Voip Pal Com Inc (QB) (VPLM) Share Price

If you have, it sounds like they don't think that much of your take on things seeing how all of those "criminals" are still running free.

$.0075 Not tons of trading in VPLM, yesterday, nor yet today, but an underlying bid is out there. Yesterday, most of the day the combined, near inside, bids were 1.5mm+. Is the 🚀🚀🚀 fueling? Things look to be turning...

Sorry, just looked again and the bids, $.007/ $.0075 combined, are near 2.5mm...GIDDY UP!

INZA et al v. AT&T INC. et al
District Of Columbia District Court
Judge: Randolph D Moss
Case #: 1:24-cv-03054
Nature of Suit 410 Other Statutes - Antitrust
Cause 15:1 Antitrust Litigation
Case Filed: Oct 25, 2024
Docket
Parties (58)
Docket last updated: 6 hours ago
Wednesday, May 21, 2025
47 cmp Request for Summons to Issue Wed 05/21 2:26 PM
REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by MICHAEL INZA, RICHARD INZA, RAY LEON, VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.(Pittman, John)

—

VOIP-PAL.COM, INC v. AT&T INC. et al
District Of Columbia District Court
Judge: Randolph D Moss
Case #: 1:24-cv-03051
Nature of Suit 410 Other Statutes - Antitrust
Cause 15:1 Antitrust Litigation
Case Filed: Oct 25, 2024
Docket
Parties (54)
Docket last updated: 6 hours ago
Wednesday, May 21, 2025
47 cmp Request for Summons to Issue Wed 05/21 2:23 PM
REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.(Pittman, John)

—-


A "request for summons to issue" is a formal request made to a court (like the clerk's office) to issue a summons, which is a legal document notifying a defendant that a lawsuit has been filed against them. Essentially, it's the plaintiff's (the one filing the lawsuit) way of initiating the process of notifying the defendant that they are being sued and are required to respond within a specific timeframe.

Here's a breakdown of what it involves:

1. Filing a Complaint:
The process begins when a complaint (a document outlining the reasons for the lawsuit) is filed with the court.

2. Requesting the Summons:
The plaintiff or their attorney then requests the court to issue a summons to accompany the complaint.

3. Summons Issued:
The court clerk's office will issue the summons, which includes information about the lawsuit and the defendant's obligations.

4. Service of Summons:
The summons, along with the complaint, is then served on the defendant, officially notifying them of the lawsuit.

Who says I haven't?

If what you assert is true, why haven’t you been to the SEC and the FBI?

Other than understanding the meaning of “waiver” in this situation, what would get you out of this ring of hell that has you insisting that satisfactory service has not been executed?

And we wait for the multiple recommendations for posts that misstate the truth.

Unlike everything else about VPLM, we're never let down by that.

Yeah, I read that.

VPLM are lying again.

They haven't served any of the any of the Defendants. As you know.

Agreed! There’s nothing else to be said, when everything has been said and done.

VPLM pulled off an ingenious move, when they filed this second amended complaint at the last minute. This caught the defendants by surprise. That wasn’t a curveball, it was a knuckleball. That was a game changer. The timing of the Google case on April 17th, one week prior to our service date, was unbelievable timing. Not too sure if it was a strategic move to space out the complaints or not but, the defendants can’t be too happy about it.

LMAO

One just has to read pages 10-20 of the filing and it’ll give a better understanding of the strong position VPLM has put themselves in.

IMHO

Now we wait for the illogical refutes

$.007 VoIP-Pal Affirms Court Acceptance of Second Amended Complaint and Service upon Defendants in Federal Antitrust and RICO Lawsuit

2025-05-13 08:00 ET - News Release


WACO, Texas, May 13, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- VoIP-Pal.com Inc. (OTCQB: VPLM) announced that the United States District Court for the District of Columbia has granted its motion for leave to enter its Second Amended Complaint as the operative pleading in its ongoing federal antitrust and RICO action against AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile. Additionally, VoIP-Pal confirms they have served all Defendants through their legal counsel by the previously extended court deadline of April 23, 2025.

Following the effecting timely service and satisfactorily responding to the Court’s procedural inquiry, the Honorable Judge Randolph D. Moss issued an order on May 7, 2025, vacating the prior show-cause deadline and discharging the associated order.

Defendants now have until June 22, 2025, to respond to VoIP-Pal’s operative complaint, which alleges violations of the RICO statutes, the Sherman and Clayton Antitrust Acts, and Section 251 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, based on alleged coordinated conduct among Defendants aimed at excluding VoIP-Pal and other potential competitors from the mobile voice-routing market. If RICO violations are proven, liability could extend to all named Defendants involved in the alleged enterprise.

