ADVFN ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.

Caffyns – the directors

Share On Facebook
share on Linkedin
Print

Caffyns (LSE:CFYN) has been a family-dominated firm for over 150 years, despite it now being a Premium Listed company on the LSE. The family have been accused by a bulletin board writer of running a corporate board of directors which “is grossly self-indulgent”.

© Image copyright elaws

I need to start the process of assessing whether this is true to the point of being seriously detrimental to minority shareholder interests.

The family do not control through ownership of more than 50% of the ordinary shares, of which there are 2.75 in issue. They control the firm through their holding of all the 2m 6% Cumulative Second Preference Shares, which each have the same voting rights as the ordinary shares (one vote per share), except in a few special situations related to the Premium Listing provisions, such as voting to leave the LSE (the prefs lose the right to vote).

In addition, Caffyn family members not sitting on the board own around 16% of the ordinary shares. Sarah Caffyns, who is a board member, has 39,232 (1.4%) ordinaries and Simon Caffyn, CEO, has 51,988 (1.9%). Also the Caffyns Pension Fund holds 4.66% of the ordinaries.

(There are some other preference shares held by the family but they do not have votes and are not relevant to the power dynamics of the firm).

Evidence for the self-indulgence charge

We’ll start with the money paid to shareholders, staff and directors over several years.

£m Dividends + cost of buying the company’s shares Staff pay (including directors) Issue of shares for SAYE Directors’ emoluments
2017 0.61 + 0.9 15.0 0.3 0.81
2016 0.60 + 0 15.7 0 0.88
2015 0.56 + 0 14.8 0.005 0.86
2014 0.36   + 0.39 14.5 0.3 1.153
2013 0.33 + 0 14.2 0 0.91
2012 0.34   +  0.1 15.0 0 0.83

Clearly, the directors have taken more cash than the shareholders have received, and £0.81m seems a lot for a £13.8m company. But, I suppose, at least director remuneration has fallen from the heights of 2014.

The question we need to ask is whether shareholders derive good value from paying over £0.8m per year to the directors. They are experienced and have proven capable over a long period.  Also, there are six people splitting this money, even though only three are full time.

Directors’ remuneration

£’000s 2017 2016
Simon Caffyn, CEO 383 410
M S Harrison (now retired) 90 283
Michael Warren (FD for 10 months) 139 0
Sarah Caffyn 64

………

………………To read the rest of this article, and more like it, subscribe to my premium newsletter Deep Value Shares – click here http://newsletters.advfn.com/deepvalueshares/subscribe-1

CLICK HERE TO REGISTER FOR FREE ON ADVFN, the world's leading stocks and shares information website, provides the private investor with all the latest high-tech trading tools and includes live price data streaming, stock quotes and the option to access 'Level 2' data on all of the world's key exchanges (LSE, NYSE, NASDAQ, Euronext etc).

This area of the ADVFN.com site is for independent financial commentary. These blogs are provided by independent authors via a common carrier platform and do not represent the opinions of ADVFN Ltd. ADVFN Ltd does not monitor, approve, endorse or exert editorial control over these articles and does not therefore accept responsibility for or make any warranties in connection with or recommend that you or any third party rely on such information. The information available at ADVFN.com is for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. In particular, the information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by ADVFN.COM and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any investment decisions. Authors may or may not have positions in stocks that they are discussing but it should be considered very likely that their opinions are aligned with their trading and that they hold positions in companies, forex, commodities and other instruments they discuss.

Leave A Reply

 
Do you want to write for our Newspaper? Get in touch: newspaper@advfn.com