not quite sure where we’d be without you!
👍️ 4
nyt nyt 4 hours ago
What's better than watching paint dry? Come to vplm and watch you money disappear!

(added christmas/new years bonus:)
Cases getting dismissed...
Super lawyers bombing out...
Rocket Docket turns into a rock at the end of a dock...
Platform headed back to pink...
Perpetual subpenny...
Silly monopoly/antitrust suits that are a farce...
Buy one get one avacados til new years...
👍️0
chazzy1 chazzy1 5 hours ago
Thanks DB! Merry Christmas and Happy Hanukkah to you, the VoIP-Pal team, and to all VPLM longs. Perhaps 2025 will be a most significant year for all VPLM shareholders. I am more optimistic than ever about the direction of our country, and believe that justice will ultimately smile upon VPLM. GLTA!
👍️ 4
ORCA ORCA 13 hours ago
HEY GUYS I NEED CHEAP SHARES.SO I CAN FLIP FOR MY CHICKEN TRIOS.
👍️0
keepemcloser keepemcloser 13 hours ago
DB,thanks for your in depth analysis of court cases and possibilities.
 Is there any chance you could discuss the current developments of VOIPPAL with the new" consultants " on the board and what they are actually doing as to why they have been given such a huge amount of stock for " consulting & advising the others on the BOD  vs that are also being paid for either same or similar services.
Seeing as us regular shareholders have to pay for our shares could you possibly share any information with us?
👍 2
DeerBalls DeerBalls 20 hours ago
$.00765 So, where are we? This is how I see it:

We will see a service of one or both of the anti-trust/class-action, anti-trust cases soon. I think VPLM has until about the 25th of Jan. to serve, but won't wait near that long. If we don't see service soon, that would indicate to me there are formative chats taking place. What else could it mean?

As to the reconsideration: I feel it is very much worth waiting for and I do believe VPLM will prevail. We don't prevail, up the channel we go(appeal)! Lewis is on it!

We still have a huge case vs. amzn sitting in wait. I AM EXTREMELY OPTIMISTIC FOR LONGS! Most could have guessed!

Nothing here all that complex, but I understand with little news flow it is frustrating. That and the length of time things seem to take🤔

My thanks to Emil and the whole VPLM team!!!!!

Everyone enjoy your day/daz, Merry Christmas/Happy Hanukkah! Late gifts this week/next week? Hope so! Hang in there! 🦌🏀z signing out!
👍 10 💯 1
nyt nyt 21 hours ago
Happy Christmahannukwanzakah and merry Festiva for the rest of ya.

Bah humbug for The Arrogant One...
👍️0
Dontnosheet Dontnosheet 1 day ago
Merry Christmas everyone!!!
👍️ 3
nyt nyt 2 days ago
Vplm gonna be a rinky dinky stinky pinky once again cuz that's where it belongs as it's "best position ever!
👍️0
Dontnosheet Dontnosheet 2 days ago
Same nonsensical posts year after year. Can’t wait for them surprises.
👍️0
DeerBalls DeerBalls 2 days ago
$.00765 Merry Christmas...Happy Hanukkah! Looking forward to some real fun! 🚀🚀🚀

Need an ability to do more green bulls...🐃🐃🐃🍾
👍 15 💯 2
ORCA ORCA 3 days ago
I AM WAITING FOR YOUR SHARES.DROP THEM.
Jimmy Buffets Sister

Re: A deleted message

Thursday, December 12, 2024 12:55:26 PM

Post#
134338
of 134440
Not to worry ORCA, if no positive news comes prior to Dec 30 as I assume it won’t. You can buy my shares.
👍️0
nyt nyt 4 days ago
If they win the win the antitrust suit, will they take "monopoly money" for pymt?
👍️0
straightword straightword 5 days ago
They should hire Mickey Mouse because no one on this executive staff has made any progress with the c0ompany and the lawsuits. That is a FACT!!
👍️ 1
chazzy1 chazzy1 5 days ago
Rapz, thank you for yet another brilliannt post! All I can add is that VoIP-Pal needs to hire you! I certainly hope that Emil and Hudnell will study your advice and take it seriously, because I believe that you are on the right track.
Thanks again!
👍️ 8
rapz rapz 6 days ago
Waiting for the reconsideration hearing by Albright could be a waste of time!

