ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for pro Trade like a pro: Leverage real-time discussions and market-moving ideas to outperform.
Voip Pal Com Inc (QB)

Voip Pal Com Inc (QB) (VPLM)

0.01414
0.00014
(1.00%)
Closed February 18 3:00PM

Empower your portfolio: Real-time discussions and actionable trading ideas.

VPLM News

Official News Only

VPLM Discussion

View Posts
ORCA ORCA 5 hours ago
THESE NEXT TWO WEEKS SHOULD BE VERY INTERESTING.I WANT TO SEE A LOT OF SELLERS STARTING TOMORROW.SO I CAN RELOAD ON MY SCHWAB ACCOUNT.
👍️0
Sos28493 Sos28493 13 hours ago
Yep. 
👍️ 1
DungSpawter DungSpawter 13 hours ago
That’s the point. The challenge posted ad nauseam by SW is impossible to prove right or wrong. It’s a supposition without any available proof either way…yet. Im just messing with the guy, passing time until something concrete does happen.
👍️ 2 💯 1
leroy kelly leroy kelly 14 hours ago
It's the best!
👍️ 3 💯 1
nyt nyt 14 hours ago
The spawner of dung and the one who gets their ham slammed were reportedly just seen egressing an emu owned hotel room. Don't jump to any conclusions tho, as it's a vplm thing so there's always different possibilities. I'm sure it was all good...
👍️0
VVVVVV VVVVVV 14 hours ago
Well, have you figured out why someone would sell at $ .0151 and then repurchased at $ 005?

It’s not brain surgery.

IMHO
👍️ 1
ham n slam ham n slam 14 hours ago
cmon emil ,make a f***ING deal! so we dont have to see the endless spew from these numbnuts!
👍️ 1
DesktopDR DesktopDR 14 hours ago
Use the ignore button. You will save so much time when you ignore the dummies.
👍️ 5 💯 1
Sheepdog Sheepdog 16 hours ago
I don't know what is going on in this conversation but proving someone is not paid by companies or lawyers involved with the litigation is, for all practical purposes, impossible.
👍 1
DungSpawter DungSpawter 17 hours ago
“Not paid, not a lackey, just the purveyor of truth”
PROVE IT! YOU CAN’T!
My Challenge Stands. Get back to me when you can prove you’re not paid by companies or lawyers involved in the litigation.
👍️ 2 💯 1
straightword straightword 19 hours ago
Some things are really easy for some to figure out. I think that your focus needs to be on hoping that the price per share doesn't drop below .01 again. But the patents are worth billions and billions ongoing right? LOL!!
👍️ 2
DungSpawter DungSpawter 1 day ago
Please apply that analysis to your challenge. Thanks again for making my point for me.
👍️ 3
straightword straightword 2 days ago
Dumb request.
👍️ 1
DungSpawter DungSpawter 2 days ago
“Not paid, not a lackey, just the purveyor of truth”
PROVE IT! YOU CAN’T!
My Challenge Stands. Get back to me when you can prove you’re not paid by companies or lawyers involved in the litigation.
This is just too easy.
👍️ 4 💯 1
ORCA ORCA 2 days ago
LOOKING FORWARD TO THE NEXT TWO WEEKS.IF BAD NEWS.I GOT THE BIG NET UP READY TO LOAD THE .01 AND BELOW AGAIN.WILL SHAKE BARB OUT.IF GOOD NEWS THEN I MAKE MORE MONEY.BUT I WISH IT GOES TO .01 AND LOWER.TO RELOAD MY SCHWAB ACCOUNT.EITHER WAY TO GOES IT WILL BE INTERESTING.
👍️0
straightword straightword 3 days ago
Deerballs is also the one that said that "big things were coming" and said that this would be a .85 stock soon. He's been correct about exactly zero things. LMAO!! Seriously, people need to wake up and come to the realization that this is going nowhere and that nothing will ever come of this in terms of the price per share being anywhere near the claims made by the CEO and the financial values of them which would mean that this would easily be a $50+ per share stock and significantly higher if the patents were worth anything remotely near what Emil has said.
👍️0
straightword straightword 3 days ago
There's a reason why this is never happened, likely because no one believe Emil and any of his claims so they don't deserve ay attention at all.
👍️0
straightword straightword 3 days ago
That is true. The FACT is that no one outside of this board cares anything about VPLM. So much for a company with parents worth "billions and billions ongoing". Just confirmation of what a farce this all is from the CEO. Th gullible with endless hope still remain though don't they?
👍️0
straightword straightword 3 days ago
Hudnell has been a complete bust and unable to get even one small financial judgement for the company, and if he's working on contingency then he must be broke or stupid, maybe both.
👍️0
straightword straightword 3 days ago
Not paid, not a lackey, just the purveyor of truth about a company that has proven absolutely nothing with respect to their patents and one that has received ZERO financial judgements. What happened to that "sure thing" AMZN settlement that we were told about last fall? The FACT is that NO ONE has been able to prove me wrong and to meet my challenge. Result smatter and VPLM has had none.
👍️0
keepemcloser keepemcloser 3 days ago
G Whitaker  isn't it A little obvious we could do all the selling compared to the buying these guy these people who do absolutely nothing could not wait to start hammering the market again I'm worried to
 see what it's gonna be like next week because the greedy sticky fingered thieves are back at it and it's not gonna be a pretty week. Let's hope they allow enough money to come into the company to pay our lawyers fees and not just for the drug habits that's our opinion and there are four of USPTO
👍️0
Sos28493 Sos28493 4 days ago
Apparently the blackout period ended a day early. 
👍️0
ORCA ORCA 4 days ago
THE Q IS OUT.NOTHING INTERESTING OTHER THAT A TON OF STOCK WAS GIVEN
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=18190376&guid=g60-keBRfGqqJth
👍️0
ORCA ORCA 4 days ago
CHECK OUT THE FILING OUT TODAY.LOL.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=18190498&guid=g60-keBRfGqqJth