VoIP-Pal will continue to provide updates as the case proceeds through the next phase of litigation.

About VoIP-Pal.com Inc.
VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. (“VoIP-Pal”) is a publicly traded corporation (OTCQB: VPLM) headquartered in Waco, TX. The company owns a portfolio of patents related to Voice-over-Internet Protocol (“VoIP”) technology that it is actively seeking to monetize.

Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements as defined under securities laws. These statements reflect management’s current expectations and are inherently uncertain. Litigation outcomes and settlement discussions are unpredictable, and there is no assurance of favorable resolution.

For Further Information
Corporate Website: www.voip-palusa.com
IR Inquiries: IR@voip-pal.com
IR Contact: Rich Inza, (954) 495-4600


So, just to get this straight on the service "question": I'm lying, VPLM'S LYING(in the media, no less), Emil's lying, Rich is, on and on, about lawsuits in Federal Court? The only one telling the truth is MINstein???

Not to be confused with Repetitive Untruth Syndrome, for example claiming that the Defendants have been served, when they haven't.


https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/05/13/3080061/0/en/VoIP-Pal-Affirms-Court-Acceptance-of-Second-Amended-Complaint-and-Service-upon-Defendants-in-Federal-Antitrust-and-RICO-Lawsuit.html

$.007 RUT-ROH: This can't hurt the VPLM cases vs. vz/t/tmus...

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/05/21/congress/exclusive-phone-companies-failed-to-warn-senators-about-surveillance-wyden-says-00361400

Zero interest in this garbage, well expect for the multiple personalities of one here. LMAO!!

Heavens to Murgatroyd, DeerBalls, watch out for that RSI*!

You'd be no use to VPLM if you recommending finger got injured through overuse!

*Repetitive Strain Injury. Not to be confused with Repetitive Untruth Syndrome, for example claiming that the Defendants have been served, when they haven't.

You're not the Bellman from The Hunting of The Snark, you know.

sunspotter Friday, November 09, 2012 9:19:12 AM

Post#
2722
of 136146
"I know more and more people are watching this stock."

If that includes the SEC - and it probably does - then you're more likely to see the stock suspended as a reasonably blatant scam rather than anything else.

Rattling Microsoft's cage when you're a crook may well be considered a tactical error in retrospect.


.007 So, MINstein, we aren't going to agree on service: You think the defendants haven't been served; I KNOW THEY HAVE!

From the post above, you've been here longer than me. I've had many reach out and ask me to thank you for your "savior attempts" on their behalves.... Then it stuck me that this service on behalf of others has been quite expensive for you:

Had one purchased $5k worth of VPLM in 11/2012 @ $.0075(would have been easy), VPLM had a roll to $.35(40x on $). Down to $.0125, up to $.45(35x on $). Most recent, a $.02 to $.11(4x on $). Just capturing 1/2 those returns, using same dollars(taxes not considered), would have turned that $5k into $3.6MILLION***.... AMAZING!

Now, after all that, funny as it is, VPLM IS BACK @ $.007... I love that exercise!

OH, AND NEVER "SUSPENDED AS A REASONABLY BLATANT SCAM"... VPLM audited and uplisted years ago...



***Many, many little runs I'm neglecting!

"DEFENDANTS ARE SERVED. BECAUSE OF THE MANOR OF SERVICE REQUESTED BY DEFENDANTS' ATTORNEYS(WHICH WAS ADHERED TO), WAIVERS WERE SENT TO THE DEFENDANTS!"

No need to shout: that just makes you not just wrong, but loud and wrong.

Again, I suggest you look up what the words "request", "waiver" and "service" mean in a legal context.

In this context they mean that VPLM have asked the Defendants if they might please be excused from serving them?

The Defendants have yet to respond, but even the meanest of intelligences should be able to understand that to date VPLM and Inza have not served the Defendants. They have merely requested a waiver of service, which the Defendants may or may not grant.

You're welcome. Let me know if you need any other help understanding this legal (or any other) process.

$.007 You play your little MINsa game, my guess to keep up your creds, of taking things out of context and LYING ABOUT WHAT I’VE SAID REGARDING "WAIVER and SERVICE":

Where have I EVER said, "REQUEST for waiver of service and SERVICE ARE THE SAME"????????? Where? Where is it?