VPLM should prepare to go to the Appeals Court and argue the MG patent case aggressively. Point out errors made by the District Court Judge viz. using a wrong precedent involving a statistical analysis of financial investments, missing the intrinsic evidence for ACRM (Access Code Request Message) as outlined in both of Mobile Gateway patents, and allowing UNSTATED CLAIMS from claim construction hearing. If VPLM wins in the Appeals Court the case will be remanded back to Albright.

Unfortunately Mr. Hudnell let himself sucked into trash arguments about the precedents like ABS Global and Salazar as well as semantics about how “a” could mean one or many. While he asserted that Albright could have erred in his judgment of non-infringement of VPLM Mobile Gateway patent, he drifted away from specific elements of a patent dispute, ignoring: Judge’s Scheduling order (due diligence of initial patent filing), claim construction, studying specific claims of 234 and 721 MG patents. This issue will be discussed later in another post.

In this post, we address the Wi-Fi calling issue used by VZ and TMUS to bamboozle the Judge Albright and others. Wi-Fi calling has been cited as an Anti Trust tool to suffocate ordinary calls relying on Wi-Fi network at home or elsewhere. It was similar to MSFT using Internet Explorer as a gatekeeper for MSFT users. Similarly DOJ is suing Google for the restricted use of its search engine.

VPLM and their legal team should study the following Wi-Fi calling cases.
1) A professor from a South Korean University invention won the case vs Verizon and T Mobile with help from a US firm KAIFI LLC (L&P). The case settled and infringement damages paid. Even AT&T settled and paid the damages earlier.
2) Second case was won by General Access Solutions in East Texas for damages of $847 millions!. Mr Hudnell and his legal team must study these cases and try win MG patent case, instead of getting side-tracked with Anti Trust and RICO cases.

Verizon Letter: (Exhibit A Case 1:24-cv-03051-RDM Document 1-2 Filed 10/25/24 Page 1 of 24)

A month ago a link to “Exhibit A” was posted on this forum. The Exhibit included a letter from attorneys working for Verizon with their comments on Verizon’s technology that are worth a review.
Quoting: (bottom section of page 6)
“…The claims of the patents asserted in the Mobile Gateway case required Verizon’s technology (questionable) to have an access code request message containing both a destination identifier and a location identifier. VoIP-Pal’s expert testified that asserted claims required a single message to contain both identifiers. At the conclusion of fact discovery, however, neither VoIP-Pal nor their expert could identify any Verizon access code request message that included both elements. Nonetheless, VoIP-Pal pressed on with its claim despite clear Federal Circuit law foreclosing its increasingly tortured positions. Judge Albright ultimately every one of VoIP-Pal’s infringement claims at an oral summary judgment hearing on July 9, 2024, with a written opinion docketed on July 29, 2024…”

Who are in the tortured positions? Verizon and T Mobile?

VERIZON AND T MOBILE CASES - Wi-Fi Calling
Verizon has been involved in several patent lawsuits and cases related to Wi-Fi calling,including:

CASE #1: VoIP-Pal
In 2021, VoIP-Pal filed a lawsuit against Verizon and other telecom companies, alleging that they blocked the emergence of a Wi-Fi calling market by tying the service to voice and text offerings. However, Verizon and T-Mobile won the case, with Judge Albright ruling that VoIP-Pal's patents did not describe the services that Verizon marketed.

In August 2024, VoIP-Pal.com filed an antitrust lawsuit against Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile, and Deutsche Telekom. The lawsuit claims that the companies have limited consumer choices and increased costs by tying Wi-Fi calling to voice and text services.

CASE #2:
https://www.theregister.com/2024/07/01/verizon_patents_ruling/
Verizon hit with a whopping $847M verdict for infringing 5G and hotspot patents.
Must be hard to face a huge, unexpected bill, amirite?
Jude Karabus, 1 Jul 2024
In one of the most massive patent verdicts in legal history, a federal jury in East Texas has ordered cellular giant Verizon to pay patent holder General Access Solutions $847 million. That's a $583 million "reasonable royalty" for infringing US Patent No 7,230,931 (the '931) patent, and $264 million for infringing the other, 9,426,794 ('794), a jury decided late last week.

Verizon banked a $12 billion profit in 2023, so the judgment represents seven percent of that annual income, or about 26 days of annual profit.

Dallas-based non-practicing entity General Access, which acquired the patents from original inventor Raze Technologies, claims elements of Verizon's 5G wireless networks, smartphone hotspots, wireless home routers, and MiFi devices violate its intellectual property.