1. Name and Address of Reporting Person *
KUANG JIN 2. Issuer Name and Ticker or Trading Symbol
Voip-pal.com Inc [ VPLM ] 5. Relationship of Reporting Person(s) to Issuer (Check all applicable)
_____ Director _____ 10% Owner
__X__ Officer (give title below) _____ Other (specify below)
CFO
(Last) (First) (Middle)
717 GROVER AVENUE 3. Date of Earliest Transaction (MM/DD/YYYY)
2/10/2025
(Street)
COQUITLAM, A1 V3J3C7 4. If Amendment, Date Original Filed (MM/DD/YYYY)

6. Individual or Joint/Group Filing (Check Applicable Line)
_X _ Form filed by One Reporting Person
___ Form filed by More than One Reporting Person
(City) (State) (Zip)

Table I - Non-Derivative Securities Acquired, Disposed of, or Beneficially Owned
1.Title of Security
(Instr. 3) 2. Trans. Date 2A. Deemed Execution Date, if any 3. Trans. Code
(Instr. 8) 4. Securities Acquired (A) or Disposed of (D)
(Instr. 3, 4 and 5) 5. Amount of Securities Beneficially Owned Following Reported Transaction(s)
(Instr. 3 and 4) 6. Ownership Form: Direct (D) or Indirect (I) (Instr. 4) 7. Nature of Indirect Beneficial Ownership (Instr. 4)
Code V Amount (A) or (D) Price
COMMON 863,235 D
COMMON 2/10/2025 M 5,000,000 A $0.005 (1) 5,863,235 D
COMMON 2/10/2025 F(1) 1,655,629 D $0.0151 (1) 4,207,606 D
👍️0
sunspotter sunspotter 4 days ago
" I have wondered what the stock would do if this story was written up in a major periodical like Barrons on (sic) the New York Times."

Then the jig would be up, and Emil and the rest of the whole sick crew would have to emigrate to somewhere that doesn't allow extradition to the US.

I suggest Putin's Russia.
👍️0
sunspotter sunspotter 4 days ago
"VP's legal team is, no doubt, working on a contingency fee basis."

What makes you say that? Other of VPLM's apologists claim that the ongoing dilution and issue of tens of millions of discounted shares and warrants are to pay for the attorney fees.

Given that Hudnell et al know that their case is doomed from the get-go, I suspect the latter is true. They may be very very bad lawyers, but they're not entirely stupid.
👍️0
9Coastal 9Coastal 4 days ago
I agree with you wholeheartedly!!!! To paraphrase your insight: "Should the time comes with no deals Emil will file the lawsuit and then there will be many eyeballs on little Voip pal. I have wondered what the stock would do if this story was written up in a major periodical like Barrons on the New York Times." ... If the stock and it's cases had been publicized in a major periodical... There would have been.... AN EXPLOSION !!!!! Think about it people. Have faith! WATCH.. & WAIT.
👍️ 8 💯 3
ORCA ORCA 4 days ago
IT WILL BE AN ABSOLUTE NIGHTMARE FOR THESE GUYS.A COMPLETE DISASTER.FOR ALL PARTIES THAT WILL BE NAMED IN THE LAWSUIT.
AND ELON MUSK WILL SCREAM THE F OUT OF THEM.AS SOON AS HE SEES THE RICO.
👍️ 4 💯 1
prophet2 prophet2 4 days ago
When this class action lawsuit was filed Deerballs kept talking about eyeballs. Where he was correct, there has not been a significant amount of new eyeballs on this case because of the way Emil is currently handling it. Emil does not want to make this case real public in consideration for defendants. Should the time comes with no deals Emil will file the lawsuit and then there will be many eyeballs on little Voip pal. I have wondered what the stock would do if this story was written up in a major periodical like Barrons on the New York Times. The defendants have too much at stake for this to happen IMO. the prophet