So, you twist/lie and bullshit... That's it. DEFENDANTS ARE SERVED. BECAUSE OF THE MANOR OF SERVICE REQUESTED BY DEFENDANTS' ATTORNEYS(WHICH WAS ADHERED TO), WAIVERS WERE SENT TO THE DEFENDANTS!

Your lame posts will start to disappear as things get closer...PREDICTION @ $.007...

MINsa score for you today is AAA...or ZZZ... Not sure how you score...

"THE COURT HAS ACCEPTED THIS AND WE NOW WAIT FOR THE DEFENDANTS RESPONSE."



Bless your heart*.

More accurately the court has noted that the Plaintiffs' attorneys have issued a REQUEST for a waiver of service, which is as I'm sure you understand but pretend not to, not at all the same thing as serving them.

"THE COURT HAS ACCEPTED THIS AND WE NOW WAIT FOR THE DEFENDANTS RESPONSE."

Bless your heart*.

More accurately the court has noted that the Plaintiffs' attorneys have issued a REQUEST for a waiver of service, which is as I'm sure you understand but pretend not to, not at all the same thing as serving them.

Saying it is dozens of times doesn't make it any less of a lie than the first time VPLM - and you and "others" - said the Defendants have been served.

The plain truth is that they haven't been served, and they can choose whether or not to grant VPLM's pusillanimous grovelling request to be excused from serving them.

I will be interested to see whether any of them grant the waiver - I kind of hope they do, because it will precipitate the collapse of this absurd and malicious lawsuit, and of VPLM and the "lawyers" they are using.

* Assuming you have one. Which I doubt.

$.00735 What is "hard"? That is a question,TRY IT!

MOVING ON: You are 100% wrong and just to get further backup, I just got off the phone withan attorney buddy of mine; he is also invested in VPLM. He comfirmed what I’ve said before:

"All defendants have been served by VPLM and THE COURT HAS ACCEPTED THE SERVICE! If the court hadn't accepted service, the service deadline would have passed and there WOULD BE NO CASE!

Service was done electronically and done according to the defendant attorneys' request, in the manner requested. The "waiver" is sent, as is customary, to confirm acceptance. THE COURT HAS ACCEPTED THIS AND WE NOW WAIT FOR THE DEFENDANTS RESPONSE."

To go further, if the cases had been not served, the cases would be dismissed; THEY HAVEN'T BEEN DISMISSED. If the cases had been dismissed, do you honestly think VPLM would be trading 40% off lowz or trading @ NEW LOWZ???? Bid right now showing someone(s) trying to buy nearly $20k (2.39mm shares) worth @ $.007????

Again, you will have more cooperation with those you come across by asking, not telling!

I bought more yesterday and I have a ton!


I understand its hard. You got me with the marketing thing saying they don't have the same marketing budget/team as a big corp. However, you can live and act with morals. Such as if you are saying you are going to serve. Then you should serve. But they didn't. They did a waiver of service, a deliberate work around to scam. So upon further consideration i am not wrong and in fact right on all of them.

I understand its hard. You got me with the marketing thing saying they don't have the same marketing budget/team as a big corp. However, you can live and act with morals. Such as if you are saying you are going to serve. Then you should serve. But they didn't. They did a waiver of service, a deliberate work around to scam. So upon further consideration i am not wrong and in fact right on all of them.

$.0069 Ok, I looked @ SP... $.0069 by $.007 with 900k shares on the bid. Are we making new lowz? No, we are currently ~40% above our recent lows, much like the defendants, t/tmus/vz. So, do the defendants have a potential for 20x/50x/100x upside??????? I think not...

Do you think, especially within our lame justice/patent systems, it is EASY to go up against the largest companies in the World????? Take a look @ the story of the intermittent wiper and the intellectual property theft there! This is not simple duty and VPLM is still standing due to Emil and team, after all these years!

I've found over many decades, getting emotional/mad over stocks does nothing. You are wrong on these guys, especially Rich. I'd suggest another tack; it might do you good! Ask questions...




You right look the SP. Bunch of frauds lied about everything. Sooner or later Rich and co will all be in Cuba with our money. But hey at least I got my morals. And didn't waste the only life I have here

You right look the SP. Bunch of frauds lied about everything. Sooner or later Rich and co will all be in Cuba with our money. But hey at least I got my morals. And didn't waste the only life I have here.

People can't dump this shit fast enough!! LMAO!!

$.00745 So, right in line, nearly the whole MINsa team showed up! Unlike Mensa, MINsa are, through posting, trying to prove I.Q.s can and do go negative! By Lord, starting to think they're close.