(Verizon also has patents related to Wi-Fi calling, including:
US9906992B1: A patent on PDN management between LTE and Wi-Fi
US11039297B1: A patent on systems and methods for handover for user equipment that supports 5G standalone operation.)

According to the complaint, devices that infringe '794 include Wi-Fi home or office routers with cellular backhaul, Wi-Fi "hotspots," and even smartphones that have Wi-Fi hotspot functionality. Both patents were originally filed in 2001. (VPLM’s AntiTrust and RICO complaints)

It claims in the original complaint that Verizon's base station equipment infringes its '931 patent – to do with beamforming networks across cell sites – and that Verizon wireless devices that receive 4G and 5G cell signals infringe its '794 patent when they route information to mobile stations using 802.11 Wi-Fi comms protocols.

CASE #3:
Verizon and T-Mobile Sued For Infringing Wi-Fi Calling Patent
https://lawstreetmedia.com/news/tech/verizon-and-t-mobile-sued-for-infringing-wi-fi-calling-patent/

In 2020, KAIFI LLC filed a patent infringement complaint against Verizon and T-Mobile.

L&P Secures Positive Reexamination Outcome for Valuable “WiFi Calling” Patent
https://www.lpiplaw.com/news/2022/5/05/lampp-secures-positive-reexamination-outcome-for-valuable-wifi-calling-patent
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) has concluded two reexaminations of U.S. Patent No. 6,922,728 owned by KAIFI, LLC. The reexaminations were requested by T-Mobile and Verizon and then merged by the PTO’s Central Reexamination Unit (CRU). The reexamination certificates, issued today, confirmed the patentability of all claims. One dependent claim was amended, and all other claims were confirmed in their original form. T-Mobile and Verizon filed the reexamination requests after KAIFI had sued each company alleging that their WiFi calling feature infringed the ’728 Patent. Both parties (Verizon and T Mobile) have since settled with KAIFI, as did AT&T following an earlier lawsuit.
The ’728 Patent was invented by Dr. Dong-Ho Cho when he was a professor at the Korea Advanced Institute for Science and Technology (KAIST)…

Plaintiff KAIFI LLC, a self-described “intellectual property consulting company that promotes and manages intellectual property directed to telecommunications technologies,” filed complaints against Verizon, T-Mobile and other related entities for patent infringement on Friday in the Eastern District of Texas over their alleged use of Wi-Fi calling technology.
The patent-in-suit is United States Patent No. 6,922,728 (the '728 patent), “Optimal Internet Network Connecting and Roaming System and Method Adapted for User Moving Outdoors or Indoors.” The ’728 patent is “directed to an Internet network connecting and roaming system and method.” Specifically, “with the patented invention, voice and data communications may be seamlessly transitioned to a Wi-Fi network from an LTE network.” The plaintiff claimed that this “reduces load and congestion on cellular networks, reduces network costs, and increases voice and data communication coverage quality and range.”

KAIFI averred that Verizon and T-Mobile adopted this patented technology to “enable seameless (sic) voice and data communication services, including Defendants’ Wi-Fi calling” and other services. The plaintiff noted that Verizon began offering Wi-Fi calling in 2015. Verizon stated that its customers could “make and receive calls and initiate video calls over a Wi-Fi Internet connection…Once Advanced Calling is enabled, customers can activate Wi-Fi Calling.” T-Mobile allegedly made similar claims about its Wi-Fi Calling. According to Verizon, the call experience should be the same, except carried out over a Wi-Fi connection instead of a cellular connection. For example, “(i)f you have a Wi-Fi connection and are in an area where voice service is weak or unavailable, use Wi-Fi calling to continue making voice calls.” KAIFI alleged that Verizon’s and T-Mobile’s accused instrumentalities include “systems, networks, and components and services thereto used and controlled by Defendants for implementing seamless network transition, including off-loading to a customer’s home Wi-Fi network, (VPLM Anti Trust and RICO case) such as through their Wi-Fi Calling system and service, and include both native and third-party, over the top (OTT) voice and data applications,” which can be used to make a Wi-Fi call.
Specifically, Verizon is accused of infringing at least claim 1 of the patent-in-suit through its instrumentalities that include a wireless network, user mobile device, Wi-Fi Calling service, internet service, etc. to make the Wi-Fi call possible. The plaintiff proffered that Verizon utilized the patented technology to provide its Wi-Fi Calling service. As previously mentioned, a user can switch between a Wi-Fi and an Advanced Calling call. As described in the patent, Verizon’s Wi-Fi Calling service is comprised of a “data communication terminal,” namely, a mobile device that can connect to both Wi-Fi and a cellular network and stores both of the connecting information in the device, which can be evidenced through Auto Join, whereby the device recognizes the Wi-Fi network and auto joins said network. Verizon’s Wi-Fi Calling system also use an “indoor gateway,” which “may be any Wi-Fi access point, to connect to a Wi-Fi network and the internet via a wire, such as a…router, modem, or ‘hotspot.’” This helps to connect the phone to the Wi-Fi, thus allowing an individual to make a Wi-Fi call. Verizon’s Wi-Fi Calling system also allegedly takes advantage of location data to recognize and use networks, as described in the patent. (VPLM Anti Trust-RICO case) Thus, by using the patented system to create and allow users to have Wi-Fi Calling, Verizon has purportedly infringed the ’728 patent. The allegations against T-Mobile are similar to the claims against Verizon.