👍️ 6 💪 5
DungSpawter DungSpawter 4 days ago
Straightword is a paid basher and lackey who should be ignored. Prove me wrong!!! No one, not even you can prove me wrong!!!
See how easy that is? I challenge anyone to prove me wrong! You can’t!!!! My challenge stands!!!
👍️ 5 💯 3
VVVVVV VVVVVV 4 days ago
I never said they haven’t started negotiations!! Just go back and read my post and then read the PR and or the filing!!

Yeah, they’re actually talking, it’s been stated in the PR and filing for the 90 days extension.

I don’t see any bad news at all. I don’t know where you’re coming up with that?

READ THE PR AND FILING!!

IMHO
👍 5 💯 1
ORCA ORCA 4 days ago
FEBRUARY 21ST AND FEBRUARY 28 ARE TWO EVENTS TO LOOK FOR.GET YOUR TICKETS READY.I AM READY TO ADD BIGLY IF SHE GOES LOWER FROM HERE.AND IF BAD NEWS,AND GOES TO .01 OR LOWER,THEN I WILL ADD 20 MILLION SHARES THIS TIME AROUND.SO LETS GET IT ON:)))EITHER WAY SHE GOES IS FINE BY ORCA:)))
👍️0
straightword straightword 4 days ago
History tells us that nothing will happen and that the VPLM price per share will remain where it is or lower. Remember when we were told last fall that there was a for certain settlement in place with AMZN and nothing happened? LMAO!!
👍️0
straightword straightword 4 days ago
Doesn't matter. NO ONE yet has been able to prove me wrong. NO ONE!!!!!!!!!!!!
👍️0
ORCA ORCA 4 days ago
((((Now if you said if they haven't started negotiations by the 28th, they will be served.))))THE BIG BOYS HAD ASKED NO TO SERVE THEIR MANAGERS OFFICERS ETC.THESE GUYS CAN LOSE THEIR WIVES,AND F UP THEIR REPUTATIONS, IF THEY GET SUED IN A RICO ACT CASE.AND THEIR NAMES WILL BE ALL OVER THE INTERNET.=THEY WILL HAVE A VERY HARD TIME TO GET A NEW JOB ELSE WHERE.THE COMPANIES BETTER HAVE $$$ READY FOR SETTLEMENTS ,BY FEBRUARY 28TH,OR GET FD.VPLM IT IS TIME TO GET TOUGH WITH THESE GUYS.GO FOR THE NECK.ENOUGH OF THE WAITING BS GAME.THE SHAREHOLDERS HAVE SUFFERED ENOUGH.TIME TO GET TOUGH.
👍 4
Sos28493 Sos28493 4 days ago
When you say "if negotiations aren't progressing" it sounds like they are actually talking. Now if you said if they haven't started negotiations by the 28th, they will be served. That has a different meaning. Which is bad news to me. IMHO
👍️0
VVVVVV VVVVVV 4 days ago
Actually, it is not as simple as that. The 28th isn’t a “deal, no deal”, line in the sand. You might want to go back and read the PR.

If negotiations aren’t progressing, then they’ll be served. It’s as simple as that!

Highly unlikely they’ll consummate a deal for $ billions in a few weeks. If that’s what you’re expecting, you might be greatly disappointed! IMHO

I hope I’m wrong but I doubt it. Just keeping it real.