"People can't dump this shit(VPLM) as fast enough"??? Ahhhhhhh, $22k in dollar volume??? REALLY?

$.00666 reference? Oh, so creative!

"In Our Opinion" shows with the normal bullshit and punctuation! No "In Our Opinion", however!

And last: "Precisely why I know they are these boards."???? Ahhhhhh, WHAT?

I BOUGHT MORE VPLM TODAY.... No, I haven't gained MINsa status, YET! We will see! 🦌🏀z riding on...

And yet you knowingly watch the clown show, tuned in while yelling at the screen every day the show is on. Yeah, you're no dummy. Turn the channel, Bozo

Precisely why I know they are these boards. There is no one this out there, this wrong, this oblivious, this _____ fill in the blank. In the real world.

Guys we are in the best position ever...... What a clown show this dude is and what a clown show this company is. As stated no one in this company has achieved anything in their lives. They are fraud worthless people. They clearly did not serve. People with a brain see that and are now selling.

0.00666!

The Number of the (D)Beast!

Figures.

“ People can't dump this shit fast enough.”

Especially the insiders with their free shares.

We already know they view their legacy obligations to file Form 4s with lordly indeed haughty contempt.

People can't dump this shit fast enough.

Good catch there DB auto fill does that sometimes.You seem to be getting our group mixed with RK .By the way according to quarterly report was part of a 30 million share settlement,not exactly chit dumb sss.lol 

$.0078 That's probably because you don't read to(o) "good"! Two many words, perhaps?

How'd the "lock..shit" workout for you? 🤔🤔🤣🤣🤣🤣 That was sure a pile of..💩💩💩!

Any new "wheels scams"?

Ray Leon probably did more by the second grade than you in you're(spelled for you) life! Ray is quite favorable on VPLM!

A good read ...Really , more  like a big bowl of fluff. Lol

$.0078 The link gives some abbreviated resumes 🤔 of some on the VPLM team. RIGHT, just a "scam" and a bunch of "liars"; coming from someone who argued and argued and ARGUED a stock could drop by 400%...🙄🤔🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 When things get deep, THIS IS MY GOTO GUY(do we still need a buyer and seller for a transaction, GOTO?)

I strongly suggest a good read of the info below:

https://www.voip-palusa.com/management-directors

Just did... Told you... Documented LIARS of the 3rd kind since long before these silly bogus patents were dreamed up...

Someone is lying. That is why this is so f...ing annoying. I am probably not the only one who wants vplm to hit and get this over with. But seems to be that there is a problem with integrity on all of these boards. I know none of the the meat heads who post on here so it is hard to tell where the truth is. My guess is it little bit on both sides. Will someone with integrity please post what the truth is?  

Since day one, when ever their lips are moving......well, you know...

None of the Defendants have been served.

Why do you keep lying that they have?

Can’t you read, or do you just pretend to be illiterate?

The court records prove VPLM is lying when they claim the defendants have been served.

PACER clearly shows that all that has happened is that VPLM’s “lawyers” have sent a REQUEST for a waiver of service, to which none of the defendants’ lawyers have responded- nor, I suspect, will they.

This is not deflection, simply a statement of the facts.

I’m sorry you continue to fail to grasp this simple reality.

DB, pay no attention to the man behind the curtain! 😊

$.0078 The Stalker is back: you are wrong, or just lying! All defendants have been served by VPLM and THE COURT HAS ACCEPTED THE SERVICE! If the court hadn't accepted service, the service deadline would have passed and there WOULD BE NO CASE!

Service was done electronically and done according to the defendant attorneys' request, in the manner requested. The "waiver" is sent, as is customary, to confirm acceptance. THE COURT HAS ACCEPTED THIS AND WE NOW WAIT FOR THE DEFENDANTS RESPONSE.

So many categories to choose from: 'Two Cell Crew', 'The Lack Responsibility Crew', 'The Nothing Better to Do Crew'... Which for you? Maybe 'The BULLSHIT Crew'?

I keep asking and you keep deflecting. What is your evidence? Are you saying that VPLM is lying? Try something that adds to our understanding not ad hominem attacks. I think we would all thank you if you could unequivocally state and back with evidence that VPLM is misleading its shareholders.

Come on, be a hero, and thanks for the blessing.

Bless your heart.

Well done for trying to do some research.

D for effort, F- for results.

The request for a waiver of service has been sent to the Defendants’ lawyers.

They have not been signed or returned.

In other words not even your first step 1) has been completed.

And the fact remains that the Defendants have definitely not been served.

Try harder.

Instead of a definition of waiver, I got the legal definition of waiver of service. I did this after looking up the definition of “of”…..no applause please, it is all in a day’s work when trying to argue with children.

So let’s try to elevate the discussion. Has VPLM failed in any manner of which you are aware in performing the required steps? They have gone on record saying that they have. What evidence do you have to the contrary?

Definition follows:

1. What is a waiver of service?
A waiver of service is a document the defendant signs to acknowledge receipt of the lawsuit without requiring formal service (e.g., being served by a process server or sheriff). It typically gives the defendant extra time to respond.

2. When is it valid?
The waiver must be signed and returned voluntarily by the defendant.
It must be filed with the court by the plaintiff.
The plaintiff must send the waiver request properly, following the applicable rules (usually via first-class mail with two copies of the waiver and a prepaid return envelope, per [FRCP Rule 4(d)] in federal cases).
3. What does it mean legally?
The defendant is not waiving any defenses, just the formal method of service.
Once filed, the signed waiver functions as if service was properly completed on the date it was filed.
4. Important caveat:
If the defendant refuses to sign and return the waiver, formal service must still be performed. And if deadlines are missed, courts may impose consequences.

I know... I know!!

You

"Every gambler knows that to lose......
Is what you're really here for"

Don't forget to hit that donate button for the EMU go fund me page! They have a lifestyle to maintain ya know...

Yep! Nice little chuck of change. Emil thanks all of his marks and morons.

"Net Loss: $1.4 million, a decrease of 48% compared to the same period in 2024, primarily due to a reduction in officers and directors’ fees and legal fees.

Net Loss for Six Months Ended March 31, 2025: $1.9 million, a decrease of 41% compared to the same period in 2024, mainly attributed to lower officers and directors’ fees and legal fees."

These guys pay themselves pretty well, considering they have zero income and a string of losses in all their patent infringement cases.

No wonder they want to keep this gravy train on the rails as long as possible.

Latest 10-Q


VPLM
+1.28%
Voip-pal.com Inc, a company specializing in the development and monetization of Voice-over-Internet Protocol (VoIP) technology and patents, has released its Form 10-Q report for the first quarter of 2025. The report highlights significant financial and operational developments, reflecting the company's ongoing efforts to streamline costs and focus on its core business activities.

Financial Highlights

Net Loss: $1.4 million, a decrease of 48% compared to the same period in 2024, primarily due to a reduction in officers and directors’ fees and legal fees.
Net Loss for Six Months Ended March 31, 2025: $1.9 million, a decrease of 41% compared to the same period in 2024, mainly attributed to lower officers and directors’ fees and legal fees.
Net Income Per Share: $0.00, remained unchanged from the previous period.
Business Highlights

Corporate Overview: VoIP-PAL.com Inc. is focused on the development and monetization of VoIP technology and patents. The company operates in a single reportable segment, which is the acquisition and development of VoIP-related intellectual property.
Intellectual Property Portfolio: The company's intellectual property portfolio consists of twenty-seven issued and pending patents designed for the broadband VoIP market. These patents provide integration solutions for VoIP services with legacy telecommunications systems.
Operational Focus: The company is primarily engaged in monetizing, selling, and licensing its VoIP patents. This includes efforts to integrate VoIP services with existing telecommunications infrastructure.
Litigation Impact: The company is involved in several patent litigation cases, which could impact its operational focus and financial resources. The outcome of these cases may significantly affect the company's ability to continue as a going concern.
Future Outlook: The company acknowledges substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern due to ongoing litigation and the need for additional capital. The management is focused on raising additional working capital and generating profitable operations to sustain its business activities.

https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=18470707&guid=Jpr-kHdxdvizlLh

March 13, 2025 - AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile Face Patent Infringement Lawsuit Over 4G and 5G Technologies

https://legalnewsfeed.com/2025/03/13/att-verizon-and-t-mobile-face-patent-infringement-lawsuit-over-4g-and-5g-technologies/
AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile are currently embroiled in legal proceedings over allegations of patent infringement connected to technologies operating under 4G/LTE and 5G standards. These claims have been brought by Pegasus Wireless Corp. in a new litigation filed in Texas federal court. The telecommunications giants are accused of utilizing patented technologies without permission, which Pegasus contends are crucial to the functionality of modern wireless communication networks operating at these standards.

Interesting...from January 27, 2025
"Will the real slim shady please stand up?"
Would appreciate any Pacer user to provide details on the below case...
https://legalnewsfeed.com/2025/01/27/cornell-university-sues-att-and-verizon-over-alleged-wi-fi-patent-infringements/