The plaintiff claimed that the defendants were notified of their infringement, but continue to infringe the ’728 patent in addition to not obtaining a license for this patent. KAIFI charged the defendants with direct, indirect and induced infringement.
KAIFI has sought declaratory judgment in its favor, an award for monetary relief, for the defendants to pay ongoing royalties, to enjoin defendants from further infringement, and other relief. The plaintiff is represented by Parker, Bunt & Ainsworth PC and LTL Attorneys LLP.

Summary Judgment Granted in Favor of L&P Client
https://www.lpiplaw.com/news/2023/07/19/summary-judgment-granted-in-favor-of-lp-client
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas today granted summary judgment in favor of Laurence & Phillips IP Law (L&P) client KAIFI LLC and against T-Mobile. T-Mobile brought the case to get out from under a settlement agreement T-Mobile entered into with KAIFI to resolve an infringement case concerning Kaifi’s U.S. Patent No. 6,922,728, which covers so-called “WiFi calling.” L&P had successfully represented KAIFI in two ex parte reexaminations of the ’728 Patent, which was fully confirmed by the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s (PTO’s) Central Reexamination Unit (CRU) during the reexaminations. In this latest suit, T-Mobile accused L&P partner Matt Phillips of inequitable conduct during the reexaminations, but the court’s summary-judgment ruling sided with KAIFI. Phillips remarked, “There was absolutely no merit in T-Mobile’s inequitable-conduct assertions,(T Mobile game - sounds familiar?) and today’s ruling appropriately puts those unpleasant and unfounded accusation behind us.”
https://www.lpiplaw.com/news/2022/5/05/lampp-secures-positive-reexamination-outcome-for-valuable-wifi-calling-patent

VZ cases and patents
Google search: verizon patents in wifi calling technology

Aspen Networks Inc.
In 2023, Aspen Networks filed a lawsuit against Verizon and T-Mobile, alleging that they infringed US Patent No. 8,009,554. The lawsuit claims that the companies incorporated protected technology into their networks without permission.This patent is related to technology that allows customers to switch from cellular service to Wi-Fi without dropping calls.
👍 4 👍️ 12 👏 4 💯 5 🤢 1
ORCA ORCA 6 days ago
WE HAVE TO MOVE ABOVE .01 VERY SOON.AND STAY THERE FOR 10 CONSECUTIVE TRADING DAYS.
ON 10TH OF Oct 2024 WE FELL TO 0.0091.AND NEVER SAW ABOVE ONE ALL THIS TIME.90 DAYS FROM OCTOBER 10TH AROUND JANUARY 10TH DUE DAY. AND WE HAVE TO BE ABOVE .01 BEFORE THAT.WE ONLY GOT A COUPLE WEEKS.DAMN I AM HOPING WE WILL NOT FALL TO PINKS.RULES BELOW.

B. In the event that the Company’s bid price falls below the minimum criteria established in
Section 2.1 (A), the Company will receive a cure period of 90 calendar days, during which time
the Company’s securities must maintain a minimum closing bid price of $0.01 per share for 10
consecutive trading days.
C. If the closing bid price falls below $0.001 at any time for five (5) consecutive trading days, the
Company’s security will be removed from OTCQB effective immediately.
👍 1
VVVVVV VVVVVV 6 days ago
nyt, the process was to irritate you and you fell for it! LMAO
👍 8 💯 1
nyt nyt 6 days ago
For those of you, who take the whole anti trust monopoly case seriously, lol....oh, and I know you're out there... let's hear how you use wifi calling as your exclusive calling vehicle. I really want to hear all about how you accomplish it... No back pedaling now....its the heart of the antitrust case......you know..... how we're all being ripped off and taken advantage of because the big dogs are raking in big, undeserved profits, since they have the ability to switch customers calls back and forth between cellular and wifi. I wanna hear from you high IQ peeps who beat them at their game by using ONLY wifi for your calling. Stand up and be counted!
👍️0
nyt nyt 6 days ago
It's not that the industry and public at large are unaware of Vplm. It's just that their whole trip is so embarrassing, they just see no need to go there. It's been stupidly ridiculed in the past, but if Vplm had really wanted global attention at least from the industry and investment circles, they could have and should have attended some of the many technical worldwide conferences where they could've easily made their product well known and even demonstrated. They purposely CHOSE to never attend any of them because they never truly wanted to sell the patents because they knew they would never be able to. By the way, maybe one of you smarties can post the announcement made by vplm that they were pulling the plug, 100%, on what they spent between 2 and 3 yrs announcing and detailing to shareholders, potential shareholders and anyone interested.....you know....the infamous Chang lies of the century and instead are putting company up for sale. Lemme know when you find that. I'd like to frame it...
Of course it doesn't exist. The whole 50 ring circus has been nothing but a humongous effort to divert your attention away from the true game. We all know what the true game is and how successful it's been!
👍️ 1
nyt nyt 6 days ago
Watch for the MMs to momentarily manipulate to a penny or above, so as to avoid being sent back to the pink corner.
👍️0
nyt nyt 6 days ago
As I said.... YOU HAVE TO UNDERSTAND THE PROCESS. You might want to read my past posts on the matter... You can never "touch" the next integer, regardless of going up or down. Of course I've never said otherwise. Those with good reading comprehension already know that. All been detailed...

You might also look for my posts on "baiting", the tactic of small men...

Incidently, you only "think" you baited me... The gray matter challenges you possess kept you from reading between the lines as to who did what. I understand and allow for that deficit.

Happy CHRISTMAHANNUQUANZACA😎
👍️0
VVVVVV VVVVVV 6 days ago
nyt, you were just baited and you fell for it, hook, line and sinker!! LMAO
👍️ 7 💯 1
nyt nyt 6 days ago
Not even close to touching a penny. You must learn to understand the process...
See my previous posts that explained and detailed the math. You can never touch the next whole number as decimals can always be added (at least up to whatever limit otc allows).
👍️0
VVVVVV VVVVVV 6 days ago
It’s touching a penny!!!!!!
👍️ 5 💯 1
straightword straightword 6 days ago
Where's the .85 that you've been predicting for the last year? LOL!!
👍️0
fung_derf fung_derf 7 days ago
The truly disgusting this is that, if you all didn't have money in this mess, you'd see the CEO for the vile person he is. He's the next door neighbor who sues you if your tree hangs over his fence or your dog barks.
I want to see him put out a PR stating the shareholders will equally divide any funds collected from a class action suit, or any suit for that matter.
Right now its just a stall tactic to get someone to buy his shares.
You all should really be ashamed of yourselves for your greed. Soon enough you'll see its just another pump and dump moment.
👍️0
Str8t-talk Str8t-talk 7 days ago
Got a bit peeved with trial cancellations, but this latest development seems to TRUMP individual cases and gets straight to it. Looking forward to next few weeks!
👍 3
nyt nyt 7 days ago
Now ya see it, now ya don't... This whole crazy thing is nothing more than an emu created DIVERSIONARY TACTIC! It's designed to divert attention from the huge steaming pile that is Vplm and all it's doings. Don't forget that he was found guilty of breach of fiduciary duty and unjust personal enrichment BY A JURY OF HIS PEERS. He had numerous failures in the past but learned ea time how to keep the farce alive. Hey Malak.....there are some ppl who want to make a sizable donation to your cancer research company, you know, the one you founded.....but they cannot seem to locate that cancer research company anywhere on the face of the globe. Hey Malak....why/how did you convince every newspaper out there to say you founded Vplm.......when you certainly did not? Hey Malak....where do you get off claiming to be an inventor? I know you invent lies daily but aside from that, what did you actually ever invent? I know you invent Vancouver class schemes, but what actual inventions did you create and patent? And while you're at it, please show us the official results of the worldwide nodal testing of the core patents. Inquiring minds would not only like to see but fully deserve to see..
Why do you claim to be the leader of the voip industry......when you have no followers?

People with keen common sense should be able to understand that this whole anti trust, monopoly thing is nothing but pure, unadulterated bull. There is no monopoly. It will be laughed out of court just as soon as you quit playing musical complaints (making them, then recinding, then remaking and refiling, et al). It's beyond fallacious. It's plain silly. There are 4 big dog carriers, recently down to 3 because Sprint was acquired. But there is at least one other company, I can't think of their name at the moment, but very well known, who are approx 75% independant, having built their 5g network from the ground up and the other 25% or so exists as MVNOs. I'll see if I can remember and post who they are, but that makes close to 4 biggies. In addition, there are I don't know how many MVNOs. While the generally just rent tower space and signal bandwidth, they are still individual companies who provide a variety of different services and prices. They are seperate legitimate cell companies such as visible, now defunct Yahoo mobile, and many others. All that above means CHOICES! Choices of services, service levels, pricing, prepaid, postpaid, wideband, 4g, 5g, etc etc etc. And they have various differences in geographical coverage. THAT IS NOT THE SIGNS OF A MONOPOLY! THAT IS NOT THE SIGNS OF ANTI TRUST. THAT IS the signs of diversity and HEALTHY
COMPETITION! Healthy competition which has resulted in not only every imaginable choice of services and phone deals, but the so called antitrust/monopoly "case" has, as it's main claim, that the consumers are being ripped off for what they pay. That's more bullshit piled on. Cell service has, because of the healthy competition, become over the years, cheaper and cheaper and cheaper! It is now very easy to get unlimited everything for $25 per month incl all taxes and fees and it's truly unlimited. No throttling. and that includes a Hotspot to boot! That.....is not the result of a monopoly. It's the result of competition!

Additionally, re: the matter of monopoly, and what a farce of an excuse it is to divert attention from the pickpocketing of Vplm, it's also ridiculous to make the claim about wifi calling. 1st of all, the friggin emu is now, out of the blue, for the 1st time ever, claiming that he and Vplm INVENTED WiFi calling. YES, HE IS INDEED MAKING THAT CLAIM IN NO UNCERTAIN TERMS! Just read his latest crap. Vplm did not invent wifi calling nor have I ever heard them claim to offer wifi, but that's what that lying emu is now saying... Furthermore, the whole idea of wifi calling, in terms of offering that as a seperate cheaper calling plan IS NO LESS THAN LUDICROUS! NO ONE WOULD EVER BE ABLE TO DEPEND ON OR USE WIFI CALLING AS THEIR PLAN, unless they were perpetually homebound. Wifi is only good for extremely short distance. In other words, it would be stupid to have a calling plan that did not include BOTH cellular and wifi. I doubt there is a single person here who uses wifi as their exclusive only signal to use for calling. Wifi calling, as it's own plan, makes no sense whatsoever, unless you are confined to your home always or a Mcdonalds parking lot.

And yet, the suit actually has the balls to claim customers are being ripped off by not being offered a plan with wifi only calling. Plain stupid.

Fact of the matter is that I posted the exact same points weeks ago BEFORE I read the MOFOs piece. When I finally did get to it, courtesy of Suns... I saw that they madeTHE EXACT SAME POINTS that I did about this debacle and they are lawyers.
👍️0
ORCA ORCA 1 week ago
I AM WAITING TO SEE MY BIDS GET FILLED:)))ITS ONLY AROUND 3 MILLION.HIT THEM AND TAKE THE MONEY.
👍️0
nyt nyt 1 week ago
That's right....as well as all the numerous previous ones....you know, the so called "op-eds". But most of all, it's not publicity for a bona fide Co, it's publicity for the big farce. It's how they raise cash to continue. The big, mean green, fiat share printing/selling machine w/optional insider ATM attachment.........gets hungry. Need to feed... Like the orange guy, when lord emu's lips are moving, he's lying. It's just another one of his Avatar and Grandville hotel plays. He knows how to wind yall up, but the ending is same as past 27 yrs.
👍️ 1
ORCA ORCA 1 week ago
WOW.VERY SERIOUS NEWS.AND READ BOLD PART.VERY SOON.VoIP-Pal CEO Emil Malak reassured shareholders that the strategic focus on antitrust and RICO claims is the most efficient path to address the harm caused by the defendants. “While patent litigation remains ongoing in Waco, Texas, we believe this approach offers the quickest and most effective route to justice,” Malak stated. “Our goal is to hold Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile, their directors, and key management accountable through the judicial process, restore fair competition in the mobile telephone communications industry, and drive shareholder value. We are working diligently to ensure that the defendants are served soon, with the goal of doing so before the end of the year.”
👍 2
traderking60 traderking60 1 week ago
VoIP-Pal Announces Filing of Amended Complaint in Antitrust and RICO Lawsuit
Press Release | 12/19/2024
WACO, Texas, Dec. 19, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- VoIP-Pal.com Inc. (OTCQB: VPLM) today announced the filing of an amended complaint to the original complaint filed in October 2024, in Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-03051-RDM, currently pending in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. This latest filing represents a significant escalation in the company’s legal efforts to address alleged antitrust violations, breaches of federal law, and racketeering activities that VoIP-Pal believes have caused harm to the company.

The amended complaint names Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile, along with several of their directors and members of their management teams, as defendants. "Our amended complaint builds on our commitment to seeking justice for the harm VoIP-Pal has endured due to alleged antitrust violations and other unlawful practices," said Emil Malak, CEO of VoIP-Pal. "By incorporating RICO claims, we are addressing not just the alleged monopolistic and exclusionary conduct we believe the defendants engaged in, but it also alleges systemic violations and coordinated actions that have targeted our company."

VoIP-Pal CEO Emil Malak reassured shareholders that the strategic focus on antitrust and RICO claims is the most efficient path to address the harm caused by the defendants. “While patent litigation remains ongoing in Waco, Texas, we believe this approach offers the quickest and most effective route to justice,” Malak stated. “Our goal is to hold Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile, their directors, and key management accountable through the judicial process, restore fair competition in the mobile telephone communications industry, and drive shareholder value. We are working diligently to ensure that the defendants are served soon, with the goal of doing so before the end of the year.”

Malak highlighted the importance of the filing as a step toward achieving accountability. "This legal action is not just about VoIP-Pal; it’s about holding powerful corporations accountable for practices that harm innovation, competition, and fairness in the telecommunications industry. We are confident that this expanded approach will demonstrate the strength of our case."

The amended complaint outlines detailed allegations, including:

Antitrust Violations: Claims of tying arrangements, exclusionary practices, and monopolistic control that have suppressed VoIP-Pal’s ability to compete.
RICO Claims: Allegations of coordinated racketeering activities, including fraudulent misrepresentation, deceptive practices, and systemic exclusion of VoIP-Pal from the market.
Harm to Consumers: The impact of these actions on market competition and millions of smartphone users across the United States.
"Filing this amended complaint marks a pivotal moment in our pursuit of justice," Malak added. "It reflects our commitment to protecting our shareholders, upholding the rule of law, and ensuring a level playing field in the telecommunications sector."

Additionally, a new article and interview with CEO Emil Malak has been published on CEOCFO Magazine, providing additional insights into VoIP-Pal's strategy. The article can be accessed here: https://www.ceocfointerviews.com/voippalantitrust121824.html.

About VoIP-Pal.com Inc.
VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. (“VoIP-Pal”) is a publicly traded corporation (OTCQB: VPLM) headquartered in Waco, TX. The company owns a portfolio of patents related to Voice-over-Internet Protocol (“VoIP”) technology that it is currently looking to monetize.

Forward-Looking Statements
Any forecast of future financial performance is a “forward-looking statement” under securities laws. Such statements are included to allow potential investors to understand management’s beliefs and opinions with respect to the future, but patent litigation involves various risks and uncertainties that could affect the company’s ability to monetize its patents. It is impossible to predict specific outcomes of litigation.

Corporate Website: www.voip-palusa.com
IR inquiries: IR@voip-pal.com
IR Contact: Rich Inza (954) 495-4600



Primary Logo
👍️ 11
Spyke37 Spyke37 1 week ago
Thanks Nick, I looked into it more yesterday as well and found that out. Still, if the basic facts are true, such as the state damages etc., it would seem that this whole story can't be hidden for long. It will be interesting to see what happens the next few weeks. RICO is pretty serious.
👍️ 8
nyt nyt 1 week ago
Hardly. You did for sure.
👍️0
Str8t-talk Str8t-talk 1 week ago
How can this not be NATIONAL or even GLOBAL news? It's MASSIVE and DISRUPTIVE to the entire industry.
👍️ 6
ThePieMan ThePieMan 1 week ago
Any news from the company, even if paying for it, is good. When we watch tv, listen to the radio, read ad's in papers, etc., we are listening to a company trying to get their message out. So that article is helpful no matter the reach.
👍 7 💯 1
Nick Papagiorgio Nick Papagiorgio 1 week ago
Unfortunately this is just a standard pay-for-exposure deal, but they likely don't have any real reach ….. company paid for this exclusive interview
👍️0
VVVVVV VVVVVV 1 week ago
258 page filing out.

Who can answer this simple question? “How does all of this go away, if these defendants settle with VPLM”?

All this tells me, is there’s nothing imminent, unless there’s someone else behind all of this. And or, the reconsideration comes back in VPLM’s favor.

IMHO
👍️ 2
chazzy1 chazzy1 1 week ago
CuriousAccountant, I see no reason not to remain bullish about VPLM. I would caution you not to read anything nefarious into the fact that VP hired a former law clerk of Judge Albright. After all, this is public information which was announced through a press release and in an SEC filing back around August, 2024. There are many legitimate reasons why having a person of this background would be useful to VP. One such reason may be to assist VP in better understanding exactly what a district court judge's standards may be, what criteria is he looking for from the plaintiff. In other words, what threshold must be met by the plaintiff from a judge's perspective. I'm sure that there are many other perfectly valid reasons as well, but I feel certain that if some conflict of interest existed, the former clerk would abstain from advising VP on the case. JMHO.
👍️ 2
DesktopDR DesktopDR 1 week ago
I don't see it to be a conflict of interest with the former law clerk working for VPLM. Now if the law clerk was still the Judges law clerk and had loads of VPLM stock, that would be a conflict of interest.
👍️ 2
meddoyeddo meddoyeddo 1 week ago
There is likely a time limit to prohibit the former clerk from working on cases involving judge Albright. And if he had no prior knowledge of this case, that time limit may not apply.
👍️ 2
CuriousAccountant CuriousAccountant 1 week ago
“ Thanks also for reminding us that Albright's former law clerk now works for VP. This relationship could prove to be invaluable to VP on multiple levels.”

I am generally bullish on VOIP-PAL but this kind of action seems wrong. As a former court officer, wouldn’t the law clerk be conflicted from providing info or working on the voip case?
👍️0
Str8t-talk Str8t-talk 1 week ago
Is this statement true? Don't believe it's been in any of the filings.
VoIP-Pal is actively developing the next phase of Wi-Fi calling technology, which we believe will be transformative for the industry. Our technology could become the carriers' best ally in adapting to the evolving telecommunications landscape.
👍️ 2
Spyke37 Spyke37 1 week ago
Boy, it would be fabulous if somehow this article got into the mainstream conscience. I don't know how this can be ignored. Now I get why the brass at VPLM are excited. It would also be interesting to see if they have announced any of this to their shareholders as it has the potential to be a VERY material event. Not announcing it could be highly frowned upon by shareholders and the SEC. Does anyone know if this lawsuit or the threat of it has reached the light of day in the Verizon, T-Mobile world?
👍 6
Str8t-talk Str8t-talk 1 week ago
I did read it..Thank you DB for posting it....10Q's & K's should be coming out soon. Another thought was heck, State Farm advertises Bundle & Save. Guess they're next up. I just hope there is more transparency going forward. It's a huge hill to climb, but sometimes the little dogs can chase the big dogs away with a nasty bark!
👍 4
InvestorinAZ InvestorinAZ 1 week ago
Did you read the article DB posted? Holy cow, this is serious stuff!
I noticed Emil talked about his personal SAFETY being at risk.
Guess he figures if he puts it out there in the public, if anything happens to him, it will point to his adversaries.
Man!! That's scary stuff!

I wondered the same thing about "wouldn't someone else just take up the lawsuit?"
What would happen if one of the alleged infringers bought out the company (not just the patents)?

Be sure to read the Q&A with Emil in the article.
He seems quite confident that a "settlement" was still very much a possibility, in fact that's the ONLY reason they pursued this course, not for vengeance, but to force them to take him seriously and come to the table. There must still be a "table" to come to then.

Like DB, I am VERY optimistic about this plan they have.
As usual, it's a game of wait and see, but I think we are in the strongest position we've ever been in.
Boy, I really give Emil credit for being the stubborn pit bull he is.
👍️ 8