IMHO
👍 2
ham n slam ham n slam 4 days ago
the initial request by the defendents was for 90 days.not to be served.emil agreed...the courts run in those 90 day time spans for ease on both parties .but that is for only negotiations.it dosnt mean he can change his mind and serve them prior which is his plan just after 30 days..that court document was Jan 30th, then the pr came out and he wants some kind of negotiations to happen before Feb 28th...you are correct he could back off , and I agree he needs to give a statement immediately , if he grants more time..I hope that doesn't be the case...he needs to stick with a.. plan ,whether its a, b, or c,, enough flip flopping!.......referring back to orcas thoughts on pps...tough call.? I do believe a settlement is the best for all holding, "X" amount per common share etc etc, warrants etc etc. a long drawn out RICO case will take a long time.the other thing to consider is, will it be jury trial, or just a judge.alot of variables imo...the suit is massive..if an offer that's on the table, that's reasonable Emil would be a fool not to take it..the man is at least 70 ..how much more does he want to deal with...jmo..time will tell.
👍️ 5
DesktopDR DesktopDR 4 days ago
Motions Hearing set for 2/21/2025 09:30 AM via ZOOM before Judge Alan D Albright. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright

>A few things can happen on 2-21-25.
>We will see if VPLM has to pay court fee’s, if they do, there will be an appeal. (price could drop)
>The judge will say the reconsideration is in process and this will be scheduled to go to court. (Price will move up).
>We could hear that an agreement has been reached between the companies. (Price will move up)

All being said and after seeing the ParkerVision video, this could still take some time. And I honestly believe that VPLM will prevail.

Thoughts?
👍️ 8
ORCA ORCA 4 days ago
WHAT YOU LIONS THINK BY END OF FEBRUARY PPS??.02 OR .01??
👍️0
ORCA ORCA 4 days ago
BEFORE THE 28TH.WE HAVE THIS TOO NEXT FRIDAY.Motions Hearing set for 2/21/2025 09:30 AM via ZOOM before Judge Alan D Albright. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright.
👍️0
VVVVVV VVVVVV 4 days ago
Preparing the financials, no insiders can sell until after Friday. If they choose to do so.

IMHO
👍️ 1
prophet2 prophet2 4 days ago
Ham, I would not be surprised at all if Emil gives them more time beyond Feb 28th. The question I have is will Emil issue another PR. If he does not it looks really bad IMO. If he does, he needs to communicate in strong terms the progress which has been made and a definitive timeline which wont be compromised this time around. the prophet
👍️ 4
ham n slam ham n slam 4 days ago
with a low volume day such as today. its no rocket science people can place low bids and see if they hit.. the 28th falls on a Friday..that's the deadline emil gave for something to happen/settlement..if not Monday March 3rd ,people will be getting served.simple as that..refer back to the last p.r...and from the previous post 4 mil shares on a 3.5 bil shares float is less than 1%
👍️ 3
Str8t-talk Str8t-talk 5 days ago
Chazzy1, Private offerings are at $.005...which is what puts money in the company's bank account, not insider selling. Insider selling puts money in the Insiders pockets which they're receiving shares at .005 as well, sell in open market and pocketing the profits. It's in the financials (the private offerings). Chang pocketed over $300k as i pointed to in an earlier post which was a guestimate.
👍️ 1
keepemcloser keepemcloser 5 days ago
Not sure why you think we should know this answer,I didn't join this handle until 2020 so I've not seen one of these periods.
👍️0
chazzy1 chazzy1 5 days ago
Here is one perspective to consider regarding insider selling. VP's legal team is, no doubt, working on a contingency fee basis. However, in order to keep VPLM off the Expert Market, VP management must keep the company current with all required SEC financial reporting, e.g., 8-k, 10-k and 10-Q.
Accounting firms charge a lot to file these on-going, comprehensive reports, and I would think that they are not working on a contingency fee basis. So where does the money come from?
VP has no income stream (yet) through the licensing of its IP, so where else could the money come from? Yep, they must either sell shares or give up the fight. I would much prefer the former. As has been pointed out, the percentage of shares being sold is minescule compared to the total number of shares owned. Thus, this is no sell-off by any stretch of the imagination. It is survival 101. I applaud VP management's fighting spirit, and hope that they succeed in their current litigation efforts as they did in their IPR battles.. By the way, in my opinion, a "scam" company would not want to go near a courtroom, where they would be placed under the highest legal scrutiny.
👍️ 3 💯 1
VVVVVV VVVVVV 5 days ago
If anyone knows, you know what it means!

IMHO
👍️ 1 😀 1
VVVVVV VVVVVV 5 days ago
If anyone knows, you know what it means!

IMHO
👍️ 2 😀 1
VVVVVV VVVVVV 5 days ago
Don’t know and I don’t care. When there’s 3.6 billion outstanding what’s a half million shares?

If insiders sell, it’s obvious to acquire their warrants or options. If they need to raise money.

IMHO
👍️0

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock